Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 - O-15-05 First Reading,m, SEBASTIAN ..a_- HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM Council Meeting Date: March 11, 2015 Agenda Item Title: First Reading of Ordinance No. 0-15-05 — Rezoning and Conceptual Development Plan Approval for 13.01 acres located southwest of the intersection of Main Street and Powerline Road, from RM -8 and RS -10 to PUD -R in accordance with a conceptual development plan known as Sandcrest Subdivision. Recommendation: Conduct first reading of 0-15-05; approve first reading and schedule second reading and public hearing for April 8, 2015. Background: Chuck Mechling, representative for Sandcrest LLC, has applied for rezoning and conceptual development plan approval for vacant property located southwest of the intersection of Main Street and Powerline Road. The existing RM -8 and RS -10 zoning would allow for 103 dwelling units. However, the conceptual development plan will restrict the subdivision to 64 single family lots. The proposed zoning, Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R), is an alternative residential zoning district which is intended to promote creative design. The overall property is relatively small for a PUD, so the site is considered an in -fill project and reflects the residential nature of the surrounding neighborhood. A PUD allows for unique design flexibility. Many of the development parameters are negotiated, such as minimum lot size and setbacks, to allow clustering of open space and recreational areas. Other development parameters, such as open space requirements, have specific code requirements. The City Council, however, may waive or modify any subdivision, site plan or other zoning requirement in a PUD when such waiver is not in conflict with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan or the Land Development Code. The design standards to be negotiated, as well as the waivers being requested are shown on the Conceptual Development Plan and are listed in the staff report. On February 19, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing. At the conclusion, they recommended by a vote of 6 — 0 that City Council approve the rezoning and conceptual development plan, as requested (including the waivers) with two conditions as follows: 1. Submit the environmental study prior to City Council consideration. 2. Submit the School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) from the Indian River County School Board prior to City Council consideration. Since that hearing, both the environmental study and the SCADL have been received. If Agenda Item Requires Expenditure of Funds: Total Cost: none Amount Budgeted in current FY: none Attachments: Ordinance 0-15-05 with exhibits, Rezoning Staff Report, Conceptual Development Plan Staff Report, P & Z minutes, applications, additional renderings from applicant. City Manager Authorization Date:/Si ORDINANCE NO. 0-15-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, REZONING APPROXIMATELY 13.01 ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF MAIN STREET AND POWERLINE ROAD FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM -8) AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY (RS -10) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL (PUD -R), IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN KNOWN AS SANDCREST SUBDIVISION,- PROVIDING UBDIVISION;PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Sandcrest, LLC, has filed a petition for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided notice of the proposed zoning change and conducted a public hearing to receive citizen input; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian, Florida, has considered the criteria identified in the Land Development Code together with the recommended findings and recommendations of its staff and Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has made the following findings: A. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives and other elements of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. B. The proposed use is in conformity with the substantive requirements of the City of Sebastian Code of Ordinances, particularly the Land Development Code. C. The proposed use is not in conflict with the public interest of the citizens of the City of Sebastian. D. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent land uses. E. Adequate public facilities and services exist in the City to serve the proposed use and the demand for such use will not exceed the capacity for such services and facilities. F. The proposed change in use will not result in any adverse impacts on the natural environment. G. The proposed use will not adversely affect the property values in the area, or the general health, safety and welfare of the City or have an adverse impact on the financial resources of the City. H. The proposed use will result in an orderly and local development pattern. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. PROPERTY. The change in zoning classification created by the adoption of this ordinance shall affect the following described real property, now lying and being within the incorporated area of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida: See attached Exhibit "A" containing 13.01 acres, more or less, as depicted on the map within said Exhibit "A". Section 2. PLANNED UNIT REZONING. The real property described in the attached Exhibit "A" is hereby given a City zoning designation of Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD -R) in accordance with the attached Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Jodah B. Bittle, P.E. dated February 24, 2015, and attached hereto as Exhibit `B". Section 3. ZONING MAP. The official City Zoning Map shall be amended to reflect a zoning designation of Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD -R) for the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A". Section 4. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact such invalid provisions. It shall further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without said invalid or unconstitutional provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section b. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember . The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Richard Gillmor Vice Mayor Jerome Adams Councilmember Andrea Coy Councilmember Jim Hill Councilmember Bob McPartlan The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2015. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Mayor Richard Gillmor ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, MMC City Clerk Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Robert A. Ginsburg, City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 Laces, I -- tap PARCEL 1: ALL OF BLOCKS ONE AND TWO AND YUCCA COURT OF SEBASTIAN GARDENS SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 58, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING SOUTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF MAIN STREET 80 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS IT NOW EXISTS. AND PARCEL 2: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, RUN NORTH 89'51'33" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ABANDONED "SEBASTIAN GARDENS" SUBDIVISION. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 58, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ABANDONED PER ORDINANCE 0-85-13. A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE WEST UNE OF A 100 FEET WIDE PARCEL FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES (OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 754. PAGE 1611, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 0070812" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 664.43 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE AT THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 643, PAGE 1083, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN DUE WEST A DISTANCE OF 488.92 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF 'SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS" SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 14, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 00'10'01' EAST ALONG SAID EAST UNE A DISTANCE OF 263.16 FEET TO A FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL AND CARTER DISK; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH OOr10'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.08 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2' IRON ROD AND CARTER CAP; THENCE RUN EAST, A DISTANCE OF 7.46 FEET TO A FOUND 4"X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT AND CARTER CAP; THENCE RUN NORTH 00710'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF 302.44 FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTH UNE OF ABANDONED "SEBASTIAN GARDENS" SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'51'33" EAST ALONG SAID SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 480.52 FEET To THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID PROPERTY CONTAINING 13.01 ACRES MORE OR LESS. y CL U EXHIBIT "A" U Page 2 of 2 U W m Go ON 3NIlN3MOd 0 r Z U U EXHIBIT "A" U Page 2 of 2 U W m Go ON 3NIlN3MOd 0 r Z CONCEPTUAL EXHIBIT "B" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SANDCREST SUBDIVISION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA LOCATION MAP I S j U 0 I . m a DRAWING INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1 COVER SHEET 2 CONCEPTUAL PUD PLAN 3 CONCEPTUAL PAVING, DRAINAGE AND UTILIT IES PLAN 4 AERIAL 5 PARCEL 1: ALL OF BLOCKS ONE AND TIAIOAM YUCCA COURT OF SEBASTIAN GAAM4 "DIVISION AS RECORDED N PUT BOOK S. PAGE $8. PUBLIC RECORDS OF INOwt RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING SOUTH OF THE RIGHT OF YMY LDE OF VAIN STREET D FEET VADE RIGHT OF MY AS IT NM EXISTS, AND PARCEL2: CONLIENCNO AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE4UARTER OF SECTION 1. TOV"HIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 33 EAST, RUN NORTH SYSri3' VAST ALOHO THE SOUTH LOSE OF THE ABANDONED *SEBASTIAN GARDERS' SUSUMS10N . AS RECORDED N PLAT BOOK S. PAGE S4 PUS IC RECORDS OF INDIAN RNER COUNT,F. FLORIDA ABANDONED PER ORDO6ANCE045.1& ADISTANCE OF TOO 00 FEET TO THE NEST LINE OF A 100 FEETtMDE PARCEL FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT4F* AY AND UTIUTY PURPOSES (OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 7S&• PAGE 1011. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA) AND THE POINT OF BEGLNN SN0. FROM SAID POOR OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH O1r0S22' VAST ALONG SAID YWAT UNE A DISTANCE OF 08&.43 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE AT THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 00. PACE 1081 INDIAN RNER COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE RLN DUE WEST A DISTANCE OF Ig92 FEET TO THE EAST LAE OF ISE P37M HIGHLANDS SUBpNS70N AS RECORDED N PUT BOOK A PAGE A PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RNER COUNTY. FLORIDA THENCE RUN NORTH Olri00%' EAST ALONG SAID EAST LOX A 013TANM OF 283.10 FEET TO A FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL AND CARTER OIONG THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00'100%' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 100.07 FEET TO A FOUND 1R' IRON ROD AND CAR TER CAP. THENCE RUN EAST. A DISTANCE OF 7.46 FEET TO A FOUND &-Ko CONCRETE LLONWENT AND CARTER CAP: THENCE RUIN NORTH OO.1001' EAST A DISTANCE OF 3OL44 FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTH LINE OF ABANDONED•SEBASTIAN GARDENS' SUBDIIRSIDK THENCE RUN SOUTH MrSt'33' EAST ALONG SND SAD SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEOIWRNNG, SAID LANG LYRG AND OEM N INDIAN RHEA COUNTY. FLORIDA SAID PROPERTY CONTAINING 13.01 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SITE DATA OFAERS SANCCREST. LLG Sam N 1."At AN YAYy'm„ am, "411 wT COUFUTANN FOR L CROSS AREA (ACI 1305 DATE c -I 0 <�) NON-RESO£NItK USt ARE1S (AC] 000 1� 9EACK n G CrFEC9K NSC RCS AREA (AC) 1301 CN?[1R. SG4VE. STn1 AND StWOY(D. LLG D. TOTAL YAR wn ALLOWED IES PLAN 4 AERIAL 5 SURVEY _ LOM DEN9Tr RE90uN9AL: D wK/ACK I 024 Ta NJ PARCEL 1: ALL OF BLOCKS ONE AND TIAIOAM YUCCA COURT OF SEBASTIAN GAAM4 "DIVISION AS RECORDED N PUT BOOK S. PAGE $8. PUBLIC RECORDS OF INOwt RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING SOUTH OF THE RIGHT OF YMY LDE OF VAIN STREET D FEET VADE RIGHT OF MY AS IT NM EXISTS, AND PARCEL2: CONLIENCNO AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE4UARTER OF SECTION 1. TOV"HIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 33 EAST, RUN NORTH SYSri3' VAST ALOHO THE SOUTH LOSE OF THE ABANDONED *SEBASTIAN GARDERS' SUSUMS10N . AS RECORDED N PLAT BOOK S. PAGE S4 PUS IC RECORDS OF INDIAN RNER COUNT,F. FLORIDA ABANDONED PER ORDO6ANCE045.1& ADISTANCE OF TOO 00 FEET TO THE NEST LINE OF A 100 FEETtMDE PARCEL FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT4F* AY AND UTIUTY PURPOSES (OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 7S&• PAGE 1011. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA) AND THE POINT OF BEGLNN SN0. FROM SAID POOR OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH O1r0S22' VAST ALONG SAID YWAT UNE A DISTANCE OF 08&.43 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE AT THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 00. PACE 1081 INDIAN RNER COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE RLN DUE WEST A DISTANCE OF Ig92 FEET TO THE EAST LAE OF ISE P37M HIGHLANDS SUBpNS70N AS RECORDED N PUT BOOK A PAGE A PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RNER COUNTY. FLORIDA THENCE RUN NORTH Olri00%' EAST ALONG SAID EAST LOX A 013TANM OF 283.10 FEET TO A FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL AND CARTER OIONG THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00'100%' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 100.07 FEET TO A FOUND 1R' IRON ROD AND CAR TER CAP. THENCE RUN EAST. A DISTANCE OF 7.46 FEET TO A FOUND &-Ko CONCRETE LLONWENT AND CARTER CAP: THENCE RUIN NORTH OO.1001' EAST A DISTANCE OF 3OL44 FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTH LINE OF ABANDONED•SEBASTIAN GARDENS' SUBDIIRSIDK THENCE RUN SOUTH MrSt'33' EAST ALONG SND SAD SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEOIWRNNG, SAID LANG LYRG AND OEM N INDIAN RHEA COUNTY. FLORIDA SAID PROPERTY CONTAINING 13.01 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SITE DATA OFAERS SANCCREST. LLG Sam N 1."At AN YAYy'm„ am, "411 wT COUFUTANN FOR L CROSS AREA (ACI 1305 DATE c -I 0 <�) NON-RESO£NItK USt ARE1S (AC] 000 1� 9EACK n G CrFEC9K NSC RCS AREA (AC) 1301 CN?[1R. SG4VE. STn1 AND StWOY(D. LLG D. TOTAL YAR wn ALLOWED 1111 AOw OAA 9QAEYAAa DILE 701 KTS'CEN WCnMu4SE A. 1460 KAON. n 32"0 (772) 77o-6622 N97T. Adf9 MITTS RADIUM y NTIAU a w 7"�RA E z -rirr iair TM>R.ot Yt�M tAw suR.ErcRs _ LOM DEN9Tr RE90uN9AL: D wK/ACK I 024 Ta 1117 .BAN RnQ IIOAtvAW4 54412 701 1 .OTO 91AOL n 32K0 E. TOSAi Y0. V D L7WSD w1S AaGORED. 7033 1712( 1'M-.fIS I. TOTAL aRRv1e LM nROPOSE.t N SM AOORSS Not AYA%AkE is/At 0 OEN9TY PROPOSLD: 64/1101 4.92 'w a (CALCULAT04 MSED ON NAR. ALLOWABLE OEW -Ml PER CJ]NPRCNCWraAE PIAN3 STRICT ANO POKD PROJECT LOCATWX SCUTWWST OCINR11 M IAAN R4M RA StARYcNT or Uu. 'RUNG RAL RANN10 WT CNTLOPNENt M0 wz&.6' 1iFN'TPArS AHAA. &WAX rAMAV 9AOIV9CN (R. LOW A. aOUMI[a. REMEASCN FACRAIV (VJA.O SE AND P00L1 Zama_ Qm z!Q .RT. T UL TAR to 'as3o-1r3o-07003-CDOO-OpOIpA PLO -IH Sax • 13a. LW K 31-39-91-awoo-7DOD-coma • tN1D.OS1D SI-30-a-OOCOD-TODD-Oo003o t�Ap N; pKy MAC,%A. giroiWAO �At.[l s►ACE1 i� AC Ac Malmo mwlW WA C.IIM PROPCN?f O.pS AV/JGAIION iRAGif Y. t /potty LKfC TRACTg G at19Nou /1001./BREW 9►AC[) 7710 ;C RE► LOT ATOTAL DLDIc."o, a W/ROIS.ENM PNYAtt ROAD/ RICHT-Or-RAY. PUNS UDLIDct AKA•LE • •C ME.Ns or COAiTAWA d 00EN9.F, IEE UWU EN OPEN SFASO ox (7150 ACI TOTAL AREA 1101 AC D41N0 VND-UAL: L0amwW. ) c. MUM9T( 7mI1Ku OACKC MAOERO•SPA CNSNa TOItNC: �-nffI 3.66V 7(NANw)a2A ACRES a0 RPUD- Aibt� aCM O+ PROPWO town KSOOITML PLAMAD wt MCLOPYDIT M L ON SR �bA�t7d eevn.t. - 011EY11T 004110• IAit7C111Om. rAJwi mf 1 . FLOOD fOK .r . AS 9OM 0. FILM, IMP �?' is N0. 120t1toM L DATLO 12/OI/12 . sOL3 SCM SOBS NAI- AAMMAUE FIVE SAW IAIIO 11 r* TOTAL - TO►OMAPNt: YAIVl2 1019 m 14.3 (URA/OS) ", CROSS 13 RCSCORAL ►.A -R ARU 1301 AC N UNITS ►LARD/A.1. Md lRoM FMIN.Q - KSOQIML O.0 U4 MIFFS U u MWK A 000,LKC LATS, A.92 MMARAI or 7 PAANND $PACO SAM K MONnJAI LOT(64 LOIS). 7,7A AC OR4UNG IMI CEIRLOP.ETAT AKA. ALL A==XV CdY[0.0n AREAS SHALL MOFOE PARMC M tRAC! 'A' SmRNRAliR NAN•CENLNt TRACT: 1.77 AC 'r ACCORDANCE RM SEC. SA -3-106 OTV Or jWASIL" 1RACT ACCESS ROADWAY TRACT: 0.30 Ahe C LAND DEVELOPMENT COLE TRACT Y:• RECREATION TRACT: 'D' 0.00 M - AAFFIC OROULAOON MIIAIILY AOR 1N7E MIK ►R1YAR TRACT OPD/ SPACE. TRACT •C' OPEN SPACE: Q.0 AD 60110 TLtCNn-V-Mr NM MIM >0 R TAD MT RADIAK SHALL K WIST47CRD SO wAT ALL O.[YrC wn NAME NN 30 K tRKi T OPO1 SPEC a_0O Ac TRACT Yr OFEN y-% 0.14 AC AONTAq ONSAO BOLT -OF -RAY TRACT N OPEN SMU: 01A AC . INLAID A MtopS n DE.TLCFIENT PARAYETM RN -R RS -70 PUD -R KRULgIt wTLfiM SN'YL St]IYL m.. AAL 40.0 STORNRATEN RUN-OrV - W LORDC .O. Or co SNARL K awls/ m AOEOIODAtt M LOCANT or GpN.E LANCE sRIALif/APLS - WPM NI LOT SOC 10,000 S< 9.500 Sr 7,121 SF S.SOO OrKA] A,750 S< A) - WARN LOT wt. 100 100 100' 11 0 950' 1 A2) - MINIMUM at ROM e7 60' of So Sao• •(2 rs _ 1P•1•AM %AAD SLTIAt[3 5 ..A rAMAA N L M p AN AS9ANO - rPb1T eLILDNG ARCA 23 2S' 25' 17 J /7 3 041M OF Int ADTAIRAT FOR 2qE TART. KR *a" rout COL"" LOA - FRO(I OAAAGE AKA 23' 23' IT t7 A 10 • . OIAIRA 932 (13l Of) FDR A ST•TOAAD SAWT4rlT E[KLOPKILT. - OCE TAALDNC AREA 11r to' TarS' • 5 S' s 7(r to' 10 2 • 0 r a to: mRAN •IOTa _ 310E ARAM AREA - REAR IT 20' 25 10' 7 t.] INE SKM LIMIT ton we eM OLL IS 23 0446 NAAI smut - k ..AM s".0,001 OfTAAAZSi N/A 20' T •(a] T •(q 15 30 M� L oOF DIUME 6043 K 30 NPI .ao - KEEN MU D.KS 20 - RAM.", L1u"m .9""1 ITIAL 7S IAL 23' - MIINNAI UMIC At. 900 ST 1.200 sr 900 57 900 St 900 SF 2j M MIM F"sma ROOT a. scow m nw OPO Et"111 NU K PRIWOM 3) snalti tin AND VOKAgC - aA.YIN LOT tO.tAI•tL euLalo1 Dox Sox Dos sex •(9) 6Ga A(9) •(W) �pNCS�1uAL p(.noK RAN ANO MNARr RAT - M►LRNOUS ARIA. 9Ox SSx a0x a0S 70x I A�i T CMLMIRN7 Mn%grnl�-A' AT AMRDYALLot: - N IID MEN SP•CE. /TREE ROYOYALO.T-ORNS:WIlCOEM POCArlt AOS SOx Sat SOx 303 KN! - POOLS 40 SCMEN U409AM - Ila: N/A MIA Y/A Y Y f0' ♦ COS AIOIl-Q-Mt 1 00.2 CO.GAINO+C! C S 1VK Mot '0. S'o-MAAt01 K., - REAR N/A N/A At 10 �TT IRDS YTA7M1 FpWPi NI' frNSW"..a S•OPLRARR PENT (0� o". NSTUD OF Apo FI_ P*cpowO SD rT r= IK NWM INSTEAD OF 90 FT. 17 FDC*. vAT(N F[RMTS 1I rn1P SEv "COMIEC9W KINRn 10 FT FRONT SUMN W6{�F,pN� PROPO9ND S R 905 YAW[ IM tK eIADAO MLA MLAO Y 10 R. m A Al �� TATPEM0.ET RNOyT(e(e7�{K PIUtaOIauRA,4pEA9wLK�W1E(L�C�s T7'IL0 9[ RA1yA{w.CS1 RIlt TfDMAOM OP�C[(AAIR�1C��31121TD�.MaSwD F[ED tD K IVLw105 GARAGE AND ADNQNT K1bWLxrt �pT1CTW R ALmROANa S[CMI ft*3D2Kid1RACON^ (9) ME AME F110P0IJb 1'Ito KKMtN F13ttAD M 27. E AREW 5CAA (P �ttwiKbCO.P�AO£ INSTEAD OF ADx KRE Nott• PCN O!Y a KCOMICW iNAT A NON-NOgTONWi C010R AND [LCYATgN PLAN FILL K Dl9W! FM Orr AL PNDR ro FINAL IIA" () PRDP0SP10 7�0.f(MrOCO 11)) F m) M, IO71' WAfl 90[ YnA01 a I FEET IS OLY FM LOTS MA1 DO NOT NAIL A 10' EASEMENT ON fOYOR IOTi,�LPNW. Q(�I( (TE ! ar 9DY NL7fA0 Tt AI NDm No a 3E aR MLL NAV( DARAa 9Dt JE77A[(S a r. Q (i3 -Ta WNWM, S17(K i 2509 7.10 Sri NOR .0 "AA= AAt K AIR L m SAO( .1N r 911 U19MXS r Lon ...E &AGR-TO-NCN (9) K AK MOPO'rAC A .7 •.0-P ANSTLAD or s7 pMAEES t.(v IRIS% AIAK A NINMIM 3. 9K s£A.cI. (C) At AM: i MIT SEPMATON KIKDT NMT WTAANCE AM EMORCWCY (IITAAIILE INSTEAD MEFtlOoO?AC SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 1717 INDIAN RiVER BOULEVARD, SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, 32960 PHONE (772) 770-9622- FAX (772) 770-9496 to GNOME R u ARG o» - �� JL�FOpgPfL{A(A�Pn1LN. EBAR, p a LVA11ePTO 6AR[D.PM O. PC 6'56 rN'w �160s C71 PNO"DO fR1 ADJACENT ► Ta t1 E soam IO THE SOUTH AMA%CENT T/ 10 THE ,FST W 7a wEST TACT'r IRA= r STMW TC�THE APOM TOM NORM s' n -a L ,• 7NIMY• {�1,� �T •4• TRACT •4• �'JuT •-51iII �-0^e� �. '�IiI t.rn—frL[- �AD�. [3 — — IT�--— — �'rIIM — i — — — '-�rI SO _ S�Ol _ — ri�1i�4Y� _ f0epN- 7�i1 �_ „ — --- 75' RW WW" - -iI1-3-Srit7-1rCi-R�3 -T' :�'-'r.+-�- HW[ ri 7!am -IN- -.Go- 21• wiM !!I --i r YY wo TE9C - -��"\ -'�.� 21' ar" L QJX riil I 3--J7i iIII 11% I IIl Iklai�I� fill: #-Sh-.6'- l�y 1.I � �—���I I � o__ �'���iiIi p ��-��� 70 � gill" 1Il.�q scr" X.J-� e-- .it' 1Ii�I �II- , :33 YIiI1 ki X p F - 1 I- p wSl I I I rw.a I iiwttc rvoY`T4"� I I r ,xc 1 I r. 3w CAVA"Yuma p-" Ji J 1-I 2c wx I I 1 I I I j j � b " I J L / 1 I-11 I 1 I I r jI r W j j wa I m wTna 11 cwc I 1 i r: emir i I st ale._ 1 1Ep3 r soe 1' I `Ti r sCAP c,s,rs L �'.eKs J I » y o I SiTarCr I ,cra.p,s[Tarr sfra\ec rir-ne -� ITwry-----T>a)..TL^3TJ13',it il -nL a L_ J » a w rr 'aS3VC� J s[mu xi o"°' L silted J » o. °' — I�TRDt3' J .aola » or oA IL--�'i'4`JI ' L 'r�uxeaiTL 1 ra.,ao.,r n Tr ,n sTTelex rie nro -tTo. nrrT I wAca I lea s•+or. +'--- z-ai°I 1J�631�J,e• �r._ _srs c.� »_r L sY z ies` J »'- °' r ,r .x -� . 1 a oYY'� In' ur 15 Tnbct J wA ¢ s: wL _ — _ _ _ — _ — — _ —n_u .0 ..0 50.0 5�.0• UutKYT t ST4 N r rA1Aa M! GslrtW 2' r"r r a r 4Ja fAS!r[q wa - 4siriHl r rA1a �+ T CJa ux�T - .,A,a • s ,1rRlA' - v"arr Is* Owl, Ma IA�vdT Mi fA1L[wT -�iC �Mff 2 ,Ara L GY,"tITiT Ma _ Ali T{G�ROACMA 3C ��UY ApT� b a �O.Ow"T rr WE W~ DrR7�r b�7 �� irb'iii—�� 70 Al i' apT�aW�aaT- pl�Mg6E�i�0pA9AAY WCAL PoR LOVA 71D �y2p0TRpY�aLOpU FOR LOi8Y7-1D FLO 3 X25 p� �yp� jyp�� pyp�/� jyp�p� l p® � IAYdIT X18 FOR L078Y1 RlON7 LAADED GAilAOE ap� OIDT TO ffCALEI SIX LOADBS OLIM08 Ma 040E TO BCAEFa > WOT W eCALg7 Fil01R tAAL1®G�RAGE WDT TO SCALE) p��T8p2�dp•�2g5� WOT TO T3CALEi �p►F�OR` tIlE �pLp0�78p2�fp�� QIDT l0 OCAL� QiOT TD BCIIFI �Ep'F��t1�MA * MOW 7a BCILD SDE w p�jp� WDT TO BCAL87 PLA/ ; Ji7n S• FG 1. t:l I w CLC'!. • ' ; vo+.- �. i �t ; �� _ � .Y. _.n'F — - -'r>7 � :7r �i C • I Ian. 7. � , -j -� a ., towAx as•lo J •=\. \ - - �- - - � y"f. i c.;c7e',Y wo AST: D •'� ;� — a, L u•,5 8' (� 7 r� •ET ro`,a,.�c r .xYADw•Ir ,01/2v . 362.93'...... - rrr•e •��:;.�' :'�`." N00'1221% 302.- 5, I.1 82- 4ihM i r- 7' ps,w i i II II II II II II II 11 II iI II I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I r_I , 7 1 8 1 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I 13 I 14 115 116 , T7 I 18 7„901 Y 14-00 Tr 14900 sT 14-00 ss 14906 sr ( 4700 S< 1 9.]00 Si 1 3--00 IF J1 14900 9 19.100 4 1 asOD Y I &lOO si f; D Its ? r r ! 11 — — — — -- --- r- - — —"°y'''"'"— � � � i 49060 0► � � — ' � ( �— — — � I ( i � 1 � i r l i E,� � 13�r I L-- . I i 50 51 �; 52 { 53 �'.,54 i55 56 i 57 58 6" sT 4 T30 Y 11T -o St A770 9F I 7-6 Si 1 { 790 v 14 790 sr I sago T I a 7-0 ST r) i 5 i i ii. iir, 1 _ I 16M50 y I j , L ----J LTJ L� --J L---JL---J Li.J L ---J L--- � EiaT: GEAR/PEGRAOE/CtEAM� J:ICH Of DEORf A"0 ,RrEGpH. I �EiT13v10�qu) 5 SHEET 13. ' \ I \ I a------- rr:,•f., ---9999-- --- --- - - s�-Yw-- -1 a -..'— -c --- _-`_'•-- _ -- -� _----- _----- __ _ _.-- _mg9999 _----=�=_ a I ""t 1992.26•— ICO' DuS'T. R/M NOC'04'J9-E - _ I 1 I� WO uss rmi�N�000T — J O.R 600RL Mw7�w EAST IVIF OF sc. 1/4 5rcr.xw 1• rwa, JI S. RG_- 33 E. I I 0 r , P.C. 161) "I .I }I 4071 ` \ 0 ` \ \ �•:'!••!„ �� GRAPHIC SCALE -29.10' - �`"_n•°• . ` '� / SPACE �Sf. �. .•.. MW LOO \) i 6Aeh .50M PCR R-2040.00' o=r10'42• L-77.sCMDAI s' C.B.-MSS11'34'E i 1 CE \ 1 , AT , TKv-4: IS 't IMO A6C afSfOt(rGrlat \ 1, \�. 1 C3 m El- -j L IL W U Z 0 U En W EL' U O Z a in zoO �GWHIS SC� LEGEND - -------- - NED ----- ----- T --- 17-1 V F 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 V 18 21 22 23 24 25 20 X I6 --- T 2 60 61 2 .52 53 54I f4 f5 5 5 f4 64 WE 28 III lhmfj Li L-11 L --- 29 --- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---a Ll ------------ -------- : _---: -- -------- ------------------soDvxu•mEuuu--- -- ------- - ------- r�7 IrZ�-- - ----------------- -- ------------- --------------------------- -------- 1� 1 2 11✓i F rn_w�l i I I I I I I I I \\V7. 11 49 4W 47 1 45 44 43 42 41 40 34 37 1: 36 35 11 -11 A� ----------- --- ------------- - --------- ------------------ ----------- ---- - — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — _nW.Sv- il G 10 A - -------- - NED ----- ----- T --- 17-1 V F 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 V 18 21 22 23 24 25 20 X I6 --- T 2 60 61 2 .52 53 54I f4 f5 5 5 f4 64 WE 28 III lhmfj Li L-11 L --- 29 --- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---a Ll ------------ -------- : _---: -- -------- ------------------soDvxu•mEuuu--- -- ------- - ------- r�7 IrZ�-- - ----------------- -- ------------- --------------------------- -------- 1� 1 2 11✓i F rn_w�l i I I I I I I I I \\V7. 11 49 4W 47 1 45 44 43 42 41 40 34 37 1: 36 35 11 -11 A� ----------- --- ------------- - --------- ------------------ ----------- ---- - — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — _nW.Sv- il G FEV24 2015 I!'IgWOOUM 1W 1141 IV183Y 1 1s383ONYs _ I I I I I I I I O I I I I I i i I 1 I i I i i I I Lsorrawlwtt, Legend As Abbroviationw. (s)mbots not scoleable for size) Report of Survey. (Protect 111-050-09) PARCEL Is Certinod To. ALL Or @LW* COW NO TWO NO 11M OMM OF 10110SAIM GOODS Fu POWESSOM LAW SURVEVCR rem or $60ce Isalswom DAW4=0 03 1101011011) 6 fta WX L FM 9L RMA 111100103, Or rem PROPIEVICKAL SWtVrM & UNIM aff wig•M SLIRM PCWCRUM an 1) wax". uc MAX awe now% I.Vmo mm or THIC MIT or m m cr 12 LAND IiJAVIN11fol VJSNW sat= uslocam was sAne"m Lai am 2) OMLM% MORK C400O.L. 9AMWT1. "MWAA III LAVA 0401100 1" vw 10 Fm ux 1113147 or sa A IT No mm LITIL" I= 1717 11PICLIN RIVER 110LUVAP% 9111t 201 ILCPJL slim comly Kom 11110=103 A RAM wo W.AcK FLOM 32M 3) OLD KRUM KATC014 TIM 14"MIM COMPANY LILCXAK oam %%U Coal' slo%sopffAs, CMMM Wrivemist L WiM alcm wx 4) OCIRMA SAM PARCEL 2: A DMIA ANME (%M slow LIGHT FST ulmoc"', morcm Agracoz 09AROL 8) 0= Lism am or FAVOwn SACK Or CLIPS W Ef= UZ Cr X 1.411% AS UASSFO 0 1K 1104A SIMON= OMACCM AT not 141111106100100 OF ft 0110111110%ST 0104-01300011 AM VAL* W D4 ImmCW ac-sumassit oF - , 1. Pow" 39 monn, CWF m VOIDS W FRMMQ' (SP -11. M) 0 XPAM 1K MOM PRIATA AWAM aval 39 1XIT. mm *=M $1,11m, NO am Me smill tm OF IM IIIS TIFE OF DMIAW RINEY 0 1 (W of 7= IM WEAW101011 ,111131 K AWJIDCNM Istwom QMWO*r 11.11101143014. 4 PICOM IN PLAT Cowlitct. Pow NO CNAIAIM Cr A a= Q[Q14= LOW US TO" TO BE M. fit 04411.9 0=1 OF 0101011 om NW rawK P& m:_=Tco"Wm POW SNOTTARY KINOF 1660,1NOT so S. own of 1 1111 to Be MSM M ACMVAff RE119MM 1111317 1014 Or A 1* 11137 aftwma Pt" am NW.W~ Qm) FONAMDAT W70M mmm SEP`110 TAM M SM WIS Ot MM ALL 41W.01 JIMMOU OF IK ROAM AM stam ftmosco (ofmft macto sm 734 "m loll, MSW CRANNIC WANNOLIC CLM orm SIM111110113 Cr PILAM AS ESTAMISC) N P&WO SJ47. FLOPIM ACIDIFFIATIC ARM QQX0f. P.000 NOM POW W lt*SM 01110sl 1110 POW am WE KWACIE 041F CCCL or =I M won- wall Mm amo somm 0,10 =110"•W A76COAV SOO " 11OW014 AM 49ASLIPIC) N FW 0C If lo 1119 omm tm At 1149 W4 IM 0101) A CAP I= MCP= MOK POW & co comcanuAL DRAK44Z Coco= 0 014mm 1001 643. PAN ion mew vim a rN* capicom MONLOMT 511011K. I= • 114 LAST DAIX W I= OW WASI WASA6 PROPOSED QkAK %M P"Lq? sm & P" 14. KA"W or low NAM camm. TOO, to" 0MR114 AJOICAN VERsOM. DARN - m smvtv om im WtTIV TO TK =ff tGrAlm OF ANY 0060M. 01APICAP TACM Not CLE POW A 13111011101C Or 410142 F1117 TO ad CCHCAM mowildw EASY SMErr m an In or Im� M"W UM*� Pa 011=1100 IN M at TAM am "mm swivel, DR "I'm vA vc 1.114 & rIsomm. armim Or !ALIO FEET Is A FWAO FM= XAM WIL AM 01017101 PLAT MAUX - OMAC" - No WSMXMM or r F 011IM01004 1ASELID172, A0IT-W-*%V% CSW Two comma team WIm* Pa. A am= 0, Icm CALCRILAID mmul, low OF WAY 0111 90111it" IM 9LfflMXP TO I= SLOVEW04 COME" AS 90M Fm 10 A Tom ;g mm ;W,4FcmmZ1= M A Alt AN 1� I I AX­sMT • NO I= OMI OR (11MUNTRIF 111 01FIESSED ell APUM IMA OWN" OF TAG 10 A AND CDC - 0:100CILM ox occum •111AMISS A COONOM 0 DOOM RAT VAMES NO lif"0113) VMs= QNM C#Pl 111DOR 11121 NOM or M' VW A CIZZU10C OF 3QZ44 AN ve $me '% or mamm valism mm. - PROFOSIZI ULM r4ft 13 AS PIRCANDO) BY TIC MM. rw m na momwaa= am L rr 1`01:1111 me No &ICLUM W Do "m aw R11111100 0111114K LM PONT OF demom"L 0" - peact I=•TM FAUG. OF LAW "M HISM11 APPIAn TO K N FILM =K X 901 (cm) I:= Pax FM n PCMMU FAII WkP F12MMM 1. CAM = 406 2012. ScIvIlm Lot= 00 1" Lvm " some III oclul 111001 =Mr. 111.01001, CW =="a"= "ll " 1PULD" C1,1490% Im we ~01111' ="so I&QI low mm an LOCIL PW PM FADE SET&ACKS SHM AAS To No, 0 K VDWU % b CLLL OFFICIAL 1110:0110 am room TO I I at amismicraL "1 cim ovemem "m e I X FAFIISFI-� • M 2*W WAS POWOM OW OJ4,10FAC, WA 24 XKMIC 04 N 90.07 BLOCK 7 .1 / .. % COLMC1101 WN 00MIMPLA. RM MWlO1I. XMIMMIT IM01101DInS IM Im A ff 1 11 1 t W 5vvAPO IK CIFF13104 tiLT1m1 IM 2 KKOS 98 WN IK 000200101. PLAT BOA(Pa 14 AAr BOOK m. m _v T0. -4 "X Soo&.WWIInar II nL?i'VA i0m U"&?r = - wl� W. AS"I (17 511 0400121211 J02. 10 (m) 34.71' v c /71341370/71341370BLOCK I FAL W North GRAPHIC SCALE son MASW 449004 S/D ow AOMMONIM Pm Apat L-221.111' ( no Como- Limb - so Is. emir IPARCEL 2 A P EL I I BLOM 2 INrNir`\ \ VACAm,r. WOODED M OF VACANT. WOODEDor MAIN AS till At Iq ------------------ (D LANCS V= 84 akA 64.1. OV. POW III necA owRr L- - - - - - - - - - - - - L-203.17' Note I CHD-200 R/W 00" date osW InformdUgn shown 32. BLOCK I VA4 FEwaoc- P10A "'wo I 3 OM'39V 662.74'(M) I - - - - OW w -m -- - No" ~&M Nor mmem -Nor MICUM SWALE WALE OAA M ft fell a M Pa left % OL PA a ft so rRAcr SWI l, PDR P.O.CL I I ___-\N I (aits. &WIG" own lot 10924 M7VJCLM64kIQWL / �' 7 % V_ A- im Rm !!I �m"WL 671.4W 3091W3910 M031 &W Lm Or SL V# =mm 1. W. it S. 0110C.211 r 20"71'M U".W(P.& 5. PC. 14) "s e 01 &M 9 It 12429"M r MERIDIAN LAND SURVEYORS 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD, SWE 201 VERO BEACH, FL 32960 72-7.9-1 PHONE: 772-794-12 111. FAX: 774096 - LB690SZI3ELLS0b"rH.NFT TM-80tv"y REVISIM OFSUR VEYFOR: SANDCREST, LLC nWSMVM�ISNOT VALID WrM0WnWS1GWAWMUM TM ORWI;Zd.*AiiiF�DSEALOFTINiMORiDA LKENSEDSURVEYOR .K j�A_-%A I CH" CURD PSM#5755 P"Jww 4-WPLAT DAM"14 FZ Pa DgL4WNDY. SFT clircmall am L 10-M4 ASNOVENICPARCM aa SCALP-* IJO Sh7Zr I OF I M DATE DESCItIMON NY rnv��r SIE HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Rezoning Application Staff Report 1. Project Name: Sandcrest PUD 2. Requested Action: Rezoning from RM -8 and RS -10 to PUD -R 3. Project Location a. Address: Southwest of the intersection of Main Street and Powerline Road b. Legal: See survey for full legal description C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 30-38-30-00003-0000-00000.4 31-38-01-00000-7000-00001.0 31-38-01-00000-7000-00003.0 4. Project Owner: Sandcrest, L.L.C. 5070 N. Highway A1A, Suite C-1 Vero Beach, FL 32963 5. Project Agent: Chuck Mechling Sandcrest, L.L.C. 5070 N. Highway AIA, Suite C-1 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772)999-3494 6. Project Engineer: Jodah Bittle, P.E. Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, L.L.C. 1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)770-9622 7. Project Surveyor: Meridian Land Surveyors 1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 794-1213 1 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: An application has been submitted by Sandcrest, L.L.C. to change the designation of 13.01 acres of land on the City of Sebastian Zoning Map to Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R). Two of the parcels totaling 12.77 acres have an existing zoning designation of RM -8 (Residential Medium Density -8 units per acre). The third parcel containing .24 acres has a zoning designation of RS -10 (Residential Single Family - minimum lot size 10,000 SF). The property is currently undeveloped. The proposed PUD Conceptual Development Plan submitted in conjunction with the rezoning application identifies a subdivision consisting of 64 single-family lots with an overall density of 4.92 units per acre. b. Current Zoning: 12.77 acres: RM -8 (Residential — Medium Density -8 units per acre) .24 acres: RS -10 (Residential Single Family -min. lot size 10,000 SF) C. Adjacent Properties Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North: C Park Land Conservation East: PS Post Office INS (9) CG Vacant CG RM -8 Apartments MDR South: RS -10 Residential homes LDR West: RS -10 Residential homes LDR d. Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: (2) Current Land Use(s): (3) Soil: (4) Vegetation: (5) Flood Hazard: (6) Water Service: (7) Sanitary Sewer Service: (8) Parks: (9) Police/Fire: 2 13.01 acres Vacant Immokalee fine sand Zone X Indian River County Utilities Indian River County Utilities North County Conservation- adjacent Sebastian Police -'/4 mile IRC Fire — 2'/2 miles 9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency a. Future Land Use: Medium Density Residential (maximum 8 units per acre) b. Level of Service (1) Traffic: The proposed development will create an ADT of 647 trips (64 lots x 10.1 ADT per unit). Applicant must submit a traffic study to determine if any additional offsite street improvements will be required. (2) Potable Water: Sandcrest Subdivision will be connecting to the Indian River County Utilities Department water facilities. (3) Wastewater: Sandcrest Subdivision will be connecting to the Indian River County Utilities Department sewer facilities. (4) Stormwater: Project includes a privately operated and maintained stormwater system, which by design will improve water filtration prior to intrusion into the groundwater system. (5) Recreation: In addition to the private recreational tract within the subdivision, property owners within Sandcrest will be subject to the city- wide recreation impact fee program used to supplement and enhance the development of future parks and recreational facilities within the community. (6) Solid Waste: There will be an increased demand on solid waste disposal with the addition of 64 residential units. A solid waste disposal district fee will be incorporated into the tax bills as each lot is developed. 10. Conformance with Code of Ordinances: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Code of Ordinances. 11. Changed Conditions: The land is currently undeveloped. In 2005, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a 95 -unit townhouse development on the subject property. That plan was never built, and after a number of extensions, the site plan expired. 12. Land Use Compatibility: The adjacent properties to the south and west are designated low density residential. Even though the land use designation for the subject property is medium density, the PUD -R zoning in conjunction with the PUD Conceptual Development Plan will limit this property to a low-density development. 13. Adequate Public Facilities: Public utilities (water, wastewater) will be incorporated within the development of the proposed PUD, and a stormwater lake will be included within the subdivision. 14. Natural Environment: The proposed PUD will contain the requisite open space as required by land development regulations. 3 15. Economic Effect: The creation of 64 single-family lots will expand the tax base for the City of Sebastian. 16. Orderly Development: The proposed zoning change is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the land development code regarding orderly development given the location of the site adjacent to other residential developments and availability of sufficient public facilities and access. 17. Public Interest: The proposed use is consistent with land use objectives and will not adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood based on design criteria outlined within the conceptual development plan. 18. Other Matters: On September 10, 2014, the Board of Adjustment for the City of Sebastian approved a variance to allow a PUD -R to be 12.77 acres, less than the required 25 acres, for the Sandcrest LLC property. Since that time, an additional .24 acre property was acquired, bringing the total area to be rezoned to 13.01 acres. On February 19, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to consider the application for rezoning and the conceptual development plan. At the conclusion of the hearing, a motion was made to recommend that City Council approve the PUD -R zoning in conjunction with the Conceptual Development Plan submitted for Sandcrest Subdivision, with design standards and waivers as requested, and with the following additional conditions: 1. Environmental study to be submitted by applicant prior to City Council consideration. 2. Provide a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) from the Indian River County School District prior to City Council consideration. Since that hearing, both the environmental study and the SCAM have been received. 19 Conclusion: The requested rezoning from RM -8 and RS -10 to PUD -R is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code and Code of Ordinances. 20. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning. E -3 DATE MOF SE HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Conceptual Development Plan - Planned Unit Development Staff Report 1. Project Name: Sandcrest PUD 2. Requested Action: Conceptual Development Plan Approval. 3. Project Location a. Address: Southwest of the intersection of Main Street and Powerline Road b. Legal: See survey for full legal description C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 30-38-30-00003-0000-00000.4 31-38-01-00000-7000-00001.0 31-38-01-00000-7000-00003.0 4. Project Owner: Sandcrest, L.L.C. 5070 N. Highway A1A, Suite C-1 Vero Beach, FL 32963 5. Project Agent: Chuck Mechling Sandcrest, L.L.C. 5070 N. Highway Al A, Suite C-1 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772)999-3494 6. Project Engineer: Jodah Bittle, P.E. Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, L.L.C. 1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)770-9622 7. Project Surveyor: Meridian Land Surveyors 1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 794-1213 1 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: In conjunction with their rezoning application, Sandcrest, L.L.C. has submitted application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Conceptual Development Plan. The subdivision design as outlined in the conceptual development plan includes 64 single- family lots together with a 1.77 acre stormwater lake, a .30 acre recreational tract and a number of open space tracts. Without rezoning to PUD -R, the current zoning would allow 103 dwelling units. The primary subdivision access point will be via Powerline Road. b. Current Zoning: 12.77 acres: RM -8 (Residential — Medium Density -8 units per acre) .24 acres: RS -10 (Residential Single Family -min. lot size 10,000 SF) C. Adjacent Properties Zoning North: C East: PS CG RM -8 South: RS -10 West: RS -10 d. Site Characteristics (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Total Acreage: Current Land Use(s): Soil: Vegetation: Flood Hazard: Water Service: Sanitary Sewer Service: Parks: Current Land Use Park Land Post Office Vacant Apartments Residential homes Residential homes 13.01 acres Vacant Immokalee fine sand Zone X Indian River County Utilities Indian River County Utilities Future Land Use Conservation INS CG MDR LDR LDR North County Conservation - adjacent Police/Fire: Sebastian Police -'/ mile IRC Fire — 2 Y2 miles 2 9. Conceptual Development Plan criteria a. Evidence of unified control of the proposed planned development and the associated agreements required. provided b. Ownership Requirements. provided C. Compliance with comprehensive plan. (1) Future Land Use: Consistent (2) Traffic Circulation: Consistent (3) Housing: Consistent (4) Public Facilities: Consistent (5) Coastal Management: Consistent (6) Conservation: Consistent (7) Recreation and Open Space: Consistent d. Compliance with applicable ordinances. Consistent e. Land use compatibility. The adjacent properties to the south and west are designated low density residential. Even though the land use designation for the subject property is medium density, the PUD -R zoning in conjunction with the PUD Conceptual Development Plan will limit this property to a low-density development. f. Adequate public facilities. Public utilities (water, wastewater) will be incorporated within the development of the proposed PUD, and a stormwater lake will be included within the subdivision. g. Natural environment. The proposed PUD will contain the requisite open space as required by land development regulations. h. Economic effects. The creation of 64 single-family lots will expand the tax base for the City of Sebastian. i. Orderly Development: The proposed zoning change is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the land development code regarding orderly development given the location of the site adjacent to other residential developments and availability of sufficient public facilities and access. j. Public interest. The proposed use is consistent with land use objectives and will 3 10. not adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood based on design criteria outlined within the conceptual development plan. . k. Other matters. On September 10, 2014, the Board of Adjustment for the City of Sebastian approved a variance to allow a PUD -R to be 12.77 acres, less than the required 25 acres, for the Sandcrest LLC property. Since that time, an additional .24 acre property was acquired, bringing the total area to be rezoned and included in the conceptual development plan to 13.01 acres. Contents of Conceptual Development Plan: a. Vicinity map: provided b. Property boundaries: provided C. existing conditions: provided d. Development plan. provided (1) Land use: provided (2) Circulation: The roadway design plan incorporated within the conceptual development plan depicts two points of ingress/egress with both the primary and secondary emergency access points on Powerline Road. The internal circulation system consists of one curvilinear street. (3) Conceptual drainage plan: provided (4) Density: 4.92 units per acre (5) Nonresidential square footage: none e. Written material: (1) Planning objectives: The Sandcrest PUD Conceptual Development Plan consists of 64 single-family lots. The designation of a property as a PUD is intended to promote creative design. Given the subject site is relatively small for a PUD, the design reflects the residential nature of the neighborhood as an in -fill project. In a PUD, elements of the design such as lot size, setbacks, etc. may be negotiated to allow clustering of open space and recreational areas. The proposed subdivision demonstrates compliance with proper planning practices by offering an alternative single-family option within the City. (2) Development schedule: provided (3) Environmental impact statement: A full environmental study will be provided prior to the preliminary platiplan approval. 4 (4) Public facilities impact statement: Sandcrest Subdivision will connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by Indian River County. (a) Quantity of wastewater generated; This will be provided on the preliminary plat/plan and reviewed by Indian River County Utilities Dept. (b) Description of proposed recreational facilities; A recreation tract has been provided. A separate site plan for development of this tract will be required. (c) Quantity of potable water required; The water system will be designed in accordance with the Indian River Co. Utility Dept. standards. (d) Estimated number of school age children expected within the development: The developer must provide a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) from the Indian River County School District prior to approval of the preliminary plat/plan. (e) Estimated property tax and/or sales tax revenue generated by the project by phase; and Estimation to be provided by the developer. (f) Any other positive or negative public facility impact. In addition, the statement shall also include all public facilities impact information that may be submitted as part of the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) review process, as applicable. Sandcrest Subdivision will connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by Indian River County. 11. Open space and landscaped areas: The proposed PUD will provide 6.50 acres of open space to satisfy the minimum standards as established by the comprehensive plan. 12. City Engineer's review: The City Engineer has reviewed the conceptual development plan. Following discussions with the project engineer, some grading improvements to the drainage canal along the southern PUD border will be provided. In addition, any use of the City right-of-way, including gates, entrance features, signs, etc., will require special agreements and/or license to encroach, as approved by City Council. A more detailed review and analysis will be performed during the preliminary plat/plan review, as well as the construction plan review. 13. Other Matters: (Reserved) 14. Analysis: Planned Unit Developments allow for unique design flexibility. The Land 5 Development code states that many development parameters are negotiated, such as minimum lot size and setbacks. Other development parameters, such as open space, have specific code requirements. Further to this, Section 54-4-20.2(a)(5)c5 states, "In approving a conceptual development plan, the city council may establish such conditions and may require such modifications as shall ensure compliance with the PUD district standards and regulations and further, the city council may waive or modify subdivision, site plan or other zoning requirements otherwise applicable to the development when such waiver or conflict is not in conflict with the city's comprehensive plan or the intent and purpose of the land development code." The design standards which are to be negotiated are shown below along with the standard proposed by Sandcrest: Minimum lot depth (interior lots) 95 feet Minimum lot depth (perimeter lots) 110 feet Minimum lot width: 50 feet Minimum front setback to building: 10 feet Minimum front setback to garage 10 feet Minimum side setback to building 5 feet Minimum side setback to garage 2 feet Minimum separation of structures 7 feet inimum rear setback (interior lots) 10 feet Minimum rear setback (perimeter lots) 25 feet Maximum lot building coverage (interior) 60% Maximum lot building coverage (perimeter) 50% Maximum lot impervious area (interior) 70% Maximum lot impervious area (perimeter) 60% The design standards which do not meet code requirements and will require waivers are listed below: Minimum lot size (interior) 4,750 SF Minimum lot size (perimeter) 5,500 SF (Standard requires lot size to be no less than 75% of the minimum lot size in the adjacent single-family residential zoning district: 9,500 x.75 = 7,125) • TA (Standard is 50 feet) 40 feet Separation between entrances 385 feet (Standard is 1,000 feet) 15. Conclusion: On February 19, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to consider the application for rezoning and the conceptual development plan. At the conclusion of the hearing, a motion was made to recommend that City Council approve the PUD -R zoning in conjunction with the Conceptual Development Plan submitted for Sandcrest Subdivision, including the design standards and waivers as outlined above, and with the following additional conditions: Environmental study to be submitted by applicant prior to City Council consideration. Provide a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) from the Indian River County School District prior to City Council consideration. Since that hearing, both the environmental study and the SCADL have been received. 16. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Sandcrest Conceptual Development Plan subject to the design standards and waivers recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. PARED 7 DATE L-1-iS PLANNING ZONING SSION MINUTES OFNREGULAR MEOET NIG OF FEBRUARY 19, 2015 DRAFT being added to the site it was actually a major modification, and the appropriate fees for a major mod had been collected. She also stated that over the years more medical uses had been brought into the building which will make the site short on parking when it is full and that staff was glad to see the additional parking being added. Mr. Qizilbash asked if the 12 foot wide drive aisle met city standards or industry standards. Mr. Mills stated it was designed to be incompliance with city standards. Mr. Watanabe stated adding additional parking to the site was a plus, and felt that a foot less would not constrict the traffic flow. In response to an additional question, staff verified that the 15 foot length of the compact spaces was in compliance with city code. A discussion ensued with Mr. Watanabe regarding the width of the drive aisle, industry standards, turning radii, and city requirements. Mr. Mills stated the width was thoroughly reviewed, and also approved by the Fire Department. Mr. Qizilbash stated ITE standard was 13 feet wide. Mr. McManus was pleased to see a site voluntarily hook into the sewer system. Mr. Roth concurred, and had questions regarding the building access off of the drive aisle. Ms. Kautenburg also agreed, and hoped the additional site signage helped with the traffic connection to the Wendy's site. Mr. Watanabe stated that staff quickly re -checked the LDC and verified that for parking spaces that were at a 45° angle, the required drive aisle width was 12 feet. Chmn. Dodd asked if there was anyone in the public that was opposed or in favor of the application. There was none. MOTION by Roth/Qizilbash "that the plan as submitted for the site plan modification for Sebastian Center be approved." ROLL CALL: Mr. Qizilbash yes Mr. Roth yes Ms. Kautenburg yes Mr. McManus yes Mr. Dodd yes Mr. Alvarez yes The vote was 6-0. Motion carried. B. PUBLIC HEARING — RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL — REZONING/CONCEPTUAL PUD PLAN — SANDCREST SUBDIVISION — RM -8 AND RS -10 ZONING TO PUD -R ZONING — SW CORNER OF MAIN STREET/POWERLINE ROAD — PARCEL ID NO.'S 30-38-30-00003-0000-00000.4, 31-38-01-00000-7000- 00001.0, AND 31-38-01-00000-7000-00003.0 Chmn. Dodd explained that PUD's were a hybrid process that involved a conceptual plan with the zoning, and that the Commission should discuss them together but take two actions/motions. He noted that there would be additional public hearings in the future for the preliminary plat also, and that the conceptual plan was not where technical details were provided. Mr. Chuck Mechling, representing the Sandcrest developers, stated the last time he was before the PZ Commission was in 1997 for review and approvals of the Collier Club Subdivision which had developed into a very successful community. He reviewed that on September 10, 2014, they went before the Board of Adjustment, and since then had done an assessment of the needs of the Sebastian market, and determined it wasn't townhomes as previously approved for the property. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 2015 Mr. Mechling then had a Power Point presentation (attached) which showed an aerial of the proposed Sandcrest subdivision location, site plan for the previous townhomes, layouts and density for the proposed subdivision, and building elevations of the proposed residences. He also discussed an article regarding the benefits of urban infilling, the history of their conceptual layouts and the purchase of the land nodule on Bob Circle. He noted the final proposed layout consisted of 64 units which was a reduction of 33% of the original vision. Ms. King explained the details of the PUD zoning whereas it allowed flexibility in design, the ability to negotiate setbacks, lot sizes, etc. which were listed in the staff report. She stated the LDC established some minimum standards but there was a clause that allowed the applicant to ask for waivers. She further explained that the Board of Adjustment granted a variance from the minimum size of a PUD which was 25 acres, and the proposed project would be 13.01 acres. Based on allowed density, the subdivision could build 103 units, but was proposing 64 units. Ms. King also stated there was a scrivener's error in the staff report on page 5, and asked the Commission to disregard #13. Chmn. Dodd asked if there was anyone in the public that was opposed or in favor of the application. There was none. Chmn. Dodd questioned if the full environmental impact study was provided for the conceptual plan, and noted the code required an updated study for the preliminary plat. Ms. King stated at some point the environmental issues would need to be addressed, and staff was comfortable with getting the study before the preliminary plat. There was discussion if the receipt of the study should be made a condition of approval. Mr. Mechling offered that the Environmental I audit was done and clean, the scrub jay survey was clean, and the gopher tortoise survey was done, and a State biologist was retained to relocate the tortoises next month. Mr. Dodd suggested those reports be given to staff before City Council, and that would be made a condition. Chmn. Dodd also discussed the School Concurrency Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) and when it should be submitted. After discussion, it was decided to make it a condition also. Mr. Qizilbash felt it was a nice plan but questioned the proposed width of the Right -Of -Way [40 feet]. Ms. King stated they were asking for a waiver for the width. Mr. Alvarez noted the application stated there would be 74 units, and asked what size homes were proposed. Ms. King responded that there had been three revisions since the application was submitted and the final plan proposed 64. Mr. Mechling stated the homes would be 1400 to 1600 SF. Mr. Roth asked if the entrance [on Powerline Road] was in the same location as the townhome project and was it considered safe lining up with the Pelican Isle Apartment driveway. Mr. Watanabe stated the developer still needed to submit a traffic analysis study, but based on the number of units and Powerline Road being a collector street, he did not see any issues, and lining up driveways, center to center, was preferred. Mr. Roth also asked for clarification regarding Bob Circle. Staff explained that a small portion of the roadway pavement encroached into the project's Bob Circle parcel, and the developer was going to donate that portion back to the city. Mr. Roth asked if the large trees and greenery on the west side of the project would be kept and maintained as a privacy barrier. Mr. Mechling responded yes, the community will maintain grass cutting, lawn service, shrubbery, and have a three -rail white picket fence around the subdivision with shrubbery behind it. Ms. Kautenburg favored the subdivision and felt it filled a niche that was needed in Sebastian. She also had concerns with the narrow width of the ROW and asked if there would be pedestrian and bike paths. Mr. Mechling stated there would be an internal sidewalk system inside the community and also externally along Powerline. 3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 2015 Ms. Simchick stated the School Board didn't have any concerns at this time, but was glad the SCADL was considered. She asked if the community would be deed restricted for age. Mr. Mechling stated at this time an age restriction was not proposed. Mr. Dodd discussed the recommendation from staff regarding the design standards and waivers that the Commission should discuss. Ms. King explained that the list on page 6 was design items the developer was asking for, and the items on page 7 specifically needed waivers. She noted the conceptual plan provided a comprehensive chart and details comparing the minimum standards. Mr. Dodd stated he felt the conceptual plans were very clear and warranted the smaller lot sizes, but that there may be traffic congestion issues at the Powerline and Main Street intersection, and that a turn lane may be necessary. There was a discussion with the city attorney with regards to the motions and waivers, and if advisable to refer to the staff report document. Mr. McManus asked if there would be an HOA plus a Master Association, or just an HOA. Mr. Mechling stated the HOA would be the Master. Mr. McManus further questioned if the sidewalk would be on the homeowners property or within the ROW. Mr. Mechling stated it would be within the common property (ROW). And in response to an additional question, Mr. Mechling stated not all of the garages would be side entry as some would be front -loading, and setbacks would be different for each garage layout with the intention that cars would not hang over the sidewalk. He also described the advantages of having a smaller roadway width, similar to Pointe West, in that it created slower traffic and a more closer neighborhood. Mr. Qizilbash calculated driveway lengths and pavement widths, along with the remaining available area for a parked car, and questioned if the vehicles would be overhanging into the roadway. Mr. Mechling stated the shorter front setbacks were for side -loading garages, which would have the additional space in front of the garage [parallel to the road]. MOTION by Dodd/Roth "to recommend to the City Council that they approve rezoning [for the subject property] from RM -8 and RS -10 to PUD -R, with no conditions, and also recommend that they approve the conceptual plan that was submitted with the rezoning request with the design standards and waivers as delineated by the staff in Section #14 of their document [staff report] and the condition that the applicant submit to the city staff the Environmental Study documents that they have." "And a condition that they provide the school concurrency document [SCADQ for Indian River School District." Mr. Roth clarified that Section #14 numbering did not change since earlier Section #13 was disregarded. Staff stated they will revise #13 to read "Reserved" for the staff report that goes to City Council. ROLL CALL: Mr. McManus yes Mr. Alvarez yes Mr. Roth yes The vote was 6-0. Motion carried. CHAIRMAN MATTERS: Mr. Qizilbash yes Ms. Kautenburg yes Mr. Dodd yes Chmn. Dodd thanked the city for cleaning up the island on Fleming Street at the Sebastian Boulevard intersection. 4 Permit Application No. SETaN City of Sebastian .,f Development Order Application Applicant If not owner, written authorization notarized from owner is required) Name: SandCrest, LLC Address: 5070 N. Highway AIA, Suite C-1, Vero Beach, FL 32963 Phone Number: ( 772 ) 999 - 3494 FAX Number. ( ) E -Mail: admin@sandcrestfl.com Owner If different from applicant) Name: Same as Applicant Address: Phone Number: ( ) FAX Number: ( ) E -Mail: Title of permit or action requested: PUD Rezoning PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-1/2" BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM. A. Project Name (if applicable): SandCrest B. Site Information Address: Southwest comer of Powerline Road and Main Street Lot: Block: Unit: Subdivision: Indian River County Parcel #: 31380100003000000000.4/31380100000700000001.0/31380100000700000003.0 Zoning Classification: Future Land Use:Medium Density Residential (max.8 du/ac) RM -8 / RS -10 Low Density (5-Units/acre) Existing Use: Proposed Use: Vacant Single Family Residential C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach extra sheets if necessary): 74 Single Family Residences, Recreation Facility (Clubhouse with Pool) DATE RECEIVED: 11 113114 FEE PAID: $ 1a5-0.60 RECEIVED BY� e_k oo,Dl_7 RECEIVED NOV 13 2014 City of Sebastian Community Developmerr ^ Penn@Application No. D. Project Personnel: Agent: Name: Address Phone Number: ( ) FAX Number: ( ) E -Mail: Attorney: Name: Address Phone Number. ( ) FAX Number: ( ) E -Mail: Engineer: Name: Jodah B. Bittle, P.E., Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC Address 1717 Indian River Blvd Suite 201, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone Number. ( 772) 770 9622 FAX Number: ( 772) 770' 9496 E -Mail: Surveyor: Name: Meridian, Land Surveyors Address 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone Number: ( 772) 794 - 1213 FAX Number: ( 772) 794 - 1096 E -Mail: Ib6905(@.bellsouth.net Robert Votaw (Manager) BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: _ I AM THE OWNER _X— I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT ALL THE INFORMATION, MAPS, DATA AND/OR SKETCHES PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE ACCURATE AND TRUE TO T E eEWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ` � \ L SIGNATURE DATE SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BY FZobei t U O A cu j WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, THIS L.�L DAY OF iU CA -t n 20�t. NOTARY'S SIGNATURE W VM L' N PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY 4lPniinn ee COMMISSION NO./EXPIRATION ( e7 I I.M SEAL 4p/`""-' \ KAREN ANN MECHUNG 1 , MY COMMISSION AFF100821 �'+i' EXPIRES March 12, 2018 (407) 39"153__ FloddaN Sew1w.com Permit Application No. The following is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances, exceptions, and appeals. ]ME, _ THE OWNER(S) / X THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNERS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE City of Sebastian BOARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICATION. IME HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE ME MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD/COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING. THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT IS BEING SIGNED BY MENUS VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR PROMISES MADE, BY ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. z SIG 'ATURE DATE Sworn to and subscribed before who is personall known to c as idem I (cation, this I. day Notary's Signature Printed Name of Notary Commission No./Expiration Seal: ,�.�.. KAREN ANN MECHUNG °•' t 3 MY COMMISSION #FF100821 aoor� EXPIRES March 12, 2018 30"103 FlorldaNataryServlm,. Permit Application No. Supplemental Information Planned Unit Development, Rezoning Request 1. Proposed zoning: PUD(R) PUD(C) PUD(I) (PUD(MH) 2. Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan? If not, which one(s)? Yes, it is consistent. I 3. Is the proposed rezoning in conformance with applicable substantive requirements of the city of Sebastian Code of Ordinances? If not, which one(s)? Yes. it is in conformance. 4. What land use and development changes have occurred since the effective date of the comprehensive plan which are relevant to the proposed amendment? None. 5. Is the proposed rezoning compatible with the existing or future land uses of the city? If not, why not? Yes, it is compatible. Form CD -2012 Page 9 of 2 1 PUD rezoning Approved: 8/27137 1 Revision: i File Name: Sipudrez Permit Application No. 6. Are there adequate public facilities to serve the proposed land use? If not, which one(s) are not adequate? Yes. 7. Would the proposed rezoning result in a significant adverse impact on the natural environment? If so, describe the impact. No, it will not have an adverse impact. S. Would the proposed rezoning adversely affect the property values of the area, the general health, safety and welfare and impact the financial resources of the city? If so, describe how. No, it will not adversely affect. 9. Does the proposed rezoning result in an orderly development pattern? If not, describe. Yes, it does result in an orderly development pattern. 10. Attach the following: a. A verified statement showing each and every individual person having a legal and/or equitable ownership interest in the property upon which the application for rezoning is sought, except publicly held corporations, in which case the names and addresses of the corporate officers shall be sufficient. b. A list of the names and addresses of all owners of parcels of real property within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel to be considered. c. A survey and legal description of the property to be rezoned. j Form CD -2012 I Page 2 of 2 PUD rezoning Approved: 8/27/97 1 Revision: ____ __ _____ File Name: Sipudrez _ Permit Application No. City of Sebastian Development Order Application Applicant If not owner, written authorization notarized from owner is required) Name: SandCrest, LLC Address: 5070 N. Highway AIA, Suite C-1, Vero Beach, FL 32963 Phone Number: ( 772) 999 - 3494 FAX Number. ( ) E -Mail: admin@sandcrestfl.com Owner If different from applicant) Name: Same as Applicant Address: Phone Number: ( ) FAX Number: ( ) E -Mail: Title of permit or action requested: Planned Unit Development - [oijeefriLm- ?cAN PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-1/2' BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM. A. Project Name (if applicable): SandCrest B. Site Information Address: Southwest corner of Powerline Road and Main Street Lot: Block: Unit: Subdivision: Indian River County Parcel #: 31380100003000000000.4/31380100000700000001.0/31380100000700000003.0 Zoning Classification: Future Land Use: Medium Density Residential (max.8 du/ac) RM -8 / RS -10 Low Density (5 units/acre Existing Use: Proposed Use: Vacant Single Family Residential C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach extra sheets if necessarv)7 74 Single Family Residences, Recreation Facility (Clubhouse with Pool) DATE RECEIVED: Ll 13 / !' 1 FEE PAID: $ l asa RECEIVED BY: Mao11P RECEIVED NOV 13 2014 City of Sebastian C'C"'nity Developm"!"' I'. Permit Application No. D. Project Personnel: Agent: Name: Address Phone Number: ( ) FAX Number: ( ) E -Mail: Attome : Name: Address Phone Number. ( ) FAX Number. ( ) E -Mail: Engineer: Name: Jodah B. Bittle, P.E., Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC Address 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone Number. ( 772) 770 9622 FAX Number: ( 772) 770- 9496 E -Mail: jbittle@sbsengineers.com Surveyor: Name: Meridian, Land Surveyors Address 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone Number: ( 772) 794 - 1213 FAX Number: ( 772) 794 - 1096 E -Mail: Ib 905 bellsouth.net Robert Votaw (Manager) BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: —I AM THE OWNER X I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT ALL THE INFORMATION, MAPS, DATA AND/OR St=CHES PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE ACCURATE AND TRUE T THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SIGNATURE DATE SWORN TOAND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BY WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, THIS DAY OF 0 M 20 1 �. NOTARYS SIGNATURE - " PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY w\C 1. COMMISSION NO./EXPIRATION I a SEAL: F`~��, KAREN ANN MECHUNG MY COMMISSION #FF700821 �,� EXPIRES March 12, 2018 (�laesorsa FroriaaNmaryServke.com Permit Application No. The following is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances, exceptions, and appeals. I/WE, _ THE OWNER(S) / X THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE City of Sebastian BOARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICATION. I/WE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE I/WE MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD/COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING. THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT IS BEING SIGNED BY ME/US VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR PRO MADE, BY ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIALF Z THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. %� a � C SIGNATURE ff DATIt Sworn to and subscribed before me byd'Jeri who isers�onally known to me or produced as identificatio- n, t i�J� day of .20_1±. Notary's Signature Nvt a Printed Name of Notary Commission No./Expiration 1 Seal: RV,AIE N KAREN ANN MECHLING j MY COMMISSION #FF100821 EXPIRES March 12, 2018 (407)39"153 FbrldallotaryServimmm Per Application No. Supplemental Information Planned Unit Development, Conceptual Development Plan (ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.) 1 1. Is the proposed conceptual development plan consistent with the elements of the comprehensive plan? If not, which ones)? Yes, it is consistent. 4. Are there adequate public facilities to serve the proposed conceptual development plan? if not, which one(s) are not adequate? Yes Form CD -2093 Page 1 of 3 PUD Conceptual Plan Approved: 8/27/97 Revision: File Name: Si udcd Pe; Application No. 1 5, Would the proposed conceptual development plan result in a significant adverse impact on the natural environment? If so, describe the impact. No , i t wi 11 not have an adverse impact. 1 6. Would the proposed conceptual development plan adversely affect the property values of the area, the general health, safety and welfare and impact the financial resources of the city? If so, describe how. No , it will not adversely affect. 1 7. Does the proposed conceptual development plan result in an orderly I development pattern? If not, describe. Yes, orderly development pattern. it does result in an 8. Is the proposed conceptual development plan in conflict with the public interest? If so, describe: No, it is not in conflict. Foran CD -2013 Pa e 2 of 3 PUD Conceptual Plan Approved: 8127197 1 Revision: I File Name: Si udcd Per. 4,pplication No. 9. Attach the following: a. A list of the names and addresses of all owners of parcels of real property within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel to be considered. b. A vicinity map. c. A map(s) of existing conditions including existing easements, street, buildings, land uses, historical site, tree groupings, wetlands, water courses, contours, the names of the property owners and existing land uses and zoning for all contiguous property, and the location and width of all existing or platted streets, easements, drainage ways and utilities contiguous to the property. d. A development plan including land use, circulation, conceptual drainage plan, densities, and non-residential square footage. e. A statement of planning objectives. f. A proposed development schedule. g. An environmental impact statement h. A public facility impact statement. Form CD -2013 Page 3 of 3 PUD Conceptual Plan Approved: 8/27/97Revision: File Name: Si udcd t�'qp Rif r�. I r op,