Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20031015 - Agenda Item - Rezoning Requestarca SIRSM HOME Of PELICAN yIStA14D Citv of Sebastian, Florida Subject: First reading of Ordinance 0-03- 14; conceptual development plan and rezoning request from Agricultural (A-1) to Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD -R) for a proposed 63 -acre planned unit development situated along CR 510 south of CR 512, and known as Sebastian River Landings Unit H. by: Agenda No. o 3 , o qJ Department Origin: Gr wth Management Tracy E. Hass Date Submitted: October 15, 2003 For Agenda of. October 22, 2003 -T-xhibits: 0-03-14, Conceptual Plan, Staff Report, P&Z recommendation, Application. EXPENDITURE AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION REOUIRED:None None I REOUIRED: None SUMMARY Sebastian River Landings, LLC, recently filed an application for phase H of the Sebastian River Landings PUD located at the intersection of county roads 510 & 512. Phase 11 will be situated on land currently occupied by unincorporated, undeveloped citrus groves immediately west of the St. Sebastian River along CR. 510. Forte Macaulay Development Inc. has submitted an annexation request for the property, along with the requisite and accompanying conceptual development plan. Additionally, the property is currently zoned A-1 (Agricultural) with an L-1 (Low Density Residential, 3 units per acre) land use designation and the applicant wishes to re -zone the property PUD -R (planned unit development -residential), with a comprehensive land use designation of LDR (low density residential). The conceptual plan has been revised in accordance with direction provided by City Council, and now includes a total of 188 single-family lots on 62.827 acres, (60.99 acres of developable land), for a proposed density of approximately 2.99 units/acre. The low-density residential land use category permits a maximum of 5 units per acre. Additionally, proposed side yard setbacks have been increased from 5 feet to 7.5 feet. The main point of ingress and egress is located along the north central quadrant of the property, and provides immediate access to phase one of the subdivision. As the property is contiguous with phase I, the provision of providing two points of ingress and egress has been satisfied via the access points outlined in phase I connecting directly to 510, with another access point along 512. The Planning and Zoning Commission held the required public hearing and forwarded a recommendation for approval of said request during a public hearing held on July 17, 2003. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends the City Council pass this ordinance on first reading. Upon receipt of comments from DCA relative to the comprehensive plan amendment, this ordinance will be scheduled for a second reading and final public hearing. "Move to pass Ordinance No. 0-03-14 on first reading and schedule a second reading and final public hearing at a later date when the final reading of Ordinance No. 0-03-13 occurs." ■� X00 0 0 tea:: +� �� ■P� � oo�eoq�e®e oo��w 0 • see �eessawee�se ees ees _�� MIM MM �eeeeeeee�a�ON M :M �eeseeeee • S��N� O,�� MM M Sebastian River EM (n Landings es��aa�®sassy.. - '• � ������©�������� �� � .ees O M 0 �*:�a�►���`�` � tea\ I >, �0� ��� Ss �� MM IMM 11 0 < 2 3. 4. an of SEBASTKN NOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Growth Management Department Conceptual Development Plan Planned Unit Development Approval Application Staff Report Project Name: Sebastian River Landings Unit II. Requested Action: Conceptual Development Plan Approval. Project Location a. Address: East of CR 510 and west of the Sebastian River, south of Sebastian River Landings and Lateral D canal. b. Legal: The South 512.13 feet of the South one-half of the Northeast one- quarter of the Northwest one-quarter, and the South 512.13 feet of the South one-half of the Northwest one-quarter of the Northwest one-quarter, less the West 200 feet, all in Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 38 East. And that portion of the North one-half of the North one half of the Northwest one-quarter of Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, lying South of the drainage canal located in, upon and under the land upon which an easement was granted to Graves Brothers Company, a Florida corporation, by easement recorded in Deed Book 28, page 435, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. And that part of the South one-half of the Northeast one-quarter of the Northwest one-quarter of Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, less the South 512.13 feet thereof. And that part of the South one-half of the Northwest one-quarter of Northwest one-quarter of Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, less the West 200 feet and the South 512.13 feet thereof. C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 26-31-38-00000-3000-00004.0 26-31-38-00000-3000-00005.0 Project Owner: Sebastian River Landings, L.L.C. 1688 W. Hibiscus Blvd. Melbourne, Florida 32901 (321) 953-3300 fax: 321- 984-2890 5. Project Agent: Mr. Timothy Jelus, Sebastian River Landings, L.L.C. N Project Engineer: Randy L. Mosby, P.E. 245514 th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 772-569-0035 fax: 772-778-3617 7. Project Surveyor: William Mott Land Surveying, Inc. 1275 S. Patrick Drive, Suite H Satellite Beach, Florida 32937 321-773-4323 fax: 321-777-4795 701 Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: The proposed Sebastian River Landings Unit Two PUD is currently unincorporated, undeveloped citrus groves immediately south of the recently annexed Sebastian River Landings P.U.D., East of CR 510, west of the St Sebastian River and northeast of the Sebastian River High School. Sebastian River Landings, L.LC has submitted an annexation request for the property, along with the requisite and accompanying conceptual development plan. Additionally, the property is currently zoned A-1 (Agricultural) with an L-1 (Low Density Residential, 3 units per acre) land use designation and the applicant wishes to re -zone the property PUD -R (planned unit development -residential), with a comprehensive land use designation of LDR (low density residential). The conceptual plan outlines a total of 7 blocks containing 188 total single-family lots on 62.827 acres (60.99 acres of developable land), for a density of approximately 2.99 units per acre. The low-density residential land use category permits a maximum of 5 units per acre. b. Current Zoning: A-1 (County Agricultural) C. Adjacent Properties Zoning Current Land Use North: A-1 (Co.) & Single Family/Vacant PUD -R East: RS -10 Single Family/Vacant South: A-1 Vacant West: A-1 Vacant Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: 62.827 acres (2) Current Land Use(s): (3) Soil: (4) Vegetation: (5) Flood Hazard: (6) Water Service: (7) Sanitary Sewer Service: Future Land Use C/I (Co.) & LDR LDR L-1 (County) L-1 (County) citrus groves Electra, Riviera, Wabasso citrus trees Zone A, AE, X Indian River County Utilities Indian River County Utilities 2 (8) Parks: North County Park —'/ mile (9) Police/Fire: Sebastian Police 4 miles County Fire — 2 miles 9. Conceptual Development Plan criteria a. Evidence of unified control of the proposed planned development and the associated agreements required. yes b. Ownership Requirements. provided C. Compliance with comprehensive plan. (1) Future Land Use: Consistent (2) Traffic Circulation: Consistent (3) Housing: Consistent (4) Public Facilities: Consistent (5) Coastal Management: Consistent (6) Conservation: Consistent (7) Recreation and Open Space: Consistent d. Compliance with applicable ordinances. Consistent e. Land use compatibility. The adjacent properties surrounding this site are designated for low density residential. The proposed PUD is low density residential, so as to be consistent and compatible with the surrounding land use designations. There will be a negligible impact caused by the proposed land use change due to the similarity of the existing uses in the area. f. Adequate public facilities. Provided — public utilities (water, wastewater) will be incorporated in the development of the proposed PUD and on-site stormwater tracts are also incorporated in the proposal. g. Natural environment. The proposed PUD will be required to contain 2 acres of park space or open recreation areas to satisfy the minimum standards as established by the comprehensive plan. The preliminary development plan will be required to demonstrate proper compliance with this regulation. 3 h. Economic effects. The property is currently not within the corporate limits of the City of Sebastian. Annexation will provide an additional 62.827 +/- acres of land area (including 1.88 acres of the existing drainage canal) and a maximum of 188 residential units, which will create an expanded tax base for the City of Sebastian. i. Orderly Development: The proposed land use change is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the proposed land use change provides for orderly development given the location of the site adjacent to similar residential property and availability of sufficient public facilities and access. j. Public interest. The City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan outlines the necessity to incorporate and/or annex enclave parcels within incorporated cities. Although the property in question is not an enclave, it is adjacent to the urban service area, and would most likely be better served by municipal services. The current use of the property is for agricultural purposes. The City does not permit agricultural use and the proposed change to a single-family development is consistent with the future goals and objectives of the City of Sebastian. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed annexation/land use change is not in conflict with public interest. k. Other matters. The requested land use change and accompanying rezoning will provide consistency with the future land use map of the comprehensive plan. Annexation of the parcels will demonstrate compliance with goals and objectives as outlined in the comprehensive plan for annexation of properties lying immediately adjacent to the urban service area. The proposed land use change will create a slightly greater impact on water, wastewater, drainage and solid waste facilities 10. Contents of Conceptual Development Plan: a. Vicinity map: provided b. Property boundaries: provided C. existing conditions: provided d. Development plan. provided (1) land use: not provided (2) Circulation: provided — the conceptual roadway design plan has been incorporated within the plan. The plan incorporates one "primary" access point, which is through the Sebastian River Landings P.U.D. As the name "Sebastian River Landings Unit Two P.U.D." implies, this will be an additional phase of the previously approved subdivision, which has direct access to both CR 512 and CR 510. (3) Conceptual drainage plan: provided (4) Densities: provided (5) Nonresidential square footage: none e. Written material: (1) Planning objectives: provided — The intent of the project owner is to create a Planned Unit Development containing single-family lots. This is proposed to be the second phase of Sebastian River Landings P.U.D. The designation of a property as a PUD is intended to promote creation of a self-sustaining development containing both residential and neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed PUD is in keeping with that objective. The proposed Sebastian River Landings Unit Two PUD demonstrates compliance with proper planning practices for incorporating a housing mix needed within the City. Additionally, the proposed is consistent with future planning objectives for the City concerning annexation of parcels of land immediately adjacent to the urban service area. (2) Development schedule: start construction December 2003 end construction December 2004 (3) Environmental impact statement: The existing site has historically been used as a grove. There are seven ditch areas identified on the survey, two of which traverse the center of the property. One wetland area consisting of .498 acres ± has been identified on the northeast corner of the site. Several lakes are proposed for utilization as stormwater retention. These lakes will be interconnected and protect against direct discharge of surface runoff by utilizing natural drainage concepts. These stormwater managerial practices will have a beneficial impact on the water resources in the area, including the opportunity for recharge. Landscape buffers will be established to provide both noise and sight buffers. Whenever possible, existing trees within the project will be maintained. (4) Public facilities impact statement: The Sebastian River Landings Unit Two PUD will connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by Indian River County. (a) Quantity of wastewater generated; Wastewater generated will be at 250 G.P.D. per unit (188) 47,000 G.P.D. (b) Description of proposed areas will _ be required as an development plan. recreational facilities; Recreation essential element of the preliminary (c) Quantity of potable water required; Potable water will be 250 G.P.D. per unit (188) 47,000 G.P.D. 5 (d) Estimated number of school age children expected within the development: Estimated 2 children per household = 376 children — this figure is based on historical averages. (e) Estimated property tax and/or sales tax revenue generated by the project by phase; and $2,500 per unit x 188 units = $470,000.00 (f) Any other positive or negative public facility impact. In addition, the statement shall also include all public facilities impact information that may be submitted as part of the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) review process, as applicable. Sebastian River Landings Unit will connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by Indian River County. 11. Open space and landscaped areas: The proposed PUD will be required to contain 2 acres of park space or open recreation areas to satisfy the minimum standards as established by the comprehensive plan. The preliminary development plan shall demonstrate proper compliance with this regulation. 12. City Engineer's review: The City Engineering Department has not raised any objections to the conceptual development plan. The Engineering Department will perform a more detailed analysis and review during the construction phase. 13. Other Matters: The requested rezoning and accompanying land use change will provide consistency with the future land use map of the comprehensive plan. Annexation of the parcels will demonstrate compliance with goals and objectives as outlined in the comprehensive plan for annexation of properties immediately adjacent to the urban service area. The proposed conceptual development plan will create a slightly greater impact on water, wastewater, drainage and solid waste facilities. 14. Analysis: The proposed Sebastian River Landings Unit Two PUD is currently unincorporated, undeveloped citrus groves immediately south of the recently annexed Sebastian River Landings P.U.D., East of CR 510, west of the St Sebastian River and northeast of the Sebastian River High School. Sebastian River Landings, L.LC has submitted an annexation request for the property, along with the requisite and accompanying conceptual development plan. Additionally, the property is currently zoned A-1 (Agricultural) with an L-1 (Low Density Residential, 3 units per acre) land use designation and the applicant wishes to re -zone the property PUD -R (planned unit development -residential), with a comprehensive land use designation of LDR (low density residential). The conceptual plan outlines a total of 7 blocks containing 188 total single- family lots on 60.99 acres, for a density of approximately 2.99 units per acre. - C: 15. Conclusion: The proposed PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code and Code of Ordinances. 16. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Sebastian River Landings Unit Two P.U.D. Conceptual Development Plan with the following conditions: The land use change shall be conditioned upon receipt of annexation approval by the City Council. o t.5 v3 PR BY DATE 7 arc or SEBASTKN NOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Growth Management Department Rezoning Application - Staff Report 1. Project Name: Sebastian River Landings Unit II. 2. 3. 4. 5. C: Requested Action: Rezoning from A-1 to PUD -R Project Location a. Address: East of CR 510, south and adjacent to Sebastian River Landings PUD phase I. b. Legal: See Survey C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 26-31-38-00000-3000-00004.0 26-31-38-00000-3000-00005.0 Project Owner: Sebastian River Landings, LLC 1688 W. Hibiscus Blvd. Melbourne, Florida 322901 (321) 953-3300 fax: 321- 984-2890 Project Agent: Project Engineer: Bruce Moia, P.E. 245514 th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 772-569-0035 Same as above fax: 772-778-3617 7. Project Surveyor: William Mott Land Surveying, Inc. 1275 S. Patrick Drive, Suite H Satellite Beach, Florida 32937 321-773-4323 fax: 321-777-4795 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: Sebastian River Landings, LLC, recently filed an application for phase II of the Sebastian River Landings PUD located at the intersection of county roads 510 & 512. Phase II will be situated on land currently occupied by unincorporated, undeveloped citrus groves immediately west of the St. Sebastian River along CR. 510. Forte Macaulay Development Inc. has submitted an annexation request for the property, along with the requisite and accompanying conceptual development plan. Additionally, the property is currently zoned A-1 (Agricultural) with an L-1 (Low Density Residential, 3 units per acre) land use 1 designation and the applicant wishes to re -zone the property PUD -R (planned unit development -residential), with a comprehensive land use designation of LDR (low density residential). The conceptual plan outlines a total of 188 total single-family lots on 62.827 acres, (60.99 acres of developable land), for a proposed density of approximately 2.99 units/acre. The low-density residential land use category permits a maximum of 5 units per acre. The main point of ingress and egress is located along the north central quadrant of the property, and provides immediate access to phase one of the subdivision. As the property is contiguous with phase I, the provision of providing two points of ingress and egress has been satisfied via the access points outlined in phase I connecting directly to 510, with another access point along 512. b. Current Zoning: A-1 (County — Agriculture) C. Adjacent Properties Zoning Ctirr _nt I and t1sp Future Land Ilse North: A-1 (Co.) & Single Family/Vacant C/1 (Co.) & PUD -R LDR East: RS -10 Single Family/Vacant LDR South: A-1 Vacant L-1 (County) West: A-1 Vacant L-1 (County) d. Site Characteristics (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Total Acreage: Current Land Use(s): Soil: Vegetation: Flood Hazard: Water Service: 60.99 acres Citrus Goves Electra, Riviera, Wabasso Citrus Trees Zone A, AE, X Indian River County Utilities Sanitary Sewer Service: Indian River County Utilities Parks: North County Park -'/4 mile Police/Fire: Sebastian Police 4 miles County Fire — 2 miles 9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency a. Future Land Use: L-1 (County — 3 units/acre) 2 b. Level of Service (1) Traffic: The proposed will create an ADT of 1,899 Trips (188 units x 10.1). Therefore, there will be an increased demand on the existing roadway network. However, CR 510 & CR 512 are operating well below capacity, and CR 512 is planned for 4-laning to 1-95. Phase I of the subdivision incorporates two "primary" access points; one of which will be a direct access to CR 512 to the north, the other a direct access to CR - 510 to the west. (2) Potable Water: Applicant will be required to connect to county utilities, as they are currently available. Therefore, this creates a positive impact by reducing the number of future potable wells. (3) Wastewater: Applicant will be required to connect to county utilities, as they are currently available. Therefore, this creates a positive impact by reducing the number of future septic systems. (4) Stormwater: The level of service standard is the same for all development; therefore, no greater impact is expected by the proposed rezoning. (5) Recreation: The proposed PUD will be required to contain 2 acres of park space or open recreation areas to satisfy the minimum standards as established by the comprehensive plan. The preliminary development plan will be required to demonstrate proper compliance with this regulation. (6) Solid Waste: There will be an increased demand on solid waste as the property is currently used as a citrus grove. 10. Conformance with Code of Ordinances: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Code of Ordinances. 11. Changed Conditions: Existing site is an inactive citrus grove, with proposed change to single-family residential. 12. Land Use Compatibility: The adjacent properties to the north, south and east are designated for low density residential, while the properties immediately west are designated for commercial use. There will be a negligible impact caused by the proposed land use change due to the similarity of the existing uses in the area. 13. Adequate Public Facilities: Provided — public utilities (water, wastewater) will be incorporated within the development of the proposed PUD, and on-site stormwater tracts are also incorporated in the proposal. 14. Natural Environment: The proposed PUD will be required to contain 2 acres of park 3 space or open recreation areas to satisfy the minimum standards as established by the comprehensive plan. The preliminary development plan will be required to demonstrate proper compliance with this regulation. 15. Economic Effect: provided — The property is currently not within the corporate limits of the City of Sebastian. Annexation will provide an additional 61+/- acres of land area and a maximum of 188 residential units, which in turn creates an expanded tax base for the City of Sebastian. 16. Orderly Development: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the proposed land use change provides for orderly development given the location of the site adjacent to residential/commercial property and availability of sufficient public facilities and access. 17. Public Interest: The City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan outlines the necessity to incorporate and/or annex enclave parcels within incorporated cities. Although the property in question is not an enclave, it is adjacent to the urban service area, and would most likely be better served by municipal services. The current use of the property is for agricultural purposes. The City does not permit agricultural use and the proposed change to a single- family and commercial development is consistent with the future goals and objectives of the City of Sebastian. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed annexation/land use change is not in conflict with public interest. 18. Other Matters: The requested re -zoning and accompanying land use change will provide consistency with the future land use map of the comprehensive plan. Annexation of the parcels will demonstrate compliance with goals and objectives as outlined in the comprehensive plan for annexation of properties lying adjacent to the urban service area. The proposed land use change will create a slightly greater impact on water, wastewater, drainage and solid waste facilities. . 19. Analysis: Sebastian River Landings, LLC, recently filed an application for phase II of the Sebastian River Landings PUD located at the intersection of county roads 510 & 512. Phase II will be situated on land currently occupied by unincorporated, undeveloped citrus groves immediately west of the St. Sebastian River along CR. 510. Forte Macaulay Development Inc. has submitted an annexation request for the property, along with the requisite and accompanying conceptual development plan. Additionally, the property is currently zoned A-1 (Agricultural) with an L-1 (Low Density Residential, 3 units per acre) land use designation and the applicant wishes to re -zone the property PUD -R (planned unit development -residential), with a comprehensive land use designation of LDR (low density residential). The conceptual plan outlines a total of 188 total single-family lots on 62.827 acres, (60.99 acres of developable land), for a proposed density of approximately 2.99 units/acre. The low-density residential land use category permits a maximum of 5 units per acre. The main point of ingress and egress is located along the north central quadrant of the property, and provides immediate access to phase one of the subdivision. As the property is contiguous with phase I, the provision of providing two points of ingress and egress has been satisfied via the access points outlined in phase I connecting directly to 510, with another access point along 512. 20. Conclusion: The requested rezoning from A-1 (County) to PUD -R is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code and Code of Ordinances. 21. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for the requested re -zoning with the following conditions: 1. The re -zoning shall be conditioned upon receipt of annexation approval by the City Council. 5 d DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 17, 2003 currently in use does not have the proper years of the code. Chmn. Smith explained that when plans are received the commission would like to be advised if the project coming before them should have fire sprinklers. If the project does not require sprinklers, could a notation be made? Capt. Diggs explained how the county's ordinance was developed. He added that sprinklers was not an item they thought should be required on a site plan because site plans are speculative as to the type of construction or occupancy. There are too many variables as to the type, height and size of the building as well as material and use for the proposed structure to make an accurate determination if sprinklers will be required. Many site plans are speculative and until the actual building plans are reviewed would the fire department be able to make an accurate recommendation of fire prevention. It was agreed that Capt. Diggs would e-mail to Tracy Hass information on the Fire Sprinkler Incentive Act. C. Public Hearing — Recommendation to City Council — Request for Land Use Amendment and Rezoning (for Proposed Annexation) — Sebastian River Landings Unit II — CR 510 — 62.83 Acres — Proposed PUD -R Chmn. Smith opened the public hearing at 8:43 p.m. Present was Mr. Tim Jelus, 1688 W. Hibiscus Blvd., Melbourne, Florida. This is a continuation of Mr. Davis's property south of the lateral B canal and is an abandoned orange grove. The proposal is for a single-family residential community with access to phase I of the subdivision. It is currently zoned A-1 in the county. Mr. Hass added that the project consists of a little over 62 acres. What is being reviewed tonight is the land use and zoning for the property. He referenced the conceptual plan showing street design and storm water lakes. Also, it does not have actual frontage on CR 510 because of the drainage right-of-way that bi-sects the property. As the code does require two means of ingress and egress, this being the second phase of development this property does have the two points of ingress and egress at CR 510 and CR 512. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the 50 Ft. wide lots and Mr. Stringer said that would come up at the next stage with negotiations on the PUD. Mr. Stringer said the more logical interpretation would be the way we've been doing it which is you show what a typical lot would be, which they have done, and then later on you will have to stipulate. Mr. Jelus interjected that what they are trying to do is have the 50 Ft. wide lots adjacent to the commercial component or 510/512 corridors of the project and then the 70 Ft. lots adjacent to the river and the lateral B canal. Mr. Allocco was concerned about the lot size. Mr. Stringer interjected that at this point the commission is establishing density, block layouts, drainage area to be used, what a typical lot will be. Negotiation on the lot sizes, particularly width, will take place during the application and approval process for a PUD. Mr. Jelus added that they have curb and gutter sections that require lakes reducing the runoff that's going directly into the south prong currently. Water and sewer is costlier than well and septic, underground power instead of overhead power. Mr. Hass added that the density is what is under review for approval and the applicant cannot increase the density beyond the five units per acre. 5 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 17, 2003 Ms. Monier was also concerned about the density and asked if there would be a Phase III and Mr. Jelus was unsure of that at this time. He added that there are three 40 -acre tracts to the south of this application and couldn't speak for the current owners what the future of that land will be. Chmn Smith reiterated this is going to be an annexation into the city and the city will govern the parameters. Mr. Hass confirmed this statement. Chmn Smith closed the public hearing at 9:39 p.m. Motion by Monier/Smith "I make a motion to recommend to city council approval of the land use amendment from L-1 to LDR based on conversations and further negotiations as discussed." Roll Call: Mr. Allocco no Chmn Smith yes The vote was 3-2. Motion passed. Motion by Smith/Faille Mr. Faille yes Mr. Mahoney no Ms. Monier yes "I make a motion to recommend to city council the approval the zone change from A-1 to PUD -R for Sebastian River Landings Phase II." Roll Call: Mr. Faille yes Mr. Allocco no Mr. Mahoney no Chmn Smith yes Ms. Monier yes The vote was 3-2. Motion passed. D. Public Hearing — Recommendation to City Council — Ordinance 0- 03-03 — Display of Building Numbers and Renumbering of Section 54-2-7.20 Chmn Smith opened the public hearing at 9:44 p.m. Mr. Stringer said the code enforcement officers recommended this provision be amended because it is very important to have building numbers that can readily seen by emergency personnel. Presently code enforcement officers must allow 30 days in order for a home or business owner to obtain and display proper numbers on their property. This ordinance shortens that time frame to 14 days. [Churn Smith closed the public hearing at 9:47 p.m.] Motion by Monier/Smith "I make a motion to recommend to city council the approval of Ordinance 0-03-03, display of building numbers and renumbering of Section 54-2-7.20." Roll Call: Chmn Smith yes Mr. Mahoney yes Ms. Monier yes Mr. Allocco yes Mr. Faille yes The vote was 5-0. Motion passed. Cei 04/21/2003 22:44 7727783617 City of Sebastian Development Order Application MOSBY ASSOC Permit Application No, )4:73%0 7 Received MAY 2003 P&Z Gra Wth Mgt ' .. ^ Applicant if not owner, written authorization notarized from owner is required) Name: SEBASTIAN RIVER LANDINGS LLC Address; 1688 W. HIBISCUS BLVD., MELBOURNE, FL 32901 Phone Number; 321 953-3300 Fax Number. 321 984-2890 E -Mail: Owner if different from applicant) Name: Address: Phone Number. IFAY Number. E -Mail: -yp® of permit or action requested: Annexation, Comp. Plan Amendment & Rezoning PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC, SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8 1/2" x 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM. A. Project's Name (if applicable): SEBASTIAN RIVER LANDINGS - UNIT II B. Site Information Address: SOUTHEAST CORER OF CR 512 $ CR 510 Lot: Block: Unit: Subdivision: Indian River County Parce! #: 26-31-38-00000-3000-00004.0, 5.0 SEE LEGAL Zoning Classification: Future Land Use: REQUESTED PUD -R RESIDENTIAL Existing Use: Proposed Use: VACANT RESIDENTIAL C. Description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach extra sheets If necessary): ANNEXATION FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT. DATE RECEIVED: FEE PAID:QHS J 111 b +,� C RECEIVED 8Y: Form CD -2001 Page 1 of 3 Develo ment [ReApproved: 08-27-97vision: G;I- rkl- ,,,. r,, 22:44 7727783617 MOSBY ASSOC PAGE 03 D. Project Personnel: Agent: MR. BRUCE MOIA, P.E. Name: MOSBY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Address: 2455 14TH AVENUE, VERO BEACH, 1=L 32960 Phone Number. 772 569-0035 117ax Number: 772 778-3617 E-Mail.- Attorney: -Mail:Attorne : N/A Name: Address: Phone Number:Fax Number. E -Mail: Engineer: MR. BURCE MOIA, P.E. Name: MOSBY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Address: 2455 14TH AVENUE, VERO BEACH, FL 32960 Phone Number: 772 569-0035 Fax Number: 772 778-3617 E -Mail: Surveyor. MR. WILLIAM MOTT Name: WILLIAM MOTT LAND SURVEYING, INC. Address: 1275 S. PATRICK DR., SUITE H. SATELLITE BEACH, FL 32937 Phone Number. 321 773-4323 Fax Number: 321 777-4795 E -Mail: I, MR. TIMOTHY JELLS, BEIN UR T DUPLY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: I AM THE OWNER X I AA THE LEGAL REPRESE E OF E OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICATIONAARO AC THATND UE TOT E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. PROVIDED IN THIS Signature -5ate Sworn to and subscribed lefore me by Who is personally known to me or produced Z23as identification, is --" day of 200 3 NOTARY'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME OF NOTARYELIZA NNEDY COMMISSION NO,/EXPIRATION Notary Public,of Florida SEAL: MY Comm exp, , 31, 2004 Comm. No. CC 964859 Form CD -2001 �Page of 3 Development Application A�pQroved: 08 27 97Revision. File Name: DOA 04/21/2003 22:44 7727783617 MOSBY ASSOC PAGE 04 The following Is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (inicuding rezoning), site plans, conditions use permits, special use permits, variances, exceptions, and appeals. IANE, , THE OWNER(S) X THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN (THE BOARD/COMMISSION) TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICATION, INVE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE INVE MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FORM ANY BOARD.COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDUREAL OR SUBSTANTICE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OT THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING. THIS WAIVER AND CO T I EING SIGNED BY ME/US VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLI R PROMI ES,DatADE, BY ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF S ASTI;Q,N. Signature Date Sworn to and subscribed before me by Who is personally known to me or produced as identification, this ,_),q0"�day of 12003 NOTARY'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY COMMISSION NO,/EXPIRATION TH E. K ENNFny SEAL: Nawry—public, State of Florida My comm. exp. Aug. 31, 2004 Comm. No. CC 964859 orm CD -2001 Pa e 3 of 3 Develo ment Application roved: 08-27-97 Revision: File Name: DOA Permit Application No. Supplemental Information EZL�I i N (s— ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES, IF NECESSARY. X 1. Proposed Zoning: PUD -R X 2. Explain how the proposed rezoning is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. ZONING IS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CONSISTENT WITH COMP. PLAN X 3. Explain how the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the applicable substantive requirements of the City of Sebastian Code of Ordiances. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CONFORMS WITH CODE. X 4. What land use and development changes have occurred since the effective date of the comprehensive plan which are relevant to the proposed amendment? NONE. X 5. Explain how the proposed rezoning is compatible with the existing or future land uses of the City. SAME ZONING AS ADJACENT PARCEL. X 6. Are there adequate public facilities to serve the proposed land use? YES. Received w N MAY � � % cn NC)�'� Growth Mgnf, ti Form CD -2017 I Pae 1 of 2 =Rezoning I Approved: 08-27-97 Revision: File Name: SIREZONE PXZ X 7. Explain how the proposed rezoning will not result in a significant adverse impact on the natural environment. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS WILL REMAIN «3 X 10. Attach the following: X a. A verified statement showing each and every indidual person having a legal and/or equitable ownerhsip interest in the property upon which the application for rezoning is sought except publicly held corporations, in which case the names and addresses of the corporate officers shall be sufficient. X b. A list of the names and addresses of all owners of parcels of real property within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel to be considered. X c. A survey and legal description of the property to be rezoned. Form CD -2017 I Page 2 of 2 Rezoning Approved: 08-27-97 Revision: File Name: SIREZONE