HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 - Comp Plan Amendment Response1225 MAIN STREET r SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (772) 589-5537 ■ FAX (772) 589-2566
July 22, 2004
Ms. Jamie Coker
Division of Community Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shummard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Re: DCA Ref. # Sebastian 04-1 — Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment.
Dear Ms. Coker:
Please accept this letter as the City's official response to the Department of Community Affairs ORC
report for the above referenced project dated April 05, 2004.
On June 02, 2004 the City Council of the City of Sebastian approved the following ordinances:
Ordinance No: 0-03-16 commonly known as Cross Creek Subdivision (map reference #1)
Ordinance No: 0-03-24 commonly known as Sebastian Crossings (map reference #4)
Ordinance No: 0-03-26 commonly known as River Oaks Preserve (map reference #5)
Ordinance No: 0-03-20 commonly known as Ashbury Subdivision (map reference #3)
Additionally, on July 14, 2004, the City Council approved the following ordinance:
Ordinance No: 0-03-18 commonly known as The Spencer Project (map reference #2)
Furthermore, Ordinance No. 0-03-22 commonly known as Roseland Satellite Tract was an element of
the original submittal, but was not approved by the City Council and is therefore not included in this
transmittal.
The above referenced Ordinances authorize large-scale amendments to the Comprehensive Plan adjusting
the Future Land Use Map to LDR (Low Density Residential, 5 units per acre) for certain property located
within the corporate limits of the City of Sebastian, as outlined within the accompanying updated Future
Land Use Map. Attached please find the following:
Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment;
A copy of the adoption ordinances; and
A statement indicating the relationship of additional changes made to the above referenced
transmittal in response to the Department's ORC report.
a
The following statements are in response to comments and objections raised by the Department's ORC
report:
Objection 1- Public Facilities Data and Analysis:
The amendment is not supported by data and analysis which identifies that the level of service will
be achieved and maintained for sewer and potable water services, and solid waste collection.
Attached hereto, please find a memo from Robert A. Morrell, PE, PBS&J, detailing current and future
capacity within the County Utility system. Please note the memo clearly states, "based on current and
planned expansions and projected capacity, we believe that IRCU will be able to accommodate the
planned development in the areas to be annexed."
Objection 2- Environmental Data and Analvsis:
The amendment is not supported by data and analysis which identifies the extent and type of
environmentally sensitive habitats on the Ashbury Subdivision Parcel. There is no analysis, which
identifies how these areas will be protected from development encroachment and subsequent
habitat loss.
Attached hereto is a completed Environmental Site Assessment, Wetlands, Scrub Jay, and Gopher
Tortoise Survey, of the Ashbury Subdivision site, as prepared by G.K. Environmental, Inc.
Said report concludes that only one "species of special concern' exists on the subject site, which is the
gopher tortoise. A state regulatory "Incidental Take" permit will be required prior to permitted land
clearing activities. Additionally, three (3) isolated wetlands exist on site, and all have been flagged and
verified by the St. Johns River Water Management District. The wetlands are isolated from waters of the
state and should not require an Army Corps of Engineers permit. Upland buffers, as required by
SJRWMD will be required for preserving wetland boundaries.
Comments:
Residential Need.
There is no current population projection or assessment of vacant lands to evaluate residential
need. The latest vacant land use map is circa 1991, as are the latest population projections.
Without current data, it is difficult to accurately assess residential need. The 1998 adopted EAR
provides some data with regard to housing projections, but this data is almost ten years old. The
EAR identified a projected affordable housing needs deficit of 1,659 units. This indicates a need
for additional multi -family units in the interior of the City. The subject amendments do not
address multi -family need. The amendment should be supported by a needs analysis, confirming
the need for additional acreage to meet single-family needs and to address how the City intends to
address multi -family needs.
Although not required until 2010, the City of Sebastian has undertaken the task of updating (rewriting)
the Comprehensive Development Plan, which will incorporate all data as outlined above. Residential
need within the community historically has been market driven, with market forces dictating numbers
and types of housing products. Although The City is aware of the identifiable need for additional multi-
family units within the community, single-family demand has outweighed that of multi -family therefore
creating a disproportionate mix. However, the City is addressing the need by supporting positive and
mutually beneficial developments such as three separate projects recently approved that incorporate a
total of 210 multi -family units, 150 of which are within a State funded affordable housing development
2
N
known as Pelican Isles. Further to this, the City is currently evaluating a rezoning request within an
existing PUD permitting multi -family (8-units/acre) so as to provide infill development of additional
units within the community. In addition to the above, the City has approved the following infill multi-
family and affordable housing projects since 1998:
Bruno's Apartments (Office/Retail Conversion)
6 units
Fischer Apartments
8 units
Pelican Gardens
53 units
Grace's Landing
70 units
Sandhill Oaks
97 units
Total
234
Including all aforementioned projects, a total of 444 multi -family (affordable, assisted living and market
rate) units have been developed within Sebastian, thus addressing the City's multi -family need.
The City will continue to promote and support an appropriate housing mix to best serve its residents.
As stated within the context of this letter, and supporting documentation previously provided, the City of
Sebastian supports the land use amendments under review and requests affirmative confirmation from the
Department of Community Affairs in this respect.
Thank you for your continued assistance, and if you require additional information to complete your
review, please do not hesitate to contact me, or my staff, at (772) 589-5537.
Sincerely,
G�
T acy E. Hass
Director of Growth Management
Attachment(s)
cc: Michael J. Busha, AICP, Executive Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
Robert M. Keating, AICP, Community Development Director, Indian River County
St. Johns River Water Management District
Florida Department of State
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Department of Agriculture
3
Message
Tracy Hass
From: Morrell, Robert A. [RAMorrell@pbsj.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 10:10 AM
To: 'thass@cityofsebastian.org'; Mike Hotchkiss (mhotchkiss@ircgov.com)
Cc: Doan, Matthew A.; Holcomb, Pamela E.
Subject: Indian River County Plant capacity Projections
Tracy,
Page 1 of 1
At the request of Dorri Bosworth and Mike Hotchkiss we are providing you information
regarding water and wastewater service by Indian River County Utilities in the CR510
area. The following information was developed in the Draft Water and Wastewater
Master Plan prepared by PBS&J with Indian River County Utilities (IRCU):
The area in question is planned to be served by IRCU North service area for
water and the Combined Central Area for wastewater.
The current capacity and demands for the North Water Service Area are
approximately 3.53 MGD (Max Day) and 2.94 MGD (AADF) respectively. The
plant capacity is currently being expanded to 6.43 MGD (Max Day). The
corresponding capacities and projected flows planned for 2010 are 10.58 MGD
(Max Day) and 5.82 MGD respectively.
The current combined capacities and flow for the County's Combined Central
Wastewater Service Area are 2.85 and 2.17 MGD (AADF) respectively. The
corresponding capacities and projected flows planned for 2010 are 4.0 and 2.98
MGD (AADF)respectively.
Based on the current and planned expansions and projected capacity, we believe that
IRCU will be able to accommodate the planned development in the areas to be
annexed.
If this is unclear or needs further explanation, please call me or Mike Hotchkiss with the
County.
:..
Robert A. Morrell, PE, DEE
PBS&J
482 South Keller Road
Orlando, FL 32810
(407) 647-7275 ext. 384
(407) 806-4384 (Direct Line)
(407) 647-0624 (Fax)
(407) 257-0341 (Cell)
7/23/2004
October 6, 2004
Gulf Of
SEBAS
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (772) 589-5537 ■ FAX (772) 589-2566
Mr. Ray Eubanks
Plan Review Administrator
Division of Community Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shummard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Re: DCA Ref. # Sebastian 04-2 — Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment.
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
In response to Mr. Gauthier's letter dated August 5, 2004 concerning the above amendment package, the City of
Sebastian rescinded the following ordinances and readopted said amendments as a single ordinance (0-04-18,
attached hereto) on September 28, 2004. Please see attached memo from City Attorney Rich Stringer to Deputy
General Counsel David Jordan for further details with regards to this matter.
Ordinance No: 0-03-16 commonly known as Cross Creek Subdivision (map reference #1)
Ordinance No: 0-03-24 commonly known as Sebastian Crossings (map reference #4)
Ordinance No: 0-03-26 commonly known as River Oaks Preserve (map reference #5)
Ordinance No: 0-03-20 commonly known as Ashbury Subdivision (map reference #3)
Ordinance No: 0-03-18 commonly known as The Spencer Project (map reference #2)
Accordingly, the city requests continuance of the review for Sebastian 04-2 consistent with Section 163.3184,
Florida Statutes.
As stipulated within previously submitted supporting documentation, the City of Sebastian supports the land
use amendments under review and requests affirmative confirmation from the Department of Community
Affairs in this respect.
Thank you for your continued assistance, and if you require additional information to complete your review,
please do not hesitate to contact me, or my staff, at (772) 589-5518.
Sincerely,
racy E. Hass
Director of Growth Management
Attachment(s)
cc: Deputy General Counsel David Jordan
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP
TO DESIGNATE AN INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR ANNEXED
LAND; ADOPTING RECORD FROM PRIOR HEARINGS; AUTHORIZING
FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
EFFECT ON OTHER ENACTMENTS, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has considered the application of landowners of each of the subject
parcels for an amendment designating an initial land use for property to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided notice of the proposed Plan Amendment and
has conducted the required public hearings to receive citizen input; and
WHEREAS, the said public hearings were conducted with due notice in compliance with
law, and all parties were provided an opportunity to present record evidence and the hearings
were opened to receive citizen input; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the criteria identified in the Land
Development Code and Florida Statutes together with the findings and recommendations of its
staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the applicable provisions of the existing
Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed changes in the City
Comprehensive Land Use Map, are consistent with the existing comprehensive plan and the
future development goals of the City of Sebastian; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, mindful of the review schedule modifications under the
Department's Supplemental Order to Executive Order 04-192 relating to Hurricane Frances and
dated September 10, 2004, desires to adopt the amendments with a single ordinance for
transmission in a format preferred by the Department of Community Affairs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
Section 1. ADOPTION OF RECORD. The record as established pursuant to the
public adoption hearings held May 26, June 2, and July 14, 2004, for Ordinance No. 0-03-16,
Ordinance No. 0-03-18, Ordinance No. 0-03-20, Ordinance No. 0-03-24, and Ordinance No. 0-
03-26 is hereby incorporated and adopted as the record for this ordinance for all legal purposes.
Section 2. DESIGNATION. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map is
hereby amended to include and designate these properties as LDR (Low Density Residential):
A. The Cross Creek Parcel.
The South %i of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 30, Township 31 South, Range 39 East,
Indian River County, Florida, LESS the East 35 feet thereof for right-of-way AND
ALSO the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, excepting the West 5 acres thereof, in
Section 30, Township 31 South Range 39 East;
containing 115 acres more or less.
B. The Spencer Parcel.
The Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 26, Township 31 South Range 38
East, LESS the West 65.3 feet for Road Right of Way;
containing 38.27 acres more or less.
C. The Ashbury Parcel.
The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, and the South 534.5 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of
the Southwest 1/4, LESS the North 250 feet of the West 200 feet, all in Section 6,
Township 31 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida;
containing 56.25 acres more or less.
D. The Sebastian Crossings Parcel "B".
See attached Schedule 1
E. The River Oaks Preserve Parcel.
PARCEL 1:
West %s less the West 40 acres of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township 31
South, Range 38 East, less right-of-way for County Road 510;
together with
PARCEL 2:
The South 100 feet of the North '/� of the Northeast'/4 of Southeast'/4 and South %2
of Northeast '/4 of Southeast '/4 and Southeast '/4 of Southeast '/4; less canal right-
of-way: less South 40 feet for road right-of-way, Section 25, Township 31 South,
Range 38 East. Said parcel containing 60.74 acres more or less;
together with
PARCEL 3:
East '/2 of Northeast '/4 of Southwest '/4, Section 25, Township 31 South, Range 38
East, less canal right-of-way and that portion lying westward thereof;
together with
PARCEL 4:
North % of the West 40 acres and the East 10 acres of the South '/z of the West 40
acres of the Southeast '/4 of Section 25, Township 31 South, Range 38 East less
right-of-way for County Road 510;
containing a total of 152.21 acres more or less.
Section 3. DESIGNATION. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map shall
be amended to include and designate this property as CG (Commercial General):
Sebastian Crossings Parcel "A" as per attached Schedule 2
Section 4. TRANSMITTAL. The City Manager is directed to transmit a certified
copy hereof to the Department of Community Affairs as Sebastian 04-2 (previously 04-1)
Adopted Amendment, and proceed in accordance with the provisions of Fla. Stat. Chapter 163.
Section 5. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are repealed. More specifically, Ordinance No. 0-03-16, Ordinance No. 0-03-18, Ordinance No.
0-03-20, Ordinance No. 0-03-24, and Ordinance No. 0-03-26, are all hereby rescinded.
Section 6. EFFECT ON OTHER ENACTMENTS. Any and all enactments
having an effective date dependent upon the effectiveness of the ordinances rescinded in Section
5, above, or otherwise cross-referencing the same, shall instead in the same manner be effective
or otherwise dependent upon this ordinance, specifically including but not limited to the
following enactments:
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-07
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-09
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-03
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-11
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-13
Section 7. SEVERABILITY
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-08
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-10
ORDINANCE NO. 0-03-21
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-12
ORDINANCE NO. 0-04-14
In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall
determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be
affected and it shall be presumed that the City did not intend to enact such invalid provision. It
shall further be assumed that the City would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance
without said invalid provision, thereby causing the same to remain in full force and effect.
Section 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment shall be
the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration
Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(1)(b),
Fla. Stat., whichever is applicable. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the
Administration Commission, this amendment may nonetheless be made effective by adoption of
a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the
Department of Community Affairs.
The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember
The motion was seconded by Councilmember Heptinstall
vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Nathan B. McCollum
Vice -Mayor Joe Barczyk
Councilmember Ray Conigho
Councilmember Lisanne Monier
Councilmember Mike Heptinstall
aye
aye
aye
ave
aye
coniglio
and, upon being put to a
The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this 22nd day of
September, 2004.
ATTEST:
Sall; A. Maia�CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
Approved as to form and legality for
reliance by the City of Sebastian only:
Ricli Stringer, City Atto6i�y
SCHEDULE "1"
PARCEL 'B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (BY SURVEYOR,)
A parcel of land lying in Section 22, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Indian River
County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast comer of the Southeast 1l4 of said Section 22, said point
being the POIN7-OF-8 EG INNING of the herein described parcel; thence run North
89°47'24" West along the South line of the South 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of said
Section 22, said line also being the North line of lands described in Deed Book 0015,
Page 0305, of the Public records of said Indian River County, a distance of 209.00
Feet; thence South 00'12'1C" West along the West fine of said Deed Book 0015, Page
0305, a distance of 238.46 Feet; thence leaving said line run South 37'40''3" West,
a distance of 80.10 Feet to a point on the North line of said Deed Book 0015, Page
0305; thence North 89`47'50" West along the North line of said Deed Book 0015,
Page 0305, a distance of 448.66 Feet; thence South 00`12'10" West along the West
line of said Deed Book 0015, Page 0305, a distance of 317.03 Feet; thence South
82'19'08" West, a distance of 44-8.89 Feet; thence South 65°5741" West, a distance
of 588.45 Feet to the East line of lands described in O.R. Book 0697, Page 0901, of
the said Public records of Indian River County; thence North 00'08'39" East along
said East line, a distance of 1,586.21) Feet a point on the North line of the South 112
of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 22, said line also being the South line of lands
described in O.R. Book 1092, Pages 0616-0620, of the said Public records of Indian
River County; thence South 89'47'50" East along said North and South line, a
distance of1,691.79 Feet to a poirrt the East line of the Northeast 1l4 of said Section
22; thence South 0012623" West along said East line, a distance of 663.99 Feet to
the POINT -OF -BEGINNING.
Containing 45.691 Acres of land more or less.
SCHEDULE "2"
PARCEL 'A'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (BY SURVEYOR)
A parcel of land lying in Section 22, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Indian River
County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast comer of the Southeast 1/4 of.said Section 22; thence
South 00'12'10" West along the.East line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 22
said line also being the East line of lands described in Deed Book 0015, Page 0305,
of the Public records of said Indian River County, a distance of 867.71 Feet to the
POINT -OF -BEGINNING of the herein .described parcel; thence continue South
00'12'10" West along the said East line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 22, a
distance of 101.34 Feet to the Northeastcomer of Romar Subdivision, according to
the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 31, of the said Public records of
Indian River County; thence South 80°52'01" West along the North line of said
Roma rSubdivision, a distance of 715.88 Feetto the Northwest corner of said Romar
Subdivision; thence South 00'12'10" West along the West line of said Romar
Subdivision and it's Southerly. extension, a distance of 221.00 Feet to the North
Right -of -Way line of County Road 512 (as described in F.D.O.T. Maintenance Map
88040-2515); thence run along said North Right -of -Way line forthe following seven
calls: North 89'39'26" West, a distance of 161.45 Feet; thence North 89°5S'37' West,
a distance of 200.09 -Feat; thence North 39°42'12" West, a distance of 199.94 Feet;
thence North 88°33'28" West, a distance of 100.02 Feat; thence North 81'44'02" West,
a distance of 100.98 Feet; thence North .32'51'38" West, a distance of 100.72 Feet;
thence North 89'42'12" West, a distance of 119.41 Feet to the Southeast comer of
lands described in O.R. Book D697, Page 0901, of the said Public records of Indian
River County; thence North 00°08'39" East along the East line of said O.R. Book
0697, Page 0901, a distance of 355.08 Feet; thence leaving said East iine. run North
65°57'41" East, a distance of 588.45 Feet; thence North 82°19'08" East, a distance of
448.89 Feet to the West line of said Deed Book 0015, Page 0305; thence South
00`12'10" West along said West line, a distance of 364.81 Feet; thence North
8.0'52'01" East along the South line of said Deed Book 0015, Page 0305, a distance
of 715.88 Feet to the POJN T -OF -BEGINNING.
Containing 14.405 Acres of land more or less.
Tracy Hass
From:
Rich Stringer
Sent:
Friday, August 27, 2004 3:48 PM
To:
'david.jordan@dca.state.fl.us'
Cc:
'tcloud@gray-robinson.com'
Subject:
Sebastian04-02 (previously 04-1) adopted amendment
August 27, 2004
Dear David,
First of all, too bad that things didn't work out for me last year so we could work together there. I would have
enjoyed DCA, though I'm probably better off not dealing with Tallahassee headaches.
I have had discussions with Mr. Dennis of your legal staff concerning the Department's response to our
Sebastian 04-2 Amendment dated August 5 (signed by Mr. Gauthier). I understand that the Department has
interpreted the "two -per -year" amendment cycle as requiring that all the ordinances in each amendment package
be adopted the same day, and that this interpretation can only be modified at a high level in the chain of
command.
First of all, I believe there is nothing in the statutory language to prevent multiple hearing dates that are then
bundled for submittal as an amendment package. Even 9J -11.011(5)(b)2 seems to allow for multiple adoption
dates for FLUM amendments, other interpretations of this rule seem somewhat strained.
Beyond this, from a practical standpoint, if there are to be meaningful public hearings on the adoption of
amendments, then the single day rule will at times be impossible to follow. We went through over thirty hours
of public hearings on these amendments, which were tied in with annexations of land within the County's
adjoining urban service area. The agenda for one meeting, due to time limitations in the procedural rules of our
Council, had to be continued over to a second meeting date and it still was not completed.
Further, most rules of procedure provide for motions to reconsider. Two of the amendment items were subject to
reconsideration, which then involved a new public notice for the rehearing, which put these items off -kilter with
the amendment ordinances that were all originally bundled together. Under the interpretation proffered by the
Department, it would be necessary to rehear all the amendment ordinances just to have a reconsideration of one
item. By the way, one of these rehearings resulted from a 2 -2 split vote when a Council member was absent and
a tie equated to defeat of the ordinance.
In discussions with one of your planners, the only suggestion on how to deal with extensive hearings on
amendment ordinances was to hold the public hearing on each item but continue the matter to a future time for a
vote. Since you could not be sure when all the hearings would be concluded, this continuance would have to be
to a time uncertain. If you did that on a contentious matter, as these were, the public would go berserk. There
would be accusations that the council was waiting to vote until the opposition was absent, that back -room deals
were being made, etc. It is not a practical solution.
The letter of 8/5/04 suggests that we rescind the ordinances and do the hearings again. This was the most
volatile issue this City has faced in ten years and it ripped the community into two camps. Public hearings
would still take days to complete, so this suggestion is unworkable.
We did adopt the amendments in distinct individual ordinances as referenced in Rule 9J-11.009(7) and the
Department could have reviewed them piecemeal, which seemingly would have allowed us to adopt them
piecemeal. Is it too late to consider this procedure to be applicable?
Talking with Tom Cloud, we were thinking that the City could do a new ordinance that, while not rehearing the
merits of the amendments, would state that Ordinances x, y and z, are hereby deemed to be a single amendment
package and are, effective this date, authorized to be submitted to the Department and all appeal dates shall run
henceforth.
I know you are sensitive to the local -level realities and understand what goes on at public hearings where the
rubber meets the highway (God bless small-town politics, right?) ... do you have any suggestions for a solution
that won't involve hearing these issues again and, thus, igniting Sebastian Civil War Part II?
Rich Stringer
Sebastian City Attorney
Tracy Hass
From: Rich Stringer
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 3:23 PM
To: Tracy Hass
Subject: Sebastian LUMA 04-02
In reference to the Ordinance readopting our Land Use Map Amendments, I would advise submitting a copy of it, the
advertisement for the public hearing, and any submittals from the public hearing, through the regular channels at DCA.
However, since I worked out the procedure and language for the Ordinance with Deputy General Counsel David Jordan,
please submit a copy of the ordinance to him for informational purposes.
Thank you.
Rich
N
'"FOMLINS* Or*41s
ILE''
,en-ter,en-terpasses on large 'Items LO -RT
rt "We're still open for shopping and for CA:
drop-offs, but only small items," she said.
Aals with the Re'us- The center is still taking, things such as
Center, which col- buttons, beads, -keys, glue scissors, tape, rVOw OPEN!
I items; is asking thread spools, ribbons, magnets; corks, cigar
ents: Throw away boxes' compact discs, bubble wrap, candy
, ,
clothes pinspensI penci s,
tins, I caps —and, 4
icy and its parent, even the pull -rings from milk cartons, she
JhA Inc., can relo- said. Ready To Serue-: Yout
lero, Beach and get But things such as clothing. would be too 1 772-388-3018
-i Sebastian in the much, to have to pack for the move, Corum.
or Carolyn Corum said. 245 SEBASTIAN BLVD. SEBASTIAN, FL,32958
For details, call Corum at 978-022.2. e CORNER OF WIM BROW DRIA. E. (512)
T Friday, Septoi-nber 17, 2004 Treasum QpE
ub-
at-
n
b -
I ck-
i n
I "I
I SS
I J.
Ic
NOTICE OF COMPREHE NSWEA
PLAN FUTURE LAND USE t
MAP AMIENDMIENT�
The Ci Co*uncil of the City of Sebastian- Indian River
CpUnty'U'rida.
pToposes to adopt.thd foii "7g ordinance:
A) '01MINANCE NQv0_04-18',
AN ORDINANCE OF - THE. CITY 'OF. . SEBASTIAN,
FLORIDA,ADOPTING1 AN AMENDMENT. TO--iii
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FUTURE LAND: USE MAP TO
DESIGNATE AN INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION;
FOR. ANNEXED LAND;ADOPTING RECORD FROM
PRIOR. HEARINGS; AVTHORIZING. FINDINGS AND.
ADNIE'qISTRATIVE. ACTIONS;., PROVIDING FOR,
CONFLICTS,` EFFECT ON, OTHER ENACTMENTS;
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE...
A public hearing. on the ,ordinance . will be held Wednes&y, September
at approkirnately 7:00 pirf inthe City, Council Chambers,
City Hall, 1225 Mai' StreetfT Sebastian, Florida...
Cityoi 5eiMi i� Zoning'Niap,- North-
oa
M_
Ay.
?
C
, kwi
M
J.
:DC3%
M.
q $I ly"MI, fig
g.
WYt j ,
M tMi
OR.
1A,
. .... . .. . . ....
.3
'X
, ra
Ail
31dr,
AM V1 N
'T
M
'n
g,
eil
41
7
. ............
ooh,
Of of 6 N t! nZx.iift Map South 0M
Following the hearing, th'i City Coqncil may ad6pt this ordinance. Interested
d ordinance in the office of the City Clerk at City
!a �' Monday tlt:roi 0 8 a nj� to 430 and may appear at the hearing
r'i m� ' 'ct '6 proposed
ose -um. ordinance.
11' Mo r y t Irou sp to d
d �e heard with re t
.Any erson who may wish to qppe�alany decision
I
wcthe proceedings made which d hi It 6 made by the City, Council
at this.
e Is hearing Will need to ensure. that a Verbatim record
record includes the testimony and . evidence upon. which. the appeal will be based,'(286.0105
ES.)
In' compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act (A -DA anyone who: needs a special -
accommodation for this meetinch6uld contact the City ordinatorat.589-533V
t ng..
At least 48 hours in advance of the meeting..
City of Sebastian
e-�o "f Sebas'fia'n- hasteThe ulty Unta
ajopted a measureto.
Increas e
roperty t li�vy:ax,..
Last year s property. tax levy:
A. Initially proposed. tax levy: 33.
Less tax reductions du& to Value Adjustment
Bo4rcl Atid'other assessment changes-
..........
C. Actual property,tax levY: ...... . ........ 3,
This year's proposed tax levy: $31&
All concerned: citizens are invited t® attenc
public hearing on the tax- increase to be he