HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 12 04 - Ord O-03-21 - 1st Readcm of
SEBASTLAN
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
%..itv vi aeoaszian, r ivriaa
Subject: First reading and public hearing for
Ordinance 0-03-21; conceptual development
plan and rezoning request from Agricultural (A-
1) to PUD -R for a proposed 56+/- acre tract of
land situated along Powerline Road north of
Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main
Street adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 1.
Subl yttal by:
Agenda No. 0 3, 0
Department Origin: Growth Management
Tracy E. Hass `I_
Date Submitted: December 4, 2003
For Agenda of: December 17, 2003
Exhibits: O -0x-21, Conceptual Plan, Staff Report, P&Z recommendation, Application.
EXPENDITURE AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION
REQUIRED:None None REQUIRED: None
SUMMARY
The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting a large-scale land use map amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land
situated along Powerline Road north of Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street adjacent to Sebastian
Highlands Unit 1. The current land use designation for this parcel of land is L-2 (Residential 6units/acre (County)),
while the current zoning is A-1 (Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting annexation of
said parcel with a land use of LDR (Low Density 5 units/acre) and corresponding zoning of PUD -R (Planned Unit
Development — Residential). The property is currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for development of
195 single-family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well below the 5 units/acre permitted under the
LDR designation or the 6 units/acre currently permitted within the existing L-2 (County) designation. The proposed
project also includes improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point north approximately
570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies immediately north, and said project will include
improvements to Powerline from Main Street south to the Ashbury Subdivision. In addition, the primary
subdivision access point will be via the proposed extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian Boulevard on a
northwesterly direction to the southeast corner of Ashbury.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Conduct first public hearing for Ordinance No. 0-03-21.
Staff recommends the City Council pass this ordinance on first reading. Upon receipt of comments from DCA
relative to the comprehensive plan amendment, this ordinance will be scheduled for a second reading and final
public hearing.
"Move to pass Ordinance No. 0-03-21 on first reading and schedule a second reading and final public hearing at
a later date when the final reading of Ordinance No. 0-03-20 occurs."
an or
SEBASTKN
, T--
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
Growth Management Department
Rezoning Application - Staff Report
1. Project Name: Ashbury Subdivision
2. Requested Action: Rezoning from A-1 to PUD -R
3. Project Location
a. Address: Powerline Road north of Sebastian Elementary.
b. Legal: See survey
C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 31-39-06-00000-5000-00014.0
31-39-06-00000-5000-00015.0
4. Project Owner:
Snook Properties, LLC
696 Shady Grove Road
Coffee Springs, AL 36318-4644
5. Project Agent:
The Coy A. Clark Company
c/o Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC.
11407 th Court, Suite F
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 770-9622 fax: (772) 770-9466
6. Project Engineer:
Same as Agent
7. Project Surveyor:
Houston & Bryant Land Surveying
9436 U.S. Highway 1
Sebastian, Florida 32958
(772) 388-8603 fax: (772) 388-8604
8. Project Description
a. Narrative of proposed action: The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting a
large-scale land use map amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land situated along
Powerline Road north of Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street
adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 1. The current land use designation for this
parcel of land is L-3 (Residential 6units/acre (County)), while the current zoning is
A-1 (Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting annexation
of said parcel with a land use of LD (Low Density 5 units/acre) and corresponding
zoning of PUD -R (Planned Unit Development — Residential). The property is
currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for development of 195 single -
1
family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well below the 5
units/acre permitted under the LD designation or the 6 units/acre currently
permitted within the existing L-3 (County) designation. The proposed project also
includes improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point
north approximately 570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies
immediately north, and said project will include improvements to Powerline from
Main Street south to the Ashbury Subdivision. In addition, the primary subdivision
access point will be via the proposed extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian
Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to the southeast corner of Ashbury.
b. Current Zoning: A-1 (County — Agriculture)
C. Adjacent Properties
North:
RM -8
Multi-family/Vacant
MDR
East:
RM -8
Multi-family/Vacant
MDR
Immokalee, Myakka, Pomello
R -MH
Orange Heights
MH
South:
PS
Sebastian Elementary
INS
West:
RS -10
Residential/Vacant
LD
d. Site Characteristics
(1)
Total Acreage:
56.25 acres (residential area)
(2)
Current Land Use(s):
Vacant
(3)
Soil:
Immokalee, Myakka, Pomello
(4)
Vegetation:
Palm, Oak
(5)
Flood Hazard:
Zone X
(6)
Water Service:
Indian River County Utilities (Water Main)
(7)
Sanitary Sewer Service:
Indian River County Utilities (Forcemain)
(8)
Parks:
Main Street Park'/4 mile
(9)
Police/Fire:
Sebastian Police'/4 mile
IRC Fire — 1 mile
9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency
a. Future Land Use: L-3 (County — 6 units/acre)
2
b. Level of Service
(1) Traffic: The proposed will create an ADT of 1,970 Trips (195 units x 10.1
trips per day). Consequently, there will be an increased demand on the
existing roadway network. However, the proposed project includes
improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point
north approximately 570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles
lies immediately north, and said project will include improvements to
Powerline from Main Street south to the Ashbury Subdivision. In addition,
the primary subdivision access point will be via the proposed extension of
South Wimbrow from Sebastian Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to
the southeast corner of Ashbury.
(2) Potable Water: Ashbury Subdivision will be connecting to Indian River
County Utilities water main, therefore eliminating the need for potable wells
within said development.
(3) Wastewater: Ashbury will be connecting to Indian River County Utilities
sewer forcemain, therefore eliminating burdensome septic systems within
the developed area.
(4) Stormwater: Project includes a privately operated and maintained
stormwater system, which by design will improve water filtration prior to
intrusion into the groundwater system, while also reducing maintenance
obligations for the City.
(5) Recreation: Property owners within Ashbury will be subjected to the
citywide recreation impact fee program, therefore supplementing and
enhancing the development of future parks and recreational facilities within
the community.
In addition, Ashbury includes a total of 16.37 acres of wetlands/upland
preserves, along with internal recreational amenities.
(6) Solid Waste: There will be an increased demand on solid waste with the
addition of 195 residential units.
10. Conformance with Code of Ordinances: The proposed rezoning is consistent with
the Code of Ordinances.
11. Changed Conditions: Undeveloped, undisturbed land, with proposed change to single-
family residential.
12. Land Use Compatibility: The adjacent properties to the north, east and west are
designated low density residential, while the property immediately south is designated for
low density residential within the County.
There will be a negligible impact caused by the proposed land use change due to the
similarity of the existing uses in the area. Additionally, the infrastructure improvements
3
slated as an element of the proposed project will enhance the viability and sustainability
of the area.
13. Adequate Public Facilities: Provided — public utilities (water, wastewater) will be
incorporated within the development of the proposed PUD, and multiple stormwater lakes
will be included within the subdivision.
14. Natural Environment: The proposed PUD will contain the requisite open space as
required by land development regulations. In addition, Ashbury includes a total of 16.37
acres of wetlands/upland preserves.
15. Economic Effect: provided — The property is currently not within the corporate limits of
the City of Sebastian. Annexation will provide an additional 56 +/- acres of land area with
an additional 195 residential units, which in turn creates an expanded tax base for the City
of Sebastian.
16. Orderly Development: The proposed land use change is consistent with the
comprehensive plan and the proposed land use change provides for orderly
development given the location of the site adjacent to residential/commercial property
and availability of sufficient public facilities and access.
17. Public Interest: The City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan outlines the necessity to
incorporate and/or annex enclave parcels within incorporated cities. As the property is an
enclave, and it is adjacent to the urban service area, it would be prudent of the City to
annex the property consistent with the goals and objectives outlined within the
comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with land use objectives and will not
adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood based on design criteria outlined within
the subdivisions conceptual development plan. Therefore, staff opines that the proposed
annexation/land use change is not in conflict with public interest.
18. Other Matters: The requested land use change and accompanying rezoning will
provide consistency with the future land use map of the comprehensive plan.
Annexation of the parcels will demonstrate compliance with goals and objectives as
outlined in the comprehensive plan for annexation of enclaves adjacent to the urban
:Y 1WVJ11 xTicRJ1
The proposed land use change will create a slightly greater impact on water,
wastewater, drainage and solid waste facilities.
19. Analysis: The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting a large-scale land use map
amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land situated along Powerline Road north of
Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street adjacent to Sebastian Highlands
Unit 1. The current land use designation for this parcel of land is L-3 (Residential
6units/acre (County)), while the current zoning is A-1 (Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The Coy A.
Clark Company is requesting annexation of said parcel with a land use of LD (Low Density
5 units/acre) and corresponding zoning of PUD -R (Planned Unit Development —
Residential). The property is currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for
development of 195 single-family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well
below the 5 units/acre permitted under the LD designation or the 6 units/acre currently
51
permitted within the existing L-3 (County) designation. The proposed project also includes
improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point north approximately
570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies immediately north, and said
project will include improvements to Powerline from Main Street south to the Ashbury
Subdivision. In addition, the primary subdivision access point will be via the proposed
extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to the
southeast corner of Ashbury.
20. Conclusion: The requested rezoning from A-1 (County) to PUD -R is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code and Code of Ordinances.
21. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested re -zoning subject to
the following:
1. The re -zoning shall be conditioned upon receipt of annexation approval by the City
Council.
Z"X/ // /. I �- S�3
PRE AK BY DAtE
5
W of
SE$AS?
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
Growth Management Department
Conceptual Development Plan
Planned Unit Development
Approval Application Staff Report
1. Project Name: Ashbury Subdivision PUD.
2. Requested Action: Conceptual Development Plan Approval.
3. Project Location
a. Address: North of Sebastian Elementary and south of Main Street.
b. Legal: See Survey
C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 31-39-06-00000-5000-00014.0
31-39-06-00000-5000-00015.0
4. Project Owner: Snook Properties, LLC
696 Shady Grove Road
Coffee Springs, AL 36318-4644
5. Project Agent: The Coy A. Clark Company
c/o Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC.
11407 1h Court, Suite F
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 770-9622 fax: (772) 770-9466
6. Project Engineer: Same as Agent
7. Project Surveyor: Houston & Bryant Land Surveying
9436 U.S. Highway 1
Sebastian, Florida 32958
(772) 388-8603 fax: (772) 388-8604
8. Project Description
a. Narrative of proposed action: The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting a large-scale
land use map amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land situated along Powerline
Road north of Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street adjacent to
Sebastian Highlands Unit 1. The current land use designation for this parcel of
land is L-3 (Residential 6units/acre (County)), while the current zoning is A-1
1
(Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting annexation of
said parcel with a land use of LD (Low Density 5 units/acre) and corresponding
zoning of PUD -R (Planned Unit Development — Residential). The property is
currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for development of 195 single-
family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well below the 5
units/acre permitted under the LD designation or the 6 units/acre currently
permitted within the existing L-3 (County) designation. The proposed project also
includes improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point
north approximately 570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies
immediately north, and said project will include improvements to Powerline from
Main Street south to the Ashbury Subdivision. In addition, the primary subdivision
access point will be via the proposed extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian
Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to the southeast corner of Ashbury.
b. Current Zoning: A-1 (County Agricultural)
C. Adjacent Properties
Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use
North: RM -8 Multi-family/Vacant MDR
East: RM -8 Multi-family/Vacant MDR
R -MH Orange Heights MH
South: PS Sebastian Elementary INS
West: RS -10 Residential/Vacant LD
d. Site Characteristics
(1)
Total Acreage:
(2)
Current Land Use(s):
(3)
Soil:
(4)
Vegetation:
(5)
Flood Hazard:
(6)
Water Service:
(7)
Sanitary Sewer Service:
(8)
Parks:
(9)
Police/Fire:
56.25 acres (residential area)
Vacant
Immokalee, Myakka, Pomello
Palm, Oak
Zone X
Indian River County Utilities (Water Main)
Indian River County Utilities (Forcemain)
Main Street Park '/4 mile
Sebastian Police '/4 mile
IRC Fire — 1 mile
2
9. Conceptual Development Plan criteria
a. Evidence of unified control of the proposed planned development and the
associated agreements required. yes
b. Ownership Requirements. provided
C. Compliance with comprehensive plan.
(1) Future Land Use: Consistent
(2) Traffic Circulation: Consistent
(3) Housing: Consistent
(4) Public Facilities: Consistent
(5) Coastal Management: Consistent
(6) Conservation: Consistent
(7) Recreation and Open Space: Consistent
d. Compliance with applicable ordinances. Consistent
e. Land use compatibility. The adjacent properties to the north, east and west
are designated low density residential, while the property immediately south is
designated for low density residential within the County.
There will be a negligible impact caused by the proposed land use change due to
the similarity of the existing uses in the area. Additionally, the infrastructure
improvements slated as an element of the proposed project will enhance the
viability and sustainability of the area.
f. Adequate public facilities. Provided — public utilities (water, wastewater) will be
incorporated within the development of the proposed PUD, and multiple
stormwater lakes will be included within the subdivision.
g. Natural environment. The proposed PUD will contain the requisite open space
as required by land development regulations. In addition, Ashbury includes a total
of 16.37 acres of wetlands/upland preserves.
h. Economic effects. provided — The property is currently not within the corporate
limits of the City of Sebastian. Annexation will provide an additional 56 +/- acres of
land area with an additional 195 residential units, which in turn creates an
expanded tax base for the City of Sebastian.
Orderly Development: The proposed land use change is consistent with the
comprehensive plan and the proposed land use change provides for orderly
3
development given the location of the site adjacent to residential/commercial
property and availability of sufficient public facilities and access.
j. Public interest. The City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan outlines the necessity
to incorporate and/or annex enclave parcels within incorporated cities. As the
property is an enclave, and it is adjacent to the urban service area, it would be
prudent of the City to annex the property consistent with the goals and objectives
outlined within the comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with land
use objectives and will not adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood based
on design criteria outlined within the subdivisions conceptual development plan.
Therefore, staff opines that the proposed annexation/land use change is not in
conflict with public interest.
k. Other matters. The requested land use change and accompanying rezoning will
provide consistency with the future land use map of the comprehensive plan.
Annexation of the parcels will demonstrate compliance with goals and objectives
as outlined in the comprehensive plan for annexation of enclaves adjacent to the
urban service area.
The proposed land use change will create a slightly greater impact on water,
wastewater, drainage and solid waste facilities.
10. Contents of Conceptual Development Plan:
a. Vicinity map: provided
b. Property boundaries: provided
C. existing conditions: provided
d. Development plan. provided
(1) land use: provided
(2) Circulation: The roadway design plan incorporated within the conceptual
development plan depicts two points of ingress/egress with one "primary"
access point to Sebastian Boulevard and a "secondary" access point to
the proposed Powerline Road. The internal circulation system consists of
a curvilinear street design with minimal points of intersection.
(3) Conceptual drainage plan: provided
(4) Densities: provided 3.47 units/acre
(5) Nonresidential square footage: none
e. Written material:
(1) Planning objectives: provided — The intent of the project owner is to
4
create a Planned Unit Development consisting of 195 single-family lots.
The designation of a property as a PUD is intended to promote creation of
a self-sustaining development comprise of residential and neighborhood
commercial uses. However, given the subject site is not immediately
accessible via a major thoroughfare, and is relatively small for a PUD, it is
not advisable that the proposed project includes commercial uses.
Therefore, Ashbury Subdivision is proposed as a single-family residential
PUD, and remains in keeping with stated objectives.
The proposed subdivision demonstrates compliance with proper planning
practices for incorporating a housing mix needed within the City.
Additionally, the proposed is consistent with future planning objectives for
the City concerning annexation of parcels of land immediately adjacent to
the urban service area.
(2) Development schedule: start construction January 2004
end construction June 2004
(3) Environmental impact statement: The following excerpts are from an
Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G. K. Environmental for Coy
A. Clark dated May 2003.
Three isolated wetlands exist on site. The wetlands have been flagged and
verified by the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD).
The wetlands are isolated from waters of the state and should not require
an Army coprs of Engineers permit to impact. However, the wetlands area
II over .5 acres in size and a SJRWMD permit and mitigation will be
required if these wetlands are impacted. Additinally, the SJRWMD will
require an upland buffer (15-25 feet to be preserved surrounding the
wetland area or mitigated for secondary impacts as a result of loss of
buffer.
No Florida scrub jays were observed within the project boundaries during
the five-day survey of the subject development.
No other endangered and/or threatened species or significant and viable
associated habitat(s) were observed or appear to exist within the project
boundaries, except for the potential existence of the eastern indigo snake.
One "Species of Special Concern" exists on the subject site, which is the
gopher tortoise. Fifteen (15) gopher tortoise burrows were identified during
the site inspections. No inactive burrows were observed. A state
regulatory gopher tortoise "Incidental Take" permit will be required prior to
permitted land clearing activities.
(4) Public facilities impact statement: Ashbury Subdivision PUD will
connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service
provided by Indian River County.
(a) Quantity of wastewater generated; Wastewater generated will
be at 250 G.P.D. per unit (195) 50,875 G.P.D.
(b) Description of proposed recreational facilities; Recreation
amenities include Children's playground, walking trails through
preservation areas, and passive open space amenities.
(c) Quantity of potable water required; Potable water will be 250
G.P.D. per unit (195) 50,875 G.P.D.
(d) Estimated number of school age children expected within the
development: Estimated 2 children per household = 390
children — this figure is based on historical averages.
(e) Estimated property tax and/or sales tax revenue generated by
the project by phase; and
$2,500 per unit x 195 units = $487,500.00
(f) Any other positive or negative public facility impact. In
addition, the statement shall also include all public facilities
impact information that may be submitted as part of the
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) review process, as
applicable. Ashbury Subdivision PUD will connect to both
public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by
Indian River County.
11. Open space and landscaped areas: The proposed PUD will be required to contain 2
acres of park space or open recreation areas to satisfy the minimum standards as
established by the comprehensive plan. The preliminary development plan shall
demonstrate proper compliance with this regulation. As proposed, the project includes
sufficient open space/recreation area.
12. City Engineer's review: The City Engineering Department has not raised any objections
to the conceptual development plan. The Engineering Department will perform a more
detailed analysis and review during the construction phase.
13. Other Matters: The requested rezoning and accompanying land use change will
provide consistency with the future land use map of the comprehensive plan.
Annexation of the parcels will demonstrate compliance with goals and objectives as
outlined in the comprehensive plan for annexation of enclaves immediately adjacent to
the urban service area.
The proposed conceptual development plan will create a slightly greater impact on
water, wastewater, drainage and solid waste facilities.
14. Analysis: The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting a large-scale land use map
amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land situated along Powerline Road north of
Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street adjacent to Sebastian Highlands
Unit 1. The current land use designation for this parcel of land is L-3 (Residential
,,y
6units/acre (County)), while the current zoning is A-1 (Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The Coy A.
Clark Company is requesting annexation of said parcel with a land use of LD (Low Density
5 units/acre) and corresponding zoning of PUD -R (Planned Unit Development —
Residential). The property is currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for
development of 195 single-family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well
below the 5 units/acre permitted under the LD designation or the 6 units/acre currently
permitted within the existing L-3 (County) designation. The proposed project also includes
improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point north approximately
570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies immediately north, and said
project will include improvements to Powerline from Main Street south to the Ashbury
Subdivision. In addition, the primary subdivision access point will be via the proposed
extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to the
southeast corner of Ashbury.
15. Conclusion: The proposed PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land
Development Code and Code of Ordinances.
16. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Ashbury Subdivision PUD
Conceptual Development Plan with the following condition:
The land use change shall be conditioned upon receipt of annexation approval by
the City Council.
P AMEBY DAT
7
A SHB UR Y SUBDIVISION AMENI TIES
• Recreation Amenities
■ t 2,000 SF Clubhouse w/ Swimming Pool
■ Children's Playground
■ Walking Trails through Preservation Areas
■ Passive Open Space (Benches, etc.)
• Environmental Considerations
■ Preservation of ± 5 Acres of Wetland Habitat
■ 20' Wide Upland Preservation Buffer Around Project
Perimeter
■ Upland Preservation Areas in NE and SW Corners of Project
■ Attempting to "Cut -In" Roadways Within Project to Promote
Tree Preservation on Individual Lots and Prevent "Moon-
Scaping"
■ Preservation of Existing Vegetation in "Landscape/
Recreation" Areas
■ Use of Existing Vegetation in Entrance Area
• Other Considerations
■ Gated Community
■ Privately Maintained Drainage and Roadway Systems
■ Curb and Gutter Design with Central Stormwater Lakes
■ 4' Wide Sidewalks on Both Sides of Street & 5' Wide Sidewalk
at Entrance
Public Benefits of Sebastian Highlands
-No perimeter buffer
-No upland preservation
-No wetland preservation
-No recreation area
-Open space at 50%.
-No sidewalks
-No curbed drainage — swale and ditch system is
a large burden on City resources
-Public Roads — a large drain on City resources
Public Benefits of Ashbury P.D.
-Perimeter Buffer — Native preservation and new vegetation
-Upland Preservation — 3.8 Acre
-100% Wetland Preservation — 2.1 Acre
-Recreation area — 2.6 Acres, with clubhouse, playground and passive recreation areas.
-Increased open space — 53%.
-Internal sidewalks — both sides of the road
-Curbed Drainage — consistent with the requests of many citizens for the city streets
-Privately maintained roads and drainage systems — no drain on city resources
-R/W construction (S. Wimbrow Extension from CR512) at no cost to the City, including:
Water and sewer main extensions
Accommodate Road Drainage at no cost to the city — helps with NPDES reg's
Provides opportunity for new commercial development — new tax base
-R/W construction from Triad (apartmts) to site (Powerline Rd.) at no cost to the City,
including:
-Accommodate City's Road Drainage at no cost to the city — helps with NPDES reg's.
-Future Land acquisition cost savings for City (Land for Powerline Road drainage)
-Additional Tax Base and impact fees collected (for 19 more lots), but with less impacts to city
resources.
Examples: Recreation Impact Fee paid, yet providing 2.6 acres of recreation
Drainage Impact Fee paid, yet providing central drainage and
accommodations for City R/W drainage
Property taxes paid, yet providing privately maintained roads.
� tsx Y.K aG0V.
�� ISOD 1� .� � _.. L 0 I 4 � w
��
K iF o w,' K �•
SEBASTIAN GARDENSUB aY T:
„
' 3 A ASSESSED 30-30-38
1 e W K
� a !
3 to K I
m �• Y 7y� l � w..�.. . ti
14
Y• 9Ala, -
le 11 11 1 11 2 �% K "J Je x Ja K K .H K Jt K t K P K MSK
to to
17
1 7
p ♦
} 1♦ 4 e e • i _j,.. / A Il "u I� I xm. ---
`�--•�-ROAD
aU L_
, L K q:.c JIK N _3•
I K IOSI x .S'. •..%wr °r '. '. iwu. 3) K
tt 1.
to ”
...... %%% �! ! �-�- \✓' - 3 W'i n e w! • ! r
a o ,ate.. �_-:_� : I `— i r `I , LL ESTATES SUB (UM( D)
41
z vIrl /T!
e 7 . � � I.�\ I i_�Ihr.� 1;W � �_.-.I
T to ¢ U a ] Y] to M a]7 l0 1. 'lam- .r_ -C \ / II
o w" 3
L 19 Y 3 3 e m
` m
,a rIYY 1 Ne 1 ]� e a �I�- - �/•\ I-�II---�f- hK'_:s• '`c n JK 1tKh
! • 02
I(laAIX1A1 AVEIAE n .1----. I \ •<Z 1' \ 7,:. 1 . _ _� r.aY�Ac a ..w'Y 'O7 "`7 y,
,
LI Lf�1
I ,
Il
I Sl ET
Lt nut'
. aY KI
�' r
�,voCADo AVC3S
n.
a
r
IBM
MNO
LI Lf�1
I ,
Il
I Sl ET
Lt nut'
. aY KI
�' r
�,voCADo AVC3S
n.
a
r
m
MNO
• a!
a b a 3e 1 ' � - -1 I I i aO n Z• ! '•u b LL a m 1. le i` r,
Ito - .1_l -----1 -._L_1• pelf
1>—_—; - J� -ter
� e ,; --,.0-- �-,�-�—f-�—f-�—►—�•l ---�j� I � ?moi u� jSIRIT
I) :a , � 1 a - �- _ � i � _ _I� _ L1 _ LI_ L 1�1. •Y• .� ��"••�� - � U I T Ps m n ' us K
AVFAJEr.
/..VIII` I— ze 0 a
I
29 Yp
�2
G
IT ��"11--"111 C_ I Ilii .v+e II '�"",� I-'�' II` AI Rye•,. .ifRCLTLV
II
uy _GTRUS Av M 1 __�I_ c _rcc:__'g �. I f J,
3 /F�
11
,a
0
!lill
?Noon
z07 Mi
��L1__L1_ - ' t ,..,. `Jt
) L s yya
' V �✓� �) �—r� �I1�I( I \ �t�u4': i �v v til K I.))
AL N �
Ju �
------- WINll---sE-�_.--_--f-7 — — -- I - — � � i Guuorow sr
T� t ,
u'F-7-1
/ wlr 9EOASTIAiI r CITY LIMITS-
-77777--7-1
INIT9 rvt O
• mD� �, e o m r'jC� li II ,n,
Immusillm
IT ��"11--"111 C_ I Ilii .v+e II '�"",� I-'�' II` AI Rye•,. .ifRCLTLV
II
uy _GTRUS Av M 1 __�I_ c _rcc:__'g �. I f J,
3 /F�
11
,a
0
!lill
?Noon
z07 Mi
��L1__L1_ - ' t ,..,. `Jt
) L s yya
' V �✓� �) �—r� �I1�I( I \ �t�u4': i �v v til K I.))
AL N �
Ju �
------- WINll---sE-�_.--_--f-7 — — -- I - — � � i Guuorow sr
T� t ,
u'F-7-1
/ wlr 9EOASTIAiI r CITY LIMITS-
-77777--7-1
INIT9 rvt O
• mD� �, e o m r'jC� li II ,n,
z07 Mi
��L1__L1_ - ' t ,..,. `Jt
) L s yya
' V �✓� �) �—r� �I1�I( I \ �t�u4': i �v v til K I.))
AL N �
Ju �
------- WINll---sE-�_.--_--f-7 — — -- I - — � � i Guuorow sr
T� t ,
u'F-7-1
/ wlr 9EOASTIAiI r CITY LIMITS-
-77777--7-1
INIT9 rvt O
• mD� �, e o m r'jC� li II ,n,
, � f
70 P.R.D. BUFFER
�'.."' ♦ �� �.
,r
iGTies��LiE+aja' _ _ �+.� Faster Rood
-----------
/.RECREATION AREA _I _ _ UPLANO I .
----------
I IL _ I 1 i r PRESERVE m u I
LkKE
II /J�\ Eo, .1 LOT.,
iy L - L1-,/ \` I Camoee E,lole, ,
w
UXOSCAK
Le North
Z• � e PRESERVED � h �' 1� I I - —t II 1'
VMENTgC PE,q�Lj�n ]]���R2��1.YY1��RNNlllllllll J LAKE I - I JF
1 J --__-
•
�20'P.PA 1BUFFER
1 \vJ I
co'
VolegNa Street 50' Rw
-----
n I I
G LAKE i I 1 - Em
.. 11 o.as ynE, ;NI
. w.
co
it
1 I I I I I I I I II —y -j
Pineapple Street 50' Rw
LOT 1.
LOT
1 1 I I I I I I 1 6vge w1, U,A 7
RECREATION
AREA,\ L 1 I �., >•
Cit -----7 r1 OR 1 , I - a'onw�n unn y
7(/ \sTATwNJ } I - - r ► I♦. 14
it WETLAND L
PRESERVE II 1i PRFSERYE I 1 l_ _ $ King Street 50' Rw
EE I RECAFATION w, ,o Ems Ems Em ,
E AREA
LAKE -`_`--1 - �\\ \ 1 r i1 .,. r• �NI
EE �
-�
T -FTangelo Street 50' R.
� I �1'IF�
_�_�J_�J_LJ_ �LJ;�: ;'ll .Ea.x LOT . E.., .,y LOT o„ ,
�,-.. �� MNgnb Unll y
/r U1EE it
-----}�--j--'�--}• ` LG,. EMyw Eolx Em,
I I I 1 IICCREATKW :\ II ^°F'•'^^
!='E
II -jII 11 JII.a I SII}` I I -Ilh III- AREA xt »,
l J --
_ - v' � CalamondIn Street 50' Rw x♦
9t3 w E tu2.8� T 1-,.il::Tn " rx. 589-Say6Y
M' PFA BEfrEP rr.,♦n u, n m
I \ Parcel: I(2
xis r. 1
/ ,
e
Seoaation Elementary $shod I � ay / /,$
e �
IP.rc.l: t Ip
- - JOSEPH W. SCNULKE P.
JODAH B. BITTLE, PE. E. SCHULKE
WILLIAM PSTODDARD, Ph.D., PE CIVIL&STR, BITTLE
& S TO D DA R D , L.L.C.
UCTURAL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING
•ENVIRONMENTAL
August 21, 2003
Tracy Haas
City of Sebastian
1201 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
Re: Ashbury
Subdivision
Conceptual Planned Unit Development
Application
Dear r
Mr.
Haas
_
Enclosed, P(ea
se
find ten n 10
sets of revised
project. We have made several revisions in accordance with ourld�scus lans for the above referenced
staff on August 1, 2003 (Tracy Haas), Au August Bions at meet, s with '
August 12 7, 2003 (Tracy g city
1'u , 2003 ( c Haas
Trac Y s a
(Tracy Haas). The revisions made were as follows: and Terrance Moore), and
-Decrease density from 214 units to 195 units. This was based on a comparison
density of the typical Sebastian Highlands lay -out. Approximately
acre area, similar to our projects size and bounds limits._ of the
pp oximately 195+ units exist within a 55-
-Increase lot widths to an average of 55 ft in u of 50 ftreviousl
-Increase side setbacks to 7 ft. This ensures each home has a minimum of se .
separation from the next inclusive of typical roof overhangs.10 ft.
-Increase open space on an individual lot basis, from 20% to 30%.
-Increase open space on a project basis, from 53% to 60%.
-Decrease maximum building height from 35 ft to 25 ft.
We have maintained approximately the same amount of recreation areas and upland
preservation, and have increased the wetland preservation areas.
We believe the above outlined changes are consistent with our discussions, and are
consistent with the ideas and objectives of the city council, its comprehensive land
" land development code.
use plan, and
We hope to be scheduled for a September P & Z commission hearing. of the date. g Please let us know
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Joseph ulke, P.E.
c: Jeffrey Blackstone
1140 71" COURT, SUITE F VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
�af5 TEL 772 / 770-9622 Fax 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL sbseng@gate. net
I °fs
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2003
Chmn Smith opened --the public hearing and swore in the applicant and staff. Mr. Joseph
• Schuike, Schulke, Bit_tte & Stoddard LLC, 1140 7`h Court, Vero Beach, Florida presented
the application. This will be a new branch of SunTrust Bank on a parcel thatis part of
the Publix Indian River Subdivision Plat and water, sewer, traffic and drainage was
accommodated for in that plat. Mr. Hass added the site plan is for a 3,500 square -foot
banking facility wit drive-thru. All the site infrastructure improvements were included in
the site development f the Publix. Access will be by existing curb cuts. S ��cient
stacking has been pro i ed for the drive-thru facility. The five conditions at apply for
conditional use are (1) S arate entrances and exits shall be provide and clearly
identified, (2) No more tha 2 curb cuts shall be permitted on any si gle street frontage,
(3) Site plan shall provide fo efficient circulation of vehicles an
(4) In the CG and
CR district, no drive-thru facile shall be located within 100 fee f a residential district,
(5) All side and rear yards abu g or adjacent to residential istricts or uses shall be
screened. Staff recommends ap oval of both the site pla dnd conditional use.
Mr. Mahoney was concerned about euing of traffic. lr. Allocco asked if the water
retention was already sized and N1r. S Nu 'e
said s. Mr. Blessing wanted to know if
SunTrust could request additional curb is in/�It
ure and Mr. Stringer said two are.
allowed for the wholePublix developmen ndre already in place.
No one from the public spoke. Chmn SmithAosed the hearing.
MOTION by Allocco/Blessing
"I make a motion that we approve thvSunTrust Bark for the conditional use permit."
• Roll Call
Mr. Faille
yes
Chmn S ith
yes
Mr. Se ey (a)
yes
Mr. B sing
yes
Mr. Allocco yes
Mr. Mahoney yes
Ms. Monier yes
The vote was/7-O.Motin carried.
MOTION by oney
"I make a moapprove the site plan as presented for the
at the Publix"
Roll Call: Mr. Faille
yes
Mr. Mahoney
yes
Mr. Blessing
yes
Ms. Monier
yes
The vote was 7-0. Motion carried.
SunTrust Bank
Mr. Allocco yes
Chmn Smith yes
Mr. Seeley yes
C. PUBLIC HEARING — RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL — LAND
USE MAP AMENDMENT/REZONING/PUD CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Ms. Monier stated for the record that she had done some research with county
. commissioners, councilmen and doesn't believe that one branch of government should
ignore the other branch. She added that the city is growing and the public is concerned.
2
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF -REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2003
The developers have certain rights but we are taking into consideration lot sizes, side
• setbacks and density. One reason the developers are looking to annex into the city is
for commercial growth, which is needed in our city.
Chmn Smith added that the City of Sebastian has home rule, which means the city
makes its own decisions. The school system is a county system and their jurisdiction.
The Growth Management Department is the arbitrator between the developer and the
city.
Chmn Smith opened the public hearing. Mr. Joseph Schulke, who was previously sworn
in, presented the application as an annexation of a 56 acre piece of property with a land
use of L-2, six units per acre supporting single and multi -family zoning. The proposal is
for a planned development. Mr. Schulke passed out similar exhibits to the
commissioners that he gave to members of the public and introduced his clients, Mr.
Coy Clark and Mr. Jeff Blackstone. The proposal is for 214 homes with increased lot
width and setbacks. Thirty-two percent of the site will be for recreation, preservation and
open spaces. It will have curb roads and sidewalks within the gated community. The
surrounding area to the north is FPL substation and soon to be built Pelican Isle
Apartments at 5.6 units per acre, to the east is Orange Heights a mobile home
community at 4.2 units per acre, to the south is existing general commercial property
and the Sebastian Elementary School, and to the west is Powerline Road. This project
will have 3.47 units per acre. It has private streets, drainage and recreation areas with
private maintenance of these. No added traffic through the Highlands, connect directly to
the main highway. They hired both traffic consultant and environmental impact
consultant. There were no endangered species found on the property and appropriate
• permits will be obtained for gopher tortoise relocation.
Mr. Hass added that the three big issues are density, lot sizes and setbacks. All these
issues were addressed through the redesign of the project. Currently the site within the
county is 6 units per acre, the proposal is for low density within Sebastian, which allows
5 units per acre, but the development proposal is presented at 3.47 units per acre.
Mr. Mahoney asked about the size of the rights-of-way and Mr. Hass said there are 40'
rights-of-way with sidewalks on both sides of the street as well as 10' easements along
the rights-of-way. Mr. Mahoney suggested that PUD's use a calculation of 75% of the
zone district requirement. There was discussion regarding open space, recreation areas
and wetlands. Mr. Keough was concerned about the 7' setbacks. Mr. Allocco
commended the layout and presentation but felt there were too many homes for the site.
Ms. Monier suggested the whole point is to negotiate. The general feeling is that the
density is too high and the applicant should consider decreasing the number of homes
by 20 and use 10' setbacks. Mr. Blessing had concerns with the 40' wide road and would
also like to see the density reduced. Mr. Seeley said he visited Collier Club and
Sebastian Lakes to view this type of community. Mr. Smith confirmed with Mr. Hass that
the developer has gone through negotiations with city staff and city council has final
decision. Mr. Stringer added the three units per acre issue is the council saying they are
not going to approve a higher density than the applicant would 'nave had in the county.
The following people spoke:
0
3
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2003
Mr. William Schulke, Sebastian, Florida said he felt that there is only abut 6' of usable
• area within the 10' setback. He also commented that with the sidewalks there would be
more street parking than with swales.
Andrea Coy, 333 Pineapple Street, Sebastian, Florida would like to see a copy of the
environmental impact study, 20' buffer area not enough, and density is too high.
Clive Beckwith, 465 Lighthouse Avenue, Sebastian, Florida liaison officer between the
Sebastian Property Owners Association and city hall and the SPOA is against any
change or decrease in the size of buildable lots from 10,000 square feet.
Bill O'Neil, 321 Tangelo Street, Orange Heights, Sebastian, Florida wanted to know how
close the ends of the streets are and Mr. Hass said 20' setback and 20' buffer.
Andrew Falice, 1045 Foster Road, Sebastian, Florida concemed about the traffic from
Pelican Isle and this project.
Rob Clearbrook, 1041 Foster Road, Sebastian, Florida is against PUD development and
concemed about the wildlife.
George Gribbroek, 1049 Foster Road, Sebastian, Florida familiar with the site for more
than 30 years and concerned about the wildlife and trees.
Mary Ingui, 626 Layport Drive, Sebastian, Florida questioned if the residents of this
development could use city parks but city residents could not use their facilities, would
. there be maintenance fees, and concerned abut the visual impact.
Mr. Schulke added they have hired GK Environmental to do an environmental
assessment of the property. He added they are preserving nine acres of upland and
wetland area.
Chmn Smith closed the hearing at 8.58 p.m. and asked Mr. Hass for a summary. He
stated the main objective in reviewing these projects is to determine consistency with the
Comprehensive Development Plan and Land Development Code as well as satisfy the
objectives of the city council. Mr. Stringer advised the commission to vote on each item
independently.
MOTION by Monier/Blessing
"I make a motion [to recommend to city council] that we change the land use to Low
Density Residential [for Ashbury Subdivision]"
Roll Call: Mr. Faille no Mr. Mahoney no
Mr. Seeley (a) no Mr. Blessing yes
BMs. Monier yes Mr., Allocco no
Chmn Smith yes
The vote was 4-3. Motion denied.
0
4
Y
PLANNING AICD ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2003
• Mr. Stringer then advised the commission to make a motion for another land use
category because if it is annexed it must have a city land use category. He 4etailed the
various land use categories.
•
•
MOTION by Monier/Blessing
"I would like to reiterate my motion [to recommend to city council] the create a land use
for the Ashbury Subdivision to LDR"
There was discussion about land use and zoning categories. Mr. Stringer advised the
commission if the land were brought in without a land use category established it would
come in at the closest corresponding city land use category. In this case it would be
multi -family because the current county land use allows 6 units per acre and our multi-
family category would be the closest.
Roll Call: Mr. Allocco
no
Chmn Smith
yes
Mr. Seeley (a)
yes
Mr. Blessing
yes
The vote was 5-2. Motion carried.
MOTION by Mahoney/Blessing
Mr. Faille yes
Mr. Mahoney no
Ms. Monier yes
"I make a motion that we [recommend to city council] rezone [Al to PUD -R] with a
minimum of 7,500 square foot lots with 7 '/2 ' side setbacks and 60' lot frontage"
Roll Call: Mr. Faille
yes
Mr. Mahoney
yes
Mr. Blessing
yes
Ms. Monier
yes
The vote was 7-0. Motion carried.
Mr. Allocco yes
Chmn Smith yes
Mr. Seeley yes
D. PUBLIC HEARING — RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL— LAND
USE MAP AMENDMENT/REZONING — CROSS CREEK SUBDIVISION
Mr. Warren Dill, 1565 U.S. #1, Sebastian, Florida represented the applicants, Mr. Hank
Fischer and Mr. Daniel Spencer. Also present is Mr. Bruce Moia of Mosby & Associates,
Vero Beach, Florida. Mr. Dill described the property location, 115 acres, 150 single
family lots, 85' X 135', 13,000 sq. ft. The lots on the cul-de-sac are almost half acre. The
density is 1.3 units per acre, proposing private streets with 50' right -of way curb and
gutter, and sidewalks on both sides. Powedine Road will be paved to access this
property. County water and sewer is available, storm water will be kept on site and no
obligation on the city for maintenance of drainage. Land use is compatible with
surrounding area. Mr. Hass added that the property is currently being used as an active
sand mine, which will cease operation this year. In the event that the Powerline Road
access is not able to occur the alternative access point will be Shakespeare.
Mr. Mahoney was concerned about who would be responsible for paving Powerline
Road and Mr. Hass said it is being negotiated. Mr. Allocco asked if the large cement
JOSEPH W. SCHULKE, P.E.
JODAH B. BITTLE, P.E.
WILLIAM P. STODDARD, Ph.D., P.E.
October 7, 2003
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERK
Tracy Haas, Director
Growth Management Dept.
City of Sebastian
1201 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
Re: Ashbury Subdivision
Conceptual P.D. Application
Dear Mr. Haas,
After careful consideration of the Planning and Zoning recommendation to City
Council, and subsequent meetings with you and Terrance Moore, the Coy A. Clark
Development Co. hereby requests that the City Council consider the approval of the
Conceptual P.D. for Ashbury Subdivision as it was previously presented to the Planning
and Zoning commission, with the following modifications:
-Increase side setbacks to 7.5 ft, as recommended by the Planning and Zoning
commission.
-Increase the perimeter buffer to 25 ft.
The subdivision, with the modifications presented herein, is a project that has
evolved through the joint efforts of our design team and City staff, and as such, has both
the City and the developer's best interests considered. We truly believe this project will
be an asset to the city.
Enclosed are twelve (12) sets of the revised plans for City Council consideration.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Schulke, P.E.
Jeff Blackstone
Coy A. Clark
1140 7`" COURT, SUITE F VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAx 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL sbseng@gate.net
Permit Application No.
City of Sebastian
HOME Of PRICAN ISLAND Development Order Anolication
-Applicant If not owner, written authorization notarized from owner is required)
Name:
r ft
rlf>
G
�. C/0 6CHULI<C iTTLE I -Ta')DAR�
Address-
--V
/\ (7
• V I7SrI 0_r L.LJ I12-•
Phone Number: (77 ) 17 U -
9 LO 0--) C�
Lot: Block:
FAX Number: 0176 )—I -)V - Hq Cd
E -Mail: �..,b
I StnQ&QOs
,
E E
4 rTa r. I t
Owner If different from applicant)
Name:
MVLTIPLL 0, nJCM DEe lI-TA 1,r,
Address:
Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number:
E -Mail:
Title of permit or action requested:
'PL.AAjrJEb U 17- DEVEt.pPrn n�T �o�c �ATUA.L �El L�Pr�rw�T ��f rJ
PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMrr OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING.
COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-1/2" BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS
SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM.
A. Project Name (if applicaple):
B. Site Information
Address:
/\ (7
• V I7SrI 0_r L.LJ I12-•
�VOn
/I`TH
OG �C-w.�•�_i.T-F�i•'J �� M i.%f i-�. :'4." �%,l-i�J`
Lot: Block:
Unit:
Subdivision:
E E
4 rTa r. I t
EC z h
Indian River County Parcel #:
31-3 -O
Zoning Classification: / _xisriNck-
't�uD-
Future Land Use:t�-
1 PAF 1
I L. R• C• Szo Lo
Dir 1%z5,n- L-2 r.R"c.
Existing Use:
Proposed Use:
ACAAA
S1N L
r
F•AMiL. SU 1JIV151'J�
C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach
extra sheets if necessary): (�(
C3'J' UC'r
L'. L
�"il..iT�.l�..
DATE RECEIVED: -7/ 7 /_ FEE PAID: $( b0
RECEIVED BY:
'i
Received
JUL 2003
?&Z
Growth Mgnt•
DO ''�. O
Permit Application No.
D. Project Personnel:
Agent: ,
p t j1
Name:ahu Ire, i T1 +� 31 isl oi{-�� til...
Address ! 04'',
E.0
Phone Number: i5 FAX Number: nj
E-Mail:
S� h
Attorney:
Name:
Address
Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number:
E -Mail:
Engineer:
Name:
c. �t v Lx C 1 �tLn� rz L L L
Address _
Li 0 1�, V SLY v ITE E20 J EA C?."^
Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: ()
>>-z_ 7-10 �ZZ ?`rZ "l�0 9yq(,
E -Mail:
Surveyor:
Name:
tYqCtr7V�fj�R'
`` .-F.
Address qO�Cy S�' ` L;
_ �� ? i n
Phone Number. FAX Number:
E -Mail: 16
Lo 9
6e I scv'+
.nt+
C N /LKL I • BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: _ I AM THE OWNER
AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS
APPLICATION, AND THAT ALL THE INF RMATION, MAPS, DATA AND/OR SKETCHES PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE
ACCU TR OT ST KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
�..
0
S+GN�FGRE DATE
SWORN T ND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BY :-� CPH
PERSONAI I Y KNOwN TO ME OR PRODUCED A) (A—
AS IDENTIFICATION, THIS Z DAY OF 20
NOTARY'S SIGNATURE W. a
PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY
COMMISSION NO./EXPIRATION
SEAL:
FAWWILLIAI! STCDD,ARD
otary ?uhlic -State cf Florida
YCommasionExGww ;r12,2=
Commission aR
Permit Application No.
The following is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments
(Including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances,
exceptions, and appeals.
I/WE, _ THE OWNER(S) /THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS
THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THEA1 ('Dmml S) o nt: �S
BOARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW HE PROPERTY IN
CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICATION.
I/WE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE ME MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD/COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY.
CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA
CONSTITUTION OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING.
THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT IS BIne
NED BY ME/US VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR
PROMISES BY AN O AGECONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAL OF THE? TY
F SEBASTIAN.
SIGNAT DATE
Sw rn to subscribed before me by SO5�ePI+
who is me or produced /v/,4
as identification, this -�-_ day of 75.,1.Y 20o7,
Notary's Signature
Printed Name of Notary
Commission No./Expiration
Seal:
_ ¢ii WILLIAM STODDARD
•'Notary public Stnte
Of f lgrida
My c mmmks n
E?qkm A{x 12, 200.9
Comm15310n R p0017873
.. t
Permit Application No.
°"OF Supplemental Information
SEEPlanned Unit Development,
;;_ Conceptual Development Plan
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
(ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.)
1. Describe how the proposed conceptual development plan is consistent with the
elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Corr,)Rr-Ht iv; ;JL' LAN"
(iSE �MMtn/p(N���Y Nrl� '�+✓EN �"vL�MsTT=`� �'1+.1Lun.��NrLy !,�%tT�- I,
-rkLS j,Lict t A n 0nJ , TME P2o+,)o cr; J� QD - (. W t L- TIL !.,vsL ;r,-,
k.J1TP -'rHC fLnuuAP-IA,Lg- Qt=Str,lr-N"rAL- I -D CQU 0h AACiyTS.
2. Describe how the proposed conceptual development plan will be in conformance
ith applicable requirements of the City of Sebastian Land Development Code.
1'H E 'P�oPIf, EU ?VD- 2 W1 --L i3C- w 17-4
rF/1o0ci=,<,�/ Go(nPREHEnISttJE LAa1Ci ',Xc AlJ'--�
Jn)
C r o i- St=ar %,i- r, LA Ns, t)
3. Would the conceptual development plan result in any incompatible land uses,
�cjo�nsi'�jdering � the ^ type a)nd location ({1 of the uses niinvolved?
--rHF- 1120 :�`J J)i�A/R�N4 it/ice L•i��l�J 1JSC
�On1�I5rr nir (uiT--r- 74r
I�2o(= r �_h Pt)
fl -R 3.75 vr,,T,
/Ar S�
4. Describe how the proposed public facilities are adequate to serve the proposed
conceptual development plan. IRiF-LtmiArzq ME;LL- Ait.0 U)rT q ?Nt,A1J R,A,!1-
'!--
TO �'n(2( l- MOn r Aj OA J fL'�l 2 . A
I v . — l IJ Ut'
I . •
Permit Application No.
5. Describe how the proposed conceptual development plan would not result in a
significant adverse impact on the natural environment. h:njv)QOr'JmQVT
�Sti
C'S ePofL-T' LjAL-s.,jn£r-a Nn A•4; bn- �AIoAti�Gc� C�
W E7L-/g o J' S IT ./ rI 1
r
'11, fir n r „n a N inn LAI',/ TMOAr YC
6. Describe how the proposed conceptual development plan would not adversely
affect the property values of the area, the general health, safety and welfare of
the surrounding public, and not negatively impact the financial resources of the
city.
lC/k -y"
,4 �E(,iuE.ST 1'J+� rr.►i•1JCAT!r)rJ. TN�_PRn0��1: �v��!?J��v�J 1S
a�/✓ I'n n (�!�� W!T4 7r i� I� 6r-"19 ✓r A-, UCVCL,,)i>/V! ��..
!S W!LL- rNC-R.r-/1=_�-. TF(t' TAX i3AS!= >✓0r'Z -rHC,-r
C, r-' S I- rl wJ s-, c E r - 4 6 L l=
r-
7. Does the proposed conceptual development plan result in an orderly
development pattern? 7�IE
11? Jnlc F"I(Y-I C Z-.572--
8.
-.Sf2-
8. Explain how the proposed conceptual development plan is not in conflict with the
public interest. P/I,C'RTy I; 1c>ojL nit 17-5
;
(Tl,/ r)G �Ei�lS?�/?nJ U�,J �aJ,1�. Sr
.. i
Permit Application No.
9. Attach the following:
la. A list of the names and addresses of all owners of parcels of real property
within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel to be considered.
Zb. A vicinity map.
c. A map(s) of existing conditions including existing easements, streets,
buildings, land uses, historical sites, tree groupings, wetlands, water
courses, contours, the names of the property owners and existing land
uses and zoning for all contiguous property, and the location and width of
all existing or platted streets, easements, drainage ways and utilities
contiguous to the property.
✓ d. A development plan including land use, circulation, conceptual drainage
plan, densities, and non-residential square footage.
e. A statement of planning objectives.
f. A proposed development schedule.
/g. An environmental impact statement
�h. A public facility impact statement.
\/i. A traffic impact statement and/or study.
3
Permit Application No.
s.,
5E$�TLJ City of Sebastian
HOME OF Develoament Order AAalication
Applicant If not owner, written authorization notarized from owner is required)
Name: /
T E C LoM? AJ C�0
_�tULKE „TSE 'p<<�?,a�t'� I,L C
Address:
I y0
ILRO �4UL�+ r X29',J
Phone Number: (-1-77_ ) -I -7 0 - 9 62.2
FAX Number: (-7-7-L)-77C)- q y 9 b
E -Mail:
5b t?_A o,.(J9_ n,?
Owner If different from applicant)
Name:
6 Noo Y, �C�I�O 2T IES LLC—
Address: //
c09 b 'S' Gfwvc ROF. ,-) C -r FCC 'Sv, R,A_x- _
Phone Number: (_77Z) -7-18 - z I �' FAX Number:
E -Mail:
Title of permit or action requested:
PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING.
COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-1/2" BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS
SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM.
A. Project Name (if applicable): 1
B. Site Information
Address:
oR of R 12—
Lot: Block: Unit:
Subdivision:
SE.0
Indian River County Parcel #:
3I-1�-0�-0000 IS, 000
-(0001S,0 -
000 ) ,0
Zoning Classification: '!�X,5r,v 6r-
Future Land Use:
_DeAr,
Exr;-71�,�
POD ILo- ��
o -.ED Low �
eA,-m , L -i �a
Existing Use`:/
Proposed Use:
V
6 I C, LC
C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach
extra sheets if necessary):
2alu S7' R,E�zoioi(, -nSVD -K GSM -1z C 4 AJ Ur-
C AJ US
Aril `/-.(L/•/DrnF' 1')"�-_ PC-A4/NES; f �rl+r f;�l ��`=l�EJ' ADOI IC*1710A) AAJD JlE6lUc'�'1—
=OfL A Nine E-xA T1 Un) H Ami bE.Ea1 S'JCn 'A ri'CI✓h (5A)C QfL(ZEA/T) y l��st�* TNI • A�
DATE RECEIVED: �I /1 /03 FEE PAID: $ RECEIVED BY: SL-.
C
cv
I(-ATI'D A)
Permit Application No.
MOF Supplemental Information
SE Rezoning Request
- _ ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
1. Proposed zoning: wD - )\
2. Explain how the proposed rezoning is consistent with the other elements of the
comprehensive plan. Swart irrlN6,c G)M�%RE4c. jSw G LAIJO (Y iC
-.UJtli tai A;: ,LI A r,7�
IZr-aV .STINIT L(ay FAJCrr��
3. Explain how the proposed rezoning is in conformance with applicable substantive
requirements of the City of Sebastian Code of /+Ordinances.
bjl u�. �� Glrr,_f h T1 (�. _t_ C.� !` �+ r r1 ` ' , c�rl)0(LL LAj
—A (Q 1) Ur i! �1MrncAANN)r AIT Lnt Iii ;vSrr\/ R ��I CI F' m A i / � � , I-, i 14r
! Vk.
- -- C-
GU RC -1- Ln i I s -t L -Z (0 UAJ I
_ 4. What land use and development changes have occurred since the effective date
of the comprehensive plan which are relevant to the proposed
amendment?_ G)rnPILE.KEAJSIVE LACI; VSE ANp 1'�- u �.T 1=o�Z
ANNEXA-m(),t) A2E 11)C+,,1L,- 5uC)m ITTSh C,,)n1LLJ(L!l��tlT"
7 -I -t I 4 P 9 L I c
5. Explain how the proposed rezoning is compatible with the existing or future land
uses of the City. TI 20 pos c:z� -Pt p - R- I S AJ S I STE AJT—
ln� Irt ►+ 'No p oS ED kA,j C c rD,:SI T 9,_) Lo, Q DFA,)S
iN CONS ! LtiT W I-rH IJA D 2L.y Irt ur �n Nom. VSA, L-2-
6. Are there adequate public facilities to serve the proposed land use?
TR, ELIMtAJAR.`i MLC111\IL. W(Th -�-N1!,A0 r� C --:L `,), )rrr--1 UTI LirE:
0) PJ
:0)rJ- 1�fnt_0 'n -!AT A- :, r r U/A-7-r1-L
A 4
nr� �wE+t ExISTS. filPu�4 h; z���
tiny, A -i
Permit Application No. _
7. Explain how the proposed rezoning will not result in a significant adverse impact
on the natural environment. C -N-)\/ I fr),nJ mWin/7 /'i L
C.Q ) 0 E�L 6 0 TA' l rL- L�1<1,4 Nom. = )i^J `c'
tT4 2 E= ! ` 'fi r -/+T '-J E7 O S o nl S ATE 1i ; 71(,) A T -I /\J ✓✓ L,
�M
_ 8. Explain how the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect the property values of
the area, the general health, safety and welfare or the financial resources of the
city. A- REavES'- Fill ANn)C�)(,--nr)tO FIA ' i t✓EnJ Ct,, rh ; * ^.
IS Sv2a(wJ&J ,nJ(�-
WILI. TAY. ?ASr- ELL TNr- Cir-/ 0;:-
T,o4' I -o 'Sr-(,.,Jr-
9.
�;r �, -,A n.JG9. Describe how the proposed rezoning will result in an orderly development pattern.
i (� �
114E T2p005F-D `JEL)C.LUFr/IEAJ-T— UJILcs '(fie t„ 0, )
,A /NJ n W L_L- A d ACCR 7,
10. Attach the following:
A verified statement showing each and every individual person having a
legal and/or equitable ownership interest in the property upon which the
application for rezoning is sought, except publicly held corporations, in
which case the names and addresses of the corporate officers shall be
sufficient.
A. b. A list of the names and addresses of all owners of parcels of real
property within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel to be considered.
c. A survey and legal description of the property to be rezoned.