HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 10 01 - Engineer's Addendum SubmittalMOSBY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
1507 20TH STREET
P.O. BOX 6368
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32961
407-569-0035
TO City of Sebastian
P.O. Box 127
Sebastian, Florida 32958
LIEUTEQ (01F MS VEOUTU
DATE JOB NO.
October 1, 1990 89-383
ATTENTION
Linda Kinchen
RE:
Chesser's Gap
WE ARE SENDING YOU CRAttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
11
9/28/90
Revised Addendum #1
11
8/8/90
Preliminary Plats
11
10/1/90
Engineering Drawings
11
9/28/90
Letters to Bruce Cooper regarding written material
for Preliminary Plats
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19
REMARKS
COPY TO
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNED: Randy L. Mosby, P.E.
1/ enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
u
MOSBY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
1507 20TH STREET
P.O. BOX 6368
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32961
407-569-0035
September 28, 1990
Mr. Dave Fisher
City of Sebastian
Post Office Box 127
Sebastian, Florida 32978-0127
Subject: Chesser's Gap
Sebastian, Florida
Engineer's Project No. 89-383
Dear Mr. Fisher:
As requested, enclosed is revised Addendum No. 1 to the written
material submitted for the subject project. This revised addendum
analyzes the project for a DRI. As you can see from the analysis,
a DRI is not required.
Also enclosed copy of Chapter 28-24 as requested.
Should you require additional information, please call.
Very r y urs
Randy Mosby, P.E
RLM:bes
cc Dr. Henry Fischer w/enclosures
Mr. Bruce Cooper w/enclosures
enc.
A
ADDENDUM NO. 1
TO THE WRITTEN MATERIAL
FOR
CHESSER'S GAP
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR
A COMMERCIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FOR
SEBASTIAN GENERAL PARTNERSHIP B.F.T.
Developments of Regional Impact (DRI) Analysis:
Chesser's Gap will consist of three (3) distinct types of development
as follows:
1. Office Parks
2. Indistrial Parks
3. Retail Services and Wholesale Facilities
Chapter 28-24 of the Florida Administrative Code sets forth the
following thresholds used to determine if a DRI Study is required
for a development:
1. Office Parks
Total Land Area = 30 Acres
Total Building Area = 300,000 ft.2
2. Industrial Parks
Total Area = 320 Acres
Total Parking = 2,500 Spaces
3. Retail, Services and Wholesale Facilities
Total Building Area = 400,000 ft.2
Total Land Area = 40 Acres
Total Parking Spaces = 2,500 Spaces
Chapter 380, Paragraph 380.06 of the Florida Statutes states for
multi -use developments, with two (2) or more land uses where the
sum of the percentages of the appropriate thresholds are equal to
or greater than one hundred forty five percent (1450) then a DRI
Study is required. Chapter 28-24 further states that if a develop-
ment is at or lower than eighty percent (800) of all numerical thres-
holds, a DRI is not required.
The following is the quantitative values of the three (3) types
of developments within Chesser's Gap.
1. Office Park
Total Land Area = 15.18 Acres
Total Building Area = 88,980 ft.2
2. Industrial Parks
Total Land Area = 17.1 Acres
of
Total Parking Spaces = 200 Spaces
Land Area =
3. Retail, Services and Wholesale Facilities
Total Building Area = 201,930 ft.2
Total Land Area = 21.6 Acres
Total Parking Spaces = 1,044 Spaces
320 Ac.
The percent of the maximum threshold
of each development is as
follows:
Total
1. Office Park
200 Spaces
Percentage of Land Area =
15.18 = 50.6% controls
30
Percentage of Total Building Area =
88,980 ft.2 = 29.7%
300,000 ft2
2. Industrial Park
Percentage
of
Total
Land Area =
17.1 Ac.
= 5.3%
320 Ac.
Percentage
of
Total
Parking Area =
200 Spaces
= 8.0% controls
2,500 Spaces
3. Retail, Services and
Wholesale Facilities
Percentage
of
Building
Area =
201,930 ft.2
= 50.50
400,000 ft.2
Percentage
of
Total
Land Area =
21.6 Ac.
= 54% controls
40 Ac.
Percentage
of
Total
Parking Spaces =
1,044
= 41.8% controls
2,500
The sum of the controlling threshold percentages are as follows:
50.60 + 8% + 540 = 112.690
As you can see from the herein analysis, the sum of the controlling
threshold does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the combined
threshold of 145% or 116%, therefore this project does not require
a DRI Study.
MOSBY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
1507 20TH STREET
P.O. BOX 6368
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32961
407-569-0035
September 28, 1990
Mr. Bruce Cooper
Building Department
City of Sebastian
Post Office Box 127
Sebastian, Florida 32978-0127
Subject: Chesser's Gap
Sebastian, Florida
Engineer's Project No. 89-383
Dear Mr. Cooper:
As requested in our meeting of September 27, 1990, and as a follow-
up to our written material for the preliminary plan dated, August 1990
for the subject project, the following are additional statements
regarding the project:
1. The proposed improvements to the intersection of C. R. 512
and Fleming Street, as detailed on the construction drawings,
are in accordance with the project's Traffic Study and the
proposed Indian River County improvements to C.R. 512.
2. All improvements within the proposed Fleming Street Extension
and all the on-site stormwater tracts will be constructed dur-
ing Phase I of the project.
3. The developer intends to file the final plan for Chesser's
Gap PUD in phases as each lot is developed.
4. Indian River County has guaranteed water and sewer service
to the project. Please refer to the attached letters.
5. As requested, by City staff, an emergency access has been added
to the west property line of the project at Cross Street.
The access will only be used in case of an emergency and will
be constructed with a breakaway barrier.
We hope the above further clarifies the development aspects of
the project.
Mr. Bruce Cooper
September 28, 1990
Page 2
Should you require further information, please call.
Ver t ly you s,
i
Randy Mosby, P E.
RLM:bes
cc Dr. Henry Fischer
enc.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
REFERENCE:
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570
M E M O R A N D U M
September 28, 1990
Planning and Zoning Commission
Bruce Cooper
Director of Community
Developme.it
Chesser's Gap Preliminary Plan
Unit Development
Sebastian General Partnership, B.F.T., has submitted their
preliminary plan unit development known as Chesser's Gap in
accordance with the Land Development Code. Chesser's Gap
conceptual plan and rezoning was approved by the adoption of
ordinance 0-87-09 on February 25, 1987. The City Council
approved a time extension November 18, 1987 for submission of
the preliminary development plan within 18 months after the
City adopted a revised thoroughfare plan. The application
has been submitted within the time restrains as set forth by
the City Council.
To get a better understanding of a Plan Unit Development. I
would encourage all commission members to review Article IV
of the Land Development Code regarding Plan Unit Development
district regulations. This submission of the preliminary
plan unit development is similar to and must meet the
requirements of the subdivision ordinance. The applicant
proposes to obtain preliminary approval for the Plan Unit
Development which would then allow him to proceed with the
construction of all required improvements.
City Staff (Bruce Cooper and Dave Fisher) has reviewed the
submitted preliminary development plan and have the following
comments:
1. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 20A-4.1
3(B)(2) which requires graphic presentation of the general
features of the proposed structures including floor plans and
elevations. Staff has no objection to the request subject to
the applicant is required to submit individual site plans for
each site prior to any development. Basically, if approved
as submitted this would be only allowing the developer to
proceed in the construction of the required improvements for
streets and drainage and to submit a final plat for the
individual lots. Therefore. Planning and Zoning Commission
can give conceptual approval to the individual site layouts
as presented, but, would hold off any approval of the actual
site until a site plan has been submitted and approved by
Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff does not object to
this type of procedure concerning a Commercial PUD which is
of a magnitude that would dictate phasing of this
development.
2. Mr. Rick Torpy, Assistant City Attorney, will be present
at the October 9th special meeting to address the written
opinion the Planning and Zoning has requested concerning
ownership requirements and for any other assistance the
Planning and Zoning Commission deems necessary.
3. Since the improvements to Flemming Street extension will
result in a cul-de-sac until General Development Corporation
completes improvements to Unit 16, staff has recommended that
the Engineer develops an emergency access possibly to Wave
Street on the westside of the property.
4. The preliminary plans must indicate street lighting in
accordance with 20A -17.1(N) of the Land Development Code.
5. The applicant must provide sufficient paperwork to
indicate that this development has committed sufficient ERU's
to hookup to the North County Sewer Project.
6. The applicant must provide in writing assurances that the
Indian River County utilities will permit this project to
hook into General Development Utilities for its potable
water.
7. City staff has recommended that the plat would represent
a 50 foot easement along the perimeter of the project as a
drainage and landscape buffer. Staff has informed the
applicant's Engineer that staff is concerned with the
landscaping buffer that the applicant will provide to assure
protection from the abutting residential development. Staff
has recommended a combination of earthberm with landscaping
or a wall. Staff recognizes that the City Council approved
the conceptual plan allowing the 100 foot setback
from residential property included the 50 foot drainage
right -a -way along the westside.
8. Attached in your packet is a copy from the Traffic Impact
Analysis which the consultant has given their conclusions and
recommendations. Any approval of this development should be
subject to a county right -a -way permit being issued by Indian
River County to insure that all the improvements will be met.
9. Staff has requested the applicant to install a
bicycle/pedestrian path in accordance with Section 20A -
17.1(K).
Since I will be away next week, the applicant is suppose to
have these items addressed in your packet. If the applicant
has satisfactorily complied with the above items, I have no
objection to the proposed development.
BC/gk
chesgap.doc