Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 OCR ReportSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH HEIDI HUGHES Governor Interim Secretary .•-..- April 5, 2004 7.19The Honorable Nathan B. McCollum CO Mayor, City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street �'' 7= - Sebastian, Florida 32958 Dear Mayor McCollum: The Department of Community Affairs has completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of Sebastian (DCA No. 04-1), which was received on December 29, 2003. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional and local agencies for their review, and their comments are enclosed. The Department has reviewed the comprehensive plan amendment for consistency with Rule 9J- 5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C) and Chapter 163, Part H, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and has prepared the attached Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report which outlines our findings concerning the comprehensive plan amendment. Our objections are the lack of data and analysis for public facilities and environmental protection. Our findings and recommendations concerning this matter are set forth in more detail in the attached report. We are available to discuss our concerns and would like to work with your staff to review proposed revisions to resolve the issues prior to adoption of the proposed amendment. We have also included copies of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. If you or your staff have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please contact Ken Metcalf, AICP, Regional Planning Administrator, or Dan Evans, Planner at (850) 922-1805. Sincerely, Valerie J. Hubbard, AICP Director, Division of Community Plamling VJH/des Enclosures: Review Agency Comments cc: Mr. Michael Busha, Executive Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: htto://www,dca state fl,us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shurrard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 1555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this letter, the City of Sebastian has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment. The process for adoption of local government comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-11.011, F.A.C. The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3189(2)(a), F. S. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the City must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendments, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to the Executive Director of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that Section 163.3 1 84(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event there are no citizens requesting this information, please inform as of this as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the City of Sebastian 04-1 proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. Each of these objections must be addressed by the City of Sebastian and corrected when the amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections that are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items, which the local government considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its non -applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non -applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments that follow the objections and recommendations section are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN AMENDMENT 04-1 April 5, 2004 Division of Community Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010 OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CITY OF SEBASTIAN (DCA No. 04-1) OBJECTIONS Objection 1 -Public Facilities Data and Analysis The amendment is not supported by data and analysis which identifies that the level of service will be achieved and maintained for sewer and potable water services, and solid waste collection. Citation Florida Statues: Section 163.3177(6)(c) Florida Administrative Code: Rule 9J-5.01 I(1)(f) Recommendation Identify the current availability of potable water and sewer services, and solid waste collection within the community, and the estimated demand the proposed amendment will place on that availability. Objection 2 -Environmental Data and Analysis The amendment is not supported by data and analysis which identifies the extent and type of environmentally sensitive habitats located on the Ashbury Subdivision Parcel. There is no analysis, which identifies how these areas will be protected from development encroachment and subsequent habitat loss. Citation Florida Statutes: Section 163.3177(6)(a) Florida Administrative Code: 9J-5.006(2), 9J -5.013(1)(a) Recommendation Describe the environmentally sensitive habitats in terms of type, location, function and relative health of the ecosystem. Identify what measures the City will use to protect these areas from encroachment. COMMENTS Residential Need There is no current population projection or assessment of vacant lands to evaluate residential need. The latest vacant land use snap is circa 1991, as are the latest population projections. Without current data, it is difficult to accurately assess residential need. The 1998 adopted EAR provides some data with regard to housing projections, but this data is almost ten years old. The EAR identified a projected affordable housing needs deficit of 1,659 units. This indicates a need for additional multi -family units in the interior of the City. The subject amendments do not address multi -family need. The amendments should be supported by a needs analysis, confirming the need for additional acreage to meet single-family needs and to address how the City intends to address multi -family needs. Urban Service Boundary For future amendments, the City should consider providing a map, which clearly delineates the location of the City's Urban Service Boundary. This would allow the City and Department to better understand which land tracts are appropriate for future annexation. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The amendment is not consistent with the following provisions of the State Comprehensive Plan Chapter 157, F.S.: Water Resources (7)(a)(b) Natural Systems and Recreational Lands (9)(a)(b) Hazardous and No hazardous Materials and Waste (12)(a)(b) Public Facilities (17)(a)(b) Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT JOSE ABREU GOVERNOR 3400 West Commercial Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309-3421 SECRETARY Telephone: (954)777-4411 Fax:(954)777-4197 . Internet Email: aerrv.oreilly62Wot.state.fl.us ` ! Toll Free: 1-866-3364435 i t February 26, 2004 Mr. Ray Eubanks, Community Program Administrator Plan Review and DRI Processing Team } Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard; Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Dear W. Eubanks: 3 D SUBJECT: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments ORC Review Local Government: City of Sebastian DCA Amendment # 04-1 The Department has reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan ,amendments for the City of Sebastian. Enclosed are objections, recommendations, and comments based on this review. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the review process. If you have any comments or questions about this letter, please contact me at (954) 777-4490. Sincerely, Ge O'Reilly, P.E. Director of Transportation Development District Four GO:TS Enclosure cc: B. Romig, FDOT Central Office K. Metcalf, DCA N. Ziegler, FDOT 4 L. Hymowitz, FDOT 4 T. Scheckwitz, FDOT 4 File: 4270.20 www.dot.stete.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER DISTRICT 4, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIONS, RECOMWNDATTONS & COMNMNTS RESPONSIBLE DIVISION/BUREAU: Planning Department NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNNENT: City of Sebastian DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT: 2/06/04 DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA: 4 oa/o4 REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS: ELEMENT: Various annexed parcels Future Land Use Element DCA Amendment # 04-1 RULE DEFICIENCY: The five proposed Future Land Use amendments, which include Cross Creek Subdivision Ord. # 0-03- 16, The Spencer Project Ord. 40-03-18, Ashbury Subdivision Ord. #0-03-20, Sebastian Crossings Ord. 40-03-24, and River Oaks Preserve Ord. 40-03-26, would change the designated land use from County Low Residential to City Low Residential designation. COM MNTS: The location relationship of these annexed areas to the Urban Service Area Boundary is not depicted. REVIEWED BY: Terry Scheckwitz_ AICD_ PHONE: 954-777-4490 REVIEWED By; Lav HvmowitzAICP PHONE: 954-777-4490 gEV1EWID BY: Nancy A Ziegler PHONE: 954-777-4490 p9GiEC1GX Department of F�oRi A Environmental Protection Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building Jeb Bush 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS 47 Colleen M. Castille Governor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Secretary March 5, 2004 Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs J / Plan Review and DRI Processing Team S �G 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard / Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: City of Sebastian, 04-1, Comprehensive Plan Amendment ORC Review Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has reviewed the above -referenced amendment proposal under the procedures of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 9J-5 and 9J-1,1, Florida Administrative Code, and we have the following comments and suggestions: The proposed amendment would change the land use designation on five parcels to Sebastian Low Density Residential (up to 5 du/acre). The sites range from 38 acres to 152 acres. Water and sewer will be available at all sites. Comments & Recommendations: According to information in the amendment package 16 acres of wetlands are present on the 56 acre parcel known as Ashbury Subdivision. There appear to be no wetlands on the other parcels. The soils underlying a considerable portion of all of the parcels are generally poorly drained Oldsmar, Immokalee, Riveira, Pomello and Wabasso soils. .These soils are identified in the Soil Survey of Indian River County- as having potential for excessive wetness, ponding and = high water table during rainy periods. Development of these parcels and adjacent flood zone areas may hydrologically affect and likely reduce natural watershed functions such as the collection, storage, filtering and discharge of runoff. As a result, non -point source runoff into the Sebastian River watershed will be an issue of concern. The Department recommends that the applicant consider a full range of planning strategies to minimize impacts to groundwater and nearby wetlands by limiting impervious surfaces and clustering structures away from wetland areas and reserving much of the land as open space for a common view in accordance with Rule 9J-5.006(5)(1). Stormwater treatment "More Protection, Less Process" Ray Eubanks March 5, 2004 Page 2 should be designed to maintain the natural predevelopment hydro—period and water quality, as well as to protect the natural functions of the adjacent wetlands. Prior to finalizing infrastructure development plans for the subject parcels, we recommend that delineation and water management district verification of the landward extent of wetlands and surface waters be obtained, in accordance with guidelines of Rule 62-340, F.A.C. Wetlands within the parcel should be designated "Conservation" to prevent encroachment after initial construction, even if surrounding land use designations are later amended. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If I may be of further assistance, please call me at (850) 245-2172. Sincerely, SEX Suzanne E. Ray Environmental Specialist Office of Intergovernmental Programs /ser of • COD wo FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood -.Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL: RESOURCES February 20, 2004 Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 10 K10 cp-1 g4 16 q Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Sebastian (04-1) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request _ . .. Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to, this agency's. esponsibilities under sections .163 3177 and 1.63.31.78, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5; Florida.Adrninistrative.Code, we reviewed.the above document to determine if data regarding historic resources have been given sufficient consideration in the request to amend the Sebastian Comprehensive Plan. We reviewed five proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map to consider the potential effects of this action on historic resources. Although none of the five tracts contain any sites listed in the Florida Master Site File or the National Register of Historic Places, it remains the city's responsibility to ensure that potentially significant historic resources will not be adversely affected by these actions. All five parcels, particularly The Spencer Project and River Oaks Preserve parcels, appear to have at least moderate archaeological site probability. The most effective way to guarantee that such sites are not damaged is for the city to sponsor or require historic resource surveys. so that it can ensure its archaeological resources and historic structures more- an.50%years ola.will be considered when substantive changes in land use are proposed ';. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 245-6333. Sincerely, - Frederick Gaske, Acting Director (J 500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • http://www•ilheritage.com O Director's Office O Archaeological Research ®'Historic Preservation O Historical Museums (850) 245-6300 - FAX: 245_64M (850) 245-6444 - FAX: 245-6436 (850) 245-6333 • FAX: 245-6437 (850) 245-6400 • FAX 245-6433 O Palm Beach Regional' Office 0 St. Augustine Regional Office O Tampa Regional Office (561) 279-1475 - FAX: 279-1476 (904) 825-5045 - FAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 • FAX 272-2340 • St.Johns River _ Water Management District Kirby B. Green III, Executive Director • Dav d 1'V. Fisis. Assistant Executive Director 4049 Reid Street • P.O. Box 1429 • Palatka, FL 32178-1429 • (386) 329-4500 On the Internet at wwworwmd.corn. March 5, 2004 D. Rav Eubanks, Administrator ((�-n /�Plan Review and Processing,% V Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment DCA Amendment # Sebastian 04-1 Dear Mr. Eubanks: St. Johns River Water Management District (District) planning staff have reviewed the above -referenced proposed comprehensive plan amendment_ The proposed amendment consists of five changes to the City of Sebastian's future land use map. District staff comments are provided below. The District staff review Focuses on potable water availability and related water resource issues in an effort to lint: land use planning and water supply planning. In the review of water supply availability, District staff consider infr�struculre, permitted allocation under consumptive use permits, and source. The. City's staff reports indicate Indian.River County Utility Services has.potable water lints available.to serve the propertieti subject to . . the future land use changes. The City's submittal package did not include some cif the infnrn�ation regardm water supply availability that is needed for District staff to adequately review the amendment. District staff have requested additional information from the. City's staff, including a map depicting service area boundaries, copies of any agreements between the City and the County for the provision of potable water, current capacity of the water treatment plant, projected demand calculations attributable to the future land use changes, 2003 water use information, 2004 growth projection, and a reserved capacity calculation. If the requested information is provided, District staff will evaluate it and forward additional comments to DCA. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments. If you have any questions, please contact District Policy Analyst Peter Brown at 38(x329-431 IiSuncom 860-4311 or phrownC.VjnrnrcLrorrt. Sincerely , Lunda Burnette: Director. Office of Communications and Governmental Affairs LB/PB cc: Tracy Hass, City of Sebastian Michael Busha, TCRPC Linda McDowell, FDLP Jeff Cole, S1 RWMD _ Marguerita Engel, SJRWMD ooVERNING BOARD ometres D. Long. crww 1 David G. Graham.,/ICE UWFth-J R. Clay AItSEC-00Aar Dior. hteJTREAsJREn W. Nichael Brandi AFOe4t John GSohd uGCSDaLLEWilliam Kan �AAnnTMore ��` t' Susan N. I lughes FERNAHGHA BEACH OR -MOD MELBourWE BEAD, UMELt .0a.10PNLLE February 20, 2004 Mr. Charles Gauthier Chief Bureau of Local Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shummard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Subject: City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan Draft Amendments — DCA Reference No. 04-1 m Dear Mr. Gauthier: C�/ C�_ �0 �4 above -referenced in accordance with the Council has reviewed the d C unc l'ssadopted plans, policies, and requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes an review procedures. Enclosed is a copy of our report as3 84r vedFloby Council at its regular meeting on February 20, 2004 pursuant to Section If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Terry L. ess, AICP Deputy Director TLH/wh Attachment B r i n g i n g C o m m u " n i t i e s T o g e t h e r • Est . 1 9 7 6 301 Ezet ocean Boulevard - Suite 3'00 - Stuart, Flod'minCa�tc9oo.or� Phone (772) 221-4060 - SC 269-4060 - Fax (772) 221-4067 - E-mail - r TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL MEMORANDUM To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM SE From: Staff Date: February 20, 2004 Council Meeting Subj ect: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review Draft Amendments to the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan DCA Reference No. 04-1 Introduction . The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires that Council review local government comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. Under the provisions of this law, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) prepares an Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report on a proposed amendment only if requested to do so by the local regional planning by theDCA council, an f the local person or if an ORC Report is otherwise deemednecessary government requests the DCA to prepare an ORC Report, then Council must provide the DCA with its own objections, recommendations for modification, and comments on the proposed amendment within 30 days of its receipt. Background The City of Sebastian is proposing five Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendments to its comprehensive plan. The proposed FLUM amendments are for properties that are being annexed into the City. The City has asked for a formal review of the proposed amendments. Evaluation Future Land Use Map Amendments The FLUM amendments are shown on the attached maps and summarized in Table'1. r Table 1 City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendments—DCA Ref. No. 04-1 Amendment i y v,�y Acreage b C:urrent�LUM 'Proposed%PLUM Locations ri,� �T rix: ,1 u J -"P Designation }:. y..: -. i r. '4 4 Y' 9' Rte, �No ..:� tt �_ esi�nation r 0-03-16 115.0 R* LDR along Powerline Road south of Barber St. and north of CR 510 0-03-18 38.3 R* LDR southeast of the intersection of CR 510 and CR 512 0-03-20 56.0 L-2* LDR along Powerline Road north of Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street 0-03-24 60.0 L-1* 45.7 acres LDR northwest of the intersection of and 14.4 acres CR 510 and CR 512 CG 0-03-26 152.2 R* LDR Along CR 510 east of 82'6 Ave. * County Designation Future Land Use Map Designations Citv Countv LDR Low Density Residential (5 units/ acre) R Residential (1 unit/acre) CG Commercial L-2 Residential (6 units/acre) L-1 Residential (3 units/acre) 1. 0-03-16 (Cross Creek Subdivision) – The proposed FLUM amendment is for approximately 115.0 acres located along Powerline Road south of Barber Street and north of CR 510 (Wabasso Road) at the southern boundary of the City. The property is home to a former sand mine operation, and the landowner is requesting annexation into the City. The present FLUM designation is Residential, a County low-density residential designation allowing a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre. The proposed designation is Low Density Residential (maximum 5 dwelling units per acre). Surrounding lands include residential to the north, northwest, and northeast and vacant land to the south, southeast, and southwest. Surrounding FLUM designations are Residential (County) to the south and east and Low Density Residential to the east, west, and north. The proposed use of the property is a 150 -lot subdivision with a density of 1.3 units per acre. 2. 0-03-18 (Spencer Project) – The proposed FLUM amendment is for approximately 38.3 acres located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of CR 512 (Fellsmere Road) and CR 510 (Wabasso Road) at the southwestern boundary of the City. The property is presently vacant, and the landowner is requesting annexation into the City. The present FLLW designation is Residential, a County designation allowing a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre. The proposed designation is Low Density Residential (maximum 5 dwellin; units per acre). Surrounding lands are primarily vacant with single-family residential to the west. Surrounding FLUM designations - are Low Density Residential to the north, L-1 Residential (County) to the west and south, and Residential (County) to the east. The conceptual plan proposed for this property includes a total of 99 single-family lots that would be a density of 2.6 units per acre. 3. 0-03-20 (Ashbury Subdivision) – The proposed FLUM north of amendmenSeb t is for ian approximately 56.0 acres located along Powerline Road Elementary School and south of Main Street. The property is presently vacant, and the landowner is requesting annexation into the City. The present FLUM designation is L-2 Residential, a County designation allowing a maximum of six dwelling units per acre. The proposed designation is Low Density Residential (maximum 5 dwelling units per acre). Surrounding lands are residential to the north and west, mobile homes to the east, and institutional to the south. Surrounding FLUM designations are Low Density Residential to the west, Medium Density Residential to the north and east, and Institutional to the south. The conceptual plan proposed for this property includes a total of 195 single-family residential homes that would be a density of 3.5 units per acre. or 4. 0-03-24 (Sebastian Crossing) – The proposed FLof the intersect onamenment is f of approximately 60.0 acres located in the northwest qu County Road 512 (Fellsmere Road) and County Road 510 (Wabasso Road) at the southwestern boundary of the City. The property is presently vacant, and the landowner is requesting annexation into the City. The present FLUM designation is Low Density Residential, a County designation allowing a maximum of three dwelling units per acre. The proposed designation is 14.4 acres of Commercial and 45.7 acres of Low Density Residential (maximum 5 dwelling units per acre). Surrounding lands are primarily vacant. Surrounding FLUM designations are Agriculture -3 (County) to the north and west, Low Density Residential to the east, and -L-1 Residential (County) to the east and south. 5. 0-03-26 (River Oaks Preserve) – The proposed FLUM amendment is for approximately 152.2 acres located along CR 510 east of 82nd Avenue at the southern boundary of the City. The property is presently vacant, and the landowner is requesting annexation into the City. The present FLLW designation is Residential, a County designation allowing a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre. The proposed designation is Low Density Residential (maximum 5 dwelling units per acre). Surrounding lands are primarily vacant land to the south, west, and east and LW re Agricuture-I (County) residential to the north. Surrounding FL10andaLow D nlsity Residential to the south, Low Density Residential to the north (County) to the east and west. Extra'm� •isdictional 1-112 acts Analysis of the proposed amendments indicates that they would not have significant extrajurisdictional impacts. A letter was sent to the County requesting comments on any