HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 - Engineer response to DCAENGINEERING, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING
UBV,MOIA BOWLES VILLAMIZAR & ASSOCIATES
August 17, 2005
IVIS. Jan King VIA Hand Carry
City of Sebastian
1225 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
Subject: Cross Creek — Phase II
Indian River County, Florida
Engineer's Project Number: 04-408
Dear Ms. King:
We have received a copy of the DCA response letter dated April 18, 2005 and have the
following responses to the two objections raised
1. A copy of the IRC utility capacity availability letter is attached. To the best of our
knowledge, this project will not require a modification to the county's CUP.
2. A copy of the traffic impact study is attached, which shows that there is adequate
capacity on the surrounding road network links to support this project.
As you are aware, the submittal to DCA consisted of three projects in which one was
withdrawn and the other denied. Therefore we believe that the impact of just the subject
project is insignificant and that the provided information should be sufficient to ensure
such. Should you have any questions regarding the above subject, please call.
ery tr y o s,
Bruce A. Moi P.E.
BAM/j b
cc: Mr. Warren Dill
2455 -,14TH AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
Phone (772) 569-0035 Fax (772) 778-3617 E-mail: mbveng0bellsouth.net
It
August 17, 2005
Mr. Bruce Moia
MBV Engineering, Inc.
2455 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32960
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Water and Sewer Availability for
Proposed Cross Creek Phase 11 Subdivision
Dear Mr. Moia:
This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding the availability of water and sewer service for the
residential subdivision known as Cross Creek Phase H, Sebastian, Florida. There is water and
sewer service available near the site.
Presently, there is adequate water and sewer capacity available to service the needs of the proposed
development however; this does not guarantee that there will be capacity availability at the time you
are ready to connect. In order to reserve capacity you must pay the appropriate capacity charges.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office at (772) 567-8000 X1823.
Sincerely,
Gordon E. Sparks, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
GES/ges
Cc: Mike Hotchkiss, PE, Capital Projects Manager
Steven Doyle, PE Assistant Director
F:\Utilities\UTILITY -CUSTOMER SERVICE\Water, Sewer, Reclaim Letters of Availability\Water & Sewer Availability - Cross Creek Phase
II.doc
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
for
CROSS CREEK,
PHASE II
A 25.55 acre Residential Subdivision to be
annexed into the City of Sebastian
Indian River County, Florida
August 2005
Prepared by: MBV Engineering, Inc.
2455 - 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 569-0035
Engineer's Project No. 04-408
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Sebastian with the potential impact of
the land use change proposed as a result of annexing the subject property into the City
limits.
The proposed project is a 25.55 acre tract located on the west side of Powerline Road,
between Barber Street and CR510, with single access to Powerline Road. The property
is proposed to be developed as a single family residential subdivision consisting of
25.55 acres.
The entire 25.55 acre tract currently has a land use density of 1 unit per acre. The
proposed land use is 5 units per acre for the 25.55 acre tract.
This Traffic statement addresses only the addition traffic impact of the proposed
improvements.
II. TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
Based on the ITE Trip generation, Seventh edition, a summary of the net average trips
(ADT) and PM Peak Hour Trips are as follows (see Appendix A for ITE Trip Rates for
Land Use):
CURRENT
Average Daily Trips (ADT)
Use Units ADT Total
Single Family 25.55 ac. x 1 unit/ac. 9.57 trips/unit
(Land Use 210) = 25 units = 240 trips
PM Peak Hour Trips (PHT)
Total
1.01 trips/unit x 25 units
= 26 trips
IN OUT
16(64%) 10(36%)
PROPOSED
Average Daily Trips (ADT)
Use Units
Single Family 25.55 ac. x 5 unit/ac.
(Land Use 210) = 127 units
PM Peak Hour Trips (PHT)
Total
1.01 trips/unit x 127 units
= 129 trips
IN OUT
82(64%) 47(36%)
COMPARISON TOTALS
Proposed Residential
Current Residential
Difference
PEAK HOUR TRIPS
IN
OUT
82
47
16
10
66
37
See Appendix B for peak hour volume distributions.
ADT Total
9.57 trips/unit
= 1216 trips
III. ROADWAY IMPACT
1860
702
2
1156
Based on Indian River County
Link Report
with adopted
capacities for
the subject
roadways (see Appendix C), the impact of the
trip difference is as follows:
Road Seqment Direction
Capacity
Current PDS
Vested PDS
Available
1-95 to CR510
1152
CR512 WB
1860
652
CR512 EB
1860
634
144
1082
CR512 WB
1860
723
162
975
CR510 to City Limit
CR512 EB
1860
702
2
1156
CR12 WB
1860
686
12
1162
City Limit to Roseland Road
CR512 EB
1860
706
2
1152
CR512 WB
1860
652
4
1204
CR512 to 66th Avenue
CR510 EB
932
406
275
251
CR510 WB
932
516
375
41
The peak hour trips and the In/Out distribution rates were based on the ITE Trip Generation,
Seventh Edition.
IV. CONCLUSION
Based on the distribution, the proposed trips do not exceed the capacity of any segment in the
County's Traffic System. In addition, the County has anticipated future impacts due to
development in this are and already has approved engineered construction drawings for
widening improvements for CR512 from 1-95 to Roseland Road, which includes intersection
improvements to the CR512/CR510 intersection. The County is also in the PD&E phase of
improvements to CR510, from CR512 to east of US Hwy. 1.
It is our opinion that this satisfies the comprehensive plan amendment objection by adequately
demonstrating that the level of service standard will be maintained and that long term impacts
have been anticipated and addressed by the County's proposed improvements plan.
Single -Family Detached Housing
(210)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 348
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
9.57 4.31 - 21.85 3.69
Data Plot and Equation
30,000
20,000
10,000
0 71.
0
X Actual Data Points
1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707
2000 3000
------ Average Rate
R2 = 0.96
Trio Generation, 6th Edition 9P3 Institute oi-ansporta"
I Lion E"I'Engineers
ineers
. . . . . . .
. . . . . - - - - - - -
X
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
X
X
X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . ... .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . .
X
X X
X
0 71.
0
X Actual Data Points
1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707
2000 3000
------ Average Rate
R2 = 0.96
Trio Generation, 6th Edition 9P3 Institute oi-ansporta"
I Lion E"I'Engineers
ineers
Single -Family Detached Housing
(210)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 294
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 216
Directional Distribution: 64% entering, 36% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
11.01 0.42 - 2.98 1.05
Data Plot and Equation
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points - Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation- Ln(T) = 0.901 Ln(X) + 0.527
2000 3000
------ Average Rate
R2 = 0.91
Trip Generation, 6th Edition 265 Institute of Transportation Engineers
LEGEND
�= TRIPS
ENTERING
TRIPS
EXITING
9
F
17
BARBER STREET
X16
'�
X10
33
19
66
O
CROSS CREEK
PHASE I 37
LLJ
z
SITE
o
U
0.
O
N
N
O
U
Q
2
w
q 33
9 F 18
16
Lnv
C.R. 510
N
y 7
9
0
C)
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
Z
N.T.S.
c
0
Cl
3
v
v
w
t'WV
ENGINEERING, INC.
CROSS CREEK
JOBNO.
04-408
CD
CONSULTING ENGINEERING
PHASE
I1
DRN/CHK
BAM
o MOIA BOWLES VILLAMI2AR & ASSOCIATES
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
DATEAUG.�
AI WOOS
' CONSULTING ENGINEERS - CA #3728 PHONE 17721 666-0036
2166
SHEET
1 OF 1
-14TH AVEHUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 FAX (779) 7 "GaSEBASTIAN,
FLORIDA
1380
1.385
1385
13901
1.390
1.395
1395
1400
1400
14G5
1405
1410
1410
1510
151.0
1520
1520
1610
11110
1620
1620
1710
1710
1720
1720
1730
1730
1740
1740
1750
1750
J U.S.
1//49Tk STREET//65TH STREET
3 U.S.
1//49Tk STREET//65TH STPEET
I i
4 U.S.
i
1//65TH STREET//69TH STREET
S U.S.
1//65TH STREET//69TH STREET
I
N U.S.
i
1//69TH STP.EF.T//OLD DIXIE HWY
s U.S.
i
i//69TH STREET//OLD DIXIE h'7Y
N U.S.
1//O7. D DI XIE HWY//SCHUMANN DP,
S U.S.
1//OLDj DIXIE HWY//SCHUMANN DR
N U.S.
i
1//SCHIIMANN DP,//C.R. 512
S U.S.
1//SCH4MPNN DR//C.R. 512
hI U.S.
I
i//C.Ri. 512//N. SEB CITY L
S U.S.
1//C.R. 5%2//N. SEB CITY L
N U.S.
1//N. SEB CITY L//ROSELAND RD
S U.S.
1./1N. SF.B CITY L//ROSELAND RD
N U.S.
1//R01;;LA14D RD//N. COUNTY LINE
S U.S.
I
1//ROSk.LAND RD//N. COUNTY LINE
N SCHUMA.NN DRV/CIR. 510 @ 66TH AVE//S. SEB CITY L
S SCHUMANN DR%/C.R.. 510 @ 66TH AVE//S. SEB CITY L
N SCHUMANN DR�/S. SEB CITY L//U.S. 1
S SCHUNLANN DRj//S. .SEB CITY L//U.S. 1
E ROSELAND RD%/C�.P.. 512//N. .SEB CITY L
i .
W ROSELAND RD%/C�-R. 512//tI. SEB CITY L
E ROSELAND KW/N. SEB CITY L//U.S. 1
W ROSELAND RD//N. SEB CITY L//U.S. 1
E C.R. 512//Sj.P.. 60//1-95
W C.R. 512//Sj.R. 60//I-95
E C.R. 512//I;95//C.R. 510
I
W C.R. 512//I-95//C.R.. 510
i
E C.R. 512//C;.R.:510//14. SEB CITY L
W C.R. 512//CI.R. 510//W. SEB CITY L
E C.R. 512//WI. SEB CITY L//ROSELAND RD
i
W C.R. 512!/Wi. SEB CITY L//ROSELAND RD
E C.R. 512//POSELAND RD//U.S. 1
W C.R. 512//ROSELA.ND RD//U.S. 1
F:/TRAFFIC/GEB/MY b01! UMENTS/2005/LINK DETAIL REPORT - May 2005
i
I
I
I
CARCRNT
�
VSTTOT
AVAIL
1,16
1,286
77
497
1,861
1,670
55
135
1,86111
1,602
51
207
1,8601
1,034
53
773
1,8601
1,649
69
142
1,86(1
I
1,074
69
717
1,86
1,697
29
134
I., 86C
1,061
40
759
1,861
1,398
13
449
1,860
1,066
12
782
1,71d
1,310
7
393
,71(.1
1,71( 1
1,015
5
690
1,86q
1,194
4
662
1,8601
Ji
1.,055
6
799
1,860
I
1,256
4
600
1,860
1,022
6
830
86
736
8
116
86
353
11
496
86y
108
2
750
8601
II
174
2
684
866(1
302
0
558
86
343
1
516
86
307
13
540
860
i
364
2
494
6511I
358
45
247
6501
554
2
94
1,86(7
634
144
1,082
1,86d
723
162
975
I
1,861
702
2
1,150'
1,86q
t
6686
12
1,162
1,86d
706
2
1,152
1,860
652
4
1,204
1,86
607
8
1,245
1,86
670
5
1,185
5/31/2005
i
tetail::Roport
R9055
- Links Detail; Report
t.r
LINK
DESC RI;?TION
CRNT PDS
VSTTOT
AVAIL
1810E
C.R.
510//C!.P..1512//66TH AVE
93
906
275
251
1810W
C.R.
I �
510//C:.R.!512//66TH AVE
I
93
516
375
41
1820E
C.R.
510//6�.TH!AVE//58TH AVE
86C
374
77
409
1820114
C.R.
510//66THIAVE//58TH AVE
86C
690
35
135
1830E
C.R.
510//5 TH AVE//U.S. 1
1,34 C
502
68
77C
1830W
C.R.
510//52TH AVE//U.S. 1
1,39q
724
69
547
1840E
C.R.
510//U S. 1//S.R. AIA
95C
547
23
360
1840W
C.R.
510//U!.S. 1//S.R. AlA
95C
795
130
25
1905E
S.R.
60//W..'000NTY LINE//C.R. 512
2,20
202
26
1,972
1905W
S.R.
60//rL COUNTY LI?)E//C.R. 512
2,204
204
21
1,975
1907E
S.R.
60//C. P.. 5i2//100TH AVE
2,200
224
0
1,976
1907w
S.R.
60//C.''R. 512//100TH AVE
2, 20q
215
0
1,985
1910E
S.R.
60//10bTH
AVE//I-95
4,84
268
54
4,518
1910117
S.R.
60//10pTH
AVE//I-95
4,891.
239
56
4,545
1915E
S.R.
60//I-�5/{82ND WE
1,86C
918
386
550
1915W
S.R.
60//I-55/(82ND AVE
i
1,86C
1,059
357
994
1920E
S.P..
60//82ND p.VE//66TH AVE
2,12(
1,250
473
397
192014
..R.
i
60//82NE YE//66TH AVE
2,12
1,384
526
210
1925E
S. R.
60//66,H AVE//58TH P,VE
2,79
1,298
306
1,166
1925W
S.R.
i
60//66TH AVE//58TH AVE
2,79
1,781
317
692
1930E
S.R.
60//58TH AVE/ /43RD AVE
2,794
1,524
186
1,080
1930W
S.R.
60//58TH
AVE//43RD AVE
2,79:
1,628
21.6
946
60//43;tD AVE//27TH AVE
2,790
1,405
157
1,228
1935E
S.R.
1935W
S.R.
60//43 RD AVE//27TH AVE
2, 79U)
1,571
168
1,051
1940E
3.R.
I
60//27TH AVE//20TH AVE
2,790
I
1,267
li3
1,41G
1940W
S.R.
60//27"H AVE//20TH AVE
2, 790
i
1, 326
132
1, 332
1945E
S.R.
60//201rH AVE//OLD DIXIE HWY
3,25
969
49
2,234
1945W
S.R.
601120TH
AVE//OLD DIXIE HWY
3,251
811
56
2,385
1950E
S.R.
i
60//OLD DIXIE HWY//10TH AVE
I
I
3,25A
979
20
2,253
i
50//OLI� DIXIE HWY//10TH AVE
3,25
619
40
2,393
1950W
S.R.
AVE//U.S. 1
3,25
979
10
2,263
1955E
S. R.
60//10TH
I
1955W
S.R.
60//10ITH p.VE//U.S. 1
3,25
819
25
2,408
1960E
S.R.
60//U.�. 1.//INDIP.N RIVER BLVD
3,251
464
1
2,787
1960W
S.R.
6G//U.l. 1//INDIAN RIVER BLVD
II
3,25q
523
2
2,727
F:(TRAFFIC/GEB/MY pOCUMENTS/2005/LINK DETAIL REPORT - May 2005 5/31/2005
li
i