HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 06 04 - IRC Wastewater Master Plan UpdateI
V
BoWlo Engineering Corporation
tZ, 1Ciint T. , IL muni-rb-s. vull.I .
370 F.,,r :'.....th S1,,-1 ,
roR1?14ai+.fit iFP.gi9P941EI!6Rf91R4�G(ANi9E{P.SMQIPC Cirah:.4'Ap.M"f:69,lYS7R"Fk'lYSi'[Sh9_'.'�995?@!0."'.:r':71I9:/IF�%CSI; TGTIp71P M'SM i1F:•{%rN •:.•,�•r
Mr. Terry Pinto, Utility Services Director dull 1". 1'tltl
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1040 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
um to Aqreement
Wate
r Plan into
Terry, enclosed is a copy of Addendum No. 1 which covers (a) expansion of the water
system master planning to include the Sebastian area, and (b) investigation of the'
feasibility of the County supplying treated water to the City of Vero Beach.
The last page of the Addendum (B-13) summarizes the estimated cost for this
project. Since the County will probably want to seek funding assistance for this
project from the Cities of Sebastian and Vero Beach, we have separated the costs for
the Sebastian and Vero Beach elements of the project.
�g,,ni'•Sebastian Area. The estimated cost for expanding the County's water plan to include
P �g Iggl. the Sebastian area is if -5 09 The Sebastian area includes everything botwenn
Ta�9 Wabasso Road, the north County line, Interstate 95 and the Indian River. As part
of life, project, we will estimate the future water demands within the Sebast ion area:
revise, the computer modol to include the Sebasfian area; analyze alternative
transmission main configurations Lhat can be used Lo serve the area in Lhv fuLurc:
identify the water supply, treatment, storage and pumping facilities that. will be
needed in the future; estimate Lhe costs for improvements and develop an
implementation schedule; and revise the current master plan report to include the
findings and recommerid ations for the Sebastian area. The master planning will cover
the time period from 1906 to 2005.
i
The Sebastian area is comprised of the City of Sebastian and unincorporated areas.
The master plan will benefit both the County and the City, so the cost of the study
may be split between the two entities. We feel that the cost should bo prorated
based on the currently estimated 2005 population expected to live within each
entity's current boundaries. The 2005 population will be used as a basis for
determining the size of new facilities that will be needed to serve existing and future
residents. It is customary to distribute the planning costs for new facilities based
on each entity's capacity requirements. Prorating cost based on land area would not
be equitable because large areas with very little or no growth do not require a
significant work effort during the planning process.
Based on population growth projections prepared by the t-ounty Planning Department,
the pro1ected 2005 population within the existing Sohaslian city Iiniils will be
'Mr. Terry Pinto /001�, Page Two )ow,, April 15, 1986
approximately 11,721 people and within the existing unincorporated areas, 13,462
% people (See attached table showing population estimate by traffic analysis zones).
Each entity's prorated share of the planning cost would be as follows:
/ City (11,721/11,721+13,46'2) x $56,188 = $26,152
County (13,452/11,721+13,462) x $56,188 = $30,036
Total 56,188
Vern Beach. The estimated cost to determine the feasibility of serving the City of
Vern Beach is $22,204.00 (See page B-13 of Addendum). As part of this phase of the
project, we will estimate future Water demands within the Vero Beach study area:
modify the computer model so thaf it can be used to analyze alternative transmission
main layouts and interconnection locations between the City and County water
systems; identify the supply, treatment, transmission system, storage and pumping
facilities that will be needed to supply the City in the future; estimate the cost of
the proposed facilities and develop an implementation program; and revise the
existing master plan report to incorporate our findings and recommendations for
supplying water to Vero Beach.
For the Vero Beach portion of the project, we have included in our budget the costs
necessary to estimate future water demands within the City of Vero Beach. if the
City already has, or can provide to us, estimates of future water demands for the
1990-2005 period disaggregated by traffic analysis zone or other suitable subareas
within the City, Work Tasks 1604 - 1616 and 1620 - 1630 can be eliminated, resulting
in a reduction in the cost for the Vero Beach portion of the project of $3121.00.
Authorization of One Part of Project. In preparing the budget estimate, we have
assumed that the County will authorize both the Sebastian and Vero Beach parts, or
the Sebastian portion by itself. Because of overlap of some of the Work Tasks for
each portion of the project, we cannot complete the Vero Beach portion of the
project by itself for the estimated budget cost shown in the Addendum. If the
County elects to complete just the Vero Beach portion and not the Sebastian part,
we would have to increase the costs presented in the Addendum for the Vero Beach
portion of the project.
Please review the attached. If you have any questions or comments, please call. I
will forward three signed copies by the end of this week.
We look forward to working with the County on this project.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
R chard J. Cole n, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
4
Enclosures`
OR-B99-197-00/lpm
tJn l �'--
Boyle Engineennq Corporation
englneers, plan nets, surveuors
320 East South Street
Orlando, Florida 32801-3515 305 / 425-1100
Mr. Terry Pinto, Utility Services Director April 18, 1986
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Addendum
//1/Expand Water System
Master Plan
Terry, we
have reduced the budget
estimate for
Addendum #1 as a result of the
negotiating
session that I had with
you and Doug
Scurlock on April 15, 1986.
Sebastian Area. The budget estimate for expanding the County's master plan into
the Sebastian area is $50,265. The scope of work is summarized in my letter of April
15, 1986.
The City's share of the budget estimate should be approximately 46.5%, or $23,373.
This is based on the percentage of people that are projected to live in Sebastian in
2005, which is the design year for master planning purposes. See my April 15, 1986
letter for supporting data on the. population projections. The County share should be
approximately 53.5%, or $26,892.
Vero Beach. I have talked with City staff and their water consultant to find out
about the water demand information that would be available for us to use on the Vero
Beach portion of the project. From what I have heard, the City should be able to
generate water demand projections for us to use, so I have eliminated the work tasks
we had originally included for us to do the work. The budget estimate for the Vero
Beach portion of the study is $19,119.
Attached are three (3) copies of Addendum #1 which we have signed. Please have
all copies signed, retain two for County files and return one to me. We look forward
to working with the County on this next phase of the water system master plan.
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORPATION
—Riehard o an, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Attachments
OR-B99-197-00/lpm _
enwtonmental engineers. saentists.
Planners. & management consuRants
June 4, 1986
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Terrance G. Pinto
Director of Utilities Services
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
RE: Indian River County
Wastewater Master Plan Update
Dear Mr. Pinto
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
Post Office Box 9626
2001 Northwest 62nd Street
Fort Lauderdale. Flonda 33310
305 776-1731
RECEIVFn SEP 1 8 1986
We are pleased to submit the attached budget proposal for the subject
project based upon our discussions held on May 9 and May 22, 1986.
This proposal includes the updating of the existing Wastewater Master
Plan for Indian River County. This proposal presents in detail the
following items:
o Exhibit A - Scope of Work
o Exhibit B - Project Schedule
o Exhibit C - Project Labor Disaggregation
o Exhibit D - Project Budget
This project will utilize the following existing documents:
o 1985 Area -wide Wastewater Master Plan
0 1986 Sludge Management Plan
o 1986 Septage Management Plan
o 1986 North Region Effluent Disposal Study
o 1986 West Region Effluent Disposal Study
We have estimated the duration of this project to be six months to
produce a draft report. For the services under this proposal, our
total fee is estimated at the upper limit amount of $86,000 and
reflects the existing engineering documents referenced above. This
total includes engineering fees of approximately $15,700 associated
with the County's most northern section. We will not exceed the
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
Mr. Terrance G. Pinto
Page Two
June 4, 1986
---------------------
upper limit amount unless we have obtained prior approval from the
County. The work shall be done under our existing agreement with the
County and shall be charged on an hourly basis.
If you should have any questions, please contact our office.
Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
Donald G. Munksgaard
Associate
DGM/in
Attachment
File: 0000-212-MS-INDRV
Approved:
E. Lawrence Adams, Jr.
Vice President
AWN .1
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
I. GENERAL
A Master Plan Update will be prepared to determine the required
capital improvements for wastewater transmission, treatment, and
disposal facilities in Indian River County for the planning period
1986-2005. The study area for the Plan shall be the entire Indian
River County area exclusive of the franchise area served by the
City of Vero Beach. The Plan will detail a county -wide approach
that is cost-effective, environmentally sound, and implementable.
Task 100 - Data Collection
This task consists of obtaining background information relevant to the
the project.
101 Collect and review existing data on land use, zoning,
soils, population, proposed developments, wastewater flows,
and historical wastewater systems information.
102 Perform a detailed review of the 1985 Area -Wide Wastewater
Master Plan.
103 Perform a detailed review of the County's 201 Plan.
104 Review existing regulatory agency permit and other relevant
requirements for the study area.
105 Review hydrogeologic data.
Task 200 - Existing Conditions
This task evaluates the existing wastewater facilities located
within the study area.
201 Discuss existing service areas, limits of the study area,
and prepare graphics delineating boundaries.
202 Discuss the existing governmental jurisdictions within the
study area/service areas.
203 Inventory the existing wastewater system and prepare
planning level maps consisting of the following components:
0 Transmission mains
0 Treatment plants
A-1
o Effluent disposal systems
o Sludge disposal systems
204 Evaluate the condition of existing wastewater treatment
and disposal facilities in terms of their ability to be
integrated into a long-term program.
205 Determine grade classification of sludge generated from
existing facilities based on Indian River County Sludge
Management Plan.
206 Determine septage generators based on Indian River County
Septage Management Plan.
207 Evaluate the existing wastewater transmission main system in
terms of both adequacy and operation.
208 Perform computerized hydraulic modeling of the County's
existing pumping station and force main system.
Task 300 - Future Conditions
This task projects various items required for evaluating the
long-term adequacy of existing facilities and timing of future
capital improvement needs for the systems.
301 Discuss the basis of planning to include duration of the
planning period.
302 Project population for each year through the end of the
planning period based on population data supplied by Indian
River County's Planning Department.
303 Analyze existing wastewater flow records to determine
historical characteristics.
304 Perform a "desktop" evaluation of infiltration/inflow
occurring in the existing collection system.
305 Develop design (peaking factors) criteria to be used in
projection of wastewater flows.
306 Project average day, maximum month, and peak hour wastewater
flows through the end of the planning period.
307 Project waste sludge production for average day and maximum
month conditions based on the Indian River County Sludge
Management Plan.
308 Project septage quantities based on Indian River County
Septage Management Plan.
A-2
AO* Aw*%
Task 400 - Alternatives
This task will involve the evaluation and selection of an optimum
plan based upon a cost-effective analysis and noneconomic factors.
401 Develop design criteria for major capital components.
402 Develop cost curves for utilization in alternative
evaluations.
403 Develop primary conceptual alternatives as follows:
o Local Treatment - Continue with on-site or
package treatment systems as presently exist in
the County.
o Subregionalization - Between four to seven
subregional treatment systems would be
evaluated.
o Regionalization - Full regionalization would be
developed and would consist of one to three
treatment systems.
404 Develop a total of between 15 and 30 subalternatives within
the primary conceptual alternatives and perform a
subjective, numeric, screening process including factors
such as capital cost, operation and maintenance cost,
regulatory agency requirements, reliability, flexibility,
environmental, reuse water potential, and implement -
ability.
405 Perform detailed cost-effective analysis based on life -cycle
costs for the highest-ranking four to six subalternatives.
406 Perform noneconomic analysis for the selected
subalternatives.
407 Select optimal plan which is most cost-effective,
environmentally sound, and implementable.
Task 500 - Recommended Improvements
This task will develop the capital improvements required for the
selected plan.
501 Identify improvements needed for transmission system based
on a phased construction approach.
502 Identify treatment components required based on a phased
construction approach.
503 Develop an effluent disposal program for the selected plan.
A-3
504 Develop sludge management program for the selected plan
based on the Indian River County Sludge Management Plan.
505 Prepare cost estimates for the recommended improvements.
Task 600 - Implementation Program
This task addresses the capital improvement program and the financial
plan to fund the necessary improvements.
601 Prepare a capital improvement program (CIP) for the planning
period which shows the required timing of facilities and
their planning level costs.
602 Evaluate adequacy of existing wastewater rate structure,
including impact fees, to fund near-term improvements.
603 Evaluate alternative sources of financing such as existing
funds on hand, contributions -in -aid -of -construction, grant
funds, impact fees, and increased user charges to support
additional debt.
604 Project type, level, and timing of additional financing
required for the selected plan.
605 Estimate the impact on existing user charges.
Task 700 - Report Preparation
A draft report and final project report will be prepared and
submitted to the County. The final report will be formally
presented to the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners.
701 Prepare a draft report and submit 5 copies to the County.
702 Prepare the final project report and submit 15 copies to the
County.
703 Present the final project report to the Board of County
Commissioners.
II. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)
The Quality Assurance/Quality Control aspect of this project is
an integral part of all work performed by CDM. The QA/QC task
includes several in-house reviews at various stages of the
project. These reviews assure the high technical quality of the
project by inclusion of senior -level staff in the review
process.
r:Q1
III. REVIEWS WITH CLIENT AND PROGRESS REPORTING
This aspect of the project has a two -fold importance.
Interaction between the County and CDM provides mutual feedback,
identifies areas of concern, and resolves technical problems
that might arise. Also, the County is kept informed as to the
progress of the project.
Task 800 - Client Reviews
Four formal reviews will be held with the client at the following
stages of the project:
801 25 percent completion.
802 50 percent completion.
803 75 percent completion.
804 Subsequent to County's review of draft report.
Task 900 - Progress Reports
Progress reports will be submitted in conjunction with monthly
billings to the County.
A-5
,..
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT SCHEDULE
C3
_F
T�
1
X
W
Z
14
mi
IL
Ic
W
F
U)
cc
Ul
F
W
N
N
a
Q
N
N
N
�
N
O
N
N
m
10
h
P
M
N
O
7K
m
m
A
1D
n
v
M
N
w
w
W
3
z
W
w
a
W
>
(D
H
r
=
N
R
R
O
w
0
O
=
d
0_
U
LLJ
=
r
~
0
o
y
aIr
V
Z
z
:3z
z
y
w
W
H
S
Q
O
7
O
�
Q
J
V
U
/-
Z
0_
N
Q
J
O
0
Q
W
W
z
to
F -
z
z
Ir
`-'
-C
N
w
O
W
O
J
w
'wa
Zw
h
F=-
y
a.
Q
>
W
Q
X
JV
p
1'
0
w
�.
a
¢
¢
o
¢
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
00
N
V
100
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT LABOR DISAGGREGATION
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT LABOR DISAGGREGATION
TASK ENEV9
ENEV8 ENEV7
ENEV5
ENWR5
ENEV4 ENEV1 DNGN DFGN AACT
SEGN TOTAL
I.
GENERAL
101
Collect and
Review Data -
- 1
8
4
- 8 - - -
4 25
102
Review 1985
Master Plan -
_ _
4
1
103
Review 201 Plan -
_ _
4
4
_ 4 _ _ _
_ 12
104
Review Regulatory
Requirements -
- -
4
105
Review Hydrogeologic
Data -
- 1
4
16
- - - - -
- 21
201
Existing Service/
Study Area -
1 2
8
-
- 4 2 8 -
- 25
202
Existing
Jurisdictions -
1 1
8
-
- - - - -
- 10
203
System Inventory -
- 4
16
24
- 40 12 40 -
- 136
204
Evaluate Existing
Treatment and
Disposal Facilities -
- 4
16
-
- 8 - - -
- 28
205
Determine Sludge
Grade _
_ 1
2
-
_ 4
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT LABOR DISAGGREGATION
Continued
TASK ENEV9
ENEV8
ENEV7
ENEV5
ENWR5
ENEV4 ENEV1 DNGN DFGN AACT
SEGN TOTAL
206
Determine Septage
Generators -
-
1
2
-
- 4 _ _ _
_ 7
207
Evaluate
Tranmission System -
1
4
12
40
- 16 - - -
- 73
208
Perform Hydraulic
Modeling -
-
4
16
40
- 24 8 32 -
- 124
301
Basis of Planning -
1
1
4
-
_ - _ _ _
_ 6
302
Population
Projections -
1
1
4
4
- 12 - - -
- 22
303
Analyze Flow
Records _
_
2
4
4
- 16 - -
26
304
Evaluate
Infiltration/Inflow -
-
4
8
_
_ 8 _ _ _
- 20
305
Develop Peaking
Factors -
-
1
4
-
_ 4 _ _ _
9
306
Project Flows -
-
4
4
-
- 8 - - -
- 16
307
Project Sludge
Production -
-
1
2
_
_ 4 _ _ _
_ 7
308
Project Septage
Quantities -
-
1
2
_
_ 4 - - _
_ 7
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT LABOR DISAGGREGATION
Continued
TASK ENEV9
ENEV8
ENEV7
ENEV5
ENWR5
ENEV4 ENEV1 DNGN DFGN AACT
SEGN TOTAL
401
Develop Design
Criteria -
-
4
2
4
- 4 - - -
- 14
402
Develop Cost
Curves -
-
1
2
-
32 24 - - -
- 59
403
Develop Primary
Alternatives -
1
2
4
4
- 4 - - -
- 15
404
Develop
Subalternatives -
1
8
24
16
- 32 - - -
- 81
405
Cost-effective
Analysis -
1
2
12
-
24 24 - - -
- 63
406
Noneconomic Analysis -
1
4
8
8
- 8 - - -
- 29
407
Select Optimal Plan -
-
2
4
4
- - - - -
- 10
501
Identify Transmission
System Improvements -
-
2
8
24
- - - - -
- 34
502
Identify
Treatment Component
Improvements -
-
12
-
-
- 24 - - -
- 36
503
Develop Effluent
Disposal Program -
1
8
16
-
- 8 - - -
- 33
504
Develop Sludge
Management Program -
-
4
8
-
- 8 - - -
- 20
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT
LABOR DISAGGREGATION
Continued
TASK ENEV9
ENEV8
ENEV7
ENEV5
ENWR5 ENEV4
ENEV1 DNGN DFGN AACT
SEGN TOTAL
505
Prepare
Cost Estimates -
-
1
2
- 32
- - - -
- 35
601
Prepare Capital
Improvement Program -
1
4
16
24 -
24 - - -
- 69
602
Adequacy of
Existing Rates -
2
2
24
- -
8 - - -
- 36
603
Alternative
Financing -
2
4
24
- -
4 - - -
- 34
604
Additional
Financing -
2
2
24
- -
- - - -
- 28
605
Impact on
User Charges -
2
2
16
- -
4 - - -
- 24
701
Prepare
Draft Report -
4
4
20
8 -
8 4 16 -
80 144
702
Prepare
Final Report -
2
4
16
8 -
8 - 8 -
40 86
703
Present Report to
County Commission -
4
4
4
4 -
- - - -
- 16
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT LABOR DISAGGREGATION
Continued
TASK ENEV9
ENEV8
ENEV7
ENEV5
ENWR5
ENEV4 ENEV1 DNGN DFGN AACT
SEGN
TOTAL
II QA/QC 4
4
4
4
4
4 4 4 4
4
40
III REVIEWS/PROGRESS REPORTING
801 25% Client Review -
-
4
4
-
- 4 - - -
12
802 50% Client Review -
4
4
4
4
- 4 - - -
-
20
803 75% Client Review -
4
4
4
4
- 4 - - -
-
20
804 Draft Report Review -
4
4
4
4
- 4 - - _
-
20
901 Progress Reports -
-
2
8
-
- - - - 16
16
42
TOTAL HOURS 4
45
136
398
257
92 380 30 108 16
144
1,610
EXHIBIT D
PROJECT BUDGET
n
EXHIBIT D
PROJECT BUDGET
r-.,
PROJECT: Indian River County
Wastewater Master Plan Update
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Updating of the Wastewater Master Plan for
all of Indian River County, excluding the service
area of the City of Vero Beach.
PROJECT
REFERENCE: Agreement between Indian River County and Camp
Dresser & McKee Inc. for General Consulting
Services.
PROJECT
BUDGET:
Total at Contract
Category Hours Hourly Rates
Senior Vice President (ENEV-9)
4
Vice President (ENEV-8)
45
Associate (ENEV-7)
136
Engineer (ENEV-5)
398
Hydraulic Engineer (ENWR-5)
257
Engineer (ENEV-4)
92
Junior Engineer (ENEV-1)
380
Designer (DNGN)
30
Drafter (DFGN)
108
Project Administrator (AACT)
16
Secretarial (SEGN)
144
Total Labor Costs 1,610 $80,400
Other Direct Costs:
Graphics, printing, xeroxing 3,600
Computer 1,200
Word Processing 800
Total Other Direct Costs: 5,600
TOTAL ESTIMATE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES $86,000
D-1
BOA�.il OF COUNTY COMMISSIOA-_ iS
1840 26th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Telephone: (305) 567-8000
August 19, 1986
Mayor Gene Harris
PO Box 127,
Sebastian, FL 32958
RECEIVED SEP 1 2 1986
RE: WATER AND WASTEWATER EXPANSION
Dear Gentlemen:
Suncom Telephone: 424-1011
Indian River County is in the process of updating and expanding
there water and wastewater master plan to cover the entire County.
We feel it would be in the best interest of the City of Sebastian
if they were included in these plans. I have enclosed for your
review and hopefully approval the scope of work along with the
breakdown of cost. If you agree to fund Sebastians portion we will
proceed immediately. The County Commission has already approved
their portion of this work.
Please feel free to contact this office for further information or
service in regard to the water and wastewater expansion project.
Sincerely,
"p ) j
4&WG. PINTO
Director of Utility Services