HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 05 25 - Meating of GDC and GDUJEFFREY P. AGRON
FERNANDO C. ALONSO
CESAR L ALVAREZ
LINDA C. ANDREWS
RUDOLPH F. ARAGON
AERRI L BARSH
HILARIE BASS
ALYSSA M. BAUMGARTEN
NORMANJ.BENFORD
LISA J. BERGER
MARK D.BLOOM
LEONARDO F. BRITO
FRANCIS B. BROGAN, JR.
BURT BRUTON
STEVE BULLOCK
ROBERT A BURLINGTON
ALBERTO R. CARDENAS
PH ILLIP J. CARVER
RICHARD G. CHERRY
SUE M, COBB
KENDALL B. COFFEY
DIANE M. CONNIFF
JEFFREY D. OECARLO
OSCAR G. PE LA GUARDIA
ALBERT A. P¢ CASTILLO
ALAN T. DIMOND
LUCIA A. DOUGHERTY
CHARLES W EDGAR, 111
SUSAN O. ELSEY
HENRY H. (BUCAY) FDA
ROBERT J. FRIEDMAN
ROBERT C. GANG
RICHARD G. GARRETT
BRIAN A GART
BRUCE H GILES`KLEIN
RICHARD ] GUSTO
LAWRENCE GOOOFSKY
LAW OFFICES
GREENS ERG, TRAURIG, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, ROSEN a OUENTEL, P.A.
ALAN S. GOLD
STEVEN E. GOLDMAN
STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH
JOSEPH G. GOLDSTEIN
LAWRENCE S, GORDON
MATTHEW 8, GORSON
DIANNE GREENBERG
MELVIN N. GREENBERG
ROBERT L. GROSSMAN
CARMEN M. HERNANDEZ
LISA A. KIRSCH
KENNETH C. HOFFMAN
LARRYJ.HOFFMAN
MARCOS O. JIMENEZ
MARTIN KALB
LORI E. KILBERG
TIMOTHY E. KISH
STEVEN J. KRA V ITZ
STEVEN A. LANDY
ALAN S. LEDERMAN
GARY A. LEVINSON
NORMAN H. LIPOFF
CARLOS E. LOUMIET
JUAN P. LOUMIET
NANCY LURIA-COHEN
BRUCE E. MACDONOUGH
ROBERT P, MACINA
ANDREW L. MANN
PEDRO J. MARTINEZ- FRAGA
JOEL O. MASER
JUAN J. MAYOL. JR.
WILLIAM LEE MCGINNE55
JOHN T METZGER
LOWS R. MONTELLO. JR.
ALICIA M. MORALES
JANET L O BRIEN
REBECCA R. GRAND
DEBBIE M. ORSHEFSKY
STEVAN J. PARDO
OLGA E. PARRA
MARSHALL R. PASTERNACK
BYRON G. PETERSEN
ALBERT O. OUENTEL
JOEL REINSTEIN
MARK J. REISMAN
LUIS REITER
CONSTANCE M. RIODER
ANDRES RIVERO
KENNETH B. ROBINSON
NICHOLAS ROCKWELL
RAOUEL A, RODRIGUEZ
ALAN . ROLNICX
MARVIN S, ROSEN
RICHARD A. ROSENBAUM
RONALD M, ROSENGARTEN
DAVID L. ROSS
ALDEN E. RUDOLPH
GARY A. SAUL
CLIFFORD A. SCHULMAN
MARLENE A. SILVERMAN
STUART H. SINGER
HOLLY R. SKOLNICK
DAVID R. SOFTNESS
LAURA P. STEPHENSON
DAVID J. TANEY
LAURA M. THOMAS
OSVALDO F. TORRES
ROBERT H. TRAURIG
JERROLD A. WISH
ROBERT M. WOLF
TIMOTHY O. WOLFE
SHEILA WOLFSON
ADAM S. ZIPPER
ZACHARY K. WOLFF (RETIRED)
May 12, 1989
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. G. Wayne Allgire
City Manager
121 S.W. Port St. Lucie Boulevard
Port St. Lucie, Florida 34984
MIAMI OFFICE
1221 BRICAELL AVENUE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131
TELEPHONES
MIAMI (305) 579.0500
B RO WARO (3051523-6111
TELEX BO -3124
TELECOPY (305) 579 -0717
WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE
100 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE • SUITE 201
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33106
(AOT) 683 -6611
TELECOPY 1407) 503.8447
BROWARD OFFICE
500 EAST SROWARO BOULEVARD • SUITE 1]50
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33304
(305) 785.0500
TELECDPY 13051165 1477
WRITER 5 DIRECT NO:
579-0613
PLEASE REPLY TO:
MIAMI OFFICE
RECEIVED f""LY 1 5 1909
Re: Meeting of General Development Corporation ("GDC")
and General Development Utilities ("GDU") Commun-
ities in Port St. Lucie -- May 25 and 26, 1989
Dear Mr. Allgire:
It has come to o
staff are planning a
governmental officials
GDC and GDU matters
communities, to be hel
It has been reported th
shared at the meetings will:
ur attention that you o
meeting of a number of
from a number of comm
of allegedly common
d on May 25th and 26th
at the information about
". be translated into the
needed to make key decisions."
James W. Pierce, City of North
Port Times, August 15, 1989.
r members
elected
unities t
o
concern
in Port
GDC an
of your
and other
discuss
to these
St. Lucie.
d GDU to be
information
City Manager
Port, North
,16w�
Mr. G. Wayne Allgire
May 12, 1989
Page 2
". . : suggest[ing] possible solutions and
approaches, and staging, planning and other
thoughts of mutual interest [which]
will provide fruitful information toward
formulating the future of our communi-
ties." Walter B. England, P.E., City of
Port St. Lucie City Engineer's Letter of
March 29, 1989.
On behalf of GDC and GDU, enclosed is my admission response
and check reserving two (2) seats at the conference for myself
and a certified court reporter. Our attendance will be solely
for the purpose of observation. We have no intention of disrupt-
ing or actively participating with your deliberations. Moreover,
we will be happy to make the final transcript available at cost
to any participating community.
It is also our understanding that you may wish to keep the
meeting secret and out of the public's scrutiny by apparently
excluding GDC, GDU, and the general public. If this is, in fact,
the case, it is somewhat paradoxical that a publicly funded
meeting that you perceive as so important to the future of all of
the participating communities' future would be surrounded in the
veil of secrecy. We believe that this type of meeting falls
within both the letter and spirit of the Government in the
Sunshine law (Section 286.011, Florida Statutes). Merely
attempting to include only one (1) elected official from each
community will not suffice to evade that law. As Justice Adkins
of the Florida Supreme Court noted:
The right of the public to be present and to
be heard during all phases of enactments by
boards and commissions is a source of
strength in our country. During past years
tendencies toward secrecy in public affairs
have been the subject of extensive criti-
cism. Terms such as managed news, secret
meetings, closed records, executive ses-
sions, and study sessions have become synon-
ymous with "hanky panky" in the minds of
public-spirited citizens. One purpose of
the Sunshine Law was to maintain the faith
of the public in governmental agencies.
Regardless of their good intentions, these
specified boards and commissions, through
devious ways, should not be allowed to
deprive the public of this inalienable right
GREENBERG. TRAU RIG, HOFFMAN. LIPOFF, ROSEN a OUENTEL, F.A.
Alo•.
Mr. G. Wayne Allgire
May 12, 1989
Page 3
to be present and to be heard at all delib-
erations wherein decisions affecting the
public are being made. (Emphasis supplied).
With these thoughts in mind, both the courts and the
Attorney General of the State of Florida have ruled and applied
the Act to even a single governmental official. See, AGO 074-84;
AGO 84-54; AGO 074-294; and American Ambulance v. Board of County
Commissioners, 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 165 (20th Cir. Ct. 1985). More-
over, in certain instances even non -elected city or county offi-
cials or employees have been held subject to the law. For
example, the Second District Court of Appeal noted:
It would be equally ludicrous to hold that a
certain committee is governed by the
Sunshine Law when it consists of members of
the public who are presumably acting for the
public, but hold a committee may escape from
the Sunshine Law if it consists of indivi-
duals who owe their allegiance to, and
receive their salaries from, the governing
authority.
K
\. 1Y• LV ✓VCl iJV4,
(Fla..1983).
. Carlson, 410 So.2d 546
• Marston, 442 So.2d 934
To date, the substantive issues identified to be discussed
at the meetings, according to letters and comments by you and
your staff, appear intended to lead to recommended courses of
action affecting the future of all of the citizens of these com-
munities, as well as GDC and GDU. Why would you want to keep the
public out of such important deliberations? What do the various
communities have to hide from the. public?
We assume that you will not discuss strategies or concerted
actions that could deprive GDC and/or GDU of their civil rights
protected under both the United States and Florida Constitutions.
See 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983 and 1988. However, we are concerned
that these inherent protections may be violated. In that regard,
we respectfully notify you that such a meeting might well be so
construed and we are constrained to place you, those present and
all those communities represented at the meetings on notice of
that potential violation and request that such discussion not
take place. See Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188,
1200 (5th Cir. 1981); cert. den'd, 455 U.S. 907 (1982).
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, HOFFMAN. LIPOFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P.A.
Mr. G. Wayne Allgire
May 12, 1989
Page 4
Moreover, several judicial decisions have construed the
federal and Florida Racketeering Statutes (RICO) as potentially
applying to governmental entities and officers in situations
which may give rise to violations of applicable legislation
enumerated within the federal and state RICO statutes. Such a
violation may take place depending on the ultimate actions that
are taken as a result of, and linked to, the scheduled workshops
and meetings. See United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 407 (5th Cir.
1977); and 18 U.S.C. 1961.
We believe that it would clearly be in the best interests of
all of the citizens of all of the affected communities to open
the meeting to the public and comply with the Sunshine Law if the
meetings are to be held at all. We will respectfully request an
acknowledgment of our reservation within five (5) days or will
assume you will not open the meeting to the light of the
Sunshine.
We reiterate our request to attend the meeting solely in a
capacity as observer and without any intention or desire to
interrupt the proceedings you have planned. Thank you for your
consideration.
Yours ve y( tr ly,
Clif Ord A. Schulman
CAS:joa
Enclosure
cc: Hon. Robert Butterworth, Attorney General
Mr. Thomas Jenkins, Brevard County Administrator
Mr. Thomas W. Frame, Charlotte County Administrator
Mr. James E. Chandler, Indian.River County Administrator
Mr. Michael Boyle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Joseph Cone, Marion County Administrator
Mr. Richard Diamond, City of Palm Bay City Manager
Mr. R. Daniel Castle, St. Johns County Administrator
Mr. Weldon Lewis, St. Lucie County Administrator
Mr. Rob McClary, City of Sebastian City Manager
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, HOFFMAN, UPOFF, ROSEN a QUENTEL, R A.