HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 - Authorization to proceed from CountyMASTELLER & MOLER, INC.
October 1, 1998
Ms. Martha Campbell, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Sebastian
Mr. James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
Indian River County
Re: Indian River County Project # 9611
County Route 512 Roadway Improvements
Blossom Ditch Diversion System
Dear Martha:
Indian River County and the City of Sebastian have authorized us to proceed with the proposed
additional work requested by the City of Sebastian regarding the Blossom Ditch Diversion
Project. The Scope of Work for the portion of work will be completed as described in our
Proposal to the City of Sebastian dated June 3, 1998.
The purpose of the Blossom Ditch Diversion project is to eliminate as best as possible discharges
from the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area from entering the natural creek which passes through
the San Sebastian Springs subdivision area. Under the City's agreement with Indian River
County, we are initiating the design of a diversion system that will direct the contributing runoff
reaching the south end of the Blossom Ditch to a new culvert to be constructed within the right-
of-way of County Route 512. The new culvert system will be extended along the County Route
512 right-of-way in a westerly direction to the South Prong of the Sebastian River. The design
will also include a baffle box to remove sediments from entering the South Prong of the
Sebastian River for small storms.
In order to initiate our services on this project, we have updated the Stormwater Management
Report and "ADICPR" Model prepared for the County Route 512 Project to highlight the
stormwater analysis completed for the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area. For the City's review,
we are enclosing herewith portions of the Stormwater Report containing information related to
the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 stormwater Basin(s); Node(s); Link(s); and Modeling Input and
Output information. Please note that the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area has been incorporated
within the portion of the County Route 512 Stormwater Management Report entitled "System
E". System E represents those drainage areas east of the South Prong of the Sebastian River
having an influence on the County Route 512 design. Sebastian Highlands Unit 5's stormwater
contributions do not traverse and/or enter any existing County Route 512 stormwater conveyance
facilities.
El 2205 loth Avenue ❑ 5211 Okeechobee Road
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ft. Pierce, Florida 34947
Ph(561)567-5300 Ph(561)466-9200
Fax(561)794-1106 Fax(561)466-9230
Ms. Martha Campbell, P.E.
Mr. James W. Davis, P.E.
09/03/98
Page 2 of 4
In general, the stormwater runoff generated by the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area is currently
directed into a drainage ditch which runs initially parallel to Roseland Road and thence parallel
and directly adjacent to the County Route 512 right-of-way. The drainage ditch serving the Unit
5 area is known as the Blossombitch. Although the Blossom Ditch does not directly contribute
runoff to the County Route 512 right-of-way, its discharge does merge with an existing
conveyance system that traverses County Route 512. The traversing system drains an area south
of CR 512. The Blossom Ditch and the traversing system both enter a small creek which runs in
a northwesterly direction through the San Sebastian Springs subdivision which creek discharges
to the South Prong of the Sebastian River.
The design of the Blossom Ditch diversion system will separate the contribution of the Sebastian
Highlands Unit 5 area from the traversing works system. The traversing works system will
continue to drain via the small creek through San Sebastian Springs. (Please note that the
County Route 512 project design incorporates the diversion of runoff from the right-of-way area
east of the traversing works to the County's proposed new System E stormwater management
system. Thus, both the County Route 512 project and the additional diversion of contributions
from the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area will remove contributing areas to the creek which
passes through San Sebastian Springs).
As stipulated between the City and County, the diversion of the contributing flow from the Unit
5 area will not be delivered to the County's proposed System E stormwater management system.
It is intended that the Blossom Ditch diversion system be constructed to function independent of
the County Route 512 planned stormwater conveyance, treatment and attenuation facilities.
As a result of the incorporation of the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 drainage basin into the County
Route 512 stormwater model, the stormwater runoff values to be utilized for design of the
diversion system are available for study. The Drainage Basins within the CR512 stormwater
model within the Unit 5 area have been designated as BHIGHl; BHIGH2; BHIGH3; BHIGH4;
and BHIGH5. The "Input" data utilized within the CR512 stormwater model relating to the
above described basins is summarized in the attached information.
The basins described above contribute runoff within the CR512 Model to Nodes which are
connected by Links. For ease of locating and understanding the model as it relates to the
Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area, the following information regarding Nodes and Links is
provided.
BASIN
NODE
BHIGHI
NRIVU
BHIGH2
NBLOSSU
B1-DGH3
NBLOSSU
BHIGH4
NS44D
BHIGH5
NBLOSSD
LMA
Ms. Martha Campbell, P.E.
Mr. lames W. Davis, P.E.
09/03/98
Page 3 of 4
The Nodes within the CR512 stormwater model are connected by LINKS. A summary of the
NODE / LINK relationship for the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area is listed below:
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
NODE
LINK
NODE
NRIVU
RPRIV
NRIVU
NRIVD
RCBLSI
NBLOSSU
NBLOSSU
RCBLS2
NS44D
NS44D
RCBLS3
NS41)
NS4D
RCBLS4
NBLOSSD
NBLOSSD
RCSSSI
NSSSIU
It should be noted that NODE NBLOSSD receives contributing flow in the CR512 model from
both the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area and the CR512 traversing works system at Station
318+11. The downstream LINK from NODE NBLOSSD is designated as RCSSSI (i.e. (R)each
/ (C)hannel / (S)an (S)ebastian (S)prings (1). It is the LINK which receives contributing flows
from both the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 Blossom Ditch system and CR512 traversing works at
Station 318+11.
Modeling of the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area within the CR512 project for the 24 HR storm
duration model produced the following peak contributing flow results to NODE NBLOSSD for
the modeled storms:
Computed
Storm Peak
Event Flow
Mean 34.60 cfs
25 YR 84.02 cfs
100 YR 113.67 cfs
In order to not adversely increase the Peak Stages within the Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 area and
specifically the Blossom Ditch system, it is recommended that the diversion system be designed
for the 100 -Year Storm Event. Peak Stage of the upstream end of the diversion system should
not exceed the Peak stage of the existing system for the 100 -YR event which has been estimated
at 17.45 NGVD at NODE NS44D.
HM
Ms. Martha Campbell, P.E.
Mr. James W. Davis, P.E.
09/03/98
Page 4 of 4
Our Preliminary review of the route topography between the current south end of the Blossom
Ditch and the potential discharge point indicates an approximate 3.0' available fall. The invert of
the upstream end of the System (at the south end of the Blossom Ditch) will be set at Elevation
11.50 NGVD. The discharge point located approximately 1550' downstream within an existing
ditch connected to the South Prong of the Sebastian River is at approximately Elevation 8.50
NGVD. Thus, the physical slope of the conveyance system maybe designed at 0.00194'/'.
It is recommended that the diversion system be developed through the use of a 60" diameter
culvert (w/ Mannings "n" = 0.012) based on the following evaluation:
Pipe Capacity
Size a, 0.001947'
54" 93.86 cfs
60" 124.25 cfs
The hydraulic slope above a 54" diameter culvert carrying 113.67 cfs has been determined to be
0.00285T. Assuming a 1550' culvert with a downstream hydraulic head elevation of 13.00
NGVD (8.50 + 54"), the upstream hydraulic head elevation required to yield 113.67 cfs would be
approximately 17.42 NGVD (13.00 + 1550*0.00285/') which is below the allowable peak stage
elevation 17.45 NGVD. Thus, a 54" diameter culvert system will meet the required design
parameters.
Should you have any questions regarding the information contained herein, please do not hesitate
to contact our office.
Sincerely yours,
MASTELLER & MOLER, INC.
52 -
Stephen E. Moler, P.E.
Executive Vice President
sem/vk
enclosures
File #9649le
(mc100198.doc)