Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09091996 RIVERCity of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE REGULAR. MEETING MONDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 CHAIRMAN COLLINS CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: MR. MR. MR. MR. MR. MS. MR. MR. COLLINS SMITH WILD MOORE CHAPIN CORUM THOMPSON (ALTERNATE) KRULIKOWSKI (ALTERNATE) ABSENT: MR. BENNETT COLLINS — EXCUSED ALSO PRESENT: MR. BOB MASSARELLI, CITY PLANNER DAWN CORAPI, SECRETARY THE SECRETARY ADVISED THE COMMITTEE THAT MR. KRULIKOWSKI WOULD VOTE IN PLACE OF MR. BENNETT. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MEETING OF AUGUST 5, 1996. MR. COLLINS ENTERTAINED A MOTION. MR. THOMPSON POINTED OUT A COUPLE OF "TYPOIS" THAT HE REQUESTED BE CORRECTED. MR. CHAPIN MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 5, 1996. MR. KRULIKOWSKI SECONDED THE MOTION. � P O RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE TWO /"'i REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 A VOICE VOTE WAS TAKEN. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MEETING OF AUGUST 19, 1996. MR. SMITH REQUESTED THAT THE MINUTES REFLECT MORE DETAIL ON THE DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE FUNDING FOR THE PROPOSED STATUE OF PAUL KREOGAL. MR. THOMPSON POINTED OUT A "TYPO" ON PAGE NINE THAT HE REQUESTED BE CORRECTED. MR. COLLINS ENTERTAINED A MOTION THAT THE MINUTES BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE CHANGES. MR. CHAPIN MADE A MOTION THAT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 19TH BE APPROVED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CHANGES. MR. WILD SECONDED THE MOTION. A VOICE VOTE WAS TAKEN. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. ANNOUNCEMENTS: MR. COLLINS PROPOSED THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 OCTOBER 14, 1996 THE COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THOSE DATES FOR THEIR NEXT REGULAR MEETINGS. MR. SMITH SUGGESTED AN IMPROVEMENT IN THEIR PROCEDURES TO AVOID THE "NO WIN SITUATION" THAT OCCURRED AT THE LAST MEETING REGARDING THE ISSUE OF THE FUNDING FOR THE HISTORICAL GRANT. HE SUGGESTED THAT THEY REVIEW AND APPROVE THEIR AGENDA AS ANOTHER STEP IN THE AGENDA PROCESS TO ALLOW THE PUBLIC AND ALL THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO KNOW WHAT THEY WILL BE ACCOMPLISHING THAT EVENING SO THEY DON'T VOTE ON SOMETHING AT THE END OF THE MEETING UNDER MEMBERS MATTERS. MR. COLLINS MADE A POINT THAT SOMETIMES THEY DON'T KNOW IN ADVANCE HOW MUCH THEY WILL BE ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH IN ONE MEETING. I'"1 MS. CORUM SAID THAT THEY COULD MAKE ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA, AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING, WITHOUT HAVING IT AS AN ITEM ON n THE AGENDA. /'"ffi�') RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE THREE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 SHE EXPLAINED THAT WHAT MR. SMITH WAS TRYING TO FIX WOULDN'T HAVE APPLIED TO THE SITUATION THAT HAPPENED AT THE LAST MEETING, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE HISTORICAL GRANT UNTIL MR. MASSARELLI SPOKE OFT IT AT ABOUT 8:30 - 9:00. SHE SAID PROCEDURALLY THEY COULD NOT STOP THE MEETING TO PUT AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA, THEREFORE SHE COULD ONLY WAIT FOR HER OWN MATTERS TO PUT IT ON THE AGENDA. SHE SAID THEY WERE MAKING A LOT MORE OUT OF WHAT HAPPENED IT WAS AN EMERGENCY ISSUE AND SOMETHING LIKE THAT WOULD PROBABLY NOT HAPPEN AGAIN, THEREFORE SHE DIDN'T THINK THEY NEEDED TO CHANGE THEIR PROCEDURES BECAUSE OF IT. MR. SMITH SAID THAT WHAT HE WAS PROPOSING WAS NO DIFFERENT THEN WHAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS IN THEIR AGENDA AS STEP NUMBER FIVE AGENDA MODIFICATIONS ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS. MS. CORUM SAID THAT SHE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH THAT ITEM AND IT WAS JUST A PROCEDURE. MS. CORUM SUGGESTED THAT BECAUSE IT WAS A POLICY CHANGE THEY SHOULD PUT IT ON THE NEXT AGENDA TO VOTE ON IT TO MAKE IT A PROCEDURE. MR. THOMPSON SAID THAT IN PREVIOUS PROCEDURES FOR OTHER BOARDS THAT HE HAS BEEN ON WHEN YOU HAVE ANNOUNCEMENTS THAT IS THE TIME TO ADD OR DELETE AGENDA ITEMS. HE STATED THAT HE THOUGHT THAT WAS WHERE IT SHOULD STAY AND HE WAS NOT IN FAVOR OF DOING ANYTHING ELSE. MR. COLLINS ENTERTAINED A MOTION. MR. SMITH BEGAN TO MAKE A MOTION ABOUT CHANGING THEIR PROCEDURES. MS. CORUM INTERRUPTED AND SAID THAT SHE DIDN'T THINK THEY SHOULD MAKE A MOTION BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE DOING WHAT THEY SAID THEY WERE NOT GOING TO DO, THEREFORE THEY SHOULD JUST ASK BOB TO PUT IT ON THE NEXT AGENDA. NEW BUSINESS: LAND USES IN THE RIVERFRONT: LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT. MR. MASSARELLI BEGAN HIS PRESENTATION WITH A BRIEF EXPLANATION AS TO HOW THEY CAME TO THE POINT THAT THEY WERE AT REMINDING THE COMMITTEE OF THE PREVIOUS EXERCISES THEY DID TO GET THERE. MR. MASSARELLI REMINDED THE COMMITTEE THAT AT THE LAST MEETING WHEN THEY TALKED ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT THEY AGREED ON HAVING ONE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE RIVERFRONT AREA CALLED RIVERFRONT MIXED USES INSTEAD OF THE SIX DIFFERENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT ALREADY EXIST. RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE FOUR /9"*N REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 HE THEN SAID THAT IF THEY GO WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AGREE ON A SINGLE ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE RIVERFRONT AREA THEY NEED TO THINK ABOUT HOW THEY WOULD IMPLEMENT THAT AND WHAT IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHOULD THEY USE TO DO THAT? HE EXPLAINED THAT THERE WAS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE ZONING MAP AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO AMEND EITHER ONE FOR CONSISTENCY. HE PROPOSED THAT THEY CONSIDER THE SAME TYPE OF DISTRICT FOR THE ZONING AS THEY DID FOR THE LAND USE BY ELIMINATING THE SEVEN ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ALREADY EXIST AND HAVE ONE. HE THEN EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT WHAT HE PROVIDED THEM WITH WAS ROUGH OUTLINE OF A SIMPLE AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO SHOW HOW THAT WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. HE THEN WENT OVER THE PROPOSAL WITH THEM. MR. MASSARELLI ENDED HIS PRESENTATION AND THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS MADE THE FOLLOWING KEY COMMENTS: MR. COLLINS EXPRESSED HIS CONCERNS ABOUT THE SIZE AND DIMENSION CRITERIA. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT HE SAW THIS RECOMMENDATION GOING UP TO THE CITY COUNCIL, BACK DOWN TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THAN BACK UP TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYBE BACK TO THEM, IN OTHER WORDS, THERE WOULD BE A LOT OF WORK ON IT SO TO GET HUNG UP ON THE DETAILS MIGHT BE A MISTAKE. HE SAID THE IMPORTANT THING WAS THE CONCEPT. WAS THIS THE TYPE OF DIRECTION THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE LAND USE AND LAND DEVELOPMENT GO IN FOR THE RIVERFRONT AREA. MR. THOMPSON EXPRESSED HIS CONCERN THAT THIS CONCEPT WOULD NOT PERMIT CONDOMINIUMS. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT WAS NOT HIS INTENT. MR. KRULIKOWSKI EXPRESSED HIS FEELING THAT THE CITY HAD TO SIT DOWN AND GET A MASTER PLAN. MR. WILD INQUIRED IF THE NEW RMU ZONING WOULD OPEN IT UP FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND VISE VERSA. MR. MASSARELLI SAID YES. MS. CORUM EXPRESSED HER CONCERN THAT ECONOMICALLY THE MIXED USE WOULD HELP THE RIVERFRONT TO THRIVE, BUT SHE WAS AFRAID THAT THE HOMES ALONG THE RIVERFRONT WOULD DISAPPEAR BECAUSE THEY COULD SELL THEM FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AND IT WOULD END UP BEING ALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITH NO HOMES UNLESS THEY ARE ON TOP OF A BUSINESS. eol'1 /9''1 RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE FIVE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT HE TOO STRUGGLED WITH THOSE SAME KIND OF CONCEPTS, BUT ASKED WHAT WAS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WAS CURRENTLY ALLOWED TODAY. HE SAID IN FACT RESIDENTIAL USES WAS A SECONDARY USE IN THE AREA AND WAS NOT GIVEN A LOT OF WEIGHT. HE SAID THAT, UNDER LAW, THEY HAD THE OPTION TO BACK TO THE TRADITIONAL ZONING AND LAND USE MAPS AND TAKE EACH LOT ONE BY ONE AND DECIDE WHAT ZONING IT SHOULD BE. HE SAID THAT THE REASON HE HEADED IN THE DIRECTION OF A MIXED USE WAS BECAUSE WHEN THEY WENT TROUGH THE EXERCISES TALKING ABOUT THE LAND USES HE DIDN'T HEAR ANYBODY SAY THAT THEY WANTED TO DIVIDE THEM UP OR KEEP THEM SEPARATED. HE SAID IF HE MISUNDERSTOOD THE COMMITTEE AND THEY WANTED TO GO IN THAT DIRECTION THEY COULD DO THAT. MS. CORUM SAID THAT SHE DID NOT REALIZE THAT'S WHAT THEY WERE DOING. SHE SAID SHE KNEW THAT THEY WERE ELIMINATING SOME OF THE ZONING, BUT IT JUST HIT HER AND SHE WAS ENVISIONING IT AND WAS CONCERNED. SHE ALSO MENTIONED THAT WHAT THEY TALKED ABOUT REGARDING DEVIATIONS FROM THE CODE ON PARKING FOR HISTORICAL STRUCTURES WAS REAL IMPORTANT AND THEY SHOULD GET TO THAT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. MR. SMITH EXPRESSED HIS CONCERNS THAT THEY DON'T LOSE WHAT THEY STARTED OUT TO DO - "THE OLD FLORIDA FISHING VILLAGE" AND THE PRINCIPLES. MR. COLLINS EXPRESSED HIS SUPPORT OF THE MIXED USE OPPOSED TO "DRAWING THE LINES ON THE MAP". MR. SMITH SAID THAT HE DIDN'T WANT TO SUPPORT MIXED USE AND END UP WITH THE EXTREME THAT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO END UP WITH. HE ASKED MR. MASSARELLI TO HELP THEM WITH THE MECHANISM THEY COULD USE WITHOUT "DRAWING LINES ON THE MAP". MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT THEY HAD A WHOLE "TOOL BOX" OF MECHANISMS CALLED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. HE EXPLAINED SOME OF THE TYPES OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND OTHER TYPES OF THINGS THEY COULD DO TO HELP PRESERVE THE AREA. THE DESIGN CRITERIA WOULD GO ALONG WAY IN ESTABLISHING THE CHARACTER IN RIVERFRONT AREA AND WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE. IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE EXISTING LAND USES THEY COULD PLACE ADDITIONAL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE HISTORICAL STRUCTURES SHOULD BE GIVEN A BREAK WHEN IT CAME f"�1 TO PARKING AS AN ENCOURAGEMENT TO MAINTAIN THEM. RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE SIX /"tet REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 HE SAID THAT THEY COULD WORK WITH OTHER AREAS THAT WERE EXPERIENCING THE SAME TYPE OF ACTIVITIES. HE ADVISED THEM THAT THERE WOULD BE A MEETING IN ST. PETE NEXT MONTH WITH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES ABOUT WATERFRONT/RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. MR. CHAPIN SAID THAT HE LIKED THE CONCEPT OF THE SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND HE THOUGHT IT WAS NEEDED. HE EXPRESSED THAT HE THOUGHT THE 10,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN SOME AREAS WAS JUST NOT REALISTIC. MR. MOORE COMMENTED ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION STATEMENT AS HAVING SOME OF THE ANSWERS THAT THEY COULD INCLUDE INTO THE ZONING AMENDMENT. AT THIS TIME MR. COLLINS ASKED FOR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. AL VALARDI, RESIDENT OF SEBASTIAN, EXPRESSED HIS CONCERNS ABOUT PARKING AND HEIGHT LIMITS. SAL NEGLIA, RESIDENT OF SEBASTIAN, EXPRESSED HIS CONCERN ABOUT ALLOWING BUSINESSES WITH APARTMENTS ABOVE THEM. HE ALSO INQUIRED ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES BEING CHANGED TO COMMERCIAL ZONING. I10111) TUT CONNELLY, RESIDENT OF SEBASTIAN, INQUIRED ABOUT THE WORDS CONDITIONAL USE BEING USED TWICE IN SECTION C, OF THE PROPOSED RMU ZONING AMENDMENT. HE ALSO INQUIRED ABOUT THE PROPOSED MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKS. HE ALSO EXPRESSED HIS CONCERN THAT MR. MASSARELLI PRESENTED AN ARGUMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE SIDEWALK NOT TO GO TO THE END OF THE CITY LIMITS EVEN THOUGH THE RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE AND THE CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE WANTED IT TO GOT TO THE END. ARLENE WESTFALL, RESIDENT OF SEBASTIAN, SAID ON BEHALF OF HER AND THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY SHE SUGGESTED THAT THEY SERIOUSLY CONSIDER LOWERING THE BUILDING HEIGHTS ON THE EAST SIDE, OF INDIAN RIVER DRIVE, TO ONE STORY BUILDINGS. AFTER A BRIEF DISCUSSION MR. MASSARELLI SUGGESTED GETTING A CONSENSUS OF WAS THIS A CONCEPT THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PURSUE FURTHER AND THEN SEND THE STAFF BACK TO MASSAGE SOME OF THOSE THINGS AND PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION GOING FURTHER. MR. COLLINS EXPRESSED HIS CONCERN THAT THEY WERE TAKING ON AN ISSUE THAT COULD BE A TWELVE MONTH ISSUE FOR THEM AND IT WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT THEIR GROUP PER SAY SHOULD BE TOTALLY INVOLVED IN BY MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS. HE SAID IT WAS MORE OF A PLANNING & ZONING AND CITY COUNCIL MATTER. HE SUGGESTED THEY GIVE THE CITY COUNCIL SOMEWHAT OF A GENERIC RECOMMENDATION. RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE SEVEN REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9. 1996 AFTER A LENGTHY DISCUSSION MR. COLLINS ENTERTAINED A MOTION ON HOW THE COMMITTEE WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE RMU ZONING. AFTER A BRIEF DISCUSSION MR. MOORE MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RMU CONCEPT MODIFIED TO INCLUDE THE VISION STATEMENTS AND DEFER THE SECTION OF THE RMU THAT TALKS ABOUT VERY SPECIFIC DETAILS UNTIL A LATER DATE. MR. KRULIKOWSKI SECONDED THE MOTION. A BRIEF DISCUSSION TOOK PLACE AS TO WHAT THEY WERE REALLY VOTING ON. MR. FRAME TRIED TO CLARIFY THINGS UP BY .TALKING IN LENGTH ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND HOW THEY COULD BE USED. HE THEN ASKED THE COMMITTEE TO A LEAST GIVE THEM THE GREEN LIGHT ON THE CONCEPT AND THEN GIVE THEM TIME TO PUT SOMETHING TOGETHER INCORPORATING THEIR CONCERNS TO BRING BACK TO THEM. MR. COLLINS ADDED TO MR. MOORE' S MOTION THAT IT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A REVIEW BY THE STAFF AND A SUBSEQUENT REPORT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. MR. .SMITH CLARIFIED THAT IN EFFECT IT WAS A DRAFT FOR ADDITIONAL STAFF WORK. A VOICE VOTE WAS TAKEN. THE MOTION WAS CARRIED 6 - 1, WITH MR. KRULIKOWSKI BEING THE ONLY MEMBER THAT VOTED NAY. PUBLIC COMMENT: NONE CHAIRMAN MATTERS: MR. COLLINS EXPRESSED HIS APPRECIATION TO MR. SMITH AND MS. CORUM FOR SITTING IN FOR HIM WHILE HE WAS GONE. HE SUGGESTED TO THE COMMITTEE THAT HE MEET WITH MR. MASSARELLI BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING OR THE FOLLOWING MEETING TO GET A REPORT AS TO WHAT PROGRESS HE HAS MADE ON VARIOUS ISSUES. MR. MASSARELLI BRIEFLY UPDATED THE COMMITTEE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE LANDSCAPE AND SIGN ORDINANCE'S. HE SAID WHAT THE AIA WANTED FROM THEM WAS A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WHAT AN OLD FLORIDA FISHING VILLAGE WAS SO THAT THEY COULD PREPARE THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND SIGN ORDINANCES. HE SUGGESTED FOR THE NEXT MEETING THAT HE BRING IN A SERIES OF PICTURES AND HAVE THEM DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT EACH /00111 PICTURE REPRESENTED AN "OLD FLORIDA FISHING VILLAGE" AND IF IT DID WHAT ABOUT IT DID. THAT INFORMATION WOULD THEN BE FORWARDED TO THE AIA AND ONE WEEKEND IN OCTOBER THEY WOULD HAVE A MEETING WITH THEM. RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE EIGHT REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 MR. COLLINS ASKED MR. MASSARELLI FOR AN UPDATE ON THE SIDEWALK. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AGREED WITH THEIR RECOMMENDATION AS WELL AS THE CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE'S RECOMMENDATION AND HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO FDOT. MEMBER MATTERS: MR. MOORE INQUIRED ABOUT CODE ENFORCEMENT ON THE RIVERFRONT. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT THE SIMPLEST WAY .WAS IF HE OBSERVED SOMETHING THAT WAS A CODE VIOLATION GIVE THEM A CALL AND THEY WOULD CHECK IT OUT. MR. MOORE EXPRESSED HIS AGREEMENT WITH MR. KRULIKOWSKI THAT THE COMMITTEE NEEDED TO COME UP WITH SOME SORT OF GENERALIZED MASTER PLAN. MS. CORUM EXPRESSED HER FEELING OF NOT WANTING NEON SIGNS IN THE RIVERFRONT. SHE INQUIRED ABOUT THE INTENTIONS OF THE AIA WORKING WITH THE TREE ADVISORY BOARD AND THE FLORIDA YARDS AND NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM TO COME UP WITH SOME NON-TRADITIONAL KIND OF LANDSCAPE FOR THE RIVERFRONT. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT HIS INTENTIONS WAS FOR THEM TO WORK CLOSELY TOGETHER. MS. CORUM ASKED IF THEY HAD COME TO ANY COMPROMISE WITH FLOODTIDE REGARDING THE SIDEWALK. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT THEY HAVE NOT MADE ANY PROGRESS ON THAT. MR. WILD i-NQUIRED TO HOW QUICKLY THEY COULD GET AN ARCHITECTURAL THEME IN PLACE SO WHEN NEW BUSINESSES CAME IN EVEN THOUGH THE ZONING HAS NOT CHANGED AT LEAST THEY WOULD HAVE TO FIT INTO THEIR VISION OF THE VILLAGE LOOK. MR. MASSARELLI SAID THAT IT WOULD TAKE APPROXIMATELY 60-75 DAYS TO PUT IT IN AFFECT ONCE THEY NEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY CONSIDERED AN "OLD FLORIDA FISHING VILLAGE". MR. KRULIKOWSKI EXPRESSED HIS OPINION OF WHAT HE CALLED VERY BAD JOURNALISM ISSUED BY THE FLORIDA TODAY REGARDING THE SIDEWALK. HE SAID A STATEMENT WAS MADE BY A JOURNALIST, TO CITIZENS OPPOSING THE SIDEWALK, "IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT MOVE". AS REQUESTED BY MR. COLLINS, MR. MASSARELLI BRIEFLY DISCUSSED (400°1 VARIOUS PROJECTS UNDERWAY ON THE RIVERFRONT. /0061) RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE PAGE NINE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 STAFF MATTERS: MR. MASSARELLI PROPOSED THE FOLLOWING TOPICS FOR THE NEXT THREE MEETINGS: * SEPTEMBER 23 - DEFINE "OLD FLORIDA FISHING VILLAGE". * OCTOBER 14 - DISCUSS ISSUE OF PRESERVING THE ACCESS TO THE RIVERFRONT AND THE "TOOLS" THAT WERE AVAILABLE TO DO THAT. * NOVEMBER - DISCUSS "MATER PLAN" OF THE RIVERFRONT AREA. ADJOURNMENT: MR. COLLINS ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 10:17. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (561) 589-5330 o FAX (561) 589-5570 SEBASTIAN RIVERFRONT COMMEE MINUTES OF MEETING HELD APPROVED AT MEETING HEL Tg H. COLLINS, CHAIRMAN AWN M. C RaPI, SE RETARY RCMAS.WP City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET Cl SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 AGENDA RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE MONDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. ROLL CALL. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MEETING OF AUGUST 51 1996 MEETING OF AUGUST 19, 1996 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS. 5. NEW BUSINESS: LAND USES IN THE RIVERFRONT: LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 6. PUBLIC COMMENT. 7. CHAIRMAN MATTERS. 8. MEMBERS MATTERS. 9. STAFF MATTERS. 10. ADJOURNMENT. IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (407)-589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF SEBASTIAN 1225 MAIN STREET 10 0 ly'AWN' �- zw6 FLORIDA THE RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, WILL HOLD THEIR REGULAR MEETING ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. DAWN M. CORAPI, SECRETARY RIVERFRONT COMMITTEE NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. NOTE: IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. '/o"� RCPUBMTI.WP