Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-21-2017 Minutes
E13ASTt4 POLICE LC'D11A1TMElyT PjO SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1201 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Code Enforcement Division CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA MINUTES SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CODE ENFORCEMENT HEARING November 21, 2017 The hearing was called to order at 2:00 p.m. by Special Magistrate Kelley H. Armitage. Administrative Assistant Janickie Smith swore in all persons that would be speaking. Present: Special Magistrate Kelley H. Armitage, Interim City Attorney Cynthia Van DeVoorde Hall, Code Enforcement Officer Curtis Bloomfield, Administrative Assistant Janickie Smith, Chief Michelle Morris, Commander John Blackledge, Councilwoman Andrea Coy, Building Department Supervisor Wayne Eseltine, Building Inspector Dan Hainey. Procedure for Enforcement of Accessory Structure (Sec. 54-2-7.5(c)(2)) Case No.: CE 17-011162 BOB HARRIS 755 S. FISCHER CIRCLE, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 Magistrate Armitage asked the procedural history of the case and if there had been a citation issued and stated Mr. Harris request of a review of the citation issued. Code Officer Bloomfield identified himself and his years of service with the City of Sebastian. Code Officer Bloomfield reviewed the code for accessory structures and stated Mr. Harris feels he is being singled out by the City of Sebastian as this is a violation that is not regularly enforced. Code Officer Bloomfield provided the address of 757 Spire Avenue who was cited for the same violation on January 28, 2016, Ms. Hall asked the notice of violation for 757 Spire Avenue be entered as exhibit K. Mr. Hams had no objections. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Harris if he understood the import of that violation into evidence, that the officer has written a previous violation similar to yours. Mr. Harris stated yes. Officer Bloomfield stated this complaint is based on an adjacent property owner. Code Officer Bloomfield stated on June 9, 2016 a complaint was received for Mr. Harris at 755 S. Fischer Circle had multiple storage sheds on the property without a permit. Code Officer Bloomfield responded to the location and was unable to see any sheds from the public road, right of way or easement. Code Officer Bloomfield provided photos of the residence on the overhead projector and explained his visit to the residence on June 9, 2016. Code Officer Bloomfield stated the call was closed at that time with a conclusion of no violations noted at this time. On March 23, 2017 Code Officer Bloomfield stated he received a complaint on the same property reference multiple recreational vehicles. After an inspection of the property he found three boats parked on the property and cited Section 54-2-7.13(b)(9) as being a code violation. Mr. Bloomfield provided photos of the boats. The owner at that time was cited. When hanging the notice of violation on the door of the residence Mr. Bloomfield stated he also saw twice the amount of recreational vehicles on the property and had a visual of two sheds. Mr. Bloomfield provided photos of his findings and explained in detail the photos. Mr. Bloomfield states the notice of violation was mailed and copies were hand delivered to Mr. Harris on March 24, 2017. Mr. Hams at that time explained the building department told him he did not need a permit for the sheds. Mr. Harris did comply and the violation for the recreational vehicles was closed. Mr. Bloomfield stated a meeting was held with Mr. Harris to clarify what was needed in order to bring the property back into compliance. Mr. Harris was recited for the same violation for the sheds on April 12, 2017. Mr. Bloomfield provided photos and a description on the overhead projector. Mr. Bloomfield stated the sheds do not meet the setback requirements of fifteen feet and the City of Sebastian request the Magistrate to cite Mr. Harris property in violation of the City of Sebastian land development code section 54-2-7.5(c)(2). Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Harris if he had any questions for the code officer. He stated yes. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Bloomfield if he originally came out to his property for the boats. Mr. Bloomfield answered yes. Mr. Harris verified with Mr. Bloomfield previous conversations reference the boats and the agreement to get rid of them and this was done in a timely manner, Mr. Harris stated permits were obtained and signed off by Dan in the building department for the sheds but was told by Mr. Bloomfield at that time he was not sure if the prefabricated plastic sheds required and would find additional information and get back with him. Mr. Bloomfield answered that is incorrect. Mr. Bloomfield explained a code violation was cited on that day for the plastic sheds so there was no need to find out about the sheds. Mr. Bloomfield stated the he wanted to verify what information was given to Mr. Harris by the building department inspectors. Mr. Harris stated there was a conversation in the lobby of the Police department with Mr. Bloomfield a week later after Mr. Bloomfield spoke with the building department and asked Mr. Bloomfield to recall that conversation. Mr. Bloomfield asked Mr. Harris to remind him of that conversation. Mr. Harris stated he was told by Mr. Bloomfield that no permitting was necessary for the plastic sheds are treated like children's playhouses. Mr. Harris stated he shook hands with Mr. Bloomfield and he departed. Mr. Bloomfield stated that was not accurate because he had cited someone previously for the sheds and the only difference would be if the Building Department Director decided not to pursue it and I would respect that. Mr. Harris stated if you look at the difference in the times of the violations of the boats and sheds which expanded over six months and our conversation in the Police Department of our agreement that the sheds were fine. I permitted the shed that I was to and no permit was obtain for the plastic sheds per Linda, Andy and Dan with the building department and you agreed with that also at the same time. Mr. Harris asked after continued pressure from his homeowner's association that prompted Mr. Bloomfield to return to his residence after being told the plastic sheds were fine to write code violations. Mr. Bloomfield answered this is not correct and referred to the overhead projector of a copy of the notice of violation dated November 24 for accessory structures. Mr. Bloomfield stated Mr. Harris was cited on his first visit to the residence for the violation and he has no knowledge of anything else that Mr. Harris has previously stated. Mr. Bloomfield acknowledged receiving a complaint from the homeowner's association but nothing further. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Bloomfield to recall the twenty minute conversation in the Police lobby telling him the plastic sheds were okay. Mr. Bloomfield stated this is incorrect and responded to a comment by Mr. Harris the violations are certain throughout the city and I explained to you at that time the violations are handled on a case by case basis. The last time I addressed a shed issue was based on a complaint. Mr. Harris stated he would hate to hold Mr. Bloomfield under fire, my conversation with Mr. Bloomfield occurred after Mr. Bloomfield held checked with the building department and you came back to me and explained the sheds were fine, there was pressure and more phone calls that caused a city employee to cave under fire. Objection from Ms. Hall asking if Mr. Harris had a question for Mr. Bloomfield. Mr. Harris stated he had no more questions. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield to identify pages 1,2, & 3 of Exhibit A on the overhead projector. Mr. Bloomfield acknowledged exhibit A as a notice of code violations posted to Mr. Hams and verified all pages and dates and the letters originated from him. Mr. Harris had no objections to this exhibit being added into evidence. Mr. Bloomfield verified the day the letters were delivered to Mr. Hams from the postal service via tracking or confirmation March 25, 2017. Ms. Hall asked that this be entered into evidence as exhibit B. Mr. Harris had no objections. Ms. Hall asked if the clerk had a copy of this information. Ms. Smith answered yes. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield to identify the page labeled as exhibit C. Mr. Bloomfield stated this is the re -issue of the second notice of violation to Mr. Hams for accessory structure dated April 14, 2017 and all pages attached to this document. Mr. Bloomfield acknowledged the letter was originated and delivered by him to Mr. Harris. Mr. Harris had no objection to this information being added into evidence. Magistrate Armitage ruled all above items would be entered into evidence. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield did he originate an item labeled as exhibit E. Mr. Bloomfield answered yes and explained the item was an official document notifying Mr. Harris of the notice of hearing with the Special Magistrate dated November 9, 2017, the notice was delivered certified mail and the date. Mr. Harris had no objections to this item being entered into evidence. Magistrate Armitage stated it is so entered. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield to identify the page labeled as exhibit F. Mr. Bloomfield stated the document was an official notice from the United Stated Postal Service via tracking confirmation. Ms. Hall requested the item entered into evidence as exhibit F. Mr. Harris had no objections. Magistrate Armitage ordered the item into evidence. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield if he recalled if he ever indicated to Mr. Harris a legal determination as to whether plastic sheds do or do not need to be permitted. Mr. Bloomfield answered yes recalling a property that he cited and that is his stance and provided further explanation. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield during Mr. Harris in asking his questions to Mr. Bloomfield indicated that he showed Mr. Bloomfield a permit for a shed that was signed off by Building Official Dan and your answer to him indicated that you would find out more about that, were you ever shown a permit that was issued for the plastic sheds. Mr. Bloomfield stated that is incorrect and the permit was for one shed and did not pertain to the six plastic sheds and explained his reasoning. Mr. Bloomfield explained he was told by Mr. Harris that there were two building officials at his residence who saw opposite from what I saw and this is the information that had to be confirmed. Ms. Hall stated she has no further questions for this witness. Magistrate Armitage stated to Mr. Harris he had a question for him. Is it fair for me to summarize your position as this: the six sheds were not permitted because you were told they did not need a permit. Mr. Harris answered correct. Magistrate Armitage stated he would have to have the Director of the building department present and see if we can have him come into the courtroom to address this issue. Would it be fair to summarize if you were told at the time that all seven sheds needed to be permitted, that all seven sheds would have been permitted. But only one shed was permitted because you were told only one needed to be permitted. Mr. Harris stated there was more to the story but this is correct. Mr. Harris stated the building officials were at his residence reference installation of my garage doors which were inspected by employees with the building department with the plastic sheds and the permitted wood shed in place and was never cited. I was told by I think it was Andy "yep we don't see those plastic sheds, we don't care about them". I think Dan Hainey was also out there who left his business card as the Chief Building Inspector and he said the sheds do not need permits, we don't care about them. Mr. Harris stated he does know that almost three years ago, Officer Bloomfield issued a citation for a shed going into the neighbor's fence. There is sixty to seventy feet behind these sheds that are between mine and the neighbor's property, identify for a moment that although these sheds have been called illegal, Mr. Eseltine explained that if I get an engineer's drawing of shed's straps so they don't blow away during a hurricane that I could apply and get a permit for these six sheds. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Eseltine is this an accurate account of the conversation with Mr. Hams. Mr. Eseltine stated partially, his first conversation to Mr. Harris when he had made those kinds of accusations on the phone, the best thing to do is have a meeting with everyone in the room. The meeting included myself, Curtis, my two inspectors, Andy A, & Dan Hainey. Andy did an inspection on the first manufactured shed that was approved, unless it is a life safety issue we don't start writing people up for everything we see and there is a Florida statue that speaks to that fact. Andy walked away from the plastic sheds stating I don't see that indicating to Mr. Harris those aren't legal but I'm not writing you up. We had this meeting with everyone in the room and we discussed all of these issues. Mr. Hainey visited the property and did not cite Mr. Hams either but counseled Mr. Harris the sheds do require permits but there are lots of these sheds around town and they have not all been cited. Towards the end of that meeting I apologized to Mr. Harris the employees not citing him for these code violations that are clear in the ordinance that these sheds need to be permitted. The sheds are sold at Home Depot and when they are bought, and no permits are obtained when installed. Mr. Eseltine stated we were responding to a complaint and when going out there Mr. Harris did comply with what he was told to do getting the sheds permitted and also complied with the engineering and we stamped off on his plans. Magistrate Armitage asked if Mr. Harris applied for these six. Mr. Eseltine answered yes structurally he has complied, the problem is the setback, they have to be fifteen feet from the property line. Magistrate Armitage asked if the property line is where these large cement barriers are, referring to a photo on the overhead projector. Mr. Harris began speaking and was instructed by the Magistrate to not interrupt. Mr. Harris apologized. Magistrate Armitage asked questions reference the photo and Mr. Eseltine answered all questions. Ms. Hall stated she had exhibit G which is the owner/builder application in which Mr. Hams applied for. Mr. Harris did not object. Magistrate Armitage allowed exhibit G into evidence. Magistrate Armitage asked additional questions reference the photo to Mr. Eseltine and all questions were answered. Magistrate Kelley asked what is the distance from the seawall and the plastic structures. Mr. Bloomfield answered about four to five feet. Magistrate Armitage asked if the setback requirements are fifteen feet. Mr. Eseltine answered correct. Mr. Eseltine stated he sent Mr. Harris a letter in September after he applied for the permits in May indicating that he had applied for the permits and we reviewed and made comments on May 17 and read the comments in the letter sent to Mr. Harris giving him 180 days to comply. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Harris if he received a copy of this letter. Mr. Harris stated yes. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Eseltine if he had anything further to add. Mr. Eseltine answered no. Ms. Hall requested this letter is added into evidence as exhibit H. Mr. Harris did not object. Magistrate Armitage so entered. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Harris if he complied with the notice to seek a variance. Mr. Harris stated the cost of the variance and stated the money spent on the permits and engineering in order to gain compliance. Mr. Harris stated he felt the sheds should not have to be permitted and explained his reasoning why. Mr. Harris also explained a photo from the rear of his property and no neighbors within at least forty feet. Mr. Harris explained he complied with the initial request of the building department in detail. Magistrate Armitage advised Mr. Harris that his plea is a textbook example to apply for a variance. And variance is beyond the prevue of this court and the reason why we're here is absence of the variance and absence of you adhering to the code, there is a violation. If you had sought a variance you would not be here. Mr. Harris stated he understood that. Magistrate Armitage stated he understood of how costly it is, but this is not an excuse. Magistrate Armitage stated the director did not approve of some of the language his employees used, is that correct. Mr. Eseltine stated not the language so much but I think they were trying to be nice and advise him rather than write him up. Magistrate Armitage stated "no good deed goes unpunished". Magistrate Armitage stated you have been given an inch and are trying to take a mile. Mr. Harris stated he did not think so at all and again made a plea on his case but was interrupted by Magistrate Armitage stating he would like to speak with the Building Official who spoke with Mr. Harris. Magistrate Armitage called for a five minute recess to bring Dan Hainey Building Official into the courtroom at 2:55 p.m. Ms. Hall requested photos taken by Mr. Bloomfield of Mr. Harris property are entered into evidence Recess ended at 3:03 p.m. Ms. Hall cross examined Mr. Eseltine. Mr. Eseltine stated his name and position with the City of Sebastian. Ms. Hall asked if Mr. Eseltine was familiar with the land development, city ordinances, and building codes. Mr. Eseltine answered yes, Florida Building code. Ms. Hall stated this gentleman was cited for and provided the section number and asked Mr. Eseltine to define an accessory structure. Mr. Eseltine answered the question and provided the definition. Ms. Hall asked additional questions defining the accessory structure code. Mr. Eseltine answered all questions. Ms. Hall asked why do these structures require a permit. Mr. Eseltine answered all questions based on the code ordinance and his knowledge and experience. Magistrate Armitage asked how the sheds are attached to the ground. Mr. Eseltine stated he has not been out to inspect them but stated he would think so. Magistrate Armitage asked additional questions reference the requirements of tying down the sheds. Mr. Harris made a plea stating the sheds do not have to be permitted and stated this is not in the Florida building codes and cited the City of Dunedin shed codes. Mr. Eseltine responded to Mr. Harris and answered all questions. Ms. Hall objected to Mr. Harris referring to code ordinances from a different city. Magistrate Armitage asked who is responsible for interpreting codes on behalf of the City of Sebastian. Mr. Eseltine answered the Building Official and that is myself. Magistrate Armitage asked who's opinion matters as far as the city. Mr. Eseltine answered as far as the State is concerned it is my opinion that matters. Magistrate Armitage stated to Mr. Harris that he can have an opinion, but it is Mr. Eseltine opinion that is the importance of the city and the reason why we are here. It is Mr. Eseltine opinion that Mr. Harris sheds are defined as a building and are in code violation. Mr. Eseltine answered correct. Mr. Harris stated he understood. Magistrate Armitage stated this is why the letter was sent to Mr. Harris in September giving you the option to seed a variance. But you rejected because of the costs. Mr. Harris answered correct. Magistrate Armitage defined the delegation of duties to officials to uphold the law. Mr. Harris stated he was in disagreement of the entire staff. Magistrate Armitage informed Mr. Harris the ordinances and laws have to be followed. Mr. Harris pleaded his case as to why his sheds should not have to be permitted, comparing them to children's playhouses and there being no neighbor within forty to fifty feet. Magistrate Armitage explained this would be an example for a variance and explained why. Magistrate Armitage explained it is his job to ensure the Building Official has followed the mandates of his office and he has. Mr. Eseltine explained to Mr. Harris his interpretation of he is misinterpreting the city code Ms. Hall responded to Mr. Harris stating the citation written for 757 Spire Ave. was an example that there are violations cited for this ordinance. Mr. Eseltine stated his building officials can testify they have written previous code violations for this ordinance as well. Building Official Dan Hainey was called to testify. Magistrate Armitage stated you were called because you were actually at the cite, is that correct. Mr. Hainey answered yes. Magistrate Armitage asked if he saw the sheds. Mr. Hainey answered yes. Magistrate Armitage asked why did you choose not to write up the landowner at that time. Mr. Hainey stated he responded to a complaint and went out to the site and explained in detail his visit to the residence. Mr. Hainey stated he explained to the homeowner the sheds were not allowed and if he did not get rid of them he would have an issue with code enforcement. Mr. Hams stated he did not have any questions for Mr. Hainey and this was a battle he was not going to win. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Eseltine if he was a general contractor. Mr. Eseltine answered correct. Magistrate Armitage stated to Mr. Eseltine it is your job to interpret building codes and use your expertise. Mr. Eseltine answered correct. Magistrate Armitage stated this particular code is not specific but it is your interpretation that is granted by the City of Sebastian determined that this building are in violation of the code. Mr. Eseltine answered correct. Magistrate Armitage stated if a city becomes aware of a problem and chooses to enforce it is within their prevue. Mr. Hams stated he understood and this was not a problem until a member of City Council felt threatened at City Hall and then it became a problem. Magistrate Armitage stated that is an incendiary statement to make. Mr. Hams stated he was told the sheds did not require a permit and today their stories have changed. Mr. Harris stated the reason he feels the employees have changed their mind in detail. Mr. Harris requested additional time to apply for a variance and appeal but will pay the money. Magistrate Armitage stated Mr. Harris left the impression that city employees have abused their power and violated his rights. Magistrate Armitage stated if you have any allegations to make it to the witness directly or say he did his job properly. Mr. Harris understood. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Harris has the witness done anything wrong, illegal, or biased. Mr. Harris answered yes and no and explained his reasoning why. Mr. Eseltine provided an explanation of what his employees explained to Mr. Harris. Magistrate Armitage stated to Mr. Harris that you made allegations against Mr. Eseltine and asked him to explain what he has done. Mr. Hams stated Mr. Eseltine because of political pressure. Mr. Eseltine stated he will admit that Mr. Wright never talked to me directly but to us in a meeting. Mr. Eseltine stated he personally did not call me. Mr. Eseltine stated there was a meeting with Mr. Wright, Code Enforcement, myself, Police Chief, City Manager, and another gentleman that I do not remember his name. Mr. Harris stated the board of directors with the homeowner's association came to City Hall and also made phone calls reference complaints. Magistrate Armitage stated this is different to allegations you made reference officials bending to political pressure. Ms. Hall stated a citizen can make a complaint. Magistrate Armitage stated you failed to show a political pressure, a resident asked for a meeting and Mr. Eseltine was directed to go. You have failed to show any political pressure of the fact that he has changed his views because he was ordered to do so. You alleged that he is abusing his position to your detriment. Mr. Harris stated all conversations with city people he should record. Magistrate Armitage reminded Mr. Harris there are laws for the State of Florida regarding recording conversations. Mr. Harris requested six months to acquire a variance. Ms. Hall stated the City of Sebastian is proposing not to obtain fees for administrative services unless the homeowner fails to comply. We are proposing for a variance or demolition of the sheds and referred to the conclusion of law and variance requesting fifteen days for a new permit application from the building department and the same to apply for a variance. Mr. Harris requested for the wave of the variance fee. Magistrate Armitage stated what in your behavior would lead you to give you that benefit and referred to the previous allegations made by Mr. Harris. Mr. Harris asked Code Officer Bloomfield you stated to me that Dan Duffell has called you numerous times, can you recall how many times. Mr. Bloomfield stated he spoke with him about three times about a complaint prior to me finding the sheds. And I explained to him that I did not see a code violation from the roadway and do not trespass onto private property. Mr. Harris asked if he felt Mr. Duffell was following up all the time to see where you're at with this complaint. Mr. Bloomfield answered not with me personally and I have not spoken with him since finding the violation. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Bloomfield if he felt pressured or ordered to find a violation against the respondent. Mr. Bloomfield answered no. Magistrate Armitage asked if he felt any conspiracy out to violate the rights of the respondent. Mr. Bloomfield answered no stating he cited Mr. Harris on his own. Mr. Harris stated he had no further questions. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield where were you when you viewed all of the sheds. Mr. Bloomfield stated he was on the adjacent wooded lot with permission from the property owner and stated his name. Ms. Hall confirmed Mr. Bloomfield took photos on the vacant adjacent property with permission from the property owner. Mr. Bloomfield stated yes. Ms. Hall requested the photos are entered into evidence as K L, & M. Ms. Hall asked Mr. Bloomfield how much time was spent on the case in 2017. Mr. Bloomfield answered four hours total. Magistrate Armitage asked is there anyone else's time. Mr. Eseltine answered three hours. Ms. Hall asked what hourly rate is typically charged for his administrative rate. Mr. Eseltine answered $60. Magistrate Armtage asked if there were any other employees doing administrative work on this case. Ms. Hall answered I believe it was the clerk and that is one hour. Magistrate Armitage called a court's witness or comment. Councilwoman Andrea Coy gave comment and her interaction with Mr. Harris. Magistrate Armitage responded to Ms. Coy's comments. Ms. Hall suggested fifteen days for Mr. Harris to apply for a variance. Magistrate Armitage asked Mr. Harris is this doable? Mr. Eseltine stated we will not make him reapply for the permit as long as he applies for the variance. Ms. Hall stated there will be no additional permit fee. All parties discussed the fee, meeting dates and stipulations for applying for a variance. Mr. Harris apologized for his behavior and explained further. Mr. Bloomfield explained previous violations cited on the property before Mr. Harris moved in. Magistrate Armitage made additional comments reference the allegations made by Mr. Hams with Mr. Harris responding. Ms. Hall referred to the order of law and conclusion of law for judgement. Thirty days for respondent to apply for a variance, pay administrative costs and be fined $20 per day if respondent does not comply. Mr. Harris called a witness Susan Prudhome who made comment. Magistrate Armitage referred the witness to contact Mr. Eseltine with any questions reference the city codes and to refer to the homeowner's association for their regulations. Ms. Hall asked what would be the stipulations if Mr. Harris is denied for the variance. Ms. Hall is requiring the sheds are demolished if the variance is denied. Magistrate Armitage asked is there a way to keep the sheds with a permit. Mr. Eseltine answered yes if Mr. Harris meets the setback requirements. Magistrate Armitage stated by February 28, the sheds will either be torn down, or moved to a position agreeable by the Building Official. Mr. Eseltine agreed. Magistrate Armitage stated if none of this is done a fine of $25 per day will be accessed. Mr. Eseltine and Dan Hainey explained the engineering process if Mr. Harris does not apply for a variance. Mr. Harris agreed. Hearing adjourned at 4:16 p.m. K "EA-t t K City of Sebastian Sebastian Police Department 1201 Main Street • Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: (772) 388-4436 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Date I a Time Served on As Owner, Resident or Agent of property located at Inspection of property indicates a violation of City O—rdinance Section 15L — •3 �'u '�� lr OwF{�u�st�,Tl'rN�—f�� c�G SfcfZ�JykGk E'�y+un„�,.u.C�.,TS� Qw�c•a� r�t4cr.3 You are hereby edtocorrecttheabove violation within ays hoer& from the above date and is no ce. time ofthFailure to comply could result in a lien of your property, a notice to appear in county court, or fines of up to $250.00 a day, every day the violation exists. You have the right to appeal this Notice of Violation to the City of Sebastian Special Magistrate for Code Enforcement. If you have any questions please call. Serve Code Enforcemeh Officer f� LIIAS-T14 LCERTMEryr 1y4 P?OPr SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1201 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Code Enforcement Division Name of owner: Address of owner: Address of violation: 772-589-5233 Hotline:772-388-4436 POSTED NOTICE OF CODE VIOLATION Current Resident 755 S Fischer Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 755 S Fischer Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 Date: March 24, 2017 Case: 17-00887 Public records indicate that you are the owner of the following property in the City of Sebastian, Florida: South Moon Under Sub Lot 8, PBI 11-52. An inspection of this property discloses, and the City has found and determined, that a condition exists thereon which is a violation of Section 54-2-7.13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sebastian in that: Sec. 54-2-7.13 Mobile homes, travel trailers, campers, boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles. (b) Parking and storage of recreational vehicles. Recreational vehicles as described herein may be parked, stored or placed on any improved lot in any residential district, provided that: (9) Not more than two recreational vehicles at the same time shall be permitted on any lot outside of an enclosed garage. ONLY TWO RECREATIONAL VEHICLES MAY BE ON THE EXTERIOR OF YOUR PROPERTY. PLEASEREMOVE ALL R Vs WHICH EXCEEDS THEALLOWED LIMIT FROM THE PROPERTYAS YOU HAVE EXCEEDED YOUR LIMIT OF TWO. You are hereby notified that unless the condition described above is remedied so as to make it in compliance with Sect. 54-2-7.13(b)(9) of the Code of Ordinances of the City within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the time of receipt hereof, the City of Sebastian will bring this case before the next scheduled hearing of the Code Enforcement Special Magistrate. If you have any questions, please phone the Code Enforcement Division. If you dispute that such alleged conditions exist on such property, you may request a hearing before the Special Magistrate to show good reason why such condition should not be corrected. Such request for hearing must be in writing and must be postmarked by a date not later than three days if five (5) days is given to correct the violation, or by hand -delivery or fax of such request by noon of the next business day if only forty-eight (48) hours is given in the notice, after your receipt of this notice by you or the occupant of the premises, and addressed to Sebastian Police Department, Code Enforcement Division, 1201 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958. Cowtruk Bk-r�L By Curtis Bloomfield Code Enforcement Officer #674 Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser - Property Data Page 1 of I Data For Parcel 31390700002000000008.0 Base Data Parcel: 31390700002000000008.0 Owner: UNAVAILABLE 6A Site Address: CONFIDENTIAL [+] Map this property. ""11 lQIll ais. Mailing Address Property Information Address: CONFIDENTIAL Prop ID: 32028 Address Line 2: Tax Code: 2 (City of Sebastian) Property Use: 0100 (SINGLE City, State Zip: FAMILY - IMPROVED) Neighborhood: 140029.00 (SOUTH MOON UNDER) Appraisal Date: 12/15/2014 Short Legal Description SOUTH MOON UNDER SUS - LOT 8 PBI 11-52 Click here for more Photos [+] Click to enlarge. Secondary Owners No additional owners found. Notes Notes: Click here to view oblique Imagery through Bing Maps. Report Discrepancy GlS parcel shapefile last updated 3/22120175:09:56 PM. LAMA database last updated 31221201711:07:35 PM. http://www.ircpa.org/Data.aspx?ParcellD=31390700002000000008.0 3/23/2017 *4 � Posh 31zy(1-7 t-- — oosg� City of Sebastian Sebastian Police Department 1201 Main Street • Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: (772) 388-4436 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Date 3 Le3 i Time�10013 C) T ` V r Served on LEFT booz -,t u0+4 As Owner, Resident ol�Agent of property located at '+55 S . V L.5cuX=- z (2(Z.- Inspection of property indicates a violation of City Ordinance Section 49r, Le — a -- - _ 1 �o s�--� .� Pl,�►�s� vu� IPcI-1, (L V,OJ'&-rL `c t�law�ir L�cu �' f OFL 2-. U�Sct��l.Lu You �v� 02yk o aLt� Youarehere y ' edtocorrecttheaboveviolation within days from the above date and time of this no ' allure to comply could result in a lien of your property, a notice to appear in county court, or fines of up to $250.00 a day, every day the violation exists. You have the right to appeal this Notice of Violation to the City of Sebastian Special Magistrate for Code Enforcement. If you have any questions please call. �j Servetea d By: '9;/ � Code Enforcement O cer SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1201 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Code Enforcement Division Tel: 772-589-5233 Hotline: 772-388-4436 POSTED NOTICE OF CODE VIOLATION Name of owner: Current Resident Date: March 24, 2017 Address of owner: 755 S Fischer Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 Address of violation: 755 S Fischer Circle Case: 17-00889 Sebastian, FL 32958 Public records indicate that you are the owner of the following property in the City of Sebastian, Florida: South Moon Under Sub Lot 8, PBI 11-52. An inspection of this property discloses, and the City has found and determined, that a condition exists thereon which is a violation of Section 54-2-7.5(c)(2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sebastian in that: Sec. 54-2-7.5(c)(2) Accessory structures. (c) General regulations of accessory buildings: (2) No accessory structure shall be constructed or maintained without a building permit being issued by the city's building official expressly designating the type of the accessory structure (example: garage, shed, pump house). PLEASE OBTAINANAFTER THE FACT BUILDING PERMIT FOR ALL SHEDS LOCATED ON YOUR PROPERTY. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AT 772-589- 5537 TO OBTAIN THE PROPER PERMIT OR ANY INSPECTIONS BY OUR BUILDING OFFICIAL. You are hereby notified that unless the condition described above is remedied so as to make it in compliance with Sec. 54-2-7.5(c)(2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City within fifteen (15) days from the time of receipt hereof, the City of Sebastian will bring this case before the next scheduled hearing of the Code Enforcement Special Magistrate. If you have any questions, please phone the Code Enforcement Division of the City. If you dispute that such alleged conditions exist on such property, you may request a hearing before the Special Magistrate to show good reason why such condition should not be corrected. Such request for hearing must be in writing and must be postmarked by a date not later than ten days if fifteen (15) days is given to correct the violation, or by hand -delivery or fax of such request by noon of the next business day if only forty-eight (48) hours is given in the notice, after your receipt of this notice by you or the occupant of the premises, and addressed to Code Enforcement Division, City of Sebastian, City Hall, Sebastian, FL 32958. By Curtis Bloomfield Code Enforcement Officer #674 City of Sebastian Sebastian Police Department 1201 Main Street • Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: (772) 388-4436 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Date �3 T Time '' Served on LZ F-f oA'C 1)c)o& -c4V'k As Owner, Resident or Agent of property located at �j- 5 5 S . V-15c� CL fL . Inspection of property indicates a violation of City Ordinance Section 5 '- OR _S C�2 ��` II�``��- ►�u+t-cSSt� D� $TRuc"�u.JLik. . coq N `�v�•lc ou.2 St (OW ©" Youareherebyn ' ed to correct the aboveviolation within ays he -Fs from the above date and time of this no ' ail ure to comply could result in a lien of your property, a notice to appear in county court, or fines of up to $250.00 a day, every day the violation exists. You have the right to appeal this Notice of Violation to the City of Sebastian Special Magistrate for Code Enforcement. If you have any questions please call. Code EnforcemenIADfficer uo. a.�ui„v� - uara I WCKIngvv tcesutts Page 1 of USPS Tracking' FAQs )(http://faq.usps.com/?articield=220900) Track Another Package + Tracking Number: 9171999991703333519293 Remove x Expected Delivery on SATURDAY 25MARCH by 2017(D 8:O®Pif1Qt G Delivered March 25, 2017 at 12:21 pm DELIVERED, LEFT WITH INDIVIDUAL SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 Tracking History March 25, 2017, 12:21 pm Delivered, Left with Individual SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 12:21 pm on March 25, 2017 in SEBASTIAN, FL 32958. March 25, 2017, 8:40 am Arrived at Unit SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 https://tools.uses.com/go/TrackConf miAction?tLabels=9171999991703333519293 11/21/2017 ��l 0 .,a�nuid!V Kesuits Page 2 of 4 March 24, 2017, 8:52 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility ORLANDO FL DISTRIBUTION CENTER March 23, 2017, 9:15 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility ORLANDO FL DISTRIBUTION CENTER Product Information u See Less n Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs (http://faq.usps.com/?articleld=220900) section to find answers to your tracking questions. The easiest tracking number is the one you don't have to know, https://tools.usps.corn/golTrackCotifirmAction?tLabels=9 t7 t999991703333519293 11/21/2017 C. _204 Trq 41 POLIC$ pgpAR7MEpr 4'4x�W O SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1201 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Code Enforcement Division Tel: 772-589-5233 Hotline: 772-388-4436 POSTED NOTICE OF CODE VIOLATION Name of owner: Current Resident Address of owner: 755 S Fischer Circle Address of violation: Sebastian, FL 32958 755 S Fischer Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 Date: April 14, 2017 Case: 17-011162 Public records indicate that you are the owner of the following property in the City of Sebastian, Florida: South Moon Under Sub Lot 8, PBI 11-52. An inspection of this property discloses, and the City has found and determined, that a condition exists thereon which is a violation of Section 54-2-7.5(c)(2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sebastian in that: Sec. 54-2-7.5(c)(2) Accessory structures. (c) General regulations of accessory buildings: (2) No accessory structure shall be constructed or maintained without a building permit being issued by the city's building official expressly designating the type of the accessory structure (example: garage, shed, pump house). PLEASE OBTAIN AN AFTER THE FACT BUILDING PERMIT FOR ALL SHEDS LOCATED ON YOUR PROPERTY. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AT 772-589- 5537 TO OBTAIN THE PROPER PERMIT OR ANY INSPECTIONS BY OUR B UILDING OFFICIAL. You are hereby notified that unless the condition described above is remedied so as to make it in compliance with Sec. 54-2-7.5(c)(2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City within fifteen (15) days from the time of receipt hereof, the City of Sebastian will bring this case before the next scheduled hearing of the Code Enforcement Special Magistrate. If you have any questions, please phone the Code Enforcement Division of the City. If you dispute that such alleged conditions exist on such property, you may request a hearing before the Special Magistrate to show good reason why such condition should not be corrected. Such request for hearing must be in writing and must be postmarked by a date not later than ten days if fifteen (15) days is given to correct the violation, or by hand -delivery or fax of such request by noon of the next business day if only forty-eight (48) hours is given in the notice, after your receipt of this notice by you or the occupant of the premises, and addressed to Code Enforcement Division, City of Sebastian, City Hall, Sebastian, FL 32958. Cau'ttiy BLo� By Curtis Bloomfield Code Enforcement Officer #674 Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser - Property Data Page 1 of 1 Data For Parcel 31390700002000000008.0 Base Data Parcel: Owner: Site Address: Mailing Address Address: Address Line 2: City, State Zip: 31390700002000000008.0 UNAVAILABLE CONFIDENTIAL [+] Map this property. Property Information CONFIDENTIAL Prop ID: 32028 Tax Code: 2 (City of Sebastian) Property Use: 0100 (SINGLE FAMILY -IMPROVED) Neighborhood: 140029.00 (SOUTH MOON UNDER) Appraisal Date: 12/15/2014 Short Legal Description SOUTH MOON UNDER SUB - LOT 8 PBI 11-52 Click here for more Photos [+] Click to enlarge. Secondary Owners No additional owners found. Notes Notes: Click here to view oblique Imagery through Bing Maps. Report Discrepancy GIS parcel shapefile last updated 411312017 5:09:58 PM. G4MA database last updated 41131201711:07.•38 PM. http://www.ircpa.org/Data.aspx?ParcelID=31390700002000000008.0 4/14/2017 F Pl)st q /-�/I � City of Sebastian Sebastian Police Department 1201 Main Street • Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: (772) 388-4436 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Date i 9L } Time-9 9 3 e;k- Served on LIZf7 14Tr boo 2 + cig4k- As Owner, Resident or Agent of property located at `+SS S - 1�t5CA'r'-2 Cz rL. . Inspection of property indicates a violation of City Ordinance Section 5 ct — i—. 5 c 2 PTV."-r WzJ� �0& i'k c-�6cs s a4� Szdcu�,zu�2Fc. OIL udL �D 5�2Z You are reby edtocorrecttheaboveviolation within day hews from the above date and time of this n allure to comply could result in a lien of your property, a notice to appear in county court, or fines of up to $250.00 a day, every day the violation exists. You have the right to appeal this Notice of Violation to the City of Sebastian Special Magistrate for Code Enforcement. If you have any questions please call. Se bT— . Code Enforcement accer SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT yto-t Posrq it Code Enforcement Division III III I I[I'll S PITNEV BOWES 1201 Main Street 02 rP $ 005.260 Sebastian, FL. 32958 000321 FRO APR 1 B 29 91 7199 9991 7033 3351 9552 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 3295858 RECEIVEp MAY 15 P011 Current Resident G 11Y/✓1 ` 755 5 Fischer Circle 0��(�, t�^_- sebastl=n FL32958 1b WMOI1 d..i2-CI'I-1 N 1 1E .339 SF. i 00851111ii i f:ETJ Rt TO ISENOER IIII IIII IIII IIII (IIII III IIII IIIIII II IIIIII IIII III II UNABLER' TOFORWARD I 32958755 FISCHER CR Sinature Required 9.�--.��5.€ I'III'11il;I1111If"ll'II'lII11"""'II'Illllllll"IllIIII!!'!!I 1;rB/tstl POLICE _ � IV SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1201 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 Code Enforcement Division 772-589-5233 Hotline:772-388-4436 NOTICE OF VIOLATION HEARING BEFORE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 17-01 1162 BOB HARRIS 755 S FISCHER CIRCLE SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 ADDRESS OF VIOLATION: 755 S FISCHER CIRCLE SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 The full legal description of the real property upon which these violations occur is: South Moon Under Sub Lot 8, PBI 11-52. ATTENTION: The Code Enforcement Division of the City of Sebastian has previously notified you of an alleged violation of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sebastian. The Code Enforcement Division contends that the following violation was not corrected within the specified time given. Per Land Development Code of the City of Sebastian Section 54-2-7.15, the Code Enforcement Division is bringing you before the Special Magistrate to be heard on the alleged violation of the following: Sec. 54-2-7.5(c)(2) Accessory structures. (c) General regulations of accessory buildings: (2) No accessory structure shall be constructed or maintained without a building permit being issued by the city's building official expressly designating the type of the accessory structure (example: garage, shed, pump house). Accordingly, the Special Magistrate has scheduled this matter for a hearing on Tuesday the 21st day of November, 2017 at 2:00 P.M. at City Council Chambers, 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida. r� Harris 755 S Fischer Circle November 8, 2017 Page two YOU ARE REQUESTED to appear before the Special Magistrate at that time to answer and defend the allegations that you have violated the above cited provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sebastian. If you fail to attend, the Special Magistrate may base his findings and act solely on the presentation made by the Code Enforcement Division. If the violation is corrected and then recurs, or if the violation was not corrected within the time specified for correction by the code inspector in the prior notice, the case may be presented to the Code Enforcement Special Magistrate even if the violation is corrected prior to the hearing. By Curtis Bloomfield I� Code Enforcement Officer #674 Harris 755 S Fischer Circle November 8, 2017 Page Three SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING You may appear with or without an attorney. You have a right to subpoena witnesses and documents and cross-examine the other party's witnesses. Subpoenas are available at the office of the City Attorney. If the Special Magistrate finds that you have committed a violation, he may order immediate compliance with the Code and provide in the order, in the event of failure to comply with the order within a period of time set forth therein, that a fine NOT TO EXCEED $250.00 per day be imposed for the period of non-compliance. If the City prevails in prosecuting the case before the Special Magistrate, it shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred in prosecuting the case (F.S. Chapter 162.07(2)). If any decision of the Special Magistrate affects you, and you decide to appeal any decision made at this meeting with respect to any matter considered, you will need a record of the proceedings and for such purposes, you may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. (State law requires the above notice. Anyone desiring a verbatim transcript shall have the responsibility, at his/her own cost, to arrange to provide the transcript.) Please be advised the conduct of the Special Magistrate hearing as defined under Florida Statute Chapter 162.07 will be followed. Please conduct yourself accordingly. City of Sebastian Code Enforcement Harris 755 S Fischer Cr November 8, 2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of this Notice of Violation Hearing before the Code Enforcement Special Magistrate w m`ai`iled�livered to the above named violator at the address stated above this �� l day of ovf rn')e� 2017. of By ZG � �- � Curtis Bloomfield Code Enforcement Officer #674 I"e UNITEDSTATES POSTAL SERVICE Date Produced: 11/13/2017 CITY OF SEBASTIAN: The following is the delivery information for Certified Mai ITM item number 7199 9991 7033 3352 2736. Our records indicate that this item was delivered on 11/10/2017 at 02:31 p.m. in SEBASTIAN, FL 32958. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. .Signature of Recipient : \X Address of Recipient : Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs. If you require additional assistance, please contact your local post office or Postal Service representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service The customer reference number shown below is not validated or endorsed by the United States Postal Service. It is solely for customer use. Customer Reference Number: 903018 33543083755 S FISCHER cl LmOF SE a�-T,N fir„ _ 7 � HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5537 • FAX (772) 589-2566 OWNE"UILDER PERMIT APPLICATION ALL OF T14E FOLLOWING MUST BE FILLED N BY APPLICANT, ACCORDING TO FS 713.135 PERMIT# 17- Q TRACKING# JGC:Q; i ( DATE: 1z7 S -/ 7 NDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARCEL ID # RECEIVED BY: LOT: BLOCK: SUBDIVISION: FLOOD ZONE: TYPE OF WORK: ANEW STRUCTURE ❑ADDITION []ALTERATION [] REPAIR []DEMOLITION Q OTHER WORK INCLUDES: []STRUCTURAL OELECTRICAL PLUMBING CHANICAL []ROOFING - SLOPE:_ [] POOL[] ALUhUNUM STRUCTURE ❑ SHED FENCE []SLAB OR DECK []OTHER r WORK DESCRIPTION: yTnbIA 6' G'x(' LASM(- SNkkP-@Gt7'H& STt�hRlf.P' SH_1S —ThAT AA-l� )Oru, 8-A1(Tid c 0.') -04e S/?I✓ ESTIMATED JOB VALUE: $ eOAD9. °'4I- TOTAL S/F `� UNDER AIR JOB NANIE: f 4 l amf S JOB ADDRESS: 7 SS S- Aiscla BI\, CI6r,LG-_ 5 E13/:MAA), ICL 719 SS( PROPERTY OWNER'SNANIE: l�Q� hIQ%Z%Zlt PHONE: ADDRESS: 7 S� S. 1 IS Ert tw , ef4, CITY/STATE: S - ttbSYnAl7 Ai. ZIP CODE Y-2vi- I' CONTRACTOR BUSINESS NAME: C)/ IIJErt _ LICENSE #: ADDRESS: CONTACT PHONE: CITY/STATE: ZIP CODE CONTACT E-hIAIL ADDRESS: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: ZIP CODE: CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: PRESENT USE: PROPOSED USE: OCCUPANT LOAD: NUMBER OF: []STORIES []BAYS []UNITS C:JBEDROOMS QFIEIGHT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: GROUP OCCUPANCY: AREA IS THE BUILDING PRESENTLY EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTENI? AYES []NO BONDING COMPANY: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: MORTGAGE LENDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: FEE SIMPLE TITLE HOLDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: I APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK AND INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED. I CERTIFY THAT NO WORK OR INSTALLATION HAS COMMENCED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF ALL LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION IN THIS JURISDICTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FOR ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS AND AIR CONDITIONERS, ETC. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SIGNED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE FILED WITH THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY IF THE VALUE IS $2,500 OR MORE, EXCEPT HEATING OR AIR CONDITIONING CHANGE OUTS LESS THAT $7,500. NOTICE: IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE AGENCIES, OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. ANY CHANGE IN BUILDING PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE RECORDED WITH THIS OFFICE. ANY WORK NOT COVERED ABOVE MUST HAVE A VALID PERMIT PRIOR TO STARTING. IN CONSIDERATION OF GRANTS, THIS PERMIT, THE OWNER, AND THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR AGREE TO ERECT THIS STRUCTURE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING CODES OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. NOTE: THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS VOID AFTER 180 DAYS UNLESS THE WORK, WHICH IT COVERS, HAS COMMENCED. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST HAVE A VALID STATE CERTIFICATION, STATE REGISTRATION, OR COUNTY COMPETENCY PLUS A✓COUNTY —WIDE LICENSE PRIOR TO OBTAINING PERMIT. AN OWNER ACTING AS THEIR OWN . OWN ER/AGENTf SIGNATURE CONTRACTOR MUST PERSONNALLY APPEAR AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO SIGN THE l3oQ L-! A 2Q I S' PERMIT APPLICATION. PER FS 489.103 PRINTED NAME OF OWNER/AGENT )ATE: <- I rt - 17 Individuals who sign as the owner's agent must first obtain legal power of attorney to sign on their behalf. STATE OF FLOREDA :OUNTY OF hereby certify that on this day of 20 personally appeared who is _ personally known tome or has _ produced identification. 'yp)g of identification produced: If L t) )fficial Signature of Notary Public Notary Seal :;�"'•.. DARINK.IAGESSE cbmmission I GO OV925 +< Exp1r99ApdI0,2NI Tms TNYTmy Ftln le UMM Ebb78S . - z ORDERED BY 0--m-CONSUMER TITLE & ESCROW SERVICES, INC. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 755 S FISCHER CIRCLE SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 FIELD WORK DATE: ,vsreols REVISION DATE(S):(REV.1 11/6/20151 (REVA 1116/2015) Tn..r..r. r. SURVEY NUMBER: 1510.3182 65�0 / rnAo gA11V � LAKE WAT/ER/ \ \ /�F� e C520 'RE.IOIR. �g / 4 SURVCY �TIm SCRCSNED CONC. REC. 5/B"I.R m POOL AREA m (ND iDl LOT B JO.5 n m CONC. m S/a 3's9' ? 218 7s/v 2L.a C CONG0 m \ mm jr wi4+a.93.5 R2 .T39 Ile COv'DECONC'ois ra :5- 660 — � ry aa.a DRfl OR/YE � \1 DPW DRNE REC 5/8" I.R. 138.30 REC. 3/8" IR 1 (NO mi (NO ID) 3 erll'05" A- O Lc; p! O mo R: m' CERTIFIED BY: R.L.S. NO. 5362 JOHN W. WALKER A CC L&E 50' PAVED PUBLIC R/N BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTH R/W LINE OF FISCHER CIRCLE SAID BEARING BEING S 8803830" W Use ofThis Survey for Rurposes other than Intended. WlMout Wnvten Vedit.u.., mil beat the Um" Sale Risk and Without ❑abdny to the 5urveyor. Nothing hereon Shall be Construed to Gw ANY Rieh6 or Senehts to Amon Other Man then, (PRIMA MOO I;. iM SEB�T�N HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5537 • FAX (772) 589-2566 9/20/2017 To: Mr. Bob Harris 755 S. Fischer Circle Sebastian, Fl. 32958 Subject: Shed(s) under permit no. 17-001654 Mr. Harris, You applied for a permit to install 6- 6x6 plastic sheds on your property on May 11, 2017. The permit application has been reviewed and comments made that have not been addressed since May 17, 2017. Specifically, the comments state the RS-20 zoning setback requirement for an accessory structure is 15 ft. from the side yard property line and 25 ft. from the rear property line. The survey submitted does not indicate the distance from the shed(s) to the side yard property line but from where the shed(s) are drawn in on the survey, it does not appear that it will meet the 15 ft. requirement. The last time we spoke on the phone, I expressed to you that the side yard setback must be met and the only other way to remedy this situation is to apply for a variance through our Planning and Zoning Department. Variance requests are heard before the City of Sebastian Board of Adjustments for approval. The Florida Building Code section 105.3.2 states that an application for permit shall become null and void 180 days after the date of filing unless the application is pursued in good faith or a permit has been issued. It has been over 4 months since you applied for the permit. The purpose of this letter is you remind you that you have an open permit application that will expire soon unless it is pursued in good faith to obtain the permit. Also, be aware that structures on properties that are not properly permitted will be subject to further action in a Code Enforcement case held before the Special Magistrate, which may lead to penalties including daily fines plus administrative costs. Please act accordingly. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Regards, GG/W 1G� Wayne Eselte Building Director 772-388-82353 CC: Joe Griffin, City Manager; Michelle Morris, Chief of Police; Dorri Bosworth, Planning and Zoning Y OF %P�� 11��j Fu�N ts� - 91 7199 9991 7033 3351 3154 rin Street lorida 32958 or MAN w re-pPLAND e n Street xida 32958 Mr. Bob Harris 755 S. Fischer Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 Mr. Bob Harris 755 S. Fischer Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking(V Results Page 1 of 4 USPS Treckingo Results FAQs >(http://faq.usps.com/?articleld=220900) Track Another Package + Remove X Tracking Number: 9171999991703333513154 ® ® P Delivered Expected Delivery by: Monday, September 25, 2017 by 8:00pm Q Product & Tracking Information See Available Actions Postal Product: Features: First -Class Mail® Certified Mail'" DATE 8 TIME STATUS OF ITEM LOCATION September 25, 2017, 2:43 Delivered, Left with SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 pm Individual Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 2:43 pm on September 25, 2017 in SEBASTIAN, FL 32958. September 25, 2017, 9:41 Arrived at Unit SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 am September 25, 2017, 9:14 In Transit to Destination ON ITS WAY TO am SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 https:lltools.usps.comlgolTrackC onfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc=2&text28777=&tLabe... l l / 1 /2017 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking(D Results Page 2 of 4 DATE & TIME STATUS OF ITEM LOCATION September 24, 2017, 3:14 Departed USPS Regional ORLANDO FL am Facility DISTRIBUTION CENTER September 23, 2017, 9:21 In Transit to Destination ON ITS WAY TO am SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 September 22, 2017, 8:33 Arrived at USPS Regional ORLANDO FL pm Facility DISTRIBUTION CENTER September 22, 2017, 7:18 Accepted at USPS Origin SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 pm Facility September 22, 2017 Pre -Shipment Info Sent to USPS, USPS Awaiting Item See Less ^ Available Actions Text & Email Updates Return Receipt Email u See Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fulipage&tLc=2&text28777=&tLabe... 11/1 /2017 K L 114 Jeanette Williams From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Janickie Smith, Clerk Code Enforcement Sebastian Police Department 1201 Main Street Sebastian, FL32958 772-388-4436 ibrown@citvofsebastia n.o re Janickie Smith Wednesday, February 14, 2018 9:35 AM Jeanette Williams FW: 755 S Fischer Cir Photos 137_0444jpg;137_0448jpg;137_0449jpg;137_0450jpg;137_0451jpg;137_0452jpg; 255jpg; 257jpg; 258jpg; 259jpg; 260jpg; 261jpg; 262jpg; 265 jpg; 266 jpg; 267jpg -----Original Message ----- From: Curtis Bloomfield Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:18 AM To: Janickie Smith Subject: 755 5 Fischer Cir Photos Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. �� � � S: r ..,. , f �. „ �� `„::i fib`, � fit. �ti. ;�� _'or ��, � ♦gyp' JJ � ` i '�I � � 1 . , 1'. ` )'i b ,: r,�,.a .: 'z:-, . �y, �; :elk,' � a. (���'- .,R� :. . .i /If` r, t. W.ems.. � �. •.. Y.�. 1 y ys PIT ,: •r � �,. ., � Nay--.r„. t R'_ i • w 45-1 p�: , j !- ,�l. l • `� .� [ ;its• n �^� � � 5 V � �'� � � � � �.. r. '� �. �� - 1 �, �1 r i ,ter `� � .� ;a.. �. L 7 �' �,_ � • �� ��� � �'�� qQ 1 y i /_3 f rya ♦"� j ,� . 4;_ ` Ara . �. s