HomeMy WebLinkAbout03091987 PZMINUTES OF SPECIAL PLAN~IN~ AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - 'MARCH 9, 1987
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY. CHAIRMAN STANLEY KRULIKOWSKI AT 7:15 P.M.
PRESENT: MAYME TAYLOR, JEWELL THOMPSON, WILLIAM MAHONEY, MARJORIE POOLE,
CHAIRMAN STANLEY KRULIKOWSKI.
ABSENT: ROBERT FULLERTON (Ff~CUSED), JAMES WADSWORTH, HAROLD EISENBARTH,
MOTION BY MR. MAHONEY, SECONDED BY MRS. TAYLOR, TO APPROVE MINUTES OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2. CARRIED.
WITH REFERENCE TO MEMO FROM ATTORNEY PALMER, MR. THOMPSON POINTED OUT THAT
SECTION 20A-6.1, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SUB-PARAGRAPH (C)(9)(B)(5)
HAD BEEN CHANGED BY ORDINANCE NO. 0-85-14,B AND SINCE SUB-PARAGRAPH
(C)(25)(B)(4) READS EXACTLY THE SAME, IT SHOULD BE RECOMMENDED THAT
THIS PARAGRAPH BE CHANGED ALSO.
MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MRS. POOLE, TO REVISE SUB-PARAGRAPH
(C)(25)(B)(4) TO CONTAIN THE SAME VERBIAGE WHICH IS IN ORDINANCE NO.
0-$5-14-B. CARRIED. (COPY OF ORDINANCE IS ENCLOSED.)
MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MRS. TAYLOR, TO DEFER UNTIL THE NEXT
WORKSHOP MEETING ALL ACTION ON POROUS PARKING, RAILROAD CROSSINGS,
INDIAN RIVER SHORE LINE, HOME OCCUPATION LICENSES, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP-
MENT RE-ZONING, GRANDFATHER GLAUSE. CARRIED.
MOTION BY MR. MAHONEY, SECONDED BY MR. THOMPSON, TO SEND LETTER TO
CITY ATTORNEY ASKING HIM TO RECONCILE APPARENT CONFLICT OF THE FOLLOWING:?
SEC.20A-9.4 - NONCONFORMING LOTS. OF RECORD (PAGE 591), SEC.,:20A-S.4 -
LOTS OF RECORD LESS THAN MINI~MUM SIZE (GRANDFATHER CLAUSE) (PAGE
SEC..20A-5.7 (C)(1) LOTS LESS THAN REQUIRED WIDTH (PAGE 3.25). CARRIED.
MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MR... MAHONEY, TO REVISE SEC.2@A-8.5(A)
STALLS.~ AISLES AND DRIVEWAYS - (PAGE 533) TO SHOW REQUIRED AISLE DIMENSIONS
CARRIED.
MR., THOMPSON BROUGHT UP THE FOLLOWI'NG ITEMS:
SEC,20A-2,6'E, FEES AND COSTS - HAS APPLICATION. FEE FOR SPECIAL USE
PERMIT BEEN ESTABLISHED? DOES APPLICANT PAY EXPENSE OF REQUIRED NOTICES?
PAGE 2,72 - ADD NEW SECTION 20A-4.~.18 - FEES AND COSTS - THERE SHALL BE
AN APPLICATION FEE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (TAPE INAUDIBLE - DON"~T
KNOW WHAT FOLLOWED)
PAGE 338 - REQUIRED FEE (SANDM~N~N(;) - DOES THIS REQUIRE ADVERTISEMENT?.
-PAGE 768 - SEC.2OA-11.6 - ADD F~ - FEES AND COSTS. THERE SHALL BE AN
APPLICATION FEE FOR ZONING UNMER 'THIS SECTION IF CHANGE IS REQUESTED BY
PROPERTY OWNER/OWNERS~.. FEE SHABL BE DETERMINED BY RESOLUTION BY
CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT SHOULD~'BEAR COST -- TAPE INAUDIBLE.
MOTION'BY MR. THOMPSON.,, SECONDED BY MRS, TAYLOR, TO PUT FEES AND'
COSTS ON"'AGENDA FOR NEXT SPECIAL MEETING. CARRIED.
DR. FISCHER MENTIONED THE FACT THAT WITH ALL THE DUTIES HE HAS THE CITY
ENGINEER IS.,UNABLE TO REVIEW SiTE PLANS WITHIN A REASONABLE LENGTH OF
TIME. DR. FISCHER SUGGESTED .THAT SOME SORT OF TIME FRAME SHOULD BE
ESTABLISHED.
MOTION BY'MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MR~ MAHONEY, TO PLACE ON AGENDA OF
NEXT SPECIAL MEETING A DISCUSSION ON.' TIME TO BE INCLUDED IN SECTION
20A-1Q.i(A)(3). CARRIED..
'~EXT SPECIAL MEETING WAS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 6, 1987.
MEETING~ADJOURNED AT 8':.25 P.M.
- 2 -
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA,
AMENDING SUB-PARAGRAPH (C)(9)(B)(§) OF SECTION
20A-6.1 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THEREBY
MODIFYING THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CON-
DITIONAL USE OF DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITiES~ PROVID-
iNG AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY
SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS=
SECTION
THE CITY COUNCIL OP
I
THE CITY OF
That sub-paragraph (C)(9)(B)(5) of Section 20A-6.1 of
the Land Development Code of the City of Sebastian, Ordinance No. 0-85-14.,
now reading as follows=
"(5) An eight foot opaque fence or wall shall be located
along all property lines, however, such screening
shall be located in such a manner which does not
obstruct vision of the ~otoring public and
and preserves safe site distance for the motorists
on and adjacent to the site".
IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS=
'(§) All side and rear yards abutting or adjacent to
residential districts or uses shall be screened in
accordance with the standards ~stablished in
Section 20A-10.2(F) of t-his Chapte~ In addition,
walls or fences may be required bY the Planning and'
Zoning Commission for the sole purpose of screening
light beams from motor vehicles utilizing drive -
through facilities if such light beams will cause
undue glare to surrounding properties, taking into
account the use of the surrourlding properties, the
distance therefrom, and the existence of other ob-
structions to such light beams. Any such require-
ments imposed by the Planning and Zoning .Commission
as to walls and fences shall be supported by
stating the basis for such requirements. This re-
quirement may be required by the Planning and
Zoning Commission after original site plan approval
if the use of the adjacent land(s) on the side or
rear of the property changes and becomes sensitive
to glare".
SECTION II
This Ordinance
adoption by the Council of the City of Sebastian, Florida.
shall be effective immediately upon final
FLORIDA
by ___
Deborah'C'. K~ages,
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly
pass~dR~by the C~ty Council of the City of Sebastian, .Florida, on
the~_~-day of __~ .... ,1986. Notice of Public Hearing hereon
published'tn a 'newspaper of general circulation tn the City
~m, required by Florida statute, and a public hearing waS'.held 'on this
~)~dinanc~,~ City council Chambers on the _~l~ of-_~ .,1986:.
Deborah C, Krages, City Cl~rk
L. Gene Harris
Mayor
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958-0127
TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330
Hector Franco
Engineering/Public Works
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
~,: 7
MARC:H 9TH, 1
CALL ]"O ORDER
ROLL (]:ALL
ANNOUNCEMENT~C:;;
APPROVE] MINUTES;
OLD BUSINESS;
NEW BUSINESS
-, ,[ , ., - ',:;"
FEE, R JARY 9'TH '11--J _., 7
NONE
REVIEI,,J/DIoL:t..=,.:, AND POSSIE;LY REC:OI"IMEND C:HAI',IGES TO
CITY OF SEBASTIAN - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AD.JOUF;N
NOTE; IF ANY PFRSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON
THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE ~JILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES HE/SHE MAY NEED TO
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS
MADE t~HICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TES"FIMONY IN EVIDENCE
ON tJHICH THE APPEAL IS MADE.