HomeMy WebLinkAbout03211985 PZ,, ~] ,~ ~][~.~~PLANNIN~ AND ZONING
BOARD
Planning and Zoning Board meeting called to order by Chairman, Harold
Eisenbarth, at 7:30 P.M., in the Sebastian City Council Chambers.
Members Present:
William Nahoney
Stanley Krulikowski
Jewell Thompson
Edra Young
Harold Eisenbarth
Members Absent:
Narjorie Poole (Excused)
Robert Fullerton
A public hering was scheduled for this meeting to discuss the request
for a re-zoning chamge from LD to PUO for the property known as
Churchman's Condo. However, through an oversight, the public hearing
was not advertised, but notices of the meeting were sent to the surround-
ing property owners. Chairman Eisenbarth announced that we would go
ahead with the public hearing in view of the fact that property owners
were in the audience and also that Attorney Palmer had advised th'at -:'
it would be all right to do so without the advertisement since the pro-
perty owners had been notified. There was a lengthy discussion on the
conceptual plan, during the course 6f which the members of the public
expressed great concern for this development with especial emphasis on
the traffic impact.
NOTION BY STANLEY KRULIKOWSKI, SECONDED BY. OEWELL THOMPSON, TO ADJOURN
THE PUBLIC HEARING. AJDOURNED: 8:47 P.M.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY 3EWELL THOMPSON, SECONDED BY STANLEY KRULIKOWSKI, THAT WE
DEFER ACTION ON THIS APPLICATION UNTIL THE NEXT BOARD MEETING UNTIL
WE CAN GET SOME LEGAL ADVICE AND HAVE TIME TO STUDY THE PUBLIC INPUT.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
NAYS:
MR. MAHONEY
MR. KRULIKOWSKI
MR. THOMPSON
MRS. YOUNG
CHAIRMAN, EISENBARTH
NONE MOTION CARRIED.
Theilminutes of the meeting of 3/7/85 were corrected to indicate that
statement made by Robert Fullerton, that "until we have further veri-
fication, we should withdraw our recommendation", was not part of the
motion made regarding the Magazine Property.
MOTION BY STANLEY KRULIKOWSKI, SECONDED BY EDRA YOUNO, TO APPROVE THE
MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 7, 1985, AS CORRECTEO.
MOTION CARRIED.
- 1 -
PLANNING AND ZONI
~ARD - MEETING 3/21.
Due to a possible co'nflict of interest, Chairman"Harold Eisenbarth
turned the gavel over to Stanley KrulikowSki to chair the following'
portion of the meeting, regarding Site Plan Approval/C.R. 512, LOts
54,55, Block 492, Unit 12,-Sebastian Highlands/Chuck Snider Property.
Mr. Gene Harris, stated that he was presenting a minor site plan for
approval, involving lots 54, & 55, on C.R. 512 for Commercial, Retail/
Restaurant, on behalf of Mr. Charles Snider his client and Mr. Oim
Foley, Architect.
After some discussion, Sewell Thompson asked if Dan Blair, Building
Official had the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed
site plan, as presented by Mr. Harris, in accordance with City or-
dinance. Dan 81air responded that he had not reviewed these plans
presented before Planning and Zoning this evening.
Mr. Gene Harris indicated that the plans were a simple site plan,
which would come under a minor site plan.
Further discussion continued, regarding the proposed site plan.
Mr. Jewell Thompson commented that Mr. Harris indicate~ on the signed
plans the set back distance. Mr, Harris stated that he would and that
it was an oversigt.
MOTION BY BILL MAHONEY, SECONDED BY EDRA YOUNG, TO APPROVE THE SITE
PLAN FOR CHARLES SNIDER, LOTS 54,55, BLOCK 492, UNIT 12.
Oust for clarification, Earl Masteller, questioned whether the Planning
and Zoning Board was proceeding with a minor site plan, without a con-
sulting engineers comments. Mr. Krulikowksi indicated that this was.
a minor site plan presented and that it was not necessary for it to
be presented to a consulting engineer, however, he did feel and recomm-
ended to the board that the site plan be reviewed by a consulting
engineer.
Mr. Krulikowski recommended that the rear right of way of the proposed
site plan be addressed alittle more and that in addition to the p~O-
po's~d 4'. hedge that trees be planted also to provide a buffer along
the rear right-of-way. Dan Blair stated that he would like a chance
to review the plan, since it was Planning and Zoning's decision at
a previous Work Shop Meeting, not to require a rear buffer on C.R.
512 properties. After some further discussion, concerning the
buffer requi~em~6~s, Mr.'Krul!koWski. indicated"that'~be~"me"~'i~gi'"i't_a~e ~ould
be referenced for~larification.
Mr. KrulikO~ski asked the board members what their feelings:.~e:~e~on
having the proposed site plan reviewed by the City engineer.
Mr. Harris stated that one of the reasons the criteria was set up,
for 7,~00 sq. ft. minor site plans, was so that the board wouldn't
need a city engineers review for a minor site plan review. Mr.
KrulikO~ski stated that Mr. Harris was correct, but indicated if
the board felt we needed it, it would then be justified.
MOTION BY BILL MAHONEY, SECONDED BY EDRA YOUNG, TO ACCEPT THE SITE
PLAN CONTINGUENT UPON A BURFER OF TREES AND HEDGE ALONG THE REAR
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: MR. MAHONEY
MR. THOMSPON
MRS. YOUNG
- 2 - NAYS: MR. KRUILKOWSKI MOTION CARRIED
PLANNING & ZONING MEETING - ~ 85
Oust for clarification, from the Planning and Zoning Board, Earl
Masteller asked if a site plan is prepared and considered a minor
site plan with less than 7,500 sq. ft. of impervious area, that it
automatically triggers the fact, that there is not going to be a
letter or review from the City Engineer, and if this is the case,
that when he brings in a site plan, he'will be treated the.same
as Mt.Harris was this evening.
To further clarify Earl Masteller~s concern, Mr. Krulikowski in-
dicated that he would be treated the same and that when the
criteria was set up as to the magnitude, of a minor or major site
plan, i.t 'gave the option of a commission engineer.
Chairman Eisenbarth, took over the gavel and chaired the remainder
of the meeting.
Mr. Dan Rruess, addressed the Planning and Zoning Board, stating that
he just wanted to clarify for the record, the~l~tter he received,
stating that the motion to make the C.R. 512 Magazine Property In-
dustiral was withdrawn, based on the fact that the road extension
of 512 was going to be re-routed. He explained that he received
a letter from Mr Michael Wright, along with a map indicating the
~.oute and that it will definitely by pass the C.R. 512 Magazine
property. Mr. Rruess stated, in his opinion, that this property
would make a fine industrial site.
Chairman~.Eisenbarth, stated that the matter, regarding the C.R.
Magazine Property has been rectified and that a follow up letter
was sent to the City Council.
MOTION BY MR. KRULIKOWSKI, SECONDED BY MRS. YOUNG, TO GET THROUGH
THE OLD UNFINISHED BUSINESS AND IF'~THERE IS TIME, ON THE EVENING
SCHEDULE, NEW BUSINESS WILL 8E ADDRESSED.
MOTION CARRIED.
OEWELL THOMPSON, VOTED'NAY
Chairman Eisenbarth, reported that a late bill was received from
Mosby and Associates, in the amount of $191.00, which was approved
for payment at theZtaSt R & Z meeting. Mr. Mosby's bill also shows
$541.00 pass due, and a new invoice in the amount of $~20.}1 for
the Churchman property.
MOTION 8Y MR.KULIKOWSKI, SECONDED 8Y MRS. YOUNG, THAT BASED ON THE
STATEMENT FROM MOSBY AND ASSOCIATES, DATED }/4/85, THAT THE BOARD
NOT ADDRESS THE STATEMENT AT THIS TIME AND RUT IT OFF UNTIL THE NEXT
MEETING, AT WHICH TIME WE REQUEST-THAT MR. MOSBY BE RRESENT~
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: BILL MAHONEY
STANLEY KRULIKOWSKI
EDRA YOUNG
NAYS: OEWELL THOMPSON
HAROLD EISENBARTH
MOTION CARRIED.
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING - 3/21/85
For the record, Chairman, Eisenbarth stated that the previous motion was
carried and that Mr. Randy Mosby, be requested to be present at the next
Rlanning and Zoning Board meeting.
Chairman EiSenbarth, reviewed the letter received from City Attorney,
Ralmer, concerning the City Ordinance and who has the authorization
to release funds.
Chairman Eisenbarth, reported that there had been no reply to the
letter sent by Rlanning and Zoning to the Department of Environmental
Regulation (DER).
Due to a heavy workload and lack of time, Chairman Eisenbarth, rec-
ommended that the report reoieved from the Finance Director, be held
over,"under "Old Business",'until the board has sufficient time to re-
view it.
MOTION BY MR. MAHONEY, SECONDED BY MR. KRULIKOWSKI, .TO FORWARD A MIAMI
HERALD NEWSPAPER ARTICLE, ENTITLED-~"THE]~DECLINE"O~'.THE.iNO~i~.~£Rm,~LBY-
~[ BURT'S ~p~,. TO. THE'.Ci'TY COUNOlL.FO~i'~HEIR INFORMATION~:'"
MOTION CARRIED.
Chairman Eisenbarth, commented that the letter was sent to the. City
Council, from the Planning and Zoning Board, regarding impact fees
and that as yet, no reply has been received.
Chairman Eisenbarth, reported that at the Regular City Council Meeting,
of ~/20/85, Mrs. Edra Young was voted as a regular member of the Planning
and ~oning Board and is no longer an alternate member.
MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MRS.YOUNG, THAT WE ASK EUGENE CONTINI,
JR., TO MAKE A FORMAL REQUEST FOR WHATEVER IT IS HE IS WANTING TO DO.
MOTION CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS:
Mr. Dan Preuss, local realtor, stated that he has recently purchased the
T-Bone Festus Restaurant Building, located on U.S. #1 and that it is his
intention to convert it into a real estate office. As far as any structual
changes, plumbing or electrical, he stated that there will be none and
that he just"'wanted approval from the board to d.e~~-~''~ this property,
from a Restaurant use to a Real Estate Office.
Mr. Mahoney questioned the situation regarding, the well and if Mr. Preuss
was going to continue to share it with the Father and Son Plaza just re-
cently constructed. Mr. Preuss stated yes, that the Father and Son Plaza
will continue to share the well. He also mentioned that this change of
use will make it easier for lot development, sinc~ only a 100 ft separation'~
is needed, because the building will no longer be a restaurant.
Mr. Thompson commented on.the parking facility. Mr. Preuss stated that there
are 9 p~rking spaces available with a total of 712 square feet.
- 4 -
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD~ETING 3/21/85'
MOTION BY MR. THOMSPON, SECONDED BY MRS. YOUNG, TO APPROVE MR. PREUSS'
REQUEST Tn ~,,~,oo~Tur= =¢=,~=~Lo--~, THEi"FORMER T-BONE FESTUS RESTAURANT,
LOCATED ON~'S.#1, TO A REAL ESTATE OFFICE.
· ~~ ~$~ o~ , .
MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Krulikowski indicated that he would/.like to see a site plan-of this
property, in order to revlew the traffic flow.
MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MRS. YOUNG, TO EXTEND THE MEETING
AN ADDITIONAL 5 MINUTES.
MOTION CARRIED.
.Mr. Gene Harris presented a basic conceptual plan fora proposed Italian
Pizza Restaurant, to be constrUcted on four lots, on C.R. 512, located
East of C.R. 512 and Barber Street.
Discussion followed, regarding the conceptual plan, Chairman Eisenbarth
remarked that at this time these four lots, located East of C.R. 512 and
Barber Street a~e presently zoned C.O.R. but is in the process of being
re-zoned to CL. Mr. Krulikowski was of the opinion that the architeotual
appearance of the proposed building be changed som~, possibly the roof
style, just to allow some deviation from other buildings on C.R. 512.
MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MR. KRULIKOWSKI, THAT WE SEE NO
MAJOR OBJECTION TO THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AS PRESENTED, SUBJECT TO ZONING
APPROVAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW.
MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. John Hamilton, Builder, Owner of Warehouse Building on C.R. 512,
stated that it is his intention to purchase industrial proper~ directly
South of his existing Warehouse, which abutts the road which is the
dividing line between the County and City. Since, the road is built
up on a high crest of the hill, which would make it very difficult to
construct a building that would be 6" - 18" above the crown of the road,
he asked what the board's feeling would be to the building sitting lower
than what the road is to the South, which will be the road the proposed
building will be fronting on. He also mentioned that after speaking
with the Health Department, that they didn't have aproblem as long as
he regrades and there was no problem with perculation. Dan Blair, Building
Official, indicated that he saw no problem and that a retention area
could be placed in the back. Mr. Blair also mentioned that since this is
a deviation form the regular standard, that the site plan show that con-
dition.
Chairman Eisenbarth, was of the opinion that this project be reviewed by
the City Engineer for a professional opinion.
Mr. Hamilton also commented on the l0 foot rear:set backl;~since he already
has an alleyway' for his existing building. It was recommended that this
be shown on the site Plan.
MOTION BY MR. MAHONEY, SECONDED BY MR. ERULIKOWSKI, TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING.
MOTION CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED: 10:44 P.M.
- 5 -