The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04031986 PZJim Gallagher Mayor City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958-0127 TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330 Deborah C. Krages City Clerk PEANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1986 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER BY' CHAI~RMA. N EISENBARTH AT 7:00 P,M. PRESENT: MR. THOMPSON MR. FULLERTON MR. MAHONEY MR. KRULIKOWSK1 MR. WADSWORTH MRS. YOUNG C~A1P, MAN EISENBARTH ALSO PRESENT: MR. FRANCO, CITY ENGINEER TOM PALMER, CITY ATTORNEY' THERE ~ERE NO ANNOUNCEMENTS. ~BAI!RMAN E!SENBARTHCALLED 'FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 20, 1986 M~NUTES'; SEVERAL CORRECTIONS WERE 'MADE TO THE MINUTES AS STATED IN THE CORRECTION SHEET ATTACHED. MOTION BY' MR. THOMPSON SECONDED BY'MR. FULLERTONTO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED FOR MARCH20, 1986. MOTION CARRIED. OLD'BUSINESS: REV!S'EDSITE'PLAN: WILDLIFE'ECOLOGICAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION CIVIC CLUB N~ ONE WAS IN ATTENDANCE FOR THIS CLUB TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. MR. PALMER WAS ASKED TO ANSWER QUESTI'ONS TH'AT SOME MEMBERS HAD REGARDING FINAL APPROVAL OF TH!S PLAN. MR, FULLERTON QUESTIONED IN THEIR BY, LAWS ARTICLE 2 SEC i REGARDING OPEN NENBERSH'!P, HiE WONDERED IF TH1SMEANT THATANYONE WALKING IN OfF THE STREET COULD BECOME AMEMBER AND CONSEQUENTLY BE SERVEDLIQUOR. THE'GENERAL CONCERN OF ALL MEMBERS'WAS TBE POSSIBLI'TY OF THIS BECOMING A D'RIflKiNG CLUB' IN DISQU1SE, AND HOW THEY' COULD PROTECT THEMSELVES AGA1NST IT. CHAIRMAN EISENBARTH GAVE THE DEFINATION OF THE WORD CLUB, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC. MINUTES - PLANNIN ZONING COMMISSION - A~rili3~986- PAGE TWO MR. PALMER INDICATED TO THE MEMBERS THAT WE COULD HAVE A STIPULATION PUT 1N THEIR LEASE WITH' THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGARDING THIS BECOMING A DRINKING CLUB AND IF 1T DOES THAT 1T WOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC BREACH OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COULD CANCEL THE LEASE I~EDIATEL¥. MR, FULLERTON 'REQUESTED THAT ATTORNEY PALMER SUGGEST THE WORDING TO BE ADDED TO.THEI~ LEASE REGARDING THIS'MATTER. MR WA.DS~O~THi RECOMMENDED THAT WE SEND A LETTER TO THE APPLICANT TO GET ~I'TBi ATTORNEY PALMER REGARDING THE WORDING IN REFERENCE TO '(' NO BOTTLECLUBS" MR, WADSWORTH]MADE A MOTION TO REFER BACKTO THE APPLICANT TO GET WITH' ATTORNEY' PALMER, MR, KRULI'KOWSKI SECONDED THE MOTION. UNDER D1~CD~S~ON ATT~NEy' PALMER ASKED IF THIS WAS THE ONLY REQU!~..EIVtENT LEFT TO !~ON OUT BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN, IT ~A,S DEC1DED T~AT THERE' WERE NO OTHER PROBLEMS OR REQUIREMENTS ~CH~ NEEDED TO BE SATISFIE~. CHAIRMAN EISENBARTH' CALLED FOR A VOTE. ON THE MOTION MOTION CARRIED.._ p,I~S'~U~,$~N.'~E~..EISTASL!SHi'~NG' A"RES!DENCE ~ER A BUSINESS IN CL 512 ZONE MR, MA~ONE.¥ ~EOUE'STED THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA AND CHAIRMAN E1SENBARTH ASKED H.]IM TO TAKE THE FLOOR AND BEGIN THE DISCUSSION. MR, MABONE¥"S ONLY QUESTION WAS IF UNDER THE NEW LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RESIDENCES WERE ALLOWED OVER COMMERCIAL BUSINESS IN THE CL 5]2 ZONE, MR, THOMPSON, MR. FULLERTON AND CHAIRMAN EISENBARTH ALL AGREED TBATAFTER-READ~NG THE SECTION IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE pErTAiNING TO ~ES!DENCES ON CL 512 THAT RESIDENCES WERE NO LONGE~ PER)I!iTTED E1THE~ OVER BUSINESSES OR BY THEMSELYES. ~F1N^L DISCUSS!~ON AND DECISION WAS THAT NO RESIDENCES WILL BE ALLOWED. ' ~E~V~SED.' ~:~T...E, p.LAN'~-~ATHER'ANDSO~,' pLAZA.' ,~ PROPOSED TIRES~TO, RE.i' CB~!~RMAN E~!SENBARTB ASKED HECTOR FRANCO I'F ALL ITEMS HAD BEEN CO~IPL!~ED I~TH~'REGARD!~NG THE LETTER DATED MARCH 25, ]1986. ~,~RANCQ INDICATED THAT FROM'AN ENGINEERiNG'STANDPOINT THAT UE' UAD SAT~$F~DALL OF.Hi!S REQUESTS. WE WENT ON TO SAY THE ONLY CU)~J~ENT IT.EMS ~REMA~N.ING WERE TH'E FACT THAT MR. PH1LLIPSON'S PLAN WAS S~ORT FOUR PARKING SPACES AND SHORT BY 2% UNDER THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. MR, FRANCO POINTED OUT THAT MR, PB1LLIPSONS ENGINEER WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THESE TWO ITEMSWERE APPROVED PRIOR TO THE LAND DEyELOPI~ENTCODE GO~NG:~NTO E~SECT ~ND THEREFOREARE'GRANDFATHERED IN AND T~T ~, PBIi. L!PSON SBOULDNOT BEREQU1RED TO CHANGE THEM. ,)~/)~..'~NCO STATE, FOR THE RECOI~D TB~T WE WAS NOT THE ENGINEER FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD WHEN THIS WAS APPROVEDAND THEREFORE poge (2) MINUTES - PLANNIN~m~ND ZONING COMMISSION - APRIL 3,~m~986 - PAGE THREE COULD NOT RENDER'A DECISION REGARDING THESE ITEMS THAT THE COMMISSION -....?LD HAVE TO'RELY ON ITS PREVIOUS APPROVAL 'FOR A DECISION. MRS, YOUNGASKEDATTORNEYPALMER IF HE WOULD BE CONSIDERED. GRANDFATHERED IN BECAUSE OF ~IOR APPROVAL.. MR, PALMER QUOTED FROM PAGE'IX-5, F-4 WH!CHSTATES:~'IF BOTH PARKING AND LANDS'CAP~NG 'ARE DE~!C1E'NT AT T~E TIME OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE UNDER THE PROV~,S~NSOF TE1S CODE AND THE CHANGE DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL P..A~E!~G OR AN~ADDI~T~NAL LANDSCAPINGWE~CB:' NOULDINCREASE THE NEED FOR PAR~N6 0!{ LANDSCAPING OVE~ THE THEN DE~)C!ENCIES, THE CHANGE IS PERMITTED" -~, ~ALM,E~ ~ENT ON TO SAYTHAT TBISMEANS' IF MR PH!LL1PSONS PLAN WAS S~.{)~T 'B~. THE' 2%GREEN AREA. AND SHORT THE FOUR PARK'iNG SPACES WHEN B.E /&qS O){tG~NALL¥ APPROVED THAT THIS SITUATION HAS NOT CHANGED OR ~O)~SENED 1N ANY NAY BY THE NEW PROPOSED CIF(ANGE AND THEREFORE WOULD BE. CON'$!DER~D A ~GRANDFATHE~ED IN" CONDITION, MR, ~UL~.~O~K) QUOTED~ROM A LETTER DATED JULY 24th OF LAST YEAR · F~O~AND~MOSBY'N~O WAS THE CONSULTING ENGINEER FOR THE PLANNING AND Z~N~NG COMM~$$~N AND AT THaT T!ME'MR, MOSBY INDICATED THAT ~f~, PB~LL~PS~N WAS 1N CONFORMITY' W~TB THE CURRENT LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, 8~LL ~ESSE~SM~TH:, ENGINEER OF RECORD 'FOR MR. PHiLLIPSON CAME TO THE POD~!JI~.~'TO ADDRESS THE COMMiSSiON. BE STATED THE SAME FACTS AS -MR, PAb~E~ ~E~ERRED TO 1N THE NEW LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ASKED TUAT ~i~S CLIENTS $~TE PLAN BE' AP~OVED, '~)~,, MAB~NE~' B~ROUGHT ~P THE QUEST)ON OF THE BACKING INTO MARTIN ALLEY. · M~ p~L~,~ GA~E THE STATE RULES' OF BACKING INTO STREETS AND ALLEYS AN'.. ~ ~ND~TED THAT ~T NOULD NOT BE ILLEGAL TO BACK iNTO THIS ALLEY. .MR,~C~jE~SER~MITHi AGAIN ADDRESS'ED THE' COMMISSION REMINDING THEM'THAT ~EN T~E ORiGiNAL AP~OVAL WAS GII/EN ~T WAS GIYEN WITH PE'RMISSION TO BAC~ ~NTO MARTI. N ALLEY' AND HE' HOPED THAT THE COMMISSION WOULD NOT NO~E~SE IT'S DECISION. MR, t~ADS~OR. TH' STATED THAT HE HAD HAD SOME PAST CONCERNS AND SAID THAT MR~ pH~LL1PSON HAD WORKED TO CORRECT TH'E PROBLEMS ON SITE AND THAT HE ~AD.:)~ADE A PERSONAL VISIT TO THE] SITE PRIOR TO THIS MEETING AND HE t~iAS SATI~ED WITH ALL THE CORRECTIONS MADE, ~, ~RUL~O~SK1 ASKED REGARDING THE CHANGES FROM NOW TO JULY. HE ~ONDERED IF MR PH!LLIPSON HAD MADE CONTACT WITH THE BUILDING DEPT ~IOR.. TO MAKING THE CHANGES TO H~S PLAN. MR, MESSERSM1TH GAVE THE CHANGES THAT WERE 'MADE TO THE PLAN. ~h~, E.~SENBARTH. ASKED FOR CLAR)F!CATION OF THE RECORD TO BE SURE T~T T~E CHAN~E$' NER. E S'H~W~NG THAT THE' BUILDING WAS LESS 1N DEPTH AND T~.~EFQ~EOF.A SMALLER SQUARE FOOTAGE, MRs, MESSE~S~')TH~ STATED FOR THE RECORD THAT THESE FACTS WERE CORRECT. ~!{, TH.Q~PSON ~ADE' COMMENTS REGARDING OTHER CASES WHICH HAD BEEN BEFORE THEF~AND I~DICATED THAT HE FELT TH:~S t~AS JUST ONE MORE OF THOSE OTHER CA~E~, Page (3} MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING CO~ISSION -APRIL 3, 1986 - PAGE FOUR MR, WADSWORTH MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN, SECONDED BY MRS. YOUNG. UNDER DISCUSSION - MR. FULLERTON i~IAD A FEW QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CLAR1FICAT!ONOF #1 ON HECTOR"S LETTER, "MOTION'CARRIED MR, KRUI'IKOWSK~- VOTED NAY NE~W~B,~SINESS: APPROVAL'OF~HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES]_ ]). Judith McCo~s'~ Bookkeeping Unlt~i:ted 10926' Mulbem~y. Street Sebastian, Florida ~2958 APPL!CANT WAS PRESENT FOR D)SCUSSION AND QUESTIONS MOTION BY,R, WADSWORTH', SECONDED BY MR, FULLERTON TO APPROVE THIS LICENSE ROLL CALL ¥OTE: ALL AYES "~OT.!.ON"CARRIED, 2) LeadeathSmi'th. ~ K& L Computer Ser¥ices Inc. 131 CalYrona St,feet Sebasti"an, Flo~i'da 329'58 A?PLICANT-N~S PRESENT FOR 'DISCUS'S10N AND QUESTIONS EST~ON ~¥~j~, E1SENBARTH AS' TO THE TypE OF COMPUTER SERVICE GIVEN, 5', ~!~TE INDICATED THaT 1T WAS COMPUTERIZED BOOKKEEPING, AND S'EC~ETAt{IAL. THAT SHE' PICKS UP AND DELIVERS THE WORK AND NO ONE ~{~LL BEi~I~I%}NG HE~ HOME'. IT 1S A ONE' PERSON OPERATION AND SHE ~NTENDS,FO~ ~T TO STAY' THAT WAY'. '))R, TU~.~S'QNQUEST~ONED THE % OF AREA TO BE USED AND ASKED 1F IT ~, fULLER. TON MOT!ON TO APPROVE, SECONDED BY MRS YOUNG. ~OLL CALL- ALL AYES' MOTION'CARRIED, ~!~CU~S~ON~E AP?O1NTMENT'O?'TWO'MEMBERS'TOWORK'WITH COUNCI~AN ROTH HECTOR GAVEl A D$CR1PTION OFMR. ~OTHS PLANS. ~, ~ABQNEYqUEST~ONED THE S~NSH~)NE LAW AND ~HETHER TWO MEMBERS ~O~NG TOGEYBE~ WOULD BE A ¥~OLATION. ~, PAL~.~.ER SAID THEIR WOULD BE NO PROBLEM AS LONG AS THE MEETINGS 04Y~-~Y~_' PUBLIC)ZED IN ADVANCE'J THE QUEST1QN WAS BROUGHT UP AS TO WHETHER THEY WERE TO BE DAY' OR EYEN~NG MEETINGS. HECTOR THOUGHT THEY MIGHT BE AT NIGHT BUT ATTORNEY PALMER WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THEY WERE GOING TO BE HELD IN THE DAY, Page (_4) MINUTES - PLANNINiND ZONING COMMISSION - APRIL ~986 - PAGE FIVE TOM PALMER.INDICATED THAT MR. ROTH'S INTENTIONS WERE TO FORMA "STUDY OR FACT FINDING GROUP" AND THAT HE SAW NO PROBLEM WITH HOLDING THE MEETINGS AROUND FOUR IN THE AFTERNOON TO FACILITATE ATTENDANCE BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBERS. MR. THOMPSON QUESTIONED WHERE THE MAP THEY WORKED ON WAS AND WHAT HAPPENED WITH] THEM. ATTORNEY PALMER INDICATED THAT THE MAP AND ITS STREETS WERE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY FOR APPROVAL AND THAT ALL STREETS WERE APPROVED WITH TUE, F_~CEpT)QN OF POWE~ LINE ROAD BECAUSE THE' COUNTY' WAS UNDER THE ~MPRES'SION THAT 1T WAS THE POWER L~NE ROAD WHICH RAN OFF OF I)j~R~ STREET RATHER THAN THE ONE' NHICH COMES 1N ON MAIN STREET. , PA~ I~.D1CATED THAT THE COUNTY' B/kS BEEN STRAIGHTENED OUT IN THIS TT~ AND THAT THEY' H~IVE' ASSURED US THAT WHEN CHANGES ARE MADE TO T~E MAP THaT POWER LINE' ROAD WILL BE INCLUDED. MR, E1SENBARTH~ ASKED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO'ATTEND THESE MEETINGS. MR. NADS'W~)RTH~, ]iR.,, MAHONEY AND MR. EISENBARTH INDICATED AN INTEREST I~' ATTENDING, MR, ftL1LLERTON STATED HE COULD BE AVAILABLE AT CERTA~ T~ES ALSO If THE MEETINGS WERE HELD AT FOUR IN THE AFTERNOON ~ULLE~TON MOTION TO APPO!NTMR. E~$ENBARTH AND MR. WADSWORTH OUR ~E~ESE'NTAT.!~ES, SECONDED BYMRS. YOUNG. tJNDE~ DISCUSS!,QN, ATTORNEY' PALMER !'ND!CATED THAT THE MEETINGS WOULD OPEN TO TB.E PUBLIC AND THAT ANY MEMBER WISHING TO ATTEND TO GIVE !~NPUT COULD BUT THAT THEY' COULD NOT CALL MR. EISENBARTH OR I~A~DSI~ORTB~ AND HAVE D]~SCUSS'I'ON OVER THE' PHONE REGARDING THIS ?4~..TTER I~ECAUS'E T~IAT 1S A DIi%ECT~IIOLAT]~ON OF THE SUNSHINE LAW. ' ~O~T~'.ON~ CARR,1ED,~ MR,, PALMER EXPLAINED HOW' THE FEES' ARE SET. EISENBARTH:' QUESTIONED WHAT IS A CREDIT AND WHAT IS CONSIDERED C~E.DIiT, 74)~, ~ALMEFR STATED THAT THE COUNTY' IS THE ONLY' ONE CAN SET A CREDIT ON ALL PROJECTS. THOMPSON READ FROM THE IMPACT FEE' FLOW CHART AND SAID THAT IN OP~NION ~ ~EADS THAT'ALL PROJECTS WILL COME' TO THE P & Z FOR APPROYAL OF IMPACT FEES. MR, PALMER INDICATED THAT IT MEANS THAT ALL THE PROJECTS WiLL COME BEFORE THE LOCAL P & Z BUTTHAT THEY WILL HAVE NO DECISION IN SETTING T~E I~PACT .FEES'UNLESS THEY' ARE STANDARD FEES AS' PER THE CHART. l!~, TU,OMPSON STATED FOR THE'RECORD THAT HE DID NOTREAD ET THAT WAY. ~,:M,AB~ONEi¥.QUESTIONEDWHETHERTH:EY' H~D THE .RIGHT TO CHANGE OUR REQUIREMENTS I~T~]T~'~R ~MPACTfE'E$, " ATTQRNEY PAkMER STATED THATUNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DO THEIR FEES CHANGE ANYBFODR~E'QUI~EMENTS. MR, PALMER STATED THAT THEIR WAS' NO LOCALINVOLVEMENT IN THESET UP OF THE FEE STRUCTURE THAT IT WAS ALL COUNTY PERSONNEL. Page (5) ~, L NN N"-N ~, M,I.N)JTE~$, '~:,,~ .... ,I,,,~,~ ,D,ZON]~NG COJVJM!.~]~QN APl)IL 986 ~, PAGE MR. MAHONEY QUESTIONED WHY WE WERE THE THIRD HIGHEST IN THE COUNTY. MR PALMER SAID THEY HAD ASKED THE COUNTY THE SAME QUESTION AND WERE TOLD 1T WAS DUETO OUR RAPID GROWTH. MR, EISENI~RTH QUESTIONED THE APPLICATIONS ANDMR. PALMER SAYS THEY ARE' SERIAL!ZEDFOR COMPLETE CONTROL AND WE MIJST KEEP TRACK OF EVER NU~BE~ EVEN ¥O~DED ONES. ' CU~ !~:]SANSi,~T, TE~S: CBA!i~MAN EISENBARTH. STATED THAT COUNCILMAN YALLONE IS NOW THE COUNCIL L~ASON' TOTHEPLANNINGAND .ZON~NG. COi~I~SS!ON BOARD AND ~.OULD BE ,,AYA!LABLETO CARRY MESSAGESBACKAND 'FORTH TO THE COUNCIL OR TO SOLVE' ANY, PROBLEMS WH~CH'I~AYAR~SE, BE ALSO ANNOUNCED TH~TTHE CITY COUNCIL REQUESTED US TO PICK AN ALTERNATE ~BE~ TO BE'RECOMMENDED TO THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. -',~: THiQ]vJPSONMADE' AMOT!~N SECONDED BY MR KRUL1KOWSKI TO BRING T~,!~S I!TE~-'TO THE:'FLOOR FOR POSSIBLE ACTION AND DISCUSSION, UNAN!MODS APPROVAL. MRS, YOUNG NOMINATED MR. ALTMAN MR, E!SENBARTH I'ND)'CATED THAT HE DIDN'T LIKE TO BERUSHED 1N THESE NOMINATIONS, MR, EISENBARTH ~ECOGNIZEDMR. 'GEORGE pEPPER TO COME TO THE PODIUM AS HEi~.I~S THE' ONL~ APPLICANT PRESENT. ~fl{, T~O~PS'ON ASKED MR PEPPER IF HE WAS A REAL ESTATE AGENT. HE ANSt~ERED NO. MR, FULLERTON SUGGESTED TH]S BE AN AGENDA ITEM FOR THE NEXT MEETING AND MR. t~Uk,,DSWORTH AGREED. ~ND REQUESTED ~H,AT MRS YOUNG WITHDRAW HER NQMiNAT!ON AT THinS T1ME'. 'MRS, YOUNG W~THDREW HER NOM~NATI!ON. ~R, ~ADS~ORTH REQUESTED THAT APPLICANTS BE NOTIFIED TO ATTEND THE NE~T ~EETING AND THAT ADVERTISEMENTS BE PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER ,REGARDING THE VACANCY'. MR, FULLERTON QUESTIONED I'F MR. PEPPER COULD BE ON TWO BOARDS AT THE SAME TtlM.E SINCE HE WAS CURRENTLY'A MEMBER OF THE GOLF COURSE ADVISORY ~IVlR~ PALiIE~ INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO RULE THAT HE KNEW Of THAT STATED THAT HE COULD NOT SERVE ON BOTHi BOARDS. -MR, EISENBARTH. QUOTED FROM XI - 10 LAST LINE OF SECTION A AND REQDESTED A CLARIFICATION FROM THE ATTORNEY'. TOM PALMER STATED ON THE RECORD THAT THIS WAS INFACT A RULE THAT BER 0 THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD COULD NOT SERVE ON ANY PAGE (6) MI'MUTE) ~ PLANN!NG AND ZONING COMJ~IS$ION -, APRIL 3, .1986 - PAGE SEVEN MR. PEPPER WAS ADVISED THAT DUE TO THIS RULE IF HE WAS SELECTED HE WOULD HAVE TO RESIGN FROM. THE GOLF COURSE BOARD, MR, pEPPER iNDICATED THAT HE WOULD BE PREPARED TO DO THATBECAUSE HE FELT HE COULD BE OF MORE HELP TO TH!S BOARD THEN TBE GOLF COURSE BOARD, MR, THOMPSON MOTIONTO MAKE' THESE APPLICATIONS AN AGENDA ITEM FOR THE NEXT MEETING, SECONDED BY'MR, WADSWORTH. UNDER D~SCUS'SIONMR. EISENBARTHiASKED IF IT COULD BE FIRSTUNDER QLD~Uf'~NEi;SSOTHE APPLICANTS DID NOT HA~E TO ATTEND THE ENTIRE MEETIi'NG ~F T~EY'.PREFERRED NOT TO. UNAN!MOUSAPPROVAL ON THE MOTION. ~BE~S'-'MATTERS MRs, THOMPSON QUESTIONED WHETHER A LETTER SENT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCiL.FROM-.TBE PLANNING AND ZONING COIv~41SS!ON NEEDED TO BE REDRAFTED TO CL.A(I{1F~~ TaATNO ~OT!ON$ WERE'MADEDURING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE~EZON~NG AND CHANGE' OF'USE FO!{ SEMBLE~ AND SEMBLER BUT.THAT TB.EX' ~ERE ~N ~FACT MADE AFTER THE PUBLIC H:EAR1NG WAS CLOSED. :MF~, PALME~ !!ND~CATED THAT H'E COULD EXPLAIN TO THE COUNCIL 1F THEY IEST!QNEDTHINS STATEMENT THAT THE PUBL!'C HEARINGS WERE CLOSED i0~ TO'AN,¥,MQT~'NS BE'!NG MADE AND THE LETTER DID NOT HAYE TO B£~EDI~A?TED, ~R, THOMPSON QUESTIONED THE BILLS THAT WERE .PAID FOR THE ADVERTISING O? TaE NOT!~CES OF PUBLIC BEARING AND WAS ADVISED THAT THE AUTHORIZATION TO A~PBO~ EXEENSE WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM THEM SOME TIME AGO, ~TT__~_ ~' '~TT ERS ~ MR PALMER ASKED THE' BOARD TO RECONSIDER THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS EGARDIiNG THE ANTENNA ORDINANCE' AND WHETHER THEY COULD COME TO SOME AGREEMENT TON1GHTREGAR'DING THE CHANGES, THE F~ST CHANGE PERTAINED TO THE DISCUSSION OF LARGE LOTS' AND HOW BIG ~$ LA'RGE, MR. PALMER 1NDI'CATED THAT HI!S INTENT NAS THAT A LARGE LOT WAS ONE ~HERE THE ANTENNA WAS NOT ¥1'S1BLE TO THE EYE FROM THE STREET; Ml~, T~OMPSON MOT1QN THAT PARAGRAPH 6 BE LEFT IN BUT THAT THE TERM ~LA~GE LOTS"BE TAKEN OUT AND'~EPLACED WITH 8~NY' PARCEL OF LAND" ~S, )~OUNG SECONDED THE' MOTION ~QLL CALL ~ UNANtI~OUS MR, PALMER ~NDICATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH INSERTING THE WORDS ~+Af pE~ G 9'''~ MR PAL~ERRE~UESTED A RULING ON ANNUAL REVIEW' OF ORDINANCE SAYS IT IS SUPERFLUOUS' TO LEAVE THAT IN. PAGE 7 MINUTES - PLANNING ZONING COII~iSSION - APRIL 3, 86. PAGE EIG[{T MR. FULLERTON.B'I~EEBHE'WOULD' WITHDRAW HIS REQUEST TO INCLUDE THAT THiE ORDINANCEBE REVIEWED ANNUALLY', MR. TBOMPSON 'MADE AMOTtON TO HAYE MR, PALMER REVISE AND SUBMIT TO THE CITY' COUNCIL DIRECTLY' WITB..OUT COMI'NG BACK TO THE PLANNING AND ZONI:NG COMMI'SSI'ON TH]~S ORDINANI]E AS AMENDED. MR. FULLERTON SECONDED TBiE MOTION, MR, KRULII~O~S'K!' SAYS' CHANGE THE WORD REVISE TO 'REDRAFT. ~QTI~)N ' CARRIED, '~-"UNANI~MODSLY~ .ENG I:N EE',R.~.NG .~lVIATT ERS NONE MR, FULLERTONMADEAMOTION TO ADJOURN UNANIMOUS ~ MEETING ADJOURNED ATg:30 P,'M, Page (8) L. Gene Harris Mayor CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958-0127 TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 3, 1986 APPROVE MINUTES - MARCH 20, 1986 OLD BUSINESS: SITE PLAN - PROPOSED WILDLIFEECOLOGICAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION CIVIC CLUB DISCUSSION RE: ESTABLISHING RESIDENCE OVER A BUSINESS IN CL 512 ZONE REVISED SITE PLAN - FATHER AND SON PLAZA - PROPOSED TIRE STORE NEW BUSINESS: APPROVAL OF HOME OCCUPATION LICENSES DISCUSSION RE: APPOINTMENT OF TWO PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBERS TO WORK WITH KENNETH ROTH ON TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DISCUSSION RE: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CHAIRMAN'S MATTERS: MEMBER'S MATTERS: ATTORNEY'S MATTERS: ENGINEER'S MATTERS: ADJOURN NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY~' NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS M~DE. Deborah C. Krages City Clark