Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06041987 PZ/�� JUNE 4TH' 1987 PRESENT; MR. FULLERTON, MR. THOMPSON, MR. MAHONEY, CHAIRMAN KRULIKOW8KI ABSENT; MR. WADGWORTH, EXCUSED, MRS. POOLE, EXC(_JSB]' MRS. TAYLOR, EXCUSED MR. EISENBARTH, EXCUSED ALSO PRESENT; HECTOR FRANCO, LINDA KINCHE11,111 SECRETARY ANNOUNCEMENTS; MR. FULLERTON ANNOUNCE8 THIS I8 MR. THOMPSON'S LAST MEETING AND THANKS HIM FOR HIS TIME AND EFFORT. MR. MAHONEY ALSO CONVEYS HIS THANKS. MR. THOMPSON ANNOUNCES THAT MR. METCALF TS THE NEW LIAISON AND IS 1--RE8ENT TONIGHT. APPROVAL OF MIN0TES.: MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED BY MR. FULLERTON CSIECONDED BY MR. MAHONEY - UNANIMOUS OLD BUSINESS� TENNECO SITE PLAN NORM 8RIMSTEAD IS PRESENT TO REPRESENT THE MR. MAHONEY ASKS HOW THE NEW PLANS HANDED OUT AT MEETING DIFFER FROM THE PLANS THEY RECEIVED IN THEIR PACKET8. MR. 8RIMSTEAD EXPLAINS THE CHANGES WERE MADE PER 8T. JOHNS AND ALSO PER THE C%TY'8 COMMENTS. MR. THOMPSON POINTE3 OUT THE REVISION BLOCK IS NOT COMPLETE MR. FULLERTON ASKS HECTOR IF' HE KNOWS THE SET BACK FROM THE RAILROAD TRACK - HECTOR SAYS HE KNOWS OF NONE AND THE COUNTY COULD NOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION EITHER. MR. FULLERTON GOES OVER HECTOR'S LETTER DATED 5-29-87 TO SEE WHAT IS STILL PENDIN8. STILL PENDING ITEMS 1,2, 8 -SOME PARKING, A DRAINAGE INLET AND LIGHT, ITEM 6 PERMITS REQUIRED FROM ST. JOHNS' FQOT AND COUNTY AND THEY NEED TO COMPLY WITH ITEM NO 7. MR. FULLERTON SUGGESTS THAT A NO LEFT TURN SI6N BE POSTED ON 512 FOR TRAFFIC HEADING WEST - HECTOR STATES THAT WOULD BE UP TO THE COUNTY. . PLANNING AND Zi �NG COMMISSION REGULAR ME� T�8 MINUTE8 - - JUNE 4TH, 1'987 PAGE TWO IT WAS STATED THAT THE NFPA DOES NOT ISSUE LICENSES FOR TANKS' THEY ARE JUST INSPECTED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO BE SURE THEY ARE INSTALLED BY THE NFPA REGULATIONS -9. MR. THOMPSON MADE A MOTION TO PO8TPONE THE SITE PLAN FINAL APPROVAL UNTIL ITEM8 THREE, SIX AND SEVEN OF HECTOR'S LETTER OF 5-29-87 ARE COMPLIED WITH. SECONDED BY MR. MAHONEY FOR DISCUSSION. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. THOMPSON COMMENDS TENNECO ON THEIR PLANS AND THE OVERALL PROJECT AND EXPLAINS THAT RE(�UIRING PERMITS IN HAND IS ONLY A FORMALITY. MR. GRIMSTEAD INDICATED HE UNDERSTOOD WHY IT WAS DONE THAT WAY AND HAD NO PROBLEM WITH IT. HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE'. -:-r KENNETH FORBES - ROOFING BASIC QUESTIONS REGARDING TYPE OF VEHICLE, EMPLOYEES AND PHONE ONLY REQUEST ARE A':--"I-"ED. NO ON PREMI8E STORAGE TO BE DONE PER APPLICANT MR. T1---IOMP8ON MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE FOR FORBES ROOFING AT 450 COLUMBUS STREET SECONDED BY MR. MAHONEY PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MAR8E FINCH - AESTHETIC SKIN CARE AND ELECTROLY8IS 165 ROYAL PALM DR MR. THOMPSON ASKS IF THE CUSTOMERS COME TO THE HOME, SHE ANSWERS YES. MR. MAHONEY QUESTIONS WHETHER THERE IS ENOUGH PARKI1\18 AND IT IS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS DUE TO THE DOUBLE QRIVE. MR. MAHONEY MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE FOR AESTHETIC SKIN CARE AND ELECTROLYSIS AT 165 ROYAL PALM DRIVE SECONDED BY MR. THOMPSON PASSED UNANIMOUSLY WITH' MR. FULLERTON STATING HIS RESERVATIONS DUE TO THE FACT THAT HE FEELS THE DPR SHOULD BE CONTACTED TO SEE IF THIS IS ALLOWED IN H01"IE8. 8URROUNDIN88 BY DAVE'S INC. SAME BASIC QUESTIONS REGARDING VEHICLE STORAGE PHONE AND EMPLOYEES MR. FULLERTON MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE FOR SURROUNDIN8S BY DAVE'S INC SECONDED BY MR. THOMPSON PASSED UNANIMOU8LY. PLANNING AND �� _IN8 COMMISSION REGULAR MEE ^N8 MINUTES JUNE 41-1-11 1987 PAGE THREE RECESS CALLED FOR FIVE MINUTES AT P.M. CALLED BACK TO ORDER A,r .8,:40 P.M. ALL PRESENT CHAIRMANS MATTERS; CHAIRMAN INDICATE8 THAT TOM PALMER WAS TO HAVE ATTENDED BUT HAD TO CANCEL AT THE LAST MINUTE. HE STATED ATTORNEY PALMER FELT OUR IDEA RE8ARDI1\18 THE MORATORIUM ON WAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION WAS GOOD AND RECOMMENDED THAT WE PURSUE THE LEGALITIES. CHAIRMAN ASKS SECRETARY -TO TRY AND GET THE ORDINANCES ON WAREHOUSING FROM THE CITY OF BOCA AND PALM BEACH FOR THE NEXT RE8ULAR MEETING. MEMBERS MATTERS; MR. FULLERTON INDICATES ON THE LIBRARY PACKAGE MATERIAL HE IS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ON U8 l BELON8IN8 TO DR FISCHER AND FEELS THEY SHOULD TAKE THE PROPERTY ON 512 AT CHESSER GAP. NO OTHER COMMENTS SINCE THE LETTER WAS ADDRESSED TO THE .MAYOR'S OFFICE THE COMMI88ION FELT THEY NOT RESPOND TO IT. MR. TH0MP8ON SAYS THANK YOU FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS AS A MEMBER AND ASKED THE COMMISSION TO CON8IDER THREE ITEMS CLOSELY WHICH SHOULD BE BEFORE THEM IN THE NEAR FUTURE. l. SEBASTIAN LAKES - REQUESTING THEY READ BOTH ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO THI8 DEVELOPMENT THAT COVER WHAT WAS APPROVED 2. ST. SEBASTIAN PUD - THAT THEY REVIEW A COPY OF THE DOCUMENT THE CITY SENT TO THE DEVELOPER AS TO WHAT THEY HAD TO DO IN THE PRELIMINARY AND A COPY OF THE DRI REPORT. 3. CHURCHMANS CONDO - THAT THEY TAKE A STRONG LOOK AT THIS DEVELOPMENT BEFORE APPROVAL MR. MAHONEY - ASI -.'ED HECTOR REGARDING THE CHANGES TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE COMMISSION PROPOGED TO THE COUNCIL. HECTOR STATES HE REVIEWED THE CHANGES AND ANSWERED THE COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL IS NOW REQUESTING THE COMMISSION TO REVIEW HECTOR'8 COMMENTS - SECRETARY INDICATES SHE PAT COPIES IN THEIR SPECIAL MEETING PACKAGES. MR. FULLERTON REQUESTED THERE BE AN AGENDA ITEM ON THE NEXT MEETING OF DIGCUSSION FOR A VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9|10 P.M. L. Gene Harris Mayor City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958-0127 TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330 Hector Frenco Engineering/Public Works P L A 1'4 N I N G A N D ;?"O N I N G C 0 M h'l I S S i 0 I'..I REGULAR MEETING AGENDA .,ItJNE 4TH, lq87 CALL TO ORDER ROLl_ CALL. ANNOUNCEMENTS AF'PROVE Ft I I',{UI'ES; OLD BUSINESS; TENNECO SITE PLAN M A Y :21 :'"::;T, 1 c ,--,.. ; NEid E.L ,:::, i NE:=;:"':; HOME OC:CUPAT I ONAL L I C. EN._ E.= CHAIRMANS MATTERS MEME, ER.;:, i IA [] ER._,, AT'TOI~NEYS PlA rER,=; IENG I NEERS MATTIER:E;; ADJOURN Nt]]"E:; l'F AblY PERSON DECIDES TO AF'PEAL ANY I.')ECI:!'];ION MADE ON 'I"HE ABOVE"' MATT'ERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF Tt'"tE; F'ROCEEDING'S, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES HEi/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSUP-.E THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TE'.E;'I"IMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS MADE.