HomeMy WebLinkAbout07021987 PZPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING MINUTE:=;
JULY 2ND, '1987
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN KRULIKOWSKI AT 7:02 P..M.
PRESENT; MRS. TAYLOR, MR. FULLERTON, MRS. POOLE, MR.
KRULIKOWSKi ~ MR. WADSWORTH, MR. EiSENBARTH, MR. MAHONEY
ABSENT; I`IONE
ALSO PRESENT; LINOA KiI',ICHEN, SECRETARY TOM PALMER, ATTORNEY
ANNOUNCEMEN'TS; MR. MOSBY REQUESTS CHANGE IN I-HE ORDER OF
AGENDA; MOTION BY MR. WADSWORTH SECOND BY MRS POOLE TO GO ON
AS PLANNED :E;INCE MR. MOSBY IS NOT PRESENT AT ]'HIS TIME
MOTION PASSED SIX TO ONE MR. F'ULLERTON VOTED NAY.
APPROVAL. OF' MINUTES; MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED BY MR.
FULLERTON '.-]ECONO BY MR. E ISENBARTH
UNDER DISCUSSION ADD THE WORD POSSIBLE TO PAGE THREE, FIRST
PARAGRAF'H WHERE I"l" TALKS ABOUT MR. WADSWORTH'S CONFLICT OF
INTEREST.
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS;
STRNAO DEVELOPERS - JOHN DEAN REPRESENTS F'ROJECT
JOHN EXPLAINS IT IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF US HIGHWAY ~l
NORTH OF HUBER'S BAIT SHOP, 6684 Sq FT REQUIRES 34
PARKING SPACES 37 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. OPEN SPACE IS IN
LINE WITH THE CODE RE(4UIREMENTS MR. DEAN ASKS FOR
6~UESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR. THERE BEING NO (~t.)ESTIONS OR
ADVERSE COMMENTS MR. ~¢ADStCORTH MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE
THE SITE PLAN DATED 6-8-"87 FOR STRNAD DEVELOPERS AT 1627
U. S. HIGHWAY ONE COI,ITINGENT TO MR. FRANCO'S LETTER DATED
..,TUNE 26, 1~¢87 SIX REMAINING ITEMS. SECOND BY MR.
EISEI`IBARTH. PASSED UI`IANIMOUSLY.
LEVIN PROPERTIES .- REPAVING SITE PLAN
RANDY MOSBY REPRESENTS PROJECT
RANDY GOES OVER THE ITEMS ON HECTOR'S LETTER OF COMMENTS
AND THEN THE I'I-EMS S'I-ILL REMAINING - OPENS THE FLOOR FOR
~UESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 'TWO
MR. FULLERTON STATES HE WENT DOWN TO THE COUNTY REGARDING
THIS SITE PLAN AND STATED MIKE ORR IS ON VACATION BUT THAT
THE COUNTY FELT THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED WITHOUT
THEIR REVIEW, MR, FULLERTON INDICATED HE IS ADAMANT THAT THE
COUNTY SHOULD REVIEW THIS PLAN SINCE IT IS ON THE CORNER OF
512 AND U.S. HIGHWAY #1. HE ALSO INDICATED HE HAD DISCUSSED
THE SITE PLAN WITH MAYOR HARRIS AND FELT IT SHOULD ALSO 8E
REVIEWED BY 'THE COUNTY,
MR. MAHONEY INDICATED THAT A HEDGE IS NEEDED ON THE NORTH
SIDE NEAR THE COMPACT CAR SF'ACES. RANDY AGREED THAT BOTH HE
AND HECTOR MISSED THAT ITEM.
MORE DISCUSSION CONTINUES AS TO WHETHER THE COUNTY SHOULD BE
INVOLVED. MR STRNAD .~FEA~..,, IN FAVOR OF THE SITE PLAN MIKE
RYAN SF'EAKS IN FAVOR OF THE '.SITE PLAN.
TOM PALMER SAYS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HA'.-] NO ._TURISDICTION OVER
'rHIS SITE PLAN AND THEIR COMMENTS ARE NOT NECESSARY AND THIS
"' ~ 'EFI~';,E THE S ·
BOARD .5'HOJLD NOT R'" ,.=' I TE PLAN BASED ON THIS POINT
MOTION BY MRS. POOLE TO APPROVE THE SI"rE PLAN CONTINGENT TO
MR. FRANCO'S LETTER OF JUNE 26TH, ]987 WITH FOUR REMAINING
CONTINGENCIES AND HEDGES ON THE NORTH SIDE ADDED SECONDED FOR
DISCUSSION BY MR. WADSWORTH. MR. WADSWORTH STATES ITEM
NUMBER FOUR OF HECTOR'S LETTER MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE AND HATES
TO :DEE IT AS A PART OF THE MOTION MR. WADSWORTH :STATES THE
APPLICANT SHOULD WORK WITH FPL TO OBTAIN A COVENANT OF
RESTRICTION WHICH CAN BE GRANTED IN LIEU OF AN ABANDONMENT.
MR. WADSWORTH ASKS IF MRS. POOLE WILL AMENO HER MOTION
I'D INCLUDE ITEMS l, 2, AND 3 WITH ITEM 4 TO BE ~ORKED OUT
BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND FPL. MRS POOLE AGREES 'TO
AMENDMENT, SECOND ALSO AMENDED IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE
WELLS SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE DRAWING JUST AS A POINT OF
REFERENCE. PASSED UNAN I MOUSLY.
SCHLITT BLDG -- SECOND STORY ADDITION
JOHN SCHLITT SF'EAKS FOR THE PROJECT
MR. SCHLI"rT STATES THIS IS A CHANGE FROM THE ORIGINAL SITE
PLAN WHICH WAS SUBMITTED WiTH APARTMENTS ON THE 'SECOND STORY.
'THIS PLAN INDICATES THEY WILL NOW BE ADDING OFFICE SPACE.
MUCH DISCUSSION REGARDING WHETHER TRUMAN STREET IS REALLY A
STREET. ATTORNEY F'ALMER STATES IF IT HAS BEEN USED AS A ROAD
FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME IT IS A ROAD. MR. SCHLITT STATES
IT HAS BEEN PLATTED AS A ROAD. MR. WADSWORTH IS ADAMANT ABOUT
CLEARING UF' THiS MATTEER,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JULY 2ND, 1987
PAGE THREE
MR. MAHONEY SAYS HE FEELS THIS SHOULD BE A MAJOR SITE PLAN
AND NOT A MINOR. ATTORNEY PALMER CHECKS THE CODE WHILE
DISCUSSION CONTINUES. MR. SCHLITT STATES THAT WHEN .HE
qUESTIONED THE STAFF NEW iMPERIOUS WAS THE ANSWER HE WAS
GIVEN TO CALCULATE ATTORNEY PALMER INDICATES THAT THIS
:STATEMENT iS CORRECT AND IT IS iN FACT A MINOR SITE PLAN.
MR. WADSWORTH ASKS WHAT THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING WILL
BE MR. SCHLiTT ANSWERS THIRTY FEET.
MOTION BY MR. WADSWORTH TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN FOR SCHLITT
BLDG CONTINGENT TO MR. FRANCO'S LETTER OF 6-18-87 FIVE
REMAINING ITEMS AT ONLY AODRESS AVAILABLE WAS 1BO0 BLOCK OF
US HIGHWAY ONE MUCH DISCUSSION REGARDING PERMANENT ADDRESS
MR. WADSWORTH WITHDRAWS HIS MOTION DUE TO THE FACT THEY
CANNOT LOCATE AN ADDRESS.
IT I.S DETERMINED ]'HAT A LETTER IN THEIR FILE STATES THE
ADDRESS IS 1Sll U. S. HIGHWAY ~l.
MR. WADSWORTH MAKES A MOTION THAT THE SITE PLAN FOR ED
SCHLITT AT 1Sll U. S. HIGHWAY #l ALSO KNOWN AS SEBASTIAN
PLAZA DATED MAY 22, 1~87 AND REVISED JUNE 15, l~87 BE
APPROVED CONTINGENT TO MR. FRANCO'S LETTER DATED 6-18-87 WiTH
IzIVE CONTINGENCIES. SECOND BY MRS. TAYLOR. UNDER DISCUSSION
MR. EISENBARTH ASKS THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE
THAT NONE OF THE OFFICE SPACE CAN BE MEDICAL. ATTORNEY PALMER
STATES THE WOROS NO MEDICAL. OFFICES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 20A
8.2 OF THE CODE WILL BE PERMITTED. MR. WADSWORTH STATES HE
WOULD STILL LI~(E A LEGAL OPINION ON ROAD RIGHT OF WAYS,
ATTORNEY PALMER STATES IT IS NOT UP TO THE CITY TO REFUSE AN
APPLICANT'S SITE PLAN BECAUSE OF A DISPUTE WITH PROPERTY
BOUNDARIES. IT IS A PRIVATE MATTER TO BE SETTLED BETWEEN THE
PARTIES INVOLVED. MUCH DISCUSSION ON THIS MATTER.
ROLL CALL AS FOLLOWS; MR. MAHONEY - YES, MRS. TAYLOR -YES
MR. EISENBARTH - NO, MR. WADSWORTH - NO, MR. FULLERTON, YES
MRS. POOLE "- YES, CHAIRMAN KRULIKOWSKI - YES.
MOTION PASSES 5-2 SITE PLAN APPROVED.
F'ROPOSED CITY ORDINANCE RE SIMILAR HOUSES
TOM PALMER EXPLAINS THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE WITH A
DRAWING ON THE E:OARO. STATES THIS PERTAINS TO SINGLE FAMILY
AND DUPLEXES ONLY.
MR. EISENGARTH qUESTIONS IF MULTI FAMILY APARTMENT BLDGS ARE
CONSIDERED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
._TULY 2ND, ]987 PAGE FOUR
MRS. POOLE SAYS SHE UNDERSTANDS WHY THEY ARE PROPOSING THIS
ORDINANCE AND THAT SOME OF THESE HOUSES ARE EYESORES BUT
FEELS IF A LADY WANTS A HOUSE THE SAME AS ONE ACROSS THE
STREET SHE CANNOT HAVE IT IF THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED AND SHE
CANNOT JUSTIFY REFUSING SOMEONE THEIR HOUSE STYLE.
· TOM INDICATES IF PASSED THIS WILL BECOME z:)A B.,:_O ON PAGE
· .'D '~, . '~' "? ·
._,4.~ AT 'THE END OF LEGAL BA..:,i._, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
TOM INDiCA]'ES THAT HE HAS SPOKEN TO GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
REGARDING THIS ORDINANCE AND THEY HAVE STATED THEY WiLL NOT
CONTEST IT IF THE CITY DECIDES TO PUT IT IN EFFECT,
MR. KRULIKOWSKI ASKS IF AMENDMENTS SUCH AS THE NUMBER OF LOTS
CAN BE MADE. TOM SAYS THEY CAN RECOMMEND ANY CHANGES THEY
WANT.
. A.~K.~, TO BE EXCUSED AT 9 30 P.M.
MR FULLERTON ~''c' :
AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION AND SEVERAL POSSIBLE CHANGE,~ THE
FOLLOWING MOTION WAS MADE.
MR. E I._,ENE, ARTH MADE A MOTION '[HAT WE FA.-',.;, THE ORDINANCB ON TO
THE COUNCIL WII"H NO RECOMMENDATIONS, SECOND BY MR. MAHONEY
PASSED UI,4AN I MOU.:,LY.
CHAIRMANS MATTERS; NONE
MEMBERS MATTERS; MR. EISENBARTH GIVES A BRIEF DISCUSSION OF
HIS REQUEST OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO WATCH THE MAXWELL
PLUMBING BUILDING FOR A SECOND STORY HE STATED DAVID MILLER
HAS FLAGGED THE: FILE AND THE PROJECT WILL BE RED TAGGED IF A
SECOND STORY GOES UP.
SECRE'FARY ASKS IF THEIR IS ANY PROBLEM WITH THE DUNCAN FORKS
MOVIE BEING :SHOWN AT THE NEXT MEETING. NO PROBLEM.
BU.¢INE.~
NO OTHER , c. ,=.,=
MEETING AD.]'OURNED Al" 10:OO F'.M.
L. Gene Harris
Mayor
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958-0127
TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330
F'LANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEE'T'ING AGENDA
JULY 2nd, 1987
CALl.. TO OF(DER
ROLL CALL
ANNOUNCEME;NTS
AF'F'ROVE M'I NU]"E;S
OLD BUSINESS;
I',,IE~ BUS INESS;
J U N E '1 8 T H ] ':~'"" "'
HOME OCCUPA]"IONAL. LICENSE'.F;
SITE PLAN .... STRNAD DEVELOPERS - U.S. HIGH~AY .ff]
'.=.; I TEl F'L. AN '- i_EV t N F:'ROF:'ERT I ES - REPAV I NG
SITE PLAN .... SOHLI'I-T - SECOND FLOOR ADDITION
D ]: '.=;CUSS I ON AND ACTION RE- F'ROF:'OSED CITY ORDINANCE
Ct"IA I RMANS MATTI"?"F,:S;
MEMBER'.:":; MAT'Tt:Si::(:i3;
AT"r'ORNEYS tdA"r'TERS;
E N G I hi E E R'...S M A 17 E.R.z,,
ADJOtjRN
No'r'EE;
Hector Franco
Engineering/Public Works
IF ANY PERSON DECIDES; TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON
THE ABOVE MA]"TERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
F'ROCEiE;'[)INGS, AND F'OR 'SUCH F'UI::;.:F;'OSES I'.'IE:/SHE MAY NEED
TO EI',I:::.;URff THAT A VERBATIM REC:ORD OF' THE PROCEEDINGS
IS MADE DI'"IICH REC:ORD INCLUDE'S THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE
ON DHtC;H THE APPEAL IS MADE.