Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07211988 PZ PLANNING AND ZONING COF~ISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JULY 21, 1988 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN KRULIKOWSKI AT ?:00 PRESENT; lfRS. TAYLOR, ME. MAHONEY, ME. WADSWORTH, MSS. POOLS, MR. FULLERTON, FR. KRULIKOWSKI, MI~S. KILKELLY AND MR. GILCHER, ALTERNATE ALSO PRESENT; LINDA KINCHEN, BRUCE COOPER APPROVAL OF MINUTES; 7-7-88 - MRS. KILKELLY KADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED, SECOND BY MR. FULLERTON, PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSINESS; STEVE LULICH- PLANNING COMMITTEE STEVE EXPLAINS WHAT THE COMi~ITTEB IS TRYING TO DO AND iNDICATES THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEMEER OF THE BOARD FOR A LIAISON. A MOTION TO APPOINT ED GILCHER AS LIAISON OFFICER WAS MADE BY I4R. FULLERTON SECOND BY MR. WADSWORTH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. INDIAN RIVER INDUSTRIAL PARK SITE PLAN HARLAN PETERSON AND DARRYL STENGER ARE REPRESENTING THE PROJECT. MRS. TAYLOR BRINGS UP THE QUESTION OF THE CONFLICTING DEED AND MR. COOPER EXPLAINS THE SITUATION. RANDY MOSBY DISCUSSES THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM ISSUE WHICH HE FEELS IS STILL UP IN THE AIR. RANDY FEELS A LEGAL OPINION iS REQUIRED TO SEE IF THEY CAN USE THE EASEMENT FOR THEIR DRAINAGE. AFTER M-OCH DISCUSSION THE FOLLOWING MOTION WAS MADE; MOTION TO POSTPONE UNTIL THE PROBLEFu~ ARE CLEARED UP WHICH WERE BROUGHT UP TONIGHT - BY MR. WADSWORTH, SECOND BY MRS. TAYLOR PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. FISCHER INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION RANDY MOSBY AND DOCTOR FISCHER REPRESENT PROJECT MR. COOPER SPEAKS BEFORE THE APPLICANTS REGARDING CHANGING THE ZONING ON THE PROPERTY. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JULY 21, 1988 PAGE TWO ZONING ON PROPERTY IS STILL WITH THE COUNTY AND ACCORDING TO THE CITY ATTORNEY LEAVING IT AS SUCH WOULD REQUIRE GOING BY THE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. RANDY INDICATES THAT A WAIVER CAN BE ATTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TO ALLOW THE CITY TO REVIEW AND APPROVE UNDER CITY REGULATIONS AND NOT COUNTY. TOMMIE THOMPSON SPEAKS AND STATES HE REMEMBERS A LETTER FROM COUNTY REGARDING THE ORDINANCE AND STATES THE COUNTY DOESN'T WANT TO BE INVOLVED. AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION REGARDING THESE ITEMS, A MOTION TO POSTPONE TO THE NEXT MEETING WAS MADE BY MR. WADSWORTH SECOND BY MRS. POOLE PASSED SIX TO ONE WITH )fR. KRULIKOWSKI VOTING NAY. CHAIRMANS MATTERS; TENNECO - CHAIRMAN STILL STATES THAT PEOPLE ARE TURNING INTO TENNECO FROM 512 THE WRONG WAY REQUESTS A NO LEFT TURN SIGN BE PUT UP AT THE LOCATION. SECRETARY TO CHECK WITH THE COUNTY AND ADVISE. MEIIBERS MATTERS; MR. MAHONEY ASKS ABOUT THE 512 AMUSE]KENT CENTER BRUCE INDICATES THE CO)I](ISSION SHOULD LOOK AT DEFINING WHAT AMUSEMENT CENTER IS BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO CLARIFICATION AS SUCH. HE STATES THAT PETE'S PLACE IS LICENSED AS A CANDY STORE AND THE KACHINES ARE AN ACCESSORY USE AND UNTIL THE CODE IS CLARIFIED THERE IS NOTHING HE CAN DO. MR. GILCHER ASKS ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE ONE WAY ALLEY ON 512 AT THE DENTISTS OFFICE. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JULY 21, 1988 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS APPROVE MINUTES; OLD BUSINESS; NONE NEW BUSINESS; STEVE LULICH- PLANNING COMMITTEE INDIAN RIVER IND PARK-SITE PLAN FISCHERS INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION CHAIRMANS MATTERS; MEMBERS MATTERS; ATTORNEYS MATTERS; ENGINEERS MATTERS; BUILDING OFFICIAL MATTERS; ADJOURN JULY 7TH, 1988 REGULAR MEETING NOTE; IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL iS MADE. PLANNING AND ZONING COK](iSSION REGULAR KEETING AGENDA JULY 21, 1988 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS APPROVE MINUTES; OLD BUSINESS; NONE NEW BUSINESS; STEVE LULICH- PLANNING COHHITTEE INDIAN RIVER IND PARK-SITE PLAN FISCHERS INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION CHAIRNANS MATTERS; MEMBERS MATTERS; ATTORNEYS MATTERS; ENGINEERS MATTERS; BUILDING OFFICIAL MATTERS; ADJOURN JULY ?TH, 1988 REGULAR MEETING NOTE; IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS MADE.