Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09181997 PZ CITY OF SEBASTIAN LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PLANNING AND ZONiNG COMMISSION MiNUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 Vice Chairman Munsart called the ~ to order at 5:00 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: V.Chnm. Muusart Ms. KiikeHy(a) Mr. Mather Mr. Pliska Mr. Thomas Mr. Sehulke Ms. Vesia EXCUSED ABSENCE: Chnm. Fisch~, Mr. Driver(a) ALSO PRESENT: Robert Massarelli, Community De~telopment Director Traey I-Iass, Plann~ II Ann Braek, Recor~ Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS: V.Chmn, Munsart announced that be would be running the meeting since Clunn, Fischer is absent, NEW, BUSINESS: RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Mr. Massarelli gave an introduction and noted that, under Florida law, the Comprehemive Plan must be updated once every five (5) y~ars. He pointed out a copy ofthe Evaluatitm and Appraizal Report that was done last yiar (1996) which includes a series of recommended changes to the Compreh~ive Plan. He eomme~ed that staff has been Comparing the Compretm~ive Plan from the day-to-day practical ~ including issues, pr~olem~ and eoncem~ that have developed with the use of this Plan. He-noted that both of these ~ of ~tio~ have ~ summarized in the Compr~emive Plan AmmdmmU, the sevamd ~: ami they are available to the public at the Library and at the Community Development Dep~,. For the benefit of the public, he further explained the activities that this Local Planning Agency haz been involved with ~ year including information provide by Mr. Les Solin on the Housin~ Elemeaxt, with ealeulationson the number of units needed for affordable housing There were two maps displayed on the wall, one. an .existing future land use map (unofficial copy), and one a proposed future land use map, proposed at one oftbe last meetings of this Agency, and also suggestions made by the Riverfront Committee. Mr. Massarelli pointed out the proposed LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, PLANNING AND' ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 changes between thc two as well as some other issues. He also pointed out some environmental areas; aa area that his Deparunent has very ~y received aa application for a PUD; a questionable area that is either medium density or mobile home, on which he asked for guidance; and a letter from Mr. Nelson Hyatt dealing with a piece of property located in the center of the mobile home area, m which he is requesting a change. Mr. Massarelli then recommended opcping thc publiC:hearing and get public inlmt, at which time issues can be discussed in detail. He noted that staff has reconunendations concen~ing some of changes that this Agency has proposed. V. Chron. Munsart ~ the publiC hearing at 5:14 P.M. Mr. Richard Smith, 13895 Indian River Drive, Roseland spoke on recommended, cluu~es tothe 168 acre piece of property to the southwest of thc City Golf Course. He noted that .it is presently designated as PUD, but was proposed to become-~. He explained thathe represems the owners of the property, handed out copies and read parts of a letter from the owners. He further explained that this property is owned by eight (8) individuals who are located .allover the world and they are asking that the property remain aszoned at present so that they' may accomplish the plan thatCh as been in the making for almost forty (40) years, He then wont on~.to explain the ~ plaa for this property ami showed drawings. There was discussion between Mr. Massarelli, Mr. Mather, and Mr. Tempia, about, this property, includiag tbe issue, of land use versus zoning. It was noted that aa inconsistenCy could ,arise if this property is changed to industrial on the Land use map, and a PUD needs to be ia a .category of Mr. Thomas brought up tho subject of the airport being so close to this PUD development, and Mr. Smith responded that that issue will be handled by disclosures to the prospectivebuyers~. Mr. Chuck Meehling, 5215 Tradewinds Drive, V~ro Beach, FL was present and:~plaialgl that he represents the eommet purchaser for the PUD property previously discussed. He conuuemed on the issue of being near the airport. He also gave information on his procedure of completely soiling the project to builders prior to starting work. He noted 'that the developrmmt loan will be in place and noted that Mr. Adam Bollinger of First National Bank is present toulght to speak on this as his Bank will be handling the development loan. He th~ spoke on the recreatiomfi fac/l/t/es ~hat will be part of this developmeat, and the many contacts that his group has had ~ mauy resid~ts near this development. He riga introduced Mr. Bill Curr. Mr. Bill Curt, 325 Marlin Pla~, Melboung Beach, ofBKl Cons~ Ecologists, spoke on some environmental issues on the property. He mentioned'~ six (6) acres of w~amts,, a twelve (12) acre scrub jay preserve, and the ~ire site is inhabited by goplgr tortoises. He not~! that:approval lias been obtained on a mitigation plan for on-site mitigation of all wetlands ~ that. site from Saint Johns River Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corps of Engiae0tS, and aPl~.wval from the Field Inspector with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the scrub jay preserve which will also preserve the gopher toRoises that live m that area. He noted that ~eg areno permi~g LOCAL PLANNING AGENt, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER lg, 1997 He then noted that final approval from these agencies will be given after submission ~r this approval. Mr. Adam Bollinger, 2006 Surfside Terrace, Vero Beach, and with First National Bank, was present and spoke on their commitment to this development and the thoroughness of the developers. In response to a question from Mr. Thomas, Mr. Smith responded that there will be model homes and also some spec homes available. He no~ that lots will not be sold separately, but it will be a package including the lot and the home. He also commented that the roads in this community will be maintained by a homeowners association. Ms. Kilkelly commented on the airport master plan and asked how the airport would impact Mr. Smith's development if the master plan was not adopted. Mr. Smith responded that he didn't see any problem although his group would like to see it implemented. He noted that'his group also has an option on another one hundred fitty-three (153 ) acres in the vicimty of the airport. Mr. Massarelli cautioned the LPA members that the proposed PUD is not an issue.tonight at this ~. He noted that the consideration Umight is good land use in that area and.if Iow density residential is the proper land use in the area, or because of its close proximity to the airport it may not be. He reminded all present that there are regulations in the Land Development Code that require that anyone within one-half the leith of the loagest runway would have to gat a navigation easement. He then noted that if low-~nsity resi~ is not a desirable land use in:that area, then you must determine what is desirable, and if industrial is desirable, he urged the membe~ to ex~aluate it and state why that property is desirable for industry. He commented that the changes made to the land-use map have to be consistent with ~e rest of the Ccmp~~ Plan. He proceeded to cite criteria for industrial property. He summarized by noting that staff would r~end that thi~ property remain low-density residm~al. Afar some discussion, Mr. Schulke commented that he thought it ludicrous'to haveC0nsidered ~ the land-use designation. He spoke about the condition of the roads in that'nren not being conducive to industrial traffic, the differences b~se~ indusuial and residential tra~c, the golf course buffer between this proposed community and the airport, and noted that the surroumting residential land use lends itself toward residential USe on that property. He suggested leaving that residential land-use alone. He also commented on the industrial zoni~ already in the City. and the fact that it is not being used. Mr. Curt commented that there is a two hundred (200) foot buffer (100' on each side) within this plan to buffer Collier Creek which might not be available if changed to industriall use. He also noted that the twelve (12) acre scrub jay habitat is next to the Goff Course and some homes will face this habitat. Mr. lamieSturgeon, 394 Main Street spoke on the residential use of Main Street, was opposed to indusUial zoning in this area, ami was'in favor of keeping the residential designation. Mr. Eric Crrotke, 358 Main Street, who is in the field of consultin~ engineering and the environmental field, commented that changing the land-use designation on this property at.this LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 point would be very detrimental, not only to the area but also to the hard work that the developer has put into this. Mr. Marshall Bruce, 346 Main Street, spoke in favor of keeping this property residential. Mr. John Mellinger, 9825 Riverview Drive, Little Hollywood, representing some of the property owners regarding some properties near the proposed PUD, spoke in favor of keeping.this property as residential. Mr. John King, 103 Harbor Point Drive, referred to letters from Wmmm Dill on proposed .~cli~nges to Schumann Commercial and Sandridge Esmes, which were included in the members: packets tonight. He urged thc LPA members to take these letters into consideration before recommending any changes to thc future land-use map to City Council. V. Chmn. Munsart closed the public hearing at 5:58 P.M. There was discussion on the land-use amendments. Staff questioned several areas which had been considered for clmnge to industrial or commercial use. These areas included locations on High Street and CR 512, and a site designated for mobile homes. There was also discussion of a text change in the industrial land-use designation to open the opportunity for some general commercial activitizs. Mr. Les Solin commented that the intent, when the Plan was originally adopted, was to allow commercial thai is compatible with ~ industrial, and that is what the Land Developmimt Code says. He suggested that it might be very prudent of the Commission to direct staff and the consultant to prepare an amemdrnem which stat~s thai intent for the futUre land use. There was discussion about compatible commercial - industrial uses. Mr. Solin also spoke of criteria for Mr. Schulke commented that this City will probably not amact heavy industrial and we need to keep the land-use open to other commercial activities. Mr. Mather commented that the industrial level would be the highest level for having sexvices, etc., and then other things of less service requirement, by changing the word, should be able to come in there, and whichever wins out economically, wins out. Staff prescmed this question- should industrial include a provision for commercial, jus~ as the Land Development Code provides for it now? Consensus: Mr. Schulke - yes Mr. Mather - yes Ms. Vesia - yes Mr. Munsart - yes Mr. Pliska - yes Mr. Thomas had a problem with the definition of industrial versus commercial. He asked if, on industrial property, a pizza parlor could be optmed ~ to an assembly plant. 4 LOCAL PLANNiNG AGENCY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 Mr. Massarelli noted that strict interpr~ation of our Comprehensive Plan would not allow a pizza shop in an industrial area next to an assembly plant. Mr. Tom Tcmpia of Solin and Associates, also noted that the way the Comprebensive Plan is written right now, you could not have that. But the Land Development Code is writt~ to allow it. Mr. Les Solin agreed with Mr. Massarelli and Mr. Tompia,. and elaborated that an assembly plant is an example of an industrial use, and a pizza parlor is an example of a commerc'ml use. ff you want industrially classified lands on the furore land use map to accommodate both industrial aud commercial, you must amend - it would be very prudent to amend the industrial land developm~t classification in the furore land use map to clearly include the word "commercial uses" among thc uses that are invited into that district, because right now it doesn't do that. However, over time, ever since 1981, you have been allowing a mix of commercial and industrial, so any doparmrc from that philosophy is going to be a major change in the philosophy of this City. Mr. Thomas then suggested a consensus of that definition. Consensus: Mr. Thomas Ms. Kilkelly - agree Mr. Pliska - agree - I agree with the definition he just gave. Mr, Massarelli suggested making a text ammdment to clearly define that commercial uses can be included in the industrial future land-use designation, which is then compatible with what our Land Development Code says. At this point, V.Chmn. Munsart re-opened the public hearing at 6:25 P.M, for more public input. john Mellinger spoke again and referred to a large lakefront property east of Wimbrow Drive, between the proposed CR 512 twin pair roads, and noted'that he understood it was designated as general commercial. He noted that as CR 512 is a main corridor east and west, and fe~ that an industrial designation in that location would not be advisable, and gave his reasons. He felt that industrial to the south of CR 512 would be more appropriate. He.comment~ that the property on the lake has been subdivided into several parcels and is commercial limited at present, which would allow something nice to go m there. And he comffumted that this will be the entrance and exit from Sebastian in the future .and this Agency should consider this, Mr. Schulke felt this was a valid point. Mr. John King commented that m commercial general, a service station would not be allowed, yet some uses under industrial could be advantageous. Mr. Thomas pointed out that there arc two accesses to 1-95, Roseland Road (to be 4-1aned in the near future) and CR 512. He didn't feel that "pretty" counted at this point, but the issue of whether that piece of industrial property should accept commercial use, as well. The next issue of discussion was Collier Club and whe~r it should be designated industrial or remain low-density residential. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUYES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 The consensus on this issue was tokeep Collier. Club Iow*denslty residential. The next discussion was about Schumann Drive, in reference to the letters from Mr. Warren Dill concerning "Sandridge Estates" and "Schumann Commercial Properties Subdivision", which is presemly designated as a limited commercial area with a COR below it. Mr. Massarelli · commented.that in past conversations, it was discussed to do away with the COR designation, which creates aa issue, 5ecau~ the surrounding area is medium*density, and we havediscusscd transition between Iow-density and commercial, or low-density - medium-density, and maybe the medium-density designation is appropriate there. He noted that thore is an approvedsite plan on the site, and if it is changed to medium-density, the site iplan would not be invalidat~ according to the City Attorney's opinion. He comtrmmat that the problem is the limited commercial area. He referred to a previous discussion that indicated that limited commercial should not.~ .inside of a residemial area because of incompatibility, among other things. He indical~ '.t!mt staff recomum~ that no chan~ be made, based on the Comprelm~ive Plan. He noted polities dealing with commerci~ development, particularly limited commercial and the proximitY to thorouglffares, near residential neighborhoods. He noted that Schumann is a major ~e, and the plan is to make it four lanes. He then proc__eeded to read from the policy. There was discussion of"strip commercial", and Mr. Mather asked iftbe plan of the City is to hold thc commercial to CR 512 and U.S. 1, how does this fit into that policy. Mr. Massarelli responded that that is not a plan in the CitY, and referred to '~mdes of commercial activity" mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Les Solin commamed that on the subject of gemini commerci-I, he had done the City's original.plaa in 1981, and at that time, GDC had a Land Development Code and the GDC master plan for the City of Sebastian. He noted that it had two (2) major potemial future sites laid Out for right from the start to be a major area for low-intensive, neighborhood commemial shopping so that people didn't have to go to U.S. I to shop. He also,noted that there is not a lc~O/~development :in the south part of the City, yet, and as it develops, the population in that area will. be,subtly greater than it is now. He suggested that the original planners for the City didfi~t'i~nvision only commercial development, along CR 512 and U.S. 1, but, fortunately, they rescrvod-a,.few well- located sites to give large sections of the residential community a choice in shoppi~. -lie poimed out that the City has strip-commercial at present, but.the original plan for the City was to have n~ighborhood shopping, and the market just hasn't reached it,yet, There was further discussion on the issue of "mom-and-pop" neighborhood stores and commercial uses in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Massarelli asked -should this piece of property be limited commercial or should it he medium dens~? Consensus Mr. Kilkelly - Limited commercial Mr..'Pliska. - Modium ~,' Mr. Schulke - Limited commer~ LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 Mr. Munsart - Limited commercial Ms. Vesia - Medium density Mr. Mather - Medium dmsity Mr. Thomas - Medium density The re, suit was Medium density - 4, Limited commercial - 3 MOTION by Thomas/Mather I move that we recess this nleeting and come back at 7:15. A voice vote was taken. The vote was 7 - 0 The meeting recessed at 6:45 P.M., and resumed at .8:22 P.M. V. Chron. Munsart noted that all members that were present pr~ionsly have ret~m~.'except Mr. Schulke. Mr. Massarelli continued to locate areas on the future tand~se map that had. been'diseased, at a previous meeting. He specified an area at Park Place on the existing future landTus$, map.that is designated as mobile homes, but on the proposed map, it is shown as low-dmsity::~al. He noted that there is a conceptual PUD on that site for mobile homes, so staff recommends that part be maintained as mobile homes. He also referred to the letter from Mr. Hyatt that requests medium d~nsity residontial on Barber Street, south of Palm Lake Club, and staff has no objection to that as it gives a good mixture to the area. He asked for a consensus for medium-density in that area, and all members agreed. Mr. Massarelli then suggested a motion to recommend to City Council the approval of the future land use map as we have shown here, the changes that 1) thc Collier Club ar~ be low-density residential, 2) Power=line Road as we show here is institufi~, 3) that the gtmeml ~cial area on the twin pairs be industrial, (with the text muendffxmt later, that's understood), 4) that we show the mobile home throughout (on thc H part) of Mr. Hyatts' property, and thc medium-density resi&mtial as requested by Mr..Hyatt, 5) the area known as Sandfidge Estates to remain ngdium- density, 6) Stonocrop area to be low-density residential, 7) Barber Street, Mr. Hyatts' request for MOTION by DriverNesia So moved. Roll call: Ms. Vesia - yes Mr. Driver(a) - y~s Mr. Thomas - yes Mr. Pliska - yes V. Chnm. Mr. Munsart - yes Ms. Kilkelly(a) - yes Mr. Mather - yes LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEI:rfEMBER 18, 1997 The vote was 7-0. Moti6n camed. Mr. Massarelli suggested a discussion on te~t amendments. V. Chnm. Munsart referred to a list of site plan termination extensions, and suggested a change at the bottom of the last sheet to road that the notices shall go out "60 days~' prior. Mr. Tom 'Tempia, Harming Operatious Mmmger at $olin and Associates, the City's planning consultant, presented the second dra~ of the compretie~ive plan arnen~ and not~ that corrective changes have been made. Ms. Kilkelly referred to page 6 of 38, policy 1-2.3.1, noted.the change in the maximum int~asity of industrial development from vehicle trips to floor area, ratio, and asi~d for some e~planatiou and discussion. Mr. Solin explained that the data ontrips per day that was used was very soR, and it wes put in the plan to fulfill tho requirem~ of tim State. The State requires that.,municipaliti~ amt':,~ give a measurem~ of the.intensity of the land ~-USe..:, He noted that, at that tin~, they had 'no. feel for floor ama ratio in Sebastian, and the easiest thing to do at.that time was ~o base the .' httemsity on either use of water, ~ flow or trauspomUi0o. He noted that the St~ ~ecomme~l~ basin~ it on transpormtiou since there was no comurrency manag~ system. He.,~~ the members that the State has since mandated ~ all local governmeots adopt a-co~mtrr~cy management system and this will require trips,per-day g~merated by every use. He also explained floor area ratio. Mr. $olin noted that as he goes tl~ough the Land Development Code, he is developing a floor area' ratio for every one ofthe districts and he ~xplah~ how he goes about this, Mr. Thomas asked about using the floor area ratio for residential, Mr, Solin responded that deas~ is used now and if high-rise buildings were involved, floor area ratio might be used But he noted that he could develop floor area ratio for residential, if requ~. He noted that,he has been informed that 'to0 much ~ spa~ is being lost in Sebastian, which affects the p~m~.l~le'.stu-fa~ mt/o, and the open space ratio can be increased. There was discussion on this issue. Mr. Solin also touched on the definitiou of"opeo space" and how water is calculated into this. There was discu~iou on forty (40) foot lots, d~p~,/md how this can be improved'infl~ Cod~. Mr. $olin requested that the Agency ~ keep an open,~ on cluster housing, becm~ som~ of it works. Mr. Massarelli suggested inserting the language about the commercial and industrial in policy 1-2.3.1, and in paragraph flu~e (3) on page six (6) of 38, "and distribution activities; warehouse and storage activities;" and insert "general commerc~l activities". Ms. Kilkelly referred to page eight (8)of thirty-eight (38), the last sub-paragraph at the bottom of page, and it was determined to ~ wordiiig to replace that which was omitted. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 Ms. Kilkelly then referred to page ~hirty-three (33), last paragraph, and there was a dillon about encouraging or requiring removal of exotic vegetation. Her next question was on page thirty.six (36), where it mentions river access to the Indian River Lagoon. It was ~ to insert SsJnt Sebsstisn River in policy.7-1,4 aider tho words Indian River Lagoon: Mr: Massarelli spoke about Grate's Landing and the letter of support that th~ ~ and in the loan program they were working under, ~ is a point system Points an~ ~..:for many items including flexibility in the standards such as density bonus for affordabl~ ~ or setbacks, etc. He asked the Agency members if they would lik~ to see a policy, under the housing olem~$, which would state that the City would develop or in~ provisions in its codo to provide for such opportunities. There was much discussion on this issue. Mr. $olin suggesu~ developing an Ordinance for considemlion by Deca~ber, 1998, to allow, for d~veloprmmt including affordable housin~ oI a sp~ified $reshold of maximum d~m~ of ten (10) ~ per acre medium density residenfinl, AIl ~ members agreed io this, Mr. Massarelli recommended a motion to state the,follOwing: To recommend to City Count, il tho adol~m of the Comprehensive Plan ~ as outlined in the s~ond drai~ dated August 21st, 1997 with the handout da~l'.geptembex 4, 1997, page 14 of 38, with ap~ A, page 27 of 38, and 28 of 38, these wore lmmted out MOTION by Driver/Thomas So moved. Mr. Pliska - yes V~'~. Munsart - yes Ms. Vesia - yes. Ms,.:.~ll~lly(a) - yes Mr. Driver(a) - yes Mr~'~r - yes Mr. Thomas - yes The. vote was 7 - 0. Motion carried. MEMBERS MATTERS: Mr. Pliska ~ on the names of roads in Sebastian and suggested that same-~..roads should be b~ter desilpmted. -. Mr. Massarelli responded that ii will be a project for the zoning technician next year. Vice Chnm. Munsart adjoumedthe ~ at 9:26 P.M. City of Sebastian 1225 MAdN STREET D SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (561,) 589-5537 [] FAX (561) 589-2566 CITY OF SEBASTL~ P~NG AND ZONING CO--iON MINUTE~ OF LPA MEETING CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONiNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 Vie~ Chaimmn Munsart callod the meeting to order'at 7:17 P.M. ~ Pk~ of ~dles~ was said, ROLL CALL: Vice Chnm. Munsart M~. Mr. Driv~a) Mr. Pliaka EXCUSED ABSENCE: Clmm. Fischer, MI'. Sclaflke Robext Maa,~amlli, Connnunity I~wlolanmt ~ Jan King, Zoning T~lmician Traey Hass, Planner II ,sam Back, Roeora S mary Vice Chmu. Munsart noted that Ms. Kilkelly and Mr. Driwr would be voting in place of Ctmm. Fischer and Mr. Schulke. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: (R~gular~-9/4/97) MOTION by Math~/Vesia I make a motion that we approve as writt~: ~ meeting - 9/4/97) A voic~ vot~ was takea. 7 - 0 motkm oarriod. (LPAmeeti~-9/4/97) Vi~e Clmm. Mumm noted that on page 3 of the minutes of 9/4/97, fl~h paragraph,i #Mr. Massarelli' should be changed to read 'Mr. Munsart'. (Afar eheCking th, rtz0~ of'the MOTION by Thomas/D~v~r I move we acco-pt the - approve ~ minutes of Thursday, September 4, 1997'with PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REG~ MEETING OF SEFi'F_btBER 18, 199'/ A voice vote was taken. 7 - 0 motion carried. BUSINESS: A. SITE PLAN REVIEW - MINOR MODIFiCATiON - Goodyear Plum. 920.U.S. Hwy #1 - Steve Pl~lipson - Revised Parking Mr. Massarelli noted that this is a site plan carried over from the previous meeting, and at the request of the applicant, was delayed till this ~. Tho only additional infommiian rec6ived in the Community Develop~ I)ep~ was a ~ ~ Mr. Fowlm concerning the survey.and th~ ~e of opm space. Mr. Randy Mosby of Mosby and Assodates of Veto Beach, FL, was pr~mt ~,.~ ~ous ar~ ~ going to aino (9) foot parla.~ ~. He ~ that the ~ lot would be r~-striped; more landscapi~ would be added; and the spac~ that v~re o~ andhe de.scribedit. He asked for a compromise oa parking spaces #18, 19 & 20, toallowthe applicant to chang~ them to dia~onal spac~ ~ of removing them. In exchange, ho offered to foot padd~ spaces have ~ approved o~ ~ ~ m the City. Mr. Thomas mentioned the subject of the four (4) front parking space, planned for used car sales, as previously discu~ed. Ms. Vesia asked what type of laadscapi~ is plann~ and Mr. Mosby responded that the applicant has a~'eed to sugge~ons from ~ C~.,,.mity Demlopmmt Depamne~ whici indudo:hodges and two (2) trees. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR. MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 Mr. Pliska commented'that on the issue of upa~ti%o a twenty (20) year old property, tlgre must be compromise, and he fcic that this represented a.good compromise, Mr. Thomas asked thc applicant how he planned to keep the four (4) spaces for car'sales separat~ from the other parking spaces, and Mr. Philipson responded that if there are no comignmcnt cars in those spaces, he was comfortable with anyone using them. Mr. Philipson also noted that the gym may move fi*om his building and a differc~ business use may locate there, and additional spaces may be needed Mr. Massarelli suggested that when and if Mr. Philipsen applies for an occupatiotml license to sell used cars, a conditio~ could be applied to the approval stating that four spaces Se'designated for use car sales, and that will enable Coct~ Enforcemem to know that only four (4) autos can be labeled '~or sale", and indicators can be placed on the wheel stops. MOTION by Mather/Driver I make a motion.that we approve the plan sabmitt~ on July 22, 1997 of Goodyear Plaza Parking layout as submitted with the attacigd mxanngndaiions. That those four parking spaces, #5, 6~ 7, and 8, be designated as for used car sales Only in the cvem that this busimss does go forward: Roll call on the amendment: Mr. Pliska - yes VC Munsart -yes Ms. Vesia - yes Ms. Kilkelly(a) . no Mr. Driver(a) - yes Mr. Mather - no Mr, Thomas - yes Mr. Pliska - yes Ms. Vesia - yes Mr. D~ver(a) - yes Mr. Thomas - yes VC Munsart - yes Ms. Km ny(a) - no Thevotewas 6- 1. Motion earned. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 1'$, 1997 NEW BUSINESS: B. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE REVIEW - Sectio~ 20A-5.7.D - 6~$ Demp~ Avenue - Mr. & Mrs. LoodM. ~ Mr. M/los Martin, 5 t4 Wirabrow Drive, was present representing Raymond and Barbara Loo$. Ms. King gave staff presentation and recomm~ded appwval. She noted that a unity of tiflo has been provided ~ tl~ shed sets on a second lot. MOTION-by Math~Neaia I make a mot/on thai we approve Raymond and Barbara Laos, 625 Demp~ Ave~aue, for ashod -'~ structure. A voice vote was take~. 7 - 0 mot/on carried. C. PUBLIC HEARING - HOME OCCUI~ATIONAL LICENSE, 989 Be, ar& L~me- Itemadette Bobek- Elderly Ms. Bernadette Bobek, 989 Beach Lane, Sd~urlian, Florida, was pres~ Them were thirteea (l 3) noticez of hearing seat out and there were no objoctioa or Ms. Bobek ~av0 a brief presentor, explaining the type of assistance she will advomso to provide. Ms. ~ gave staff presentat/on, notod that Ms. Bobak's assistan~ w/Il not be in her own home, but'al the home of any clients. Staff would rocommend approval. peam/t waz needed to take clieats to a store, and no one was aware of such ~~ MOTION by Vosia/Mather I make a mot/~ that we appwv, the Home Oc, cupalional Liceme for Companions and Mo~, 989 Beach Lam, A voice vote was take~. 7 - 0 motion carded. D. PUBLIC HEARING - HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE - 1043 Gardmi~ Stret~ - John MtKeever - Aerial l~hotography Mr. lohn McKeever, 1043 Oardeo/a Street, ~ was presem. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION M1NIYrEs OF REG~ MEETING OF SEPTEMIIER 15~ There wer~ thirteen (13) notice. O/~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~.obj~ ~ ~~ letters received. Mr. McK~wer gave a brie£pmsmtation. Mr s r's pm4ous uiress, V. Chron. Munsart opem~ and closed the public ~ at 7:55, and there, was rio ImbF~, input. MOTION by Thomas/Driwr I move to approve the condiu'onal uso ~ for Mr. Jolm McKoover at 1 Street, for.his Aerial Photography ~. A voice vote was take~. 7 - 0 motion eam'ied. Romine - Tmcki~ ~rvice Mr. Dale Romine, 516 Gerald Street, was present, and norad that his home addre~ is for phone calls only. There were twenty-one (21) notice~ o/hearing s~t ont, taem ~as one objection le~ and no non- · objection let~rs received. Mr. Driver initiated a discussion about possibly parkin~ the dump tm~'at home a shog time, and this issue was discussed. MOTION by Vesis/Mather Tracking at 516 Gerald Street, Sebastian. A voice vote was taken. 7 - Omotioa carried. F. PUBLIC HEARING - HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICl~NSE - 19/Eas~.~r~t~'-.l~berta Warner. Cleaning Servlee Ms. Robertn, W~, 197 Easy Street, Sebastian, was present. There were twenty.fiw (25) notices O/~arin~ sent out and the~ were no obje~ion or non- PLAN-N~G AND ZONING COMMISSION 1VHNUTES OF RF~~ MEETING OF SEPTEMB~ 18, 1997 objection letters received. Ms. Warner gave a brief persentation. Ms. King gave staff presentation and recommended.approval. V. Clmm. Mumart opined and closed tho public hearing at 8:04, and there was no public input. MOTION by Mather/Driver I make a motion that we approve Roberm Wamer's Cloaning Service, located at 197 Easy Street. A voice vote was taken. 7 - 0 motion carried. CHAIRMAN MATTERS: None MEMBERS MATTERS: None DIRECTOR MATTERS: Mr. Massarelli announced that the procedures manual is now completed and-is being distributed to the staff, City Manager, City Clerk, City Engineer, Polic~ Chief and City Council, and it is.a manual that takes all the Land I)evelopmem Cod~ regulatio~ and spells out tho procedure that will applications request the information that is r~luimd by the code, and should l~p mlumco the permitting process and help the applicants. He also noted that the evaluation of fees has been c, ompl~ and a comprehemive f~= ,.sclgdale should be going to the City Manager ve~'y soon for all the Land Dewlopmmt Code ~ · He commm~ that from the information gather~ at present, lhe fees will probably ~-~tiiple, and Code permit. At this time, it iz only paying about onv4hird of.the ~z andis ~ supported He noted that the site plan for Bayrock, Walgrg~x~ and First National were approved by City Council last nighg as well as the two special um pormits, Mrs. Spates aud the Balme. Mr. Massarelli indicated having received an application for a PUD - Collier Club, Them is a preliminary plat in for Sehastian Woods vzhieJa'isa mplat of part of Sebastian ~, off Schumatm Drive. An application has bern receiver for a.used car lot at the old Video Doc site. V. Clmm.. Mumart adjourned tl~ meeting at $:11 P.M. (9/26~7 AB) City of Sebastian 1225 MAiN STREET g SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (561) 58'9-5330 n FAX (561) 589-5570 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING lvflNUTES OF MEETING ~ APPROVED AT MEETING HELD E. ANN BRACI(, RECORDING SECRETARY /0041 tlo�. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (561) 589-5330 o FAX (561) 589-5570 AGENDA THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1997 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . 3. ROLL CALL. 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of September 4, 1997, LPA Meeting of September 4, 1997 6. OLD BUSINESS: A. Site Plan Review - Minor Modification - Goodyear Plaza - 920 U.S. Hwy #1 - Steve Philipson - Revised Parking 7. NEW -BUSINESS: B. Accessory Structure Review - Section 20A -5.7.D 1. 625 Dempsey Avenue - Mr. & Mrs. Loos/M. Miles C. Public Hearing - Home Occupational License - 989 Beach Lane - Bernadette Bobek - Elderly Assistance D. Public Hearing - Home Occupational License - 1043 Gardenia Street - John McKeever - Aerial Photography E. Public Hearing - Home Occupational License - 516 Gerald Street - Dale Rominc - Trucking Service F. Public Hearing - Home Occupational License - 197 Easy Street - Roberta Warner - Cleaning Service 7. CHAIRMAN MATTERS: 8. MEMBERS MATTERS: 9. DIRECTOR MATTERS: 10. ATTORNEY MATTERS: 11. ADJOURNMENT. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. SAID APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF ACTION. (286.0105 F. S) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (407) -589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. (0�