Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 Technical Staff Report60087-1 Technical Staff TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT ROUTING SHEET APP. NO. / - fpcç-'2--- / BOARDAjb"94 7or)28TH DAY PROJECT NAME: 7 C,r/ C ,i7Q/ /,197 '/% 7' REVIEWERS: FILE NAME: ASSOC. PERMIT REVIEW AND ROUTING INITIALS AND DATE HISTORY RECEIVED FORWARDED REVIEWING ENGINEER REVIEWING ES OTHER STAFF (Specify) SUPERVISING ES SUPERVISING ENGINEER SERVICE CENTER DIRECTOR SERVICE CENTER TYPING REVISIONS I SENT TO PALATKA BY SC RECORDS OR 40C-40, 400 PERMIT ISSUED (Check below when designated review is necessary) LI LEGAL (Specify) DIV. DIRECTOR/SURFACE WATER MGT. LI DIV. DIRECTOR/ENV. RES. MGT. LI OTHER (Specify) /--92 L 13 (-- !?/o/qq I-zc.- DEPT. DIRECTOR/ASST. DEPT. DIRECTOR 12/._I &7P EXHIBITS(other than maps) SUPPLEMENTAL DATA MAPS LETTERS OF CONCERN SITE INSPECTION REP SSL AUTHORIZATION YES NO YES NO DENIAL (SUB) (40C-1 .605) NO YES NO NO (See previous permit file) YES DEC 171999 INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT December 9, 1999 Applicant: City of Sebastian ATTN: Martha Campbell, P.E. 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Consultant: Earl H. Masteller, P.E. Masteller & Moler, Inc. 2205 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 County: Indian River Project Name: Stonecrop Waterway Section: 23 Township: 31S Range: 38E Acres Owned: Project Acreage: 10.53 Authority: chapter 373 F.S.; chapter 40C-4 F.A.C. F.A.C. Basin Code: 1 OE General Project Description of Application No. 4-061-60087-1: This application is for the construction of a stormwater retrofit project to provide stormwater treatment for a 574-acre residential drainage basin located in the City of Sebastian. Receiving Water Body(ies): St. Sebastian River (Class Ill) Existing Land Use: residential basin Operation and Maintenance Entity: City of Sebastian Easements/Restrictions: Yes Staff Comments: Stonecrop is an 8.5-acre, man-made basin abutting the South Prong of the St. Sebastian River. The basin was constructed by the original developer of the Sebastian Highlands development located in the City of Sebastian. The 8.5-acre basin was originally constructed with an earthen dam separating the basin from the South Prong. The dam was intended to provide retention within the 8.5-acre basin prior to discharge into the South Prong. The dam has breached over time and a flowway has formed extending from the two 60-inch culverts, which discharge into the basin, to the breach in the dam. Approximately 574 acres of residential drainage area presently flows into the Stonecrop basin. Because of the breach in the dam and the flowway which has been created within the Stonecrop basin, runoff from the 574-acre drainage basin is presently conveyed to the South Prong with no significant stormwater treatment storage or peak flow attenuation storage provided in the basin. This application is for the modification of the Stonecrop basin to provide improved stormwater treatment within the 8.5-acre basin. The Stonecrop improvements are jointly funded by a grant from the FDEP, the District's Indian River Lagoon SWIM program, and the City of Sebastian. The proposed modifications to the basin include excavation of a permanently-wet, siltation pond on the north side of the basin, construction of a weir structure for control of discharges from the basin, repair of the breach in the existing earthen dam, and planting of wetland vegetation within the basin. The retrofit of the Stonecrop basin is part of a larger plan to improve water quality in the St. Sebastian River and downstream in the Indian River Lagoon. The restoration of the dam with a weir structure for controlled discharges from the basin and the associated creation of a deeper settling pond at the northern end of the basin will significantly improve the water quality treatment provided by the basin while helping to protect downstream residences from flooding. The breach has existed for more than a decade, and during that time a wetland of considerable size (over 4 acres) has developed in the lower half of the basin. The wetland is vegetatively dominated by wax myrtles with a thick and relatively diverse ground cover of wetland ferns, grasses, and herbs. Because of its location directly adjacent to forested areas of the St. Sebastian River, the existing wetland provides significant habitat value to the local ecosystem and the attempt has been made to retain as much of that habitat value as possible in the design of the retrofit project. The proposed improvements will require both permanent and temporary impacts to the onsite wetlands, which comprise about half the basin's surface area. The settling pond will be partially excavated within the upstream end of the wetlands. The remaining wetlands will be rollerchopped and partially cleared to remove wax myrtles. The myrtles, if left, would die under the flooded conditions once the breach is repaired, and would increase the nutrient loadings downstream. After myrtle removal, wetland trees appropriate to the wetter planned conditions in the basin will be replanted throughout the remaining wetland. The herbaceous layer will be disturbed during myrtle removal but will recover quickly from roots and seeds in the soil. Staff believes the proposed impacts have been minimized and will be offset by the water quality benefits which will accrue to the downstream forested wetlands and riverine and estuarine habitat as well as the planting to occur in the wetland. The loss of wetland acreage in the upper portion of the basin will be offset functionally by the vegetative enhancement of the majority of the wetlands, changing its nature from a shrubby area dominated by wax myrtles to a mixed herbaceous and forested area dominated by bald cypress and other wetland trees. The wetland's hydroperiod will be significantly increased by the breach repair, and the production of amphibians and small fish as food sources for avian species, including protected ones, will greatly increase. The project entails no unacceptable cumulative loss to wetland functions, and the "secondary' effects of the project to wetland and aquatic habitat will be beneficial. The project meets all ERP wetland review criteria including the public interest test. Staff believes that the proposed project meets all applicable conditions for permit issuance pursuant to sections 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, F.A.C. Summary Table Stonecrop Stormwater retrofit TOTAL WETLANDS/SURFACE WATERS ON SITE (4.1 acres) IMPACTS THAT REQUIRE MITIGATION (0.8 acres) 0.8 acres of dredging for stormwater pond IMPACTS THAT REQUIRE NO MITIGATION (3.3 acres*) * Temporary impacts Wax myrtle rollerchopping MITIGATION (3.3 acres**) 3.3 acres of wax myrtle eradication and replanting with wetland tree species ** Downstream water quality improvements to the south prong of the Sebastian River Application is for the reconstruction of an existing stormwater basin and the installation of a structure to provide stormwater treatment for a large drainage basin within Sebastian Highlands. Recommendation: Approval Conditions for Application Number 4-061-60087-1 General ERP Conditions (See Condition Sheet): 1-19 Special ERP/MSSW/Stormwater Conditions (See Condition Sheet): 1,10,12,13,14,17,18,19,28 Tables: N/A Other Conditions: 1. The proposed surface water management system must be constructed and operated in accordance with the plans received by the District on November 17, 1999. 4. 2. The proposed mitigation must be in conformance with the Masteller and Moler, Inc. submittal received by the District on November 17, 1999. 3. The placement of the rip-rap erosion protection between the control structure and the river must be done in such a way as to avoid any damage to nearby cypress and other native trees. 4. Removal of wax myrtle debris must be conducted in such a way so as not to disturb the seed source in the soil or the below-ground plant parts. 5. Note 3 of Sheet 8 of 8 of the permitted plans applies to the planting contractor's responsibilities to the City and not to District planting success criteria. Reviewers: Brown/G ronceski INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT December 9, 1999 Applicant: City of Sebastian ATTN: Martha Campbell, P.E. 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Consultant: Earl H. Masteller, P.E. Masteller & Moler, Inc. .2205 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 County: Indian River Project Name: Stonecrop Waterway Section: 23 Township: 31S Range: 38E Acres Owned: Project Acreage: 10.53 Authority: chapter 373 F.S.; chapter 40C-4 F.A.C. F.A.C, Basin Code: 1 OE General Project Description of Application No. 4-061-60087-1: This application is for the construction of a stormwater retrofit project to provide stormwater treatment for a 574-acre residential drainage basin located in the City of Sebastian. Receiving Water Body(ies): St. Sebastian River (Class Ill) Existing Land Use: residential basin Operation and Maintenance Entity: City of Sebastian Easements/Restrictions: Yes Staff Comments: Stonecrop is an 8.5-acan-made basin abutting the South Prong of the St. Sebastian River. The basin was c't1'structed by the original developer of the Sebastian Highlands development located in the City of Sebastian. The 8.5-acre basin was originally constructed with an earthen dam separating the basin from the South Prong. The dam was intended to provide retention within the 8.5-acre basin prior to discharge into the South Prong. The dam has breached over time and a flowway has formed extending from the two 60-inch culverts, which discharge into the basin, to the breach in the dam. Approximately 574 acres of residential drainage area presently flows into the Stonecrop basin. Because of the breach in the dam and the flowway which has been created within the Stonecrop basin, runoff from the 57cre drainage basin is presently conveyed to the South Prong with no significant stormwater treatment storage or peak flow attenuation storage provided in the basin. This application is for the modification of the Stonecrop basin to provide improved stormwater treatment within the 8.5-acre basin. The Stonecrop improvements are jointly funded by a grant from the FDEP, the District's Indian River Lagoon SWIM program, and the City of Sebastian. The proposed modifications to the basin include excavation of a permanentlet, siltation pond on the north side of the basin, construction of a weir __--- structure for control of discharges from the basin, repair of the breach in the existing earthen dam, and planting of wetland vegetation within the basin. The retrofit of the Stonecrop basin is part of a larger plan to improve Water quality in the St. Sebastian River and downstream in the Indian River Lagoon. The restoration of the dam with a weir structure for controlled discharges from the basin and the associated creation of a deeper settling pond at the northern end of the basin will significantly improve the water quality treatment provided by the basin while helping to protect downstream residences from flooding. The breach has existed for more than a decade, and during that time a wetland of considerable size (over 4 acres) has developed in the lower half of the basin. The wetland is vegetatively dominated by wax myrtles with a thick and relatively diverse ground cover of wetland ferns, grasses, and herbs. Because of its location directly adjacent to forested areas of the St. Sebastian River, the existing wetland provides significant habitat value to the local ecosystem and the attempt has been made to retain as much of that habitat value as possible in the design of the retrofit project. The proposed improvements will require both permanent and temporary impacts to the onsite wetlands, which comprise about half the basin's surface area. The settling pond will be partially excavated within the upstream end of the wetlands. The remaining wetlands will be rollerchopped and partially cleared to remove wax myrtles. The myrtles, if left, would die under the flooded conditions once the breach is repaired, and would increase the nutrient loadings downstream. After myrtle removal, wetland trees appropriate to the wetter planned conditions in the basin will be replanted throughout the remaining wetland. The herbaceous layer will be disturbed during myrtle removal but will recover quickly from roots and seeds in the soil, Staff believes the proposed impacts have been minimized and will be offset by the water quality benefits which will accrue to the downstream forested wetlands and riverine and estuarine habitat as well as the planting to occur in the wetland. The loss of wetland acreage in the upper portion of the basin will be offset functionally by the vegetative enhancement of the majority of the wetlands, changing its nature from a shrubby area dominated by wax myrtles to a mixed herbaceous and forested area dominated by bald cypress and other wetland trees. The wetland's hydroperiod will be significantly increased by the breach repair, and the production of amphibians and small fish as food sources for avian species, including protected ones, will greatly increase. The project entails no unacceptable cumulative loss to wetland functions, and the "secondary" effects of the project to wetland and aquatic habitat will be beneficial. The project meets all ERP wetland review criteria including the public interest test. Staff believes that the proposed project meets all applicable conditions for permit issuance pursuant to sections 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, FAG. Wptres SUMMARY TABLE PROJECT NAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT TOTAL WETLANDS/SURFACE WATERS ON SITE (acres) MPACTS THAT REQUIRE MITIGATION (acres) 2 (free text) IMPACTS THAT REQUIRE NO MITIGATION (acres) (free text) MITIGATION W+e aJ'K1 fro'&t +t (acres) (free text) 3. f '-' by Recommendation: Approval Conditions for Application Number 4-061-60087-1: General ERP Conditions (See Condition Sheet): 1-19 Special ERP/MSSW/Stormwater Conditions (See Condition Sheet): 1,10,12,13,14,17,18,19,28 Tables: N/A Other Conditions: 1. The proposed surface water management system must be constructed and operated in accordance with the plans received by the District on November 17, 1999. 2. The proposed mitigation must be in conformance with the Masteller and Moler, Inc. submittal received by the District on November 17, 1999. 3. The placement of the rip-rap erosion protection between the control structure and the river must be done in such a way as to avoid any damage to nearby cypress and other native trees. 4. Removal of wax myrtle debris must be conducted in such a way so as not to disturb the seed source iroil oeloyound plant parts. 5. Note 3 of Sheet 8 of 8 of the permitted plans applies to the planting contractor's responsibilities to the City and not to District planting success criteria. Reviewers: Brown/G ronceski 1. GIS/ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATION TRACKING SHEET Application Number: 4-061-60087-1 Reviewer (s):_BROWN! 9-8-9 9 Date Received: Applicant: CITY OF SEBASTIA1'! Project Name: STONECROP WATERWAY REPLACEMENT GRONCESKI Request for Additional Information must be mailed by : 10/6/99 Regulatory Meeting Date if determined technically/administratively complete: Date 1st RAI sent Date 1st Resp received I Date 2nd RAI sent:______________ Date 2nd Resp. received: Date 3rd RAE sent: Date 3rd Resp. received: Date 4th RAE sent: Date 4th Resp. received:______________________ Date Application Complete: -- Schedule for _________________________Regulatory Meeting (Approval/Denial) MAPPING INFORMATION: Acceptable as Recorded: YES NO Location Criteria: 12tIJkta*i Comments: Date Application Entered: QUAD Initials: Date Application Mapped: Initials: **NOTE: PLEASE RETURN TO THE DATA MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR UPON SCHEDULING BOARD ACTION INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT December 9, 1999 Applicant: City of Sebas ATTN: Marthâ-tampbèll, RE. 1225 Main Street Sebastion, Florida 32958 Consultant: Earl H. Masteller, P.E. Masteller & Moler, Inc. 2205 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 County: ndian Rive Project Name: Stonecrop Waterway Section: Township: 31S Range: 38E Acres Owned: Project Acreage: 10.53 Authority: chapter 373 F.S.; chapter 40C-4 F.A.C. F.A.C. Basin Code: 1OE General Project Desc$ption of Application No. 4-061-60087-1: This application is for, stormwater retrofit project to provide stormwater treatment for a 574-acre residential drainage basin located in the City of Sebastian. Receiving Water Body(ies): St. SebasJ River (Class Ill) Existing Land Use: residential basin Operation and Maintenance Entity: City of Sebasl(J Easements/Restrictions: Yes Staff Comments: Stonecropis an 8.5-acre)man-made basin abutting the South Prong of the St. Sebast River. The basin was constructed by the original developer of the SebastJi Highlands development located in the City of Sebastian. The 8.5-acre basin was originally constructed with an earthern dam separating the basin from the South Prong The dam was originally intended to provide retention within the arebasirririor to diécharge into the South Prong. The dam has breached over _- time and a flowway has formed extending from the two 60-inch culverts, which discharge into the basin, to the breach in the dam. Approximately 574 acres of residential drainage area presently flows into the Stonecrop basin. Because of the breach in the dam and the flowway which has been created within the Stonecrop basin, runoff from the 574-acre drainage basin is presently conveyed to the South Prong with no significant stormwater treatment storage or peak flow attenuation storage provided in the basin. This application is for modification of the Stonecrop.sterage basin to provide improved stormwater treatment within the 8.5-acre basin. The Stonecrop improvements are jointly funded by a grantthe FDEP, the District's SWIM programand the City of Sebastian. The proposed modifications to the basin includexcavation of a permanently wet, siltation pond on the north side of the basin, construction of a weir structure for control of discharges from the basin, repair of the breach in the existing earthern dam, and planting of wetland vegetation within the basin. The retrofit of the Stonecrop basin is part of a larger plan to improve water quality in the St. Sebast(i River and downstream in the Indian River Lagoon. The restoration of the dà(n with a weir structure for controlled discharges from the basin and the associated creation of a deeper settling pond at the northern end of the basin will significantly improve the water quality treatment provided by the basin while helping to protect downstream residences from flooding. The breach has existed for more than a decade, and during that time a wetland of considerable size (over 4 acres) has developed in the lower half of the basin. The wetland is vegetatively dominated by wax myrtles with a thick and relatively diverse ground cover of wetland ferns, grasses, and herbs. Because of its location directly adjacent to forested areas of the St Sebast River, the existing wetland provides significant habitat value to the local ecosyt'em and the attempt has been made to retain as much of that habitat value as possible- wiiigthe design of the retrofit project. The proposed improvements will require both permanent and temporary impacts to the onsite wetlands, which comprise abphalf the basin's surface area. The settling pond will be partially excavated-fhe upstream end of the wetlands. The remaining wetlands will be rollerchopped and partially cleared to remove wax myrtles. The myrtIesif leftNould die under the flooded conditions once the breach is repairedand would increase nutrient,A loadings-eaiied downstream. After myrtle removal, wetland trees appropriate to the wetter planned conditions in the basin will be replanted throughout the remaining wetland. The herbaceous layer will be disturbed during myrtle removal but shoLd recover quickly from roots and seeds in the soil. Staff believes the proposed impactsA are-justified by the water quality benefits which will accrue to the downstreath forested wetlands and riverine and estuarine habitat.) The loss of wetland acreage in the upper portion of the basin will be offset funqUelally by the vegetative enhancement of the majority of the wetlands, ehnging its nature from a shrubby area dominated by wax myrtles to a mixed herbaceous and forested area dominated by bald cypress and other wetland trees. The wetland's hydroperiod will be significantly increased by the breach repair, and the production of amphibians and small fish as food sources for avian species, including protected ones, will greatly increase. The project entails no unacceptable cumulative loss to any wetland function, and the "secondary" effects of the project to wetland and aqautic habitat will be beneficial rather than negative. The project meets all ERP wetland review criteria including the public interest test. Staff believes that the proposed project meets all applicable conditions for permit issuance pursuant to sections 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, F.A.C. Wetland Inventory (acres) Total Wetlands on Project Site: 4.1 Total Wetlands Preserved: 0 Total Wetlands Disturbed: 3.3 Total Wetlands Lost: .8 Total Wetlands Created as Mitigation: 0 Total Wetlands Enhanced or Restored as Mitigation: 3.3 Other Compensation: Recommendation: Approval Conditions for Application Number 4-061-60087-1 General ERP Conditions (See Condition Sheet): 1-19 Special ERP/MSSW/Stormwater Conditions (See Condition Sheet): 1,10,12,13,14,17,18,19,28 Tables: N/A Other Conditions: ii 1. The proposed surface water management system must be constructed and operated in accordance with the plans received by the District on November 17, 1999. 2. The proposed mitigation must be in conformance with the Mastetler and Moter, Inc. submittal received by the District on November 17, 1999. 3. The placement of the rip-rap erosion protection between the control structure and the river must be done in such a way as to avoid any damage to nearby cypress and other native trees. 4. Removal of wax myrtle debris must be conducted in such a way as to not remove existing seed source in soil and below ground plant parts. 5. Note 3 of Sheet 8 of 8 of the permitted plans applies to the planting contractor's responsibilities to the City and not to District planting success criteria. Reviewers: Brown/G ronceski U PERMIT APPLICATION APPRAISAL FORM - BIOLOGICAL REPORT MileNumber:...9 k.ø ...................................... WRM File Number: Project Name: ....2C1J Zél? County: Applicant: ............ ..L27 Waterbod(.%52..C,-" Class: I IV V Outstanding Florida Waterbody (If applicable): lnspectlon by: ..../7 C.E1..J Date of Inspection: 6?...6 Attach photographs and site map indicating photo stations and direcons of view. Attach sketches or notes on site plan it needed for clarification of descriptions. MSSW Project Description [ to be used on TSR and permit] Construcon and operation of a new system Alteration and operation of an existing system not previously permitted by the District Modification of a system previously permitted by the District (check one of the boxes below) Alteration and operation of an existing system; previous permit number: ........................................................... Construcon and operaon of additional phases of a system; previous permit number: ................................ Removal of a system Abandonment of a system a Re-applicaUon for permit that has expired Extension of permit prior to expiraben The project consists of ................ .$.2c .......................... " ........ .JLL$ ................................ Z!j2 Z.fl ... Z77 .................................. WRM Project Description [to be used on TSR and permit] Construdion in waters of the State including the excavaon of ..................................... cubic yards of material from ............ ............... and the placement of ...................................... cubic yards of fill material in ...................................... acres of (complete if applicable): The project also includes construction of a stormwater management system to serve the The system consists of acres of for ................. acre project. SJRWMD (11/16/92) Project History pre-application meetings related permits previous/existing violations (if they exist) Construction Techniques and Turbidity Controls if dredging in waters is proposed, describe the sediment characteñsUcs ?c2 ........ 6 2/1 .. E ........ (2:1 .? E ............... . ........ e2.c' 6%. zftV '2,9 Z..? .................... 4, Site Biophysical Characteristics Vegetative Community community description - both uplands and wetlands (assign each wetland an i.d. number for descpon purposes - see page 4 of form) community types condition of community surrounding landuse ,2....Y . 2..2ZcJ ................ 2.j/ .......................... e Z...... .................... /1/ ................................ ../ & ............... L?.2z2c ........................ ..4 .$ ............ ..J z. f.2.., /2L.i1 SJRWMD (11/16/92) Site Disturbances degree and types of existing site disturbances exoc/nuisance species Hydrologic Characteristics current conditions normaVhistorical conditions Wildlife Use observed or reasonably anticipated (including T or E species) role of site in overall trophic structure of area, including use by man attath macro-invertebrate assessment (if applicable) Water Quality characterize existing quality, include suspected cause of current problems (if any exist) C . ...'Z ....A ......................... .f e2 .................................. ..'. 7 ............... 5. ........ 2. ........ 4. ................ L... ... ..7 . -c.! ................... 70 72/ . E 3 SJRWMD (1 1/16/92) Wetland/Waterbody Impact Summary Wetland Encroachments (attach additional sheets if necessary) size impact isolated! ditch wetland 1.0 (acresl (acres/code*) W.O.S yesIno) co-dominant spcs I . Open Water Encroachments: size site LD. (acres) impact isolated! (acres) W.O.S. *codes: FH, FW, SH, SW (from wetland inventory) ditch Iyes/no) Wetland Impact/Mitigation Proposal Summary . ../ ............................... ..2( ..................................... . i2,2 ................... i... ............ ./ F 2.2/" 22/ /E22.,4/ ... ........ az : 47 E 5 ,22./ .. ./ 4.... ...................................... 7i2 ... . 4 SJRWMD (11/16!92) Table 3: PROJECT OFF-SIrE MITIGATION SUMMARY MITIGATION CREATION RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT WETlAND UPLAND OTHER ID PRESERVE PRESERVE AREA TARGET AREA TARGET AREA TARG AREA TYPE AREA TYPE AREA TARG TYPE TYPE TYPE TYPE PROJECT fi TOTALS Q comments: 3 7aEccP CODES (multiple entries per cell not allowed): Target Type or Type = target or existing habitat typefrom an established wet and classification system or land use classification for non-wetland mitigation Form number 40C-4.900(1) Pg 10 of 12 Table 2: PROJECT ON-SITE MI1IGATION SUMMARY MITIGATION ID CREATION RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT I WETLAND PRESERVE UPLAND PRESERVE OTHER AREA TARGET AREA TARGET AREA TARGET AREA TYPE AREA TYPE AREA TARGET TYPE TYPE TYPE TYPE / 0 0. woO 0 ODES (multiple entries per cell not allowed): rget Type or Type = target or existing habitat type from an established wetland classification 'stem or land use classification for non-wetland mitigation Reviewer: rm number 4OC4.9OO(1) Pg 9 of 12 Table 1: PROJECT WETLAND (WL) AND OTHER SURFACE WATER (SW) SUMMARY /L & SW WL & SW TYPE WL & SW SIZE WL & SW NOT IMPACTED TEMPORARY WL & SW IMPACTS PERMANENT WL & SW IMPACTS MITIGATION I D ITYPE WL & SW IMPACT SIZE IMPACT CODE WL & SW TYPE IMPACT SIZE IMPACT CODE / 0 /3,3 0 1 'OJECT )TALS: nments: 0 57 c,) c,2c/' i,;&2 ii? q 06/- 6 ooá,2-' DES (multiple entries per cell not allowed): tland Type: from an established wetland classification system (see Section E, 11 b.) )act Type: D=dredge; F=filI; H=change hydrology; S=shading; Cclearing; O=other M NUMBER 4OC-49OO(1) Pg 8 of 12 Reviewer: (i/2C't/(Ef/C7 U.i,1i/O io:09 kAA 41)! hO )UUU 1h1Uit(.L\ L(LjtJtJ :& Ston ecrop Basin / ,a,w 0W31 5ASflAN LAKES CRAVEN .ThOWSON & ASSOCtATES, ic. CITY OF SEBASTIAN ENGINEERS PLANNERS SUREYORS I 277 IN2iA RiVER RLVD. 301 VER0 8EACFI. FL 32860 (407) 778-3002 1 tonecrap Basin LoLaton NT.S. N N ri:1 Mag 15.00 MonMarO8l4:051999 LocalRoad Scale 1:15,625 (at center) Major Connector 1000 Feet US Highway 500 Meters Railroad I c Locale Cemetery 1 Water River/Canal Intermittent River _1 LIIJ ir UNIVERSAL ENG1NEERG ScIENCES STONECROP WATERJ.L!!4.i CONTROL STRUCTURE SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA VICINITY MAP )RAWN 6Y G.W.V. 1OAT 4 FEB 99 I°°° BY: B.F. ATE: 4 FEB 99 AS SHOWN IOROER NO: 32371-007-01 SPORT N 41307 AGE NO: FIGURE 2 GIS/ADMIMSTRATIVE APPLICATION TRACKING SHEET Application Number: 4-061-60087-1 Reviewer (s):_BROWN! 9-8-99 GRONCESKI DateReceived: Applicant: CITY OF SEBASTIAN Project Name: STONECROP WATERWAY REPLACEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Request for Additional Information must be mai[ed by : 10!6!99 Regulatory Meeting Date if determined technically/administratively complete: Date 1st RAI sent: J 99 Date 1st Resp. received: JJ-J 9.2 Date 2nd RAI sent:______________ Date 2nd Resp. received: Date 3rd RAI sent: Date 3rd Resp. received: Date 4th RAI sent: Date 4th Resp. received:______________________ Date Application Complete: // / - /9 Schedule for di9 iv' iVA' ? 7 Regulatory Meeting (Approval/Denial) MAPPING INFORMATION: Acceptable as Recorded: YES NO Location Criteria: MAP NUMBER Comments: Date Application Entered: Date Application Mapped: QUAD Initials: Initials: **NOTE: PLEASE RETURN TO THE DATA MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR UPON SCHEDULING BOARD ACTION GIS/ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATION TRACKING SHEET Application Number: 4-061-60087-1 Reviewer (s):_BROWN! 9-8-9 9 GRONCESKI Date Received: Applicant: CITY OF SEBASTIAN Project Name: STONECROP WATERWAY REPLACEMENT Request for Additional Information must be mailed by : 10,'6!99 Regulatory Meeting Date if determined technically/administratively complete:______ Date 1st RAI sent: Date 2nd RAI sent: Date 3rd RAI sent: Date 4th RAI sent: Date Application Complete: Schedule for MAPPING INFORMATION: Date 1st Resp. received: Date 2nd Resp. received: Date 3rd Resp. received: Date 4th Resp. received:_____________________ Regulatory Meeting (Approval/Denial) Acceptable as Recorded: YES NO Location Criteria: MAP NUMBER Comments: Date Application Entered: Date Application Mapped: QUAD Initials: Initials: **NOTE: PLEASE RETURN TO THE DATA MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR UPON SCHEDULING BOARD ACTION