Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-07-2019 PZ AgendaMa SEB`sTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, MARCH 7, 2019 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting of January 17, 2019 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL and PUBLIC HEARINGS None • Chairman opens hearing, attorney reads ordinance or resolution or title • Commissioners disclose ex-parte communication • Chairman or attorney swears in all who intend to provide testimony • Applicant or applicant's agent makes presentation • Staff presents findings and analysis • Commissioners asks questions of the applicant and staff • Chairman opens the floor for anyone in favor and anyone opposing the request (anyone presenting factual information shall be sworn but anyone merely advocating approval or denial need not be sworn in) • Applicant provided opportunity to respond to issues raised by staff or public • Staff provided opportunity to summarize request • Commission deliberation and questions • Chairman calls for a motion • Commission Action UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input on items other than on the printed agenda, is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of members present 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Accessory Structure Review - LDC Section 54-2-7.5 - 133 Cardinal Drive - 806 SF Detached Carport - Shawn M Hosey 10. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson 11. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. STAFF MATTERS 13. ADJOURN HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (F. S. 286.0105) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 569-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING. All government meetings in City Council Chambers will be broadcast live on COS -TV Comcast Channel 25 and ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed via the city website — www.citvofsebastian.oro unless otherwise noticed and rebroadcast at a later date — see COS -TV Channel 25 for broadcast schedule 2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 17, 2019 1. Call to Order -- Chairperson Kautenburg called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Pledae of Allegiance was recited by all. O G ._ m _ 3. Roll Call C N o Present: Mr. Roth Mr. Mauti (a) C H a Mr. Simmons (a) Mr. Qizilbash E a Ms. Kautenburg Mr. Hughan Mr. Carter Mr. Alvarez C: VCh a c Not Present Mr. Reyes -- Excused 03 m m O � C •� Also Present: Mr. James Stokes, City Attorney '� o o Iii n CL a Ms. Dorri Bosworth, Planner N Q Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer Ms. Dale Simchick, Indian River County School Board, was not present. 4. Announcements and/or Aaenda Modifications Ms. Kautenburg announced that, since Mr. Reyes is absent, Mr. Mauti will be voting in his place. 5. Approval of Minutes A. Regular Meeting of October 18, 2018 Ms. Kautenburg asked for any additions or corrections to the Minutes as presented. Hearing None, Ms. Kautenburg asked for a motion to accept the Minutes. A motion to accept the Minutes as presented was made by Mr. Roth, seconded by Mr. Carter, and approved unanimously by voice vote. 6. Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearinas A. Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Land Development Code Amendment -- Amending Article XXII, Language and Definitions -- Section 54-5-22.3 Land Use Classifications -- Clarifying Adult Personal Service Businesses PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 2019 Mr. Stokes read the Agenda title, being a recommendation to City Council. This public hearing is regarding an amendment to the Land Development Code of the City of Sebastian, Florida -- Ordinance 0-19-01 -- Amending Article XXII, Language and Definitions -- Section 54-5-22.3(c) Land Use Classifications -- Clarifying Adult Personal Service Businesses, providing for severability, providing for repeal of laws in conflict, providing for codification, providing for scrivener's errors, and providing for an effective date. Ms. Kautenburg asked for staff presentation on the matter. Ms. Bosworth gave the background on how this amendment to the Ordinance came to be before the Committee. Included in the Agenda packet for this meeting is a copy of the Minutes from the City Council meeting in November where a gentleman presented who had been working with Ms. Bosworth, and he was attempting to find a location for an artist studio and a tattoo parlor. She reviewed the conditional use criteria for adult entertainment establishments which she had included in the packet. Also included is a definition of those establishments as set forth in the Use section of the Code, which is where tattoo parlors, considered as adult personal services, is contained. All the criteria necessary for a tattoo parlor is very onerous regarding distances from a residential district, from churches, from other adult entertainment establishments, and from a bar or lounge, etc. She stated there is currently a tattoo parlor along Route 512 which is in the industrial zoning district. They were granted a conditional use permit by this Commission after they obtained a variance due to being within 200 feet from a bar and grill. When the applicant came before City Council, the discussion of Council was that the attitude towards tattoo parlors and tattoo artists has changed over time. The section of the Code that is currently in place is from 1985. Council agreed that the City Code was too restrictive and asked staff to adjust the Code so as to not make it so onerous to find a location. She was contacted by the applicant several times, and a location could never be found that would conform to all the conditional use criteria necessary for his business. Staffs initial thought was to create a definition for tattoo establishments, then go back to Article V and insert the use in the zoning districts that would be permissible for tattoo parlors. She described that that process can be very costly and burdensome for the City because it would be changing conditional and permitted uses in the zoning districts, and the process is regulated by the State. Staff then looked into the Definition section to make it clearer and further define what constitutes Adult Personal Service Businesses and place it under one of the existing categories in the Code. Thus, it would not be necessary to change the zoning districts where these establishments are permitted; it would be only changing definitions and getting the criteria established. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 3 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 2019 Staff further investigated how the State considers tattoo parlors in their licensing and what regulations would have to be followed. It was discovered that tattoo artists are regulated by the Department of Health, and the same licensing regulations are applicable to tattoo artists as for hair and nail salons who perform permanent make-up. Thus, it was a concern for how to regulate tattoo artists when the City has no regulations for the hair and nail salons that have those personnel working there and offering those services without creating non -conforming businesses. After further investigation and discussion, staff created a definition that would allow adult personal businesses which were licensed by the State and is proposing that these establishments be considered a retail type of establishment as opposed to adult entertainment. Ms. Kautenburg then asked for discussion or comments from the members of the Commission. Mr. Alvarez: • Inquired whether the applicant has a specific address for his business. Ms. Bosworth stated no, that the question regarding adult entertainment personal businesses versus retail establishments needs to be settled before any applications can be entertained. Mr. Roth: • Wanted to clarify that the description contained in the Agenda packet which is displayed in blue ink is the language that is proposed to be changed. Ms. Bosworth stated that is correct. It will be located immediately below the Adult Entertainment Establishments section and further clarifies the Adult Personal Service Businesses. • Voiced a concern about having these businesses in the Commercial Riverfront Area. He stated that, although beauty salons are permitted there, some of the clientele for the tattoo parlors might be a little different than clientele of beauty salons. Ms. Bosworth explained that, if tattoo parlors were not permitted in that zoning district, then beauty/nail salons that are existing and are subject to the same regulations/licensing, they would become a non -conforming use. Mr. Carter: • Asked about over the past five years what is the estimate of how many people have inquired about tattoo parlors. Ms. Bosworth estimated that approximately two to three times a year she will get an inquiry regarding tattoo parlors. Mr. Carter stated his only concern would be if a large number of parlors would be setting up in the City. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 4 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 2019 • Inquired if a business such as a bar would be allowed to have a tattoo parlor inside that business. Ms. Bosworth stated that in that case the site specifics would have to be adhered to such as parking, landscaping, etc. She also stated that she is not sure if State statutes would allow a tattoo parlor to operate inside a bar or lounge. • Inquired whether a tattoo parlor could also have a liquor license for their establishment. Ms. Bosworth stated she would follow up on that question. • Inquired as to what type of art the applicant will have inside his establishment. Ms. Bosworth said she is not certain, but he is looking to have an art studio and a tattoo parlor. Mr. Qizilbash: • Favors a clearer definition for a tattoo parlor instead of labeling it under an Adult Personal Services Business. Ms. Bosworth stated that if a more specific definition for tattoo establishments and artists is established, that would have to be specifically added into some of the zoning districts. The Trade and Skilled Services title is more of an umbrella that includes different types of businesses and could include tattoo artists. She also stated that, after researching how the neighboring municipalities treat tattoo parlors in their codes, staff could not find any that specifically address tattoo parlors or any that have specific definitions. Mr. Hughan: • Regarding the section on the last page of the Agenda packet where it mentions Adult Entertainment Establishment Businesses and describes what kinds of businesses are included, he inquired whether all those businesses are going to be also included in the same section of the Code where tattoo parlors are permitted. Ms. Bosworth stated no, those businesses mentioned there are limited to conditional uses in the industrial zoning district. She further described that if a business holds a license from the Department of Health such as a massage therapist or a tattoo artist, that business is not going to be considered as adult entertainment. Those businesses are considered as retail. • Does not agree with having tattoo parlors along the River. Mr. Mauti: • Stated that when considering having or not having tattoo parlors along the River, some of the businesses that are already there may have clientele somewhat akin to tattoo parlor clientele. Ms. Bosworth mentioned that the City now allows medical marijuana dispensaries in most of their zoning districts. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 2019 PAGE 5 Ms. Kautenburg: • Stated she believes the update to the Code is appropriate if it is licensed and regulated by the State. Ms. Bosworth stated these businesses still have to receive a tax receipt from the City so that annually staff verifies that they are up to date. There being no further discussion on this matter, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion on the recommendation. A motion to recommend to City Council Ordinance 0-19-01 amending Article XXII, Language and Definitions -- Section 54-5-22.3, Land Use Classifications -- clarifying Adult Personal Service Businesses was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Hughan. ROLL CALL: Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Total vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carried. 7. Unfinished Business -- None. 8. Public Input -- None. 9. New Business -- None. 10. Commissioners Matters Mr. Mauti (a) -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Carter: • Addressed the question of the Commissioners receiving their Agenda packets not through the mail. Ms. Bosworth stated staff is open to suggestions as to how to make delivery more timely. She will check with MIS so that members can open the packets on their computers that have been sent by email Mr. Roth: • Inquired as to the status of the "Spirit of Sebastian" project. Ms. Bosworth reviewed that the developer has submitted its preliminary plat application. Staff has not completed its jurisdictional reviews. The consulting engineer has been reviewing the traffic impact study. The developer is also conferring with the County relating to Old Dixie Highway. The application is only for Phase 1 and Phase 2. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 6 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 2019 There is also a plan submitted for the entranceway on Del Monte , and the developer has scheduled a meeting with the homeowners along that street regarding landscaping at the entranceway. • Asked what is still needed for the master plan on the riverfront lots. Ms. Bosworth stated staff wants more detail, and what has been presented so far is more conceptual. She added that this master plan includes all the property in the CRA, and staff wants more detail also on the lots in the CRA that are not riverfront lots. Mr. Mauti: • Inquired if only Del Monte is being addressed. Ms. Bosworth stated that staff will review the area for any off -site improvements needed, but staff is not yet working on that part of the review. • Stated that neighbors are inquiring about the new traffic pattern. Ms. Bosworth stated staff has just received a revised traffic report, and that report is still being reviewed by the City's consulting engineer. Mr. Hughan: • Asked if the packets were sent out for the vacation rental properties. Ms. Bosworth stated they have them at the office, and there is a link on the City's website. Anyone can obtain a packet at the Community Development Department. Ms. Kautenburg: • Inquired if there has been any activity regarding various other uses for the small riverfront lots. Ms. Bosworth stated it was planned by staff to get an inventory of those lots. At that same time a riverfront market analysis was performed as well as a CRA master plan. Staff has received two different drafts of the master plan regarding those lots, and another revision is in the works. Staff will present the master plan to the Commission as soon as it is completed. Mr. Alvarez: • Brought up the situation where motor vehicles are being sold on residential lots along Barber Street. He inquired whether this Commission can recommend to City Council that an ordinance be added to the Code restricting the number of vehicles sold in the City by private citizens to two a year. Ms. Bosworth stated there are restrictions in place regarding the sale of autos on residential properties, including the fact that every vehicle on private property must be registered, licensed and insured by a resident residing at the property. She will follow up with Code Enforcement regarding this matter. She will also look into State licensing regarding this matter. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 7 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 2019 • Inquired regarding the status of the lots along Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512) next to the Library. Ms. Bosworth reported that a letter has been sent to the developer and, per Code, the developer has until April 2019 to present the final plat and have the lot sodded, graded, and completed. 11. City Attornev Matters -- None. 12. Staff Matters -- None. As a point of order, Mr. Roth inquired as to when elections will be held. Ms. Bosworth stated elections can be placed on the Agenda for next meeting. 13. Adiournment -- Ms. Kautenburg called for any further business. Hearing none, she adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m. 19 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Lm SEAT-N HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Accessory Structure Staff Report Property Owner: Contractor: Requested Action: Project Location: Current Zoning: Required Findings: Shawn Houey Homeowner Approval of an 806 SF Carport 133 Cardinal Drive Lots 38 & 39, Block 562, Sebastian Highlands Unit 16 RS-10 Current Land Use: Single-family Residence Does Does Not Comply Comply A. No accessory structure shall be constructed until the construction of the principal structure has been started. '/ 1. House completed 11,91 ; or house under construction 2. Accessory structure to be located on same lot as principal structure ; or located on second lot that has been combined with principal lot by a unity of title ')"iO WT — UPt7}l t7F T'IT-LE. B. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback): 1. Front yard: No detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. Principal structure setback is Q 7 , Accessory structure setback is t@a I 2. Front yard on corner lot: Accessory structures may not be located in the secondary front yard of an improved corner lot unless the corner lot is joined in unity of title with an interior lot that contains the principle structure. However, said accessory structures shall not be located closer than 25 feet N'Pr from the secondary front property line in the RS-10 zoning district, and in all other zoning districts shall meet required front yard setbacks. Secondary front yard setback is N /A and proposed accessory structure front yard setback is Does Does Not Comply Comply 3. Side yard: Required side setback is 10' Accessory structure side setback is LIZ- T ' t 4. Rear yard: The required rear yard is QO A detached accessory structure may encroach into the required rear yard, provided it meets all the following: a. It is a minimum 10 feet from the rear property line. ✓ Proposed accessory structure has a 3-q' setback. b. It is not in an easement. Rear easement is 20 and proposed setback is 7,oZ 1 c. It does not exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage. Proposed accessory structure is TO(- square feet. d. It does not exceed 12 feet in height. Proposed accessory structure is 15' "F feet in height. Accessory structures which are attached, or do not meet the above four requirements must meet the standard rear setback which is e'W Proposed accessory setback is 32' C. No mobile home, travel trailer or any portion thereof, or / motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. D. Applicant must expressly designate the type of the accessory structure (i.e. garage, shed, etc.) CAR Po-eT— ✓ E. Must comply with all city codes. F. The height of accessory structure cannot exceed height of principal structure. House is approximately 1141'' and accessory structure will be 15't -� PF7RvX I o `' (r2R�E �lrk-naY. � 1 FFeer�-CE G. Attached or detached Quonset -type or style accessory / structures are prohibited. ✓ H. A residential lot is allowed 5 square feet of accessory building area (cumulative) for every 100 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum 1000 square feet. Property square footage ,20, D3g x .05 = Allowable sq.ft. of accessory structures Odl. a DOD Existing accessory structures W Y t 1 1] (4 SF / V Proposed accessory structure �( oto SF Total existing and proposed `► $4�-&F J 2 Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Any attached or detached accessory building, carport or breezeway over 500 square feet in area must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission utilizing the following criteria: Does Does Not Comply Comply A. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. ✓ -)F tPP1ucth+L. STRueTug- tfAS /KeTAL. j�-ooP B. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. C. Accessory structures 501 sq.ft. to 750 sq.ft. in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and N/� trim, roofing materials and pitch. D. Accessory structures 751 sq.ft. to 1000 sq.ft. in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways, as follows: 1 shrub for every 3 lineal feet and 24 inches in height at planting. / oPew cARPblZr ✓ Lineal dimension totals 3 f + J q _ 3 Total Shrubs Required Is — Review fee has been paid: YES NO Additional Considerations: • The property file did not have complete records, i.e. building elevations from the 1980/81 house permit. The applicant has submitted photos showing the structure and color the carport gable end will be painted to match the house. • Based on the difference of the finished floor elevations of the house and carport, the accessory structure will appear as the same height of the principal structure. • Consideration was given to how the carport would be used and entered regarding calculations for required landscape materials. • Property owner should clarify how many trees are existing on the double lot, and verify that required trees will be planted to meet code, if necessary. Prepared by Date Ful u) m G m En —i O m m .fl r a z -I m 0 cm O a r 'I N M H Q `O CD 0) f 5' WOOD FENCE ` + 1L9_. Il (50' RIGHTOFWAY) LOT 40 KILDARE DRIVE o BLOCK 562 d _o 6' 1,000 FENCE_J g� (S00°02'21'E 12429'M.) 1_r� =—12509'M) S 00°00'00" E 129. 19'P. 1, _ _ 25.00'P. W ^L---GONG-- GRASS DRIVE =p 6 I CONC � A/CPAD 8.6' 26.7' _ 16.1, 11.8' 27.6' e 25.4' I _ ~FAA 2 6.0' I ALUMINUM � W o O v UTILITY SHED n O z WOOD FLOOR 2 o �y o f eg " W s zI LOT39��W BLOCK 562 0L4 N� 0000 �RPSS DRIVE 27 0' CONCRETE / DRIVEWAY STONE ALL iI1I TILE PCHAIN C�„ LINK FENCE: L 32.0 —_ 62.0' F 31 I PROPOSED CARPORT PROPOd ED FINISHED OOREL ELEVATION i Fl.00R ELEVATION=50.5 � l/'Lil.0 RC -SE �� 31 0' 52 0' 3z.a'� VO4F4r474raaleY4 WI 0 i z o xl g 2DD, D.3' D_Y.ILU U. t_ ''LFV`ry UNR KrvI[ N 00000'00" W 725.00' P IN 00°00'15' E 125 04' M ) LOT 37 BLOCK 562 BOUNDARY SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 38 AND 39, BLOCK 562, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS, UNIT 16, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGES 45 THRU 451 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF CARDINAL DRIVE AS N 90D00'00' E AS PER RECORD PLAT. 2. NO INSTRUMENT OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, SETBACK LINES RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN. NO TITLE OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. LOT 38 BLOCK 562 (VACANT) �x �gm I s 43 I _—. pY aa' U N DO"00'00' W - 25.00' P. (25.04' M ) no Q�I NORTH SCALE 1'=30' OO POINT OF CURVATURE CERTIFIED TO: CONSTANCEJ. REDMOND and SHAWN M. HOSEY VANDEVOORDE HALL LAW, P.L. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY LEGEND: O- FOUND 5/80IRON REBAR WITH CAP STAMPED "PLS 4896N �- FOUND 5/80IRON REBAR, NO CAP OR IDENTIFICATION p- FOUND NAIL, NO DISK OR IDENTIFICATION PREPARED BY: CECRLE LAND SURVEYING, INC. n nninn 1 A.In fl lnl'I'll n'- 01 1"e,rrr ..... 7 THIC CI IRI/FY IC NI(1T INITFNUI FTI To I nrATF FYI CTI NIG BOX EAVE FRAME RAFTER OPEN CARPORT - HORIZONTAL ROOF TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION TYPICAL END ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE BOX EAVE FRAME RAFTER OPEN CARPORT - VERTICAL ROOF TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL END ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE 0 BOX EAVE FRAME RAFTER ENCLOSED BLDG - HORIZONTAL FLOOD VENT (As applcable), --r.-rw. TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE ROLL -UP DOOR SWINGING DOOR (As appl(cbble), (As applicable) BOX EAVE FRAME RAFTER ENCLOSED BLDG - VERTICAL RO( I III FLOOD VENT As applimbla) I � i TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE ROLL -UP DOOR SWINGING DOOR (As eppllmble) (As applimble) TYPICAL END ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL BOW RAFTER GABLE END ELEVATION _ TYPICAL BOX EAVE RAFTER GABLE END ELEVATION _ TYPICAL BOX EAVE RAFTER G, NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 7r let Or Ii fi!?i h' 9 R .t'OP i -- --I 13,5 r � � W" - N5a r ,T r �ii1 Y / Y ACHY OF j SEB ft HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5537 • FAX (772) 589-2566 OWNE"UILDER PERMIT APPLICATION j� ALL OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE FILLED IN BY APPLICANT, ACCORDING TO FS 713.135 L� PERMIT # / / 6 6 Y % TRACKING # jV6 '3 4 4 DATE: i —may � l INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARCEL ID # ✓�3 (f I T DDOO 3ZM 260,003fxREIVED BY: LOT: BLOCK: Si;lZSUBDIVISION: .5;4A.S9 A f�I�klaet�sFLOOD ZONE: TYPE OF WORK: &EW STRUCTURE ADDITION []ALTERATION [] REPAIR []DEMOLITION [] OTHER WORK INCLUDES: STRUCTURAL []ELECTRICAL []PLUMBING[]MECHANICAL []ROOFING - SLOPE:_ [] POOL Q ALUMINUM STRUCTURETLL[] SHED FENCE [] SLAB OR DECK [] OTHERt WORK DESCRIPTION: (iO�e�/�?'�15 LZi & /,jk C""Q ✓ 6l l ACL 3—/ 1 y'� ,- CiI"t - ' ESTIMATED JOB Vz' VALUE: $ ✓I 00/7 TOTAL S/F OQ UNDER AIR JOB NAME: h'oS e—CL FLA C-Ku Z C t�aQs j -,tllt ` JOB ADDRESS: J 33 t 4/W e) l eld3 PO' i Oe �Z'i±>0.5 4 n- *-:1- Z I J o PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: 15Y 0,LA.>0% ADDRESS: ),33 /�,a�`(�;,�.a� n i ✓P. j CITY/STATE: CONTRACTOR BUSINESS NAME: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE: T7Z ^ cJ erg' 148F? ZIP CODE _ lFL `LJ--V' LICENSE #: CONTACT PHONE: ZIP CODE PHONE: ZIP CODE: PRESENT USE: PROPOSED USE: OCCUPANT LOAD: NUMBER OF: STORIES EIJBAYS []UNITS []BEDROOMS QFIEIGHT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: GROUP OCCUPANCY: AREA IS THE BUILDING PRESENTLY EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC I = SPRINKLER SYSTEM? [DYES []NO BONDING COMPANY: PHONF, ADDRESS: _ CITY/STATE: MORTGAGE LENDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: FEE SIMPLE TITLE HOLDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: § 54-1-2.4 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE drainage, water and wastewater facilities, and all required community facilities, and all other needed public improvements; and forward to the city council written recommendations on such matters; i. Consider, review and make recommendations concerning studies of city public land needs and recommend site acquisition for the same, including development plans and requisite facilities; j. Annually prepare, in conjunction with the city engineer, a list of the capital improvements recommended for construction during the next fiscal year and the four-year period following it, showing recommended order of priority thereof, the year recommended for beginning construction, the year recommended for com- pleting construction, and the estimated costs thereof; k. Carry out powers of site plan review as stipulated in article XVIII of the land development code; Perform any other duties, which lawfully may be assigned to the commission In performing functions set forth in section 54-1-2.4, the planning and zoning commission shall act only in an advisory capacity to the city council. When the planning and zoning commission reviews and recommends actions regarding a major site plan approval as defined in article XVIII, the decision of the planning and zoning commission shall be final, unless said decision is appealed to the city council within ten days of the decision, as provided for in the land development code. (e) Appropriation of funds. The city council shall appropriate funds necessary for expenses incurred by the planning and zoning commission in its performance of the above listed functions. The planning and zoning commission shall not have the power to contract with private or governmental persons or entities, or to commit or expend funds of the city. (f) Rules of procedure. The planning and zoning commission shall establish and adopt rules of procedure, which shall include, but not be limited to, election and duties of officers; meeting schedule, time, and place; establishing order of business and method of transaction; procedure for action and voting by members; conduct of public hearings; rules of conduct; parliamentary procedure; maintenance of records; and method of amending same. (1) Officers. From among its members the planning and zoning commission annually shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson at the first regular meeting of the commission held at the beginning of each calendar year. Whenever possible, the persons selected as the chairperson and vice chairperson of the commission shall have served two years as a regular member of the commission and shall have attended at least 90% of the meetings of the planning and zoning commission which such member was not otherwise excused from attending by the chairperson at such meetings of the commission. The planning and growth management director shall appoint a city employee to serve as secretary to the planning and zoning commission and take minutes of the meetings of the commission. LDC2:10 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 3-YEAR TERMS MEETS 1ST AND 3RD THURSDAY OF EACH MONTH - 6:00 P.M. MEMBER NAME AND APPOINTMENT HISTORY ADDRESS [MOST RECENT HISTORY FIRST] Robert Hughan Took McManus' regular member position 1244 Larkspur Street 11/2017 Sebastian, FL 32958 rhuahanloDbellsouth.net Reappointed alt member 2122/17 (305) 498-2947 Took Kautenburg's unexpired alternate member position 12/16/15 Rick Carter Reappointed 3122/17 237 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Took Cardinale's expired regular focussys0comcast.net member position 4/27/11 918-4600 Took Durr's unexpired alt member position 2/9/11 Reappointed 3/26/14 Tahir (Bash) Qizilbash Reappointed 5/10/17 103 Barbara Court Sebastian, FL 32958 Bash.Des0amail.com Reappointed 3/26/14 581-0775 Took Paul's expired regular member position 4/27111 Louise Kautenburg - Chair Reappointed 2/22/17 973 Oswego Avenue Sebastian, FL 32958 Took Durr's unexpired regular member LouiseklCiuno.com position 10/14/15 696-3716 Reappointed 1/8/14 Took Hennessey's unexpired alternate member position 3/14/12 CURRENT STATUS Term to expire 11/1/2020 Term to expire 4/1/2020 Term to expire 5/1/2020 Term to expire 2/1/2020 David Reyes — Vice Chair 458 Oak Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Jdr53470att.net 453-6157 Joel Roth 1984 E. Lakeview Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 ioelroth(a)msn.com 589-6894 Al Alvarez 492 Quarry Lane Sebastian, FL 32958 alalvarez(o)aol.com 532-8767 Charles Mauti - Alternate P. O. Box 782129 Sebastian, FL 32978 Cmm33270amail.com (772)205-9448 Bill Simmons - Alternate 509 Drawdy Way Sebastian, FL 32958 Bsimmon s41 la)comcast. net (270) 314-3554 Reappointed 5/9/18 Reappointed 6124115 Reappointed 6113/12 Took Simmons unexpired regular member position 311/11 Took Neuberger's unexpired alternate member position 7/14/10 Reappointed 4127/16 Reappointed 4124/13 Reappointed 5112/10 Took Buchanan's unexpired regular member position 1/27/10 Took Dodd's expired regular member position 12/14/16 Took McManus' unexpired alternate member position 11/19/14 Took Hughan's unexpired alternate member position 1.10/18 Took Alvarez's expired alternate member position 12/14/16 Term to expire 6/1/2021 Term to expire 5/1/2019 Term to expire 11/1/2019 Term to expire 1/1/2020 Term to expire 11/1/2019 No code provision as to staff liaison. Community Development Director serving as staff liaison. LDC 54-1-2.4 provides Director shall appoint secretary. 4 regular members are needed to make a quorum. In the event a regular member cannot make the meeting, an alternate steps in.