The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-18-2019 PZ Agendama SEeASTLAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 2019 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting of March 21, 2019 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL and PUBLIC HEARINGS None • Chairman opens hearing, attorney reads ordinance or resolution or title Commissioners disclose ex -parte communication • Chairman or attorney swears in all who intend to provide testimony • Applicant or applicant's agent makes presentation • Staff presents findings and analysis • Commissioners asks questions of the applicant and staff • Chairman opens the floor for anyone in favor and anyone opposing the request (anyone presenting factual information shall be sworn but anyone merely advocating approval or denial need not be sworn in) • Applicant provided opportunity to respond to issues raised by staff or public • Staff provided opportunity to summarize request • Commission deliberation and questions • Chairman calls for a motion • Commission Action UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input on items other than on the printed agenda, is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of members present 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Accessory Structure Review — LDC Section 54-2-7.5 — 788 Atlantus Terrace — 952 SF Detached Garage — Jeffrey & Mary McIntyre 10. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS 11. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. STAFF MATTERS Updates from Director 13. ADJOURN HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (F. S.286.0105) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING. All government meetings in City Council Chambers will be broadcast live on COS -TV Comcast Channel 25 and ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed via the city website — www.citvofsebastian.ora unless otherwise noticed and rebroadcast at a later date — see COS -TV Channel 25 for broadcast schedule 1 2 3 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 21, 2019 Call to Order -- Chairperson Kautenburg called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Pledae of Alleaiance was recited by all. Roll Call Present: Not Present: Also Present: Mr. Roth Mr. Simmons (a) Ms. Kautenburg Mr. Carter Mr. Reyes -- Excused Mr. Mauti (a) Mr. Qizilbash Mr. Hughan Mr. Alvarez Ms. Dorri Bosworth, Planner Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer Ms. Mara Schiff, Indian River County School Board, was not present. 4. Announcements and/or Aaenda Modifications Ms. Kautenburg announced that, since Mr. Reyes is excused, Mr. Simmons will be voting in his place. Ms. Kautenburg proposed an agenda modification, moving New Business to being addressed immediately after approval of the Minutes, with the item listed for consideration being an accessory structure review Hearing no objections, the modification to the agenda was approved. 5. ADDroval of Minutes A. Regular Meeting of March 7, 2019. Ms. Kautenburg asked for any additions or corrections to the Minutes as presented. Hearing none, Ms. Kautenburg asked for a motion to accept the Minutes. A motion to accept the Minutes as presented was made by Mr. Carter, seconded by Mr. Hughan, and approved unanimously by voice vote. 6. New Business �e C ,_ O ~ QEL �E CtS L) Cn O COS > > w -0 C 2 aC a UJ) N -2' a Co Ms. Kautenburg announced that, since Mr. Reyes is excused, Mr. Simmons will be voting in his place. Ms. Kautenburg proposed an agenda modification, moving New Business to being addressed immediately after approval of the Minutes, with the item listed for consideration being an accessory structure review Hearing no objections, the modification to the agenda was approved. 5. ADDroval of Minutes A. Regular Meeting of March 7, 2019. Ms. Kautenburg asked for any additions or corrections to the Minutes as presented. Hearing none, Ms. Kautenburg asked for a motion to accept the Minutes. A motion to accept the Minutes as presented was made by Mr. Carter, seconded by Mr. Hughan, and approved unanimously by voice vote. 6. New Business PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 A. Accessory Structure Review -- LDC Section 54-2-7.5 -- 557 Sloane Street -- 720 SF Detached Garage -- Cheryl Scranton Ms. Kautenburg asked for the applicant to present her case. Ms. Cheryl Scranton and Mr. Ed Furnari, her husband, appeared, and Mr. Furnari spoke on the matter. His proposed plan is to build a garage on the lot adjacent to the lot on which their house is situated. It will be a Carolina Carport building, all metal. Ms. Bosworth stated that, based on the size of the proposed garage -720 square feet— it is required to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The staff report contains all the items from the Code that need to be met in order to issue the building permit. The setback requirements of 20 feet have been met. Because the building is proposed to be erected right at the 20 -foot setback line, the Building Department will require a new survey. She stated the house is 14 feet in height, but she needs to know what the height of the proposed structure will be. Mr. Furnari stated it will be 13 feet. Ms. Bosworth stated the applicants had mentioned that there are two sheds on the property. Mr. Furnari stated each of the sheds is 12 by 10 feet, but one of those sheds is going to be torn down after he builds the new garage. Ms. Bosworth stated it should be a condition of approval that the one shed be taken down and removed from the property before the CO is issued on the new building. She stated that the architectural design of the proposed building must be compatible with the overall architectural design of the primary residence, including facades and materials, color, trim, roofing materials, and pitch. Staffs only concern is with the roof. The applicants have stated the roof on the new structure is going to be a green metal roof. The roof on the house is now a black shingle roof. Mr. Furnari stated regarding the color of the roofs, the roof on the house is 20+ years old. They will be doing a new roof within the next five years, and they do not want a black roof. They plan on putting a green metal roof on the house when they replace the roof so it is more in line with the carport roof. He further stated that, if this is a major issue, he can always change the color of the roof going on the carport to black. Ms. Kautenburg inquired if any members of the Commission had any questions or comments. Mr. Simmons: • Inquired if the trees that are presently existing are to remain. Mr. Furnari stated yes, they will keep the trees that are there now. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 3 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21. 2019 Mr. Roth: • Regarding the proposed structure being corrugated metal, he inquired if staff is satisfied with that. Ms. Bosworth stated the siding on the house is vertical, and the metal on the carport will be horizontal. If the proposed structure were 750 square feet, the siding would have to match the house exactly, but with the 720 square - foot size, it is not required to match exactly. She stated the garage will be painted to match the color of the house. • Commented that the color of the proposed building is listed as tan. Mr. Furnari stated the builder only offers so many color choices, and the one they picked appeared to be the closest to the color of the house. • Commented on a 12 x 12 concrete pad in the rear of the property with a 4 -foot - wide walkway that is pictured. Mr. Furnari stated that concrete pad and the walkway are no longer present; there is a pool in that area. • Asked if Mr. Furnari has any objections to the motion containing the Sandstone color as the color of choice. Mr. Furnari said that would be acceptable. He will contact the contractor and change the color to Sandstone if necessary. Ms. Kautenburg: • Mentioned a rather large motor vehicle pictured, and it appears to be parked near the front of the lot. The Code states recreational vehicles must be behind the front line of the house. Mr. Furnari stated they would move that vehicle so that it is in compliance. • Stated she does not have a problem with the color of the roof as proposed. She stated there is enough diversity in the neighborhood and there are enough trees on the lot that the roof colors will not be a problem. Mr. Mauti: • Inquired whether the building will have any windows. Mr. Furnari stated it would have no windows, just a garage door on the front and one on the back and one man door on the side. • Inquired as to the size of the garage doors. Mr. Furnari stated one of the garage doors is going to be 12 X 9, and the other is going to be 10 X 8. • Asked if the manufacturer could send actual samples of the colors available. Mr. Furnari stated he did not know if that could be done. Ms. Bosworth stated that they will not be able to match the colors perfectly, and if the colors are generally in the same color group, that is acceptable. She did emphasize that the color of the roof needs to be addressed. She also stated if the Commission wants Sandstone as the color, that could be put into the motion, but she did not think it necessary to get a sample sent. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 4 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21. 2019 Mr. Hughan: • Stated from the pictures, the beige color offered for the garage would match the color of the house more than the tan. Mr. Furnari stated when they looked at the color chart on the internet, the tan looked to be the closest to the color of their house. He commented that colors that are printed on different devices/websites are not always the same, and what you get in the end is not always what you expected when it was ordered. He stated if the Commission thinks another color than what they have chosen will match the house better, he is willing to change the color for the carport. • Inquired if the manufacturer stated what the wind load would be on this building. Mr. Furnari stated it is approved by Indian River County, and he approximates it at 150 MPH. Ms. Bosworth stated it has to be 160 MPH, but that will be verified during the structural review. • Inquired what the roof color on the garage is going to be. Mr. Furnari stated it will be green. Mr. Qizilbash: • Questioned how many sheds that are there now will stay. Mr. Furnari stated one will stay and one will be torn down. Mr. Qizilbash stated that would be above the 750 feet maximum allowed. Ms. Bosworth stated they are entitled to have 1,000 square feet because.their lot is over an acre. • Inquired if there will be any utility easements affected. Ms. Bosworth stated once the formal survey is obtained, that will show if there will be any easements affected. • Inquired if Mr. Furnari has unity of title for the two lots. Mr. Furnari stated yes. • Asked if the figure of 44,000 square feet in area is correct. Ms. Bosworth stated, according to the property appraiser's records, that is correct. • Inquired if there will be a driveway installed. Mr. Furnari stated there is a culvert there presently which he put in about two years ago. There being no further discussion, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion to approve the 720 -square -foot detached garage at 557 Sloane Street, Lots 2 and 3, Block 64, Sebastian Highlands Replat Unit 2 as submitted, with the requirement for a survey, removal of one of the sheds now present on the rear of the lot, and recommending the Sandstone color on the siding was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Carter. A roll call vote was called for by Ms. Kautenburg. Roll Call Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons (a) -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 5 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Motion carries unanimously. 7. Quasi -Judicial Public Hearinas A. Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing -- Site Redevelopment Plan -- Verizon Demolition and New 2,400 SF Retail Building at 1676 US Highway #1 (Existing 2,600 SF State Farm Insurance Office) -- CR (Commercial Riverfront) Zoning District The Commission's clerk and Technical Writer, Janet Graham, swore in everyone who was offering testimony. Ms. Kautenburg asked if any of the Commissioners had had any ex parte communications regarding this matter. All the Commissioners indicated they had not. Ms. Kautenburg then asked for the applicant or the applicant's agent to make their presentation. J. Wesley Mills, of Mills, Short & Associates, representing the owners of the property, stated the plan is to demolish the existing building, construct a slightly smaller new building with architectural enhancements to be more compatible with the neighborhood. The tenant would be Verizon Wireless. Site improvements are also proposed for the project to help bring it more into compliance with City requirements but also FDOT standards for vehicular traffic. A significant amount of landscape enhancements for the site are proposed, removing any exotic or invasive vegetation now on site, and improving the traffic flow on the asphalt parking area to bring it more into compliance with today's standards. He stated he is here to answer any questions any of the members has about this project. Ms. Kautenburg asked for staff input. Ms. Bosworth described the site and referred the Commissioners to their agenda packets. Two-thirds of the property will be open space. It is not expected that there will be any large delivery trucks—just UPS- and FedEx -type trucks. There is a steep slope to the rear of the building, and the staff has requested a fence along the property in that area. The developer plans to install a split -rail fence similar to the fencing at the rear of the Dollar Store across Route 1. It was discovered that several of the trees in that area are PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 6 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 either exotics or invasives, so they will all be taken out. The palms, pines, and oaks will be preserved, and the site will be brought into compliance with current Riverfront landscaping laws. St. John's Water Management District reviewed the proposal. Since it is a redevelopment project, Verizon did not need to get a formal stormwater permit, but they did ask that there be installed some small retention areas at the front of the site. An off-site improvement they are going to do is to add a sidewalk in the right-of-way along US Highway #1. The east property line does abut private residences, so there is an opaque buffer required. A 293 -linear -foot wooden fence will be installed. There will also be a one -foot berm installed near that fence which will also prevent some water runoff in the case of a heavy rain. Staff requested a Phase 1 and Phase 2 report on the site. Regarding the history of the site, in the past it was a Stuckey gas station. The old site plans showed where the gas tanks were located. The tanks were filled with sand when the property was turned into a restaurant. According to the site assessment that was received, the site met all the soil testing and national standards. There are no tortoises, no wetlands. There is in the northeast corner a power pole with an osprey nest on it. Research revealed no requirement of how far the developers have to be away from that osprey nest while the site was being cleared. However, the staff will require the contractor who is going to clear the site to present some type of plan that shows how that is going to be addressed— either by keeping away a certain distance, maybe clearing by hand, or other ways in which they can protect the nest while work is being done. Due to the steepness of the slope at the rear of the property, an erosion -control matting will be installed. An inspection will be done on the matting 30 days after installation to ensure that there has been no erosion since it was installed, and the sod and other landscaping materials have taken root. Regarding the lighting in the rear of the property, some shielding may be necessary to ensure the light does not infringe on residential property to the east. Staff feels that the proposal meets all the Land Development Code requirements, the requirements of the Riverfront Overlay District, and staff recommends approval of the site plan. Ms. Kautenburg asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners. Mr. Carter: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 7 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 • In keeping with the desire to keep the fishing -village theme, he would like to see some nautical -theme additions incorporated into the plans. Mr. Qizilbash: • Questioned whether St. John's Water Management has approved of this plan. Mr. Mills stated they have gotten a letter of approval from St. John's. They also got a letter from FDOT approving the plan. The stormwater drainage system also has been designed based on City standards. • Stated the City requires retaining drainage of an inch and a half of rainfall, and this plan only calls for one inch. Ms. Bosworth stated staff would request that the revised calculations show that what is designed is an inch and a half. • Regarding drainage flow, there is not a single cross-section in the driveway/parking lot, but if FDOT has approved the plan, then he is not concerned. Mr. Mauti: • Regarding the existing underground tanks, he asked if those tanks are metal or concrete. Mr. Mills stated he believes they are concrete tanks, and they had the soil tested around those tanks before they purchased the property. Ms. Bosworth stated the only records that could be found regarding the tanks was from the 1980s and stated the tanks were filled with sand and slurry, but the records did not indicate if the tanks were concrete or metal. She stated the Phase 2 testing did not indicate there was anything additional needed. Mr. Mauti stated that if the tanks were metal, there could possibly be a problem with them collapsing. • The plan shows where there will be a future sign. He inquired regarding what dimensions that sign might be and if the sign will have electricity. Mr. Mills stated the sign will be a standard monument sign in compliance with the City's regulations, and the sign will be electric. • Concerning the runoff from this property onto the property to the east, he is concerned that the proposed berm and fencing will not be adequate. Mr. Mills stated there will be a berm constructed, the soil will be stabilized and monitored, so if there is an issue during construction, it will be addressed. The structure will have roof drains and guttering. There will be underground piping to drain the water into the drainage along US 1. Mr. Hughan: • Concerning the osprey nest, he inquired whether ospreys are affected by lighting like the tortoises are. Ms. Bosworth stated there was research done, and nothing could be found regarding the effect of lighting on ospreys. Mr. Mills stated that, even though the nest is not on their property, they will take whatever precautions are necessary to protect the nest, as it is on the right-of-way. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 8 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 • Addressed the sea grapes at the north driveway and questioned whether those will be removed. Mr. Mills stated yes. Ms. Kautenburg: • Is very impressed with the plans, especially the underground drainage in the driveway/parking lot. Mr. Roth: • Regarding the lighting, he would recommend some sort of shield on the lighting so that it does not extend an excessive distance. Mr. Mills stated there are plans for light fixtures with shields, which makes it have a down -lighting effect. Ms. Bosworth stated if there are any complaints from neighboring property owners regarding the lighting once the project is completed and the property is lit, that can be addressed. • Also regarding lighting, he wanted clarification on what lighting fixtures will be used on the front of the building. Mr. Mills stated on the drawings on Page A-102 the light fixture that is being proposed for the front of the building with the shields is described there. • Questioned if the air-conditioning unit will be totally surrounded by a structure that will hide the air conditioner. Mr. Mills stated yes. • Regarding the fence at the rear of the building, he suggested instead of a split -rail fence maybe a post -and -rope fence might be more in keeping with the fishing village theme. Mr. Mills stated that following discussion between the staff and his team, it was decided that the split -rail fence would be used. • On the drawings there is what he deems as a tree barrier. He questioned whether that is permanent. Mr. Mills stated that is not a permanent barrier; it will just be used during the construction phase. • Questioned if FDOT has approved the curb cut as it is proposed. Ms. Bosworth stated the FDOT permit has been obtained regarding the plan. Mr. Alvarez: • Inquired how high the light poles will be. Ms. Bosworth stated they will be 20 feet. • Asked how many employees will be hired. Mr. Mills stated it will be a typical Verizon store, but he is not certain how many employees they will have. Mr. Robert Gierke, the owner/developer, stated the sales team is 6 to 12 that they rotate around depending on the volume and the days of the week. Mr. Simmons: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 PAGE 9 • His only comment is that this plan will be a huge improvement over what is there now. There being no further questions from the Commissioners, Ms. Kautenburg called upon anyone from the public who wishes to speak in favor of the project. Beth Sembler, who owns the property to the east of the property in question, stated she is very much in favor of the Riverfront district overlay requirements. Although she is in favor of the project, she wishes the proposed building were more in keeping with the fishing village theme. She is also concerned about the osprey nest. There has been an osprey nesting in that nest for several years, and she would like to see more than just the minimal protection required by law. She is also concerned about the runoff coming off the back slope of the property. She has spoken with Ms. Bosworth concerning the lighting in the back of the building, and if she feels the lighting is intrusive onto her property, she wants to be assured that it will be rectified. She inquired about the hours of business, and Mr. Gierke stated they will open between 9 and 10 a.m. and close between 8 and 9 p.m. Sunday hours would be shorter. Ms. Sembler reiterated she is not against the project, but these are the concerns she has. Ms. Kautenburg called upon the applicant to respond to issues raised by staff or the public. Robert T. Gierke, owner/developer, reviewed the work that went into getting approval for this project, and how the final design was geared toward the flavor of the rest of the neighborhood as much as possible. He also stated that whatever runoff there is from the building will go westward toward US 1, and whatever drainage there is from the rear of the property towards the east will be from whatever is there presently. While they will be disturbing the exotic species that presently exist, they will be replacing those with a very extensive amount of landscaping, including trees, in that area. He stated Verizon wants to be a good neighbor, including protecting the osprey nest. Mr. Mills discussed that the work that has to be done will be a distance away from the osprey nest, not immediately next to it. He stated they will speak to the environmentalist to see how they can better protect the osprey nest. Ms. Bosworth stated that when the land -clearing permit request comes in, staff will require a plan from the land -clearing contractor on how they will protect the osprey nest. Ms. Kautenburg asked Ms. Bosworth to summarize the request. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 10 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 Ms. Bosworth stated that most of the questions have been addressed. Regarding the runoff on the slope to the rear of the property, if after the rainy season begins in June it is felt that there needs to be more stabilization, that will be addressed. Ms. Kautenburg asked if any of the Commissioners had any further concerns. Mr. Roth is still concerned with the front architecture of the building. Mr. Carter reiterated his concern about the absence of a nautical theme on the front elevation of the building. Ms. Bosworth stated staff would look into the possibility of adding some hardscaping relative to a nautical theme. Mr. Simmons asked if there is anything about this project that does not meet the existing Code. Ms. Bosworth stated it meets the intent of the Riverfront and meets all the requirements for site development. There being no further discussion, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion to approve the site redevelopment plan consisting of the demolition of an existing office building and construction of a new 2,400 square -foot retail building, along with the required parking, landscaping and side amenities at 1676 US Highway #1 was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Simmons. This motion is made subject to the following conditions: that consideration be given to protecting the osprey nest in future plans, and also consideration be given to the drainage if alterations are needed as construction continues to completion. Ms. Kautenburg called for a roll call vote. Roll Call Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- No Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was six ayes and one nay. Motion carries. 10. Commissioners Matters Mr. Mauti: • Addressed the Spirit of Sebastian project and the questions that were unanswered on the developer's application—those being Nos. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9. He inquired whether the developer has since provided the answers to those questions. Ms. Bosworth stated the items that were necessary for a complete preliminary plat PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 11 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2019 package have been submitted. She further stated she would look up the specific questions Mr. Mauti mentioned. Mr. Roth: • Questioned what the progress is of the old railroad building on Cleveland Street. Ms. Bosworth stated permits have been issued already, and the developer is in the process of getting the building ready for retail use. The complete site will have to be in place before a CO is issued for that building to be able to be used for commercial use. • Is concerned about the lack of followup on the "fishing village" theme that was decided upon in the past for the City. He feels that some of the matters the Planning and Zoning Commissioners suggest are not being followed up on. Ms. Bosworth stated that the staff was very disappointed in what has been presented as the CRA Master Plan. There were three revisions to this proposed plan, and these revisions underwent some outside peer review as well as City staff review, and the consultants have now been let go. So much of what has been talked about regarding Mr. Roth's concerns are tied in to the CRA Master Plan, so when the Master Plan is finalized, a lot of the questions Mr. Roth raised will be answered. • Pointed out that he was not criticizing any one person or the staff in general; he just would like to see more feedback from the upper echelon at the City. Mr. Alvarez: • Regarding the property on Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512), there is a for sale sign there now. Ms. Bosworth stated it has always been for sale, and the developer has a time line for the final plat which should be submitted shortly. • In regard to native -animal signage in the City displaying tortoises, etc., he has never had any contact by anyone in regard to this matter. Ms. Bosworth stated she would get with the person from the Environmental Department on this subject. • He agreed with Mr. Roth's concern about followup on matters this Commission has brought up. Specifically, he is concerned about the vehicles for sale along Barber Street. Ms. Bosworth stated she had conferred with Code Enforcement, and those sites are in compliance. Mr. Mauti: • Explained what he had found regarding the question of whether selling these cars is a business in a residential area. Ms. Bosworth stated complaints such as this need to go before the Code Enforcement Department. Ms. Bosworth explained that the City needs additional proof such as photographs that these cars are being sold from a residence on a regular basis PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 12 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 21. 2019 Ms. Kautenburg: • Opined that this is a matter for Code Enforcement, and not this Commission, and if someone has a complaint, to file it on line and/or go to the Police Department and file a complaint. 11. Citv Attornev Matters -- None. 12. Staff Matters -- None. 13. Adiourn -- Ms. Kautenburg called for any further business. Hearing none, she adjourned the meeting at 7:47 p.m. jg Ma tN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Accessory Structure Staff Report 1. Property Owner: 2. Contractor: 3. Requested Action: 4. Project Location: 5. Current Zoning: 6. Required Findings: Jeffrey and Mary McIntyre Stmad Custom Builders, Inc. Approval of a 952 SF Detached Garage 788 Atlantus Terrace Lots 2, 3, 14 & 15 Block 241, Sebastian Highlands Unit 10 RS -10 Current Land Use: Single-family Residence Does Does Not Comply Comply A. No accessory structure shall be constructed until the construction of the principal structure has been started. / 1. House completed 1 {ra oo -�L ; or V house under construction 2. Accessory structure to be located on same lot as principal , / structure ; or located on second lot that has V been c mbined wit principal lot by a unity of title I��r ok't�'k1-e- B. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback): 1. Front yard: No detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. Principal strucrt�ure setback is rl I . Jr �. Accessory structure setback is t/ , 2. Front yard on corner lot: Accessory structures may not be located in the secondary front yard of an improved corner lot unless the corner lot is joined in unity of title with an interior lot that contains the principle structure. However, said accessory structures shall not be located closer than 25 feet NA from the secondary front property tine in the RS -10 zoning district, and in all other zoning districts shall meet required front yard setbacks. Secondary front yard setback is . and proposed accessory structure front yard setback is Does Does Not Comply Comply 3. Side yard: Required side setback is C) ' V/ Accessory structure side setback is 1 01 4. Rear yard: The required rear yard is a a , A detached accessory structure may encroach into the required rear yard, provided it meets all the following: a. It is a minimum 10 feet from the rear property line. Proposed accessory structure has a oZo setback. i ✓ b. It is not in an easement. Rear easement is and proposed setback is a D c. It does not exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage. Proposed V/ accessory structure is 915A square feet. d. It does not excged 12 feet in height. Proposed accessory structure is AO _ feet in height. Accessory structures which are attached, or do not meet the above four requirements must meet the standard rear setback ✓ which is $AV Proposed accessory setback is ant C. No mobile home, travel trailer or any portion thereof, or / motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. t/ D. Applicant must expressly design to the type of the accessory structure (i.e. garage, shed, etc.) 0.� E. Must comply with all city codes. ✓ F. The height of accessory structure cannot exceed height of 19 = principal structure. House is approximately , and accessory structure will be A D+ •(SCC VAM"Os) G. Attached or detached Quonset -type or style accessory / structures are prohibited. 1/ H. A residential lot is allowed 5 square feet of accessory building area (cumulative) for every 100 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum 1000 square feet. Property square footage i g x.05= ✓ Allowable sq.ft. of accessory structures 10 G O Existing accessory structures 0 Proposed accessory structure 6 5 al Total existing and proposed Cl S 11� 2 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Any attached or detached accessory building, carport or breezeway over 500 square feet in area must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission utilizing the following criteria: Does Does Not Comply Comply A. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. B. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. C. Accessory structures 501 sq.ft. to 750 sq.ft. in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the Aprimary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, roofing materials and pitch. D. Accessory structures 751 sq.ft. to 1000 sq.ft. in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways, as follows: 1 shrub for every 3 lineal feet and 24 inches in height at planting. Lineal dimension totals q d - 3 = Total Shrubs Required 3 0 Review fee has been paid: V YES NO Additional Considerations: Based on the area of development, current codes require the property to have 12 trees. Total existing tree information is not shown on the survey. Tree credits will be given for trees currently located on the property. A condition should be added that, after a site inspection to verify existing trees, additional trees shall be planted to bring the property into compliance, if necessary. The required amount of foundation plantings will be checked at final inspection. C • Because of the difference in the finished floor elevations of the house and carport, the accessory structure will appear as the same height of the principal structure. Prepared by Date I t ' {'L�t+ •s' Y t! � � Y�a11�r Google Earth rc� 2018 Googro ` •N` •i Y� •.��, Sly �`• {'�� Ott ;ki fdd& � .. R_%iA . • L 4001W 7: W. .r 1- lid t`.. • * _ .. 90 ft w e ty • �� r � s: .r I t ' {'L�t+ •s' Y t! � � Y�a11�r Google Earth rc� 2018 Googro ` •N` •i Y� •.��, Sly �`• {'�� Ott ;ki fdd& � .. R_%iA . • L 4001W 7: W. .r 1- lid t`.. • * _ .. 90 ft w c s i u N ,• M Aye sM.Sv � 17 l � � �,� F 1 � �v � .r'y c 4 { I •- it r' � � r f � +, i 3 ,r !t'"s�li " f t� '�, /,. � 4 l i, � ^ 1+�' � r � � �,i jKi ; Yy "4� v A .4�y 4 •^'y!%� .x - ,_ o ' �• , i:� �+ j . dfi ,7 r iY.+g..,.Ir,G ��61 -� �jJ 1�� BOUNDARY SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LO!! LOTS 14 ET 15, BLOCK 241, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 11, ACCORDING a TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 PAGES 56 4'.' cbb I THRU 561 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, 7y LL a FLORIDA. W L��3P 0 c WEl SURVEYOR'S NOTES: �� 0 �(, 02 ��O 1. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF CLEARBROOK h �-�(] 40.4' - STREET AS N 00002'520 WAS PER PLAT. o S I 2. NO INSTRUMENT OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF 8 WAYAND/OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR 3 3 EXCEPT AS SHOWN. NO TITLE OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. Np 3. THIS SURVEY IS NOT INTENDED TO LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND a FOUNDATIONS, ENCROACHMENTS OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPT o gg L LW AS SHOWN, HOUSE TIES ARE TO FOUNDATION. Z ^' 4. THE LOT SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE 'X° PER Z N FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 12061CCO90 E, DATED MAY 4, 1989. W 'V N N h 5, ELEVATIONS BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM ELEVATION 50.00 oa° ASSUMED ON THE CENTERLINE OF CLEARBROOK STREET. og ABBREVIATIONS: ' 3 O P -PLAT M -MEASURED RIW-RIGHT OFWAY A/C -AIR CONDITION R -RADIUS A -ARC LENGTH D -DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE) p C -CENTERLINE COV. -COVERED O.U.L.-OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES �N CONC.-CONCRETE PU6-DE-PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT = C) PLS -PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR z o M SLI CERTIFIED TO: EDWARD POSHADEL & SUSANNE ZISTLER I '� MGB CONSTRUCTION, INC. W J LEGEND: 0 - SET 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "PLS 4896" �J Oo - FOUND PK NAIL & 1-114" DISK 0� y0� e 50.00' — oO HEADWALL D=1 I o 5 2- 50' _50 RIGHT OF WAY 1 BRAC E / ANTUS � - ATS T 4 A 4.6 '16 66l&1pSTANCE 1.36' NTTBAR11' 63, M.1 °2128'A CHORD 144. °13 �N 77 D,13°3LBZO \ u 2 0 0Z aZ%'2a i D;25 32820 ,6 A;145.53'i ' �\ \ 4 �s LOT 13 BLOCK 241 V d9y, c a o CIO�\ y H.� v Ri��. LO!! CECRLE LAND SURVEYING, INC. a aQ°� p�1oe o-• 4'.' cbb I 10749 HIGHWAY 11.5.!, SUITE A, SEEASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 7y LL a ti' '�• W L��3P 0 c WEl O 5 2- 50' _50 RIGHT OF WAY 1 BRAC E / ANTUS � - ATS T 4 A 4.6 '16 66l&1pSTANCE 1.36' NTTBAR11' 63, M.1 °2128'A CHORD 144. °13 �N 77 D,13°3LBZO \ u 2 0 0Z aZ%'2a i D;25 32820 ,6 A;145.53'i ' �\ \ 4 �s LOT 13 BLOCK 241 V d9y, c a o CIO�\ y H.� v Ri��. PREPARED BY: LO!! CECRLE LAND SURVEYING, INC. a 1. 7' 4'.' cbb 10749 HIGHWAY 11.5.!, SUITE A, SEEASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 7y LL a ti' '�• 0 c WEl j, �� 0 �(, 02 ��O CERTIFIED CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF IN h �-�(] 40.4' - �O j0• o S I BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 8 61GI7-6 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THIS SURVEY IS PREPARED AND 3 3 CERTIFIED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT OR CLIENTS NAMED Np HEREON, THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE PREPARED BY: CECRLE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FLORIDA LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS #6637 10749 HIGHWAY 11.5.!, SUITE A, SEEASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 PHONE (561) 386-0520 i CERTIFIED CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF IN g CONFORMITY 1440TH THE MINIMUM TECH141CAL STANDARDS SET FORTH o S I BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 8 61GI7-6 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THIS SURVEY IS PREPARED AND 3 3 CERTIFIED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT OR CLIENTS NAMED Np HEREON, THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE a ORIGINAL RASIED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. o gg S g o0 Z ^ Z N THOMAS -Z ", .L.S. 48 W 'V N N h oa° og �N N ❑Lf-) O 0 O 8 S8905710811 W 25.001 P. 8 M. LOT 15 BLOCK 241 D=12° -98.54 R = 453.20' LOT 1 BLOCK 241 / CHORD BEARING 99p9i- M I (STT�12' 01 37 LOTS 14 LOCK 241 027'28" A.2 D=25 8;453.20 LOT 2 R BLOCK 241 0�" LOT 3 BLOCK 241 i 'f� It ..ShYto�—b =�, 4 . I h (--moi� � � 0 + o1i`a FIELD BOOK 33-78 I SHEET I OF I BOUNDARY SURVEY 9.12.2000 ADDED PLOT PLAN 10.2.2000 REVISED PLOT PLAN 6.7-2001 REVISED PLOT PLAN 6-21-2001 FORM BOARD LOCATION 8-20-2001 FINAL SURVEY 1.28-2002 I SCALE I•=30' PROJECT NUMBER 00.226 FRONT ELEVATION /SCALE 1/4"z 1'0* L 200AMP El FANEL RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE 1/4"- 1'0" man FlNISHEO FLOOR OF GLRBGE V ElEV. V-0° ��ViJJJ Pe - FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4'- 1'0" LEFT ELEVATION SCALE 1/4' • 1'0" REAR ELEVATION SCALE 1/4'- 1'0" FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE 1/4'= 1'0' N.., PLY. x+am srRv veFlrc TRU55 PLAY PRG-O�8 YS. }W39 R_A-M- NT x OL. MAL NR ORIF ED60---� \ FYI V�NYL�VYglfm 40PPR 1'!P ` �uox POR G%1BLUF LILATGX ON. t4 nnD� PLrexw AxD ' nesNme eAwu �A� rLuxLew V — xmxmure xeAx ]CR nFA B'O AFF NiI)9@I.R LONT. 0 19IAPPL® xBLiLr iO N„WNFr —Nr — ND2 OT@YR LELl16s °JILLLBG I/l'MRiGR 9OPPR COMP PA91EX i0 iRYGp MN WI -V.' OM1YNLL %RLtl AiiOL. dI MIY 9N91YOL.NMI �O. MbIPR1LAIYM LN&IbA 4TIIGl W1 pYMRA6N MO Nl XM Rf0.9f E MY IDORI%ML MMA16 OP M MROx fC W 9 q MC inlssGs DrxeR MM Me wTRwe MecPm. O EEP OR MA5ONRY WALL oxe ITM OB _________ --- _____.•. I. MuorL .,wlrw�rmm�. J �xM�n nGi°"Pmim°LIm°Ml�row i w: 1 1 � 1 . .I I I. I < I r. _ •'1YAP6I u'ERrTw�smxcnF2 nomayeg NF'MIHiRt148 � • 1 FBBu+Rpt(gyf_ yA111R6a yFeu 1 • I j1prJ!'IYIiG QSYu'exFlGnmly Tm ICLeI I. 4®•' 1 � 1 ' I. 1• i ' 1 F . I � • , le I .1 1 : 4 ' I ' I RELE55 � a <6MMEDCO0.0.ELE55 1•a bMOLC OOJR RFLBB• 1 Fza 1' WO 2'e 100 zB—. 2B FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE 1/4'= 1'0' N.., PLY. x+am srRv veFlrc TRU55 PLAY PRG-O�8 YS. }W39 R_A-M- NT x OL. MAL NR ORIF ED60---� \ FYI V�NYL�VYglfm 40PPR 1'!P ` �uox POR G%1BLUF LILATGX ON. t4 nnD� PLrexw AxD ' nesNme eAwu �A� rLuxLew V — xmxmure xeAx ]CR nFA B'O AFF NiI)9@I.R LONT. 0 19IAPPL® xBLiLr iO N„WNFr —Nr — ND2 OT@YR LELl16s °JILLLBG I/l'MRiGR 9OPPR COMP PA91EX i0 iRYGp MN WI -V.' OM1YNLL %RLtl AiiOL. dI MIY 9N91YOL.NMI �O. MbIPR1LAIYM LN&IbA 4TIIGl W1 pYMRA6N MO Nl XM Rf0.9f E MY IDORI%ML MMA16 OP M MROx fC W 9 q MC inlssGs DrxeR MM Me wTRwe MecPm. O EEP OR MA5ONRY WALL oxe ITM OB I. MuorL .,wlrw�rmm�. J �xM�n nGi°"Pmim°LIm°Ml�row w: GARAGE DOOR PECE55ED SILL TYPICAL HALL 5ECTION %AI NTS LL nwwax RRAbRe•.LExR,ENN.m.Rm VIULpYB13GYS Nr TABULATION DETACKEDGARAGE 952 M ��l YI 5 d 0 pJo 1�3moom� m y3 cJmnj WR C1 `m"mom c mAr M m I d ee I ad o= W m�sel. w WnE.i FkQtPIBIB.R �(M>#TMars�u< ME�.�9�slPinryl eearsMLr, *1>/19 - uasRi%Imxrismes NFvmsa,e» 0� I �Z-2 A-1 I� r-nueo wm� mxrt ] u.]w�um, s-sam ��uNmror3s Pee Aoomvaa raonaNaFimiauvm JBF1I6-1B/1T urumw.Mmrt J �gyxw n u INwoNE3rxATArrop u o nr wrie.Pl�, uxlil (premnn --� tmomvwrm r —_ n3P0OIt1. . I— uVMt9lWmn¢ne��N C1EAR „mrw(vaw svnx SIB•' 4S �MINd'NOMINAM M6ARlIM61Y116 Iwl¢ Rm(UmG �YIPH1B115 ME 9I1M1 wl SIPoICNMl PIN 51 Hr 2 SM16NP016 FL¢.,¢EO HI6NINRw9wM1RNAW.E. i X[01W 1'KNPML9LWN6 PMI56f RNMLwYASfIIMflS COMPOSITE MASONRY W/PRECAST UM BEAM SECTION TYP SOFFIT - VIMALUM. MASONRY SOIew ISP LINTEL SCHEDULE A 200 AMP ELEC. PANEL 61 \ = I I I II I I I I I 10- 1 2 Ii DIi • 3.' .1 iI '« 38RDO 'DC ExcwEmwa sEw rxwsiwcMNE Pss�omaN® ro MEEr w1E uuoRre NEpnxaaw,e Cf rNE W ®IIIIXI MTflEflOSNR BU6DING 110 L3R]n. PESwFTLL AND 0.RPSfIiKTW3 EIBBII$mgILY. 3�ao/tq iAxeraC.o�wam, r.e flSJOuS IQG U1, snIE1 M16U P. R9]6 RtCFE41MK 9NiP1EPlA6}&9 d 0 A SME LOAD(P.L.F.) DLESIGN(P.LF.) LINTEL LINTEL LINTEL as. usr NUMBER SCHEDULE LENGTH GRAY UPLIFT CRANKY U ul LI 8F16 1B -IT 114" 1366 -800 192 -130 L2 BF90 1B -1T 114" 4006 -1]53 192 -130 L3 8RF620B-1T 4'-6" 6904 4993 159 -124 *CUSTOM CUT LENGTH - z 3 10'-0" 12'-0" IOD1200HD CUSTOM OJT LENGTH (45° ANGLE) .- FORM & POUR 200 AMP ELEC. PANEL 61 \ = I I I II I I I I I 10- 1 2 Ii DIi • 3.' .1 iI '« 38RDO 'DC ExcwEmwa sEw rxwsiwcMNE Pss�omaN® ro MEEr w1E uuoRre NEpnxaaw,e Cf rNE W ®IIIIXI MTflEflOSNR BU6DING 110 L3R]n. PESwFTLL AND 0.RPSfIiKTW3 EIBBII$mgILY. 3�ao/tq iAxeraC.o�wam, r.e flSJOuS IQG U1, snIE1 M16U P. R9]6 RtCFE41MK 9NiP1EPlA6}&9 d a a a a a SHEET S-1 0 A �O ♦ID.9 O WALL LEGEND �I3VwNG1510;wRWID®L -CBS YMLLS OIY90.Mf. STRUCTURAL FLOOR PLAN m Lxn SCALE: 1/B• - r -o•, Galas su1c: ue• -1'-U• a EXTERIOR DOOR SCHEDULE �J noArt wmm xE3o9r cowsns NEMaRI¢ 1 3'-0 6'-0" SW NGING 0000. — 2 101.0 10'-0' 1001000HD - z 3 10'-0" 12'-0" IOD1200HD - a a a a a SHEET S-1 12 5 < ®®®® Moo Qw 00 00 FINISHED FLOOR FRONT ELEVATION SCALE I/4 = I 1 0" 27' 3 27'- 11.1.61% C.SI(20KL.O. N 9.0 13-11-1/2 13'3-1/2 ,F 'T, is ii, ..I. 1 V 10-112 jO�715173RJ 6-8 2'- — 9'] NOTE, 10-0 §d=. aide® M MOTE: WIFLOOR PLAR VERIFY WALL HEIGHTS Tx.x... ..T WITH TRUSS LAYOUT. UNLES, FLOOR PLAN SCALE 114" = 1' 0- Z3. 3 I lio 9 I NOTE, VERIFY ALL DIMENSION 1 5 WIFLOOR PLAR m 11 rp. PE PLAN LEFT ELEVATION SCALE 1/0" = 1' 0' REVATION ,�-,,,KIEWiL-�SCALE 1/41- . V G- OD RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE l/0" = 1' 0- TYPICAL WALL SECTION STUCCO OVER BLOCK A -111111 on Of Insulation ITA{omocx,;A�L.'LL OuhS..., the anew CDda W the state of Ftorldo Shell W p.10.0 at the time Of QfO- 0 PUNICATEDRAM MISQ0 DRAWNG#omm POSI-ADIELMSMER RESIDENCE MODEL: CASTAMY MOD. IJ Slcvl 14816— BLOCK UNIT SUBSERAS7ANHIGHLANDS ADDRESS ATIPN)ISTEW& rl:RBR00K eREViSION #i. = 2 M1.1 on 3 -1/11/-1 WNG 1932 GARAGE 622 I�ORCH ENTRY .. go TOT AL 3010 I. FamalalEMINXMEMy GL wSUUEGqW;E .. ro,awEwaRaFva IEIONI YON 9.RSEERACU%T 7 lo.�MSYSTEM : I.. = r=.ul=z . Ose L Q4r&0NEQlr IA 1 HERNOSTAi i0 BE 1' AFF. 4 JIM 16 NVOIENSHOVERYAeIERiuO IT COME 'A �,WlW REPARED BY B) l RJ On CIF SST!A1ti HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5537 • FAX (772) 589-2566 PERMIT APPLICATION /,e9 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE FILLED IN BY APPLICANT, ACCORDING TO FS 713.135 PERMIT # / / — 4ni 116,-7 TRACKING # C% (�i/i�_(�_ DATE: 3 / 2Q /201/n9 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARCEL ID #31382400001241000014 0 RECEIVED BY: /0 f� LOT: 15 BLOCK:241 SUBDIVISION: Sebastian Hinhlands Unit 10 FLOOD ZONE: No TYPE OF WORK: 0IEW STRUCTURE ADDITION ALTERATION ❑REPAIR DEMOLITION ❑ OTHER WORK INCLUDES: aPL� 'LEE�OL�1O NUMST [] SHEB"o ENCSLAB DECK OTHER WORK DESCRIPTION: Construct a CBS 34'x 28' detached naraoe ESTIMATED JOB VALUE: $60,000.00 TOTAL SIF 982 UNDER AIR None SOB NAME: MClntvre garaae JOB ADDRESS: 788 Atlantus Terrrace SUITE/UNIT NO. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Jeffry A and Mary I Mclntrye PHONE: 303-995-0142 ADDRESS: 788 Atlantus Terrace CITY/STATE: Sebastian, FI. - ZIP CODE 32958 CONTRACTOR BUSINESS NAME: Strnad Custom Builders. Inc ADDRESS: 9852 Honevsuckle Dr. CITY/STATE: Sebastian, FI. CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: nis03(g7.hotmail.com ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Janet B. Dunlap ADDRESS: 9056 Enq(ewood Ct. CITY/STATE: Vero Beach. FI, CONTACT E -MAH, ADDRESS: INFOe.Enaineermvhome.com LICENSE #: CBCO28224 CONTACT PHONE: 772-473-8591 ZIP CODE 32976 PHONE: 772-918-8044 ZIP CODE: 32963 PRESENT USE: PROPOSED USE: OCCUPANT LOAD: NUMBEROF:11STORIES [�]BAYS QIWITS [_]BEDROOMS LDHEIGHT 13'-4" TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. CBS GROUP OCCUPANCY: AREA IS THE BUILDING PRESENTLY EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM? nYES DNO BONDING COMPANY: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: _ MORTGAGE LENDER: _ __ PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: FEE SIMPLE TITLE HOLDER: _ PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK AND INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED. I CERTIFY THAT NO WORK OR INSTALLATION HAS COMMENCED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF ALL LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION IN THIS JURISDICTION. 1 UNDERSTAND THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FOR ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS AND AIR CONDITIONERS, ETC. WARNING TO OWNER., YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SIGNED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE FILED WITH THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY IF THE VALUE IS $2,500 OR MORE, EXCEPT HEATING OR AIR CONDITIONING CHANGE OUTS LESS THAT $7,500. NOTICE: IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE AGENCIES, OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. ANY CHANGE IN BUILDING PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE RECORDED WITH THIS OFFICE. ANY WORK NOT COVERED ABOVE MUST HAVE A VALID PERMIT PRIOR TO STARTING. IN CONSIDERATION OF GRANTS, THIS PERMIT, THE OWNER, AND THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR AGREE TO ERECT THIS STRUCTURE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING CODES OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. NOTE: THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS VOID AFTER 180 DAYS UNLESS THE WORK, WHICH IT COVERS, HAS] COMMENCED. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST HAVE A VALID STATE CERTIFICATION, STATE REGISTRATION, OR COUNTY COMPETENCY PLUS A COUNTY -WIDE LICENSE PRIOR TO OBTAINING PERMIT. (ALL ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS MUST HAVE OWNER'S SIGNATURE ONA�PLIC ION 0 PROVIDE COPY OF CONTRACT) SIGNATURE OF OWNER/AGENT QU IFIER'S SIGNATURE Jeffry A Mclntvre Neil J. Strnad PRINTED NAME OF OWNER/AGENT PRINTED NAMEOFQUALIFIER DATE: DATE: 31e;/ 5 O / Y Individuals who sign as the owner's agent must first obtain owner's written authorization to sign on their behalf STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF "NOTARY IS FOR QUALIFIER'S SIGNATURE" I h reby certi that on th}'s Z 9 day f /"l -, Imo— 20 � � personally appeared -/D , S %%Z/(/ who is rsonally known to me or has produced identification. Type of i ntification pro ncc Official Signa of Notary Public Notary Sealoa r;'K,'";••, ESS • nxm.u�=.amer•