Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-20-2019 PZ AgendaMa SEBASUAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/ LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2019 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting of April 18, 2019 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS • Chairman opens hearing, attorney reads ordinance or resolution or title • Commissioners disclose ex -parte communication • Chairman or attorney swears in all who intend to provide testimony • Applicant or applicant's agent makes presentation • Staff presents findings and analysis • Commissioners asks questions of the applicant and staff • Chairman opens the floor for anyone in favor and anyone opposing the request (anyone presenting factual information shall be sworn but anyone merely advocating approval or denial need not be sworn in) • Applicant provided opportunity to respond to issues raised by staff or public • Staff provided opportunity to summarize request • Commission deliberation and questions • Chairman calls for a motion • Commission Action A. Public Hearing — Review of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element, and Public Facilities Element with Regards to Adaptation of the Coastal Resiliency Plan UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input on items other than on the printed agenda, is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of members present 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Accessory Structure Review — LDC Section 54-2-7.5 — 910 Greenbrier Avenue — 540 SF Detached Carport with Utility Storage — M/M Robert Hatch 10. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS 11. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. STAFF MATTERS Discussion of Upcoming Meetings and Dates 13. ADJOURN HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (F. S.286.0105) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING. All government meetings in City Council Chambers will be broadcast live on COS -TV Comcast Channel 25 and ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed via the city website — www.citvofsebastian.oro unless otherwise noticed and rebroadcast at a later date — see COS -TV Channel 25 for broadcast schedule 2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 18, 2019 1. Call to Order -- Chairperson Kautenburg called the meeting to order at 6:Q0 p.m.l 05 ay C 2. Pledoe of Allegiance was recited by all. G . m 3. Roll Call 20 ¢ Present: Mr. Roth Mr. Reyes Qi E 0 E Mr. Simmons (a) Mr. Mauti (a) a E Ms. Kautenburg Mr. Qizilbash G p �, c Mr. Carter Mr. Hughan c) n $mO Not Present: Mr. Alvarez -- Excused .0 ? '" „QC oo9 Also Present: Ms. Lisa Frazier, Community Development Directo N Ms. qCn Q Dorri Bosworth, Planner Mr. Jim Stokes, City Attorney Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer Ms. Mara Schiff, Indian River County School Board liaison, was not present. 4. Announcements and/or Aoenda Modifications, Ms. Kautenburg announced that, since Mr. Alvarez is excused, Mr. Mauti will be voting in his place this evening. Mr. Stokes requested an agenda modification. He asked to have the City Attorney Matters and Staff Matters precede the Commissioners Matters section, as he has some items he wants to review with the commissioners which are relevant to Staff Matters and Commissioners Matters. It was agreed among the commissioners to make that change to the agenda. 5. Aooroval of Minutes A. Regular Meeting of March 21, 2019 Ms. Kautenburg asked for any additions or corrections to the Minutes as presented. Hearing none, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion to accept the Minutes as presented. A motion to accept the Minutes was made by Mr. Carter, seconded by Mr. Hughan, and approved unanimously by voice vote. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 6. Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearinos -- None 7. Unfinished Business -- None 8. Public Input -- None 9. New Business A. Accessory Structure Review -- LCD Section 54-2-7.5 -- 788 Atlantic Terrace -- 952 SF Detached Garage -- Jeffrey & Mary McIntyre Ms. Kautenburg disclosed that she is acquainted with Mr. and Mrs. McIntyre. She has not discussed this matter with the Mclntyres and was unaware of it until she reviewed the agenda packet. Ms. Kautenburg asked for the applicants to present their application. Mr. Jeffrey McIntyre and Mrs. Mary McIntyre appeared, and Mr. McIntyre spoke regarding the matter. His proposed plan is to build a garage in which to store a boat. There is to be no occupancy of the structure. There will be a separate driveway for the structure. Ms. Bosworth stated that, based on the size of the proposed garage -952 square feet— it is required to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and match the house exactly. It will be a custom-built garage. There will be framing around the doors to match the trim on the house, painted the same color. This is on a double lot with unity of title. There will be three trees removed in order to construct the garage, and they have already pulled their tree -removal permit. At the time of the final inspection, if there are any additional trees that need to be planted, that will be addressed. It is also required to have some foundation plantings. Thirty plants will be put in around the building. That will also be verified before the certificate of completion is issued. Staff recommends approval. Ms. Kautenburg inquired if any members of the commission had any questions or comments. Mr. Hughan: • Addressed the subject of the swale where the driveway will connect to the roadway and inquired if there will be a culvert. Mr. McIntyre stated yes, it is going to have a culvert. TAN -00", PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 PAGE 3 Noted the shingles on the proposed building are a different style than what are on the house. He inquired if the colors and styles of the shingles are going to match. Mr. McIntyre stated they are. He stated they will all be architectural shingles. Mr. Reyes: Inquired what the proposed 53.1 finished floor set out on the plan is based on. It appears to be a foot lower than the house. Ms. Bosworth stated there will be a difference of a foot in the roof lines, but the appearance will be that they are the same. Mr. Reyes asked what the elevation is in that area. He is concerned that the garage may flood. Mr. McIntyre said that neighborhood is not in a flood zone. Ms. Bosworth stated the elevation at the intersection is 50 feet, and this building will be three feet above that. There being no further discussion, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion to approve the 952 -square -foot detached garage at 788 Atlantus Terrace, LDC Section 54- 2-7.5 as submitted, with staff's recommendations, was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Hughan. A roll -call vote was called for by Ms. Kautenburg. Roll Call Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Mauti (a) -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was seven ayes and no nays. Motion carries. 10. Citv Attornev Matters Mr. Stokes addressed the Commission regarding dealing with the agenda on Commission Matters, i.e. what is appropriate for discussion at public meetings and what is not. Many times, pertaining to a number of boards/commissions, questions are being asked and inquiries are being made regarding subjects that are not within the boards'/commissions' jurisdiction. He reiterated that the Planning and Zoning Commission is a very vital part of the City, and the City needs and appreciates their service. He reviewed that City Council is responsible on a broader base for overall policy, planning, and long-range vision, etc. So, at council meetings it is very appropriate for council members to inquire about the status of various projects within the City. That is council's role as being the policy makers PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 4 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 for the City; whereas, this commission's role is to evaluate the items that come before them on the agendas and see how those matters fit into the overall picture. He and his staff are working on getting the focus on dealing with items that are on the agendas. He emphasized that the commission can and should address items pertaining to how items on the agenda factor into the larger plan. When the items on the agenda have been addressed and the commission raises questions regarding other matters, that puts staff in a difficult situation because a lot of times some matters are not ready for public consumption yet. He reviewed there are provisions in Florida statutes that allow, especially with economic -development items, to be shielded because of competition. He invited the commission members to call him or staff at any time if they have questions, but to refrain from doing so at public meetings. He also asked if anyone had questions this evening. Mr. Roth: • Asked for clarification, and Mr. Stokes explained how to differentiate between legitimate subjects for discussion at meetings versus idle curiosity. Mr. Stokes stated he is cognizant of the fact that there is not always a distinct line regarding what is and what is not proper to discuss at public meetings. • Inquired whether, instead of calling the staff with questions, are emails to staff permitted as regards the Sunshine Law. Mr. Stokes stated yes. Mr. Reyes: • Stated that, as volunteer commissioners, they get a lot of questions asked from the public especially as regards safety concerns, and he inquired if it is not proper for the commission members to inquire about those projects. Mr. Stokes stated the questions Mr. Reyes asked regarding the elevations when tonight's proposed garage project was discussed were perfectly appropriate. But he further stated that there are various departments within the City to address such matters as code enforcement, building permits, etc., and this commission should not get involved with matters that are under the jurisdiction of those departments. He stated if one of the commissioners notices something in the City that is not in accordance with a project that came before Planning and Zoning in the past, they should call him or staff and inform them, so that the matter can be dealt with immediately rather than waiting until the next commission meeting. Mr. Carter: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 5 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 • Brought up a project that was reviewed by the commission and was started. Then it was stopped. He inquired if it is an appropriate question to ask about the status of those projects that stop for reasons such as financial, etc. Mr. Stokes replied it is not improper to ask questions regarding these projects, just not during a formal public meeting. Mr. Reyes: • Stated he has been on this commission for almost 10 years, and he is questioning why this is being brought up now. He reviewed that the members of this commission have been asking these kinds of questions for years. He questioned why the City allowed this to go on for so long. He is not happy about it. • Stated that most of the time the questions that are asked by the commissioners are relating to public safety. Mr. Mauti: • Stated he is continuously asked by neighbors, etc. regarding different projects within the City, and he questioned if he is not allowed to answer those questions. Mr. Stokes pointed out that he is not restricting anyone from asking questions during these meetings, but he is trying to put into place good meeting practices. • Asked if the commissioners could request updates on projects that were approved in the past. Ms. Frazier said yes, staff could update the status of a project but could not go into detail as to its status. • Complimented the work that Ms. Bosworth has done and is continuing to do as regards Planning and Zoning. Ms. Kautenburg: • Stated that, as commissioners, they are volunteering to provide a service in order to contribute to the betterment of the community, but as such there are times when they may overstep their role. When questions come to any of the commissioners such as Code Enforcement questions, they should refer the questioners to the proper department for answers rather than bringing it up at a meeting. Mr. Qizilbash: • Asked if a member of the public asks about an item that is not on the agenda, are the commissioners allowed to answer that. Mr. Stokes said yes, if it is part of Public Input, the commissioners can answer those questions. Ms. Frazier interjected that Mr. Stokes has in the past few months given talks on the Sunshine Law, etc., and what is being discussed here is educational. One of the goals PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 6 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 is to refrain from disseminating information that is just rumors or subjects that are not ready for public discussion. Ms. Bosworth stated that this discussion was prompted by an interaction she had with one of the commission members as to a Code Enforcement issue. She had worked with this commission member on a question related to Code Enforcement. They had phone calls back and forth, and the issue was still brought up at the last Planning and Zoning meeting, and she did not think the issue should have been brought up here at a public meeting under Commissioners Matters. She invited the commissioners to contact staff with any questions, but not to bring these items up at a public meeting. Mr. Stokes also suggested that, if one of the commissioners would call in to staff and ask for an update on a particular project, staff could then add that to the agenda for the next meeting, where it could be addressed. Mr. Carter: • Suggested just deleting the section "Commissioners Matters" from the agendas. Mr. Roth did not think this was possible, as it follows the format that City Council has set up. Ms. Frazier stated if the commission wants to consider that, it would be fine. She suggested that under "Commissioners Matters," if someone wants to question the status of a project, etc., to ask for further information on the subject, which then can be put on the agenda for the next meeting. That would be the proper time to address it. 11. Staff Matters Ms. Frazier recounted the status of some of the projects that are being worked on. • Indian River Drive -- The work on the pavement and crosswalks has been done. There is continuing work regarding landscaping and new signage. • FIND Grant for Fisherman's Landing Working Waterfront Park -- Staff was successful in obtaining this grant. The grant covers partially funding the living shoreline protection project, along with a pervious -pavement parking lot. That work should be completed by the end of the summer. • FEMA Grant on Stonecrop -- That request has been submitted, and FEMA is asking for more information, so that is taking some time. • Two grants for the Indian River Lagoon Council -- One is for the septic -to - sewer program, and one is for the oyster -gardening program, which is the environmental education program that is run at the Working Waterfront Park. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 7 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 • DEO Grant -- An application will be submitted in May which, if successful, will fund the bulk of this commission's work next year as the City works to have the comprehensive plan updated. This needs to be updated by the end of September 2020. This commission will be reviewing proposed updates, and it will be a big job • Grant Application Revisions -- Several grant applications are being revised, including the septic -to -sewer program, facade grant program, and tree protection. There have been two new programs instituted: the vacation rental program and stormwater utility fee credit program. • National Flood Insurance Program -- Requires a community rating system recertification, which is done. • Census -- The City is preparing for the census with maps. • Coastal Resiliency Plan -- A $50,000.00 DEO grant was received last year in order for the City to comply with State legislation regarding peril and flood. The coastal resiliency plan has to be included in the comprehensive plan. That is done and will be presented to Council next week. As the second part of that grant, staff needs to update certain portions of the comprehensive plan, and that will be brought to this commission for review sometime in June. That has to be completed by the end of June. • HUD -- Another project the commission will be involved in is where HUD provides dollars, and Sebastian is an entitlement city. We have to update our five-year consolidated plan. We have a contract in front of Council next week, and, should it be approved, we will be moving forward, which will require a public meeting— again an opportunity to get the commission's input as far as how the City wants these HUD dollars to be spent. In the past, Ms. Bosworth stated that the City utilized them for the veterans housing grant, and the septic at Riverview Park was taken out and a lift station was put in. She stated the City is looking to get the five- year consolidated plan done so that the City can get these entitlement dollars. • CRA Master Plan -- The one big "hanging chad" is the CRA Master Plan, and this is something that is very disappointing to City staff. The consultant who was hired came highly recommended. Things moved along very well, and then the consultant had a large turnover of staff. The individuals whom City staff had been working with left. Staff expressed their concerns. After three renditions of the plan, the City had to let them go, as they were not addressing the uniqueness of Sebastian. They were not addressing the specific catalyst projects they were being asked to address. Therefore, it was brought in house to complete. It will be this summer before the commission can expect to review it. • CIP PLAN -- The CIP for Ms. Frazier's department is really concentrating on the comprehensive plan update. This will require a large amount of time in the next year. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 8 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2019 12. Commissioners Matters Ms. Kautenburg asked for any comments or questions from the commission. Mr. Reyes: • Inquired if there was another firm who came in second when the contracts were solicited. Ms. Frazier replied that, under the Competitive Consultants Negotiation Act, staff did do an RFQ over a year ago to firms to submit for landscape architecture. They were one of the top three selected. The City has reached out to another consultant. Unfortunately, most of the budget was spent, so it will have to be finished in house. Mr. Mauti: • Asked if the commissioners would have a chance to review the master plan before it goes to City Council. Ms. Frazier stated yes, the commissioners will have to look at it to ensure that it is compatible with the City's comprehensive plan. Mr. Roth: • Recalled that in the past there was to be a project to identify walking paths and signs. He inquired whether that is under the umbrella of the multiple projects that are being worked on presently. Ms. Frazier stated it is, and it will be presented to City Council next week. • Mr. Roth brought up the theme that was suggested for Sebastian to have a "fishing - village theme" going forward, and he wondered if that is still a priority. Ms. Frazier stated that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council did the whole overlay concept and emphasized the old -fishing -village -type look. That has been morphed into the overlay district, which is part of the City's code, and Ms. Bosworth brings that idea up for anything that is being developed or redeveloped within the CRA district and the overlay district. Ms. Frazier stated she would like to revisit it and make it part of the CRA master plan. Mr. Reyes: • Asked where the colors were taken from that were selected. Ms. Bosworth stated they were modified from the Route 60 Overlay District in Vero Beach. Ms. Kautenburg: • Complimented staff on the City's website, stating it is getting better and better. 13. Adlourn -- Ms. Kautenburg called for any further business. Hearing none, she adjourned the meeting at 7:10 p.m. jg ary Cx SEAT'" HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ www.cityofsebastian.org DATE: June 20, 2019 TO: Local Planning Agency FROM: Community Development Department RE: Coastal Resiliency Comprehensive Element Text Changes The City of Sebastian has completed the Coastal Resiliency Plan in accordance with Task 1 of the FDEP Florida Resilient Coastlines Funding. Task 2 requires an update to the respective Elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan in accordance with statutory requirements of the Peril of Flood Act relating to coastal flooding and sea level rise. An assessment of vulnerability of various aspects of land -use, assets, society and ecosystems to certain hazards was made with the end goal of enhancing resiliency through modifications to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) of the applicable elements of the comprehensive plan. The three elements, Coastal Management, Conservation and Public Facilities, have not been updated since 1999. Major modifications are required of the entire Comprehensive Plan prior to October 2020. Therefore, the City is only reviewing these elements in accordance with the FDEP Grant requirements (Due by June 30, 2019) which are related to Coastal Resiliency. These Draft GOP's will be incorporated into the final version which we will begin working on throughout this next year. Final GOP's will be approved by the City Council and the DEO once we complete the update to the Data, Inventory and Analysis (DIA). The results from the Coastal Resiliency Plan indicate that a majority of the City's infrastructure does not appear to be at risk from sea level rise and only some infrastructure is at risk during major rain events. Potential adaptation strategies and timelines to consider were presented as follows: • Short Term ✓ Update Comprehensive Plan ✓ Define existing flooding levels of service — streets ✓ Locate and map all City outfalls — retrofit with tide valve ✓ Discuss potential of early warning systems for elderly • Long Term ✓ Re-evaluate bulkhead/sideslope inspections; detailed surveying ✓ Update Stormwater Master Plan ✓ Coordinate with County to prioritize hardening of lift stations The Kimley-Horn team has incorporated the findings of the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., March 2019 into the Land Use Element (Chapter 1), Public Facilities Element (Chapter 4), and the Coastal Management and Conservation Elements (Chapters 5 and 6, respectively) of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The amendments pertain primarily to coastal resiliency and sea level rise, including those recommendations incorporated in the Coastal Resiliency Plan. Additionally, there has been the consolidation of redundant/repetitive policies and objectives allowing for a merger of the two elements, Coastal Management and Conservation, into a new element titled "Conservation and Coastal Management Element". This results in a much more functional, readable, and usable unified element incorporating the recommendations of the Coastal Resiliency Plan. In summary, the consolidation resulted in six (6) fewer objectives and twelve (12) fewer policies. A summary of the changes that were made to create the new Conservation and Coastal Management Element are as follows. • Modifications to objectives discussing habitat protection for policy consolidation • Inclusion of resiliency plan references, data, and analyses to objectives regarding the CHHA, floodplain, evacuation plans, and redevelopment and development in vulnerable areas • Updates due to amendments in Florida Statutes • Updates to rectify invalid cross-references or element references • Deletion and/ or modification of dates and "shall' clauses in policies to reflect land development code updates (these were vetted at length to confirm the land development code reflected the direction provided). These now read as "shall continue to require" or "shall maintain". • Text updates to incorporate the resiliency plan and support its implementation These changes were important to better reflect the threats of flooding and sea level rise and the importance of resiliency measures while also improving the organization and flow of the Comprehensive Plan. The reorganization of the Conservation and Coastal Management Elements into one element is recommended to address similar topics/subjects in a more succinct manner. A comprehensive matrix of changes has been included within this package. For your information, the following is an excerpt from the City Land Development Code Sec. 54-1-2.9 — Procedures for amending the comprehensive plan. "Planning and Zoning Commission Review. The Planning and Zoning Commission, ......... shall hold a public hearing thereon.....................In deliberating, the Commission shall consider the following: 1. Consistency with Other Elements of Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. The commission shall identify any inconsistencies. 2. Conformance with Ordinances. Whether the proposal is in conformance with any applicable substantive requirements of the City of Sebastian Code of Ordinances, particularly the Land Development Code, and/or whether the proposed amendment will require amendments to any ordinances of the City. 3. Changed Condition. Whether, and the extent to which, land use and development conditions have changed since the effective date of the existing regulations involved which are relevant to the proposed amendment. 4.Land Use Compatibility. Whether, and the extent to which, the proposal would result in any incompatible land uses, considering the type and location of uses involved. 5. Adequate Public Facilities. Whether, and the extent to which, the proposal would result in public facilities and services exceeding the capacity for such services and facilities existing or programmed, including transportation, utilities, drainage, recreation, education, emergency services and similar necessary facilities and services. 6.Natural Environment. Whether, and the extent to which, the proposal would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment. 7.Economic Effects. Whether, and the extent to which, the proposal would adversely affect the property values in the area, the general health, safety and welfare and impact the financial resources of the City. 8.Orderly Development. Whether the proposal would result in an orderly and local development pattern. Any negative effects on such patterns shall be identified. 9. Public Interest Enabling Act. Whether the proposal would be in conflict with the public interest, and whether it is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this chapter and its enabling legislation. I O.Otber Matters. Other matters which the Planning and Zoning Commission may deem appropriate." )Article/Section (Standard Ch. 1 Future Land Use Description of what is included in the City's natural B.2 Natural Resources resources including applicable Element(s) C.2 Land Use Analysis Vacant Land Suitability Analysis Identifies areas of the City for future development and C.3 Projected Land redevelopment including areas within flood prone areas Use Needs (including SLR) based on 2019 Study City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan Update Identified (Possible) Conflicts & (Preliminary) Recommendations Comment I Recommendation Although informational only, Element references must be updated to reflect the new Element Title Revise with the new Element Title and also reflect the full Resiliency study here (and in DIA) discusses what needs to be analyzed as part of the vacant lands analysis and what factors to reference/incorporate including Natural Resources Update/amend sub -section d. Natural Resources to reflect analysis should also consider the 2019 Resiliency Plan Language is provided here (no GOPs though) regarding future Revise and update information in this section to reflect the 2019 Resiliency Plan; will also need to update and expand information within the respective GOPs of this Element to redirect population and public development and redevelopment including future conservation areas expenditures away from these areas Policy 1-1.1.4 Reflects areas of the City within an identified CRA including areas C.4/C.5 Redevelopment Needs along the Riverfront which may be subject to SLR Add language regarding/recognizing the potential for impacts due to SLR and Resiliency in future redevelopment projects Policy 1-2.9.5 Not part of the KH Scope of Services; however the analysis should be Preserving Riverfront Access Identifies the acreages of FLU designated lands discussed and identified to be updated based on the 2019 Resiliency Policy 1-3.2.2 Table 1-6 FLU Table including Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) Plan N/A Goal 1-4 May require an update based on 2019 Resiliency Plan (Not part of the Obj 1-4.1/Policy 1- Map 1-5 ESL Map Illustrates/identifies the currently designated ESLs KH Scope of Services to update maps/GIS) IN/A No specific change is warranted but should be identified for future discussion including recognition of the mitigation measures per the Policy 1-1.1.3 Density Defined 2019 Plan Consider identifying (cross-reference) with new combined conservation/coastal element for mitigation strategies Policy 1-1.1.4 RMU Conservation Land Use including corresponding Obj 1-1.7 Policies 1-1.7.1, .2, .3 Policy 1-2.9.5 Preserving Riverfront Access Policy 1-2.9.6 Preservation of Existing Assets within the Riverfront Policy 1-3.2.2 Land Development Regulations Policy 1-3.2.5 Performance Standards Goal 1-4 Resource Protection Obj 1-4.1/Policy 1- 4.1.1 and 1.2 CHH Mitigation and Hurricane Evacuation Plans Obj 1-4.3/Policies 1- 4.3.1, 3.2, 3.5 and 3.7 Protection of Natural Resources Policy 14.5.1 Incorporate Innova$ve Techniques Policy 1.4.7.7 Manage Current Developmental Impacts No specific change but acknowledgement of 2019 Study and potential impacts to development and redevelopment in this area should be discussed 2019 Study Acknowledged Identifies and describes the Conservation Land Use which may be impacted by the 2019 data Clarify Code reference and also clarifyfidentify 2019 Plan, including cross-reference (see also - specific policy) to new element (Provides language regarding City acquisition of access to the riverfront Note, amendment may not be necessary other than to acknowledge FS with regard to peril of flood/slr components regarding use of public funds Provides for the protection, restoration and enhancement of existing assets within the riverfront Identifies the areas that should be subject to additional development standards including those areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding Identifies those items that may be included in the land development code and requiring additional standards see following Obj and Policies specific to Resource Protection Identifies the plans needed including coordination efforts for development and redevelopment post hazard Requires the City to adopt and maintain land development regulations for the protection of natural resources including floodplains Similar comment as above Similar comment as above I Isee previous comment (Note, amendment may not be necessary but it should be understood that additional lands may be subject to the development standards based on the data from the 2019 study Add language regarding (reflecting) areas subject to SLR and or periodic/seasonal flooding See Below (New/amended language not necessary; may want to consider incorporating by reference the 2019 Resiliency Plan into the City's adopted Plans see previous comment; this is more of an acknowledgement that implementing standards should be adopted by the City specific to the mitigation portion of the Resiliency Master Plan see previous comment see previous comment Transform Monroe Page 1 of 3 Ch. 5 Coas�lr Management/Ch. 6 Conservation Note: This Analysis and the following comments assume (recommend) a consolidation of the Coastal Management and Conservation Elements into one succinct Element in order to eliminate redundancies, streamline the Elements and the respective GOPs i describes what is required when conflicts arise between land use and 1 B. Land Use Conflicts certain lands Update the language to reflect the new Element comprised of the two sub elements Coastal and Conservation Contains references for FEMA and FIRM related information including 1 Coastal Floodplains references to maps Update the map references and refine the definitions consistent with FS Regulating Development in the Provides standards for development and areas where development is Confirm references and agencies regulating. Also, reflect new Element Name and identify the 2019 Resiliency Plan as incorporated by reference but placed in the DIA; identify the Adaptation Action Plan Floodplain prohibited including mitigation strategies Within the DIA, utilize the 2019 Plan Data and incorporate for future use and analysis including justification of GOPs 1 I Natural Disaster Planning Identifies Hurricane Vulnerability Zones, storm events, Considerations etc. Language could be added reflecting Sea Level Rise / Peril of Flood including (potential) impacts to public facilities, identify strategies per Plan also Identification of CHHA Identifies what structures and facilities are maintained/to be maintained More of an acknowledgement in the definition; however, the City's Stormwater Management Ordinance should be amended and updated to reflect the Mitigation Strategies and information in the Resiliency Drainage Facilities and Operational Responsibility by the City; includes references to maintenance, etc. Plan Includes updating terms and requirements for public infrastructure expenditures within the CHHA and hazard prone areas Identifies the County system and increased coordination between the Identifies public infrastructure currently within the CHHA Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Operational Responsibility City and County with respect to septic to sewer conversion. Continued discussions and coordination with the County including coordination on the hardening of critical infrastructure (is., lift stations) is recommended. No amendment is needed to this language Existing Natural development and redevelopment within the CHHA and other defined Drainage and Goal 5-1 and related Identifies the specific programs and regulations to be enforced within areas; provides generalized restrictions within certain areas; Recharge... Regulations and Programs the City including zoning, stormwater, subdivision regulations. More of an acknowledgement in the definition; however, the City's respective Ordinances should be amended and updated to reflect the Mitigation Strategies and information in the Resiliency Plan Amend GOPs consistent with FS and including mitigation strategies (by reference); updating references to FS specific to Peril of Flood. Note: Objective 5-1.1 through Provides standards including time frames for the adoption of City the FS regarding Peril of Flood or similar Policy 4-1.3.1 and 3A On-site wastewater treatment systems and regulations standards and or conditions for allowing septic systems See previous comment; also, the City's septic to sewer program is a critical component considering the location of existing septic tanks within environmentally sensitive areas section B address Water Quality / Indian River Lagoon information already discussed and or provided in the Coastal Element Similar to previous comments, this is not a recommended policyhext amendment but an acknowledgement that the 2019 Plan should be consulted when developing the next CIP and prioritizing the Policy 4-2.1.2 Priority for Correcting Existing Deficiencies Policy relates to the annual update of the CIP to correct deficiencies, expenditure of public funds Obj 4-3.1 and related addresses Floodplains Policies relate to the provisions for adequate stormwater and Not pail of the formal scope of this review; however, these policies should be reviewed consistent with the 2019 Plan and appropriate measureslordinances developed or amended to incorporate the 2019 Policies Protect Natural Drainage Features protection of lands, etc. Plan recommendations { Ch. 5 Coas�lr Management/Ch. 6 Conservation Note: This Analysis and the following comments assume (recommend) a consolidation of the Coastal Management and Conservation Elements into one succinct Element in order to eliminate redundancies, streamline the Elements and the respective GOPs i describes what is required when conflicts arise between land use and 1 B. Land Use Conflicts certain lands Update the language to reflect the new Element comprised of the two sub elements Coastal and Conservation Contains references for FEMA and FIRM related information including 1 Coastal Floodplains references to maps Update the map references and refine the definitions consistent with FS Regulating Development in the Provides standards for development and areas where development is Confirm references and agencies regulating. Also, reflect new Element Name and identify the 2019 Resiliency Plan as incorporated by reference but placed in the DIA; identify the Adaptation Action Plan Floodplain prohibited including mitigation strategies Within the DIA, utilize the 2019 Plan Data and incorporate for future use and analysis including justification of GOPs 1 I Natural Disaster Planning Identifies Hurricane Vulnerability Zones, storm events, Considerations etc. Language could be added reflecting Sea Level Rise / Peril of Flood including (potential) impacts to public facilities, identify strategies per Plan also Identification of CHHA Defines and references the CHHA and storm surge areas/zones Update information consistent with FS including Peril of Flood and SLR considerations; additional strategies provided in Resiliency Plan Includes updating terms and requirements for public infrastructure expenditures within the CHHA and hazard prone areas Existing Infrastructure in the Coastal Area Identifies public infrastructure currently within the CHHA Update language and analysis including facilities inventoried as part of the 2019 Plan Provides guidance and standards for Coastal Management including development and redevelopment within the CHHA and other defined Goal 5-1 and related Coast Management; Restricting Development areas; provides generalized restrictions within certain areas; Obj and Policies Activities.... implementing policies for shoreline uses, etc. Amend GOPs consistent with FS and including mitigation strategies (by reference); updating references to FS specific to Peril of Flood. Note: Objective 5-1.1 through 5-1.11 have some level of amendment either by update of the reference to the new Element, FS references, updates per the FS regarding Peril of Flood or similar Conservation Element Some of this information is duplicative and references/reiterates section B address Water Quality / Indian River Lagoon information already discussed and or provided in the Coastal Element Delete duplicate language and consolidate all IRL information Conservation section C addresses Floodplains see previous comment see previous comment Vegetative Communities (page 6- Coastal Ridge, South Florida Flatwoods, etc.; items 1-6 5, etc.) are duplicative with Coastal Element language see previous comment see previous comment Conservation Uses Conservation Uses including Vegetative Communities, (page 6-10) etc. Language is similar and duplicative in certain cases see previous comment Transform Monroe Page 2 of 3 Obj 6-1.2 and Obj 5- Water Quality and Protecting Coastal Resources, Protection of environmentally sensitive areas and includes similar 1.1 Wetlands, etc, language can consolidate / integrate into one succinct Objective Update date (reflects 1998) and confirm regulations are adopted and Policy 6-1.4.3, 4.4, 4.5 Required Dedication of Conservation Easements maintained Update date (reflects 1999) and confirm regulations are adopted and Policy 6-1.4.5 Wetland Development Restrictions maintained Protection Measures of shorelines and estuarine habitats; similar Obj 6-1.8 and 6-1.9; information found within both Ch 5 (5-1.1, 5-1.2, 5-1.3, etc.) and 6 (s- and Obj 5-1.2 Shoreline Protection Measures 1.8/6-1.9) can consolidate / integrate into one series of Policiesione Obi Policy 5-1.2.1 and 6- Similar information provided; however, some differing information as to 1.4.2 Wetland Transitions definition and application Revise and update for consistency between terms; may also consider consolidating into one policy with sub components Both Elements including language specific to shorelines and estuarine Obj 6-1.13 and 5-1.2 Address Shoreline and Estuarine environments environments see previous comment Transform Monroe Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-1.1.3: Density Defined. Maximum gross residential density shall be determined by dividing the "maximum allowable units" by the "gross land area" (i.e., dwelling units/gross land area). All residential densities denoted on the Future Land Use Map stipulate the maximum gross densities permitted for development on the land. Gross land area shall be defined as those contiguous land areas under common ownership proposed for residential development. In cases where residential land abuts waters of the State, the boundary shall be delineated as established by the State and no density credit shall be granted for waters of the State. In cases where residential land abuts other natural floodplains or wetlands, the land development regulations shall provide performance standards and/or criteria which may further restrict the character of land for which density credit may be granted. The intent is to allocate density credits only to those lands which are buildable pursuant to urban design criteria. These criteria shall be incorporated within the land development regulations. Mitigation strategies, identified in the City of Sebastian �rr�9esiyn 9nnaugfions 9nc. Element. Density is expressed in terms of a range up to a specified maximum. Where so stated as a range, the maximum density is not guaranteed by right. Subdivision, zoning and site plan review criteria and procedures shall assure that specific density assigned to new development is compatible and consistent with established residential development patterns and provides equitable use of the land. Criteria to be considered in allocating density shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Protect the integrity and stability of established residential areas; b. Assure smooth transition in residential densities; c. Require application of sound landscaping and urban design principles and practices; d. Protect environmentally sensitive areas; e. Minimize the impact of flood hazards; f. Coordinate with Indian River County as well as appropriate state and regional agencies charged with managing land and water resources; and g. Provide reasonable use of the land. I-35 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT and services; highway oriented sales and services; and other general commercial activities defined in the land development regulations. General commercial designations are located in highly accessible areas, adjacent to major thoroughfares. The maximum intensity of general commercial development measured in floor -to -area ratio is 0.6. Policy 1-1.4.3: C.R. 512 Commercial (C-512). The purpose of the commercial C.R. 512 corridor is to accommodate retail sales and services and other commercial activities and community facilities that are compatible with nearby residential areas. This land use designation expressly excludes vehicular sales and services; bars and lounges; parking garages; enclosed and unenclosed commercial amusements; indoor theaters; merchandising of second-hand goods, including flea markets, wholesale trades and services; industrial uses or outside storage activities, or any other activities which may generate nuisance impacts such as glare, smoke, other air pollutants, noise, vibration, fire hazard, or other adverse impacts associated with more intense commercial and industrial activities. The maximum intensity of commercial development measured in floor -to - area ratio is 0.5. Policy 1-1.4.4: Riverfront Mixed Use (RMU). The Riverfront Mixed Use designation is intended to provide a mixture of residential, commercial, recreational, and institutional uses in the Riverfront District. Develovment and level rise impacts ger the City of Sebastian Coastal Resiliency Plan Prepared Br. Kimlev Hom and Associates. Inc.. March 2019 The City anticipates that by 2025, the mix of uses in RMU will be 25% residential; 20% institutional/recreational, and 55% commercial. The maximum intensity for commercial development and institutional/recreationaluses shall be 0.6 FAR The allowable residential uses are single family, duplexes, multiple -family up to eight (S) units per acre, and commercial resort residential uses. Policy 1-1.4.5: General Pattern of Commercial Land Use. In order to promote efficient flow of traffic along major thoroughfares cited in the Traffic Circulation Element, achieve orderly development and minimize adverse impact on residential quality, commercial development shall be concentrated in strategically located areas having location characteristics which best accommodate specific land, site, public facilities and market location requirements of their respective commercial uses. Similarly, proliferation of strip commercial development shall not be extended. The existence of commercial areas on one corner of an intersection shall not dictate the development of all comets with the same or similar use; nor does the existence of commercial development on a major thoroughfare dictate that all frontages must be similarlyused. Policy 1-1.4.6: Allocating Commercial Land Use. The allocation and distribution of Lanar�eriyn 9nnouafrans 9nc. I-39 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Objective 1-1.7: CONSERVATION LAND USE. The Conservation land use category identifies lands that are environmentally fragile natural resources for long term preservation. It is vital to redirect population and public expenditures away from these areas so that future development and redevelopment does not occur. its defined in c°T 00300), This designation may be impacted Prepared Ry._Kenley Hom and Associates. Inc March 2019 Further descriptions of the this text. The protection and preservation of conservation resources shall be achieved through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1-1.7.1: Conservation Designation (CON). It is the intent of the "Conservation" land use designation to provide for the long term protection and preservation of environmentally sensitive natural resource systems. If it is impractical to designate the area containing conservation resources as Conservation due to size, location, or other factors, the City shall have the option of obtaining a conservation easement from the property owners) to protection the area. Areas covered by a conservation easement shall be treated the same as areas designated as Conservation on the FLL M. Development is limited within "Conservation" designated areas to accessory uses only, except where State and/or federal agencies having jurisdiction allow development rights. The applicant shall bear the burden of proof in determining that development shall not adversely impact conservation resources. Site alteration should be limited to accessory structures that support the conservation use (i.e. park pavilions, classroom space, park ranger office/equipment, etc. The maximum intensity of development activity measured in floor to -area ratio is 0.25 FAR- Policy AR Policy 1-1.7.2: Acquisition: The City shall support the acquisition of natural areas or open space through publicly funded programs, including the acquisition and development of facilities that promote and educate the public about the economic, cultural and historic heritage of the City. Policy 1-1.7.3: Allocation of Conservation Land Use. The City shall monitor the Future Land Use Map to ensure the application of Conservation Land Use to applicable properties. This includes taking into consideration Associates. Inc., March 2019. GOAL 1-2: FUTURE ALLOCATION OF LAND USE. THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT THE CHARACTER AND LOCATION OF LAND USES INCORPORATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND PRINCIPLES OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION, PROMOTE ORDERLY LAND USE TRANSITION, AND MINIMIZE THREATS TO HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE. Objective 1-2.1: PLAN AND DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL QUALITY. Residential �im�TJesiyn 9nnauaGans 9nc. I-43 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT etc.; develop a mixture of uses and a variety of opportunities for recreational, residential and commercial uses; encourage progress while protecting property rights; and protect the environment while fostering compatible uses. The land development regulations shall encourage a mix of uses and enforce the "Old Florida Fishing Village" design theme within the Riverfront CRA. Policy 1-2.9.3: Public and Private Sector Partnerships. The City shall coordinate redevelopment issues with the private sector in promoting mobilization of public and private resources necessary to effectively carry out redevelopment efforts, especially along the Indian River Drive corridor which borders the Indian River Lagoon. Policy 1-2.9.4: Code Enforcement Activities. Code enforcement activities shall be continued as an integral part of the City's regulation programs. The code enforcement program shall preserve and protect structurally sound land improvements and land uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1-2.9.5: Preserving Riverfront Access. River access, either through boat ramps, docks and piers or through walkways, scenic easements or breezeways, is a treasure to be enjoyed by all of the citizens of Sebastian. The City shall continue to develop programs and identify funding sources to acquire access to the river. Sea level rise and flooding should be considered in Policy 1-2.9.6: Preservation of Existing Assets within the Riverfront. The protection, restoration, and enhancement of existing assets, including historical structures, is important in implementing the "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme. The Crtyshall continue to enforce the procedures and ordinances adopted for this purpose. By 2010, the City shall develop programs and identify funding sources to protect, restore and enhance the historical structures in the Riverfront District. Sea level rise and Policy 1-2.9.7: Reinforce and Enhance Appearance of City Gateways along the US 1 and CR 512 Corridors. The City, together with the private sector, shall continue to introduce landscaping and urban sign amenities along gateways to the C1ty particularly the US 1 and CR 512 corridors. Such enhancement shall include application of community appearance criteria which reinforces good principles of design as well as preserving unique characteristics and open space for scenic vistas. The gateway improvements shall also address the implementation of uniform streetscape amenities, enhanced signage and intersection improvements. 'irrra VeVfv7 9nnavg6onr, 9nc. I-51 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT the land use element analysis of vacant lands) in order to protect and/or conserve natural systems, including topography, soil conditions, vegetation, natural habitat, and other environmentally sensitive land and water resources. Land use shall also be predicated on availability of man-made infrastructure and service systems required to support respective land use activities. Policy 1-3.2.1: Future Land Use Map and Related Policies. The Future Land Use Map and related policies identified in section 1-2 "Future Land Use Map," provide definitions of land use designations and qualitative standards which shall be applied in allocating future land uses. Policy 1-3.2.2: Land Development Regulations. The City's existing land development code governing zoning; subdivision; signage; landscaping and tree protection; and surface water management shall be revised as needed in order to: 1) effectively regulate future land use activities and natural resources identified on the Future Land Use Map; 2) adequately protect property rights; and 3) implement the goals, objectives, and policies stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan. The land development regulations shall continue to be applied to: a. Regulate the subdivision of land; b. Regulate the uses on land and in water consistent with this Element, ensure the compatibility of adjacent land uses, and provide for open space; c. Protect the environmentally sensitive lands designated in the Comprehensive Plan, especially wetlands which shall be identified based on presence of hydric soils including but not limited to: Chore, loamy fine sand, Pineda fine sand, Floridana sand, Malabar fine sand, Myakka fine sand depressional, Holopaw fine sand, Pompano fine sand, and Riviera fine sand. In addition, wetlands may be identified by wetland vegetative species as presented in Rule 17-4.022, FAC, or as may hereafter be amended. Additional lands, including areas Inc.. March 2019: d. Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and stormwater management. Additional lands may be Associates. Inc.. March 2019: e. Protect aquifer recharge functions and areas; f. Regulate signage; g. Ensure safe and convenient on-site and off-site traffic flow and vehicle parking needs; LAnar�erign?nnauabbns 9nc. ADOPTED April 22, 2009 I-54 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT h. Dedication, acquisition and development of future rights-of-way as identified in the programmed engineered master plan for the City's major thoroughfares; and L Provide that development orders and permits shall not be issued which result in a reduction of levels of services for impacted public facilities below the levels of service standards which shall be adopted by the City Council. Policy 1-3.2.3: Standards for Residential Density. Existing land development regulations shall be applied for purposes of implementing this Comprehensive Plan. Residential development standards shall be based on and be consistent with the densities indicated in the corresponding Policies. Policy 1-3.2.4: Non -Residential Development Standards. Land development regulations addressing the location and extent of non-residential land uses shall continue to be enforced in a manner with the Future Land Use Map and the policies and descriptions of types, sizes, and intensities of land uses contained in this Element. Policy 1-3.2.5: Performance Standards. The following performance standards incorporated in the land development code shall be updated and refined as needed to reflect best management principles and practices. This Lanar9enyn 9nnaualons 9nc, vuineraare to sea Levet rise ana penooic/seasonal tloodutg_Plan review shall be carred out by the Department of Growth Management and the City Engineer, using as needed other professionals with demonstrated expertise in the issue under review. a. Provide criteria for protecting wetlands; b. Establish open space requirements; d. Provide criteria for drainage and stormwater management; e. Incorporate criteria for requiring off-street parking and managing internal traffic circulation as well as access to and egress from the street system; f. Mandate availability of requisite services and infrastructure; g. Stipulate criteria for perimeter screening and buffering land uses and facilities which may otherwise adversely impact development of adjacent land use; h. Establish standards for erosion and sedimentation control; i. Address historically significant properties meriting protection. j. Require an assessment of the environmental impact of development during major site plan review and stipulate appropriate performance criteria in the Land Development Code. I-55 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOAL 1-4: RESOURCE PROTECTION. THE QTY SHALL SEEK TO MAINTAIN AND MANAGE THE QTY'S NATURAL AND MAN-MADE RESOURCES BY ESTABLISHING A PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT THAT IS HARMONIOUS WITH THE CITY S NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE. Objective 1-4.1: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD MITIGATION AND HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS. The land development regulations shall include administrative procedures which ensure that any development order approved by the City impacting population density within the coastal area is coordinated with the Indian River County Hurricane Evacuation Plan and applicable regional or State hurricane evacuation pians. Additionally, the City shall eliminate uses that are inconsistent with any interagency hazard mitigation report deemed appropriate by the City. The City shall consider the findings of the City of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By Kimley-Hom and Associates Inc March 2019 in updates to the Coastal High Hazard Mitigation and Hurricane Evacuation Plans. This objective shall be measured through implementation of the following policies. Policy 1-4.1.1: Interagency Hazard Mitigation Reports. Interagency hazard mitigation report shall mean the recommendations of a team of federal, state, regional, or local officials which address measures to reduce the potential for future flood losses and which is prepared in response to a Presidential Disaster Declaration. Policy 1-4.1.2: Coordinate Hazard Mitigation Reports with Development and Redevelopment. In the event that Sebastian is included in a Presidential Disaster Declaration, the City shall use the interagency hazard mitigation report as the basis for prohibiting redevelopment of uses which are inconsistent with the report recommendations. Additionally, the City shall use the interagency hazard mitigation report to prevent new uses which are inconsistent with the report recommendations from locating in the area included in the Presidential Disaster Declaration. Finally, should an interagency hazard mitigation report be issued for Sebastian, the City shall consider adopting a program for eliminating existing uses which are inconsistent with the report recommendations. Objective 1-4.2: PROTECTION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES. The City shall establish procedures for identification and protection of historic properties and structures within the City and to provide for protection of archaeological sites. Policy 1-4.2.1: Development Impacts. Beginning in January 2009, the City shall require development applicants to demonstrate measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of the proposed development on historic or archaeological site or structure identified in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. As a minimum, the plan shall identify precautions to be taken to prevent the following adverse impacts: • Destruction or alteration of all or part of such site; • Isolation from, or alteration of the surrounding environment; • Introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with a property or alter its setting; .LAn��engn 9nnavglom; 9nc. I-56 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT • Vegetation removal shall not be permitted on a historic or archaeological site unless the vegetation to be removed is a part of a duly authorized scientific excavation, or is a part of an approved development plan; • Transfer or sale of the site of significance without adequate conditions or restrictions regarding preservation, maintenance, use or re -use; and • Other forms of neglect resulting in resource deterioration. Policy 1-4.2.2: Programming for Archaeological and Historic Sites. The City shall coordinate with the State in developing programs for implementing City and State policies for identifying, preserving, and enhancing sites of historical and/or archaeological significance. Programs for identification, evaluation of relative significance, protection, preservation, and enhancement shall be promoted, utilizing available public resources at the local, State, and Federal level as well as available private sector resources. Objective 1-4.3: PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES. The city -shall maintain land development regulations which ensure that development and conservation activities shall protect natural resources as directed by the below stated policies. Implementation standards should be adopted By: Kimley-Hom and Associates. Inc.. March 2019. Policy 1-4.3.1: Managing Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The City shall maintain land development regulations that protect natural resources, such as, groundwater, surface water, floodplains, wildlife habitat, wetlands and other vegetative communities, from the impact of development. Additionally, the City will limit development in areas that have inadequate soils, topography or other constraints to protect public health and welfare. Wetland preservation shall be consistent with the requirements and regulations of the St. Johns River Water Management District, FDEP, and the Corps of Engineers. Policy 1-4.3.2: Natural Systems. The City shall maintain regulations for managing environmentally sensitive natural systems, including, but not limited to, the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River, Schumann Lake, Lake Hardee, Collier Creek, the Elkcam Waterway, and other environmentally sensitive resources Policy 1-4.3.3: Protect Habitats of Flora and Fauna Having Special Status. The habitat of rare, endangered, and threatened species of flora and fauna and others having special status as identified in the Conservation Element shall be protected. Policy 1-4.3.4: Aquifer Recharge. The City shall establish an aquifer recharge ordinance, which would provide incentives for developers to minimize irr,�anrinnc ciirfarrc in p6me recharge areac �ana�Tlesign 9nnaualans 9nc. I-57 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Objective 1-4.5: CONSIDER APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE LAND AND WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND ENERGY CONSERVATION CONCEPTS. The City of Sebastian shall continue to maintain land development regulations which incorporate concepts for managing land and water resources which are responsive to unique development and conservation issues identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1-4.5.1: Incorporate Innovative Techniques in the Land Development Regulations. The City's land development regulations shall continue to incorporate land and water resource management techniques, which have been demonstrated to be successful and cost effective in resolving development and conservation issues such as surface water management, soil erosion and sedimentation control, land clearing and excessive tree removal, loss of native plants and wildlife habitat, and conservation of March 2019. Policy 1-4.5.2: Use of Energy. Site planning standards shall be adopted which require and/or provide incentives to developers to incorporate energy conservation measures in site layout and design. Promote practices that ensure that each form of energy is used to do work for which it is best suited. Recognize the energy services provided by natural features of the environment including landscape, sun and wind, and promote site development and resource management that complements or substitutes for energy -intensive technologies. Policy 1-4.5.3: Energy Efficient Land Development. Land development regulations shall continue to promote energy efficient land development. Recognize the relative energy dependency of commercial and industrial land uses and consider energy dependency in any policy pertaining to new industry promotion strategies or policy concerning maintenance or expansion of existing industry or commerce. Encourage land use patterns that by location, scale; and design minimize long-term energy commitments to construction, operation, maintenance, and replacement. Encourage natural resource conservation and utilization in ways that are consistent with sound energy management principles. Policy 1-4.5.4: Coordination of Energy Management. The City shall participate in regional, State, or local initiatives directed at coordinating energy management within the public and private sectors. These tasks may include joint formulation of energy related decisions with concerned federal, state, regional, and County agencies as well as with concerned private entities. Such activities shall be directed toward maximizing awareness of energy related problems, issues, alternative techniques for resolving energy related problems and issues, and to identify future areas �an<//Jerign 9nnaugGans, 9nc. I-59 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-4.7.4: Administer Land Use Controls. Administer adopted land use controls, including the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, building regulations, housing code, traffic regulations, and regulations governing streets and sidewalks. Policy 1-4.7.5: Public Assistance. Provide continuing land use information and assistance to the public. Policy 1-4.7.6: Intergovernmental Coordination. Coordinate land development issues where applicable with other public agencies at all levels of government pursuant to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of this plan. Policy 1-4.7.7: Manage Current Developmental Impacts. Evaluate and manage impacts of proposed development pursuant to existing ordinances, including, but not limited to, public facilities, natural environment, and impact on stable residential neighborhoods. Policy 1-4.7.8: Urban Design and Community Appearance. Good principles of urban design shall be applied through site plan review procedures in order to enhance general community appearance as well as to preserve and enhance open space and landscape. This program shall assist in protecting major natural and man-made resources within the City, including such scenic natural resources as the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River, the Collier Creek natural drainage corridor, Schumann Lake, as well as developing residential neighborhoods and centers of commercial or institutional activity. Policy 1-4.7.9: Special Land Use Studies. In order to maintain land use policies responsive to changing conditions, problems, and issues, the City shall undertake special studies as needed to develop specific local strategies for resolving unanticipated land use problems and issues. Objective 1-4.8: CONTINUING EVALUATION OF LAND USE ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS. The City shall use the following policies as criteria in evaluating the effectiveness of the Land Use Element. Policy 1-4.8.1: Review the Impact of Change Indicators on Land Use Policy. Trends in the magnitude, distribution, and characteristics of population and land use shall serve as indicators of possible changes in land use needs. The policy implications of major trends in land use characteristics shall be evaluated on a continuing basis. Land use policy shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems andissues. Policy 1-4.8.2: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling, programming, budgeting and implementation of �mmed land lice aed in this Flemem shall he Lan�9esiyn 9nnouabbnr, 9nc. I-62 ADOPTED April 22, 2009 CITV OF SFRASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 4-1.3: PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. The City shall on a continuing basis assist in assuring implementation of existing State regulations imposing mandated standards for inspections, operation, and maintenance of on- site wastewater treatment systems. Policy 4-1.3.1: Use of On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems. The City's septic to sewer program is a critical component considering the location of existing septic tanks within environmentally sensitive areas and areas vulnerable to the impacts of flooding and sea level rise. Use of on-site wastewater treatment systems shall be limited to the following conditions: a. Existing septic tanks may remain in service until such time as centralized service is made available. b. Use of septic tank systems for new development shall be restricted to sites on which the Indian River County Public Health Unit renders a finding that the site and facility design is in compliance, with State and local regulations governing the same. c. New development shall be required to connect with the central sewer system. Pursuant to the standards established by Indian River County. Policy 4-1.3.2: Coordinate with the Indian River County Public Health Unit. The City's land development regulations shall require that all proposed development which impacts an existing septic tank or generates need for a new septic tank be required to provide evidence of approval by the Indian River County Public Health Unit prior to receiving a development order or permit from the City. Any such approval by the City shall be conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with Indian River County requirements for ongoing facility maintenance and operation. Policy 4-1.3.3: Conditions Governing Development Orders or Permits. Beginning in January 1, 1998, the City shall adopt amended land development regulations at the earliest date possible which include performance criteria stipulating that prior to the issuance of development orders or permits all development shall be found consistent with regulations of all federal, State, and local on-site wastewater treatment systems. The City's performance criteria shall also regulate the location, timing, and scale of development in order to ensure that new development is effectively served by wastewater services. The performance criteria shall discourage the proliferation of permanent package treatment plants. System reviews shall be coordinated with the State Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in order to promote best management practices and compliance with relevant State permitting procedures. Similarly, through application of the performance criteria the City shall discourage extensive use of septic tanks and wastewater drain fields on areas with characteristics or conditions unsuited for their adaptation. Policy 4-1.3.4: Compliance with On -Site Wastewater Treatment and Water Quality Regulations. By September 1990 the City shall adopt amended land development regulations which require that performance criteria be incorporated in order to regulate on-site wastewater treatment, including impacts on water quality. The performance criteria shall stipulate that all new or altered on-site wastewater treatment improvements shall be compliant with regulations of federal, State, and County agencies having jurisdiction. The performance criteria shall stipulate that the City shall not issue any permit for new or altered on-site wastewater treatment systems. Due to the area's vulnerability to sea level rise and flooding, the City's respective Ordinances should reflect the mitigation strategies that are outlined in the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., March 2019. Comprehensive Plan Coals, Objectives and Policies L?w CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES F.I.F,N[F.NT OBJECTIVE 4-2.1d: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY'S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN. The City has, through Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., prepared a Stormwater Management System Conceptual Master Plan (SWCMP). The SWCMP was developed to two factors: 1) the City has developed to the point where flooding potential is acute, and 2) public awareness and dissatisfaction with current drainage conditions. The basic finding of the SWCMP is that the Sebastian Highlands subdivision has severe drainage system deficiencies that, in the event of a severe storm, would cause major flooding of streets and homes as well as damage infrastructure. The City shall incorporate the stormwater management system improvements recommended in SWCMP into the Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement program through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 4-2.1d.1: Stormwater Management Plan Implementation Projects. The City shall work towards implementing over the next 10 years the following projects identified in the City's Stormwater Management Conceptual Master Plan: PROPOSED WORK PHASE Maintenance: Primary Maintenance: Secondary Maintenance: Back and Side Ditches Maintenance: Swales Capital Improvements: Perimeter Culverts Capital Improvements: Control Structures Capital Improvements: Stormwater Puma Stations Capital Improvements: Stormwater Park Capital Improvements: Interior Svstems North of CR 512 Capital Improvements: Interior Svstems South of CR 512 IOIAL EST. TOTAL COST EST. AVG YEARLY COST $750,000 $75,0001 $770,000 $77,00q $415,000 $41,50q $160,000 $16,0001 $2,843,0001 $284,3001 $900,0001 $90,000 $1,500,000 $150,000 $2,000,000 $200,0001 $10,800,0001 $1,080,000 $11,200,0001 $1,120,0001 $31,338,0001 $3,133,8001 Policy 4-2.1.1: Compliance with Capital Improvements Element. All major public facility projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvements Element of this plan, as may be hereinafter amended. Policy 4-2.1.2: Priority for Correcting Existing Deficiencies. In developing the annual schedule of capital improvement projects, the City shall assign highest priority to those projects required for purposes of correcting existing deficiencies. When developing the next Capital Improvements Plan and n_ rioritizinQ the exnenditure of public funds the Citv is encouraged to consider the recommendations of the Citv of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliencv Plan. Prepared Bv: Kimlev-Hom and Associates_ Inc.. March 2019, Policy 4-2.1.3: Existing Deficiencies Shall Not Be Increased by New Development. The City shall issue no development order for new development which would result in an increase in demand on deficient facilities prior to completion of improvements needed to bring the respective facility up to standard. The Citv is encouraeed to consider the mitigation data. information. and strategies contained in the Citv of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliencv Plan. Prepared Bv: Kimlev-Horn and Associates. Inc.. March 2019. The City shall include an adequate facilities requirement as part of the updated Land Development Code. The adequate facilities ordinance shall mandate that future applications for development shall include a written evaluation of the impact of the anticipated development on the levels of services for the water and wastewater systems, solid waste system, drainage, recreation, and the traffic circulation system. The latest point for determining whether public facilities shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development shall be prior to the issuance of a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of use. Prior to issuing such development order or permits, the City shall render a finding that the applicant has provided written assurance that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES F,IEMF.N'T development shall be served with each of the above cited facilities with a level of service at least equal to that level of service stipulated in Policy 4-1.1.1. The developers application shall include written assurances that any required improvements shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development (i.e., by the time a certificate of occupancy is granted by the City). The application process shall be consistent with requirements cited in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5.1. Policy 4-2.1.4: Coordinate with Indian River County Hazardous Waste Planning Efforts. The City shall offer assistance to Indian River County as the County assesses and plans for hazardous waste management in a manner consistent with the provisions of §403.7265, F.S. OBJECTIVE 4-2.2: MEETING PROJECTED PUBLIC FACILITY DEMANDS TO 2002. The City shall plan for projected public facility demands through the year 2002 by undertaking the following projects: a. Wastewater System Projects. b. Solid Waste Projects. c. Drainage Projects. d. Potable Water System. Policy 4-2.2.1: Coordinate with Capital Improvements Element. All public facility projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvements Element of this Plan. Policy 4-2.2.2: Public Facility Planning and Management Efficiency. In scheduling the location, timing and staging of public facility improvements, the City Council shall consult the Citv of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliencv Plan. Prepared Bv: Kimlev-Horn and Associates. Inc.. March 2019. The Citv Council shall also use the following criteria: a. Minimize disruption of services; c. Maintain service levels for all respective facilities. b. Prevent duplication of labor; and Policy 4-2.2.3: Additions of Public Facility Project Approvals. All required federal, State, and County permits shall be obtained before the City undertakes or authorizes contractors to undertake construction and/or operation of facilities. OBJECTIVE 4-2.3: MEETING PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR THE YEAR 2003 THROUGH YR 2010. The City shall meet projected public facility demands between 2003 and 20 IO by undertaking the following projects: a. Wastewater System Projects. b. Solid Waste Projects. c. Drainage Projects. d. Potable Water System. Policy 4-2.3.1: Scheduling Needed Capital Improvements. The City Council shall ensure that projects required to meet projected demands through the year 1996 shall be in the Capital Improvements Element of this plan in accordance with the requirements of §163.3177(3), F.S. GOAL 4-3: PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER DRAINAGE IN ORDER TO PROTECT AGAINST FLOOD CONDITIONS AND PREVENT DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS. OBJECTIVE 4-3.1: PROTECT NATURAL DRAINAGE FEATURES. By September 1998 the City shall adopt land development regulations protecting natural drainage features and ensuring that future development utilizes stormwater management systems consistent with criteria of DEP and SJRWMD as well as the improvements identified in City's Stormwater Management System Conceptual Master Plan (SWCMP). It is recommended to update the current Stormwater Master Plan to include a Citv-wide evaluation to improve the numerical model with the latest datasets as outlined in the Citv of Sebastian, Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies LJTV nF SFRASTUN CHAPTER 4: PUBIC FACH.TTTFS F ..MF.NT Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., March 2019. A detailed inventory of stormwater assets should be completed and the update of the model should include the development of a schema to increase the adaptive capacity for the City in the case of sea level rise and chronic flooding scenarios. As a minimum the regulations shall include the following: • Establish a coordination mechanism with the Sebastian River Water Control District (SRWCD) for controlling the flow of water through the SRWCD's radial gate dam in order to protect the natural drainage features in Sebastian; • Establish a buffer zone along all natural drainage features; • Maintain on-site drainage requirements to ensure that natural drainage features are not overloaded by runoff from adjacent properties (water quantity); • Prohibit direct discharge of untreated stormwater into natural drainage features (water quality); • Existing stormwater engineering, design and construction standards for on-site systems should be evaluated and amended as needed; • Existing standards for erosion and sediment controls should be evaluated and amended, if necessary; and • Periodic inspection of on-site systems shall be required to ensure continuance of system design and maintenance. Policy 4-3.1.1: Ensure that Urban Lands Provide Adequate Drainage and Protection from Flooding and Manage the Retention of Ground and Surface Water at Levels that Enhance Natural Storage Capacity of Watersheds and Promote Aquifer Recharge. Promote the ecological, biological, and hydrological role that surface waters play in sustaining recharge to aquifers and supporting surface vegetation. Manage the location design and intensity of urban development in order to foster continuance of natural hydrological processes, including preserving recharge areas, promoting on-site retention of surface waters and natural return of surface water into the soil, and channelling excess stormwater volume primarily via natural grassy swales. Require the integration of natural storage areas and natural drainage courses into water management plans for new development. The recognition of sea level rise and flooding risks should be taken into consideration and there should be the incorporation of the data sets and mitigation strategies that are outlined in the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., March 2019. Policy 4-3-1.2: Provide Adequate On -Site Retention and Ground Water Recharge while Directing the Surplus Run-off to Receiving Waterways in a Manner which Prevents Imbalance to their Ecosystems. Upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the City shall continue to enforce the level of service standards identified for retention/detention in Policy 4-1.1.1. By September 1990 the City of Sebastian shall adopt amended land development regulations which shall include land use controls, such as subdivision regulations, zoning, including site plan review and performance criteria as well as special erosion controls, landscape and flood management ordinances which shall assist in implementing stormwater management and water quality controls. The programs shall be continually updated based on improved knowledge of problems, issues, and best management practices. This includes the incorporation of the mitigation strategies that are outline in the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, hTc., March 2019. The impacts of future sea level rise and combined rain events may cause more flooding and level of service violations and water quality issues that rectuire best management practices to be devised. Given the hydrology of the area, the city shall develop a pollutant load model as recommended in the Coastal Resiliency Plan. There shall also be the consideration of hardening the pump -stations based on their criticahties. In FY 1992-93 the City shall commence the engineered stormwater management plan which shall provide recommended regulatory measures designed to protect and preserve water quality, retard runoff, and enhance percolation. By the end of 1994, the Stormwater Management Plan shall be implemented by adopting regulatory ordinances for implementing the Plan. In addition, by the end 1994 the City shall amend the capital Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT §5-1 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES. This section includes both conservation and coastal management goals, obiectives, and implementation policies This section was consolidated into one unified element to eliminate redundancies and increase usability and readability. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Conservation and Coastal Management Element pursuant to 163.3177. F.S. 163.3177(6)(g) and 163.3178, F.S. «a cnr 5.01-2(3), GOAL 5-1: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENTAFSTRICT DRITt OPMENT ACT4WTIES TI -4-4-T SAIOU-11) DAMAGE OR DESTROY C0 -48T -All- C AND PROICC-T HUMAN LIFE AAID L� ' PVNyl/] T;VDL`ATTTTTT C• il�r ADL`AC CiTD Ti�'T- TO ]SDESTRUCTION E STRUCTIO R N A TU4 A r I}jSt4STE'iIS FI,09DING AND STHE COASTAL COMMUNITY OF SEBASTIAN SHALL CONSERVE PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE CITY'S NATURAL COASTAL RESOURCES AND LIMIT PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN AREAS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION BY FLOOD RISK AND NATURAL DISASTERS IN ORDER TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND QUALITY OF NATURAL SYSTEMS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVE 5-L1: PROTECT COASTAL RESOURCES. WETLANDS, ESTUARY. LIVING MARINF, RESOURCES, FISHERIES. WILDLIFE, AND WILDLIFE HABITATS. Mr innv The City shall disturbance of seagrass beds wetlands habitats of endangered or threatened species The performance criteria shall Protect fisheries, wildlife and wildlife habitats from the adverse impacts of development by regulating the location "taking" of private property rights the City's land development regulations shall provide for flexible develo merit alternatives, including planned unit developments which shall mandate conservation of said resources while allowing more flexible development options on developable portions of the site R, 01, i i ^11 t^ •-•m^ • - a w the ....«.e.„,.«,..,.,.« ,._ .�.^ f , n.« .«_ «„i.^. Des,....«inn in r„«.... inn¢ The City shall maintain land development regulations including performance standards designed to protect, conserve, and enhance wetlands and other natural resources, including estuarine environmental quality, by: a. Preventing potentially adverse impacts of development and redevelopment on wetlands and estuaries; Maintaining or improving estuarine environmental quality by improving storm water management by commencing the storm water management plan identified in Policy 4-2.1.1. The plan shall provide a basis for adopting regulatory measures for enhancing estuarine water quality and shall identify capital improvements needed to improve the storm water management system. This would include a City-wide evaluation to update the numerical model with the latest datasets identified in the City of Sebastian Coastal Resiliency PlanPrepared By Kimlev Horn and Associates, Inc. March 2019 b. The regulatory measures recommended in the storm water management plan shall be incorporated in the land development regulations and the recommended capital improvements shall be incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan capital improvement schedule. c. Minimizing potential adverse impacts of development along the Indian River Lagoon, including estuarine resources such as living marine organisms, seagrass, coastal marsh, and mangroves together with adjacent environmentally sensitive transition areas; and June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT d. Regulating the impacts of development on wildlife habitats. These objectives shall be accomplished as herein below cited us well as through coordination with the st johns ns.o_ Water- u,�.,„, g t Pi SJRWMD and _ o FDEP.. and 4h -o.. h the Indian River Lagoon n SWIA4 b p� Y S`Tn'r This Obiective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies Policy 5-1.1.1: Development Restrictions in Wetlands, Lakes. and Estuarine Areas. The City shall enforce its wetland protection ordinance which shall restrict development within wetlands and shall require consideration of dedication of conservation easements by applicants for upland development who also own title to adjacent wetlands. By Deee—ocr 11, 1P1V, The City shall amend continue to reo_uire that its land development code to includes performance criteria which prohibits development of wetlands.1111�The Citv shall also wetlands from physical and hydrologic alterations as well as specifically direct incompatible land uses awayfrom wetlands. Wetlands shall be defined as set by 373.421 F.S. and 373.019(227) F S i^ R-H4e 9J ;-.00;-(;^9�C—. and shall be protected from physical or hydrologic alterations in order to maintain natural functions. Wetlands have the following functions: • Wetlands serve important natural biological functions, including food chain production; and general habitat; and nesting, spawning, rearing, and resting sites for aquatic or land species; • Wetlands a.re an integral part of natural drainage systems impacting sedimentation patterns, salinity distribution, flushing characteristics, current patterns, and other environmental characteristics; • Wetlands can be significant in shielding other areas from wave action, erosion, or storm damage; • Wetlands serve as valuable storage areas for storm water and flood waters; • Wetlands can be prime natural recharge areas; and • Wetlands provide natural water filtration processes which serve to purify water. No development shall be permitted in wetlands other than approved passive recreation open space restricted accessway. bird sanctuary, natural storm water retention/detention natural preserve or other similar approved use pursuant to the City's Flood Prone Land and Wetland Preservation Ordinance &20A -10.2(G), Land Develo ment Code. There should also be the protection and conservation of lakes and estuarine areas In order to protect lakes and estuarine areas, such as the Indian River Lagoon and the St Sebastian River, the City's land development regulations shall include performance criteria designed to regulate against land development activities which adversely impact water quality, contribute to shoreline erosion and sedimentation or otherwise threaten the long- term existence of lakes and estuarine areas The intent of the Re ug latory measures shall be to conserve the lakes and estuarine areas and protect these coastal resources from detrimental impacts of development 6uDaivision Urdmance and the Wetland Preservation Ordinance to provide for the dedication of conservation easements or reservations where the City finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect the value and function of a wetland. conduct a wetland delineation. A delineation of the upland wetland boundary shall be established based upon an on- site field survey by a professional biologist or registered engineer provided by the applicant and coordinated with the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and/or the US Army CM of Engineers (USACOE). Furthermore, the development shall through n June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT wetlands on the site. 1. Review Process. The City shall coordinate with the jurisdictional agencies for pumoses of renderin legal, equitable, and environmentally sensitive determinations of the development rights to be permitted on such wetlands and/or lands under the jurisdiction of the State or Federal government The developer of the parcel of environmentally sensitive land shall he responsible for obtaining permits or exemptions from the SJRWMD FDEP and USACOE F 8....:«, m I D I !japn'x U id from ' " ' ` Engineers, as may be appropriate prior to obtaining a development order or development plan review approval from the City. Regardless of permitting by Federal or State permitting agencies, the City shall reserve the right to determine the appropriate land use density/intensity, and special mitigation measures including but not limited to the construction of culverts or other means 2. Burden on the Applicant. The applicant shall bear the burden of proof in determining that development shall impacted, such determinations shall be based on physical and biological data obtained from specific site investigations by a biologist an engineer or by another professional competent iii producing data and analysis necessary to support impact assessments e W..iypr F« tie..« ml W I a is Afi • a r Il I a marginal wedands h >_ I Providing !'Al- , -mvensatefy presenv aFeas 4A.A.igh- f—piti-gaig ag@iP4 0 joss of viable wedand ysama ..«,i ..«I..: 1. C aR .a. BR y iic-iA Af 3. Compensatory mitigation may be permitted in cases of overriding public benefit where State agencies having appropriate jurisdiction approve the mitigation measures proposed by the developer.Any such development shall ensure continuance and maintenance of essentially natural conditions and functions Policy 5-1.1.5: Protect the Indian River Lagoon. B cr 31, 1 , The City shall adoptamexde continue to require land development regulations which include performance criteria mandating that the potential impacts of proposed shoreline development be analyzed as part of the process and prior to approval of a development permit or development order. The applicant shall bear the burden of demonstrating that potential adverse impacts on estuarine resources have been or shall be prevented. The review process for all proposed development that fronts on Indian River Drive shall involve all local, State, and regional entities with jurisdictional authority. hnpacts to be considered shall include the following but not be restricted to: • prevent estuarine pollution; • control surface water run off; • reduce exposure to natural hazards; June 2019 • protect living marine resources; • ensure adequate public access; and ensure adequate sites and standards for regulating water -dependent and water -related uses. CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 5-1.1.6: Protect Living Marine Resources, Coastal Marsh, Estuarine Water Quality, and Seagrass Beds. ,.,.,.... By Tbef 31, 1997 The City shall adept continue to Emuire land development regulations which include performance criteria which shall regulate against adverse impacts of development on seagrass beds and coastal marsh areas. Since these areas are sensitive to increased turbidity and other forms of pollution, water run-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regulated through effective water quality management criteria. Given the hydrology of the area it is encouraged that there be the development of a pollutant load model based off of the recommendations outlined in the City of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By Kimlev-Horn and Associates Inc.,March 2019 The land development regulations shall require that plans for development impacting marine resources be coordinated, with state and federal agencies having jurisdiction. The City's approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant receiving approval from other public agencies having jurisdiction. In order to protect the water quality of the Aquatic Preserve no new point source pollution shall be nermittM rn City snap require the tonowmg June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT gg a A A i. the OWS jtf�29f0fffl t9 -- gfti.o Wqj Rjy@f i SWIM. DEP 3A-&JDV/T4iI a. Surface water management systems shall he designed and constructed to retain or detain with filtration as a Off-site: 25 -year, 24-hour design storm On-site: 10-year24 hour design storm b. A vegetated and functional littoral zone shall be established as part of the surface water management system of lakes occurring on all property. Prior to construction of the surface water management system for anyhp ase of a protect the developer shall prepare a design and management plan for the wetland/littoral zone that will be developed as part of these systems The plan should: i. Include "ical cross sections of the surface water management system showing the average water elevation and the -3-foot contour (i.e., below average elevation) ii. _Specify how vegetation is to be established within this zone including the extent method bTe and timin of any planting to be provided: and iii. Provide a descrintion of anv management nrnrednrtc to hP fnn....—A :.. --A— vegetation and should be maintained permanently as part of the water management system As a minimum 10 square feet of vegetated littoral zone per linear foot of lake shoreline should be established as part of the surface water management system. c. Class II Waters (i.e., coastal waterbodies which currently do or have potential for supporting shellfish harvesting. That portion of the Indian River within the City's corporate limits has been classified by DEP as a Class II waterbodD shall be protected by incorporating the following provisions into the City's land development regulations• i. Dredging activities shall be limited to approved maintenance dredging and shall minimize adverse impacts on shellfish propagation or harvesting ii. Ensure good water quality by coordinating with the DEP and the SJR)VMD in monitoring the quality of storm water run-off and nil discharge processes where these agencies have jurisdiction criteria designed to ensure that new development provides effective and adequate storm water management improvements concurrent with the impacts of new development iii. Limit the use of Class II waters to water dependent activities that are not contrary to the public interest and satisfy a community need iv. Limit modification of grass beds only to those cases involving overriding public interest. v. Where modification of grass beds is permitted the City shall assure that (a) A determination of overriding public interest has been demonstrated prior to modification of grass beds. (b) Project run-off and nutrient introduction shall be controlled to prevent an increase in water turbidity. (c) Projects damaging grass beds during construction shall incorporate mitigative techniques which re-establish benthic conditions favorable to natural regeneration (Ll�-�'peGial_atte..nYion_c6an }w� t f' 1 t' 't �I ' ! 1 t�,�h (el h Il th ,7 1 t review process. The Citv shall coordinate closely with State and federal agencies during the June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT permitting processes to ensure that the intent of these policies is carried out Policy 5-1.1.7: Manage Impact of Coastal Development on Tidal Flushing and Circulation Patterns. Tidal flushing and circulation patterns generally shall not be altered by development activities. No development shall produce changes in the tidal flushing and circulation patterns unless the City and other public agencies having jurisdiction have granted requisite permits. No such permit shall be granted by the City unless all other agencies having jurisdiction have granted clearance and the applicant has submitted hydrographic information sufficient to clearly demonstrate that no adverse environmental impacts shall be occasioned by the proposed changes in tidal flushing and circulation patterns. Finally, no alteration in tidal flow shall be permitted which causes stagnation or siltation. Policy 5-1.1.8: Promote Propagation of Fish and Wildlife. The City shall incorporate criteria in the land development regulations which require consideration of the impact of development on submerged lands and other habitats for fish and wildlife. The criteria shall be implemented to ensure maintenance of essentially natural conditions in order to further the propagation of fish and, wildlife as well as public recreation opportunities. Policy 5-1.1.9: Protection of Manatee Habitats. The City shall promote protection of manatee habitats in a manner consistent with guidelines of the Marine Research Institute of the State Department of Environmental Protection For instance. the City shall comply with the following State Guidelines: • The City of Sebastian shall assist Indian River County, the Department of Environmental Protection, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other State and federal agencies in developing an area -specific manatee protection plan and marina siting plan in order to ensure long-range manatee and habitat protection • Permit applications for all boating facilities including single family docks and dry storage shall be evaluated in the context of cumulative impacts on Manatees and marine resources • Construction and expansion of multi -slip docking facilities and boat ramps shall be directed to locations where there is quick access to deep open water, where the associated increase in boat traffic will be outside the areas of high manatee concentration, and where wetlands supporting manatee habitat will not be disturbed The City shall assist DEP in distributing State publications and educational materials on coastal and marine resource conservation and manatees in particular, to boaters and assist the display of such materials • Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted with or without channel exemptions as appropriatein areas frequented by manatees. Enforcement of Weed zones should be improved. • The City shall assist DEP in protecting manatees from injury and disturbance resulting from aquatic commercial and recreational activities. Manatee food requirements shall be considered in n4all aquatic plant management activities where manatees may occur. • The City shall assist DEP in ensuring the protection of habitat of special significance to manatees Policy 5-1.1.10: Manage the Impacts of Development on Fisheries The City shall incoroorate procedures for coordinating with the Florida Gamernne and Freshwater Fish Commission and DEP as appropriate in reviewing the implications of development proposals including proposed subdivisions and site plan review petitions Such coordination shall be designed to assist in identifying potential adverse impacts of proposed development on marine habitats and fisheries The City shall inco1porate performance standards into land development regulations which are designed to preserve the water quality within the Indian River Lagoon and which protect marine grass beds coastal marshes, and mangroves in order to preserve marine habitats and fisheries June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 5-1.1.12: Protection of Living Marine Resources The City shall continue to renhave-adosted by "neeember- 4.1—WW land development regulations which require estuarine shoreline developments to avoid adverse impacts of development on seagrass beds and coastal marsh Since these areas are sensitive to increased turbidity and other forms of pollution, water runrtm-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regulated through effective water quality management criteria Plans for development impacting marine resources shall be coordinated with stake agencies having iurisdiction prior to the City granting plan approval and/or prior to release of any permit for construction. CoMnsatory mitigation may be permitted in cases of overriding public benefit where State agencies having appropriate iurisdiction approve the mitigation measures proposed by the developer. Any such development shall ensure continuance and maintenance of essentially natural conditions in order to further prWagation of fish and wildlife as well as public recreation opportunities OBJECTIVE 5-1.2: PROTECT NATIVE VEGETATION AND MARINE HABITATS. Begimpong in lappa 499 The City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to protect and retain maior vegetative communities and marine habitats arm �.vuc shall be used in managing and protecting the impacts of development on major vegetative communities and marine habitats. These regulations shall mandate restoration in order to compensate for unauthorized removal of vegetation and to enhance stabilization of fragile slopes and/or shorelines impacted by development p,D 1 " 1999 The City shall amend t omits adopted land development regulations by mandating any wetlands mitigation shall include minimum performance standards in order to enhance regeneration of viable wetlands and wetland vegetative communities Policy 5-1.2.2: Preservation of Native Plant Communities The City shall amend the adopted land development regulations to ensure compliance with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan (Policy IO 1.2.2) mandating that new development set aside as a minimum 25 percent of each native )ant commum as identified in the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Anal sis . Qopsemca The ordinance shall provide incentives for increased conservation of native plant communities determined by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to be "regionally rare or endangered.,, Such an incentive program ma include for instance an exchange which sets aside one 1 unit of "regionalLy "regionallyrare or endangered upland" in exchange for two units of common habitat Such "set asides" of habitat shall be preserved in a viable condition with intact canopy, understory, and ground cover. Pursuant to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council policy cited above the City may require payment of a fee in lieu of the above described mandatory "set aside" of habitat Such cash payment may be in the form of an impact fee in lieu of habitat preservation to be accumulated firom development for the purchase of upland habit preservation off-site rather than on-site. Other adjustments ma only be granted where campensatogy mitigation is provided through revegetation with native plant species compatible with existing plant communities Where payment of an impact fee in lieu of preservation is an allowable option the impact fee paid should be at least equivalent to: (the average assessed value of one acre of the particular habitat type under consideration within the County the development occurs in) (the number of acres of that habitat type the development was required to set aside but elected to contribute toward preservation off-site) Such impact fees shall be payable to the Citynn �or to commencement of development on-site June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 5-1.2.4: Removal of Trees Causing Safety Hazard The City shall amend its land development regulations to require that trees, such as Australian Pines which are prone to wind damage and blockage of evacuation routes be feasibility of imitating a similar program to remove any trees on public property which impose a critical 1=4 -threat -to evacuationroutes. OBJECTIVE 5-1.3: IMPROVE WATER OULAITY AND QUANTITY The Cith shall maintain land development regulations which address water quality and quantity through the implementation o1 the followingolp ides. Policy 5-1.3.1: Regulate Agricultural Activities to Preserve Water Quality. Land development regulations shall include stipulations requiringthat hat agricultural activities shall: a. Not be conducted adiacent to existing waterways and surface water management activities and shall comply with all applicable Wficies of DEP SJRWMD and other agencies having appropriate jurisdiction as well as State laws, including administrative rules governing the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Such activities shall not threaten the water quality of the Indian River Lagoon; b. Maintain natural drainage patterns: c. Promote the use of surface water supplies for irrigationpumoses; d. Prohibit the expansion of agricultural activities into wetland areas; and e. Use best management principles and practices in order to reduce pesticide and fertilizer run-off, prevent soil erosion, and preserve water quality. Policy 5-1.3.2: Regulate Wastewater Treatment Discharge to Preserve Water Quality. Land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance standards in order to protect waterquality: a. All new residential subdivisions excluding individual single-family houses in existing subdivisions as well as multiple family and non-residential development within the established service area of the major public wastewater system shall be required to connect to the Indian River County wastewater system pursuant to &20A -17.2(P) of the Land Development Code of the City of Sebastian In areas where developments cannot be connected to the public sewer, the development may be allowed to use septic tanks provided that the County Health Department approves and the developer agrees to install dry sewer lines in the development for connection at a later date The City Council may waive the requirement to install dry lines. Policy 5-1.3.3: Protect Deep and Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas The City has no Prime deep aquifer recharge areas which have been identified by the St Johns River Water Management District However, stipulations for protecting surficial aquifer recharge areas shall be incomorated into the City's land development regulations which require retention of open space for all development in order to: • Preserve the quality and quantity of water resources within the surficial aquifer, • Promote improved surface water management and Create natural or landscaped urban green space for enhanced community aesthetics and passive pedestrian activities. Policy 5-1.3.4: Deep Aquifer Water Conservation. In order to protect the quality and quantity of deep aquifer water resources, the City shall coordinate with the St John's River Water Management District and other applicable regulatory agencies in identifying the existence and location of free flowing deep aquifer wells_ and in requiring corrective measures including capping plugging or installing regulatory devices June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT which control the discharge of water from the deep aquifer pursuant to the St Johns River Water Management District policies. aeveiopment to coorainate with the St Johns River Water Management District in obtaining consumptive use permits. In order to comply with potable water conservation policies of the St Johns River Water Management District and achieve a reduction in the current rates of water consumption the land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance standards: a. Where reclaimed water is available potable water supplies may not be used to meet irrigation needs b. Require the use of water -saving plumbing fixtures on all new development c. In order to reduce demand for irrigation water (which in tum often places greater demand upon potable water sources) at len st-least thirty (301/o) percent of all landscaping material obtained fmm off-site sources for use on an site should be native plants. Further at least fifty (50%) percent of nil trees used in landscaping shall be native species in order to lessen water demand Policy 5-1.3.6: Emergency Conservation of Water Sources The City shall coordinate with the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) in implementing emergency water conservation measures based on the SJRWMD plans for management of the region's water resources protect potable water supply and quality by restricting land development within public water well cones of influence in order to avoid potential adverse impacts on potable water resources Nflfll!t"AK.10- - 6 RgmM+mM .wC I Mere o - o OBJECTIVE 5-1.4: PROTECT AIR OUALITY Beeirm`ne in r.........-. tone The City shall maintain land development regulations including performance standards which ensure that development meets or exceeds the minimum air quality standards established by the Florida De artment of Environmental Protection DEP and shall establish regulatory programs to prevent and/or minimize non -point sources of air pollution (note: the City has no point sources of air pollution). Policy 5-1.4.1: Combat Erosion and Generation of Dust Particles. Land development regulations shall incomorate performance standards which combat erosion and generation of fugitive dust particles The regulations shall require that measures be taken on building sites or cleared areas which assure that ex posed destabilized or other altered soil is expeditiously covered with an acceptable erosion control material Policy 5-1.4.2: Air Pollution and Land Use Regulations The City's adopted land development regulations including- adoote It soilerosion and`L-eAimen ion con s as we as nuisance a emen s s all corifmuetoo June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT protect against loss of air quality by maintaining land use controls which promote only activities compatible with existing land uses and natural systems and prohibit activities which generate air pollutants and other adverse impacts on the environmentally fragile coastal ecosystem OBJECTIVE 5-1.5: SHORELINE USES AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO SHORELINE, PROTECTING ESTUARINE SHORELINE AND CONSERVATION LAND RESOURCES The City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria ensuring implementation and enforcement of the Comprehensive Plan land use policies for prioritizing shoreline uses. This objeetiye shall be measufed 4bw w implementation of stir+ fAlOWifig ffliejeg. By 31-1-009 „ I - - - The City shall have land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to ensure that designated conservation land resources, are protected based on locally determined criteria which further the goals objectives and policies of the Genset,atien Conservation and Coastal Management Element This Obieetive shal�-W the tmelement"" - `'' "' ung n —hews—.—The City shall also have adopted land Policy 5-1.5.1: Criteria for Prioritizing Shoreline Uses and Public Shoreline Access. In reviewing applications for shoreline development first priority shall be directed to the following shoreline uses: a. Non- structural shoreline protection uses such as native shoreline revegetation programs; b. Approved water -dependent estuarine shoreline uses such as: pervious accessways and duly permitted dock facilities and commercial marinas. All such facilities shall satisfy all provisions of the City's land development code and obtain requisite permits from all environmental permitting agencies prior to obtaining City approval. Newly proposed marinas shall not be approved unless the applicant demonstrates that the manna site is consistent with the City's conservation and coastal management policies. Priority shall be directed to water dependent uses which are available for public use. These facilities shall demonstrate during site plan review compliance with performance standards stipulated in Policy 5- 1.2.1(2) in order to prevent adverse impacts to natural features. Second priority shall be directed toward water -related uses such as: a. Parking facilities for shoreline access; b. Residential structures which comply with the building code for structures within the State coastal building zone; and c. Recreational facilities which comply with applicable codes. The City of Sebastian has no beach or dune system, and therefore, shoreline protection policies apply only to the estuarine shoreline. Policy 5-1.5.2: Implementing Policies for Shoreline Land Uses. Land development regulations shall stipulate provisions implementing shoreline land use priorities, including criteria for regulating water -dependent and water - related shoreline land uses. The Ci shall have adopt i 1 1? ' - 9 10[ City � land development regulations which prohibit any development within the wetland estuarine shoreline other than water dependent native shoreline vegetation programs approved pervious or elevated accessways or other uses approved by the City pursuant to other City regulations shall be permitted No structures which constrict water circulation in the lagoon shall be permitted The regulations shall address the following: a. Protecting Living Coastal Marine Life. The City shall continue to enforce land development regulations which protect species with special status from the adverse impacts caused by development. All applicants proposing development activities along the estuarine shoreline or within submerged areas shall be required-t"ubmit a site-pla"ursuant-to-site plan -review regulations. Such site plan shall previde-- June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT sufficient information describing marine life potentially impacted by proposed fond uses as well as related construction activity. The plan shall stipulate 11SSUfanees that the proposed project shall not adversely impact marine life or water quality. For instance, water quality control techniques such as the use of weirs forpurposes of managing turbidity may be required by the City. In addition, the City shall require surveys of existing conditions, specifications of planned site improvements, and techniques to be used during construction as well as in operating and maintaining the land use in order to prevent damage to living marine organisms. b. Water -Related Uses in State Coastal Buildine Zone. All water -related uses shall be built on uplands landward of the floodway. Within the State coastal building zone all construction activities shall be predicated on plans compliant with applicable State and local building codes. Dredging and filling of wetlands or open water in order to accommodate water -related uses shall not be permitted unless the City approves such activity pursuant to provisions of the wetland protection ordinance, the storm water management ordinance, and all other relevant site plan review criteria. c. Estuarine Shoreline Structures/Water-Deaendent Uses. Within the wetland estuarine shoreline, no development other than water dependent native shoreline revegetation programs approved pervious or elevated accessways, and other uses approved by the City pursuant to the Storm Water Management and Flood Protection Ordinance shall be permitted. Hardening of the lagoon shoreline shall not be permitted unless the upland property is critically imperiled and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline. The design specifications of any shoreline hardening structure shall: i. Comply with best management principles and practices and be accomplished by use of the least environmentally damaging methods and designs possible; ii. Avoid n vertical slope which generates erosive tendencies, especially to adjacent unprotected shoreline properties. Pervious interlocking tile systems, filter mats, and similar stabilization methods shall be used in lieu of vertical walls whenever feasible; iii. Not be located waterward of the mean high-water line except when it is shown to be in the public interest; iv. City approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant receiving approval from other public agencies having jurisdiction; and v. Incorporate a program of shoreline vegetation or revegetation in order to build, enhance, and stabilize a natural shoreline. d. Land Use Restrictions in Submerged Lands and Wetlands. No non -water dependent uses shall be permitted on submerged lands or wetlands. Development on uplands adjacent to wetlands shall preserve a buffer known as the wetland transition area, as defined in the Storm Water Management and Flood Protection Ordinance. The specific boundary of a wetland transition area shall be established by field investigation. Similarly, no structures which constrict water circulation in the lagoon shall be permitted. e. Protection of Wetland Transition Areas. Transition areas shall be defined as the area separating wetland between wetlands and upland development or other land alteration activities. This area shall meet the minimum size requirements established by SJRWMD for wetland buffers. The purpose of the transition zone is to ensure the continuing function of respective wetland communities. The City shall retain the right to prohibit development within the wetland transition area the boundary of a wetland transition area shall be established by field investigation At a minimum the following uses shall be prohibited within the wetland transition areas: • All industrial uses; • Wastewater treatment facilities: • Animal feedlots: June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT f. Dock Facilities. Docks or marina improvements shall not be approved by the City until the applicant demonstrates compliance with all applicable federal and State laws and administrative rules, including §160.20.04(5), F.A.C.ygoveming Aquatic Preserves as well as applicable policies of regional agencies. No commercial marina facilities shall be permitted on the Sebastian River. The City shall require site plans for all docks and marinas. These plans must demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that the facilities shall not adversely impact natural marine resources, including, but not limited to, seagrasses, estuarine waters, manatees and other living marine organisms. The plans shall indicate: i. Location relative to all impacted natural marine resources. ii. Structural specifications. iii. Description of all impacted natural marine resources, including their location and physical characteristics. iv. Multi -slip dock or marina facilities shall be located so as to prevent or minimize dredging and shall not disturb seagrass beds or adjacent wetlands. v. Availability and location of sewage pump -out facilities. vi. Hurricane contingency plans. vii. Mitigation techniques proposed to compensate for any potential environmental disruption. g. Estuarine Water- OualPty In or -ler to m'rvres A atk; Presen,e, no new r" pelltition shall be peFfnitted to diseharge into the lagoon or into ditehes or- eanals flowing into die-lageen-An _ hiit/_ hire«� addition, in or -der to reduee non point-setiFee pell-i—ts Lagoon Pim., L:w. 1Lir Lagoon Comprehensive e Ge a Managemen Dt... A�-,%Ald%i %1 KiZ11 rhe following: Siffface ivater management -systems shall be designed and eensn:aeted. te retain Rr detain with filn-7atiefl, as ff�fiftRUR13 the stofm Water fun off generated. &Rm the fi_n;* 0Be ineh of rainfall evpr the Pntire site. The stafra water design shall be predieated eia-the-follewing-: Off site; 25 year, 24 hats- design stere} 61n silt: 92 ysw, 21 hitur iltd ii Jeer. +ii A .,,abet :ate d d fu netional li 1 zene li l l b establioltakxpee s■C "t, the de veleper shall prepmra-design ozz? mu zgam _ p{_'n--y_p,� .1 ..«t plan F «A.,.....N..«A/1:e+,. 1 L will i- develr?;A &z -,&A .3L c :hese systems. The plan should! (a)lneludet�xpieal areas seetions of the surface watermanagement system showing the ffi,aragewater elevatie ., e (b)S 7 h vegetation is to be established idii this z_ -' __-t-d___the extent, -_ ' me tit 7P a ar.3 `-in2iag-6t. -i-idsWir vrA hailth of the 1.44 « 1 zene. The l:rt . l zone as established -a ..0 -- _ _ entirely of nativ vegetatien and should be maintained tly -li•- TWr 3f-fr1i ei/a�!lLert ;F%4e ::b""e- js'vna-ys-n mi—1p- - _e feet of haer-al zone per iii.The City shag ceardinate v4th ths St johns Water Management DistriGt in developing and adopting or-dinanee regulating installation of undeWound storage tanks for petfoleum pr-odurts. iv. The City shall eaenlinate with the St johns Watef Management Distriet in revie-Mng issues and ap ---- 0 a RiverLageQa4Pe i7vt wtrii iutriets-� June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT g. Shoreline Access. Shoreline access to the Indian River Lagoon shall be promoted in order to maintain accessways at approximately one-half mile intervals along the shoreline. State assistance shall be enlisted to achieve land required to appropriately store vehicles, provide rest room facilities, and accessways designed in a manner compatible with the shoreline ecosystem. The location of access points and related improvements shall be consistent with the City's Riverfront Study as enacted. The City has no beaches and, therefore, beach access policies of the State are not applicable; however, the City shall consider as part of the Riverfront Study ways to ensure public access and provide the necessary infrastructure to support waterfront activities. h. Si2naee alone the Indian River Lagoon. At the time land development regulations are amended in order to comply with the adopted comprehensive plans, the City shall consider restricting commercial signage along the Indian River, to only those signs deemed essential for water dependent facilities. The City shall coordinate, with jurisdictional agencies to develop uniform signage and criteria to further this policy. The City's sign regulations in the area east of the railroad tracks from the north City limit to the south City limit shall be consistent with the recommendations in City's Riverfrom Study as enacted. natural waterways, or the estuarine shoreline to submit as part of the development review process plans which demonstrate how the development shall incorporate feature designed to protect against potential adverse potentially adverse impacts shall be prevented or that coin enp satory mitigation shall occur. The City shall also have adee«^ i 1- ^ ^^ 1 21 1997 land development regulations which require all applicants pWosing development activities along the estuarine shoreline or within submerged areas to submit a site plan pursuant to site plan review regulations. Such site pian shall provide sufficient information describing marine life potentially impacted by proposed land uses as well as related construction activity. The plan shall stipulate assurances that the proposed protect shall not adversely impact marine life or water quality. - instanee, wateF:"4At±e9fM sis i ty. In addition the City shall require surveys of existing conditions specifications of planned site improvements and techniques to be used during construction as well as in operating and maintaining the land use in order to prevent damage to living marine organisms. vegetation shall be removed from the estuarine shoreline without a duly authorized City land clearing permit Similarly criteria shall be included in the land development regulations which require that applicants for development along the estuarine shoreline shall be required to revegetate stabilize and enhance damaged estuarine shorelines by planting native vegetation including mangrove and/or other native estuarine plant species which: i. Contribute to marine productivity and water quality; ii. Offer protection from erosion and flooding and iii. Contribute to the natural soil building process Hardening of the estuarine shoreline with rip -rap, bulkheads or other similar devices shall not be allowed unless erosion constitutes a critical peril to upland property and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline Such shoreline hardening structures shall generally not be vertical seawalls or bulkheads and shall comply with June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT development regulations shall incomorate the following performance criteriaog verning the location and design of such structures: • Comply with best management principles and practices and he accomplished by use of the least environmentally damaging methods and designsspo sible • Avoid a vertical slope which generates erosive tendencies es ecially to adjacent unprotected shoreline properties. Pervious interlocking Lile systems, filter mats. and similar stabilization methods shall be used in lieu of vertical walls whenever feasible: • Not be located waterward of the mean high-water line except when it is shown to be in the public interest • City approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant receiving approval from otherubn lic agencies having jurisdiction: and • Incorporate a program of shoreline vegetation or revegetation in order to build, enhance and stabilize a natural shoreline. In order to stabilize areas susceptible to shoreline erosion such as shorelines along canals and the Indian River Lagoon which are susceptible to erosion land development regulations shall require that all new develo meat preserve shoreline native vegetation and revegetate areas along shorelines demonstrating historically erosive tendencies. appropriate native estuarine plant species which: i. Contribute to marine productivity and water quality, ii. Offer protection from erosion and flooding and iii. Contribute to the natural soil building process shoreline of the St. Sebastian River with rip -rap bulkheads or other similar devices except where erosion constitutes a critical peril to upland property and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline Such shoreline hardening structures shall generally not be vertical seawalls or bulkheads The specific location and design of such structures shall: ii. Avoid n. vertical slope which generates erosive tendencies especially to adjacent unprotected shoreline properties Pervious interlocking tile systems, Filter mats and similar stabilization methods shall be used in lieu of vertical walls whenever feasible; iii. Not he located watenvmdofthe mean high -v wlineexcgptwhen itisshown tobeinthe public interest; iv. Approval conditioned upon receiving approval from other public agencies having iurisdiction• and v. Incorporate a program of shoreline vegetation or revegetation in order to build enhance and stabilize a natural shoreline. Policy 5-1.5.7: Designation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Pghe,e.. 6 1.8 a-7797,9 Ob - June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Map I-9 specifically includes areas reserved for conservation uses or restricted development Table I-1 in the land use element provides a tabular summary of existing and projected future use of natural and historical resources. This table includes areas reserved for conservation uses or restricted development Table I-1 footnote #1, incorporates a list of existing land development regulations thatrep sently regulate and shall in the future continue to regulate use of natural resources. All natural and historic resources identified in May 1-9 and Table I-1 shall either remain undeveloped or shall undergo "restricted development." "Restricted development" shall be regulated through performance criteria within the amended Land Development Regulations and through objectives and policies contained in the adopted Comprehensive Plan OBJECTIVE 5-1.6: LIMITING PUBLIC SUBSIDY OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL HIGH - HAZARD AREA Upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan the City shall limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high -hazard areas to restoration or enhancement of natural resources and public services for water dependent uses The City shall aim to minimize the impact of natural hazards such as flooding and sea level rise to the community by directing development away from the coastal high hazard areas as defined by State Statute U63.3178(2)(f), F.S. Policy 5-1.6.1: Public Investments in Coastal High -Hazard Area Public funded facilities shall not be built in the coastal high -hazard area unless the facility is for public access resource restoration adequate evacuation, or service to water dependent activities. These facilities may face inundation and be impacted if they are outdoor facilities based on data included in the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency PlanPrepared By Kimlev-Horn and Associates Inc., March 2019 OBJECTIVE 5-1.7: AVOID POPULATION CONCENTRATIONS IN COASTAL HIGH -HAZARD AREAS. Beg PAIMg la JhzfA&jrjr 199& The City shall restrict development and not increase densities or intensities beyond those depicted on the Future Land Use Map in Coastal High Hazard Areas (CHHA) in order to minimize danger to life and property occasional by hurricane events, flooding, or sea level rise. The City shall direct population concentrations away from CHHA. The CHHA shall be defined as those areas located within the Category I evacuation zone established in the Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. Policy 5-1.7.1: Restrict Development in Coastal High -Hazard Areas. The City shall incorporate appropriate policies in the land development regulations in order to direct population concentrations away from known or predicted coastal high hazard areas which are areas located within the category I evacuation zone established in The Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. Also, the City shall direct population concentrations away from known areas that are vulnerable to flooding inundation and sea level rise as established in the City of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By: Kimlev-Hom and Associates Inc March 2019. Development principles and strategies that eliminate unsafe development in the CHHA must be used as defined by& 163 3178(2)(t) F.S. The following provisions shall restrict development within the coastal high -hazard area: a. Water and sewer treatment plants, industrial holding ponds and other potential point pollution sources within the coastal high -hazard area are prohibited. b. Require construction within the hurricane flood zone to meet storm and flood proofing standards exceeding those required fora 100 -year storm. c. Residential development and/or redevelopment in the CHHA shall not exceed existing residential densities for that property. June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT d. Beach sand dune alteration shall be prohibited OBJECTIVE 5-1.8: MAINTENANCE OF FLOODPLAIN Beei,.,ing in jaauapL,nne. The City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to protect the natural functions, including flood- canning and flood storage capacity, of the 100 -year floodplain Policy 5-1.8.1: Enforce Policies to Maintain Floodplain The City shall continue to enforce its surface water management and flood damage prevention regulations §20A-10.2(11), Land Development Code of the Citv of Protection Ordinance shall maintain consistency with Program policies of the Federal Insurance Administration. The City shall monitor new cost-effective programs for minimizing flood damage_ Such Policy 5-1.8.2: Purchase of Floodplain. The City shall identify and recommend to the State and the St Johns River Water Management District purchase of floodplain that would comply with program guidelines established under the Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) Program or the Save Our Rivers (SOR) Program. OBJECTIVE 5-1.9: HURRICANE EVACUATION. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County in attaining a hurricane evacuation time of less than twelve (12) hours. There is the potential to put into place early warning notifications for elderly residents who are potentially more vulnerable as recommended in the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan Pre aced By Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc March 2019 Inundation caused by flooding and sea level rise is predicted to impact evacuation routes on Sebastian Boulevard and this vulnerabilli should be addressed to increase resilience. City of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliency Plan Pre aged By: Kimtev-Horn and Associates Inc March 2019 Policy 5-1.9.1: Hurricane Evacuation Logistical Support. In order to prevent unnecessary evacuees crowding roads and shelters, the City shall coordinate with Indian River County in disseminating information concerning the need of residents to evacuate at various hurricane threat levels, flood events, and sea level rise events. The City shall coordinate with the County and the Indian River County Emergency Management Director in assisting the implementation of the County's campaign to educate the general citizenry regarding emergency preparedness plans, including specific citizen directives. Policy 5-1.9.2: Future Coordination with the County in Emergency Preparedness. In order to provide for safe and efficient evacuation of the residents of the City of Sebastian and other communities in the event of a hurricane, the City shall continue to coordinate with Indian River County in annual updates of the County Peacetime Emergency Plan. This update shall enable the County and incorporated municipalities to plan for future population densities which will neither adversely impact the efficiency of the evacuation plan nor increase evacuation times. In order to ensure that future developments are consistent with the Peacetime Emergency Plan and amendments thereto, the City's laud development regulations shall mandate that new development maintain a density threshold which is consistent with the Peacetime Emergency Plan. This stipulation will assure that future density thresholds may be accommodated without adversely impacting hurricane evacuation time. The City shall also coordinate with the County in updating hurricane evacuation shelter assignments as well as other policy formulation surrounding June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT land use and emergency preparedness. OBJECTIVE 5-1.10: HAZARD MITIGATION AND COASTAL HIGH -HAZARD AREAS. Beginning i 3anua-.. y 194-, The City shall maintain land development regulations which contain performance standards regulating development activities in a manner which minimizes the danger to life and property occasioned by-huaieane natural hazard events including: 1. Storm and Floodproofmg Standard for Non-residential Structures. Non-residential construction within the coastal high hazard area shall meet storm and floodproofing standards exceeding those required for a one hundred (100) year storm. 2. Restrictions of Redevelopment. If a structure located within the high hazard area receive storm damage in excess of fifty (50) percent of its appraised value, all such damaged structures shall be required to meet all current laws and ordinances, including those enacted since construction of the subject structure. Policy 5-1.10.1: Coastal High -hazard Area Defined. The coastal high hazard area (CHHA) consists of the Category I evacuation zone established in the Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. The only areas within the City limits identified in the Category I evacuation zone are the City's mobile home parks. The City shall enforce development restrictions, identified in ".; Policv 5-1.7.1. within the CHHA and any area found to have historically experienced destruction or severe damage from storm driven, wind, water, or erosion. The City has identified the high velocity storm surge area as indicated on the Federal flood insurance rate maps as the only such area. Policy 5-1.10.2: Coordinate Update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City shall coordinate with the County in updating the hazard mitigation annex of the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan pursuant to the five (5) year interval schedule adopted by the County. Updates of the Plan shall identify specific actions that may be implemented to reduce exposure to natural hazards. The current Plan contains no inter -agency hazard mitigation component. The Comprehensive Plan shall incorporate interagency hazard mitigation reports as such reports are generated in the future. .10.3: Implementing General Hazard Mitigation. By n,.,.,....ue_ 2, ,nno The City shall adept iiii land development regulations which require that no development other than shoreline stabilization activities and water dependent recreation activities shall be allowed, within the coastal high hazard area. The only exception to this regulation shall be that existing mobile homes within the CHHA shall be grandfathered in, thereby may be repaired and/or replaced as long as the density does not increase. The performance criteria shall stipulate the need to reduce exposure of human life and property to natural hazards. Policy 5-1.10.4: Existing Infrastructure in the CHHA. The City shall establish b�-Jwraay IQ99 a priority list of infrastructure facilities located in the CHHA which could be relocated, mitigated or replaced should state funding become available for such activities. Additional infrastructure and assets are inventoried in the Citv of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared Bv: Kimlev-Horn and Associates. Inc.. March 2019. Annendix B. Asset -Threat Matrices. OBJECTIVE 5-1.11: POST -DISASTER REDEVELOPMENT. Bigim4ag in dvm,aurf IPP& The City shall continue to coordinate with the County in providing immediate response to pohu ieane post -disaster situations pursuant to policy directives cited below. Policy 5-1.11.1: Recovery Operations. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County in modifying the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan in order to establish compliance with this objective. The update of the Plan shall include strategies for post -disaster recovery operations. Policy 5-1.11.2: Post -Hurricane Assessments. By r,,,......ber 11, 1nno The City Council shall appoint a Recovery Task Force comprised of the City Manager, the Building Official and others as determined by the City Council. The Recovery Task Force shall be responsible for assessing the conditions following a hurricane or other similar disasters June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT such as flooding events and shall propose strategic actions necessary to establish order and re-establish communication and basic service delivery systems necessary for health, safety, and welfare. Within ninety (90) days after appointment of the Recovery Task Force, the Task Force shall meet to determine a management framework for resolving issues confronted in times of a natural disaster. The management framework shall be reviewed with the County Civil Defense Officer for compliance with the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan and shall be presented to the City Council for review and approval. The management plan should provide a basis for executing the following activities during times of natural disaster. a. Establishing a temporary moratorium on building activity; b. Reviewing and deciding upon emergency building permits; c. Coordinating with State and Federal officials to prepare disaster assistance applications; d Analyzing and recommending to the City Council hazard mitigation options, including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities; e. Developing a redevelopment plan including limitations on redevelopment in areas ofrepeated damage; and f. Recommending amendments to the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan and other appropriate policies and procedures. Policy 5-1.11.3: Repair and Clean-up. In planning post -disaster redevelopment activities, factors to be considered in order to protect the public health and safety shall include: a. Repairs to potable water, wastewater and power facilities; b. Removal of debris; c. Stabilization or removal of structures in a perilous condition; and d. Minimal repairs to make structures habitable. These considerations shall receive first priority in determining the appropriateness of emergency building permits. Long term redevelopment activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task Force has coordinated immediate repair and clean- up operations. Policy 5-1.11.4: Hazard Mitigation and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The Recovery Task Force shall propose any needed Comprehensive Plan amendments which reflect the recommendations contained in any inter- agency hazard mitigation reports or other reports prepared pursuant to §406, Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (PL 93- 288). Policy 5-1.11.5: Redevelopment Activities. I3 bin►irb :ai !Ayfa rf IN4, The LDRs shall require the redevelopment of any structure within the City that received storm -damage in excess of fifty (50%) percent of its appraised value to meet all current laws and ordinances, including those enacted since construction of the subject structure. The citv shall reauire that new develonment and redevelopment in areas that are at high risk of flooding to use best practices, strategies, and engineering solutions that may reduce risk and losses due to storms. flooding and sea level rise as defined by &163.3178(2)(fl. F.S. Policy 5-1.11.6: Establish Public Facilities Review Committee. By Deee. bei 31, 199& The City Council shall designate the Recovery Taskforce as the City's designated Public Facilities Review Committee charged with the responsibility for reviewing available alternatives for managing damaged public facilities following a hurricane event. The Committee shall evaluate future options for such facilities, including, but not limited to, abandonment repair in place, relocation, and reconstruction, with structural modifications. The Committee shall consider these options based on the following considerations: a. Cost to construct; b. Impacts on the environment; c. Cost to maintain; d. Public sector; e. Recurring damages; f. Impacts on land use, and g. Other relevant factors. June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 5-1.12: HISTORIC RESOURCES. The City shall assure that there shall be no loss of historic resources on City owned property and land development regulations shall assure that historic resources on private property shall be protected, preserved, or re -used in a manner sensitive to the historic properties of the site and/or structure. The City's Historic Resources are listed in Appendix B of the Housing Element. Policy 5-1.12.1: Promote Identification of the City's Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources. The City shall coordinate with the State Division of Historic Resources and the Sebastian River Historical Society in continuing to identify, protect, analyze, and explain the City's historical, archaeological, and cultural resources. Such efforts shall include determination of their worth and vulnerability, as well as determination of specific applicable preservation management policies. Policy 5-1.12.2: Performance Standards for Protecting Sites of Historic or Archaeological Significance. Land development regulations shall include precautions necessary to prevent the following adverse impacts to historic or archaeological sites of significance: a. Destruction or alteration of all or part of such site; b. Isolation from, or alteration of the surrounding environment; c. Introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with a property or alter its setting; d. Transfer or sale of the site of significance without adequate conditions or restrictions regarding preservation, maintenance, use, or re -use; e. Vegetation removal shall not be permitted on a historic or archeological site unless the vegetation to be removed is a part of a duly authorized scientific excavation, or is a part of an approved development plan; and f Other forms of neglect resulting in resource deterioration. Policy 5-1.12.3: Alternatives to Preserving Historic or Archaeological Sites. As an alternative to preserving historic or archaeological sites, the owner of impacted lands may allow excavation of the site by the Division of Historic Resources or another State approved entity prior to development. Should a site be scientifically excavated in this manner, development may proceed following completion of the scientific excavation by the approved entity. OBJECTIVE 5-1.13: PUBLIC SERVICES IN COASTAL AREA. The level of service standards, service areas, and proposed phasing stipulated in other elements of the Comprehensive Plan for facilities in the coastal area and additional standards under this objective shall be applied whenever development orders or permits are requested. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 5-1.13.1: Ensure Available Infrastructure and Coordinate Timing and Staging of Public Facilities with Private Development. By-4)eee ibsr 21, 1H.2, The City shall have adopted land development regulations which shall ensure that future development is directed only to those areas where public facilities which meet the City's adopted level of service standards are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. In order to assure appropriate timing and staging no occupancy permit shall be granted until infrastructure and services required by respective developments are in place and available for use concurrent with the impacts of development. The infrastructure shall be designed in a manner consistent with the existing and projected future demands generated by development projected in the future land use element. The infrastructure shall also be consistent with applicable local, regional and State coastal resource protection policies. OBJECTIVE 5-1.14: COMBAT SOIL EROSION. ;? . aaRaan1-998. The Citv shall maintain land development reeulations which include performance criteria desiened to reduce the incidence of soil erosion caused by land clearing. breaches in stabilized shorelines. and lands havine exposed soil without veeetative cover. June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 5-1.14.1: Implementing Erosion Control Land development regulations shall require that appropriate measures be taken during land clearing and building operations to assure that exposed destabilized or otherwise altered soil is expeditiously covered with an acceptable erosion control material These provisions shall be incorporated in the Subdivision and Tree and Landscape Ordinances IVIIINr KALJ A1NL iyiliNhKAL EXUAVA ZION ACHVIT1ES No mining activities including sand mining shall be permitted within the City since the City is characterized by natural systems which would potentially receive irretrievable losses from the impacts of such operations Policy 5-1.15.1: Prohibition Against Mining Activities. Land development regulations shall prohibit mining of minerals, except for existing sand mining operations based on the irretrievable losses which such intense activities may potentially impose on the City's fragile coastal ecosystem as documented in the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analysis. OBJECTIVE 5-1.16: HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT The City shall coordinate with hidian River County as well as appropriate State and regional agencies in deveto iinng effective plans for managing hazardous waste (Moto: No hazardous, waste pollutants or sites currently exist within the CW) Beginning in January 1998 the City shall maintain land development regulations which prohibit the following land uses and activities within wellfields and aquifer recharge areas as well as any area where it would adversely impact natural resources: a. Sanitary landfills: b. Animal feedlots: c. Incinerators d. Wastewater treatment facilities: e. Petroleum or Mficide storage facilities; f. Above -ground or below -ground pipes for pollutants or contaminants g. All other land uses that store, handle, or generate hazardous materials or wastes Hazardous materials or wastes, as regulated by this section shall consist of the following_ • Chapter 38F41 of the Florida Administrative Code (the Florida Substance List). •'Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 261 (Identification and Listing of Hazardous Wastes) • Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 302.4 (Table 302.4) (List of Hazardous Substances and Retortable Quantities). • Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 355 Appendix A and B (List of Extremely Hazardous Substances) Policy 5-1.16.1: Managing Hazardous Waste. The City shall continue to enforce land development regulations which incoMorate development restrictions directed toward preserving natural systems and accommodating only low intensity land use activities identified in the Land Use Element Therefore the Cit does not anticipate that hazardous waste shall threaten the City's natural resources Nevertheless the City shall continue to work with the County and appropriate State and regional agencies in developing an improved areawide solid waste management program which includes more innovative solid waste management technologies that save energy and/or produce renewable energy and effectively manage hazardous waste ------------ in order to manage coastal resources within the jurisdiction of more than one local government orubn lic agency and assist in implementing appropriate portions of existing multi jurisdictional resourceIn annin and June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT management pians addressing the coastal area including the Indian River Lagoon and other natural systems within the City. Also, establish an intergovernmental coordination mechanism in order to manage natural resources and assist in State, and federal agencies in managing coastal resources These policies shall also be applied in managing intergovemmental activities associated with protecting conserving and preserving natural resources within the City. Management activities shall include, but not be limited to the following_ a. The City shall coordinate the followingcoastal resource management issues with Indian River County i. Participate in County forums and technical review concerning emergency preparedness and hurricane evacuation issues anduodate of the Peacetime Emergency Plan including hurricane evacuation plans ii. Participate in technical review and in formulation of policies concerning the U.S. 1 C R 512 and Roseland Road (C.R. 505) corridors, including storm water management policies within these corridors This activity shall also be coordinated with the State DOT. iii. Public access issues shall be coordinated with Indian River County, including issues surrounding maintenance and improvements. iv. Issues surrounding conservation of the shorelines of the Indian River and St Sebastian River shall be coordinated with Indian River County, and the State DEP as appropriate V. The City shall coordinate resource management within the Indian River Lagoon with Indian River County. b. Maier issues to be coordinated with Indian River County in order to assure that all future development shall be timed and staged to assure that requisite infrastructure and services are available to respective developments concurrent with the impacts of the development c. Maior issues to be coordinated with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) as may be appropriate in managing the following, activities, which are occurring within the area that fronts on Indian River Drive excluding improved open space: i. The City shall coordinate nil development and resource conservation measures impacting the Aquatic Preserve with the DEP as well as other applicable public agencies. These activities shall include but not be limited to review of proposed development potentially impacting natural resources including development petitions for docks shoreline stabilization, dredging, or other alteration of natural resources under the State's jurisdiction ii. All applications for development activity impacting waters of the State as well as tidally influenced coastal marsh., or other lands under the iurisdiction of the State shall he coordinated with agencies having appropriate jurisdiction iii. The City shall coordinate with technicnl staff within DEP and SJRWMD in order to assure implementation of sound principles and practices of coastal resource management during the development review process as well as in the formulation of policies impacting coastal resource management iv. The City shall coordinate with the SJRWNID as well as other appropriate State agencies in matters surrounding storm water management drainage water quality and quantity, and consumptive use permitting. The City Growth Management Department shall coordinate with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) in preparing the Comprehensive Plan and amendments thereto in order to assure consistency with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Comprehensive Plan In addition the City shall coordinate other tannin� issues of regional significance with the TCRPC. The City shall forward copies of development proposals within the area that fronts on Indian River Drive to public agencies having jurisdiction in the management of potentially impacted natural resources. June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT the effectiveness of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element resources within the City. Policy implications of such changes shall be examined and corrective measures shall be pursued. Coastal management and conservation policies shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues. Policy 5-1.18.2: Schedule. Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling programming budgeting and implementation of programmed coastal management activities and conservation activities identified in this Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in carrying out a systematic program for implementing coastal management and conservation goals objectives and policies Policy 5-1.18.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and evaluating the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental coordination as well as coordination with private sector groups interested in coastal management and conservation policy and programs. The effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of coordination mechanisms in resolving coastal management and conservation problems and issues. conservation problems and issues and implementing corrective actions rfeviewn c ..1,..:, of polia #ltz i/L. 1, CA. V.2, and Pwseland Road inn 50151 rerridef 1 di li t a s r t IY\11aMt Thi' xqvity June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT i"nitlil mf ;m-:;aes shall be eaerdina ed- o.-r'1L I►ylamu i1ir� r✓a/rj, julwl and imp eventents. W. issais reuww?-ir, ; and State nnn as a__ fepri t_ tx1Y ► L1$ilvr. Ili'r�County; - tl,_ -- TheQt shall ^ reqpurep,mamge �-1116114%'IN. I�1l'IF l•, Va10tt\f/" NUjor issues .., 4e .,...,..''....ated- .4th Illdiro. 11rr�r Count), i,.«Aa« to assure that all F..t,.«,. A,.veI,--.v _n. ..1...11 a •:. �ed4o tl.at .. �narr-o�a,!!.✓� �/`yl ✓..b.,.. zo-aaai'a'e-alar-roquinasovrit�-a�_^•.reseture and se.^. r.^,e: 1/!/ V/7v%iA\J 1E-t8-{eSpee41ve deVeloPments eonetfffefft with the impaets of the development. Et 111mr, Ill'Fei alllt A/IVhI@mc kt/t in matiaa/1►a �he folllewing aefivitie ..l,:al. are eeetiffing within t 4 F c I►�}1 liirrni ive, chfY$:zg :vaFrsved epenspaee i. The Cifj embi 1 ^t'^ 1- r imo.__._'U=1. the pr,12 g_.._11.4.,`.1:`. These aefivities shall iRelude, but not be limited toreview of pr-opese development vete .t.:l�avdfNl yz4u%/Iee, i-J1vo66m' r1 dcvclnninent pet t',. 1 for deeks, 1_.,.`lin stabilization dFedging, or othef alteFatieff F tiatural fesEm« a he State's ii. All1TjV:fW..: a«al, r othef lands under- 1, jwisdiefioft of the State shall beaeFdinatpd. b 7I'' 1wAc. • W.TheCity'Uliq I'GP oa4$ 0711WI'_ID in nrrle::e ,,,,,,,,,,, , ,,Yl.f.��.orr well as the f latioii of li es - t Y b �rr iv. Theshall e;a:. to ,,:. 111E CIIV IMI'elrvr. ll as other Sa � b mag p 6. The city "«1\1► k?IWV, rl Plwrr►rvrib Gouneil (T-CRPG) in pfepafing the Comprehensive Plan and ameadments thereto in Rrd-p,;: to assure- Regieftal Plafming couneil Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the City shall eoefdinate other plamiing issues E) egienrl esbvil=lr&N with theTG PC..Tfamvxd a tt,at, sill I►kWi W-.,3. Driveto ..1:Cf 11W/ A3 fYC.a.,;at:a tl,a WiflifiagemelA of ata an- -d natural FeSOWGOS. c OBTL'/`UNT 1.11: n0N1P.:.^:: 1N.a-fiV1 VJ1,rX^*o 'N OF CL\UXAL. PAI1JU. --ELEI%IENTv v it, dizail xi; tl the na atat T.ta «t EfWilwiments, Wement S Pohey5 1.11.1z RepWew the impaet of Changing Conditions on Coastal Ailanagement Polley and Conservage Poliey. The City shall meniter ineasti es shallt-%! Y4G%F/Np it" _ Sic blae�a relim�vred as needed -mi efder-ti f/tt►V!L flupa, si':e to e:el ging p.«eblp ; g and-isques June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Budget Implement 6 � in this Element shall be evidenee of the City's effeetiveness in rarfyifig out a systafflat4o pregfflin for- implefReatin eeastal mamgement a.eale el.:eet. .ve and li PoNq i 1.11.7- Coordinate with u.aa: afid Pr-ivate Seeters. 3xn i1 Yirrall.Y :rp.em-e..t:ulg evaluating the EI►N/CI. t4a"d ne :t,E..:......Ana nttall ile...,...t, the I-*'.Jll117Abiirt----- - ---- --`-- k----"'---Rt-..! _.,.,.d :.......... .... 'el as eRefdin i111� with privato seeter gfeups iRtefeste iN 116f%/G% pvl resolvingPrograms. The effeetiveness of this appreaeh shall be evaluated by the quooeqq Rf enArdifiation Moohafflisms in e9astal managementY Poliey 5 1.11.4: Aehieve Effeetive Resolution of Coastal Alanagement Goals, Objeetives and Polides. Th -e t.4TeetiveneSss ..r tl... ` ut,3Yi. Ddu%iiageiiiertt Lzf/' n,cnta! z'leme n', gl;All be a.. .ea 1.y the n• «tal IIIc a«t T_'_. ___—_________�.. .i. :.�.�:� u.�n✓cac F%aannanbpreeess F :ae«ti C...«g IIr/✓iV, Nckt�A eolise 5afian prablimNV 11fA IUrW� hmp� img4 calicos Ivic--mil'1 VI&9Hs, June 2019 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS This section includes two sub -sections that address the requirements as defined by State Statute including 6163.3177. F.S. by providing the data inventory and analysis supportive of goals, obJectives, policies, and implementation programs for both coastal manaeement and conservation. Appropriate cross-references to other Comprehensive Plan Elements are included in order to avoid the duplication of information. Identification of the Coastal Area. Pursuant to the requirements as defined by State Statute including 6163.3177. F.S., T of§n^s„ 12, the coastal area shall be defined as the area between U.S. I and the Indian River Lagoon, except where North Central Avenue intersects with U.S. 1, then the eastern edge of North Central Avenue shall constitute the western boundary of the City's coastal area. Map 5-1 delineates the coastal area of Sebastian. It should be noted that there are issues within the Conservation and Coastal Management Element that will be influenced by factors outside the designated coastal area. Traffic circulation, hurricane evacuation, and infrastructure issues are among those topics that will be discussed on a larger scale. The City has not designated any unincorporated areas adjacent to its borders as areas of specialconcern. Identification of Natural Resources. This section identifies and inventories air and water aualitv. floodnlains. valuable mineral deposits. soil erosion problems and endangered snecies. Description of Natural Resources. Rivers. bays. lakes. wetlands including estuarine marshes, and air including information on a_uality of resource available from and classified bv_ the Florida Deoartment of Environmental Protection. 5A: Coastal Management Existing Land Use and Shoreline Conflicts The Land Use Element includes a detailed inventory and analysis of existing and future land use needs within the City of Sebastian. Land Uses in the Coastal Area. The land uses along the Indian River Lagoon within Sebastian consist mainly of commercial land uses with several recreational and open space areas. The coastal area is approximately 65 acres is size. In additional to the commercial uses, there are several scattered residential uses located with the coastal area. Non-residential uses still maintain the largest share of uses within the coastal area. A more in-depth inventory and analysis of existing land uses within the City can be found in the Future Land Use Element. A. Water Dependent Uses. Rule §915.003(144), AC Florida Statute defines water dependent uses as activities that can be carried out only on, in, or adjacent to water areas because the use requires access to the water body. Within Sebastian, these activities include public and private marinas; fishing; boating; and active and passive recreation. The waterfront area is a vital economic activity area within the City. The ambiance of the City is perhaps rooted in this area. The City has a plan for the waterfront area (cross-reference Land Use Element). The City places a high value on the few water dependent facilities noted on Map 5-1 and looks forward to their continued use, maintenance, and enhancement over time. A number of water -dependent structures are located east of Indian River Drive as noted on Map 5-1, including three marinas, two piers, and two boat ramps. Several small privately -owned boat docks and piers line the littoral area but are not shown on the map, as they do not represent major water- dependent or related land uses. The marinas are located in an area that is suitable for marina activities. Along the Indian River Lagoon shoreline, the City has two major access points at the Municipal Pier (northernmost pier cited on Map 5-1) and at the Yacht Club and Boat (southernmost pier cited on Map 5-1). There are approximately thirty parking spaces at each facility. The waterfront area spans approximately 9,000 linear feet within the City limits. T„nP In10 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Map 5-1 Coastal Area of Sebastian B. Water Related Uses. o..,e nr c 003(:46) Florida Statute defines water related uses as activities which are not directly dependent upon access to a water body, but which provide goods and services that are directly associated with water -dependent or waterway uses. Water related uses include: boat storage, marine repair, retail boat and trailer sales, marine industrial (boat building, boat yards, hull work and painting, marine construction), tropical fish collection and sales, fish houses (wholesale and retail fish sales, processing, and packaging), commercial fishing support (trap storage, building and dipping), ship stores, bait and tackle stores, and dive shops. The City has no water related activities aside from the water dependent activities discussed herein. C. Land Use Conflicts. At this time there are few if any conflicts related to land use in the coastal area; however, this could change in the future. The City's Riverfront Committee has studied and created a plan for improving the riverfront, including preservation of strategic areas. The Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element s would govern any conflict that arose between land uses proposed in the Riverfront Plan and the environmentally sensitive portions of the coastal area. These two elements cite numerous objectives and policies designed to protect estuarine resources from the adverse impacts of development. These policies and performance standards shall be incorporated in the amended land development regulations in order to prevent potential conflict associated with development or redevelopment of marine related activity in the waterfront core area. Another conflict that exists is not a land use conflict, but rather a conflict between animal and man. Manatees are frequently found in portions of the Sebastian River and Indian River lagoon. These mammals are very slow and therefore cannot protect themselves from motorized watercraft. The Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies stipulates policies for protecting such marina life, including posting of signage warning boaters of potential presence of manatees and regulating speeds in areas where manatees are known to frequent as identified in Policy 6-1.7.5. D. Economic Base. The waterfront core area is a vital economic activity area within the City. The ambiance of the City is perhaps rooted in this area. The Riverfront Committee understood the role that the riverfront plays in Sebastian's economy. The Committee stated that in order for the City to retain the natural beauty of the area as well as increase the economic base, a mix of residential and commercial uses is necessary within the coastal area. This was the basis for the Riverfrom Plan. Natural Resources and Development Implications The City of Sebastian has guided development within the community to supply its residents with an acceptable level of supportive services. This fact, together with the City's numerous natural resources, provides the residents of Sebastian with a highly desirable natural setting with water oriented recreational amenities. The following section provides an inventory and analysis of the natural and man-made resources present throughout the City of Sebastian, and the impact future development will have on these resources. Those areas that are subject to coastal flooding are also addressed. The City has not identified other areas of special local concern "since the following analysis provides a comprehensive analysis of natural resources based on available information. Vegetative Communities and Marine Habitats with Dominant Species. Fisheries, and EndsnaereOl lbreateoed_. Rare or Species of &eci?t Concern. Sebastian contains four primary vegetative communities and one primary marine habitat. Wand waterways are also classified as a vegetative community, though not a primary one, due to its role as a habitat and feeding grounds for a variety of flora and fauna. The six vegetative communities indigenous to Sebastian and the Sebastian River Estuary are described below based upon data and information from the fSJRWMD). Map 5-2 delineates the generalized locations of these communities within the City. The specific boundaries of these communities can only be identified through on-site investigation in areas where a question arises concerning the environmental sensitivity of a T,,..Imo CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT parcel of land. This section provides a general description of these communities and the implications of development within them. The ^tion Ulnent ic9f c n, zi, i t E n r 4 defleteg the demiflant plant d anifna' speeies asseeiatsd "'"' each of theeammullittes—This section also denotes the dominant plant and animal species associated with each of the communities and analyzes the vegetative communities marine habitats, and endangered, threatened, or species of special concern within Sebastian A. Coastal Ridge Community. The Coastal Ridge Community is comprised of slash pine with an understory of palmetto and is found on the higher elevation areas of the City. The coastal ridge community lies within some of the most developed areas of Sebastian; hence, they exist in small dispersed clusters. This community is characterized by level to gently sloping, excessively drained and moderately well drained soils such as Astatula and St. Lucie which are sandy to a depth of eighty (80) inches or more. The coastal ridge community is characterized as good to excellent recharge potential for the surficial aquifer. Due to the importance of the surficial aquifer in providing potable water to the City, development in these areas should be limited or restricted to ensure the continued viability of this community. Finally, raccoons, opossums, the Florida mouse, various songbirds, hawks and Eastern diamondback rattlesnake are among the dominant wildlife species found in this community. The US 1 corridor is located entirely within the coastal ridge community. Most of the City's non- residential development, including commercial and industrial uses, is located within the US 1 corridor. Very little undeveloped land remains in this area. Land development regulations addressing open space and tree protection need to be enforced in order to preserve the remaining value and functions of the coastal ridge. As future populations further develop these areas into residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, these vegetative communities will be separated into smaller clusters as slash pine and palmetto land cover is removed. Alteration of the coastal ridge community's character is also likely to occur as vegetation more typically associated with residential developments, such as palm trees and shrubbery, are included in man-made landscaping of these areas. The coastal ridge communities lie within some of the most developed areas of Sebastian hence they exist in small dispersed clusters. As shown on the Existing Land Use Map in the Future Land Use Element residential commercial, and industrial land uses are located on the approximately 865 acres consisting of coastal ridges As future populations further develop these areas into residential commercial and industrial land uses these vegetative communities will be separated into smaller clusters as slash pine and palmetto land cover is removed. Alteration of the coastal ridge community's character is also likely to occur as vegetation more typically associated with residential developments such as palm trees and shrubbery, are included in man-made landscaping of these areas. Changes to the character of the community's vegetation and related -densities will likely induce species sensitive to environmental changes to seek more attractive, undisturbed habitats in areas outside Sebastian's corporate limits. Species favoring open terrain and urban settings are likely to commence refuge in transitional areas. However, no abnormal impacts on flora or fauna are expected to occur; only those impacts normally associated with an area experiencing further urbanization are anticipated for the Coastal Ridge Community. B. South Florida Flatwoods. The Flatwoods are found on nearly level land at lower elevations than the Coastal Ridge Community where water movement is gradual to the natural drainage ways. The flat topography and saw palmetto with intermittent pines are characteristic of this community. The soils are nearly level, deep, acid, sandy and poorly to somewhat poorly drained. Representative soils in this community are Myakka, Eau Gallie, and Immokalee. Due to the lower elevations (portions of this community are within the 100 -year flood plain), specific standards and regulations have been implemented to protect the residents from the effects of flooding. Raccoon, opossum, bobwhite quail, mourning doves, and the green anole are among the dominant wildlife species found in the Flatwoods This Community covers most of the City and is found in large clusters. The land use for those areas containing flatwoods in the coastal area is commercial. The Riverfrom Plan dictates the impact of future development on the South CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Florida Flatwoods community in the coastal area. The Riverfront Plan ensures the value and function of the community is preserved through land development regulations. The South Florida flatwoods community, as shown on Map 5-2 is the most represented vegetative community within the City of SebastianThis community_ presently remains in large undisturbed clusters and covers an area of approximately 6,282 acres Existing designated land use for those areas containing flatwoods is primarily residential (single family) Although much of the subject area is undeveloped, a large portion is already committed to residential development A large portion of Sebastian is part of a planned community and, hence has been subdivided into Jots The designated land use for those areas containing flatwoods is primarily residential (single family). Although much of the subject area is undeveloped, a large portion is already committed to residential development. A large portion of Sebastian is part of a planned community and, hence, has been subdivided into lots. Therefore, future residential development will replace much of this vegetative community's natural vegetation, separating it into smaller dispersed clusters. Since Sebastian will attract new residents and development, this vegetative community can be expected to decrease in density as new homes and associated landscaping and lawns alter its current character. Although sufficient vegetation will exist to support wildlife endemic to this community, some wildlife species can be expected to decrease in numbers as they move westward into Indian River County to avoid contact with man and to find more natural habitats. Conversely, as more open space is created to accommodate residential land use needs, wildlife species not common to flatwoods, but which prefer open terrain, may be attracted to these areas. Impacts to both flora and fauna of the flatwoods community, as described above, are expected to be typical for an undeveloped area undergoing urbanization. No abnormal impacts are expected to occur from future residential developments locating in flatwood domains. Map 5-2: Vegetative Communities C.Wetland Hardwood Hammock. This vegetative community is found in depressions or on lower elevations than the Flatwoods. The Wetland Hardwood Hammock is a wetland climax forest on poorly drained soil with a high-water table. The soils associated with this community are nearly level, somewhat poorly and poorly drained with loamy subsoil and sandy surfaces. Representative soils in this community are Myakka and Oldsmar. Live oak, cabbage palm, red maple, wax myrtle, and wild grape are among the dominant plant species found in this community. Grey squirrels, skunks, raccoons, the red -shouldered hawk, and the green tree frog are among the dominant animal species found in the Wetland Hardwood Hammock. Existing wetland hardwood hammock communities consist of densely vegetated, undisturbed natural areas. Since they lie within floodplains and do not contain soil characteristics favorable to development, the character and quality of these communities should continue to remain in their current natural state. No structures are presently constructed within this community, but future development may encroach into its fringes potentially reducing its present total area of approximately 417 acres. Wildlife indigenous to these wetland hardwood hammock communities will probably remain at existing population levels, with only minimal impacts placed on those creatures whose habitats are located on the fringe of the community. The City has a wetland protection ordinance, which has been useful in retaining wetlands. The Henderson Wetlands Protection Act of 1984 (State of Florida) protects wetlands designated as State waters. Permits must be obtained from the Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection (DEP) before development can occur within thesewetlandareas. D. Swamp Hardwoods. The Swamp Hardwood vegetative community is normally submerged or saturated for a portion of the year, and is characterized by a primarily deciduous canopy. Soils associated with this community are nearly level, very poorly drained, and are dark colored. Representative soils are Floridana and Holopaw. Dominant plant species found in this community are laurel oak, red maple, black gum, hackberry, swamp dogwo✓, 1aJ-:.,-G. -i LY:I .z..d climbing milkweed—1 mTh-.A/", r'—j Y :••J., F:leated — CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT woodpecker, horned owl, and barred owl are among the dominant animal species found in the Swamp Hardwood community. Urban development has encroached into some clusters of swamp hardwood in past years, and some areas that have been filled and covered are now indiscernible from their original natural vegetative state. A number of wetland pockets were once located in what now serves as the Sebastian'town green; but these also have been filled. Existing undisturbed wetland areas remain in the northern and southern sectors of the City. With the exception of wetlands associated with Schumann Lake, most wetlands lie in areas designated for residential (southern areas of Sebastian) or for industrial (northern areas) land uses. In addition to local controls over wetlands, prior to any activities in wetlands lying within jurisdictional waters of the State, a fill permit must be obtained from the DEP. SJRWMD maintains jurisdiction over other wetlands such as the Collier Creek swamp hardwoods area. No wetlands or swamp hardwood areas exist within the jurisdiction of the Federal government. Although 353 acres of land characteristic of swamp hardwoods have been identified, they are condensed into small -dispersed clusters containing sparse native vegetation indigenous to this community. Due to future development potential in the central sectors of the City, only small pockets of swamp hardwoods will probably continue to exist in the far southern and northern areas of Sebastian. The City of Sebastian would take appropriate measures to protect those swamp hardwoods found in these areas from development encroachment. E. The Indian River Lagoon. The Indian River Lagoon rests along the eastern border of Sebastian's northern sector. The Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge and spoil islands are found within this area as well. The Lagoon is possibly the most productive habitat within the City of Sebastian. As a whole, the Indian River Lagoon supports one of the richest and most productive aquatic faunas within the continental United States. This estuary has revealed a large variety of plants and animals, as well as a concentration of rare and endangered organisms, including mammals, birds, reptiles, fishes, and invertebrates that exist in several communities, such as: • Marine (Sea) grass beds • Deepwaterareas • Tidal flats • Saltmarsh grass • Oyster Bars The littoral vegetative community identified along Sebastian's shore includes seagrass beds. Locations of these beds are depicted on Map 5-2. Dominant wildlife endemic to seagrass beds include • Bird species: brown pelican, double crested cormorants, white ibis, gulls, and ducks; • Fish species: tarpon, Florida blenny, blunmose stingray, and sea catfish; • Invertebrates: Pink shrimp, stone crab, blue crab, spiny lobster, Southern quahog, clams and oysters; • Mammal species: manatee. In 1986, a segment of the estuary from Malabar to Vero Beach was designated an Aquatic Preserve by the State of Florida. A management plan was developed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to ensure continued viability of this sensitive environment. This plan addresses the management of the Indian River (Malabar to Vero Beach) located in Indian River and Brevard County, and presents the primary responsibilities and authorities delegated to DEP to successfully undertake this endeavor. As stipulated with the plan, "the main objective of the resource management plan in the aquatic preserve is to protect the resources of the aquatic preserves for the benefit of future generations." (Section 258.35, F.S.) According to the plan, management of the Preserve will primarily emphasize the "maintenance of the existing and essential natural conditions." (Aquatic Preserve Management Plan, 1986) These maintenance techniques will include: • Monitoring, protecting, and restoring plant communities and animal life, particularly endangered and threatened flora and fauna; • Conserving archaeological and historical sites; • ManaainvenerOaC mentofdevelo mentalongThePreserve'schoreling and within its waters: CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT • Coordinating with other State and Federal environmental agencies. The Indian River Lagoon is expected to remain in its current natural condition for some time since it is protected by State regulations from impacts from development on its shores, as well as from fill and dredge activities within its waters. Water quality within the Lagoon may also improve as State and local pollution control efforts prevent and reduce pollution levels entering its waters. The SJRWMD has designated the Indian River Lagoon as a SWIM project, which furthers the efforts by the State, County and City to improve water quality. F. Inland Open Water Areas. Those inland areas of Sebastian which are submerged during all of the year, with the exception of extreme dry periods, are classified as inland open water areas. Most of these areas are usually below the water table. Such areas include streams, lakes, ponds, canals, and waterways. Those areas of Sebastian classified as inland open waterways include Collier Creek, Schumann Lake, three unnamed lakes/ponds, Collier Waterway, and Elkcam Waterway. Inland open waterways should receive only minimal effects from future development. Although development will not encroach into the waterways, urban runoff from adjacent residential neighborhoods could possibly degrade their water quality. However, increases in pollution levels associated with runoff should be minimal, allowing the vegetation and wildlife now present therein to proliferate for years to come. No future development is planned for areas within inland open waterways. Coastal Floodplains. The National Flood Insurance Program which is administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency has determined that portions of the City of Sebastian are subject to flooding from a I00 year storm. Specific flood zone boundaries can be found on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Community Pane NambeF 120!23 0005 B r ised May " iron These maps are on file with the City of Sebastian Building Department. These maps provide flood zone designations and base flood elevations for the community. The maps also identify those areas subject to coastal flooding from wave action. Map 5-2 denotes the general areas within Sebastian that are subject to coastal flooding. as shown on the 100 Year Floodplain Ma p. a number of arterial and collector roadways cross through portions of me 100 -year floodplain. The largest commercial area within the City lies between U.S. Route 1 and the Indian River Lagoon in the northeast area of the City. The pmMsed future land use designation for this area is Riverfront Mixed Use, which allow a mix of commercial residential and office uses. This area will continue to be the commercial core of Sebastian. A. Location of Coastal Floodplains. Flood prone areas within Sebastian generally embrace most all wetlands located within the City. Wetlands are depicted on Map 6-1. . Map 5-2 delineates the 100 -year flood plain as well as the VE -Zone that is subject to the effects of storm surge, waves, erosion, or other manifestations of rapidly moving or storm driven water. The VE -Zone does not encroach landward of the City limits as denoted on Panel 0077E. The only structures located with the VE- Zone include water dependent marina moorings, piers, and boat ramp facilities within the Indian River. B. Development in the Floodplain. Development occurring within floodplain areas must include appropriate measures to preclude detrimental effects of floodwaters. A drainage system comprised of a network of canals, ditches, and natural waterways mitigates potential flooding problems for development currently located in areas affected by 100 -year floodplains. Special measures have had to be incorporated into roadway construction and development within these floodplain areas, primarily reflected in the consideration of on-site elevation above the flood level. Particularly in the southern area of the City, CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT development has had to provide additional drainage facilities to prevent new flood problems from arising or from exacerbating existing problems. The largest portion of the City's drainage facilities are situated in its southern section, where such facilities are needed the most. Increased development in flood prone areas will most likely involve filling of low areas and the construction of homes that meet the FEMA guidelines. Filling of wetlands should be avoided to ensure that the natural buffering and retention capabilities of these areas are preserved. C. Regulating Development in the Floodplains. The City's floodplain management program and storm water management regulations prohibit construction waterward of the high velocity storm surge area defined by the VE -Zone on the FEMA Maps, unless the DEP and other applicable agencies approve dredge and fill for activities such as water dependent activities. In addition, these ordinances require that development within the floodplain protect the functions and values of the floodplain as elaborated in the land use element. Performance criteria that mandate the post development conditions shall not increase the amount or rate of surface water runoff beyond pre -development conditions. The Conservation and Coastal Management Element 's Goals, Objectives, and Policies establish standards for preserving the value and natural functions of the floodplain, estuary, and associated flora and fauna. As the land development regulations are amended, the new code must implement these goals, objectives, and policies. New data and mitigation strategies should be incorporated and implemented as outlined in the Cily of Sebastian Coastal Resiliency Plan Prepared By: Kimley-Hom and Associates. Inc.. March 2019. SMifically. the Adaptation Action Plan which includes strategies actions and adaptations that can be implemented short and long term There should be the utilization and incorporation of the Coastal Resiliency Plan's flood and sea level rise data for future use and analysis including justifications of the accompanying goals. objectives, and policies. Coastal Wildlife Habitats. Within the City of Sebastian, a number of areas are used as habitats by certain species of fauna. Some species are highly specific regarding their nesting, breeding, and feeding grounds, while others are highly adaptive and able to exist in a variety of environments. Specific species of wildlife and their habitats are listed in Table 6 in the Conservation Sub -Section. Element. Map 5-2 denotes the respective habitats by vegetative community. While the wildlife thriving in and along the Indian River Lagoon and the Sebastian River primarily consist of aquatic -related animals and fish, the coastal ridge community contains dominant species that require drier habitats. However, some coastal ridge species may frequent the shores of the Lagoon to scavenge for food or prey. Further description of dominant wildlife species found within these coastal communities is provided in the Conservation Sub -Section. Element. As the City of Sebastian experiences more development, environmentally sensitive areas and specific wildlife habitats may be adversely affected. Care should be taken to assure the preservation of those areas that are critical to specific species survival. Living Marine Resources. The Indian River Lagoon supports one of the richest and most productive aquatic habitats within the continental United States. Marine grasses are generally found in shallow water areas of estuaries. The Indian River Lagoon has a significant amount of grass beds in the vicinity of Sebastian Manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme), Cuban shoal grass (Halodule wrightii), and widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima) are most prevalent. These species tend to form in distinct zones, with their location depending on water depth. These areas stabilize sediments; entrap silt; recycle nutrients; provide shelter, habitat, and substrate for animals and other plants; and are an important direct food source for a number of animals, including the endangered West Indian Manatee. Increased freshwater and storm water run-off as well as dredge and fill activities can cause increased turbidity, siltation, and subsequent degradation of these beds. Those species found in shallow areas are also subject to damage by boating activity. Protection of these grass beds should be promoted when addressing issues concerning the Indian River Lagoon. r,,„P 10 o CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Historic Resources and Development Implications OM The land use element identifies historically significant buildings within the City of Sebastian. Since the vast majority of the historical sites within Sebastian are located within the coastal area, it is important for the City to preserve these sites. Table 5-1 identifies the generalized location of these historically significant structures within the coastal area. The Sebastian Area Historical Society, Inc. has developed a publication entitled "A Historic Tour of the Sebastian Area." This publicationwillenhancethe public's knowledge ofthe City's historic resources, whichwill intumencourage the preservation ofthose sites as the coastal area develops. The Comprehensive Plan includes policies for protecting historic resources. These policies ensure that future development does not adversely impact thehistoric and archaeologicalsites identified herein orothersites, whichmaybeidentified inthe future. In addition, the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, located southeast of the City, has been listed in the National Historic Register as sites of prehistoric significance. Because this site is located in a National Wildlife refuge, it is protected to themaximum extent possible. TABLE 5-1: HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES IN THE COASTAL AREA LOCATION RESIDENTIAL SITES NON-RESIDENTIAL SITES Indian River Paul Stevenson House; L. F. Chesser House; George Sebastian City Marker; McCain Drive Nelson House; C. F. G. Kroegel House; Paul Kroegel Garage (Hurricane Harbor), House; Ruth Miller Rouhdtree House; Bob McCain Ocean Breeze Service Station, House; Charlie Beugnot House; Carrol Park House; Indian River Seafood Co.; Jesse Youngue House; David Peter Sembler & Sembler, Inc.; Gibson House; McDonald House; Ruffner House; W. May's Marina; C. Edwards House; Archie Smith House; George Archie Smith Wholesale Fish Welline House. US Highway 1 S. A. Park House; William Braddock House; Carlisle House; Dale Winbrow Log Cabin; M. M. Miller House; Parris Lawson House; Ardelia Cain -Wilson House; Stephen Vickers House; Cain House; Doc Sloan House; Wimbrow Residence; Longacre House; Okie Bland House; Thomas McPherson House. Main Street John Beugnot House, Washington Maurice Braddock House, Place Central Avenue Source: Sebastian Area Historical Society, Inc. 1997 Co.; Vickers Store; Walters Garage; Sebastian Town Hall; Sebastian Woman's Club; East Coast Lumber and Supply Co.; Letchworth Garage R.G. Hardee Oak Tree; Sebastian and Park Cemeteries CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Analysis of Estuarine Areas Pursuant to §n - 012(2- ", — ' , 4163.3177. F.S. this section will describe the existing conditions and future impacts development will have on the Indian River Lagoon. Aquatic Preserve. In January 1986, the State of Florida declared the Indian River Lagoon, from Malabar to Vero Beach, an Aquatic Preserve. The intent is to have areas with exceptional biological, aesthetic, or scientific value set aside as preserves or sanctuaries for the benefit of future generations. The Indian River Lagoon is an important home and nursery area for an extensive array of fish and wildlife, as well as an area for various recreational activities. The Aquatic Preserve borders portions ofthe City ofSebastian on the east. Water Quality. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has classified the estuary bordering Sebastian as Class II waters. Class II waters are defined as coastal water bodies which can or actually do support shellfish harvesting. Pollutants. DEP published a report in June 1986, which states that the principal water quality problem within the estuary ishighnutrientlevels. Theprincipalpollution sourceswereidentifiedassewagetreatment plants and urban run-off. Fresh water enters the Aquatic Preserve from streams and canals, which divert water from the St. Johns River Basin. Following is a list of known point sources of pollution with surface water outfalls as identified by the FDEP in their 1986 report: Site Name Reflections Sebastian Lakes Pelican Point Water Whispering Palms Treatment Plants Riverside Cypress Estates San Sebastian Grimes Industrial TVDe of Discharee Storm Water Storm Water Industrial Domestic Sewage Storm water Storm water Storm water Industrial Dischareed to: Indian River Lagoon Sebastian River Indian River Lagoon Indian River Lagoon Indian River Lagoon Sebastian River Sebastian River Sebastian River Note: The Whispering Treatment Plant is no longer a source of pollution as the plant has been deactivated, and the area is now served by central sanitary sewer. The non -point source pollutants introduced to the surface waters ofthe Sebastian area through urban run-off may have a number of detrimental effects to the natural systems of the City. Suspended solids increase the turbidity of the Lagoon and thus reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the seagrass beds. Elevated nutrient levels result in eutrophication of the estuary and decreased productivity of the system as a whole. In addition to the above-mentioned pollutants, heavy metals such as mercury, zinc and lead accumulate in the sediments of the receiving waters, thereby contaminating benthic organisms. bMcts of sea level rise and combined rain events may affect water quality and a pollutant load model may need to be developed as recommended in the City of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliency Plan Prepared By: Kimlev-Horn and Associates Inc.. March 2019. A. Improvements Related to Water Quality. The City of Sebastian has prepared an engineered Storm Water Management Plan. A key component of this plan is the creation of a retention area serve the middle portion of the City's storm water management needs. This retention area would redirect some of the storm water away from the Indian River Lagoon, thereby reducing the pollutants entering the Lagoon. In addition, the City, in an effort to remedy existing non -point source pollution problems, may require greater on-site retention of urban run-off the use of grass swales and natural vegetation to slow the sheet flow of this ran -off is recommended. Infiltration basins, which allow percolation of storm water into the sandy soils of the City, are another method of reducing the amount of non -point source pollution occurring within Sebastian. T,,.om o CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Indian River Lagoon. "& ^tated n the CoastalE - The Indian River Lagoon is considered an Aquatic Preserve from Malabar to Vero Beach The City of Sebastian borders this area of exceptional water quality. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has classified the estuary bordering the City of Sebastian as Class II waters Class II waters are defined as coastal water bodies which potentially can or actually do support shellfish harvesting_ Indian River County operates all centralized potable water and sanitary sewer service in Sebastian. Therefore, any of the existing wastewater treatment plants that were discharging into the Lagoon are now deactivated and not polluting the waters. As more septic tanks are connected to central sewer, the opportunity for pollutants from septic tanks to enter the Lagoon will be eliminated. Improvement of water quality in the Indian River Lagoon has been a cooperative effort between the City, the County SJRWMD the National Estuary Program the Indian River County Mosquito Control District, and the Natural Resource Conservation Service The SJRWMD's SWIM program has studied agricultural runoff and best management practices in the Sebastian area SJRWMD has also worked with quality. SWIM has provided funding for a septic tank survey and a seagrass mappingrroogram 2. St. Sebastian River. According to DEP's 1992 305(b) reportthe St Sebastian River has the poorest water quality in the southern half of the Indian River Lagoon The C-54 and Fells mere canals drain into the St Sebastian River contributing excess fresh water to the Indian River Lagoon Problems stem from agricultural runt throughout the watershed residential development in the south prong and wastewater discharges in the north prong, 3. Groundwater. The Soil Survey of Indian River County states that the surfrcial aquifer water is of good quality and is generally suitable for all purposes The removal of iron and color and reducing of hardness is generally desirable when surficial aquifer waters are used for domestic purposes A more detailed inventory of the surfrcial aquifer can be found in the Future Land Use Element and the Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element MAP 6-1 Estuarine Shoreline and Wetland Areas B. Regulations. The City adopted land development regulations in late 1992, which implemented the goals, objectives and policies found in this element. The City has attempted to eliminate negative impacts from development through the enforcement of land development regulations, including storm water management; landscaping; and treeprotection. C. Coordination with Other Entities. Improvement of water quality in the Indian River Lagoon has been a cooperative effort between the City, the County, SJRWMD, the National Estuary Program, the Indian River County Mosquito Control District, and the Natural Resource Conservation Service. The SJRWMD's SWIM program has studied agricultural runoff and best management practices in the Sebastian area. SJRWMD has also worked with Florida Department of Health, Indian River County Department of Environmental Health, the Marine Resources Council of East Central Florida, and the National Estuary Program to monitor surface water quality. SWIM has provided funding for a septic tank survey and a seagrass-mapping program. Table 5-2 identifies the existing State, regional and local regulatory agencies and programs used in matters of estuarine environmental quality. CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT TABLE 5-2: STATE, REGIONAL, & LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCIES & PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT/AGENCY PROGRAMS STATE I 1. Department of Environmental The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is responsible for Protection regulating air and water quality. DEP is the lead agency for implementation of the Aquatic Preserve Management Plan, and is associated with the aquatic preserve management program. The DEP is also the local contact for the initiation of dredge and fill applications in conjunction with the COE. 2. Department of Community Affairs. The Department of Community Affairs is responsible for reviewing Developments of Regional Impact (DRI) and for designating Areas of Critical State Concern /ACSC). 3. Florida Fish and Wildlife The FWC's office in Vero Beach along with the central office assists Conservation Commission (FWC) in developing fish and wildlife management programs for the aquatic preserve. This agency was formerly the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 4. Department of Transportation The DOT works with, the resident engineer on anticipated projects (DOT). having possible impacts on the aquatic preserve. 5. Department of State, Bureau of This agency has a close working relationship in any activities of Historic management Preservation policies needed for the protection of archaeological and historical sites. 6. Department of Health Both The central office staff and field personnel have established communication and coordination linkages. The locally conducted programs of septic tank regulation and mosquito control. REGIONAL 1.St John's River Water SJRWMD administers permitting programs for the local consumable Management District use of water and storm water discharge. In addition, it has primary (SJRWMD). responsibility for 2. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) T,m, ')mo regulating water quantity and quality impacts of proposed development. The agency is also responsible for permitting dredge and fill activities. The TCRPC functions include: • Assisting local governments in coordinating planning issues transcending the boundaries of local jurisdiction; • Managing evaluation ofdevelopments of regional impact; • Serving as a regional clearinghouse for State and federal programs; and CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Prepare regional plans and assist The State in carrying out services of regional and state concern LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS 1. Special Districts Districts include Sebastian River Water Control District, Inlet Taxing Districts, and Indian River Mosquito Control District These special taxing districts have been established to correct drainage, inlet maintenance and mosquito control problems. 2. Florida Inland Navigation FIND is responsible for providing and maintaining spoils islands as well District as being responsible for the dredging and maintenance of the Intracoastal (FIND). Waterway. Source: Solin and Associates, hic., 1998 Natural Disaster Planning Considerations §9 c 012(2)(e) This section addresses natural disaster planning considerations including: hurricane evacuation, post -disaster redevelopment, and implications for infrastructure within the high hazard area. Hurricane Vulnerability Zone. The hurricane vulnerability zone for the City of Sebastian has been identified as those areas requiring evacuation during the event of a 100 -year storm, or Category 3 hurricane. The areas requiring evacuation during such occurrences are the Indian River Lagoon shoreline; the 100 -year floodplains; mobile home residences; and areas receiving impacts from Category 3 hurricane storm -surge heights. Generally, areas experiencing Category 3 storm -surge impacts lie within the 100 -year floodplain. As shown in Map 5-3, areas within the City receiving storm -surge impacts during Category 3 storm events are within the 100 -year floodplain for either the Indian River or Sebastian River. The threats of sea level rise and flooding could also have potential negative impacts to public facilities. Development and redevelopment strategies should be used to reduce flood risk in these areas as defined in § 163.3178(2), F.S. Mitigation strategies such as defining existing street and structure flooding levels of service, are provided in the City of SebastianCoastal Resiliency PlanPrepared By_ Kimlev-Horn and Associates, Inc., March 2019. Hurricane Preparedness. The Regional Planning Council has done several hurricane preparedness and evacuation studies for the Treasure Coast area, including Sebastian. The last hurricane evacuation study update was done in 1994. A. Evacuation Areas and Population. Within Indian River County, those residents living on the barrier island as well as those living in mobile homes are required to evacuate during a Category 1 hurricane. All hurricane evacuation planning is coordinated with the Indian River County Emergency Management Office. Those residents within hurricane vulnerability areas will be evacuated at varying degrees beginning with Category 2. The estimated number of residents from the Sebastian area evacuating at each storm level is denoted below: Storm Event Evaenation Population Category 1: 2,884 (mobile home residents) Category 2: 5,854 T,,,,P')n l O CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Category 3: 6,501 Category 4: 7,150 Category 5: 10,026 B. Public Shelters. Experience has shown that not all residents who may be threatened evacuate their homes. Only a small percentage of those residents, who do evacuate their homes, utilize public shelter facilities. Many residents prefer to relocate at commercial hotels/motels, homes of friends or relatives, or at other private shelters. A small number will seek refuge at public shelters managed by either the American Red Cross or the Indian River County Emergency Management Service. Both these organizations estimate that approximately nineteen percent (19%) of the evacuees will take refuge at designated shelters. The primary evacuation shelters within or near Sebastian are Sebastian High School (2,000 spaces) and Pelican Island Elementary School (1,064 spaces). With 3,064 spaces, the local shelters adequately meet the needs of those seeking shelter. The numbers requiring public shelter for each storm level are shown in Table 5- 3. Although public shelters are dispersed throughout Indian River County, some County residents from other evacuation zones or from neighboring coastal Counties may choose to take refuge at Sebastian area shelters. However, their numbers are expected to be minimal. Therefore, an adequate amount of shelter space is available for Sebastian residents in the unfortunate event of a hurricane. TABLE 5-3: EVACUATION POPULATION USING PUBLIC SHELTERS BY STORM EVENT STORM EVACUEES POPULATION USING CATEGORY PUBLIC SHELTER I 1 2,884 2 15,854 3 16,501 4 17,150 5 110,026 SHELTER CAPACITY 1 548 3,604 11,112 3,604 11,235 3,604 11,359 13,604 11,905 13,604 Source: Solin and Associates, Inc., 1997 Map 5-4: Hurricane Vulnerability Zone REMAINING 3,056 12,492 12,369 2,245 1,699 C. Evacuation Routes. The evacuation routes out of the City of Sebastian include US 1 and CR 512. These two roadways also serve most of the northern half of the County. US 1 run north and south through the entire County and would be used by a number of residents to evacuate into other counties. CR 510 via the Wabasso Causeway would provide an evacuation route for the residents of the north barrier island. CR 510 connects with CR 512 west of Sebastian and CR 512 connects with I-95 a few miles west of the CR 510 intersection. Because the evacuation routes serving the City also serve the County, hurricane evacuation planning must be done on a countywide basis. Map 5-5 identifies designated evacuation routes. Constraints on Evacuation Routes. Constraints are likely to prevail on certain segments of U.S. 1 and C.R. 512 since they both traverse through areas subject to flooding from 100 to 500 -year storm waters. The segment of U.S. 1 just south of C.R. 512 north to Main Street lies within a 100 to 500 -year floodplain, while a quarter -mile length of C.R. 512 crosses the 100 -year floodplain associated with Collier Creek. The potential for road -surface flooding during heavy rainfall is greater along these road segments within Sebastian than along others. The road segments listed below may experience constraints from road surface flooding during storm events: i. US 1/CR 512 Intersection. This intersection lies within an area experiencing flooding during 100 -year storm occurrences. In addition, the intersection is situated on the western border of an area impacted by r,,,,P IM o CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT storm -surge from the Indian River Lagoon during Category 3 or worse hurricane. ii. Roseland Road, Near Sebastian Airport. A small portion of Roseland Road, as identified on the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Map, is impacted by 100 -year storm flooding as well as storm -surge occurring during a Category 5 hurricane. iii. Collier Creek Crossings. Both Roseland Road and C.R 512, the main evacuation routes for the City of Sebastian, both cross Collier Creek. Regular inspection of both bridges crossing the creek is imperative to ensure structural reliance. Should one of these bridges wash-out during a storm -event, as some bridges crossing canals did in other areas of the Treasure Coast during previous storm events, a safe evacuation of Sebastian and Indian River County residents could be placed into precarious situation. 2. Future Transportation Needs Related to Evacuation. The County has conducted several studies that determined that no specific roadway improvements are needed by 2020 to accommodate hurricane evacuation. One study with specific impacts on evacuation in the Sebastian area is the recently completed Wabasso Causeway Study. This study determined that north barrier island evacuation times would be acceptable at buildout without any major roadway improvements. The focus of that study was the causeway, and the analysis indicated that the causeway would not need improvement by 2020. D. Clearance Time. Clearance time is defined as the time required to clear the roadway of all vehicles evacuating in response to a hurricane or other severe weather event. Clearance time is determined by three factors: mobilization time, travel time, and delay time. Travel time and delay time are to a great extent dependent upon roadway characteristics. Mobilization time is dependent upon how much notification is provided and how prepared the citizens are to evacuate. According to the Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study, evacuation clearance times for Indian River County will vary based on storm levels and impacts associated with a hurricane. In case of a hurricane threat, Sebastian residents will be notified by radio and television broadcast systems, the mobile public-address system, and the anti -looting squad as to the appropriate time to evacuate their areas. Proper notification will allow sufficient time for Sebastian residents to evacuate the area. Map 5-5: Hurricane Evacuation Routes The study showed that the clearance time for Indian River County ranged from 5.5 hours for a summer season, rapid response during a Category 1 or 2 storm event to 10.5 hours for a late fall season, long response to a Category 3, 4 or 5 storm event. With a maximum estimated clearance time of 10.5 hours for worst case conditions in the most severe storm event, the County's clearance time is within the generally accepted standard of 12 hours. E. Special Needs Population. The evacuation plan provides highest priority to the movement of physically handicapped and individuals with special needs, which comprise approximately 250 persons Countywide. In addition, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council has indicated that 6.9% of the residents in Indian River County would need transportation assistance. The evacuation plan stipulates that school buses will serve as a transportation mode when and whereneeded. The Indian River County Emergency Management Department maintains a file ofthe physically handicapped and individuals with special needs. Special transportation has been arranged which includes vans and hydraulic lifts, ambulances, taxis, and private vehicles. Red Cross officials have designated special shelters. An emergency phone line is designated for their use through the emergency operations center. A local television station has arranged to carry disaster announcements directed to this special group and a post- disaster check will be conducted for this group according to policies cited in the evacuation plan. Post Disaster Redevelopment. The City of Sebastian Department of Growth Management has no records indicating that any structures in Sebastian have a history of receiving repeated damage during storm surge of flood conditions. Actually, no habitable structures are located in the VE -Zone. In order to effectively administer redevelopment activities subsequent to a major storm event, the City must develop an organizational framework in concert with Indian River County. The City of Sebastian should consider adopting strategic guidelines for post -disaster recovery operations. A Recovery Task Force should be created. This Task Force should be T,, r+ 1010 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT directed to prepare a management plan for assessing conditions following a hurricane or similar disaster, including strategic actions necessary to establish order and reestablish communication and basic service and delivery systems necessary for health, safety and welfare. The coastal management goals, objectives, and policies provide specific courses of action for accomplishing this objective. Identification of the Coastal High Hazard Area. The coastal high hazard area (CHHA) consists of the Category I evacuation zone established in the Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. The only areas within the City limits identified in the Category I evacuation zone are the City's mobile home parks. The City shall enforce development restrictions, identified in Policy 5-1.4.1, within the CHHA and any area found to have historically experienced destruction or severe damage from storm driven wind, water, or erosion. The City has identified the high velocity storm surge area as indicated on the Federal flood insurance rate maps as the only such area. The threats of sea level rise and flood events should also be taken into consideration in reward to development and redevelopment strategies used in these areas as defined in § 163.3178(2), F.S. Additional mitigation strategies are outlined in the City of Sebastian. Coastal Resiliency Plan Prepared By Kimley-Hom and Associates hie., March 2019 The restriction of development activities and limiting of public infrastructure expenditures within the CHHA and hazard prone areas should also be considered as defined in § 163.3178(1). F.S. A. Storm Surge Areas. As shown on the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Map, three areas within the City of Sebastian will receive effects from a high velocity storm -surge. Each area is discussed below. • The area generally east of Indian River Drive bordering the Indian River Lagoon is likely to be affected more than any other area in the City. During a Category 3 hurricane, storm -surge is projected to reach a height of 12.8 feet above sea level. This area has an elevation of eight to ten feet Existing land use in this area consists primarily of commercial and institutional uses. The proposed land use for this area is Riverfront Mixed Use. Two land pockets along Roseland Roadjust west of the Sebastian Airport may be affected by storm -surge during a Level 3 or worse hurricane. Both land areas are presently undeveloped. The Future Land Use Map designates an institutional use for both sites. Adjacent land to the portion of the Sebastian River which lies within the City's corporate limits will also be susceptible to effects of storm -surge during a Category 3 or worse hurricane. Uplands adjacent to this portion of the Sebastian River are part of the San Sebastian subdivision; a single family residential development the development has preserved the functions of the Sebastian River floodplain. The development is compliant with the City's drainage performance standards and wetlands have remained intact Existing Infrastructure in the Coastal High Hazard Area. No infrastructure exists within the coastal high hazard area (CHHA). The only structures within the CHHA in Sebastian are mobile homes. In addition, no structures are located within a portion of any floodway within the City. Additional infrastructure in the city that has been inventoried or identified as being at risk to seal level rise or flooding is recorded in the City of Sebastian Coastal Resiliency Plan Prepared By: Kimlev-Horn and Associates hie., March 2019 Appendix B Asset -Threat Matrices Development and Redevelopment in the Coastal Area. The City of Sebastian should apply performance standards in managing development or redevelopment within coastal areas. Performance standards are particularly vital in protecting the function and value of the one -hundred (100) year floodplain. The City enforces a comprehensive flood and storm water management ordinance, which has specific criteria for managing development within the 100 -year floodplain. Effective management of new development and redevelopment activities should prevent future loss of property and life. Future Considerations to Reduce or Maintain Hurricane Evacuation Times. The City of Sebastian can maintain current estimated evacuation times or reduce them in the future by considering the following: • Improve traffic circulation system according to level of service standards set forth in the Goals, Objectives, and Policies Document • Improve quality of traffic flow during severe storms or hurricane events by eliminating or alleviating aforementioned hazardous constraints. • Follow procedures set forth in the Indian River County Disaster Evacuation Plan. BmP 1010 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Indian River County Peacetime Emergency Plan: Disaster Evacuation Plan. This Plan sets forth the overall direction and control of disaster evacuation operations for Indian River County. The Evacuation Plan outlines the organization, concept or operations, responsibilities, warning, and alert system, and special transportation needs required to adequately prepare for a hurricane prior to its landfall. In the event a hurricane should strike Indian River County, an executive group comprised of the County Emergency Management Director, County Administrator, County Attorney, Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, County General Services Director, and the mayor of each incorporated municipality within the County, including the City of Sebastian. The City of Sebastian should continue to cooperate and work with the County when it updates and evaluates the County Disaster Evacuation Plan. Beach and Dune Systems an c� 2(2)(mim), There are no beach or dune systems present within the City of Sebastian. The undeveloped shoreline areas that are present shall be covered in the following section. Public Access Facilities rn c5�i This section provides an inventory of the public access facilities, as well as the capacity and need for future access areas. Public Access Facilities to the Indian River Lagoon. Map 5-1 shows water dependent uses along the Indian River shoreline. Table 5-4 summarizes the characteristics of water dependent activities in the Sebastian area. The Indian River shoreline is 9,000 feet within the City limits and includes two points of public access marked by the two City piers. Each access point can accommodate approximately thirty vehicles, respectively TABLE 5-4: MARINAS AND BOAT RAMPS IName Ownership Type of Facility Available Parking I. Dale Wimbrow Park County Boat Ramp 20 2. Main Street/Riverfront Park City Dock/Boat Ramp/Fishing Pier 40 3. Sebastian Yacht Club City Dock/Boat Ramp/Fishing Pier 20 4. Sebastian Inlet Marina Private Marina/Boat Ramp N/A 5. Oyster Point Resort Private Marina/Boat Ramp N/A 6. Mays Marina Private Marina N/A 7. Sembler & Sembler Private Marina N/A 8. Paradise Marina Private Marina N/A 9. Marker 68 Marina I Private Marina N/A Source: City of Sebastian, 1997 Public Access Facilities to the St. Sebastian River. The portion of the Sebastian River shoreline within the City is located in San Sebastian Springs, a privately developed single family residential community. However, as noted on the Recreation Resources map in the land use and recreation elements, public access points are provided at Wimbrow Park and McDonald Park, two riverfront parks owned and operated by Indian River County. Coastal Roads and Facilities Providing Scenic Overlooks. The location of Indian River Drive and adjacent bike path to the Indian River Lagoon provides scenic overlook opportunities for motorists and pedestrians along the shoreline as well as at the two piers noted on Map 5-1. In addition to this roadway, the Riverfront Park located at Main Street and Indian River Drive east of U.S. 1, has facilities adjacent to the Aquatic Preserve, which provide overlook opportunities. T",, om o CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The Pelican National Wildlife Refuge lies near the eastern border of the City. This area is administered by the Federal government and was established to protect the birds, many of which are endangered or threatened, which utilize this area. While only being accessible by boat, the Refuge gives the residents of Sebastian and surrounding areas a place to observe wildlife in its natural habitat. Existing Infrastructure in the Coastal Area §cmvm(.) r n This section provides the existing and future infrastructure needs for the City of Sebastian. No infrastructure is located in the high hazard area. Roadways, Bridges and Causeways. Two main roadways, Indian River Drive and US 1, service the coastal area of Sebastian. US 1 is a State arterial and Indian River Drive is a County collector. The remaining roadways are local. Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Facilities. The majority of the residents of Sebastian rely on septic tanks and private wells for sanitary sewer and potable water. The County's potable water and sanitary sewer treatment plants are located outside the City's limits. The only public facilities within the City are the County's water and sewer mains. Drainage System. The City of Sebastian presently relies on a network of swales, ditches, and canals for their drainage. Storm water is discharged into the Indian River Lagoon and the Sebastian River. The City prepared a storm water master plan, which will include a retention area to serve the middle portion of Sebastian. Shoreline Protection Structures. The City currently regulates against hard shoreline protection structures. Fiscal Impact of Future Infrastructure Needs and Improvements. A complete analysis of the future infrastructure needs and improvements can be found in the Capital Improvements Element. This Element provides a description of the fiscal impacts, phasing and projected needs for infrastructure within the City of Sebastian. CONSER47 A TION ELEMENT TATA TNITENTOR ANT T .A_c This seetion addresses the JaI2 1 and,,.0 §915 nl. a(l) . n n the r .. «r,e G,. effIeffient nrpfopfigip t3 s -r +•Prwnrac to the Land d i i ;z=4 n z- ldentifleation fNatural n Des infefMatisil ___ _ _— __Natural Rese—reas Rivers F rC f t[it Ii al rxo[cccrom 5B Conservation A. Air Ouality. The Florida Department of Environmental Protections (DEP) does not presently monitor air quality in the Sebastian area on a regular or periodic basis However, according to DEP's Division of Air Resource Management in the Central Florida District Office air quality in the Sebastian area is good to excellent. Reasons supporting excellent air quality include: I) the absence of major industries in the area (i.e., not point sources of air pollution) and 2) close proximity of the Atlantic Ocean and land and sea breezes tend to rapidly disperse automobile -generated pollution Major industrial centers in the Southern and Midwest United States occasionally affect air quality in the City during the winter months due to southern pollution drift combined with weather inversions However, these r,,,,A 1010 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT incidences are rare. Corridor pollution produced from traffic on U.S. 1 and C R 512 is minor and although traffic will increase as the population in the area increases federal controls on automobile pollutant emission rates should cause reductions in the gross amount of pollutants present Pollution generated from commercial and industrial developments within and adjacent to the City is not anticipated to adversely affect the air quality of Sebastian Fugitive dust particles from land cleared for development may be experienced by the community, and developers should be requested to quickly replant development areas followingclearing. earing. Considering all factors, no measurable decrease in the City's air quality is anticipated in the immediate or long-term future. r,,,P')m 0 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT SEEMS". WE ..._ B. Wetlands. The City of Sebastian has a number of wetland areas within its comorate limits The Land Use Element contains a wetlands map and a section which describes the value and function of wetlands. The Cit 's existing regulatory measure for preserving wetlands is described The Conservation and Coastal Mana eg ment Element cites additional approaches to regulate the wetlands including a more specific approach in identi_fyinn wetlands based on wetland vegetation and hydric soils T,,..')nl 0 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT pat4j,...t....tjin tha seu � rea of t Qt!, j-!, I.....i plA t... , w a _ "a past a ipm e t• • s to re vefA flood pfebleimF £ ^^- exaeorbating 0 Li The t F t n iv� drainage Commercially Valuable Mineral Deposits A review of the Florida Mining Atlas: A Guide to Mineral Resource Management from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (published 1982)revealed that there are no commercially valuable deposits of coquina dolomite phosphate clay, or peat present within the City of Sebastian No active or inactive mineral mining sites other than sand mining along the coastal ridge in the southeast portion of the City, have been identified within the City. Soil Erosion Problems. The City of Sebastian does not have any specific areas of soil erosion according to the Soil Conservation Service. Erosion potential can be mitigated by reducing the time interval between the clearing of land and actual development or construction Four general areas have been identified as potential soil erosion problem areas: A. Construction Areas. Manu areas are cleared of vegetation prior to construction During that interval constnictron sites are highly subiect to wind erosion Many times these intervals span several weeks or more before development takes place. B. Canal Areas. The banks of canals may erode causing sediment to build up within the canals and reducing the carrying capacity of the waterways This erosion is frequently caused by run-off from construction sites During construction the removal of vegetation from canal banks or at the waterline increases the amount of soil which may subsequently be washed into thewaterwax C. Gentle Slopes. The City of Sebastian has areas characterized by sandy soils and gentle slopes These areas are subiect to erosion during periods of heavy and/or frequent rainfall D. Indian River Lagoon Area Portions of the Indian River Lagoon shoreline which are disturbed or altered also have erosion potential. Runoff from the land combined with wind and wave action from the estuary transport a large quantity of soil from these areas in a very short period of time hmP 101 Q CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT ij--Inl9url-F�een Wn#t�Araa Tt- a .. ,.0 C t, t • t. ti, II r t � Lie glish Areas iflgludp. 1 I cr1y355 �ItFlS® 'N P.1 ofgalmst,m i god ;«I�+TaA+m"9jiorrvrar al t a n 11'gE n I c t r-..-nsorvrQ Thain, --n an waTPrtiwaus should reeeive t minimpi orr r _ n1 er<v�i "3etu+t11 not Priam lah a} I...« _.«,.rr rfam @4japent t 2r1i33&s--cocsi� t t aceradP thei xa �tPr mx�! t T e ,n..tien IP aff"a rr t t _ fulum ....41..« ,«I a Fisheries. Throughout the Aauatic Preserve there are a number of commercially and recreationally valuable species of fin and shellfish. Clams oysters crabs and shrimp are the major invertebrates that are commercially valuable in the area. Sea trout snook, pompano mullet and redfish are among the fmfish that are harvested both commercially and recreationally from the waters bordering the City of Sebastian Due to the expansive nature of the Indian River Lagoon it is veru difficult to determine exact values for the commercial and recreational catches of the above-mentioned species within the City. Endangered Species. Table 6-1 identifies those species which have been listed by either Federal State or local governments as being endangered threatened or as a species of special concern and are found within the City of Sebastian. This list is not all inclusive. Some of the s cies which are included in the list are found infrequently within the City but have ranges that do include Sebastian 7„nP ')nl Q SCIENTIFIC NAME Eretmochelvs imbricata imbricate Aphelocoma coerulescens coerulescens �Egretta cae' IEaretta rufescens Egretta tthula Egretta tncolor American alligator SSC Atlantic loggerhead turtle T rommon snook SSC Atlantic green turtle E �eatherback (=leathery) turtle E Pastern indigo snake T [Atlantic hawksbill turtle I E ,Gopher turtle SSC Atlantic ridlev turtle [ E Atlantic salt marsh snake T [Roseate spoonbill SSC lorida scrub 'a T (Little blue heron SSC (Reddish egret SSC �nowv egret SSC (Tricolored (=Louisiana) heron SSC T S/A T IE IE �T IE E T T ramv pctcgttuus tuuttrtus Kxrcac pereanne taicon I E I Falco sparverius paulus outheastem American kestrel T = Appendix I Species (CITES) lHaematopusally iatus lAmerican oystercatcher SSC — Appendix III Species [HaliaeetusleucoceEhalus aid ea le T T ITrns canadensis oratensis Florida sandhill crane T M cteria americanaWood stork E E Pandion haliaetus s re 1 SSC Pelecanus accidentalis Wown pelican I SSC Sterna antillarum keast t I T Sterna dougallii Poseate tern I T T Mammals Lutra c_ anade�� Iver otter II Podomvs flondanus lorida mouse SSC Ajaia aLala oleate spoonbill SSC E GFC = Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service CITES = Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora E = Endangered T = Threatened T(S/A) = Threatened/Similarity of Appearance SSC = Species of Special Concern I = Appendix I Species (CITES) lI — Appendix II Species (CITES) III — Appendix III Species (CITES T„nP')m o m E II II CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Existing and Potential Usage of Natural Resources This section provides a description of existing commercial recreational and conservation uses for the natural resources in the City of Sebastian. Known Pollution problems, includin hazardous wastes, are discussed as well as the potential for preservation conservation and utilization of available lands within the City. The Land Use Element includes a detailed evaluation of the existin and proiected future use of conservation resources. This section includes a statement of how development within areas having natural constraints to development shall be restricted based on existing land development regulations as well as proposed amendments to those regulations Existing Commercial, Recreational and Conservation Uses The following section describes the commercial recreational and conservation uses of the natural resources found in Sebastian A. Commercial Uses. The natural resources within Sebastian are used in two different ways: water dependent uses and commercial fishing. 1. Water -Dependent Uses. The City of Sebastian has approximately 198 acres of commercial land within its boundaries. A portion of this commercial land abuts the Indian River Lagoon the majority of which is used by mannas, restaurants, and their ancillary facilities the taking of shellfish is prohibited within that portion of Sebastian's jurisdiction located between the Indian River Lagoon main navigational channel and the mainland shoreline and the portion of the Indian River Lagoon located within the City's jurisdiction west of the navigational channel has been conditional approved by DEP for shellfishing. No area of the Lagoon within Sebastian has received unrestricted approval. Although commercial fishing is permitted in the Lagoon the shallow waters within the Sebastian area limit its extent. According to the Fisheries -Independent Monitoring Program Annual Report for 1995 the Indian River Lagoon was home to a number of different fish and shellfish species which are commercially or recreationally important. The predormnant shellfish was the stone crab (meninpe spp) and the predominant fish was the spot (ieiostomus xanthurus) Other fish and shellfish reported were sheepshead white trout ladvfish, tarpon, southern whiting striped mullet white mullet shrimp black dnim red drum and permit B. Recreational Uses. The Indian River Lagoon provides the most extensive resource-based recreational area within the City. Fishing, boating and other water -dependent recreation are available throughout the Aquatic Preserve. Marinas, piers, and boat ramps are located along the segment of the Lagoon abutting the City. C. Conservation Uses. Conservation uses are defined as activities within land areas desi ated for the Purpose of conserving or protecting natural resources or environmental quality. This includes areas designated for flood control, protection of quality or quantity of groundwater or surface water, floodnlain management fisheries management, or protection of vegetative communities or wildlife habitats 1. Conservation of Vegetative Communities Vegetative communities within the City's land area are protected to partthrough a tree protection ordinance By limiting removal of trees from development sites and through mandatory planting of trees on such sites the ordinance helps to conserve vegetative communities, particularly the pine flatwoods which dominate the greater portion of Sebastian's land area Vegetative communities rooted in floodplains and State waters are also protected by State environmental regulations and local development regulations The development regulations require a 50 percent reservation of open space for residential development and a 15 - 35 percent reservation of open space for nonresidential development. In addition, it is recommended that the City amend the tree protection ordinance to ensure compliance with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan #10.1.2.2 mandating that new development set aside as a minimum 25 percent of each native plant community which occurs on site 2. Conservation of Marine Communities. The seagrass vegetative community lies within the Indian River Lagoon where FDEP monitors their conditions Protects them from potential damage and restores dama_ag beds. Conservation efto`rts conducted by FDEP are—di—scussed in grea—deTajrn`t Indian River lagoon hinP 9l11 Q CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Aquatic Preserve Management Plan and the Indian River Lagoon SWIM plan )ue to shallow waters within the Sebastian area theme of seagrass beds lie near the surface making this .abitat susceptible to damage from motor boats both pleasure and commercial craft Although no studies ,ave been conducted on the impacts of water craft on the seagrass communities the local office of the )epartment of Environmental Protection has observed damage to the beds Any wildlife thriving in these :callow waters also are susceptible to harm from motor boats 3. Conservation of Marine Species. Manatees a large and docile mammal listed on both State and Federal endangered species lists, are susceptible to detrimental impacts from both loss of seagrass beds as well as water crafts. Threats to manatees from water craft may be reduced in areas along the Indian River where reduced speed limits are posted or where manatee habitats are identified and posted as such The Marine Research Institute of FDEP maintains records of those manatees known to be fatally injured by water craft Although figures are not available for the immediate lagoon area adjacent to Sebastianinformation for Indian River County is 7 manatee deaths occurring between 1974 and 1987 as a result of collisions with water craft. However, these figures do not reflect unidentified injuries or fatalities to the s ep cies Conservation of the Scrub Jay and Habitat. The Scmb Jay is a bird presently listed on the State's endangered or threatened species list. In the early 1 990's the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission has conducted an inventory of their habitats and population levels within the City of SebastianGeneral locations of their habitat and nesting areas include the area Just south of the airport and the Sebastian Highlands area Identification of their nesting areas has enabled the City County, and State to preserve some areas from future detrimental impacts of development along the west edge of the Sebastian River. In addition the State in conjunction with Indian River County has purchased the property within the St. Sebastian PUD and the AGC Industrial Park for the purposes of preserving scrub jay habitats as well as several other small tracts in the Sebastian Highlands area Known Pollution Problems. No ma or sources of air pollution have been identified within the City of Sebastian. In maior contributor of pollutants to the surface waters of the City and Indian River County. Utilization of more advanced treatment techniques and storm water management will assist in decreasing the detrimental effects of pollution on the natural systems of the City. Neither the City of Sebastian nor the Treasure Coast Regional Planning council have records available on hazardous waste generators within the City of Sebastian Although no generators have specifically been identified hazardous waste Potential for Preservation, Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources Preservation areas have been defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as those areas within the municipality having major ecological hydrological physiographic historical or socio-economic importance to the public at large These areas are already subject to various State regulatory programs The importance of these areas to the City has been discussed in Previous sections A continuance of present preservation programs and implementation of additional programs as needed is recommended to ensure the viability of these areas in the future Areas within the City of Sebastian included in this classification are: • Class II Waters Marine Grass beds Historical and Archaeological Sites • Wetlands Conservation areas have been defined by the Florida DEP as those lands and waters of the municipality havingcertain natural or institutional use limitations requiring special precautions prior to conversion to development Such precautions could entail extensive design and constructions criteria to protect the development from unsuitable landscape conditions Areas classified as conservation areas include the following: Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas and 100 Year Floodplains. T„nP')nj o CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Map 4-9 of the Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste Drainage Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element delineates those areas within the City of Sebastian which have been designated as having good to excellent recharge potential for the surficial aquifer by the Indian River County Soil Survey. With the exception of those areas identified as wetlands on Mao 6-1 all other areas within the City have moderate to good potential as recharge areas s wasnoted in the Sanitary Sewer. Solid Waste Drainage Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge dement, a large share of the residents of Sebastian are dependent upon the surficial Nuuifer for potable water. Areas with xcellent recharge potential should be conserved to ensure adequate supply of water for the future The use of permeable ,avements and more restrictive land use regulations may be utilized in these conservation areas to ensure the viability of pis resource. Development of the 100 -year floodplain must comply with design standards as they have been defined by the State and local eovemments before construction is approved in these areas As development continues and the amount of developable land decreases pressure to develop the environmentally sensitive lands within the City will increase. As such, the City of Sebastian may wish to implement measures to preserve conserve or protect the environmentally sensitive areas within the community for future generations Other areas having potential for conservation or protection include the following: 1. Sebastian River. The portion of the Sebastian River flowing within the City lies within an area which is presently designated for residential uses At the time such development occurs sufficient setback from the river will ensure protection of water quality as well as refuge for wildlife 2. Marine Seagrass Beds. Seagrass beds thriving along the Indian River Lagoon's edge at Sebastian provide habitat for a plethora of aquatic species, including the endangered manatee These areas are Protected as they lie within the AquaticPreserve 3. Vegetative Communities. Although a large portion of land within the City has already been Platted and committed to land uses, large undeveloped tracts of land are present on which exist undisturbed vegetative communities. Some of these areas have been designated for institutional land uses Primarily recreation in nature, on the current. proposed Future Land Use Map Park designs should consider the preservation of vegetative communities to provide habitat for wildlife as well as passive recreation alternatives for residents of Sebastian. A large tract of land surrounding the Sebastian Airoort has been designated for institutional land uses. Areas encompassing the golf course adjacent to the airport also contain undisturbed vegetative corn numties. Current and Projected Water Needs. This section Provides an inventory of the current and Projected water needs and sources to the year 2010. The protections will be based on present demands and estimated population Quality quantity existing conservation measures and policies concerning available sources will beanalvzed Existing Potable Water Sources. Potable water in the City of Sebastian is received from either Private on-site wells or from the County's water treatment plant Sebastian derives its potable water from one of two sources the surficial or deep aquifer. The surficial aquifer is recharged via rainfall percolation through the soils This source has relatively good quality water, but is highly susceptible to contamination from various land use practices such as chemical applications for agricultural purposes septic tank use and over pumpage resulting in saltwater intrusion. The deep or artesian aquifer, also known as the Floridan aquifer is recharged in eastern Osceola County and is less susceptible to contamination from land uses due to its slow eastward movement which removes and traps pollutants in the soils Once this water reaches the Sebastian area it has high chloride levels and an undesirable color and smell. Reverse osmosis is the method of choice in this area for treatment of waters from the Floridan aquifer. Existing Potable Water Demand. The hidian River County Evaluation and Appraisal Report: Potable Water Sub Element (Draft) states that the City of Sebastian has a per unit potable water demand of approximately 250 gallons per day. Table 6-2 provides a listing of the projected potable water demand based upon the population projections and the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub -Element To ensure the efficient and acceptable delivery of potable water services to the City of Sebastian continued coordination with Indian River County Utilities is recommended. r,, P )niq Source: Solin and Associates. Inc. 1999 Ouantitv of Available Water. According to the.SJglums River N141n r _ n` SJRWMD adequate ouantities of groundwater exist in both the Shallow and Floridan Aquifers to meet future water demands of the Citv of Sebastian as well as surrounding communities. Utilization of reverse osmosis water treatment systems will nrovide an unlimited amount of available water for residential. commercial. industrial and agricultural land uses. Potable water reauirine onlv aeration and disinfection, however. is limited in auantity_ . Wells within the Sebastian area nenetrate both aquifer systems. The Indian River Countv Water Master Plan provides information on the transmissivity and well vields for the Shallow and Floridian Aquifers underlving Indian River Countv. Hvdrologic orooerties of the Shallow Aquifer are relatively consistent in coastal areas of Indian River County. For the Shallow Aquifer, transmissivitv (i.e.. the measurement of water movement through geologic subsurface) ranges from approximately 20.000 to 50.000 gallons per day per foot. Wells drawing water from this aquifer tvnically vield between 200 and 1.100 _gallons ner minute (GPM). Wells penetrating the Floridian Aquifer generally exceed 1.000 GPM. Analvsis of Water Conservation, Use and Protection. The Citv of Sebastian narticinates in water conservation, use, and protection through programs and policies sunnorted by the P77tt lti A (SJRWMDI. Under Section 373.016. F.S._ the SJRWMD and all other water management districts are reauired to "promote conservation. development, and nroper utilization of surface and ground water." To accomplish this directive. the SJRWMD considers and establishes conservation in policv and rule development, public information programs, planning, and resource management and evaluation. Programs and nolicies of SJRWMD are enumerated below. Water Shortage Plan. Section 373.246. F.S., delegates powers to the SJRWMD Governing Board to declare and implement water shortage warnings water use restrictions. and water shortages. To aid the Board in the decision- makine process, the Water Management District develons a Water Shortage Plan with a nurnose to nrovide for essential water uses such as medical care and fire nrotection. for instance. The Citv_ of Sebastian is the nrimary enforcement agent of the Water Shortage Plan. G. Consumptive Use Rule. The consumptive use rule established in Chanter 40C-1. F.A.C., requires water consumption criteria to be based on the reasonable and beneficial use of water. A reasonable and beneficial use dictates: 11 The use ofwater in such auantity as is necessary for economic and efficient utilization -for a nur_oose and in a manner which is both reasonable and consistent with the public interest. " Conservation measures are also witnessed through the use of a consumptive use permitting process which enables the SJRWMD to review certain oronused and existing_ develo_nments for reasonable and beneficial use of water. H. Wastewater Reuse Program. The SJRWMD encourages the reuse of wastewater for irrigaation our_ ores as a measure to conserve water. Incentives to install and utilize wastewater reuse facilities is provided in the Water Management District'spermit ' proc s or wastewater treatment—facilities,— -- r,,,,P �m q CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT TABLE 6-2: EXISTING AND PROJECTED POTABLE WATER DEMAND YEAR POPULATION I UNITS GALLONS/UNIT/DAY AVERAGE DEMAND I (Gailons/Davl I 1998 15,115 I 5_,998 1250 1,499,504 2000 17,153 6}775 250 1,693,750 2005 20,798 8,278 250 2,069,500 2010 24,449 I 9,476 250 369 OW Source: Solin and Associates. Inc. 1999 Ouantitv of Available Water. According to the.SJglums River N141n r _ n` SJRWMD adequate ouantities of groundwater exist in both the Shallow and Floridan Aquifers to meet future water demands of the Citv of Sebastian as well as surrounding communities. Utilization of reverse osmosis water treatment systems will nrovide an unlimited amount of available water for residential. commercial. industrial and agricultural land uses. Potable water reauirine onlv aeration and disinfection, however. is limited in auantity_ . Wells within the Sebastian area nenetrate both aquifer systems. The Indian River Countv Water Master Plan provides information on the transmissivity and well vields for the Shallow and Floridian Aquifers underlving Indian River Countv. Hvdrologic orooerties of the Shallow Aquifer are relatively consistent in coastal areas of Indian River County. For the Shallow Aquifer, transmissivitv (i.e.. the measurement of water movement through geologic subsurface) ranges from approximately 20.000 to 50.000 gallons per day per foot. Wells drawing water from this aquifer tvnically vield between 200 and 1.100 _gallons ner minute (GPM). Wells penetrating the Floridian Aquifer generally exceed 1.000 GPM. Analvsis of Water Conservation, Use and Protection. The Citv of Sebastian narticinates in water conservation, use, and protection through programs and policies sunnorted by the P77tt lti A (SJRWMDI. Under Section 373.016. F.S._ the SJRWMD and all other water management districts are reauired to "promote conservation. development, and nroper utilization of surface and ground water." To accomplish this directive. the SJRWMD considers and establishes conservation in policv and rule development, public information programs, planning, and resource management and evaluation. Programs and nolicies of SJRWMD are enumerated below. Water Shortage Plan. Section 373.246. F.S., delegates powers to the SJRWMD Governing Board to declare and implement water shortage warnings water use restrictions. and water shortages. To aid the Board in the decision- makine process, the Water Management District develons a Water Shortage Plan with a nurnose to nrovide for essential water uses such as medical care and fire nrotection. for instance. The Citv_ of Sebastian is the nrimary enforcement agent of the Water Shortage Plan. G. Consumptive Use Rule. The consumptive use rule established in Chanter 40C-1. F.A.C., requires water consumption criteria to be based on the reasonable and beneficial use of water. A reasonable and beneficial use dictates: 11 The use ofwater in such auantity as is necessary for economic and efficient utilization -for a nur_oose and in a manner which is both reasonable and consistent with the public interest. " Conservation measures are also witnessed through the use of a consumptive use permitting process which enables the SJRWMD to review certain oronused and existing_ develo_nments for reasonable and beneficial use of water. H. Wastewater Reuse Program. The SJRWMD encourages the reuse of wastewater for irrigaation our_ ores as a measure to conserve water. Incentives to install and utilize wastewater reuse facilities is provided in the Water Management District'spermit ' proc s or wastewater treatment—facilities,— -- r,,,,P �m q CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT I. Abandoned Artesian Wells. Included among the SJRWMD's conservation efforts is a program targeted at plugging unattended free-flowing artesian wells This program attempts to identify abandoned wells seal them and restore them to their natural hydrologic condition J. Public Education. SJRWMD also promulgates information to the Public concerning water conservation Pamphlets, slide shows speeches and addresses made through media sources are a variety of ways in which the District educates and informs the public about waterconservation Either Indian River County Utilities or on-site wells provide water to residents of Sebastian In order to protect existing and future wellfield locations from possible future harmful impacts associated with development encroaching into these areas, the City of Sebastian should encourage Indian River County to establish a wellfield protection ordinance and program. At the present no such ordinance has been adopted Such a program will help ensure future populations of Sebastian safe quantities of Potable water within the surficial aquifer. Existing and _Projected Agricultural Water Demand According to the Future Land Use Element there are no agricultural land uses within the City of Sebastian No change in agricultural land uses is anticipated in the foreseeable future. Existing and Projected Industrial Water Demand. According to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub -Element, the existing and Proiected industrial demand for the North County area is and will continue to be 2,500 gallons per day (GPD) per gross acre This amount is equivalent to approximately ten (10) dwelling units per acre based on Indian River County estimates of water consumption by industrial land use activities in the North County area including the City of Sebastian Based on existing and projected industrial acreage of 50 and 140 acres respectively, the City's present and future industrial water demand will increase from 125,000 to 350,000 GPD by 2010 T,,,, 1010 On 11 SSBAST_" HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Accessory Structure Staff Report 1. Property Owner: Robert and Shirley Hatch 2. Contractor: Carolina Carports, hie. 3. Requested Action: Approval of an 18'X 30'(540 SF) Detached Carport 4. Project Location: 910 Greenbrier Avenue Lots 25 & 26, Block 318, Sebastian Highlands Unit 13 5. Current Zoning: RS -10 Current Land Use: Single-family Residence 6. Required Findings: Does Comply A. No accessory structure shall be constructed until the construction of the principal structure has been started. 1. House completed 1997 ; or house under construction 2. Accessory structure to be located on same lot as principal structure ; or located on second lot that has been combined with principal lot by a unitv of title L to Iry n F 'n rLe _ 119 B. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback): 1. Front yard: No detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is / located on the same real estate parcel or lot. Principal V structure setback is Qfo . I Accessory structure setback is 50' 2. Front yard on corner lot: Accessory structures may not be located in the secondary front yard of an improved corner lot unless the corner lot is joined in unity of title with an interior / lot that contains the principle structure. However, said V/ accessory structures shall not be located closer than 25 feet from the secondary front property line in the RS -10 zoning district, and in all other zoning districts shall meet required front yard setbacks. Secondary front yard setback is Q T ' . and proposed accessory structure front yard setback is SO Does Not Comply Does Does Not Comply Comply 3. Side yard: Required side setback is /0 Accessory structure side setback is 45" (50UT4 LIN t, 4. Rear yard: The required rear yard is o2O A detached accessory structure may encroach into the required rear yard, provided it meets all the following: a. It is a minimum 10 feet from the rear property line. Proposed accessory structure has a 9a' setback. wtsr L.INE-� b. It is not in an easement. Rear easement is CO and y proposed setback is 9 Z, c. It does not exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage. Proposed accessory structure is 5"q 0 square feet. d. It does not exceed 12 feet in height. Proposed accessory structure is 11. S''' feet in height. Accessory structures which are attached, or do not meet the / above four requirements must meet the standard rear setback ✓ which is 20, Proposed accessory setback is 9 z' C. No mobile home, travel trailer or any portion thereof, or motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. D. Applicant must expressly designate the type of the accessory structure (i.e. garage, shed, etc.) ngp-12 (.CTII I7�I S� uvTlTt: E. Must comply with all city codes. ✓ F. The height of accessory structure cannot exceed height of principal structure. House is approximately 19, accessory structure will be 11-:5- : G. Attached or detached Quonset -type or style accessory / structures are prohibited. H. A residential lot is allowed 5 square feet of accessory building area (cumulative) for every 100 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum 1000 square feet. Property square footage . Ll7 aeees = aO. `O;r x.05 = Allowable sq.ft. of accessory structures Qo2ysF� 100051c- Existing 0005EExisting accessory structures Proposed accessory structure SL4 5F Total existing and proposed 5-L40 5 F 2 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Any attached or detached accessory building, carport or breezeway over 500 square feet in area must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission utilizing the following criteria: Does Does Not Comply Comply A. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. B. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. 3: r a r�t2oPos C. Accessory structures 501 sq.ft. to 750 sq.ft. in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, roofing materials and pitch. D. Accessory structures 751 sq.ft. to 1000 sq.ft. in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways, as follows: 1 shrub for every 3 lineal feet and 24 N' inches in height at planting. Lineal dimension totals / _ 3 = Total Shrubs Required Review fee has been paid: YES NO Additional Considerations: Roof color will be "Quaker Gray" which will be very similar to the existing roof on the house. Trim may be requested to be painted black to match the residence. A permit for the auxiliary driveway has been previously approved and has been constructed (millings). The carport lot has been grubbed and partially cleared with an approved permit. With consideration of the remaining trees, the double lot is in compliance with landscaping requirements. \ /Urn2R.t Prepared by C Date MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LOTS 25 & 26, BLOCK 318, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 13, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 82 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. r FD. N/D O �� N 90'00'00 E 990'(P) 990.22'(M) ��_ L.$, #6077 Ln C L P.I. — — —�—ASP T PAVEMENT D. N/D 8g , FD 5/0" IR/C '" cu WATER METER.� WATER METER ®.` PLS 4029 W 80.00' N 9socr I N 90'00'00' E � I I Li o Z w J I I I N ) O 18 1 ry IW I Ig 1 1$ 1 I I WATER METER.� <— )71- 80.00' N 9socr �k 60.12' �Ld C �I o Z w P i� I N ) W>� \ d1 w N Ld N 2 LOT 26 BLK. 318 LOT 1 I w w 1 (OCCUPIED) (OCCUPIED) I > > C? QI HOUSE & IMPROVEMENTS NOT w a a I SHOWN, PER OWNER REQUEST S Into I --OIs' OVERHEAD WIRES 1 I (TYPICAL_) CERTIFIED TO. N ROBERT C. HATCH and SHIRLEY P. HATCH PROPERTY ADDRESS. 910 GREENBRIER AVE. SEBASTIAN, FL. 32958 :RT END SECTION 5J18- IR/C R25 oo• 6077 n D9Poo'W A3927' 035 36• J $ 25 NT 30' / I SET5/8" IR/C L.S. #6077 8 /--z s '-1 Igx30 X9' GAt'?ul-t vjj'f;hi sikeW 1 ; I GRE_ENBRIER AVE. (50' R/W) CHAIN NK FENCELI — — — J L(TYPICAL) — — — — — — — — GUY ANCHOR r 10• P.U.DE. _30. 1 E .• .30" 10' P.U.DE. 'POWER POLE s ,. +I_p.J-� s 90.00.00' w 85.1Z- — . • — .. — .. _�` 4'�w LPOWER POLE FD. 1/2"-IR/C \.. 10• P.U.DE. 10' P.U.DE. • 10' P.U.DE. PLS 3444 00 Q a- al 0 Q cj:� Z O Q M Of W Q m W ry •(50'RIGHT-OF-WAY) �8" GREENBRIER AVENUE N9��Elal7., sr -gyp -6 - B60OaY.—------------F-------- - ,�.- N�9 E�1=-P. I91roV K1 ^ J A1rHN a /' /� B Ird1.Il Y.1 Ni N 119«I4Hp'r nw,n R F rr� r a8 90600'00. E 8 i .00'r. yydd R DUNE y$ z . �r `SBI Hw J I I\^moi " =.0 m (S 4 y PI i /-- Q /C1J I ' •' Eye 21.r m �1 T ` (/ V aITm 3. I 8 44 0.9 0.L 10.T ri S O LatA' . y .I m i ^ • r a LOT I I q ONE STORY RESIDENCE a� W 0 BL0CKLOT 2318 BLOCK 318 O $O I FINISHED FLOORELEYATION-552 I Srp 10.r a 2 =poo W '• �SK, llr ya mvEPEn s.v'V rP lO.a'"R4DP� InyEWb x 1 Y' L= i R 4 0 E PATIO 3 y,614ti r arD�� EB .E.�x , z 1.5E - - - ���� s �oD�o'oo• eo.00'.. LOT 22 - TSM"�a's''I LOT 24 BLOCK 318LOT 23 BLOCK 318 BLOCK 318 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTHE BLOCKHERESF AS EC' DEDHIGHLANDSUNITI 7 PAGEACCORDING MAP OF SURVEY TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR I PAGE UA 1HRU 82FOF THE %TRIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, RMIDA SURVEYOR'S NOTES: CERTIFIED TD 1. BEMINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CENTERUNE Of GREENBRIER STEPHEN ad LOM CNERONI AVENUE AS N 80'00'00' E AS PER PUT. CEMCO HOMES 2. NO INSTRUMENT OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS. RIGHTS OF LEGEND: WAY AND= OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR 0. SO SM- IRON REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 'PLS 1096' EXCEPT AS SHOWN. NO TITLE OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. O- FOUND SIB' IRON RESSR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 'PLS 4029- A. FOUND NAIL b Fair DISK 3. THIS SURVEY IS NOT INTENDED TO LOCATE DUSTING ♦• SET PK NAIL UNDERGROUND FOUNOA7101I5, ENCROACHMENTS OR ANY IMPROVEMENT$ EXCEPT AS SHOWN. PREPARED BY: 4. THE LOT SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE 'r PER CECRLE LAND SURVEYING. INC, PHONE (561) 7060520 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 12061COD78 E. DATED MAY 4. 1989. FLORIDA LAND SURVEYING 9 /6677 10749 HIGH 958 S. ELEVATIONS BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM, ELEVATION 50.00 II ASSUMED ON THE CENTERUNE Of GREENBRIER AVENUE. CERiIFI R GE AHD BELIEF IN CONFORA ANDARD$ SET FORTH AILBREVIATIONS: BY THE. TO CHAPTER P -PIAT M -MEASURED MY -RIGHT OF WAY APCWA CONDITION 61G176 I n PREPARED AND rrENTERIDIE COV.{DVERED LSLWD SURVEYOR QAIIF U YE DS ENR NAMED d.I.4OVERNFAD UIIIIT'F UN ES CONC.-CONCRETE HEREON; TYA LATUKE AND THE PU60E•PUBUC UTILITY 6 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ORIGI ELDf ,ICS OR AND MAPPER PK-PARDERAIAION BRAND NAME) PLS~ESLONAL LAND SWLVEY(M 9pYYYlY"tYLY 1F161tN rMLLD1YIMY11-Ib1Wr ., IDRM qVD IIXAlICf11-11-19P6 •$1. �Rw,_ FINAL SURVEY 4.11-1997 'SCALE I'e 20' FIELD BML.L. ( A. 1ECT NUMBER W276 j ---� �f ��� ��' 4\ l ''�- �y ' mux , �. . .eJ�e `b � �i �M1�:: - � i r. t 'i " Y"���s �. ri ,vane, .., .. .+t . -.�' v .a .. n �� 4t ..�.s,.�,�,�rr f'" ..�"1R. 187 Cardinal Ridge Trail, Dobson, NC 27017 • 1-800-670-4262 COLOR CHART RHAWRLEYOFPUANMGE PKINGBLUE" ANAL RED" PTRU"EBURGUNDY MWHITE CLAY j BLACK BROWN MVINTBURGUNDY THAT COLORS TO THE PRINTING PROCESS Untitled Map-y�.� W : Legend Write a description for your map. 910 Greenbrier Ave Heads Up Sprinkler Inc r L. k4 ✓M4 _ 0 o Ll A� 1 F —(UNN ELVAO ET IN REAR ELEVATII -u-=-- These plana have been examlmA and approved by ih Glen Neer County 43'akh to o1 ffi pqc Tank L! SHALLBE_ _.^?u-ttJJt�Noa eon! _.In.wlle_ Gffi Sep9cTank WHJI Sp. F4 W Grainfield In 2F' wide Venahada e lainie 07TIG MV'1'BEAVSTNa,4D PNOh TO GONSWV0170N. V rtWYW> CM OF 5EBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5537 - FAX (772) 589-2566 OWNE"UILDER PERMIT APPLICATION ALL OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE FILLED IN BY APPLICANT, ACCORDING TO FS 713.135 PERMIT # 1 �i dC�,�"77 TRACKING #1 77 DATE: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARCEL ID # RECEIVED BY: LOT: a BLOCK: 31? SUBDIVISION: FLOOD ZONE: TYPE OF WORK: 191MEW STRUCTURE ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR []DEMOLITION ❑ OTHER WORK INCLUDES: 9STRUCTURAL []ELECTRICAL ❑PLUMBINGCHANICAL []ROOFING- SLOPE:_ ❑ POOL ❑ ALUMINUM STRUCTURE ® SHED�FENCE ❑ SLAB OR DECK []OTHER WORK DESCRIPTION: 11 X 3 C X G CArDor* w:-4, (J; (47 S 4-o rrnj�e , ` 0 ESTIMATED JOB VALUE: S �S-�B�U • C'11 TOTAL S/F SI/6 SQ l= UNDER AIR JOB NAME: R -t C Hfnc 4 . JOB ADDRESS: G I i? PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: zve5 CLT C Y07C it `F PHONE: 3 o S -yrs 1- y3 j ADDRESS: Cb O� P.<a::n h r� L r P Jt _ I CITY/STATE: '. ' lzGjAS71 A:v ,, I=t' ZIP CODE CONTRACTOR BUSINESS NAME: t116 1,QLICENSE #: ADDRESS: CONTACT PHONE: CITY/STATE: ZIP CODE CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: B EG c H U L iNc PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: ZIP CODE: PRESENT USE: PROPOSED USE: RU �7—) OCCUPANT LOAD: NUMBER OF: TORIES [/ BAYS QUNITS C BEDROOMS [214EIGHT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: C o A 7 ? r� S is �': L GROUP OCCUPANCY: AREA 5­yD T f� IS THE BUILDING PRESENTLY EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM? AYES E23N0 BONDING COMPANY: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: MORTGAGE LENDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: FEE SIMPLE TITLE HOLDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: I APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK AND INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED. I CERTIFY THAT NO WORK OR INSTALLATION HAS COMMENCED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF ALL LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION IN THIS JURISDICTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FOR ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS AND AIR CONDITIONERS, ETC. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SIGNED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE FILED WITH THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY IF THE VALUE IS $2,500 OR MORE, EXCEPT HEATING OR AIR CONDITIONING CHANGE OUTS LESS THAT $7,500. NOTICE: IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE AGENCIES, OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. ANY CHANGE IN BUILDING PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE RECORDED WITH THIS OFFICE. ANY WORK NOT COVERED ABOVE MUST HAVE A VALID PERMIT PRIOR TO STARTING. IN CONSIDERATION OF GRANTS, THIS PERMIT, THE OWNER, AND THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR AGREE TO ERECT THIS STRUCTURE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING CODES OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. NOTE: THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS VOID AFTER 180 DAYS UNLESS THE WORK, WHICH IT COVERS, HAS COMMENCED. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST HAVE A VALID STATE CERTIFICATION, STATE REGISTRATION, OR COUNTY COMPETENCY PLUS A COUNTY—WIDE LICENSE PRIOR TO OBTAINING PERMIT. — /���! / AN OWNER ACTING AS THEIR OWN OWNER/AGEN777 SIGNATURE CONTRACTOR MUST PERSONNALLY APPEAR AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO SIGN THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PER FS 489.103 PRINTED NAME OF OWNER/AGENT DATE: Individuals who sign as the owner's agent must first obtain legal power of attorney to sign on their behalf. STATE OF T,V_) A COUNTY 04` I hereb hat on this ✓ day of _,) a f>( �0 personally appeared I I �'r - who is personally known to me or has , produced identification. Typ 4atio produced: FL o T Off cial Signatt�Ite of Notary Public Not Seal • -'... cresslenx002260 .LINDAM.LOHSL E*i s June 18. 202 r'"o Bended roy 2 90639,•1019