Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-28-2019 CC Agenda
Lin LX SERT�V HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2019 - 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE Procedures for Public Input are on Back of Agenda 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION — Pastor David Daniel, Sebastian Church of God 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Led by Council Member lovino 4. ROLL CALL 5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications for additions require unanimous vote of City Council members 6. PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS, BRIEF ANNOUNCEMENTS Presentations of proclamations, certificates and awards, and brief timely announcements by Council and Staff. No public input or action under this heading. 19.110 A. Proclamation — Constitution Week — September 17 — 23, 2018 — Accepted by Sydney Rigaud, President of the Treasure Coast Society Children of the American Revolution & Dr. Holly Hamilton, Pelican Island Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution 19.111 B. Proclamation — Inflammatory Breast Cancer Month — October 2019 — Accepted by Dr. Holly Hamilton Brief Announcements 7. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member City Council so requests; in which event, the item will be removed and acted upon separately. If a member of the public wishes to provide input on a consent agenda item, he/she should request a Council Member to remove the item for discussion prior to start of the meeting or by raising his/her hand to be recognized. pgs 5-9 A. Approval of Minutes — August 13, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting 19.002 B. Resolution No. R-19-18 - Accepting the 3rd Quarter Financial Report and pgs 10-32 Recognizing Necessary Amendments and Adjustments to the FY18119 Annual Budget (Transmittal, R-19-18, Report) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA RECOGNIZING AMENDMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2018 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AS PROVIDED FOR IN EXHIBIT "A", PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 of 156 19.112 C. Approve Alcoholic Beverages at Community Center for Ferguson Event on pgs 33-35 December 28, 2019 from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm - DOB Verified (Transmittal, Application, Receipt) & COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS City committee reports and Council Member regional committee reports. No public input or action except for City committee member nominations and appointments under this heading. 19.008 A. Natural Resources Board (Transmittal, Applications, Ad, List) pgs 36-47 i. Interview, Unless Waived, Submit Nominations for One Unexpired, Regular Member - Term to Expire July 2021 ii. At Council's Discretion, Move to Waive Advertising Requirement and Fill One, Unexpired Alternate Member Position — Term to Expire July 2022 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS Procedures for legislative public hearings: • Mayor opens hearing ■ Attorney reads ordinance or resolution • Staff presentation ■ Public input ■ Staff summation ■ Mayor closes hearing • Council deliberation and action 19.096 A. Second Readina & Adoption Hearina of Ordinance No. 0-19-04 — Petition for pgs 48-122 Voluntary Annexation — Graves Brothers Comnanv (Transmittal. 0-19-04, Report, Attachment A) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 1,118 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 510 ROW, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO THE 74TH AVE ROW, NORTH OF 69TH STREET ROW, AND EAST OF 82ND AVE ROW; PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE CORPORATE LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR INTERIM LAND USE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PJ Ad 811119 & 8118119) 19.096 B. First Readina and Public Hearinq for Transmittal to DEO - Ordinance No. 0-19-05 pgs 123-156 Reauest for Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment — Graves Brothers Comoanv (Transmittal. 0-19-05, Staff Report. Attachment "A," Draft P&Z Minutes) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY ESTABLISHING LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION OF AG -1 (AGRICULTURAL, 1 UNIT PER 5 ACRES) ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 1,046.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 510, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO 74TH AVENUE, NORTH OF 69TH STREET, AND EAST OF 82ND AVENUE; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE (PJ Ad 8/11119) 2 of 156 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11. PUBLIC INPUT The heading on Regular Meeting agendas 'Public Input" provides an opportunity for individuals to bring NEW INFORMATION OR REQUESTS TO CITY COUNCIL NOT OTHERWISE ON THE PREPARED AGENDA. Individuals are asked to attempt to resolve matters with staff prior to meetings. Individuals are asked to provide copies of material for Council one week prior to the meeting if they intend to refer to specific material. City Council will not debate an issue during Public Input but may by consensus direct a Charter Officer in regard to the item if necessary or place a requested item on a future agenda. 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 14. CITY MANAGER MATTERS 15. CITY CLERK MATTERS 16. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS A. Council Member Dodd B. Council Member lovino C. Council Member McPartlan D. Mayor Hill E. Vice Mayor Kinchen 17. ADJOURN (All meetings shall adjourn at 9:30 p.m. unless extended for up to one half hour by a majority vote of City Council) r* HEARING LOOP INSTALLED. SWITCH HEARING AID TO T -COIL HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS. All City Council Meetings are aired live on Comcast Channel 25, ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed on City of Sebastian Website www.cityofsebastian.org. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (F. S.286.0105) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING. Future Council Meetina Dates: September 11, 2019 — Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 16, 2019 — First Public Hearing on Millage and Budge t/CIP/Financial Policies September 25, 2019 — Regular City Council/Final Millage, Budget, CIP, Financial Policies Hearing & CRA Budget Meeting October 9, 2019 — Regular City Council Meeting October 23, 2019 — Regular City Council Meeting November 20, 2019 — Regular City Council Meeting — Swearing In 3 of 156 PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC INPUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION R-15-10 Regular Citv Council Meetinas Public input is ALLOWED under the heading_ s: ✓ Consent Agenda ✓ Public Hearings ✓ Unfinished Business ✓ New Business ✓ Public Input Public inout is NOTALLOWED under the headings: ✓ Proclamations, Awards, Brief Announcements (except for individuals giving or accepting proclamations or awards); ✓ Committee Reports and Appointments (except for committee members giving reports and applicants being interviewed for committee appointments); ✓ City Council Matters ✓ Charter Officer Matters Council may, by majority vote, call upon an individual to provide input if desired. Workshops and Special Meetings. Public input is limited to the item on the agenda Time Limit Input on agenda items where public input is permitted on agendas is FIVE MINUTES; however, City Council may extend or terminate an individual's time by majority vote of Council members present. Input Directed to Chair Speakers shall address the City Council IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL DELIBERATION of the agenda item and ALL INPUT SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE CHAIR, unless answering a question of a member of City Council or City staff. Individuals shall not address City Council after commencement of City Council deliberation on an agenda item after public input has concluded, provided, however, the Mayor and members of City Council may recall an individual to provide additional information or to answer questions. Certain Remarks Prohibited Personal, impertinent, and slanderous remarks, political campaigning and applauding are not permitted and may result in expulsion from the meeting. The Chair shall make determinations on such remarks, subject to the repeal provisions below. Appealina Decisions of Chair Any member of Council may appeal the decision of the Chair to the entire Council. A majority vote of City Council shall overrule any decision of the Chair. Public Input Heading on Agenda The heading on Regular Meeting agendas "Public Input" provides an opportunity for individuals to bring NEW INFORMATION OR REQUESTS TO CITY COUNCIL NOT OTHERWISE ON THE PREPARED AGENDA. Individuals are asked to attempt to resolve matters with staff prior to meetings. Individuals are asked to provide copies of material for Council one week prior to the meeting if they intend to refer to specific material. City Council will not debate an issue during Public Input but may by consensus direct a Charter Officer in regard to the item if necessary or place a requested item on a future agenda. 4 of 156 CITY Or SEBASTLINN ;7t HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2019 - 5:01 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 1. Mayor Hill called the Regular Meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. 2. A moment of silence was held. 3. Council Member Dodd led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Jim Hill Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen Council Member Ed Dodd Council Member Albert lovino Council Member Bob McPartlan Citv Staff Present City Manager Paul Carlisle City Attorney James Stokes City Clerk Jeanette Williams Administrative Services Director Ken Killgore Asst. Administrative Services Director Cindy Watson Community Development Director/CRA Manager Lisa Frazier Community Development Manager Dorri Bosworth Leisure Services Director Brian Benton Police Chief Michelle Morris Police Lieutenant Tim Wood 5. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FY2019 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN THROUGH ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. R-19-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2019-2024 FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN, 2019 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND AN APPLICATION FOR CDBG FUNDING FOR FY2019 (SF424); AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND TRANSMIT ALL DOCUMENTS TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read the title of Resolution No. R-19-17. Mayor Hill opened the public hearing at 5:02 p.m. Corbett Alday, Vice President, Guardian Community Resource Management, introduced himself and displayed a brief PowerPoint outlining the program objectives. He said the first public hearing was held, a draft plan was put together and advertised to receive public comment. 5 of 156 Regular City Council Meeting August 13, 2019 Page Two He pointed out the eligible areas on the map and said improvements received from the hearing included: housing rehabilitation for seniors and veterans public facilities such as crosswalks, trails, sidewalks, all-inclusive playgrounds, and crime prevention through environmental design infrastructure improvements to include stormwater runoff, drainage, street improvements and U.S. 1 gateway parking improvements He outlined the chosen projects on slides 12 and 13. There was no response to the Mayor's request for public input. The Community Development Director said during the comment period, she did receive one request from Barney Giordan, representing the Veterans Council of Indian River County and American Legion Post 189 to expand the housing allocation to include improvements to the veteran's facilities. Mr. Alday explained that improving the facilities would probably not be eligible because an asset is needed. Mr. Giordan said the Indian River Veterans Council is willing to coordinate and cooperate with the City to help those that cannot help themselves or help veterans regardless of their income. The City Manager stated the grant has allocated $50,000 for the rehabilitation of veterans housing and he welcomed input to identify applicants. Mayor Hill closed the public hearing at 5:15 p.m. MOTION by Council Member lovino and SECOND by Council Member McPartlan to adopt Resolution No. R-19-17 approving the Community Development Block Grant Five - Year Consolidated Plan and FY19 Annual Action Plan. Roll Call: Vice Mayor Kinchen — aye Council Member Dodd — aye Council Member lovino — aye Council Member McPartlan — aye Mayor Hill — aye Motion carried 5-0. 6. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications for additions require unanimous vote of City Council members MOTION by Mayor Hill and SECOND by Vice Mayor Kinchen to add Item A - Unfinished Business, Interlocal Agreement between the City of Sebastian and Indian River County for the Operation of the City Fire Marshal Services. Roll Call: Council Member Dodd — aye Council Member McPartlan — aye Vice Mayor Kinchen — aye Motion carried 5-0. Council Member lovino — aye Mayor Hill — aye 6 of 156 Regular City Council Meeting August 13, 2019 Page Three 7. PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS, BRIEF ANNOUNCEMENTS Presentations of proclamations, certificates and awards, and brief timely announcements by Council and Staff. No public input or action under this heading. 19.106 A. Presentation by Indian River Countv Commissioner Tim Zorc - Support for Usinq Bethel Creek as a Location for a Florida Tech "Lagoon Flushing" Studv Indian River County Commissioner Tim Zorc said State Representative Thad Altman has secured $800,000 from the 2019 Legislative Session to institute a Florida Institute of Technology study and he has been gathering letters of support to have Bethel Creek considered as a project site. MOTION by Council Member Dodd and SECOND by Mayor Hill to send a letter of support to Florida Tech passed with a unanimous voice vote. (5-0) 19.107 B. Presentation by Gehrinq Group - EmNovee Health, Dental, and Vision Insurance Program for FY19/20 Mark Rodriquez, Senior Analyst, Gehring Group, introduced himself and displayed a PowerPoint outlining the employee health, dental and vision benefit renewal process with their recommendation. (See attached) Mr. Rodriquez said the total increase will be $8,847 for all employees. Brief Announcements - none 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes — July 24, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting 19.107 B. Approve FY2019/2020 Employee Group Medical (Florida Blue), Dental and Vision (Humana) as Previously Presented (Transmittal, Summary) 19.108 C. Approve Agreement Between the School Board of Indian River County and the City of Sebastian for the School Resource Officer Program and Authorize the Mayor to Execute Appropriate Documents (Transmittal, Agreement) 19.108 D. Approve Agreement Between the Sebastian Charter Junior High, Inc. and the City of Sebastian for a School Resource Officer and Authorize the Mayor to Execute Appropriate Documents (Transmittal, Agreement) 19.109 E. Award RFQ to Eau Gallie Electric for Design Build of City Hall Emergency Generator and Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate a Guaranteed Maximum Price (Transmittal, Score Sheet, Proposal) Council Member Dodd asked to pull items C & D. MOTION by Council Member Dodd and SECOND by Vice Mayor Kinchen to approve items A, B, and E passed with a unanimous voice vote. (5-0) 7 of 156 Regular City Council Meeting August 13, 2019 Page Four Items C & D Council Member Dodd said he supported the school resource officer agreements and wanted to invite the public to view the Police Department's public service announcement on YouTube featuring the school resource officers to get a feel for who they are and their duties which extend beyond student safety. MOTION by Council Member Dodd and SECOND by Council McPartlan to approve items C and D. Roll Call: Mayor Hill — aye Vice Mayor Kinchen — aye Council Member Dodd — aye Council Member lovino — aye Council Member McPartlan — aye Motion carried 5-0. 9. COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS City committee reports and Council Member regional committee reports. No public input or action except for City committee member nominations and appointments under this heading. Council Member Dodd stated the MPO held a special meeting earlier in the day to discuss the Graves Brothers property and they heard a lot of issues in regard to the annexation. Council Member McPartlan said interested parties are requesting an annexation agreement but everything is already established in the ordinances that we have. He suggested they might want to slow down until the City Manager can meet individually with the County Commissioners. Mayor Hill noted the City has been working with all the parties involved from the beginning. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 19.014 A. Approve an Interlocal Agreement between the Citv of Sebastian and Indian River Countv for the Operation of the Citv Fire Marshal Services (Transmittal, Agreement) The City Manager requested approval of the interlocal agreement outlining fire safety plans and the installation inspection services. The City Attorney confirmed the agreement addressed the concerns of all interested parties. MOTION by Mayor Hill and SECOND by Council Member McPartlan to approve the Interlocal agreement between the City and the Indian River County Emergency Services District passed with a unanimous vote. (5-0) 11. PUBLIC INPUT James Bacon, Sebastian, said his neighbor refuses to trim his trees growing over to his property. He asked that tree trimming be included in the overgrown grass nuisance ordinance. The City Manager advised that Mr. Bacon has the right to trim the tree overhanging his property and his conflict with his neighbor is a civil matter. 8 of 156 Regular City Council Meeting August 13, 2019 Page Five Dr. Robert Bedea, 119 Crawford Drive, said he has seen the Tropical Landscape Company apply what appeared to be fertilizer in Riverview Park. He asked that the City monitor the landscape company. Damien Gilliams, 1623 US Highway 1, said the City is not ready for the Graves Brothers' annexation and asked staff to meet with the concerned organizations before proceeding with the annexation. Andrea Ring said the Graves Brothers' property will be developed regardless of the annexation. She would like to see the City have control over the development. 12. NEW BUSINESS - None 13. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS - None 14. CITY MANAGER MATTERS The City Manager reported that the contractor is working on pickleball courts despite the excessive amount of rain the City is experiencing. 15. CITY CLERK MATTERS - None 16. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS A. Vice Mayor Kinchen - None B. Council Member Dodd - None C. Council Member lovino - None D. Council Member McPartlan - None E. Mayor Hill said it is easy to be up in arms against things and not have real information, but Council's job is to protect the residents of the community. 17. Being no further business, Mayor Hill adjourned the Regular City Council meeting at 5:53 p.m. Approved at the August 28, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting. Mayor Jim Hill ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC — City Clerk 9 of 156 IMCT SE HOME OF PELICAN kkND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 28, 2019 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution Accepting the 3rd Quarter Financial Report and Recognizing Necessary Amendments and Adjustments to the FY 2018-2019 Annual Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve Resolution R-19-18. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to City financial policies, budget reviews and any necessary adjustments are presented to the City Council quarterly. A capital project status report, investment report and accomplishments are also included. Formal approval by the City Council was given during the quarter for an adjustment to use General Fund Reserves to have a consultant help us develop a Strategic Pian. Additionally, there is an adjustment for using the General Fund Renewal and Replacement Account (R&R) for emergency repairs to the lenses of the lights at Friendship Park that requires City Council's formal approval. In accordance with the authority given by the Annual Budget Resolution, the City Manager has approved other budget transfers between accounts within Departments and made adjustments necessary to "implement programs, projects and expenditures authorized by the City Council". Thus, the City Manager's adjustments included budget changes to reallocate funds to and from expenditure accounts and capital projects as necessary during the quarter. All the above adjustments are listed in Exhibit "A" that is an attachment to the Resolution. IF AGENDA ITEM REQUIRES EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS: Total Cost: As per Exhibit "A" of Resolution Amount Budgeted in Current FY: NIA Amount of Appropriation Required: As per Exhibit "A" of Resolution Fund to Be Utilized for Appropriation: NIA Administrative Services Department Review: ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. R-19-18 and Exhibit "A" Quarterly Financial Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2019 City Manager ut orization: Date:''i ��°i 10 of 156 RESOLUTION NO. R-19-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA RECOGNIZING AMENDMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2018 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AS PROVIDED FOR IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an analysis of the revenues and expenditures for the three (3) months that ended on June 30, 2019 indicated that certain budget adjustments required formal approval by the City Council and that previously approved amendments and adjustments by the City Manager should be recognized; and WHEREAS, the City Council and City Manager have previously approved any other necessary amendments and adjustments in accordance with the Annual Budget Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The budget of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending September 30, 2019 has been amended and adjusted as necessary within the quarter ending June 30, 2019; a summary of such amendments and adjustments being attached hereto and more particularly identified as Exhibit "A"; the revised appropriations, if any, are set out therein and are recognized as having been made to maintain and carry on the government of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida. Section 2. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 3. Sections of this resolution may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of typographical errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, without need of further action of the City Council by filing a corrected copy of same with the City Clerk, Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. It was moved for adoption by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember vote was as follows: Mayor Jim Hill Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen Councilmember Bob McPartlan Councilmember Ed Dodd Councilmember Albert Iovino and, upon being put to a vote, the The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this 28"' day of August 2019. ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC City Clerk CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Mayor Jim Hill Approved as to form and content for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: James D. Stokes City Attorney 11 of 156 EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION R-19-16 SUMMARY OF BUDGET CHANGES FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 ADJUSTMENTS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL: Budget Before Budget Budget After ProjectlAccount Change Adjustment Change Reason for Adjustment Unappropriated Fund Balance $5,093,799 ($55,500) $5,038,299 06/12/19 Using General Fund Reserves for Professional Services 0 $55,500 $55,500 development of a Strategic Plan. ADJUSTMENTS BEING SUBMITTED FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: ADJUSTMENTS PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY MANAGER: Budget Before Budget Budget After Project/Account Change Adjustment Change Reason for Adjustment Appropriation from R&R Account ($82,047) ($3,384) ($85,431) R&M Park Facilities $34,000 $1,366 $35,366 Used for emergency repair of light $2,000 --------------------- $9,000 -------------------------- $11,000 lenses at at Friendship Park. Equipment Leases $2,500 $2,018 $4,518 i ADJUSTMENTS PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY MANAGER: 12 of 156 Budget Before Budget Budget After Project/Account Change Adjustment Change Reason for Adjustment Sale of Fixed Assets ($20,000) ($9,000) ($29,000) Adjustment to use additional Airport Asset R&M of Grounds ---------------------------------------- $2,000 --------------------- $9,000 -------------------------- $11,000 Sale revenue on Ground Maintenance. ---------------------- Code Enforcement Fines ($35,000) ($78) ($35,078 Offsetting City Clerk Court filing expenses Clerk of Court t=iling Fees - - - - -------------------------- $300 -------------- $78 $378 with Code Enforcement Fines revenue. Airport FDOT Revenue 0 ----------- ($7,200) ------------------------------------------------- ($7,200) Using Grant revenue and the Airport's R&M Grounds $2,000 ($1,800) $200 Ground Maintenance budget to fund a Tree Removal Project 0 $9,000 $9,000 Project to remove trees. Additional Compensation - $6,600 ($2,750) $3,850 --- --------- ---------------- ------ Adjust Re ular Salaries accounts for the Regular Salaries - - - ----------------------------- $7,153,450 ------------ $2,750 - ----- $7.156,200 ------------------------------------------------- quarterly incentive awards. Appropriations from Prior Year ($490,665) $21,565 ($469,100) Adjustment to close the 2018 Local Option Street Repaving 2018 Project ----------------------------------------------- $384,207 ----------------- ($21,565) ----------------- $362,642 Gas Tax Fund Repaving Project. Regular Salaries $562,900 ($2,787) -------------------------------------------------------- $560,113 Adjustment to use Leisure Services Barber Street Restrooms Project ----------------------------------------------- $134,123 -------------------- $2,787 -------------- $136,910 -------------------------------------------------------- Salaries account to close Project. 12 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT THIRD QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30, 2019 SUMMARY THE THIRD QUARTER FOR GENERAL FUND ENDED WITH 81% OF BUDGETED REVENUES BEING RECEIVED. COLLECTIONS FOR THE YEAR SHOULD WELL EXCEED PROJECTIONS. DEPARTMENTS HAVE SPENT 74% OF THE BUDGETED AMOUNTS AND CAN BE EXPECTED TO STAY WITHIN BUDGET FOR THE YEAR. $145,513 HAS BEEN USED FROM PRIOR YEAR FUND BALANCE AND THE R&R ACCOUNT. GENERAL FUND SUMMARY General Fund Revenue 4,030 DA4rsted ewe[ Murlo Datm 3,500 C 3,000 R 3 2,540 0 2,040 1,540 1,040 500MOW 4g� 3f05 y��5 0+ to 4�Ja4dAi'S 411zg ilp\l`Ij �`y¢� �J� �ld* e5�d0 RESERVES NOW TOTAL $5,952,678. LOANS TO THE GOLF COURSE AND FOR AIRPORT PROJECTS, INVENTORIES, PREPAYMENTS AND RESTRICTED LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDS RESULT IN PROJECTED RESERVES OF $4,917,728. GENERAL FUND BALANCE FORECAST Fund Balance Budget Beginning Balance 10101118 YTD % Beginning Balance $ - $ 5,373,381 � Req uestetl � Received Ad Valorem Taxes Fund Balance/R&R Changes to Date: 3,816,814 - 3,758,059 98.5% Franchise Fees 1,394,340 829,160 59.5% Utility Taxes (55,500) 2,935,950 __ 1,827,213 62.2% Hurricane Recoveries $1,581,745 $532,619 $2,114,864 - BBSC Restroom Repairs 532,620 n1a Intergovernmental (24,696) 2,919,860 1,929,106 661% Charges for Service Two Air Conditioners 549,902 444,951 80,9% Licenses and Other 528,442 492,243 93.1% Transfers In 40,000 (3,384) 30,000 75.0% Total Revenues $ 12,185,308 $ 9,843,351 80.8% From Fund Balance 145,513 $ (145,513) -100.0% Total Sources $ 12,330,821 $ 9,697,838 78.6% City Council 55,908 35,276 631% City Manager (2,973,706) 298,289 - 217,785 73.0% City Clerk $ 207,036 Adjust R&R to $275,000 154,639 74.7% City Attorney 85,431 104,914 $ 81,062 77.3% Admin Services Assigned Funds 693,455 (1,045,908) 507,183 73.1% MIS Division $ 476,934 $ 348,211 73,0% Police Department 5,849,182 4,917,728 4,513,304 77.2% Public Facilities 1,854,372 1,263,876 68.2% Parks and Recreation 1,248,340 875,286 70.1% Community Dev. 396,147 257,128 64.9% MatthewPrma Costs - - n/a Non-Departmentai 1,146,244 864,791 75.4% Total Expenditures $ 12,330,821 $ 9,118,541 73.9% Unappropriated - - nla Total Uses $ 12,330,821 $ 9,118,541 73.9% Net Unassigned Fund Balance $ 5,952,678 General Fund Revenue 4,030 DA4rsted ewe[ Murlo Datm 3,500 C 3,000 R 3 2,540 0 2,040 1,540 1,040 500MOW 4g� 3f05 y��5 0+ to 4�Ja4dAi'S 411zg ilp\l`Ij �`y¢� �J� �ld* e5�d0 RESERVES NOW TOTAL $5,952,678. LOANS TO THE GOLF COURSE AND FOR AIRPORT PROJECTS, INVENTORIES, PREPAYMENTS AND RESTRICTED LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDS RESULT IN PROJECTED RESERVES OF $4,917,728. GENERAL FUND BALANCE FORECAST General Fund Expenditures iutlst,d Ewge! MuNo Dam 6000 - y 5,000 4,000 3 3,aoo- 0 H 2,000 1,404 Aw Mr dw am low eo 00 c" cn4 ° do <° X15 `Lgo�e Wac 2Pbe 00 n� pe¢ v� vg. eC' Fund Balance R&R Account Beginning Balance 10101118 $ 5,098,381 $ 275,000 Year to Date Revenue 9,843,351 � Req uestetl � Received $1,500 Fund Balance/R&R Changes to Date: S i,z so - ' Unfinished 2018 Projects (4,582) s5ou Allocated for Strategic Pian SZSP (55,500) __ Crab E. Bill's Repairs Matthew Irma Totals _ ■ Requestedi $1,581,745 $532,619 $2,114,864 (20,457) BBSC Restroom Repairs (24,696) Score Board Replacement (1,414) Two Air Conditioners (4,705) Essential MIS Equipment (30,775) Lights for Friendship Park (3,384) Year to Date Uses $ (60,082) $ (85,431) Other Expenditures (9,118,541) Current Reserves $ 5,763,109 $ 189,569 Expected Changes to Year End: Additional Revenue 2,984,664 - Additional Expenditures (2,973,706) - Expected 9130119 Balance $ 5,774,067 $ 189,569 Adjust R&R to $275,000 (85,431) 85,431 Expected Reserves $ 5,688,636 $ 275,000 Assigned Funds (1,045,908) - Net Unassigned Funds $ 4,642,728 $ 275,000 Total $ 4,917,728 General Fund Expenditures iutlst,d Ewge! MuNo Dam 6000 - y 5,000 4,000 3 3,aoo- 0 H 2,000 1,404 Aw Mr dw am low eo 00 c" cn4 ° do <° X15 `Lgo�e Wac 2Pbe 00 n� pe¢ v� vg. eC' ALL HURRICANE IRMA CLAIMS WERE PAID BUT $143,666 ON MATTHEW IS STILL UNPAID. $z,zso Hurricane Reimbursements $2.Oo0 5143,666 Due on Matthew S1.7sa � Req uestetl � Received $1,500 S i,z so - ' g 5t.aao S750 s5ou _ SZSP __ Matthew Irma Totals _ ■ Requestedi $1,581,745 $532,619 $2,114,864 w Received $1,498,079 $532,519 $1,970,698 13 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT THIRD QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30, 2019 SUMMARY OPERATING EXPENDITURES FOR THE STORMWATER GOLF COURSE: BALANCES ARE AFFECTED BY LOANS DIVISION ARE WELL WITHIN BUDGET AND REVENUES FROM GENERAL FUND AND THE LOANS FROM THE ARE ABOVE AMOUNTS PROJECTED. BUILDING FUND FOR IRRIGATIONICLUBHOUSE WORK. STORMWATER FUND SUMMARY GOLF FUND SUMMARY Budget YTD % Budget YTD % Beginning Fund Balance $ 95,702 $ 350,464 Beginning Resources $ $ (623,866) SlormwaterFees 1,995,000 1,996,571 100.1°10 Charges for Service 1,227,094 1,083,802 88.3% Interest 19,000 30,728 161.7% Pro Shop Sales 70,000 76,186 108.8% Total Revenues $ 2,014,000 $ 2,027,299 100,7% Rent 30,000 19,922 66.4% From Fund Balance 95,702 -0,0% Miscellaneous 8,780 8,780 100.0% Total Sources $ 2,109,702 $ 2,377,763 112,7% Total Revenues 1,335,874 1,188,690 89.0% Operating Expenditures 1,609,702 1,048,414 65.1% From Fund Balance - ria Transfer to Capital Projects 5001000 32,367 6.5°/° Total Sources $ 1,335,874 $ 564,824 rola Total Uses $ 2,109,702 $ 1,080,781 51.2% Operating Expenses $ 11196,115 $ 597,397 49.9°/% Ending Fund Balance $ 1,296,982 Pro Shop Purchases 45,000 62,751 139.4% Expected Change to Year End: Cart Loan Payments 56,391 51,691 91.7% Stormwater Fees and interest 50,000 Total Operating Expense 1,297,506 711,839 54.9% Expenditures (429,998) Capital Expenses - 10,892 n/a Transfer to Capital Projects Building Fund Payment 38,368 28,776 75.0% Net Available Funds $ 916,984 Total Uses $ 1,335,874 $ 751,507 56.3% ` Total Ending Resources $ - $ (186,683) Expected Change to Year End: Revenues 215,076 REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE AIRPORT DO NOT Expenditures (654,337) INCLUDE GRANT RECEIPTS AND EXPENSES, AS THESE Expected 9!30119 Balance $ (625,944) ARE HANDLED IN THE AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION FUND. AIRPORT FUND SUMMARY BUILDING FUND RESOURCES REMAIN AT GOOD LEVELS, EVEN WITH THE LOANS TO THE GOLF FUND. Budget YTD °/° Beginning Resources $ $ (133,240) BUILDING FUND SUMMARY Rents 431,061 308,112 71.5% Budget YTD % Fuel Sales 90,000 12,278 13.6% Beginning Resources $ 13,633 $ 350,437 Miscellaneous 113,310 121,731 107.4% Licenses and Permits 774,700 623,986 80.5% Total Revenues 634,371 442,121 69.7% Charges for Service 12,800 10,385 81.1% Total Sources $ 634,371 $ 308,881 Fines and Forfeits 5,800 5,934 102.3% Miscellaneous 9,200 12,664 137.7% Operating Expenses 408,154 326,907 801% Golf Fund Loan Payments 38,368 28,776 75.0% Fuel Purchases 71,200 8,945 12.6% Total Sources 854,501 681,745 79.8% General Fund Loan 40,000 30,000 75.0% Operating Expenses 771,320 489,507 63.5% DST Fund Loan 30,500 - 0.0°x° Capital Outlay 19,750 - 0.0% Capital Outlay 50,319 26,988 53.6% Transfers Out (Clear V ilage) 13,633 n!a Contingency 34,198 0.0% Contingency 49,798 Na Total Expenditures $ 634,371 $ 392,840 61.9% Total Uses $ 854,501 $ 489,507 57.3% Total Ending Resources $ (83,959) Total Ending Resources $ 543,175 Expected Change to Year End: Expected Change to Year End: Revenues 127,750 Revenues 154,443 Expenditures (161,483) Expenditures (200,423) Expected 9130119 Balance $ (117,692) Expected MOM Balance $ 497,195 14 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN FUND SUMMARIES QUARTER ENDING 06/30/19 15 of 156 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2018/2019 2018/2019 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr Annual Percent ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET of Budget GENERAL FUND TAXES -6,090,319.79 -5,247,654.62 -6,443,086.70 -6,414,431.78 -8,147,104.00 78.73% LICENSES & PERMITS -126,130.66 -124,481.87 -148,557.23 -129,646.66 -143,100.00 90.60% INTLRGVT'L REVENUE -1,665,905.48 -1,731,592.45 -3,290,626.32 -2,461,725.97 -2,919,860.00 84.31% CHARGES FOR SERVICE -246,813.56 -231,325.27 -303,708.80 -444,951.03 -549,902.00 80.91% FINES AND' FORFEITS -66,023.33 -40,082.53 -33,063.77 -45,155.16 -50,578.00 89.28% MISC. REVENUE -230,870.29 -205,116.52 -253,287.11 -317,441.11 -334,764.00 94.83% TRANSFERS IN -549,730.79 -494,999.91 -543,749.94 -29,999.97 -40,000.00 75.00% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -145,513.DC 0.00% GENERAL FUND REVENUE -8,975,793.90 -9,075,253.17 -11,016,079.87 -9,843,351.68 -12,330,821.00 79.83% CITY COUNCIL 32,741.23 36,222.30 37,146.78 35,275.53 55,908.00 63.10% CITY MANAGER 189,575.05 195,881.30 351,925.97 217,785.09 298,289.00 73.01% CITY CLERK 301,513.42 137,714.27 162,181.66 154,638.56 207,036.00 74.69% LEGAL 57,907.50 56,559.23 75,298.77 81,062.20 104,914.00 77.27% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 414,094.57 414,998.25 483,082.19 507,182.85 693,455.00 73.14% M.I.S. DIVISION 144,239.41 124,416.50 290,236.70 348,210.72 476,934.00 73.01% AUDIO VISUAL 124,015.97 78,204.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% POLICE ADMINISTRATION 671,402,15 631,102.59 683,916.92 655,353.84 858,496.00 76.34% POLICE PATROL 1,824,076.20 1,979,766.22 2,269,535.03 2,657,802.75 3,313,817.00 80.20% CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 133,663.98 123,238.85 131,501.55 135,246.63 183,672.00 73.63% POLICE INVESTIGATIONS 596,843.65 523,686.37 591,453.81 617,566.22 846,924.00 72.92% POLICE COMMUNICATIONS 372,108.34 443,876.44 447,006.72 447,334.90 646,273.00 69.22% ENGINEERING 0.00 427,361.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% ROADS AND DRAINAGE 625,587.05 336,319.62 627,652.30 679,794.88 998,760.00 68.06% STORMWATER UTILITY DIVISION 778,488.46 507,741.01 791,738.67 0.00 0.00 0.00% CENTRAL GARAGE 166,207.36 154,203.48 160,714.22 176,708.99 248,212.00 71.19% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 166,375.70 323,337.53 302,592.86 273,340.82 421,180.00 64.90% PARKS/RECREATION 699,064.09 688,675.89 651,203.41 875,285.56 1,248,340.00 70.12% CEMETERY 142,234.22 121,174.69 140,255.83 134,031.65 186,220.00 71.97% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 190,556.02 137,293.84 275,703.41 257,128.01 396,147.00 64.91% NON -DEPARTMENTAL 1,056,769.89 1,248,363.97 872,708.89 864,791.20 1,146,244.00 75.45% GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 8,687,464.26 8,690,137.94 9,345,855.69 9,118,540.40 12,330,821.00 73.95% 15 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN FUND SUMMARIES QUARTER ENDING 06/30/19 16 of 156 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2018/2019 2018/2019 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr Annual Percent ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET of Budget LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX TAXES -423,747.72 -437,541.84 -468,071.00 -463,994.87 -740,300.00 62.68% INTERGVT'L REVENUE 0.00 -12,532.00 -12,908.00 0.00 -13,295.00 0.00% MISC. REVENUE -1,345.53 -602.17 -4,120.77 -6,388.71 -3,764.00 169.73% TRANSFERS IN -200,000.00 -200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -469,110.00 0.00% LOGT FUND REVENUE -625,093.25 -650,676.01 -485,099.77 -470,383.58 -1,226,469.00 38.35% OPERATING EXPENSES 155,393.88 22,716.63 13,834.70 29,384.24 116,350.00 25.26% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 12,010.50 27,570.45 0.00 3,200.00 0.00% DEBT SERVICE 242,748.10 242,635.30 242,444.90 239,186.60 243,177.00 98.36% TRANSFERS OUT 249,922.20 597,098.25 74,456.36 424,060.55 863,742.00 49.10% LOGT EXPENDITURES 648,064.18 851,744.05 358,306.41 692,631.39 1,226,469.00 56.47% DISCRETIONARY SALES TAX TAXES -2,060,578.50 -2,154,327.21 -2,305,098.74 -2,379,465.56 -3,572,500.00 66.61% MISC. REVENUE -5,781.35 -11,922.38 -23,354.22 -68,482.78 -63,107.00 108.52% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,293,032.00 0.00% DST f UND REVENUE -2,066,359.85 -2,166,249.59 -2,328,452.96 -2,447,948.34 -4,928,639.00 49.67% OPERATING EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 30,950.00 4.85% TRANSFERS OUT 2,033,757.78 2,301,839.71 1,904,517.84 1,193,106.26 4,630,219.00 25.77% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 267,470.DD 0.00% DST FUND EXPENDITURES 2,033,757.78 2,301,839.71 1,904,517.84 1,194,606.26 4,928,639.00 24.24% RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT FUND MISC. REVENUE -29,273.56 -30,905.70 -34,943.41 -41,331.60 -49,000.00 84.35% TRANSFERS IN -349,624.18 -342,240.96 -366,531.86 -404,673.34 -406,167.00 99.63% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -303,964.00 0.00% RRD REVENUE -378,897.74 -373,146.66 -401,475.27 -446,004.94 -759,131.00 58.75546 OPERATING EXPENSES 191,360.34 62,002.55 141,469.51 292,627.74 413,392.00 70.79% CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,083.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 66,000.00 0.00% GRANTS AND AIDS 72,000.00 0.00 34,676.03 0.00 55,000.00 0.00% TRANSFERS OUT 29,685.28 219,495.57 279,494.90 30,D00A0 224,739.00 13.35% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% RRD EXPENDITURES 308,129.52 281,498.12 455,640.44 322,627.74 759,131.00 42.50% PARKfNG IN LIEU OF FUND MISC. REVENUE -22,573.63 -21,839.60 -10,930.79 -1,057.12 -406.00 260.37% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% PARKING IN LIEU OF REVENUE -22,573.63 -21,839.60 -10,930.79 -1,057,12 -406.00 260.37% CAPITAL OUTLAY 61.60 44,703.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 13,792.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 406.00 0.00% PARKING IN LIEU Of EXPENDITURES 61.60 58,495.00 0.00 0.00 406.00 0.00% 16 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN FUND SUMMARIES QUARTER ENDING 06/30/19 17 of 156 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2018/2019 2018/2019 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd CRtr Annual Percent ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET of Budget RECREATION IMPACT FEE FUND MISC. REVENUE -132,346.06 -74,543.44 -116,126.68 -101,692.72 -174,228.00 58.37% FROM FUND BALANCES 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -425,943.00 0.00% REC. IMPACT FEE REVENUE -132,346.06 -74,543.44 -116,126.68 -101,692.72 -600,171.00 16.94% OPERATING EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFERS OUT 19,463.60 35,621.84 440,096.10 212,663.94 600,171.00 35.43% TO FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% REC. IMPACT FEE EXPENDITURES 19,463.60 35,621.84 440,096.10 212,663.94 600,171.00 35.43% STORMWATER UTILITY FUND MISC. REVENUE -981,080.81 -987,521.11 -999,784.57 -1,958,411.29 -2,014,000.00 97.24% TRANSFERS IN -100,000.00 -100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -95,702.00 0.00% STORMWATER REVENUE -1,081,080.81 -1,087,521.11 -999,784.57 -1,958,411.29 -2,109,702.00 92.83% PERSONAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 661,094.89 891,152.00 74.18% OPERATING EXPENSES 46,819.82 10,248.15 139,990.31 387,319.09 700,351.00 55.30% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,198.16 18,199.00 100.00% TRANSFERS OUT 508,312.10 942,747.32 524,999.97 14,168.50 500,000.00 2.83% TO FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% STORMWATER EXPENDITURES 555,131.92 952,995.47 664,990.28 1,080,780.64 2,109,702.00 51.23% LAW ENFORCE FORFEITURE FUND FINES AND FORFEITS -965.00 -26,061.00 -100.00 -150.00 -1,000.00 15.00% MISC. REVENUE -27,676.81 -405.64 -587.41 -2,310.50 -145.00 1593.45% FORFEITURES FUND REVENUES -28,641.81 -26,466.64 -687.41 -2,460.50 -1,145.00 214.89% OPERATING EXPENSES 3,759.86 2,475.61 5,007.03 2,566.04 0.00 0.00% CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,158.69 9,293.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% GRANTS AND AIDS 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,145.00 0.00% FORFEITURE FUND EXPENDITURES 21,918.55 14,769.11 6,507.03 5,066.04 1,145.00 442.45% DST DEBT SERVICE FUND MISC. REVENUE -491.79 236.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFERS IN -650,333.97 -264,695.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% DST DEBT SERVICE REVENUE -650,825.76 -264,458.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% OPERATING EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% DEBTSERVICE 1,028,624.80 354,517.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% DST DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 1,028,624.80 354,517.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% STORMWATER DEBT SERVICE FUND MISC. REVENUE -716.48 -847.76 -2,971.97 -4,663.92 -900.00 518.21% TRANSFERS IN -300,855.78 -302,222.25 -302,843.97 -302,185.53 -403,792.00 74.84% FROM FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% STORMWATER DEBT REVENUE -301,572.26 -303,070.01 -305,815.94 -306,849.45 -404,692.00 75.82% DEBT SERVICE 400,499.00 402,357.50 404,077.60 403,659.30 403,659.00 100.00% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,033.00 0.00% STORMWATER DEBT EXPENDITURES 400,499.00 402,357.50 404,077.60 403,659.30 404,692.00 99.74% 17 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN FUND SUMMARIES QUARTER ENDING 06/30/19 18 of 156 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2018/2019 Z018/2019 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr Annual Percent ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET of Budget GOLF COURSE FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 0.00 0.00 -50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% CHARGES FOR SERVICE -913,211.26 -925,120.86 -1,002,571.94 -1,157,913.35 -1,291,294.00 89.67% MISC. REVENUE -33,023.04 -44,554.94 -67,488.66 -30,776.74 -44,580.00 69.04% TRANSFERS IN 0.00 -96,075.00 -11,320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% GOLF COURSE FUND REVENUE -946,234.30 -1,065,750.80 -1,131,380.60 -1,188,690.09 -1,335,874.00 88.98% ADMINISTRATION 453,514.52 532,117.16 753,455.38 476,527.82 613,742.00 77.64% MAINTENANCE 431,828.46 464,286.76 424,469.51 426,640.39 567,335.00 75.20% GOLF COURSE CARTS 110,189.15 114,574.96 138,513.71 123,437.10 154,797.00 79.74% GOLF COURSE FUND EXPENSE 995,532.13 1,110,978.88 1,316,438.60 1,026,605.31 1,335,874.00 76.85% AIRPORT CHARGES FOR SERVICE -14,248.40 -12,293.71 -12,963.03 -3,332.79 -18,800.00 17.73% MISC. REVENUE -521,849.16 -317,381.05 -376,978.83 -429,843.41 -544,371.00 78.96% TRANSFERS IN 0.00 -5,526.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -21,624.00 0.00% AIRPORT REVENUE -536,097,56 -335,200.76 -389,941.86 -433,176.20 -584,795.00 74.07% ADMINISTRATION 199,271.56 300,279.61 299,134.44 379,306.97 584,795.00 64.86% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1,266.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% AIRPORT EXPENSE 200,538.04 300,279.61 299,134.44 379,306.97 584,795.00 64.86% BUILDING FUND LICENSES & PERMITS -593,898.20 -534,545.90 -683,716.05 -623,986.52 -774,700.00 80.55% CHARGES FOR SERVICE -10,145.96 -9,061.34 -10,908.43 -10,384.94 -12,800.00 81.13% FINES AND FORFEITS -3,727.35 -3,721.00 -4,786.00 -5,933.50 -5,800.00 102.30% MISC. REVENUE -11,445.69 -8,053.99 -8,386.45 -12,664.42 -9,200.00 137.66% TRANSFERS IN 0.00 -23,293.97 -31,744.00 -28,775.97 -38,368.00 75.00% FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -13,633.00 0.00% BUILDING REVENUES -619,217.20 -578,676.20 -739,540.93 -681,745.35 -854,501.00 79.78% PERSONAL SERVICES 293,558.49 318,234.17 382,717.49 416,741.07 656,556.00 63.47% OPERATING EXPENSES 75,999.11 86,374.80 80,200.36 72,766.39 128,397.00 56.67% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,750.00 0.00% TRANSFERS OUT 334,440.91 119,187,02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TO FUND BALANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,798.00 0.00% BUILDING EXPENSE 703,998.51 523,795.99 462,917.85 489,507.46 854,501.00 57.29% 18 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2019 Project Budget Share Project Expenditures Funds Number Description Budget Sources (in Thousands of S). B11d2ct To Date Encumbrances_ Remaining FY2017 A1762 Septic to Sewer Grants (Kept available for Grants) CRAIGRANT 305/1 DD 405,000 237,497 167,503 A1765 Oyster Bags @ Working Waterfront (To end 9130119) SW/GRANT 24124 47,928 3,860 44,068 TOTAL S 452,928 S 241,358 S - S 211,570 FY2018 A1811 Generators (Designlbuild underway, adding 80K in 2020) DST 40 40,000 27,050 12,950 A1823 Cemetery Improvements (Road designed, plans underway) CTF 150 150,000 1,098 4,215 144,687 A1824 Working Waterfront Phase 3 (Pending FIND approval) DST 25.7 25,700 18,345 7,356 - A 1854 Taxiway C Construction (Complete, pending budget transfer) FAAlFDOT(DST 2,2161109.61150.4 2,475,946 1,881,359 636,713 (42,127) A1860 Stonecrop Drainage (Pending FEMA Grant approval) DST/GRANT 19.110 19,145 10,956 8,189 - TOTA.L S 2,710,791 S 1,938,809 S 656,473 S 115,510 A1901 Police Vehicles & Equip (Items received, will he closed) DST 375 375,446 216,821 100,952 57,673 A1903 Evidence Building Fixtures (Completed, will be closed) DST 50 50,000 - 49,904 96 A1904 Brush Dump Truck (Order not yet received) DST 51.5 51,469 - 51,342 127 A1920 Working Waterfront Phase 3 (Pending FIND approval) FINDIDST 1701250 420,000 15,936 6,664 397,400 A1921 Pickleball (Construction has started in August) DSTIRIF 1971283 479,762 70,065 358,766 50,930 A1922 Bark Park Shade Structures (Working with venders) RIF 14 14,000 - - 14,000 A1923 Park Improvements (Being used for Ballfield Scoreboards) RIF 20 20,000 2,827 - 17,173 A1925 Park Signage (Council has approved concept) RIF 100 100,000 2,601 20,390 77,010 A1926 Coastal Resiliency Plan (Plan completed in 4th quarter) DEP 50 50,000 41,000 9,000 - A1927 Community Center Curbing (Completed in 4th quarter) RIF 6.1 6,176 - 6,160 16 A1928 Yacht Club Pier (Determining design) RIF 40 40,000 - - 40,000 A1930 Indian River Drive Corridor (Using rest for lights or paving) LOGT 100 100,000 53,419 46,581 A1931 Street Repaving (Work being scheduled with Contractor) LOGT 401A 401,100 8,000 393,100 A1932 CavCorp Parking Lot (Getting another price quote) DST 50 50,000 - 50,000 A1933 Relocate Public Facilities Compound (Design/build underway) DST 1737.7 1,737,649 1,737,649 A1934 Radar Signs (Completed in 41h quarter) DST 15 15,000 - 13,530 1,470 A1960 Stonecrop Drainage (Pending FEMA Grant approval) FEMA/DST 889.6!296,5 1,186,137 8,850 5,650 1,171,637 A1961 Stormwaterlmprovements (Planning additional projects) SW 500 500,000 14,169 119,590 366,241 A1952 Construct Hangar D (Evaluating contractor bids) FDOTIDST 8001200 1,000,000 35,037 38,550 926,413 S 6,596,739 S 468,724 $ 780,498 S 5,347,517 GRAND TOTAL S 9,760,458 S 2,648,890 $ 1,436,971 $ 5,674,597 19 of 156 QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 At June 30, 2019, the total of the City's cash and investments were $13,804,121.64. Of this, $9,467,954.80 was held in an interest bearing checking account at Seacoast National Bank, $3,811,516.28 was invested with the State Board of Administration and $524,650.56 is deposited with Florida Trust, which invest in short-term bonds, The City did not purchase any new securities during the quarter and does not hold any direct investments in government securities. Returns at the end of the quarter were 2.51% for the Bank and 2.52% for the State Board. Since the investment was initially made with Florida Trust, our average annualized return has been 3.16% over the 34 months it has been invested. However, the average annualized return over the last 3 months of this quarter was 5.83%, with the last month of the quarter being 6.09%! SEACOAST NATIONAL BANK STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION (SBA) CURRENT CURRENT CASH BALANCE ALLOCATION BALANCE PER sCr'T INVESTMENT ALLOCATION BALANCE PERCENT General Fund S 3,762,63193 39.74% General Fund $ 1,080,126.12 28,34% Local Option Cres Tax Fund 277,595.54 2.93% Local Option Gas Tax Fund 52,746.62 1.38% Discretionary Sales Tax Fund 3,722,374.96 39.32% Discretionary Sales Tax Fund 530,240.29 13 91 % ItiverfrontRedevelopmentFund 243,928.36 2.581/6 RiverfrontRedevelopment Fwd 302,113.77 7.93% Parkinglo-lieu-OfFund - 0.00% Parking ln-Lieu-Of Fund 55,538.49 1.46% Recreation Impact Fee Fund 407,445.68 430% Recreation Impact Fee Fund 133,523.11 3.50% Stormwater Utility Fund 608,152.31 6.42% Stormwater Utility Fund 609,921.99 16,170% Law Enforcement Forfeiture Fund 10,544,61 0.11% Law Enforcement Forfeiture Fund 30,883.56 0.91% Stormwater Series 2003 Debt Service Fund 76,854.87 0.81% Stormwater Series 2003 Debt Service Fund - 0.00% Capitol Projects Fund - 0.00% Capitol Projects Fund - 0.00% Capital Improvements Fund (41,000,00) -0.43% Capital Improvements Fund - 0.00% Transportation Fund (010) 0.00% Transportation Fund - 0.001/1 Stennwater Projects Fund 180,004.76 190% Stormwater Proj ects Fund - 0.00% Golf Course Fund 178,546.75 1.89% GnlrCourseFund - 0.00% Airport Fund 260,835,62 2.76% AirportFund - 0.00% Airport Projects Fund (965,730.50) -10.201% Airport Projects Fund - 0.001/6 Building Department Fund 439,$83,80 4.64% Building Department Fund 221,903.47 5.82% Cemetery Trust Fund 295,386.21 3.12% Cemetery Trust Fund 702,178.86 1842% Performance Deposits Fund 10,750,00 0.11% Performance Deposits Fund 92,340.00 2.42% Total Bank Balance S 9,467,954.80 100.001/6 Total SBA Balance S 3,811,516.28 100.00% 20 of 156 MOF SEBMT limit— =. Gin HOME OF PELICAN ISL ND To: Mayor and City Council Thru: Paul Carlisle, City Manager From: Kenneth W. Killgore, Administrative Services Director Date: August 14, 2019 Re: 3rd Quarter Accomplishments Fiscal Year 2019 The following are the 3r1 Quarter Accomplishments for City Departments as assembled and edited by the Administrative Services Department for the three months ended June 30, 2019. CITY CLERK Legislative SuoDort Matters • City Clerk prepared agenda, attended/recorded six Regular City Council meetings, one public hearing. • Completed follow up of approved Council matters – contracts, letters, e-mails, scanned to LF and indexed. • Nine resolutions adopted by Council. + One ordinance passed on first reading. + Eleven proclamations prepared for presentation by Mayor. • Provided monthly City calendars and revisions to Council, City staff and press. • One advertisement placed with TCPalm. • Coordinated attendance of clergy for Council meeting invocations. • Distributed one Code and one LDC supplement. Records Management Program • Responded to 58 public records requests. • 117 cubic feet of paper records met retention along with duplicate and OSA records destroyed by shredding vendor. • Twelve boxes of Personnel Files were imported into Laserfiche for permanent and long term records. • Transferred and documented five bid records and twenty-one Finance boxes for storage. Election Matters • Pre -qualified one candidate to 2019 Election. • Accepted one campaign treasurer's report. Citv Board Matters • Noticed vacancies, prepared five board appointments, notified and provided info to appointees, updated. • Board Handbook and distributed pages. • City Clerk prepared agenda, attended/recorded one CRA, one BOA within Council Meetings. • Records clerk attended one Council Meeting and one Public Hearing. • Records Clerk published all scanned City board packets to City website, Facebook, Laserfiche and also provided to press and Council, • Prepared two certificates of appreciation for outgoing board members. Cemetery Matters • Certificates of Interment Rights issued for 23 locations for a total of $23,750. • Scanned all cemetery records as sold or amended for permanent retention. • Set up cremains lots for Unit 3, Blocks 49 & 50. Personnel/Educational Matters • Records Clerk attended two project management meetings. • Records Clerk attended three meetings for the Events Committee. • City Clerk and Records Clerk attended CPR & First Aid Training. • Records Clerk attended FRMA Conference and received recertification in Records Management. • City Clerk and Records Clerk attended a Webinar on Social Media. • City Clerk attended Seminar on Negative Attitudes. • City Clerk and Records Clerk assisted with retirement party for Tarbell, Nicholas and Curry. Community Matters 0 Responded to or forwarded CITYSEB emails to appropriate departments. 21 Of 156 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES * Monitored FEMA website for activity on the final reimbursements due on Hurricane Matthew. • Provided administrative support to the Police Pension Board. • Prepared 2nd Quarter Budget Amendment and made presentation to Budget Committee and City Council. • Prepared Drafts of FY2020 Budget and Capital Program. • Presented Recommended FY2020 Budget and Capital Program to the Budget Committee. • Handled normal processing of payroll, accounts payable and cashiering. • Maintained listing of current capital projects and held frequent meetings with project managers to monitor progress. • Coordinated the quarterly employee investment meetings with the ICMA representative. + Monitored and completed required grant paperwork on Airport and other grants. • Monitored and approved payments on major contracts. • Worked on review and revision of City personnel policies. • Recruited, interviewed and hired replacements for vacant positions, including Procurement/Contracts Manager. • Worked on review and updating of records on contracts and agreements. • Worked on review and updating of the purchasing procedures. POLICE DEPARTMENT Administration • Continued review of agency policies as per accreditation standards. Conducted interviews for police officer and 911 operator positions. • Hired 3 police officers, 2 police recruits and 1911 operator. • Attended 6 special event meetings with city staff and participated in 2 fundraising events. • Completed our I lth Citizen's Academy with 22 participants graduating. * Administration attended 5 Council meetings. • Attended over 100 Law Enforcement related meetings and 21 public meetings and/or speaking engagements. • Administrative personnel attended over 60 hours of training. • Continued to collect statistical data to include: personnel, community, crime, etc. + Responded to 15 public records requests. • Continued our Community Outreach Program focusing on enriching our relationship with our citizens hosting events. • 2018/2019 Budget submissions. • Continued review of agency policies as per accreditation standards. Volunteers • The Community Service Volunteers worked a total of 1,980.5 hours during this quarter. • 56 bank deposit details were made. This service is done for City Hall so employees do not have to leave their assigned duties. • 2 traffic control details were assigned. These consist of directing traffic at city events, road closures, etc. • 912 house watches/close patrols were completed. • 63 vehicle' transports were made consisting of taking the vehicles to different locations for repairs, etc. • 147 business checks were made. These business checks are conducted to help patrol officers keep an eye on the business community which helps reduce crime. • 67 area checks of banks were made. Visual marked units around the banks at various times helps to deter crime. • 74 Airport checks were made. The visibility helps to deter crime. • 58 special details were assigned. • 0 miscellaneous assists for law enforcement personnel. • 129 paper runs, i.e.: State Attorney's Office, Sheriff's Office, etc. The volunteers pick up and deliver packages such as council packages, State Attorney paperwork, and miscellaneous items as needed. • Assisted with traffic control on 13 traffic crash scenes. • 0 warnings for handicapped parking tickets issued and 0 warnings for other parking infractions issued. • 39 citizen contacts. • 326 miscellaneous jobs. • 56 hours of Escorts were completed. 2 22 of 156 School Resource Officers Patrol hours Mentor lunches Crossing Guard contacts _ EJune Reports ■ May GREAT classes taught DARE classes taught ■ April Area/school checks 0 10 20 30 40 50 Area/school checks Full time Full time 10 10 DARE classes taught Classes Complete Classes Complete School out 0 GREAT classes taught I 6 Classes Complete School out 6 Reports i 5 8 4 17 Crossing Guard contacts ` 25 32 3 60 Mentor lunches 5 5 0 10 Patrol hours In school In school 40 40 Community event hours 0 0 2 2 Hours Christmas in July 8 10 50 68 Road Patrol and SAecial Operations • Officers were dispatched to 7059 calls for service, and self -initiated 4431 events. • 109 adult and 8 juvenile arrests were made. • Officers issued 172 citations, 1 parking citations, and 638 written warnings. • Officers completed 625 offense reports and 86 crash reports. Special Operations Incident Citations Warnings Reports Arrests Traffic Unit (462) 0 0 0 0 K-9 Ofc's (41/38/37) 34 89 33 12 TOTALS 34 89 33 12 Incident Citations Wamings Reports Arrests Traffic Homicides (462) 0 0 0 0 Boat Ofc (Assigned to shift coverage). K-9 Ofc's (41/38/59/42) 18 51 17 8 TOTALS 18 51 17 8 K-9 Unit • Arrests (Misdemeanors) 0 • Arrests (Felonies) 0 + Narcotic Searches 3 • Activity Reports 4 • K-9 Demos 3 • K-9 Training Hours 260 • Schools attended: ETOA SWAT Leadership and Officer Involved Shooting_ • Additional Training (SRT, In-house, New Hire, K-9 School, etc.): 568. • Agency Assisted: Fellsmere PD and Indian River County. Road Patrol and Special Operations have continued to professionally serve the community by patrolling the city in order to deter crime and maintain the community policing philosophy. Officers and sergeants maintain their skills by attending mandatory and advanced training throughout the year. 23 of 156 3 Detectives Arrests 3 6 1 10 Warrants 2 1 1 4 �n,n&Trai /Meeting Hours 106.5 130 68 344.5 FFallow-Ups 9 19 21 49 (Active Cases 13 8 8 29 Assigned Cases 16 12 8 36 Cleared Cases 2 3 1 6 Inactive Cases 2 4 4 10 Supplements 4 5 4 13 Surveillance (hours) 23 15 35 73 Surveillance (hours) Supplements Inactive Cases Cleared Cases Assigned Cases Active Cases Follow -Ups i Training/Meeting Hours Warrants Arrests Subpoenas 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 4 June ■ May ■ April 24 of 156 Communitv Policing & Crime Prevention Officer JARRESTS WARRANTS JTRAINING/MEETINGS (hours) I FOLLOW-UPS ACTIVE CASES JASSISGNED CASES CLEARED CASES INACTIVE CASES SUPPLEMENTS SURVEILLANCE (HOURS) COPE OUARTERLY REPORT 2 2 0 4 2 0 2 4 8 10 8 26 4 5 5 14 0 4 3 7 4 5 5 14 4 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 7 10 9 26 15 15 20 50 ACTIVITY COMMUNITY EVENTS HOURS 74 Community Everts: I HonorFlight-12 Agency Regional Outreach: Outreach:- Admin 8& Outreach: Pension Board -2 AGENCY OUTREACH EVENTS 3 I Concert! n the park -10 Trailer -3 crimestoppers -2 Special EventsMeeting- Torch Run -4 5plash Pad 2 COMMUNITY MEETINGS` 25 I IRSOpenHouse-14 POP: MonthlyChlefsBrief-4 SCHOOL -RELATED EVEN' 4 I LE/Ea rl's Day -10 >Community Meeting9':} Leadership Meatng-1 PUBLIC TRAINING CLASSES 20 North Pool -4 Home Depot Day -16 ,ExchangeC9ub•5. -- S80-4 First Responders -4 REGIONAL OUTREACH 2 I NCLibrory4 RotaryOub{ WreathPiacement•4 Eaplorerftt PROBLEM -ORIENTED POLICIN( 0 I ECIC -2 Activities: 30 HonorGuaM•6 Sacral Media EXPLORER POST ACTIVITIES 30 I Training and Schools: Management: TRAINING AND SCHOOLS 98 Redkids I nstructor- Facebaok Schon! Related Events: 40 Twitter IN-SERVICE INSTRUCTION 18 I Pelican Island Elem-4 Crimeprevertion-40 Instagram SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT 24 SehastianPDApp ADMINISTRATION & RESEARCF 19 I Public Training Classes: ROAD PATROL COVERAGE Full Time In -Service Inst Active Shooter Violence -4 New hire -2 S.A.F.E. Women Class -12 Firearms -8 Tactical build•8 ■ ACTIVITY ■ COMMUNITY EVENTS 20 30 - _ ■ AGENCY OUTREACH EVENTS - [ COMMUNITY MEETINGS 4 ■ SCHOOL -RELATED EVENTS 98 ■ PUBLIC TRAINING CLASSES ■ REGIONAL OUTREACH 159 3 -PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING 19 a EXPLORER POSTACTIVITIES 24 ■TRAININGANDSCHOOLS 19 ■ IN -SE RVICE INSTRUCTION SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & RESEARCH 0 ROAD PATROL COVE RAGE COPE UNIT ACTIVITY CHART 25 of 156 E Communications Division April, May & June 2018 3rd Quarter Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Totals Disp. Calls For Service 1,492 1,444 1,485 4,421 Officer Initiated Calls 1,371 1,587 1,482 4,927 Code Enf. Initiated Calls 544 702 772 2,018 Volunteer Initiated Calls 138 388 413 939 Calls Entered Into CAD. 3,654 4,228 4,279 12,161 911 Calls Received R 772 725 768 2,265 911 Calls Transferred OuTI, 382 346 376 1,104 Admin. Calls Received " 2,120 2,020 2,205 6,345 Admin. Calls Transferred 1,473 1,274 1,473 4,220 Outgoing Admin. Calls 794 896 1,048 2,738 Training/Meeting Hours 27 27 24 78 Crime Scene/Evidence 3rd Quarter April I May I June I Totals Property Received 115 113 43 271 Property Processed 30 49 15 94 Property Sent to Lab 20 16 22 58 Property Returned 6 10 10 22 Property Disposed 0 5 52 57 Cars Impounded 0 0 1 1 Video's Burned 24 51 15 90 Supplements Written 1 10 4 15 Training Hours 0 40 56 96 Call Outs 1 0 3 4 Call Outs Training Hours �s Supplements Written Video's Burned Cars Impounded June Property Disposed _ ■ May Property Returned ■ April Property Sent to Lab Property Processed Property Received 0 50 100 150 200 250 26 of 156 2 Code Enforcement • Issued 459 written warnings. This range from grass and weeds too high, trailers parked in front of the property line, trash and debris, yard sale permits, overgrowth of adjoining lot, no permit for a fence install, etc. • 124 property inspections for title companies and 152 sign violations. • 696 Code Services. • 651 re -inspections, 77 violations were not complied with, 136 were posted for abatement, 44 abated by vendors. • 404 violations complied. • 10 Liens filed, 5 liens released. • 143 violation letters sent for various reasons such as grass and weeds too tall, trash and debris, overgrown lots, etc. in an attempt to gain compliance. • There were no calls for water violation during the 3rd quarter. Alarm Assessment • $580.00 in alarm permits (new and renew). • $50.00 in false alarms fines. • 125 alarm responses by officers, 53 of these were false. • 33 New permits issued. + $540.00 in alarm permits (new and renew). • $200.00 in false alarms fines. • 160 alarm responses by officers, 70 of these were false. • 25 New permits issued. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Citizen Reauest • 176 request 58 stormwater related Roads Division • Asphalt • Put down 52 tons between potholes, overlays and repairs including: • Schumann walkways, Collier Creek large double repair, Gardenia patch. • Cemetery driveway in front of Kip's office garage door (involved removal of old milling driveway). • North Central/Jackson intersection, Cross St. & Main. St. apron, T -hanger pipe repair area. • Concrete + Removed lifted sidewalk, cut roots, formed & repoured two flags on Laconia by Tulip. • Removed and repoured two spots on Indian River Drive, one by Mulligans &one by Oyster Point for sign shop to install approach warning plates. • Dug out, formed and poured a 121x8 slab for Kip at Cemetery. • Dug out, formed and poured 8x8 slab for bike repair station on Riverfront. • Rented core drill and prepped area by Capt. Butchers for crosswalk sign relocation. • Core drilled concrete, set poles and hung chain link fencing for roads lock up area in TAJ. • Dug out, formed and poured 6x4 pad and assembled and mounted memorial bench at Golf Course. Miscellaneous • Cut and removed tree/stumps along property line/block retaining wall at Cemetery. • Dug down sand on Cemetery side to homeowners land grade and hauled sand away. • Repaired washout on Cemetery roadway with millings. • Dug up concrete pipe at T -Hangars, found and repaired joint separation then backfilled & compacted area. • Filled in sink hole on Azine Tern Until -SW crew could repair pipe separation. • Land clearing and removal behind Harbor Lights property, also removal of the contractors debris. • Assisted Paul Chapline with Airport office demolition /removal project. • Removed pavilion from Yacht Club work area. • Started edging back Schumann Dr. asphalt walkways. • Spread Millings, regraded and rolled overflow parking lot. • Replaced broken plank on Periwinkle walk over bridge. • Put down millings around two bathrooms on Golf Course where rain water was washing out the ground. • Swapped out 2 bench seats for Greg Gardner at Golf Course. • Refurbished old roads equipment trailer with new wiring, tires, etc. • Installed new battery kill switch on roads skid steer. • Cleaned the gutters & curbs of weeds and debris on Powerline Rd. and also started trimming over grown hedges/trees on entire road. • Used Rental stump grinder to remove stump from City Hall property. • Moved and weed eated all bridges. 27 of 156 • Mowed City lot on Periwinkle and Caravan. • Moved spillways at Concha and Joyhaven, and interior/exterior of PW Compound. • Started edging sidewalks and cleaned gutters on Fleming by Wave St. • Attended CPR training class, attended Stormwater Erosion class 2 days. • Right of ways • Cit all lots in unit 5, cut south half of unit 1. • Cut lots on all of Laconia from 512 to Periwinkle. • Cut lots on Robin Lane, • Mise. problem lots around town for quarter round maintenance. & traffic view construction. • Also cleaned quarter round on all lots that had it installed. • Grinding • Ground down all trip hazards at City Hall property. • Started grinding in the Concord/Schumann area and marked out all trip hazards with white paint in the area to warn pedestrians until repairs are completed. • Ground down all trip hazards at Sembler property on North Central. • Ground down trip hazards at Cemetery niche, pavilion area. • Airport Land Clearing Project • Removed trees that were cut by contractor. • Rented stump grinder for select stump removal, • Cleared trees around entire drainage ditch. • Dug out drainage ditch.. • Brought in fresh dirt and regraded entire area and gave roads staff practice time on the equipment in the process. • Installed 187' of single rail wood fencing to corner off freshly cleared area. Sign ShaD • Signage and Installation: • Created: 167 • Signs Installed: 68 • Signs straightened 7 • Decals: 37 • Pavement Markings: • Stop Bars 101 • Yellow Line Striping 150 Ln. ft. • White Line Striping 7,103 Ln. ft. • Parking Lots 120 Ln. ft. (Crab -E -Bills) • Crosswalks 14 • Special Projects: • Signage along river front: Completed. • ADA PDP mats installed at river front: Completed. • Laconia/Crystal Mist/Gladiola intersection resigned: Completed. • Airport Shad Hangars signage and pavement markings: Complete. • Barber St./ Englar St. Pedestrian Crosswalk resigned: Completed. • Street sign/Stop sign replacement section 1: Completed. • M.O.T. Special Events. • School Light Issues — 5. • Citizen Request — 16 (all addressed and closed). • Created Signs: • Street signs : 156 • Regulatory: 3 • Warning: 23 • Guide: 0 • Wayfind: 6 • Wildlife: 8 • Misc. 4 28 of 156 0 Facilities Maintenance • Maintain City Flags. • Maintain & monitor all lift stations. • Monthly AC maintenance all City Buildings. • Assist with Splash Pad Operations. • Daily monitoring of City Marquees. • Monthly monitoring and supplies for 15 AED Stations. • Perform daily maintenance and repairs to all City Buildings. • Monitor daily activity Nash Janitorial. • Sign Shop: Replace AC. • Cemetery: Replace AC. • Art Club: Replace AC unit ##2. • Old School: Replace AC unit #5. • City Hall: Install white boards at MIS and City Attorney's office. • Airport Admin: Paint East and North short wings (Nash). • Airport Admin: Carpet cleaning East and North short wings (Faulkner). • Community Center: Replace sink and faucet assembly. • Backflow: Complete backflow device testing. • Police Dept.: TLC Engineering HVAC systems review/inspection. Cemetery Routine mowing, weed eating, & edging • Burials full: 9. • Cremains: 10. • Fix irrigation u -I -z-6. • Dug cremains holes. • Fisher graded expansion flat. • Enhancements : True Green & plants. • Monthly gauge of rain: 20.20 Inches. • Parts run. • Showed public cemetery property. • Markers installed. • Took office chairs to landfill, added red mulch. • FisherlSandhill/d rt ongoing. • Cleaned culver/r/w north Central Avenue. Construction Specialist • Parks • Repair lighting Twin Piers. • Secure pricing for new lighting Twin Piers. • Install new lighting skate park. • Install new timer at historical park. • Grass maintenance at Stormwater park. • Install new pump splash pad. • Airport • Remove closet walls in vacant office area. • Close off doorway and window area. • Seal and paint walls. • PD • Replace exhaust vent motors roof top. • Replace faulty breakers electrical room. • Install new LED lighting in lobby. • Community Development • Pricing and estimates for lighting Indian. River Dr. • Security door reception area. 9 29 of 156 • Cemetery • Install new lighting. • Install new irrigation pump. • Repair wiring @ pump house. • Crab -E- Bills • Repair walkway deck surface. • Estimates for roof repair. • Golf Course • Replace photo cell parking lot. • Install fencing back 9 bathroom areas. • Repair waterline at front 9 bathrooms. • Install water shut off valves. • General research for lighting and pricing on upcoming projects and repairs to older facilities and Parks. Fleet Management • The Fleet Management Staff completed 258 repair work orders, 57 preventive maintenance services 14 service calls and 5 road trips to pick up parts. • In addition to in-house vehicle/equipment work orders, 26 vehicle and equipment repairs were scheduled and completed by outside vendors. The fleet Management Staff completed 258 repair work orders, 57 preventive maintenance services 14 service calls and 5 road trips to pick up parts. • In addition to in-house vehicle/equipment work orders, 26 vehicle and equipment repairs were scheduled and completed by outside vendors. • Took delivery of the following units: (I Big Tex 7' x 14' dump trailer. • (1) Arising 7 x 12' enclosed trailer. • Completed the prep (lights, rack, graphics, etc.) on the following units: (1) Big Tex 7'x 14 ` dump trailer. • (1) Arising 7' x 12' enclosed trailer. • Fuel Cost as of the April 6, 2018 is as follows: • $2.08 per gallon of gasoline, increase ofl.05 % over the past 90 days. • $2.26 per gallon of diesel fuel, decrease of .99% over the past 90 days. LEISURE SERVICES • Special Events Prep • Delivered and retrieved carts, prepared, clean-up, open and shut stage for event. • Maintenance • Debris cleanup, pressure wash fence, tree trimming, replacing stones in front of splash pad and clock tower, Barbed wire fence removal Filbert park, Apply asphalt millings to parking lot Hardee Park, apply mulch Riverview Park, Aging scoreboard panel removal BSSC. • Installation • New bench Stormwaterpark, Doggie bag station Stormwater Park, install bench Hardee Park, Install new irrigation pump at Chamber of Commerce. • Repair • Irrigation line and head repair Chamber of Commerce, Irrigation line and head repair at medians Schumann Dr. , Irrigation line repair dog park, water leak at the Police Dept., Netting repair & multi-purpose field BSSC, Broken fence Riverview Park, Irrigation line and head repair Friendship Park. • Total of 12 repairs. • Maintenance 32 • Installation 11 • Special Event Prep 11 • Worked Event 11 • Continued maintenance on all of the parks and medians, mowing, edging, weed eating, trimming hedges, pulling weeds, and picking up trash. 30 of 156 10 STORMWATER DEPARTMENT • Quarter Round Maintenance • Cleaned 3,040 Liner ft. • Stormwater Park • Pumps 1-2-3 ubsoect wre structures and weed eat. • Rear Ditch Excavation (units 2 -4 - 6) • Units 1-17 1,479 cubic yards of vegetation removed. • Stormwater Inspections • 332 Inspections. • Road Crossing • 3 140 ft, installed. • Vac Truck • 6 Baffleboxes Indian River Dr. 7 cubic yards removed. • Monitor contractor cutting ditches and right of ways. • On going mowing & clearing up Stormwater detention ponds in unit 17 Day Dr. Area. • Missing month of April information. GOLF COURSE • Revenue 18-19 17-18 Difference+/- • 3rd Quarter Rev. $291,499 $248,101 }$43,398 • YTD Tot. Rev. $1,242,096 $1,058,095 +$184,001 • 3rd Quarter Rounds 11,602 10,104 +1,498 • YTD Tot. Rds. 38,711 33742 +4,969 • 3rd Q. Green Fee $98,277 $86,070 +$12,207 • 3rd Q. Cart Fee $152,394 $127,855 +$24,539 • 3rd Q. Annual Member $1,169 $2,349 -$1,180 • YTD Ann. Mem. $96,306 $84,877 +$11,429 • 3rd Q. USGA Hdcp. $120 $240 4120 • 3rd Q. Discount Card $281 $374 493 • YTD Discount. Cd. $32,151 $30,001 +$2,150 • 3rd Q. Driving Range $11,066 $9,337 +S 1,729 • YTD Dr. Range. $40,715 $34,437 +S6,278 • 3rd Q. Club Rental $777 $690 x-$87 • 3rd Q. Club Storage $0 $62 +$62 • YTD CR & CS $5,707 $4,920 +$787 • 3rd Q. Golf Shop Retail $19,084 $20,953 -$1,869 • YTD Shop Retail $76,186 $67,102 +$9,084 • 3rd Q. PGA Pro Lesson $740 $168 +$572 • YTD Lesson $1,460 $1,912 -$452 • 3rd Restaurant Rent $7,575 $0 +$7,575 • YTD Rest. Rent $19,922 $0 $0 +$19,922 • Comments: Revenue continues to be strong in greens, cart fees & rounds played. This is due, in part, to the excellent condition of the golf course (greens and fairways in very good condition). Golf shop sales continue to be very good and the driving range is having one of its best years revenue -wise. • Charity, Corporate and Special Golf Tournaments for the 3rd quarter included Friendship Christian Church (48 players), Len Eddy 3 -Day Invitational Memorial (16 players), Spanish Lakes Rovers League (20 players), Indian River Airboat (132 players), Sebastian Chamber of Commerce (116 players), T. P. Medical Benefit (144 players), Habitat Golf League (20 players) and LPGA Amateur Association 24 players). • Charity, Corporate and Special Golf Tournaments scheduled for 4th quarter include Piper Aircraft, Sebastian River High School Rugby and Sebastian River High School Football Boosters Touchdown Club. • Continued success with junior golf clinics in conjunction with the Indian River Golf Foundation. SNAG (Starting New at Golf) clinics and private and group junior golf lessons are always available. • All weekly leagues, including Wojo's Monday League, Postal League, Sebastian Men's and Women's Golf Associations, Sebastian Business League and weekend `Blitz" leagues, offering great support and repeat play. 31 of 156 11 AERPORT • Removed trees that were cut by contractor • Rented stump grinder for select stump removal • Cleared trees around entire drainage ditch • Dug out drainage ditch • Brought in fresh dirt and regraded entire area and gave roads staff practioc time on the equipment in the process • Installed 187' of single rail wood fencing to corner off freshly cleared area BUELDING DEPARTMENT • In the third quarter of this fiscal year, a total of 51 new single-family homes were issued building permits. New single family residence permits have increased significantly after falling off for two quarters. Other permits of significance include 1 new manufactured home, 0 new commercial buildings, 0 commercial additions, 6 commercial alterations, 1 commercial build out, 2 residential additions, 3 new multi -family and 17 residential alterations. In all, 1,216 building permits were issued in the third quarter. Over all permitting has now increased by 22% over this quarter. This has been the most permitting activity we have seen in a year. • Total number of inspections for the third quarter was 4020 for an average of 63 inspections per working day. The number of inspections has remained about the same as the second quarter, This is likely to increase as permitting activity increased. • The Fire Marshal's office has continued to conduct annual inspections as requested from businesses that need annual inspections for their licensure requirements. • The number of Certificates of Occupancy issued for the third quarter included 36 new single family residences, 4 commercial certificates of occupancy, 2 commercial temporary certificates of occupancy, 1 commercial certificates of completion. • The following lists the Business Tax Receipt activity for the second quarter: new businesses -14, renewals -7, transfers -0, duplicates -0, home based businesses -16, commercial businesses -5, insurance companies -0 and solicitor registrations -12. In addition, there have been 42 requests for permit records on properties within the city from lien/title companies. • The Building Department has successfully implemented the new building department computer program. This program has many benefits to the customer. Customers who create an account get instant notification on any updates to the status of their permits. They also get real time notification of inspection results. The customer receives an e-mail with the printed copy of the permit and approved documents for all the smaller permits that are approved. On-line permitting for smaller permits will be available in the near future. 32 of 156 12 I -M, If SEBASTtAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL COUNCIL MEETING DATE. August 28, 2019 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Alcohol beverage approval. RECOMMENDATION. Approve alcoholic beverages for Ferguson Baby Shower at the Community Center. BACKGROUND: Teslyn Ferguson is seeking Council approval to serve alcoholic beverages at the Community Center on Saturday, December 28, 2019 from 3:OOPM to 9:OOPM. Staff has verified Applicant's date of birth. They are expecting 90 to 100 people. IF AGENDA ITEM REOUIRES EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS: NIA Administrative Services Department/CFO Review: ATTACHMENTS: City Manager Authorization: 77 Date: fl,2 i J/ J 1. Facility Rental Pen -nit Application 2. Receipt(s) 33 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN FACILITY 2019 RENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION an HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Parks Phone: (772) 228-7054 FAX: (772) 388-8248 *for emergency purposes ONLY, please dial 772.473,0454 =, l `� Date: r Community Center L/ts n A Name of Perm�p' tee (permits may ry be issued to an adult) A U ki) 1 l l V1 1;1 1 f �'J Y Physical Address cAn City State Reason for Rental - Type -a Function Office Use Only: 6250 Security Pd: Date Initials Rental Fee 6.7% Tax Total Rental Pd: Date n&ais City Marager Approval: Date initials City Council Approval: Date (if applicable) Police Hire Verification (If applicable) Initials ❑ Yacht Club Name of Organization (if applicable) Mailing Address (if different) 917 9'D�/ Phone E -Mail (�e_Sr(Dls i Ain tiTWgd Number of Attendees (if more than 75 attendees, police services are requciirred by R-10-15) l `� L -I lye Req uested Da e ' Time: Fro nr To Please answ the f I�wing ye or no: 1) Are you a resident of Sebastian? 1 2) Will there be an admission charge or door charge? C11f 3) Will alcoholic beverages be served? r{ /4 If es, lease rovide govt. issued ID roof of age (Q I sl 1 iii""" 111 Y P P 9 P 9 Da e of I13irth Verified by I,uS't ,,``she undersigned, acknowledge that I am the applicant or authorized agent of the above r renced oration, that 1 am aware of the provisions of the City of Sebastian Codes and Resolutions in respect to this application and use of City facilities for which I have applied and agree to abide by all rules and regulations set out for use of City facilities. I understand that the $250.00 security deposit will be refunded if the building is left clean and undamaged, however, failure to clean the facilities immediately after the use, or causing any damage to the facility will result in forfeiture, in part or full, of the se urity deposit. Si r�ure o�`Applicant 34 of 156 CITY OF SEBASTIAN 1466 PARKS & RECREATION RECEIPT Name yh r�bi 0 h 1-1Cash Date !!� b dheck C,,li j Credit Amount Paid 1 001001 208001 Sales Tax 001001 220000 Security Deposit ao 001501 362100 Taxable Renta 001501 362150 Non -Taxable Rent 001501 342100 Police Security Services 001501 366150 Brick Pavers 001501 366000 Memorial Benches 001501 369400 Reimbursement Services Total Paid Initials White - Dept. of Origin • Yellow - Admin. Svcs. • Pink - Applicant 35 of 156 M CIF BAS -FLAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND COUNCIL MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM TITLE RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL August 28, 2019 Natural Resources Board Interview, unless waived, and nominate one unexpired, regular member - term to expire 7/1/2021 At Council's discretion, move to waive the advertising requirement of Resolution R-12-38 and fill vacated alternate position BACKGROUND: In response to the City Clerk's advertisement, the City Clerk has been notified that the following would like to serve (alphabetically): Robert Bedea Kathy Brothers Jessica Lovell Alternate Member Gerald Rosebery submitted his resignation to the City Clerk Wednesday, August 21 leaving his alternate position open. At Council's discretion, fill the vacant position with one of the applicants. ATTACHMENTS: Applications, Ad, List City Clerk Authorization: Date: �- - 21-1 q J - 36 of 156 CITY Of 5r Tt -N HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND VOLUNTEER BOARD AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION This application form is a public record under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and is open to public inspection. In accordance with FS 119.07 Exemptions, individuals employed or retired from certain professions relating to law enforcement may request that their physical address and phone number remain confidential. Unless requested, that information will be available and not redacted. Per Section 2-170, all Board and Committee members must be City residents unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or resolution. Board and Committee terms are three years unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or resolution. You may reapply for succeeding terms upon term expiration. r Name: r� Address (( [ — City: State: Zip: 3z _v Telephone: (7-5 ) �z�7 - b Z7F E -Mail Address: Employer: City: V C `"- State: Zip: Business Telephone: (t7,� )7/ / e 5 - 7�2 o I am interested in serving on the tthe following board(s)/ccommittee(s): I" Choice: ! v�� ''C�� _504452nd Choice: pj) 0 CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE (serves only six months, every five years —next meeting in 2021) CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY BOARD CONSTRUCTION BOARD* (permanent) DISABILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (temporary) NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD (permanent) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION* ** (permanent) POLICE RETIREMENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES* PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (permanent) SEBASTIAN YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL (temporary) VETERANS' ADVISORY BOARD (temporary) *Filing of financial disclosure is required following appointment **Must be resident one year prior to application. 37 of 156 Please summarize special skills, qualifications, or education you have acquired for this appointment: (Your resume, professional certifications or designations may be attached.) s� Why do you want to serve on this board? r i © - ao C v U� Ka� Do you presently serve on another City Board or Committee? iV 0 If yes, please list: Have you previously served on any other City Board or Committee? t) n If yes, please list: I will represent the best interests of the entire City while serving as a board member. I hereby waive and release any and all rights for claims for damages and injuries I may suffer while performing or after performing volunteer services for the City of Sebastian. I give permission for the City of Sebastian to use my photograph for publicity purposes (unless requesting exemption). If required for this board, I consent to the annual filing of the Statement of Financial Interests. http://www.ethics.state.fl.us/ethics/forms.htm] If appointed, I acknowledge that it is my obligation and duty to comply with the following: Code of Ethics for Public Officials (Florida Statutes, Chapter 112, Part Ill) and Florida Sunshine Law (Florida Statutes, Chopter286) Statutes may be reviewed at htto://www.flsenate.pov/statutes I understand I must contact the City Clerk's office to request reappointment prior to expiration or to be considered for another board. I hereby certify that all the statements made on this application are true and correct. I understand that any false sta t r omissions from this application may be cause for my application not to be considered. Signature of Applicant: Date:1 �! , Date Received by City Clerk's Office ��/� �/ S by: 38 of 156 MY OF SE AN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND VOLUNTEER BOARD AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION This application form is a public record under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and is open to public inspection. In accordance with F5 119.07 Fxemptions, individuals employed or retired from certain professions relating to law enforcement may request that their physical address and phone number remain confidential. Uniess requested, that information will be available and not redacted. Per Section 2-170, all Board and Committee members must be City residents unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or resolution. Board and Committee terms are three years unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or resolution. You may reapply for succeeding terms upon term expiration. Name: Kathryn Ann Brothers ( K,Gt} , 6 Address: 569 Ray St City: Sebastian FL 32958-4245 Telephone: (615-438-3632 E -Mail Address: _kathybrothers@me.com Employer: .retired City: Business Telephone: ( State: Zip: I am interested in serving on the following boards)/committee(s): 15` Choice: Natural Resources 2"d Choice: Metro Planning Organic-ation Citizen Advisory Committee CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE (serves only six months, everyfive years — next meeting in 2021) CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY BOARD CONSTRUCTION BOARD* (permanent) DISABILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (temporary) NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD (permanent) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION* ** (permanent) POLICE RETIREMENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES* PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (permanent) SEBASTIAN YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL (temporary) VETERANS' ADVISORY BOARD (temporary) *Filing of financial disclosure is required following appointment **Must be resident one year prior to application. 39 of 156 Please summarize special skills, qualifications, or education you have acquired for this appointment: (Your resume, professional certifications or designations may be attached.) Please see attached resume Why do you want to serve on this board? _Want to be more involved i+ he community; have served on boards for years; use experience and knowledged gained over 30+ years as banker and attorney. Do you presently serve on another City Board or Committee? no If yes, please list: Have you previously served on any other City Board or Committee? no If yes, please list: I will represent the best interests of the entire City while serving as a board member. I hereby waive and release any and all rights for claims for damages and injuries I may suffer while performing or after performing volunteer services for the City of Sebastian. I give permission for the City of Sebastian to use my photograph for publicity purposes (unless requesting exemption). If required for this board, I consent to the annual filing of the Statement of Financial Interests. http://www.eth ics.state.fl. us/ethics/forms.html If appointed, I acknowledge that it is my obligation and duty to comply with the following: Code of Ethics for Public Officials (Florida Statutes, Chapter 112, Part lll) and Florida Sunshine Law (Florida Statutes, Chapter 286) Statutes may be reviewed at http://www.fisenate.gov/statutes I understand I must contact the City Clerk's office to request reappointment prior to expiration or to be considered for another board. l hereby certify that all the statements made on this application are true and correct. I understand that any false statements or omissions from this application may be cause for my application not to be considered. Signature of Applicant: iC "v,_ A. 6kD %Y_ Date: g 14 1 16t Date Received by City Clerk's Office ` �' N by: 4 W+IXC XiPYZ, 40 of 156 Kathryn Ann "Kathy" Brothers 569 Ray Street Sebastian FL 32958-4245 615-438-3632 Education University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. B.A., political science, with highest honors, Phi Beta Kappa. J.D., College of Law. M.A., Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce. Career Held progressively responsible positions in Nashville TN banks, including Bank of America and Regions Bank. Focused on commercial real estate, commercial lending and commercial credit. Began as a Credit Analyst; retired as Chief Credit Officer in 2013. Part time instructor for Risk Management Association (RMA), the premier banking education and training organization. Currently teach Commercial Loan Documentation and Construction Loan Management. Practiced real estate law as founding member of boutique Nashville area firm. SCUBA instructor (trained with EASE in Vero Beach). Previous Board Experience Chair and Finance Committee Chair for Comprehensive Care Center, Nashville, TN, a nonprofit medical center for HIV+ patients. Vestry member, Junior Warden and Finance Committee chair at Nashville area Episcopal Churches, most recently at St. Ann's. Volunteer for Hands On Nashville; Nashville Humane Association. Past and Present Memberships Kentucky Bar Association, Tennessee Bar Association, American Bar Association C0Ii04W111111P Specialized negotiation training; proficient in major computer software 41 of 156 crn 0w ST HOW OF PELICAN ISLAND VOLUNTEER BOARD AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION This application form is a public record under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and is open to public inspection. In accordance with FS 119.07 Exemptions, individuals employed or retired from certain professions relating to law enforcement may request that their physical address and phone number remain confidential. Unless requested, that information will be available and not redacted. Per Section 2-170, all Board and Committee members must be City residents unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or resolution. Board and Committee terms are three years unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or resolution. You may reapply for succeeding terms upon term expiration. JESSICA LOVELL Name: Address: 419 JOY HAVEN DRIVE Zip: 32958 Telephone: ( 276 E -Mail Address: JNLOVELL00@HOTMAIL.COM Employer: BB&T (Branch Banking and Trust) City: HQ Winston Salem Business Telephone: ( 336 ) 703 - 5655 FL City: SEBASTIAN State: 732 9023 State: INC Zip: 27023 I am interested in serving on the following board(s)/committee(s): 1" Choice: Natural Resources Board 2nd Choice: CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE (serves only six months, every five years -- next meeting in 2021) CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY BOARD CONSTRUCTION BOARD* (permanent) DISABILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (temporary) NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD (permanent) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION* ** (permanent) POLICE RETIREMENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES* PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (permanent) SEBASTIAN YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL (temporary) VETERANS' ADVISORY BOARD (temporary) *Filing of financial disclosure is required following appointment "Must be resident one year prior to application. 42 of 156 Please summarize special skills, qualifications, or education you have acquired forth is appointment: (Your resume, professional certifications or designations may be attached.) I have a blended work background and skillset with strongest focus in program planning, project implementation, and operational monitoring. I enjoy taking challenging assignments and turning into scalable and structured projects with simple solutions by applying operational, tactical, and strategic management methodologies. With the aptitude, diligence, perseverance, and a high level of performance, I welcome challenging initiatives while working with minimal resources. Included resume for qualifications and education. Why do you want to serve on this board? I welcome the opportunity to apply my passion to protect and restore our natural resources; meanwhile, building a partnership within the community and working in collaboration with peers, to address and solve natural resource initiatives. Do you presently serve on another City Board or Committee? NO If yes, please list: Have you previously served on any other City Board or Committee? NO If yes, please list: I will represent the best interests of the entire City while serving as a board member. I hereby waive and release any and all rights for claims for damages and injuries I may suffer while performing or after performing volunteer services for the City of Sebastian. I give permission for the City of Sebastian to use my photograph for publicity purposes (unless requesting exemption). If required for this board, I consent to the annual filing of the Statement of Financial Interests. http://www.ethics.state.fl.us/ethics/forms.html If appointed, I acknowledge that it is my obligation and duty to comply with the following: Code of Ethics for Public Officials (Florida Statutes, Chapter 112, Part ill) and Florida Sunshine Law (Florida Statutes, Chapter 286) Statutes may be reviewed at htto://www.flsenate.Rov/statutes I understand I must contact the City Clerk's office to request reappointment prior to expiration or to be considered for another board. I hereby certify that all the statements made on this application are true and correct. I understand that any false statements or omissions from this application may be cause for my application not to be considered. Signature of Applicant: '.,PLi�w,f"'x Date: p � f Date Received by City Clerk office �- 5 " l f by: W.11 43 of 156 Jessica Nicole Lovell 419 Joy Haven Drive • Sebastian, FL 32958 • (276) 732-9023 • 1nlovelI00@hotmad,com Experience Program Manager BB&T 01/2017 -present Provide direct leadership over the strategy, implementation, and execution of an enterprise -wide emergency preparedness and response infrastructure and automated external defibrillator programs. Collaborate and build relationships cross - functionally with all business unit stakeholders to provide emergency response plans at 2,300+ facilities in 16 states. Establish and maintain a pool of 8,500+ on-site emergency responders to build, sustain, and enhance the capability to mitigate against, prepare for, and respond to emergencies and disasters. Drive the development and sustainment of program administration operations while providing guidance and consultation to functional groups at each location. Facilitate partnership growth and program awareness with functional groups by implementing training programs. Direct the development and implementation of policies, plans, and procedures, designed to foster sustainability and programs compliance. Utilize evaluation and improvement plans in establishing policy and plan procedure modifications to enhance infrastructure, in conjunction with management. Develop quality control measures for monitoring program progression while assessing and managing issues and resolutions to meet goals and objectives. Aligning strategic plans into actionable tasks and oversee prioritization process and resources allocations. Monitoring performance management of vendor and internal partners service level agreements for efficiency and cost variances. Create reports, summaries, and program briefings to management. Provide effective leadership while being innovative and creative when working to solve problems. Public Health All Hazards Emergency Planner and Safety Coordinator Stokes County Public Health 0712011-01/2017 Oversee the development and enhancements of CDC Public Health Preparedness Operational Capabilities while integrating all - hazard approach involving the healthcare community, emergency management, community officials, stakeholders, and other critical organizations to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from health emergencies. Coordinate interagency and community needs assessments and surveys, aligning planning efforts to response plan development utilizing Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines, to enhance coordination, improve emergency response capabilities, bridge identified gaps, build public confidence, and long-term sustairability. Foster the growth of strategic planning and implementation of integrated emergency response plans and surrounding resources through the development of extensive programming, promoting, and networking with local and regional organizations. Warranty Administrator and Accounts Representative Lake Keowee Chrysler Dodge Jeep 0312010-0512011 Prepare, verify, and process all warranty claims to reconcile receivables. Code, process, and schedule all billing invoices and purchase orders; thereby, arbitrating payment of status or adjust accounts within specific guidelines. Daily general ledger balancing of bank deposits, credit card debits/credits, and customer payments. Project Coordinator Checked Flag Sports 05/2006-03/2010 Develop, coordinate, and implement multi -tiered channel tasks associated with mass distribution of merchandise. Prioritize activities of 6 -staff team to ensure projects are produced timely and in accordance with established budget and objectives for each project. Assist sales and marketing management with communications media and advertising materials to effectively represent products and services to customers and prospects. Office Administrative Specialist Blue Ridge Regional Airport 10/2003-05/2006 Provide a wide range of operational and support activities while assisting management. Ability to develop specialized reports to track, analyze, and correct data. Compose and prepare correspondence, memoranda, and promotional materials. Ability to analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective and independent course of action while remaining proactive and responsive to higher management. 44 Of 156 Receptionist Associate The City of Martinsville. Public Works and Water Resources 06/2000-01/2004 Provide specialized and complex office support to the Public Works and Water Resources Directors. Analyze and resolve problems in a logical and effective manner. Ability to interact with public and city officials with diplomacy and tact. Interpret and explain City ordinances and guidelines, department policies, programs, rules, requirements, and procedures. Research, compile, analyze, and prepare information and statistical and financial data for inclusion into special and periodic reports, documents, proposals, and correspondence related to department operations including documents of confidential nature. Exercise tact and diplomacy in dealing with sensitive, complex and confidential information or documents. Promote a positive city image and professional customer relations. Park Interpreter Fairy Stone State Park 1998-2001 Seasonal Develop and conduct a variety of natural, cultural history, educational and recreational programs, or special events to a variety of audiences. Manage visitor center daily operations, meanwhile creating an atmosphere of hospitality through courteous, helpful, and professional interpersonal skills. Conduct and interact with diverse groups effectively while obtaining cooperation. Assist in land conservation via trail maintenance or development. Capability to work outdoors in varying weather conditions, while maintaining strong attention to safety and apparent violations of park regulations. Education M.B.A. Master of Business Administration: East Carolina University, (2018 -Present) Minora Project Management B.A. Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness: Virginia Commonwealth University, (2013) Minora Criminal Justice 4.0 GPA A.A. Administration of Justice: Patrick Henry Community College, (2005) Software Microsoft and Mac applications: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, SharePoint, Project; Planon, Ariba, FileMaker; QuickBooks; ERA Reynolds and Reynolds; Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, and QuarkXPress. 45 of 156 CfY OF SIE , HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND July 29, 2019 Contact: Jeanette Williams 388-8215 PRESS RELEASE NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD VACANCY The City of Sebastian is seeking applicants to fill an unexpired, regular member, term on the Natural Resources Board. The term will expire July 2021. This board holds the City's annual Earth Day event and advises City Council on environmental issues with a three -pronged focus on preservation, regulatory programs and asset management. This is a volunteer position and applicants must be a City resident. The Board meets on the first Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 1225 Main Street, Sebastian. If Council fills a regular member position with an alternate member, Council reserves the right to fill the alternate position with remaining applicants. Applications are available in the City Clerk's office, City Hall, 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm or at www.citvofsebastian.orq and will be accepted until August 12, 2019. �:= 46 of 156 NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD Nicole Mosblech Apptd reg member 5124117 Term expires 873 Gilbert Street 7/1/2020 Sebastian, FL 32958 Nikki, mosblech(d-)gmail.com (484) 269-7017 Robert Howland Apptd reg member 2113119 Term expires 1323 Cownie Lane 71112022 Sebastian, FL 32958 Howlar1955C°7gmail.com (352) 262-3199 Jon Wolfe -vacant Apptd 10/10/18 Term expires 7/1/2021 536 Cross Creek Circle Sebastian, FL 32958 itbwolfena.gmail.com (561) 252-5329 Ruth Callaghan Apptd reg member 1123119 Term expires 202 Barbossa Drive 7/1/2022 Sebastian, FL 32958 Rforman32 ,amail.com (610) 304-9973 Gonna Ware Apptd 4110119 Term expires 781 Tuxedo Terrace 7/1/2022 Sebastian, FL 32958 diwares a( ,,amall.com (757) 999-0331 Brian O'Neill Apptd 9113117 Term expires 790 Beard Avenue 7/1/2020 Sebastian, FL 32958 sdbfo(a.vahoo.com (310) 403-1675 Charles Stadelman Apptd 9113117 Term expires 146 Mabry Street 7/1/2020 Sebastian, FL 32958 stadelman(aD.bel Isouth.net (772)584-5522 Gerald Rosebery — Alternate Apptd 1123119 Term expires 1343 Thornhill Lane 7/1/2022 Sebastian, FL 32958 geraIdrose berv(cDvahoo.com (772) 913-1749 Susan Olson — Alternate Apptd 6112119 Term expires 460 Perch Lane 7/1/2020 Sebastian, FL 32958 Jerrvandsue1967(a,bellsouth.net (772) 664-6085 Revised 6.28.19 4 regular members are needed to make a quorum. In the event a regular member cannot make the meeting, an alternate steps in. 47 of 156 Cm f SEB11 AS?�l HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Council Meeting Date: 28 August 2019 Aaenda Item Title: Ordinance 0-19-04 — Petition for Voluntary Annexation -- Graves Brothers Company — Second Reading and Public Hearing Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 0-19-04. Background: In accordance with Florida Statute 171.044, Voluntary Annexation and the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan; the property owners, Grave Brothers Company represented by Mr. Jeff Bass, have requested a voluntary annexation into the City of Sebastian. The subject property consist of 1,118 acres, more or less, located south of County Road 510 ROW, west of lands adjacent to the 74`I' Ave ROW, north of 69h Street ROW, and east of 82°d Ave ROW. The subject property is currently vacant agricultural land in unincorporated Indian River County, contiguous to the existing corporate limits and boundaries of the City of Sebastian. The applicant has requested a mix of future land use designations in order to achieve consistency with the city's adopted Future Land Use Element of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The property currently maintains an active agricultural use so the zoning will remain as Agriculture A-1 until such time as conceptual planning has been completed for the property. A Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis has been submitted by the applicant as Attachment "A". If Agenda Item Reauires Expenditure of Funds: NIA Administrative Services Department/CFO Review: " Attachments: 1. Ordinance 0-19-04 2. Staff Analysis Report 3. Attachment "N'— Request Letter & Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis from applicant 4. Iet6ers ficin Ixidian River am -Ly City Manager Authorization: 4 Date: 28 August 2019 48 of 156 ORDINANCE NO. 0-19-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 1,118 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 510 ROW, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO THE 74TH AVE ROW, NORTH OF 69TH STREET ROW, AND EAST OF 82ND AVE ROW; PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE CORPORATE LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR INTERIM LAND USE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owners of real property in unincorporated Indian River County, contiguous to the existing corporate limits and boundaries of the City of Sebastian, and being reasonably compact, petitions the governing body of the City of Sebastian to be voluntarily annexed into the municipality; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian, Florida finds and determines that the annexation of said parcel is in the best interest of the City; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. PROPERTY. The following described property now lying and being in an unincorporated area of Indian River County, Florida, is hereby annexed into the corporate limits of the City of Sebastian, Florida and the boundary lines of said City are hereby redefined to include said real property as shown on "Exhibit 1" containing 1,118 acres, more or less. Section 2. INTERIM LAND USE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION. The interim land use and zoning classifications for this property shall be consistent with the provisions of state law. Section 3. FILING. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, as well as the Chairman of the County Commission of Indian River County, Florida, and with the Florida Department of State within seven days of adoption. 1 49 of 156 Section 4. NOTICE. That notice of this ordinance has been posted in accordance with Section 171.044, Florida Statutes. Section 5. SCRIVENER'S ERRORS. Sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of typographical errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, without need of public bearing, by filing a corrected or re -codified copy of same with the City Clerk. Section 6. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 7. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold or determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, the remainder of the Ordinance shall be invalidated and it shall be presumed that the City Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact this Ordinance without such invalid or unconstitutional provisions. Section 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. Following its adoption and recordation, includiniz the Annexation AP-reement attached hereto as Exhibit 2, executed by all parties, this Ordinanace shall become effective. This OFdinancc :hall become efzeetive i ecti-a C'1 -Y up the City The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Jim Hill Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen Councilmember Ed Dodd Councilmember Albert Iovino Councilmember Bob McPartlan The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this 28'x' day of August, 2019. 2 50 of 156 ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC City Clerk CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA IM Jim Hill, Mayor Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: James Stokes, City Attorney 51 of 156 J CITY OF 5EBA5TIAN i 0 0 o GRAVES BROTHERS CITY OF SEBASTIAN - ) I ANNEXATION 150' I I) BYPASS --f h r -- CANAL i I I e� )TAL AREA TO BE VEXED - INCLUDES L RIGHTS OF WAY E. EXHIBIT 1 OVERALL SITE AREA - INCLUDING RIGHTS OF WAY, APPROVED PD "LIBERTY PARK" 125' V LATERAL x CANAL a DEDICATIONS. i I ±1,118 AC 100 C4E 125' —�' LATERAL 'L' CANAL i C5E N . w r ISM 11 'r- . .* y ■ ,ai � . " Iw►'�j'! MMPI* �. � INDIAN RIVER APPROVED Pp "RIVER OAKS � �r wtln 9 M COUNTY , 5COA5TIAN '• I�-�� i i r � ° !y 00 I z " o Z ^ _ 150' I I) BYPASS --f h r -- CANAL i I I e� )TAL AREA TO BE VEXED - INCLUDES L RIGHTS OF WAY E. EXHIBIT 1 OVERALL SITE AREA - INCLUDING RIGHTS OF WAY, APPROVED PD "LIBERTY PARK" 125' V LATERAL x CANAL a DEDICATIONS. i I ±1,118 AC 100 C4E 125' —�' LATERAL 'L' CANAL i C5E N . w r ISM 11 'r- . .* y ■ ,ai � . " Iw►'�j'! MMPI* �. � � �r wtln 9 M ..s I � •: ° !y 00 z " o Z ^ _ j*7 GRAPHIC SCALE U B00 1 inch 800, ft. SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.' ..� ., EXHIBIT T I CrvIVr srnuc>tau- UMkW erOr • 40F Pr N No-- lMvru �urravc ��:�� cEnnn LVD. S tiu E 201 ion x0. a00aaae6 7717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO 9EACH. FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 1770-9622 FAX "21770-9496 EMAIL fnfc@sbsengineers.com M I � 0 Exhibit 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATION ALL THAT LAND LYING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE COMMON SECTION CORNER OF SECTION 25, 26, 35 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MARKED BY A FOUND 20d NAIL WITH NO IDENTIFICATION RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 063806, RUN NORTH 89"56'13" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH SECTION LINE RUN SOUTH 00004'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WABASSO ROAD / S.R. 510 / 85TH STREET, RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 88510-2601, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 181, PAGE 593 AND 658 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C' CANAL / 82nd/ AVENUE, 250.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32 , PAGE 177 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY ANNEXATION; FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING RUN NORTH 89'56'13" EAST ALONG THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WABASSO ROAD / S.R. 510 / 85TH STREET, A DISTANCE OF 2435.37 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT "LATERAL 'L' CANAL", 150.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 210, PAGE 300 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 0010'09" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1416.65 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL 150.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°34'14" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1347.63 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL 125.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°10'26" WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL A DISTANCE OF 640.57 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°10'01" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 664.73 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00"05'15" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1940.26 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'R -14E CANAL' 100.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN CHANCERY ORDER BOOK 9, PAGE 564 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°44'16" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF LATERAL 'R -14E' CANAL A DISTANCE OF 740.98 FEET TO THE COMMON RANGE LINE OF RANGE 38 EAST AND RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°1128" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 36 AND RANGE LINE A DISTANCE OF 1280.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36 ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST MARKED BY A FOUND 4"x4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH NO IDENTIFICATION RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 078031; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89"50'19" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31 A DISTANCE OF 4.05 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST MARKED BY A FOUND 4"x4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH ALUMINUM DISK STAMPED "CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC PRM LB 205" RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 078026, SAID DESCRIBED SECTION CORNERS COMPRISED AS DOUBLE CORNERS EAST TO WEST ON THE COMMON TOWNSHIP LINE OF TOWNSHIP 31 AND 32 SOUTH WITH THE COMMON RANGE LINE OF RANGE 38 AND 39 EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°13'25" WEST ALONG SAID COMMON RANGE LINE, AND EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT "DIKE / LEVEE" 100.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 48, PAGE 23 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 2657.45 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'01'45" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 1 AND RANGE LINE A DISTANCE OF 2590.99 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL, 125.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 210, PAGE 300, SAID INTERSECTION POINT BEING NORTH 00°01'45" EAST 62.50 FEET FROM THE FOUND 4"x4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH DISK STAMPED "RLS 1192" MARKING THE COMMON SECTION CORNER OF SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND SECTIONS 6 AND 7 OF TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 063825; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°53'29" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 754.22 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL'L' CANAL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'44" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 17.50 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 220, PAGE 469 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 89"53'29" WEST A DISTANCE OF 275.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°53'29" WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89"53'29" WEST A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°53'29" WEST A DISTANCE OF 3768.00 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C' CANAL 225.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32, PAGE 177; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°07'03" EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2637.27 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST / WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 1; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°07'03" EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2679.25 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 AND SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ALSO BEING THE COMMON TOWNSHIP LINE OF TOWNSHIP 31 AND 32 SOUTH; THENCE CONTINUE ON SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE RUN NORTH 00°04'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1279.32 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C -3E' CANAL 100.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32, PAGE 177, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°50'51" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 12.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00°04'07" EAST ALONG AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'C' CANAL, NOW BEING 250.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 3997.98 FEET TO THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WABASSO ROAD / C.R.510 / 85TH/ STREET AND POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATION CONTAINING 48,689,617.86 S.F. OR 1117.76 ACRES (INCLUDES CANAL RIGHTS OF WAYS) THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY DESCRIPTION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST & PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SHEET 1 of 2 0.9.9 71053 -Cl 53 of 156 GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY ,°° a°°;; ;"" CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. �'�' :&Z�5 2019 A FLORFDA CORPORATION RIVER BLVD. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS GRA"flBr CIo1M scoEL �ak ' 27701ND1AN 1708 21st STREET, VERO BEACH, FL 329� IE�� Guccvreso 1w ADO MISSING CALLS AMIDCCRRFCTEDDSTANCE FSC 107AN120101 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL: 1772), 562 x197 FA1C(7721582-7180 FLOR'IOA Int dm REF.R : 083715,1x4065 ENSEN34705E SIGNATURE GATE FILE NAME:IA321S.14 NO.I REVISION sYI DATE) TEL FA, -CARTER AS CIAIES. INC COAa051 LB 205 FB&PG.:087,,p57- ���DDD THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY DESCRIPTION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST & PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SHEET 1 of 2 0.9.9 71053 -Cl 53 of 156 PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA I III I Ill III I III III 1 III I , I, l III I III tll LATERALC CANAL- ' 'RANCH ROAD" ^ 82nd AVE. / S.R. 609 I II I I I I I I I I III I a II � I I ! 1 I I ILIO Z. ' O fa m II z rll� Ifl I I I I I I I i_ ..IimO I -• I .q IIto I I Is I: 1-I BYPASS CANAL m � m lill -- �II LATERAL 'L' CANAL 70"':�Tr 6 A7iR;4�L•ZA19/i'C-'�'�'I'- I�' EAST 1/2 OF HE I/+ 1 55 I rn I l^ I �oMI mr IIIII I / Of SE + 1 m ..74th AVENUE HAil4t' I N I I rn N I lil - I Illm �� ally I a I m ly OO31 I. 3 GRAPHIC SCALE a 4w 0 400 ea0 r200 a scut. (r A,.A - 400 F.4 k - THIS SKETCH I5 NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY DATE -102&29.2018 DESCRIPTION SHEET GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY '[u ;;;a„�"°' CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. ORA 0 FSCAAS a� I CRAWNBr FSCID A+ SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AFLORIDACORPORATION CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 1HI98aEfCMAkODESCRIPIIX+CDIISISTSCF3SHEEfS APP0.9Y FSROEL 2770 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. O+re1SH0TVAUOT9m10UTTHE OEHER(91, PLOTUY . F AC_c .e 8 PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST 2 Of 2 3708 21st STREET, VERO BEACH, FL 32960 FILefan:E Ie�Bse:q INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA I+I ADD HISSMOCALESA140C08REMDD/9TN.:E FSC 0710-1201S VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL:(772)5624191 FAX:(772)562-7180 REFS'08]215.IAd864 PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION NO REVISION BY DATE TLL Fnx Fa.aPG. .esT,.+p0e7- M. r. tlDsxl 54 of 156 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT THIS ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of August 2019, by and between the CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a Florida municipal corporation, whose mailing address is 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958 (the "City") and, GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY, whose mailing address is 2770 Indian River Blvd., Suite 201, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (the "Owner") WHEREAS, the City is a Florida municipal corporation located within Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Owner listed herein is the fee simple title holder to certain real property currently located within the unincorporated area of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the real property at issue is approximately 1,118 acres, which is reasonably compact, is contiguous to the municipal boundary of the City, will not result in the creation of enclaves, and is more particularly described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and hereinafter referred to as "property"; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to annex the property described in Exhibit 1 into the municipal boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, the Owner will initially maintain the agriculture use of the property, but desires to eventually develop the property for other certain uses as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the Owner has applied to the City to change the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map on the property to facilitate the development of the property in the future; and 55 of 156 WHEREAS, contingent upon approval of the annexation petition, Owner has applied to the City to assign a Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map as set forth in Ordinance No. 0- 19-05, which is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement in order to memorialize their understanding and agreements with respect to the annexation of the property, and with respect to the future development and use of the property; and WHEREAS, upon compliance with the obligations of this Agreement, the development of the property will be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has found and determined that the City's interest will be best served by annexing the property into its municipal boundaries and by entering into this Agreement to ensure that development of the property is in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan (CP) and Land Development Code (LDC); and WHEREAS, the property is particularly suited for inclusion in to the City due to its proximity to existing traffic corridors and transportation systems, and annexation will yield significant benefits to the City in the form of measured development, increased employment opportunities and employment base, an increased tax base, and permanent conservation and preservation of natural ecosystems; and WHEREAS, the City is entering into this Agreement pursuant to the authority of the Florida Constitution (including Article VIII, Section 2(b) and (c) thereof), the general powers conferred upon municipalities by statute and otherwise (including Chapter 166, Florida Statutes), and the City's Charter; and WHEREAS, all the requirements set forth in Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and as otherwise set forth in Florida law and the City's Codes and Ordinances, for the voluntary 56 of 156 annexation of real property have been fulfilled, or will be fulfilled through compliance with this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the exchange of mutual promises set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficient of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and the Owner agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The forgoing recitations are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference; and all exhibits to this Agreement as hereby deemed to be a part hereof. 2. Owners. The Owner represents that they hold fee simple title to the real property and have lawful authority to petition for the voluntary annexation of the property set forth herein. 3. Annexation. (a) The City hereby acknowledges that Owner has submitted a petition requesting the voluntary annexation of the real property by the City in accordance with Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City agrees to consider and act upon the Annexation Petition. The Owner commits and agrees that while the Annexation Petition is voluntary, Owner is prohibited from withdrawing its petition and that to do so would result in a breach of this Agreement if annexation of the property is approved at second reading of the annexation ordinance on August 28, 2019, or such other date for second reading as established by the Sebastian City Council, but not later than August 28, 2020. The Owner and the City agree that the annexation ordinance shall be properly noticed in accordance with Section 171.044(2), Florida Statutes, and scheduled for second reading on August 28, 2019. (b) In the event the Department of Economic Opportunity fails to support approval of the Future Land Use for the property, or the City fails to adopt the future land use set forth in this Agreement, the Owner reserves the right to request the City to take all necessary 57 of 156 steps to promptly and expeditiously de -annex the property; and the City agrees it will take those steps necessary to fulfill this request to the extent legally permissible. Upon de -annexation (contraction) this Agreement shall terminate. 4. Development of the Annexed Property. (a) Development Plans for property. The City finds and agrees that residential uses of varying densities, commercial uses, office uses, warehouse/ industrial uses, schools, institutional uses, civic uses, and utility uses are appropriate uses of the property and that such uses will benefit the City's residents. (b) Owner recognizes that this Agreement does not authorize approval of any specific development plan or proposal. (c) Planned Unit Development. The parties agree that any future rezoning shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as existing or as amended, and shall be accomplished only through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a Master Planned Unit Development (MPUD). (d) The Owners agree to make provision for a mixed-use "Town Center' area and housing types shall be mixed to meet various income levels and lifestyle choices as part of the development in accordance with the PUD as approved by the City. (e) Extractions. The Owner agrees that, the allocation and donation of institutional lands necessary for governmental services such as post offices, public safety, schools etc., and the dedication of ROW to the appropriate entity to promote an interconnected, extended and improved grid road system, along with a well-planned transportation system of roads and streets throughout the development, in coordination with Indian River County, to specifically include 81st Street, 77th Street, and 73rd Street, as well as 74th Avenue; shall be 58 of 156 identified by concurrency analysis in accordance with the City of Sebastian land development codes and ordinances, at the time of development. . (f) Conservation. The Owner agrees that, dedication of conservation lands shall be made to the appropriate entity at the time of development to include any natural areas of significant importance, and the provision of greenway trails to promote a system of connectivity and access consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes at the time of rezoning and development. (g) The Owner agrees that, the allocation of parks and recreational lands consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes specifically: a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of publicly accessible recreation lands, and a minimum of 2 acres/ 1000 residents of other recreational lands, will be required at the time of development. (h) The Owner agrees and will provide buffers adjacent to low density areas outside of the PUD Overlay to include increased greenspace along the site's south property line and the part of the east property line south of Liberty Park TND. (i) As a condition of the PUD process the open space requirements shall be as defined in Section 54 of the City's Land Development Code. 5. Transportation: At time of development, the Owner or its successor shall work together with the City to establish a satisfactory, well planned roadway network. Transportation concurrency shall be satisfied at the time required by constructing improvements or execution of a mutually agreeable Proportionate Fair Share Agreement; or a mutually agreeable Developer's Agreement; or a mutually agreeable Impact Fee Assessment. 6. Wetlands: The City acknowledges and agrees that at the present time, the applicable rules and regulations of the St. John's River Water Management District govern all wetland jurisdictional determinations and any related wetlands mitigation, and that any 59 of 156 wetland permit issued by the St. John's River Water Management District for any portion of the property shall satisfy all City wetland permitting requirements for the portion of the property subject to such permit. 7. Improvements: Neither the City nor the County shall not be required or obligated in any way to construct or maintain or participate in the construction or maintenance of any improvements (except for maintenance of improvements dedicated to and accepted by the City at its sole discretion). The Owner, its grantees, successors or assigns in interest, or an association, as applicable, shall be responsible for the maintenance of all improvements not dedicated to and accepted by the City. 8. Land Use. The future land use of the property is set forth in Ordinance No. 0-19-05, which is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 9. Utilities. (a) Pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement between Indian River County and the City, water and wastewater utilities will be provided exclusively by Indian River County. Drainage and Stormwater shall be handled by the Sebastian River Improvement District. If either the County or the SRID fails to comply with their lawful obligation to provide such services, the Owner will be free to seek other alternatives. To the extent not funded by others, the Owner shall be responsible for funding design, permitting and construction of the Infrastructure in order to serve the needs of the future development of the property at full build -out and in accordance with the level of service established by the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time. This Infrastructure shall be built to the City and permitting agencies' reasonable and customary standards. It is recognized by the Parties that said Infrastructure may be constructed in phases commensurate with the creation of demand by development. 60 of 156 (b) As a condition of future developments, sufficient land area shall be allocated for infrastructure required to support the development and mandate hook-up to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new developments. These services shall be provided by the County or alternative services as set forth herein; however, no septic systems would be allowed in accordance with City policy and land development codes. 10. No Waiver of Police Power. As provided above and otherwise herein, the parties recognize and agree that certain provisions of this Agreement will require the City and/or its boards, departments or agencies, acting in their governmental capacity, to consider certain changes in the City's Comprehensive Plan, zoning ordinances or other applicable City codes, plans or regulations, as well as to consider other governmental actions as set forth in this Agreement. All such considerations and actions shall be undertaken in accordance with established requirements of state statute and City ordinances, including applicable notice and hearing requirements, in the exercise of the City's jurisdiction under the police power. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit or restrict the powers and responsibilities of the City in acting on applications for comprehensive plan changes and applications for other development. The parties further recognize and agree that these proceedings shall be conducted openly, fully, freely and fairly in full accordance with law and with both procedural and substantive due process to be accorded the applicant and any member of the public. 11. Covenants Running with the Land and Successors and Assigns. The obligations imposed and entitlements created pursuant to this Agreement shall run with and bind the property as covenants running with the land and this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable by and against the Parties hereto, their personal representatives, heirs, successors, grantees and assigns. 12. The City acknowledges its intention, in good faith, to fulfill the following: 61 of 156 (a) Coordinate the pro -rata funding of the interchange, bridge crossings, or roadways with adjacent property owners/ developers when such other properties are benefited by these improvements. (b) Implement a "cost -recovery' agreement when the Owner funds more than its pro -rata share of an improvement. (c) Work with the Owner to secure appropriate impact fee credits based upon fair share apportionment payments and/or actual construction of improvements. (d) Review and process any permit applications or other requests for approval submitted to the City to ensure that development within the property proceeds in a timely manner. The City further agrees to assist during the review processes of any other governmental approvals and permits for the property. 13. General Terms: (a) The terms "contribute", "dedicate", "dedication", "convey", "conveying", or "conveyance" as used in this Agreement relating to a municipal or governmental transfer, shall mean to transfer ownership to the City or other governmental body, without any cost to or payment by the City or other governmental body, such dedication or conveyance shall be a gift by the Owner, without any compensation. (b) Preparation of this Agreement has been a joint effort of the parties and the resulting document shall not, solely as a matter of judicial construction, be construed more severely against one of the parties than the other. (c) Owner, upon execution of this Agreement, shall pay to the City the cost of recording this Agreement in Indian River County, Florida. (d) This Annexation is subject to various provisions contained in Chapter 171 Florida Statutes, Municipal Annexation or Contraction. A portion of the boundary of the 62 of 156 property is contiguous to the City. "Contiguous" is defined in Section 171.031(11) Florida Statute, to mean "that a substantial part of a boundary of the territory sought to be annexed by a municipality is coterminous with a part of the boundary of the municipality." Should there be any legal challenge to the annexation of the property, whether based on contiguity, enclaves or any other theory, the Owner agrees to assume all risk associated with the challenge. The Owner further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from all claims, suits and judgments in any way arising out of or relating to the annexation of the property. This indemnity and hold harmless shall extend to all costs, fees and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and expert witness fees incurred by the City in the investigation or defense of any challenge to the annexation whatsoever, including but not limited to Chapter 164, Chapter 171 and any legal challenge filed in Court, including all levels of court and any attorneys' fees that the City may be ordered to pay pursuant to Section 171.081 Florida Statutes (collectively a "Third Party Claim"). Promptly after receipt of notice of the making or commencement by any third party of any claim, action, lawsuit, or proceeding as to which indemnification may be sought (a "Third Party Claim"), the City shall notify Owner. Failure to do so shall not relieve Owner from any liability that it may have under this section unless Owner is prejudiced by the lack of such notice; provided that, in such case Owner shall not be responsible for that portion of the liability caused by the prejudice resulting from the lack of notice. If any such Third Party Claim is brought against the City, Owner shall be entitled to participate and, to the extent they may elect by written notice delivered promptly to the City after receiving notice from the City, to assume the defense with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. The parties agree to cooperate fully in connection with the defense, negotiation, or settlement of any such legal proceeding, claim, or demand. The City shall have the right to employ counsel in any such case, with counsel reasonably acceptable to the Owner, and the fees and expenses of this counsel 63 of 156 shall be at the expense of the City, subject to reimbursement from Owner. In any of these events, fees and expenses of the City's counsel shall be borne by Owner. Owner may not settle any Third Party Claim without the consent of the City. After any final judgment or award has been rendered by a court, arbitration board, or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction and the time in which to appeal from it has expired, a settlement has been consummated, or Owner and the City arrive at a mutually binding agreement with respect to each separate matter alleged to be indemnified by Owner, the City shall forward to Owner notice of any sums due and owing by it with respect to the matter, and Owner immediately shall pay all of the sums owing, by wire transfer or certified or bank cashier's check, to the City. 14. Attornevs' Fees. Should any party to this Agreement bring an action against any other party to enforce any provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs in all trial and appellate proceedings. 15. Notices. Every notice, demand, consent, approval or other document or instrument required or permitted to be given to any party to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the following address (or such other address as any party may designate from time to time in writing). For City. Paul Carlisle, City Manager 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 with a copy to: City Attorney 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 For Owner: Jeff E. Bass President Graves Brothers Company 2770 Indian River Blvd., Suite 201 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 with a copy to: Registered Agent on file. 64 of 156 16. Effective Date and Duration. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties. 17. Miscellaneous. (a) Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains and sets forth all the promises, covenants, agreements, conditions and understandings between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. (b) Terms and Words. All terms and words used in this Agreement regardless of the number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or number as the context or the use thereof may require. (c) Severability. If any provisions of this Agreement are held to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected or impaired and each remaining provision shall remain in full force and effect. In the event that any term or provision of this Agreement is determined by appropriate judicial authorities to be illegal void or otherwise invalid, said provision shall be given its nearest legal meaning or be construed as deleted as such authority determines and the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed to be in full force and effect. (d) Headings. Captions and paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and in no way define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement, nor the intent of any provision hereof. (e) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Florida and venue with respect to any litigation between the Parties related to this Agreement shall be Indian River County. Florida. (f) Permits. Conditions. Terms. or Restrictions. The failure of this Agreement to address a particular permit, condition, term, or restriction existing at the time of execution of 65 of 156 this Agreement shall not relieve Owner of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirement, condition, term, or restriction. (g) Amendments. This Agreement shall not be changed, modified or amended except by an instrument in writing and executed by the parties owning the affected portion of the property with the same formality and or equal dignity herewith. (h) Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded by the City, at Owner's expense, in the Official Records of Indian River County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC — City Clerk 2019 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Jim Hill, Mayor As Approved by the Council on August 28, (SEAL) The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this day of 2019, by Jim Hill, Mayor of the City of Sebastian, Florida who is personally known to me. SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC Print Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: 66 of 156 OWNER: GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY Jeff Bass, President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this day of 2019, by Jeff Bass, President of the Graves Brothers Company who is personally known to me. SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC Print Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: 67 of 156 01) LIF SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Annexation Application - Staff Analysis June 26, 2019 Re: Graves Brothers Company — Voluntary Annexation Request The property owners have requested a voluntary annexation into the City of Sebastian. The subject property consist of 1,118 acres, more or less, located south of County Road 510 ROW, west of lands adjacent to the 74"' Ave ROW, north of 690' Street ROW, and east of 82" Ave ROW. The subject property is currently vacant agricultural land in unincorporated Indian River County (IRC), contiguous to the existing corporate limits and boundaries of the City of Sebastian. The applicant has requested a mix of future land use designations in order to achieve consistency with the city's adopted Future Land Use Element of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is adjacent to the service boundary for municipal services and has provided capacity concurrency for County utility services. The property currently maintains an active agricultural use so the zoning will remain as Agriculture A-1 until such time as conceptual planning has been completed for the property. A Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis has been submitted by the applicant as Attachment "A". STAFF FINDINGS 1. A petition for annexation has been executed by the owners of the subject property and is consistent with Chapter 171 F.S. The property has been found to be coterminous with a part of the boundary of the municipality. "The separation of the territory sought to be annexed from the annexing municipality....a right - of --way for a highway, road, railroad, canal, or utility; or a body of water, watercourse, or other minor geographical division of a similar nature, running parallel with and between the territory sought to be annexed and the annexing municipality, shall not prevent annexation under this act, provided the presence of such a division does not, as a practical matter, prevent the territory sought to be annexed and the annexing municipality from becoming a unified whole with respect to municipal services or prevent their inhabitants from fully associating and trading with each other, socially and economically". 2. The proposal is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. a. Objective 1-1.2: Agriculture Land Use which recognizes annexation of existing agricultural lands until such a time that urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no longer economically sustaining. These Policies provide for a holding period to ensure orderly development that provides economic development opportunity through a mix of industrial, commercial and housing that conforms to the City's Comprehensive plan and LDC in order to achieve diversification of the municipal tax base. b. Objective 1-2.10: Annexation Studies which promote planning for annexations to prevent urban sprawl and disjointed urban service delivery systems by providing an analysis of land use, traffic circulation, concurrency, drainage, and environmental protection. Fiscal impact analysis and contribution to the City's tax base has been included. Parameters of the Annexation Studies include: i. Analysis of Area in accordance with Comprehensive Plan Data, Inventory, and Analysis a) A conceptual development plan has been presented that proposes multiple Land Uses in order to meet the City's Comprehensive Plan. Land Development Regulations will provide the final 68 of 156 determination of densities and intensities allowed within the proposed development at time of site planning. Comprehensive Plan data, inventory and analysis reference a deficit in industrial, commercial and multifamily residential land uses in the City. ii. Fiscal Impact Analysis and contribution to the City's tax base: A fiscal analysis of the proposed project reflects the potential annual net fiscal gain to the City at final buildout — $7,030,099. a) Total assumed annual taxable revenue including Ad Valorem taxes, Utility taxes, and Franchise Fees = $6,483,1091year. b) Stormwater Utility Fee was incorrectly calculated and the actual value = $546,990/year c) Recreation impact fee one time revenue = $3,680,505. iii. Concurrency Analysis: Level of Service (LOS) impacts have been addressed as part of the annexation request and change in Future Land Use. a) Transportation: Planned improvements to thoroughfare roads on perimeter of property will provide a favorable grid network providing multiple means of access and egress from the development. These improvements are programmed for funding at various stages with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and IRC. Improvements to these corridors will open up these lands on the southern border of Sebastian for future development. The development proposes an internal network that will support a compact development concept and assist in the distribution of traffic. b) Utilities: Currently, IRC maintains existing water and sewer transmission mains on CR 510 along the north boundary and utilities will be extended south of the Urban Services Boundary along the east property line with the development of Liberty Park PD TND. Public utilities are available to this site with available capacity. c) Drainage: The property is bisected by several drainage canals controlled by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID) and conceptual plans show additional stormwater ponds throughout the development. d) Recreation: Institutional and Recreational public lands are conceptually presented and will be addressed during land use and zoning. e) Environmental Protection: Conservation land use designation has been proposed to preserve ecologically sensitive areas of the property. Open space requirements will be defined during site plan development. 3. Indian River County Future Land Use Element The City is seeking adequate commercial and industrial lands to accommodate its economic development needs and many have pointed to the 510 corridor as a place to meet those needs. For over two years, the City was in negotiations with Indian River County and other municipalities in the county to enact an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) primarily to address the issue of annexation. No agreement was reached however, annexation reserve areas were proposed for Sebastian that included lands south of CR 510 to 69`x' Street. The ISBA and the Comprehensive Plan support coordination with IRC as part of the annexation process to encourage annexation of larger contiguous areas as opposed to piecemeal annexations being governed by different sets of development regulations. This may lead to lack of coordination, poor urban design and a corridor that does not function as well as it should. A meeting was held with IRC regarding fixture growth along CR 510 and 82nd Ave due to the FDOT and IRC planned corridor improvements that will trigger real estate speculation, annexations, and future land use amendments. IRC stated that this area may be a potential for a new town development under the IRC Future Land Use Element. However no new town shall be established unless it meets the minimum size requirement of 1500 contiguous acres for lands east of I-95. The proposed project consists of 1,118 acres of property and does not meet this criterion though; the proposed development meets the underlying 69 of 156 intent of the New Town concept. TRC expressed support relating to the proposed grid road system, as well as future road connections to the south. TRC provided valuable recommendations regarding development of the property in accordance with the proposed concept plan which will be reviewed under the City's PUD and site plan review process. Use of current City land use designations exaggerate the commercial/industrial area along the future 82nd avenue corridor rather than the intended clustering of commercial/industrial at intersections and residential filling in as part of a mixed use concept. Several suggested big picture concepts that will be discussed during the Future Land Use Plan Amendment are as follows: a) Allow special mixed use through the City's PUD process. b) Provide for extension of the internal street grid as shown in the conceptual plan. c) Require conservation of the South Prong slough area and provide for greenway trails/public access along the South Prong slough. d) Allow for internal density transfer and clustering of the development to allow concentrations of denser areas within the overall project to off -set green open spaces. e) Require a "town center" mixed use activity center and clusters of commercial/industrial at major grid road intersections. f) Require a greenbelt adjacent to low density areas outside the project. g) Require aesthetic development standards as part of the PUD process. h) Require institutional/recreational uses. i) Address affordable housing through the PUD process. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse impact on the public health, safety, welfare, or aesthetics of the city or region. 5. The property legal description requires a review by the City surveyor prior to final approval. Lisa L. Frazier, ATCP Prepared by 6/26/2019 Date 70 of 156 Graves Brothers Company Indian River County, FL Annexation and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared by: Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, L.L.C. Joseph Schulke, P.E. 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 June 2019 RECEIVE® JUN 0 5 2019 City of Sebastian Community Development Dept. 71 of 156 Annexation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Graves Brothers Company Sections 1 -32S -38E and 36 -31S -38E Indian River County, FL Prepared by: SchuIke, BittIe & Stoddard, L.L.C. Joseph Schulke, P.E. 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 STATEMENT This statement has been prepared to support a request to annex the subject property into the City of Sebastian and change the future land use map (FLUM)_designation of approximately 1047 acres from Indian River County "AG -1" (Agricultural - 1 unit/5 acre) to several City of Sebastian future land Use designations, including: -CG - "Commercial General" — approximately 112.3 acres -CL — "Commercial Limited" approximately 10.1 acres -IND - "Industrial" — approximately 126.7 acres -INST - "Institutional" — approximately 130.7 acres -MR— "Medium Density Residential" approximately 384.0 acres -LR "Low Density Residential" — approximately 70.5 acres -VLR — "Very Low Density Residential" — approximately 169.4 acres -CONS - "Conservation" — approximately 43.0 acres The purpose of this request is to secure the approvals necessary to permit the development of the property within the City of Sebastian, with Future Land Use designations consistent with the city's Future Land Use Map and with densities and intensities consistent with the city's adopted Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan (April 2009), and the 2010 EAR based amendments. The landowner is: Graves Brothers Company Jeff Bass, President 2770 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 The property is located in section 1 -32S -38E and part of 36 -31S -38E and is adjacent to and south of C.R. 510 approximately, north of 69"' St, west of 74th Ave (extension), and east of 82"d Ave (extension). The northern portion of the property (hereafter referred to as "the site") abuts the City of Sebastian city limits. As part of this request, the applicant is providing statements on Impact on Public Facilities and Services, Fiscal Analysis, Environmental Impacts, Compatibility with City's Comprehensive Plan, Compatibility with Surrounding Areas, and has prepared a conceptual plan supporting the application. Page 2 72 of 156 Included with this statement are the following contents: Statement 1.0 Impact on Public Facilities and Services 2.0 Fiscal Analysis 3.0 Environmental Impacts 4.0 Compatibility with City's Comprehensive Plan 5.0 Compatibility with Surrounding Areas Aimendices Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning List of Exhibits Exhibit A — Location Map and Thoroughfare Plan Road Network (Contiguous to Site) Exhibit B — Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SRID Canals Exhibit C — Utility Infrastructure Exhibit D Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit E — Proposed Site FLUM Map Exhibit F — Proposed City FLUM Map Amendment Exhibit G — Preliminary Wetland Assessment Attachments Warranty Deed Title Policy/Certification Traffic Impact Analysis (O'Rourke Engineering & Planning) Page 3 73 of 156 I. Impact on Public Facilities and Services. Generally, the site lies at a very advantageous location which supports urban development. The site is the benefactor of existing and planned thoroughfare roads, existing water and sewer utilities, and existing SRID drainage facilities, which can support the future urban development of the site. The site is strategically located where several existing and proposed thoroughfare plan roads will provide a favorable grid network of streets, providing multiple means of access from all directions. The road network will ensure that traffic generated by the site development will not overburden one or two thoroughfares, that residents and employees of the site can conveniently access or depart the area with little risk of delays or hindrances, and most importantly, both city and Indian River County emergency services will have multiple alternative routes to serve the site. The site will have thoroughfare roads on its entire perimeter: The FDOT is preparing for the extension of 82"d Ave on the site's west boundary from SR60 to CR510, and the widening of CR510 along the site's north boundary from 2 to four lanes from USI to CR512. The initial extension of 74th Ave along the sites east boundary from CR510, 3/4 of a mile south, and the extension of 81st street from 66th Ave to 74th Ave will be completed as a condition of approval by the TRC approved Liberty Park PD TND. This project would ultimately complete the 74th Ave extension along the southern % of its east boundary to 691h St. Once the 81St St extension is completed, 69th St on the sites south boundary will connect 82 d Ave to US 1 to the east. The site will have several thoroughfare roads extending into and creating thoroughfare intersections internal to the site: 78' and 80th Ave in the north south direction, and 73rd, 77th and 81St streets in the cast west direction. See Exhibit,4 — Location Map and Thoroughfare Plan Road Network (contiguous to the site) See Exhibit B Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SKID Canals The site is located adjacent to the county Urban Services Area on its north and east sides. The official boundary in this vicinity is CR510 (north of CRS 10), and 66th Ave (east of 66th Ave). However, the county has already effectively moved the boundary from 66th Ave to 74th Ave with the approval of the Liberty Park PD TND, a mixed use development with over 900 units and 200,000 sf of commercial use. Consequently the effective county urban service line is at the sites east and west boundary. Irrespective of the COUNTY's urban service line location, Article 6 "Operating, Maintenance and Expansion of the Sebastian Utility System" of the "Interlocal Agreement Providing for the Transfer of the City of Sebastian Water and Wastewater System" adopted Sept 20, 1995 between IRC and the City of Sebastian provides that IRC has an affirmative duty to expand the system inside and outside of the city, and to provide service by the county's water and Page 4 74 of 156 wastewater systems concurrent with the demands of new growth or the expansion or extension of water or wastewater transmission, distribution, or collection facilities by either the city or the county. Currently, IRC has existing water and sewer transmission mains on CR510 on the sites north boundary and will have utilities at the sites' east boundary concurrent with the development of Liberty Park PD TND. Liberty Park PD TND will be connecting and extending utilities south and west from CRS 10 and 66th Ave, through 81" St, 70th and 74t' Ave, ultimately bringing utility services to the sites east property line. See Exhibit C— Utility Inf•astructure The site lies entirely within the Sebastian River Improvement district (SRID), a chapter 189 and 289 Improvement district which is responsible for the implementation, operation and maintenance of a water control plan and stormwater drainage by gravity within the district boundaries. Consequently, adequate facilities are in place to ensure the site has adequate and Iegal drainage capabilities. The site lies adjacent to and east of lateral C Canal, and is bisected in the north south direction by Lateral L canal. Lateral L canal runs along and through the natural slough and headwaters of the South Prong of the St. Sebastian River. Several sub -laterals bisect the site in the east to west direction, draining a majority of the site west to Lateral C. These include sub -laterals C2E through C5E. (See Exhibit B — Site Thoroughfare Network and SKID Canals) Adequate traffic, utilities, drainage, and other facilities either exist or are planned in the vicinity of the site. The Comprehensive Plan, FLU Element and IntragovernmentaI Element, objectives 8-1.3 and 9-1.5 establishes standards for Concurrency management and specifically, standards for Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Drainage, and Recreation. Chapter IX of the City's Land Development Code, "Concurrency Management", defines the level of service standards for these facilities, and specifies that adequate provisions for these services are necessary to support new development. Conceptual Site Plan/ Land Planning — Basis of Concurrency analysis: Due to the size and proposal to assign multiple Land Uses to the site, a conceptual site plan has been prepared. The plan was prepared to forecast how the site will likely develop, with due consideration given to thoroughfare roads/ access, environmental features and drainage, and existing development patterns and existing land uses. In addition, land use intensities/ densities were estimated based on the city's comprehensive plan needs, and the city's development trends. See Appendix A Conceptual Site Plan I Land Planning See Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan Page 5 75 of 156 To summarize, the following listed intensities and densities are used to prepare this statement Subject Acres I Proposed Future Land Use Allowed Gross Acreage Net Acreage** I Category I Density/FAR Units 112.3 95.56 CG 10,000/ acre 955,600 sf 10.1 7.82 CL I 10,000/ acre 78,200 sf 43.0 41.38 J CONS 0 0 126.7 C 112.68 I IND 20,000/ acre 2,253,600 sf 130.7 I 114.41 I INST 0.005 j 24,919 sf I up to 8 units per 384.0 360.87 MR acre 2,887 units up to 5 units per 70,5 68.27 LR acre 342 units up to 3 units per 169.4 156.38 VLR I acre 470 units I ** Net acreage = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW's See Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan /Land Planning This statement on the "Impact on Public Facilities and Services" assumes the site would be developed at maximum permitted intensities and densities (outlined above). However, the City's comprehensive plan clearly indicates that the maximum intensities and densities are not vested or guaranteed, and in practice, the actual intensities and densities will be lower due to what would likely be developed on the site. There are numerous development restraints that will likely decrease the actual intensity and density of the development including: ROW dedications, potential environmentally sensitive areas that may necessitate preservation; large stormwater facilities to meet new environmental regulations, minimum lot size standards, minimum open space requirements, and stormwater facilities identified on this site by FDOT for CR510 and 82A Ave improvements. This statement assumes that Impact's to Public Facilities and Services are negligible for project areas assigned "'Conservation" and "Institutional" FLUM Land Use. The majority of the "Institutional" Land Use is assumed to be land reserved for recreation, parks and stormwater needs of the site — which are uses that are accessory to the Commercial/ Industrial and Residential uses and would have no impacts to public facilities. Other uses permitted within the "Institutional" FLUM designation are schools, church's, civic halls/ Page 6 76 of 156 government buildings. These will comprise only a a minor portion of the "Institutional" Land Use area, and its impacts are negligible, and in many instances, will be a net positive impact (i.e. government, utility or school site providing public services and / or facilities). Transportation: A detailed Traffic Analysis has been prepared and is being submitted by Susan E. O'Rourke; O'Rourke Engineering & Planning (SO). This report hereby refers to and relies on the SO study to address the Traffic component of the analysis on the "Impacts on Public facilities and Services". The results of the referenced Traffic Impact Study indicate that the project as proposed, will meet level of service standards for all impacted roadway networks. Page 7 77 of 156 Water and Sewer Utility: Water and sewer demand: 1.Commercial use: 1,033,800 sf 250 GPD per ERC; I ERC per 5000 A; 10,000 sf per acre (1 ERC per 5000 sf per IRC ordinance 91-9; 250 gpd per ERC per City 54-3-9.7) 1,033,800 sf x 1 ERC 15000 sf x 250 gpd / ERC — 51,690 GPD/ 207 ERC 2. Industrial Use: 2,253,600 sf 250 GPD per ERC; 1 ERC per 10000 sf of warehouse and 1 ERC per 3000 sf manufacturing (assume 50%/ 50% =- I ERC per 6500 sf avg); 20,000 sf per acre (1 ERC per 6500 sf per IRC ordinance 91-9; 250 gpd per ERC per City 54-3-9.7) 2,253,600 sf x 1 ERC 16500 sf x 250 gpd / ERC = 86,680 GPD 1347 ERC 3. Residential Use: 3699 units 250 GPD per ERC; I ERC per I unit (I ERC per res unit, 250 gpd per ERC and per City 54-3-9.7) 3699 ERC x 250 gpd / ERC Total Estimated Demand: per IRC ordinance 91-9; 924,750 GPD 13699 ERC 1,063,120 GPD / 4252 ERC 1.063 MGD Water and sewer Capacity Water capacity available / South & North County R.O.: 20.01 MGD capacity 12.62 MGD ADF = 7.39 MGD Capacity Sewer capacity available I Central & West WWTP: 10.0 MGD capacity -4.88 MGD ADF = 5.12 MGD Capacity * data from IRCDUS Water and Wastewater Plan Information, IRCDUS website — dated 8/1/2018 Prior to any site development approval, the city's land development regulations require that the proposed development plan provides sufficient evidence that public facilities have adequate capacity for the project's demand on facilities. The IRCDUS (IRC utility dept) has adopted (via IRC BCC ordinance 91-9) and implements an impact fee program to ensure the long-term capability to provide acceptable level of service. From ordinance 91-9: "The fee is charged to real property owners to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers". Currently IRCDUS Impact fee is $ 2796 per ERC for sewer, and $1300 per ERC for water. Total estimated fees that would be paid by the site if developed at the estimated intensities and densities of the conceptual site plan are: Total Impact fee, based on 2019 fee rate: ($2796 + $1300) x 4252 ERC = $17,416,192 Page 8 78 of 156 In addition to payment into the impact fee program, IRCDUS requires that all developments construct and pay for all the requisite utility extensions to the site, and all the internal utility infrastructure (collection, transmission and distribution mains). Once constructed, IRCDUS requires that the developer turn the facilities over to the utility department. Drainatic: The drainage level of the service standards outlined in the city's land development code, Chapter IX Concurrency Management, include: 1. Post development run-off shall not exceed pre -development run-off for a 25 -year 24-hour event. 2. Treatment of run—off from the first 1 inch of rainfall on-site. All developments, at time of site plan application, are reviewed for compliance with local and state storm water regulations, which require on-site retention and pollutant abatement, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge criteria of the city storm water ordinance, the local drainage district (S.R.I.D.) and the state -environmental permitting agency (S.J.R.W.M.D.). Therefore, any future development on the site would be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of the pre -development discharge rates and prohibited from discharging pollutants in excess of pre -development volumes. Further, the large majority of the site lies within Flood Zone X, outside of the 100 year flood hazard area, and the site lies entirely within the Sebastian River Improvement district (SRID), a chapter 189 and 289 Improvement district which is responsible for the implementation, operation and maintenance of a water control plan and stormwater drainage by gravity within the district boundaries. Consequently, adequate facilities are in place to ensure the site has adequate and legal drainage capabilities. In addition, the S.R.I.D. limits post development discharge rates to no more than 2" run-off volume in a 24-hour period. This requirement substantially exceeds the city's pre -post discharge requirement. Prior to any site development approval, the city's land development regulations require that the proposed development plan provides sufficient evidence that the project, when constructed and operating, will meet or exceed the local and state requirements. Further, the City has adopted and implements a stormwater program to ensure the long-term viability of all stormwater systems. The development of this site would be subject to those requirements, including the payment of an annual Stormwater Impact assessment (levied through the annual property tax assessment). The estimated stormwater fee collected by the city from the site when developed is $325,060 per year. (see Section 2.0 - Fiscal Analysis). Recreation: The parks and recreation level of the service standards outlined in the city's land development code, Chapter IX Concurrency Management, include 5 acres* of park areas for every 1000 residents in the city, as well as various quantities of recreation Page 9 79 of 156 facilities (i.e.: pools, tennis courts, etc.). The City's 2010 EAR indicates that the city has a surplus of recreational facilities. The 2010 EAR indicates that the city has approximately 313 acres of community and neighborhood parks, while it only has an estimated demand through 2025 of approximately 130 acres of recreation area. Similarly, the individual quantity of recreation facilities is met or exceeded through 2025. (*Note that the city's 2010 EAR uses 4 acres per 1000 population) This site proposes a mix of uses, including commercial, industrial, institutional and residential uses. The city's recreation requirements are strictly tied to residential development and population. Consequently, this site's impacts to parks and recreation facilities and services are based on the residential component. Recreation area demand: Proposed no. of residential units: 3699 Population per unit: 2.17 persons per unit (city average, 2009 Comp Plan) Recreation area: 5 ac 1 1000 x 3699 units x 2.171 unit = 40 acres Recreation area provided/ available: I. Institutional area provided: 114.4 acre (reference conceptual site plan) Assume 40% institutional area is rec; 114.4 ac x 0.40 = 45.8 ac 2. Conservation area = 41.4 ac 3. City surplus: 313 ac - 130 ac = 183 ac Total provided / Available = 270.2 ac The city also has a guaranteed dedicated financial resource -- the park and recreation impact fee fund - which this site will participate. This fund is used to finance new capital improvements and manage and operate exiting facilities. The estimated recreation fee collected by the city from the site when developed is $3,680,505 -- (onetime fee) (see Section 2.0 - Fiscal Analysis). Solid Waste: The city does not identify a solid waste component in its Concurrency Management standards (Chapter 1X). Conclusion: Based on the above data, public facilities for traffic, drainage, solid waste, water, wastewater, and recreation have or will have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed Land Uses for the subject property. Page 10 80 of 156 2.0 Fiscal Analysis The proposal to annex 1047 acres into the city and assign several FLUM designations, including commercial, industrial and residential uses, will have a net positive Fiscal Impact to the city. FLU Element 1-2.10.1: Parameters of an Annexation study may include: Fiscal Impact Analysis and determination of Future Capital Expenditures necessary to meet basic services such as police, emergency services, utilities, code enforcement, building and zoning, permitting and inspection services to meet City Standards. The impact analysis is provided below. Estimated Revenue Generated: Ad Valorem taxes; total estimated taxes are: $ 4,506,309/yr 1. Annexation and "Commercial General" and "Commercial Light" FLUM Land Uses assigned to 103+- ac (per conceptual site plan — see appendix A): -Assume 1,033,800 sf*, valuation at $170.00 / sf, tax values at $175,746,000, rate 3.400). -Ad Valorem taxes are estimated to be approximately $527,238 per year 2. Annexation and "Industrial" FLUM Land Use assigned to 113 +- ac (per conceptual site plan see appendix A): -Assume 2,253,600 sf*, valuation at $150.00 / sf, tax values at $338,040,000, rate 3.400). -Ad Valorem taxes are estimated to be approximately $1,1.49,336 per year 3. Annexation and residential land uses ("MR, LR and LR" FLUM Land Uses) assigned to 586 ac (per conceptual site plan see appendix A): (assume 3699 homesites, $225,000 taxable value after homestead exemption, tax values of $832,275,000, rate 3.400) -Ad Valorem taxes are estimated to be approximately $2,829,735. Utility tax and franchise Fees are: $ 1,976,800/yr 1.Commercial and Industrial; 3,287,100 sf total -Electric, at 15.9% of electric revenue generated, assuming commercial average use and costs of 14/ KwH /sf/ year; $1008/ month/ 10,000 KwH = $737,630 -Water/ sewer and CST estimated to be $110,640 (approx. 15% of electric) 2.Residential; 3699 homesites -Electric, at 15.9% of electric revenue generated, assuming 3699 homesites, residential avg bill of $123/ month in Fl., = $868,100 -Water/ sewer and CST estimated to be $260,430 (approx. 30% of electric) 3.Utility Impact fees: While utility (water and sewer) impact fees are NOT collected by the city, there is a substantial fee collected by IRCDUS. Currently the IRCDUS Impact fee is $ 2796 per Page 11 81 of 156 ERC for sewer, and $1300 per ERC for water. Total estimated fees that would be paid to IRC concurrent with development of the site at the estimated intensities and densities are: Total Impact fee, based on 2019 fee rate: ($2796 + $1300) x 4252 ERC = $17,416,192 *(one time fee) Stormwater annual non -ad valorem tax: $ 325,0601yr 1.Commercial and Industrial; 216 acre total -assume 60% impervious area, 1 ERU / 3285 sf, $120 / year fee -assume 50% credit -fee: 216 ac x 43560 sf/ac x 0.60 x 1 ERU/ 3285 sf x $120 x 0.50 — $103,110 2.Residential; 587 acres/ 3699 homesites -(1) homesite = (1) ERU (3285 sf impervious area); $120 / year per ERU fee -assume 50% credit -fee: 3699 homesites x $120 x 0.50 = $221,950 Recreation Impact Fee: $3,680,505* *(one time fee) 1.Commercial and Industrial; NA. assessed to residential sites only 2.Residential; 3699 homesites -(1) homesite = (1) ERU, $ 995 per ERU — one time impact fee -fee: 3699 homesites x $995 = $3,680,505 Summary, Total revenue generated: Ad Valorem taxes; total estimated taxes are: $ 4,506,3091yr Utility tax and franchise Fees are: $ 1,976,8001yr Stormwater annual non -ad valorem tax: $ 325,060/vr Total: $6,808,169/ yr One time recreation Impact fee: $3,680,505 Fiscal impacts to city: -Police: The need for additional police is typically correlated to residential population growth. Fiscal 'impacts are minor. A population increase of 8030 people (3699 units x 2.17 persons), requires 20 additional police officers (at 2.5 officers per 1000 persons). Approximate cost of $95,800 per officer, or $1,916,000 per year. The site proposes to designate approximately 114 acres as "Institutional" FLUM Land Use. The applicant anticipates that during future site development planning, appropriate "Institutional' sites will be identified by the applicant and the city, and land dedicated to the city for the expansion of the Page 12 82 of 156 city's government capabilities, which would include a police sub -station and other government offices. -Emergency services: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Emergency services are provided by IRC. IRC collects taxes on all properties to defer the operating and maintenance costs, and collects impact fees assessed at time of building permit application on all new construction (including development in the city) to mitigate the costs for capital improvements (ie: land, buildings). -Utilities: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Utility services are provided by IRC and FPL. The city collects Utility and Franchise fees (see above). IRCDUS collects impact fees assessed at time of building permit application on all new construction (including development in the city) to mitigate the costs for capital improvements (ie: land and facilities for water and wastewater plants). -Code enforcement: There is only a negligible fiscal impact to the city . The site will likely be developed with most improvements constructed, dedicated and maintained by POA(s), with maintenance and operation by the POA(s), and with restrictive covenants administered by the POA(s). -Building and zoning: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Fees are charged by the city to cover services provided. -Permitting and inspections: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Fees are charged by the city to cover services provided. -Streets and drainage, maintenance: There is no fiscal impact to the city. All roads, driveways, parking areas and required drainage facilities will be privately owned, constructed and maintained. Thoroughfare roads adjacent to or bisecting the site which are identified by TRC on its thoroughfare plan network (74th Ave, 82" d Ave, 69th St, 73rd St, CR510) are eligible to receive funds from the county wide Traffic Impact fee program. IRC collects impact fees assessed at time of building permit application on all new construction (including development in the city) to mitigate the costs for capital improvements (i.e. ROW purchases and road and intersection capacity upgrades). Conclusion: Non-residential development traditionally has less of a fiscal impact than residential development. Providing a mix of uses will permit the non-residential development to off -set perceived residential impacts. Page 13 83 of 156 Expenditures are less, and tax revenue is appreciably more. This analysis finds that. Annexation and the assignment of a mix of Commercial, Industrial and Residential Land Uses creates a favorable net positive fiscal gain: Annual revenue and expense: -annual tax revenue generated: $6,808,169/ yr -annual expense: $1,916,000 / yr -net fiscal gain: $4,892,169 One time recreation Impact fee: $3,680,505 If the city does not annex the property, the property can develop in IRC under its "New Town" development regulations, or as part of a "Traditional Neighborhood Design Planned Development" (i.e. Liberty Park PD TND), or as a 5 acre "Ranchette" development. Another alternative to the applicant is to seek annexation into the City of Fellsemere, and develop under that city's regulations. (The applicant currently owns lands adjacent to and west of the project site that extends to the city of Fellsmere's east city limit and boundary). If any of these scenarios were to occur, the City of Sebastian would realize a substantial loss of income (no income), loss of control of development at the foot steps to the city, and lose an opportunity to fulfill many of its Comprehensive Plan's stated goals and objectives. In addition, many of the perceived and real impacts associated with development will affect the city, regardless of the fact it is not within the city limits, such as: use of city parks and recreation facilities, use of, and wear and tear of city streets, and other similar impacts, with -out any tax income or annual recreation or stormwater utility fund fees. Page 14 84 of 156 3.0 Environmental Impacts Any Environmental impacts caused by the potential development of the site would be similar under development whether in IRC or the City of Sebastian, unless pro -active measures were taken to protect the natural resources. The majority of the site was a former citrus grove, and the site does not contain any undisturbed native upland habitat, except along the fringes of a small wetland area. There is a small wetland area (see Exhibit G) within a natural slough located along lateral L in the NE area of the site. This is part of the headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. This natural flow way contains native upland on the fringe of the slough, and wetland areas and an old creek bed. Consistent with the comprehensive plan Future Land Use Element, objectives 1-1.7 and policy 1-1.7.3, preservation of these areas is proposed, and will provide protection and buffering of these natural resources from development and loss of habitat. It is important to acknowledge that prior to any site development, requisite permits from the Federal government (USFW, ACOE), the state (FDEP, SJRWMD) and local agencies (city and SRID) are required and any wetlands or other natural resources that may be Iocated on the site are protected by federal, state, and city regulations; Consequently, impacts to environmental resources would require the approval of those agencies, and mitigation to off -set any impacts are normally required. However, the applicant has taken a pro -active approach, and has obtained a preliminary environmental assessment (see Exhibit G) which has identified the wetland areas. Based on this location, the applicant has proposed to designate 41+- acres of the site that lies over and around this environmental resource as a preservation area with a "Conservation" FLUM Land Use map designation. In addition, the Land Use plan proposes only large estate type single family homesite development located adjacent to the preserve areas, providing an adjacent compatible land use. The "Conservation" Land Use is placed over the preservation areas, and the "Very Low Density Residential" Land Use is placed adjacent to these areas. A benefit of site development is that water quality impacts to the receiving waters (in this case, the Sebastian River and Indian River lagoon) are generally expected to be reduced from current conditions, which permit agricultural operations to start up with little oversight or regulation. Site development regulations require the construction of storm water management systems that detain and prevent erosion and excess stormwater run-off, removes pollutants, and often requires the installation and maintenance of shoreline protection buffer(s) when adjacent to surface waters or wetlands, and protection of or mitigation for jurisdictional wetlands on the site. Due to the city and state's efforts to increase regulations to protect the states waters and environment, development standards have been adopted, including the construction of active storm water management systems for new development, to ensure the development decreases the site's impacts to the environment. As a result, the stormwater run-off discharge rates and pollutant volumes discharging into the headwaters of the Sebastian River will be reduced. The requirements for new development contrast with the present agricultural design that allows drainage directly into the headwaters without any storm water retention or treatment. Therefore, the required storm water management associated with new development should reduce the amount of pollutants and freshwater runoff that is currently placed into the river via the approximately 1047 acre agricultural site. (See Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning; Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan; Exhibit E —proposed Site FL UMmap; Exhibit G— Preliminary environmental assessment) Page 15 85 of 156 4.0 Compatibility with City's Comprehensive Plan Approving the annexation and granting the request to re -designate the subject property to several Future Land Use Designations within the city would result in development which would be compatible with surrounding areas and will be compatible with the city's long term objectives and goals adopted in its Comprehensive Plan. The proposed FLUM designations and approximate acreages are as follows: -CG - "Commercial General" — approximately 112.3 acres -CL "Commercial Limited" — approximately 10.1 acres -IND - "Industrial" — approximately 126.7 acres -INST - "Institutional" — approximately 130.7 acres -MR — "Medium Density Residential" — approximately 3 84. 0 acres -LR "Low Density Residential" — approximately 70.5 acres -VLR — "Very Low Density Residential" — approximately 169.4 acres -CONS - "Conservation" — approximately 43.0 acres Reference Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan/ land Planning, and Exhibits E -- Proposed Site FL UM Map; Exhibit F— Proposed City FLUMMap Amendment The site is adjacent to approximately 67 acres of land within the city with a Future land use Designation of "Commercial General". The annexation of the site is a logical extension of the city, as evidenced by both the city's comprehensive plan (see type written references below) and further, by the proposed Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) between Indian River County and several of the municipalities. While this agreement was never ratified, it was nevertheless spearheaded by Indian River County, and still serves as a reference in the city's current comprehensive plan to "continue to carefully pursue a rational annexation policy that is consistent with possible enactment of the ISBA, but is not dependent on it". The ISBA map delineates all properties south of the city limits, including the site, south to 69th St. within the city's annexation reserve area. The site is a formal agricultural (citrus) site that is no longer sustainable. Annexation and designation of FLUM designations consistent with the city's comprehensive plan provides the flexibility to allow the site owner to develop, and the city to approve a mix of uses that are consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan and 2010 EAR objectives and goals. In addition to residential development, the proposed FLUM designations will permit the development of commercial, light industrial, and institutional uses, and designate conservation land uses in appropriate locations where environmentally sensitive lands exist. Consistent with the city's comprehensive plan, Transportation Element (Objective 1.5), the site lies strategically in a location of several existing and proposed thoroughfare roads that will provide a favorable grid network of streets, providing multiple means of access Page 16 86 of 156 from all directions, ensuring that traffic generated by the site development will not overburden one or two thoroughfares, that will allow residents and employees from the site to conveniently access or depart the area with little risk of delays or hindrances, and most importantly, both city and Indian River County emergency services will have multiple alternative routes to serve the site. Proposed Land Planning consistent with the Coinnrehensive Plan (See Appendix A Conceptual Site Plan /Land Planning) Reference Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan This proposal to annex approx. 1047 acres into the City of Sebastian required conceptual land planning and the development of a conceptual site plan (Exhibit D) to determine the appropriate FLUM Land Uses for the site, and the Land Use intensities/ densities and placement. The conceptual site plan was the planning tool referenced for the location of FLUM Land Use designations and preparation of the proposed amendment to the city's FLUM. The development of the conceptual site plan included the determination of appropriate maximum densities and intensities based on current land use data, trends, statistics, and goals of the city's comprehensive plan, and also included the determination of appropriate location of the various land uses, based on existing and proposed roads and infrastructure, existing natural environmental features of the site, adjacent land uses, and various other factors. (see Appendix A for details) Commercial and Industrial FLUM Designations It is generally the consensus of the Sebastian leaders and residents that the city is underserved by commercial and industrial business, and that the city loses a significant amount of business resources — employment opportunities, retail sales, etc. to the county seat (Vero Beach) and the adjacent surrounding unincorporated areas to the south, as well as to Palm Bay and Brevard County to the north. Many Sebastian residents are required to travel well over '/2 hour to these adjacent communities on a daily basis. However, this site's location provides the city the unique opportunity to capitalize on planned FDOT and IRC capital improvements. This site lies east of and adjacent to the location of the FDOT's future extension of 82"d Ave from SR60 to Cr510 — the new north south corridor between the two 195 interchanges; and the city's 2010 EAR identifies the extension of Laconia Street south to CR510, aligning with the 82nd Ave extension. The site lies adjacent to and south of CR510, which will be undergoing significant improvements. FDOT is planning to widen CR510 from 2 to four lanes from Us to Cr512 within the next 5 years. Consequently, the future major intersection created by these improvements at 82"d Ave and CR510 will be located at the NW corner of the site. These planned road extensions and improvements provide the opportunity for the city to create a commercial / industrial node that can accommodate the city's long range goals: to provide for business development and employment opportunities, and additional tax revenue for the city. The proposed FLUM map designations for the site include designating "Commercial General" to areas at the intersection, and designating both "Commercial Page 17 87 of 156 General" and "Industrial" designations along the 821d Ave corridor. This area will become a new Commercial/ Industrial Node serving the city, and provides the following benefits: -Conveniently accessible by the city residents, as well as adjacent county residents -While conveniently accessible by the city residents, it is NOT expected to add significant traffic to or impact the city's residential streets. The site is accessible via main thoroughfares. The node will only serve to shorten and intercept existing trips city residents currently have to make to commercial and employment destinations much further away. -Strategically located, the proposed commercial and industrial node will intercept trips to destinations further away. Consequently, heavily traveled links (US 1, 58' Ave, 66th Ave) may see a net decrease in trips by City residents to Vero Beach and south county areas, freeing up capacity. -The accessibility to both I95 interchanges makes the node a viable location for industrial uses, warehousing and manufacturing. The following supports the above declarations regarding access, thoroughfare roads, and future road improvements: a. Transportation Element 1.1.5 — The city shall coordinate with the IRC MPO to identify new transportation corridors to increase north/south connectivity, including Laconia Street extension south to CR 510. b. CR510 4 lane divided facility from USI to CR512, IRC Transportation Improvement Program (FY 2017/2018 — 202112022) c. 82nd Ave construction from CR510 to 69th St. —ROW acquisition (FY 2017/2018 2019/2020), and construction to follow. d. 82nd Ave paving from 26th St. to 69th St. — preliminary engineering (FY 2017/2018) and ROW acquisition and construction to follow. The following references are in direct support of annexation and the designation of Commercial and Industrial FLUM designations: 1. 2010 EAR indicates that the city's FLU Element shall be updated to identify a need for up to 59 acres of commercial development and 68 acres of industrial land to meet 2025 needs. Page 18 88 of 156 2. 2010 EAR, "Economic Development and Job Creation" (Major Issue 2), recommendations include creating a New "Economic Development" element of the comprehensive plan, and instituting several recommendations, including: a. Consider the potential for employment generating commercial -industrial uses in the CR510 corridor south of the city. 3. 2010 EAR, "Annexation and Service Delivery" (Major Issue 5), recommendations suggest that the city should accept voluntary annexation requests in this vicinity of the city and include assigning a FLUM designation of "Commercial General" and "Industrial". Citations in support of this include the following: a. Policy 1-1.2.2: Agricultural for Annexed lands — The city shall use the agricultural land use classification for future annexations until such time that urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no longer economically sustainable. The applicant has submitted an application to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The applicant intends on assigning other FLUM designations other than agricultural, because; -Urban growth is contiguous: The site is surrounded by the city of Sebastian on its north property line with commercial and residential uses, and it is surrounded on its east, south and west sides by lands lying in Indian River County with an Agricultural (AG -1) FLUM Land Use. However, less than 113 of the surrounding land is utilized for any agricultural purposes. It is evident that urban and suburban development has afflicted the area, making the project site's land less desirable and more difficult to operate successful agricultural ventures. Road improvements afflicting the site include the widening of Cr510 from 2 to 4 lanes on the north property line, the extension of 82nd Ave on the west property line by FDOT, and 74th Ave along the east property line. Recent development approvals include the Liberty Park PD TND on the east side, and the Quail Valley Golf Course on the south property line, and numerous 5 acre residential subdivisions (`Ranchettes) adjacent to the south %2 of the east side of the site. The recent development and plans for road construction and development nearby provide evidence that urban development is encroaching within this once predominantly agricultural area, supporting the idea of land annexation into the City of Sebastian. -Agricultural activities are no longer sustainable: Neighboring properties are experiencing a transition from general agricultural uses to more intensive uses such as residential and commercial. This property is affected by these transitional uses making citrus production unviable at this location due to the effects from citrus pests and diseases, principally, citrus greening and citrus canker. The intensive pest management programs required for the production of citrus are nearly impossible to economically administer in this type of urban or transitional land use setting. Page 19 89 of 156 b. A Future land use map (FLUM) amendment application shall be submitted concurrently with annexation requests. Attached with the annexation application is a proposed FLUM amendment application and proposed FLUM Map. c. Supporting text written within the 2010 EAR, reads that "if this area (south of the city) is developed with other than rural uses, it should become part of the city", and "the city is seeking adequate commercial and industrial lands to accommodate its economic development needs, and many have pointed to the 510 corridor as a place to meet those needs." d. The city's FLU Element may be updated to adopt the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) and its map. However, the document acknowledges that the ISBA may NOT get approved, but the city should continue to carefully pursue a rational annexation policy that is consistent with possible enactment of the ISBA, but is not dependent on it. It should be noted that the ISBA map delineates all properties south of the city limits, including the site to 69t" St. within the city's annexation reserve area. 4. Future Land Use element (2009 Comp Plan):"The city would like to increase the amount of industrially zoned land to attract large employment centers. However, based on the fact that the city is mostly built out, there are no sites available to accommodate this future need. The city will, therefore, be open to future annexation of industrial lands for this purpose". 5. Consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1-2.3, the city shall Plan and Design for Industrial Growth. Residential FLUM desienations The following references are in direct support of annexation and the designation of residential FLUM designations and densities: 1. 2010 EAR indicates that the city's Future Land Use Element shall be updated to identify a need for up to 2845 units: "in terms of residential demand, Sebastian will clearly need to designate some additional residential land uses by 2025, as the gap between estimated remaining capacity ...and projected need ...is substantial", "which leaves to a remaining deficit of 2,845 units". 2. 2010 EAR indicates that a significant portion of additional units should be multifamily: "Policy Goals — including the promotion of alternative transportation modes, energy efficient land use patterns, and various economic benefits to be gained through a variety of housing choices and coordination of housing with Page 20 90 of 156 employment locations suggests that the city should strive for a significant share of additional units to be designated as multifamily..." 3. 2010 EAR, "Economic Development and Job Creation" (Major Issue 2), recommendations include creating a New "Economic Development" element of the comprehensive plan, and instituting several recommendations, including: "Include strategies to increase the variety of housing types in the city. The EAR further states that the city lacks a significant stock of multi -family housing". Conservation FLUM designation The following references are in direct support of annexation and the designation of Conservation FLUM designations and densities: Objective 1-1.7 Conservation Land Use Policy 1-1.7.3 — The city shall monitor the Future Land Use Map to ensure the application of Conservation Land Use to applicable properties Preservation areas are located along lateral L and the headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. This natural flow way contains native upland and wetland areas, and consistent with the comprehensive plan Future Land Use Element, objectives 1-1.7 and policy 1-1.7.3, preservation of these areas will provide protection and buffering of these natural resources from development and loss of habitat. The "Conservation" Land Use is placed over the preservation areas, and the "Very Low Density Residential" Land Use is placed adjacent to these areas. Institutional FLUM desienation The following references are in direct support of annexation and the designation of Institutional FLUM designations and densities: Objective 1-1.6 The city shall ensure that needed public services are developed concurrent with new development Policy 1-1.7.3 — The city shall monitor the need for increased land area for institutional uses and ensure the Institutional Land Use on the Future Land Use Map is expanded to accommodate development. The "Institutional" Land Use (total 114.4 net acres) is placed in appropriate areas, consistent with the city's designation for drainage areas, recreation areas, and community and civic areas: Page 21 91 of 156 I . Community (i.e. church, clubs), civic (i.e. police, fire substations) and institutional (i.e. parks, stormwater) are anticipated to be necessary, and the Institutional Land Use was placed at most thoroughfare plan collector road intersections internal to the site. 2. A thin, linear land area running adjacent to and west of lateral L is provided, and together with the preserve area, runs the length of the site from north to south. This area serves multiple purposes, including a linear access to Lateral L for canal maintenance, a continuous 2 mile "greenway", and provides an alternate mode of transportation — a pedestrian path and bikeway. This green corridor traverses the site, from CR510, where it connects to the existing adjacent IRC conservation area and the site's preserve area, and continues south along lateral L. This "Greenway" is consistent with the 2010 EAR, "North Indian River County Greenway Plan — Sebastian", providing a connection to the IRC Central Greenway system. The corridor provides several interconnections with east west collector roads, providing convenient access to the other areas of the site, and the corridor provides connections and access to larger land areas along the pathway where recreation, civic or community uses are located. 3. At the southeast corner of the site, at the intersection of 69th St and 74th Ave, and across from the Quail Valley Golf Course, a 20+- acre area is reserved for a future community or civic use. This could be a church, school, recreation 1 park, or other institutional use. Page 22 92 of 156 5.0 Compatibility with Surrounding Areas This proposal to annex approximately 1047 acres into the City of Sebastian required conceptual land planning and the development of a conceptual site plan to determine the appropriate FLUM Land Uses for the site, and the Land Use intensities/ densities and placement. The conceptual site plan was the planning tool referenced for the location of FLUM Land Use designations and preparation of the proposed amendment to the city's FLUM. The development of the conceptual site plan included the determination of appropriate maximum densities and intensities based on current land use data, trends, statistics, and goals of the city's comp plan, and also included the determination of appropriate location of the various land uses, based on compatibility with existing and proposed roads and infrastructure, compatibility with existing natural environmental features of the site and adjacent sites, compatibility with adjacent land uses, and various other factors. (see Appendix A Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning, paragraph titled: Adjacent Lands and Site Plan Compatibility CONCLUSION Based on the statements and analysis provided herein, the city can conclude that the requested annexation and land use designations are compatible with surrounding areas, consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, will have a net positive fiscal impact to the City, and meets all applicable Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment criteria. Page 23 93 of 156 Appendix A - Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning This proposal to annex approximately 1047 acres into the City of Sebastian required conceptual land planning and the development of a conceptual site plan to determine the appropriate FLUM Land Uses for the site, and the Land Use intensities/ densities and placement. The conceptual site plan was the planning tool referenced for the location of PLUM Land Use designations and preparation of the proposed amendment to the city's FLUM. The development of the conceptual site plan included the determination of appropriate maximum densities and intensities based on current land use data, trends, statistics, and goals of the city's comp plan, and also included the determination of appropriate location of the various land uses, based on existing and proposed roads and infrastructure, existing natural environmental features of the site, adjacent land uses, and various other factors. Reference Exhibit B —,Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SRID Canals; Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan; and Exhibit E Proposed Site FLUMMap Maximum intensities and densities: Current city land use data, trends, and statistics referenced to estimate maximum densities and intensities: Residential data: -ratio: residential area to total developable land: currently 50%, but will approach 70% (* 1) -current residentially designated land: 4593 ac (*1) -current residential population density in the city: 22,722 pop/ 4593 ac. — 4.95 res/ac (*2) (* 1) -current unit density: 10,471 units/ 4593 ac = 2.3 units / ac. -current pop per unit: 22,722 pop 110,471 units =2.17 pop / unit -deficit in units: 2845 units (*2) -MR Land Use density: 8 units/ ac (* 1 } -LR Land Use density: 5 units/ ac {* 1) -LR Land Use density: 3 units/ ac (*1) Commercial data: -current intensity: 10 ac / 1000 pop (*1) -commercial deficit. 59 ac (*2) -new commercial land, post 2010 EAR: +67 ac (reference 2018 annexation) -10,000 sf / ac intensity Industrial data: -current intensity: 10 ac / 1000 pop (* 1) -industrial deficit: 68 ac (*2) -20,000 sf / ac intensity Institutional data: -Percent of total city land: 16% (* 1) -Community park required: 2 ac / 1000 pop (* 1) -Neighborhood park required: 2 ac / 1000 pop. (*1) -Deficit: none. Significant surplus (*1) Conservation Data: -City will pursue acquisition of desirable areas for permanent designation (* 1) (* 1) — 2009 Comprehensive Plan (*2) — 2010 FAR Page 24 94 of 156 Estimated Intensities and Densities: Calculations PROPOSED FLUM AREA CALCULATIONS ** Net area = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW's Page 25 95 of 156 GROSS NET** AC AC COMMERCIAL GENERAL 112.3 95.6 COMMERCIAL LIMITED 10.1 7.8 CONSERVATION 43.0 41.4 INDUSTRIAL 126.7 112.7 INSTITUTIONAL 130.7 114.4 MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 384.0 360.9 LOW RESIDENTIAL 70.5 68.3 VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL 169.4 156.4 TOTAL 1046.7 957.5 ** Net area = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW's Page 25 95 of 156 Density I Intensity - Consistent with 2009 Comp Plan 12010 EAR *Based on 2009 Comp. Plan and 2010 EAR ** Net area = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW'S Page 26 96 of 156 Adjust for Plan / Map General Assumptions* (Net Area)** Actual Prop, Actual Land Use (Prop. Residential 2009 CP FLUM) From 50%, changing towards 70% Residential Land MR — 360.9 ac x 8/ac = 2887 Assume 65% LR - 68.3 ac x 5/ac = 342 Assume VLD 3 / ac LVR 156.4 ac x 3/ac = 470 0.65 x 1046.7 — 680.4 / ac 585.6 ac 3699 units 3699 units Units 680.4 x 3 = 2041 585.6 ac 2010 EAR Deficit = 2845 > 4886 Population 2009 CP - 2.17 / unit 2.17 x 4886 = 10,603 2.17 x 3699 — 8027 people 8027 people Commercial 2009 CP - 10 ac / 1000 10 ac / 1000 x 10,603 = 106 10 ac / 1000 x 8027 = 80 2010 EAR Deficit = + 59 = 59 Graves 67 ac annex --67 =-67 98 ac 72 ac 103.4 ac Industrial 2009 CP - 10 ac / 1000 10 ac / 1000 x 10,603 —106 10 ac / 1000 x 8027 — 80 2010 EAR deficit =68 —+68 174 ac 148 ac 112.7 ac Recreation 2009 CP - 4 ac 1 1000 Conserv. area ---> 41.4 ac Assume 40% of institutional area: 4 ac / 1000 x 10,603 42.4 ac 0.40 x 114.4 � 45.8 ac 87.2 +1- ac 87 +1- ac Institutional 16% of total City land 16% of total land 1046 x 0.16 = 168 ac 957.5 x 0.16 = 153.2 114.4 institutional 41.4 conservation 155.8 ac *Based on 2009 Comp. Plan and 2010 EAR ** Net area = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW'S Page 26 96 of 156 Subject Acres Proposed Future Land Use Allowed Gross Acreage Net Acreage" Category Density/FAR Units 112.3 95.56_ CG 10,000/ acre 955,600 sf 10.1 7.82 CL 10,000/ acre 78,200 sf 43.0 41.38 CONS 0 0 126.7 112.68 IND 20,000/ acre 2,253,600 sf 130.7 114.41 INST 0.005 24,919 sf up to 8 units per 384.0 360.87 MR acre 2,887 units up to 5 units per 70.5 68.27 LR acre 342 units up to 3 units per 169.4 156.38 VLR acre 470 units ** Net acreage = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW'S Page 27 97 of 156 Land Use Designation Marnpin2 — determination of location: The preparation of the proposed FLUM required the determination of the appropriate location of the various land uses, based on various factors including existing and proposed roads and infrastructure, existing natural environmental resources, adjacent land uses and compatibility, and various other factors: ]. Road network: The FDOT plans the future extension of 82nd Ave from SR60 to CR510, and the widening of CR510 from 2 to four lanes from USI to Cr512. Consequently, the improvements at 82r1 Ave and CR510 provide the opportunity for the creation of a commercial I industrial node at the intersection of CR510 and 82nd Ave, and along the 82nd Ave arterial road. The Commercial industrial node will provide opportunities for the city to attract large employment centers and business centers. The "Commercial General" and "Industrial" Land Uses were placed in this vicinity to capitalize on the proposed FDOT improvements, the accessibility to the city residents and nearby county residents, and the accessibility to both I95 interchanges. The site lies strategically in a location of several existing and proposed thoroughfare plan roads that will provide a favorable grid network of streets, providing multiple means of access from all directions. Neighborhood commercial, office, community (i.e. church, clubs), civic (i.e. police, fire substations) and institutional (i.e. parks, stormwater) uses were placed at the thoroughfare plan road intersections internal to the site. These "neighborhood commercial nodes" were placed to provide convenient, nearby and accessible services to the residents of the project site. This will provide local business and employment opportunities, capture traffic internally, and provide community centers of activity. "Commercial Limited", "Institutional", and "Commercial General" Land Uses were placed in these areas. The largest internal area is located at the intersection of 77th St and 78th Ave and will serve as a Community or "Town" center (approximately ac). The majority of the residential density for the site was internalized and placed adjacent to and surrounding the "neighborhood commercial nodes". These residential areas include the highest densities permitted in the city. The placement is meant to provide convenient, nearby and accessible services to the residents of the project site. The "Medium Density Residential" Land Use is placed over these residential areas. Reference Exhibit,4 — Location Map and Thoroughfare Plan Road Network (Contiguous to Site); Exhibit B — Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SRID Canals; Exhibit C Utility Infrastructure; and Exhibit E — Proposed Site FLUMMap North 1 South roads: a. east boundary: the site is adjacent to 74th Ave — an TRC planned minor arterial thoroughfare road. The IRC approved "Liberty Park PD TND" development lying east of the site will extend 74th Ave from CR510 approximately 3/4 mile. The project site would continue the extension of 74th Ave south another 1.25 miles to 69th St. Page 28 98 of 156 b. west boundary: the site is adjacent to 82nd Ave --- an IRC planned arterial thoroughfare road. FDOT has plans to improve and extend 82nd Ave from SR60 to Cr510 - the new north south corridor between the two 195 interchanges in Indian River County, c. internal roads: the project site would provide for the dedication and extension of 78th Ave from 691h St., 1.5 miles north into the site, serving as a local collector road; and provide for the dedication and extension of 80th Ave from 69' St., 2 miles to CR510, serving as a local collector road. East / West roads: a. North boundary: the site is adjacent to CR510 — an existing IRC arterial thoroughfare road. FD OT has plans to improve and widen CR510 from 2 to 4 lanes from US 1 to CR 512. b. south boundary: the site is adjacent to 691h St — an existing IRC collector thoroughfare road. This road extends from US 1 to 82nd Ave, providing access to numerous north south arterial roads including US 1, 581h Ave, 66th Ave and 82nd Ave c. internal roads: the project site would provide for the dedication and extension of 73rd St from 82nd Ave, 0.5 miles east into the site, serving as a local collector road; and provide for the dedication and extension of 77th St. from 82nd Ave east 1 mile to 74th Ave, serving as a collector road; and provide for the dedication and extension of 81St St. from 82nd Ave cast 1 mile to 74th Ave, serving as a collector road. The IRC approved "Liberty Park PD TND" development lying east of the site will extend 81St St. from 74th Ave to 66th Ave. The road network will ensure that traffic generated by the site development will not overburden one or two thoroughfares, that residents and employees from the site can conveniently access or depart the area with little risk of delays or hindrances, and most importantly both city and Indian River County emergency services will have multiple alternative routes to serve the site. Page 29 99 of 156 2. Environmental Resources/ Wetlands, headwaters of the South Sebastian Creek, and drainage facilities: The site lies entirely within the Sebastian River Improvement district (SRID), a chapter 189 and 289 Improvement district which is responsible for the implementation, operation and maintenance of a water control plan and stormwater drainage by gravity within the district boundaries. The site Iies adjacent to and east of Lateral C Canal and is bisected in the north south direction by Lateral L canal. Lateral L canal runs along and through the natural slough and headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. Several sub - laterals bisect the site in the east to west direction, draining the site west to lateral C. These include sub -laterals C2E through CSE. Reference Exhibit B — Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SKID Canals On the conceptual site plan (see Exhibit D) several areas were located due to their proximity to the laterals and sub -laterals, including: -Stormwater areas are located adjacent to the intersection of road thoroughfares and sub - laterals — providing a convenient and natural downgradient location for stormwater management systems for future thoroughfare roads bisecting the site. Small neighborhood parks were also located in these areas, which are commonly situated together with stormwater lakes/ ponds. The "Institutional" Land Use is placed in these areas, consistent with the city's designation for common stormwater areas city wide. -Preservation areas are located along lateral L and the headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. This natural flow way contains native upland and wetland areas, and consistent with the comprehensive plan Future Land Use Element, objectives 1-1.7 and policy 1-1.7.3, preservation of these areas will provide protection and buffering of these natural resources from development and loss of habitat. Large estate type single family homesite development is located immediately adjacent to the preserve areas, providing an adjacent compatible land use. The "Conservation" Land Use is placed over the preservation areas, and the "Very Low Density Residential" Land Use is Placed adjacent to these areas. -A thin, linear land area running adjacent to and west of lateral L is provided, and together with the preserve area, runs the length of the site from north to south. This area serves multiple purposes, including a linear access to Lateral L for canal maintenance, a continuous 2 mile "greenway", and provides an alternate mode of transportation — a pedestrian path and bikeway. This green corridor traverses the site, from CR510, where it connects to the existing adjacent IRC conservation area and the site's preserve area, and continues south along lateral L. This "Greenway" is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, 2010 EAR, "North Indian River County Greenway Plan — Sebastian", providing a possible connection to the IRC Central Greenway system. The corridor provides several interconnections with east west collector roads, providing convenient access to the other areas of the site, and the corridor provides connections and access to larger land areas along the pathway (5 + ac) where recreation, civic or Page 30 100 of 156 community uses are located. The "Institutional" Land Use is placed in these areas, consistent with the city's designation for drainage areas, recreation areas, and community and civic areas. Adiacent Lands and Site Plan Compatibility: The site is surrounded by the city of Sebastian on its north property line with commercial and residential uses, and it is surrounded on its east, south and west sides by lands lying in Indian River County with an Agricultural (AG -1) FLUM Land Use. However, less than 1/3 of the surrounding land is utilized for any agricultural purposes. It is evident that urban and suburban development has afflicted the area, making the project site's land less desirable and more difficult to operate successful agricultural ventures. Road improvements afflicting the site include the widening of CR510 from 2 to 4 lanes on the north property line, the extension of 82"d Ave on the west property line by FDOT, and 74th Ave along the east property line. Recent development approvals include the Liberty Park PD TND on the east side, and the Quail Valley Golf Course on the south property line, and numerous 5 acre residential subdivisions ("Ranchettes") adjacent to the south 1/2 of the east side of the site. The recent development and plans for road construction and development nearby provide evidence that urban development is encroaching within this once predominantly agricultural area, supporting the idea of land annexation into the city of Sebastian. The conceptual site plan (see Exhibit D) designates land uses after considering adjacent existing and proposed land uses and compatibility. North property Line Adiacent lands: The site is adjacent to CR510 on its north property, and borders the City of Sebastian on most of the property line. FD OT has plans to widen CR510 from 2 to 4 lanes from US 1 to CR512. Recently, a 67 acre parcel along the west %2 of the north property line was annexed into the city, with plans for Commercial development. To the east of that commercial property is a 40+- acre undeveloped (abandoned citrus) property which remains in IRC, and to the east of that is approximately 120 acre parcel lying in the city with plans for residential development (River Oaks PD). Site Plan/ Compatibility: Commercial areas are located along the sites CR510 frontage across from the existing "Commercial General" FLUM designated area in the city. Commercial General" Land Uses were placed in these areas. Page 31 101 of 156 East property line Adiacent Lands: The east property line is adjacent to many different land uses, all of which depict various levels of urban and sub -urban encroachment into the agricultural landscape: - 74th Ave arterial Road - The extension of 74th Ave is planned along the southern I 3/4 miles of the east property line. This is part of the IRC thoroughfare plan — and will extend from CR510 south to 69th St and presumable further south in the future. - Conservation Land - the northern 1/4 mile is land held by IRC for conservation (FLUM "Con"). This land is mostly native vegetation, with uplands and wetlands surrounding a creek, part of the headwaters of the South Prong of the St. Sebastian River. Just east of the preserve is an existing residential subdivision (Citrus Hideaway). - South of the IRC conservation lands, along approximately 1/2 mile of the site's east property line / 74th Ave extension lies the proposed Liberty Park PD TND. This proposed development was approved by IRC with over 900 residential units and over 200,000 sf of commercial use. As a condition of approval, Liberty Park developers are required to extend 74th Ave south 3/4 of a mile from CR510. In addition, it is required to extend 81St St west from 661h Ave to 741h Ave. - South of Liberty Park PD TND, along the sites south 1 1/4 anile of the east property line lies numerous 5 acre residential homesites (aka "Ranchettes"). Site Plan/ Comvatibility: Preservation areas are located in the north east areas of the site adjacent to the IRC Conservation area. The preservation is located over the headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. Low density large estate type single family homesite development is proposed immediately adjacent to the preserve areas, providing an adjacent compatible land use. This low density residential land use continues south along the east property line, where it is adjacent to the largest "estate" homesites of the Liberty Park PD TND, and further south where it is adjacent to many 5 acre single family "ranchettes". At the southeast corner of the site, at the intersection of 69th St and 74"' Ave, and across from the Quail Valley Golf Course, a 20+- acre area is reserved for a future community or civic use. This could be a church, school, recreation / park, or other institutional use. The "Conservation" Land Use is placed over the preservation areas, and the "Very Low Density Residential" Land Use is placed over the residential areas. The "Institutional" Land Use is placed over the community / civic area. South Property Line Adiacent Lands: The south property line is adjacent to 69' St, which is a continuous thoroughfare road (IRC collector), starting east of US 1, through to 82°d Ave. Upon the completion of 82nd Ave extension by FDOT, 691h St. is certain to become a busy route for travel from the SR60 corridor into the central part of the county, and the intersection of 82nd Ave and 69th St will likely see significant increases in traffic. Page 32 102 of 156 The Quail Valley Golf Course borders the east 1/z of the south property line. A proposed, partially constructed and abandoned 5 acre single family subdivision lies west of the Golf Course, Site Plan/ Compatibility. Low density residential land use is located along the majority of the south property line and 69th St frontage, where it is across from Quail Valley Golf Club. However, at the SW corner of the site is the intersection of 691h St and 82nd Ave. Upon the completion of 82nd Ave extension, this will become a busy intersection, and a desirable location for commercial activities in this "corner" of the city. Consequently, the residential area will transition to a higher density use for apartments/ townhomes, and finally transition to commercial use at the intersection. The "Low Density Residential" and "Median Density Residential" Land Uses are placed over the residential areas, and "Commercial general" Land uses are placed over the commercial use areas at the intersection. West Property Line Adiacent Lands: The site is adjacent to the proposed FDOT 82nd Ave extension, an arterial road connecting CR510 to SR 60, and connecting the two I95 interchanges. Properties lying west of the 82nd Ave extension and the sites west property line are owned by the applicant (owner of the project site). Approximately 1000 acres in size, the property is mostly abandoned citrus grove, and now in pasture. The property is a candidate for future annexation into the city. However, there are several small parcels internal to the 1000 acres that are owned by others, which hinders the ability to annex all these lands at this time. Site Plan/ Compatibilitv: There is over a 300' buffer on the west property line. In addition to the proposed 120' wide 82nd Ave ROW on the west property Iine, Lateral "C" Canal a 225' canal ROW buffers the adjacent applicant owned property from the site. The FDOT plans the future extension of 82nd Ave from SR60 to CR510, and the widening of CR510 from 2 to four lanes from USI to CR512. Consequently, the improvements at 82nd Ave and CR510 provide the opportunity for the creation of a commercial / industrial node at the intersection of Cr510 and 82nd Ave, along the 82nd Ave arterial road, and at the intersection of 69th St and 82nd Ave. The development of this node will provide opportunities for the city to attract large employment centers and business centers. The Commercial General and Industrial Land Uses were placed in this vicinity to capitalize on the proposed FDOT improvements, the accessibility to the city residents and nearby county residents, and the accessibility to both I95 interchanges. Page 33 103 of 156 Exhibit A — Location Map and Thoroughfare Plan Road Network (Contiguous to Site) 104 of 156 EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP & THOROUGHFARE PLAN ROAD NETWORK (CONTIGUOUS TO SITE) 1--95 & S.R. 60 !; .j INTERCHANGES CITY OF �o�,„,a■ r .� SEBASTIAN C. R. 512 oop �IDIAN PLI - M RIVER t COUNTY _.._. 391 R. 510 - ul IL >Z Cl) 7 -,IIo - O --� 1_s 1 _ •'_ ■ O n rn I D_ �� fi..i... C h.. z z ��_ ' C�.rn -- _ - •■� • --. _... _------- ---- —_..._ - --_.-j E39TH ST. 3 1 3 1 1 � 3 (-O.T X CITY OF FELLSMERE E D - i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY [f ! I! ....... .. . .................y._ _..,..--�.- i i 7' J =3 1-95 & S.R.S. R, 60 -(INTERCHANGE j!Ji I I, '€ S.R. 60 N 'NOTE: LIBERTY PARK, BLUE WATER BAY, AND RIVER OAKS P.D,'S ARE SHOWN ON MAP FOR REFERENCE. THESE ARE APPROVED, BUT NOT YET CONSTRUCTED. a o o GRAVES BROTHERS CITY OF SEBASTIAN = ANNEXATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXHIBIT A 1, {��� ■ ■ ■ II■ 1 JI I Vl....1 � 'NOTE: LIBERTY PARK, BLUE WATER BAY, AND RIVER OAKS P.D,'S ARE SHOWN ON MAP FOR REFERENCE. THESE ARE APPROVED, BUT NOT YET CONSTRUCTED. a o o GRAVES BROTHERS CITY OF SEBASTIAN = ANNEXATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXHIBIT A 1, {��� ■ ■ ■ II■ 1 11 _- ! ! It- _. '�M S. R. 60 ( (I� Imi ii'� GRAPHIC SCALE 0 2,000 4,000 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 4,000 ft. SCHULKE, BITTLE” & STODDARD, RAdI L-L.C./r� aW & S7RUC7UML aMEOW • LWD PLAkvNB4G - EAMRCJNmjx,{L PE ; CMU FWAUM of AIJnVP1MnM No.: 0000eeea 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 261 VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 1770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com w - Vl....1 � 2 � C m II. 11 _- ! ! It- _. '�M S. R. 60 ( (I� Imi ii'� GRAPHIC SCALE 0 2,000 4,000 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 4,000 ft. SCHULKE, BITTLE” & STODDARD, RAdI L-L.C./r� aW & S7RUC7UML aMEOW • LWD PLAkvNB4G - EAMRCJNmjx,{L PE ; CMU FWAUM of AIJnVP1MnM No.: 0000eeea 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 261 VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 1770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com w - Exhibit B Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SRID Canals 106 of 156 �1 T CITY OF PROPOSED SEBASTIAN C.R. 510 166' UL TIMATE FDOTRow' �.�.�.l��r.�.E>• - --- E _ 31.0' ROlh' J^ I DEDICATION I I I I I 100' C2E I � � — PROPpSEQ i 80THAVE. 80' ROW PROPOSED I� � alsrsr. � I c-, o I 80' ROW O > z I m I-- - - - I I II I i ---------- ' I I 100' - - - - I C3E PROPOSED 77TH ST. I 80' ROW f I I II I f If I I i I ' � I I I I 225' LATERAL 'C' CANAL I I PROPosEQ � I eo' ROW PROPOSED 73 T ST. II 80' ROW i I I 580'R0V DEDICATION,W� _. 'r f L'LI OLIJj 10 Q�� I C5 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY r 150' I 'J - BYPASS --•1 CANAL t PEXHIBIT B APROVED PD "RIVER OAKS SITE THOROUGHFARE PLAN CITY OF NETWORK & S.R.I.D. CHANGES SEBASTIAN 130' ROW I `DEDlCAT10L. _ EXI TING ROAD 4E i 125' , LATERAL C' ' CANAL - a I E CD i PROPOSED 69TH T ROW -4ST 100' UL TIMATE L o - ROWPER IRC EDICA TION T 0 0 GRAVES BROTHERS SITE THOROUGHFARE i - CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLAN NETWORK & S.R.I.D. ANNEXATION CHANGES FOR 1,047 AC ANNEXATION r. 0 LEGEND LOCAL ROAD OR ACCESS DIVEWAY ---- i STREET/ROW Y " CANAL RO//(S.R.1.D) -- z OD C Z Z STREET/ROW I 717 BY0THERS 1 SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L-C- CML & SMUCHhUL LNClNEMW • LAND PL1WX • DvmwmaffAL PERMR71N6 CV0F=7M Of AVMGRQA710N No.: 00005M- 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960��� TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 772 1770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineecs.mm 800 1 ft. J ..k 1 SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L-C- CML & SMUCHhUL LNClNEMW • LAND PL1WX • DvmwmaffAL PERMR71N6 CV0F=7M Of AVMGRQA710N No.: 00005M- 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960��� TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 772 1770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineecs.mm 800 1 ft. J Exhibit C — Utility Infrastructure 108 of 156 > mz z -i Z M Cn E) m 0 --� rn m M 0 -0 5 z m 03 > c 2 co m 0, 0 Z (f) > r>- M 2--1 r- m U) m ;c 70 C: M z >< 71 > cn C 0 0 C: ;u m 14-2 cil 4-3 0 C CA z E it —h I FELLSMERE I : z 0 > C z Fwo m -co < < m IM EXHIBIT C _0 E: M 0 VJ -0 W 0 mco z m co 0 Ppl")VE El M AR�j LJ+kj-I A IF </T, IT M l't"I o 0 AV—E-1 z E- 0 cn LLLW.jj SCHULKE, BITTLE &STODDARD, L.L.C. CM d SMWXmL vommmNo - " mmNm - DmRwmavrAL COMMI OF AUB40IMTM R04 00D066da 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 329 100 TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 772 f 770,9496 EMAIL infogsbsonginenrs.. o,., sp GRAVES BROTHERS CITY OF SEBASTIAN ANNEXATION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXHIBIT C _0 E: M 0 VJ -0 W 0 mco z m co 0 Ppl")VE El M AR�j LJ+kj-I A IF </T, IT M l't"I o 0 AV—E-1 z E- 0 cn LLLW.jj SCHULKE, BITTLE &STODDARD, L.L.C. CM d SMWXmL vommmNo - " mmNm - DmRwmavrAL COMMI OF AUB40IMTM R04 00D066da 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 329 100 TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 772 f 770,9496 EMAIL infogsbsonginenrs.. o,., Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan 110 of 156 -r T . CITY OF PROPOSED SEBASTIAN C. R. 510 966' UL TIMATE FDO TROW DEDICATION RECREATION AREA LC2F 0' l000 I ' PROP011 80THAVEJ 80' ROW r OPOSEDST ST {+ ESTATES ' ROW i 150' o> j z� m i BYPASS CANAL loo,Q I C3E- j RESIDENTIAI { l �Z } I pG 1 FDO T IMPROVEMENTS & PR POSED 1 �l 7TH ST. DEDICATIO �8 RECREATION(PARK) & 'ROW R_ I I i I 225' LATERAL 'C' CANAL ! EOH 1 ol PROPOSED j 73TH ST. TOWN CENTER 801ROW LIMITED COMMERCIAL NODE 58.n'A,nIn7 [ DEDICATION j RESIDENTIAI { l �Z ESTATES pG 1 FDO T IMPROVEMENTS & RESIDENTIAL 1 �l 1 Ole Q) ; DEDICATIO RECREATION(PARK) & R_ STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT cl o I l INSTITUTIONAL USE: GOVT, CHURCH, COMMUNITY I • i - o CENTER, SCHOOL, EMS _ _•. -_' - PROPOSED 69TH I15'ROW LOCAL ROAD ORACCESS - DRIVEWAY ST 100' ULTIMATE EDICA TION o - ROw7'ER IRS STREET/ROW - INDIANRIVER COUNTY CONSERVA770NAREA • - CITRUS l�__. HIDEAWAY _ VEHICgLAR DRIVE TO TRAIL HEAD I� ll PARKI7YGFOR }l TRAIL I &D GREENWAY TRAIL RESIDENAAL ESTATES 0 •1 j RESIDENTIAI { l �Z ESTATES pG 1 FDO T IMPROVEMENTS & RESIDENTIAL 1 �l 1 PR POSED 78`Tt�` Vi r- 80'Row IC }— I PARK 100' C4E � US RECREATION FIELDS / COURTS RESIDENTIAL ESTATES RESIDENTIAL ESTATFS 125' LATERAL 'L' CANAL RESIDENTA ESTATES EXHIBIT D CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN APPROVED PD "LIBERTY PARK" PROPOSED _ r 74THAVE 130'ROW j OFFSITE-LIBERYPARK� CANAL'. PROPOSED 81ST ST 80' ROW OFF SITE -LIBERTY PARK LEGEND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FORLOCAL ROW 74TH A VE j STORMWATER 80' Goff MANAGEMENT FOR i I FDO T IMPROVEMENTS & RESIDENTIAL LOCAL ROW _ 130' ROW DEDICATIO RECREATION(PARK) & STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT 'T TING I RECREATIONAND/OR I J CONSERVATION J L j i I RESIDENTIAL . - COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL cl I l INSTITUTIONAL USE: GOVT, CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, SCHOOL, EMS - LOCAL ROAD ORACCESS - DRIVEWAY STREET/ROW - CANAL ROW (S.R.I.D.) RESIDENTIAL ^. ESTATES STREET/ROW BY OTHERS -� GENERAL INDICATION OF DRAINAGE PATTERN PEDESTRIAN TRAIL (GREEN WAY) 1 > nch * 800 ; ft. GRAVES BROTHERS SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CONCEPTUAL SITE � CITY OF SEBASTIAN I CML & S7WX7u>AL 0VGAUVNG . LWO PiAWNc , 0MROAWW L ,Ori ,« PLAN FOR COS i >o ANNEXATION 1,047 AC ANNEXATION wrrOOROM� No_ 0000°°°° tj 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32060 - TEL 7721 770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com ti Exhibit E — Proposed Site FLUM Map 112 of 156 i CITY OF PROPOSED SEBASTIAN C.R. 51016 6' 10165' UL TIMATE FDOTROW i I 81ST ST LATERAL o 'C' CANAc ! 0' ROW i� 0> C Z Mel EII V— — — — — I — c 5 r I F— QEDfCATIC,"1 CONSERVATION l,r. 106' ' I C2E PROPOSE`i-- I PRO�ED I 80THAVE 80' ROW i 1 _ 1 150' BYPASS—[ CANAL I i \ CITRUS 1 HIDEAWAY i . 1 EXHIBIT E PROPOSED SITE FLUM MAP t Fr_F,un 3RCAGRICULTURAL-I {Max. T u15 ac) COMMERCIAL 512 nrv, COMMERCIAL GENERAL dQ COMMERCIAL LIMITED CONSERVAT10N _ INDUSTRIAL - INSTITUTIONAL VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (Max. 2durac) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IMax. 5 dutacj MOBILE HOME (Max. 5 dtVmj MEDIUMDENSITY RtESIDENT!AL (Max B duvac) RIVERFRONT MIXED USE PROPOSED E ,. 74THAVE 130'ROW r OFF SITE -LIBERYPARK �» APPROVED PD "LIBERTY PARK" WMA i7 — 80' ROW CANAL! 74TH AVE 80' RO - PROPOSED 81ST ST SO' ROW OFF SI TE - LIBERTY PARK LEGEND LOCAL ROAD OR ACCESS DIVEWAY STREET/ROW _ 136,Row DEDICAT10 CANALROW(S.R.10.) STREFT/ROW BrorHERs EXI TING PROPOSED FL UM AREA II I CALCULATIONS GROSSAC NETAC CG f 112.26AC 956 AC 225' I 81ST ST LATERAL o 'C' CANAc ! 0' ROW i� 0> C Z I I Z: I 80THA1/E. it I II 80`ROW 100' I C3E I I II ' II PR POSED 80THAVE 80' ROW i 1 _ 1 150' BYPASS—[ CANAL I i \ CITRUS 1 HIDEAWAY i . 1 EXHIBIT E PROPOSED SITE FLUM MAP t Fr_F,un 3RCAGRICULTURAL-I {Max. T u15 ac) COMMERCIAL 512 nrv, COMMERCIAL GENERAL dQ COMMERCIAL LIMITED CONSERVAT10N _ INDUSTRIAL - INSTITUTIONAL VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (Max. 2durac) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IMax. 5 dutacj MOBILE HOME (Max. 5 dtVmj MEDIUMDENSITY RtESIDENT!AL (Max B duvac) RIVERFRONT MIXED USE PROPOSED E ,. 74THAVE 130'ROW r OFF SITE -LIBERYPARK �» APPROVED PD "LIBERTY PARK" WMA i7 — 80' ROW CANAL! 74TH AVE 80' RO - PROPOSED 81ST ST SO' ROW OFF SI TE - LIBERTY PARK LEGEND LOCAL ROAD OR ACCESS DIVEWAY STREET/ROW _ 136,Row DEDICAT10 CANALROW(S.R.10.) STREFT/ROW BrorHERs EXI TING PROPOSED FL UM AREA II I CALCULATIONS GROSSAC NETAC CG f 112.26AC 956 AC 225' I I I f LATERAL 'C' CANAc ! j i� PROPOSED I I I 80THA1/E. I 80`ROW ------------- I I PROPOSED 73TH ST. I i I 80' ROW III II 58.0'ROW :_ DEDICATION L �IQ� y Q I J 160' i C5E oz�o; ITII II • I L. I I _ PROPOSED 69THII YR Ow w ST 100' UL TIMATE EDICA TION o - -ROW PER7RC— Cn 0 10.11AC 78AC 43.02 AC 41.4 AC 126.72 AC 112.7AC INST 130.66 AC [fR 383.95AC 76.53 AC zo LLR1 169.35AC 1 oZ { C TOTAL 1,0467ACAC m 114.4 AC 360.9 AC 68.3 AC 1564 AC 957.5AC QUAIL VALLEY GOLF CLUB GRAVES BROTHERS PROPOSED FLUM I SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.x 7 CITY OF SEBASTIAN FOR COS aM & MWXn#W a0MMUNG - LWD PLAWIW - 0MRMWRffAL PEiWff G ANNEXATION1 647 AC ANNEXATION O�1r,ATION OF AMORa"TION NO_ 00000M _ 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 7721 770-9498 EMAIL infoVsbserioineers.com 1 J 1 Exhibit F — Proposed City FLUM Map Amendment 114 of 156 LASTSAVED'.-011111E,40 AM', SAVED BY: JONAS:ORAIMNG: V:t'miRI-93 GRAVES BROTHERS I D ACRE SFRATIANANNEXATIONGEDWRODIJCTION DRAVANGS'GONSTRXTMPLANSIGRAVES BROE ANNEX PROP PLUM WGTORMWAMR-2W :PLATDATE'.& 0191:N 37 PM .' 1 CPAPSFA>•P. i �. b gi06G¢AV q LL �. 'P N OELMvxrg pp 12 { '1 AIFM ; A�� n OrcNBM EXHIBITF j PROPOSED CITY FLUM 10w�LgAfAv1 FLORA[ANn AV � m ¢ � G+ � � 1 GRAPHIC SCALE MAP AMENDMENT HNIEPHLLAV � � N VA,LLI9 AV TATIGRM � F � rt3 PL yu p i 2,NEa A � YiGTNBT, 1 leen - 10V0(l, - OEIEP:FVM Y 1AVPCftr LP 9 GSA - _. - -- x1RNn AV CNELLOM t_Try ST FOSSgRAV FaiST[PAY ��. ~ �� ... OOC1G11M 0W7GRM y4�� •S 1 - ,, I C 1NS6Er+0.AY N q R9SEAY fi' "r1 VCV _.. �_ I !0 .�NetAM w. of h 3 ,4 I • —1 Al r4lANCW Av y 3 RALAV ' � ��— cnnr nv $ar cNrny � osAEnoM g Ee.ax,vAY OSei:GCAY ww sono NAR4 -_ -- f ._.•_.. _••.a..jF WLPRINAv y �' FYq BYriGOa Ay 0 1 e1.4Np Nur voRCAM e 4• �'s' S S TnRPOn,Y rARwNM �,n � `g AMTUMNTER � � � � GicsonAY $ P'E w LANpLEAv JANAICAAv AJAwxwM �' F � 9ECKE«M 00EEnM 1 �l �' �p`�' rceNDULM cuui OR aEAMIgAAV R� BERMLac-/'0 3a•' ®y8'�,�: Cr WNE� of:NOUERiry W7.y C' p� —ESM y " F"NGQAY A YiEMAv +lam y [S v «F3X CI 53�i ! - 8 ° t S "`666hihh� a 22 9 /C GWR0. LN Y aw IIAAEOn Av `E� d1iN c1 "1..:. :. � wrcD Av �� as «ANEN C«EC39AAV Al. 3 24EN3«Ay 4• okYCN Av i q`L�yF "+'i y, CC �A +r....._.._ CIIugEM � � k x �5+4'TpdT' OAPni Rr 1 1 AVr� ERN�Lr n j 'FAR eq, E_P 1 • E5A9rIAn rRaGSINp BCvp - 1f�' � it ANp pEUpRF�Av - 't^R 1 —1 LANE ..GrgrNUYcrv.9 4� U' s df1"•p� cua<IsvE wAr�_+..�.•• 11�¢¢,, I�Wu oREENemERM 3 � tl-� �r�s� Yg q�' _ Ensr sr - f E S n L 3 R TY i'•- • NMINI OR j OULFsrRFAMM CC V p'Rl�.p,0"a X %a9F TE m MAJE—Av ~ �i. C 1O' .y0 •" 5k <r LGF•"SeR qP MLN,RasEAv 9 � _ S �w �4 g MRn[1PR "i svEErsAYM vp1 � sTREAA1tEYAv �LFAst TEP �°� W. ��OCNAde ,.. .� •, tF �� FiOiSER AY w RrGOREDGE IFN I M y� G CSy G, ,.pLA' w��TFg� � Z � � � i - ..-_....... i•_Vr tiFr.. •--:.-.' q��y, R0.CwGNo,LOR k TY 9 �J� � W�i•I`ML '4 k � r r•G�G'ER of'd o r � � f'ERIWIIRLE pi .. `� k d �. �Lt y['i1` F WEER it ' OdF' Po9rxorun aw9asEAOR '`. GurnouM � �� �, 4 �' d^�'�' o¢� sAaIr�EF �� 3 uPc«MaMr IER � � !••_•• ��"a�••1 pn�cAn sr � ff k �a 4 v aAv �~+aNwewAv ®® RS-3 ; 1 I ®® \� (IRC} ' IRFA-Y- RS-7 - � � (IRC) IILJ LJ ®rFITl ®®CON-1 - (1RCJ i pn-rNo �:E®® Rs-3 t I (IRC) (IRC) i APT] H W LLLLLLLLt.�, • - (IRC, � I El: T m � Li LEGEND a-7 ® CONSERVATION ; COMMERCIALLIMITED ©CRABOUNDARY (IRC) AGRICULTURE (Max. 1 dWSacros) - COMMERCIAL GENERAL -• CITY BOUNDARY i VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (Max. 3dulac) - COMMERCIAL 512 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREAS LOWDENSITY RES3)EN7AL(Max, 5 dulac) - RIVERFRONT MIXED USE WATER MOBILE HOME (Mm. 5 &Vac) - INDUSTRIAL ® MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (Max. 8 dU1ac) - INSTITUTIONAL V .R GRAVES BR07HERS PROPOSED FLUM MAP I SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L-L.C.° `"m CITY OF SEBASTIAN aEaamer�.ws- CML dr S7RUGTURN" ENGlNfERlA� UND PLANNING • ENVlAONMENIAL PERM1771NG °` ""R :"I �+-c•0• ' r ANNEXATION FOR COS CERTIFICATION OF AUTHOMZATioN NO.; 00009898 •°" " " am®B a.ws- 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 sG E As NOTED 1047 ACRE ANNEXATION TEL 772 1770.9622 FAX 772 f 770-9435 EMAIL info(M08enuineers.com "`e wtE Gz/1e/re Exhibit G — Preliminary Wetland Assessment 116 of 156 iiA . : • � fix. - - r ` • j i � 4,+ i Ae Wetlan� r-, ir. • t --)� { 29.43 bac. i. .s Y 1 • t 5 sw t.w- . 41 •,. --I .+... ._! " • 191 Ya.rr 1 S ..fir II Mier 1 ' _ i fir• T' [ w roves Br r f h rnary We: nd 'MaP , fr ,-',. 8r i t -- - !L • SCJEIVTI T S A�ov=D �: LEW CARTE, —$oo , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Bob Solari Chairinaii District 5 Susan Adanis Vice Chairiiian District I August 14, 2019 Via email Mayor Jim dill City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Joseph E. Flescher District 2 Tim Zorc District 3 Peter D. O'Bryari District 4 RE: Ordinance 0-19-04 - Petition for Voluntary Annexation - Graves Brothers Company Mayor Hill, On Monday, the Metropolitan Planning Organization had a productive conversation focused on the transportation issues relating to the proposed Graves Brothers Company annexation. Yesterday, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners discussed the annexation and expressed concerns with the transportation and utility issues pertaining to the proposed annexation. Based upon these discussions, it appears that there is an opportunity to craft an annexation agreement between the City of Sebastian and the Graves Brothers that more fully addresses key issues such as transportation, utilities, and the relationship with the Sebastian River Improvement District which have not been adequately addressed to the benefit of both parties and importantly the citizens of Sebastian and Indian River County. On behalf of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, I respectfully request that the City Council of the City of Sebastian table making any decision on the annexation on August 20h. We would hope that the City Council would consider adopting an annexation agreement that could both address these issues and memorialize the framework for the annexation while at the same time gain the support of the community. The proposed annexation has the potential to change the future makeup of the City of Sebastian. We believe it is best to take the time to make sure that these changes will be a benefit for the current and future residents of Sebastian and Indian River County as a whole. Sincerely, Bob Solari Chair of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners CC: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Jason E. Brown, County Administrator 1801 2711 Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 118 of 156 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR o z �iORIDt August 8, 2019 Via email Mr. Paul Carlisle City Manager 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 RE: Ordinance 0-19- 04 - Petition for Voluntary Annexation - Graves Brothers Company Paul: As a follow-up to our meeting on Friday, August 2nd, concerning the above -referenced matter, 1 wanted to send you the County's list of concerns in writing, before consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its meeting; on August 15'1' as well as the second reading of the ordinance at the City Council's public hearing scheduled for August 28th. Water/ Wastewater/ Reclaimed Water It is asserted that IRC has an affinnative duty to expand the [IRCDUS water and sewer] system inside and outside the city. and to provide service by the county`s water and wastewater systems concurrent with the demands of new growth...", This statement from the lune 26, 2019 City of Sebastian Agenda item 12.A is not accurate. Section 6.05 of the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) adopted September 20, 1995 between the City of Sebastian and the County States that the County "' shall have an affirmative duty, and is hereby authorized by the City, to provide, in a manner consistent with this agreement, water and wastewater services within the incorporated area of the City under County ordinances, resolutions, regulations and policies regardless of whether a lot or parcel of land connected with or provided service by the County's water and wastewater system is located in the incorporated area pursuant to Section 6.08(A) of the ILA which states ", The construction, expansion, or acquisition of any water or wastewater utility facilities by the County, or major alterations which affect the quantity or quality of the level of service provided or available within the incorporated area of the City shall be consistent with applicable local government comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to Chapter 163, Part H. Florida Statutes... 1RCDUS provides water and sewer service in accordance with the Urban Service Area boundary and the approved Utility Master Plan which can, but is not required to, accommodate development outside the Urban Seri ice 119 of 156 08/08/19 t rtv of Sebastian AIr, e-vati-oll Area. (County Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub Element Policy 5.7 limits the centralized water service to those areas within the Urban Service Area). Aside from the local government policies that outline logical, efficient and planned growth as set forth in the Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there are restraints from the regulatory agencies with respect to the water and/or wastewater capacity that is claimed to be available for this annexation project. From a water capacity perspective, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) recognizes that (currently) IRCDUS can physically produce up to 20.01 Million gallons a day (MGD). However other regulatory constraints such as the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Consumptive Ilse Permit limits IRCDUS's groundwater withdrawals to 12.83 MGD from 2021-2031. The proposed 1.06MGD of estimated potable water demand places a burden on IRCDUS to increase its FDEP demineralization concentrate (DC) treatment and disposal permit limitations. IRCDUS' current DC site may have to be substantially upgraded to comply with the annexation's full build out projections. From a wastewater capacity perspective, the collection and transmission infrastructure that will be relied on for this proposed annexation may need to be replaced or upgraded due to additional flow and pressure demands so as to not create an operation and maintenance issue in the future. There will be a need to set aside a minimum of several acres in a strategic location within the annexation boundary for either a potable water storage and re -pump station or a master planned inline sewer pump station that is equipped with emergency power once more engineering data becomes available. Any and all domestic wastewater produced within the ] ,1 18 acres will need to be returned in an equal amount and used as reclaimed water for irrigation, and said requirements should be designed to have adequate storage capacity of the reclaimed water during high precipitation events. In short, while the City of Sebastian staff agenda dated June 26, 2019 as part of its concurrency analysis denotes that utility capacity exists, there is no unconstrained affirmative duty to serve this area inconsistent with local policies and procedures, and there are complex regulatory restrictions on the current capacity that prohibit the annexation (in its current form) from occurring without needed regulatory changes and/or infrastructure upgrades. Such potential utility rapacity concurrency issues cannot be expected to be satisfied by existing IRCDUS rate payers within the Urban Service Area, but instead must be resolved consistent with the Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and borne by the property owner(s) and'or developer. Community Development The conceptual site plan ( Exhibit D) and the proposed site Future Land Use Map (Exhibit E) reflect certain aspects consistent with the Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan "new town" concept. such as a town center. extension of an internal street grid system. and conserved lands adjacent to and encompassing the south prong of the St. Sebastian River. Other aspects, however. are inconsistent with the new town concept set forth in the Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Those aspects include the lack of a perimeter greenbelt along the project edges outside of the urban service area, and the establishment of two miles of strip commercial/industrial use along (future) 82nd Avenue. Also, for development density 18011 27`x' Street, Vero Beach, Fl. 32960-3388 PHONE: 772-226-1408 120 of 156 08/08/19 Citi, afSebastian Anne_vation consistency, County staff would prefer a cap on gross residential density at 1.5 units per acre or 2.0 units per acre, with potential for density transfers in from other agricultural areas, allowing concentrations of denser areas within the overall project off -set by green open spaces (as seen with prior large annexations by the City of Fellsmere). Although it has been explained that City commercial /industrial land use classifications allow for multi -family residential use, and thus an opportunity for mixed use along the $2nd Avenue corridor and clustering, of commercial/industrial uses at intersections, such a mixture and clustering is not required under the proposed FLUM nor reflected on the conceptual site plan. To address that issue and to provide consistency with the Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, County staff strongly urges the City of Sebastian adopt a comprehensive plan text amendment concurrent with the land use designation amendment to address that issue and other new town concepts to the benefit of both City and County residents. Please Deep in mind that the annexation does not address the stonnwater farming that is proposed for the property. The waterfarming may have an impact on the future land use of the property and the proposed future rezoning. Public Works It is important to maintain and extend a connected grid system for transportation purposes. While the annexation addresses the internal grid south of CR 510, there is a lack of connectivity to the areas north of CR 510. Laconia Street is a key north/south roadway segment within the City of Sebastian. Any annexation agreement approved by the City of Sebastian should accommodate the impacts to Laconia Street. Extending Laconia Street south to CR -510 will provide a north/south route between 66th Avenue and where CR -510 turns north to connect to CR -512. Laconia Street provides an internal collector road within the City that will allow for residents to reach CR -510 without unnecessarily travelling to CR -512 or to Barber Street as a means to reach 82nd Avenue and the proposed commercial/industrial area. Following the meeting between City and County planning staff in March, County staff was under the impression that Laconia Street would be extended, which would help establish connectivity with a well-developed grid system. The Laconia Street extension would combine with other roadways detailed below to ensure a system of roads connecting Sebastian Highlands with the grid system south of CR 510. These connections vvould be 1.) the City's planned expansion of Shakespeare Street in line with 74th Avenue, 2.) the planned (County/Liberty Park) extension of 70th Avenue south to 81st Street by Liberty Magnet school, 3.) the existing Schurnan/66th Avenue connection, as well as Laconia/82nd Avenue. County staff was disappointed to hear that the Laconia Street expansion is no longer planned. Exhibit B of the annexation package indicates that Graves Brothers Company is dedicating right of way for 82nd Avenue. This is not correct. Florida Department of Transportation is in the process of taking the right of way through eminent domain. It should be transparent to all interested parties that Graves Brothers Company is not dedicating right of -way for 82nd Avenue, but is in fact increasing the costs of the 82nd Avenue project as a result of this annexation request. 1801 27u' Street, Fero Beach, Fl. 32960-3388 PHONE: 772-226-1408 121 of 156 08/08/19 Citi, of Sebastian Annevation County staff has contacted the Florida Department of Transportation regarding how the proposed annexation and zoning use changes will impact the cost of purchasing right of way along 82"d Avenue and on CR -510. FDOT stated that the appraiser would consider the likelihood of annexation and a change in zoning when assessing a property's value. A land use of commercial/industrial would typically have a higher value than an agricultural land use and so it would seem that the annexation could increase the property's value, thereby increasing the project costs. Suri mare County staff provides these comments in an effort to improve the pending; annexation that is under consideration. Please know that the County fully understands and respects the City's home rule authority to make decisions for the residents and taxpayers of the City. County staff is concerned primarily with the potential impacts that development of this area will have on services that are provided by the County. The County does offer that this is a significant annexation that will impact the future of Sebastian and the entire northern portion of the county for many years to come. We arc hopeful that the City will consider these comments and address potential issues fully prior to completion of the annexation process. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this any further, please do not hesitate to contact me_ Sincerely, 1 jaso ; E. B own Couty'dtninistrator CC: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27`h Street, Fero Beach, FI. 32960-3388 PHONE: 772-226-1408 122 of 156 Im, SE T_" HOME Of PELICAN ISLAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Council Meetin.2 Date: 28 August 2019 Azenda Item Title: Ordinance 0-19-05—First Reading and Transmittal Hearing - Request for Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment — Graves Brothers Company Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 0-19-05 on first reading and authorize transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for comments Background: On June 26, 2019, City Council approved at first hearing the proposed annexation of 1118 acres, more or less, of property into the city as petitioned by Graves Brothers Company, represented by Mr. Jeff Bass. Graves Brothers Company requests consideration for an amendment to the comprehensive plan future land use map (FLUM) designation from Indian River County "AG -1" (AGRICULTURAL) to City of Sebastian CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION). The subject site is located south of CR 510 and Residential (L-1) and Conservation (C-3) land in the County; Commercial (CG) land in the City; west of Agricultural (AG -1), Conservation (C-3), and Planned Development (Liberty Park TND) in the County; north and east of Agricultural (AG -1) land in the County. The subject site is adjacent to the south city limits coterminous with the boundary of the municipality. The subject property consists of an active agricultural site that is no longer economically viable due to changed conditions. After careful review and a public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, a motion was made and seconded to find the proposed change to the Future Land Use Map and recommended conditions to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and to forward a recommendation for the adoption of the requested change to the City Council, however the motion failed due to a tie vote of the Commission. A motion was made to deny approval due to lack of information, which died due to a lack of a second. In accordance with City Code Sec. 54-1-2.6(b)(1) - City council's role. In cases where the recommendation of the city planning and zoning commission is adverse to the proposed change, such change shall not become effective except by an affirmative vote of a majority of four members of the city council. A large scale land use amendment (over 10 acres) must be reviewed by the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). Upon receipt of comments from DEO relative to the comprehensive plan future land use map amendment, this ordinance will be scheduled for a second reading and final public hearing. 123 of 156 If Agenda Item Requires Exuenditure of Funds: NIA Administrative Services Department/CFO Review: Attachments: 1. Ordinance 0-19-05 2. City Council Staff Report 3. Previously Provided Applicant Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis Attachment "A". 4. Draft PZ Commission Minutes 5. Exhibit F 6. Exhibit D City Manager Authorization: ��y r Date: 28 August 2019 124 of 156 ORDINANCE NO. 0-19-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY ESTABLISHING LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION OF AG -1 (AGRICULTURAL, 1 UNIT PER 5 ACRES) ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 1,046.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51.0, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO 74TH AVENUE, NORTH OF 69TH STREET, AND EAST OF 82N° AVENUE; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. WHEREAS, after careful review and a public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, a motion was made and seconded to find the proposed change to the Future Land Use Map and recommended conditions to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and to forward a recommendation for the adoption of the requested change to the City Council; WHEREAS, the motion failed due to a tie vote of the Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the criteria identified in the Comprehensive Plan and Florida Statutes together with the findings and recommendations of its staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided notice of the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment and has conducted the required public hearings to receive citizen input; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed changes in the City Comprehensive Future Land Use Map and conditions, are consistent with the existing future development goals of the City of Sebastian; encourages the most appropriate use of land, water and other resources; promotes and protects the public health, safety, and general welfare; provides adequate and efficient infrastructure and resources; and protects the public interest within the City of Sebastian. 125 of 156 WHEREAS, in accordance with City Code Sec. 54-1-2.6(b)(1) - City council's role, In cases where the recommendation of ' the city planning and zoning commission is adverse to the proposed change, such change shall not become effective except by an affirmative vote of a majority offour members of'the city council... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. AFFECTED PROPERTY. The amendment to the Comprehensive flan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) adopted by this Ordinance shall affect the following described real property, now lying and being within the incorporated area of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida: See attached Exhibit I Property Survey Section 2. DESIGNATION, The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map shall be amended, with conditions, to include the affected property, and designate the same in accordance with the requirements of Florida law as follows: CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL, 112.3 ACRES), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED, 10.1 ACRES), IN (INDUSTRIAL, 126.7 ACRES), INS (INSTITUTIONAL, 130.7 ACRES), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 384 ACRES), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 70.5 ACRES), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 169.4 ACRES), AND C (CONSERVATION, 43 ACRES), The City recognizes specific large scale amendments with unique characteristics that do not readily fall into existing land use categories. The specified property as identified in (Exhibit F) contains a Mixed Use concept plan as shown in (Exhibit D). As part of the land use amendment, conditions pertaining to the mixed use development have been incorporated into Ordinance 0-19-05 as follows: a. Rezoning of the property shall be done through the City of Sebastian's Planned Unit Development process as described in Article XX of the Land Develonment Code. b. Housing types shall be mixed to meet various income levels and lifestvle choices. c. Future dedication of ROW to the appropriate entity will occur at the time of development to promote an interconnected, extended and improved arid road system, along with a well-planned transportation system of roads and streets throughout the development, in coordination with Indian River County_ . to specifically include 8151 Street, 77"' Street, and 73`d Street, as well as 74`x' Avenue. d. Provision for a mixed-use "Town Center" area. e. Future allocation and donation of institutional lands necessary for governmental services such as post offices, public safety, schools, etc. as identified by concurrenev analysis in accordance with the City_ of Sebastian land development codes and ordinances at the time of development. f. Strategic assembly of commercial and industrial develop_ ment consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 126 of 156 g. Future dedication of conservation lands to appropriate entitv at the time of development to include anv natural areas of significant importance, and the provision of L-reenwav trails to promote a system of connectivity and access consistent with the Citv's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes. h. Allocation of parks and recreational lands consistent with the Citv's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes sp_ ecifically: a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of publicly accessible recreation lands, and a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of other recreational lands. i. Buffers adiacent to low density areas outside of the PUD OverIav_ to include increased areenspace alone the site's south property line and the part of the east _property line south of Liberty Park TND. j. As a condition of future developments, sufficient land area shall be allocated for infrastructure required to support the development and mandate hook-up to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new developments prior to receiving development orders. Therefore. the Graves Brothers Sebastian South PUD Overlav must provide sewer and water service as a condition of development. These services may be provided by the County or alternative services, however no septic systems would be allowed in accordance with City policy and land development codes. Section 3. TRANSMITTAL. The City Manager is directed to transmit a certified copy hereof to the authorities designated under Fla. Stat. 163.3184(3) upon passage at first reading, and proceed herewith in accordance with the provisions of Fla. Stat. Chapter 163. Section 4. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold or determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City Council did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional provision. It shall further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without said invalid or unconstitutional provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section 6. SCRIVENER'S ERRORS. Sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of typographical errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, without need of public hearing, by filing a corrected or re -codified copy of same with the City Clerk. Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon the concurrence of the issuance of a Notice of Intent by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity or other final action finding the amendment herein in compliance, including the adoption and recordation of the Annexation Agreement. 127 of 156 Section 8. ADOPTIVE SCHEDULE. That this Ordinance was passed on the first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of August, 2019, and adopted on second/final reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23`d day of October, 2019. PASSAGE UPON FIRST READING The foregoing Ordinance was moved for passage upon first reading this 28", day of August, 2019 by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Jim Hill Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen Councilmember Ed Dodd Councilmember Albert Iovino Councilmember Bob McPartlan ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC City Clerk 128 of 156 ADOPTION The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember . The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Jim Hill Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen Councilmember Ed Dodd Councilmember Albert Iovino Councilmember Bob McPartlan The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC City Clerk CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Mayor Jim Hill Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: James Stokes, City Attorney 129 of 156 1 fAT — i TOTAL AREA TO BE ANNEXED - INCLUDES ALL RIGHTS OF WAY i DEDICATIONS. I f 1 l ±1,118 AC L L r�. LW t -, 1 it II R it 11 - GRAVES BROTNT;RS CITY OF SEBASTIAN va ¢ r I ANNEXAVON GRAPHIC SCALE 0 800 1 inch = 000 ft. i 1 SCHULKE. $ITTLE & STODOARD, 14 q E%NIPIT 1 , t'IS! i4s,DAlup�. t.fea�Lna ?L+a_ T ggxF •�=�CAlL.aL.C. G. 5WTE,;1 Er❑ J .a ITV :.F IIIF 1 ��J jFoP.UVFC3 V;1 � EXHIBIT 1 IAN all��a � �-pI�,E��ax, OVERALL SITE AREA -INCLUDING RIGHTS OF WAY. L._.�......._._. L .......,...�. 71 11, _ 'P�R6'•E7 Pv h — _ l O i I 9rPtic5—{ � S CAW I iC 1 fAT — i TOTAL AREA TO BE ANNEXED - INCLUDES ALL RIGHTS OF WAY i DEDICATIONS. I f 1 l ±1,118 AC L L r�. LW t -, 1 it II R it 11 - GRAVES BROTNT;RS CITY OF SEBASTIAN va ¢ r I ANNEXAVON GRAPHIC SCALE 0 800 1 inch = 000 ft. i 1 SCHULKE. $ITTLE & STODOARD, 14 q E%NIPIT 1 , t'IS! i4s,DAlup�. t.fea�Lna ?L+a_ T ggxF •�=�CAlL.aL.C. G. 5WTE,;1 Er❑ J .a qll Cf SEBAST HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application City Council Staff Report August 28, 2019 I. Project Name: GRAVES BROTHERS SEBASTIAN SOUTH 2. Requested Action: LAND USE CHANGE EXISTING: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY: AG -1: AGRICULTURAL -- I (1 UNIT/5 ACRES, 1046.7 ACRES) FUTURE: CITY OF SEBASTIAN: CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL, 112.3 ACRES), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED, 10.1 ACRES), IN (INDUSTRIAL, 126.7 ACRES), INS (INSTITUTIONAL, 130.7 ACRES), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 384 ACRES), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 70.5 ACRES), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 169.4 ACRES), AND C (CONSERVATION, 43 ACRES). 3. Project Location a. Address: 85TH ST. (CR 510), 8400 BLOCK, VERO BEACH, FL 32967 b. Legals: Section 1, Township 32 South, Range 38 East and part of Section 36, Township 31 South and Range 38 East, containing approximately 1046.7 acres (1117.76 acres including all canal rights of ways) (Legal Description and Survey Attached) 4. Project Owner: Graves Brothers Company 2770 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL, 32960 (772) 562-3886 E -Mail: jbass@gravesbrotherscompany.com 5. Project Agent: Joseph W. Schulke, PE, Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)770-9622 E -Mail: jschulke@sbsengineers.com 6. Project Engineer: Joseph W, Schulke, PE, Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)770-9622 E -Mail: jschulke@sbsengineers.com 7. Project Surveyor: Frank Cuccurese, P.S.M., Carter Associates, Inc. 1708 21" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 562-4191 Email: FrankCacarterassoc.com 1 131 of 156 Adjacent Properties Zoning Current Land Use North: RS -3, Con -1, Vacant/Residential & and City CG Commercial, Conservation East: A-1, Con -1, Agriculture, Conservation, PDTND Liberty Park West: A -I Vacant/Agriculture South: A-1 Vacant/Agriculture 9. Site Characteristics a. Total Acreage: b. Current Zoning: c. Current Land Use(s)- d. Flood Hazard: 10, Project Narrative 1046.7 acres Future Land Use L-1, C-3, and City CG AG -1, C-3, and Planned Development AG -1 AG -1 County A -I (Agriculure-1) Vacant/Agricultural Zone X (Low Risk 50%); Zone AE (High Risk 50%) A petition for voluntary annexation has been executed by the owners of the subject property and is consistent with Chapter 171.044 F.S. The subject property consist of 1,046.7 acres, more or less, located south of County Road 510, generally west of the 740' Ave ROW, north of 690` Street ROW, and cast of 82nd Ave ROW. The subject property is currently vacant agricultural land in unincorporated Indian River County (IRC), contiguous to the existing corporate limits and boundaries of the City of Sebastian. The proposed development is adjacent to the service boundary for municipal services (CR 510) and contains lateral canals owned and maintained by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID). Current zoning will remain as A-1: Agricultural until such time as the applicant provides petition to the City for a zoning amendment. The City Council will hold a public hearing on August 28, 2019 to consider the annexation of this property. The applicant has requested a mix of future land use designations in order to achieve consistency with the city's adopted Future Land Use Element of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The property currently maintains an active agricultural use and will continue as A-1 until such time as conceptual planning has been completed for the property. A Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis has been submitted by the applicant as an Attachment. The proposal is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Sebastian's 2009 Comprehensive Plan parameters of the Annexation Studies. a. Obi ective 1-1.2: Agriculture Land Use which recognizes annexation of existing agricultural lands until such a time that urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no Ionger economically sustaining. These Policies provide for a holding period to ensure orderly development that provides economic development opportunity through a mix of industrial, commercial and housing that conforms to the City's Comprehensive plan and LDC in order to achieve diversification of the municipal tax base. b. Obiective 1-2.10: Annexation Studies which promote planning for annexations to prevent urban sprawl and disjointed urban service delivery systems by providing an analysis of land use, traffic circulation, concurrency, drainage, and environmental protection. In accordance with the City Land Development Code Sec. 54-1-2.9 — Procedures for amending the comprehensive plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing on amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and make recommendation to the City Council. In deliberating, the Commission shall consider the information provided. 2 132 of 156 11. Comprehensive Plan Consistency, A. Conformance with Code of Ordinances: The proposal is in conformance with applicable substantive requirements of the City of Sebastian Code of Ordinances, particularly the following Land Development Codes: a. Surface Water Management Ordinance b. Wetland Protection Ordinance c. Protection of Open Space, Tree Protection, and Protection of Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas d. Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Controls and Estuary Protection B. Changed Conditions: Land use and development conditions have changed locally and regionally since the effective date of the existing regulations which are relevant to the proposed amendment. Vacant agricultural property is no longer economically viable beyond a short planning horizon and therefore, the proposed future changes meet changes in development patterns and infrastructure improvements proposed by the County and State, such as the widening of CR 510 and future extension of 82"d Avenue. C. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed future land use is not incompatible with surrounding land uses to the north or east of the project boundary. It is recognized that the mix of land uses proposed for this project are inconsistent with the agricultural and rural uses that are currently located in this area. However, the proposed land uses are compatible with the future projected land use needs of the City of Sebastian and concurrent with future projected growth patterns for the City. The change in land use provides for a higher intensity of use than the current land use, however, future demands for industrial and commercial development along the widened and improved CR 510 and future extension of 82"d Avenue supports the future need for this use. Therefore, it is consistent with projected future growth and development expressly defined within the 2010 EAR and the Comprehensive Plan. A conceptual development plan has been presented that proposes multiple Land Uses in order to meet the City's Comprehensive Plan. Zoning designations and Land Development Regulations will provide the final determination of densities and intensities allowed within the proposed development. Densities and Intensities provided per Land Use allocations are at maximum yield based on acreage. These proposed densities and intensities will NOT be realized for these land uses at time of development due to regulations pertaining to stormwater, transportation, recreation, open space, buffer zones and setbacks. Assumptions of the acreage available for residential development due to restrictions on development are between 75% and 90%. Current City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan data, inventory and analysis reference a significant deLicit in industrial, commercial and multi -family residential land uses in the City. In summary, the City of Sebastian does not contain adequate land area for necessary land uses based on population and demographic data. Consequently, using current City land use designations may exaggerate commercial/industrial area along the future 82"0 Avenue rather than the intended clustering of commercial/industrial at intersections and residential filling-in as part of a mixed use concept. The City is in the process of updating its comprehensive plan and proposes to include future land use designations more applicable to smart growth concepts and mixed use. In accordance with Objective 1-2.7: Planned Unit Development (PUD) the City shall promote innovative development concepts through the PUD zoning and land development process that establishes flexibility in development in order to ensure applicable road grid extensions, density allocations and clustering, conservation and open space criteria, and mixed use concepts. Several suggested big picture concepts that should be considered during the Future Land Use Plan Amendment are as follows: a) Consider the use of the City's PUD zoning and site plan development process to promote mixed use. b) Provide for the extension of the internal street grid as shown in the conceptual plan. C) Require conservation of the South Prong slough area and provide for greenway trails/public access along the South Prong slough. 3 133 of 156 d) Allow for internal density transfer and clustering of the development to allow concentrations of denser areas within the overall project to off -set green open spaces. e) Require a "town center" mixed use activity center and clusters of commercial/industrial at major grid road intersections. f) Require a greenbelt adjacent to low density areas outside the project. g) Provide a mix of housing through the PUD process. The proposed land use changes include: CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL, 112.3 ACRES), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED, 10.1 ACRES), IN (INDUSTRIAL, 126.7 ACRES), INS (INSTITUTIONAL, 130.7 ACRES), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 384 ACRES), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 70.5 ACRES), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 169.4 ACRES), AND C (CONSERVATION, 43 ACRES). The following excerpt from the Future Land Use Element of the City Comprehensive Plan will assist in identifying the proposed uses in relation to the City requirements. 1. Land Use Categories [§9J-5.006 (1)(a) and (c), F.A.C.] Residential Land Uses In 2008, there were 3,285 developed residential acres within the City of Sebastian, primarily in the low-density category. The residential category represents approximately forty-three (43) percent of the total land area in the City, and includes single-family, multi -family and mobile home developments. Residential categories are intended to provide appropriate locations for a diversity of dwelling types, densities and sizes for citizens to live in, and not provide for non-residential uses. However, all residential designations will also allow for necessary supporting services such as utilities, parklands, and education facilities. Residential uses are divided into the following categories on the Existing Land Use Map: Very Low Density Residential — (up to 3 units per acre) This category is mainly comprised of large lot single-family residences at densities of no more than three (3) units per one (1) gross acre. Typical uses found in these areas include primarily single-family detached homes on individual lots and accessory uses. In 2008, most very low density neighborhoods were located in the outskirts of the City, with a few pockets in the more central areas. Lot sizes were not much different than in the low density areas, but these developments were approved as subdivisions and contain common areas that result in lower densities. There were a total of approximately 461 acres of very low density residential in the City in 2008, comprising fourteen (14) percent of the residential lands. Low Density Residential - (up to 5 units per acre) This residential category is dominated by detached single-family homes on lots of varying sizes and with a density of 5 units per gross acre or less. Areas shown as low density in the Existing Land Use map include primarily single-family detached homes on individual lots, accessory uses and supportive community uses. The low density residential lands are currently the most prevalent land uses in the City, totaling 2,479 acres, or seventy-six (76) percent of the residential lands. Medium Density Residential - (up to 8 units per acre) The medium density residential category shows areas developed with both single-family and multi -family dwelling units (including duplex) at densities up to eight (8) units per gross acre. Typical uses may include single family detached, zero lot line, duplexes, triplexes, 4 134 of 156 quadruplexes, garage apartments, villas, cluster housing, townhouses, modular/ manufactured homes and small apartment complexes Medium density residential areas serve as transition between the lower density areas and more urban uses. There were approximately 169 acres of medium density residential in the City in 2008 (5% of the total developed residential lands). Commercial The commercial land use category consists of a variety of retail and office uses; such as, medical facilities, shopping centers, restaurants, automobile service facilities, and similar uses. In 2008, there were 242 acres of lands used for commercial activities. There are four types of commercial development present in the City: limited commercial, general commercial, the commercial district along CR 512, and Riverfront mixed use. Commercial lands are concentrated along the US 1 and CR 512 corridors, Main Street and Indian River Drive. Compared to other communities in the State, the City of Sebastian has a very small proportion of commercial relative to the amount of residential. Limited Commercial Sites within this category include shops with limited inventory or goods, such as neighborhood convenience stores, small scale drug stores, specialty shops, personal services, as well as limited transient lodging facilities. There are several nodes of limited commercial in the City, comprising a total of 32 acres (13% of the total developed commercial lands). Commercial General Sites within this category include general retail sales and services; highway oriented sales and services; and other general commercial activities, including hotels and motels, or residential complexes, or other transient quarters. There are several concentrations of commercial general land use, mainly in along CR 512 and US 1. The sites comprise a total of 40 acres (16% of developed commercial lands), not including general commercial areas located within the Riverfront district. Industrial The industrial land use category includes both light and heavy industrial uses. Industrial uses are typically connected with manufactunn9, assembly, processing or storage of products. Typical uses consolidated into this category include warehousing, wholesaling, limited retail, heavy equipment repair, private utility facilities (cellular switching stations, electrical substations), limited assembly, processing, motor vehicle impoundment facilities, construction offices, adult entertainment, and storage areas. Industrial types of uses are currently located along the FEC corridor, and also near the airport. Lands within this category currently comprise approximately 225 acres, or 3% of the total lands in the City. Institutional Lands shown as Institutional comprise approximately 1,091 acres and include public and semi-public uses such as: Public Facilities, including governmental administration buildings, public utilities; emergency services facilities, airport; and similar public/semi-public facilities. The majority of the land within this category corresponds to airport land. There is also the site in the south part of the City owned by the Water Management District also shown as Institutional (Stormwater Park). 5 135 of 156 Educational institutions Parks and recreation areas and open space, including the Municipal Golf Course. Other public facilities (hospitals and supportive health care units; cultural and civic facilities; cemeteries) Conservation The conservation designation includes public lands that have been acquired and private land areas that have been reserved by mutual agreement with the property owner for the preservation and protection of Sebastian's natural resources. There are currently 1,082 acres of conservation lands on the existing land use map, predominantly in the north part of the City adjacent to the airport. Other conservation areas include the estuarine shoreline along the St. Sebastian River and about 162 acres owned by the County (Sebastian Harbor). The site adjacent to the airport has been purchased by the State and the County for future mitigation. 2. Projected Land Use Needs [f9J-5.006(2)(c), F.A.C.] This section of the Future Land Use Element projects the amount of land for different land use categories that will be necessary projected needs. to accommodate future population growth. The methodology used to project the future demand for the various land uses was based on the current proportion of land use acreage to population. (a) Future Residential Land The City of Sebastian will continue to be a residential community through the year 2025. The City has designated 4,593 acres of residential land on the Future Land Use Map (Map I-6). The proportion of acreage of land use to population and the housing needs identified in the Housing Element were used to determine future residential land use needs. As can be seen in Table I-5, future growth would demand approximately 5,032 residential acres (not including mixed use designation) by 2025 if the 2008 ratio were used. The Housing Element identified a need for a total of 17,274 dwelling units by 2025; that is 7,596 (6,981 single family and 615 multifamily) more than in 2005. Table I-8 presents the amount of developable residential lands by land use category and the holding capacity of those lands. Based on the acreage of vacant land designated as residential in the Future Land Use Map, the City could accommodate an additional 5,000 dwelling units by 2025. The City expects an increase in residential acreage in the future but not to the extent of keeping the same 2008 ratio. The Future Land Use Map shows a total of 4,593 acres of residential land. In addition, the Riverfront district (see Commercial section below) encourages the development of higher density developments in conjunction with retail or office developments. That increase in available lands for residential development, in addition to expected future annexations of residential lands, will address the future demand for residential land use. As shown in Table I-6, the percentage of residential lands relative to the total developed/ developable lands will go up from 50% to 70%. Residential development will be accommodated based on the following ranges of density. Very Low Density Residential - Up to 3 units per acre Low Density Residential - Up to 5 dwelling units per acre Medium Density Residential - Up to 8 dwelling units per acre (b) Future Commercial Land Use A primary consideration in the allocation of lands for future commercial developments is the size of the primary market area. The Sebastian area has and will continue provides basic office and retail services to households residing in or near the City limits; however, the Vero Beach and Melbourne 6 136 of 156 urban vicinities have, and will continue to serve as the primary business centers within Indian River County and Brevard County. Projections of future commercial land were based on current ratio of land use to population. Based on the 2008 population of 23,462, the ratio is currently 10 commercial developable acres per 1,000 population. This ratio, which includes the mixed use contained in the Riverfront district, is low compared to other communities in the State. Applying the 2008 ratio to the 2025 population projection, the City would need a total of 371 commercial acres. The Future Land Use map shows 447 acres of commercial land use, an increase of approximately 205 acres over the present. Four levels of commercial are planned: Limited Commercial General Commercial Development within all commercial categories will be restricted to a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6, except for the CR 512 Commercial land use which shall be limited to 0.5 FAR Individual zoning districts within these land use categories may further restrict the maximum FAR noted in this plan. (c) Future Industrial Land Use The City of Sebastian currently has approximately 225 acres of industrial land, comprising about 3.4% of the developed land. Based on the current population of 23,462, there are 10 acres of industrial per 1,000 people. At that rate, there would be a need for 345 acres by 2025. However, the City has allocated only 299 acres of industrial on the Future Land Use Map, primarily along U.S. 1 and in the area around the Airport. The City would like to increase the amount of industrially zoned land in the City -to attract large employment centers. However, based on the fact that the City is mostly built up, there are no sites available to accommodate this future need. The City will, therefore, be open to future annexation of industrial lands for this purpose. The maximum intensity of industrial development measured in floor -to -area ratio is 0.50. (d) Future Institutional Land Use The Future Land Use Map shows 1,249 acres of Institutional Iand use. This represents 16% of the total land in the City, and 19% of the developable land (excluding Gonservation). The majority of the acreage corresponds to the airport property. The maximum intensity allowed within this category shall not exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.6. Based on the analysis of additional recreation and open space needs identified in the Recreation Element, the City of Sebastian will require 2 acres of neighborhood park land and 2 acres of community park land per 1,000 residents. With a projected functional population of 35,940 persons by 2025, the City will need approximately 144 acres of park and open space to meet future recreation demands. Since the City currently has 297 acres of neighborhood parks and 800 acres of community parks, including the Municipal Golf Course and the Stormwater Park s, sufficient park and open space acreage exists to meet the future demand. (e) Future Conservation Land Use The Future Land Use Map shows 1,089 acres of Conservation. This figure could change overtime as the City will continue pursuing acquisition of those areas that are desirable for permanent designation as conservation land uses on the Future Land Use Map, or pursue agreements with property owners to preserve environmentally sensitive resources. 7 137 of 156 D. Adequate Public Facilities: The extent to which the proposal would result in public facilities and services exceeding the capacity for such services and facilities existing or programmed, is determined at the Land Use level based on the amount of density/intensities provide. However, it is difficult to determine actual impacts prior to zoning and site plan development therefore assumptions need to be made and conditions put in place to mitigate for any projected impacts to public facilities. Transportation: Planned improvements to thoroughfare roads located on the perimeter of the property, CR 510 and 82nd Ave, are included within the IRC MPO Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as priority projects funded over time. Acquisitions of ROW on 82nd avenue and stormwater treatment pond locations are currently in process through the FDOT. Construction of this road is not yet programmed. CR 510 ROW acquisition is funded from 202012023. Construction has not been programmed. Improvements to these corridors will open up the lands on the southern border of Sebastian for future development. The County has surmised that a change in Land Use changes the value of the land and will increase the cost of the ROW acquisition. Until the property has been rezoned and has a proposed higher use, land use changes are speculative at best and do not equate to value. The proposed Land Use plan offers a favorable internal grid network which provides multiple means of access and egress from the devclopment to the City and surrounding areas. A traffic analysis has been submitted with this request and concludes that: "With the extensive network of streets and connections to the existing grid, all links will operate at acceptable levels of service. Therefore, the project meets the level of service criteria with in the Sebastian Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with its goals, policies and objectives for transportation." The development proposes an internal network that will support a compact development concept and assist in the distribution of traffic. In accordance with the Transportation Element, Objective 1. 5, Policies 4, 6, 8, and 12, the Citv should require dedication of the proposed street grid sv_ ste_m and connector roadway_ s as a condition of development. Utilities: Currently, IRC maintains existing water and sewer transmission mains on CR 510 along the north boundary and utilities will be extended south of the Urban Services Boundary (USB) along the east property line with the development of Liberty Park PD TND. The corridor also acts as the USB line for lands south of Sebastian. Though capacity is available for this project should it develop in the near future, capacity is not "reserved" for this area of the County as the waste water treatment plant and the FDEP Consumptive Use Permit capacity is limited to growth potentials inside the USB. In accordance with the IRC -COS Interlocal Agreement for Utility Service from 1995, the County agrees to provide services to the City for existing and future developments. According to County staff, these services are not necessarily available for developments outside of the Urban Service Boundary. Since 1999, over 1042 acres has been placed into conservation by the County or State within the USB of the City of Sebastian. Therefore, consideration should be given to transfer of the Utility service density from those conservation lands in the City that will not be developed to be allocated by the County for utility services. In addition, at the time of the Fellsmere annexations in 2014, which consisted of over 8800 acres of agricultural lands, the USB was modified to include all of this acreage. In accordance with City of Sebastian Objective 4-1.1, the City requires land development regulations which mandate hook-up to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new developments prior to receiving development orders. Therefore. the proposed development must provide sewer and water service as a condition of development. These services may be provided by the County or alternative services, however no septic systems would be allowed in accordance with City policy and land development codes. Policy 1-4.4.4.- Accommodating -4.4.4:Accommodating Requisite Infrastructure, "during the subdivision review, site plan review, and permitting processes the City shall insure that respective future developments allocate sufficient land area for infrastructure required to support the development." Police/Fire: Currently, the Sebastian Police Department is approximately 6.9 miles from this site and the nearest County Fire Station is approximately 4 miles. Based on the increase in use proposed for this project, additional facilities may be required to accommodate this growth. The proposed land use change includes 8 138 of 156 approximately 130 acres for institutional services which includes public safety. The City should require donation of those lands once that determination is made Housing: The proposed land use change provides a mix of housing options to accommodate various levels of income range and lifestyle choices, appropriate for a mixed use development or "New Town". Drainage: The property is bisected by several drainage canals controlled by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID) and conceptual plans show additional stormwater ponds throughout the development. At the time of development, a stormwater management plan will be required for each development plan and permitting will be required through the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). Over 130 acres of land have been proposed as Institutional which may address any additional stormwater needs. Recreation and Open Space: Institutional and Recreational public lands are conceptually presented and will be addressed during land use and zoning. Over 130 acres of land have been proposed for public uses including: public safety, stormwater, open space or recreation. At the time of development a better understanding of the extent of the required public facilities will be identified. In addition, recreational needs will be required to be met as part of the City's Recreation Impact Fees program. E. Natural Environment: The proposal would result in significant conservation of the existing natural environment. The subject site contains important wetlands and natural slough area that is part of the headwaters to the St. Sebastian River. It has been proposed that this entire area be placed under the Conservation land use designation (over 43 acres) and will be further protected from development under the jurisdiction of Federal, State and City regulations. Consequently, impacts to environmental resources would require the approval of those agencies and mitigation to off -set any impacts. Furthermore, the conceptual site plan, which will be approved as a condition of the annexation and land use designation, includes a network of trails and open space as part of the proposed site development. Goal 1-4: Resource Protection and Objective 1-4.3 encourages the maintenance of land development regulations which ensure the protection of natural resources. F. Economic Effect: The proposal will affect the future development pattern and property values in the area. A change in the future use of this property is projected to provide a higher net positive tax base for the City which will mitigate any future costs for increased public services. Industrial and Commercial developed land use provides a higher potential for revenue to the City, and lower service costs per unit, than single family residential. A net benefit in jobs and taxable revenue is projected for the community in jobs and taxable revenue. A Fiscal Impact Analysis was provided of the proposed project which reflects the potential annual net fiscal gain to the City at final buildout at $7,030,099. 1. Total assumed annual taxable revenue including Ad Valorem taxes, Utility taxes, and Franchise Fees = $6,483,109/year. 2. Stormwater Utility Fee was incorrectly calculated and the actual value = $546,990/year 3. Recreation impact fee one time revenue = $3,680,505. G. Orderly Development: The proposed land use change would result in an orderly development pattern along this corridor and south of the City. The proposed land use change is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive plan identifies a need for industrial, commercial and multi -family development to meet projected 2025 growth. The Comprehensive Plan and 2010 EAR recommends that the City should seek to annex areas south of the City along the CR 510 corridor extending to 66'h Ave. The proposed development would provide needed employment centers, mixed housing options, and institutional needs. H. Intergovernmental Coordination: Indian River County Comprehensive Plan The City is seeking adequate commercial and industrial lands to accommodate its economic development needs and the 2010 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) pointed to the 510 corridor as a place to meet those needs. For over two years, the City was in negotiations with Indian River County and other municipalities in the county to enact an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) primarily to address the issue of annexation. No 9 139 of 156 agreement was reached however, annexation reserve areas were proposed for Sebastian that included lands south of CR 510 to 69"' Street. The ISBA and the Comprehensive Plan support coordination with MC as part of the annexation process to encourage annexation of Iarger contiguous areas as opposed to piecemeal annexations being governed by different sets of development regulations. This may lead to lack of coordination, poor urban design and a corridor that does not function as well as it should. A meeting was held with IRC prior to the annexation request regarding future growth along CR 510 and 82nd Ave due to the FDOT and IRC planned corridor improvements that will trigger real estate speculation, annexations, and future land use amendments. IRC expressed support relating to the proposed grid road system, as well as future road connections to the south. IRC provided recommendations regarding development of the property in accordance with the proposed concept plan which will be reviewed under the City's PUD and site plan review process. In accordance with Indian River County (IRC) Policy, developments outside of the Urban Service Boundary (USB) must consist of: 1. low density residential on well and septic systems, 2. Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TND's), or 3. New Towns. a. Should the land owner prefer to stay in the County, they could develop the property at 1 unit/5 acres which could result in approximately 200 lots with 200 septic systems (Le. Vero Lake Estates). b. The County is in the process of approving a TND, Liberty Park, at the intersection of 66`[' Ave and CR 510. It will consist of 913 mixed residential units and approximately 209,000 sq. ft. of commercial use on 511 acres of property on the southern border of the City, outside of the USB. Four sites located in various places within the County, including the City of Vero Beach, contributed density to Liberty Park from inside the USB. Utilities may extend outside the USB for developments transferring density from inside USB. These transfer of development rights (TDR's) were used to increase density allocations to Liberty Park from 1 unit/5 acres. These four (4) sites are then development restricted (cannot be developed). The transfer of densities included 8 units/acre and 6 units/acre. c. The IRC Future Land Use Element specifically establishes New Town minimum criteria of 1500 contiguous acres for lands east of 1-95, so this property may not develop as a "New Town" under the County's policy. I. Public Interest: In the City of Sebastian's adopted 2010 EAR, the City is encouraged to pursue voluntary annexations of areas south of the City along the CR 510 corridor in order to meet the projected need for growth in the community based on demographics and population. The requested land use changes are consistent with the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan. 12. Analysis: Graves Brothers Company requests consideration for an amendment to the comprehensive plan future land use map (FLUM) designation of approximately 1046.7 acres from Indian River County AG -1 to City of Sebastian CG, CL, IN, INS, MDR, LDR, VLDR, and C. The request to annex the subject property into the City of Sebastian will be made to the City Council. The proposed future change in land use meets changes in development patterns and infrastructure improvements, such as the widening of CR 510 and future extension of 82nd Avenue. The subject site is adjacent to existing and proposed urban development along the south city limits coterminous with the boundary of the municipality. The subject property consists of a former agricultural site that is no longer economically viable due to changed environmental and regional conditions Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the First Reading of Ordinance 0-19-05, establishing changes to the Future Land Use Map and placing conditions upon the future development in accordance with the City of Sebastian. Comprehensive Plan and Transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity for comment. The City recognizes specific large scale amendments with unioue characteristics that do not readilv fall into existing land use categories. The specified property as identified in (Exhibit F) contains a Mixed Use concept 10 140 of 156 elan as shown in (Exhibit D). As part of the land use amendment. conditions b_ ertainina to the mixed use development have been incorporated into Ordinance 0-19-05 as follows.: a. Rezoning of the property shall be done through the City of Sebastian's Planned Unit Development process as described in Article XX of the Land Develooment Code. b. Housing tvDes shall be mixed to meet various income levels and lifestyle choices. e. Future dedication of ROW to the appropriate entitv will occur at the time of development to promote an interconnected, extended and improved Arid road system, along with a well-planned transportation system of roads and streets throughout the development. in coordination with Indian River C_ount_v, to specifically include 81" Street. 77`h Street, and 73`d Street. as well as 74"' Avenue. d. Provision for a mixed-use "Town Center" area. e. Future allocation and donation of institutional lands necessary for governmental services such as post offices, public safety. schools. etc. as identified by conc_urrencv analysis in accordance with the Citv of Sebastian land development codes and ordinances at the time of development. f. Strategic assembly of commercial and industrial development consistent with the City's Comorehensive Plan. g. Future dedication of conservation lands to appropriate entity at the time of development to include anv natural areas of significant importance, and the provision of greenwav trails to Dromote a system of connectivity and access consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes. h. Allocation. of Darks and recreational lands consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes specifically: a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of publicly accessible recreation lands, and a minimum of 2 acres/ 1000 residents of other recreational lands. i. Buffers adiacent to low density areas outside of the PUD Overlay to include increased greenSDace along the site's south DroDerty line and the part of the east property line south _of Liberty Park TND. j. As a condition of future developments, sufficient land area shall be allocated for infrastructure reauired to support the development and mandate hoop -up to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new developments prior to receiving development orders. Therefore, the Graves Brothers Sebastian South PUD Overlay must Drovide sewer and water service as a condition of development. These services may be provided by the County or alternative services. however no septic systems would be allowed in accordance with City Dolicv and land development codes. Y/a Z- GPf2E D Y DAVE 11 141 of 156 Please see pages '7 1 to I "5 for Attachment #3 142 of 156 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 4 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 A T nt the City to come in and shut his business down. Ms. Kaute rg called for a motion. A motion was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Roth to app the special exception permit to Adam Espley to allow a wholesale auto sales business w the CR zoning district, specifically for the property located at 920 US Highway #1 with the itional conditions that the business shall not be allowed to display, sell on site or tempora ' ark any vehicles involved with the auto sales operation on the business property. Roll Call: Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- es Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Mauti (a) -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Vote was 6-0 in favor. Motion carries. B. Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment (For a Proposed 1,118 Acre Annexation) -- Graves Brothers Company, Applicant -- Properties Located Adjacent and South of CR 510 -- A Total of 1,047 Acres, More or Less, of Subject Parcels Requesting Initial Land Uses (Less Road and Canal Right -of -Ways) -- Request is for CG (Commercial General), CL (Commercial Limited), IN (Industrial), INS (Institutional), MDR (Medium Density Residential), LDR (Low Density Residential), VLDR (Very Low Density Residential), and C (Conservation) Land Uses Ms. Kautenburg prefaced the opening of this matter by announcing that, due to the large number of the public attending this meeting, each person who wants to speak during the Public Input section of this agenda item will be limited to three minutes instead of the regular five minutes. Ms. Kautenburg made a motion that a time limit of three minutes per individual speaker from the public be established, seconded by Mr. Hughan. Roil Call Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Mauti (a) -- No Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Vote was 5 ayes, 1 nay. Motion carries. 143 of 156 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AG MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 T Mr. Stokes read the item into the record, and Ms. Kautenburg called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Lisa Frazier, Community Development Director for the City of Sebastian, introduced herself and made a PowerPoint presentation on the matter before the Commission (SEE ATTACHED). She addressed the Commission and described their position as sitting as the land planning agency, which involves looking at the long-range plan for the City in order to make a recommendation to City Council regarding this property. Her presentation described the elements of the proposed land use map, how they relate to each other, and attempted to dispel any misconceptions that there might be regarding this project. There were color -coded drawings/maps of the various uses and parcels within the project. Her presentation also described analyses that were done regarding infrastructure, etc. She further stated that the recommendations made by this Commission, if the application is approved, will become a part of the ordinance as presented to City Council. So it becomes a law, and then it would be translated into the comprehensive plan. Ms. Kautenburg called upon the applicant to make his presentation. Mr. Joseph Schulke from the offices of Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard gave a PowerPoint presentation (SEE ATTACHED) in which he described the project. He reviewed the packet of information that he has submitted with the application and stated it shows that the project is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. His hope is to inform the public how the proposed project will be good for the City of Sebastian. He pointed out the ratio of green space to developed space, the roadways granting ingress and egress in and around the proposed development, and the areas that would be designated as commercial space. (SHORT BREAK TAKEN AT 7:49 P.M.) (BACK ON THE RECORD AT 7:57 P.M.) 8. Public Input Ms. Kautenburg called the meeting to order and called for public input in favor of the project. • Andrea Ring, Sebastian, FL. 144 of 156 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAG ' MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15 2019 Asked that, if this project is allowed, the City consider upgrading its standards to the Chesapeake Bay Act standards of water quality and sewer -to -septic standards. She is in favor of the project and thinks it will be a positive addition to the City. Seeing no further members of the audience who wished to speak in favor of the project, Ms. Kautenburg asked for anyone wishing to speak against the project to form a line and approach the microphone one at a time in an orderly fashion. • Rene Boisvert, Brookedge Terrace, Sebastian Stated he represents approximately 400 fellow neighbors. His group wants to maintain the small-town atmosphere that is Sebastian. He asks that, when the City considers development, it keeps the projects smaller. • John Christino, Sebastian Is inquiring about the additional acreage owned by the same entity in the area of the proposed annexation. He is in favor of keeping Sebastian as a small town and is concerned with how the addition of new businesses will affect the present small businesses in Sebastian. • Frank Casiglia, Sebastian Is in favor of keeping Sebastian a small town. He questions the impact the proposed project would have on traffic in the area. • Tim Glover, Micco Is the President of the Friends of St. Sebastian River. He presented copies of a letter his group had sent to the City voicing some concerns regarding the proposed annexation and how it will affect the St. Sebastian River. • Robert Bedea, Sebastian Is concerned about the existing environmental conditions and how the proposed project will impact those conditions, especially the water quality of the Indian River Lagoon. • Ardra Rigby, Sebastian Is the President of the West Wabasso Project. He questions the benefits the proposed project would have on the West Wabasso community. Concerning to him is the fact that West Wabasso is fighting to get sewage, and he is concerned if the new project allows septic, how that will affect West Wabasso. • David Brown 145 of 156 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION P MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 T Is concerned regarding the notice that was presented to the public regarding input from the public for or against the project. He thinks more people should have been notified other than those within 400 feet of the annex point. He questions the environmental impact this project will have on the area. • Patricia Mandell, Sebastian The population explosion that will accompany the proposed annexation will strain the existing infrastructure of Sebastian. She is concerned about the affect the project will have on wildlife in and around the St. Sebastian River. Suggestion was made to have an entity such as the Indian River Land Trust and/or others purchase the property and preserve it. She suggests a slower approach which would allow more studies on the impact of this project on surrounding areas before annexation is done. • Lisa Boisvert, Sebastian Questions how this project will affect hospitals, schools, ambulance response time, traffic, etc. She suggested an independent investigation/report on how all these different factors would be affected. She suggested the issue be revisited in six months. • Jennifer Mina, Sebastian Is concerned about loss of habitat. She is also concerned regarding the burden on the police department and other services in Sebastian. She feels that the residents of Sebastian don't have a say in what is happening regarding the annexation. • Mark Fleming, Sebastian Suggested that the owner of the property proposed to be annexed should be here to speak for himself. He suggested that the school district will be heavily impacted by the increase in population created by this annexation. Also, the police department will have to be increased as well as the code enforcement division. His group has hired an attorney to make a presentation to City Council. • George Glenn, Jr. Is an attorney representing the Pelican Island Audubon Society and other groups. He stated this is where the City of Sebastian Planning and Zoning Commission has the most input as to the future of this annexation property. He has not seen any documents stating there will be a text change other than a map amendment. He suggests that the City's discretion is at the land -use phase, and the City should 146 of 156 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PA $1r. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 not give the landowner interim land uses that have been proposed by the applicant. There are inconsistencies in the existing comprehensive plan on what is to happen on annexation of agricultural property that is currently outside the current service area boundary. • Carter Taylor Represents the Clean Water Coalition of Indian River County. He agrees with what has been said so far, and Mr. Glenn's point is very well taken, that in approving these land -use entitlements and hearing them before the subject property is actually annexed into the City, he questions what authority the City has in doing that when the property is not part of the City yet. His coalition is mostly concerned with water quality issues. He called attention to the adjacent property which is also owned by the applicant and the possibility that the applicant will be asking for another annexation in the future. He gave an example in Volusia County where the same sort of annexation was attempted, and after going to court, it was rejected. He also addressed the short amount of time that was spent during the City's presentation on the flood map and what will be necessary in that regard. • Richard Baker President of the Pelican Island Audubon Society. He asked why City Council has not had a chance to look at the letter from Indian River County regarding this matter. He thinks this matter is being rushed through, and more acres should be bought and preserved as agricultural areas. He reviewed that the sewer systems in Florida are failing due to overload. He suggested that the process of annexation be slowed down to work out problems such as sewer systems, etc. He also addressed the small area of conservation land proposed in this annexed property. • Nancy Gomez, Sebastian Hopes the documents that were presented tonight will be online for review. She doesn't think most of the residents of Sebastian are complaining because they have to drive a few extra miles for other restaurant and/or shopping choices. She stated that the particular project in discussion is a concern to the residents of Sebastian. She suggested an endangered -species study done on the proposed annexation property. She also mentioned that by changing the law with the amendment, that will affect future growth, and she thinks that is a very important thing to consider. • Pamela Parris, Sebastian Vice President of Sebastian Property Owners Association. She suggested the current planning and zoning laws of Sebastian should be updated. She also asked 147 of 156 40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION P MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 T that the Commission ask City Council to postpone the granting of this application until more study is done and more input is had, • Jason Brown County Administrator. He stated that Indian River County is not opposed to the annexation, but the County is opposed to it in its current form. The County thinks the City should slow this process down and take time to make sure the City gets this right. He stated that the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners did just yesterday send a letter, a part of which he read, to Mayor Hill asking that the City slow the process down. He provided a copy of that letter. He stated there was also a letter sent from the City Manager of Fellsmere today to the City Manager of Sebastian, a copy of which he also provided, which lists Fellsmere's concerns regarding this matter. He reiterated that this is the time when the City can get the applicant to agree to certain things, and the City will have less authority going forward. He believes there should be an annexation agreement between the City of Sebastian and the applicant setting forth certain density restrictions, etc. He emphasized that now is the time to slow down. He also addressed the wastewater limitations being different from what the applicant suggested. He also read a portion of the interlocal agreement stating that no entity other than the County can furnish wastewater services to or within the incorporated area of the City. • Patty Kuhner Feels that the growth will cause too much traffic, too many people, and Sebastian becoming an atmosphere like south Florida. She also wonders, if Sebastian turns this proposed annexation down, if the County will develop a New Town. • David Rinker Agrees that Sebastian get the annexation rather than the County. He did extensive demographic studies and settled in Sebastian. He is for the annexation as long as an influx of people doesn't come with it. • Brian O'Neill, Sebastian Is concerned about the comprehensive plan for Sebastian which calls for 10% increase in residents per year. Given that, he thinks a decision on this annexation should be delayed until the new comprehensive plan is completed and recommendations from the Natural Resources Board are in. The 3,600 homes in this annexation plus the 2,000 homes the County is developing will have a huge impact on the atmosphere in Sebastian. • Damien Gilliams, Sebastian 148 of 156 '1** PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PA F MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15 2019 President of Sebastian Property Owners Association Objected to this hearing under the rules and regulations for modifications. He opined there was supposed to be a unanimous vote changing the length of time for public input, and there is one vote nay. He stated that no one approached his organization to speak on this matter, and thus there was no input given from the community. He suggested there be an engineer and a land development attorney involved in the development of the proposed project. He suggested the matter be tabled until proper representation is obtained. • Mary Rue Described her health concerns and the fact that so much development will limit the ability to grow fresh vegetables and fruits, • Vincent Burke Director of Utility Services of Indian River County He is not opposed to this annexation, but he asked the Commission to listen to the counsel of the people who appeared tonight and to take the time for due diligence and not rush this project through. He asked the Commission, if they allow the annexation, to put an annexation agreement in place to make sure that certain requirements are included so that all the concerns are addressed. He is specifically concerned with the demineralization of the water that will be required to serve the additional population. • Albert Alvarez, Sebastian Is concerned with the expansion of CR 510 and the increased cost of that expansion if and when this annexation and development come to fruition. Seeing no more persons to present public input, Ms. Kautenburg closed this section of the meeting. She then asked for comments by staff. Ms. Frazier emphasized to the Commission that they are making a decision on the future land use designations. Staff has provided them with some recommendations that staff feels have addressed most, if not all, of the concerns that have been brought up in the numerous letters and meetings that were attended. She stated that this evening there was talk of annexation agreements. That is not for this Commission to decide; it would be up to City Council to determine if they would like to have an annexation agreement. That discussion will occur on August 28th. However, this evening's discussion is regarding the future land use designations. Ms. Kautenburg called on the applicant to make any additional comments. 149 of 156 40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PA 1p MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 T Mr. Schulke clarified the subject of the size of the conservation area. He stated that, while there is conservation space designated, there is also 50% open space in the project as well. Ms. Kautenburg called on Ms. Schiff for input. Ms. Schiff, the Indian River County School Board liaison, stated that, while she is not stating a position of the District or the Board, she wanted to point out a couple of issues that she hopes will be considered in the deliberation, and particularly by the developers. Ms. Schiff said she didn't hear a lot of comment other than from members of the public on the impact on schools and education. She questioned whether the developer had spoken with the School District, as a lot of these issues concern not just the City but also the County in the ways that they interact. In particular, there are two schools on that road -- an elementary school and a high school. Speaking of the traffic patterns, she asked that those patterns feeding into and out of those schools be considered. She hopes that the developer will work with the School District to consider what the impact will be on the schools. Ms. Kautenburg called for questions/comments from the Commissioners. Mr. Roth • Wanted clarification that, while the Commission is considering annexation of the property, will the zoning code be changed, or will the agricultural designation continue on the property after this annexation. Ms. Frazier answered yes, the agricultural designation would remain. • Addressed the matter of zoning classifications in this plan and asked the City Attorney if that is something the Commission should include in considering a motion. Mr. Stokes said no, that any changes to zoning will come later. The only thing being addressed tonight is future land use. Mr. Mauti • Is concerned that the Commission had a very short time to review this project. He stated some of the documents that were presented were difficult to read. • Asked why, when there is a new comprehensive plan coming out in the near future, is there a rush to do this annexation. He asked what impact the new comprehensive plan would have on the developer. Ms. Frazier replied that the developer has indicated that they do not wish to annex into the City without a future land use designation. They would like to do that simultaneously. The City looked at it as an opportunity to put controls on the property with these recommendations. 150 of 156 OR, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 1 T MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 She indicated it will probably take 18 months to get the new comprehensive plan completed. • Regarding the Commercial General (CG) and Commercial Limited (CL) designations, they allow for more multiple residential units such as condos and apartments. He does not see the businesses locating there so as to create a large amount in taxes for the City. • Would like to see the matter of annexation tabled so that the Commission has sufficient time to further study this project. • Inquired where the projected amount of tax money to be received by the City from this project come from. He doesn't feel there was enough data available for him to make a decision, and the matter should be reviewed. Ms. Kautenburg • Reviewed the reasons she chose to move to Sebastian. She said that a small town is not necessarily the size of the population, but it is an attitude. She stated this property will be developed, and the only way Sebastian can control and enjoy how the development affects Sebastian is by not saying no to this annexation and thus giving the control to someone else. • Regarding an annexation agreement, that does not fall within the purview of this Commission. That will be for City Council to decide. Ms. Kautenburg called for any further discussion. Hearing none, she then called for a motion. A motion to table the matter was made by Mr. Mauti, seconded by Mr. Alvarez. Roll Call Mr. Roth -- No Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Vote was 4 ayes and 2 nays. Mr. Mauti (a) -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- No Mr. Stokes interjected that this Commission has an affirmative duty to either provide a recommendation or not provide a recommendation. If this matter is going to be tabled, the Commission must put on the record and direct staff as to what it is they need. Mr. Stokes also stated if this meeting is to continue, the Commission must make a motion to extend the meeting. 151 of 156 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 1 T MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion to extend the meeting for 30 minutes. A motion to extend the meeting for another 30 minutes was made by Mr. Alvarez, seconded by Mr. Roth. Roll Call Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Mauti (a) -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Vote was 6-0 in favor. Motion carries. Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg asked if the matter is tabled, whether it has to be tabled to a date certain. Mr. Stokes stated yes. Mr. Kautenburg asked if the Commission does not send a recommendation to City Council, will the matter will still appear on City Council's agenda and they act without a recommendation. Mr. Stokes answered that it will still appear. He further states that if this Commission doesn't want to vote on this matter, that will be deemed a recommendation against, and City Council will deal with it as if it were a recommendation against. Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion by Mr. Mauti was made that staff review the items presented by the two gentlemen from the County and the attorney, and from there this Commission will make a decision on the recommendation to City Council. Mr. Stokes reviewed that staff needs definite input as to what this Commission needs. Mr. Stokes stated before another motion is made, the prior motion to table this matter be withdrawn. Mr. Mauti motioned to withdraw his prior motion. Mr. Alvarez seconded the motion to withdraw the original motion. Roll Call Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Mauti (a) -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Vote was 6-0 in favor. Motion carries. 152 of 156 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 14 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 A motion to not send this matter to City Council was made by Mr. Mauti and seconded by Mr. Carter. Mr. Stokes stated that is not within the Commission's purview. The Commission cannot decide not to send it to City Council. It has to go to City Council with either a recommendation for approval or a recommendation for denial. A recommendation to deny approval was made by Mr. Mauti due to lack of information. Ms. Kautenburg called for a second. Hearing none, the motion died for lack of a second. A motion to send the matter to City Council with a recommendation to move forward, including the recommendations of staff, was made by Ms. Kautenburg and seconded by Mr. Roth. Roll Call Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Carter -- No Mr. Mauti -- No Vote was 3 ayes and 3 nays. Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- No Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Stokes informed the Commission that another motion was needed. Mr. Roth made a point that this Commission has been given the information and they should trust their elected leaders and their counsel to make a good decision, realizing that when it goes through, this Commission will then have the opportunity to look at the planned development and how that goes forward, which will control the face of that whole project. A motion was made by Mr. Roth to approve the Graves Brothers project on CR 510 with the staff recommendations on page 11 of the report, items a through j, and was seconded by Ms. Kautenburg. Roll Call Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- No Mr. Roth -- Yes Vote was 3 ayes and 3 nays. Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Carter -- No Mr. Mauti -- No 153 of 156 )C� PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 15 T MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2019 Mr. Stokes stated that a tie vote should be sent to City Council as a recommendation against approval. 8. Unfinished Business -- None 9. Public Input -- None 10, Commissioners Matters -- None 11. Citv Attornev Matters -- None 12. Staff Matters -- None 13. Adjourn -- Ms. Kautenburg called for any further business. Hearing none, she adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m. a 154 of 156 {� I 40p' EXHIBIT F a e' - g PROPOSED CITY FLUM GRAPIEC SCALE •. t F'Y „: ,¢" r„rq € 3 —..'”. - MAP AMENDMENT % nee _._,.�E � �—° a `a' � � �.r,�wn� �w 3W � �� Py�¢,.q. �v�"lg �r �• .,�.r�. r '� �� _w _ a,v ter•, �`"� �''. ���'�� °�,,.°" s E e y>o- • �e, ��" a � � 4 ! ••L ;a 4 ��°' � pt°�� x�4 °° A G wneen� Vis' t 1 w •�`�FLP I' ~va,•rR'F �''" 9 xw ,ag k ...........1 c 6 C r �j A•7 CON- (IRCiND � I RS�� (IRC (IRC) Q "�, Q--� ;LR C)V A-i ®O® (fRCJ I Lu i fRC F-1 Frl F C) m m_ avLavoE rassloE LEGr.BifaNOu six .0 NI i A'f -CON9ER FnON ®GOAIMERpALLIMIIEO =IiS 11NEPRl' {lRCJ �ALRlG1LTNNE Ina.x�awsare,l �CquNSNpAL CElveau I'".'-icNraounoaar Iv,wLIMa,.aawa�I�coM peons cxNnzuroaREAs LWJDENSIiY RESIUElRNl (hia.StlWaz� - RNEPFRONSMaEE MSE NAlTFA - - MEEILE NOME [Mer,SaWac� -INEUSTRIAL - MEDIIiM DENSITY RE90ENTULL 1Mec a aw.c1 - INS]rIUnONAI 1 Ty € 1 cRAves BROTHERS pR0A05ED FLl M MAP SCHULKE, BITTLE & STCDDARD, L.L.C. �` I AJ' a e a CITY OF SEBASTIAN FOR COS crest a mamiuwu cvc''m-E�r°'x'' unm vaA�xrN,n �xraLernTnAC.�' °n.•" p °`. �rz g /I ANNEXATION TE -2170-22 FA 77217%"Rs 1717 INDIAN RIVERFlELVD., a SUITE 201 VEFo W -H, FLORIb4 :29W l men I 1047ACREANNE7(ATION aana�rna�snear,9�„aars_�om J Mmav„i1, Cfl Lfi O L0 CITY OF APPROVED PD SEBASTIAN INDIAN RIVER 'RIVER PROPOSED CouNTY f /� C.R 510 168' ULTIMATE CITY of I � SESASTIAN FDOTROW' — --—L. �- _ YIrE DEDIG1Ti0f! I RFCRFA TOIN AREA NwERaogNU 'CONEFRVATJDM1'AREA j ,' _ 1 .CITRUS VEH1Cl#LAR DRIVE HIDEAWAY II To 7R41L'i F4" I i —IISI j RTRAIL 1 _ 1t1 EXHIBIT D CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN _J ..— PROPOSED 1 80THAVE� ` `1 74TNAVE730'Rd 80' ROW oFF SlTF - IIBERY PARK PROPOSED z 81ST ST I Etsa_s I o� a 801ROW BYPASS �$ o CANAL PROPOSED — 81STST80'ROW OFF SITE - LIBERTYPARK II n RrSiaEMTV,. 1 ' .� I I I GREFNWAV� EsrArEs �I / TRAIL z CONAL. - I ESiATE9 ' LEGEND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT L -D FORLOCALRO'N 1 F PROPOSED I:- — 74TH AVE 9TOR aWATER 8Q'Rdl MANAGEMENTFOR - I , FOOT UPROVEMEWS & PR POSED PR POSED I s:=tr,, LOCAL ROW HST 78TA`7iV �— �! Esriaea i3P'ROW - Df01CAT10 RECREATION(PARXJ & ! 8 'ROW 80'ROW� — [al STORMWATERMANACEMEAT _ I EX! TING RECREA ONAND OR 4 AD CONSERVATION I PARIC� TOWN ~ II xEsro±s+rut f - CSNTER I I Es7A TFs ! V_ I RESIDENrrAL I I _ COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL',. C4E INSTfI ONAL USE: GOV-V, mURCH, commuNfTY 225' 1 I 125' I - { CENTER, SCHOOL. EMS LATERAL LATERAL 'L' C'CAh'aL PROPOSED C'd'L I LOCAL ROAD ORACCESS = 807NAVE — — I DRIVEWAY I RE6M'ENTk. ao'Rdw "'"' STREET/ROW �d PROPOSED O I L— — CANALROW(S.R.10.) 73MST 8P`ROW I LIMITED COMMERCIAL I j Ll NODE STREET/ROW EYOTHERS ICS _ a �- GENERAL INDICA TfON cI I I OFDRAINAGEP,4771=1?N �— { PEDESTRIAN TRAIL (GREEN WA }9 PLIH I PROPOSED 69TH 5 ROW ST 100' ULTIMATE ,,- OA TION RyRC— 1 inch B00 j ft. 1 GRAYES l BRQTHERS CCNCEP7LAL517 I SCHa11LKE BITTLE&STODDARD, L.L.C. _ cOF SEBASTIAN PLAN FOR COS I �m: I ANNEXATION 1,047 AC ANNEXATION 00°®® I S IJ 17 T INDIAN RIVER BLVD., sufr 201 VERA BEACH, FLORIDA 2296 TELTil T,09522 FAX772,770,N4 5 EMAIL Inb�ahse.�glnecrs.mn i