Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019 Approval to send to DEO for CommentsCReF - - - -11 0S HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 www.cityofsebasfian.org September 10, 2019 Mr. Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) State Planning Agency Plan Processing Team Caldwell Building 107 East Madison Street, MSC 160 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 RE: Transmittal of Proposed City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map amendment; Graves Brothers Company, 1047 acres. Dear Mr. Eubanks: Enclosed, please find one paper copy and two (2) compact disc copies of the following proposed City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan amendment of the Future Land Use Map for review. On June 5, 2019, the City of Sebastian received a petition for Voluntary Annexation of approximately 1118 acres of land from Graves Brothers Company, located in unincorporated Indian River County. The property includes lateral canals owned and maintained by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SAID). The SRID is a special taxing district that will not require a land use change as part of the Future Land Use Map amendment. Therefore, the amount of land requiring a land use amendment with the extraction of the lateral canals and rights of way amounts to 1046.7 acres. The On August 15, 2019 Sebastian's Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, considered the Future Land Use Map amendment at an advertised public hearing. The Local Planning Agency was unable to come to a consensus regarding a recommendation for City Council approval. The City Council then held a public hearing on August 28, 2019 to consider the transmittal of the following Ordinance to state and regional review agencies: ORDINANCE NO. 0-19-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY ESTABLISHING LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION OF AG -1 (AGRICULTURAL, 1 UNIT PER 5 ACRES) ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 1,046.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 510, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO 74TH AVENUE, NORTH OF 69TH STREET, AND EAST OF 82ND AVENUE; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. At the above referenced public hearing, the City Council approved Ordinance 0-19-05 on first reading and authorized transmittal to state and regional review agencies. A final public hearing concerning this amendment at the adoption stage is anticipated to be held in November 2019. This amendment is not related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact or an Area of Critical State Concern, and are not required to follow State coordinated review guidelines. The amendment is being submitted under the expedited state review process. Any questions or comments regarding the proposed amendment should be directed to: Lisa Frazier, AICP Community Development Director City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Telephone: #772-388-8228 Email: lfra zi er(�b ciNo fsebast ian. ore The submittal package contains one paper copy and two (2) compact disc copies of the proposed amendment and the amendment's supporting materials including: • Ordinance 0-18-07 and Agenda Transmittal sheets with recommendations • Staff Report and Applicant supporting data and analysis • Future Land Use Map depicting existing land use designations • Future Land Use Map depicting the adopted land use designations Copies of the complete amendment package including the supporting materials identified above have been e-mailed directly to the following review agencies as of this date: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, St. Johns River Water Management District, Indian River County, District Four Office of the Florida Department of Transportation, Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of State, Department of Education. Should you need any additional information to proceed with this request, please contact me. Sincerely, Li Leger Frazier, AICP Community Development Director Cc: Bob Solari, Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Roland DeBlois, Community Development Director, Indian River County Steven Fitzgibbons, AICP, St. Johns River Water Management District Michael J. Busha, AICP, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Stacy L. Miller-Novello, P.E., Director of Transportation Development, District Four Office of The Florida Department of Transportation, Plan Review, Department of Environmental Protection Deena Woodward, Historic Preservation Planner, Florida Department of State Kylene Casey, Educational Consultant -Growth Management Liaison, Department of Education M� SERASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Council Meeting Date: 28 August 2019 Agenda Item Title: Ordinance 0-19-05— First Reading and Transmittal Hearing - Request for Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment — Graves Brothers Company Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 0-19-05 on first reading and authorize transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for comments Background: On June 26, 2019, City Council approved at first hearing the proposed annexation of 1118 acres, more or less, of property into the city as petitioned by Graves Brothers Company, represented by Mr. Jeff Bass. Graves Brothers Company requests consideration for an amendment to the comprehensive plan future land use map (FLUM) designation from Indian River County "AG -1" (AGRICULTURAL) to City of Sebastian CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION. The subject site is located south of CR 510 and Residential (L-1) and Conservation (C-3) land in the County; Commercial (CG) land in the City; west of Agricultural (AG -1), Conservation (C-3), and Planned Development (Liberty Park TND) in the County; north and east of Agricultural (AG -1) land in the County. The subject site is adjacent to the south city limits coterminous with the boundary of the municipality. The subject property consists of an active agricultural site that is no longer economically viable due to changed conditions. After careful review and a public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, a motion was made and seconded to find the proposed change to the Future Land Use Map and recommended conditions to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and to forward a recommendation for the adoption of the requested change to the City Council, however the motion failed due to a tie vote of the Commission. A motion was made to deny approval due to lack of information, which died due to a lack of a second. In accordance with City Code Sec. 54-1-2.6(b)(1) - City council's role. In cases where the recommendation of the city planning and zoning commission is adverse to the proposed change, such change shall not become effective except by an affirmative vote of a majority offour members of the city council. A large scale land use amendment (over 10 acres) must be reviewed by the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). Upon receipt of comments from DEO relative to the comprehensive plan future land use map amendment, this ordinance will be scheduled for a second reading and final public hearing. If Agenda Item Reauires Exuenditure of Funds: N/A Administrative Services Department/CFO Review: Attachments: 1. Ordinance 0-19-05 2. City Council Staff Report 3. Previously Provided Applicant Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis Attachment "A". 4. Draft PZ Commission Minutes 5. Exhibit F 6. Exhibit D City Manager Authorization -A0000011;< /11 Date: 28 August 2019 MLf SE�TM.- HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 (772) 388-8215 jwilliams@cityofsebastian.org I, Jeanette Williams, MMC, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 0-19-05 as adopted by Sebastian City Council at their August 28, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY ESTABLISHING LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION OF AG -1 (AGRICULTURAL, 1 UNIT PER 5 ACRES) ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 1,046.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 510, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO 74TH AVENUE, NORTH OF 69TH STREET, AND EAST OF 82ND AVENUE; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. Signed and sealed this 6t' day of September, 2019. J nette Williams, MMC ty Clerk City of Sebastian ORDINANCE NO. 0-19-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY ESTABLISHING LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED), IN (INDUSTRIAL), INS (INSTITUTIONAL), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND C (CONSERVATION) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION OF AG -1 (AGRICULTURAL, 1 UNIT PER 5 ACRES) ON PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 1,046.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 510, WEST OF LANDS ADJACENT TO 74""° AVENUE, NORTH OF 69T.. STREET, AND EAST OF 82"'n AVENUE; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. WHEREAS, after careful review and a public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, a motion was made and seconded to find the proposed change to the Future Land Use Map and recommended conditions to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and to forward a recommendation for the adoption of the requested change to the City Council; WHEREAS, the motion failed due to a tie vote of the Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the criteria identified in the Comprehensive Plan and Florida Statutes together with the findings and recommendations of its staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided notice of the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment and has conducted the required public hearings to receive citizen input; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed changes in the City Comprehensive Future Land Use Map and conditions, are consistent with the existing future development goals of the City of Sebastian; encourages the most appropriate use of land, water and other resources; promotes and protects the public health, safety, and general welfare; provides adequate and efficient infrastructure and resources; and protects the public interest within the City of Sebastian. WHEREAS, in accordance with City Code Sec. 54-1-2.6(b)(1) - City council's role, In cases inhere the recommendation of the city planning and zoning commission is adverse to the proposed change, such change shall not become effective except by an afrntative vote of a uu jority of four members of the city council... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. AFFECTED PROPERTY. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) adopted by this Ordinance shall affect the following described real property, now lying and being within the incorporated area of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida: See attached Exhibit I Property Survey Section 2. DESIGNATION. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map shall be amended, with conditions, to include the affected property, and designate the same in accordance with the requirements of Florida law as follows: CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL, 112.3 ACRES), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED, 10.1 ACRES), IN (INDUSTRIAL, 126.7 ACRES), INS (INSTITUTIONAL, 130.7 ACRES), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 384 ACRES), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 70.5 ACRES), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 169.4 ACRES), AND C (CONSERVATION, 43 ACRES). The City recognizes specific large scale amendments with unique characteristics that do not readily fall into existing land use categories. The specified property as identified in (Exhibit F) contains a Mixed. Use concept plan as shown in (Exhibit D). As part of the land use amendment, conditions pertaining to the mixed use development have been incomorated into Ordinance 0-19-05 as follows: a. Rezoning of the property shall be done through the City of Sebastian's Planned Unit Develonment process as described in Article XX of the Land Development Code.. b. Housing types shall be mixed to meet various income levels and lifestyle choices. c. Future dedication of ROW to the appropriate_entity will occur at the time of development to promote an interconnected, extended and improved and road system. along with a well-planned transportation system of roads and streets throughout the development, in coordination with Indian River County, to 1pecifically include 81" Street, 77'h Street, and 73`d Street, as well as 74"' Avenue., d. Provision for a mixed-use "Town Center" area.. e. Future allocation and donation of institutional lands necessary for governmental services such as host offices. public safety, schools, etc. as identified by concurrenev analysis in accordance with the City. of Sebastian land development codes and ordinances at the time of development. . f. Strategic assembly of commercial and industrial development consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. g. Future dedication of conservation lands to aLpropriate entitv at the time of development to include anv natural areas of significant importance, and the provision of ereenwav trails to promote a system of connectivity and access consistent with the Citv's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes. It. Allocation of parks and recreational lands consisjcnt with the Citv's Comprehensive Plan and land development codes specifically: a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of nubliciv accessible recreation lands. and a minimum of 2 acres/ 1000 residents of other recreational lands., i. Buffers adiacent to low density areas outside of the PUD Overlav to include increased ereenspace alone the site's south oropertv line and the part of the east property line south of Libertv Park TND. j. As a condition of future developments. sufficient land area shall be allocated for infrastructure reouired to support the development and mandate hook-up to central notable water and wastewater systems for all new developments prior to receiving development orders. Therefore, the Graves Brothers Sebastian South PUD Overlav must provide sewer and water service as a condition of development. These services may be provided by the Countv or alternative services. however no septic systems would be allowed in accordance with Citv policv and land develonment codes. Section 3. TRANSMITTAL. The City Manager is directed to transmit a certified copy hereof to the authorities designated under Fla. Stat. 163.3184(3) upon passage at first reading, and proceed herewith in accordance with the provisions of Fla. Stat. Chapter 163. Section 4. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold or determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City Council did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional provision. It shall further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without said invalid or unconstitutional provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section 6. SCRIVENER'S ERRORS. Sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of typographical errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, without need of public hearing, by filing a corrected or re -codified copy of same with the City Clerk. Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon the concurrence of the issuance of a Notice of Intent by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity or other final action finding the amendment herein in compliance, including the adoption and recordation of the Annexation Agreement. Section S. ADOPTIVE SCHEDULE. That this Ordinance was passed on the first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of August, 2019, and adopted on second/final reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of October, 2019. PASSAGE UPON FIRST READING The foregoing Ordinance was moved for passage upon first reading this 28'h day of August, 2019 by Councilmember Hill The motion was seconded by Councilmember iovino and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Jim Hill aye Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen aye Councilmember Ed Dodd aye Councilmember Albert iovino aye Councilmember Bob McPartlan aye ATTEST: CtiYVI�- anette Williams, MMC City Clerk = ADOPTION The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councihnember . The motion was seconded by COUncilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Jim Hill Vice Mayor Linda Kinchen Councilmember Ed Dodd Councilmember Albert Iovino Councilmember Bob McPartlan The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2019. ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, MMC City Clerk CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA M. Mayor Jim Hill Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: James Stokes, City Attorney EXHIBIT 1 OVERALL SITE AREA- INCLUDING RIGHTS OF WAY. USERTY PARM &TAIM TOTAL AREA TO BE ANNEXED -INCLUDES ALL RIGHTS OF WAY DEDICATIONS. j I ±1,118 AC I; I UE I I I I ucwu 1� I ______ Itti�- I GRAPHIC SCALE if j ••• f"f 0 BOO 1 1 inch = 000 EL CRAVES BROTHERS (rrz E 8 RD�,o•LL.C. I I LItY Of SEBASTIAN ANNEXATION E HIBITI I Y Rte`/ S``rrowrz I 11�4w�ENu4.bRtlmrMm�em DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATION ALL THAT LAND LYING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 3B EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN ROVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE COMMON SECTION CORNER OF SECTION 25, 26, 35 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MARKED BY A FOUND 200 NAIL WITH NO IDENTIFICATION RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 063806, RUN NORTH 89.58'13' EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH SECTION LINE RUN SOUTH 00.0407' WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WARASSO ROAD / S.R. 510 / 85TH STREET, RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 88510-2601, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 181, PAGE 593 AND 658 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C' CANAL / 82nE1 AVENUE, 250.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32 , PAGE 177 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY ANNEXATION; FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING RUN NORTH 89.68'13' EAST ALONG THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WABASSO ROAD / S.R. 510 / 85TH STREET, A DISTANCE OF 2435.37 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 'LATERAL 'L' CANAL', 150.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 210, PAGE 300 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.1909' WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1416.65 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL 15090 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 8984'14 EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY UNE A DISTANCE OF 1347.63 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL 125.00 FEET WOE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 009028- WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE T OF SAID LATERAL'U CANAL A DISTANCE OF 640.57 FEET TO i THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL V CANAL; t THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.101' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH I RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 684.73 FEET TO THE I{ WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL; 1 GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY 1 AR.ORIw coRPORanoN Rc H. FLORKA W ,y VERO BEaLH. FLORIN IItl60 THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.05-15' WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1940.26 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL -R-14E CANAL' 100.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN CHANCERY ORDER BOOK 9, PAGE 584 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89144'16' EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF LATERAL 'R -14E' CANAL A DISTANCE OF 740.98 FEET TO THE COMMON RANGE LINE OF RANGE 38 EAST AND RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE N EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.1128- WEST ALONG SATO EAST LINE OF SECTION 36 AND RANGE LINE A DISTANCE OF 1280.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36 ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST MARKED BY A FOUND 4'X4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH NO IDENTIFICATION RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 078031; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'50'19' EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31 A DISTANCE OF 4.05 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST MARKED BY A FOUND 4k4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WBTH ALUMINUM DISK STAMPED 'CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC PRM W 205' RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 078025, SAID DESCRIBED SECTION CORNERS COMPRISED AS DOUBLE CORNERS EAST TO WEST ON THE COMMON TOWNSHIP LINE OF TOWNSHIP 3/ AND 32 SOUTH WITH THE COMMON RANGE LINE OF RANGE 38 AND 39 EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.1325' WEST ALONG SAID COMMON RANGE LINE, AND EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT 'DIKE / LEVEE' 10000 FEET WADE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 48, PAGE 23 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA A DISTANCE OF 2657.45 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.01.45' WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 1 AND RANGE LINE A DISTANCE OF 2590 99 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL'V CANAL, 123.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 210, PAGE 300, SAID INTERSECTION POINT BEING NORTH 00.01'45' EAST 62.50 FEET FROM THE FOUND 4'x4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH DISK STAMPED 'RLE 1192' MARKING THE COMMON SECTION CORNER OF SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND SECTIONS 6 AND 7 OF TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 063825; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'5329' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 754.22 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL V CANAL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 0WOT44' WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 17.50 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 220, PAGE 469 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES. SOUTH 89.53'29' WEST A DISTANCE OF 275.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH WOT44' WEST A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'53'29' WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'07'44' WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'53'29' WEST A DISTANCE OF 10000 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.07`44' WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.53'29' WEST A DISTANCE OF 3768.00 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C' CANAL 225.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32. PAGE 177; THENCE RUN NORTH 00'OT03- EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 263727 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST / WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 1; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00'07'03' EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2679.25 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION W4TH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I AND SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 38, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ALSO BEING THE COMMON TOWNSHIP LINE OF TOWNSHIP 31 AND 32 SOUTH; THENCE CONTINUE ON SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE RUN NORTH 00.04'07' EAST A DISTANCE OF 1279.32 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WHIZ THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL -C-3E- CANAL 10000 FEET WOE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32, PAGE In. PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.50'51' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 12.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00'0407' EAST ALONG AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL IC, CANAL, NOW BEING 250AD FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 3997.98 FEET TO THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WABASSO ROAD / CRSI0I BSTH/ STREET AND POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATION CONTAINING 48,689,617.88 S.F. OR 1117.76 ACRES (INCLUDES CANAL RIGHTS OF WAYS) Exhibit 1 TNs oescRvrpx N eqT a Rouxmm sumEv CARTER AMOCIA7'ES, INC BNGViB2R9 ad'9 L1NB SURVBTOR9�CT/A /�r�Yx Y DESCRIPTION SECIIIXI I.1gW5NW ]3SOViN. RPNGE][Er3T BTREE'f, VERA BEAGR I,AY 6PMT OF SEL11pI M, lOKNSNIP ]13WM,PNIGELE15i INC Pr4xta W ,awn,aww p,xr.• RIDVH NVERCWN\Y. FIORIOR 0�� ,� xu�u� PROPOSED PROPERTYANNEXATION 4,.]�C, PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA III I III I III nl nl II iv ti I I $e I ;i I I I I F I - - - - - - - - - - JJ���� `' $` I �§ � x° I x• I III I I I ---_---- I—_—_--" i —_— I � a• lip 9 p4 auNucawE Tws weTa u�xor P eouxonm uwK* 6RAVESBROTNERSCOMPANY PFLgxW cpiPO MN 3FL W04XRIVER BLVD. QA CALMER ASSOCIATES, INC CDN9V4TINC BNDIN88R9 ANO YND 9URV8YOR9 Tp T]DB 2IYBTHEET. VEgD BEPfJ1. FL S4YW _ 'O ,�r�iw�a.° DESCRIPTION SECnOX 1. TOVMSxIPRSpIIX,RNNBVEPBT 6PMTOF SELTIIXi b. TCM:$NIP]iSov R.WLiE]BEPBI I.. RN CO11NfY.FILMIM gN�(T^ OI L VFXOBFACN. iLp11M ]1YB0 w I ialnnyn--"� Iu_Iml° .�.p nom- PROPOSED PROPEf[TYANNEUITDN i GBAPB�C 9C4R � ua ; '�••�_�� 5 Alm a... � e' i i ae„ •b p M1 rvy pRcl - ��,_. rn-i: a -. =•�.. w.. �-: PD -TND RC) EXHIBIT F PROPOSED CITY FLUM MAP AMENDMENT RS -J (IRC) MGEND 11o,e4 em or i GRAVEs BROTNEN PROPOSED FLUM MAP I SCHULKE, BTfTLE B STGDDARD. L.L.C. sssnsnary rn.erwu mvuov.wm n.«m. _ (`_ i e e nrvrvExnnory FOR CNE oc °9 rzw.mc I I • '+� 11047 ACRE ANNEXATION _ omv rw. �k•Mr":`a°=°.�.� Jt�`���eiFm � � CITYOF PROPOSED SEBASTIAN CR 5/0158 , ; ULTlAf47E FD07ROW' L/w.w/w .Aw.w _ ono'Rrnr J A'GtG➢P: _ RECR£9!IGY _ 4REA 'ROII' PROPOSED - 8/STST.'- 80'ROW p z � I BrvA55— CAVAL 1 J— IZ a CY I AFmw,w PRE°"E°'D IN°NU RNER : RItER OAK5 EXHIBIT D COVNTY ; �0 l� £cvrnARRovEI�NrsA TwA.�, CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN LGrwL Row L.Ewge w.wAw.w Fw. .w _ i Avweree.anTr I WS[M,ISYwvu DEAR HIDER \NAY IflKUlA40RlVE CIT.. �� /17 C•• OI IO IRAL M1EAO LEXIS APERv PO RECRGIMVANOpR I corvsERvalxAN ROAD I 'LIBERTY OgRK' '= \ pAAYfAYGELW �- 1 � I R£sroENRAL ]RAI IEIO do �^ ,. Z 'ROII' PROPOSED - 8/STST.'- 80'ROW p z � I BrvA55— CAVAL 1 J— IZ a CY I r— PR.P:^crD 1 —{ POSEE; I 7 -h,- f I eoRov✓I rowN CENRR LlAnfro COVA4RLLA( NJOE - a IW O =P Q II PROPOSED SETH L BROW STOWPERIRC DEDlC47/ON -ROWPER/RC - CTs PROPOSED 701HAVE 130 Ow OFFS/7E-Ll8FRYPARK rzs' —ureRrs t' CANAL , PROPOSED 81STSTWROW S17E-L18ERTYPARK LEGEND t SrM WAi£RALWAGEAIENT V FpRLLCPL ROW -J AFmw,w 74THAVFr� 80 ROW _. Sr(MAfWAfr,4 AUWGENENT" �0 l� £cvrnARRovEI�NrsA LGrwL Row r— PR.P:^crD 1 —{ POSEE; I 7 -h,- f I eoRov✓I rowN CENRR LlAnfro COVA4RLLA( NJOE - a IW O =P Q II PROPOSED SETH L BROW STOWPERIRC DEDlC47/ON -ROWPER/RC - CTs PROPOSED 701HAVE 130 Ow OFFS/7E-Ll8FRYPARK rzs' —ureRrs t' CANAL , PROPOSED 81STSTWROW S17E-L18ERTYPARK LEGEND t SrM WAi£RALWAGEAIENT V FpRLLCPL ROW -J -� 74THAVFr� 80 ROW _. Sr(MAfWAfr,4 AUWGENENT" l� £cvrnARRovEI�NrsA LGrwL Row GEOIGNq: + I RECADIM IFA"$ lu STQPAIWATRANWGEAff,Nr OI LEXIS TING RECRGIMVANOpR I corvsERvalxAN ROAD I �- 1 � I R£sroENRAL �+J do ,. coAfRIERCNL/MIGUSMUL OI USE IAYSPMIpNAt GDYr LMRGJf CONMUNRY ' I I35 I )ERAL E• 1 CEN!£R, SCHOq, EATS LINH StaGvlti 1 LOLAL ROAOORACLf55 -� ORNEWAY $mEEi/ROW CAN4L ROWISRLOA smM7/ROW RYoiNERR GENERA(ANGIGNGN _ OTORANAGERAMfr p>� tM£FNWAErRVL 1G.4NWAYA I �z I GRAPHIC SCALE B Boo 1 Inc�t. GRAVES BRBTNERSCONCEPTUAL SITE I SCHULKE, E 8 JT ARD, L.L.C. i• �NEIunOH UR I PIAN FOR COS IAAl43RKTNAL BITTL OOApolb'•ANO nA 4PR�wv.awFmx ` 1, 047 AC ANNEXATION ism MFS SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application City Council Staff Report August 28, 2019 1. Project Name: GRAVES BROTHERS SEBASTIAN SOUTH 2. Requested Action: LAND USE CHANGE EXISTING: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY: AG -1: AGRICULTURAL— 1 (1 UNIT/5 ACRES, 1046.7 ACRES) FUTURE: CITY OF SEBASTIAN: CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL, 112.3 ACRES), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED, 10.1 ACRES), IN (INDUSTRIAL, 126.7 ACRES), INS (INSTITUTIONAL, 130.7 ACRES), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 384 ACRES), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 70.5 ACRES), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 169.4 ACRES), AND C (CONSERVATION, 43 ACRES). 3. Project Location a. Address: 85TH ST. (CR 510), 8400 BLOCK, VERO BEACH, FL 32967 b. Legals: Section 1, Township 32 South, Range 38 East and part of Section 36, Township 31 South and Range 38 East, containing approximately 1046.7 acres (1117.76 acres including all canal rights of ways) (Legal Description and Survey Attached) 4. Project Owner: Graves Brothers Company 2770 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL, 32960 (772) 562-3886 E -Mail: jbass@gravesbrotherscompany.com 5. Project Agent: Joseph W. Schulke, PE, Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 770-9622 E -Mail: jschulke@sbsengineers.com 6. Project Engineer: Joseph W. Schulke, PE, Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 770-9622 E -Mail: jschulke@sbsengineers.com 7. Project Surveyor: Frank Cuccurese, P.S.M., Carter Associates, Inc. 1708 215` Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772)562-4191 Email: FrankC(c�carterassoc.com 8. Adjacent Properties 9. Site Characteristics a. Total Acreage: b. Current Zoning: c. Current Land Use(s): d. Flood Hazard: 10. Project Narrative Future Land Use L-1, C-3, and City CG AG -1, C-3, and Planned Development AG -1 AG -1 1046.7 acres County A-1 (Agriculure-1) Vacant/Agricultural Zone X (Low Risk 50%); Zone AE (High Risk 50%) A petition for voluntary annexation has been executed by the owners of the subject property and is consistent with Chapter 171.044 F.S. The subject property consist of 1,046.7 acres, more or less, located south of County Road 510, generally west of the 740' Ave ROW, north of 69'" Street ROW, and east of 82"d Ave ROW. The subject property is currently vacant agricultural land in unincorporated Indian River County (IRC), contiguous to the existing corporate limits and boundaries of the City of Sebastian. The proposed development is adjacent to the service boundary for municipal services (CR 510) and contains lateral canals owned and maintained by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID). Current zoning will remain as A-1: Agricultural until such time as the applicant provides petition to the City for a zoning amendment. The City Council will hold a public hearing on August 28, 2019 to consider the annexation of this property. The applicant has requested a mix of future land use designations in order to achieve consistency with the city's adopted Future Land Use Element of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The property currently maintains an active agricultural use and will continue as A-1 until such time as conceptual planning has been completed for the property. A Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis has been submitted by the applicant as an Attachment. The proposal is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Sebastian's 2009 Comprehensive Plan parameters of the Annexation Studies. a. Obiective 1-1.2: Agriculture Land Use which recognizes annexation of existing agricultural lands until such a time that urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no longer economically sustaining. These Policies provide for a holding period to ensure orderly development that provides economic development opportunity through a mix of industrial, commercial and housing that conforms to the City's Comprehensive plan and LDC in order to achieve diversification of the municipal tax base. b. Obiective 1-2.10: Annexation Studies which promote planning for annexations to prevent urban sprawl and disjointed urban service delivery systems by providing an analysis of land use, traffic circulation, concurrency, drainage, and environmental protection. In accordance with the City Land Development Code Sec. 54-1-2.9 — Procedures for amending the comprehensive plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing on amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and make recommendation to the City Council. In deliberating, the Commission shall consider the information provided. Zoning Current Land Use North: RS -3, Con -1, Vacant/Residential & and City CG Commercial, Conservation East: A-1, Con -1, Agriculture, Conservation, PDTND Liberty Park West: A-1 Vacant/Agriculture South: A-1 Vacant/Agriculture 9. Site Characteristics a. Total Acreage: b. Current Zoning: c. Current Land Use(s): d. Flood Hazard: 10. Project Narrative Future Land Use L-1, C-3, and City CG AG -1, C-3, and Planned Development AG -1 AG -1 1046.7 acres County A-1 (Agriculure-1) Vacant/Agricultural Zone X (Low Risk 50%); Zone AE (High Risk 50%) A petition for voluntary annexation has been executed by the owners of the subject property and is consistent with Chapter 171.044 F.S. The subject property consist of 1,046.7 acres, more or less, located south of County Road 510, generally west of the 740' Ave ROW, north of 69'" Street ROW, and east of 82"d Ave ROW. The subject property is currently vacant agricultural land in unincorporated Indian River County (IRC), contiguous to the existing corporate limits and boundaries of the City of Sebastian. The proposed development is adjacent to the service boundary for municipal services (CR 510) and contains lateral canals owned and maintained by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID). Current zoning will remain as A-1: Agricultural until such time as the applicant provides petition to the City for a zoning amendment. The City Council will hold a public hearing on August 28, 2019 to consider the annexation of this property. The applicant has requested a mix of future land use designations in order to achieve consistency with the city's adopted Future Land Use Element of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The property currently maintains an active agricultural use and will continue as A-1 until such time as conceptual planning has been completed for the property. A Statement of Impact and Concurrency Analysis has been submitted by the applicant as an Attachment. The proposal is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Sebastian's 2009 Comprehensive Plan parameters of the Annexation Studies. a. Obiective 1-1.2: Agriculture Land Use which recognizes annexation of existing agricultural lands until such a time that urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no longer economically sustaining. These Policies provide for a holding period to ensure orderly development that provides economic development opportunity through a mix of industrial, commercial and housing that conforms to the City's Comprehensive plan and LDC in order to achieve diversification of the municipal tax base. b. Obiective 1-2.10: Annexation Studies which promote planning for annexations to prevent urban sprawl and disjointed urban service delivery systems by providing an analysis of land use, traffic circulation, concurrency, drainage, and environmental protection. In accordance with the City Land Development Code Sec. 54-1-2.9 — Procedures for amending the comprehensive plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing on amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and make recommendation to the City Council. In deliberating, the Commission shall consider the information provided. 11. Comprehensive Plan Consistency. A. Conformance with Code of Ordinances: The proposal is in conformance with applicable substantive requirements of the City of Sebastian Code of Ordinances, particularly the following Land Development Codes: a. Surface Water Management Ordinance b. Wetland Protection Ordinance c. Protection of Open Space, Tree Protection, and Protection of Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas d. Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Controls and Estuary Protection B. Changed Conditions: Land use and development conditions have changed locally and regionally since the effective date of the existing regulations which are relevant to the proposed amendment. Vacant agricultural property is no longer economically viable beyond a short planning horizon and therefore, the proposed future changes meet changes in development patterns and infrastructure improvements proposed by the County and State, such as the widening of CR 510 and future extension of 82"d Avenue. C. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed future land use is not incompatible with surrounding land uses to the north or east of the project boundary. It is recognized that the mix of land uses proposed for this project are inconsistent with the agricultural and rural uses that are currently located in this area. However, the proposed land uses are compatible with the future projected land use needs of the City of Sebastian and concurrent with future projected growth patterns for the City. The change in land use provides for a higher intensity of use than the current land use, however, future demands for industrial and commercial development along the widened and improved CR 510 and future extension of 82"d Avenue supports the future need for this use. Therefore, it is consistent with projected future growth and development expressly defined within the 2010 EAR and the Comprehensive Plan. A conceptual development plan has been presented that proposes multiple Land Uses in order to meet the City's Comprehensive Plan. Zoning designations and Land Development Regulations will provide the final determination of densities and intensities allowed within the proposed development. Densities and Intensities provided per Land Use allocations are at maximum yield based on acreage. These proposed densities and intensities will NOT be realized for these land uses at time of development due to regulations pertaining to stormwater, transportation, recreation, open space, buffer zones and setbacks. Assumptions of the acreage available for residential development due to restrictions on development are between 75% and 90%. Current City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan data, inventory and analysis reference a significant dC ictt in industrial, commercial and multi -family residential land uses in the City. In summary, the City of Sebastian does not contain adequate land area for necessary land uses based on population and demographic data. Consequently, using current City land use designations may exaggerate commercial/industrial area along the future 82"d Avenue rather than the intended clustering of commercial/industrial at intersections and residential filling-in as part of a mixed use concept. The City is in the process of updating its comprehensive plan and proposes to include future land use designations more applicable to smart growth concepts and mixed use. In accordance with Objective 1-2.7: Planned Unit Development (PUD) the City shall promote innovative development concepts through the PUD zoning and land development process that establishes flexibility in development in order to ensure applicable road grid extensions, density allocations and clustering, conservation and open space criteria, and mixed use concepts. Several suggested big picture concepts that should be considered during the Future Land Use Plan Amendment are as follows: a) Consider the use of the City's PUD zoning and site plan development process to promote mixed use. b) Provide for the extension of the internal street grid as shown in the conceptual plan. c) Require conservation of the South Prong slough area and provide for greenway trails/public access along the South Prong slough. 3 d) Allow for internal density transfer and clustering of the development to allow concentrations of denser areas within the overall project to off -set green open spaces. e) Require a "town center" mixed use activity center and clusters of commercial/industrial at major grid road intersections. f) Require a greenbelt adjacent to low density areas outside the project. g) Provide a mix of housing through the PUD process. The proposed land use changes include: CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL, 112.3 ACRES), CL (COMMERCIAL LIMITED, 10.1 ACRES), IN (INDUSTRIAL, 126.7 ACRES), INS (INSTITUTIONAL, 130.7 ACRES), MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 384 ACRES), LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 70.5 ACRES), VLDR (VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 169.4 ACRES), AND C (CONSERVATION, 43 ACRES). The following excerpt from the Future Land Use Element of the City Comprehensive Plan will assist in identifying the proposed uses in relation to the City requirements. 1. Land Use Categories [§9J-5.006 (1)(a) and (c), F.A.C.] Residential Land Uses In 2008, there were 3,285 developed residential acres within the City of Sebastian, primarily in the low-density category. The residential category represents approximately forty-three (43) percent of the total land area in the City, and includes single-family, multi -family and mobile home developments. Residential categories are intended to provide appropriate locations for a diversity of dwelling types, densities and sizes for citizens to live in, and not provide for non-residential uses. However, all residential designations will also allow for necessary supporting services such as utilities, parklands, and education facilities. Residential uses are divided into the following categories on the Existing Land Use Map: Very Low Density Residential —(up to 3 units per acre) This category is mainly comprised of large lot single-family residences at densities of no more than three (3) units per one (1) gross acre. Typical uses found in these areas include primarilysingle-family detached homes on individual lots and accessory uses. In 2008, most very low density neighborhoods were located in the outskirts of the City, with a few pockets in the more central areas. Lot sizes were not much different than in the low density areas, but these developments were approved as subdivisions and contain common areas that result in lower densities. There were a total of approximately 461 acres of very low density residential in the City in 2008, comprising fourteen (14) percent of the residential lands. Low Density Residential - (up to 5 units per acre) This residential category is dominated by detached single-family homes on lots of varying sizes and with a density of 5 units per gross acre or less. Areas shown as low density in the Existing Land Use map include primarily single-family detached homes on individual lots, accessory uses and supportive community uses. The low density residential lands are currently the most prevalent land uses in the City, totaling 2,479 acres, or seventy-six (76) percent of the residential lands. Medium Density Residential - (up to 8 units per acre) The medium density residential category shows areas developed with both single-family and multi -family dwelling units (including duplex) at densities up to eight (8) units per gross acre. Typical uses may include single family detached, zero lot line, duplexes, triplexes, 4 quadruplexes, garage apartments, villas, cluster housing, townhouses, modular/manufactured homes and small apartment complexes Medium density residential areas serve as transition between the lower density areas and more urban uses. There were approximately 169 acres of medium density residential in the City in 2008 (5% of the total developed residential lands). Commercial The commercial land use category consists of a variety of retail and office uses; such as, medical facilities, shopping centers, restaurants, automobile service facilities, and similar uses. In 2008, there were 242 acres of lands used for commercial activities. There are four types of commercial development present in the City: limited commercial, general commercial, the commercial district along CR 512, and Riverfront mixed use. Commercial lands are concentrated along the US 1 and CR 512 corridors, Main Street and Indian River Drive. Compared to other communities in the State, the City of Sebastian has a very small proportion of commercial relative to the amount of residential. Limited Commercial Sites within this category include shops with limited inventory or goods, such as neighborhood convenience stores, small scale drug stores, specialty shops, personal services, as well as limited transient lodging facilities. There are several nodes of limited commercial in the City, comprising a total of 32 acres (13% of the total developed commercial lands). Commercial General Sites within this category include general retail sales and services; highway oriented sales and services; and other general commercial activities, including hotels and motels, or residential complexes, or other transient quarters. There are several concentrations of commercial general land use, mainly in along CR 512 and US 1. The sites comprise a total of 40 acres (16% of developed commercial lands), not including general commercial areas located within the Riverfront district. Industrial The industrial land use category includes both fight and heavy industrial uses. Industrial uses are typically connected with manufacturing, assembly, processing or storage of products. Typical uses consolidated into this category include warehousing, wholesaling, limited retail, heavy equipment repair, private utility facilities (cellular switching stations, electrical substations), limited assembly, processing, motor vehicle impoundment facilities, construction offices, adult entertainment, and storage areas. Industrial types of uses are currently located along the FEC corridor, and also near the airport. Lands within this category currently comprise approximately 225 acres, or 3% of the total lands in the City. Institutional Lands shown as Institutional comprise approximately 1,091 acres and include public and semi-public uses such as: Public Facilities, including governmental administration buildings, public utilities; emergency services facilities, airport; and similar public/semi-public facilities. The majority of the land within this category corresponds to airport land. There is also the site in the south part of the City owned by the Water Management District also shown as Institutional (Stomtwater Park). Educational institutions Parks and recreation areas and open space, including the Municipal Golf Course. Other public facilities (hospitals and supportive health care units; cultural and civic facilities; cemeteries) Conservation The conservation designation includes public lands that have been acquired and private land areas that have been reserved by mutual agreement with the property owner for the preservation and protection of Sebastian's natural resources. There are currently 1,082 acres of conservation lands on the existing land use map, predominantly in the north part of the City adjacent to the airport. Other conservation areas include the estuarine shoreline along the St. Sebastian River and about 162 acres owned by the County (Sebastian Harbor). The site adjacent to the airport has been purchased by the State and the County for future mitigation. 2. Projected Land Use Needs [f9J-5.006(2)(c), F.A.C.] This section of the Future Land Use Element projects the amount of land for different land use categories that will be necessary projected needs. to accommodate future population growth. The methodology used to project the future demand for the various land uses was based on the current proportion of land use acreage to population. (a) Future Residential Land The City of Sebastian will continue to be a residential community through the year 2025. The City has designated 4,593 acres of residential land on the Future Land Use Map (Map I-6). The proportion of acreage of land use to population and the housing needs identified in the Housing Element were used to determine future residential land use needs. As can be seen in Table I-5, future growth would demand approximately 5,032 residential acres (not including mixed use designation) by 2025 if the 2008 ratio were used. The Housing Element identified a need for a total of 17,274 dwelling units by 2025; that is 7,596 (6,981 single family and 615 multifamily) more than in 2005. Table I-8 presents the amount of developable residential lands by land use category and the holding capacity of those lands. Based on the acreage of vacant land designated as residential in the Future Land Use Map, the City could accommodate an additional 5,000 dwelling units by 2025. The City expects an increase in residential acreage in the future but not to the extent of keeping the same 2008 ratio. The Future Land Use Map shows a total of 4,593 acres of residential land. In addition, the Riverfront district (see Commercial section below) encourages the development of higher density developments in conjunction with retail or office developments. That increase in available lands for residential development, in addition to expected future annexations of residential lands, will address the future demand for residential land use. As shown in Table I-6, the percentage of residential lands relative to the total developed/developable lands will go up from 50% to 70%. Residential development will be accommodated based on the following ranges of density: Very Low Density Residential - Up to 3 units per acre Low Density Residential - Up to 5 dwelling units per acre Medium Density Residential - Up to 8 dwelling units per acre (b) Future Commercial Land Use A primary consideration in the allocation of lands for future commercial developments is the size of the primary market area. The Sebastian area has and will continue provides basic office and retail services to households residing in or near the City limits; however, the Vero Beach and Melbourne urban vicinities have, and will continue to serve as the primary business centers within Indian River County and Brevard County. Projections of future commercial land were based on current ratio of land use to population. Based on the 2008 population of 23,462, the ratio is currently 10 commercial developable acres per 1,000 population. This ratio, which includes the mixed use contained in the Riverfront district, is low compared to other communities in the State. Applying the 2008 ratio to the 2025 population projection, the City would need a total of 371 commercial acres. The Future Land Use map shows 447 acres of commercial land use, an increase of approximately 205 acres over the present. Four levels of commercial are planned: Limited Commercial General Commercial Development within all commercial categories will be restricted to a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6, except for the CR 512 Commercial land use which shall be limited to 0.5 FAR Individual zoning districts within these land use categories may further restrict the maximum FAR noted in this plan. (c) Future Industrial Land Use The City of Sebastian currently has approximately 225 acres of industrial land, comprising about 3.4% of the developed land. Based on the current population of 23,462, there are 10 acres of industrial per 1,000 people. At that rate, there would be a need for 345 acres by 2025. However, the City has allocated only 299 acres of industrial on the Future Land Use Map, primarily along U.S. 1 and in the area around the Airport. The City would like to increase the amount of industrially zoned land in the City to attract large employment centers. However, based on the fact that the City is mostly built up, there are no sites available to accommodate this future need. The City will, therefore, be open to future annexation of industrial lands for this purpose. The maximum intensity of industrial development measured in floor -to -area ratio is 0.50. (d) Future Institutional Land Use The Future Land Use Map shows 1,249 acres of Institutional land use. This represents 16% of the total land in the City, and 19% of the developable land (excluding Conservation). The majority of the acreage corresponds to the airport property. The maximum intensity allowed within this category shall not exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.6. Based on the analysis of additional recreation and open space needs identified in the Recreation Element, the City of Sebastian will require 2 acres of neighborhood park land and 2 acres of community park land per 1,000 residents. With a projected functional population of 35,940 persons by 2025, the City will need approximately 144 acres of park and open space to meet future recreation demands. Since the City currently has 297 acres of neighborhood parks and 800 acres of community parks, including the Municipal Golf Course and the Stormwater Park s, sufficient park and open space acreage exists to meet the future demand. (e) Future Conservation Land Use The Future Land Use Map shows 1,089 acres of Conservation. This figure could change overtime as the City will continue pursuing acquisition of those areas that are desirable for permanent designation as conservation land uses on the Future Land Use Map, or pursue agreements with property owners to preserve environmentally sensitive resources. D. Adequate Public Facilities: The extent to which the proposal would result in public facilities and services exceeding the capacity for such services and facilities existing or programmed, is determined at the Land Use level based on the amount of density/intensities provide. However, it is difficult to determine actual impacts prior to zoning and site plan development therefore assumptions need to be made and conditions put in place to mitigate for any projected impacts to public facilities. Transportation: Planned improvements to thoroughfare roads located on the perimeter of the property, CR 510 and 82nd Ave, are included within the IRC MPO Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as priority projects funded over time. Acquisitions of ROW on 82nd avenue and stormwater treatment pond locations are currently in process through the FDOT. Construction of this road is not yet programmed. CR 510 ROW acquisition is funded from 2020/2023. Construction has not been programmed. Improvements to these corridors will open up the lands on the southern border of Sebastian for future development. The County has surmised that a change in Land Use changes the value of the land and will increase the cost of the ROW acquisition. Until the property has been rezoned and has a proposed higher use, land use changes are speculative at best and do not equate to value. The proposed Land Use plan offers a favorable internal grid network which provides multiple means of access and egress from the development to the City and surrounding areas. A traffic analysis has been submitted with this request and concludes that: "With the extensive network of streets and connections to the existing grid, all links will operate at acceptable levels of service. Therefore, the project meets the level of service criteria with in the Sebastian Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with its goals, policies and objectives for transportation." The development proposes an internal network that will support a compact development concept and assist in the distribution of traffic. In accordance with the Transportation Element, Objective 1.5, Policies 4, 6, 8, and 12, the Citv should reo_uire dedication of the nronosed street grid system and connector _roadways_ as a condition of development. Utilities: Currently, IRC maintains existing water and sewer transmission mains on CR 510 along the north boundary and utilities will be extended south of the Urban Services Boundary (USB) along the east property line with the development of Liberty Park PD TND. The corridor also acts as the USB line for lands south of Sebastian. Though capacity is available for this project should it develop in the near future, capacity is not "reserved" for this area of the County as the waste water treatment plant and the FDEP Consumptive Use Permit capacity is limited to growth potentials inside the USB. hi accordance with the IRC -COS Interlocal Agreement for Utility Service from 1995, the County agrees to provide services to the City for existing and future developments. According to County staff, these services are not necessarily available for developments outside of the Urban Service Boundary. Since 1999, over 1042 acres has been placed into conservation by the County or State within the USB of the City of Sebastian. Therefore, consideration should be given to transfer of the Utility service density from those conservation lands in the City that will not be developed to be allocated by the County for utility services. In addition, at the time of the Fellsmere annexations in 2014, which consisted of over 8800 acres of agricultural lands, the USB was modified to include all of this acreage. In accordance with City of Sebastian Objective 4-1.1, the City requires land development regulations which mandate hook-up to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new developments prior to receiving development orders. Therefore, the proposed development must provide sewer and water service as a condition of develonment. These services may be provided by the County or alternative services, however no septic systems would be allowed in accordance with City policy and land development codes. Policy 1-4.4.4.• Accommodating Requisite Infrastructure, "during the subdivision review, site plan review, and permitting processes the City shall insure that respective future developments allocate sufficient land area for infrastructure required to support the development." Police/Fire: Currently, the Sebastian Police Department is approximately 6.9 miles from this site and the nearest County Fire Station is approximately 4 miles. Based on the increase in use proposed for this project, additional facilities may be required to accommodate this growth. The proposed land use change includes I approximately 130 acres for institutional services which includes public safety. The City should require donation of those lands once that determination is made Housing: The proposed land use change provides a mix of housing options to accommodate various levels of income range and lifestyle choices, appropriate for a mixed use development or "New Town". Drainage: The property is bisected by several drainage canals controlled by the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID) and conceptual plans show additional stormwater ponds throughout the development. At the time of development, a stormwater management plan will be required for each development plan and permitting will be required through the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). Over 130 acres of land have been proposed as Institutional which may address any additional stormwater needs. Recreation and Oben Snace: Institutional and Recreational public lands are conceptually presented and will be addressed during land use and zoning. Over 130 acres of land have been proposed for public uses including: public safety, stormwater, open space or recreation. At the time of development a better understanding of the extent of the required public facilities will be identified. In addition, recreational needs will be required to be met as part of the City's Recreation Impact Fees program. E. Natural Environment: The proposal would result in significant conservation of the existing natural environment. The subject site contains important wetlands and natural slough area that is part of the headwaters to the St. Sebastian River. It has been proposed that this entire area be placed under the Conservation land use designation (over 43 acres) and will be further protected from development under the jurisdiction of Federal, State and City regulations. Consequently, impacts to environmental resources would require the approval of those agencies and mitigation to off -set any impacts. Furthermore, the conceptual site plan, which will be approved as a condition of the annexation and land use designation, includes a network of trails and open space as part of the proposed site development. Goal 1-4: Resource Protection and Objective 1-4.3 encourages the maintenance of land development regulations which ensure the protection of natural resources. F. Economic Effect: The proposal will affect the future development pattern and property values in the area. A change in the future use of this property is projected to provide a higher net positive tax base for the City which will mitigate any future costs for increased public services. Industrial and Commercial developed land use provides a higher potential for revenue to the City, and lower service costs per unit, than single family residential. A net benefit in jobs and taxable revenue is projected for the community in jobs and taxable revenue. A Fiscal Impact Analysis was provided of the proposed project which reflects the potential annual net fiscal gain to the City at final buildout at $7,030,099. 1. Total assumed annual taxable revenue including Ad Valorem taxes, Utility taxes, and Franchise Fees = $6,483,109/year. 2. Stormwater Utility Fee was incorrectly calculated and the actual value = $546,990/year 3. Recreation impact fee one time revenue = $3,680,505. G. Orderly Development: The proposed land use change would result in an orderly development pattern along this corridor and south of the City. The proposed land use change is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive plan identifies a need for industrial, commercial and multi -family development to meet projected 2025 growth. The Comprehensive Plan and 2010 EAR recommends that the City should seek to annex areas south of the City along the CR 510 corridor extending to 66s` Ave. The proposed development would provide needed employment centers, mixed housing options, and institutional needs. H. Intergovernmental Coordination: Indian River County Comprehensive Plan The City is seeking adequate commercial and industrial lands to accommodate its economic development needs and the 2010 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) pointed to the 510 corridor as a place to meet those needs. For over two years, the City was in negotiations with Indian River County and other municipalities in the county to enact an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) primarily to address the issue of annexation. No w agreement was reached however, annexation reserve areas were proposed for Sebastian that included lands south of CR 510 to 690' Street. The ISBA and the Comprehensive Plan support coordination with IRC as part of the annexation process to encourage annexation of larger contiguous areas as opposed to piecemeal annexations being governed by different sets of development regulations. This may lead to lack of coordination, poor urban design and a corridor that does not function as well as it should. A meeting was held with IRC prior to the annexation request regarding future growth along CR 510 and 82nd Ave due to the FDOT and IRC planned corridor improvements that will trigger real estate speculation, annexations, and future land use amendments. IRC expressed support relating to the proposed grid road system, as well as future road connections to the south. IRC provided recommendations regarding development of the property in accordance with the proposed concept plan which will be reviewed under the City's PUD and site plan review process. In accordance with hidian River County (IRC) Policy, developments outside of the Urban Service Boundary (USB) must consist of: 1. low density residential on well and septic systems, 2. Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TND's), or 3. New Towns. a. Should the land owner prefer to stay in the County, they could develop the property at 1 unit/5 acres which could result in approximately 200 lots with 200 septic systems (i.e. Vero Lake Estates). b. The County is in the process of approving a TND, Liberty Park, at the intersection of 66" Ave and CR 510. It will consist of 913 mixed residential units and approximately 209,000 sq. ft. of commercial use on 511 acres of property on the southern border of the City, outside of the USB. Four sites located in various places within the County, including the City of Vero Beach, contributed density to Liberty Park from inside the USB. Utilities may extend outside the USB for developments transferring density from inside USB. These transfer of development rights (TDR's) were used to increase density allocations to Liberty Park from 1 unit/5 acres. These four (4) sites are then development restricted (cannot be developed). The transfer of densities included 8 units/acre and 6 units/acre. c. The IRC Future Land Use Element specifically establishes New Town minimum criteria of 1500 contiguous acres for lands east of I-95, so this property may not develop as a "New Town" under the County's policy. I. Public Interest: In the City of Sebastian's adopted 2010 EAR, the City is encouraged to pursue voluntary annexations of areas south of the City along the CR 510 corridor in order to meet the projected need for growth in the community based on demographics and population. The requested land use changes are consistent with the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan. 12. Analysis: Graves Brothers Company requests consideration for an amendment to the comprehensive plan future land use map (FLUM) designation of approximately 1046.7 acres from Indian River County AG -1 to City of Sebastian CG, CL, IN, INS, MDR, LDR, VLDR, and C. The request to annex the subject property into the City of Sebastian will be made to the City Council. The proposed future change in land use meets changes in development patterns and infrastructure improvements, such as the widening of CR 510 and future extension of 82nd Avenue. The subject site is adjacent to existing and proposed urban development along the south city limits coterminous with the boundary of the municipality. The subject property consists of a former agricultural site that is no longer economically viable due to changed environmental and regional conditions Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the First Reading of Ordinance 0-19-05, establishing changes to the Future Land Use Map and placing conditions upon the future development in accordance with the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan and Transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity for comment. The Citv recoenizes soecific laree scale amendments with unique characteristics that do not readilv fall into existine land use cate¢ories. The specified nronertv as identified in (Exhibit F) contains a Mixed Use concent 10 plan as shown in (Exhibit D). As nart of the land use amendment, conditions vertaining to the mixed use develovment have been incomorated into Ordinance 0-19-05 as follows: a. Rezoning of the Dronerty shall be done through the City of Sebastian's Planned Unit Develonment nrocess as described in Article XX of the Land Develovment Code. b. Housing tvves shall be mixed to meet various income levels and lifestyle choices., c. Future dedication of ROW to the aonronriate entity will occur at the time of develovment to Dromote an, interconnected, extended and imvroved grid road system. along with a well-planned transvortation system of roads and streets throughout the development. in coordination with Indian River County, to sDecifically include 81" Street, 77"' Street. and 73d Street, as well as 70 Avenue._ d. Provision for a mixed-use "Town Center" area. e. Future allocation and donation of institutional lands necessary for governmental services such as post offices. public safety. schools. etc. as identified by concurrencv analysis in accordance with the City of Sebastian land develonment codes and ordinances at the time of develovment., f. Strategic assembly of commercial and industrial develonment consistent with the City's Comvrehensive Plan. g. Future dedication of conservation lands to at)Dronriate entity at the time of develovment to include any natural areas of significant importance. and the provision of ereenwa- trails to Dromote a system of connectivity and access consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land develovment codes.. h. Allocation of narks and recreational lands consistent with the City's Comnrehensive Plan and land develovment codes sDecifically: a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of Dublicly accessible recreation lands, and a minimum of 2 acres/1000 residents of other recreational lands.. L Buffers adjacent to low density areas outside of the PUD Overlay to include increased greensvace along the site's south nroDertv line and the part of the east DroDertv line south of Liberty Park TND., j. As a condition of future develovments, sufficient land area shall be allocated for infrastructure required. to sunnort the development and mandate hook -un to central Dotable water and wastewater systems for all new developments prior to receiving development orders. Therefore, the Graves Brothers Sebastian, South PUD Overlay must provide sewer and water service as a condition of development. These services, may be Drovided by the County or alternative services, however no sevtic systems would be allowed in accordance with City volicv and land develovment codes. Dtl �^ DATE / 11 Graves Brothers Company Indian River County, FL Annexation and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared by: Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, L.L.C. Joseph Schulke, P.E. 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Beach, FL 32960 June 2019 Included with this statement are the following contents: Statement 1.0 Impact on Public Facilities and Services 2.0 Fiscal Analysis 3.0 Environmental Impacts 4.0 Compatibility with City's Comprehensive Plan 5.0 Compatibility with Surrounding Areas Aonendices Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning List of Exhibits Exhibit A — Location Map and Thoroughfare Plan Road Network (Contiguous to Site) Exhibit B — Site Thoroughfare Plan Network and SRID Canals Exhibit C — Utility Infrastructure Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit E — Proposed Site FLUM Map Exhibit F — Proposed City FLUM Map Amendment Exhibit G — Preliminary Wetland Assessment Attachments • Warranty Deed • Title Policy/Certification • Traffic Impact Analysis (O'Rourke Engineering & Planning) Page 3 wastewater systems concurrent with the demands of new growth or the expansion or extension of water or wastewater transmission, distribution, or collection facilities by either the city or the county. Currently, IRC has existing water and sewer transmission mains on CR510 on the sites north boundary and will have utilities at the sites' east boundary concurrent with the development of Liberty Park PD TND. Liberty Park PD TND will be connecting and extending utilities south and west from CR510 and 66th Ave, through 81st St, 70th and 7411 Ave, ultimately bringing utility services to the sites east property line. See Exhibit C— Utility Infrastructure The site lies entirely within the Sebastian River Improvement district (SRID), a chapter 189 and 289 Improvement district which is responsible for the implementation, operation and maintenance of a water control plan and stormwater drainage by gravity within the district boundaries. Consequently, adequate facilities are in place to ensure the site has adequate and legal drainage capabilities. The site lies adjacent to and east of lateral C Canal, and is bisected in the north south direction by Lateral L canal. Lateral L canal runs along and through the natural slough and headwaters of the South Prong of the St. Sebastian River. Several sub -laterals bisect the site in the east to west direction, draining a majority of the site west to Lateral C. These include sub -laterals C2E through C5E. (See Exhibit B — Site Thoroughfare Network and SR -ID Canals) Adequate traffic, utilities, drainage, and other facilities either exist or are planned in the vicinity of the site. The Comprehensive Plan, FLU Element and Intragovemmental Element, objectives 8-1.3 and 9-1.5 establishes standards for Concurrency management and specifically, standards for Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Drainage, and Recreation. Chapter IX of the City's Land Development Code, "Concurrency Management", defines the level of service standards for these facilities, and specifies that adequate provisions for these services are necessary to support new development. Conceptual Site Plan/ Land Planning — Basis of Concurrency analysis: Due to the size and proposal to assign multiple Land Uses to the site, a conceptual site plan has been prepared. The plan was prepared to forecast how the site will likely develop, with due consideration given to thoroughfare roads/ access, environmental features and drainage, and existing development patterns and existing land uses. In addition, land use intensities/ densities were estimated based on the city's comprehensive plan needs, and the city's development trends. See Appendix A— Conceptual Site Plan I Land Planning See Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan Page 5 government buildings. These will comprise only a a minor portion of the "Institutional" Land Use area, and its impacts are negligible, and in many instances, will be a net positive impact (i.e. government, utility or school site providing public services and / or facilities). Transportation: A detailed Traffic Analysis has been prepared and is being submitted by Susan E. O'Rourke; O'Rourke Engineering & Planning (SO). This report hereby refers to and relies on the SO study to address the Traffic component of the analysis on the "Impacts on Public facilities and Services". The results of the referenced Traffic Impact Study indicate that the project as proposed, will meet level of service standards for all impacted roadway networks. Page 7 In addition to payment into the impact fee program, IRCDUS requires that all developments construct and pay for all the requisite utility extensions to the site, and all the internal utility infrastructure (collection, transmission and distribution mains). Once constructed, IRCDUS requires that the developer turn the facilities over to the utility department. Drainage: The drainage level of the service standards outlined in the city's land development code, Chapter IX — Concurrency Management, include: 1. Post development run-off shall not exceed pre -development run-off for a 25 -year 24-hour event. 2. Treatment of run—off from the first I inch of rainfall on-site. All developments, at time of site plan application, are reviewed for compliance with local and state storm water regulations, which require on-site retention and pollutant abatement, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge criteria of the city storm water ordinance, the local drainage district (S.R.I.D.) and the state -environmental permitting agency (S.J.R.W.M.D.). Therefore, any future development on the site would be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of the pre -development discharge rates and prohibited from discharging pollutants in excess of pre -development volumes. Further, the large majority of the site lies within Flood Zone X, outside of the 100 year flood hazard area, and the site lies entirely within the Sebastian River Improvement district (SRID), a chapter 189 and 289 Improvement district which is responsible for the implementation, operation and maintenance of a water control plan and stormwater drainage by gravity within the district boundaries. Consequently, adequate facilities are in place to ensure the site has adequate and legal drainage capabilities. In addition, the S.R.I.D. limits post development discharge rates to no more than 2" run-off volume in a 24-hour period. This requirement substantially exceeds the city's pre -post discharge requirement. Prior to any site development approval, the city's land development regulations require that the proposed development plan provides sufficient evidence that the project, when constructed and operating, will meet or exceed the local and state requirements. Further, the City has adopted and implements a stormwater program to ensure the long-term viability of all stormwater systems. The development of this site would be subject to those requirements, including the payment of an annual Stormwater Impact assessment (levied through the annual property tax assessment). The estimated stormwater fee collected by the city from the site when developed is $325,060 per year. (see Section 2.0 - Fiscal Analysis). Recreation: The parks and recreation level of the service standards outlined in the city's land development code, Chapter IX — Concurrency Management, include 5 acres* of park areas for every 1000 residents in the city, as well as various quantities of recreation Page 9 2.0 Fiscal Analysis The proposal to annex 1047 acres into the city and assign several FLUM designations, including commercial, industrial and residential uses, will have a net positive Fiscal Impact to the city. FLU Element 1-2.10.1: Parameters of an Annexation study may include: Fiscal Impact Analysis and determination of Future Capital Expenditures necessary to meet basic services such as police, emergency services, utilities, code enforcement, building and zoning, permitting and inspection services to meet City Standards. The impact analysis is provided below. Estimated Revenue Generated: Ad Valorem taxes; total estimated taxes are: $ 4,506,309/yr 1. Annexation and "Commercial General" and "Commercial Light' FLUM Land Uses assigned to 103+- ac (per conceptual site plan — see appendix A): -Assume 1,033,800 sf*, valuation at $170.00 / sf, tax values at $175,746,000, rate 3.400). -Ad Valorem taxes are estimated to be approximately $527,238 per year 2. Annexation and "Industrial' FLUM Land Use assigned to 113 +- ac (per conceptual site plan — see appendix A): -Assume 2,253,600 sf*, valuation at $150.00 / sf, tax values at $338,040,000, rate 3.400). -Ad Valorem taxes are estimated to be approximately $1,149,336 per year 3. Annexation and residential land uses ("MR, LR and LR" FLUM Land Uses) assigned to 586 ac (per conceptual site plan— see appendix A): (assume 3699 homesites, $225,000 taxable value after homestead exemption, tax values of $832,275,000, rate 3.400) -Ad Valorem taxes are estimated to be approximately $2,829,735. Utility tax and franchise Fees are: $ 1,976,800/yr I.Commercial and Industrial; 3,287,400 sf total -Electric, at 15.9% of electric revenue generated, assuming commercial average use and costs of 14/ KwH /sf/ year; $1008/ month/ 10,000 KwH = $737,630 -Water/ sewer and CST estimated to be $110,640 (approx. 15% of electric) 2.Residential; 3699 homesites -Electric, at 15.9% of electric revenue generated, assuming 3699 homesites, residential avg bill of $123/ month in FL, _ $868,100 -Water/ sewer and CST estimated to be $260,430 (approx. 30% of electric) 3.Utility Impact fees: While utility (water and sewer) impact fees are NOT collected by the city, there is a substantial fee collected by IRCDUS. Currently the IRCDUS Impact fee is $ 2796 per Page 11 city's government capabilities, which would include a police sub -station and other government offices. -Emergency services: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Emergency services are provided by IRC. IRC collects taxes on all properties to defer the operating and maintenance costs, and collects impact fees assessed at time of building permit application on all new construction (including development in the city) to mitigate the costs for capital improvements (ie: land, buildings). -Utilities: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Utility services are provided by IRC and FPL. The city collects Utility and Franchise fees (see above). IRCDUS collects impact fees assessed at time of building permit application on all new construction (including development in the city) to mitigate the costs for capital improvements (ie: land and facilities for water and wastewater plants). -Code enforcement: There is only a negligible fiscal impact to the city . The site will likely be developed with most improvements constructed, dedicated and maintained by POA(s), with maintenance and operation by the POA(s), and with restrictive covenants administered by the POA(s). -Building and zoning: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Fees are charged by the city to cover services provided. -Permitting and inspections: There is no fiscal impact to the city. Fees are charged by the city to cover services provided. -Streets and drainage, maintenance: There is no fiscal impact to the city. All roads, driveways, parking areas and required drainage facilities will be privately owned, constructed and maintained. Thoroughfare roads adjacent to or bisecting the site which are identified by IRC on its thoroughfare plan network (74th Ave, 82nd Ave, 69" St, 73`d St, CR510) are eligible to receive funds from the county wide Traffic Impact fee program. IRC collects impact fees assessed at time of building permit application on all new construction (including development in the city) to mitigate the costs for capital improvements (i.e. ROW purchases and road and intersection capacity upgrades). Conclusion: Non-residential development traditionally has less of a fiscal impact than residential development. Providing a mix of uses will permit the non-residential development to off -set perceived residential impacts. Page 13 3.0 Environmental Impacts Any Environmental impacts caused by the potential development of the site would be similar under development whether in IRC or the City of Sebastian, unless pro -active measures were taken to protect the natural resources. The majority of the site was a former citrus grove, and the site does not contain any undisturbed native upland habitat, except along the fringes of a small wetland area. There is a small wetland area (see Exhibit G) within a natural slough located along lateral L in the NE area of the site. This is part of the headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. This natural flow way contains native upland on the fringe of the slough, and wetland areas and an old creek bed. Consistent with the comprehensive plan Future Land Use Element, objectives 1-1.7 and policy 1-1.7.3, preservation of these areas is proposed, and will provide protection and buffering of these natural resources from development and loss of habitat. It is important to acknowledge that prior to any site development, requisite permits from the Federal government (USFW, ACOE), the state (FDEP, SJRWMD) and local agencies (city and SRID) are required and any wetlands or other natural resources that may be located on the site are protected by federal, state, and city regulations; Consequently, impacts to environmental resources would require the approval of those agencies, and mitigation to off -set any impacts are normally required. However, the applicant has taken a pro -active approach, and has obtained a preliminary environmental assessment (see Exhibit G) which has identified the wetland areas. Based on this location, the applicant has proposed to designate 41+- acres of the site that lies over and around this environmental resource as a preservation area with a "Conservation" FLUM Land Use map designation. In addition, the Land Use plan proposes only large estate type single family homesite development located adjacent to the preserve areas, providing an adjacent compatible land use. The "Conservation" Land Use is placed over the preservation areas, and the "Very Low Density Residential" Land Use is placed adjacent to these areas. A benefit of site development is that water quality impacts to the receiving waters (in this case, the Sebastian River and Indian River lagoon) are generally expected to be reduced from current conditions, which permit agricultural operations to start up with little oversight or regulation. Site development regulations require the construction of storm water management systems that detain and prevent erosion and excess stormwater run-off, removes pollutants, and often requires the installation and maintenance of shoreline protection buffer(s) when adjacent to surface waters or wetlands, and protection of or mitigation for jurisdictional wetlands on the site. Due to the city and state's efforts to increase regulations to protect the states waters and environment, development standards have been adopted, including the construction of active storm water management systems for new development, to ensure the development decreases the site's impacts to the environment. As a result, the stormwater run-off discharge rates and pollutant volumes discharging into the headwaters of the Sebastian River will be reduced. The requirements for new development contrast with the present agricultural design that allows drainage directly into the headwaters without any storm water retention or treatment. Therefore, the required storm water management associated with new development should reduce the amount of pollutants and freshwater runoff that is currently placed into the river via the approximately 1047 acre agricultural site. (See Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning; Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan; Exhibit E — proposed Site =Mmap; Exhibit G — Preliminary environmental assessment) Page 15 from all directions, ensuring that traffic generated by the site development will not overburden one or two thoroughfares, that will allow residents and employees from the site to conveniently access or depart the area with little risk of delays or hindrances, and most importantly, both city and Indian River County emergency services will have multiple alternative routes to serve the site. Proposed Land Plannine consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (See Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan /Land Planning) Reference Exhibit D — Conceptual Site Plan This proposal to annex approx. 1047 acres into the City of Sebastian required conceptual land planning and the development of a conceptual site plan (Exhibit D) to determine the appropriate FLUM Land Uses for the site, and the Land Use intensities/ densities and placement. The conceptual site plan was the planning tool referenced for the location of FLUM Land Use designations and preparation of the proposed amendment to the city's FLUM. The development of the conceptual site plan included the determination of appropriate maximum densities and intensities based on current land use data, trends, statistics, and goals of the city's comprehensive plan, and also included the determination of appropriate location of the various land uses, based on existing and proposed roads and infrastructure, existing natural environmental features of the site, adjacent land uses, and various other factors. (see Appendix A for details) Commercial and Industrial FLUM Desienations It is generally the consensus of the Sebastian leaders and residents that the city is underserved by commercial and industrial business, and that the city loses a significant amount of business resources — employment opportunities, retail sales, etc. to the county seat (Vero Beach) and the adjacent surrounding unincorporated areas to the south, as well as to Palm Bay and Brevard County to the north. Many Sebastian residents are required to travel well over %s hour to these adjacent communities on a daily basis. However, this site's location provides the city the unique opportunity to capitalize on planned FDOT and IRC capital improvements. This site lies east of and adjacent to the location of the FDOT's future extension of 82nd Ave from SR60 to Cr510 — the new north south corridor between the two195interchanges; and the city's 2010 EAR identifies the extension of Laconia Street south to CR510, aligning with the 82nd Ave extension. The site lies adjacent to and south of CR510, which will be undergoing significant improvements. FDOT is planning to widen CR510 from 2 to four lanes from Us to Cr512 within the next 5 years. Consequently, the future major intersection created by these improvements at 82nd Ave and CR510 will be located at the NW corner of the site. These planned road extensions and improvements provide the opportunity for the city to create a commercial / industrial node that can accommodate the city's long range goals: to provide for business development and employment opportunities, and additional tax revenue for the city. The proposed FLUM map designations for the site include designating "Commercial General" to areas at the intersection, and designating both "Commercial Page 17 2. 2010 EAR, "Economic Development and Job Creation" (Major Issue 2), recommendations include creating a New "Economic Development" element of the comprehensive plan, and instituting several recommendations, including: a. Consider the potential for employment generating commercial -industrial uses in the CR510 corridor south of the city. 3. 2010 EAR, "Annexation and Service Delivery" (Major Issue 5), recommendations suggest that the city should accept voluntary annexation requests in this vicinity of the city and include assigning a FLUM designation of "Commercial General" and "Industrial". Citations in support of this include the following: a. Policy 1-1.2.2: Agricultural for Annexed lands — The city shall use the agricultural land use classification for future annexations until such time that urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no longer economically sustainable. The applicant has submitted an application to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The applicant intends on assigning other FLUM designations other than agricultural, because; -Urban growth is contiguous: The site is surrounded by the city of Sebastian on its north property line with commercial and residential uses, and it is surrounded on its east, south and west sides by lands lying in Indian River County with an Agricultural (AG -1) FLUM Land Use. However, less than 1/3 of the surrounding land is utilized for any agricultural purposes. It is evident that urban and suburban development has afflicted the area, making the project site's land less desirable and more difficult to operate successful agricultural ventures. Road improvements afflicting the site include the widening of Cr510 from 2 to 4 lanes on the north property line, the extension of 82nd Ave on the west property line by FDOT, and 74th Ave along the east property line. Recent development approvals include the Liberty Park PD TND on the east side, and the Quail Valley Golf Course on the south property line, and numerous 5 acre residential subdivisions (`Ranchettes) adjacent to the south %2 of the east side of the site. The recent development and plans for road construction and development nearby provide evidence that urban development is encroaching within this once predominantly agricultural area, supporting the idea of land annexation into the City of Sebastian. -Agricultural activities are no longer sustainable: Neighboring properties are experiencing a transition from general agricultural uses to more intensive uses such as residential and commercial. This property is affected by these transitional uses making citrus production unviable at this location due to the effects from citrus pests and diseases, principally, citrus greening and citrus canker. The intensive pest management programs required for the production of citrus are nearly impossible to economically administer in this type of urban or transitional land use setting. Page 19 employment locations — suggests that the city should strive for a significant share of additional units to be designated as multifamily..." 2010 EAR, "Economic Development and Job Creation" (Major Issue 2), recommendations include creating a New "Economic Development" element of the comprehensive plan, and instituting several recommendations, including: "Include strategies to increase the variety of housing types in the city. The EAR further states that the city lacks a significant stock of multi -family housing". Conservation FLUM desienation The following references are in direct support of annexation and the designation of Conservation FLUM designations and densities: Objective 1-1.7 Conservation Land Use Policy 1-1.7.3 — The city shall monitor the Future Land Use Map to ensure the application of Conservation Land Use to applicable properties Preservation areas are located along lateral L and the headwaters of the South Prong of the Sebastian River. This natural flow way contains native upland and wetland areas, and consistent with the comprehensive plan Future Land Use Element, objectives 1-1.7 and policy 1-1.7.3, preservation of these areas will provide protection and buffering of these natural resources from development and loss of habitat. The "Conservation" Land Use is placed over the preservation areas, and the "Very Low Density Residential' Land Use is placed adjacent to these areas. Institutional FLUM desienation The following references are in direct support of annexation and the designation of Institutional FLUM designations and densities: Objective 1-1.6 The city shall ensure that needed public services are developed concurrent with new development Policy 1-1.7.3 — The city shall monitor the need for increased land area for institutional uses and ensure the Institutional Land Use on the Future Land Use Map is expanded to accommodate development. The "Institutional" Land Use (total 114.4 net acres) is placed in appropriate areas, consistent with the city's designation for drainage areas, recreation areas, and community and civic areas: Page 21 5.0 Compatibility with Surrounding Areas This proposal to annex approximately 1047 acres into the City of Sebastian required conceptual land planning and the development of a conceptual site plan to determine the appropriate FLUM Land Uses for the site, and the Land Use intensities/ densities and placement. The conceptual site plan was the planning tool referenced for the location of FLUM Land Use designations and preparation of the proposed amendment to the city's FLUM. The development of the conceptual site plan included the determination of appropriate maximum densities and intensities based on current land use data, trends, statistics, and goals of the city's comp plan, and also included the determination of appropriate location of the various land uses, based on compatibility with existing and proposed roads and infrastructure, compatibility with existing natural environmental features of the site and adjacent sites, compatibility with adjacent land uses, and various other factors. (see Appendix A — Conceptual Site Plan / Land Planning paragraph titled: Adjacent Lands and Site Plan Compatibilitv CONCLUSION Based on the statements and analysis provided herein, the city can conclude that the requested annexation and land use designations are compatible with surrounding areas, consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, will have a net positive fiscal impact to the City, and meets all applicable Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment criteria. Page 23 Estimated Intensities and Densities: Calculations PROPOSED FLUM AREA CALCULATIONS GROSS NET** ** Net area = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW'S Page 25 AC AC COMMERCIAL GENERAL 112.3 95.6 COMMERCIAL LIMITED 10.1 7.8 CONSERVATION 43.0 41.4 INDUSTRIAL 126.7 112.7 INSTITUTIONAL 130.7 114.4 MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 384.0 360.9 LOW RESIDENTIAL 70.5 68.3 VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL 169.4 156.4 TOTAL 1046.7 957.5 ** Net area = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW'S Page 25 Subject Acres Gross Acreage 112.3 10.1 43.0 126.7 130.7 Proposed Future Land Use Allowed Net Acreage** Category I Density/FAR Units 95.56 CG 10,000/ acre 955,600 sf 7.82 CL 10,000/ acre 78,200 sf 41.38 CONS 0 0 112.68 IND 20,000/ acre 2,253,600 sf 114.41 INST 0.005 24,919 sf up to 8 units per 384.0 360.87 MR acre up to 5 units per 70.5 68.27 LR acre up to 3 units per 169.4 156.38 VLR acre ** Net acreage = Gross area less internal thoroughfare ROW'S Page 27 2,887 units 342 units 470 units b. west boundary: the site is adjacent to 82"d Ave — an IRC planned arterial thoroughfare road. FDOT has plans to improve and extend 82nd Ave from SR60 to Cr510 - the new north south corridor between the two I95 interchanges in Indian River County. c. internal roads: the project site would provide for the dedication and extension of 78`x' Ave from WE' St., 1.5 miles north into the site, serving as a local collector road; and provide for the dedication and extension of 80d' Ave from 69"' St., 2 miles to CR510, serving as a local collector road. East / West roads: a. North boundary: the site is adjacent to CR510 — an existing IRC arterial thoroughfare road. FDOT has plans to improve and widen CR510 from 2 to 4 lanes from USI to CR 512. b. south boundary: the site is adjacent to 69`h St — an existing IRC collector thoroughfare road. This road extends from US 1 to 82nd Ave, providing access to numerous north south arterial roads including US 1, 58`h Ave, 66d' Ave and 82nd Ave c. internal roads: the project site would provide for the dedication and extension of 73`d St from 82nd Ave, 0.5 miles east into the site, serving as a local collector road; and provide for the dedication and extension of 77th St. from 82'd Ave east 1 mile to 74th Ave, serving as a collector road; and provide for the dedication and extension of 81' St. from 82nd Ave east 1 mile to 74h Ave, serving as a collector road. The IRC approved "Liberty Park PD TND" development lying east of the site will extend 81" St. from 74`h Ave to 66th Ave. The road network will ensure that traffic generated by the site development will not overburden one or two thoroughfares, that residents and employees from the site can conveniently access or depart the area with little risk of delays or hindrances, and most importantly both city and Indian River County emergency services will have multiple alternative routes to serve the site. Page 29 community uses are located. The "Institutional" Land Use is placed in these areas, consistent with the city's designation for drainage areas, recreation areas, and community and civic areas. Adiacent Lands and Site Plan Compatibility: The site is surrounded by the city of Sebastian on its north property line with commercial and residential uses, and it is surrounded on its east, south and west sides by lands lying in Indian River County with an Agricultural (AG -1) FLUM Land Use. However, less than 1/3 of the surrounding land is utilized for any agricultural purposes. It is evident that urban and suburban development has afflicted the area, making the project site's land less desirable and more difficult to operate successful agricultural ventures. Road improvements afflicting the site include the widening of CR510 from 2 to 4 lanes on the north property line, the extension of 82"a Ave on the west property line by FDOT, and 74th Ave along the east property line. Recent development approvals include the Liberty Park PD TND on the east side, and the Quail Valley Golf Course on the south property line, and numerous 5 acre residential subdivisions ("Ranchettes") adjacent to the south %2 of the east side of the site. The recent development and plans for road construction and development nearby provide evidence that urban development is encroaching within this once predominantly agricultural area, supporting the idea of land annexation into the city of Sebastian. The conceptual site plan (see Exhibit D) designates land uses after considering adjacent existing and proposed land uses and compatibility. North property Line Adiacentlands: The site is adjacent to CR510 on its north property, and borders the City of Sebastian on most of the property line. MOT has plans to widen CR510 from 2 to 4 lanes from US 1 to CR512. Recently, a 67 acre parcel along the west % of the north property line was annexed into the city, with plans for Commercial development. To the east of that commercial property is a 40+- acre undeveloped (abandoned citrus) property which remains in IRC, and to the east of that is approximately 120 acre parcel lying in the city with plans for residential development (River Oaks PD). Site Plan/ Compatibility: Commercial areas are located along the sites CR510 frontage across from the existing "Commercial General" FLUM designated area in the city. Commercial General" Land Uses were placed in these areas. Page 31 The Quail Valley Golf Course borders the east '/z of the south property line. A proposed, partially constructed and abandoned 5 acre single family subdivision lies west of the Golf Course. Site Plan/ Compatibilitv: Low density residential land use is located along the majority of the south property line and 691h St frontage, where it is across from Quail Valley Golf Club. However, at the SW corner of the site is the intersection of 69th St and 82"d Ave. Upon the completion of 82' Ave extension, this will become a busy intersection, and a desirable location for commercial activities in this "corner" of the city. Consequently, the residential area will transition to a higher density use for apartments/ townhomes, and finally transition to commercial use at the intersection. The "Low Density Residential" and "Median Density Residential" Land Uses are placed over the residential areas, and "Commercial general" Land uses are placed over the commercial use areas at the intersection. West Pronertv Line Adiacent Lands: The site is adjacent to the proposed FDOT 82"d Ave extension, an arterial road connecting CR510 to SR 60, and connecting the two I95 interchanges. Properties lying west of the 82nd Ave extension and the sites west property line are owned by the applicant (owner of the project site). Approximately 1000 acres in size, the property is mostly abandoned citrus grove, and now in pasture. The property is a candidate for future annexation into the city. However, there are several small parcels internal to the 1000 acres that are owned by others, which hinders the ability to annex all these lands at this time. Site Plan/ Compatibilitv: There is over a 300' buffer on the west property line. In addition to the proposed 120' wide 82nd Ave ROW on the west property line, Lateral "C" Canal — a 225' canal ROW — buffers the adjacent applicant owned property from the site. The FDOT plans the future extension of 82nd Ave from SR60 to CR510, and the widening of CR510 from 2 to four lanes from USI to CR512. Consequently, the improvements at 82"d Ave and CR510 provide the opportunity for the creation of a commercial / industrial node at the intersection of Cr510 and 82"d Ave, along the 82nd Ave arterial road, and at the intersection of 69th St and 82"d Ave. The development of this node will provide opportunities for the city to attract large employment centers and business centers. The Commercial General and Industrial Land Uses were placed in this vicinity to capitalize on the proposed FDOT improvements, the accessibility to the city residents and nearby county residents, and the accessibility to both I95 interchanges. Page 33 EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP & THOROUGHFARE PLAN ROAD NETWORK (CONTIGUOUS TO SITE) GRAPHIC SCALE 'NOTE: D 2.000 "00 LIBERTY PARK, BLUE WATER BAY, AND MVEFOR F9RENAKS E. ARE SHOWN ON MAP APP R VERENCE. THESE ARE APPROVED, BUT NOT YET CONSTRUCTED. 1 loch=4,000H, bbJJ GRAVES BROTHERS I CHULKE, BITTLE & STODDA D, L.L.C. N. CITY OF SEBASTIAN Aawcnpt�9.p�®els ®w,twc® gen/Ey I Imo.• INUM RIVER CANNEXATIOOUNTY IXNIBR A ���> Moux u�x . wnE poi �nFo auw. wwon naso J ,_�7• T.:. , - I` C.R. EXHIBIT B SITE THOROUGHFARE PLAN — -^ NETWORK & S.R.I.D. CHANGES FDOTROIt _L 1 --__— ------ s r RS T •.--.T I - _ I �.�t ;L _ li APPROVFDPD I I � �II .'LIBERTY PMP' PROPOSED ED � -- PROPOSED -� 74THAVE 130'R 8B71/AVE •r OW i Bp ROW I I OFf SITE -LIBFRYPARK PROPOSED - • !I SISTST. I L } w a r 80 ROW R� . PROPOSED 81STST80'ROW I � � }�1'� OFFS(7E-LI9fRTYPAR I I I i €� I PROPOSED - 717HAVf _ _� I PROPOSED PROPOSED 3 I 77THST.` 76TH AVE. I E 1.w'Rpvl x E '. IBe'ROW 30'ROW k ceuHCA]]ppLL 3I v 4 I� - I HERR nNGT I R ---------------- AO 4 31 3 aE ! I -� LEGEND � I PROPOSED I I cAwl -'� eaulRonnoR r �.K>A ''t CESSONEWAY 8AC 80'ROW S]RGEJ/RDW - __,� RDW(SR.(D/ _• OFCIGROW _j {— sBYOmmsW _ tea_ r 1. I a I — - --- - 3I t �A KFROPOSED 69 E TH OW.B100 "D. E � - TION :i yS �.' sE.o:�' DRyVp SE�BASl1AH PIAN NEWARK&G R.ISIM ED.HULKE�B o�STOD®ARDI L.L.C. i CHANGES PoIi I juvuviAAt rtartvn ,.� JI O, tl` €o_ -L ANNEfGTION 1,04]AO ANNEXATION ix wnw. nN>:x i�ixwIll��Yxna hinxixroe� W K Lu 2 U) w IURBAI SERVICE7, INDIAN RIVER C.O.S. LEGEND PROPOSED i. 'NOTE' CITY OF - _ TRANSMISSION SEBASTIAN j I DIAMETER DISTRIBUTON MAINS ANNEXATION ARE NOT DEPICTED I I, I LEGEND 'NOTE' WATER PIAN DEPICTS LARGE DIAMETER _ TRANSMISSION TRANSMISSION MAINS. SMALLER DIAMETER DISTRIBUTON MAINS FORCE MAIN ARE NOT DEPICTED EXHIBIT C UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROPOSE UTILITY EXTENSIONS (LIBERTY PARK) 0 II� w w INDIAN RIVER CPUJVTY m m Zi �.F V GRAPHIC SCALE 0 7� 0 ( IN FEET) 94�� 1 ivch = 1,6008. =AS°E""""° �°P° EXHIBIT D se_.asnnry In°wN RIVER •' wvBtgAKs• PROPOSED courvTv UR.L519 T7AM76tf T ; ' cm CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN L7AO oP FDOTROVr� 'EMS AN -. �� a rr l�` fr°9 �Y'•� cRRus , - 9/PROL� IHIDEAWAY "I K�AgyO�A�M1TE \ _ R£CREAWN AREAQ V I I "LIBEfETY PARK• SS I ' PRDPOS y -w PROPOSED - _ 80THA� a� .I 7,THAVE180'ROW II F' 80'ROWI OFFSITE-LIBERYPARK •- PROP0.4E0 s 4 PP 81STST. 16 i ��x h I1 O p A7ROW I 9YPA55 :, J� PROPOSED .� �� �•. y + -..;, � � -fi� � �:.. 87ST5780'ROW ?I •- �� I I 1 �'�S \ OFFSITE-UBERTVPARK AN 3i \ I �— LEGEND v , �� • L '-_ --- - 6.•.� .� IT� - ROPOSED � iORLOG8LA7�AVJgOEMEV7 i 747HAWrPR srLh4NWATEA POSED PoSED ec�wrw I LOCA W . ST.`m 78RlMV x°uis ly.� _ 'RDW gagD = q nmrw I SWMWERA4WAOEdIENi e +.. I APA.a.., R n0 � ONSER✓MAM 42V W�T P TDW ___ a BCUG/"SIRL4L ` . -tzTs - t j GE rI s•. CWRMCROMAWNRY �r UTERA< ? :Ka CENTER, SC1bOL, EAtl CCAN4L � - u ERu I. PROPOSED - G'R'1L (OCALAOAOORACCESS 80'ROW ORNEwAY POROW I I ar ^'•""♦" c ® STREET/ROW n* TJm15T x= ♦ n L CANALROWISRIOJ Iv.•'9� Wer uMIIEDE Y( @ .-{. ` I }' seoenw •s PROW RECREAwmH vsT U STREEWROW OCDIGI = =RIB I 4, 1 I.j SYONIERS II�� � L ; � OfOltVN4GEPATIERN q f 1 cz t a x - - -j FRCPOSED69TH '+ - 0 _= BTIBP DLTA417E DW E___ T Y �--, A7K)N , h Bo lI d' +ffitlwla _ _ 6MV6 BRO7NER5 CONCEPTUALSRE I SCHULKE� PpRO, L.LC.- I1 ` ANNO 101 PLAN FOR COS I ae.vamalt exwealat rtaeLw -+• IM I i e' 1,047AC ANNE TION r,rmin xw, sunE mL vmo een�cx wvoe ersx° i;` - - VIT- 1 I I 1 -. PROPOSED �� BfSTST. d0',40W w- (),LI_•'i¶f EXHIBIT E INDIAN RNER ` couNTr : APPROVED RJVER AKS' 'RIVER OAKS" PROPOSED SITE FLUM MAP TI CITY OF - I LEGEND EE�—L «._i R.ICTIAN . PCAWMlId4WlIMuIWScj _ J,l -CWI.FACNLER T -r-. T — 1 SCQ••Ywilll QE�M� O _`— 4 ) I I� I - I :O� �CWMAfY11➢ll(D � CITRUS -cavaat✓nnI• ,All YICEAWAY. f -MW311WL IRCD IA f„ •• -y,Iginynwµ I� CON EDVATION L.�y, •- '. f I. VEXvlwvowvlY PFERENRUW W.N •► 2 I iow oExsmuxloexrtv lwcsw I MCBEEXRiE1Mu 5Jiq Arj —lrcvlw.oEusmusiwmnlua . ,Ir .. qA r � . Eu.1 _. ..,. ),mow •.�dJ � I �arEmnoxnam us __ PROPOSED 747HAVE 130'ROW -Z-WE vs L^GNA( ,. PROPOSID O 'ROW J I PRO J 13TRSr. 80'ROW MG -ROW •a f F< J I lr� ECSE J I } PROPOSED 81STST80'ROW LEGEND ____� LCGLLROAGOR ACCESSONEWAY 'ROPOIED 74THAW smEET7Row -IYl''WW -�-�! GNA[FOWISR.AG1 EG77AI R Oi s PROPOSED FLUMAREA CALCULATIONS GWWAC RPTAL LG I tlffi6AC MAC jl a I ronac eeac •i V. ^_�. •.� 4OAC 41.4AC ING MRAO 1127AC {IJ NST J I]0.MAC 114.4AC I I — W I 3&995AC ,'bV9AC • I !A I MMAC M3AC • 7 III ISAC 156.4AC �o L os < TOTAL E 1,M..7ACAC GS7SAC p II .• 1 11 ------ — ---- ' 1 PROPOSID 69TH - - • • • - I CI 01 011 • ST f00'ULTIMATE BROW IDICAnON coLFcwa - F�Jvcli BOq ft PROPOSED FLUM SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. ` I CITY CF SE9ASIIAN FOR COS va Asraewwlt �rt�Gwrwwx rerns t-" ANNDGi1GN 1,04]AC ANNEXATION Ix yr Xrvw'r`riinniowm>auvvo xx, Floxon �mw _ J, F(IniiT/¢Ry Ey/Itnkgrpy,gneasmn la � u -A gym., EXHIBIT F - - PROPOSED CITY FLUM . -- - MAP AMENDMENT f"''�eellle 1AR999 ff ilkvasa i � I�L b s _ ev ♦ iJ lP 1 X �`' 5 } FR 41 I E � � • �A ��� d�♦4 ��♦�.� a +nava ♦ {� .. I II�III 1 J < lul JHL- r m_- 1 YI rr I f-1 ' I � LEOENO — Af mmwzw =ow 512 Manwa PRC j� Jermovlrsw.�e+ro.� O r+ww 1 VIII— JIII sdvozsmr.nmwm.w�s.w �mnbcwsz pw.souwMwwm wus 1 frawvvenrmawerwxu.seaq �maaaa.rr�n uss�nva �zm1v euwzmwpreawx �+�ennw� F 6 is ( cw,vss aeoNExs PROPOSEDFLUM MAP E. ULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. ii x 1111 l CItt OF5EBAON Ilfw srwnweu 51 s� r'r�xe axxFxnnox FOR COS 1�71i 1047 ACRE ANNEXATION R' 1 .� �Mv e�w„ �:z- moi= u EXHIBIT G PRELIMINARY WETLANDS ASSESSMENTUa _ ILL', r i �tll f Wetland 23.;nc.- --IAF{� � �- ii(� �� z-=• -� 3 - }. 71_ __ - —' —l'—_ ___r� _s i q Gruv�s Br �4 Preliminary Nz1_�and Map ' "0 �• rr �^-�� or--- LEW CARTER, CO ULTING SOIL SCIENTIST "' A`j�,-•':FICA. FILM,: dip of southeast gaartsr (4*1 and Boothe"* quarter (S*) of Southeast quarter (oaf) of Sestiele tWOUty-tht•ee (83)1 rest Half (Wf) and fest Half (wfJ of Nast Nsir (Nf) of Section 'wenty-Nttt r2c las. 0 ■Leon A61� woos .. my 000miseioa expires l0/E0/66 Northesst quarter (at), Smtheast Quarter (S*) of Northwest quarter (Nrf), Bottle Nair (8�) Mod and "oorded this 18th. day of September, 1931. =. 01"T corns, Q -- - Clark. -- 7 ----- - 4 (86)1 southwest quartos (Wk) of Nortarest Quarter (N9}) and Smthweat quarter (BAf) of Bae*- fieve�,-• THIS nrD2STM, vada andentered Into thio 17 day of September, A. D. 10611 BETWEEN •5�:. IHDIAN RIVER THUT QOi7wBS, a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of i�•, �.-tar.(ffi) of Northwest quarter (Elf)= All of Sections Sweaty-sigbt (ss); Twoaty-aiaa (s9)y... 71"ida, party of the 71rat part, and GRAVES BROTILIR8 CWANr, a corporation created and exist Thirty (30), Thirty -Sas (31), Thirty-two (3E), Shirty -three (33), 'Thirty -Som' (54), and'Vdr$; - -ins under the laws of the State of 7lorida, party of the Bsoead part, -'.. N1171ZSUM= That the acid party of the first part for and in consideration of the or or (SEf) aad Northeast Quarter (NNf) of Nortbsaet quarter (Naf) of Northeast quant" azaa of Sem Dollars (#10.00) and other valuable considerations, to it in hand paid by the said i.- IN 90wk" TUM -M (3!1 W=I RAM TBISSS-NEM (68) am party of the second part, the rOOsipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained a OUOR Ons (1)i Seetim Seo (d) *:Dept Northeast quarter (Naf) of Southeast gaart*r (R*)t and sold to the said party of the second part, its sucossaors and assigns forever, the fellow - All Of Sectloas ThrOG (6), 7uur (4), rive (6), Sint (6), Bevin (7),l19b* (S), Nine (9), rsa lag described property situate, lying and being In the County of Indian RSTer, State of nori- (10), Nlevm (11), Swe1Ts (U), Thirteen (18), yourtam (14), Hftean (16), Sdstem (16)0 da, to -rite LN rowx=p u SOUTH RANGE 36 XUT Lot Three (6) of Beutioa 11 111 of fractional Seutiona Six (6), S"On (1), and Eight (e). Lot One (1) and East Half W of GOutb044t quarter (SR(•) of Section Eleven (d1)1 Lot One (1) sad North Balt (N}) of Northeast Quarter (N*), southwestQuarter (B*) of Northeast Quarter (NN}), - East Half (A}) of Northwest Quarter (ER}), EOrtheast Quarter (H*) of Southwest Quarter (SF})r and,Southweat Quarter (BN$) of Southwest Quarter (6w}), less six (6) Acres in the northeast Q; corner Of Southwest Quarter (Bw}) of Southwest quartsr (S*) of Section Sws1Ta (18)1 rest Balt (Wb) of Southeast Quarter (SN}), Southeast Quarter (S7}) of Southwest Quarter (SO) of Section P&lrteea (13)t North Half (N}) of North-East Quarter (Na) and Southwest quarter (86}) of Northeast Quarter (N*) of Section sonrtaeft (14); Lots E and E of Section Fitton (16)1 All. of f"otiOsal Scott= c0"1%40s (17)1 All of Section Eighteen (18)1 North Filf of North Balt - .-'t, _ fi_'•. ` - and South Halt (gk) of South Heat (S}) of SOOUOA Nineteen (19)1 North -Half (N}) of North ' Nell (F1}) and South Half (S}) of South Half (o}) of Section Twenty (SO); yot One (1) and Bogth _ Ntif,(8}) of South Bali (Si) of Section Twnty-cae (21)) South Halt (e}) of South Half of: saetion Sweaty -two (28)i Southeast quartos (Olaf) of Northeast Quarter (1*) North Balt of southeast gaartsr (4*1 and Boothe"* quarter (S*) of Southeast quarter (oaf) of Sestiele tWOUty-tht•ee (83)1 rest Half (Wf) and fest Half (wfJ of Nast Nsir (Nf) of Section 'wenty-Nttt r2c E4) NOrths4st Quarter (Naf), East Half (*) at Southeast quarter (SAf),; dlortb Na1s (>N1) of Northesst quarter (at), Smtheast Quarter (S*) of Northwest quarter (Nrf), Bottle Nair (8�) Of aotthwoat quarter (BFf),; and eewsntem (17). •ore■ in the fora of a para) .i^Fm off of WW "at side of the Northwest quarter (11W of Sobth"wt quarter (Br}) If Section Twenty-fiTe - 4 (86)1 southwest quartos (Wk) of Nortarest Quarter (N9}) and Smthweat quarter (BAf) of Bae*- Sea Sw4at7-912 i(26); All of Hestina Swmty-*mZt (87) me" East Nall (N}) of South"" .00 ; rf; ' ., R i�•, �.-tar.(ffi) of Northwest quarter (Elf)= All of Sections Sweaty-sigbt (ss); Twoaty-aiaa (s9)y... - Thirty (30), Thirty -Sas (31), Thirty-two (3E), Shirty -three (33), 'Thirty -Som' (54), and'Vdr$; - • . �. -fivo (86)i All of Beatim'Thirty-six (36) *xsept Nortbwast quart"of (Nw}) North*asb "art- uart `" or or (SEf) aad Northeast Quarter (NNf) of Nortbsaet quarter (Naf) of Northeast quant" _.., i.- IN 90wk" TUM -M (3!1 W=I RAM TBISSS-NEM (68) am a OUOR Ons (1)i Seetim Seo (d) *:Dept Northeast quarter (Naf) of Southeast gaart*r (R*)t All Of Sectloas ThrOG (6), 7uur (4), rive (6), Sint (6), Bevin (7),l19b* (S), Nine (9), rsa s�. - (10), Nlevm (11), Swe1Ts (U), Thirteen (18), yourtam (14), Hftean (16), Sdstem (16)0 . and ala@ except the Northwest Quarter (NoV of Southeast Quarter (alt) of Southwest Quarter (Sgt) or Southwest Quarter (SFt) and Southwest Quarter (Sgt) of Xbrthsast Quarter (S7t) of -SMimat Quarter (art) 'of Southwest Quaresr (Sit) or 6eotfon rive (5), Teansbip Thirty (&C), South of Range Thirty-seven (07) last of Floating Great, Drswrd County, ploridat , The lands hereinbetere described and conveyed by this deed Contain 10,909 sera. Yore or leu, Also all live stoat, tool's, apparatus, meohiasry, accounts receivable, notes r4lei7- able, and all personal property of every kind and description mored by the party of the first Port. And the aaid-yarty of the first part does hereby tally warrant the title to said property, and will dsfand the seta against the lawful olaina of all parsons whasklOwsr, IN rX== MWWT, the said party of the Met pari hu caused then presents to - be signed In its nate by its president, an& its corporate nal to be affixed, attested by its Secretary, this the day and year first above written. (Coptpo Ts Dau.) INDIAN MEN FRDIT GRDW8 Signed, sealed and delivered In BY ffiibert Grave■-� the presence oft Viae-rronlaenc '. J. J. Sarms 1Tff8'T D. a. iilhoit (WL) N Secretary. J. A, Graven _ STATS ON 07 FLUM . CCQrr 07 INDIAN 3113M . I HZWr 07aTIyr that on this 17 day of September, A. D. 1901, before W Personally appeared Robert $. Graven, aid 0. G, rilholt, floe-Prnidsat and Secretary, respectively, of Indian River Fruit Growers, a corporation of the State of 71orida, to me known to be the per- sats deeeribed is and who executed the foregoing instrument and severally acknowledged the eaoutiun theroof to be their free not and dead as cuoh officers, for the Omen and purposes therein mentioned; and that they affizad thereto the official Seal of said carporaticne and the said instrument is the sot Cad deed of Sell corporation. N,TaBB v7 Signature and official Seal in Said County and State, the day and'year - last aforesaid, (R. P. am) AtA WIN, uvare or riorxaa es large my Comisdon lcpires May 80 1904. - Filed and records& this 18th, day of September, 1961. >tII,:a LiTNGpP I �7 OIAOOIT CC=,BY Al (oa t7 Clark. I T]IIB IS0B1lp90, Pads this 10th day of September A. D. 1961, 811SH! A. Y, JUI prop-) I 1 ,I RUNS, Incorporated a corporation edsting under the laws of the .tate of !bridal hs" Sts; . ,f priaelpab plaw of business in the County of Indian River and State of Florida party e2. the '' first part, and 1. Y. 5111 of the County of Indian River and State of Florida party of the Mena& part,- pdffi601M, that the said party of the first pari, for and In consideration of the �' "• - am of ran Dollars and other f►l.uaDL Considerations Dollars, to it in hand paid, the rmeelpt , rberoof is hereby acknowledged, hes granted, bargained, sold, aliened, randsed, released,esu- iaW and. Confirmed, and by these presents doth grant,, bargaiiy sail, alSu, rCaise, rale w, seam and oanfirs, unto the said party of the second part and his heirs and Ammig" �forsTcs, . all that aartadn parcel of land lying end being in the County of Indian River,, and State Of ! Nllorida Norm partioulariy described es fallow■t DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATION ALL THAT LAND LYING IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH. RANGE 30 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE COMMON SECTION CORNER OF SECTION 25. 26, 35 AND 311. TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH. RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. MARKED BY A FOUND 200 NAIL WITH NO IDENTIFICATION RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 063806, RUN NORTH 09'56'13' EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECIIUN 38, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH. RANGE 38 EAST A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH SECTION LINE RUN SOUTH 00'04'07' WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WASASSO ROAD / S.R. 510 / BSTH STREET, RIGHT OF WAY MAP SECTION 08510.2601, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 181, PAGE 593 AND 658 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C' CANAL / 82nd AVENUE, 2W.W FEET WADE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32 . PAGE 17] OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF WE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY ANNEXATION; FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING RUN NORTH 89 -WIT EAST ALONG THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WARASSO ROAD / S R. 510 / BSTH STREET, A DISTANCE OF 2435.37 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 'LATERAL 'L' CANAL", ISOM FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK M. PAGE 300 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN SOUTH 08'10'09' WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1416.65 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL 150.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH BWWlP EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1347.63 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL 125.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH w1086' WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL'L' CANAL A DISTANCE OF 840.57 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL V CANAL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89-10V1' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 684.73 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'L' CANAL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'95'15- WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1940.28 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'R -14E CANAL' 100.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN CHANCERY ORDER BOOK 9, PAGE 504 OF IME PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'4418- EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF LATERAL 'R -14E' CANAL A DISTANCE OF 740.98 FEET TO THE COMMON RANGE LINE OF RANGE 30 EAST AND RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION W. TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST,'I HENCE RUN SOUTH 00'11'28' WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION W AND RANGE LINE A DISTANCE OF 1280.08 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 66 ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST MARKED BY A FOUND 4'xf CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH NO IDENTIFICATION RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 078031; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.50'19' EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 31 A DISTANCE OF 4.05 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST MARKED BY A FOUND 4'x4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH ALUMINUM DISK STAMPED 'CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC PRM LS 205' RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER 078026, SAID DESCRIBED SECTION CORNERS COMPRISED AS DOUBLE CORNERS EAST TO WEST ON WE COMMON TOWNSHIP LINE OF TOWNSHIP 31 AND 32 SOUTH WITH THE COMMON RANGE LINE OF RANGE 38 AND 39 EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'13'25" WEST ALONG SAID COMMON RANGE LINE, AND EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT -DIKE / LEVEE' 100.00 FEET WADE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 48, PAGE 23 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 2657.45 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'01'45' WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 1 AND RANGE LINE A DISTANCE OF 2500.0 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERPI- V CANAL, 125.00 FEET WADE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 210, PAGE 300, SAID INTERSECTION POINT BEING NORTH 00'01'45' EAST 82.50 FEET FROM THE FOUND 4'k4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH DISK STAMPED "RLS 1192' MARKING THE COMMON SECTION CORNER OF SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND SECTIONS 6 AND 7 OF TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, RECORDED WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DOCKET NUMBER W3825; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'5389' WEST ALONG SND NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 754.22 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID LATERAL'L' CANAL; THENCE RON SOUTH 00'0744' WEST ALONG SND WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 17.50 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN ROAD HIGH] OF WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 22q PAGE 460 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA: THENCE RUN ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOCI OWING COURSES: SOUTH 89'5389' WEST A DISTANCE OF 275.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH OPOTW WEST A DISTANCE OF TOM FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89"53'29' WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'DT4P WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'53'29- WEST A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET: THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'OT44' WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.0 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.53TV WEST A DISTANCE OF 3768.00 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C CANAL 225.0 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 82, PAGE 177; THENCE RUN NORTH 00'07'03' EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2637.27 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST I WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 1; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00'07403' EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2678.25 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SECTION 1 AND SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ALSO BEING THE COMMON 'I OWINSHIP LINE OF TOWNSHIP 31 AND 32 SOUTH: THENCE CONTINUE ON SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE RUN NORTH 500,a0r EAST A DISTANCE OF 1279.32 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LATERAL 'C -3E' CANAL 100.00 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 32, PAGE 177, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 8VWSI' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 12.51 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH WNW' EAST ALONG AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LATERAL 'C' CANAL, NOW BEING 250.0 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 3097.98 FEET TO THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WABASSO ROAD / C,R510 / 65TH/ STREET AND POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATION CONTAINING 48,689,61706 S.F. OR 1117.76 ACRES (INCLUDES CANAL RIGHTS OF WAYS) 1 iXIEPEIIGMTICN6NOTIYAMMRf NRKr -- - 1 i. " un e'NWW le , GRAVES BROTHERS COMPANY CA1tt'ERA$$DCIATFS,INC. pFLOPIO...ERPTCN ,r� CON911L1'INGCNG=@669 ANU IANO 911NVRYORS ]i]OIXOVJI PIVE0.PlV0. 17TH ]1rt5TPEET. VERO tlFACH FL �B]0 SN1 VEROREACM, FLORIDA.S. u, p>a6m.um r Vrvleuar,w N] V 1 Tie 7, w vrtur+ - DESCRIPTION p3HE, SECTION I."NVE1 b50UTM. PiNOEbEP]i 6PMTKSEC1RM b. TGNN]IIIP ]ISWM PNICEbFAST 1 Oft IN04W PIVEPCOUNIY. PtOR10A PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNIX/+TDN I. PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNEXATION SECTION 1, TOWNS14IP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST AND PART OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA I III I III I III I III dl u l � III I I; I In II 1 iii I i Y Y I 3, SII II YY I 1a I I ', I a I I I TY I I I I Y I p I I x N II I I $ Ly I 1: a xA xa • Y A 1 R I i= i m gV➢NCSVIF m ,NY.NF,IiI tli NOT. BpRGM, W Y1Y[Y GRAVES BROTHS 8CONPANT ( ] ;,'= l'AHl'611 A550CN'1'&ti�1NC. DESCRIPTION SH ET -- AFLORIDA CONPORATION CUNSIILTINO BNCINYNN9 AND NNR SORVCYOR9 sum r rte— SECTI0.V I. TOVM�HCRIPTIO RAIWE MFgST e u..ux.s �mmwr�w.uu.a 1FM0 u nn ¢rvu a»OWCUN RIVFR FLVO. 1..1. T.- VERO SEKH,R9aSN r.rm�wv.mnu n� vw APMTCF SP.CTWY, TfANISMP ]15WM,RANOE ]xF Si 2DIz . VFPOtlEAC11, ILORIIM]dB0 >Ly; p>b y:A p. wcpMyFT>y] me�wa 4ay WOIM RNER COVNry.FLMIM PROPOSED PROPERTY ANNE%ATION o..•],m�, On SE��T AN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2019 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting of July 11, 2019 and Regular meeting of July 18, 2019 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL and PUBLIC HEARINGS • Chairman opens hearing, attorney reads ordinance or resolution or title • Commissioners disclose ex -parte communication • Chairman or attorney swears in all who intend to provide testimony • Applicant or applicant's agent makes presentation • Staff presents findings and analysis • Commissioners asks questions of the applicant and staff • Chairman opens the floor for anyone in favor and anyone opposing the request (anyone presenting factual information shall be sworn but anyone merely advocating approval or denial need not be sworn in) • Applicant provided opportunity to respond to issues raised by staff or public • Staff provided opportunity to summarize request • Commission deliberation and questions • Chairman calls for a motion • Commission Action A. Public Hearing — Recommendation to City Council — Special Exception Request — Vehicular Sales in Commercial Riverfront Zoning District — 920 US Highway #1 — Adam Espley B. Public Hearing — Recommendation to City Council — Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment (For a Proposed 1,118 Acre Annexation) — Graves Brothers Company, Applicant — Properties Located Adjacent and South of CR 510 — A Total of 1,047 Acres, More or Less, of Subject Parcels Requesting Initial Land Uses (Less Road and Canal Right -of -Ways) — Request is for CG (Commercial General), CL (Commercial Limited), IN (Industrial), INS (Institutional), MDR (Medium Density Residential), LDR (Low Density Residential), VLDR (Very Low Density Residential), and C (Conservation) Land Uses UNFINISHED BUSINESS None ' EXHIBIT E OF , i /PPROVEU PD PROPOSED SEEBABk STIAN IIIDNII RIVER -RIVER VAHc � courm � _ PROPOSED SITE PLUM MAP CR 518 iGA' OLTIAIATf IEGFND L FOOT s's�,rl-u L•e �.r.v.. muw�cuvw-lun �w.nl — �cauencw sv /" ;74T� RCCOIISERVA➢ONL'ID�f— � 77 PROPOSE —'T- PROPOSED -`17MAVE ,E -E 130ROW 'ROWI \ rf-LI6ERYPARKPROPOSED81STST. ff+I -- - -aoVtD PD —I_ pw II I 1� — G1F T -- PROPOSED 81STSr80'R0W OFFSITE-LIBERTYPARK fn• / —UiERAL 1' CAHLL LEGEND I� I PR ' T47NAI'f I1 �Jr- PR ED P ED ST y 80'R O�W T- --� J= II � II II ` II LIE � II II 1 I PROPOSED I I + 701RST 80'ROW I saaBGw _ -LEPYAi)ON rll_ _I I I II I I PROPOSED69TH I L 6'ROW ST 100'OLTIMATE ROWPERIRC DEDICATION NmOUAIL VALLEY GOLF CLUB 80 ROW I +a RGIv OEOCAIIOA 1 TEXA TING ' II RVD I —�I F I I )IS I iURFA(t' LhWIL I OG RCAGm ALCESSGNEWAY SIREET/RGw CAAWL RCWISRI.C/ Sm 'Iww 6YOIAERS PROPQ$,EQj TIAL REq el Cert of SEGBATM514X PROPOSEDFLUM I SCHULI(Em Bryl aCOSlE 8 ST ARD, L.L.C. L``as ,� eee r AXNE%AnON �1U4r ACANNEXATIONIIaa'�Isrolnµcl wiiGlVEv xMwul/�E;nAw,i aiwYavw mamw� i II1 i�.m,:roea:a GAMAC WAC LG I MZAC 916AC LI 1911AC )BAC CQY6 `LAW UWAC I1.4AC IlZIUAC F 1.d87ACAC 9SI9AC 1127AC bVST IAI66AL IIIIAC 0 am MOAC YA9AC el Cert of SEGBATM514X PROPOSEDFLUM I SCHULI(Em Bryl aCOSlE 8 ST ARD, L.L.C. L``as ,� eee r AXNE%AnON �1U4r ACANNEXATIONIIaa'�Isrolnµcl wiiGlVEv xMwul/�E;nAw,i aiwYavw mamw� i II1 i�.m,:roea:a IR I ASDL MJAC VLR 1wx1 fK4AC og MT& F 1.d87ACAC 9SI9AC --;GRAPHIC SCALE_ 0 am I i.I,h = 800 ft. el Cert of SEGBATM514X PROPOSEDFLUM I SCHULI(Em Bryl aCOSlE 8 ST ARD, L.L.C. L``as ,� eee r AXNE%AnON �1U4r ACANNEXATIONIIaa'�Isrolnµcl wiiGlVEv xMwul/�E;nAw,i aiwYavw mamw� i II1 i�.m,:roea:a ZW 2030 Future Land Use HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LEGEND ` IUNan Servlw Area llbeftY Park ® Pmooaaa a„n—., ® CINc(FellameR OC b o15eCanlan C Y o1 Vera BeecF OTownollnalan Rlvm 5M10ra9 OT...., 0.a, — AG :lg WWra 1(I Un VSAaea) AG -3'. AgxulWmll(I Un V10Asras) — AG 3 ApncNWMI3(1 UNI - BCI. Bme CYPre.lmo o.amam Dmrlm (10 ualalMre) -c, C.—Nallm l (I) IJ IACR) - GR CanservaVan 3 (I Un001ns) _ G3:f n—ah-3(1 UnIV2.5 Ams) - c3 commemaumaoalnal 1.1 --ID.wa,, Ra apa Val -1 (3 VnILAcre) LL L 2 Law Ogre, RaslaenYel 2(6 Lail .) OM-1'Medil.-DaIII, Rezaenfal-1(3 UnN Ie) M3 MI P—wnVal2 (10 UnilalMa) - MHRP'M Ola Home Renaal Paw Uglw Ave) .I MUNI. M n,la, PVB P EII F I" R.ft IR.I (1 UmVAva) u RC P' .. -I C wl Oft EC Recleealon TTrans11-1 P.wanllal(I UnlVMre) 0 1.4 Mi. IIII,,:I L 589TH ST S> > FF m < >a a eTrH sT >t tt SETH ST rn I- - L Q y e a q 35TH ST �7 J. t33RDST�Oo Q _ ST > Q S7RO F $» Q> 711 'u ai3iia CQre a 79TH ST fm kr° e,m3 ir9iHy 'S7illiTm. 1 TTH T -a m A 1 d 1') 3 m glnaxalo� ) (1 1 Q 1 TYRO ST S 1> 1151STT L\ 1 ¢ n a r m T m 'r Z 31 1 m _ ..r 65i115i 1 63RD ST 1 33RD sr 9 ST � N \ Orate \ 1 500a (ILgp� \ TH ST- - 71ST 1 >a m 1 1 9 KIM N IT �PIP�B 1 o 1 61ST ST 1 q L 589TH ST S> > FF m < >a a eTrH sT >t tt SETH ST rn I- - L Q y e a q 35TH ST �7 J. t33RDST�Oo Q _ ST > Q S7RO F $» Q> 711 'u ai3iia CQre a 79TH ST fm kr° e,m3 ir9iHy 'S7illiTm. 1 TTH T -a m A 1 d 1') 3 m glnaxalo� ) (1 1 Q 1 TYRO ST S 1> 1151STT L\ 1 ¢ n a r m T m 'r Z 31 1 m _ ..r 65i115i 1 63RD ST 1 33RD sr 9 ST � N \ Orate \ 1 500a (ILgp� \ TH ST- - 71ST 1 >a m 1 1 9 m 1 65TH ST 3P 1 1 1 61ST ST 1 53RD ST 4 III 3 V 01 -MO � y q Yf'i I( ` D ST q 49TH 6T -57TH ST > F BENT PINE OR a 1 9 IBRD sT —�'F 3P 55TH ST 1 Sl RD 3T 53RD ST 4 III I 1 V 01 -MO � y q Yf'i I( ` D ST 49TH 6T �- `I' 1 AA yyy!!r jjj .1"nD118`4 0 VM(TIS lig 9 9 '. IBRD sT —�'F 3P I aAYp0 INDIAN k j-I—# RIVER - SHORES D ST IST ST — 5]LaaS I .1"nD118`4 0 VM(TIS lig