HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-03-2020 NRB AgendaCQY OF
SEBASTzt
�I
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, March 3rd, 2020 - 6:00 P.M.
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FL
"To improve the quality of life in Sebastian by nurturing
the balanced relationship between our citizens and our environment by
protecting, preserving and promoting our natural resources"
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. CLOSE REGULAR MEETING, OPEN CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP
(Board moves to audience seats)
AGENDA ATTACHED
V. CLOSE WORKSHOP, OPEN REGULAR MEETING
(Board moves back to seats)
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — ACTION ITEM
February 4th, 2020 Meeting Minutes
VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Item A. Board Member Positions Available
VIII. PUBLIC INPUT
IX. NEW BUSINESS
X. OLD BUSINESS
Item A. Earth Day & Arbor Day Celebration on Saturday, April 25th 9:OOAM-4:OOPM
i. Discuss event planning progress by department
ii.Determine next steps
XI. MEMBER MATTERS
XII. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA:
i. Finalize Earth Day & Arbor Day Celebration Plans
ii.Edward Donn Representative to address the Board
iii. Discussion Sustainable Sebastian Initiatives # 3 & 4
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS
AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY
AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. SAID APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITHIN TEN DAYS
OF THE DATE OF ACTION. (286.0105 F. S).
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THIS
MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (407)-589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.TWO OR
MORE ELECTED OFFICIALS MAYBE IN ATTENDANCE.
nFT cj
SEBA'S'r
AWL
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
Council Meetinq Date
Aqenda Item Title: IV
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD
AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM
March 3rd, 2020
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP AGENDA
Recommendation: Submitted for board Member review and discussion.
Backqround: The regular Natural Resources Board Meeting will close, and the workshop for
discussion of the conservation and coastal management elements of the comprehensive plan will
commence
If Aqenda Item Requires Expenditure of Funds:
Total Cost: n/a
Attachments: Workshop Agenda
Natural Resources Board
Conservation & Coastal Management Comprehensive Plan Element Review
March 3, 2020
Welcome, Introductions and Housekeeping
II. Purpose of the Workshop is to discuss high level goals and objectives related to conservation and
coastal management. Policies, though acknowledged, are considered implementation tools and
therefore, not part of this workshop. Certainly, any concerns or questions related to policies may be
noted. Today's comments will be summarized and used to inform Comprehensive Development Plan
decisions and policies as we consider all the Elements of the Plan.
(All information will be provided at Workshop)
Outline: Break Into Small Groups For Discussion And Review Of Similar Topic Obiectives
Goal 1. Protection and Conservation of Natural Resources
Objectivel.l
Protection of Resources
Objective 1.2
Protection of Wetlands
Objective 1.3
Protect Native Vegetation
Objective 1.4
Improve Water Quality and Quantity
Objective 1.5
Protect Air Quality
Objective 1.6
Protections of Shoreline and Public Access to Shoreline
Objective 1.7
Minimize Soil Erosion
Objective 1.8
Mining and Mineral Excavation Activities
Objective 1.9
Tree Protection and Preservation
Objective 1.10 Green Infrastructure and Sustainability
Goal 2. Coastal Management and Resiliency
Objective 2.1 Coastal High -Hazard Area
Objective 2.2 Maintenance of Floodplain
Objective 2.3 Hurricane Evacuations
Objective 2.4 Post -Disaster Redevelopment
Objective 2.5 Establish an Adaption Action Area Overlay District
Objective 2.6 Continuing Evaluation of Conservation and Coastal Management Element
Effectiveness.
V. Discussion Questions for Consideration of Small Groups
a. Which natural resource do you value the most based on your group of topics?
b. What ideas do you have to protect this resource?
c. What is the largest obstacle to conserving/ protecting this natural resource in Sebastian?
VI. Close Workshop
CMDF
SEBAST
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD
- AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
Council Meetinq Date: March 3rd, 2020
Aqenda Item Title: IV. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
Recommendation: Submitted for board Member review and discussion
Backqround: Strikethrough and underline version of the proposed element goals and objectives as
submitted by Kimley-Horn consultants on 2/21/20
If Aqenda Item Requires Expenditure of Funds:
Total Cost: n/a
Attachments: Proposed draft of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Comprehensive Plan
CUT 4"(
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD
", ; AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM
HOME OF PELICAN 1 LANCE
Board Meetinq Date: March 3rd, 2020
Aqenda Item Title: IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- ACTION ITEM
Recommendation: Submitted for Board Member approval
Backqround:
If Aqenda Item Requires Expenditure of Funds:
Total Cost: n/a
Attachments: Minutes from regular board meeting held on February 4th, 2020
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 4, 2020
I. Chairman Stadelman called the Natural Resources Board to order at 6:00 p.m.
II. Pledae of Allegiance was recited by all.
III. Roll Call
Present:
Mr.
Carrano (a)
Mr.
O'Neill
Ms.
Mosblech
Mr.
Stadelman
Ms.
Brothers
Ms.
Ware
Ms.
Callaghan
Absent:
Ms. Lovell -- Excused
Also Present:
Kim Haigler, Environmental Technician
Robert Loring, Senior Planner
Janet Graham, Technical Writer
IV. Aooroval of Minutes
Mr. Stadelman asked if there were any corrections/changes to the Minutes of the January
7, 2020 meeting as presented. Hearing none, Mr. Stadelman called for a motion. A
motion to approve the January 7, 2020 Minutes as presented was made by Ms.
Callaghan, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, and passed unanimously via voice vote.
V. Announcements
A. Board Member Positions Available
Ms. Haigler stated there is one board member alternate position available. Interested
parties may contact the City Clerk for application information.
Ms. Haigler also introduced Robert Loring, who is the City's new Senior Planner. Mr.
Loring has vast experience as a planner. He also holds degrees in architecture and
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD PAGE 2
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2020 MEETING
historic preservation. He has also been involved in rewriting tree ordinances. She stated
he will be a great asset to implementing the Sustainable Sebastian initiative.
VI. Public Inout
• Graham Cox, Sebastian reviewed that sometime ago the Pelican Island Audubon
Society worked on a document containing the City's landscape ordinance that is
presently in effect and the model ordinance done by the Native Plants Society and
put them both in one document side-by-side so that they can be compared.
Ms. Haigler stated she distributed copies of that document to all the Board
members last summer. She stated this document was a big help. She will also
distribute it to anyone on the Board who was not a member last summer.
VII. New Business
A. Nomination of Integrated Pest Management Sub -Committee
Mr. Stadelman stated that the Natural Resources Board (NRB) has been asked to
participate in the Integrated Pest Management Sub -Committee activities for their input.
Ms. Haigler described that the NRB is being asked to provide three members of the NRB
to be part of a committee that is going to meet every Wednesday beginning February 12.
An integrated pest management plan is going to be developed for Sebastian's parks and
other City properties.
Ms. Brothers inquired as to who else will be part of the Committee. Ms. Haigler stated
she will be part and Brian Benton, Director of Leisure Services. Other community
members will also be asked to participate. The meetings will be 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. on
Wednesdays. This plan needs to be implemented quickly, as there has been a
moratorium on the parks, and the parks have been seriously invaded by pests. This plan
needs to be organized and finalized so that it can be presented to City Council on April
8th_
Ms. Brothers volunteered to participate as well as Mr. Carrano and Mr_ O'Neill. Ms.
Callaghan stated that this is her area of expertise. However, she will be out of the country
during most of March, but she will have access to email and, if her input is desired, she
would like to participate that way.
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD PAGE 3
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2020 MEETING
Ms. Ware inquired if other Board members may attend these meetings even if they are
not part of the Sub -Committee. Ms. Haigler stated the meetings are open to the public,
so anyone may attend.
VIII. Old Business
A. Sustainable Sebastian, Discussion of Goals and Tasks for:
Initiative 1: Support overall reduction in the use of single -use plastics
by the City of Sebastian and its business community by assisting and
promoting Keep Indian River Beautiful/Keep Brevard Beautiful's
Littler Quitter and Surfriders' Ocean Friendly Restaurants programs,
and through the identification of alternative products.
Initiative 2: Support Landscaping practices that promote a healthy,
native ecosystem by assisting and promoting Keep Indian River
Beautiful's Lagoon -Friendly Lawns and University of Florida IFAS
Florida -Friendly Landscape programs.
Mr. Stadelman reviewed that at the last meeting Board members were tasked with coming
up with two objectives and how those objectives can be attained. He called on Board
members to make their comments and suggestions.
Ms. Haigler explained that these initiatives are open for discussion. The language set
forth in this agenda item is taken directly from the Resolution, but these initiatives are
open for discussion and not limited to what is in the Initiatives language.
Mr. Stadelman described the initiatives listed in the Sustainable Sebastian Resolution.
Ms. Callaghan has three goals, the first of which is getting 50 percent of the restaurants
licensed in Sebastian to agree to achieve the bronze level as defined in the Litter Quitter
program. The tasks associated with that goal would be to create literature such as
brochures, etc. Next would be to disseminate that literature, not only to the businesses,
but to the school systems and other groups such as the Elks and others in an attempt to
educate as many as possible about this project. She also suggested running an article
in the newspaper as another way to reach the public. All of the licensed food
establishments in Sebastian would also need to be visited_ Information should also be
posted on the NRB website.
Mr. O'Neill stated that the bronze level is very easy to achieve. Eliminating plastic straws
will get the participants to the bronze level. Eliminating plastic bags will get the
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD PAGE 4
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2020 MEETING
participants to the silver level. Using biodegradable cups will get participants to the gold
level.
Ms. Callaghan stated it is important to attach a timetable to these goals. Ms. Haigler
suggested a goal of getting 50 percent of the restaurants to attain the bronze level in the
next year. It was the consensus of the Board that that is an achievable goal.
There was extended discussion among the Board members regarding how to proceed
with attaining the goals as outlined in the initiatives.
One suggestion was made by Mr. O'Neill to emphasize the Litter Quitter program by
promoting the phrase, SBC, S --straws, B --bags, C --cups as an easy way for people to
remember what the initiative is about. It was the consensus by Board members and staff
that this is an excellent suggestion.
It was decided that the goal would be 50 percent signup of the businesses in the CRA in
the program during the first year. The task would be for volunteers to individually contact
the businesses with a folder containing information relative to achieving the different
levels of the Litter Quitter program.
Regarding the Surfrider program, Ms. Haigler stated their information will be included in
the packets that are given out.
Mr. Loring also suggested contacting the Chamber of Commerce as the first business to
approach, as they have a lot of resources to help in reaching out to businesses. Ms.
Brothers volunteered to contact the Chamber.
Mr. O'Neill mentioned a gentleman who handles the Litter Quitter account for Edward
Donn & Company as a person who would be a valuable resource for City Hall to become
more sustainable. Ms. Haigler suggested having him come to a meeting. Mr. O'Neill will
reach out to this gentleman in this regard.
Ms. Haigler described the process that is needed to change over to sustainable products
at City Hall, who should set the example.
Ms. Callaghan went on to describe her second goal, that being banning the use of single -
use plastics during City events on City property. Mr. Loring stated in the short term that
could be done as a policy, and then sometime in the future make it a City Council
actionable item.
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD PAGE 5
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2020 MEETING
Ms. Haigler also announced that it is a goal of the City to have a bottle -refill station in
Riverview Park before Earth Day and with the ultimate goal of having those stations at all
City parks.
Extensive discussion commenced among the Board and staff regarding the policy of
banning single -use plastics at City events and City -sponsored events and how the policy
will be implemented.
Ms. Mosblech suggested establishing a task for setting the use of a certain percentage
of single -use plastics to be replaced by sustainable items in City Hall. She also suggested
updating the contracts of vendors attending events in the City.
Ms. Callaghan suggested addressing the problem of plastics and trash on the barrier
islands through the "No Trace Left Behind" program. Ms. Haigler stated she would list
that as Goal #3 and would contact Emily Dark, who is involved with the Leave No Trace
program.
Regarding Initiative 2, Ms. Ware suggested the NRB reach out to other local groups in
the area who are pushing different programs. She gave an example of the Native Plant
Society and the various brochures they have for distribution.
Ms. Haigler stated she was in contact with the IFAS extension office. They have a folder
with lots of literature with information regarding lawn care, etc. They also have a schedule
of their workshops. She obtained 100 of these folders and added the information from
them to the information she already has regarding this project. She made it into a "new
homeowner packet" that she distributes when she makes the final inspection on a new
home. She will contact the Master Gardeners and the Extension Office to request the
folders and the literature that goes into them. She will ask for volunteers to stuff the
folders so that they can be handed out on Earth Day.
Mr. O'Neill inquired whether there are links on the NRB's website to these various other
groups that have been discussed_ Ms. Haigler stated that currently there are links to KIRB
for the lagoon -friendly lawns and for the IFAS websites. She asked for input on links to
other groups that can be included on the website.
Ms. Haigler asked Mr. Loring to explain a little bit about Task C under Goal #3 of the
Implementation Plan. He stated that a program that he was involved with in the past in
Palm Bay was recognizing someone who had a prize lawn. A door hanger was placed
which said, "We Noticed." This was a way to tell people that the City recognized their
efforts. In furtherance of that program, a plaque was given, and the individual got to shake
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD PAGE 6
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2020 MEETING
the mayor's hand. Ms. Haigler suggested when the "We Noticed" sign is placed
information could be listed on the back as to the different steps necessary to becoming a
Florida -Friendly Lawn.
Mr. O'Neill brought up the Surfriders Ocean -Friendly program and the vast information
they can provide. Ms. Haigler said that could be added to the links on the website.
Mr. Carrano inquired whether there is a list of grants that are available. Ms. Haigler stated
she has a whole spreadsheet identifying the grants and the attendant information relative
to applying for them. She will consult with City staff and see where City Council is on the
subject of grants.
B. Earth Day & Arbor Day Celebration on Saturday, April 25th at 9:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m.
Discuss event planning progress by department
Ms. Haigler stated she has a flyer completed except for entertainment. Mr. O'Neill stated
he has oral commitments from the musicians, but he has not gotten any contracts back
yet. He will get with the relevant parties and notify them that, if they want to be included
in the flyers, there is a deadline to be met.
Ms. Haigler said the applications have been posted online. There will also be applications
available in her office.
Ms. Mosblech said she will be sending out the retail vendor sheets and the food vendor
sheets along with the fire permits. Ms. Haigler explained how this is handled through a
Google Drive account.
Ms. Ware suggested preparing an informational flyer describing a poster contest so that
it could be presented to the schools after this Earth Day Celebration but before the end
of this school year_ The contest would run during the next school year and winners would
be decided on Earth Day 2021.
Determine Sustainable Sebastian promotional products for
Celebration
After discussion among staff and Board members, it was determined that the following
will be ordered:
STRIKETHROUGH COMPILATION OF
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS
CHAPTER CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS,
OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
§5-1 CONSERVATION ■ COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS, GUEGIIVES,
AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES. This s&c-#on stip u lafe-s-ga-1,11s,
.. - .. - . . peliGiesthe . . - u - . Elemont•
66FiI • . ,• •
Goal -5-1: Protection and Conservation of Natural Resources. QGGstGl
MGRGgeMeRt rocfrir f IJo 1eIGPMeRf GlGfiVifioc thGf W G ild dGPRGge r�rr
�
dos+r„„ GGGSt.-I reSG irGeS GRd r,r„+off huMGR lam, fe GRd limit publi-_
8XPe dif iroc iR Groac ✓ubjeGt to d8S# GfiGR h„ RGf irGl dicGcferc. The coastal
community of Sebastian shall conserve, protect, and appropriately manage
the Citv's natural eeasta! resources G -Rd limit public eXl9e di+ .r^3 in arees
s Mort tG r e5# GtiGR by fIGGd rich GRd RGt m' r-disGstorc in order to enhance
the auality of life and auality of natural systems within the community.
Obiective 1.1: Protection of Resources. The protection of the Citv's natural
resources and habitats will improve the health of the natural environment for
the community.
Policv 1.1.1Objective 5-1.1: Protection of coastal resources, wet' T
estuaries 1*y*nn murine ree - wcec fisheries Wildlife, and wildlife habitats. BY
DeGembor 31, 1998 The Citv shall continue to reauire heve edGOfed land
development regulations (LDRs) which include performance criteria which
that limits disturbance of seagrass beds, wetlands, and habitats of
endanaered or threatened species. The performance criteria shall protect
fisheries, wildlife, and wildlife habitats from the adverse impacts of
development by regulating the location, density, and intensity of those
activities which cause the adverse impact. The City shell eRferGe these lGR-c
s,-f-.4ohnr, River \ Gter MIGIRrvOeMont Difrit(SiR\/ IMIDl GRGI the StGte iR
W emefiRO igreteGtieR of fishers wildlife, GRIGI wildlife hGbitats. In erder fe
WeVeRt 4IGI iiRd' Of QriVGte oreoerf„ riohfc, The Citv's LDRs shall recoanize the
rights of property owners to use their lands in a manner consistent with the
rules, policies, and Guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Tie
PC Me. 10
-- --- - ---- -- -- -- ----
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20
-
-- - -- - - - -- --- deed- --- --- -
lZ
-- -le-val i - - -- -deed - - -
a. -- peteRtidly GdveFse iMpg-GtSef develepmeRt---
- - - - - - •• - • - • wetlGRds - . - d - d - . - . . - or • • -
d .- -. d.u-. d 9LJG!ity by ••- - •- StGrM WGtor mmOgeMeR
PI -IR •- - - -- - bGsis fer deed •- reguietery meGsures -
Reed -d - --- d e the StGrPR WGIter .--•--e--e• • - d • -
b. The - d . . meGsuFes reGGmmeRded . the std..wGter.. d . d d - .. - .
GempreheRSiVe PIGIR d d •imprgvemeRtsGhedule.
- d - .. - . dGriteriG . . - - - • • - - - - .. d . d
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20
Rd -- - -- - - --- - - - - - OrGfeGf
iRGlUde 0erfGrMGRGe GriteriG deSiGIRed tG reQUIGIte GGIGiRSt IG
--
- ---- GGfivities whiGh Gdversely imiqGGtw--r -
fhrE?GfeR the -- teFM eXiSteRGe -f 'GkeS --- 8#UGHRe Gr-GGreGS SLJGh -
IS
teQether with GdiGGeRt eRViFGRmeRtGllV- trGRSiti9R GreGs The
-- 19rGt8Gt fh8Se GGG#Gl- --- d8trimeRtGl
--- ef develeigmeRt-.Wet'-Rd --li be defiRed es setby
Wet'GRds ether thOR eigigreved igIossive reGreGfiGR, WeR SI9GC-,--
rE?S#iGteGl-- - RGItYrGl StGrM
-- -- RGItUrGl i9reserve, - or j.milar Gigigreved uses
Policv 1.1.2 1.1.5 5-1.1.2: Protect the Lakes, Estuarine Areas, and the
Indian River Lagoon. By DeGembor 31, 1992, The Citv's Iai2Fd
deVeIGOPAeRt reQ lGfiGRs LDRs shall include performance criteria
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20
designed to regulate against land development activities which
adversely impact water auality, contribute to shoreline erosion and
sedimentation, or otherwise threaten the Iona -term existence of lakes
and estuarine areas such as living marine organisms, seaarass, coastal
marsh, and mangroves. The City shall GdGpt GPReRded continue to
reauire irnd .-eyel^pmen+ reg UlGti ns LDRs which include performance
criteria mandating that the potential impacts of proposed shoreline
development be analyzed as part of the process and prior to approval
of a development permit or development order. The applicant shall
bear the burden of demonstrating that potential adverse impacts on
estuarine resources have been or shall be prevented. The review
process for all proposed development that fronts on Indian River Drive
shall involve all local, State, and regional entities with reaulatory
. r;;^+^rG' authority. Impacts to be considered shall include the
following but not be restricted to:
• prevent estuarine pollution;
• control surface water run off;
• reduce exposure to natural hazards;
• protect living marine resources;
• ensure adequate public access; and
• ensure adequate sites and standards for regulating water -dependent
and water -related uses.
Policy Protect, Stabilize, and Enhance the Estuarine Shorellin
DeGemb-
- IQ- -Of QQQ1- • - - - - --- - -
-- ---- -- --- -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - - -- --
- --- he 8St1JGFiRe ShGFeliRe shGI1 be reqlJiFed tG FeVegetGte, stGbil4e,
SpeGieS WhiGh'
HGrdeRiRg - - estyGlFiRe sheFeliReith • rap, lbulkheGGIS eF ethe
-- - -- - -- -- -- - - -- - - - - -- • - - -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 4
- -I --- - --- I Y --- 11- - - -- -- - - --
deSigR Gf clruGtures shGI!Gppreved by Gs well Gs by
_ -O • • -- - -- -_ - • th
- --_ - --_ -_ - -_--_-
nt prim
-- -- -- - - - - ---- -- -
--- - - -- -- --- ---- --- -- --- -- --
IN M111 P -01-01M V_ W
_- IN
--.._._- - • _-
•• •-.-
Policy 1.1.3 1.1.6 5-1.1.4: Protect Living Marine Resources, Coastal Marsh,
Estuarine Water Qualitv, and Seagrass Beds. By DeGernbor 31, 1997 The
City shall adept continue to reauire IGRd deve'^^mor+ LDRs
which include performance criteria which shall regulate against adverse
impacts of development on seagrass beds and coastal marsh areas.
Since these areas are sensitive to increased turbidity and other forms of
pollution, water run-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regulated
through effective water quality management criteria. Given the
hvdroloav of the area, it is encouraaed that there be the development of
a pollutant load model based off of the recommendations outlined in the
City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prer)ared By: Kimley-Horn and
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20
Associates, Inc., March 2019 (Coastal Resiliency Plan). The
deVelr,PPReRt Feg IGItiGRs LDRs shall require that plans for development
impacting marine resources be coordinated, with state agencies having
jurisdiction. The I shGI1 be enditinned 1 pen the r pp'i. GRt
or publihGViRg it irisdiGfir,r,
Policy 1.1.4 1.1.7 5-1.1.5: Manage Impact of Coastal Development on
Tidal Flushing and Circulation Patterns. Tidal flushing and circulation
patterns generally shall not be altered by development activities. No
development shall produce changes in the tidal flushing and
circulation patterns unless the City and other public agencies having
jurisdiction have granted requisite permits. No such permit shall be
granted by the City unless all other agencies having jurisdiction have
granted clearance and the applicant has submitted hydrographic
information sufficient to clearly demonstrate that no adverse
environmental impacts shall be occasioned by the proposed changes
in tidal flushing and circulation patterns. Finally, no alteration in tidal flow
shall be permitted which causes stagnation or siltation.
_ A. City
FeqUiF_ _ _ . of the irnpGGt of _ _ _ u _ _ _ _ _ _
erder te further the prepGgatieR ef fish GRd, wildlife Gs well P u -.b -.l i-,.
FeGFeGtiGR O
Policv 1.1.5 1.1.9 6-1.7.5: Protection of Manatee Habitats. The Citv shall
promote protection of manatee habitats in a manner consistent with
Guidelines of the Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI) of the FWC.
MGriRe ReSeGrch Inctitute of the StGte De�cI rOfl=R��irn� IFG TrPReRtGT
PrGteGtiGR.. For instance, the Citv shall comply with the following State
Guidelines:
• The Citv of Sebastian shall assist Indian River Countv, FDEP, #4e
[DeO IrtRgeRt of ERVirGRPR8RtPVI DrGteGti i4& U.S. CICh GIRGI Wildlife
cue USFWS, FWC, and other State and federal agencies, in
developing an area -specific manatee protection Dlan and
marina siting plan in order to ensure Iona-ranae manatee and
habitat Drotection.
• Permit applications for all boating facilities, includina sinale familv
docks and dry storage, shall be evaluated in the context of
cumulative impacts on Manatees and marine resources.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 6
• Construction and expansion of multi -slip dockina facilities and boat
ramps shall be directed to locations where there is auick access to
deep, open water, where the associated increase in boat traffic will
be outside the areas of hiah manatee concentration, and where
wetlands supporting manatee habitat will not be disturbed.
• The Citv shall assist BE-P—FWC in distributina State publications and
educational materials on coastal and marine resource
conservation, and manatees in particular, to boaters, and assist the
disdav of such materials.
• Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted, with or without channel
exemptions as appropriate, in areas frequented by manatees.
Enforcement of speed
zones should be improved.
The Citv shall assist QE -R FWC in Orotectina manatees from iniury and
disturbance resulting from aquatic commercial and recreational
activities. M'"'RGteo fGGd FeQ iiFePReRfc shrtill be GGRS;deFed in nil
GGI GfiG 19W1PYr1/'V
1GI t G1eP E?Rt GGtiVifioc WheFe PRGIRGIteec RgGY GGG it
�F7
• The Citv shall assist DER FWC in ensuring the protection of habitat of
special significance to manatees.
Obiective 1.2: Protection of Wetlands. The value of wetlands for
maintaining water auality, storing floodwater, reducing erosion, and
orovidina wildlife habitat has been proven. The Citv shall implement
policies that limit adverse impacts or alterations to wetlands and surface
waters to the areatest extent possible.
Policv 1.2.1: Wetland Protection. Wetlands shall be defined as set by 373.421
F.S. and 373.019(27) F.S. and shall be protected from Ohvsical or hvdroloaic
alterations in order to maintain natural functions. The Citv shall maintain LDRs
including performance standards designed to
protect, conserve, and enhance wetlands and other natural resources,
including estuarine environmental quality, bv:
• Directina incompatible land uses awav from wetlands
F8GIeVeIr+OPAeRt „r, wetlGIRGIS i- RGI 8St GFioc; Maintaining or improving
estuarine environmental auality by improving storm water management
by commencing a storm water management Dlan identified iR PeliGy ,I_
moi. The Dlan shall Drovide a basis for adoDtina reaulatory measures for
enhancing estuarine water auality and shall identify capital improvements
needed to improve the storm water management system. This would include
a City-wide evaluation to update the numerical model with the latest
datasets identified in the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 7
- - - WIN-
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
uu--- -- -- ----- -- -- - - -- - -- - --
e. Minimizin-- -- - -- ---- - -- ------ - --- -- --
ret. - - - - WINE - - - ■ - ♦ - _ NO 01-01 - 11111 _ - ■ ■ ■
Policv 1.2.1 1.1.2 b-1 �3: Reauired Dedication of Conservation Easements
or Reservations. By DeGe or 31, 199F The GitV ShG" rvrv,eRd G-ontinue-t-a
+rGRsitieR GFeGS. The Citv shall (grneRd maintain #fie SubdivisieR
crdiRGIRGe GIRd the Wet'GlRd PreservGtieR Ord RGIR e reaulations $-e that
provide for the dedication of conservation easements or reservations
where the Citv finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect
the value and function of a wetland.
Policv 1.2.2 1.1.3 6-1.4.4: Wetland Delineation Establishina the Wetland Line.
Beoirlrlino in januGry 1998, The City shall include in the LDRs a requirement
that anv development fh me is the GriteriG iR PGI GV � 1A.1 Pape, 5 1.1-A
shall conduct a wetlGRd delineation of the landward extent of wetlands
and other surface waters.
The landward extent of wetlands and other surface waters shall be field
delineated and flaaaed by shGli be estGblished bGsed u)^- -- ---site flab'
survey y a professional biologist Gr reoistered enoiRe r provided by the
applicant and formally approved by GeGrdiRGted with the St. Johns River
Water Manaaement District (SJRWMD), S-�4ohns RiVeF WGter nor r,r- QeMeRt
Di fit, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and/or
the US Armv Corps of Enaineers (USACE). F irfhermero the r eyelGOMe t
fURGtions, jz
Policv 1.2.3 1.1.4 6-1.4.5: Administration of Wetland Development
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 8
Restrictions. BY DeGember 1999, 31, 1999, The Citv shall
GRqeRd continue to reauire that its LDRs lGRd deVelG19R eRt ^ t-9 include
performance criteria which limits igrehibits the development of wetlands.
The Citv shall hGve Gdeigted continue to reauire LDRs !Gnd develeorneR
FeQUIGIti which implement the followina:
1 Review PFGeess. The Citv shall coordinate with toe state and
federal reaulatory iUFi8diGtiG aaencies for purposes of
renderina legal, eauitable, and environmentally sensitive
determinations of the development rights to be permitted on
such wetlands and/or lands under the iurisdiction of the State or
3.
Federal aovernment. The developer of the parcel of
environmentally sensitive land shall be responsible for
obtaining permits or exemptions from the FDEP PleridG
floraG14mor t ^f ERVi1FGRRgeR4Gl PFGteGfi^R PEP)and from the I Ic
ArrnyGerr, Gf ERGiReerc USACE, as may be appropriate, Driorto
obtainina a development order or development Dlan review
aDDroval from the Citv. Reaardless of Dermittina by Federal or
State Dermittina aaencies, the Citv shall reserve the richt to
determine the aDDroDriate land use, density/intensity, and
special mitigation measures includina, but not limited to, the
construction of culverts or other means.
BYFdeR GR the AopliGGRt. The aDDlicant shall bear the burden of
Droof in determining that develoDment shall not adverselv impact
wetlands, transitional wetlands, and other environmentally fragile
natural systems. The molicant shall Drove that the tvpe, value,
function, size, and condition of the wetland will not be adverselv
impacted, such determinations shall be based on Dhvsical and
biological data obtained from specific site investigations by a
bioloaist, an enaineer or by another Drofessional competent in
producing data and analvsis necessary to suDDort impact
assessments.
- ■--- ---- - - -------rar-er_ts .tea
demonstrate that anv wetland desianations within the confines of
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 9
their property no lonaer function as wetlands.
4 WGiyer fer MGrQiRGI Wet! vRdS If MifigGterd_ For small isolated
marginal wetlands that the developer is providing viable
compensatory preserve areas which mitigate against a loss of
viable wetland systems, the Citv may waive the preservation
requirements, in and only in, the case of an overriding Dublic
interest.
Pollocy 1.1.10 6-1.8.1 . Manaqe the impacts of Development on Fosher*es.
Th8 94Y ShIG111 iRGGrI9GPGte- - -r GGGrGliRGfiRQ - the FlGridG
revie-WiRCI tho iMIDliGIGItieRs- develwMeRt - --- - - - -- - --- --
develeigmeRt -- --- -- hGbitGts --- fisheries.The City shell iRGGrI9GrGte
I9E?rfGrMGRGe StIGIRGIGrIGIS- - --- d8','8lGI9MeRf reQUlGfiGRS- - Gre - - - --- -- - - --- -- - --- -- --- ----- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i-.- No I =*- 011
r - - - r - r - - r - The Gitv shGlifurther i9rGteGt wbidlife - - - wildlife
---tGts by I9FGMGtiRQ the d8diGGtiGR Gf GGRservGfien -- ----- -
Poky 1.1.12 6-1.8.3. Protec-flon of L*Anq Madne Resources. The City sh t
urbidity - r - etheF ferms - igellutieR, wetor- r - r - - - r -
w--rwGter - -
lity
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 10
- - - -- - -- -- - -- --- - - --- - - - - -- - --
--- -- - - - -- --- - - -- -- -- -- ---- - - --- -- -
--- - ---- - - - -- - --- -- - _-
-
-- -- - - --- - - - - • • - --
ei9portuniti-e-s,
Obiective 1.3 4-.2 7: Protect Native Veaetation and marine h.ibkits
B8Qinninrti in Irtini GrY 1999, The Citv shGll MGiRfGin lGRd deVeIGPPR of
req ietiens whir T ierfermGIRGe Griterie deSir- Red fry values the
protection and retention of maior veaetative communities and shall
implement policies that protect native habitats, conserve environmental
lands, minimizes effects of environmental pollution, and increases awareness
of efforts of non-native habitat species.
Policv 1.3.1 1I� 6-1.7.1: Implementina Protection of Veaetative
Communities and Marine Habitats. The Citv's LDRs, I GIRd devel„r,monf
reoulati , includinq the adopted Tree Protection and Landscape
Requlations, of the City's I Gnd Deyeleigmenf (cede shall be used in
manaaina and protectinq the impacts of development on maior veaetative
communities and marine habitats. These regulations shall mandate
restoration in order to compensate for unauthorized removal of vegetation
and to enhance stabilization of fragile slopes and/or shorelines impacted by
development.
EM ■ - rZYMN moi-r•r•_rr_
--- -- ------ -- - -- - ------ -- -- --- -- --ME-
- - - - - - ---- - -
Policv 1.3.2 4-.2-.2 6-1.7.2: Preservation of Native Plant Communities. The Citv
shall GMeRd reauire the LDRs to
oRSUFe b in GGM0liGRGe with the GeGst ReCliGRGI Dlrvnninry GGYRGil
ReQiGRGl GGmr,reheRSiV e PGliGY PIGIR (PeliGy 10.1 .2.2) mandate that new
development set aside, as a minimum 25 percent of each native plant
community (Gs ideRtifie d in the f GtG'RyeRtery GRd RGlysis) GGnservrvfinn
Gl�Tt ChGoter 61. The ordinance shall provide incentives for increased
conservation of native plant communities determined by the Treasure Coast
Reaional Plannina Council (TCRPC) to be "regionally rare or endanaered."
S Gh GIR iRGeRtiVe E)FG FGPR FRGY inr`li de fGr iRStGRGe GIR exGhGRoe which
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 11
&a - - - r--TJw - ---
QrGURd Or. PurJJ
The City may reauire payment of a fee in lieu of the
ebeve described mandatory "set aside" of habitat. Such cash Davment may
be in the form of an impact fee in lieu of habitat preservation to be
accumulated from development for the Durchase of upland habit
preservation off-site rather than on-site. Other adiustments may only be
aranted where compensatory mitigation is provided through reveaetation
with native Dlant species compatible with existing plant communities.
. - GGFe Gf the
Policv 1.3.3: Protection of Native Habitats and Natural Resources. The City
shall Drotect significant native habitats through its LDRs and review
Drocess including the following:
• Preserve existing native veaetation and natural areas including
threatened native habitats
• Encouraae development forms that Drovide protection of significant
native habitats such as clustered development and alternative
roadway desians (i.e., reduced rights-of-wav)
• Development shall first avoid impact to significant native habitats
• Mitigate adverse impacts whenever areas of native habitats are
involved in the development of DroDerty
• Reauire development to first impact lower auality habitats and
resources before impacts to hiaher auality habitats and resources are
considered and used
• Native habitat shall be used whenever possible to fulfill open space
reauirements
• Protect environmentally sensitive/significant areas (i.e., floodplain,
watersheds, water recharge areas, etc).
Policv 1.3.4 4-.2-.3 6-1.7.3: Removal of Undesirable Exotic Veaetation. The City
shall amend the adopted Tree Protection Ordinance as may be required to
reauire that, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occuoancv for a new
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 12
development; the owner/applicant shall remove all nuisance and invasive
exotic vegetation as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council
(FLEPPC) on the subiect property.
Policv 1.3.5 1.2.4 61.7.4: Removal of Trees Causina Safetv Hazard. The Citv's
chrvll Gmend ifc IGRd deyeleornenf req !!bens LDRs shall to require that trees,
such as Australian Pines, that are prone to wind damaae and blockage of
evacuation routes be removed from areas deemed by the Citv to be critical
corridors for evacuation purposes. This shGII be imr,lomonteGI
r`GRG irrTenf with the rvbeye stGted r)r)IiGy 6_1 7 r
.7 �)e!iG � 5 1.2.2. In addition,
the Citv shall consider the feasibility of imitating a similar program to remove
anv trees on public property which impose a critical threat -to
evacuation routes.
Obiective 1.4 4-:3 6-1.2: Improve Water Qualitv and Quantitv: BeQinninry in
jGRUGrV 1998, Tho "'it- chrvll mrvin+ruin IrvnrJ i lo\ioler�mon+ rorvi ilrvfir)nc Whii-h
rvddress \ Gter a GiitV GRd Q GRfitV thre qh the imr\lomeRtGtir\n of the
ac�-arc���ry-crr r. r-rr
fGIIGWiRQ
. It is the obiective of the Citv to maintain policies and
regulations which provide measures to protect and improve water auality and
ouantity.
Policv 1.4.1 444: Water Qualitv: In order to protect the water auality of the
Aquatic Preserve, no new point source pollution shall be permitted to
discharge into the laaoon or into ditches or canals flowinq into the laqoon. In
addition, in order to reduce non -point source Dollutants, IGRGI ,Io\,olr,r,mon+
reQuiGti LDRs shall iRGGPr,Grr to fho fr1IIG_'0Vinry r,orfGrmrvRGe c GRGIGFdS in
r\o IeF f eliN r\f the 94Y'c \A GteF rocr\i irr�oc GRGI comely with the
c�-y-�-�-rcrrc�--rc�o�rcc�-��rrcr
Indian Riker I GIGIGr,n SWIAA Phan, Indian River Lagoon Act, FDEP, SJRWMD, and
the Indian River Laaoon Comprehensive Conservation and Manaaement
Plan. The Citv shall require the followina: I GRGI G18V81r,9mon+ FeQ iIGtir,nc chGII
a. Surface water management systems shall be desianed and
constructed to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum the
storm water run-off generated from the first one -inch of rainfall over
the entire site. The cfGrrR \. GteP deSirvn StGRd hGI1 be orediGGteG1
GR the fE)IIGWiRQ'
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 13
b. A veaetated and functional littoral zone shall be established as part
of the surface water management system of lakes occurrina on all
property. Prior to construction of the surface water management
system for anv phase of a oroiect, the developer shall prepare a
desian and management plan for the wetland/littoral zone that will
be developed as part of these systems. The DIGR sh„ ld:
i IRGlude t igi�Gress se Vfienc of the si irf�e Geer MGRGqemeRt
wss"frehG',4inrti the I er�'A'GtE?r eleVGfiGR GIRGI fho _3 feet
GeRte it (i.e., belew GyerG e eleyGtieP
i . SigeGify hewyeaetGtieR is fry be estGblished within Chic
Gli irdiRQ the e4eRf, methed N19e Gpd timin
c. Class II Waters (i.e., coastal waterbodies which currently do or
have potential for supporting shellfish harvesting)
of fj, e lRdiGR River -Within the r'iWS Gerr,^rGte limitc h9s beeT
rlrssified by DEP GS r GIrss II WGterhe ) shall be protected
by incorporating and maintina the following provisions int -e the
Citv's LDRs IGR d rdeyeleigmeRt reo ilrfie :
i. Dredaina activities shall be limited to approved
maintenance dredaina and shall minimize adverse impacts
on shellfish propagation or harvestina. The Citv shall reauire
that fill and dredaina activities comply with all applicable
local, state, and federal reauirements.
ii. Ensure aood water auality by coordinatina with the FDEP
and the SJRWMD in monitorina the auality of storm water
run-off GR d rill /dlsGhGroe oreGesses wTOr�ese G Y e7S-
I-hGye ii irisdiGtiGn The QtY shG'' RGtifY the eigigreigriGte
ith l
eoeRGy gni une rdiGtieR Gs oeteRfiGl issues er i9reblems Gro
�
identified by the City The Citv's Gmonded
,develeorneRf reo ilGtieRs LDRs shall provide performance
criteria desianed to ensure that new development provides
effective and adequate storm -water management
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 14
improvements concurrent with the impacts of new
development.
iii. Continue to asses needs for retrofittina stormwater outfalls
without adeauate treatment.
iv. Limit the use of Class II waters to water dependent activities
that are not contrary to the public interest and satisfy a
community need,
v. Limit modification of arass beds only to those cases
involvina overridina Dublic interest.
- . • nutriont. ShGI1 be
G. _. G.
TTRl�
mitiqGtive teGhRiQues
b8RthiG GeRditieRS-
FeQeReFG#G-R-.
threyoh (G) Gbe
Policv 1.4.2'6-1.2.2: Reaulate Agricultural Activities to Preserve Water
Qualitv. The Citv's ' G RGI i- eVeIGORgeRt req ,i.ti+r.-.LDRs shall include
stipulations reauirina that agricultural activities shall:
a. Not be conducted adiacent to existina waterways and surface water
management activities and shall comply with all applicable policies
of FDEP, SJRWMD, and other agencies having appropriate iurisdiction as
well as State laws, includina administrative rules aovernina the Indian
River Laaoon Aquatic Preserve. Such activities shall not threaten the
water auality of the Indian River Laaoon;
b. Maintain natural drainaae patterns;
c. Promote the use of surface water supplies for irrigation Durposes;
d. Prohibit the expansion of aaricultural activities into wetland areas, and
e. Use best management OrinciDles and Dractices in order to reduce
pesticide and fertilizer run-off, Drevent soil erosion, and preserve water
auality.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 15
■
. subdiViSiGIRS,as • m-ilv epd
. G . FesideRfiGl.. .
te ♦ 1;z.2(P) Gf the LGRGIDeVeIGPMeRt
the develeigmeRt.. .
QGURGil u . u .
Policv 1.4.3 1.3.4 6-1.2.5: Protect Deep and Surficial Aquifer Recharqe
Areas. The Citv has no prime deep aquifer recharge areas which have
been identified by the SJRWMD S#-4ohnc Riker WGfer AAGRGQemor,+
n'�. However, stipulations for protecting surficial aquifer recharge
areas shall be incorporated into the Citv's IGIRd ,-eyelel9r eRt
FeQUIGtiGRs LDRs which require retention of open space for all
development in order to:
• Preserve the auality and auantity of water resources within the surficial
aquifer,
• Promote improved surface water management; and
• Create natural or landscaped urban Green space for enhanced
community aesthetics and passive pedestrian activities.
Policv 1.4.4'6: Deep Aquifer Water Conservation. In order to
protect the quality and quantity of deep aquifer water resources, the
City shall coordinate with the St -.-John's River WGter PAGRGqor eRt
n"� SJRWMD and other applicable reaulatory aaencies in identifvina
the existence and location of free flowing deep aquifer wells and in
reauirinq corrective measures, including capping, plugginq, or installing
reaulatory devices which control the discharae of water from the deep
aquifer pursuant to the SJRWMD S#�-4ohnc River Wester AArvRGOeMeRt
n'� policies.
Policv 1.4.5 1.3.6 6-1.2.7: Protection and Conservation of Potable Water
Supply. By DeGe Y mor 31, 1992, Consistent with the Indian River Countv
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 16
Water Supply Plan, the Citv shall GMeRd continue to reauire the LDRs
IGRGI deVeIGr,- eRt FeQ IGtinns to 19'¢ incorporate performance criteria
for public potable water wellfield protection. In addition, administrative
procedures shall reauire applicants for development to coordinate with
the SJRWMD S4-4ohnc RiVeF Water MGRGGlo,,,ont Dic;lric4 in obtaining
consumptive use permits. In order to comply with potable water
conservation Dolicies of the S#4ohncliver WGIter n^GR "qe``'`'ont Dicfrie*
SJRWMD and achieve a reduction in the current rates of water
consumption, the Citv's LDRs shall
incorporate the followina performance standards:
a. Where reclaimed water is available, Dotable watersuDDlies may not be used
to meet irrigation needs.
b. Reauire the use of water-savina olumbina fixtures on all new
development.
c. In order to reduce demand for irrigation water (which in turn often places
greater demand upon Dotable water sources), at Jen.stleast thirty (30%)
percent of all landscaoina material obtained from off-site sources foruse
on anv site should be native plants. Further, at least fiftv (50%) Dercent of nil
trees used in landscaDina shall be native species in order to lessen water
demand.
Policv 1.4.6 1.3.7 6-1.2.8: Emerqencv Conservation of Water Sources.
The Citv shall coordinate with the &1�4ohnc RiVeF WGIter nnGRGQeY eRt
n'� TSJRWMDI in implementing emeraencv water conservation
measures based on the SJRWMD plans for management of the region's
water resources.
Policv 1.4.7 1.3.8 6-1.2.9: Manaqinq Land Use Surroundinq Water Well
Cones of Influence. BY DeGe or 31, 1999 The Citv's 4 Gdeot a`"''r, ed
hGVe iGRGI leyel.,r-,PReR+ FeQ IGti Rs LDRs shall which contain Derformance
criteria desianed to Orotect Dotable water suDDly and auality by restricting
land development within public water well cones of influence in order to
avoid Dotential adverse impacts on Dotable water resources.
Policv 1.4.8 Wig: Best Manaqement Practices. The Citv is susceptible to
impacts of future sea level rise and combined rain events that would cause
floodina based on data outlined in the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan. Best
Manaaement Practices to address flooding level of service violations and
water auality shall be devised and, aiven the hvdrologv of the area, it is
encouraged that there be the development of a pollutant load model. It is
also encouraaed that there be the hardenina of DumD-stations in order to
increase resiliency against flooding events.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 17
Obiective 1.5 4-:4 6-1.1: Protect Air Qualitv. B8QiRRiRQ it IGR Gr„ 1998, The
Citv shall MGitl ain land deVelGr,mor,f Fowl IGti1r-rAc i.RGI1 1diRQ— 0orfGrmr RGe
StGlR Ards wh;Gh ensure that development meets or exceeds the minimum
air auality standards established by the FDEP Fleride f eOGIrtrReRt r,f
ERVir„r,r,-,eR, Gl PrGteGti„r, PEP) and shall establish reaulatory Droarams to
prevent and/or minimize non -point sources of air Dollution (Rete: the G#Y
Policv 1.5.1 1.4.1 6-1.1.1: Combat Erosion and Generation of Dust Particles.
The Citv's LDRs I GIRd i-eVe'Gomonf reQ iIG iGRS shall incorporate
performance standards which combat erosion and aeneration of fuaitive
dust particles. The regulations shall reauire that measures be taken on
building sites or cleared areas which assure that ex -posed, destabilized, or
other altered soil is exDeditiously covered with an acceDtable erosion
control material.
Policv 1.5.2 1.4.2 2: Air Pollution and Land Use Reaulations. The Citv's
LDRs , includina adopted soil
erosion and sedimentation controls as well as nuisance abatement
standards, shall continue to Drotect aaainst loss of air auality by maintaining
land use controls which Dromote only activities compatible with existing
land uses and natural systems and Drohibit activities which Generate air
pollutants and other adverse impacts on the environmentally fragile coastal
ecosystem.
Policv 1.5.3 1.4.3: Transportation Investments. The Citv shall sumort maior
transportation investments that demonstrate an ability to substantially improve
mobility, encourage urban infill development, reduce traffic congestion and
improve air auality in Indian River County and the region in a cost-effective
manner.
Objective 1.6 4-.5 5-1�horeline Uses and Public Access To Shoreline,
Pry trr ectinEstuarine Shoreline And ConservResources-.rLand ,
Protection of Shoreline and Public Access to Shoreline. The City s
erif�On✓uring;rnplerneRtGtieR Gnd enferGomon+ of the GernpreheRsiye
PIGR Ir-vRd use peliGies fe recognizes the importance of prioritizing
shoreline uses includina Drotectina and Dreservina shoreline access,
water based facilities, and natural resources. This ebieGtive shGI1 b
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 18
Pll.�.1
- 11 - O■ 2
...r1R.T_T.ZtF..RThe WREPT-'GIVIe
G d . g _ IGRd . _ _ .. _ . requiations whiGh _ the wGter
-- O • • • r)rotectinq - shoreline. -
.b _ _ ShGI1 .4 imolepReRted .. ._ .Q 9
pormitting GgeRGiesebtGiRiRg GitY ... Newly prepesed
TtT-�T�iK7►-tS�Tllr ..... - .. - ... - - .... .. _ with
perfGr.... _ StGR.. dc clipulated■. _
G. PGFkiRg fGGilities fGr shGreliRe
■-
■- .. .
Policv 1.6.1: Natural Shoreline Svstems. The Citv shall promote natural
shoreline systems by utilizing the site and development process
to:
1. Discourage the hardening of the Indian River Lagoon and other natural
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 19
waterwav shorelines; this would include reauirinq an environmental impact
study and a special Citv Council variance for anv sea wall construction
2. Encourage the softening of the shorelines
3. Promote the installation of native vegetation and removal of existing
hardening structures
Policv 1.6.2: Public Access to Waterfront Areas. The Citv shall encourage
developers to provide public waterfront access adiacent to the
waterfront. Such access may include walkways, bikeways, water taxis,
canoeing/kavaking, public spaces, dining areas, and the like.
Policv 1.6.3: Conservation Easements. The Citv shall work with private
property owners to implement conservation easements to protect sensitive
natural resources such as mangroves, dune systems, and coastal tidal areas.
Policv 1.6.4: Florida Native Veqetation and Features. The Citv shall promote
the use of native Florida vegetation and protection of natural
features in coastal and waterfront development.
Policy 1.6.5 4,54: 5-1.2.1(2): Implementing Policies for Shoreline Land Uses.
The Citv's ' ',Rd deye!GpMeRt Feg lGti„r_s LDR's shall stipulate provisions
implementing shoreline land use priorities, including criteria for regulating
water -dependent and water -related shoreline land uses. The Citv's &hG-4
hGVe Gdeoted by DeGem r 31, 1997 lGRd deVeIGPPReRt FeQYlGtiGRs LDRs
shall which prohibit anv development within the wetland estuarine shoreline,
other than water dependent native shoreline vegetation programs,
approved pervious or elevated accessways, or other uses approved by the
Citv pursuant to other Citv regulations. spry" be permitted No structures
which constrict water circulation in the lagoon shall be permitted. The
FegUlGti LDRs shall address the following:
i. All applicants proposing development activities along the estuarine
shoreline or within submerged areas shall be required to submit a site
plan pursuant to site plan review regulations. SUGh Site PIGR ShG11 PFGVide
preposed fGRd YSeS GS WellGIS Fe'Gted-• -• GlGfiVity. The - -• ShG11
stipulat• 11 SSUrGRGesthe prepesed prejeGf- -
ly
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 20
+eGhRiq ies si Gh ns the use ef weirs for pure
mr„ he required bythe City. In addition, the City shall require surveys
of existing conditions, specifications of planned site improvements,
and techniques to be used during construction as well as in
operating and maintaining the land use in order to prevent damage
to living marine organisms.
b Water -Related Uses in State Coastal Bu*l *na Zones All water -related
uses shall be built on uplands landward of the floodway. Within the
State coastal building zone all construction activities shall be
predicated on plans compliant with applicable State and local building
codes. Dredging and filling of wetlands or open water in order to
accommodate water -related uses shall not be permitted unless the City
approves such activity pursuant to provisions of the wetland protection
ordinance, the storm water management ordinance, and all other
relevant site plan review criteria.
G. Cstuadne ShoFel*ne StF4etwes /WateF-geoe;aen�s /ithin the
die+Iry Rd es+i GriRe shereliRe Re deye!GpMeRt ether +hGR wGter
depeRden+ RGtiVe shGr lime reVegetGtiGR pregrGms Gppreyed pervie is
er ele,,Gted GGGeCs\A GY8 rvRd ether uses ppreyed by the City purava-t
to the Sterm \A Gter GR emery+ i-IRd Gleed Pre+eG4ir_n Q41-liRIGIRGe shG
rcrmc��vrrrr��r o g �rrrcrn�arra-rrc^..^a-rTvr�
be permit+ei l Hardening of the lagoon shoreline shall not be permitted
unless the upland property is critically imperiled, and the use of
vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline. The design specifications
of any shoreline hardening structure shall be implemented in the Citv's
I nR(Z
ont prim
TRGPRGgiRg
--- --- --- -- -- -- -
- - - _ - - - - - - -- &,f
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 21
d. Land Use Desi !c#c-n` in Submersed Lands and Wetian Js. No non -water
dependent uses shall be permitted on submerged lands or wetlands.
Development on uplands adjacent to wetlands shall preserve a buffer
known as the wetland transition area. d defined in the Sterm WG ter
AAGIRGgenc�ont c/id Gleed RreteGtiGR OrrdinrnGe. The specific boundary
of a wetland transition area shall be established by field investigation.
Similerly, ne stn Gt ares which GensfriGt \ eter GirG IGtion in the legeen
shell be permiffed
e. PFoteetion of We+l/vn d TFQnsition Arens Transition areas shall be
defined as the area separating wetland and upland areas and in
which development activities may be regulated to protect wetlands.
The transition zone is an area havinq a direct groundwater or surface
water influence. The transition area provides a buffer between
wetlands and upland development or other land alteration activities.
This area shall meet the minimum size requirements established by
SJRWMD for wetland buffers. The purpose of the transition zone is to
ensure the continuing function of respective wetland communities.
Thome ( hG11 retGin the right to prehihif i eyeleopneRf ithin tha
weflGRd tFGRSitiGn GFee the be iRdery ref e wetlGRd tFGRSitiGn GreG she!!
v�- crrr
she established by field iRVeStiQGtiE)n At a minimum the fell(DWiRQ uses
shGli be ithin the Wet'GIR I frrnsifien Grecs.
,f.^vEk FaFiletee_. Docks or marina improvements shall not be approved
by the City until the applicant demonstrates compliance with all
applicable federal and State laws and administrative rules,, inr-lg
§,�2,n. 4(5)F.A.C.—governing Aquatic Preserves as well as applicable
policies of regional agencies. No commercial marina facilities shall be
permitted on the Sebastian River. The City shall require site plans for all
docks and marinas. These plans must demonstrate to the City's
satisfaction that the facilities shall not adversely impact natural marine
resources, in^I„�diRg, but not limited tG, Ce/'VgFGIPSeC, eSt GFine \A�(G tee FS,
mGnc RGtee-ceS GRGI error--GtheF liViRgM rrriRe erganicrnc. The PIGIns shG11 indiGGfe
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 22
v. AvGdGbilify --- IGGGfiGR Gf SeWGgs 9Uf fGlGiliti
G -- PIG
r -N rn, r -N e -N c,= rA fn, n rN rn m,= m c e -i f,= fz--N r ni m � z r -un f,= n
i. 3W-'GGe wGter MGRGgemeRt SyStOMS
GGRStrlJGted fG FE?fGiR Gr GlefGiR With filfrGItiGR, GIS a minimum, thq sferm
w(�4or run Gff g8R8rGIf8d frGM th8 firSt GRe iRGh Gf rGiRfG'' GV8
eRtire site. The sterm
-
-- - -- shGll be prediGGted - the
-
--
`� i 7 G it deSigR c+ QR Site: 1(l Bio 7
8##-�i�o : � 6 ��a r, � 1 h orn� a r, � 9-i4r
(i.e., below GverGge eleVGtiOP�-,
_--
eStGblished GIS PGrt Gf the SUrfGGe _ _ MGRGgemont t
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 23
g. Celine Access. Shoreline access to the Indian River Lagoon shall be
promoted in order to maintain accessways at approximately one-half
mile intervals along the shoreline. State assistance shall be enlisted to
achieve land required to appropriately store vehicles, provide rest room
facilities, and accessways designed in a manner compatible with the
shoreline ecosystem. The IGGGtiGR Gf GGGecc PGiRtS GRGI relate/"[
ir-prevemontc :haIIbe GE)RSiSTeRt with the City's Riyerfront Stud&
eRGGte�erity hac Re heeGhec rvRd fherpfero beGGh rvGGeSc
iS
PG'iGleC of the C+a+e are ria+ rvPPIiGr ble hr,wo"or The City shall
consider GIS mart of the Riyerfront Studways to ensure public access
and provide the necessary infrastructure to support waterfront activities.
GGFnpreheRSiVe p!Gprs the City shall consider restricting commercial
signage along the Indian River, to only those signs deemed essential for
water dependent facilities. The City shall coordinate, with reaulatory
jUFiSdiGtiG agencies to develop uniform signage and criteria to
further this policy. The gi+"'S cigR regi lG ono in the area east of the
FGi'FGGd tFGGkS fram the Rerth City limit to the cal ith Citi limit �all be
Policv 1.6.6 4,154 t-1.111: Protection against Potential Adverse Impact
on Estuarine Shoreline and Site Plans Reauired for Developments in
Estuarine Shoreline Areas. By De^eor 31, 199?, The City's
continue +a real lire IGRGI / leVel/lr,rYler,+ real iGtiGRS whiGh LDRs shall
reauire applicants for development alona lakes, natural waterways, or
the estuarine shoreline to submit as part of the development review
process plans which demonstrate how the development shall
incorporate feature desianed to protect against Dotential adverse
impacts to: Shoreline veaetation and stabilization; Water Quality; Native
habitat, Livina marine resources; and Shoreline access. No shoreline
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 24
•- - •• -nt shall be ••• • -• until the ar)r)licant hasdemonstrated
that •• - • adverse imr)acts shallbe iDrevented or •
comiDensatory mitiqation shall occur. The Citv shall Glse hGve Gdepted
er ithin c)ibmemed Gre o c)jbmit a site plan iourgiGIRt tG site 191GR review
WGIf8r QYGlifY GGRtrGl- .. - the use ef weirsfor ouriogses
Policv 1.6.7 1.5.4 5-1.1.3: Protect, Stabilize, and Enhance the Estuarine
Shoreline. R„ DeGemh^r 31, 10,98, The Citv shGli ^^r+iR e +^ rea tiro
ins^rr,,,rry+o Griterie Within the IG Rd r eyeleigmeRt reo ilGtieRS WhiGh LDRs shall
stipulate that no native vegetation shall be removed from the estuarine
shoreline without a dulv authorized Citv land clearinq permit. Similarlv, criteria
shall be included in the LDRs'^RG' ''eyel^^mor,+ reo lG+ieRS which require that
applicants for development alonq the estuarine shoreline shall be required to
revegetate, stabilize, and enhance damaqed estuarine shorelines by planting
native vegetation, includinq manqrove and/or other native estuarine plant
species. `"'ham
f—C–ontribOe te the -- -' seil byildiRQ.9rGGeSS.
Hardeninq of the estuarine shoreline with rip -rap, bulkheads or other similar
devices shall not be allowed unless erosion constitutes a critical peril to
upland property and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the
shoreline. Such shoreline hardeninq structures shall qenerallv not be vertical
seawalls or bulkheads. Ufa^" r,
^^m',, withQorf^rmrvRr c+Gr,i I rvrr lc here.--
^ited iR Peli^„ 5 1.2.1 f2) (^) Peli' , 5 1.5.2,' -G4 -.The specific location and desiqn
of such structures shall be approved by the Citv as well as by other public
entities havinq iurisdiction in the matter. ' ^Rd deVeIGOrneR+ re i lG+iGRS shall
rdeSiOR ^f S Gh S# Gt Fes-.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 25
FINE
f1dim
-- - - -- --- -- --- --- -- --
--- - - --- Gthor ioubli-G-oGlQ-8RGIe hGViRQ - -- ---
_ _ .. -
re-equ.,lefieRS whiGhreauiFe - dylv authoriz--4-Rormit to rarneve
elterGtionc,the --- -. shG11be _- _- - _ _-_ - _ stGbilize,
int c,;o9
CAN ShG11 Gde0t Gontinue te reauire IGRGI develeopnent- -shGreliRe Gf the St. SebGstiGn River with rin ran, bull(heGds er ether
-
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 26
Aveid R. veFtiGGI sleige whiGh QeReretes. . g
• G . . GIRGI
IRGerigerete G igrewarn ef shereliRe. erreveqetetiGR
Policv 1.6.8 1.5.7 6-1.9.1: Desiqnation of Environmentaliv Sensitive Areas.
IR PeliGies tal1v Se
nsitive Areas.
_ 1.8 . _ 1.9 ObieGtivo
.e reGGUFGeS, Wet'GRGIS, GRd U191GRd
ME
x-1-9 This Element's DIA specifically includes areas reserved for
conservation uses or restricted development TGbl 1 1 in the I^Rd
elemeRt oreyidec G fr-vb lar ajmmar„ ref evicfiRQ rvRd igreieGted future ire i ice
ref RGt FGI r-vRd hisf^rii- GI rese ir^ec r- f
Thiss bie iRGli des GreGS recerVed fer
�-r7r�
GeRserVGtien uses er resfri^fed deyeleigmeRt TGble 1_1 feetnete jf 1
ir�i-^rr�^rrvfec G Iicf Of eXiSti Q IGIRGI i-leVel0QrReRt reQ ilG i^Rc thGt
r,reser,fl„ reQUI^fe !-vRd shall in tho future-Eontinue to reo ,I^+e use ef
RGt irG! All conservation land uses
res^� identified in-MaID 1 4 9Rd TGble 1_1 shall either remain
undeveloped or shall undergo ''restricted development." ''Restricted
development" shall be requlated throuqh performance criteria adopted
and maintained within the ernen decd 1 runt-! fleyel^r,meRt ReQ IGIfiens
LDRs. GRd +hro oh obieGtiyec r-vRd r,^Ii^iec GORtriRed in the Gdeotec
GeMWeh eRciVe PIG -R-..
Obiective 1.7 444 6 Combat Soil Erosion. BeQiRRiRQ iR jGRUGrY 1998, The
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 27
Citv shall maintain LDRs lGRd deVeIGOMeRt FeG1WlGtiGRS which include
performance criteria designed to reduce the incidence of soil erosion
caused by land clearing, breaches in stabilized shorelines, and lands havina
exposed soil without veaetative cover.
Policv 1.7.1 1.14.1 6-1�1: Im0ementina Erosion Control. The Citv's LGnd
r-eyeleigmeRt reQ lGtiGRs LDRs shall reauire that appropriate measures be
taken durina land clearina and building operations to assure that exposed,
destabilized or otherwise altered soil is expeditiously covered with an
acceptable erosion control material. These provisions shall be incorporated
in the Subdivision and Tree and Landscape Ordinances.
Objective 1.8 X56: Preventina Potential Adverse Impacts of Future
Minina of Minerals and Mineral Excavation Activities. No minina activities,
includina sand mining, shall be permitted within the Citv since the Citv is
characterized by natural systems which would potentially receive irretrievable
losses from the impacts of such operations.
Policv 1.8.1 1.15.1 6-1.6.1: Prohibition Against Mining Activities. LGRd
r-eyel.,igmeRt rea l,- tieRs LDRs shall prohibit minina of minerals, except for
existing sand mining operations, based on the irretrievable losses which such
intense activities may potentially impose on the Citv's fragile coastal
ecosystem as documented in the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and
Analvsis.
Goal 2: Coastal Manaqement and Resiliencv. The coastal community of
Sebastian shall GGRSE? r"o, rFE)teGf iGtelY PY,!",RGGle the WS
RGt FGI GGGStG' FeSG FGeS Grp limit public expenditures in areas subiect to
destruction by flood risk and natural disasters in order to enhance the Quality
of life of its residents. GRGI GlUGlitY Gf RGtYFGI systems within thec-ommunity.
Obiective 2.1 Policy 5-1�1 ; Coastal Hiah-hazard Area Defined. The
coastal hiah hazard area (CHHA) consists of the Cateaory I evacuation
zone established in the Treasure Coast Statewide Regional H rye
Evacuation Studv. The only areas within the Citv limits identified in the
Cateaory I evacuation zone are the Citv's mobile home parks. The Citv shall
enforce development restrictions, ideRtifi8 d iR PG'iG ' 5 1.1.1 P9liGY 5��
within the CHHA and anv area found to have historically experienced
destruction or severe damaae from storm driven, wind, water, or erosion. The
Citv has identified the hiah velocity storm surae area as indicated on the
Federal flood insurance rate maps as the only such area.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 28
Policv 2.1.1 ^Obeee ve 5-1.3: Limiting Public Subsidv of Development in
the Coastal Hiqh-Hazard Area. WIDGR GGIG19+i„r Gf the vGmr,roheRSiVe RIGH�4-,
The Citv shall limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted
in GeGStG! hirvh_hGzGrd GreGs the CHHA to restoration or enhancement of
natural resources and public services for water dependent uses. The only
exception to this regulation shall be that existing mobile homes within the
CHHA shall be Grandfathered in, therebv may be repaired and/or replaced
as lona as the density does not increase. The Citv shall aim to minimize the
impact of natural hazards such as floodinq and sea level rise to the
community by directing development awav from the CHHA eGStG! hich
hG�GGFG1 GFeGs as defined by State Statute & 163.3178(2) (f), F.S.
Policv 2.1.2 4-.M.4 5-1.6.4: Existing Infrastructure in the CHHA. The Citv shall
establish by AGR ,rr„ 1999 a priority list of infrastructure facilities located in
the CHHA which could be relocated, mitigated or replaced should state
funding become available for such activities. Additional infrastructure and
assets are inventoried in the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan.
Policv 2.1.31 5-1�1: Public Investments in Coastal Hiqh-Hazard Area.
Public funded facilities shall not be built in the CHHA eGstG! hioh_hG,�GFGI
Greg, unless the facility is for public access, resource restoration, adeauate
evacuation, or service to water dependent activities. These facilities may
face inundation and be impacted if they are outdoor facilities based on
data included in the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan.
Policv 2.1.4Gb*e^f0�4^ 5-1.6: Hazard Mitiqation and Coastal High -
Hazard Areas. BeQi ,r iRQ iA GrR 1CGF , 1998, The Citv shall maintain i
de','eIGI9PReRt Fowl iIGtiGRs LDRs which contain performance standards
reaulatina development activities in a manner which minimizes the dancer to
life and property occasioned byh� rye natural hazard events including:
1. Storm and Floodoroofina Standard for Non-residential Structures. Non-
residential construction within the coastal high hazard area shall meet
storm and floodoroofina standards exceeding those reauired for a one
hundred (100) vear storm.
2. Restrictions of Redevelopment. If a structure located within the
hGZGrd Gr CHHA receive storm damaae in excess of fifty (50) percent
of its appraised value, all such damaaed structures shall be reauired to
meet all current laws and ordinances, includina those enacted since
construction of the subiect structure.
Policy 2.1.5:Ob ^+'� T 5-.4: Avoid Population Concentrations in
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 29
Coastal High -Hazard Areas. BegirlrliRg irl IGR GFY 1999, The City shall restrict
development and not increase densities or intensities bevond those
depicted on the Future Land Use Map in the Geestel High I-GZGrd Arervc
JCHHA} in order to minimize danger to life and property occasional by
hurricane events, flooding, or sea level rise. The City shall direct population
concentrations away from CHHA. The GHH A shrvll be defined Gs thew Grervc
leGGted within the Gry+egerli I eliGG GtieR zene ecteblishod in the Tr e
QeGst StGtewide Regional HurriGGReGGUGtion Study.
Policy 2.1.6 4,74 i -1.A.1: Restrict Development in Coastal High -Hazard
Areas. The City shall incorporate appropriate policies in the kNf',d
deyelrlpMerlf reg ilGtiE)Rs LDRs in order to direct population concentrations
away from known or predicted the CHHA. GrlGStG' high hrv�rvrd rvrervc WhiGh
ryre ryreGS Ir GGted within the e^ +egery 1 e\/GG IrytiGR �GRe eCtGblished Irl The
TTreGS ire GE)Gst Reg irlr'al HurriGGRe GyGG GtiGR St y Also, the Citv shall
direct population concentrations away from known areas that are
vulnerable to floodina inundation and sea level rise as established in the
Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan. Development DrinciDles and strategies that
eliminate unsafe development in the CHHA must be used as defined by
� 163.3178(2) (f), F.S. The following provisions shall restrict development within
the CHHA GGGStGl high hGzGrd GreG-
a. Water and sewer treatment plants, industrial holding ponds and other
potential point pollution sources within the coastal high -hazard area
are prohibited.
b. Require construction within the hurricane flood zone to meet storm
and flood proofing standards exceeding those required fora 100 -year
storm.
c. Residential development and/or redevelopment in the CHHA shall
not exceed existing residential densities for that property.
d. Beach sand dune alteration shall be prohibited.
Objective 2.2',.8-6-1.3: Maintenance of Floodplain. Bervirlrlirlry H
jGRYGP� 1998, The Citv shall maintain LDRs I'' Rd deVelr ORgerl+
FeQYlGti which include performance criteria designed to Drotect the
natural functions, includina flood- carrvina and flood storaae capacity,
of the 100-vear floodplain.
Policv 2.2.1 1-.84 6-1.3.1: Enforce Policies to Maintain Floodplain. The
Citv shall continue to enforce its surface water management and flood
damaae prevention regulations, W0A 19.2(H), 1 GRd De„elrlr,merl+
Gede of the Gity of SebGsthurl (Gs G irrerl+ly exists GRd rvc rrlrvY
heFe iRGffer he GPReRded). New develoDment encroaching into the
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 30
floodplain shall incorporate flood protection measures sufficient to
protect against the 100-vear flood. New development encroaching
into areas subiect to sea level rise, storm surae, and flood inundation
shall incorporate flood protection measures as defined in the Citv's
Coastal Resiliencv Plan. The Citv's Storm Water Manaaement and
Flood Protection Ordinance shall maintain consistencv with Droaram
policies of the Federal Insurance Administration. The Citv shall monitor
new cost-effective programs for minimizina flood damage. Such
programs may include modification to construction setback
requirements or other site design techniques, as well as upgraded
building and construction techniaues. The Citv shall encouraae the use
of best practices of development strategies that results in reducing
flood risk and the removal of coastal real Droperty from flood zone
designations established by the Federal Emeraencv Aaencv as
reauired by � 163.3178(2) (f), F.S.
Policv 2.2.2 1.8.2 6-1.3.2: Purchase of Flood0ain. The Citv shall identifv
and recommend to the State and FDEP the S44ahnc River er
AAGIRGI iemeRt Distrie4 purchase of floodDlains that would comply with
Droaram auidelines established under the QGRseryGti^n GRGI
ReGPE?GtiGT (CARL) Florida Forever Proaram GF the SGIVe QJ
Riders (SQR) PrGrvrGRq
Objective 2_3 44 Hurricane Evacuation. The City shall coordinate with
Indian River County in attaining a hurricane evacuation time of less than
twelve (12) hours. There is the potential to Dut into place early warning
notifications for elderlv residents who are Dotentiallv more vulnerable as
recommended in the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan. According to the
Coastal Resiliencv Plan, inundation caused by floodina and sea level rise is
predicted to impact evacuation routes on Sebastian Boulevard and this
vulnerability should be addressed to increase resilience.
Qty 1--
ofC}}e estieR Gerst
e�n �7ResiliepGy Plrvn Preoeired %,.* i• Kimlo�i_em et
AssGG' ,�,,
Policy 2.3.1 '� 3-1�1: Hurricane Evacuation Logistical Support. In order to
prevent unnecessary evacuees crowding roads and shelters, the City shall
coordinate with Indian River County in disseminating information concerning
the need of residents to evacuate at various hurricane threat levels, flood
events, and sea level rise events. The City shall coordinate with the County
and the Indian River County Emergency Management Director in assisting
the implementation of the County's campaign to educate the general
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 31
citizenry regarding emergency preparedness plans, including specific
citizen directives.
Policy 2.3.2 4-.9-.-2 5-1.5.2: Future Coordination with the County in Emergency
Preparedness. In order to provide for safe and efficient evacuation of the
residents of the City of Sebastian and other communities in the event of a
hurricane, the City shall continue to coordinate with Indian River County in
annual updates of the County's PoGlGot mo Comprehensive Emergency
Manaqement Plan. This update shall enable the County and incorporated
municipalities to plan for future population densities which will neither
adversely impact the efficiency of the evacuation plan nor increase
evacuation times. Ir, Grd8r fG 8RS ire that future deVeIGIGMeRfS G,re GGRSiS;eRf
with t�eeGe imo EmOrlYDRGY PIGR GIRd Gine dmonts there$e, The City's
LDR's shall mandate that new development
maintain a density threshold which is consistent with the Countv's
PeGGetimo Comprehensive Emergency Manaqement Plan. This stipulation
will assure that future density thresholds may be accommodated without
adversely impacting hurricane evacuation time. The City shall also
coordinate with the County in updating hurricane evacuation shelter
assignments as well as other policy formulation surrounding land use and
emergency preparedness.
_ 11, _ r�7T_TS T_7 ■ FRf :�T_L7_T'l_'
._ __ ()(
e. e.
Policy ].10.1 6-1.6.1: Coastal High -hazard Area Defined. The __
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 32
-- - - - -- - -- --- - --
- -- -- - - - -- -- -- --- -- -- - -- - - - --
Policy 2.3.3 1.10.2 5T.6.2: Coordinate Update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The City shall coordinate with the County in updating the hazard mitigation
annex of the I GGGI P8GIGefiMe Countv's Comprehensive Emergency
Manaqement Plan pursuant to the five (5) year interval schedule adopted
by the County. Updates of the Plan shall identify specific actions that may
be implemented to reduce exposure to natural hazards, include strategies
for post -disaster recovery operations,The GYrreRt PIGIR ,., RtGiRS Re ir,+o r-
Gger}c-y ha enen�� prelhTeRsiVePl�hG!' and
incorporate interagency hazard mitigation reports as such reports are
generated in the future.
Policy
1 in 3 5-1.6.3:
_1L3: imp!
31, 1993 The 94y' LDRo oh
this -- ShGl1 be thGt eXiStiRg rRebile--
-reduGe tG RGtUrG! -- - -
- fair.% . -
- - - - ♦ - - - -- - - - -
1.11-11011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ffi
IZO
-- -- -- ---- - - -- - - - - - ♦ -- --- - - - ---
♦ - -- �.-
Objective 2_4 4,14 3-1.7: Post -disaster Redevelopment. Beginning in IGn iGv Y
1998, The City shall continue to coordinate with the County in providing
immediate response to porgy hurriene post -disaster situations.
peliG y direGtides Cited below,
- —1mr—ITHEW,
■1111111
RE
■ — M. -
CONSERVATION
& COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 33
Policy 2.4.1 1.11.2 5-1.7.2: Post -Hurricane Assessments. By DeGermi-rbecr 31,
449-9 The City Council shall appoint a Recovery Task Force comprised of the
City Manager, the Building Official, and others as determined by the City
Council. The Recovery Task Force shall be responsible for assessing the
conditions following a hurricane or other similar disasters such as flooding
events and shall propose strategic actions necessary to establish order and
re-establish communication and basic service delivery systems necessary for
health, safety, and welfare. Within ninety (90) days after appointment of the
Recovery Task Force, the Task Force shall meet to determine a management
framework for resolving issues confronted in times of a natural disaster. The
management framework shall be reviewed with the County Civil Defense
Officer for compliance with the County's Comprehensive I eGGI PeGGetime
Emergency Management Plan and shall be presented to the City Council
for review and approval. The management plan should provide a basis for
executing the following activities during times of natural disaster.
a. Establishing a temporary moratorium on building activity;
b. Reviewing and deciding upon emergency building permits;
c. Coordinating with State and Federal officials to prepare disaster
assistance applications;
d Analyzing and recommending to the City Council hazard mitigation
options, including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities;
e. Developing a redevelopment plan including limitations on
redevelopment in areas of repeated damage; and
f. Recommending amendments to the Local Peacetime Emergency
Plan and other appropriate policies and procedures.
Policy 2.4.2 1 1 1 _o 5-1.7.3: Repair and Clean-up. In planning post -disaster
redevelopment activities, factors to be considered in order to protect the
public health and safety shall include:
a. Repairs to potable water, wastewater and power facilities;
b. Removal of debris;
c. Stabilization or removal of structures in a perilous condition; and
d. Minimal repairs to make structures habitable.
These considerations shall receive first priority in determining the
appropriateness of emergency building permits. Long term redevelopment
activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task Force has coordinated
immediate repair and clean- up operations.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 34
I
I o 101 01-0,11191
iel A-1
Policy 2.4.3 1.11.5 5-1.7.5: Redevelopment Activities. Begg IY iRg iR GR GFY
1998, The LDRs shall require the redevelopment of any structure within the
City that received storm -damage in excess of fifty (50%) percent of its
appraised value to meet all current laws and ordinances, including those
enacted since construction of the subject structure. The city shall require
that new development and redevelopment in areas that are at high risk
of floodina to use best practices, strategies, and enaineerina solutions
that may reduce risk and losses due to storms, flooding and sea level rise
as defined by � 163.3178(2) (f), F.S.
Policy 2.4.4 1 1 1.6 5-1.7.6: Establish Public Facilities Review Committee. 8y
DeGem r 31, 1999, The City Council shall designate the Recovery
Taskforce as the City's designated Public Facilities Review Committee
charged with the responsibility for reviewing available alternatives for
managing damaged public facilities following a hurricane event. The
Committee shall evaluate future options for such facilities, including, but
not limited to, abandonment repair in place, relocation, and
reconstruction, with structural modifications. The Committee shall
consider these options based on the following considerations:
a. Cost to construct;
b. Impacts on the environment;
c. Cost to maintain;
d. Public sector;
e. Recurring damages;
f. Impacts on land use, and
g. Other relevant factors.
Obiective 2.5: Establish an Adaptation Action Area Overlav District. To
minimize future risk, the Citv shall establish an Adaptation Action Area
(AAA) Overlav District for areas that are vulnerable to coastal flooding and
the impacts of sea level rise, based on the data and modelina outlined
within the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan and compliant with � 163. 3178, F.S.
Policv 2.5.1: Adaptation Action Area. Within the LDRs, the Citv of Sebastian
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 35
shall establish criteria for Low Impact Desian and Flood Resistant Desian for
new development and redevelopment within the AAA. Development
within this overlav district must comply with coastal development best
practices including but not limited to construction enaineerina solutions
and low impact development techniques that utilize veaetation and
natural features to minimize surface runoff and reduce flood risk.
Policv 2.5.2: Transfer of Development Riahts Proaram. The City shall
establish a Transfer of Development Riahts (TDR) proaram to incentivize
the preservation of natural resources within vulnerable areas includina
those identified within the Citv's Coastal Resiliencv Plan. The Citv shall
desianate parcels within the established CHHA or proposed AAA
Overlav District as sendina zones for development riahts, and less
vulnerable parcels outside of the established CHHA or proposed AAA
as receivina sites for density and intensity transferred throuah the TDR
proaram. This allows development at hiaher densities in low risk areas
and encourages less intense development in the Citv's floodplains
StGte DiViSiGR ef HiStGFiG ReSeUFGeS DiViSieR ef HisteriGel ReseurGes ef the
continuing te ideRtify, PrGteGt, GRGlyZe,GR-'
GFGhGeeleg;GGI,.
G. DestruGtieR er GiterGtieR ef Gil er pG
e...e.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 36
- - -- - ---- - -- - - - - 001-01
deYe'GpMeRt. ShGUIGI- site be SGieRtifiGGeXGG'.'Gted in this MGRRer,
mGy prepreGeed felleWiRg GernpletieR -
-- - -- --- -
meGsyred- -.- .-.Q - - - - •7- -
Polec 1.12.1 Insure Ava"able infrastructure and Coordonate
Timing and Staging of Public Facilities with Private Development By
direGted GRIY tG these GreGs whero publiG fGGilities. . meet the
grGRted until infrgstruGture G.d - - -- -- by - -- -
generGted by develepment preje d in the Future Land Use
The .frGstruGture shGI1 Gise be GeRSiSteRt
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 37
Me
-- - -- - - - - - - --
---
destGbilized er etherwise GiteFed seilexigedtiGUSIV Geveredwith GIR
T�a,,=cci wr,&x/iciAL,%c c6,,wll 1,&n
Oboect*ve 2.7 1.15 6-1.6. Prevenfinci Potenteal Adverse !mDacts of Future
Wnona of Monerals and Moneral- No mininizi -
lesses -- the imI9GGtSGf SUGh WerGfiGRS.
D„I 2.7 •1 1.16.1 6-1.6.1; • PFoh*h*i*on Anninci Mininn Aeii�i%sTLGIRQ
OBjECTIVE 1.16 6-1.10: HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT. The City sh
_.
where. . ..
G. GI . G •
b. AROMG1 _ _ .
G. lRGiReFGtGFS
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 38
- QhGiq�er 29j 1 I Gf the F!GridG A dminictratie (v'ede /fho GleriGla SubctGRGe
U
+
.. Title ref the Cede ef�aorGl Regi re
'GtiGRS Pert 261 NdeRtifiGGtieR nd I ictinG[
. Title 40�f the Gede of Federrl Req !GtieRS PGrf 302.4 (TGblo 302.4) (List f
HGzGrdouc Subc/'GRGES GRd Re Quantiti2-s�
. Title ref the Cede of FederGl Req !GtieRS 19 t 2/56 AigQeRdiv A rvRd R (List
of Extremely I-GzGrr-ouc Subc,')
Eontinu
-- -- - - - - -- - - --- --- -- - - - -
11111-410111111 WE I
--- -- --- - ---------- -- - -- -
COASTAL AREA AND FOR MANAGING CONSERVATION ACTWITISS, Ec/'ablich
systerns
.. - • - - - RGtUFGI reseuFGes - • - • • .. - . . - - - - - - - - -
GrdiRGRG-0s, • • 101GIRS Gf eXiStiRO StGte, -- -•- - - - - GO-eRGieS
Sewe-..*
--- -- --- - -
- •- -- •- - IN -- --- -- . ..-•-- •- • -- ...-. -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 39
limited- - - - -
oreperedRess --- hUrr*!GGRe evGGUGtieR issues --- YodGte
GeRGeFRiRq the U.S. 1, C.P. 6 12, GIRd ReselGRd Read IG.R. 505)
--- •• ! •- -- -- - .. -- . .. -. !. . -.- ON
b -.—Meier issues te be GeerdiReted with lRdiGR River GeYRN iR erder te
M - i -STT-I-T-TTFIO20721�1�7:�7�T-7y � - ■ -
ere- thGt freRtS-. lRdiGR River Drive, ex-duclinq imioreved ---•
-- -
MeGSUFeS iMI9GGtiRQ the AauGtiG Preserve with the DEP Gs well Gs etheim
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 40
Obiective 2.8 448 6-1.12: Continuina Evaluation of Conservation and Coastal
Manaqement Element Effectiveness. The Citv shall use e felie lino r^l-.-,
GY+� in evaluatei�the effectiveness of the Conservation and Coastal
Manaaement Element.
Policv 2.8.1 1.18.1 6-1.12.1: Review the Impact of Chanqinq Conditions on
Coastal Manaqement and Conservation Policv. The Citv shall monitor and
evaluate significant chances in the characteristics of natural coastal
resources and natural resources within the Cifv. Policv implications of such
chances shall be examined, and corrective measures shall be pursued.
Coastal management and conservation policies shall be refined as needed in
order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues.
Policv 2.8.2 1.18.2,6-1.12.2: Schedule, Budaet and Implement Proarammed
Activities. The timely scheduling, proaramminq, budaetinq and
implementation of programmed coastal management activities and
conservation activities identified in this Element shall be evidence of the Citv's
effectiveness in carrvinc out a systematic program for implemenfina coastal
management and conservation aoals, obiectives, and policies.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 41
Policv 2.8.3 1.18.3 6-'�3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While
continually implementina and evaluating the Conservation and Coastal
Manaqement Element, the Citv shall maintain a process of intergovernmental
coordination as well as coordination, with private sector Groups interested in
coastal management and conservation Policv and programs. The
effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of
coordination mechanisms in resolving coastal management and conservation
problems and issues.
Policv 2.8.4 1.18.4,6-1.12.1: Achieve Effective Resolution of Coastal
Manaaement and Conservation Goals, Obiectives and Policies. The
effectiveness of the Conservation and Coastal Manaaement Element shall be
measured by the Citv's success in achievina coastal management and
conservation aoals, obiectives and policies. The Conservation and Coastal
Manaaement Element incorporates a systematic Dlannina process for
identifvina coastal management and conservation Droblems and issues and
implementina corrective actions.
Policv 2.8.5: Interaovernmental Coordination. Specific Obiectives and Policies
regarding intergovernmental coordination and this Element are provided and
identified in the Interaovernmental Coordination Element.
weyl-53 Eli —151
GPPFepFiGte-- - Gf eXiS-t multi r—e -- -- --W.
_ _ _ _ _ _
inGludo, but not be limited te, the fe"eWiRg-.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 42
b—
StGfe DEP GIS GpprGpriGte.
MGIRGIge nt Dic/IriGt (SAW AD) ac may be GpprC)PriGte ill,
-- -
- - - - - - publiG GgeRGieS. These GGtivities• - • - o,butngtbe
.
the - .
preGess Gs wellac in the fGFMUlGtiGR Gf PG'iC-iOG iMPOGtiRg GG- -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 43
ongimptive use permittiRg
---- -- - PIGIR ---GmeRdmontc therete iR erder te Gssure
GGRsisteRGY with the TreGsure GeGst
-- -- -- -- -- River Drive 4o publiG -- - -- -- jurisdiGtiGR
X1313W WT
.. the fG11GWiRg
E1E?PHE?Rf.
Polic Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Coastal
Policy 5 1.11.1 Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities.
Gentinuelly
iRtergeverRmeRtG1 GGGFGIiRGtiGR GIS Well GIS
.. . .. ..ith• • -seGter-groups interested . .. . u.... _.._.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 44
§6-1 CONSERVAPON GOALS, OBjECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES.
This t es geGis, -- - es, GRGI implePRRg -- - GF �hE?
QGR5erVGfiGR Ele..e s - - 163.3177(6) s -s §9J
GOAL 6_1; CONSERVATION. TING COASTAL QgMAYAUNITY nG SEBASTIA.W
HALL CONSERVE, PROTECT, AND APPROPRIATELY ren e 14AGE THE CITY'S
NATURAL (-nACTAI DESS CES IN QRDER TO ENH.414CE THE QUALITY nG
fin! SYSTE.1�4-�IIT!-N THE 9C)AAMUNITY.
-- --- - - - 1GRd -- ------t rE?gU1GtiGRS iRG1UGliRg PerfGrPRGRGe
-•-- - _thet develepMeRtmeets er exGeeds tho
-- GRGI shG11establich regUIGItGry- -- GPRS-t-G�
preveRt GRd/or minIMIZ9 RGR pe'R.t SGurGes ef Gir PG!IutieR (Rete: the Gity
hGS -- peiRt seurGesef Gir -- --
-..-- - - -• -•- generGtien ef fugitive s partiGies.•- -- - -•
• ---- _-
-•- develeprReRt reguietionc,- •_ --_- _- seil- -sieR ---
zj
- • - ether --verse
eGOSYSteM.
OBjECTIVE 6-1.2: WATER QUA'_'TY AND QUANTITY. Beginning iR iGnuGry
PG'iGies.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 45
A
WlilIII
-.- - --.. - •10=72=2=212"- - -
G. Sorfif cc�WGtrelit SyStOmr, Shall be doSigRod GRd
r-GR4r iry
Gted +G retGiR Gr Glo+iR With fil+rr+iGr, GIS a minimum th&
StGRR'A'Gtor run Gff gE?Rerr+e(J frGM the fire+ GRe_iRGh Gf rGiRfrll Geier
the ori+ire site. The StGrmWRter decigR StGR Grd chGll be prediGGted
rrr�
GR the fGl G'A'iRg-
cff_si�5_ year, 21 hour deciryonn OR c�ZyGr24 hei it decirvr,
c+
-. - -- - . --. . -.
li
Zj
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 46
--_- WGter - - _ -_ • f • •• ■ •- the
City • - Retify • - - - - - - _ - GgeRGy-with_ • GIS
- - - • tl ix/jes er preblePRS _ - - - • ified - • - 94y, The
----•--- IGRd -- - ----- • -- - t - _ --
_ _ _ .. _ . - GriteriG _ - _ . - _ _ eRSYrO f new _ - - _ _ .. _ .
- - - - - • - - - - - - St - M '^'Gfer .. _ . _ _ - u - .
Reed,
iv. Limit modifiGGItiGrl Gf grGssbeds GRly te these Geses iRvel •_
thGt-
dePRGRS#Gted pFiGr tG MGdifiGGtiGR ef grGs 49771
PreVeRt _• iRGreGSe iR wetor turb;,d#�-
Pr,ai,=r-+c
IRGGFPGrGte mitigGtiveteGhRiqUeSWhiGh _ _ • t • • •
Iilc
0 X99 64
- - -- --- - -- -- -- ------ - -
111 e City shR!l
0 Me - 0 fflo
■_liey 6 1.2.2: R.9gulGte AgriGulturd AGtivifies te Preserve WeIterw
-- deVeIGPrneRt reguletionc- -• CtiPUlGtiE)RS reqUiriRg that
-- - aGtivities shG!I-
-j. -- - - -- - - - ---«- -
rnGRGgern Rt- - --- shGli Gernplywith G-11 --- -- - peliGies
..■
aG Stnte IGWS,- - -- GIdminictrative rules -- - - -- the lRdiGR River
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 47
- Use bost mnnagemontprinGiples- • - PrGGtiGeS• erder - reduG&
RS, eXG'6q
ac multipl
Policy 6-1.2.4. Preserve and Enhance Lagoon and Canal Shorelline.#�
- -. . c,+abilize Gr c gicGeptiblo to - •_ - - -• - •- - •-
-.--.
Policy 6-1.2.5. Protect Deep and SuFficiall. Areas.. - City
hGs no prime deep Gquifer reGhGrge GreGs whiGh hGve been identified
lei. MOTEZZM:
110
-- - - - -- - ----. -- -
—Preserve• - quGlity GRd qYGRfity q -lit - •
SUrfiGi- - - -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 48
RGfUrGl GF IGIRdSGGped---- --GE? fGr eRhGRGE?d
c-ommunity eesthefiGs GRd pGssive pedestriGIR GGtivities.
Policy 6-1.2.6; Deep . cn.-
mqGGGn
- - •-
yWRmt
eG
MsdG11u
1111
Gere�ti
sG,
Doli�
21 7• Droteo�
�--a�rr �T-r-rvT
no,Pr 31, 1999, the
be used te meet irrigGtieR n dc. b, Require the use efwGter SRViRg
plumbing fixtures en Gil new develepment
plaGes greGter demand UPOR -- -- - wGter seurGes),Gt-4on.ct. thirty
—vim Z.' Q.01oil�icQQr�.� �� � � � �.�y
IN W-1 111
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 49
A-1.2.?: Managing Land Use SuFFounding WateF Well Cones of
preteGt petGbie or rupply
Policy -1.3.11: SWIM Program Coordination. BegiRRiRg in January, 1992,
. . - .. -t Dic/lriG-t4or purp9ses oeseurGes GvGilGble threugh the
OWECTIVE 6-1.3: AAAINITFIISIANCE OF FLOODPLAIN. BegiRRiRg iR jGRUGry
. .-Alibi. - O O -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 50
Policy Pier -chase of Floodplain. The City --!l ideRtify GRd
rl��
FE?GGPRPReRGl tG �he SfGfe GRGI �he S� 4oh.nc River WGfer AAGRGgE?RqeRt
DistriGt PUrGhGse ef fleedplains,.. ..
phYSiGGI GRd hydrelegiG GlterGtiGRSwell - -
Gt
Policy 1.1.1: Wetland Development Restrictions. Wet'GlRcls,as - . -
■ the QGGStGl AAGIRGIger4qeRt ElepReR . beprefeGted e u
♦ . . the . . .
..WGIter.
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 51
--
PI1■■■■�YY�_
buffers. - O purp9se ef the trGRSitiGR ZGRe is - eRSUre til - Gontinuing
. - . - . . .
All iRd icfri�l
�s
a �r
+rorr�c
fGGili+ioc
. • - greuRGI- greu
l eS fGr PGllUtGRtS•
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 52
DedicationRequiFed
ewations. By DeGe.. or 31, 1992
the City . .. i
i
W---AR- ME 111111111111ml - B15m. v 0 le ilt le--plip le iee e
DelineationPolicy -1.1.1: Afetland
. . .
johns. u . DistriGt, the
�1 The �lii"W"IrlT�TTfP'TELT-iAli7:�7�.T-7fIf7tTf/�7�T��
i
purposes.
. .. .... •
PreteGfiGR ■ ■ GRGI frem the ARny Gerp ef ER. Gs ..
Gy be
reserve the rightdetermine .!Gnd use,
1WIN-1.0".r1:T�1:W-7�T7.�2�.".Wq m - - On= f�1:{�'�L�11■T ,"g.1m 7mems
��J���I����� ���. JAI � � � �� � � �� ,���I ��� J���I•
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 53
RGtYrGl Systoms.The GppliGant shallprgve thGt-
PR 19 - GlE4erRqiRGfionc chgll be - on • GI ---
--iGGI -- - ebtGiRed from- - irlvesfigetieRs by
- .. - .
FiSh GRGI ♦ - u - be . - - - GlUriRg the - - - - .. - .
♦ -- nts shall •- - -• epportunity te se demonstrate thet -.
Wet'GRGI - - - • - - • - • • - - • - - - - -• - - • - -
- - - - �7�
- -•-s thp-ithe develG19-or is previdiRg viGble -••-- -
&y#omc, the City ..- WGive the preserVGtieRrequirements,.-
61713W1I �M W�iT�11,1 E7.itT�l1 ■3:T�ZiT�! - - .. . • f •
FTST1_ M.-.-lir=l•1-1IT --..-.
POTENTIALOBjECTIVE 6-1.6: PREVENTING ADVERSE NPACTS OF FUTUR
MINING OF MINERALS
♦ ■MINERAL EXCAVATION ♦ fminingGGtivities,. - . -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 54
SGRd mining, ShGII-- - gity SiRGE?
-- - by RGtUrGeMSWhiGhWGUld --
dGGIJPR8Rt8d-••- -•-• ■ -• ■- - 'RveRtGrV -•- ♦ RGIV�!�.
1*1
OBjECTIVE 6-1.7: PROTECT NATIVE VEGETATION♦ \ MARINE HABIT
Policy 6-1.7.1. Implementing Protection of Vegetative Commune
■- - --••-• - •- •• •-- •- -•- - - - •- •-
---•- - -• - -- - - -•- -•- - -•- --- - - • as --
Policy 6-1.7.2. Preservation of Native Plant Communities.
The . -
:T -TWT ..fPT4:Ts!•TI�■17�1�1/� - _ . _ - - - - - - . - - - . -
■
IN, - •
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 55
"qff
-- - ---- ---- - --- -
In �
--
- -
, , , *
---- - - - - --- - -- -
-- --- -- - - - ---- - -- --- - - --
--- - tile City mey require pGyrnerlt Gf - fee iR lieY ef the ---
iR the -- - - lieu ef hGbitGt PF8S8rVGtiGR be
te
-- deV81GPM8Rt fGrthe pUrGhGS8 Gf UPIGRd hGbit _ . eff siterGti 1or tlmn 9R site. Other .. •ints may eRly
♦ ■ ♦ ♦ .
IN
AA2-mm WHO
� �-_
Policy 6-1.7.4: Removal of Trees Causing Safety Hazard. The City
Policy 6-1.7.5. Protection of Manatee Habitats. The City shelle..�
..
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 56
SebG4iGR ShG11 Indin.n Ri\'8F- Rf�', �h8
DepGrfMeRt Gf ER','irGRMeRtGl PrGfeGtiGR, the U.S. Fich GIRGI Wild
ServiGe, GIRGI ether StGte GIRGI federd GgeRGies, iR. develepiRg GIR
GreG.spedfiG r-nGRGtee prc)teGtiC)R PIGIR GRd mnrina SitiRg PIGIR iR
Grder tG E?RSUre IGRg - rGRge MGRGfee GRGI hGbitGt PrGteGtiGR.
a Permit GIPPliGations for ell beGtiRg fGGilitieS, iRG!ud'Rg SiRgle fGmily
dGGkS GRd dry sterege, shdi be evG!u d in th8 GGRtext ef
C�JMUlgfiVE? iPRPGGtS -•
"'HO ar
-•- where wetlGRds, 9Jpp9rtiRg ••-•- -- habitnt Will Ret -- • f -p
•- gify shGli axj.st DEP in distributing-ts publiGGtiGRS -•- -- - eRG'
1-inrj r-nt-irir-\,= r,=ct-,i irt-,= t-4nrA ir�--
- — I I — 11 — I --- — 1— v —1— 1 — — I I — —1— 1
PGrtiGU'Gr, te beeters, GRd the disp!Gy ef such materids.
SlGw er idle speed zeReS shG11 be edepted, with er witheUt GhGIR
eXePRPtiGRG GIS GPPrGPriGfe, iR GreGS freqUeRted by PRGRGtees.
ERfGrGerneRt ef spee-ed
ZGRes sheuld-lao improved.
fisheries, - - -•- wildlife hGbitats. In order- prevent "t -king" -
develeprneR#-
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 57
-- - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - -- -- ---
FreshwGterr f - GRd - - - - - tile
WE
- - - - -til reeteRed,er rerewildlife r wildlife hGbitGts Gs well
wildlife r wildlife hGbitets ef speGiG'r - - es - - - -in Table
theQenserVGtiGR -rr-r dGtG iRveRtGFY -rte GRGlySiS. The City sh�
further preteGt wildlife GRd wildlifehGbitGts by PFeMGtiRg the dediGGtien ef
GeRservGtieR eeseRqeRts er reservGtiGRS- -d heroin
Policy Protection of Living Marine Resources. The City shellheve
Gdepted DeGembor 31, 1997 IGIRd deVeleprReRtregyletieRS- -
- - r r - r r seegressbeds GRd Geestelmarch. - - - - - - - -
r 'RtreduGtieRof nutri9RtSr be - - threugh effeGtive - -
releGlSe Gf GRY- r�
fer Genstryetien. GempensGtery rr gG e- rrG be permitted ineGses-
•
AnysuGh -- - rr -- -- ensureGontinuanGe -d rr r --G - - ef
wildlife GIS Well ac publiG reGreGtieR j p t -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 58
develepmeRt GGtivitieS-l-R- the estyGlFiRe shereliRe er within gibmerged
GreGS to c/ibmit a site plan purgiant to j.te PIGIR review regul ons. Suiah
purposes ef rnGRGI-giRg turbidity rnGy be required by the City. IR GdditieR,
---- -- by DeGernbor 31, 1997-•-
ShGlibe permitted,
OBjECTIVE 6-1.9; PROTECT CONSERVATION LAND RESOURCES. gy
ap 1 9 rPa
---------- -!• I I in the es G
tGbylor gimmGry-f existiRg - - prejeGted future.use ef AGturd ---
eXiSti-- --- develepment regUlGtiC)RS-- PreSeRtly regUlGte --- shG11
s• 1 9 GRd Teble 1 1 shGlieither rernGi-R
develepmgnt"
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 59
11111
- - - C. - - - 111 . - - - - - - - -- - - - - - ' - -
PeliGies 6
1.8 GRd 6-1.9 eStUGriRe shereliRe reseurGes, wetlGRds, GRol upland hGbitGts
Gr8 GddFeSSed iRGlUdiRg the Fegu!Gtery frGme,o,,erk tlrFeughwhiGh the gify
iRtonds te••- •--- - - - - •- preseFve the - - - -Future - •-
�1��13�ii\�I� iT� _ . . ■ .1/. ., . . .A3,.\iiw—mm, Ii l•T-'ll
rRRteFiRIS GF WGStOC.- by
this seGtieR shG11 GeRsist ef the felleWiRg!
—C-h-aoor UF � 1 qf the FleridG Adminicft9tive Cede (the Fier
SulbStGRGe
.. • s-ASm Pr - ♦I - -
- . - efE>.tremely _ - - - • • • -
P0 Gontinu&-t-G
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 60
-- --- - - - --- --- - - - -
reseurGes within the gifj.
.
--- - -- -- - -- shell -----
Policy Review the impact of Changing Conditions on
Conservatoon Policy. The City rneRiter --- eVGIUGte SigRifiGGRt
--- - -- - - ----- -- -- - --- --- --- - - - ---- -
sh(l -• • -- - - -- -- - -- - --- - ------ - m -l-
_ �a�i`za�:r_r_n���r_r_r_er_rr_■r.:n _
hp firnely - - p4lagramming,budgeting -••• - - -
• • ----- -ems -- � - -- e: -...� -: �..� -- -- -
_ F�11f�i i �ifta.�T�'t' FRT:R'r77lti! 7 777 _1 FTS'T:T' � 77� T -t - ♦ :�i _WmIll
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 61
-- - -- -- - - rigs - R- GGRSer',Gti--
preblerns GRd issues. I
Policy 6-1.12.4, Achieve Effect Resolution of Consewation G -Galls-,
Objectives and Policies. The effeGtiveRess ef the C;eR8erVGtiGR ElerneRt
issues -.i implemeRtiRg GerreGfive m-eGsures.
oll
• - - -----------
-.Wk-
- - - - • -
0101 - - - • • - - - • -IN
- -
=,-.r! -- • - -• •- - - •- --
Policy Pretection Against Potential Adverse impact on Edwarine
develepmeRt review preGeess PIG.PIGRS whiGh dePRGRS#Gte hew the
- - - •GgGiRSt
p-(-4onticil adverse irnpGGtS te:•- - •- VegetgtiGR -•- StGbilizetien7 ♦ - eI,
quelit)q Netive hebitet; Living I -e reseurGes- end Shereline eiGGess. Ne
shereliRe deVelePPReRt ShG11-11-- --- - -f until the GPPliGGRt
II M T" 14000
' \ - - • - • -
SHOW 1150,
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 62
. - .
RGGOmpliGbed by use . - 18G#- . . u - . .... . .. -
.. d d - . -
♦ Gid R. VertiGGI SIGPe WhiGh geR8rGIteS erGSiVe teRGleRGileS,-
systems,
WRI'S'Oo'heReVer -
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT DRAFT 2/20/20 63
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
GOALS. OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
Goal 1: Protection and Conservation of
Natural Resources.
The coastal community of Sebastian shall conserve, protect, and
appropriately manage the City's natural resources in order to enhance the
quality of life and quality of natural systems within the community.
Objective 1.1 - Protection of Resources.
Protect the City's natural resources and habitats to improve the health of the
natural environment for the community.
Policy 1.1.1: Protection of natural resources, wildlife, and habitats. The City
shall maintain land development regulations (LDRs) which include
performance criteria that limits disturbance of seagrass beds, wetlands,
and habitats of endangered or threatened species. The performance
criteria shall protect fisheries, wildlife, and wildlife habitats from the adverse
impacts of development by regulating the location, density, and intensity
of those activities which cause the adverse impact. The City's LDRs shall
recognize the rights of property owners to use their lands in a manner
consistent with the rules, policies, and guidelines of the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS). The City will encourage the provision of
contiguous conservation easements and preservation areas to maintain
wildlife corridors and minimize the fragmentation of habitat.
Policy 1.1.2: Protect the City's lakes, estuarine areas, and rivers. The City's
LDRs shall include performance criteria designed to regulate against land
development activities which adversely impact water quality, contribute
to shoreline erosion and sedimentation, or otherwise threaten the long-
term existence of lakes and estuarine areas such as living marine
organisms, seagrass, coastal marsh, and mangroves. The City shall
continue to require LDRs which include performance criteria mandating
that the potential impacts of proposed shoreline development be
analyzed as part of the process and prior to approval of a development
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 1 1 P a g e
permit or development order. The applicant shall bear the burden of
demonstrating that potential adverse impacts on estuarine resources
have been or shall be prevented. The review process for all proposed
development that fronts on Indian River Drive shall involve all local, State,
and regional entities with regulatory authority. Impacts to be considered
shall include the following but not be restricted to:
o Prevent estuarine pollution;
o Control surface water run off;
o Reduce exposure to natural hazards;
o Protect living marine resources;
o Ensure adequate public access; and
o Ensure adequate sites and standards for regulating water -dependent and
water -related uses.
Policy 1.1.1 Protect Living Marine Resources, Coastal Marsh, Estuarine
Water Quality, and Seagrass Beds. The City shall maintain LDRs which
include performance criteria which shall regulate against adverse impacts
of development on seagrass beds and coastal marsh areas. Since these
areas are sensitive to increased turbidity and other forms of pollution, water
run-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regulated through effective
water quality management criteria. Given the hydrology of the area, it is
encouraged that there be the development of a pollutant load model
based off of the recommendations outlined in the City of Sebastian,
Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.,
March 2019 (Coastal Resiliency Plan). The LDRs shall require that plans for
development impacting marine resources be coordinated with state
agencies having jurisdiction.
Policy 1.1.4: Manage Impact of Coastal Development on Tidal Flushing
and Circulation Patterns. Tidal flushing and circulation patterns generally
shall not be altered by development activities. No development shall
produce changes in the tidal flushing and circulation patterns unless the
City and other public agencies having jurisdiction have granted requisite
permits. No such permit shall be granted by the City unless all other
agencies having jurisdiction have granted clearance and the applicant
has submitted hydrographic information sufficient to clearly demonstrate
that no adverse environmental impacts shall be occasioned by the
proposed changes in tidal flushing and circulation patterns. Finally, no
alteration in tidal flow shall be permitted which causes stagnation or
siltation.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 2 1 P a g e
Policy 1.1.5: Protection of Manatee Habitat. The City shall promote
protection of manatees and manatee habitat in a manner consistent
with a applicable state guidelines and Indian River County's Manatee
Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan
(August 2004).
Objective 1.2: Protection of Wetlands. Implement policies that limit adverse
impacts or alterations to wetlands and surface waters to the greatest
extent possible.
Policy 1.2.1: Wetland Protection. Wetlands shall be defined as set by
373.421 F.S. and 373.019(27) F.S. and shall be protected from physical or
hydrologic alterations in order to maintain natural functions. The City shall
maintain LDRs including performance standards designed to protect,
conserve, and enhance wetlands and other natural resources, including
estuarine environmental quality, by:
o Directing incompatible land uses away from wetlands
o Maintaining or improving estuarine environmental quality by improving
storm water management by commencing a storm water
management plan. The plan shall provide a basis for adopting regulatory
measures for enhancing estuarine water quality and shall identify capital
improvements needed to improve the storm water management system.
This would include a City-wide evaluation to update the numerical model
with the latest datasets identified in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan.
Policy 1.2.1: Required Dedication of Conservation Easements or
Reservations. The City shall maintain regulations that provide for the
dedication of conservation easements or reservations where the City
finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect the value
and function of a wetland.
Policy 1.2.2: Establishing the Wetland Line. The City shall include in the
LDRs a requirement that any development shall conduct a delineation of
the landward extent of wetlands and other surface waters. The landward
extent of wetlands and other surface waters shall be field delineated
and flagged by a professional biologist provided by the applicant and
formally approved by the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP),
and/or the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Policy 1.2.3: Administration of Wetland Development Restrictions. The
City shall continue to require that its LDRs include performance criteria
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 3 1 P a g e
which limits the development of wetlands. The City shall continue to
require LDRs which implement the following:
o The City shall coordinate with state and federal regulatory
agencies for purposes of rendering legal, equitable, and
environmentally sensitive determinations of the development rights
to be permitted on such wetlands and/or lands under the
jurisdiction of the State or Federal government. The developer of
the parcel of environmentally sensitive land shall be responsible for
obtaining permits or exemptions from the FDEP and from the
USACE, as may be appropriate, prior to obtaining a development
order or development plan review approval from the City.
Regardless of permitting by Federal or State permitting agencies,
the City shall reserve the right to determine the appropriate land
use, density/intensity, and special mitigation measures including,
but not limited to, the construction of culverts or other means.
o The applicant shall bear the burden of proof in determining that
development shall not adversely impact wetlands, transitional
wetlands, and other environmentally fragile natural systems. The
applicant shall prove that the type, value, function, size, and
condition of the wetland will not be adversely impacted, such
determinations shall be based on physical and biological data
obtained from specific site investigations by a biologist, an engineer
or by another professional competent in producing data and analysis
necessary to support impact assessments.
o Applicants shall have an opportunity to so demonstrate that any
wetland designations within the confines of their property no longer
function as wetlands.
o For small isolated marginal wetlands that the developer is providing
viable compensatory preserve areas which mitigate against a loss of
viable wetland systems, the City may waive the preservation
requirements, in and only in, the case of an overriding public interest.
Objective 1.3: Protect Native Vegetation. Implement policies that protect
native habitats, conserve environmental lands, minimize effects of
environmental pollution, and increase awareness of the effects of non-native
habitat species.
Policy 1.3.1: Implementing Protection of Vegetative Communities and
Marine Habitats. The City's LDRs, including the adopted Tree Protection
and Landscape Regulations, shall be used in managing and protecting
the impacts of development on major vegetative communities and
marine habitats. These regulations shall mandate restoration in order to
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 4 1 P a g e
compensate for unauthorized removal of vegetation and to enhance
stabilization of fragile slopes and/or shorelines impacted by
development.
Policy 1.3.2: Preservation of Native Plant Communities. The City shall
require the LDRs to mandate that new development set aside, as a
minimum 25 percent of each native plant community. The ordinance
shall provide incentives for increased conservation of native plant
communities determined by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council (TCRPC) to be "regionally rare or endangered." The City may
require payment of a fee in lieu of the described mandatory "set aside" of
habitat. Such cash payment may be in the form of an impact fee in lieu
of habitat preservation to be accumulated from development for the
purchase of upland habit preservation off-site rather than on-site. Other
adjustments may only be granted where compensatory mitigation is
provided through revegetation with native plant species compatible with
existing plant communities.
Policy 1.3.3: Protection of Native Habitats and Natural Resources. The City
shall protect significant native habitats through its LDRs and review
process including the following:
o Preserve existing native vegetation and natural areas including
threatened native habitats
o Encourage development forms that provide protection of significant
native habitats such as clustered development and alternative
roadway designs (i.e., reduced rights-of-way)
o Development shall first avoid impact to significant native habitats
o Mitigate adverse impacts whenever areas of native habitats are
involved in the development of property
o Require development to first impact lower quality habitats and
resources before impacts to higher quality habitats and resources are
considered and used
o Native habitat shall be used whenever possible to fulfill open space
requirements
o Protect environmentally sensitive/significant areas (i.e., floodplain,
watersheds, water recharge areas, etc).
Policy 1.3.4: Removal of Undesirable Exotic Vegetation. The City shall
amend the adopted Tree Protection Ordinance as may be required to
require that, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a new
development; the owner/applicant shall remove all nuisance and
invasive exotic vegetation as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 5 1 P a g e
Council (FLEPPC) on the subject property.
Objective 1.4: Improve Water Quality and Quantity: Maintain policies and
regulations to protect and improve water quality and quantity.
Policy 1.4.1: Water Quality: In order to protect the water quality of the
Aquatic Preserve, no new point source pollution shall be permitted to
discharge into the lagoon or into ditches or canals flowing into the lagoon.
In addition, in order to reduce non -point source pollutants, LDRs shall
comply with the Indian River Lagoon Act, FDEP, SJRWMD, and the Indian
River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. The
City shall require the following:
o Surface water management systems shall be designed and constructed
to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum the storm water run-off
generated from the first one -inch of rainfall over the entire site.
o A vegetated and functional littoral zone shall be established as part of
the surface water management system of lakes occurring on all
property. Prior to construction of the surface water management
system for any phase of a project, the developer shall prepare a design
and management plan for the wetland/littoral zone that will be
developed as part of these systems.
o Class II Waters (i.e., coastal waterbodies which currently do or have
potential for supporting shellfish harvesting) shall be protected by
incorporating and maintaining the following provisions in the City's
LDRs:
• Dredging activities shall be limited to approved maintenance
dredging and shall minimize adverse impacts on shellfish
propagation or harvesting. The City shall require that fill and
dredging activities comply with all applicable local, state, and
federal requirements.
• Ensure good water quality by coordinating with the FDEP and the
SJRWMD in monitoring the quality of storm water run-off. The City's
LDRs shall provide performance criteria designed to ensure that
new development provides effective and adequate storm -water
management improvements concurrent with the impacts of new
development.
• Continue to asses needs for retrofitting stormwater outfalls without
adequate treatment.
• Limit the use of Class II waters to water dependent activities
that are not contrary to the public interest and satisfy a
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 6 1 P a g e
community need,
• Limit modification of grass beds only to those cases involving
overriding public interest.
Policy 1.4.2: Regulate Agricultural Activities to Preserve Water Quality.
The City's LDRs shall include stipulations requiring that agricultural
activities shall:
o Not be conducted adjacent to existing waterways and surface water
management activities and shall comply with all applicable policies
of FDEP, SJRWMD, and other agencies having appropriate jurisdiction as
well as State laws, including administrative rules governing the Indian
River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve. Such activities shall not threaten the
water quality of the City's rivers and waterbodies;
o Maintain natural drainage patterns;
o Promote the use of surface water supplies for irrigation purposes;
o Prohibit the expansion of agricultural activities into wetland areas;
and
o Use best management principles and practices in order to reduce
pesticide and fertilizer run-off, prevent soil erosion, and preserve
water quality.
Policy 1.4.3: Protect Deep and Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas. The
City has no prime deep aquifer recharge areas which have been
identified by the SJRWMD. However, stipulations for protecting
surficial aquifer recharge areas shall be incorporated into the City's
LDRs which require retention of open space for all development in
order to:
o Preserve the quality and quantity of water resources within the
surficial aquifer,
o Promote improved surface water management; and
o Create natural or landscaped urban green space for enhanced
community aesthetics and passive pedestrian activities.
Policy 1.4.4: Deep Aquifer Water Conservation. In order to protect the
quality and quantity of deep aquifer water resources, the City shall
coordinate with the SJRWMD and other applicable regulatory
agencies in identifying the existence and location of free flowing
deep aquifer wells and in requiring corrective measures, including
capping, plugging, or installing regulatory devices which control the
discharge of water from the deep aquifer pursuant to the SJRWMD
policies.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 7 1 P a g e
Policy 1.4.5: Protection and Conservation of Potable Water Supply.
Consistent with the Indian River County Water Supply Plan, the City
shall continue to require the LDRs to incorporate performance
criteria for public potable water wellfield protection. In addition,
administrative procedures shall require applicants for development
to coordinate with the SJRWMD in obtaining consumptive use
permits. In order to comply with potable water conservation policies
of the SJRWMD and achieve a reduction in the current rates of water
consumption, the City's LDRs shall incorporate the following
performance standards:
o Where reclaimed water is available, potable watersupplies may not be
used to meet irrigation needs.
o Require the use of water -saving plumbing fixtures on all new
development.
o In order to reduce demand for irrigation water (which in turn often places
greater demand upon potable water sources), at least thirty (30%) percent
of all landscaping material obtained from off-site sources for use on any
site should be native plants. Further, at least fifty (50%) percent of trees
used in landscaping shall be native species in order to lessen water
demand
Policy 1.4.6: Emergency Conservation of Water Sources. The City shall
coordinate with the SJRWMD in implementing emergency water
conservation measures based on the SJRWMD plans for
management of the region's water resources.
Policy 1.4.7: Managing Land Use Surrounding Water Well Cones of
Influence. The City's LDRs shall contain performance criteria designed
to protect potable water supply and quality by restricting land
development within public water well cones of influence in order to avoid
potential adverse impacts on potable water resources.
Policy 1.4.8: Best Management Practices. The City is susceptible to
impacts of future sea level rise and combined rain events that would
cause flooding based on data outlined in the City's Coastal Resiliency
Plan. Best Management Practices to address flooding level of service
violations and water quality shall be devised and, given the hydrology of
the area, it is encouraged that there be the development of a pollutant
load model. It is also encouraged that there be the hardening of pump -
stations in order to increase resiliency against flooding events.
Objective 1.5 - Protect Air Quality.
Protect and improve air quality by ensuring development meets or
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 8 1 P a g e
exceeds state and federal air quality standards and establishing regulatory
programs to prevent and/or minimize non -point sources of air pollution.
Policy 1.5.1: Combat Erosion and Generation of Dust Particles. The City's
LDRs shall incorporate performance standards which combat erosion
and generation of fugitive dust particles. The regulations shall require
that measures be taken on building sites or cleared areas which assure
that exposed, destabilized, or other altered soil is expeditiously covered
with an acceptable erosion control material.
Policy 1.5.2: Air Pollution and Land Use Regulations. The City's LDRs,
including adopted soil erosion and sedimentation controls as well as
nuisance abatement standards, shall continue to protect against loss of
air quality by maintaining land use controls which promote only activities
compatible with existing land uses and natural systems and prohibit
activities which generate air pollutants and other adverse impacts on
the environmentally fragile coastal ecosystem. The City shall also
promote the function of trees in improving air quality through the Tree
Protection and Landscaping Ordinance, consistent with Objective 1.9.
Policy 1.5.3: Land Use and Transportation. Consistent with the Land Use
Element and Transportation and Mobility Element, the City shall promote
the reduction of vehicle emission by supporting land uses that promote
walking, biking, transit, and alternative modes of transportation, and
encourage urban infill development that limits the need for automobile
use, increases trip capture and reduces traffic congestion in a cost-
effective manner.
Objective 1.6 Protection of Shoreline and Public Access to Shoreline.
Protect and preserve the City's shorelines and public access to water
based facilities and natural resources.
Policy 1.6.1: Natural Shoreline Systems. The City shall promote natural
shoreline systems by utilizing the site and development process
to:
o Discourage the hardening of the Indian River Lagoon and other
natural waterway shorelines; this would include requiring an
environmental impact study and a special City Council variance for
any sea wall construction
o Encourage the softening of the shorelines
o Promote the installation of native vegetation and living shorelines and
the removal of existing hardening structures
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 9 1 P a g e
Policy 1.6.2: Public Access to Waterfront Areas. The City shall encourage
developers to provide public waterfront access adjacent to the
waterfront. Such access may include walkways, bikeways, water taxis,
canoeing/kayaking, public spaces, dining areas, and the like.
Policy 1.6.3: Conservation Easements. The City shall work with private
property owners to implement conservation easements to protect
sensitive natural resources such as mangroves, dune systems, and
coastal tidal areas.
Policy 1.6.4: Florida Native Vegetation and Features. The City shall
promote the use of native Florida vegetation and protection of natural
features in coastal and waterfront development.
Policy 1.6.5: Criteria for Prioritizing Shoreline Uses and Public Shoreline
Access. In reviewing applications for shoreline development first priority
shall be directed to the following shoreline uses:
o Non- structural shoreline protection uses such as native shoreline
revegetation programs;
o Approved water -dependent estuarine shoreline uses such as: pervious
accessways and duly permitted dock facilities and commercial
marinas. All such facilities shall satisfy all provisions of the City's land
development code and obtain requisite permits from all
environmental permitting agencies prior to obtaining City approval.
Newly proposed marinas shall not be approved unless the applicant
demonstrates that the marina site is consistent with the City's
conservation and coastal management policies. Priority shall be
directed to water dependent uses which are available for public use.
These facilities shall demonstrate during site plan review compliance with
performance standards stipulated in Policy 1.6.6 of this element in order
to prevent adverse impacts to natural features. Second priority shall be
directed toward water -related uses such as:
o Parking facilities for shoreline access;
o Residential structures which comply with the building code for
structures within the State coastal building zone; and
o Recreational facilities which comply with applicable codes.
The City of Sebastian has no beach or dune system, and therefore,
shoreline protection policies apply only to the estuarine shoreline.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 10 1 P a g e
Policy 1.6.6: Implementing Policies for Shoreline Land Uses. The City's
LDR's shall stipulate provisions implementing shoreline land use priorities,
including criteria for regulating water -dependent and water -related
shoreline land uses. The City's LDRs shall prohibit any development within
the wetland shoreline, other than water dependent native shoreline
vegetation programs, approved pervious or elevated accessways, or
other uses approved by the City pursuant to other City regulations. No
structures which constrict water circulation in the lagoon shall be
permitted. The LDRs shall address the following:
o All applicants proposing development activities along the City's
shorelines or within submerged areas shall be required to submit a site
plan pursuant to site plan review regulations. In addition, the City shall
require surveys of existing conditions, specifications of planned site
improvements, and techniques to be used during construction as well
as in operating and maintaining the land use in order to prevent
damage to living marine organisms.
o All water -related uses shall be built on uplands landward of the
floodway. Within the State coastal building zone all construction
activities shall be predicated on plans compliant with applicable
State and local building codes. Dredging and filling of wetlands or
open water in order to accommodate water -related uses shall not be
permitted unless the City approves such activity pursuant to provisions
of the wetland protection ordinance, the storm water management
ordinance, and all other relevant site plan review criteria.
o Hardening of the lagoon shoreline shall not be permitted unless the
upland property is critically imperiled, and the use of vegetation has
failed to stabilize the shoreline. The design specifications of any
shoreline hardening structure shall be implemented in the City's LDRs.
o No non -water dependent uses shall be permitted on submerged
lands or wetlands. Development on uplands adjacent to wetlands
shall preserve a buffer known as the wetland transition area. The
specific boundary of a wetland transition area shall be established by
field investigation.
o Transition areas shall be defined as the area separating wetland and
upland areas and in which development activities may be regulated
to protect wetlands. The transition zone is an area having a direct
groundwater or surface water influence. The transition area provides
a buffer between wetlands and upland development or other land
alteration activities. This area shall meet the minimum size
requirements established by SJRWMD for wetland buffers. The purpose
of the transition zone is to ensure the continuing function of respective
wetland communities.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 11 1 P a g e
o Docks or marina improvements shall not be approved by the City until
the applicant demonstrates compliance with all applicable federal
and State laws and administrative rules governing Aquatic Preserves
as well as applicable policies of regional agencies. No commercial
marina facilities shall be permitted on the Sebastian River. The City
shall require site plans for all docks and marinas. These plans must
demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that the facilities shall not
adversely impact natural marine resources.
o Shoreline access to the Indian River Lagoon shall be promoted in
order to maintain accessways at approximately one-half mile intervals
along the shoreline. State assistance shall be enlisted to achieve land
required to appropriately store vehicles, provide rest room facilities,
and accessways designed in a manner compatible with the shoreline
ecosystem. The City shall consider ways to ensure public access and
provide the necessary infrastructure to support waterfront activities.
o The City shall consider restricting commercial signage along the
Indian River, to only those signs deemed essential for water
dependent facilities. The City shall coordinate with the applicable
agencies to develop uniform signage and criteria to further this policy.
Policy 1.6.7: Protection against Potential Adverse Impact on Estuarine
Shoreline and Site Plans Required for Developments in Estuarine
Shoreline Areas. The City's LDRs shall require applicants for
development along lakes, natural waterways, or the estuarine
shoreline to submit as part of the development review process plans
which demonstrate how the development shall incorporate feature
designed to protect against potential adverse impacts to: Shoreline
vegetation and stabilization; Water quality; Native habitat; Living
marine resources; and Shoreline access. No shoreline development
shall be approved until the applicant has demonstrated that
potentially adverse impacts shall be prevented or that
compensatory mitigation shall occur.
Policy 1.6.8: Protect, Stabilize, and Enhance the Estuarine Shoreline. The
City LDRs shall stipulate that no native vegetation shall be removed from
the estuarine shoreline without a duly authorized City land clearing permit.
Similarly, criteria shall be included in the LDRs which require that applicants
for development along the estuarine shoreline shall be required to
revegetate, stabilize, and enhance damaged estuarine shorelines by
planting native vegetation, including mangrove and/or other native
estuarine plant species. Hardening of the estuarine shoreline with rip -rap,
bulkheads or other similar devices shall not be allowed unless erosion
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 12
constitutes a critical peril to upland property and the use of vegetation has
failed to stabilize the shoreline. Such shoreline hardening structures shall
generally not be vertical seawalls or bulkheads. The specific location and
design of such structures shall be approved by the City as well as by other
public entities having jurisdiction in the matter. The implementation of
living shorelines shall be encouraged.
Policy 1.6.9: Designation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. This
Element's DIA specifically includes areas reserved for conservation
uses or restricted development. All conservation land uses identified
shall either remain undeveloped or shall undergo "restricted
development.'' "Restricted development" shall be regulated through
performance criteria adopted and maintained within the LDRs.
Objective 1.7: Minimize Soil Erosion. Reduce the incidence of soil erosion
caused by land clearing, breaches in stabilized shorelines, and lands having
exposed soil without vegetative cover.
Policy 1.7.1: Implementing Erosion Control. The City's LDRs shall require
that appropriate measures be taken during land clearing and building
operations to ensure that exposed, destabilized or otherwise altered soil
is expeditiously covered with an acceptable erosion control material.
The City's regulations related to soil erosion will be informed by the Best
Management Practices as established by SJRWMD, FDEP, FDOT, Florida
Cooperative Extension Service, Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, and
Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Objective 1.8: Mining and Mineral Excavation Activities. Prevent the adverse
effects of the extraction of mineral resources within the City.
Policy 1.8.1: Prohibition Against Mining Activities. The LDRs shall prohibit
mining activities, except for existing sand mining operations, to protect
the City's ecosystems.
Objective 1.9: Tree protection and preservation.
Protect and preserve Sebastian's trees and promote a healthy urban forest
throughout the City in recognition of the importance of trees as a valuable
public resource that enhances livability and provides environmental benefits.
Policy 1.9.1: The City shall continue to maintain the Tree Protection and
Landscaping Ordinance within the LDRs to address, at a minimum, tree
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 13
protection and removal standards, historic trees, mangroves, undesirable
exotic vegetation, suitable trees for planting, and residential/commercial
development tree requirements.
Policy 1.9.2: The City shall consider the implementation of plans for the
planting trees and landscaping within specific public rights-of-way and
other public areas.
Policy 1.9.3: The City shall continue to seek Tree City USA designation
through the Arbor Day Foundation.
Policy 1.9.4: Removal of Trees Causing Safety Hazard. The City's LDRs shall
require that trees, such as Australian Pines, that are prone to wind damage
and blockage of evacuation routes be removed from areas deemed by
the City to be critical corridors for evacuation purposes. In addition, the
City shall consider the feasibility of imitating a similar program to remove
any trees on public property which impose a critical threat to evacuation
routes.
Objective 1.10: Green Infrastructure and Sustainability
Consider sustainability and environmental -consciousness in the City operations
and promote the utilization of green infrastructure.
Policy 1.10.1: The City shall consider the development of a Sustainability
Action Plan to include long-term objectives and short-term actions to
guide the City in areas including, but not limited to, improving quality of life
and community/individual health; energy conservation/independence; air
quality, water quality, and natural systems; and economic sustainability.
Policy 1.10.2: Consistent with the Economic Development Element, the City
shall explore strategies to leverage the City's natural and economic assets
to attract `green jobs' and related industries.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 14 1 P a g e
Goal 2: Coastal Management and Resiliency.
The coastal community of Sebastian shall limit public expenditures in areas
subject to destruction by flood risk and natural disasters in order to enhance
the quality of life of its residents.
Objective 2.1: Coastal High -hazard Area. The coastal high hazard area
(CHHA) consists of the Category I evacuation zone established in the
Treasure Coast Statewide Regional Evacuation Study. The only areas within
the City limits identified in the Category I evacuation zone are the City's
mobile home parks. Enforce development restrictions within the CHHA and
any area found to have historically experienced destruction or severe
damage from storm driven, wind, water, or erosion. The City has identified
the high velocity storm surge area as indicated on the Federal flood
insurance rate maps as the only such area.
Policy 2.1.1: Limiting Public Subsidy of Development in the Coastal High -
Hazard Area. The City shall limit public expenditures that subsidize
development permitted in the CHHA to restoration or enhancement of
natural resources and public services for water dependent uses. The only
exception to this regulation shall be that existing mobile homes within the
CHHA shall be grandfathered in, thereby may be repaired and/or
replaced as long as the density does not increase. The City shall aim to
minimize the impact of natural hazards such as flooding and sea level rise
to the community by directing development away from the CHHA as
defined by State Statute § 163.3178(2) (f), F.S.
Policy 2.1.2: Existing Infrastructure in the CHHA. The City shall establish a
priority list of infrastructure facilities located in the CHHA which could be
relocated, mitigated or replaced should state funding become available
for such activities. Additional infrastructure and assets are inventoried in
the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan.
Policy 2.1.3: Public Investments in Coastal High -Hazard Area. Public
funded facilities shall not be built in the CHHA, unless the facility is for
public access, resource restoration, adequate evacuation, or service to
water dependent activities. These facilities may face inundation and be
impacted if they are outdoor facilities based on data included in the
City's Coastal Resiliency Plan.
Policy 2.1.4: Hazard Mitigation and Coastal High -Hazard Areas. The City
shall maintain LDRs which contain performance standards regulating
development activities in a manner which minimizes the danger to life and
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 15 1 P a g e
property occasioned by natural hazard events including:
o Storm and Floodproofing Standard for Non-residential Structures. Non-
residential construction within the coastal high hazard area shall meet
storm and floodproofing standards exceeding those required for a one
hundred (100) year storm.
o Restrictions of Redevelopment. If a structure located within the CHHA
receive storm damage in excess of fifty (50) percent of its appraised
value, all such damaged structures shall be required to meet all current
laws and ordinances, including those enacted since construction of the
subject structure.
Policy 2.1.5: Avoid Population Concentrations in Coastal High -Hazard
Areas. The City shall restrict development and not increase densities or
intensities beyond those depicted on the Future Land Use Map in the
CHHA in order to minimize danger to life and property occasional by
hurricane events, flooding, or sea level rise. The City shall direct
population concentrations away from CHHA.
Policy 2.1.6: Restrict Development in Coastal High -Hazard Areas. The City
shall incorporate appropriate policies in the LDRs in order to direct
population concentrations away from known or predicted areas in the
CHHA. Also, the City shall direct population concentrations away from
known areas that are vulnerable to flooding inundation and sea level rise
as established in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. Development
principles and strategies that eliminate unsafe development in the CHHA
must be used as defined by § 163.3178(2) (f), F.S. The following provisions
shall restrict development within the CHHA:
o Water and sewer treatment plants, industrial holding ponds and other
potential point pollution sources within the coastal high -hazard area
are prohibited.
o Require construction within the hurricane flood zone to meet storm and
flood proofing standards exceeding those required fora 100 -year storm.
o Residential development and/or redevelopment in the CHHA shall not
exceed existing residential densities for that property.
o Beach sand dune alteration shall be prohibited.
Objective 2.2: Maintenance of Floodplain. Protect the natural
functions, including flood- carrying and flood storage capacity, of the
100 -year floodplain.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 16 1 P a g e
Policy 2.2.1: Enforce Policies to Maintain Floodplain. The City shall
continue to enforce its surface water management and flood
damage prevention regulations. New development encroaching
into the floodplain shall incorporate flood protection measures
sufficient to protect against the 100 -year flood. New development
encroaching into areas subject to sea level rise, storm surge, and
flood inundation shall incorporate flood protection measures as
defined in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. The City's Storm Water
Management and Flood Protection Ordinance shall maintain
consistency with program policies of the Federal Insurance
Administration. The City shall monitor new cost-effective programs
for minimizing flood damage. Such programs may include
modification to construction setback requirements or other site
design techniques, as well as upgraded building and construction
techniques. The City shall encourage the use of best practices of
development strategies that results in reducing flood risk and the
removal of coastal real property from flood zone designations
established by the Federal Emergency Agency as required by
§ 163.3178(2) (f), F.S.
Policy 2.2.2: Purchase of Floodplain. The City shall identify and
recommend to the State and FDEP purchase of floodplains that
would comply with program guidelines established under the Florida
Forever Program.
Objective 2.3: Hurricane Evacuation. Coordinate with Indian River County in
attaining a hurricane evacuation time of less than twelve (12) hours. There is
the potential to put into place early warning notifications for elderly
residents who are potentially more vulnerable as recommended in the City's
Coastal Resiliency Plan. According to the Coastal Resiliency Plan,
inundation caused by flooding and sea level rise is predicted to impact
evacuation routes on Sebastian Boulevard and this vulnerability should be
addressed to increase resilience.
Policy 2.3.1: Hurricane Evacuation Logistical Support. In order to prevent
unnecessary evacuees crowding roads and shelters, the City shall
coordinate with Indian River County in disseminating information
concerning the need of residents to evacuate at various hurricane threat
levels, flood events, and sea level rise events. The City shall coordinate
with the County and the Indian River County Emergency Management
Director in assisting the implementation of the County's campaign to
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 17 1 P a g e
educate the general citizenry regarding emergency preparedness plans,
including specific citizen directives.
Policy 2.3.2: Future Coordination with the County in Emergency
Preparedness. In order to provide for safe and efficient evacuation of
the residents of the City of Sebastian and other communities in the event
of a hurricane, the City shall continue to coordinate with Indian River
County in annual updates of the County's Comprehensive Emergency
Management Plan. This update shall enable the County and
incorporated municipalities to plan for future population densities which
will neither adversely impact the efficiency of the evacuation plan nor
increase evacuation times. The City's LDR's shall mandate that new
development maintain a density threshold which is consistent with the
County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. This stipulation
will assure that future density thresholds may be accommodated without
adversely impacting hurricane evacuation time. The City shall also
coordinate with the County in updating hurricane evacuation shelter
assignments as well as other policy formulation surrounding land use and
emergency preparedness.
Policy 2.3.3: Coordinate Update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City
shall coordinate with the County in updating the hazard mitigation
component of the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management
Plan pursuant to the five (5) year interval schedule adopted by the
County. Updates of the Plan shall identify specific actions that may be
implemented to reduce exposure to natural hazards, include strategies
for post -disaster recovery operations, and incorporate interagency
hazard mitigation reports as such reports are generated in the future.
Objective 2.4: Post -disaster Redevelopment. Coordinate with Indian River
County in providing immediate response to post -disaster situations.
Policy 2.4.1: Post -Hurricane Assessments. The City Council shall appoint a
Recovery Task Force comprised of the City Manager, the Building Official,
and others as determined by the City Council. The Recovery Task Force
shall be responsible for assessing the conditions following a hurricane or
other similar disasters such as flooding events and shall propose strategic
actions necessary to establish order and re-establish communication and
basic service delivery systems necessary for health, safety, and welfare.
Within ninety (90) days after appointment of the Recovery Task Force, the
Task Force shall meet to determine a management framework for
resolving issues confronted in times of a natural disaster. The
management framework shall be reviewed with the County Civil Defense
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 18 1 P a g e
Officer for compliance with the County's Comprehensive Emergency
Management Plan and shall be presented to the City Council for review
and approval. The management plan should provide a basis for
executing the following activities during times of natural disaster.
o Establishing a temporary moratorium on building activity;
o Reviewing and deciding upon emergency building permits;
o Coordinating with State and Federal officials to prepare disaster
assistance applications;
o Analyzing and recommending to the City Council hazard mitigation
options, including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public
facilities;
o Developing a redevelopment plan including limitations on
redevelopment in areas of repeated damage; and
o Recommending amendments to the Local Peacetime Emergency
Plan and other appropriate policies and procedures.
Policy 2.4.2: Repair and Clean-up. In planning post -disaster
redevelopment activities, factors to be considered in order to protect the
public health and safety shall include:
o Repairs to potable water, wastewater and power facilities;
o Removal of debris;
o Stabilization or removal of structures in a perilous condition; and
o Minimal repairs to make structures habitable.
These considerations shall receive first priority in determining the
appropriateness of emergency building permits. Long term
redevelopment activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task
Force has coordinated immediate repair and clean-up operations.
Policy 2.4.3: Redevelopment Activities. The LDRs shall require the
redevelopment of any structure within the City that received storm -
damage in excess of fifty (500) percent of its appraised value to meet
all current laws and ordinances, including those enacted since
construction of the subject structure. The city shall require that new
development and redevelopment in areas that are at high risk of
flooding to use best practices, strategies, and engineering solutions
that may reduce risk and losses due to storms, flooding and sea level
rise as defined by § 163.3178(2) (f), F.S.
Policy 2.4.4: Establish Public Facilities Review Committee. The City
Council shall designate the Recovery Taskforce as the City's
designated Public Facilities Review Committee charged with the
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 19
responsibility for reviewing available alternatives for managing
damaged public facilities following a hurricane event. The Committee
shall evaluate future options for such facilities, including, but not
limited to, abandonment repair in place, relocation, and
reconstruction, with structural modifications. The Committee shall
consider these options based on the following considerations:
o Cost to construct;
o Impacts on the environment;
o Cost to maintain;
o Public sector;
o Recurring damages;
o Impacts on land use, and
o Other relevant factors.
Objective 2.5: Establish an Adaptation Action Area Overlay District. To
minimize future risk, establish an Adaptation Action Area (AAA) Overlay
District for areas that are vulnerable to coastal flooding and the impacts of
sea level rise, based on the data and modeling outlined within the City's
Coastal Resiliency Plan and compliant with § 163. 3178, F.S.
Policy 2.5.1: Adaptation Action Area. Within the LDRs, the City of
Sebastian shall establish criteria for Low Impact Design and Flood
Resistant Design for new development and redevelopment within the
AAA. Development within this overlay district must comply with coastal
development best practices including but not limited to construction
engineering solutions and low impact development techniques that
utilize vegetation and natural features to minimize surface runoff and
reduce flood risk.
Policy 2.5.2: Transfer of Development Rights Program. The City shall
establish a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program to
incentivize the preservation of natural resources within vulnerable
areas including those identified within the City's Coastal Resiliency
Plan. The City shall designate parcels within the established CHHA or
proposed AAA Overlay District as sending zones for development
rights, and less vulnerable parcels outside of the established CHHA
or proposed AAA as receiving sites for density and intensity
transferred through the TDR program. This allows development at
higher densities in low risk areas and encourages less intense
development in the City's floodplains
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 20
Objective 2.6: Continuing Evaluation of Conservation and Coastal
Management Element Effectiveness. Evaluate the effectiveness of the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
Policy 2.6.1: Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Coastal
Management and Conservation Policy. The City shall monitor and
evaluate significant changes in the characteristics of natural coastal
resources and natural resources within the City. Policy implications of such
changes shall be examined, and corrective measures shall be pursued.
Coastal management and conservation policies shall be refined as
needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues.
Policy 2.6.2: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The
timely scheduling, programming, budgeting and implementation of
programmed coastal management activities and conservation activities
identified in this Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in
carrying out a systematic program for implementing coastal management
and conservation goals, objectives, and policies.
Policy 2.6.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually
implementing and evaluating the Conservation and Coastal Management
Element, the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental
coordination as well as coordination, with private sector groups interested
in coastal management and conservation policy and programs. The
effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of
coordination mechanisms in resolving coastal management and
conservation problems and issues.
Policy 2.6.4: Achieve Effective Resolution of Coastal Management and
Conservation Goals, Objectives and Policies. The effectiveness of the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element shall be measured by the
City's success in achieving coastal management and conservation goals,
objectives and policies. The Conservation and Coastal Management
Element incorporates a systematic planning process for identifying coastal
management and conservation problems and issues and implementing
corrective actions.
Policy 2.6.5: Intergovernmental Coordination. Specific Objectives and
Policies regarding intergovernmental coordination and this Element are
provided and identified in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
Conservation & Coastal Management Draft 2/25/20 21 1 P a g e
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 2020 MEETING
PAGE 7
a. Rectangle 4" x 2" white vinyl stickers -- $282.00 for 1000
b. Organic cotton 13" x 15" totes --$448.00 to $672.00 for 2001300
c. Tee Shirts Mens/Womens, color front -- $80.00 for 10 (may need more)
d. Seed packets (envelopes, seeds, labels)
e. Metal tumblers
Ms. Haigler stated she will prepare a one-page flyer describing what Sustainable
Sebastian is to be handed out at different events.
Mr. Stadelman suggested coming up with a basic definition of Sustainable Sebastian or
"catch phrase" to get the word out. Mr. O'Neill had suggested SBC, S --straws, B --bags,
C --cups, or "Sebastian Business Cares."
IX. Member Matters
Mr. O'Neill pointed out that getting two-thirds of the goals this year would be straws and
bags, which are very detrimental to the turtles.
Mr. Stadelman thanked everyone for their hard work on this project and reminded
everyone that this Board has been invited to be involved in the Integrated Pest
Management Sub -Committee as well as devising the new Comprehensive Plan. These
things will impact this community for many years to come.
Ms. Haigler announced that Patrick Morgan from the Sebastian Area Historical Society
has a great deal of information. Also, on Wednesday, February 19th, they will be
presenting a history of mosquito control at the North County Library, which is very
interesting.
X. Items for Next Aaenda
XI. Adiournment
There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Ms.
Brothers, seconded by Ms. Ware, and approved unanimously via voice vote. Meeting
was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
By: Date:
Chairman Charles Stadelman
0