Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04-2020 PZ AgendaHOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET a. SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2020 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting of March 5, 2020 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL and PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input on items other than on the printed agenda, is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of members present 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Accessory Structure Review - LDC Section 54-2-7.5 - 502 Hibiscus Avenue - 996 SF Detached Garage - Charles Hiltz 10. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS 11. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. STAFF MATTERS, 13. ADJOURN DUE TO HEALTH CONCERNS REGARDING CORONAVIRUS, ALTERNATIVE METHODS WILL BE IN PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC TO PROVIDE INPUT REGARDING THIS MEETING. INTERESTED PARTIES MAY CONTACT THE CITY AT 772-388-8226 OR E-MAIL QUESTIONS AT COSTV(a)COSTV.CITYOFSEBASTIAN.ORG OR MAY VISIT THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT http://www.cit�,ofsebastian.oreJpublic-input-methods. HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (F. S. 286.0105) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING. All government meetings in City Council Chambers will be broadcast live on COS -TV Comcast Channel 25 and ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed via the city website — www.citvofsebastian.orq unless otherwise noticed and rebroadcast at a later date — see COS -TV Channel 25 for broadcast schedule 2 1. 2. 3. CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 5, 2020 Call to Order -- Chairman Reyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 A. �} I` Pledge of Alleciance was recited by all. .&.. — m Roll Call Present: Not Present Also Present: 's C � i •Co W in ir cu F' Mr. Roth Mr. Reyes a Mr. Simmons Mr. Christino (a) Ms. Kautenburg (a) Mr. Qizilbash 3^ Mr. Carter Mr. Alvarez -- 0 co Mr. Hughan -- Excused •= ® c MN <<W Ms. Dorri Bosworth, Planning Manager Mr. Robert Loring, Senior Planner Mr. James Stokes, Acting City Attorney Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer Ms. Mara Schiff, Indian River County School Board liaison, was not present. 4. Announcements and/or Agenda Modifications Mr. Reyes announced that Mr. Hughan is excused from tonight's meeting, and Ms. Kautenburg will be voting in his place. 5. Aovroval of Minutes Mr. Reyes called for a motion to approve the Minutes of February 20, 2020. A motion to accept the Minutes of the meeting of February 20, 2020 as presented was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Qizilbash. Roll Call Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Prior to opening the Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearings, Mr. Qizilbash suggested first hearing Item 9A -- Accessory Structure Reviews under New Business PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Mr. Reyes stated a motion by Mr. Qizilbash is on the floor to make a change to the meeting Agenda, which will require a unanimous vote of the Commission members. Mr. Carter seconded the motion. Roll Call: Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote 7-0 in favor. Motion passes 9. New Business A. Accessory Structure Review -- LDC Section 54-2-7.5: 725 Layport Drive -- 24 x 31 Carport -- Justin Poteat The applicant, Mr. Justin Poteat, described his property as two conjoined lots that are heavily wooded. He is requesting to put a 744 -square -foot accessory structure onto the lot adjacent to his home. Setbacks are 20 feet from the back of the property and 15 feet from the side of the property. He has chosen materials to closely resemble the colors of his house. It is a preassembled steel structure from USA Steel Buildings, who will do the installation. Mr. Poteat will be preparing the lot. He has a permit application for the building, adding a culvert, and removing just a couple of the palm trees to make room for the accessory structure. Mr. Loring stated staff reviewed the required items that are necessary for compliance. Staff deemed that the request was in compliance except for the following provisions. The Commission needs to decide if the proposed carport meets the intent of the Planning and Zoning Commission review for Provision No. 7(c). The proposed carport roof has a similar color but not a similar roof material as the home. The proposed carport only has a 3:12 pitch roof; the existing home has a 6:12 pitch roof. It should be noted that the applicant mentioned that the site is heavily wooded, and a condition for the Commission to consider is, if they wish to approve the accessory structure, would the site remain heavily landscaped to curtail any deleterious effects to the surrounding properties. It also should be noted that the applicant has applied for the driveway permit, and it is going to remain as a dirt/sod with a culvert pipe over the existing swale. Mr. Qizilbash inquired if the building will be open in the front and the back. Mr. Poteat stated it will be. He advised Mr. Poteat to verify with the Building Department that the structure meets with the current Building Code. Mr. Poteat stated the structure will be certified to withstand 180 MPH winds. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 PAGE 3 He also asked how the structure will be anchored. Mr. Poteat stated that in the engineering plan it is specified as a screw and anchor and a concrete footing on the bottom of the post, which does meet the Building Code. Mr. Christino asked if there will be a separate driveway installed to access the building. Mr. Poteat stated just the culvert will be added and will remain a grass driveway. He also inquired as to how close the accessory structure will be to the neighbor's house because of possible noise. Mr. Poteat stated the neighbor behind him has an empty lot, and the neighbor next to him has a tall fence. They will not be able to see it from their property. Mr. Roth asked if Mr. Poteat plans to keep the lot heavily wooded as it is presently. Mr. Poteat stated the only trees he is removing are a couple of the palm trees that he needs to do in order to access the building and to erect the building. None of the large oaks are being removed. Mr. Roth also noted the color that will be used is said to be compatible with the house. He would request that the Planning Department approve the color before the permit is issued and inquired as to what the roof is made of. Mr. Poteat stated it will be galvanized steel. It will be a dark slate gray which closely matches the shingles on the house. Mr. Alvarez inquired if Mr. Poteat lives at the property. Mr. Poteat stated yes, he does. Mr. Reyes stated he is somewhat concerned about the anchoring. There being no further discussion, Mr. Reyes called for a motion. A motion to accept the accessory structure application for 725 Layport Drive, 24 x 31 carport was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Reyes. Mr. Roth asked for an amendment to the motion for'the City to review the color of the structure. Roll Call: Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Vote 7-0 in favor. Motion passes 958 Bermuda Avenue Steinacher Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes -- 26 x 38 Detached Garage -- Steven Mr. Reyes announced that Mr. Qizilbash will recuse himself from voting on this application, as his son designed the structure. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 4 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Ms. Bosworth noted for the record that Mr. Qizilbash will be filing a form 8(B). It will be attached to the Minutes, and staff per the form is giving the Commission members notice that Mr. Qizilbash will be completing that. The applicant, Steven Steinacher, stated he is proposing to build an accessory structure that is 980 square feet. He has met all the criteria regarding the City Codes. Mr. Loring has found that most items were found to be compliant. Based on the submitted plan, there appears to be 94.67 feet of perimeter area around the perimeter of the proposed structure, which will require 32 shrubs to be planted and maintained. This should be an item that the Commission may wish to mandate as part of the approval. Secondly, the site will be required to keep and maintain a minimum of 12 trees on site. Thirdly, the homeowner has applied for an auxiliary driveway permit for the culvert pipe over the existing swale with elevations set by the Stormwater Department. Mr. Christino asked if the roof pitch is the same as the house. Mr. Steinacher stated it is. He stated the roof will be the same material and the same color as the house. The roof is wooden trusses with a one -foot overhang for the soffits. Mr. Roth asked if there is a shrubbery plan that will accompany this application. Mr. Loring stated the requirement is that the perimeter of the accessory structure has perimeter landscaping. He also inquired as to what the building will be used for. Mr. Steinacher stated that it will be used to store high-end automobiles. Mr. Alvarez asked how many garages Mr. Steinacher plans on having with houses. Mr. Steinacher stated he owns seven houses in Sebastian. There is only one other house that has a vacant lot next to it, and that lot is not one that he could use. Mr. Alvarez is concerned about the number of houses with garages next to them that Mr. Steinacher may own. Mr. Stokes stated that is not a consideration here. Every one of the applicant's lots must be treated separately. Mr. Reyes inquired what the code is for elevation above the crown of the road for any new foundation. Mr. Loring stated it is typically 18 inches above the crown of the road, but this is not an inhabitable structure. Mr. Reyes asked if the applicant could come in later and request to do some modifications to this building to turn it into a rental. Mr. Loring stated no, that the properties have a unity of title. Mr. Reyes called for a motion. A motion to approve the 26- x 38 -foot detached garage at 958 Bermuda Street subject to the additional considerations on Page 3 of the application, sub -sections A, B and D, was made by Mr. Simmons and seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call: Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 5 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- (withdrew) Vote 6-0 in favor. Motion passes. 1520 Glentry Lane -- 22 x 38 Detached Garage -- Greg Anderson Mr. Greg Anderson stated he is proposing building a detached garage next to his house on a half -acre lot. He is hoping to make it as architecturally integrated as possible with his residence. All materials will be the same, including the metal roof. There will be generous setbacks on all sides. The pitch of the house is 6:12; the pitch of the garage will also be 6:12, not 7:12 as it shows on the engineering drawing. The request by staff for perimeter plantings will be complied with. To the north side of the proposed structure between the garage and the house there is an existing paver walkway, which he would like to maintain. That is their access to HVAC and pool equipment. That would be problematic for plantings on the north side of the proposed building but would still allow approximately 60 feet of plantings around the perimeter. Mr. Reyes asked regarding the plantings around the building. If the applicant does not surround the structure with the shrubs, if that would be a problem, and he asked staff for their findings. Mr. Loring stated that in the case of this request, the applicant has some additional pavers and some other equipment there which doesn't lend itself to landscaping. The commission could mandate that the other sides are landscaped and give him relief from that one side, or they could reduce the number of required plantings. It's up to the commission as to how they wish to proceed. Another question staff has is regarding the roof of the structure. Mr. Anderson stated that the house roof is also a metal roof. Staff recommends approval of the application. Mr. Qizilbash noted that there is an RV parked on the property. When this garage is built, he asked where that RV will be placed. Mr. Anderson stated that RV is not his. He is doing some pro bono work for a friend. It will not be there when the work on the structure is completed. Mr. Christino agreed there is no need to put shrubbery between the home and the garage. He would grant the applicant a waiver there. Mr. Roth feels there is no need for shrubs all the way around the accessory structure. He suggested the rear of the structure and the side away from the house would be the only areas where there would be shrubbery needed. He inquired if there are any lights PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 6 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 proposed to be added to the outside of the structure facing the neighbors. Mr. Anderson stated he does not anticipate doing that. There being no further questions or comments from the commission, Mr. Reyes called for a motion. A motion to approve the accessory structure as submitted for 1520 Glentry Lane, a 22 x 38 detached garage, with staff recommendations and the current report that it will be a 6:12 pitch and adding that the requirement for shrubs can be reduced to only require shrubbery on the rear and side of the structure facing away from the residents' house, was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Carter. Mr. Reyes clarified the motion regarding the shrubbery would include the wording above. Roll Call: Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Reyes returned to Item 6A on the Agenda. 6 Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearinqs Mr. Stokes swore in all who intend to testify during the quasi-judicial public hearings. A. Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing -- Conditional Use Permit -- New Model Home -- 958 & 964 Roseland Road -- Lots 19 & 20, Block 162, Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 -- Holiday Builders, Inc. Mr. Stokes read the item into the record. Mr. Reyes inquired if any of the commissioners had had any ex parte communications regarding this Agenda item. All stated they had not. Mr. Trevor Lewis, representing Holiday Builders, stated they are seeking a conditional use permit for a new model home on Roseland Road as well as the parking lot adjacent to it. The model home is complete and has received the certificate of occupancy. They are just waiting for approval to clear and prep the parking lot next to it. Mr. Loring stated staff has found the applicant to be compliant with the Code. Additional considerations are, regarding the model home, the permits expire one year after the date PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 7 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 of approval but may be renewed administratively at that time. If the model home permits are not renewed, the applicant will be responsible for the removal of the parking area, connecting sidewalks, and all signage. Recommendation by staff is for approval with the requirement that the right-of-way permit from Indian River County will be required for the parking area and a building permit for any model home signage is obtained. It also should be noted that they have already applied for a sign permit with the Building Department. Another condition is that illegal flag signage shall not be used, and off -premise signs or directional signs cannot be placed along City streets. An additional condition is that the contractor will remove the parking area and model signage when the model permit expires. Mr. Qizilbash called attention to the supplemental information where it stated business hours -- " none, open house." He asked what is meant by that. Mr. Lewis stated that was identified on the sign itself, because hours are altered as far as daylight savings, but their typical hours are 9:00 to 6:00 for model centers. Mr. Qizilbash stated the business hours should be listed. Mr. Simmons asked if there are any outstanding issues with Holiday Homes. Mr. Lewis stated he is not aware of any. Mr. Reyes inquired of the staff why the applicant is required a right-of-way permit. Mr. Loring stated it is for the driveway onto the parking area. Ms. Bosworth stated it is the driveway permit for the parking lot and will need to be issued from Indian River County since Roseland is a County road. Mr. Reyes opened the hearing for anyone from the public in favor of the project who would like to speak. Seeing no one, he called for anyone in opposition to the project who wishes to speak. Seeing none, he called for a motion. A motion to approve the conditional use permit application for Holiday Builders model home at 964 Roseland Road, Lots 19 & 20, with the staff stipulations of Item 10, Nos. 1 thru 4, was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call: Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes B. Quasi -Judicial Hearing -- Site Plan Modification -- Hometown Pet Care PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 PAGE 8 Center -- Additional Parking -- 827 Sebastian Blvd. -- Lots 20 and 21, Block 187, Sebastian Highlands Unit 8 -- C-512 (Commercial CR 512) Zoning District Commissioner Qizilbash moved from the dais to present the next case. He will not be voting in this matter. Mr. Stokes read the item into the record. Mr. Stokes stated it is highly unusual for a commissioner to step off the dais during a meeting and present an item. He admonished the commissioners to treat this application the same way they would treat any application. It is completely irrelevant that he is a colleague of theirs. He is outside of that role right now. Mr. Loring also notified the commission that there is in front of them Form 8(B). Staff is required to inform the commission that a copy must be provided to the members of the agency, the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed, and it must be completed within 15 days (SEE ATTACHED). Mr. Reyes inquired of the commission members if there have been any ex parte communications regarding this agenda item. All members stated there have not been. Mr. Tahir Qizilbash, engineer for this project, stated the proposed modification is for additional parking, which will consist of four additional parking spaces in the adjacent lot, which is part of the same property, plus stormwater retentions and landscaping requirements. The existing parking surface will be replaced with concrete parking, and the landscaping on the existing parking area will also be improved. Mr. Loring stated that all site -related items are compliant with the Land Development Code in the CR -512 Overlay District. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Abandonment of all interior six-foot side yard easements. 2. The existing sign is to remain as is until such time that it is removed or destroyed, with the provision that any new signs would have to meet size, height, and setback requirements. 3. The skirt for the existing sign does not meet the ground requirements. Staff would also like a provision that any landscaping as a result of the new construction in that area shore up the bottom skirt so that it is adequately covered with either landscape or berm. Mr. Roth inquired if the facility has animals boarded there. Mr. Qizilbash stated there is no boarding at the facility. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 9 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Mr. Alvarez asked if the entrance is going to remain the same. Mr. Qizilbash stated the entrance would remain the same. There will be a hedge put along the alley, so nobody will be coming in from there. Mr. Qizilbash addressed Mr. Stokes regarding interior easements. He stated the County handles abandoning interior easements in house, automatically abandoning the interior easements. He suggested Sebastian should follow that practice. Mr. Stokes stated there are so many different easements for so many different purposes, that doing anything automatically would always be dangerous. Mr. Qizilbash suggested that at least it needs to be reviewed to see if this is a utility easement, simply a setback, an access easement, etc. Mr. Stokes stated staff could look into that matter and make recommendations to Council. Ms. Bosworth described in detail the process for abandoning those easements. Mr. Reyes inquired about the water that collects in the alley behind this property. Mr. Qizilbash stated the retention pond will help a lot with that. He also inquired about the area that is used for walking the pets that come to the center. Mr. Qizilbash stated the lots next door to the parking area are also owned by the pet care center, so the dogs can be walked there. Ms. Kautenburg addressed the subject of an automatic abandonment of easement. She suggested that could cause problems in the eventual sale of a property in the future. She stated lenders and title companies insist on having something in writing that shows that the easement was abandoned. Ms. Bosworth addressed this subject. In the Sebastian Highland subdivision plat there are 17 units. In units 9 thru 17 there is specific verbiage on the cover sheet of the plat that says if more than 1 or 2 lots are unified, the easements automatically go to the outside, and they don't have to be formally abandoned. Units 1 through 8 don't have that verbiage, and it was opined by a previous city attorney who said there must have been a reason why they didn't put it on those lower units, and this formal abandonment is required. Because this property is in Unit 8, they will have to go through this formal abandonment. Ms. Kautenburg stated that works because it says that on the plat; if it does not say it, the banks and title companies are going to want to see an official abandonment. Mr. Reyes opened the floor for anyone from the public in favor of the project who would like to speak. Seeing none, he opened the floor for anyone in opposition to the project who would wish to speak. Hearing nothing further from staff or commission members, Mr. Reyes called for a motion. A motion to accept the site plan modification for the Hometown Pet Care Center for PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 10 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 additional parking at 827 Sebastian Boulevard with the recommendations provided by staff was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Reyes. Roll Call: Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash (withdrew) Vote was 6-0 in favor. Motion passes. 7. Unfinished Business -- None 8. Public Input -- None 10. Commissioners Matters Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Carter asked when the new pickle ball courts are scheduled to be opened. Mr. Loring stated the opening was just this morning. Mr. Reyes recalled that he did bring up a matter at the last meeting regarding some accessory structures he had some concern about. Staff has answered his questions. Ms. Bosworth reviewed that those structures had been properly permitted. Mr. Reyes suggested that the criteria regarding these structures over 500 feet should be revisited regarding color, roof pitch, shrubbery, and materials requirements. 11. Citv Attornev Matters -- None 12. Staff Matters Mr. Loring called commissioners' attention to a large packet of material that was presented to them. Those are the components for the Comprehensive Plan for future land use for schools and housing. Staff is asking for the commissioners try to digest that material so that there can be an informed discussion at the next meeting. Staff realizes it is a lot of material and would appreciate any input that the commissioners might have. Ms. Bosworth explained what elements are contained in this packet for the new Comprehensive Plan and described the timeline for addressing the different elements. 13. Adiourn Mr. Reyes called for any further business. Hearing none, he adjourned the meeting at 7:11 p.m. jg Growth Management Department Accessory Structure Staff Report 1. Property Owner: Mr. Charles Hiltz 2. Contractor: Ando Building Corporation 3. Requested Action: Approval of a 996 sq. ft. detached garage building 4. Project Location: 502 Hibiscus Avenue Lots 6 &7, Block 27, Sebastian Highlands Unit 1 5. Current Zoning: RS -10 Current Land Use: single-family residence 6. Required Findings: Does Does Not Comply Comply A. No accessory structure shall be constructed until the construction of the principal structure has been started. 1. House completed 2001 ; or house under construction 2. Accessory structure to be located on same lot as principal structure ; or located on second lot that has been combined with principal lot by a unit, of title Book 1693, Page 301 B. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback): 1. Front yard: No detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. Principal structure setback is 25.5' Accessory structure setback is 25.5' 2. Front yard on corner lot: Accessory structures may be located to the front of the front setback line along the boundary of the secondary front yard on an improved corner lot. Secondary front yard setback is N/A 3. Side yard: Required side setback is 10.0' Accessory structure side setback is 24.9' Does Does Not Comply Comply 4. Rear yard: The required rear yard is 20' . A detached accessory structure may encroach into the required rear yard, provided: a. It is a minimum 10 feet from the rear property line. Proposed accessory structure has a 64.5' setback. b. It is not in an easement. Rear easement is 10' and proposed setback is 64.5' c. It does not exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage. Proposed accessory structure is 996 square feet. d. It does not exceed 12 feet in height. Proposed accessory structure is 16' feet in height. Accessory structures which are attached, or do not meet the four above requirements must meet the standard rear setback which is 20' Proposed accessory setback is 64.5' C. No mobile home, travel trailer or any portion thereof, or motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. D. Applicant must expressly designate the type of the accessory structure (i.e. garage, shed, etc.) Garaze E. Must comply with all city codes. F. The height of accessory structure cannot exceed height of principal structure. House is approximately 24' , and accessory structure will be 16' G. A residential lot is allowed 5 square feet of accessory building area (cumulative) for every 100 square feet of lot area. Property square footage _20.000.0 x.05 Allowable sq.ft. of accessory structures 1000 t 1000 max) Existing accessory structures _122.21 Proposed accessory structure 996 Total existing and proposed 1,118.21 X 2 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Any attached or detached accessory building, carport or breezeway over 500 square feet in area must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission utilizing the following criteria: Does Does Not Comply Comply A. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. B. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. C. Accessory structures 501 sq.ft. to 750 sq.ft. in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the N/A primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, roofing materials and pitch. D. Accessory structures 751 sq.ft. to 1000 sq.ft. in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways, as follows: 1 shrub for every 3 lineal feet and 24 X inches in height at planting. Lineal dimension totals 118 = 3 = Total Shrubs Required 40 Review fee has been paid: 4 YES NO Additional Considerations: • Based on the submitted plan, there appears to be approximately 118' of perimeter area, which includes the concrete pad proposed to the west of the proposed structure. The size and scope of the project would require a total of 40 shrubs to be planted and maintained around the perimeter of the garage. This should be an item for the Board to mandate as a condition of approval. A revised plan showing the required landscaping should also be submitted to city staff as a part of the approval process, with landscaping required to be in place and maintained at the time of final approval. The proposed Garage at minimum needs to match the roof material of the existing home. It appears that the existing home has a dimensional asphalt shingle, and the proposed garage has a metal roof. The applicant has applied for a roof permit to install a metal roof on the home; as a condition of approval, the Board may wish to mandate that the roof on the home is completed prior to a Certificate of Completion request for the proposed detached garage, and that both the home and garage have matching roof, and paint colors at the time of final approval. 3 • As a condition of approval, the existing shed needs to be removed prior to construction of the new garage so that the total square footage of accessory structures is under the 1000 square foot threshold. • Lot #6 appears to lie within a flood plain. The survey needs to be updated showing the demarcation line that runs thru the lot. The updated survey will need to be submitted to the Building Department for a flood plain determination prior to the form board inspection for the proposed garage. • It should be noted that the proposed garage is 16'-0" in height and the proposed home has a roof line that is approximately 24'-0" in height. The roof line as proposed is compliant to the code, and complimentary to the existing home. • The proposed finish floor elevation and the existing finish floor elevation are .04" (1/2" difference) and are compliant and complimentary to one another. • The roof pitch of the proposed detached garage and the existing home match. r Date SHEET 1 OF 2 SURVEY SKETCH --------- SURVEY NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL SHEETS MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED FOR ANDO BUILDING CORPORATION LOT 24 BLOCK 27 p^ (NG ID) � LOT 5 BLOCK 27 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 21 BLOCK 27 BLOCK 27 BLOCK 27 N90.00'00'E yo1'9 165,00' �j I " I ZY1 i x I ADw A X f pm am 1 p COAGPEIE oLOT 6 .," I >� Ln a BLOCK 27 x'y A Vi a coom m XVI #502 w 289 f ONE STORY CB c �/40 ES D RESIDENCE o CBS GARAGE = 24.36 AC g_ PROPOSED 'oZ is' F/FfE/= 24.4 ML o N LOT 8 BLOCK 27 —e4. I 23.9 ? I R -BEARING 22'911 I LOT 7 BASIS I BLOCK 27 cnAwwy penEtwr N90'00'00' '—` 9,0 N90.00'00' � e 165,00' 415.00' � 20 S CORNERCK OF SITE BENCHMARK ;R1 'bap SITE BENCHMARK #2 ,�•" HIBISCUS AVENUE 4 ELEVATION = x ELEVATION = x (50' R/W) x 21.25 (NAVD '88) 21.08 (NAVD '88) g 18' ASPHALT ROADWAY NOTES: PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE SERVICED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE RECORD AND MEASURED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. P.U.&D.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT. BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON THE RECORD BEARING FOR THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HIBISCUS AVENUE. ELEVATION NOTES: ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD'88). PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PER HEALTH DEPARTMENT. E106RNG CATION. x* PROPOSED ELEVATION- \20M DRAINAGE MROW .---� NORTH ARROW & GRAPHIC SCALE Ind 0 1.1 = 30, 30' PERMIT NUMBER AND CONTACT ANDD BUILDING CORPORATION JOB / - 1912-034 F1E1D DATE - 12/17/2019 REVISION - REVISION - KNOW IT NOW, INC. REVISION - MOVED PROPOSED GARAGE 1.3.20 REVISON - PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING REVASION - ADD DRIVEWAY 3.17.20 REVISION - 5220 US HIGHWAY 1, #140 • REVISION - MOVED GARAGE 5.12.20 REVISION - VERO BEACH, FL 32967 REVISION - REVISION - PHONE - (888) 396-7770 FLORIDA BUSINESS CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER L8 6912 WWW.-KINSURVEYORS.COM • T. ELEV. 19' — 4-15/16' A.F.F. 12 7� . 12' — NIS R ELEV. 0' — 0' ELECTRICAL NOTES: 1. ALL 120 -VOLT, SINGLE-PHASE, 15 -AND 20 -AMPERE BRANCH CIRCUITS SUPPLYING OUTLETS INSTALLED IN DWELLING UNIT FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, BEDROOMS, SUNROOMS, RECREATION ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS OR SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN ARC -FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER, COMBINATION -TYPE, INSTALLED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION OF THE BRANCH CIRCUIT (61h EDITION FBC-R E3902.12). 2. ALL RECEPTACLES MUST BE TAMPER-RESISTANT (6th EDITION FBC-R E4002.14). 3. ALL KITCHEN, BATHROOM, GARAGE, EXTERIOR, LAUNDRY, UTILITY B WET BAR OUTLETS INSTALLED WITHIN 6'-0" OF THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF A SINK SHALL HAVE GROUND -FAULT CIRCUIT -INTERRUPTER (GFCI) PROTECTION (6th EDITION FBC-R E3902). 4. GARAGE DOOR BUTTONS ARE TO BE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 5'-2"A.F.F. OF HOME. 5, SHOWER RECESS CANS ARE TO BE WEATHER PROOF. 6. ALL OUTLETS ARE TO BE MOUNTED AT 15"A.F.F. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. VERIFY ALL ELECTRICAL LOCATIONS WIBUILDER. B. LOCATE CIRCUIT BREAKER PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS. 9. LOCATE ELECTRICAL METER PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS. 1n FI FPTP fr. GI DI nu .0 Qr aRAAT.r FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1/4' = 1' 0' 8-4ID TTM/ AI. IN 2" !7J CONDUIT I •12q'240V I O '150 ANP SM NEMA 31, SERVICE 150 AMP AX: BRrAK A5 RCG9)IRED PER .. METER rAULT CURRENT' 8 rANS. A 1201240V 1 C 3W NBAA SR 150 AMP SO CIRCUIT PLUSH MWNT R 12 COPECK TO 30 .UGHTS 4 Ounm BRFAICP—R—=lIc corrCR-o PANEL WATtR hmmt IB COPPER TO RANGE RUN (3) d/0 RUN 1 #4 Cu TO 5fi! 1W GROUND SERIAL CABLE ROD ANU REBA't M FOOTER . NOTPSt I . INTER -SYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POR CONWECTING = = OTHER SY9TCA�9 TO DE PROVIDED OmRNALLY ON METER 1 OR SERNCL -NCL WZr. SCC. e3G09.9, FBC 5th er.rnoH P K "51. ELEV, 19' - 4-1 /16' A.F.F. NIS ELEV. '0' - ELECTRICAL NOTE6: 1. ALL I -VOLT, SINGLE-PHASE. 16 -AND MAMPERE BRANCH CIRCUITS SUPPLYING OUTLETS INSTALLED IN DWELLING UNIT FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, LPA0 ROOMS, PARLORS. LIBRARIES, DENS. BEDROOMS. SUNROOMS, RECREATION ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS OR SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN ARC -FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER, COMBINATIOWTYPE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION OF THE BRANCH CIRCUIT(OM EDITION FBC•R E3902.12). 2. ALL RECEPTACLES MUST BE TAMPER-RESISTANT (BN EDITION FBGR &002.14). 3. ALL KITCHEN, BATHROOM. GARAGE, EXTERIOR LAUNDRY. UTILITY A WET BAR OUTLETS INSTALLED WITHIN 6'4' OF THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF A SINK SHALL HAVE GROUNDFAULT CIRCUIT4NTERRUPTER (GFCD PROTECTION (6O EDITION FBCR E39M 4. GARAGE DOOR BUTTONS ARE TO BE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 5'-2'AF.F OF HOME- 6. OME6. SHOWER RECESS CANE ARE TO BEWEATHER PROOF 6. ALL OUTLETS ARE TO BE MOUNTED AT I5 -AFF. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. T. VERIFYALL ELECTRICAL LOCATIONS WISUILDER B. LOCATE CIRCUIT BREAKER PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS. G. LOCATE ELECTRICAL METER PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS. 10, ELECTRICALPIIW ISSCHEMATIC. ELECTRICIAN SHALLVERIFY THAT ALLELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS MEET STANDARD NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE(2017 NEC), NFPA70 AALL CITY. COUNTY S STATE CODES. INCLUDING THE CURRENT FLORIDA BUILDINGCODE 11. WATER HEATER TBP RELIEF VALVE FULL SIZE TO EXTERIOR. WATERHEATERAT FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL TO BE IN PAN WITH DRAIN TO EXTERIOR WITHERMALEXPANSION DEVICE 1 j FRONT ELEVATI❑N SCALE 1/4' = 11 0' eWA &•IA TNWALMP I IRWB40VI OaWmaaMORCUT Opt + ruat M.L:. 90CR0Af - . I 811511 AIRRIT IQmmm 10 1 lI2 COM TO jA� SM IBM SK �- IBDAW $Q DOHf5I 011T1m �AIC WEMIA r'wLTOUBMITfcaMmvv � PAN21. WAn '�. --}`\� bOOPPNt10 RAIME • IUNIA401Taww BR0UND nNimcmLe ' W0AM7 RFLAt11OM1TryW� 1A . X111 R.9181Lh1 E0FIDT10TNANAlN11 POROIIT¢„'TEIG . • 011f�9Y9',f TDOC tPD41IRD mammAUTON xE102 ' aeaLTaretMNLLPp•'.Ig.'•mogs.mcswz:no" .. 120141. . - 2. ALLOY RTO al ARGFROIPC FAULT ND. HGfbAV.OlJaAG1. AM100N9lEDTAUAIRJIB ^„HMI GOAPIY NIR!ATUG1d2 . ' *AWA10181:T1e' fNTI0NAL 01LY.TRICN.000C ll1CP1 CWBF I LOC,M.fOAOt ..C'O�Ylill'. _ MECTRICAL 5C"ATIG LEFT ELEVATI❑N SCALE 1/8' = V 0' REAR ELEVATI❑N I! I1I SCALE 1/8' I=lfY 0' No RIGHT ELEVATI❑N SCALE I/8' = 11 0' JELECTRIC DESIGN 8 SPECIFICATIONS NOT 36' D INCLUDED IN ENGINEER'S SEALED WORK. I F— " �pR — T 'Ron ...... ._-6. 0 12' D T u 112 22 HS TEMP -�. % 1 ■ - 0o■- , Enyy -Ir I�■ ■ 111P I I I I ■ // 1 PIE am I I i L-------•------- I lwvd L --------------J LJ BATFl— BATH I PUMP B N SOLO TUBE-' - 12' 0" CLG. A.F.F. I I I on I I� ■ yNIEL ®7' 4 F.F. I DET4CHED ■ DETA�HED GARAGE GARAGE g I VAULTIb CLG. "M (>R DEDICATED 110 VOL am CONCRETE SLAB I I aR ti — — — — — — — — — — ELECTRICAL PLAN SCALE 1/4" = 1' 0" I - NAIL PATTERN ROOF & WALL SHEATHING SHEATHING 150 do 160 mph (Vult) Wind USE SAME NAIL PATTERN FOR WALLS, MAY USE COMMON NAILS ON WALLS 010 W.''/z` rm m 1/fe' ®rlRl w41uLT 610R1Fs. Yml laE ae REIN. ROOFING, SEI!PRIXIUW wvRfaal m MFl m 41minlwlt coal 6ha FOCES a Fab YIM N RWO-NYNIf W1a 0.1Is• 6N1Nt 6HIeTm REI® U12 FAIND A oI11RTFA R1VI RWx Ie -20 wucv PEA Ncx O,.fYO• FULLIIOIIM xvw GNPDI Y Iml � -Ilea ®Amlam Ives ..1ae Hoer apse tae E[ ssVA 1 1I II -A eIm aw m sBa ro lral .mow- . br.� I I_tl I I I /r x.aAeew N,ro ISI m �&�mGILNAPIER IlfiTAUC111RALD616A ISFITIOR Im9.l.l N1NDM1118 � � v xea'xHTxaten.waAa®Ie ll6w6xi1ae OlxlTBLSNA)e. Fea mlaa Nn DL mea TYPICAL WALL SECTION BuExIII—11 Kaam"rmRwwaw _Ma amnsw s-.4Im sro u7®aR ale a SCALE 3/8" 0" NAILING PATTERN FBC SDfTH EDITION FBC(R)(2017) DETAIL w KYM wu r vs RAu Ia aaaaq! amso � a"�rwrsss aawma Aae MPLT aaalarlar MlgaAB Yaa mIlR WalaaOMAa qAM, IAEIlOCA9 Kamm FINISH PER ELEVATION BXfi NO W.W.M. FINISH FLOOR 4'MIN- 1,4, FINISH ORADE ILLED CELL DOWEL ®EACH TICAL CELLWT O LAP B VERTICAL 05 ^' REBAR TO BOND BEAM CLEAN COMPACTED FILL 1B' MONOLITHIC FOUNDATION MINIMUM COM 0UUR 800.4 CHAIRS OFSLTERIOR MASONRY WALL B1•., E.1fY-ra" ONESTORY A � I � ■ � � I O ■ • W CONCRETE I SLAB ■ 1r I GROUTED CELLS WITH 145 REBAR ■-----------I-----------� , I I -3' 0 18' 0 - 8"C .. 12' C 78' f x FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4" = 1' 0" 36' 0 D f 2' C x . 1a avlX ta � 3 I r IJ1' u� LT sc ae2 Y�v's 2• RAM,; JSER (KIS.) j3/4" GARAGE DOOR RECESS L A i -------------------�! � I A 3_411 Ir I I � I = REINF '-V,�. ON.OW VISOUw,I1 MOISTURE OISIU - BARRIER OLLt•I TURE�BARRIEROON CLEAN COMPACTEDO93 JF(]ro' JJjFB"jfLn VNJ_ CO PACTED TMW EU WiII'lll{i 3,4V GARAGE DOOR RECESS 18' 0 36' 0 FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE 1!4" = 1' 0" � � � A ZLL Of N I i I I I o 0� i b' (1) A6 NE -BAN CONTINUOUS ONONBEARING B FOOTING 11 CONG SLAB SCALE VZ' • Tb - I I I J j3/4" GARAGE DOOR RECESS L A i -------------------�! � I A 3_411 Ir I I � I = REINF '-V,�. ON.OW VISOUw,I1 MOISTURE OISIU - BARRIER OLLt•I TURE�BARRIEROON CLEAN COMPACTEDO93 JF(]ro' JJjFB"jfLn VNJ_ CO PACTED TMW EU WiII'lll{i 3,4V GARAGE DOOR RECESS 18' 0 36' 0 FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE 1!4" = 1' 0" � � � A ZLL Of N I i I I I o Q Ib i = Lu W ILI I I I J I � i rrnn Y S v "C 12'Y TABULATION DETACHED GARAGE TOTAL c O y W O c O Ol O S Ff PLIJVIM c c CpiO 3: av) 3 cs A 0 Q I� ton � 1 l7 � I ZLL Of N Q LL = Lu W ILI r^ r V W In rrnn Y S v �j�( K% W CO . Z UJ Y U ZMo Jm7NQ W2 pV NOT VALID WITHOUT U`_ 11/5/2019 ORIGINAL SIGNATURE 13 MARCH 202 DAIL kill iii/'' 11114"= cIL No 1' `�� f =* *= 190-0 Io. 51406 STATE OF A -1i OMp1,. '�lh n1T1TTT�`, - C' xi Y A �rJ�' •T.'\ fi PORCN V ,L„•n � �• - - '- � vd Y.F � at, v_I .• y x rr _ �Y �n� —• I M DO L_JL_j ----- ■ / / / / NooK •u-- �' ^ ^ �4--, ELEVATION11 SCALE -3M" -r yAi 1 ■ - E�� xae ceraL i I=86PRQQ - -.y / / / / _ ' ,�, . I 1 aY� _ •L _r.k a. r ._ -ter _ IF lull y 4 -\ •--' i t DININGGIJ ®I \WER {- JI ---—� LTO -4 ® BED -3 t- FLATS4 rs i I I\ q GARAGE I y a 4 L Y MdRPET ■ J = � f � - I • BEDrZ s � ' I CARPET -..L,..— A FLOOR PLAN i 1 __J .GALE N4"•1' I ----------- __________ 1 G■1R0(j fAIH1!•fIH 14RtpMR /- oi8y 80 FOOTAGE LIVING 1,841 GARAGE 436 PORGN 303 ENTRY 40 TOTAL- 2,611 OVERALL- 52'8'x'" INFO U BEFORE PREFORMING ANT WORK GOI1PdRE FLOOR PLAN BLAB PLAN, EL �T�pPLd�86TRd DRAWMb °� 5/28/2020 502 Hibiscus Ave 502 Hibiscus Ave - Google Maps Sebastian, Florida P Google Street View T R 502 H - hl<LiSt_n �1w s; 4 � - 1 Image capture: Jun 2011 © 2020 Google https://www.google.com/maps/@27.8046408,-80.4836929,3a,90y,341.25h,89.89Vdata=!3m6!lel!3m4!1sKgebRKedAm73Qd tda_gaw!2eO!7il3312!8i... 1/1 5/28/2020 Go, gle Maps 502 Hibiscus Ave 502 Hibiscus Ave - Google Maps Imagery ©2020 Google, Imagery ©2020 Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, Map data ©2020 1000 ft 502 Hibiscus Ave Sebastian, FL 32958 0 (�) (�o: o Directions Save Nearby Send to your Share phone Photos https://www.goog le.com/mapslplace/502+Hibiscus+Ave,+Sebastian,+FL+32958/@27.8038078,-80.4881259,2856m/data=!3m 1! 1 e3!4m5!3m4! 1 sOx88d ... 1/2 CITY Of s HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT - 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5537 • FAX (772) 589-2566 PERMIT APPLICATION ALL OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE FILLED IN BY APPLICANT, ACCORDING TO FS 713.135 PERMIT # i' % , TRACKING # _ DATE: �'/ Z40 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARCEL ID # 313 $ m ► 0060x0,2 7000W -7, o RECEIVED BY: LOT: 6 BLOCK: o7 7 SUBDIVISION: `�vba`� } i a n N i 9kla�nof� FLOOD ZONB; %� TYPE OF WORK: NEW = ADDITION PF1 ALTERATION = REPAIR DEMOLITION WORK INCLUDES: STRUCTURAL 2 ELECTRICAL ErPLUMBINO [MECHANICAL EROOFING ❑ OTHER ❑ WORK DESCRIPTION: ESTIMATED JOB VALUE: $ Qi . ()n4 TOTAL S/F I UNDER AIR /V/4 JOB NAME: —.� 7 -e ci- kA c r -t n i 1 7 JOB ADDRESS: -5 O b t' -t- G u Q. S eb o��, i s ✓� l_ 3�� s g PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: °I PHONE: ,x-410 SSS 02615 ADDRESS: '5-00- A u t 6 0ZQ -%4 r A A ';�I- 3a R 5 1S CITY/STATE: ba -A- n F4, ZIP CODE CONTRACTOR) AC -1 daL&Ck c. LICENSE #: G IS ISO ADDRESS: 3 tsq PHONE: 77.2 5S9 -5-?,9 CITY/STATE: ZIP CODE 329 SSS ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: 6, L, � a� e�� E� PHONE: 3-2 17? 3 9 3 4 3 ADDRESS: (o h -7 S V 1 a Mi n 8 c' CITYISTATE; S c ZIP CODE: _-f>.2a <-R PRESENT USE: VO 64A+ I a n e) PROPOSED USE: OCCUPANT LOAD: NUMBER OF: STORIES= BAYS Q UNITS Q BEDROOMS= HEIGHT Q pQ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: C OCCUPANCY TYPE: AREA / IS THE BUILDING PRESENTLY EQUIPPED WTTH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM? YES = NO Q BONDING COMPANY: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE; MORTGAGE LENDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: FEE SIMPLE TITLE HOLDER: PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: aVlA>70fFi c. e, 2 ot,'el wt'