Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-05-2020 PZ MinutesCITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 5, 2020 N. 1. Call to Order -- Chairman Reyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p. m C- 2. Pledoe of Allegiance was recited by all. C m C � � 3. Roll Call C— A Present: Mr. Roth Mr. Reyes a' Mr. Simmons Mr. Christino (a) Ms. Kautenburg (a) Mr. Qizilbash O - :o Mr. Carter Mr. Alvarez Not Present: Mr. Hughan — Excused cc C o C NO an Also Present: C/) N ¢ CL Q i Ms. Dorri Bosworth, Planning Manager Mr. Robert Loring, Senior Planner Mr. James Stokes, Acting City Attorney Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer Ms. Mara Schiff, Indian River County School Board liaison, was not present. 4. Announcements and/or Acenda Modifications Mr. Reyes announced that Mr. Hughan is excused from tonight's meeting, and Ms. Kautenburg will be voting in his place. 5. Approval of Minutes Mr. Reyes called for a motion to approve the Minutes of February 20, 2020. A motion to accept the Minutes of the meeting of February 20, 2020 as presented was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Qizilbash. Roll Call Mr. Qizilbash — Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Roth — Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) -- Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Prior to opening the Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearings, Mr. Qizilbash suggested first hearing Item 9A — Accessory Structure Reviews under New Business a m m 0 O PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Mr. Reyes stated a motion by Mr. Qizilbash is on the floor to make a change to the meeting Agenda, which will require a unanimous vote of the Commission members. Mr. Carter seconded the motion. Roll Call: Mr. Qizilbash — Yes Mr. Roth — Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote 7-0 in favor. Motion passes Mr. Carter — Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) — Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes 9. New Business A. Accessory Structure Review -- LDC Section 54-2-7.5: 725 Layport Drive -- 24 x 31 Carport -- Justin Poteat The applicant, Mr. Justin Poteat, described his property as two conjoined lots that are heavily wooded. He is requesting to put a 744-square-foot accessory structure onto the lot adjacent to his home. Setbacks are 20 feet from the back of the property and 15 feet from the side of the property. He has chosen materials to closely resemble the colors of his house. It is a preassembled steel structure from USA Steel Buildings, who will do the installation. Mr. Poteat will be preparing the lot. He has a permit application for the building, adding a culvert, and removing just a couple of the palm trees to make room for the accessory structure. Mr. Loring stated staff reviewed the required items that are necessary for compliance. Staff deemed that the request was in compliance except for the following provisions. The Commission needs to decide if the proposed carport meets the intent of the Planning and Zoning Commission review for Provision No. 7(c). The proposed carport roof has a similar color but not a similar roof material as the home. The proposed carport only has a 3:12 pitch roof; the existing home has a 6:12 pitch roof. It should be noted that the applicant mentioned that the site is heavily wooded, and a condition for the Commission to consider is, if they wish to approve the accessory structure, would the site remain heavily landscaped to curtail any deleterious effects to the surrounding properties. It also should be noted that the applicant has applied for the driveway permit, and it is going to remain as a dirt/sod with a culvert pipe over the existing Swale. Mr. Qizilbash inquired if the building will be open in the front and the back. Mr. Poteat stated it will be. He advised Mr. Poteat to verify with the Building Department that the structure meets with the current Building Code. Mr. Poteat stated the structure will be certified to withstand 180 MPH winds. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 3 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 He also asked how the structure will be anchored. Mr. Poteat stated that in the engineering plan it is specified as a screw and anchor and a concrete footing on the bottom of the post, which does meet the Building Code. Mr. Christina, asked if there will be a separate driveway installed to access the building. Mr. Poteat stated just the culvert will be added and will remain a grass driveway. He also inquired as to how close the accessory structure will be to the neighbor's house because of possible noise. Mr. Poteat stated the neighbor behind him has an empty lot, and the neighbor next to him has a tall fence. They will not be able to see it from their property. Mr. Roth asked if Mr. Poteat plans to keep the lot heavily wooded as it is presently. Mr. Poteat stated the only trees he is removing are a couple of the palm trees that he needs to do in order to access the building and to erect the building. None of the large oaks are being removed. Mr. Roth also noted the color that will be used is said to be compatible with the house. He would request that the Planning Department approve the color before the permit is issued and inquired as to what the roof is made of. Mr. Poteat stated it will be galvanized steel. twill be a dark slate gray which closely matches the shingles on the house. Mr. Alvarez inquired if Mr. Poteat lives at the property. Mr. Poteat stated yes, he does. Mr. Reyes stated he is somewhat concerned about the anchoring. There being no further discussion, Mr. Reyes railed for a motion. A motion to accept the accessory structure application for 725 Layport Drive, 24 x 31 carport was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Reyes. Mr. Roth asked for an amendment to the motion for the City to review the color of the structure. Roll Call: Mr. Roth — Yes Mr. Qizilbash — Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Alvarez — Yes Vote 7-0 in favor. Motion passes Mr. Carter — Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) — Yes 958 Bermuda Avenue -- 26 x 38 Detached Garage -- Steven Steinacher Mr. Reyes announced that Mr. Qizilbash will recuse himself from voting on this application, as his son designed the structure. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 4 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Ms. Bosworth noted for the record that Mr. Qizilbash will be filing a form 8(B). It will be attached to the Minutes, and staff per the form is giving the Commission members notice that Mr. Qizilbash will be completing that. The applicant, Steven Steinacher, stated he is proposing to build an accessory structure that is 980 square feet. He has met all the criteria regarding the City Codes. Mr. Loring has found that most items were found to be compliant. Based on the submitted plan, there appears to be 94.67 feet of perimeter area around the perimeter of the proposed structure, which will require 32 shrubs to be planted and maintained. This should be an item that the Commission may wish to mandate as part of the approval. Secondly, the site will be required to keep and maintain a minimum of 12 trees on site. Thirdly, the homeowner has applied for an auxiliary driveway permit for the culvert pipe over the existing swale with elevations set by the Stormwater Department, Mr. Christino asked if the roof pitch is the same as the house. Mr. Steinacher stated it is. He stated the roof will be the same material and the same color as the house. The roof is wooden trusses with a one -foot overhang for the soffits. Mr. Roth asked if there is a shrubbery plan that will accompany this application. Mr. Loring stated the requirement is that the perimeter of the accessory structure has perimeter landscaping. He also inquired as to what the building will be used for. Mr. Steinacher stated that it will be used to store high -end automobiles. Mr. Alvarez asked how many garages Mr. Steinacher plans on having with houses. Mr. Steinacher stated he owns seven houses in Sebastian. There is only one other house that has a vacant lot next to it, and that lot is not one that he could use. Mr. Alvarez is concerned about the number of houses with garages next to them that Mr. Steinacher may own. Mr. Stokes stated that is not a consideration here. Every one of the applicant's lots must be treated separately. Mr. Reyes inquired what the code is for elevation above the crown of the road for any new foundation. Mr. Loring stated it is typically 18 inches above the crown of the road, but this is not an inhabitable structure. Mr. Reyes asked if the applicant could come in later and request to do some modifications to this building to turn it into a rental. Mr. Loring stated no, that the properties have a unity of title. Mr. Reyes called for a motion. A motion to approve the 26- x 38-foot detached garage at 958 Bermuda Street subject to the additional considerations on Page 3 of the application, sub -sections A, B and D, was made by Mr. Simmons and seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call: Ms. Kautenburg (a) — Yes Mr. Reyes — Yes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 5 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Roth — Yes Mr. Alvarez — Yes Mr. Qizilbash — (withdrew) Vote 6-0 in favor. Motion passes. 1520 Glentry Lane — 22 x 38 Detached Garage -- Greg Anderson Mr. Greg Anderson stated he is proposing building a detached garage next to his house on a half -acre lot. He is hoping to make it as architecturally integrated as possible with his residence. All materials will be the same, including the metal roof. There will be generous setbacks on all sides. The pitch of the house is 6:12; the pitch of the garage will also be 6:12, not 7:12 as it shows on the engineering drawing. The request by staff for perimeter plantings will be complied with. To the north side of the proposed structure between the garage and the house there is an existing paver walkway, which he would like to maintain. That is their access to HVAC and pool equipment. That would be problematic for plantings on the north side of the proposed building but would still allow approximately 60 feet of plantings around the perimeter. Mr. Reyes asked regarding the plantings around the building. If the applicant does not surround the structure with the shrubs, If that would be a problem, and he asked staff for their findings. Mr. Loring stated that in the case of this request, the applicant has some additional pavers and some other equipment there which doesn't lend itself to landscaping. The commission could mandate that the other sides are landscaped and give him relief from that one side, or they could reduce the number of required plantings. It's up to the commission as to how they wish to proceed. Another question staff has is regarding the roof of the structure. Mr. Anderson stated that the house roof is also a metal roof. Staff recommends approval of the application. Mr. Qizilbash noted that there is an RV parked on the property. When this garage is built, he asked where that RV will be placed. Mr. Anderson stated that RV is not his. He is doing some pro bono work for a friend. It will not be there when the work on the structure is completed. Mr. Christino agreed there is no need to put shrubbery between the home and the garage. He would grant the applicant a waiver there. Mr. Roth feels there is no need for shrubs all the way around the accessory structure. He suggested the rear of the structure and the side away from the house would be the only areas where there would be shrubbery needed. He inquired if there are any lights PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 6 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 proposed to be added to the outside of the structure facing the neighbors. Mr. Anderson stated he does not anticipate doing that. There being no further questions or comments from the commission, Mr. Reyes called for a motion. A motion to approve the accessory structure as submitted for 1520 Glentry Lane, a 22 x 38 detached garage, with staff recommendations and the current report that it will be a 6:12 pitch and adding that the requirement for shrubs can be reduced to only require shrubbery on the rear and side of the structure facing away from the residents' house, was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Carter. Mr. Reyes clarified the motion regarding the shrubbery would include the wording above. Roll Call: Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Reyes — Yes Mr. Simmons — Yes Mr. Qizilbash — Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) — Yes Mr. Alvarez — Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Reyes returned to Item 6A on the Agenda. 6 Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearinos Mr. Stokes swore in all who intend to testify during the quasi-judicial public hearings. A. Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing -- Conditional Use Permit — New Model Home — 958 & 964 Roseland Road -- Lots 19 & 20, Block 162, Sebastian Highlands Unit 5 — Holiday Builders, Inc. Mr. Stokes read the item into the record Mr. Reyes inquired if any of the commissioners had had any ex parte communications regarding this Agenda item. All stated they had not. Mr. Trevor Lewis, representing Holiday Builders, stated they are seeking a conditional use permit for a new model home on Roseland Road as well as the parking lot adjacent to it. The model home is complete and has received the certificate of occupancy. They are just waiting for approval to clear and prep the parking lot next to it. Mr. Loring stated staff has found the applicant to be compliant with the Code. Additional considerations are, regarding the model home, the permits expire one year after the date PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 7 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 of approval but may be renewed administratively at that time. If the model home permits are not renewed, the applicant will be responsible for the removal of the parking area, connecting sidewalks, and all signage. Recommendation by staff is for approval with the requirement that the right-of-way permit from Indian River County will be required for the parking area and a building permit for any model home signage is obtained. It also should be noted that they have already applied for a sign permit with the Building Department. Another condition is that illegal flag signage shall not be used, and off -premise signs or directional signs cannot be placed along City streets. An additional condition is that the contractor will remove the packing area and model signage when the model permit expires. Mr. Qizilbash called attention to the supplemental information where it stated business hours — " none, open house." He asked what is meant by that. Mr. Lewis stated that was identified on the sign itself, because hours are altered as far as daylight savings, but their typical hours are 9:00 to 6:00 for model centers. Mr. Qizilbash stated the business hours should be listed. Mr. Simmons asked if there are any outstanding issues with Holiday Homes. Mr. Lewis stated he is not aware of any. Mr. Reyes inquired of the staff why the applicant is required a right-of-way permit. Mr. Loring stated it is for the driveway onto the parking area. Ms. Bosworth stated it is the driveway permit for the parking lot and will need to be issued from Indian River County since Roseland is a County road. Mr. Reyes opened the hearing for anyone from the public in favor of the project who would like to speak. Seeing no one, he called for anyone in opposition to the project who wishes to speak. Seeing none, he called for a motion. A motion to approve the conditional use permit application for Holiday Builders model home at 964 Roseland Road, Lots 19 & 20, with the staff stipulations of Item 10, Nos. 1 thru 4, was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call: Mr. Qizilbash — Yes Mr. Alvarez — Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) — Yes Mr. Reyes -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. B. Quasi -Judicial Hearing — Site Plan Modification -- Hometown Pet Care PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 8 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Center -- Additional Parking -- 827 Sebastian Blvd. -- Lots 20 and 21, Block 187, Sebastian Highlands Unit 8 -- C-512 (Commercial CR 512) Zoning District Commissioner Qizilbash moved from the dais to present the next case. He will not be voting in this matter. Mr. Stokes read the item into the record. Mr. Stokes stated it is highly unusual for a commissioner to step off the dais during a meeting and present an item. He admonished the commissioners to treat this application the same way they would treat any application. It is completely irrelevant that he is a colleague of theirs. He is outside of that role right now. Mr. Loring also notified the commission that there is in front of them Form 8(B). Staff is required to inform the commission that a copy must be provided to the members of the agency, the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed, and it must be completed within 15 days (SEE ATTACHED). Mr. Reyes inquired of the commission members if there have been any ex parte communications regarding this agenda item. All members stated there have not been. Mr. Tahir Cizilbash, engineer for this project, stated the proposed modification is for additional parking, which will consist of four additional parking spaces in the adjacent lot, which is part of the same property, plus stormwater retentions and landscaping requirements. The existing parking surface will be replaced with concrete parking, and the landscaping on the existing parking area will also be improved. Mr. Loring stated that all site -related items are compliant with the Land Development Code in the CR-512 Overlay District. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Abandonment of all interior six-foot side yard easements. 2. The existing sign is to remain as is until such time that it is removed or destroyed, with the provision that any new signs would have to meet size, height, and setback requirements. 3. The skirt for the existing sign does not meet the ground requirements. Staff would also like a provision that any landscaping as a result of the new construction in that area shore up the bottom skirt so that it is adequately covered with either landscape or berm. Mr. Roth inquired if the facility has animals boarded there. Mr. Qizilbash stated there is no boarding at the facility. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 9 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 Mr. Alvarez asked if the entrance is going to remain the same. Mr. Qizilbash stated the entrance would remain the same. There will be a hedge put along the alley, so nobody will be coming in from there. Mr. Qizilbash addressed Mr. Stokes regarding interior easements. He stated the County handles abandoning interior easements in house, automatically abandoning the interior easements. He suggested Sebastian should follow that practice. Mr. Stokes stated there are so many different easements for so many different purposes, that doing anything automatically would always be dangerous. Mr. Qizilbash suggested that at least it needs to be reviewed to see if this is a utility easement, simply a setback, an access easement, etc. Mr. Stokes stated staff could look into that matter and make recommendations to Council. Ms. Bosworth described in detail the process for abandoning those easements. Mr. Reyes inquired about the water that collects in the alley behind this property. Mr. Qizilbash stated the retention pond will help a lot with that. He also inquired about the area that is used for walking the pets that come to the center. Mr. Qizilbash stated the lots next door to the parking area are also owned by the pet rare center, so the dogs can be walked there. Ms. Kautenburg addressed the subject of an automatic abandonment of easement. She suggested that could cause problems in the eventual sale of a property in the future. She stated lenders and title companies insist on having something in writing that shows that the easement was abandoned. Ms. Bosworth addressed this subject. In the Sebastian Highland subdivision plat there are 17 units. In units 9 thru 17 there is specific verbiage on the cover sheet of the plat that says if more than 1 or 2 lots are unified, the easements automatically go to the outside, and they don't have to be formally abandoned. Units 1 through 8 don't have that verbiage, and it was opined by a previous city attorney who said there must have been a reason why they didn't put it on those lower units, and this formal abandonment is required. Because this property is in Unit 8, they will have to go through this formal abandonment. Ms. Kautenburg stated that works because it says that on the plat; if it does not say it, the banks and title companies are going to want to see an official abandonment. Mr. Reyes opened the floor for anyone from the public in favor of the project who would like to speak. Seeing none, he opened the floor for anyone in opposition to the project who would wish to speak. Hearing nothing further from staff or commission members, Mr. Reyes called for a motion A motion to accept the site plan modification for the Hometown Pet Care Center for PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 10 MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2020 additional parking at 827 Sebastian Boulevard with the recommendations provided by staff was made by Mr. Carter and seconded by Mr. Reyes. Roll Call: Mr. Reyes — Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez — Yes Mr. Qizilbash (withdrew) Vote was 6-0 in favor. Motion passes. Unfinished Business — None 8. Public Input -- None 10. Commissioners Matters Mr. Simmons — Yes Mr. Carter — Yes Ms. Kautenburg (a) — Yes Mr. Carter asked when the new pickle ball courts are scheduled to be opened. Mr. Loring stated the opening was just this morning. Mr. Reyes recalled that he did bring up a matter at the last meeting regarding some accessory structures he had some concern about. Staff has answered his questions. Ms. Bosworth reviewed that those structures had been properly permitted. Mr. Reyes suggested that the criteria regarding these structures over 500 feet should be revisited regarding color, roof pitch, shrubbery, and materials requirements. 11. City Attornev Matters — None 12. Staff Matters Mr. Loring called commissioners' attention to a large packet of material that was presented to them. Those are the components for the Comprehensive Plan for future land use for schools and housing. Staff is asking for the commissioners try to digest that material so that there can be an informed discussion at the next meeting. Staff realizes it is a lot of material and would appreciate any input that the commissioners might have. Ms. Bosworth explained what elements are contained in this packet for the new Comprehensive Plan and described the timeline for addressing the different elements. 13. Adiourn Mr. Reyes called for any further business. Hearing none, he adjourned the meeting at 7:11 p.m. jg FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME -FIRST NAME ­MIDDLE NAME �y NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE QtZl _&Asti IAli JZ fI I�UFUNIN(r•,,,Q ZorJIN4- oommisSr0�--- MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORrw OR COMMTTEE ON 105 SAP-3%Ele,,J� Obup-r-- MICH I SERVE IS A UNR OF: CRV TY ❑COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY D SC-�fIFST kxI . 3Z`ISSf rY couNMJDAU 0211/ 2� E �TIOF Gjv{ oFuStB'flASTtNxJ DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MYp210N R'lATeCff s . �O• !7 Cl ELECTNE Jl APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the County, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or Committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Flodda Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure In which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructors on this forth before Completing the reverse side and filing the farm. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive County, municipal, or other local public once MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which been to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of Community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officars of independent special tax districts elected an a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative' Includes only the othcers father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A'business associate" means any person or onfity engaged in or Carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock "change). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE.00CURS by Completing and filing this farts with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the forth in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting In the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must Complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 88 - EFF. 12000 PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided Immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. You must complete the form and file It within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the forth in the minutes. A copy of the farm must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the farm must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, TAHtr- Q1ZtL-8AsH hereby disclose that on /KAeat 5'*' 20 y'1O (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of , by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of which is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting Interest in the measure Is as follows: = Ate THE ?I?03t-CT- eP(r41Jee- Foe-tttE ftPPucRM�APPuertRw-, fo'V- WHICtt- My CIVIL EwCr(NLt2INL CbfAPANy efAS 8--e" PtTAtuyc�. s u.(r� Br'. P-EP2Esr�.nNt-TtrErFPPLtc/N`T" I7 ulKrr..�— rit,= �E'v lrlcJ �v pursues r(L-we,r+c,- gefoe E>'ITt>- �L(�NNIr`.i,_ r� zvNrNa- Ov+wnlSSrrr�— EG'- $11 st-aasnn-� 81-0b Nom(r-So-u ?tT Cfli2E SITE- Putr m00(R-rcATrrr,— Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 8B- EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2 FORM 86 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LASTT NAME�FIIRSSTT NAME­M ODLE NAME A N1-:AsSr 5� TN(C IVL t{ M ID GA l0 3 &t2g+1 A OW Z i crTY scY3gsTTr1TU Fes- 3a458- DAM ON WHICH VOA OCCURRED /NR2ctt T-; ao aD NAME OF BOARD COUNCIL COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE viN,A C'ommcs&dam THE HISERCOUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITYOR COMMITTEE ON �W/HICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF: COUNTY I WCNY OCOUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY d1 A'NA IQtOL - NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: CL`t�f O� SEY3ff517 r'tLU MY POSITION IS: ❑ ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 86 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or Committee. It applies to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of Interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this mason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and fling the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of Community redevelopment agencies (CRAB) under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officers father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A 'business associate' means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, ccowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly staling to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must Complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form In the minutes. (Continued on page 2) CE FORM BB - EFF. 1D12013 PAGE 1 Adopted by reference in Rule 34.7.010(1)(1), FA.0 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is fled. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. You must complete the forth and file it within 15 days after the vote ocours with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must Incorporate the forth in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the forth must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I. `rA R r2 a IZt tZ}S t+ , hereby disclose that on MAec 14 S� , 20 -'aD (a)A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one or more) _ inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, 4 Ll & IZ i t- BASF J T inured to the special gain or loss of my relative. ALA & l21 L 8.45 t inured to the special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: My SONS CDykpar.Al/ I fEIC t} ( fi SI WG�S P�2f�= t=—NG-INEt"(LC�O ��,7, 1t1i=1 ACCEssxz� STP1ccNke pf-0?0sroAve—, Bu tEtCfK wAS eLN lZI� h B',/ TliE A-A-I.)fu,u-i, 20A r -L-- (�'oWAAk(5sa-.-- by which If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or pnvllege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer, who Is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. s- A0 Date File ognalure NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10.000. CE FORM 88 - EFF 1012013 PAGE 2 Adopted by reference in Rule 30.7.010(1gQ, F.A.C.