HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-27-2021 CC AgendaIndividuals are subject to screening prior to entering any City building and entry may be denied if any
indicator of illness or prior COVID exposure is identified. All persons entering City Council Chambers
where social distancing is not possible, shall wear face coverings. R-20-32. Sec. 1 (1)
SE
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
& COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2021 — 6:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
OR ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Led by Vice Mayor Hill
4. ROLL CALL
5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS
Modifications for additions require a unanimous vote of City Council
6. PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS, BRIEF ANNOUNCEMENTS
Presentations of proclamations, certificates and awards, and brief timely announcements by Council and Staff.
No public input or actions under this heading.
A. Proclamation - Retirement of Kip Kelso, Sebastian Municipal Cemetery
Supervisor — Celebrating 37 Years of Service
Brief Announcements
• January 30 - Sebastian River Art Club Show at Riverview Park — 10am — 4pm
• February 5 - Concert in the Park at Riverview Park — 5:30pm — Spm - Johnny & the Blaze
(Motown, Classic Rock, Funk, Top 40)
7. PUBLIC INPUT
The heading on Regular Meeting agendas "Public Input" provides an opportunity for individuals to bring
NEW INFORMATION OR REQUESTS TO CITY COUNCIL NOT OTHERWISE ON THE PREPARED
AGENDA. Individuals are asked to attempt to resolve matters with staff prior to meetings. Individuals are
asked to provide copies of materials for Council one week prior to the meeting if they intend to refer to
specific material. City Council will not debate an issue during Public Input but may by consensus direct a
Charter Officer in regard to the item if necessary or place a requested item on a future agenda.
1 of 192
8. CONSENT AGENDA
All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member of City Council so requests, in which event,
the item will be removed and acted upon separately. If a member of the public wishes to provide input on a
consent agenda item, he/she should request a Council Member to remove the item for discussion prior to
start of the meeting or by raising his/her hand to be recognized.
pgs 6-17 A. Approval of Minutes — January 13, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting
9. COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS
City committee reports and Council Member regional committee reports. No public input or action except for
City committee member nominations and appointments under this heading.
pgs 18-23 A. Construction Board (Transmittal, Application, List, Advertisement)
Interview, Unless Waived, Submit Nominations for One Unexpired,
Concerned Citizen, Alternate Member Positions — Term will Expire
September 21, 2021
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Procedures for legislative public hearings:
Mayor opens hearing
Attorney reads ordinance title
v Staff presentation
Mayor closes hearing
Council deliberation and action
pgs 24-137 A. First Reading of Ordinance No, 0-21-01 Providing for the Transmittal of the City
of Sebastian Proposed Comprehensive Plan 2040 in Accordance with the State
Coordinated Review Amendment Process Section 163.3184(4) and (5), Florida
Statutes (Transmittal, Final Draft Recommendations, 0-21 -0 1 )(Documents
available at https:llwww.cityofsebastian.org/373/Comprehensive-Plan-2040)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF
SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY, EXCLUDING THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT, PURSUANT TO 163.3184 (3), FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT AND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY
ELEMENT, THE HOUSING ELEMENT, THE INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, THE
CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, THE PARKS,
RECREATION, & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, THE GOVERNANCE &
IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT, AND THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEMENT; INCLUSIVE
OF ALL ASSOCIATED TABLES, EXHIBITS AND MAPS; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS
AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES
INCONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, -
AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (PJ Ad 1117/2021)
2 of 192
11. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND CONVENE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY MEETING
pgs 138-140 A. Approval of Minutes — December 9, 2020 CRA Meeting
pgs 141-172 B. Discussion of Septic to Sewer Program Options and Provide Directive to Staff
(Transmittal, Report)
12. ADJOURN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AND RECONVENE
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
14. NEW BUSINESS
pgs 173-175 A. Resolution No. R-21-03 — Opposing the Elimination of Statutory Authorization for
Regional Planning Councils in Florida (R-21-03)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
ADOPTING THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC.
POSITION; OPPOSING THE ELIMINATION OF STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION FOR
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS IN FLORIDA AS PROPOSED IN SENATE BILL 132
OR SIMILAR PROPOSED LEGISLATION; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERROR;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR
PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
pgs 176-192 B. Approve Cost Share Agreement #35859 between the St_ Johns River Water
Management District and the City of Sebastian for Wastewater Utiliity
Improvements on Roseland Road for the Sebastian Municipal Airport Property
(Transmittal, Agreement)
15. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS
16. CITY MANAGER MATTERS
17. CITY CLERK MATTERS
18. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS
A. Mayor Dodd
i. Charter Officers Contract Procedures Update
B. Vice Mayor Hill
C. Council Member Jones
D. Council Member McPartlan
E. Council Member Nunn
19. ADJOURN (Alt meetings shall adjourn at 9:30 pm unless extended for up to one half hour by a majority
vote of City Council)
3 of 192
NO STENOGRAPHIC RECORD BY A CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER WILL BE MADE OF THE
FOREGOING MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE
CITY COUNCIL, BOARD OR AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS
MEETING OR HEARING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (F.S.286.0105)
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF 1990, ANYONE WHO
NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY`S
SEATING - ADA COORDINATOR AT 388-8226 or ADA@ CITYOFSEBAS TIAN. ORG AT LEAST 48
HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING,
HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL
GOVERNMENT MEETINGS.
TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF CITY OFFICIALS, CITY STAFF, AND THE PUBLIC,
OFFICIALS CAN FULLY PARTICIPATE AND TAKE OFFICIAL ACTION DURING THIS PUBLIC
MEETING BY USE OF COMMERCIAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGY. R-20-34 Sec. 2 (e)
ZOOM INFORMATION
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88987583969
OriRhone one -tap. US:+13126266799„88987583969# or+19294362866„88987583969#
Or Telephone: Dial(far higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 436 2866 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669
900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782
Webinar ID: 889 8758 3969
International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kvKXpYYOC
4 of 192
PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC INPUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. R-20-34
Reaullar Citv Council Meetinas
Public input is ALLOWED under the heading:
• Consent Agenda
• Public Hearings
• Unfinished Business
v New Business
Public Input
Public Input is NOT ALLOWED under the headings:
Proclamations, Awards, Brief Announcements (except for individuals giving or accepting
proclamations or awards);
Committee Reports and Appointments (except for committee members giving reports and
applicants being interviewed for committee appointments);
City Council Matters
. Charter Officer Matters
Council may, by majority vote, call upon an individual to provide input if desired.
Workshops and Special Meetings
Public input is limited to the item on the agenda
Time Limit
Input on agenda items where public input is permitted on agendas is FIVE MINUTES; however,
City Council may extend or terminate an individual's time by majority vote of Council members
present.
Input Directed to Chair
Speakers shall address the City Council IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL
DELIBERATION of the agenda item and ALL INPUT SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE CHAIR,
unless answering a question of a member of City Council or City staff. Individuals shall not
address City Council after commencement of City Council deliberation on an agenda item after
public input has concluded, providing, however, the Mayor and members of City Council may
recall an individual to provide additional information or to answer questions.
Certain Remarks Prohibited
Personal, impertinent, and slanderous remarks, political campaigning, and applauding are not
permitted and may result in expulsion from the meeting. The Chair shall make determinations
on such remarks, subject to the repeal provisions below.
Appealing Decisions of Chair
Any member of Council may appeal the decision of the Chair to the entire Council. A majority
vote of City Council shall overrule any decision of the Chair.
Public Input Headina on Aaenda
The heading on Regular Meeting agendas "Public Input" provides an opportunity for individuals
to bring NEW INFORMATION OR REQUESTS TO CITY COUNCIL NOT OTHERWISE ON
THE PREPARED AGENDA. Individuals are asked to attempt to resolve matters with staff prior
to meetings. Individuals are asked to provide copies of material for Council one week prior to
the meeting if they intend to refer to specific material. City Council will not debate an issue
during Public Input but may be consensus direct a Charter Officer in regard to the item if
necessary or place a requested item on a future agenda.
5 of 192
111) 04
SEBASTtAN
MWE
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2021 — 6:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
Mayor Dodd called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Pastor Grant Foster, Riverside Church, gave the invocation.
3. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
4. ROLL CALL
Mayor Ed Dodd
Vice Mayor Jim Hill
Council Member Fred Jones
Council Member Chris Nunn
Council Member Bob McPartlan
Citv Staff Present:
City Manager Paul Carlisle
City Attorney Manny Anon, Jr.
City Clerk Jeanette Williams
Community Development Manager Dorri Bosworth
Environmental Planner Kimberly Haigler
Deputy Police Chief Greg Witt
5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS - None
6. PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS. BRIEF ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Announcements from Environmental Planner Kimberlv Haider & Members of the
Natural Resources Board
• Sustainable Sebastian promotional merchandise has arrived
2Id Year Receipt of "Tree City USA Growth" Award
• 191h Year Receipt of "Tree City USA" Award
• Earth Day Announcement — April 241h
Ms. Haigler and Charles Stadelman, Chairman of the Natural Resources Board,
distributed personalized tumblers to the Council Members so they may reduce the use of
plastic bottles at their meetings. She also distributed Sustainable Sebastian
merchandise and pamphlets that they plan to hand out at Earth Day in Riverview Park
on April 24t1i.
6 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 2
Ms. Haigler also announced the City was awarded the Tree City USA designation for the
19th consecutive year and the Growth Award for the second consecutive year
authenticating the City's extra effort in preserving and enhancing tree canopy.
Mayor Dodd said Sustainable Sebastian was a multi -year project that the Natural
Resources Board was working on to not only find ways to make things more sustainable
such as working with restaurants in not using plastic and so forth, but also in working
with the City on how to make the City itself more eco-friendly and more sustainable. He
congratulated the board on their effort.
Vice Mayor Hill also said the board was doing an excellent job in educating the public
and he appreciated all their hard work.
Mr. Stadelman said the board was direct representation of the Council and he looked
forward to working on sustaining Sebastian for many years to come.
Brief Announcements:
Mayor Dodd congratulated the City's Procurement Manager, Ann -Marie Fraser, for
recently receiving the prestigious NIGP Certified Procurement Professional Certification.
Mayor Dodd said at the County Commission meeting there was an informative
presentation on the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccinations. He stated the County is
doing everything they can to expedite the distribution.
Executive Roundtable's 3rd Annual Rail Trail 5K Run/Walk across the 1-95
Central Railroad Corridor Greenway Pedestrian Overpass will be held Saturday,
January 16 at 8:00 am — Meet at the Fellsmere Trailhead Preserve, 11090
County Road 512
Fellsmere Frog Leg Festival - January 21 - 24 (COVID Protocols will be in place.
A drive-thru/takeout option will be available for guests who may wish to enjoy the
World -Famous Frog Leg Festival dinners in the comfort of their own home
Mayor Dodd read the announcements. Vice Mayor Hill invited the public out to the
Executive Roundtable's 5K Run which was certain to be a cool run over the Interstate 95
overpass.
7. PUBLIC INPUT
Richard Gillmor, Sebastian, commended the City's Golf Pro Greg Gardner for keeping
the golf course open during the lockdown. However because only one cart was used per
person, the batteries have worn out because of overuse. He noted a tournament is
difficult to play if one cart has a good battery but there might be five competitor carts with
bad batteries.
Mr. Gillmor also asked that the City consider replacing the golf course nets that have
blown down with the hurricanes. He suggested that one of the council members such as
Vice Mayor Hill, who is in the golf course business, might want to supervise the golf
course and report back to them periodically.
7 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 3
6.24 pm
In closing, Mr. Gillmor said free speech is in jeopardy in this country, and he appreciated
the ability of citizens to be able to get up at a City Council meeting like this and speak
their mind.
Council Jones stated he has been discussing the golf carts with the City Manager and
asked him to give an update on when the batteries would come in.
The City Manager explained the golf carts are still under warranty and if the City puts in
another type of battery it would void the warranty; the required batteries are programed
to the chargers in the software that comes with the new batteries. He said that he did
not want to spend $35,000 for the batteries and then have to replace the carts.
In moving to receive input from the citizens sifting outside through video monitoring,
Council Member Nunn asked that the outside participants remember to respect the
employees who are making it possible for them to participate.
Bob Schmidt said he was upset that he couldn't approach the building, his elected
officials or the stores in Indian River County because of some perceived threat. He
would like his freedom back.
Peter Heilemann, new citizen of Sebastian, said the January CDC numbers say that of
the 300,000 that died of COVID, only 4% died of COVID alone. The other 96% died of
preexisting conditions. He said he would not allow the contrived panic of COVID to run
his life.
Sue Heilemann, said her in-laws came here looking for freedoms which are being taken
away. She said she wanted her freedoms back and asked Council to reconsider the
mask mandate.
Stacie Meyer said she was assaulted at a store for not wearing a mask and asked
Council to end the state of emergency; emergencies are to be immediate and
unexpected.
Martin Stieger said they are losing rights and the wearing of masks should be a choice.
Tom , agreed with what everyone else had expressed; their rights were being
taken away.
Denise Russo said she just moved here from California which is a mess because the
Governor has shut everything down. She said everybody needs to wake up and not ruin
the beautiful state.
Ruth Kuvlesky, founder Indian River Freedom Coalition, asked to lift the state of
emergency, stop masking employees, and stop preventing people from coming into the
building.
Zoom Participants
Bill Simmons asked why most of the items on the consent were listed as an emergency
purchases. Mayor Dodd asked him to speak on that issue when the items are pulled.
8 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 4
6:59 pm
Mr. Simmons asked if the legal fees from the Graves Brothers lawsuits been paid.
Vice Mayor Hill called for a point of order requesting that responses to individuals come
at the end of public input.
Robert Stephen asked why Sebastian can't be part of the solution in spraying the canal
system.
Graham Cox, George Street, suggested a positive explanation of what is happening to
control the aquatic invasive vegetation and where it is happening be sent out to property
owners on the canal to give them an explanation of what to expect; it would be a good
neighbor policy.
Nelson McCollum said he gives Council credit for taking a lot of heat; commended staff
for addressing the golf cart issue. He said he didn't feel like his rights were in danger if
someone asked him to put a mask on; Council was on the right side of the issue.
In regard to the canal vegetation, Mr. McCollum said as a former farmer, he has sprayed
millions of gallons of glyphosate and he doesn't have cancer. He knows it is still being
used today. He thanked Council for protecting the City's assets.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes — December 9, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting
21.001 B. Notification of the Emergency Purchase of Audio Visual Products from Pro
Sound & Video; and Pathway Communications LTD to Continue Compliance with
CDC Recommendation of Social Distancing by Offering Virtual Meetings in the
Total Amount of $43,744.00 (Transmittal, Proposal/Invoices)
21.001 C. Notification of the Emergency Purchase of Digital Software from MCCi, SHI and
GoGov to Enhance Electronic Public Interaction During the Local State of
Emergency for the Initial Amount of $23,295.23 and Annual Cost of $23,567.67
(Transmittal, Proposalllnvoices)
21.002 D. Notification of the Emergency Purchase of Two Full Matrix Message Signs with
4G Fleet Manager Online Access from Prologic ITS, LLC in the Amount of
$33,459.66 (Transmittal, Quotes)
21.003 E. Notification of the Emergency Purchase of 16 Handsfree Water Fountains with
Bottle Filling Stations from Equiparts Corp. and Two Touchfree Water and Ice
Dispensers from Culinary Depot, Inc. in the Total Amount of $46,901.70
(Transmittal, Quotes)
21.004 F. Notification of the Emergency Expenditure to Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. --
Cemetery Expansion — Roadway (CO#1) in the Amount of $14,990.00 to
Complete Additional Improvements (Transmittal, CO#1, Quote, Staff Notes)
9 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 5
21.005 G. Notification of the Emergency Expenditure to Asphalt Paving Systems in the
Amount of $21,328.78 to Repave Two Intersections After Culvert Replacement
(Transmittal, Invoice)
21,006 H, Approve Alcoholic Beverages for the McGrath Family Event at Community
Center on January 17, 2021 from 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. — Permittee DOB
Verified (Transmittal, Application, Receipt)
21.007 I. Approve Sweet Tea Sip & Stroll Special Event Organized by Snow's Space
Coast Superior Events at Riverview Park on January 23-24, 2021 (Transmittal,
Application, Receipt, Cert of Ins)
21.008 J. Approve Alcoholic Beverages for the Faulkner Family Event at Yacht Club on
February 6, 2021 from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. — Permittee DOB Verified
(Transmittal, Application, Receipt)
Council Members requested to pull items B, C, D, E, F, G, and I.
Vice Mayor Hill asked that discussion on items B, C, D, and E be handled at one time
because they are similar, based on CARES Act expenditures.
MOTION by Council Member McPartlan and SECOND by Council Member Jones to
approve items A, H, and J passed with a unanimous voice vote. 5-0.
Items B, C, D, E
Mayor Dodd stated they received e-mails from Stacie Meyer and Denise Harland and
asked if they were present or on Zoom to discuss the items. They were not present.
Richard Gillmor cited the dates of the emergency purchases and noted Council is in
session now to where they can meet to decide how the money is spent. He noted
$43,000 was spent for virtual meetings that have been happening successfully for the
past seven months. He said it is time to end the emergency and let Council decide to
how to spend the money.
The City Manager summarized the audio visual equipment expense was to provide for
wireless microphones, a new projector for the overhead screen, and a microphone in the
courtyard to provide additional opportunities for people to participate in the meetings.
He also explained the digital software provided people an opportunity to fill out the
CARES Act grant forms on-line to be more efficient; the matrix signs are to provide
notice to the public when the vaccines become available; and the water fountains
throughout the City will now be hands -free to reduce the spread of the virus.
The City Manager noted the Emergency Declaration requires him to bring the
expenditures before them and if he has made a mistake he apologized.
Council Member Nunn thanked the City Manager for spending the CARES Act money cn
things that make it better for the City, such as water fountains back in the parks.
10 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 6
MOTION by Council Member Nunn and SECOND by Council Member Jones to approve
items B, C, D, and E.
Vice Mayor Hill said there have been so many complaints that the public hasn't been
able to participate in the meetings or contact them and here the City Manager has
provided these ways and he did a heck of a job. He noted these waters are unchartered;
and individually and as a group they are doing the best that they can; he has confidence
that the City Manager will get us through this.
Bill Simmons asked what it takes to be called an emergency. The City Manager
explained the purchases were done under the emergency declaration and he has to
bring them back to Council for ratification.
There was no further public input.
Roll call: Vice Mayor Hill - aye
Council Member Jones - aye
Council Member McPartlan - aye
Council Member Nunn - aye
Mayor Dodd - aye
Motion carried. 5-0
Item F — Cemetery Expansion Roadway
The City Manager stated when staff did the bid for the expansion there was an additional
bid for the roadway but it came in at $29,000. Staff renegotiated it to receive value
engineering and it was reduced to $14,990.
Council Member Jones noted the budget provided for $15,000 and asked why approval
was needed. The City Manager explained a change order greater than 15% of the bid
amount must come back to Council for approval. He noted the original contract was
signed under the emergency declaration.
Mayor Dodd called for public input on items F and G but there was none.
MOTION by Vice Mayor Hill and SECOND by Council Member Nunn to approve consent
agenda items F and G.
Roll call: Council Member Jones - aye
Council Member McPartlan - aye
Council Member Nunn - aye
Mayor Dodd - aye
Vice Mayor Hill - aye
Motion carried. 5-0
Item I - Sweet Tea Sip & Stroll Special Event
Mayor Dodd stated that he pulled this item to announce that the event was open to the
public at Riverview Park on January 23 and 24. Council Member Nunn stated they were
still looking for vendors.
There was no public input.
11 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 7
MOTION by Mayor Dodd and SECOND by Council Member McPartlan to approve item I
passed with a unanimous voice vote.
9. COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS
21.009 A. Citizens Budaet Review Advisory Board (Transmittal, Applications, List, Advertisements)
Interview, Unless Waived, Submit Nominations for One At -Large
(Additional) Member Position - Term will Expire November 2021
Applicant Sherrie Matthews introduced herself.
Council Member Nunn nominated Mr. Sullivan. Council Member Jones nominated Mr. McGinn.
Roll call: Council Member McPartlan - Mr. McGinn
Council Member Nunn - Mr. Sullivan
Mayor Dodd - Mr. McGinn
Vice Mayor Hill - Mr. McGinn
Council Member Jones - Mr. McGinn
Terrence McGinn was appointed to the At -Large (Additional) Member position for the
FY20121 budget cycle.
ii. Interview, Unless Waived, Submit Nominations for Two Alternate Member
Positions - Terms will Expire January 2024
Dave Newhart was unanimously nominated to fill the first alternate member position and
James Sullivan was unanimously nominated to fill the second alternate member position.
21.010 B. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (Transmittal, Applications, List, Advertisement)
i. Interview, Unless Waived, Submit Nominations for Unexpired, One
Alternate Member Position — Term will Expire Mav 2023
Mayor Dodd nominated Ms. Drumheller. Council Member Nunn nominated Mr. Pelletier.
Roll call: Council Member Nunn
- Mr. Pelletier
Mayor Dodd
- Ms. Drumheller
Vice Mayor Hill
- Ms. Drumheller
Council Member Jones
- Ms. Drumheller
Council Member McPartlan
- Ms. Drumheller
Vicki Drumheller was appointed to the unexpired, alternate member position.
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
20.141 A. Second Readina and Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 0-20-03 — Proposina a
Land Development Code Amendment to Section 54-2-5.10(2) Size and
Dimension Criteria with Regards to Establishing Startina Points for Buildinq
Heiqht Measurement (Transmittal, 0-20-03, Sec. 26-1, Ex.A, Minutes)
12 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 54-2-5.10(2), SIZE AND
DIMENSION CRITERIA, REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF STARTING POINTS
FOR BUILDING HEIGHT MEASUREMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
REPEAL OF LAWS IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING
FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PJ Ad
12/29120)
The City Attorney read the title of Ordinance No. 0-20-03 and Mayor Dodd opened the
public hearing at 7:21 p.m.
The Community Development Manager stated the ordinance would amend the section of
the Land Development Code that has to do with where the City starts the measurement
for building heights. It came about when a couple of the contractors were having
problems meeting the current starting point if the property was in a flood zone. Staff
looked at other coastal communities and the proposed ordinance is what staff believes
would work for the City. She explained that if a property was in the flood zone, them
would be a requirement of an additional foot of free board and that is where the City
would start the measurement; and additional 18 inches would be required in the V Zone.
She reported the ordinance was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission; to
Council for a first reading, and staff recommended approval.
There was no public input and Mayor Dodd closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m.
MOTION by Vice Mayor Hill and SECOND by Council Member Jones to approve
Ordinance No. 0-20-03.
Roll call: Vice Mayor Hill - aye
Council Member - aye
Council Member Mr. McPartlan - aye
Council Member Mr. Nunn - aye
Mayor Dodd - aye
Motion carried. 5-0
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
20.128 A. Approve CO#1 with Thor Guard Inc. to Increase the Previously Approved
Purchase and Installation of a Liahtnina Prediction and Warnina Svstem at
Barber Street Sports Complex for a Total Cost of $29,751.35 (Transmittal, CO#'I ,
Minutes Excer)t, Specs}
The City Manager explained the first system approved by Council would no longer be
supported by the company; however, this upgraded system would provide more
opportunities for use at the Barber Street Sports Complex.
The City Manager offered to look into expanding the system to other locations in the
City.
13 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 9
MOTION by Vice Mayor Hill and SECOND by Council Member Nunn to approve CO#1
with Thor Guard, Inc. for the purchase and installation of a lightning prediction and
warning system.
Roll call: Vice Mayor Hill - aye
Council Member Mr. Jones - aye
Council Member Mr. McPartlan - aye
Council Member Mr. Nunn - aye
Mayor Dodd - aye
Motion carried. 5-0
21.011 A. Award and Authorize Negotiations for Request for Qualifications (RFQ #21-01)
for As -Needed Engineering Services to the Four Top -Ranked Firms: Carter
Associates, Inc,: Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.; Kimlev-Horn &
Associates, Inc.: Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard. LLC (Transmittal. Score Sheet,
Reference Checks)
The City Manager conveyed the RFQ went out to solicit services and the selection
committee chose the top four firms. He asked for authorization to negotiate contracts for
award on an as -needed -basis.
MOTION by Council Member Jones and SECOND by Council Member Nunn to award
and authorize negotiations for as -needed engineering services from Carter Associates,
Inc.; Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.; Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.; and Schulke,
Bittle & Stoddard, LLC passed with a unanimous voice vote. 5-0
21.012 B. Approve Work Authorization (CSA#7) to Infrastructure Consultinq & Engineerinq
for Site Preparation of the Future Square Hangars at Sebastian Municipal Airport
in an Amount Not to Exceed $49,797.50 (Transmittal, CSA#7, Scope, Fee
Summarv, Certification)
The City Manager said this work authorization was a part of the Airport Master Plan to
promote and build hangar space.
Vice Mayor Hill said he loved to see the expansion of the property.
MOTION by Council Member Jones and SECOND by Council Member McPartlan to
approve the CSA#7 to Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering for the site preparation of
future square hangars at Sebastian Municipal Airport.
Roll call: Council Member Mr. McPartlan - aye
Council Member Mr. Nunn - aye
Mayor Dodd - aye
Vice Mayor Hill - aye
Council Member Mr. Jones - aye
Motion carried. 5-0
14 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 10
21.013 C. Award Invitation to Bid (ITB#21-03) Nuisance Abatement Mowina Services to
Conlon Landscar)ina. Inc.: Micco Land Services. LLC; and Moblev II Enterprises,
LLC for Two Year Terms with Renewal Options for One Year Term (Transmittal,
Bid Tab, Bid Responses, Aareement)
The City Manager said this was to mow back vegetation on vacant lots and asked for
approval.
MOTION by Vice Mayor Hill and SECOND by Council Member Nunn to award nuisance
abatement mowing services contracts to Conlon Landscaping, Inc.; Micco Land
services, LLC; and Mobley II Enterprises, LLC.
Roll call: Council Member Nunn - aye
Mayor Dodd - aye
Vice Mayor Hill - aye
Council Member Jone - aye
Council Member McPartlan - aye
Motion carried. 5-0
13, CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS
In response to a comment from the audience, the City Attorney assured Council that he
does review every contract that comes before them; he does not approve them but
reviews them for legal sufficiency.
14. CITY MANAGER MATTERS - None
15. CITY CLERK MATTERS - None
16. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS
A. Council Member Nunn
Council Member Nunn thanked staff for their great support structure for council
members.
He conveyed that he did not like to wear masks but he does when he has to. He didn't
understand why it was so difficult for people to wear one for 10 feet to come inside to sit
down, while it may not prevent the virus, it is respectful for your neighbor. He said given
the comments regarding the County's distribution of the vaccines this past week, he
encouraged everyone to find patience while the County works out the distribution kinks;
it will make it a better place for us when we are done.
B. Mayor Dodd
Mayor Dodd stated it was the one-year anniversary of the City Attorney who has
requested that Council look at his contract. He asked Council if there was consensus 'to
meet as a committee and come back to Council.
15 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 11
Vice Mayor Hill suggested negotiations should be offered to all of the officers. It was the
consensus of Council to have the Mayor meet with the City Attorney, City Manager, and
Chief Financial Officer to come up with a process that will come back to Council for
approval.
He displayed the Septic to Sewer Report provided by staff and noted the City still has
about 140 properties that can use sewer systems but the problem is that the City can't
use the grant money until the City receives a 95% connection rate which will take some
responsibility and planning. He asked if Council was interested in directing the City
Manager to put a plan together to take over the effort and accomplish the hook up of all
of the properties in the CRA District.
He said there is a Schulke, Stoddard, & Bittle report indicating that the highlands are the
greatest offender with the septic tanks and if the City cannot convert the CRA District,
the highlands will never be in compliance.
Mayor Dodd said the only way the City can do this without requiring each property owner
to convert, is by taking on responsibility, applying for as much grant money as the City
can and then start assessments where a business would pay a little more than a
homeowner.
As an alternative to an assessment, he said if the City can put in 25 lift stations that a
hundred properties could use, he was sure the County would much rather have 25 lift
stations as opposed to each property having a lift station.
The City Manager offered to put this onto the next agenda to receive clear direction on
how to move forward. There was no objection to his suggestion.
Mayor Dodd said he was concerned where they were going as a country; there was a
perfect storm in 2020 of things that make people question the validity of the government
and the validity of its intention towards the citizens. He said he may not be happy with
the results of the presidential election or the wearing of masks but he is not willing to
start a civil war over it.
He is hearing militaristic talk that is much more severe than he has heard in his lifetime.
He said he heard talk when he returned from Vietnam in California and Seattle but it was
nothing compared to what he is hearing today. He said it is absolutely scary that the
leaders in the Country would condone these attitudes and the citizenry is truly beginning
to believe that it is them against the government.
In regard to the comments on the mask policy, he heard it is the citizens against the
government; the City is not trying to take away their rights, but follow the science. He
implored citizens in Sebastian to think very hard about the damage that can be done
when the citizenry believes that the government no longer cares for them or supports
them; or that the government no longer protects them. It is scary what might happen
over next 12 months. He asked the citizens to take some time to think about this.
C. Vice Mayor Hill
16 of 192
Regular City Council Meeting
January 13, 2021
Page 12
Vice Mayor Hill said he appreciated all of the staff members such as the police officers,
public works department that have to deal with the environment that we are in. He said
he has never sat with more reliable guys on Council that have the best interests of the
citizens at heart, but it has been an absolute beat down on all sides.
He asked people to take a walk on the riverfront, look at the sunrise, dolphins, white
pelicans and understand that they live in paradise. He said the Council Members and
staff care about the community. He asked everyone to try to get along and thank God
for what they have.
D. Council Member Jones
Council Member Jones said he has gone down to Fisherman's Landing which is going to
be an awesome project once the job is done. He thanked the City Manager and
Community Development Director for their work on the project.
E. Council Member McPartlan
Council Member McPartlan said the Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council will be
having their point in time count next week to count how many homeless and couch
surfers there are which equates to how many federal dollars that come down into the
community to work with the homeless.
He reported that he attended the Indian River Veterans Services Council where he
invited them to participate with the City's Veterans Advisory Board.
He asked people to be nice to each other; there are people out there that have real
problems.
17. Being no further business, Mayor Dodd adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at
7:56 p.m.
Approved at the January 27, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting.
Mayor Ed Dodd
ATTEST:
Jeanette Williams, MMC — City Clerk
17 of 192
MY OF
SEAT'"
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
COUNCIL MEETING DATE
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL
January 27, 2021
Construction Board
RECOMMENDATION: Interview, unless waived, and submit nominations for one
unexpired alternate member, concerned citizen positon —Term
to expire September 30, 2022
BACKGROUND: In response to the City Clerk's advertisement, the City Clerk
has received notice from Christopher Roberts that he would
like to be considered for the concerned citizen position. No
other applications were received.
Sec. 26-191. - Membership; terms; filling of vacancies.
(a)The city construction board shall be composed of seven members and, as far as practical, shall consist of
two licensed or certified contractors (residential, building, general), one electrical contractor, one heating and
ventilation contractor, one architect or engineer, one plumbing contractor, and one concerned citizen. The city
council may also appoint one or two alternate members who shall serve as necessary to assemble a
maximum of seven voting members of the board. It is preferred that the alternate members consist of one
licensed or certified contractor and one concerned citizen. All members and alternate members shall be
appointed by the city council, pursuant to section 2-170 of this Code.
ATTACHMENTS:
Clerk Authorization: %
Date: I /Z.Ol7CJLlV
Application, Ad, List
WLY�A,niA_
18 of 192
'-pow,
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
VOLUNTEER BOARD AND COMMITTEE APPLICATION
This application form is a public record under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and is open to public inspection. in accordance with
FS 119.07 Exemptions, individuals employed or retired from certain professions relating to law enforcement may request that
their physical address and phone number remain confidential. Unless requested, that information will be available and not
redacted.
Per Section 2-170, all Board and Committee members must be City residents unless otherwise specified in the enacting
ordinance or resolution. Board and Committee terms are three years unless otherwise specified in the enacting ordinance or
resolution. You may reapply for succeeding terms upon term expiration.
Name: oA P{ gole � 5
Address: City;" ` %? State #
zip: Telephone: (77L ) 6 �
E-Mail Address; (, k? t4 v9 4S 60 16 & Gj fn cl)' / : to"
Employer:
ePC4C_4iq 1r_'A 6f
j.'Id feA C f
r—OA,?
City: pcf
,1 V
State:
Zip: 017
Business Telephone: () )' -
I am interested in serving on the following boa rd(s)jcomrnittee(s);
1" Choice: ("C"` ht4(,4f 0 _j) n PrIC6 C4i°
�4��C 2 Choice:
CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE (serves only six months, every five years -- next meeting in 2021)
CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY BOARD
CONSTRUCTION BOARD* (permanent)
DISABILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (temporary)
NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD (permanent)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION* ** (permanent)
POLICE RETIREMENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES*
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (permanent)
SEBASTIAN YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL (temporary)
VETERANS` ADVISORY BOARD (temporary)
*Filing of financlal disclosure is required following appointment
"Must be resident one year prior to application.
19 of 192
Please summarize special skills, qualifications, or education you have acquired for this appointment:
(Your resume, professional certifications or designations may be attached.)
�--, � �'`1 � � � P. � C ��� �: �► � � � �� �.�: �J��:,� � sir �,r: L,f ""'
Why do you want to serve on this board?
1 lt'Wr) r, 110 L4) 4e ) D(O f P611` k ec
Do you presently serve on another City Board or Committee?
If yes, please list:
Have you previously served on any other City Board or Committee?
If yes, please list:
Y
rr ales S
I will represent the best interests of the entire City while serving as a board member. I hereby waive and release any
and all rights for claims for damages and injuries I may suffer while performing or after performing volunteer
services for the City of Sebastian. I give permission for the City of Sebastian to use my photograph for publicity
purposes (unless requesting exemption).
If required for this board, I consent to the annual filing of the Statement of Financial interests.
ttitt-jwww.ethic.s stiite.fl.us/ethics forms.httTlI
If appointed, I acknowledge that it is my obligation and duty to comply with the following: Code of Ethics for Public
Officials (Florida Statutes, Chapter 112, Part Ili) and Florida Sunshine Law (Florida Statutes, Chapter286)
Statutes may be reviewed at ;,.,` flseriate�o�stattites
I understand I must contact the City Clerk's office to request reappointment prior to expiration or to be considered
for another board. I hereby certify that all the statements made on this application are true and correct. I
understand that any false statements or omissions from this application may be cause for my application not to be
considered.
f -�Signature of Applicant:. Date:
c, 11 -
Date Received by City Clerk's Office 14�-2V G f by / ,k ki-1 ,M A 20 of 192
J-
CITY OF
5JEELASTLNN
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
November 4, 2020 Contact: Jeanette Williams
388-8215
PRESS RELEASE
CONSTRUCTION BOARD
The Sebastian City Council is accepting applications for the following volunteer positions on the
Construction Board:
One Regular Member, HARV Contractor Position — Term expiring 912022
One Regular Member Engineer or Architect Position — Term expiring 912021
One Alternate Member, Contractor Position — Term expiring 912022
One Alternate Member, Concerned Citizen Position — Term to expire 9/30/2022
The Construction Board provides advice to City Council on any matter affecting contractors or
the construction industry within the corporate limits of the City.
Applicants must be City residents. Please be advised these positions are subject to financial
reporting requirements.
If Council fills a regular member position with an alternate member, Council reserves the right to
fill the alternate position with remaining applicants.
Application forms are available in the City Cleric's Office, City Hall, 1225 Main Street, Sebastian,
between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm or downloaded from www.cityofsebastian.org
Applications will be accepted until the positions are filled.
21 of 192
CONSTRUCTION BOARD
3-YEAR TERMS
MEETS 2ND TUESDAY EACH MONTH - 6:00 P.M.
MEMBER NAME AND
POSITION
APPOINTMENT
CURRENT
ADDRESS
HISTORY
STATUS
Electrical
Took BuAa's
Term to expire
Nicholas Scheskowsky
Contractor
9/30/2022
113 Joy Haven Drive
Position
position
Sebastian, FL 32958
10/14/2020
scheskowskv(d�vahoo.com
(561) 324-1205
Jean Carbano
Regular
Reappointed
Term to expire
433 Betty Avenue
Concerned
10/14/2020
9/30/2023
Sebastian, FL 32958
Citizen
Reappointed
Jeanne41990,aoI.com
Position
10/11/17
581-1397
Reappointed
9/10/14
Reappointed
10/12/11
Reappointed
9/24/08
Reappointed
9/14/05
Took Stuart
Houston's position
6/13/01
James Fortier — Chair
Plumber
Position
Reappointed
Term to expire
1301 Dewitt Lane
10/10/2018
9/30/2021
Sebastian, FL 32958
James(CDseaoaksbt.com
Reappointed
473-2043
9/9/2015
Reappointed
9/26/2012
Took Reyes
position 3/23/11
VACANT
Engineer or
Manero's position
Term to expire
Architect
9/30/2021
Position
22 of 192
w
Jock Crockett Regular Reappointed Term to expire
103 Thunderbird Drive Contractor 10/10/2018 9/30/2021
Sebastian, FL 32958 Position
iohncrockettna.bellsouth. net Took Berry's
581-0495 position 5/10/17
VACANT HARV Dalessandro's Term to expire
Contractor position 9/30/2022
Richard Wilcher
Regular
Appt reg member
Term to expire
221 Midvale Terrace
Member
1/8/2020
9/30/2021
Sebastian, FL 32958
Contractor
iohniaviehosafat6Damail.com
Apptd alt member
(240) 695-3163
7/11/18
Took Zullo's position
VACANT
Alternate
Parris' position
Term to expire
Concerned
9/30/2022
Citizen
Position
VACANT Alternate Wilcher's position Term to expire
Contractor 9/30/2022
Position
Per Code 26-198 — Building Official, Wayne Eseltine, shall initiate proceedings, make
recommendations, report on each matter.
4 regular members are needed to make a quorum. In the event a regular member cannot make the
meeting, an alternate steps in.
23 of 192
\m if
SEB T"
-� --rPELam - --
HOME OF ICAN ISLAND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL
Council Meeting Date: January 27, 2021
Agenda Item Title: First Reading of Ordinance 0-21-01 providing for the transmittal of the City
of Sebastian Proposed Comprehensive Plan 2040 in accordance with the
State Coordinated Review Amendment Process Section 163.3184(4) and (5),
Florida Statutes
Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance 0-21-01 on First Reading providing for the
transmittal of the Proposed City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan 2040
Background: The City of Sebastian has amended the City of Sebastian's
Comprehensive Plan in its entirety, excluding the Economic Development Element, in accordance with
Chapter 163.3184(3) and has conducted the required public hearings to receive citizen input. The
Comprehensive Plan contains goals, objectives, and policies to guide the development of the City of
Sebastian through the year 2040, addressing land uses, transportation & mobility, housing, infrastructure,
conservation & coastal management, parks, recreation & open space, governance & implementation, and
public schools elements.
The Draft plan was provided to the City Council on October 2, 2020 along with a matrix showing all
changes to the plan. Since the current Comprehensive Plan has been amended in its entirety excluding the
Economic Development EIement, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) recommends
a matrix to be submitted along with the amended Comprehensive Plan in lieu of the strikethrough format
typically transmitted.
Attachment 1 contains edits to the Comprehensive Plan 2040 recommended by PZ Commission/LPA on
October 15, 2020 and directed by City Council on December 9, 2020. Please consider these changes as
part of the final review of the package distributed to Council on October 2, 2020.
Following the City Council's review and consideration of all relevant evidence, information and
testimony at this public hearing, staff requests the approval of Ordinance 0-21-01 on first reading
(Attachment 2). The City of Sebastian shall transmit within ten (10) working days the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendment and appropriate supporting data and analyses to the DEO and review
agencies in accordance with the State Coordinated Review Amendment Process Section 163.3184(4) and
(5), Florida Statutes. Once DEO has received the PROPOSED document, they have sixty (60) days to
provide objections, recommendations and comments referred to as the ORC report. The City has 180
days to ADOPT the final document at which time it will go into effect.
Staff is prepared to answer any questions regarding the amended plan and request approval to proceed
with the transmittal process. Please find all relevant documents on the city website at
www.citvofsebastian.ora.
If Agenda Item Reauires Expenditure of Funds:
Budgeted Amount:
Total Cost: ���
Funds to Be Utilized for Appropriation:
Attachments:
1. Final Draft Recommendations as supplement to Comprehensive Plan 2040 document received
October 2, 2020.
2. Ordinance 0-21-01 Comprehensive Plan 2040
24 of 192
Administrative Services Department Review:` l
r
City Attorney Review:
Procurement Division Review, if applicable:
City Manager A7-v
orization
Date: /_
J
25 of 192
CIR of
SE13ASTIAN
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518
www.citvofsebastian.org
CITY OF SEBASTIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040
January 2021
Note: The attached edits to the Comprehensive Plan 2040 were recommended by PZ
Commission/LPA on October 15, 2020 and directed by City Council on December 9,
2020. Please consider these changes as part of the final review of the package
distributed to Council on October 2, 2020. Please note any questions, concerns, and
recommendations for discussion at the next scheduled meeting, January 27, 2021.
ATTACHMENTS
• Land Use Element GOPs showing only the Industrial language as strike-
through/underline
• Transportation Mobility Element DIA showing only edit to the table in strike-
though/underline
• Housing Element DIA showing only language added at the end in underline
• Conservation Coastal Element GOPs and DIA showing the edits as strike-
though/underline
• Updated FLUM with border and title block
• Updated Road Jurisdiction Map with border and title block
• Updated Schedule
26 of 192
,fWMEE ff!p BAN ISLAND
I
LAND USE ELEMENT
The Land Use Element promotes livability, sustainability, and smart growth
principles to guide the development of the City of Sebastian and shape how
the City will grow in the next 20 years. The purpose of the Land Use Element
is to designate future land use patterns with corresponding densities and
intensities in areas which will best accommodate the projected growth. This
Element ensures the minimization of adverse impacts on natural resources
and the maintenance of essential facilities and services at desired levels to
maintain the quality of life within the City. The Land Use Element is the
foundation of the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan as it ties all or
portions of the other Elements and establishes the planning framework for
the City's Vision moving forward.
LAND USE ELEMENT
HIGHLIGHTS
1. Designates future land use patterns to guide sustainable growth and
development within the City;
2. Encourages mixed use development and increased densities and
intensities;
3. Promotes transfer of development rights or incentives for the
protection of the City's natural resources;
4. Incorporates emergency preparedness measures for natural and
man-made disasters to ensure the City's resilience;
5. Promotes affordability, accessibility, and healthy communities;
6. Encourages low -impact development, sustainable, and energy
efficient building design and practices;
7. Guides growth management principles to prevent the proliferation of
sprawl and requires adequate infrastructure and public facilities to
support the City's population;
8. Encourages the utilization of design standards and form based code
principles in order to enhance the community's appearance;
9. Articulates redevelopment and renewal strategies as well as promotes
infill development and redevelopment;
10. Requires the protection of the City's historical and cultural resources.
M
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES
Goal 1-1: Land Use Designations.
Future growth in the City of Sebastian will be managed using sustainability and smart growth principles to
accommodate development and redevelopment. The Land Use Element shall be used as a tool to direct growth
into the urban core and designated growth areas, recognizing redevelopment opportunities, optimizing services
and infrastructure and protecting the environment.
Objective 1-1.1: Establish Land Use Designations. The land use designations
identified in this Element and depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) shall support a variety of land uses,
density and intensity, and an appropriate mix of uses to accommodate the City's future population identified in
the Data Inventory and Analysis (DIA). The City's land use designations shall be grouped by the overarching
categories of Residential, Non -Residential, and Other.
Policy 1-1.1.1: Future Population. The City shall designate sufficient lands necessary to accommodate
at a minimum the projected residential population growth and supporting non-residential development
based on the medium population projections through the planning period.
Policy 1-1.1.2: Residential Density Defined. Residential development (density) is measured by
dwelling units per gross acre (du/ac). All residential densities denoted on the FLUM stipulate the
maximum gross densities permitted for development on the land however, the maximum density is not
guaranteed by right. The appropriate allocation of density shall encourage a compact, transit -accessible,
and pedestrian -oriented community. Subdivision, zoning, and site plan review criteria and procedures
shall assure that specific density assigned to new development is compatible and consistent with
established residential development patterns and provides equitable use of the land. Criteria to be
considered in allocating density shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Protect the integrity and stability of established residential areas;
• Assure efficient and appropriate use of land to reduce sprawl;
• Assure transition in residential densities;
• Require application of sound landscaping and urban design principles and practices where
applicable;
• Protect environmentally sensitive areas;
• Minimize the impact of flood hazards and seal level rise;
• Coordinate with Indian River County as well as appropriate state and regional agencies charged
with managing land and water resources; and
• Provide reasonable use of the land.
A. In cases where residential land abuts waters of the State, the boundary shall be delineated as
established by the State and no density credit shall be granted for waters of the State. In cases where
residential land abuts other natural floodplains or wetlands, the land development regulations shall
provide performance standards and/or criteria which may further restrict the character of land for
which density credit may be granted and or permitted to transfer such credit. The intent is to allocate
4
density credits only to those lands which are buildable pursuant to urban design principles criteria.
These criteria principles that shall be incorporated within the Land Development Code (LDC).
Policy 1-1.1.3: Non -Residential Intensity Defined. Non-residential development (intensity) is
measured in floor area ratio (FAR). FAR is calculated by dividing the total size of the building/structure (in
square feet) by the total size (in square feet) of the lot on which the building is located. All non-residential
intensities denoted on the FLUM stipulate the maximum intensities permitted for development on the land
however, the maximum intensity is not guaranteed by right.
Policy 1-1.1.4: Implementing Land Use Designations. The City shall implement the following land use
designations in Table 1-1 as shown on the FLUM.
Table 1-1: Land Use Designations
Low Density
Medium Density
Mobile Home Development
Limited Commercial 0.6 FAR
General Commercial
Commercial 512
Riverfront Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Industrial
Institutional
Notes:
1. Up to 12 du/ac with incentives
2. Up to 10 du/ac with incentives
3. Up to 1.0 FAR with incentives
1.0 FAR
0.5 FAR
8 du/ac? & 0.6 FAR
10 du/ac' & 0.6 FAR
0.5 FAR
0.6 FAR
k 5
Objective 1-1.2: Residential Land Use. The Residential Land Use category consists of Very
Low Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Mixed Residential uses in
progressive degrees with :higher density in areas adjacent to the urban core and less density in the perimeter of
the City. Residential development shall be planned and designed to create and perpetuate stable residential
neighborhood and implement the policies stipulated below.
Policy 1-1.2.1: Very Low Density Residential Development (VLDR). Areas designated as Very Low
Density shall accommodate up to three (3) dwelling units per acre and shall be comprised of primarily
single-family detached homes on individual lots.
Policy 1-1.2.2: Low Density Residential Development (LDR). Areas designated as Low Density shall
accommodate a maximum density of up to five (5) dwelling units per acre and shall be comprised
primarily of single family detached homes on individual lots and attached residential homes.
Policy 1-1.2.3: Medium Density Residential Development (MDR). Areas designated as Medium
Density shall accommodate a mixture of single-family (detached and attached) residential housing, multi-
family residential housing, and compatible civic uses and open space(s) at a maximum density of ten (10)
dwelling units per acre and up to twelve (12) dwelling units per acre with the use of TDRs or incentives.
TDRs and incentives shall be outlined in the LDC and may include but are not limited to projects that
incorporate regional stormwater pond(s), attainable and workforce housing, shared parking structures(s),
bike/pedestrian connectivity, and quality of public open space. The Medium Density designation is
intended to encourage and enhance livability in the City through the provision of a diverse mix of housing
stock that is attainable, well -integrated with the City's mobility network, and in close proximity and
accessible to services (public and private), neighborhood and community amenities, and employment
centers. Due to the nature of development within this designation, multi -.modal connectivity is
encouraged. The density of uses within this designation should be sensitive to adjacent neighborhoods
to ensure appropriate transitions, buffers, and compatibility. The City may utilize financial and other
incentives to assist the private sector in the provision of attainable and 'missing middle' housing within
the Medium Density designation.
Policy 1-1.2.4: Mobile Home Residential Development. Areas designated as Mobile Home shall
accommodate mobile home parks or subdivisions at a maximum of five (5) dwelling units per acre. The
LDC shall contain requirements for open space landscaping and buffers to effectively screen mobile
home developments from adjacent residential development.
Policy 1-1.2.5: Code Compliance. The City shall facilitate the maintenance, redevelopment, and
quality of housing units within the City through conservation, rehabilitation, education, compliance, and
enforcement of LDC regulations and building code standards including the provisions to upgrade
substandard housing. The LDC or other document shall include property maintenance standards for
buildings including residential structures, mobile and manufactured homes, etc. requiring that
all property, structures and buildings shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements
adopted. Standards shall include provisions restricting a person from occupying as owner -occupant or
permit another person to occupy premises which are not in a sanitary and safe condition and which do
not comply with the requirements of the code. Maintenance responsibility for mobile homes and
11
nw n
premises located within mobile home parks lies with the responsible party based on the obligations set
forth in Section 723.024, Florida Statutes, as amended. The standards shall include provisions that
all property and premises shall be maintained in a clean, safe, secure, and sanitary condition. The
storage of trash, rubbish, and garbage is prohibited on any property.
Policy 1-1.2.65: Allocating Residential Development. The highest residential densities shall continue
to be allocated to sites with adequate and supporting public infrastructure, accessible to major arterials
or collector streets and adjacent to existing development with the same or higher density. The allocation
of new residential land use shall be based on the following considerations:
• Projected population;
• Infrastructure (availability);
• Infill;
• Enclaves;
• Housing trends and characteristics including provisions for missing middle and attainable
housing;
• Provision and maintenance of quality residential developments and housing stock;
• Protection of environmentally natural systems;
• Location and or proximity to the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA);
• The need to plan for transition in residential densities; and
• Provision and maintenance of traffic circulation.
Policy 1-1.2.76: Protect Residential Areas from the Adverse Impacts of Transition in Land Use.
Established residential areas and projected future residential areas as delineated on the FLUM shall be
protected from encroachment by potentially incompatible non-residential development. This does not
preclude necessary community facilities from locating within residential areas when such activities satisfy
established criteria of this plan and the City's LDC.
Objective 1-1.3p Non -Residential Land Use. A variety of non-residential land use
designations shall be maintained to assure availability of sites that accommodate the varied site and spatial
requirements for such activities as: professional and business offices, commercial activities, employment
generating businesses and general retail sales and services, and industrial. In doing so, the City shall promote
the image and function of the urban core which is the City's center for commerce as well as civic and cultural
enrichment. Office development may serve as a transitional use separating more intensive commercial uses from
residential development. Office development and limited commercial activities (neighborhood serving) may also
be suitable and locate along the outer fringe of the urban core where such development may encourage
reinvestment in declining residential areas surrounding the urban core.
Policy 1-1.3.1: Definition of Neighborhood Level Commercial Activities. Neighborhood level
commercial activities are defined as including retail and office activities that service residential
neighborhoods.
Policy 1-1.3.2: Limited Commercial Development (LCD). The purpose of the Limited Commercial
land use designation is to consist of sites intended to accommodate neighborhood level commercial
activities. The maximum intensity is 0.6 FAR. Limited commercial activities and personal services shall
include establishments catering to the following markets:
• Neighborhood residential markets within the immediate vicinity as opposed to county -wide or
regional markets; or
• Specialized markets with customized market demands.
Policy 1-1.3.3: General Commercial Development (CG). The purpose of the General Commercial
land use designation is to accommodate general retail sales and services; highway oriented sales and
services; and other general commercial activities defined in the LDC. General Commercial designations
are located in highly accessible areas, adjacent to major arterials. The maximum intensity is 1.0 FAR.
Policy 1-1.3.4: C.R. 512 Commercial (C-512). The purpose of the Commercial C.R. 512 designation
is to accommodate retail sales and services and other commercial activities and community facilities that
are compatible with nearby residential areas. This land use designation and implementing zoning district
expressly excludes vehicular sales and services; bars and lounges; parking garages; enclosed and
unenclosed commercial amusements; indoor theaters; merchandising of second-hand goods, including
flea markets, wholesale trades and services; industrial uses or outside storage activities, or any other
activities which may generate nuisance impacts such as glare, smoke, other air pollutants, noise,
vibration, fire hazard, or other adverse impacts associated with more intense commercial and industrial
uses. The maximum intensity is 0.5 FAR.
Policy 1-1.3.5: Riverfront Mixed Use (RMU). The Riverfront Mixed Use designation is intended to
provide a mixture of residential, commercial, recreational, and institutional uses in the Riverfront District.
Development and redevelopment in this designation is at risk of potential flooding and sea level rise
impacts per the City of Sebastian, Coastal Resiliency Plan, Prepared By Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc., March 2019 (Coastal Resiliency Plan). The use of Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) shall be
encouraged as a tool to move the density/intensity of development from the east area of the district to
the west area of the district outside of the CHHA. The City's LDC may also define additional areas as
receiving zones. The maximum intensity is 0.6 FAR, and up to 1.0 FAR with incentives. The allowable
residential uses are single family, duplexes, multi -family with densities up to eight (8) dwelling units per
acre, and up to ten (10) dwelling units per acre with the use of TDRs or incentives. Incentives shall be
only available for areas outside of the CHHA and shall be outlined in the LDC and may include but are
not limited to projects that incorporate regional stormwater pond(s), shared parking structures(s),
bike/pedestrian connectivity, and quality of public open space.
Policy 1-1.3.6: Mixed Use (MU). The purpose of the Mixed Use designation is to provide a mixture of
residential, office, commercial, recreational, limited industrial, and institutional uses and encourage town
centers along major arterial corridors. This designation shall target areas outside of the Riverfront Mixed
Use district to allow for greater flexibility and changing market types in identified areas of the City such
as the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. These areas may also serve as TDR receiving areas allowing
for the preservation of additional preservation and conservation lands within the City. Additional design
and development standards including form based code principals shall be incorporated into the LDC. The
maximum intensity is 0.6 FAR, and up to 1.0 FAR with incentives. The allowable residential uses include
single family, duplexes, and multi -family up to ten (10) dwelling units per acre, and up to twelve (12)
of 1 2 8
dwelling units per acre with the use of TDRs or incentives. Incentives shall be outlined in the LDC and
may include but are not limited to projects that incorporate regional stormwater pond(s), shared parking
structures(s), bike/pedestrian connectivity, and quality of public open space.
Policy 1-1.3.7: Industrial Land Use Desiqnation. The purpose of the Industrial Land Use designation is to
provide strateaicaliv located sites for industrial needs and requisite support services. The City's Industrial Land
Use may be further designated as Industrial (IND) and Heavv Industrial (HI) in order to support future economic
development and iob arowth. In the past, absorption of industrial land has been relatively slow within the City.
Most industrial districts are established locations with existing conditions. Challenges exist for new large scale
industrial employers to locate in the City due to lack of adequate parcel sizes, infrastructure, and locations with
convenient access to maior transportation routes. New industrial locations shall ensure protection of
environmentally sensitive lands and protected natural resources. A hiah priority shall be given to reserving
strategically located lands adaptive to the unique location requirements of industrv.
A. Industrial (IND) Land Use designation provides for limited manufacturing and industrial uses which
minimize the potential for any adverse impacts upon nearby properties which include: utilities: liaht
manufacturing. assembling and distribution activities: warehousing, storaae and wholesaling activities;
general commercial activities: aviation related industry, services and facilities; support services such as
night watchmen or custodian residential accessory uses: and other similar land uses which shall be
regulated through appropriate zonina procedures.
B. Heav►r Industrial (HI) Land Uses are subiect to additional protective measures through appropriate
zoning procedures. The Citv will establish separate HI district location criteria and performance criteria
that provide a greater separation from impacts to surrounding land uses. Uses permitted in the HI
district allow a broader ranae of uses that may have a greater impact on adiacent properties includina_ :
sites which require large surface area. bulk storage facilities, logistic centers/ terminals: distribution
centers; warehousing, manufacturing and processing; preen technologies and wholesale salvage
operations; and support services such as niaht watchmen or custodian residential accessory uses.
C. Locational Standards:
1. Industrial sites shall aenerally be allocated in areas accessible to arterial roads. rail corridors. or
near airport facilities and should be located in more sparsely developed areas. New industrial
land use areas shall also be located near existing compatible land uses. separated from
residential and institutional areas. Where new industrial locations are adiacent to
environmentally sensitive lands and protected natural resources. anDrooriate buffers and other
techniaues shall be used to ensure protection of such lands and resources from industrial
development. The maximum intensity is 0.5 FAR.
2. The Citv shall encourage industries that contribute to the City's and local economies of the
Treasure Coast and Space Coast. The Citv shall also encourage green industries (such as
recycling facilities) that minimize potentially negative regional impact to the environment.
3. The allocation of land resources for industrial development shall be responsive to the location
and space requirements of industrial activities and potential fiscal and environmental impacts on
the Citv of Sebastian. The location and distribution of industrial land use shall be determined
based on the following considerations:
9
• Trip generation characteristics and impact on existing and planned transportation
systems, including dependency on rail, air, or trucking for distribution of material and
goods;
• Anticipated emolovment generation. floor area requirements. and market area;_
• Ability to meet established performance standards for preventing or minimizino
nuisance impacts. such as emission of air pollutants, glare, noise or odor, or generation
of hazardous bv-products;
• Impact on established as well as anticipated future development and natural systems;
and
• Impact on existing and planned public services, utilities, water resources, and energv
resources.
4. The City shall prevent nuisance impacts frequently associated with industrial activities by
maintainina performance standards in the LDC for manaa_ inq_ emission of noise, air pollutants.
odor, vibration, fire or explosive hazard, and glare.
5. In addition to the performance standards identified in F above, the Citv shall establish
performance standards in the LDC as it pertains to both industrial and heavv industrial districts
which at a minimum address, but are not limited to, the following:
• Allowable uses
• Land use compatibility. buffering and landscaping
• Access points. traffic controls, and narking
• Sionage
• Gross floor area. impervious surface ratios
• Open space
• Character of an area
• Locational factors
• Environmental impacts
• Secondary containment and open air storage facilities.
6. All facilities adioininq or on an airport shall be in accordance with FS Chapter 333 and 330 and
shall protect aerial approaches and not restrict or prevent aircraft operations.
P$liey-j-4-.-W: IMttst W L-8nd Ajse DesignatimiM D).-The-ffurpeseef the [Rdustrial-designation is to
provide strategically located sites for industrial needs and requisite support services.
A. —Industrial sites shall generally be allocated in areas accessible to rail corridors or near airport
facilities and should be located in more sparsely developed areas. The maximum intensity is 0.5
FAR.
B.—The City shall establish standards in the LDC including, but not limited to, use,
buffering/compatibility; locatienal criteria, etc: as it pertains to -both light and heavy industrial
districts. Uses allowed in the Industrial designation include: manufacturing, assembling and
distribution activities; warehousing and storage activities; general commercial activities; aviation
related industry, services and facilities; and other similar land uses which shall be regulated
through appropriate zoning procedures. Heavy metal fabrication, batch plants, chemical or
10
petroleum -manufacturing or fefining rubber of plastics rnanufacturing--er-other.-use-generating
potentially harmful environmental or nuisance impacts shall -be prohibited.
G7-The-6ity-shall--preventt nuisance-impacts--frequentty-assec-fated-with--industrial-activities-by
maint iningperfermenee standards ferr "lln gng-en risse"f„oise, air pollutants, eder, vibFation-,
fire -or - explosive ba-zardi and -glare:
D.—The City shall encourage industries that contribute optimally to the Gity's economy and that of
the Treasure Coast and Space Coast. The City shall -also encourage green industries that
minimize impact to the environment: The allocation of land resources for industrial development
shall-be--responsive-to the leeatioi and space equirernents- dustria"etivitiao and petentiat
fiscal -and environmental- impacts on the City -of Sebastian:
E: The location and distribution of industrial land use shall -be determined based on the following
considerations:
---Trip-generation haraeteF es-and-impaet-en-exis+irr,g &rrd plwrod t�anspert�atiort yster
including dependency on rail; air-, or tracking -for distribution of naw aterial and goods;
Anticipated-e►nployfne"ener-atien fflo .rti 7-✓4uifernents; -and-market wea;
Ability--to--r Ee
impacts;-such-ae-emission of air pollutants; gtare-noise-or-odef; er-generatien-ofbazzardous
by-products;
Ifrfipari. v C&MJ51kh�-d as well -as anticipated future dovc�,-.rvrf Gird raturalsy3tcr r; rad
41 Irrpz.^Tv„-existing and lsiafiRed-pubtiE""^ ••+��:+„s water d
", , s„Q -znc,l
reseufees:
Policy 1-1.3.8: Institutional Land Use Designation (INST). The Institutional land use designation is
intended to accommodate existing public and semi-public services including: governmental
administration buildings; places of worship, cultural or civic centers, and other similar public or private
not -for -profit uses; public schools and not -for -profit educational institutions; hospital facilities and
supportive health care units; arts and cultural or civic facilities; essential public services and facilities;
cemeteries; fire and emergency operation facilities; public and private parks and recreation areas; utilities;
extensive open areas comprising major committed public and semi-public open spaces, including the
Municipal Golf Course and Sebastian Municipal Airport; and other similar activities. The maximum
intensity of this designation is 0.6. The location, scale, timing, and design of necessary public and semi-
public services and utilities shall be closely coordinated with development activities in order to promote
more effective and efficient delivery of requisite services and utilities. The City shall maintain and enforce
appropriate standards and specifications for the design and construction of public and semi-public
services in order to promote cost effectiveness and quality control consistent with all applicable federal,
state, regional, and local standards.
Policy 1-1.3.9: Pattern of Non -Residential Land Use. In order to promote efficient flow of traffic along
major arterials cited in the Transportation & Mobility Element, achieve orderly development, and
minimize adverse impact on residential quality, non-residential development shall be concentrated in
strategically located (targeted) areas. These areas include those having location characteristics which
best accommodate specific land, site, public facilities and market location requirements of their respective
non-residential uses. Similarly, proliferation of strip non-residential development shall not be extended or
11
supported. The existence of non-residential areas on one part (quadrant or side) of an intersection shall
not dictate the development of all parts with the same or similar use; nor does the existence of non-
residential development on a major arterial dictate that all frontages may be similarly used.
Policy 1-1.3.10: Allocating Non -Residential Land Use. The approval of non-residential uses shall
recognize that respective non-residential activities frequently have different site, spatial, and market area
characteristics and generate significantly different impacts. The non-residential development
designations on the FLUM shall be complemented by zoning, performance standards, and site plan
review requirements which shall regulate development on such land. These regulations shall assure that
the proposed development of non-residential designated sites is appropriate and can be adapted to the
proposed site. For instance, the LDC shall address issues regarding:
• Parking including safe and convenient vehicle and pedestrian circulation;
• Open space preservation and natural constraints to development;
• Perimeter and internal landscape requirements;
• Availability of public facilities at adequate levels of service;
• Urban design and required amenities, including, but not limited to, signage controls, fences,
pedestrian amenities, building height, building setback, and orientation, and other similar design
features;
• Controlled access and egress;
• Trip generation characteristics, impact on existing and planned transportation facilities and ability
to achieve a functional internal circulation;
• Location and site requirements based on intensity of use, specific needs of respective
commercial activities, their market area, anticipated employment generation, and floor area
requirements;
• Compatibility with and impact on other surrounding commercial activities;
• Relationship to surrounding land uses and natural systems; and
• Impact on existing and planned community services and utilities.
Objective 1-1 A Other Land Use. The City shall provide designations for Agriculture and
Conservation land uses.
Policy 1-1.4.1: Agriculture Land Use Designation. The Agriculture land use designation shall be used
for the following uses: farming, crops, range and livestock activities; protecting industries that are a part
of the state's traditional economic base such as citrus and aquaculture; agricultural research; agricultural
related businesses; public facilities; institutional uses or recreational uses. The City shall also utilize the
Agriculture land use designation for future annexations of existing agricultural lands until such a time that
urban growth is contiguous and agricultural activities are no longer economically viable. Residential
density is limited to 1 unit per 5 acres.
Policy 1-1.4.2: Conservation Land Use. The Conservation land use designation identifies lands that
are environmentally sensitive or fragile natural resources for long term preservation. It is vital to redirect
population and public expenditures away from these areas so that future development and
redevelopment does not occur and negatively impact those areas. This designation may be impacted by
1)
flooding and sea level rise predictions forecasted in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan as well as those
areas subject to native and wildlife habitats, and critical habitat corridors.
A. Further descriptions of the Conservation land use category can be found in the Conservation &
Coastal Management Element including provisions (allowances) as may be regulated and
permitted by State and Federal agencies. If it is impractical to designate the area containing
conservation resources as Conservation due to size, location, or other factors, the City shall have
the option of obtaining a conservation easement from the property owner(s) to protect the area.
The City shall support the acquisition of natural areas or open space through the use of TDRs or
through publicly funded programs, including the acquisition and development of facilities that
promote and educate the public about the economic, cultural and historic heritage of the City.
The maximum intensity is 0.25 FAR. The applicant for a development shall bear the burden of
proof in determining that development shall not adversely impact conservation resources.
Objective 1-1.5: Transfer of Development Rights. Transfer of Development Rights
(TDRs) for both residential and non-residential development allow for blended densities and intensities while
protecting conservation lands and areas prone to sea -level rise and flooding, and native habitats.
Policy 1-1.5.1: Utilizing Transfer of Development Rights. The City shall establish formal TDR
standards in the LDC including but not limited to transfer rates and requirements in order to direct
development away from targeted (identified) areas. Consistent with Policy 5-2.5.2 in the Conservation &
Coastal Management Element, these identified areas include but are not limited to conservation lands,
Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), proposed Adaptation Action Area (AAA) Overlay, public open spaces,
wetlands and other native habitats. Incentives established through the TDR process may include density
and intensity bonuses based on the quality of the areas being protected and preserved, provision of public
spaces, public infrastructure improvements or similar.
Objective 1-1.6: Planned Unit Development. The City promotes innovative
development concepts and procedures through the use of the planned unit development as a means to improve
development design and recognize unique land characteristics.
Policy 1-1.6.1: Planned Unit Development Overlay Designation. The City's LDC shall continue to
allow a planned unit development overlay zoning designation in order to provide a voluntary management
framework for coordinating objectives of developers with those of the City Council. The City Council shall
reserve the authority to invoke new conditions in extending development rights based on:
• Changes in conditions surrounding the impacted land uses in the vicinity;
• Evolving issues surrounding infrastructure levels of service;
• Impacts on natural resources; and/or
• Other related issues impacting the nature of the proposed planned unit development.
Policy 1-1.6.2: Planned Unit Development Option. The planned unit development overlay designation
shall be available as a voluntary approach for managing specific development characteristics and project
amenities to be incorporated in residential, commercial, industrial, or mixed use development options.
13
Developers who voluntarily participate in the process shall bind themselves as well as those who may be
their successors in title to the subject land.
Goal 1-2: Growth Management.
The City shall ensure that the character and location of land uses incorporate best management practices and
principles of resource conservation, promote orderly land use transition, and minimize threats to health, safety,
and welfare while encouraging economic stability to keep pace with the City's growth.
Objective 1-2.1: Transitioning from Rural to Urban. The City shall ensure a transition
from rural to urban uses within the Urban Service Boundary (USB) of the City and annexation reserve area.
Policy 1-2.1.1: Smart Growth Principles. The City shall promote smart growth principles that direct
growth in an intentional, comprehensive way. These principles include but are not limited to promoting a
mix of uses, compact building design, walkable communities, housing diversity, environmental
preservation, and transportation choices.
Policy 1-2.1.2: Protect Developments from Possible Adverse Effects of Neighboring Permitted
Uses. The City's LDC shall incorporate standards and/or review criteria for mandating retention of open
space, regulating building design, including setbacks, building placement on site, and building orientation.
These provisions shall be directed toward supporting compatibility as well as to preserving light, air, and
open space. Other reasonable design principles, including buffering standards, shall be included in the
LDC.
Policy 1-2.1.3: Minimize Impacts Between Urban and Rural Land Uses. The LDC shall incorporate
performance standards, urban service availability standards, and other requirements which ensure
buffering between urban and rural land uses. This is necessary in order to maintain responsive land
management policies along the outer suburban fringe where urban development within the City could
potentially impact unincorporated agricultural lands, and vice versa.
Objective 1-2.2: Prevent Proliferation of Urban Sprawl. The City shall continue to
maintain LDCs which include performance standards ensuring that the location, scale, timing, and design of
development shall be coordinated with public facilities and services in order to prevent the proliferation of urban
sprawl, maximize pubic infrastructure, and achieve cost effective land development patterns.
Policy 1-2.2.1: Urban Sprawl Definition. According to Ch. 163.3164(51), FS, urban sprawl is defined
as a development pattern characterized by low density, automobile -dependent development with either
a single use or multiple uses that are not functionally related, requiring the extension of public facilities
and services in an inefficient manner, and failing to provide a clear separation between urban and rural
uses.
Policy 1-2.2.2: Resource Protection. The City shall seek to maintain and manage the City's natural and
man-made resources by establishing a pattern of development that is harmonious with the City's natural
environment and quality of life.
14
Policy 1-2.2.3. Land Acquisition. The City shall use the capital improvement program (CIP) and budget
process to pursue acquisition of land as may be necessary to provide recreation, conservation, and
related public benefits and promote multiple use of public lands.
Policy 1-2.2.4: Accommodate Growth. The City shall continue to seek fiscal resources to extend City
service areas, improve City roadways, coordinate public infrastructure and make other improvements
necessary to accommodate growth and maintain services and facilities at adopted level of service
standards.
Policy 1-2.2.5: Development Orders and Permitting Process. Development orders and permits for
all future development shall be timed and staged to assure that requisite infrastructure and services are
available
Policy 2.2.6: Concurrency Management. The maximum allowable density and intensity of land uses
may be limited based on available public infrastructure. Land use shall be predicated on availability of
man-made infrastructure and service systems required to support respective land use activities. The City
shall continue enforcing their concurrency management program, pursuant to Ch. 163, F.S., to ensure
that future development is provided essential services and facilities at acceptable standards.
Policy 1-2.2.7: Design of Public Facilities and Utilities. Public facilities and utilities shall be located
and designed to maximize the efficiency of services provided and minimize adverse effects on natural
systems and conservation lands.
Policy 1-2.2.8: Developments Not Served by Public Water and/or Wastewater Systems. All
developments in areas not serviced by public water and/or wastewater systems shall be governed by
applicable State laws and administrative regulations. In those cases where public wastewater systems
are not currently available, the City will work with the County and applicable regional and state agencies
to convert those areas through a "septic to sewer" program or similar, where such infrastructure is
available and financially feasible.
Policy 1-2.2.9: Accommodating Requisite Infrastructure. During the subdivision review, site plan
review, and permitting processes the City shall insure that respective future developments allocate
sufficient land area for infrastructure required to support the proposed development.
Policy 1-2.2.10: Infill Development and Redevelopment. The City shall encourage infill development
and/or redevelopment of underdeveloped/underutilized parcels of land in otherwise built-up areas that
have access to existing infrastructure and services. This includes planning for the mitigation and
redevelopment of brownfields for productive uses.
Objective 1-2.3: Innovative Natural Resource Management and Energy
Conservation Concepts. Consistent with Land Use Goal 1.4, the City of Sebastian recognizes the
importance to maintain LDCs which incorporate concepts for managing land and water resources which are
responsive to the City's unique development and conservation lands. These may include but are not limited to
low impact development (LID), best management practices, and joint use stormwater features.
15
Policy 1-2.3.1: Low -Impact Development (LID). The City shall encourage LID principles for
development and redevelopment including those within newly annexed areas. The City shall require new
developments to address future nutrient loading and water conservation through principles including but
not limited to:
• LID design practices and technologies that address energy, water, and nutrient conservation;
• Use of natural, Florida friendly landscaping; and/or
• Reduced, low, or no fertilizer use on greenspaces and yards
Policy 1-2.3.2: Incorporate Innovative Techniques in the Land Development Code. The City's LDC
shall continue to incorporate land and water resource best management practices such as reduced
impervious areas, increased buffers, LID, surface/storm water management including water quality, soil
erosion and sedimentation control, and conservation of water supply which have been demonstrated to
be successful and cost effective in resolving development and conservation issues such as land clearing,
excessive tree removal, and loss of native plants and wildlife habitat. Implementation standards are
encouraged to be adopted by the City specific to the mitigation portion of the City's Coastal Resiliency
Plan.
Policy 1-2.3.3: Energy Efficient and Resilient Land Development. The City's LDC shall continue to:
• Promote energy efficient land development;
• Recognize the relative energy dependency of commercial and industrial land uses and consider
energy dependency in any policy pertaining to new industry promotion strategies or policy
concerning maintenance or expansion of existing industry or commerce;
• Encourage land use patterns that by location, scale; and design minimize long-term energy
commitments to construction, operation, maintenance, and replacement; and
• Encourage natural resource conservation and utilization in ways that are consistent with sound
energy management principles.
Policy 1-2.3.4: Energy Conservation in Building and Construction. The City shall encourage energy
efficient building codes and promote efficient energy conservation in building heating and cooling
systems.
Objective 1-2.4: Annexation Studies. Consistent with Objective 1-2.2 and its related policies,
the City acknowledges a need to prevent urban sprawl and disjointed urban service delivery systems. In addition,
the City desires to develop a plan for managing annexation of unincorporated enclaves, the annexation reserve
areas as well as fringe areas adjacent to the City, especially for potential economic centers within the
incorporated .area.
Policy 1-2.4.1: Parameters of the Annexation Studies. The City of Sebastian may require an analysis
on a case by case basis for areas considered for annexation. A City of Sebastian annexation study may
include but is not limited to:
• Review and evaluation of Indian River County land development forecasts within the
unincorporated urban area together with supportive documentation;
of- 2
16
Analysis of area to be annexed of unincorporated enclaves and subareas within the unincorporated
urban area, including:
■ Population and housing;
■ Parks and recreation facilities
■ Traffic circulation system;
■ Water and wastewater service;
■ Stormwater facilities/Drainage;
■ Natural water basins;
■ Level of Service analysis; and
■ Impact of development on of state and federally listed protected species.
• Protect urban population and employment trends and estimate land area required to
accommodate projected residential and nonresidential activities;
• Fiscal impact analysis and determination of future capital improvements to meet such basic
services such as police protection, utilities, code enforcement, building and zoning, permitting and
inspection services to meet City of Sebastian standards;
• Analysis and determination of impacts to municipal and County services including police & fire
protection, utilities, permitting and inspection, school capacity, etc., to meet standards outlined in
Interlocal agreements (including the Interlocal Boundary Services Agreement between the County
and the municipalities); and/or
• Analysis of current land uses to determine contribution to the City's tax base.
Policy 1-2.4.2: Annexation Strategy. The City shall develop an annexation strategy for planning and
managing development within the unincorporated urban area, including annexation alternatives. The
strategy shall include but not be limited to procedures for intergovernmental coordination of land use
policy governing development within unincorporated urban areas (including isolated enclaves) which are
logical targets for incorporation into the City of Sebastian and Policies and or actions for developing
efficient systems for delivering municipal services and achieving diversification of the municipal tax base.
The City may utilize annexation agreements as one tool in addressing provision(s) for services.
Policy 1-2.4.3: Annexation Infrastructu� _. Annexations shall be analyzed and consistent with the
Governance & Implementation Element and the Infrastructure Element to ensure adequate public
infrastructure is available for development of the property. The City shall coordinate with the Indian River
County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) for the potable water and wastewater facility needs of
the future land use of an annexed area to ensure the availability of adequate potable water and sewer
facility capacity and wastewater treatment services.
Policy 1-2.4.4: Annexation Low -Impact Development. Consistent with Policy 1-2.3.1, the City shall
encourage low -impact development (LID) and Florida friendly landscaping principles for newly annexed
areas.
Objective 1-2.5: Emergency Management. Ensure the City's preparedness and resiliency
in the case of a natural disaster or emergency such as sea level rise/flooding events, hurricane/tornado winds,
fires, pandemics/epidemics, terrorism, earthquakes or other disasters.
17
Policy 1-2.5.1: Resiliency and Preparedness. Consistent with Policy 4-1.1.10 of the Infrastructure
Element and Objectives 5-2.3 and 5-2.4 of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element, the
City shall include emergency management criteria into the LDC to mitigate the impacts of natural
disasters or emergency events in order to protect public health and safety.
Policy 1-2.5.2: Post Disaster Economic Recovery. The City shall include criteria in the LDC that
requires post -disaster economic recovery implementation tools to be in place to direct recovery after a
disaster has occurred.
Policy 1-2.5.3: Emergency Infectious Disease Response Plan. The City shall pursue the development
of an Emergency Infectious Disease Response Plan in coordination with other local and state response
plans.
Goal 1-3: Preserving and Enhancing the Built
Environment.
The City shall ensure that the community's appearance and important archaeological and historical resources
are protected to improve the quality of life for its residents.
Objective 1-3.1: Community Appearance and Urban Design. The appearance of
major transportation corridors serving as gateways into the City, as well as major activity centers shall be
managed and enhanced through application of the site plan review process.
Policy 1-3.1.1: Urban Design and Community Appearance. Good principles of urban design shall
be applied through site plan review procedures in order to enhance general community appearance as
well as to preserve and enhance open space and landscape. This program shall assist in protecting major
natural and man-made resources within the City, including the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River,
the Collier Creek natural drainage corridor, Schumann Lake, public parks and other public grounds and
institutions, as well as developing residential neighborhoods and centers of commercial or institutional
activity.
Policy 1-3.1.2: Reinforce and Enhance the City's Community Appearance. Major attributes shall be
preserved through application of design review standards and management of signs, landscaping, open
space, tree protection, and other urban design amenities.
Special emphasis shall be placed on preserving and/or improving the character of major natural
and manmade corridors, including the intracoastal shoreline, the estuarine and river systems,
major drainage corridors, and major transportation corridors which serve as a focal point for the
motoring public and an inviting gateway to visiting tourists. Such enhancement shall include
application of community appearance criteria which reinforces good principles of design.
The City may utilize design standards or form based code based principles in its LDC in order to
enhance the community's appearance. These standards are a form of land development
regulation that fosters predictable built results and a high -quality public realm by using physical
form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. On -site TDRs or
18
incentives should also be considered and would allow the continued development of a property
at levels "vested" at pre -dedication acreage.
Policy 1-3.1.3: Plan and Design for Non -Residential Quality. Within the urban core non-residential
development shall be planned and designed to enhance the identity, design, and vitality of the waterfront
corridor which provides a unique waterfront activity center within the urban core area of the City.
Policy 1-3.1.4: Improve the Function and Image of the Downtown as the Central Urban Core
Area. Non-residential development decisions shall promote the function of the downtown urban core
area as a center for government and institutional services as well as a focal point for retail trade, business
and professional offices, and civic and cultural enrichment. The City's LDC shall be directed to achieving
a mix of land use activities consistent with the FLUM. The City shall also continue to enforce the Riverfront
design regulations, which provide a physical theme for development and redevelopment opportunities
reinforcing the unique waterfront setting of the downtown area.
Objective 1-3.2: Protection of Archaeological and Historic Resources. The
establishment of procedures for identification and protection of historic properties and structures within the City
will provide for the protection of archaeological sites.
Policy 1-3.2.1: Development Impacts. The City shall require applicants to demonstrate measures to
mitigate the adverse impacts of the proposed development on historic or archaeological site or structure
identified in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. At a minimum, the plan shall identify precautions to be
taken to prevent the following adverse impacts:
• Destruction or alteration of all or part of such site;
• Isolation from, or alteration of the surrounding environment;
• Introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with a property
or alter its setting;
• Vegetation removal shall not be permitted on a historic or archaeological site unless the
vegetation to be removed is a part of a duly authorized scientific excavation, or is a part of an
approved development plan;
• Transfer or sale of the site of significance without adequate conditions or restrictions regarding
preservation, maintenance, use or re -use; and
• Other forms of neglect resulting in resource deterioration.
Policy 1-3.2.2: Programming for Archaeological and Historic Sites. The City shall coordinate with
the State in developing programs for implementing City and State policies for identifying, preserving, and
enhancing sites of historical and/or archaeological significance. Programs for identification, evaluation of
relative significance, protection, preservation, and enhancement shall be promoted, utilizing available
public resources at the local, State, and Federal level as well as available private sector resources.
Objective 1-3.3: Encourage Redevelopment and Renewal. The City shall maintain
procedures in the LDC to limit the proliferation of urban sprawl and encourage redevelopment and revitalization
of blighted and economically challenged areas.
19
Policy 1-3.3.1: Community Redevelopment Area. The FLUM depicts the boundaries of the
Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). The City shall continue to promote vitality and redevelopment
of the five conceptual districts: Park District, Sebastian Boulevard Mixed Use District, U.S.-1 Commercial
District, Riverfront District, and the Sebastian Boulevard South District as directed in the City of Sebastian
Community Redevelopment Master Plan included in this Element's DIA. The City shall update the CRA
Master Plan reflecting the principles and strategies contained within this Comprehensive Plan and apply
those to the targeted redevelopment areas.
Policy 1-3.3.2: Managing Development Within Mixed Use Districts. Consistent with Objectives 1-
1.3 and 1-1.5 and their respective policies the City's LDC shall maintain performance standards for the
City's Mixed Use Districts to ensure that land development activities, resource conservation and
infrastructure issues are managed in a manner that will consider the needs of all the citizens of Sebastian.
A. The City shall promote a mixture of uses and a variety of opportunities for recreational, residential
and commercial uses; encourage progress while protecting property rights; and protect the
environment while fostering compatible uses.
B. The LDC shall encourage a mix of uses and enforce the "Old Florida Fishing Village" design
theme within the Riverfront CRA District. Flooding and sea level rise shall be taken into
consideration for areas of the Riverfront District located in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA).
The City may incentivize redevelopment through the use of TDRs to direct new development and
population growth away from natural hazards and environmentally sensitive areas.
Policy 1-3.3.3: Public and Private Sector Partnerships. The City shall coordinate redevelopment
issues with the private sector in promoting mobilization of public and private resources necessary to
effectively carry out redevelopment efforts, especially along the Indian River Drive corridor which borders
the Indian River Lagoon. Sea level rise and flooding shall be considered in low-lying areas in regard to
limiting the use of public funds to achieve these goals as defined in §163.3178(1), F.S.
Policy 1-3.3.4: Code Enforcement Activities. Code enforcement activities shall be continued as an
integral part of the City's regulation programs. The code enforcement program shall preserve and protect
structurally sound land improvements and land uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1-3.3.5: Preservation of Existing Assets within the Riverfront. The protection, restoration,
and enhancement of existing assets, including historical structures, is important in implementing the "Old
Florida Fishing Village" design theme. The City shall continue to enforce the procedures and ordinances
adopted for this purpose. The City shall develop programs and identify funding sources to protect,
restore, and enhance the historical structures in the Riverfront District. Sea level rise and flooding should
be considered in low-lying areas in regard to limiting the use of public funds to achieve these goals as
defined in §163.3178(1), F.S.
Objective 1-3.4: Design for Healthy Communities. Encourage design principles that
accommodate for healthy lifestyles and safety.
20
Policy 1-3.4.1: Healthy Communities. The City shall ensure equitably distributed and accessible active
transportation facilities (i.e. sidewalks, bike lanes) and recreational opportunities (i.e. parks, greenways)
to support healthy lifestyles and physical activity.
Policy 1-3.4.2: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. The City shall encourage crime
prevention in public areas through environmental design (CPTED) principles.
Goal 1-4: Implementation.
The City will continue to monitor and evaluate development and resource conservation within the City pursuant
to goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan Land Use Element and carry out an effective implementation
program.
Objective 1-4.1: Monitoring. The City monitors the Land Use Element to ensure that it is
successfully implemented.
Policy 1-4.1.1: Land Development Code. The City's existing LDC shall be revised as needed in order
to: 1) effectively regulate future land use activities and natural resources 2) adequately protect property
rights; and 3) implement the goals, objectives, and policies stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan.
Performance standards incorporated in the LDC shall be updated and refined as needed to reflect best
management principles and practices. The LDC shall continue to:
• Regulate the subdivision of land;
• Regulate the uses on land and in water consistent with this Element, ensure the compatibility of
adjacent land uses, and provide for open space;
• Protect the environmentally sensitive lands designated in the Comprehensive Plan, especially
wetlands
• Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and
stormwater management. Additional lands may be subject to development standards based on
the flooding and sea level rise data from the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan;
• Protect aquifer recharge functions and areas;
• Regulate signage;
• Ensure safe and convenient on -site and off -site traffic flow and vehicle parking needs;
• Dedication, acquisition and development of future rights -of -way as identified in the programmed
engineered master plan for the City's major arterials; and
• Provide that development orders and permits shall not be issued which result in a reduction of
levels of services (LOS) for impacted public facilities below the levels of service standards which
shall be adopted by the City Council.
Policy 1-4.1.2: Land Use Information System. The City shall provide continuing land use information
and assistance to the public. The City shall establish, maintain, and periodically update the land use
information system, integration of the Tax Appraiser property files, City Planning Department field data,
Building and Zoning Department permit files, engineering base maps, and all other relevant land use data
files.
92 21
Policy 1-4.1.3: Land Use Trends. The City shall continue to monitor and evaluate population and land
use trends. Trends in the magnitude, distribution, and characteristics of population and land use shall
serve as indicators of possible changes in land use needs. The policy implications of major trends in land
use characteristics shall be evaluated on a continuing basis. Land use policy shall be refined as needed
in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues.
Policy 1-4.1.4: Fiscal Management. The City shall continue to implement fiscal management policies
of the CIP and budget.
Policy 1-4.1.5: Special Land Use Studies. In order to maintain LDCs responsive to changing
conditions, problems, and issues, the City shall undertake special studies as needed to develop specific
local strategies for resolving unanticipated land use problems and issues.
Policy 1-4.1.6: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling,
programming, budgeting and implementation of programmed land use activities identified in this
Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in carrying out a systematic program for
implementing adopted land use goals, objectives and policies.
Policy 14.1.7: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and
evaluating the Land Use Element, the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental coordination as
well as coordination with private sector groups interested in land use policy and programs. The
effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of coordination mechanisms in resolving
land use problems and issues.
Policy 1-4.1.8: Achieve Effective Resolution of Land Use Goals, Objectives, and Policies. The
effectiveness of the Land Use Element shall be measured by the City's success in achieving land use
goals, objectives, and policies. The Land Use Element incorporates a systematic planning process for
identifying land use problems and issues and implementing corrective actions.
Policy 1-4.1.9: Intergovernmental Coordination. Specific Objectives and Policies regarding
intergovernmental coordination and this Element are provided and identified in the Governance &
Implementation Element.
22
IVAN
well
T
DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Transportation & Mobility Element is to plan for a transportation system that emphasizes
residents' accessibility to goods and services and supports the Land Use Element. The Element also encourages
a reduction in vehicle miles travelled and also encourages better transportation planning. The Transportation &
Mobility Element establishes Level of Service (LOS) standards for the major roadways and supports land
development policies that promote other transportation alternatives.
An essential base for planning a transportation system is the Land Use Element. The Future Land Use Map
(FLUM) can guide where new or improved transportation facilities may be needed. The Transportation &
Mobility Element assesses the condition and capacity of the existing transportation facilities, projects future
needs, sets LOS standards for roads, and determines future system improvements.
Roadway LOS standards are established to ensure that adequate facility capacity for future development is
concurrently sufficient with the issuance of development orders and development permits. These standards will
be established for each roadway link consistent with the facility type, and current Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) LOS guidelines.
The Transportation & Mobility Element also recognizes the need to provide transportation alternatives to
increase accessibility and provide a comprehensive transportation system. Therefore, this Element addresses
roadway facilities, transit facilities, availability of public parking facilities, availability of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities, airport and rail line systems, and other ancillary services and programs.
INVENTORY
An efficient transportation system should provide access to various land uses through alternative transportation
modes. The overview of the existing multi -modal transportation system within the City of Sebastian provides the
basis for analyzing existing transportation deficiencies and needs within the City. This section will identify existing
roadway and transit facilities, availability of public parking facilities, availability of bicycle and pedestrian facilities,
airport facilities, train facilities and other ancillary services and programs.
Road System
This section describes the major roadway facilities within the City and their relative function in the City's
circulation system. The traffic circulation system can generally be described as a small area of curvilinear gridded
streets in the town center and a collection of disconnected rural roads surrounding the City. The following is a
description of the major roadways in the City of Sebastian.
US 1 (Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway) is under the jurisdiction of FDOT and serves as an urban principal
arterial connecting the City of Sebastian with cities such as Melbourne, Vero Beach, and Fort Pierce, U.S. 1 runs
along the state's east coast from Key West to Jacksonville. The portion of US 1 that passes through the City of
Sebastian is part of the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway: The Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway is a 130-
mile long scenic byway located along the shores of the Indian River lagoon. US 1 in the City of Sebastian is a
2
V,
divided four (4) lane facility located on the east side of the City parallel to the Indian River Lagoon. This road
provides a linkage for both inter- and intra-state traffic between the north and south portions of the state and into
Georgia. Since US 1 is the primary north -south route through the City of Sebastian, local traffic also uses this
road on a frequent basis.
Sebastian Boulevard (County Road 512) is a divided four (4) lane facility under the jurisdiction of Indian River
County and serves as an urban minor arterial for the City, providing access to US 1 and Interstate 95. County
Road 512 runs diagonal through the center of the City south from County Road 510 and splits becoming
unidirectional prior to terminating into US 1.
Wabasso Road (County Road 510) is a two (2) lane facility under the jurisdiction of Indian River County and
serves as a county minor arterial for the City, providing access to US 1 and Sebastian Boulevard (County Road
512). County Road 510 runs in an east -west direction just south of the City and turns north and connects to
County Road 512 on the western side of the City.
Roseland Road is an undivided two (2) lane facility under the jurisdiction of Indian River County and serves as
an urban collector for the City of Sebastian. County Road 505 runs along the west side of the City from US 1 to
County Road 512 at the southeast corner of the City's limits, connecting the City with the unincorporated
community of Roseland.
Barber Street is an undivided two (2) lane facility that provides a semi -circular transverse across the southern
and western portion of the City. Barber Street is under the jurisdiction of the City and serves as an urban collector.
Barber Street's semicircular route along the southern and western portion of the City begins on the south eastern
side of the City at US 1 and ends on the north western side of the City at Lake Drive. This road is characterized
by its curvilinear design.
Easy Street is an undivided two (2) lane facility provides north south access from Main Street on the north
western side of the City, near the airport, to Schumann Drive in the southern central portion of the City. Easy
Street is under the jurisdiction of the City and serves as an urban local road.
Fleming Street is an undivided two (2) lane facility provides north south access from Main Street on the north
western side of the City, near the airport, to South Easy Street in the southern central portion of the City. Fleming
Street is under the jurisdiction of the City and serves as an urban collector. Fleming Street is characterized by
its functionality as a north -south connector alternative to Easy Street, Barber Street, and Powerline Drive.
Main Street is an undivided two (2) lane facility provides diagonal north -south access on the north western side
of the City, near the Sebastian Municipal Golf Course. Main Street is under the jurisdiction of the City and serves
as an urban collector. The south-western terminus of Main Street begins at Wimbrow Drive. The north- eastern
terminus of Main Street is at US 1.
Laconia Street is an undivided, north -south, two (2) lane facility from Sebastian Boulevard to Concha Drive.
Laconia Street is under the jurisdiction of the City and serves as an urban collector for the City of Sebastian.
Schumann Drive is an undivided two (2) lane facility from Barber Street to Beach Lane and a divided two (2)
lane facility from Beach Lane to US 1, under the jurisdiction of the City and serves as an urban collector for the
3
192
City of Sebastian. Within the City, Schumann Drive runs north -south along the eastside of the City from Barber
Street to US 1 and can be characterized by its curvilinear design.
Englar Drive is an undivided two (2) lane facility under the jurisdiction of the City and serves as an urban collector
for the City. Englar Drive provides an east -west connection from Barber Street to Schumann Street. Englar Drive
allows the primary residential area access to US 1 and the commercial districts.
Jurisdiction and Maintenance Responsibility
The jurisdictional responsibility of each roadway in the City of Sebastian is displayed on Map 2-1. There is one
State roadway, US 1 and three County roadways, CR 510, CR 512 and CR 505. Several minor roadway segments
that function as local collectors, under City jurisdiction, have also been shown on the map.
Functional Classification
The functional classification of major roads in the City of Sebastian is illustrated in Map 2-2. The functional
classification of public roads in this Element is based on FDOT criteria, which considers quantitative and
qualitative factors such as jurisdiction, land access, route length, and trip lengths. A road hierarchy is used to
identify relative importance of roads within the system; provide guidance for LOS and design standards; aid in
establishing improvement priorities; identify maintenance responsibility; and, assist in determining funding and
financing policies. The hierarchy used in this Element includes:
Limited Access Facilities/Freeways: Designed to provide regional mobility via uninterrupted flow at high travel
speeds for regional trips. Access spacing is generally on the order of one mile or more, and average travel speeds
are above 40 miles per hour. There is no direct land access, and urban freeways are multilane, divided facilities.
Lane access is always via ramps to major arterials or frontage roads. There are currently no limited access
facilities within the City of Sebastian.
Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): While the City does not have any Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)
roadways in or near the municipal limits, there are two SIS facilities located within the City: the Florida East Coast
Railroad and the Intercoastal Waterway.
Arterials: Provide regional mobility via both uninterrupted flow and interrupted flow segments. Arterials provide
mobility around and through urban and community cores and accommodate relatively long trip lengths as
opposed to providing access to adjacent properties. Arterials are further classified as "Urban" or "Rural'
depending on the road location, "Principal", "Major" or "Minor" depending on its function and relative importance
and as Class I, II, or III based on the number of signals per mile, access controls, geometric cross sections, and
speed limits for performance purposes.
Collectors: Provide for movement between local streets and the arterial network. Collectors serve residential,
commercial and industrial areas and are further classified as urban or rural based on location and area served.
Local Roads: Provide direct access to abutting properties. Local roads accommodate traffic originating in or
traveling to properties within a neighborhood, commercial or industrial development. Local roads are not
considered part of the major thoroughfare system.
4
Existing Characteristics of Major Trip Generators and Attractors
Overall, the location of major trip generators and attractors influences roadway improvement needs as well as
the demand for transit. Trip production areas are those portions of the City where major residential developments
are located because this is where trips are generated. All of the Sebastian Highlands would be considered a trip
production area. Trip attraction areas are locations with shopping, recreation, medical, employment, and other
facilities, generally the location of the trip ends. People are attracted to these areas by the services or facilities
available there. The major traffic attractors within the City include several Publix Shopping Centers, the Wal-Mart
Superstore, Sebastian River Medical Center, the Post Office, the Municipal Golf Course, the Municipal Airport,
as well as the City's boat ramps. Other facilities that are classified as minor traffic attractors include City Hall, the
schools, City parks, businesses in the waterfront area, and the North County Library.
Existing Modal Split and Vehicle Occupancy Rates
Throughout the Sebastian area, single occupancy vehicle trips account for the vast majority of all trips in Indian
River County. This is due in part to the lack of mass transit and bicycle/pedestrian ways in 2000. However, since
2000 the transit system has increasingly gained popularity and has steadily increased ridership each year.
Automobile travel continues to be the easiest and most convenient mode of travel. Alternative modes of
transportation are less attractive because accessibility is limited, and freedom of travel is restricted.
Population Characteristics
According to the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), Sebastian's official
population estimate as of 2019 is 25,168 residents. According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey,
approximately 92% of the workers living in Sebastian drove to work alone, 8% drove to work in a carpool, and
0.1 % took public transportation to work.
Constrained Facilities
Section 339.155, Florida Statutes, makes governmental police powers available to preserve and protect property
necessary for transportation corridors and recommends that needed rights -of -way be acquired as far in advance
of construction as possible. FDOT requests that local governments identify constrained roadways in their
comprehensive plans to ensure maintenance of the operating conditions, so that significant degradation in the
LOS does not occur. A constrained roadway is one in which adding two or more through lanes to meet current
or future needs is not possible due to physical, environmental or policy barriers. There are currently no
designated constrained roadway segments within the City limits.
Accident Locations
Accident analysis is critical because it provides a tool for City and State officials to recommend appropriate safety
measures. Accident frequency along with roadway performance can be used to prioritize future roadway needs.
Accident data, based on written crash reports, was compiled by the City of Sebastian Police Department from
January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. The three (3) intersections with the highest number of accidents, in
descending order, were: Roseland Road and Sebastian Boulevard, Jackson Street and US 1 (28 accidents), and
Barber Street and Sebastian Boulevard (28 accidents. Table 2.1 lists the other intersections in the City that were
identified in the written crash reports.
5
92
Table 2-1: Written Crash Reports (intersections) - Updated
Jackson St & US 1
28
Roseland Rd & Sebastian Blvd
36
Main St & US 1
_
27
Barber St & Sebastian Blvd
28
Fleming St & Sebastian Blvd
18
Easv St & Sebastian Blvd
16
Barber St & Schumann Dr
6
Delaware Ave & Sebastian Blvd
8
Source: City of Sebastian Police Department, Written Crash Reports for the Period of 1/1/2017
to 1213112019
Signalized Intersections
County Road 512 and US 1 are the only two major corridors with signalized intersections within the City. There
are currently traffic signals at the following intersections of County Road 512: County Road 510 (90th Avenue),
County Road 505 (Roseland Road), Barber Street, Fleming Street, Easy Street, Delaware Avenue and US 1.
There are seven traffic signals at the following intersections of US 1: Jackson Street, County Road 505 (Roseland
Road), Main Street, County Road 512 (EB and WB), Schumann Drive, Barber Street and County Road 510
(Wabasso Road). US 1 in this area has less than two signals per mile, qualifying the roadway as a Class I State
two-way Arterial. The intersection of Barber Street and Schumann Drive is also signalized.
Evacuation Routes
Sebastian is a coastal community and in the event of a hurricane or natural disaster evacuation routes must be
delineated. Residents living in mobile homes are required to evacuate even in the event of a Category 1
hurricane, which is the least severe type of hurricane. Map 2-3 depicts the principal evacuation routes for the
City. The Conservation & Coastal Management Element of this plan addresses hurricane evacuation in detail.
Though not part of the City of Sebastian, the residents living on the barrier island are required to evacuate during
a Category 1 hurricane. As indicated in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element, the Regional
Planning Council has done several hurricane evacuation studies for the Treasure Coast area, including
Sebastian. The last hurricane evacuation study update was done in 2016 prepared by Indian River County.
The City of Sebastian participates with the Indian River County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) regarding
hurricane evacuation and other emergency management activities. Indian River County's Comprehensive
Emergency Management Plan identifies CR 512, CR 510, Roseland Road (CR 505), US 1 and Interstate 95 as
the primary evacuation routes. US 1 runs north and south along the Indian River Lagoon through the County and
would be used by a number of people evacuating from the surrounding counties. County Road 512 runs
diagonally through the City predominately east and west, which would provide Sebastian residents an evacuation
route connection from Interstate 95 and US 1.
Clearance time is defined as the time required to clear the roadways of all vehicles evacuating in response to a
hurricane or other severe weather event. Clearance time is determined by three factors: mobilization time, travel
time, and delay time. From a transportation system perspective, travel time and delay time are important because
those times, to a great extent, are dependent upon roadway characteristics. Indian River County's
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan showed that the clearance time for Indian River County range
from 12.5 to 27 hours.
Airport
The City of Sebastian owns and operates a 625 acre general aviation airport consistent with the adopted City of
Sebastian Municipal Airport Master Plan (2018). The Sebastian Municipal Airport is generally located north of
CR 512 between CR 505 and US 1. Access to the airport facilities is on Main Street and Roseland Road. The
airport has two asphalt runways which are 3,200 feet long and 75 feet wide and 4,000 feet long and 100 feet
wide. This facility houses several aviation related businesses. The primary use for this facility is related to general
aviation, related businesses, skydiving and flight -training. There are no passenger related flights currently
operating out of this airport.
The airport is surrounded, on its south and east boundary, by a City owned and operated municipal golf course.
On the northeast side of the airport, an approximately 112 acre conservation parcel was purchased by the St.
Johns River Water Management District. Located on the westside, and adjacent to the airport, is an industrial
district, which provides space for office, industrial, and supporting uses for the airport.
Rail
An active railroad system runs parallel to US 1 on its west side. Approximately 10 trains per day use these rail
lines. This rail line is used predominately for freight transport of goods to and from south Florida. There are no
passenger stations along this stretch of rail line within the City or within a close proximity. Brightline is currently
in the process of adding tracks to this railroad system.
Public Transit System
Currently, GoLine Indian River Transit (IRT) provides service to the City of Sebastian with five (5) routes. See
Map 2-4 for the GoLine routes within the City. In addition to participating with the IRT GoLine transit system, the
City of Sebastian utilizes the County's transportation disadvantage program known as the Community Coach.
The Community Coach vehicle is a smaller size bus than the full-length traditional route buses. The Community
Coach system is headquartered in Vero Beach. This program was created to help provide a transportation option
to individuals because of an ailment, age, or disability, are incapable of using private transportation. This system
is available for transport to medical appointments, employment centers, education facilities and essential life
supporting daily regimes.
Parking System
Public parking in the City of Sebastian consists mainly of off-street parking. The City has several free parking lots
and also provides on -street parking at various locations throughout town. The City of Sebastian Riverfront Parking
Study (2011) evaluates existing supply and demand for parking in the Riverfront and projects future parking
demand.
7
92
Bicycle System
The City of Sebastian recognizes the need to provide transportation alternatives to increase accessibility and
provide a comprehensive transportation system. Currently, Sebastian does not have a citywide comprehensive
system of bicycle facilities. However, the City does have an off -road bicycle/pedestrian path along the north side
of CR 512 and on -street facilities on portions of US1. This three-mile path was a railroad right-of-way which the
County converted into a recreation path.
Pedestrian System
The City has a relatively comprehensive sidewalk system throughout the City. However, some portions of the
City are disjointed, with sidewalks available on one side of the roadway facility but not located on the opposite
side. Based on the current LDC, developments are required to construct sidewalks along collector and arterial
roads.
Intermodal Facilities
Intermodal facilities are those traffic circulation components that accommodate and interconnect different modes
of transportation and serve the movement of people and goods. The City of Sebastian has water, rail, and air
intermodal facilities that interconnect different modes of transportation.
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
Transportation can have a major role shaping the spatial and functional organization of a community. It can
determine the size, scale, status and identity of a community. However, there are other contributing factors that
need to be considered, such as the personal, social, physical, environmental, economic and cultural attributes of
the community. This section analyzes existing and projected future conditions of the transportation system to
provide a comprehensive assessment of the various transportation facilities and services, and their relationship
with existing land uses.
This section also addresses growth trends. The analysis provides an examination of the current and future
performance of the roadway system as well as the transit performance. Other modes of transportation are also
addressed for additional opportunities in lieu of the automobile.
Future travel demand estimates are based on the population growth rate and the employment -to- population
ratio. This analysis includes a comprehensive approach to the future transportation demand. Included within this
analysis are future plans for bicycle, pedestrian, transit and roadway facilities. Also included are potential
strategies to help alleviate future demand on constrained and overcapacity facilities.
Roadway Current Performance
The roadway LOS concept is defined in the FDOT 2009 Quality/ Level of Service Handbook, as amended. as a
qualitative assessment of the road user's perception of the quality of flow and is measured by a scale of driver
satisfaction. The scale ranges from "A" to "F", with "A" representing the most favorable driving conditions and
"F" representing the least favorable.
MOT adopted statewide minimum LOS standards for the State highway system. The minimum LOS standards
are used for planning applications, including the review of local government plans. The generalized maximum
8
volume tables provided by FDOT are guidelines recommended for broad planning applications. They are to be
used as a general guide to determine highway LOS and through -lane requirements. Minimum level -of -service
standards recommended for the state system are shown on Table 2-2. The standardized descriptions of service
levels used in transportation planning are as follows:
LOS A: A condition of road performance where traffic density is very low, with little or no restrictions in
maneuverability. Drivers can maintain their desired speed with little or no delay.
LOS B: A condition of road performance where traffic density is low, and vehicles travel with operating speeds
somewhat restricted by other vehicles. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speeds.
LOS Q A performance condition where operating speeds are determined by other vehicles, permitting a stable
traffic flow. Drivers might have limitations to maneuver and to increase speeds.
LOS D: A condition of road performance where traffic density is high but tolerable. Fluctuations in traffic volumes
may cause reductions in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver. In some instances, traffic
flows approach unstable conditions.
LOS E: Represents traffic operation near the roadway capacity or maximum service volume. Vehicles flow at
unstable conditions. Stop -and -go situations may happen. In freeways or limited access roads, speeds are near
thirty (30) miles per hour and traffic density is high.
LOS F: This condition usually results from long lines of vehicles backing up because the traffic volume exceeds
the roadway capacity. The vehicles are forced to operate at very low speeds. Stop -and -go situations are frequent
and in extreme cases, vehicles stop for long periods of time.
The existing performance of the roadway system represents the operating level of the facilities and will identify
current deficiencies, if any exist. The analysis found no current deficiencies on any roadway serving the City.
9
192
Table 2-2: FDOT Minimum Levels of Service Standards
mt;uu" B C C(D) D(E) D(E) Maintain
Highway
(Freeway) l�
Controlled
Access B C C D E Maintain 11
Highways
Two -Lane B C D D E Maintain
Multi lanes C C D D E Maintain
1
Note: Level of service standards inside of parentheses apply to general use lanes only when exclusive through lanes
exist.
Source: FDOT Level of Service Standards, 2009.
Availability of Transportation Facilities and Services to Serve Existing
Land Uses
Current and future land use patterns have a substantial influence on the characteristics of the transportation
system. Table 2-3 illustrates the primary land uses served by each transportation facility.
10
Table 2-3: Transportation Facilities and Land Uses Served
Principal
Commercial General, Commercial Limited, Industrial,
US 1
4 4.0
Arterial
Institutional, and Residential Low Density
County Rd 510
2 3.5
County Minor
Improved Pasture/Citrus
Arterial
County Rd 512
County Minor
Commercial General, Residential Low Density,
Arterial
Residential Medium Density; Residential Mobile Home
4 4.1
Development; Industrial, and Institutional
Roseland (County
2 2.0
County
Residential Low Density, Industrial, and Institutional
Rd 505)
Collector
Barber St
2 5.1
City Collector
Residential Low Density and Institutional
Easy St (Main to
2 1.0
City Collector
Residential Low Density, Commercial Limited, and
Institutional
512)
Fleming St
2 2.0
City Collector
Commercial General and Residential Low Density
Laconia St
(Periwinkle to
2 1.1
City Collector
Residential Low Density
Roseland)
Main St (Fleming
2 1.2
City Collector
Residential Low Density; Institutional
to US I)
Schumann Dr
2 2.9
City Collector
Residential Low Density, Residential
Medium Density, and Institutional
Easy St (512 to
2 1.5
Significant
Residential Low Density
Englar)
Local Streets
Englar Dr
2 1.2
Significant
Residential Low Density and institutional
Local Streets
Commercial General, Commercial Limited, Institutional,
Residential Low Density, and Residential Mobile Home
Indian River Dr
2 2.0
Significant
Development
Local Streets
AMW
11
CategoryRoadways LanesLength
Louisiana Ave/High Commercial General, Industrial, Institutioral, Residential
St (From Main to Low Density, Residential Mobile Home Development,
2 0.7 Significant Residential Medium Density
512 East) Local Streets
Vocelle Ave 2 0.8 Significant Cernmer hal General an Residential Low Density
Local Streets
Wimbrow Dr 2 2.8 Significant Residential Low Density and Residential Medium Density
Local Streets
Source: City of Sebastian, 2098.
Intermodal Facilities
The City of Sebastian has water, rail, and air intermodal facilities that interconnect different modes of
transportation. If the demand on roadway capacities become strained the need for additional intermodal facilities
will develop. The projected demand on the roadway system indicates that additional intermodal facilities may not
be necessary in the future.
Future Growth Projections
The year 2020 volumes were determined by the growth rate between the 2015 AADT volumes and the 2018
AADT volumes provided by the Florida Department of Transportation Historical AADT Report. From this data,
the yearly growth rate was determined as 4.29%. To account for future 5-year and 20-year growth on the
roadways, the projected 2040 volumes provided by the Indian River County Base Cost Feasible Plan Daily
Volumes published by Indian River County MPO were adjusted based on the 2020 volumes to ensure none of
the 2040 project volumes were less than the existing volumes. This long-range growth rate was determined as
0.21 % and was compounded annually.
Future Roadway Performance
This subsection provides an analysis of the projected traffic circulation system needs. These needs are based
on the anticipated travel demand and operating characteristics of major roadways. Tables 2-4 through 6 and
Maps 2-5 through 2-7 show the 2020, 2025, and 2040 expected traffic conditions. All roadway segments
modeled comply with the FDOT LOS standards as described above.
12
rn
0
co
N
Table 2-4: Existing Level of Service, 2020
R...
..
mumervicei
Type
Lanes AADT
2020
Peak K
Factor
DirectionClass
Hour
US 1 (Indian I Roseland Jackson
Principal
Class 1
4 31,742
9
15,836
1,425
1,560
1,8901,960
B
River Lagoon Road Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Jackson Main Street
Principal
Class 1
4 30,961
9
15,681
1,411
1,560
1.89
1,960
B
River Lagoon
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Main Street! County
Principal
Class 1
4 30,961
9
15,681
1,411
1,560
1,89
1.960
B
River Lagoon
Road 512
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
WB
US 1 (Indian
County County
Principal
Class 1
4 30,961
9
15.681
1,411
1,560
1.8901,960
B
River Lagoon
Road 512 Road 512
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
WB EB
1_
US 1 (Indian County Schumann
Principal
Class 1
4 31,101
9
15,743
1,417
1,560
1,8901.960
B
River Lagoon Road 512 Dr
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.) EB
US 1 (Indian Schumann
Barber
Principal
Class 1
4 31,125
9
16,494
1,484
1,560
1,8901,960
B
River Lagoon Dr
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Barber
Wabasso
Principal
Class 1
4 31,125
9
16,494
1,484
1,560
1,8901.960
B
River Lagoon
Street
Road
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
13
rn
N
O
co
N
County Road
County
Roseland
Minor
Class 1 4 23,818 9 11,987 1,079 1,404 1,7011,764 B
512
Road 510
Road
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Roseland
Barber
Minor
Class II 4 17,563 9 8,793 791 1,1971,59311,683 C
512
Road
Street
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Barber
Fleming
Minor
Class II 4 16,602 9 8,582 772 1,1971,5931,683 C
512
Street
Street
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Fleming
Winbrow
Minor
Class 11 4 15,973 9 8,401 756 1,1971,5931,683 C
512
Street
Drive
Arterial
Non -
State
CountyRoad
Winbrow
Easy Street
Minor
Class II 4 15,973 9 8,401 756 1,1971,5931,683 C
512
Drive
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road Easy Street
Delaware
Minor
Class II 4 15,531 9 7,775 700 1,1971,5931,683 C
512
Avenue
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Delaware
us 1
Minor
Class 11 4 15,510 9 8,079 727 1,1971,501.683 C
512
Avenue
Arterial
Non -
State
Roseland County North City Collector Class 1 2 10.637 9 5,410 487 459 738 792 C
Road (County Road 512 Limits Non -
Road 505) State
14
a�
w
0
c0
N
'•.• Name
FromTo
Functiona I
A Class
No. of
._
mum
Service
2020
Class
'eLanes
AADT
Peak K
DirectionVolume
2020
Factor
Hour
Schumann
South City
Barber
Collector
Class II
2
8,918
9
420
1,1971,5931,68
C
Dr (66th Ave)
Limits
Street
Non -
State
Schumann
Barber
Englar
Collector
Class 1
2
4,133
9
995
459
738
792
B
Dr
Street
Drive
Non -
State
Schumann
Englar
us 1
Collector
Class 1
2
3,263
9
154
459
738
792
B
Dr
Drive
Non -
State
Englar Drive
Barber
S Easy
Collector
Class 1
2
2,284
9
108
459
738
792
B
Street
Street
Non -
State
Englar Drive S Easy
Schumann
Collector
Class 1
2
4,133
9
*
195
459
738
792
B
Street
Dr
Non -
State
Fleming County
Main Street
Collector
Class 1
2
2,828
9
133
459
738
792
B
Street Road 512
Non -
State
Main Street
us 1
Fleming
Collector
Class 1
2
1,196
9
56
459
738
792
B
Street
Non -
State
Main Street Fleming
Winbrow
Collector
Class 1
2
1,686
9
x
79
459
738
792
B
Street
Drive
Non -
State
15
a')
0
c0
N
'•.• Name
FromTo
FunctionalNo.
of
..
2020
Class
• -
Lanes AADT•
•
•
2020
Factor
Hour
Easy Street
Main Street
Englar
Local
2 2,828
9
*
133
332
533 572Drive
FCIass
Laconia
County
County
Collector
2 5,873
9
276
459
738
792
B
Street
Road 512
Road 510
State
County Road
County
82nd Ave
Minor
Class 11
4
15,692
9
8,153
734
1,197
1,5931,683
C
510
Road 512
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
82nd Ave
70th Ave
Minor
Class li
4
15,692
9
8,153
734
1,1971,59
1,683
C
510
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
70th Ave 66th Ave
Minor
Class 11
4
15.396
9
7,921
713
1,197
1,5931,683
C
510
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road 66th Ave 58th Ave
Minor
Class II
4
14,558
9
7,357
662
1,1971,5931,683,
C
510
Arterial
Non -
State
Barber Street
US 1
Schumann
Local
Class 1
2
9,244
9
•
435
332
533
572
C
Dr
Other
Barber Street
Schumann
Englar
Collector
Class 1
2
9,244
9
a435
459
738
792
B
Dr
Drive
Non -
State
Barber Street
Englar
County
Collector
Class 1
2
9,244
9
435
459
738
792
B
Drive
Road 512
Non -
State
16
M
Cn
0
co
N
Road 512 Drive Non -
State
(1) The 2020 volumes were derived from Indian River County Traffic Engineering 2018 Traffic Volume Report and an area wide growth
rate was applied to each link (FDOT Online 2015 - 2018) to determine 2020 volumes
(2) 'K' factor was provided by the MOT Traffic Online
(3) The peak direction was provided by the Indian River County Traffic Engineering Annual Traffic Counting Report (2018)
(4) Peak hour is the peak direction multiplied by 'K' factor or AADT 2020 volume multiplied by FDOT 'K' factor and direction 'D' factor.
17
rn
rn
0
co
N
Table 2-5., Year 2025 Projected Roadway Performance
US 1 (Indian Roseland Jackson Principal Class 1 4 31,742
River Lagoon
Road
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Jackson
Main Street
Principal
Class 1
4 30,961
River Lagoon
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Main Street
County
Principal
Class 1
4 30,961
River Lagoon
Road 512
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
YOB
US 1 (Indian
County
County
Principal
Class 1
4 30,961
River Lagoon
Road 512
Road 512
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
WB
EB
US 1 (Indian
County
Schumann
Principal
Class 1
4 31,101
River Lagoon
Road 512
Dr
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
EB
US 1 (Indian
Schumann
Barber
Principal
Clsss 1
4 31,125
River Lagoon
Dr
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Barber
Wabasso
Principal
Class 1
4 31,125
River Lagoon
Street
Road
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
County Road
County
Roseland
Minor
Class 1
4 23,818
512
Road 510
Road
Arterial
Non -
State
32,093 9
31,303 9
31,303 9
31,303 9
31,445 9
31,469 9
31,469 9
24,081 9
50 1,444 1,56 1,89 1,960
0 0
51
1,437
1,.56 1,89
1,960
0 0
51
1,437
1,56 1,89
1,960
0 0
51
1,437
1,56 1,89
1,960
0 0
51
1,443
1,56 1,89
1,960
0 0
53
1,501
1,56 10
1,960
0 0
53
1,501
1,56 1,89
1,960
0 0
50
1,404
1,76 1.70
1,404
4 1
n.
B
B
N
B
0
K
18
rn
0
co
N
•,•Name
Road
FromToFunctional•
of ! ! ,
! ,
, 25
Class
Type
Lanes 2020
Growth•
Volume
Rate
Factor
Hour
Factor
,
County Road
Roseland
Barber
''Minor
Class 11
4 17,563
17,757
9
50
799
1,19 1,593 1,6 C
512
Road
Street
Arterial
Non-
7 83
State
County Road
'Barber
Fleming
Minor
Class 11
4 16,602
16,785
9
52
786
1,19 1,593 1,6 C
512
Street
Street
Arterial
Non-
7 83
State
County Road
Fleming
Winbrow
Minor
Class II
4 15,973
16,149
9
53
770
1,19 1,593 1,6 C
512
Street
Drive
Arterial
Non-
7 83
State
County Road
Winbrow
Easy Street
Minor
Class II
4 15,973
16,149
9
53
770
1,19 1,593 1,6 C
512
Drive
Arterial
Non-
7 83
State
County Road
Easy Street
Delaware
Minor
Class II
4 15,531
15,703
9
50
707
1,19 1,593 1,6 C
512
Avenue
Arterial
Non-
7 83
State
County Road
Delaware
us 1
Minor
Class 11
4 15,510
15,681
9
52
734
1,19 1,593 1,6 C
512
Avenue
Arterial
Non-
7 88
State
Roseland
County
North City
Collector
Class 1
2 10,637
10,755
9
51
494
459
738 792 C
Road (County
Road 512
Limits
Non -
Road 505)
State
Schumann Dr
South City
Barber
Collector
Class 11
2 8,918
9,017
9
424
1,19 1,593 1.6 C
(66th Ave)
Limits
Street
Non-
7 S3
State
19
rn
00
0
coo
N
Schumann Dr
Barber
Englar
Collector
Class 1
2
4,133 0.22%
4,179 9
Street
Drive
Non -
State
Schumann Dr
Englar
us 1
Collector
Class 1
2
3,263
3,299 9
Drive
Non -
State
Englar Drive
Barber
S Easy
Collector
Class 1
2
2,284
2,309 9
Street
Street
Non -
State
Englar Drive
S Easy
Schumann
Collector
Class 1
2
4,133
4,179 9
Street
Dr
Non -
State
Fleming
County
Main Street
Collector
Class 1
2
2,828
2,859 9
Street
Road 512
Non -
State
Main Street
us 1
Fleming
Collector
Class 1
2
1,196
1,209 9
Street
Non --
State
Main Street
Fleming
Winbrow
Collector
glass 1
2
1,686
1,705 9
Street
Drive
Non -
State
Easy Street
Main Street
Englar
Local
Class 1
2
2,828
2,859 5
Drive
Other
197 459 738 792
155 459 738 792 B
" 109 459 738 792 B
' 197 459 738 792 B
135 459 738 792 8
57 459 738 792 B
' 80 459 738 792 B
135 332 533 572 B
20
rn
co
0
co
N
Laconia
county
county
Collector
Class 1
2
5,873
Street
Road 512
Road 510
Non -
State
County Road
County
82nd Ave
Minor
Class II
4
15,692
510
Road 512
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
82nd Ave
70th Ave
Minor
Class II
4
15.692
510
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
70th Ave
66th Ave
Minor
Class 11
4
15,396
510
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
66th Ave
58th Ave
Minor
Class II
4
14,558
510
Arterial
Non -
State
Barber Street
US 1
Schumann
Local
Class 1
2
9,244
Dr
Other
Barber Street
Schumann
Englar
Collector
Class 1
2
9,244
Dr
Drive
Non -
State
Barber Street
Englar
County
Collector
Class 1
2
9,244
Drive
Road 512
Non -
State
5,938 9 &280 459 738 792 B
15,865
9
52
742
1,19
1,593
1,6 C
7
83
15,865
9
52
742
1,19
1,593
1,6 C
7
83
15,566
9
51
714
1,19
1,593
1,6 C
7
83
14,719
9
51
676
1,19
1,593
1,6 C
7
83
9,346
9
440
332 533
572
C
9,346
9
440
459 738
792
B
9,346
9
440
459 738
792
B
21
0
0
co
N
Barber Street County
Road 512
Collector Class I
Non -
State
459 138 192
(1) Growth rate derived from 2020 volumes provided by Indian River County Traffic Engineering and 2040 volumes provided by the Indian
River County MPO = 0.22% / year
(2) 'K' factor was provided by the FDOT Traffic Online
(3) The direction U factor was derived from the year 2020 peak direction volume divided by the 2020 AADT volume from the Indian River
County Traffic Engineering Annual Traffic Counting Report (2018)
(4) Peak hour volumes were determined by applying the 'K' factor and the direction 'D' factor to the year 2025 volumes
`Direction 'D' Factor = 52.3 provided by FDOT Traffic Online
(5) Service volumes based on 2009 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook
" Class type uses generalized standard volumes and 'non -state' applied a -10% reduction and other' applied a -35961 reduction to the
generalized service volume
22
0
co
N
Table 2-6: Year2040 Projected Roadway Performance
U''S 1 (Indian
Roseland
Jackson
Principal
Class 1
4
28,040
33,121
9
50
1,490
River Lagoon
Road
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Jackson
Main Street
Principal
Class 1
4
28,040
32,306
9
51
1,483
River Lagoon
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Main Street
County
Principal
Class 1
4
27,748
32,306
9
51
1,483
River Lagoon
Road 512
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
WB
US 1 (Indian
County
County
Principal
Class 1
4
27,378
32,306
9
51
1,483
River Lagoon
Road 512
Road 512
Arterial
c*nic Hwy.)
WB
EE
US 1 (Indian
County
Schumann
Principal
Class 1
4
24,928
32,452
9
51
1,490
River Lagoon
Road 512
Dr
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
EB
US 1 (Indian
Schumann
Barber
Principal
Class 1
4
26,696
32,477
9
53
1,549
River Lagoon
Dr
Street
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
US 1 (Indian
Barber
Wabasso
Principal
Class 1
4
26,185
32,477
9
53
1,549
River Lagoon
Street
Road
Arterial
Scenic Hwy.)
1,5601,8901,960 B
1,5601,8901.960 B
1,5601,8901,960
1,5601,8901,960
1,5601,8901,960
1,56 1,8901,960
1,56 1,8901,960
51
B
B
0
n.
23
N
O
cfl
N
Road Name From To
Functional
^Class No. of (1) (2) ADJ
(3) (4) (5) (6) Maximum Service
2040'
Class
.- Lanes AADT■
•
0•0
■
0•0
Factor Hour
■
County Road County Roseland
Minor
Class 1 4 29,120 1
9 50 1,3101,40 1,7641,701 1,40
B
512 Road 510 Road
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Roseland
Barber
Minor
Class 11
4 14,165
18,326
9
50
825
1,1971,59
1,683
C
512
Road
Street
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Barber
Fleming
Minor
Class II
4
14,165
17,323
9
52
811
1,1971,59
1,683
C
512
Street
Street
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Fleming
Winbrow
Minor
Class II
4
15,076
16,667
9
53
795
1,1971,59
1,683
C
512
Street
Drive
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Winbrow
Easy Street
Minor
Class II
4
'15,076
16,667
9
53
795
1,1971,5931,683
C
512
Drive
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
Easy Street
Delaware
Minor
Class II
4
15,076
16,205
9
50
729
1,1971.5931.683
C
512
Avenue
Arterial
Non -
State
County Read
Delaware
us 1
Minor
Class li
4
8,288
16,184
9
52
757
1,1971
, 5931,683
C
512
Avenue
Arterial
Non -
State
24
W
0
co
N
Roseland Road
County
North City
Collector
Class 1
2
13,784 9
(County Road
Road 512
Limits
Non-
505)
State
Schumann Dr
South City
Barber
Collector
Class Il
2
14,679 9
(66th Ave)
Limits
Street
Non -
State
Schumann Dr
Barber
Englar Drive
Collector
Class 1
LF
3,342 4,312 9
Street
Nor► -
State
Schumann Dr
Englar Drive
us 1
Collector
Class 1
2
5,145 9
Non -
State
Englar Drive
Barber
S Easy
Collector
Class 1
2
4,544 9
Street
Street
Non -
State
Englar Drive
S Easy
Schumann
Collector
Class 1
2
5,152 9
Street
Dr
Non -
State
Fleming Street
County
Main Street
Collector
Class 1
2
2,408 2,951 9
Road 512
Non -
State
691 1,1971,5931,683 C
' 203 459 738 792 B
` 242 459 738 792
214 459 738 792
243 459 738 792
4 139 459 738 792
0
IE
N
B
25
Main Street
US 'I
t-ieming
uouector
uass i
z
Z3,Doo �
Street
Non -
State
Main Street
Fleming
Winbrow
Collector
Class 1
2
1,827 9
Street
Drive
Non -
State
Easy Street
Main Street
E.nglar Drive
Local
Class 1
2
2,058 2,951 9
Other
Laconia Street
County
County
Collector
Class 1
2
6,128 9
Road 512
Road 510
Non -
State
lot 'tJ,7 !JV IVC. V
" 86 459 738 792 B
139 332 533 572 B
288 459 738 792 B
County Road
County
82nd Ave
Minor
Class 11
4
19,514
9
52
913
510
Road 512
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
82nd Ave
70th Ave
Minor
Class II
4
21,853
9
52
1,023
510
Arterial
Non -
State
County Road
70th Ave
66th Ave
Minor
Class II
4
21,853
9
51
1,003
510
Arterial
Non-
4�-
State
0
County Road
66th Ave
58th Ave
Minor
Class II
4
19,543
9
51
897
�O
N
510
Arterial
Non-
State
1,1971,5931,683 C
1,1971,5931,683 C
1,1971,5931,683 C
1,1971,5931,683 C
W.
Barber Street us 1 Schumann local Class I 2 5,958 9,645 9 454 332 533 572 C
Dr Other
Barber Street Schumann Englar Drive Collector Class 1 2 10,052 9 473 459 738 792 C
Dr Non -
State
Barber Street Englar Drive County Collector Class 1 2 8,772 9,645 9 454 459 738 792 8
Road 512 Non -
State
Barber Street County Winbrow Collector Class 1 2 8,756 9 412 459 738 792 B
Road 512 Drive Non -
State
*Direction 'D' Factor = 52.3 provided by FDOT Traffic Online
(1) AADT 2040 volumes were taken from Indian River County Base Cost Feasible Plan Daily Volumes provided by Indian River County
MPO, adopted in December 2015
(2) Adjusted AADT 2040 volumes were used when project 2040 volumes were less than 2020 and 2025 volumes. A 0.22 % exponential
growth rate was applied to 2020 volumes
--4 (3) X factor was provided by the FDOT Traffic Online
o,
o (4) The direction 'D' factor was derived from the year 2020 peak direction volume divided by the 2020 AADT volume from the Indian
-31 River County Traffic Engineering Annual Traffic Counting Report (2018)
co
N
27
Public Transit Performance
Fixed -route transit has increased in Indian River County with 895,462 in fiscal year (FY) 2010/11 to 1,156,034
in FY 15/16. As indicated in Table 2-7, ridership increased on Route 5 by 69.6%% and Route 9 by 80.5%%. FY
2015/16, Route 10 and Route 5 have the highest trips per mile in the City of Sebastian at 1.16 and 1.13
passengers per revenue mile, respectively. None of the routes meet the County's ridership per mile standard of
0.25 trips per mile.
Table 2-7. 2014-2016 Indian River County Transit Performance in Sebastian
Route 10 97,630 93,592 4°% 1
Route 11 20,874 24,144 16%
Route 12 45,052 42,198 -6%
- .W-
Source: Indian River County MPO, August 2017.
Future Transportation Plan
This section provides recommendations for creating a safe, convenient, and energy efficient transportation
system, coordinated with future land uses, plans and programs of the County and FDOT.
Since World War II, roadways have been designed primarily for automobiles. Very little attention has been given
to accommodating other modes of transportation such as bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. The goal of this
Transportation & Mobility Element is to look at roads as multi -modal transportation corridors, and to start to
plan for future growth accordingly.
Intergovernmental coordination is essential for the most cost-effective provision of transportation system
improvements. Clearly, the City of Sebastian does not possess the resources nor is it fiscally responsible for the
entire transportation system within the City. For example, both Indian River County and FDOT have financial
responsibility for county roads and state highway system roads, respectively. Therefore, it is necessary for the
City to review the transportation improvement plans and programs prepared by the County and FDOT. In this
way, the effort and dollars expended by the City to improve its transportation system may be complemented and
perhaps enhanced by the activities of the County and FDOT.
One area of coordination should include the preservation and protection of rights -of -way for identified future
roadway improvements and construction. With the escalating value of land and costs entailed in right-of-way
acquisition it is essential that the City protect roadway corridors in advance from building encroachment.
28
76 of 192
Increased right-of-way costs reduce the funds available for actual construction. The City needs to utilize
techniques such as setback requirements, zoning restrictions, right-of-way protection regulations and official
transportation maps to preserve and protect existing and future rights -of -way.
Future Transportation Map
The City of Sebastian is located in an urbanized area. The adopted LOS standard of "D" for all of the major
roadways serving Sebastian will be met in the year 2025 given the assumptions included in this plan. The
projected roadway performance for the year 2040 includes the programmed improvements listed below. The
adopted LOS standard of "D" for all of the major roadways serving Sebastian will be met in the year 2040. Future
roadway design will need to incorporate bicycle, pedestrian and, eventually, transit features to achieve a true
multi -modal system. In addition to incorporating roadway design standards, the City will start requiring that new
developments be interconnected to enhance the transportation network. Development design must provide
connectivity and access between adjacent residential developments and nearby land uses.
According to the Indian River County MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, Cost Affordable Plan (with
enhanced revenues), anticipated roadway improvement and construction projects by 2025 include:
• Widening County Road 510 from County Road 512 to 66th Avenue from two (2) lanes undivided to
four (4) lanes undivided with an estimated cost of $16,000,00.
• Projected Indian River County MPO roadway improvement and construction projects by 2040
include:
• Widening Roseland Road from Country Road 512 to US 1 from two (2) lanes undivided to four (4)
lanes undivided with an estimated cost of $69,702,825.
• Providing a new two (2) lane undivided roadway on 82nd Avenue from Laconia Street to 69th Street
with an estimated cost of $24,575,004.
• Widening 66th Avenue from Barber Street to 81st Street from two (2) lanes undivided to four (4)
lanes undivided with an estimated cost of $17,357,922.
There are no planned FDOT roadway improvement or construction projects scheduled within the City of
Sebastian.
Future Public Transit Plan
The City of Sebastian works closely with the Indian River County Transit department. The ridership, for the five
(5) routes currently servicing the City, has steadily increased in the last several years. This trend is expected to
continue in the near and long term future. As the ridership increases the demand for additional bus routes will
potentially occur. New routes should take into account the land use pattern within the City. The 2040 Indian River
County Long Range Transportation Plan has identified one additional bus route for the Sebastian area. This route
would connect the City of Sebastian with the City of Fellsmere along CR 512.
Future Pedestrian Plan
All great cities are "walkable" cities. Pedestrian mobility is greatly influenced by the mix and proximity of land
uses, as well as the availability of adequate sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities. In 2004 the Indian River
MPO studied the bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the entire County. This study identified several roadways
in need of sidewalk facilities including portions of CR 512, Fleming Street, 82nd Avenue, Schumann Drive, Barber
f 29
192
Street, and Roseland Road. The City will further identify gaps in the pedestrian system and allow prioritization of
pedestrian improvements along major roadways, within downtown and throughout the City. Implementation of
these improvements will provide connectivity to the overall transportation system. Appropriate land use and
careful urban design will encourage walking for short trips and for accessing transit facilities and services. The
City's LDC encourages increased pedestrian mobility by requiring sidewalks for all new development. Map 2-8
shows proposed bike and pedestrian routes.
Future Parking Plan
Parking is an essential component of the overall transportation system. The decision of a commuter to drive
alone or to use alternative transportation modes such as ride- sharing or public transit depends to a large extent
on the cost, accessibility and availability of public parking. Currently, parking within the City has not been a major
concern. The current parking requirements for new development have been adequate for patrons. Therefore, no
additional parking studies were determined to be necessary at this time.
Future Bicycle Plan
Bicycling is a viable mobility alternative. Bicycle networks provide a commuting alternative as well as a
recreational asset. As described in the inventory section, there are currently on and off street bicycle facilities on
portions of US 1 and County Road 512. The Indian River County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
identified County Road 512, Barber Street, Schumann Drive, Englar Drive, Roseland Road, and 82nd Avenue as
needing bicycle facilities for 2040.
The City of Sebastian recognizes the need to provide transportation alternatives to increase accessibility and
provide a comprehensive transportation system and is coordinating with the Indian River County MPO to identify
future bicycle route improvements and potential future bicycle routes and facilities. The City does have an
opportunity to potentially provide future off-street bicycle facilities similar to the rails to trails facility parallel to CR
512. Map 2-8 shows proposed bike and pedestrian routes.
TSM/TDM Strategies
Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) are options for
communities trying to add roadway capacity without having to construct costly new facilities. The ultimate goal
of the TDM program is to influence people to shift to more efficient modes of transportation and to travel during
off-peak hours. TSM strategies, on the other hand, aim to affect the actual supply of transportation services. The
most effective programs integrate supply and demand strategies to create a transportation network that
promotes efficient choices. The City of Sebastian does not have the need to offer any of these programs at this
time. However, the options may be considered in the future.
n
r�.
t
DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
Introduction
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163 of the 2019 Florida Statutes, the Housing Element consists of a
data inventory and analysis (DIA) that influences the overarching goals, objectives, and policies that will guide
housing development within the City of Sebastian. The City's housing trends and needs are evaluated in this
analysis in order to ensure a proper mix of housing types are available to accommodate diverse housing needs
achieve a livable community.
Housing Inventory
This section deals with the characteristics and conditions of the existing housing stock in the City. In order to
compile this analysis, the primary sources of data include the U.S. Census Bureau and the American Community
Survey (ACS). These specific resources were applied as they comprise some of the most current and accurate
information available.
Tables 3-1 through 3-16 of this section provide an inventory and comparison of housing characteristics for the
City of Sebastian and Indian River County. Data appearing for Indian River County represents the entire county,
including all unincorporated and incorporated areas as well as Sebastian.
Dwelling Units by Structure Type
A comparison of dwelling units by structure type for the City of Sebastian when compared to Indian River County
is displayed in Table 3-1. Single-family detached homes make up the majority of the inventoried housing units
within Sebastian and Indian River County. Indian River County has a significantly higher percentage of multi-
family housing than Sebastian.
Table 3-1: Dwelling Units by Structure
Single -Family Detached
Sinai
9,665
87.0%
e-Fami[v Attached 444 4.0%
Multi -Family 287 2.6%
Mobile Home 704 6.3%
49,485
4,731
17,958
6,205
Other (Boat, RV, Van, Etc.) 15 0.1 % 90
Total 11,115 100% 78,469
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
6a3.T%
6.0%
22.9%
7.9%
0.1 %
100%
0 of ;9�2 2
Dwelling Units by Tenure
A comparison between owner -occupied dwelling units and renter -occupied dwelling units in Sebastian and
Indian River County is presented in Table 3-2. As depicted below, approximately 80.2% of the City's occupied
dwelling units are occupied by the owner as compared to 75.8% in the County. The County has a slightly larger
percentage of renter -occupied units at 24.2% as compared to 19.8% in Sebastian.
Table 3-2., Dwelling Units by Tenure
Renter -occupied 1,849 19.8% 13,997 24.2% -
Total Occupied Housing 9,351 100% 57.911 100%
Units
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Household Size
The average household size is 2.24 people per dwelling unit according to the University of Florida Bureau of
Economic and Business Research (BEER). Table 3-3 lists households according to the number of persons
comprising a household in Sebastian and in the County.
Table 3-3: Persons per Household
Total Occupied Households 9,351 57,911
1-person household 2,508 18,188
2-person household 4,751 26,377
3-person household 1,062 6,095
4-or-more person household 1,030 7,251
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
192 3
Housing Vacancy
Based on the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Estimates, the City experienced a vacancy
rate of 15.9% for all housing units, a figure lower than that experienced by the County, which had a 26.2% vacancy
rate. Table 3.4 shows the number of vacant housing units according to the circumstances creating vacant units.
Table 3-4: Vacancy Status of Housing Units
Vacant Units For Rent
Rented, Not Occupied
For Sale Only
Sold, Not Occupied
For Seasonal, Recreational,
or Occasional Use
Vacant Units for Migrant
Workers
Other Vacant Units
"I, /04
I D.U%
GU,DDD
40.4/o
246
2.2%
3,910
5.0%
14
0.1 %
420
0.5%
134
1.2%
1,227
1.6%
245
2.2%
903
1.2%
712
6.4%
9,445
12.0%
0
0.0%
224
0.3%
413
3.7%
4,429
5.6%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
4
Housing Age
Table 3-5 compares the age of year-round housing units in the City of Sebastian and Indian River County. The
majority of year-round housing unit construction in both the City and County took place between 2000-2009. As
denoted below, a large majority of Sebastian's housing stock (82.9%) was constructed between 1980 and 2009,
with 28.8% being constructed between 2000-2009.
Table 3-5. Dwelling Units by Age of Construction
2010 or Later
404
3.6%
1,763
2.3%
2000-2009
3,197
28.8%
20,455
26.4%
1990-1999
2,882
25.9%
13,592
17.5%
1980-1989
3,130
28.2%
19,562
25.2%
1970-1979
968
8.6%
12,888
16.6%
1960-1969
264
2.4%
4,314
5.6%
1950-1959
140
1.3%
3,898
5.0%
1940-1949
40
0.4%
1,012
1.3%
1939 or Earlier
90
0.8%
98
0.1 %
Total
11,115
100%
77,582
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Monthly Housing Rent
Table 3-6 compares the monthly gross rents for specified renter -occupied housing units in the City with the
Indian River County totals for the year 2017. The median gross rent in the City of Sebastian is approximately
$1,020 as compared to $928 in Indian River County.
Table 3-6. Gross Rent
$500-$999
767
44.8%
6,937
1 51.5%
$1,00041,499
691
40.4%
4,000
29.7%
$1,50041,999
177
10.3%
739
5.5%
$2,000-$2,499
[]
0.0%
439
3.3%
$2,500-$2,999
23
1.3%
113
0.8%
83,000 or More
0
0.0%
220
1.6%
Total
1,711
100%
13,463
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
92 5
Monthly Cost of Owner -Occupied Units
The median monthly owner cost in the City of Sebastian is approximately $1,139 as compared to $1,273 in Indian
River County. The monthly owner costs with a mortgage are shown in Table 3-7. This provides context in terms
of the value of owning a home and affordability of owning a home when compared to renting.
Table 3-7. Owner Costs
Less than $500
90
2.5%
426
2.1 %
$500 to $999
1,220
33.7%
6,098
29.5%
$1,000 to $1,499
1,479
40.9%
6,408
31.0%
$1,500 to $1,999
603
16.7%
3,504
16.9%
$2,000 to $2,499
158
4.4%
1,619
7.8%
$2,500 to $2,999
63
1.7%
909
4.4%
$3,000 or more
7
..0.2%
1,712
8.3%
Total
3,620
100%
20,676
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Value of Owner -Occupied Housing Units
The median home value in Sebastian is $157,200 as compared to $172,600 in Indian River County. The owner -
occupied units by value are shown in Table 3-8.
Table 3-8: Owner -Occupied Units by Value
Less than $50,000
478
6.4%
4,102 1
9.3%
$50,000 to $99,999
1,296
17.3%
7,816
17.8%
$100,000 to $149,999
1,688
22.5%
6,470
14.7%
$150,000 to $199,999
1,905
25.4%
7,163
16.3%
$200,000 to $299,999
1,675
22.3%
7,707
17.6%
$300,000 to $499,999
377
5.0%
5,505
12.5%
$500,000 to $999,999
83
1.1 %
3,341
7.6%
$1,000,000 or more
0
0.0%
1,810
4.1%
Total
7,502
100%
43,914
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
6
Household Income
The household income levels for Sebastian compared to Indian River County are show in Table 3-9. The median
household income for the City is higher than Indian River County but the per capita income for the City is lower
than Indian River County.
Table 3-9: Household Income
Median Household Income $49, 655 $49,009
(2017 Dultars)
Per Capita Income (2017 Dollars) $26,001 $33,122
Persons in Poverty, in percent 12,6% 10.6%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Low- to Moderate -Income Households
The City of Sebastian Consolidated Plan 2019-2024 (prepared by Guardian CRM) defines very low, low, and
moderate income households. These are based upon the most recent information available from the USHUD and
is adjusted annually and by family size. The following definitions will be used:
• Very Low Income: Households that do not exceed 30% of the area median income (AMI)
• Low Income: Households between 31 % — 50% of the AMI
• Moderate Income: Households earning 51 % - 80% of the AMI
Ratio of Income to Housing Cost
The ratio between housing costs and income within Sebastian and Indian River County are denoted in Table 3-
10 and Table 3-11 below. Affordable housing is determined by comparing the cost of housing to household
income. Florida Statutes defines affordable housing as monthly rents or monthly mortgage payments including
taxes, insurance, and utilities do not exceed 30 percent of the median adjusted gross annual income for
households.
92
Rent -to Income Ratio
Rent as a percentage of income for Sebastian compared to Indian River County is shown in Table 3-10.
According to Census data the highest percentage of renters in both Sebastian and Indian River County are paying
35 percent or more of their income for housing. This makes affordability an issue for renters in both the City and
the County.
Table 3-10: Rent -to Income Ratio
Less than 15 %
119
6.4%
1,152
8.2%
15% to 19.9%
218
11.8%
1,147
8.2%
20% to 24.9%
456
24.7%
1,854
13.2%
25%to 29.9%
181
9.8%
1,454
10.4%
30% to 34.9%
187
10.1 %
1,305
9.3%
35% or more
518
28.0%
6,381
45.6%
Not Computed
170
9.2%
704
5.0%
Total
1,849
100%
13,997
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Mortgage Costs to Income Ratio
The monthly mortgage costs -to -income ratio for both Sebastian and Indian River County are shown in Table 3-
11. The highest percentage of owners with and without a mortgage in both Sebastian and Indian River County
are paying less than 30% of their income for housing.
Table 3-11: Costs to Income Ratio
With Mortgage, Less than
30%
2,406
32.4%
13,107
30.2%
With Mortgage, More than
1,214
16.3%
7,410
17.1%
30%
Without Mortgage, Less
3,492
47.0%
19,651
45.3%
than 30%
Without Mortgage, More
321
4.3%
3,203
7.4%
than 30%
�.
Total
7,433
100%
43,371
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, X- 73-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
of 192
Cost Burden
Cost -burdened households pay more than 30 percent of income for rent or mortgage costs. Data for this section
has been supplied by the Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse. Based on 2016 estimates, the data indicates that
1090 households within the City (38%) paid more than 30% of income for housing which equals the 38% of
County households that paid more than 30% of income for housing.
Table 3-12 - Amount of Income Paid for Housing Household by Cost Burden, 2016
j Sebastian
Sebastian
Sebastian
Sebastian
Sebastian
Indian River County
Indian River County
Indian River County
Indian River County
Indian River County
30% AMI or less
92
259
30.1-50% AMI
5
142
156
50.1-80% AMI
73
311
12
80.1-120% AM
233
126
more than 120% AMI
301
84
30% AMI or less
382
180
2561
30.1-50% AN
336
1470
1827
50.1-80%AMI
1436
1969
480
80.1-120% AM
1918
591
56
more than 120% AMI
2504
296
28
Source: Indian River County and City of Sebastian data taken from Shimberg Center - Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse
Sebastian
Sebastian
Sebastian
Sebastian
Sebastian
Indian River County
Indian River County
Indian River County
Indian River County
Indian River County
30% AMI or less
34
202
295
30.1-50% AMI
562
178
305
50.1-80%AMI
937
590
301
80.1-120% AM
1183
460
109
more than 120% AMI
3050
467
26
30% AMI or less
401
709
2376
30.1-50% AMI
1978
1393
1737
50.1-80% AN
3852
1756
1606
80.1-120% AM
6140
1739
901
more than 120% AMI
21009
2704
595
Source: Indian River County and City of Sebastian data taken from Shimberg Center - Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse
._1 9
192
Cost Burden of Households with Householder Age 65 and Older
According to the Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse, 4,310 households in Sebastian (41.1 %) were headed by
a person age 65 or older in 2016. In comparison, 43% of households in the County were headed by elderly
persons. In Sebastian, 3,924 of elderly households (91 %) own their homes, while 1,392 elderly households
(32.2%) pay more than 30 percent of income for rent or mortgage costs.
Table 3-13 - Households with Householder Age 65 and Older, Cost Burden by Tenure and Income, 2016 Estimate
(Summary)
Sebastian
Owner
30% AMI or less
18
136
108
Sebastian
Owner
30.1-50% AMI
339
121
124
Sebastian
Owner
50.1-80% AN
571
245
116
Sebastian
Owner
80.1-120% AM
621
125
44
Sebastian
Owner
more than 120% AMI
1232
119
5
Sebastian
Renter
30% AMI or less
56
47
Sebastian
Renter
30.1-50%AMI
2
23
37
Sebastian
Renter
50.1-80%AMI
13
51
5
Sebastian
Renter
80.1-120%AM
29
45
Sebastian
Renter
more than 120% AMI
37
41
Indian River County
Owner
30% AMI or less
215
475
930
F Indian River County
Owner
30.1-50% AMI
1161
912
722
Indian River County
Owner
50.1-80% AMI
2437
752
620
Indian River County
Owner
80.1-120% AM
3417
475
377
Indian River County
Owner
more than 120% AMI
10190
805
180
Indian River County
Renter
30% AMI or less
227
113
548
Indian River County
Renter
30.1-50%AMI
168
257
562
Indian River County
Renter
50.1-80% AMI
308
466
292
Indian River County
Renter
80.1-120%AM
370
199
44
Indian River County
Renter
more than 120% AMI
488
198
24
Source: Indian River County and City of Sebastian data taken from Shimberg Center - Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse
10
92
Inventory of Standard/Substandard Units
The Census provides indicators for substandard housing by measuring overcrowding and the lack of complete
plumbing, kitchen, or heating equipment. Overall substandard housing makes up a very small percentage of the
overall occupied units in both the City and the County. An analysis of substandard housing is displayed in Table
3-14.
Table 3-14: Substandard Housing
Overcrowded (1.01 or More 12 0.1% 806 1.4%
Persons per Room)
No Fuel Used 131 1.4% 988 1.7%
Lacking Complete Kitchen 15 0 2% 226 0.4%
Facilities
Lacking Complete Plumbing u 0.0% 97 0.2%
Facilities
Total 158 1.7% 2,117 3.7%
wmn ..
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Government Subsidized Housing
The following are government subsidized housing resources that can be utilized by the City of Sebastian.
• Florida Housing Finance Corporation: a public corporation of the State of Florida that offers
homeownership programs, multifamily development programs, predevelopment and
demonstration project loans, and technical assistance for local governments.
• Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Program: increases the availability of
affordable housing units in the County by providing low or no -interest loans for down payments
and closing costs, loans for impact fees, and loans for renovation of substandard housing units.
The funding source for the program is the State Housing Initiatives Partnership.
• Community Development Block Grant: provides funds through the Small Cities Program for
capital improvements.
• Section 8: provides rental subsidies to very low, low, and moderate -income households. The
rental limits are set each year by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
bfi_192 11
• Rural and Farm Worker Housing: no rural or farm workers housing is required within the City,
and no housing is designated for rural or farming purposes.
Mobile and Manufactured Homes
The City of Sebastian recognizes the importance of housing choices to meet the housing needs of different types
of households. Licensed mobile home parks in the City of Sebastian include:
• Park Place
• Fischer's Corner
• Orange Heights
• Palm Lake Club
• Riverview
Housing for Special Needs
Special housing needs are necessary for the elderly, children, and those who have physical or emotional needs
that require special residential accommodations. Such residential accommodations may or may not demand on -
site professional medical assistance, twenty-four hour assistance, or other special facilities. In some cases,
special housing situations can involve a group of unrelated residents that share living accommodations because
their physical or emotional needs require special services or assistance from other group members.
The City of Sebastian recognizes the importance of providing housing for special needs. The State of Florida has
adopted laws that control local government regulation of certain residential facilities serving special needs
groups. These laws ensure that there are adequate sites for group homes in every community throughout the
State (Chapter 419, F.S.). Special housing accommodations for Sebastian's residents can include nursing homes
and group homes. Group homes can be further defined as a community residential home, adult family care
homes, assisted living facilities, and family foster homes. These special housing facilities are generally defined
as follows:
Nursing Homes: Any institution, building residence, private home or other place, whether operated for profit or
not, which provides 24-hour nursing care, personal care, or custodial care for persons not related to the owner
or manager by blood or marriage. The person under such care resides overnight at the home. See Section
400.021(12) F.S.
Assisted Living Facilities: A facility designed to provide personal care services in the least restrictive and most
home -like environment. These facilities can range in size from one resident to several hundred and may offer a
wide variety of personal and nursing services designed specifically to meet an individual's personal needs. See
Section 400.402, F.S.
Adult Family Care Homes: A full-time, family -type living arrangement, in a private home, under which a person
who owns or rents the home provides room, board, and personal care, on a 24-hour basis, for no more than five
disabled adults or frail elders who are not relatives. See Section 400.618, F.S.
Community Residential Home: A dwelling unit licensed to serve clients of the Department of Children and
Family Services, which provides a living environment for seven to fourteen unrelated residents who operate as
the functional equivalent of a family, including such supervision and care by supportive staff as may be necessary
to meet the physical, emotional, and social needs of the residents. See Section 419.001, F.S.
Family Foster Home: A private residence in which children who are unattended by a parent or legal guardian
are provided 24-hour care. Such homes include emergency shelter family homes, family foster group homes,
and specialized foster homes for children with special needs. A person who cares for a child of a friend for a
period not to exceed 90 days, a relative who cares for a child and does not receive reimbursement for such care
from the state or federal government, or an adoptive home which has been approved by the department or by a
licensed child -placing agency for children placed for adoption is not considered a family foster home. See Section
409.175 FS.
Assisted Housing Inventory
Based on data from the Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse, Table 3-15 lists assisted living facilities located
within or close to the City of Sebastian.
Table 3-15. Assisted Housing Inventory, 2019
11065 Ganga
Way
Grace's 1055 Grace's
Landing Landing Sebastian 32958
Circle
Indian
River
County
Indian
River
County
Housing Credits 9%,
SAIL. Section
2071223{I)
925 Pelican Indian
Pelican Isles Isle Circle Sebastian 32958 River Housing Credits 9
County
Source: Shimbergenter = Florida Housing a a earn g ouse
Historical Structures
70 70
150 150
Sebastian has a number of historic resources within its city boundaries. Historic resource data was retrieved
from the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State. The Division of Historical Resources
of the Florida Department of State maintains a central archive for Florida's historical and archaeological sites
known as the Florida Master Site File. Historical structures and properties including those which are on the
National Register of Historic Places are listed in in Table 3-16 and illustrated on Map 3-1. The historic resources
are mainly concentrated in the northeast portion of the City.
According to the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State there are 82 structures
documented in the City as having historic significance. Five (5) of which are on the National Register of Historic
Places such as the Archie Smith Wholesale Fish Company, which is the only remaining intact fish house in the
area from the 1920's and one of the few left in the State of Florida. The Division of Historical Resources of the
Florida Department of State delineates two historic districts in the City. Historic districts are defined by a group
of historically significant structures or sites. Old Town Sebastian Historic District West includes 9 historic
192 13
structures and Old Town Sebastian Historic District East includes 15 historic structures. It is important to take
the historic resources in the City into consideration when guiding growth in order to avoid the potential adverse
impacts of development activity.
Table 3-16. Historical Resources
SITE NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNIFICANCE
FL EAST COAST R.R.
1G98 FOSTER RD
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SECTION HOUSE
SEMBLER, CHARLIE HOUSE
1660 N INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HUDSON, JAMES HOUSE
N LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
FIELDS, LILLIAN JEWEL
1016 S LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HOUSE
SCHUMANN HOUSE
1065 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SUDDARD, EDITH HOUSE
1061 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ROSE, DR DAVID HOUSE
1063 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BRADDOCK, GEORGE
1309 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ARMSTRONG HOUSE
BAUGHMAN HOUSE
1525 N LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
TAYLOR, J HOUSE
1533 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HARDEE, CAPT R G HOUSE
MAIN ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SITE
VICKERS STORE
MAIN ST & US 1 [A]
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
DEVANE, FERN HOUSE
1100 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ROSE, A G HOUSE
1025 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
WALTERS GARAGE
MAIN ST & US 1 [B]
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
EAST COAST LUMBER &
909 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SUPPLY CO
SEBASTIAN WOMENS CLUB
932 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BLDG
PARK, S A HOUSE
937 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SEBASTIAN TOWN HALL
1125 US 1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BRADDOCK, WILLIAM HOUSE
1208 US 1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HARRISON BUILDING
1329 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
LETCHWORTH GARAGE
1330 U.S. 1 HWY
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HOUSE
CARLISLE HOUSE
1437 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
MILLER, M M HOUSE
US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
STEVENSON PROPERTY
COOLIDGE ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
' BEUGNOT, JOHN
1068 MAIN ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HARDEE, MAY HOUSE
1317A OLD DIXIE HWY
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
GATE POSTS
1317E OLD DIXIE HWY
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
CHESSER, L F HOUSE
712 HARRISON ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
r MW
14
of-192
HURRICANE HARBOR/
1540 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE.
MCCAIN'S GARAGE
MCCAIN, BOB
1541 N INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
OCEAN BREEZE SERVICE
1690 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
STATION
AUGUST PARK/
1737 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BEUGNOT/WEST PROPERTY
WELLING, GEORGE HOUSF
1745 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BLAND, OKIE HOUSE
710 JACKSON ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
TAYLOR, CHARLES HOUSE
909 N LOUISANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BAUGHMAN DAIRY
1533 N LOUISANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SEBASTIAN GRAMMAR &
1225 MAIN ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
CARPENTER HOUSE
1041 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
CARPENTER, ORVA HOUSE
1044 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
GULLEDGE-LETCHWORTH-
1053 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
PHELPS HOME
RYALL, BILL HOUSE (SEARS)
1056 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
i BRADDOCK, MAURICE
709 WASHINGTON PL
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HOUSE
SR 512 BUILDING
SR 512
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BAMMA VICKERS LAWSON
1133 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HOUSE
1 CAIN-WILSON, ARDELIA
1523 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURL
HOUSE
VICKERS, STEPHEN HOUSE
1141 US 1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
CAIN HOUSE
1531 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SLOAN, DOC
1603 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
PALMER HOTEL
11330/UNIT 12 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
EFFICIENCIES
PALMER MOTEL
11330/UNIT 14 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
EFFICIENCIES
` SEBASTIAN CITY MARKER
HARRISON/INDIAN R DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ASHBURNER, H HOUSE
1024 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
MCPHERSON, THOMAS
1005 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HOUSE
CHURCH OF GOD
925 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
CHURCH OF GOD
905 US1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
PARSONAGE
GRAY, JAMES HOUSE
1044A LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
DAY., B F HOUSE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
FIELD, H HOUSE
1049 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HANCOCK, CHARLES HOUSE
1040 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
UNDERILL PROPERTY
128751 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
15
3 of 192
WARD PROPERTY
1736 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
MAY'S MARINAIFLOODTIDE
1732 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
MARINA PROPERTY
WARREN PROPERTY
1720 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
FOOD TOWN STORES
1424 U.S. 1 HWY
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
PROPERTY
IZZO PROPERTY
1405 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
BOUDNOT PROPERTY
1302 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
FERN CARPENTER HOUSE
1036 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
9320 90TH AVENUE
9320 90TH AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
1100 MAIN ST
1100 MAIN ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
1101 PALMETTO AVENUE
1101 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
HARBOR LIGHTS MOTEL
1215 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
OFFICE
HARBOR LIGHTS MOTEL
1215 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ADDITIONAL BLDG 1
HARBOR LIGHTS MOTEL
1215 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ADDITIONAL BLDG 2
HARBOR LIGHTS MOTEL
1215 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
ADDITIONAL BLDG 3
HARBOR LIGHTS
1215 INDIAN RIVER DR
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
1210 U.S. 1
1210 U.S. 1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
1053 LOUISIANA AVENUE
1053 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
UNITED METHODIST
1053 LOUISIANA AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
CHURCH PARSONAGE
SEBASTIAN RIVER BAPTIST
1117 US 1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
1206 U.S. 1
1206 US 1
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
1113 PALMETTO AVENUE
1113 PALMETTO AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
700 MAIN ST
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
3905 90TH AVE - BLDG 1
8905 90TH AVE
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
SEBASTIAN ROADSIDE
10795 US 1 HWY
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE
RESTAURANT
SMITH, ARCHIE, WHOLESALE
1740 INDIAN RIVER DR.
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE &
FISH COMPANY
NATIONAL REGISTER
OLD TOWN SEBASTIAN
BOUNDED BY PALMETTO AVE,
HISTORICAL DISTRICT &
HISTORIC DISTRICT WEST
LAKE AND MAIN STS.
NATIONAL REGISTER
OLD TOWN SEBASTIAN
MAIN AND WASHINGTON STS.,
HISTORICAL DISTRICT &
HISTORIC DISTRICT EAST
RIVERSIDE DR., FEC RAILROAD
NATIONAL REGISTER
SEBASTIAN GRAMMAR AND
1225 MAIN ST.
NATIONAL REGISTER
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LAWSON, BAMMA VICKERS,
1133 US 1
NATIONAL REGISTER
HOUSE
Source: Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State
16
Additional Analysis
Based on the available data and information, the following has been provided for reference purposes only. It is
understood this information is supplemental and provides a snapshot of valuations/rates specific to the 10-Year
Home Value Index (ZHVI) for the area. The ZHVI represents the typical value for homes in the 35th to 6511
percentile range for a specific area. The ZHVI includes single-family homes and condominiums/co-ops. Table 3-
17 shows the average home values in the City of Sebastian for the last ten years. Since 2010, the average home
values in Sebastian have increased from an average of $137,514 to $230,721. The Zillow Observed Rent Index
(ZORI) represents a measure of the typical observed market rent rate for homes and apartments that fall into the
40th to 60th percentile range in a given region. Yet, Zillow only calculates ZORI for the top 100 metro areas in
the Country and does not include data for Sebastian.
Table 3-17. 10-Year Home Value Index
O I- N M I+ O M O co
lt� 7 O co CO O M O Vf e- �-
r LO O d' d' r__ cO Ln I- 6! V
N Lo N Ln I- O> s- N V_ c-
I� ti M 0D (3i r, d O V to to
O N CO O M CD h LL) P•
Average Sale m NM co O ct co N N M
9 N N N r V_ r
Price 409, `fr 61). 69.� ds 619- vl� f.41) 6% 64 414
Source: https.11www.zillow.comlresearchldatal
Accordina to the National Association of Realtors website. "Apartments for rent in Sebastian. Florida have a
median rental price of $1,550. There are 31 active apartments for rent in Sebastian." By comparison.
"Apartments for rent in Indian River County. Florida have a median rental price of $1.800. There are 552 active
apartments for rent in Indian River County."
CONSERVATION & COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
The Conservation & Coastal Management Element sets the foundation for the City to protect and
preserve its natural environment and coastal resources as well as protect life and property from
natural disasters. This Element is broken into two goals: conservation and coastal management. The
conservation objectives and policies encourage sustainability initiatives and ensure the protection
of the City's natural resources such as lakes, rivers, wetlands, wildlife, shoreline, air, marine
resources, native vegetation, and environmentally sensitive lands. The coastal management
objectives and policies ensure the protection of the City's coastal shoreline as well as the protection
of the City's residents and infrastructure from sea level rise and flooding risks. The Conservation
& Coastal Management Element ensures the resiliency of the City and protects the quality of
natural systems within the community.
CONSERVATION & G ASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEM EN10
HIGHLIGHTS
1. Requires the protection of the City's natural resources, wildlife, and habitats and
encourages restoration efforts;
2. Protects the City's native vegetation and trees as well as its air quality;
3. Protects the City's surface waters and marine resources;
4. Protects water quality through the promotion of stormwater treatment and integrated
maintenance practices;
5. Protects the City's shorelines and public access to shorelines;
6. Focuses on sustainability measures including green building design, green jobs, and green
infrastructure;
7. Enforces the limitation of public expenditures and avoidance of population concentrations
in areas subject to destruction by flood risk and natural disasters;
8. Encourages the implementation of mitigation strategies outlined in the City's Coastal
Resiliency Plan to prepare against flooding and sea level rise as well as the maintenance of
the City's floodplains;
9. Establishes emergency management measures and post -disaster development strategies
for the City in the face of a natural disaster;
10. Establishes the use of an Adaptation Action Area (AAA) Overlay District and a Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) program to further resiliency measures within the City;
11. Ensures development is compatible with sensitive coastal and wetland resources.
0 192 3
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
Goal 5-1: Protection and Conservation of Natural
Resources.
Sebastian is home to a diverse collection of natural resources and habitats and as such shall conserve, protect,
promote, and appropriately manage the City's natural resources in order to enhance the quality of natural
systems and the sustainability of the community.
Objective 5-1.1 c Protection of Wildlife and Habitats. Protect the City's natural
resources, wildlife, and habitats to improve the health of the natural environment.
Policy 5-1.1.1: Protection of Natural Resources, Wildlife, and Habitats. The City's land development
code (LDC) shall include:
a. Performance criteria that protects the City's natural resources, wildlife, and habitats. of
endangered or threatened species from the adverse impacts of development by regulating the
location, density, and intensity of those activities which cause the adverse impact.
b. Standards which increase conservation incentives during development to further protect and
preserve the City's natural resources.
c. Provisions which recognize the rights of property owners to use their lands in a manner consistent
with the rules, policies, and guidelines of the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Policy 5-1.1.2: Wildlife Protection. The City shall utilize the LDC and review processes to ensure that
development projects evaluate potential environmental impacts and provide mitigation for negative
impacts. Development shall not adversely impact any threatened or endangered species or species of
special concern without appropriate permitting and/or mitigation.
Policy 5-1.1.3: Endangered or Threatened Species. The City shall protect threatened or endangered
native species by requiring that proposed new development and redevelopment (where applicable) be
examined for location of Listed Species. The City through its LDC and review processes, will:
a. Coordinate with the County, Federal, and State agencies for the identification and protection of
endangered and threatened species
b. Require applicants to consult with the appropriate agencies, to use recognized surveying
techniques to identify listed species, and to provide documentation of such coordination and
compliance prior to City approval to conduct any activities that could disturb listed species or their
habitat
• If endangered species, threatened species, or species of special concern are found, such
species' habitat shall be identified on the proposed site plan and a plan for mitigation shall
be discussed in the site plan narrative
• Such information shall be addressed through the project staff report
c. Promote connectivity and minimize habitat fragmentation
1-11 4
192
Policy 5-1.1.4: Designation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. This Element's DIA specifically
includes areas reserved for conservation uses or restricted development. All conservation land uses
identified shall either remain undeveloped or shall undergo "restricted development." "Restricted
development" shall be regulated through performance criteria adopted and maintained within the LDC.
Policy 5-1.1.5: Wildlife Corridors. Consistent with Policy 5-1.9.6 and Policy 5-1.1.6, the City shall
encourage the provision of contiguous conservation easements and preservation areas to maintain
wildlife corridors and minimize the fragmentation of habitat.
Policy 5-1.1.6: Open Space Corridor System. Through the LDC and land development review
process, the City shall continue to identify opportunities to:
a. Provide an interconnected open space corridor system that links existing open spaces,
greenways, public right of ways, and trails including new open space corridors
b. Provide connections from adjacent development to existing or planned open space corridors
c. Connect parks and civic resources (i.e., Community Center)
d. Provide low -impact natural activities such as walking trails, benches, picnic areas, and
canoe/kayak launches
e. Connect the City and County's open space corridors
f. Require that open space corridors minimize the fragmentation of significant wildlife habitat.
Corridor widths shall be defined based on the natural range of targeted habitat/species; however,
are generally considered to be a minimum of 25 feet in width
Policy 5-1.1.7: Open Space Crossings. The City shall consider road construction, reconstruction or
other similar improvements encroaching or crossing an open space corridor, encourage crossing design
features, and consider alternative roadway design standards. Crossings shall be designed in accordance
with the recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Policy 5-1.1.8: Native Habitats Inventory and Assessment. The City will update its inventory and
assess significant native habitat remaining within the City limits eve 5 [five] vears. The City will also
require development and redevelopment to determine the existence of any significant native habitats and
such information will be added to the inventory.
Policy 5-1.1.9: Restoration Efforts. The City shall encourage the restoration of degraded sensitive
habitat in order to reestablish natural diversity and encourage connectivity of vital habitats.
Policy 5-1.1.10: Open Space. The City's LDC shall include an open space requirement which:
a. As density of development increases, the percentage of open space shall increase as well; and
b. Open space shall be limited to a certain percentage of the stormwater retention area to ensure
that native habitat is being conserved.
Policy 5-1.1.11: Protection of Vegetative Communities. The City's LDC, including the adopted Tree
Protection and Landscaping Regulations, shall be used in managing and protecting the impacts of
development on major vegetative communities. These regulations shall mandate restoration in order to
compensate for unauthorized removal of vegetation and to enhance stabilization of fragile slopes and/or
shorelines impacted by development.
of -192 5
Policy 5-1.1.12, Protection of Native Habitats. The City shall limit the disturbance of and protect
significant native habitats through its LDC and review process including the following:
a. Preserve existing native vegetation and natural areas including threatened native habitats;
b. Encourage development forms that provide protection of significant native habitats such as
clustered development and alternative roadway designs (i.e., reduced rights -of -way);
c. Development shall first avoid impact to significant native habitats;
d. Mitigate adverse impacts whenever areas of native habitats are involved in the development of
property;
e. Require development to first impact lower quality habitats and resources before impacts to higher
quality habitats and resources are considered and used;
f. Native habitat shall be used whenever possible to fulfill open space requirements; and
g. Protect environmentally sensitive/significant areas (i.e., floodplain, watersheds, water recharge
areas, etc.).
Policy 5-1.1.13: Preservation of Native Vegetative Communities. The City's LDC shall include an
open space requirement and mandate that new development set aside a minimum 25% of each native
vegetative community including trees as identified in Policy 5-1.1.11. The ordinance shall provide
incentives for increased conservation of native vegetative communities determined to be regionally rare
or endangered. The City may require payment of a fee in lieu of or participation in a tree bank (as may
be adopted by the City) for the described mandatory "set aside" of habitat. Such cash payment may be
in the form of an impact fee in lieu of habitat preservation to be accumulated from development for the
purchase of upland habit preservation off -site rather than on -site. Other adjustments may only be granted
where compensatory mitigation is provided through revegetation with native vegetative species
compatible with existing vegetative communities.
Policy 5-1.1.14: Florida Friendly Landscaping. The City shall encourage the use of Florida Friendly
landscaping which uses low -maintenance plants and environmentally sustainable practices.
Policy 5-1.1.15: Removal of Undesirable Exotic Vegetation. The LDC shall require that, prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a new development; the owner/applicant shall remove all
nuisance and invasive exotic vegetation as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC) on
the subject property.
Policy 5-1.1.16: Invasive Exotic Vegetation and Wildlife. The City should help prevent the spread of
non-native invasive exotic vegetation and wildlife and protect the health and well-being of the native
environment through:
a. Removal of existing invasive exotic species in coordination with City initiated work projects and
replacement with native Florida plant species;
b. Prohibition of the use of invasive exotic species;
c. Public awareness about the harmful impacts of non-native species into the environment; and
d. Regional, state, and federal partnerships on efforts to eradicate invasive exotic species
1 o 192 6
Policy 5-1.1.17: Tree Protection, The City shall continue to maintain the Tree Protection and
Landscaping Ordinance within the LDC to address, at a minimum, tree protection and removal standards,
historic trees, mangroves, undesirable exotic vegetation, suitable trees for planting, and
residential/commercial development tree requirements.
Policy 5-1.1.18: Urban Tree Canopy. The City shall focus on preserving and promoting its urban tree
canopy and consider the addition and enhancement of trees and landscaping within specific public rights -
of -way and other public areas. The City shall maintain their Tree City USA designation through the Arbor
Day Foundation.
Objective 5-1.2: Protection of Surface Waters and Wetlands. Implement
policies that limit adverse impacts or alterations to surface waters and wetlands to the greatest extent
possible.
Policy 5-1.2.1: Protect the City's Natural Lakes and Rivers. The City's LDC shall include performance
criteria designed to regulate against land development activities which adversely impact water quality,
contribute to shoreline erosion and sedimentation, or otherwise threaten the long-term existence of the
City's surface waters.
Policy 5-1.2.2: Required Dedication of Conservation Easements or Reservations. The City shall
maintain regulations that provide for the dedication of conservation easements or reservations where the
City finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect the value and function of a wetland or other
surface water.
Policy 5-1.2.3: Wetland Protection. Wetlands shall be defined as set by 373.421 F.S. and 373.019(27)
F.S. According to Florida Statutes, wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface
water or groundwater at a frequency and a duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances
do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils. Soils present in
wetlands generally are classified as hydric or alluvial, or possess characteristics that are associated with
reducing soil conditions. The prevalent vegetation in wetlands generally consists of facultative or obligate
hydrophytic macrophytes that are typically adapted to areas having soil conditions described above.
These species, due to morphological, physiological, or reproductive adaptations, have the ability to grow,
reproduce, or persist in aquatic environments or anaerobic soil conditions. Florida wetlands generally
include swamps, marshes, bayheads, bogs, cypress domes and strands, sloughs, wet prairies, riverine
swamps and marshes, hydric seepage slopes, tidal marshes, mangrove swamps and other similar areas.
Florida wetlands generally do not include longleaf or slash pine flatwoods with an understory dominated
by saw palmetto. Wetlands have the following functions:
• Wetlands serve important natural biological functions, including food chain production; and
general habitat; and nesting, spawning, rearing, and resting sites for aquatic or land species;
• Wetlands are an integral part of natural drainage systems impacting sedimentation patterns,
salinity distribution, flushing characteristics, current patterns, and other environmental
characteristics;
• Wetlands can be significant in shielding other areas from wave action, erosion, or storm damage;
• Wetlands serve as valuable storage areas for storm water and flood waters;
• Wetlands can be prime natural recharge areas; and
• Wetlands provide natural water filtration processes which serve to purify water.
1�t�f^ 9'f 2
Wetlands shall be protected from physical or hydrologic alterations in order to maintain natural functions.
The City shall maintain LDC performance standards designed to protect, conserve, and enhance wetlands
by directing incompatible land uses away from wetlands. The LDC shall also prohibit any development
within the wetland shoreline or adjacent buffer area, with the exception of water dependent native
shoreline vegetation programs, approved pervious or elevated accessways, or other uses approved by
the City pursuant to other City regulations.
Policy 5-1.2.4: Establishing the Wetland Line. No non -water dependent uses shall be permitted on
submerged lands or wetlands. The LDC shall include a requirement that any development conduct a
delineation of the landward extent of wetlands and other surface waters. The landward extent of wetlands
and other surface waters shall be field delineated and flagged by a professional biologist provided by the
applicant and formally approved by the SJRWMD, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP), and/or the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Policy 5-1.2.5: Wetland Transition Area. Development on uplands adjacent to wetlands shall preserve
a wetland transition area which will act as a buffer between wetlands and upland development or other
land alteration activities. The LDC shall require this buffer to be in accordance to the minimum standards
set by SJRWMD. The specific boundary of a wetland transition area shall be established by field
investigation and must be indicated on site plans for development. The purpose of the transition area is
to ensure the continuing function of respective wetland communities.
Policy 5-1.2.6: Administration of Wetland Development Restrictions. The City shall coordinate with
state and federal regulatory agencies in regard to the development rights to be permitted on wetlands
and/or lands under the jurisdiction of the state or federal government. The developer of the parcel of
environmentally sensitive land shall be responsible for obtaining permits or exemptions from
SJRWMD, FDEP, and the USACE, as may be appropriate, prior to obtaining a development order or
development plan review approval from the City. Regardless of permitting by Federal or State
permitting agencies, the City shall reserve the right to determine the appropriate land use,
density/intensity, and special mitigation measures including, but not limited to, the construction of
culverts or other means.
Policy 5-1.2.7: Development Requirements. The City's LDC shall include standards that require that
the applicant shall bear the burden of proof in determining that development shall not adversely impact
wetlands, transitional wetlands, and other environmentally fragile natural systems. The applicant shall
prove that the type, value, function, size, and condition of the wetland will not be adversely impacted,
such determinations shall be based on physical and biological data obtained from specific site
investigations by a biologist, an engineer or by another professional competent in producing data and
analysis necessary to support impact assessments. Applicants shall have an opportunity to demonstrate
that any wetland designations within the confines of their property no longer function as wetlands.
Objective 5-1.3: Protection of Marine Resources. Protect and appropriately manage
the City's marine resources and living marine organisms.
Policy 5-1.3.1: Protect Living Marine Resources, Coastal Marsh, Estuarine Water Quality, and
Seagrass Beds. The City shall maintain the LDC to include performance criteria which shall regulate
against adverse impacts of development on estuarine areas such as living marine organisms, seagrass,
coastal marsh, and mangroves. The LDC shall require that plans for development impacting marine
resources be coordinated with state agencies having jurisdiction. The applicant shall bear the burden of
192
demonstrating that potential adverse impacts on estuarine resources have been or shall be prevented.
The review process for all proposed development that fronts on Indian River Drive shall involve all local,
state, and regional entities with regulatory authority. Impacts to be considered shall include the following
but not be restricted to:
a. Prevent estuarine pollution;
b. Control surface water run off;
c. Reduce exposure to natural hazards;
d. Protect seagrasses and other living marine resources;
e. Ensure adequate public access; and
f. Ensure adequate sites and standards for regulating water -dependent and water -related uses; and
g. Ensure -protection of fisheries and living. marine organisms.
Policy 5-1.3.2: Manage Impact of Coastal Development on Tidal Flushing and Circulation
Patterns. The City's LDC shall include standards that require that tidal flushing and circulation
patterns shall not be altered by development activities. No development shall produce changes in the
tidal flushing and circulation patterns unless the City and other public agencies having jurisdiction have
granted requisite permits. No such permit shall be granted by the City unless all other agencies having
jurisdiction have granted clearance and the applicant has submitted hydrographic information sufficient
to clearly demonstrate that no adverse environmental impacts shall be occasioned by the proposed
changes in tidal flushing and circulation patterns. No alteration in tidal flow shall be permitted which
causes stagnation or siltation.
Policy 5-1.3.3: Protection of Manatee Habitat. The City shall promote protection of manatees and
manatee habitat in a manner consistent with applicable state guidelines and Indian River County's
Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan (August 2004).
Policy 5-1.3.4: Conservation Easements. The City shall work with private property owners to
implement conservation easements to protect sensitive natural resources such as mangroves, dune
systems, and coastal tidal areas.
Objective 5-1.4: Improve Water Quality and Quantity. Maintain policies and
regulations to protect and improve the City's water quality and quantity.
Policy 5-1.4.1: Water Quality. Water run-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regulated through
effective water quality management criteria. In order to protect the water quality of the Aquatic Preserve,
no new point source pollution shall be permitted to discharge into the lagoon or into ditches or canals
flowing into the lagoon. In addition, in order to reduce non -point source pollutants, the LDC shall comply
with FDEP, SJRW`MD, and the Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.
Policy 5-1.4.2: Requirements. In order to protect water quality the City's LDC shall require the following
for new development or redevelopment:
a. The use of Low Impact Development (LID) strategies and best management practices shall be
encouraged including as part of the stormwater fee credit program;
b. Erosion control consistent with Objective 5-1.7 and its related policy;
M
c. Surface water management systems shall be designed and constructed to retain or detain with
filtration, as a minimum the storm water run-off generated from the first one -inch of rainfall over
the entire site;
d. Landscaped buffer areas shall be required in accordance with the minimum buffer requirements
established by SJRWMD;
e. A vegetated and functional littoral zone shall be established as part of the surface water
management system of lakes occurring on all property. Littoral zone plantings shall be
encouraged in commercial and residential subdivision stormwater ponds including as part of the
stormwater fee credit program. Prior to construction of the surface water management system for
any phase of a project, the developer shall prepare a design and management plan for the
wetland/littoral zone that will be developed as part of these systems;
f. Require sewage pump -out facilities at all marinas and for facilities which sell petroleum products
require adequate fuel spill containment facilities measures; and
g. No new Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) may have septic.
Policy 5-1.4.3: Class II Waters. Class II Waters (i.e., coastal waterbodies which currently do or have
potential for supporting shellfish harvesting) shall be protected by incorporating and maintaining the
following provisions in the City's LDC:
a. Dredging activities shall be limited to approved maintenance dredging and shall minimize adverse
impacts on shellfish propagation or harvesting. The City shall require that fill and dredging
activities comply with all applicable local, state, and federal permitting requirements;
b. Ensure good water quality by coordinating with the FDEP and the SJRWMD in monitoring the
quality of storm water run-off. The City's LDC shall provide performance criteria designed to
ensure that new development provides effective and adequate storm -water management
improvements concurrent with the impacts of new development;
c. Continue to asses needs for retrofitting stormwater outfalls without adequate treatment;
d. Limit the use of Class II waters to water dependent activities that are not contrary to the public
interest and satisfy a community need; and
e. Limit modification of grass beds only to those cases involving overriding public interest.
Policy 5-1.4.4: Regulate Agricultural Activities to Preserve Water Quality. The City's LDC shall
include stipulations requiring that agricultural activities shall:
a. Not be conducted adjacent to existing waterways and surface water management activities and
shall comply with all applicable policies of FDEP, SJRWMD, and other agencies having appropriate
jurisdiction as well as State laws, including administrative rules governing the Indian River Lagoon
Aquatic Preserve. Such activities shall not threaten the water quality of the City's rivers and
waterbodies;
b. Maintain natural drainage patterns;
c. Promote the use of surface water supplies for irrigation purposes;
d. Prohibit the expansion of agricultural activities into wetland areas; and
e. Use best management principles and practices in order to reduce pesticide and fertilizer run-off,
prevent soil erosion, and preserve water quality.
Policy 5-1.4.5: Protect Deep Aquifer Water Resources. In order to protect the quality and quantity of
deep aquifer water resources, the City shall coordinate with SJRWMD and other applicable regulatory
agencies in identifying the existence and location of free flowing deep aquifer wells and in requiring
10
1 4 of 192
corrective measures, including capping, plugging, or installing regulatory devices which control the
discharge of water from the deep aquifer pursuant to the SJRWMD policies.
Policy 5-1.4.6: Surficial Aquifer Recharge Area Protection. The City shall protect surficial aquifer
recharge areas from impacts that would significantly alter their ability to function. The City's LDC shall
include standards that restrict development within surficial aquifer recharge areas and that require
retention of open space for all development in order to:
a. Preserve the quality and quantity of water resources within the surficial aquifer;
b. Promote improved surface water management; and
c. Create natural or landscaped urban green space for enhanced community aesthetics and passive
pedestrian activities.
Policy 5-1.4.7: Protection and Conservation of Potable Water Supply. The City shall continue to
require the LDC to incorporate performance criteria for public potable water wellfield protection. In
addition, administrative procedures shall require applicants for development to coordinate with the
SJRWMD in obtaining consumptive use permits. In order to comply with potable water conservation
policies of the SJRWMD and achieve a reduction in the current rates of water consumption, the City's
LDC shall incorporate the following performance standards:
a. Where reclaimed water is available, potable water supplies may not be used to meet irrigation
needs;
b. Encourage the use of water -saving plumbing fixtures on all new development; and
c. In order to reduce demand for irrigation water (which in turn often places greater demand upon
potable water sources), at least 30% of all landscaping material obtained from off -site sources for
use on any site should be native plants. Further, at least50% of trees used in landscaping shall be
native species in order to lessen water demand.
Policy 5-1.4.8: Emergency Conservation of Water Sources. The City shall coordinate with the
SJRWMD in implementing emergency water conservation measures based on the SJRWMD plans for
management of the region's water resources.
Policy 5-1.4.9: Managing Land Use Surrounding Water Well Cones of Influence. The City's LDC
shall contain performance criteria designed to protect potable water supply and quality by restricting land
development within public water well cones of influence in order to avoid potential adverse impacts on
potable water resources.
Policy 5-1.4.10: Resiliency. The City is susceptible to impacts of future sea level rise and combined rain
events that would cause flooding based on data outlined in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. Best
management practices to address flooding level of service violations and water quality shall be devised
and, given the hydrology of the area, it is encouraged that there be the development of a pollutant load
model. It is also encouraged that there be the hardening of pump -stations in order to increase resiliency
against flooding events.
Policy 5-1.4.11: Stormwater Management. Consistent with Policy 4-1.4.2 of the Infrastructure
Element, the City shall pursue the development of an update to the 2013 Stormwater Management
Master Plan. The plan shall provide a basis for adopting regulatory measures for enhancing water quality
and shall identify capital improvements needed to improve the storm water management system.
11
Policy 5-1.4.12: Illicit Discharge. Consistent with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) generic permit requirements for
regulated municipal separate stormwater systems (MS4), the City shall implement a stormwater
management program to reduce the contamination of stormwater runoff and prohibit and eliminate illicit
discharges to the MS4. The City's regulations related to illicit discharge detection and elimination will be
informed by the Best Management Practices as established by FDEP. The City shall also continue to
follow the regulatory requirements for the NPDES MS4 permit, as set forth in Chapter 62-624, F.A.C.
Policy 5-1.4.13: Septic to Sewer Conversion. Consistent with Policy 4-1.2.3 of the Infrastructure
Element, the conversion of septic tanks to centralized sewer services is critical, considering the location
of existing septic tanks within environmentally sensitive areas and areas vulnerable to the impacts of
flooding and sea level rise. The City shall continue to support the implementation of the Sebastian CRA
Septic to Sewer Conversion Program and Indian River County initiatives to expand sanitary sewer service
within the City such as the North Sebastian Septic to Sewer Phase I Conversion Project.
Policy 5-1.4.14: Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). The City shall continue to support the Basin
Management Action Plan (BMAP) for the Central Indian River Lagoon in meeting the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (FDEP) adopted nutrient total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for the main
stem of the Indian River Lagoon Basin.
Objective 5-1.5: Protect Air Quality. Protect and improve air quality by ensuring development
meets or maintains exceeds state and federal air quality standards and establishing regulatory programs to
prevent and/or minimize non -point and ambient sources of air pollution.
Policy 5-1.5.1: Combat Erosion and Generation of Dust Particles. The City's LDC shall incorporate
performance standards which combat erosion and generation of fugitive dust particles. The regulations
shall require that measures be taken on building sites or cleared areas which assure that exposed,
destabilized, or other altered soil is expeditiously covered with an acceptable erosion control material.
Policy 5-1.5.2: Air Pollution and Land Use Regulations. The City's LDC, including adopted soil erosion
and sedimentation controls as well as nuisance abatement standards, shall continue to protect against
loss of air quality by maintaining land use controls which promote only activities compatible with existing
land uses and natural systems and prohibit activities which generate air pollutants and other adverse
impacts on the environmentally fragile coastal ecosystem. The City shall also promote the function of
trees in improving air quality through the Tree Protection and Landscaping Ordinance, consistent with
Objective 5-1.9.
Policy 5-1.5.3: Land Use and Transportation. Consistent with the Land Use Element and
Transportation & Mobility Element, the City shall promote the reduction of vehicle emission by
supporting land uses that promote walking, biking, transit, and alternative modes of transportation, and
encourage urban infill development that limits the need for automobile use, increases trip capture, and
reduces traffic congestion in a cost-effective manner.
Objective 5-1.6: Protection of Shoreline and Public Access to Shoreline.
Protect and preserve the City's shorelines and public access to water based facilities and natural resources.
Promote post -development shoreline stabilization methods that mimic a natural shoreline and support native
habitat.
1Q6o192 t2
Policy 5-1.6.1: Public Access to Waterfront Areas. The City shall encourage developers to provide
public waterfront access adjacent to the waterfront. Such access may include walkways, bikeways, water
taxis, canoeing/kayaking, public spaces, dining areas, and the like.
Policy 5-1.6.2: Florida Native Vegetation and Features. The City shall require the use of native Florida
vegetation and protection of natural features in coastal and waterfront development.
Policy 5-1.6.3: Public Access to Indian River Lagoon. The City's LDC shall require shoreline access
to the Indian River Lagoon to be promoted in order to maintain accessways along the shoreline. State
assistance shall be enlisted to achieve land required to appropriately store vehicles, provide rest room
facilities, and accessways designed in a manner compatible with the shoreline ecosystem.
Policy 5-1.6.4: Waterfront Planning. The City's LDC shall include criteria for regulating water -
dependent and water -related shoreline land uses. No structures which constrict water circulation in all
flowing surface waters shall be permitted.
Policy 5-1.6.5: Shorelines and Submerged Lands Planning. The City's LDC shall require all
applicants proposing development activities along the City's shorelines or within submerged areas to
submit a site plan which demonstrate how the development shall incorporate features designed to protect
against potential adverse impacts to shoreline vegetation and stabilization, water quality, native habitat,
and shoreline access. The City shall require surveys of existing conditions, specifications of planned site
improvements, and the techniques to be used in constructing, operating, and maintaining the land use.
No shoreline development permit or development order shall be approved until the applicant has
demonstrated that potentially adverse impacts shall be prevented or that compensatory mitigation shall
occur.
Policy 5-1.6.6: Prioritizing Shoreline Uses and Public Shoreline Access. The City's LDC shall
include the following criteria for prioritizing shoreline uses and public shoreline access:
a. In reviewing applications for shoreline development First Priority shall be directed to non-
structural shoreline protection uses (ex: native shoreline revegetation programs) and approved
water -dependent shoreline uses (ex: pervious accessways, duly permitted dock facilities, and
commercial marinas). Priority shall be directed to water dependent uses which are available for
public use.
b. In reviewing applications for shoreline development Second Priority shall be directed to water -
related uses such as parking facilities for shoreline access, residential structures which comply
with the building code for structures within the State coastal building zone, and recreational
facilities which comply with applicable codes.
Policy 5-1.6.7: Water Dependent Shoreline Uses. The City shall require that water dependent
shoreline uses obtain requisite permits from all environmental permitting agencies prior to obtaining City
approval. Docks or marina improvements shall not be approved by the City until the applicant
demonstrates compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and administrative rules governing
Aquatic Preserves as well as applicable policies of regional agencies. The City's LDC shall require site
plans for all docks and marinas and no commercial marina facilities shall be permitted on the St. Sebastian
River. Site plans must demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that the facilities shall not adversely impact
natural marine resources.
of 192 ' �
Policy 5-1.6.8: Water Related Shoreline Uses. The City's LDC shall require that all water -related uses
be built on uplands landward of the floodway. Within the state coastal building zone all construction
activities shall be predicated on plans compliant with applicable state and local building codes. Dredging
and filling of wetlands or open water in order to accommodate water -related uses shall not be permitted
unless the City approves such activity pursuant to provisions of the wetland protection ordinance, the
storm water management ordinance, and all other relevant site plan review criteria.
Policy 5-1.6.9: Hardening of the Shoreline. Hardening of the shoreline with rip -rap, bulkheads or other
similar devices shall not be allowed unless erosion constitutes a critical peril to upland property and the
use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline. The City's LDC shall include design specifications
of any shoreline hardening structure. Such shoreline hardening structures shall generally not be vertical
seawalls or bulkheads. The specific location and design of such structures shall be approved by the City
as well as by other public entities having jurisdiction in the matter. The LDC shall require an environmental
impact study and a special City Council variance for any sea wall construction. The City shall require the
compliance with state and federal permitting requirements in the removal and/or modification of protected
shoreline vegetation.
Policy 5-1.6.10: Protect, Stabilize, and Enhance the Shoreline. The City shall promote natural
shoreline systems by utilizing the site and development process to promote the installation of native
vegetation and living shorelines and the removal of existing hardening structures. The City's LDC shall
stipulate that no native vegetation shall be removed from the shoreline without a duly authorized City land
clearing permit. Similarly, criteria shall be included in the LDC which requires an applicant for
development along the shoreline to be required to revegetate, stabilize, and enhance damaged shorelines
by planting native vegetation.
Objective 5-1.7: Minimize Soil Erosion. Reduce the incidence of soil erosion caused by land
clearing, breaches in stabilized shorelines, and lands having exposed soil without vegetative cover.
Implementing Erosion Control. The City's LDC shall require that appropriate measures
be taken during land clearing and building operations to ensure that exposed, destabilized or otherwise
altered soil is expeditiously covered with an acceptable erosion control material. The City's LDC shall
require compliance with regulatory requirements and the City's NPDES MS4 permit, including
consistency with Policy 5-1.4.2. The City's regulations related to soil erosion will be informed by the Best
Management Practices as established by SJRWMD, FDEP, FDOT, Florida Cooperative Extension Service,
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences,
and Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Objective 5-1.8: Mining and Mineral Excavation Activities. Prevent the adverse
effects of the extraction of mineral resources within the City.
Policy 5-1.8.1: Prohibition Against Mining Activities. The LDC shall prohibit mining activities, except
for existing sand mining operations, to protect the City's ecosystems.
Objective 5-1.9: Green Infrastructure and Sustainability. Consider sustainability
and environmental -consciousness in the City's operations and promote the utilization of green infrastructure.
Policy 5-1.9.1: Sustainability. The City shall support the Sustainable Sebastian Initiative and Resolution
in order to promote sustainability principles and encourage adaptation strategies.
Policy 5-1.9.2: Sustainability Action Plan. The City shall consider the development of a Sustainability
Action Plan to include long-term objectives and short-term actions to guide the City in areas including,
but not limited to, improving quality of life and community/individual health; energy
conservation/independence; air quality, water quality, and natural systems; and economic sustainability.
Policy 5-1.9.3: Green Jobs. Consistent with the Economic Development Element, the City shall
explore strategies to leverage the City's natural and economic assets to attract 'green jobs' and related
nature based industries.
Policy 5-1.9.4: Integrated Pest Management Plan. The City shall implement its 2020 Integrated Pest
Management Plan in order to promote the most sustainable pest management methods which aim to
minimize risks to human and environmental health through the limited use of chemicals, while also
remaining economically feasible.
Policy 5-1.9.5: Green Building Design. Consistent with Policy 1-2.3.4 of the Land Use Element the
City shall encourage energy conservation in building and construction. The City shall encourage green
building design (i.e. LEED) which promotes energy and resource efficiency, waste reduction, pollution
prevention, respects natural topography, and improves occupant health and productivity.
Policy 5-1.9.6: Green Infrastructure. Green infrastructure provides for wildlife habitat, stormwater
management, and recreational opportunities. The City shall plan for and manage its green infrastructure
including its parks, greenways, and protected conservation lands. The City shall also coordinate local
open space plans with regional green infrastructure plans in order to promote connectivity, investment,
and maximize the ecological and public benefits of green infrastructure.
Goal 5-20 Coastal Management and Resiliency. The coastal
community of Sebastian shall limit public expenditures in areas subject to destruction by flood risk and natural
disasters.
Objective 5-2.1: Coastal High -Hazard Area. The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is an
area particularly vulnerable to the effects of coastal flooding from tropical storm events and is defined by section
163.3178(2)(h)9, Florida Statutes, as the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as
established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model
(See Map 5-7). The City shall enforce development restrictions within the CHHA and any area found to have
historically experienced destruction or severe damage from storm driven, wind, water, or erosion. The City has
identified the high velocity storm surge area as indicated on the Federal flood insurance rate maps as the only
such area.
5-2.1.1: Coastal High Hazard Area Application: The following shall apply for purposes of evaluating
applications for development within the City, specifically comprehensive plan land use amendments, map
and text, and rezoning:
a. If 50 percent or more of a parcel of land is located within the Coastal High Hazard Area, then the
entire parcel shall be considered within the Coastal High Hazard Area
;�491'15
b. Isolated areas that are defined by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model to be at higher
elevations, and are surrounded by the CHHA or by the CHHA and a body of water, shall be
considered within the CHHA
c. For purposes of evaluating development proposals or site plans, if any portion of the proposed
building footprint is in the CHHA, then the entire parcel shall be considered within the CHHA
Policy 5-2.1.2: Limiting Public Subsidy of Development in the Coastal High -Hazard Area. The City
shall limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in the CHHA to restoration or
enhancement of natural resources and public services for water dependent uses. The only exception to
this regulation shall be that existing mobile homes within the CHHA shall be grandfathered in, thereby
may be repaired and/or replaced as long as the density does not increase. The City shall aim to minimize
the impact of natural hazards such as flooding and sea level rise to the community by directing
development away from the CHHA as defined by State Statute §163.3178(2)(f), F.S. This policy shall not
be interpreted as prohibiting the extension of sewer lines to replace failed septic tank systems identified
in Policy 5.2.1.3 and Policy 5-2.1.4 below.
Policy 5-2.1.3: CHHA Infrastructure. Consistent with Policy 4-1.2.3 of the Infrastructure Element,
the City shall support septic to sewer efforts in order to preserve environmental integrity and protect the
health of residents. Enhanced septic systems which include additional treatments may be allowed in the
CHHA for areas not serviced by wastewater facilities.
Policy 5-2.1.4 Infrastructure Extensions: The City shall encourage the extension of wastewater
facilities to replace failing septic tank systems in areas subject to flooding as a means to protect ground
water quality.
Policy 5-2.1.5: Existing Infrastructure in the CHHA. The City shall establish a priority list of
infrastructure facilities located in the CHHA which could be relocated, mitigated or replaced should state
funding become available for such activities. Additional infrastructure and assets are inventoried in the
City's Coastal Resiliency Plan.
Policy 5-2.1.6: Public Investments in CHHA. Except as provided in Policies above, publicly funded
facilities shall not be built in the CHHA, unless the facility is for public access, resource restoration,
adequate evacuation, or service to water dependent activities. These facilities may face inundation and
be impacted if they are outdoor facilities according to the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. The City is
encouraged to consider a funding source for purchasing CHHA properties and creating low impact/ low
risk re -use of the property.
Policy 5-2.1.7: Hazard Mitigation and CHHA. The City shall maintain LDC's which contain performance
standards regulating development activities in a manner which minimizes the danger to life and property
occasioned by natural hazard events including:
a. Non-residential construction within the CHHA shall meet storm and floodproofing standards
exceeding those required for a one hundred (100) year storm; and
b. If a structure located within the CHHA receive storm damage in excess of fifty (50) percent of its
physical size, all such damaged structures shall be required to meet all current laws and ordinances,
including those enacted since construction of the subject structure.
192
Policy 5-2.1.8: Avoid Population Concentrations in CHHA. The City shall restrict development and
not increase or support densities or intensities beyond those depicted on the Future Land Use Map in the
CHHA in order to minimize danger to life and property caused by hurricane events, flooding, or sea level
rise. The City shall direct population concentrations away from CHHA.
Policy 5-2.1.9: Restrict Development in CHHA. The City shall incorporate policies in the LDC in order
to direct population concentrations away from known or predicted areas in the CHHA. Also, the City shall
direct population concentrations away from known areas that are vulnerable to flooding inundation and
sea level rise as established in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. Development principles and strategies
that eliminate unsafe development in the CHHA must be used as defined by §163.3178(2)(0, F.S. The
following provisions shall restrict development within the CHHA:
a. Water and sewer treatment plants, industrial holding ponds and other potential point pollution
sources within the coastal high -hazard area are prohibited;
b. Require construction within the hurricane flood zone to meet storm and flood proofing standards
exceeding those required for a 100-year storm; and
c. Residential development and/or redevelopment in the CHHA shall not exceed existing residential
densities for that property.
Objective 5-2.2: Maintenance of Floodplain. Protect the natural functions, including flood -
carrying and flood storage capacity, of the 100-year floodplain.
Policy 5-2.2.1: Enforce Policies to Maintain Floodplain. The City shall continue to enforce its surface
water management and flood damage prevention regulations including the following:
a. New development encroaching into the floodplain shall incorporate flood protection measures
sufficient to protect against the 100-year flood. New development encroaching into areas subject
to sea level rise, storm surge, and flood inundation shall incorporate flood protection measures as
defined in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan.
b. The City's Storm Water Management and Flood Protection Ordinance shall maintain consistency
with program policies of the Federal Insurance Administration including the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS). The City shall monitor new cost-
effective programs for minimizing flood damage. Such programs may include compensatory
storage for loss of floodplain or modification to construction setback requirements, or other site
design techniques, as well as upgraded building and construction techniques.
c. The City shall encourage the use of best management practices for development strategies that
result in reducing flood risk and the removal of coastal real property from flood zone designations
established by the Federal Emergency Agency as required by §163.3178(2)(0, F.S.
Policy 5-2.2.2: Purchase of Floodplain. The City shall identify and recommend to the State and FDEP
purchase of floodplains that would comply with program guidelines established under the Florida Forever
Program.
Objective 5-2.3. Emergency Management. Ensure City preparedness in the case of a
natural disaster or emergency.
Policy 5-2.3.1 Emergency Preparedness: Consistent with Objective 1-2.5 of the Land Use Element
and Policies 4-1.1.10 and 4-1.1.11 of the Infrastructure Element, the City shall include emergency
1�1 ?-of� 92 17
management criteria into the LDC to mitigate the impacts of natural disasters or emergency events,
including fires, pandemics/epidemics, terrorism and other disasters in order to protect public health and
safety.
Policy 5-2.3.2: Hurricane Evacuation. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County in attaining a
hurricane evacuation time of less than twelve (12) hours. There is the potential to put into place early
warning notifications for elderly residents who are potentially more vulnerable as recommended in the
City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. According to the Coastal Resiliency Plan, inundation caused by flooding
and sea level rise is predicted to impact evacuation routes on Sebastian Boulevard and this vulnerability
should be addressed to increase resilience.
Policy 5-2.3.3: Removal of Trees Causing Safety Hazard. The City's LDC shall require that trees,
such as Australian Pines, that are prone to wind damage and blockage of evacuation routes be removed
from areas deemed by the City to be critical corridors for evacuation purposes. In addition, the City shall
consider the feasibility of imitating a similar program to remove any trees on public property which impose
a critical threat to evacuation routes.
Policy 5-2.3.4: Hurricane Evacuation Logistical Support. In order to prevent unnecessary evacuees
crowding roads and shelters, the City shall coordinate with Indian River County in disseminating
information concerning the need of residents to evacuate at various hurricane threat levels, flood events,
and sea level rise events. The City shall coordinate with the County and the Indian River County
Emergency Management Director in assisting the implementation of the County's campaign to educate
the general citizenry regarding emergency preparedness plans, including specific citizen directives.
Policy 5-2.3.5: Future Coordination with the County in Emergency Preparedness. In order to
provide for safe and efficient evacuation of the residents of the City of Sebastian and other communities
in the event of a hurricane or other disaster,
a. The City shall enforce its Emergency Management Plan and continue to coordinate with Indian
River County in annual updates of the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
addressing future populations and responses (response times, evacuation times, shelter capacity,
etc).
b. The City's LDC shall mandate that new development maintain a density threshold which is
consistent with the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. This stipulation will
assure that future density thresholds may be accommodated without adversely impacting
hurricane evacuation time. The City shall also coordinate with the County in updating hurricane
evacuation shelter assignments as well as other policy formulation surrounding land use and
emergency preparedness.
Policy 5-2.3.6: Coordinate Update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City shall coordinate with the
County in updating the hazard mitigation component of the County's Comprehensive Emergency
Management Plan pursuant to the five (5) year interval schedule adopted by the County. Updates of the
Plan shall identify specific actions that may be implemented to reduce exposure to natural hazards,
include strategies for post -disaster recovery operations, and incorporate interagency hazard mitigation
reports as such reports are generated in the future. The City shall also maintain, update, and enforce the
City of Sebastian's Emergency Management Plan to ensure preparedness in the case of a natural
disaster.
Objective 5-2.4: Post -disaster Redevelopment. Coordinate with Indian River County in
providing immediate response to post -disaster situations.
Policy 5-2.4.1: Post-Emeraencv Hurricane Assessments. Consistent with the City of Sebastian's
Emergency Management Plan, the City Council shall appoint a Recovery Task Force (RTF) comprised of
the City Manager, the Building Official, and others as determined by the City Council. The RTF shall be
responsible for assessing the conditions following a hurricane or other similar disasters such as flooding
events and shall propose strategic actions necessary to establish order and re-establish communication
and basic service delivery systems necessary for health, safety, and welfare. Within ninety (90) days after
appointment of the Recovery Task Force, the Task Force shall meet to determine a management
framework for resolving issues confronted in times of a natural disaster. The management framework
shall be reviewed with the County Civil Defense Officer for compliance with the County's Comprehensive
Emergency Management Plan and shall be presented to the City Council for review and approval. The
management plan should provide a basis for executing the following activities during times of natural
disaster:
a. Establishing a temporary moratorium on building activity;
b. Reviewing and deciding upon emergency building permits;
c. Coordinating with State and Federal officials to prepare disaster assistance applications;
d. Analyzing and recommending to the City Council hazard mitigation options, including
reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities;
e. Developing a redevelopment plan including limitations on redevelopment in areas of repeated
damage; and
f. Recommending amendments to the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan and other appropriate
policies and procedures.
Policy 5-2.4.2: Repair and Clean-up. In planning post -disaster redevelopment activities, factors to be
considered in order to protect the public health and safety shall include:
a. Repairs to potable water, wastewater and power facilities;
b. Removal of debris;
c. Stabilization or removal of structures in a perilous condition; and
d. Minimal repairs to make structures habitable.
These considerations shall receive first priority in determining the appropriateness of emergency building
permits. Long term redevelopment activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task Force has
coordinated immediate repair and clean-up operations.
Policy 5-2.4.3: Redevelopment Activities. The LDC shall require the redevelopment of any structure
within the City that received storm -damage in excess of fifty (50%) percent of its appraised value to meet
all current laws and ordinances, including those enacted since construction of the subject structure. The
city shall require that new development and redevelopment in areas that are at high risk of flooding to
use best practices, strategies, and engineering solutions that may reduce risk and losses due to storms,
flooding and sea level rise as defined by §163.3178(2)(f), F.S.
Policy 5-2.4.4: Establish Public Facilities Review Committee. The City Council shall designate the
Recovery Taskforce as the City's designated Public Facilities Review Committee charged with the
responsibility for reviewing available alternatives for managing damaged public facilities following a
hurricane event. The Committee shall evaluate future options for such facilities, including, but not
limited to, abandonment repair in place, relocation, and reconstruction, with structural modifications.
The Committee shall consider these options based on the following considerations:
a. Cost to construct;
b. Impacts on the environment;
c. Cost to maintain;
d. Public sector;
e. Recurring damages;
f. Impacts on land use; and
g. Other relevant factors.
Objective 5-2.5o Establish an Adaptation Action Area Overlay District. To
minimize future risk, establish an Adaptation Action Area (AAA) Overlay District for areas that are vulnerable to
coastal flooding and the impacts of sea level rise, based on the data and modeling outlined within the City's
Coastal Resiliency Plan and compliant with §163.3178, F.S.
Policy 5-2.5.1: Adaptation Action Area (AAA). Within the LDC, the City of Sebastian shall establish
criteria for Low Impact Design and Flood Resistant Design for new development and redevelopment
within the AAA. Development within this overlay district must comply with coastal development best
practices including but not limited to construction engineering solutions and low impact development
techniques that utilize vegetation and natural features to minimize surface runoff and reduce flood risk.
Policy 5-2.5.2: Transfer of Development Rights Program. The City shall utilize the Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) program identified in Land Use Policy 1-1.5.1 to incentivize the preservation
of natural resources and habitats including those within vulnerable areas and also those identified within
but not limited to the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. The City shall designate parcels within the established
CHHA or proposed AAA Overlay District as sending zones for development rights, and less vulnerable
parcels outside of the established CHHA or proposed AAA as receiving sites for density and intensity
transferred through the TDR program. This allows development at higher densities in low risk areas and
encourages less intense development in the City's floodplains and natural areas.
Objective 5-2.6: Continuing Evaluation of the Conservation & Coastal
Management Element Effectiveness. Evaluate the effectiveness of the Conservation &
Coastal Management Element.
Policy 5-2.6.1: Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Coastal Management and
Conservation Policy. The City shall monitor and evaluate significant changes in the characteristics of
natural coastal resources and natural resources within the City. Policy implications of such changes shall
be examined, and corrective measures shall be pursued. Coastal management and conservation policies
shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues.
Policy 5-2.6.2: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling,
programming, budgeting and implementation of programmed coastal management activities and
conservation activities identified in this Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in carrying
out a systematic program for implementing coastal management and conservation goals, objectives, and
policies.
Z 20
Policy 5-2.6.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and
evaluating the Conservation & Coastal Management Element, the City shall maintain a process of
intergovernmental coordination as well as coordination, with private sector groups interested in coastal
management and conservation policy and programs. The effectiveness of this approach shall be
evaluated by the success of coordination mechanisms in resolving coastal management and conservation
problems and issues.
Policy 5-2.6.4: Achieve Effective Resolution of Coastal Management and Conservation Goals,
Objectives and Policies. The effectiveness of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element
shall be measured by the City's success in achieving coastal management and conservation goals,
objectives and policies. The Conservation & Coastal Management Element incorporates a systematic
planning process for identifying coastal management and conservation problems and issues and
implementing corrective actions.
Policy 5-2.6.5: Intergovernmental Coordination. Specific Objectives and Policies regarding
intergovernmental coordination and this Element are provided and identified in the Governance &
Implementation Element.
i5_ aff 92 21
DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
Introduction
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 163 of the 2019 Florida Statutes, the Conservation & Coastal
Management Element consists of a data inventory and analysis that influences the overarching goals, objectives,
and policies. This Element sets the foundation for the City to protect its natural environment and protect life and
property from natural disasters.
Waterb®dies
Utilizing data retrieved from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Map 5-1 illustrates the waterbodies located within
and surrounding the City of Sebastian. The inland areas of Sebastian which are submerged during all of the year,
with the exception of extreme dry periods, include streams, wetlands, lakes, ponds, canals, and waterways. Those
areas of Sebastian classified as inland open waterways include Collier Creek, Schumann Lake, three unnamed
lakes/ponds, Collier Waterway, and Elkcam Waterway. Wetlands are scattered throughout Sebastian, with
concentrations in the northeast and southeast portions of the City. The St. Sebastian River runs along the west
side of the City limits and has historically been preserved through setback restrictions.
The Indian River Lagoon rests along the eastern border of Sebastian and is one of the most biologically diverse
estuaries in North America. It has been designated as an Outstanding Florida Water and an Estuary of National
Significance. The estuary's mangrove wetlands and salt marshes provide a plethora of benefits for the community
such as filtering runoff, stabilizing sediments, maintaining water quality, and protecting shorelines from erosion.
The Indian River Lagoon is protected by State regulations from impacts of development on its shores, as well as
from fill and dredge activities within its waters.
Waterways within the City are protected and will receive only minimal effects from future development. Although
development will not encroach into the waterways, urban runoff from adjacent residential neighborhoods could
possibly degrade their water quality. However, increases in pollution levels associated with runoff should be
minimal, allowing the vegetation and wildlife now present therein to proliferate for years to come.
Wildlife and Habitats
The City of Sebastian's native vegetation and forests as well as wetlands, streams, lakes, ponds, canals, and
freshwater waterways including the St. Sebastian River provide vital habitat for wildlife within the City. The Pelican
Island National Wildlife Refuge is found along the eastern border of Sebastian. The Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge
was the nation's first national wildlife refuge and is designated as a National Historic Landmark and a Wetland of
International Importance. The Refuge provides a habitat for endangered species and migratory birds. The Indian
River Lagoon estuary also acts as a home for a large variety of plants and animals with concentrations of rare
and endangered organisms including mammals, birds, reptiles, fishes, and invertebrates. These species exist in
several communities, such as sea grass beds, deep water areas, tidal flats, saltmarsh grass, and oyster bars.
Throughout the Indian River Lagoon there are a number of commercially and recreationally valuable species of
fin and shellfish. Clams, oysters, crabs and shrimp are the major invertebrates that are commercially valuable in
the area. Sea trout, snook, pompano, mullet, and redfish are among the finfish that are harvested both
commercially and recreationally from the waters bordering the City of Sebastian.
1-� 22
192
Marine grasses are generally found in shallow water areas of estuaries. The Indian River Lagoon has a
significant amount of grass beds in the vicinity of Sebastian. These species tend to form in distinct zones,
with their location depending on water depth. These areas stabilize sediments, entrap silt, recycle nutrients,
provide habitat, and are an important direct food source for a number of animals, including the endangered
West Indian Manatee. Increased freshwater and storm water run-off as well as dredge and fillactivities can
cause increased turbidity, siltation, and subsequent degradation of these beds.
Due to shallow waters within the Sebastian area, the top of seagrass beds lie near the surface, making this habitat
susceptible to damage from motor boats, both pleasure and commercial craft. Any wildlife thriving in these
shallow waters also are susceptible to harm from motor boats. Manatees are susceptible to detrimental impacts
from both loss of seagrass beds as well as water crafts. Threats to manatees from water craft may be reduced in
areas along the Indian River where reduced speed limits are posted or where manatee habitats are identified
and posted as such.
The City of Sebastian should continue to maintain and support Resolution No. R-08-14 which adopts guidelines
for the City of Sebastian for the protection of protected animal and plant species in review of land clearing
activities. The related goals, objectives, and policies that ensure the protection of wildlife and habitats within this
Element are important including for the protection of the Gopher Tortious and Scrub Jay habitats within the City.
The Scrub Jay is a bird presently listed as a threatened species by both the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. General locations of their habitat and nesting
areas within Sebastian include the area just south of the airport and the Sebastian Highlands area. Identification
of their nesting areas has enabled the City, County, and State to preserve some areas from future detrimental
impacts of development. The City's 2019 report, Conservation of the Florida Scrub -Jay within the City's Municipal
Airport, includes a summary of more than 30 years of scrub -jay conservation efforts and regulatory requirements
from the Habitat Conservation Plan (1999), the Incidental Take Permit (2000), and other City documentation.
The City intends to continue to plan for and manage its green infrastructure including its parks, greenways, and
protected conservation lands. Green infrastructure provides for wildlife habitat, stormwater management, and
recreational opportunities.
Conservation of Resources
Lands that are conserved within and adjacent to the City are identified in Map 5-2. Approximately 901 acres
within the City of Sebastian are conservation lands. These areas include:
• Ansin Tract
• Archie Smith Fish House
• Fischer Tract
• North Sebastian CA
• NSCA addition
• Sebastian Harbor Preserve
• Sebastian Scrub CA
• St Sebastian River Greenway
• Jane Schnee Scrub Preserve
• Pelican Island Elementary Scrub Preserve
• Rotary Park
of 192 23
These conservation lands help protect natural resources, enhance environmental quality, conserve vital habitats,
and reduce fragmentation within the City.
Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlife species which have been listed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission as being endangered or threatened in the City of Sebastian are documented in Table
5-1. This list is not all inclusive. Some of the species which are included in the list are found infrequently within
the City but have ranges that do include Sebastian.
Table 5-1: Threatened and Endangered Wildlife Species
Everglade snail kite
Rostrhamus sociabilis
Federally Endangered
plumbeus
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
Federally Endangered
Wood stork
Mvcteria americana
Federally Threatened
Audubon's crested caracara
Polyborus plancus
audubonii
Federally Threatened
Piping Plover
Charadrius melodus
Federally Threatened
Florida scrub-iay
Aphelocoma coerulescens
Federally Threatened
Rufa ed knot
Calidris canutus rufa
Federally Threatened
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Least tern
Sternula antillarum
State Threatened
Black skimmer
Rynchops niger
State Threatened
Tricolored heron
Egretta tricolor
State Threatened
Little blue heron
Eoretta caerulea
State Threatened
Reddish egret
Egretta rufescens
State Threatened
American oyster catcher
Haemotopus palliates
State Threatened
Florida sandhill crane
Antigone canadensis
State Threatened
pratensis
West Indian manatee (Florida
manatee)
Florida panther
Southeastern beach mouse
Florida bonneted bat
Trichechus manatus
(Trichechus manatus
latirostris)
Puma concolor coryi
Peromyscus polionotus
niveiventris
Eumops floridanus
Federally Threatened
Federally Endangered
Federally Threatened
Federally Endangered
OEM
24
192
Bottlenose dol
American alligator
Hawksbill sea turtle
Leatherback sea turtle
Loggerhead sea turtle
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle
truncates
Alligator mississippiensis
Eretmochelys imbricata
Dermochelys coriacea
Caretta caretta
Lepidochelys kempii
Marine Mammal Protection Act
Federally Threatened (Due to
Similarity of Appearance)
Federally Endangered
Federally Endangered
Federally Threatened
Federally Endangered
Source: United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Land Use Cover
According to the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) 2013-2016 land use data set, primary
land uses and their acreages within the City's boundaries are shown in Table 5-2 below. Each of these land uses
and their corresponding detailed land use covers within Sebastian are broken out in this section. Map 5-3
delineates the generalized locations of these SJRWMD land uses within the City. Vegetative communities
included within these land uses shall be protected to the maximum extent practicable to reduce fragmentation
of wildlife corridors. Changes to the character of the community's vegetation and related -densities will likely
induce species sensitive to environmental changes to seek more attractive, undisturbed habitats in areas outside
Sebastian's corporate limits. However, no abnormal impacts on flora or fauna are expected to occur; only those
impacts normally associated with an area experiencing further urbanization are anticipated.
Table 5-2: SJRWMD Land Use Coverage
j Agriculture
238
2.5%
Barren Land
13
0.1 %
Rangeland
898
9.5%
Transportation, Communication, and
412
4.3%
Utilities
Upland Forests
467
5.0%
1 Urban and Built -Up
6,096
64.2%
Water
853
9.0%
Wetlands
514
5.4%
C Total
9,489
100%
Source: Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Agriculture: The Agriculture land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• improved Pastures
1 T9-ofr 9� 2 __
• Woodland Pastures
• Tree Nurseries
• Citrus Groves
• Herbaceous (Dry Prairie)
• Mixed Upland Nonforested
• Abandoned Tree Crops
Barren Land: The Barren Land land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Disturbed Lands
• Spoil Areas
Rangeland: The Rangeland land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Herbaceous (Dry Prairie)
• Shrub and Brushland
• Mixed Upland Nonforested
Transportation, Communication, and Utilities: The Transportation, Communication, and Utilities land use
covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Airports
• Roads and Highways
• Electric Power Facilities
• Auto Parking Facilities (When not directly related to other land use)
• Communications
• Electrical Power Transmission Lines
• Wet Prairies
• Water Supply Plants (Including pumping stations)
• Surface Water Collection Features
• Emergent Aquatic Vegetation
• Freshwater Marshes
• Surface Water Collection Features
Upland Forest: The Upland Forest land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Pine Flatwoods
• Sand Pine
• Longleaf Pine - Xeric Oak
• Upland Hardwood Forests
• Upland Mixed - Coniferous / Hardwood
Urban and Built Up: The Urban and Built Up land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Residential
• Commercial and Services
• Cemeteries
• Commercial and Services Under Construction
• Sand and Gravel Pits
26
192
• Holding Ponds
• Other Light Industrial
• Institutional
• Marina's and Fish Camps
• Parks and Zoos
• Golf Courses
• Community Recreational Facilities
• Herbaceous (Dry Prairie)
• Shrub and Brushland
• Mixed Upland Nonforested
Water: The Water land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Streams and Waterways
• Lakes
• Reservoirs
• Bays and Estuaries
Wetlands: The Wetlands land use covers within Sebastian include the following:
• Bay Swamps
• Mangrove Swamps
• Mixed Wetland Hardwoods
• Cabbage Palm Hammock
• Wetland Forested Mixed
• Freshwater Marshes
• Wet Prairies
• Mixed Scrub -shrub Wetland
• Emergent Aquatic Vegetation
Primary vegetative communities within the City that are listed above include, but are not limited to, wet prairies,
mixed scrub -shrub wetland, freshwater marshes, mixed wetland hardwoods, sand pine, upland hardwood forests,
pine flatwoods, mixed upland non -forested, shrub and brushland, and herbaceous upland non -forested. These
primary vegetative communities indigenous to Sebastian are described below based upon data and information
from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Wet prairies: Wet prairies are flatland or slope with sand or clayey sand substrate. They are usually saturated
but only occasionally inundated. They are statewide excluding the extreme southern peninsula. Wet prairies
experience frequent fire (2-3 years). They are a treeless, dense herbaceous community with few shrubs. Included
is wiregrass, blue maidencane, cutthroat grass, wiry beaksedges, flattened pipewort, toothache grass, pitcher
plants, and coastal plain yellow -eyed grass.
Mixed scrub -shrub wetland: Mixed scrub -shrub wetlands are wetland areas that are dominated by woody
vegetation less than 20 feet in height. This can occur in many situations, but in most cases involves transitional
or disturbed communities on drier sites. Persistent examples of shrub wetlands include shrub bogs and willow
swamps.
I'
ll 27
Mixed wetland hardwoods: Mixed wetland hardwoods are wetland hardwood communities which are
composed of a large variety of hardwood species tolerant of hydric conditions yet exhibit an ill-defined mixture
of species.
Freshwater marshes: Freshwater marshes are long hydroperiods that are dominated by grasses, sedges,
broadleaf emergents, floating aquatics, or shrubs.
Sand pine: Sand pin is found on ridges throughout the state. It experiences rare fire (20-80 years). It includes a
canopy of sand pine and an understory of the three shrubby oaks, or less commonly, and Florida rosemary.
Upland hardwood fo Upland hardwood forests are located upland with sand/clay and/or calcareous
substrate. Located from the Panhandle to the central peninsula. It experiences rare or no fire. Includes a closed
deciduous or mixed deciduous/evergreen canopy. Also includes American beech, southern magnolia, hackberry,
swamp chestnut oak, white oak, horse sugar, flowering dogwood, and mixed hardwoods.
Pine flatwoods: Pine flatwoods include mesic pine woodland or mesic shrubland on flat sandy or limestone
substrates, often with a hard pan that impedes drainage.
Mixed upland non -forested: Mixed upland non -forested areas include upland non -forested landscape in which
neither herbaceous nor shrubs cover over 2/3 of the area. It may include areas where tree species are
regenerating naturally after clear cutting or fire but are less than 20 feet tall. These include native hardwood and
coniferous species , but does not apply to plantations
Shrub and brushland: Shrub and brushland includes saw palmettos, gallberry, wax myrtle, coastal scrub and
other shrubs and brush. Generally, saw palmetto is the most prevalent plant cover intermixed with a wide variety
of other woody scrub plant species as well as various types of short herbs and grasses. Coastal scrub vegetation
would include pioneer herbs and shrubs composed of such typical plants as sea purslane, sea grapes and sea
oats without any one of these types being dominant.
Herbaceous upland non -forested: Herbaceous upland non -forested areas include upland nonagricultural,
non -forested lands which contain no evidence of cattle grazing. It includes areas that have over 67% herbaceous
cover, not counting any forested inclusions, which may be up to 25% of the area. It also includes prairie grasses
which occur on the upland margins of the wetland zone and may be periodically inundated by water. Generally,
it is the marginal area between marsh and upland forested areas. These grasslands are generally treeless but in
wet areas would have many types of soils resulting in a variety of vegetation types dominated by grasses, sedges,
rushes and other herbs while dryer grass areas would be dominated by wire grasses with some saw palmetto
present.
Air- luality
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection rates the quality of air in the City of Sebastian as good. The
absence of major industries in the area helps to support the air quality in the City. Pollution generated from
commercial and industrial developments within and adjacent to the City is not anticipated to adversely affect the
air quality of Sebastian. Fugitive dust particles from land cleared for development may be experienced by the
community, and developers should be requested to quickly replant development areas following clearing. The
majority of air pollution in the City of Sebastian continues to emanate from automobile emissions. As the
population in the area continues to increase so will traffic and emissions.
192
Water Quantity any Quality
This section analyzes the current and projected water needs and sources based on the demands for industrial,
agricultural, and potable water use and the quality and quantity of water available to meet these demands.
Water Demands
The City of Sebastian's potable water is provided by a system operated by the Indian River County Utilities
Department. The City is located within the North County Service Area and serviced by the North County Water
Treatment Plant. Potable water in the City of Sebastian is received from either private on -site wells or from the
County's water treatment plant. Currently, the plants operated by the Indian River County Utilities Department
use the Upper Floridan aquifer as their primary water source. The County uses reverse osmosis to treat water
drawn from the Floridian Aquifer. Located on the north side of 77th Street, west of 58th Avenue, the North County
Water Treatment Plant began operating in 1997. According to Indian River County, the current permitted design
capacity of the plant is 11.44 MGD. Currently, there is adequate treatment capacity for the planning period.
Additionally, the County is currently upgrading the Roseland Tank to a storage and repump station that will
improve pressure in the North Sebastian area.
According to the Land Use Element, zero percent of the City's acreage is designated for Agriculture. No change
in agricultural land uses is anticipated in the foreseeable future. According to the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub -Element, the existing and projected industrial demand for the North
County area is and will continue to be 2,500 gallons per day (GPD) per gross acre. The City's adopted Level of
Service Standard for potable water is 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Table 5-3 provides a
listing of the projected potable water demand based upon the population projections and the entire City being
connected to the County potable water system. In order to meet projected demand in 2040, the City will require
an estimated 3,978,000 gallons per day. To ensure the efficient and acceptable delivery of potable water
services to the City of Sebastian continued coordination with Indian River County Utilities is recommended.
Table 5-3: Projected Potable Water Demand
2020
25,957
11,616
250
2,004,000
2025
28,562
12,933
250
3,233,250
2030
30,806
14,100
250
3,525,000
2035
32,757
15,029
250
3,757,250
2040
34,567
15,912
250
3,978,000
Source: Population projections and household estimates from Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse
Water Conservation
The City of Sebastian participates in water conservation, use, and protection through programs and policies
supported by SJRWMD. Per Section 373.016, F.S., the SJRWMD, and all other water management districts are
required to "promote the conservation, replenishment, recapture, enhancement, development, and proper
utilization of surface and groundwater." To accomplish this directive, the SJRWMD considers conservation in the
29
development of policy and rules, public information programs, planning, and resource management and
evaluation.
Conservation measures are also witnessed through the use of a consumptive use permitting process, which
enables the SJRWMD to review certain proposed and existing developments for reasonable and beneficial use
of water.
The SJRWMD encourages the reuse of wastewater for irrigation purposes as a measure to conserve water.
Incentives to install and utilize wastewater reuse facilities are provided in the Water Management District's
permitting process for wastewater treatment facilities.
Included among the SJRWMD's conservation efforts is a program targeted at plugging unattended, free -flowing
artesian wells. This program attempts to identify abandoned wells, seal them, and restore them to their natural
hydrologic condition.
SJRWMD also promulgates information to the public concerning water conservation. Pamphlets, slide shows,
speeches, and addresses made through media sources are a variety of ways in which the District educates and
informs the public about water conservation.
Aquifer Recharge
There are no areas within the City that have been adopted by the St. John's River Water Management District as
prime groundwater recharge areas for the Floridan aquifer. The coastal ridge area has the best recharge
potential. However, most of this area has been developed as part of the "Old Town." Other portions have been
mined for sand. The Floridan aquifer is recharged in eastern Osceola County and very little down migration of
water is possible due to two factors:
• A confining layer of silt and clay and various other materials separates the surficial and deep (Floridan)
aquifer; and
• The potentiometric surface of the aquifer is approximately +30 feet NGVD (National Geodetic Vertical
Datum), this upward pressure will not permit recharge except under extremely high head conditions.
The top of the surficial aquifer within the City is generally located between five (5) and ten (10) feet below the
ground surface but may be much closer to the ground surface depending upon the amount of rainfall which is
present. The rainfall in the area recharges the surficial aquifer, and as such, the water table depth fluctuates with
the amount and intensity of the rainfall.
The surficial aquifer recharge areas within the City may not supply large quantities of water to the aquifer but
serve to prevent lateral saltwater intrusion into inland groundwater supplies.
The City's zoning regulations, flood damage prevention ordinance, and subdivision regulations accomplish an
adequate degree of protection for natural drainage and recharge areas. Sebastian's existing land use has
generally developed in a manner favorable to natural groundwater recharge and natural flood protection.
Water Quality
The degradation of water quality in Sebastian may be a concern with the potential for increased growth and
urbanization. With an increase in impervious surfaces the more concern there is for pollutants and runoff into
water bodies. A decrease in water quality can cause several issues for the City including harmful algal blooms.
Recognizing nitrogen leachate in i.jroundwater is a s�nificant contributor to water quality in surface water bodies.
of 192
Improvement of water quality should continue to be a cooperative effort between the City, the County, St. Johns
River Water Management District (SJRWMD), the National Estuary Program, Indian River County Mosquito
Control District, and the Natural Resource Conservation Service. SJRWMD has also worked with Florida
Department of Health, Indian River County Department of Environmental Health, the Marine Resources Council
of East Central Florida, and the National Estuary Program to monitor surface water quality.
Urban run-off is a major contributor of pollutants to the surface waters of the City and Indian River County.
Utilization of more advanced treatment techniques and storm water management will assist in decreasing the
detrimental effects of pollution on the natural systems of the City. Impacts of sea level rise and combined rain
events may affect water quality and a pollutant load model may need to be developed as recommended in the
City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. The City's Stormwater Management Plan shall identify approaches to address
existing and potential deficiencies in the City's existing stormwater management system to maintain water quality.
Indian River County operates all centralized potable water and sanitary sewer service in Sebastian. Therefore,
any of the existing wastewater treatment plants that were discharging into the Lagoon are now deactivated and
not polluting the waters. As more septic tanks are connected to central sewer, the opportunity for pollutants from
septic tanks to enter the Lagoon will be eliminated.
As stated in the Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) for the Central Indian River Lagoon (2013), the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has classified the estuary bordering the City of Sebastian as:
• Class II waters which have a designated use of shellfish propagation or harvesting; and
• Class III waters which means that it must be suitable for recreation and must support the propagation and
maintenance of a healthy, well-balanced population of fish and wildlife.
FDEP develops and adopts total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for the waterbody segments it identifies as
impaired. A TMDL is the maximum amount of a specific pollutant that a waterbody can assimilate while
maintaining its designated uses. As stated in the BMAP, FDEP adopted the nutrient TMDLs for the main stem of
the IRL Basin in March 2009. The TMDLs focus on the water quality conditions necessary for seagrass regrowth
at depth limits where seagrass historically grew in the basin, based on a multiyear composite of seagrass
coverage. The median depth limits of seagrass coverage in the IRL Basin decreased over the years due to
decreased water quality resulting from anthropogenic influences. As polluted runoff reached the lagoon, it
created conditions that prevented the seagrass from growing in deeper water.
As described in the BMAP, the Central Indian River Lagoon is currently meeting the TMDL seagrass depth limit
targets. The purpose of the BMAP is to document the completed projects that contributed to this success and to
identify future projects to continue seagrass improvement.
Sails
Soils indigenous to Sebastian are a natural resource that has been an -important factor in the development of the
City. In earlier times, when agriculture was a major occupation, soil properties were a crucial determinant of the
success of a farm or grove. Other development occurred, given the right location, on soils having the least
limitations and requiring the least amount of corrective measures. Under the economics of land development
today, the choice of land for a specified use is more often determined by factors such as location rather than the
kind of soil. However, knowledge of the types of soil present in Sebastian is still important in assessing the
limitations or reclamation that must be done to develop a site.
31
125 0T192
The Indian River County Soil Survey prepared by the Soil Conservation Service and revised in September 2019
gives details of the 30 different soil types that exist in Sebastian. The soil classifications are made based upon
the water table, slope, erosion potential, permeability, subsidence and organic (muck/peat) content. The soils are
also rated as to their potential for development based upon those limiting properties. Soil types covering the City
are illustrated in Map 5.4.
The physiographic features in the City of Sebastian consist of relatively flat lands with some gently rolling hills.
The City of Sebastian physiography is part of the mainland Atlantic Coastal Ridge. The ridge is a remnant of an
offshore bar that was formed in the Pamlico Sea (Soil Survey of Indian River County, Florida, January 1987). The
soils are predominantly "nearly level" to "gently sloping" very dry, and sandy. Slope does not exceed five (5%)
percent. Native vegetation consists of flatwoods with small depressions, including oak, slash pine, rosemary, saw
palmetto, scrub oak, and pineland threeawn. Following is a description of soil associations and their
characteristics.
1. Soils of the Sand Ridges, Astatula, Archbold, and St. Lucie. Nearly level to gently sloping, excessively
drained and moderately well drained soils that are sand to a depth of 80 inches or more. These soils are
situated along the main narrow spine of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, primarily along the FEC corridor. Very
few sites remain undeveloped along this corridor. The principal vegetation is long leaf and slash pine,
sand pine, saw palmetto, scrub oak, live oak, cabbage palm, and hickory. Pineland threeawn and
bluestems are the most common native grasses.
2. Soils of Faatwoods, L__ , ..._ .........,.....
a. Immokalle-Myakka-Satellite. Nearly level, poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained soils; some
are sand throughout and some have a dark sandy subsoil. Vegetation consists of South Florida slash
pines and scattered live oak. The understory includes saw palmetto, running oak, inkberry, fetterbush,
wax myrtle, pineland threeawn, bluestem, panicums, and other grasses.
b. Eau Gallie-Oldsmar-Wabasso. Nearly level, poorly drained soils that have dark sandy subsoil; some
have subsoil that is underlain by loamy material at a depth of less than 40 inches, and some have a
subsoil that is underlain by loamy material at a depth of more than 40 inches. This soil is found on
broad flatwoods and includes soils in scattered wet depressions. The natural vegetation is South
Florida slash pine, saw palmetto, inkberry, rusty lyonia, and several grasses and weeds.
c. Myakka-Immokalle. Nearly level, poorly drained soils that have dark sandy subsoil. These soils
primarily support South Florida slash pine with an understory of saw palmetto, running oak, inkberry,
fetterbush, wax myrtle, and varied grasses.
3. Soils of the Sloughs, Poorly defined Drainageways and Hammocks- Boca-Wabasso-Riviera. Nearly level,
poorly drained soils, some have a loamy subsoil underlain by hard limestone at a depth of 40 inches;
some have a dark sandy subsoil underlain by loam material at a depth of less than 40 inches, and some
have a loamy subsoil at a depth of 20 to 40 inches. These soils support blue maidencane, St. Johns wort,
scattered cypress trees, red maple, wax myrtle, sand cordgrass, millswort, and other water -tolerant
weeds and grasses.
The wetlands protection ordinance prohibits development of wetlands. The definition of wetlands is the same as
presented in State Legislation. In the City of Sebastian the following hydric soils are present: Chobee loamy fine
sand, Riviera fine sand, Myakka fine sand depressional, Holopaw fine sand, Pompano fine sand, Riviera fine sand
depressional.
According to DEP's Division of Water Resource Management, there are no commercially valuable deposits of
coquina, dolomite, phosphate, clay, or peat present within the City of Sebastian. No active or inactive mineral
mining sites, other than sand mining along the coastal ridge in the southeast portion of the City, have been
32
192
identified within the City. The City of Sebastian does not have any specific areas of soil erosion. Erosion potential
can be mitigated by reducing the time interval between the clearing of land and actual development or
construction.
Coastal Area
The coastal area in Sebastian is defined as the area between U.S. I and the Indian River Lagoon, except where
North Central Avenue intersects with U.S. 1, then the eastern edge of North Central Avenue shall constitute the
western boundary of the City's coastal area. The land uses along the Indian River Lagoon within Sebastian consist
mainly of commercial land uses with several recreational and open space areas. In addition to the commercial
uses, there are several scattered residential uses located within the coastal area. The coastal area is
approximately 65 acres is size. The Land Use Element identifies historically significant buildings within the City
of Sebastian. Since the vast majority of the historical sites in Sebastian are located within the coastal area, it is
important for the City to preserve these sites.
Water Dependent Uses
Water dependent uses are activities that can be carried out only on, in, or adjacent to water areas because the
use requires access to the water body. Within Sebastian, these activities include public and private marinas,
fishing, boating, kayak launches, and active and passive recreation. The waterfront area is a vital economic
activity area within the City. The ambiance of the City is perhaps rooted in this area. The City has a Riverfront
Plan for the waterfront area to spur revitalization and redevelopment. The City places a high value on the few
water dependent facilities and looks forward to their continued use, maintenance, and enhancement over time.
A number of water -dependent structures are located east of Indian River Drive including three marinas, two piers,
and two boat ramps. There are also several small privately -owned boat docks and piers but they do not represent
major water- dependent or related land uses. The marinas are located in an area that is suitable for marina
activities. Along the Indian River Lagoon shoreline, the City has two major access points at the Municipal Pier
and at the Yacht Club and Boat. The waterfront area spans approximately 9,000 linear feet within the City limits.
The natural resources within Sebastian are used for water dependent uses and commercial fishing. The Indian
River Lagoon provides the most extensive resource -based recreational area within the City. Fishing, boating and
other water -dependent recreation are available throughout the Aquatic Preserve.
Water Related Uses
Water related uses are activities which are not directly dependent upon access to a water body, but which provide
goods and services that are directly associated with water -dependent or waterway uses. Water related uses
include: boat storage, marine repair, retail boat and trailer sales, marine industrial (boat building, boat yards, hull
work and painting, marine construction), tropical fish collection and sales, fish houses (wholesale and retail fish
sales, processing, and packaging), commercial fishing support (trap storage, building and dipping), ship stores,
bait and tackle stores, and dive shops. The City has no water related activities aside from the water dependent
activities discussed herein.
33
12T-65F192
Coastal Economy
The City of Sebastian strives to provide a highly desirable natural setting with water oriented recreational
amenities for its residents. The waterfront core area is a vital economic activity area within the City. The riverfront
plays an important role in Sebastian's economy. In order for the City to retain the natural beauty of the area as
well as increase the economic base, a mix of residential and commercial uses is necessary within the coastal
area.
As stated in the Basin Management Action Plan for the Central Indian River Lagoon (2013), the IRL is a valuable
ecological and economic asset for the state of Florida and the counties that border the lagoon and its tributaries.
The lagoon directly and indirectly supports a large part of the region's and the state's economy. The basin
supports the multimillion -dollar Indian River citrus industry and boat and marine sales industries. Finfish and
shellfish harvesting from the lagoon contribute to local economies. A 2008 economic study (Hazen and Sawyer)
carried out for the IRL NEP estimated the total value of the lagoon's benefits to residents and visitors at $ 3.725
billion, measured in 2007 dollars. The Impact Analysis for Planning Regional Economic Input Output Model was
used to estimate the economic contribution of lagoon -related expenditures. More than $1.3 billion of economic
benefit was generated from money spent on recreational activities, both from residents and visitors, including
items such as boat purchases, boat repairs, and marina slip rental and dockage fees. An additional $762 million
was estimated for recreational use value, which is the amount that people would be willing to pay for the
opportunity to engage in a recreational activity on the lagoon. Therefore, the total value for 2007 for lagoon -
related recreation was close to $2.1 billion.
A significant increase in the amount and diversity of wildlife on the lagoon and improved water quality in the basin
would increase the recreational use value of the entire IRL system by about $80 million per year. Other
recreational expenditures and real estate values may also increase under improved environmental conditions
but were not estimated during the study. The increase in value reflects a greater willingness by residents and
visitors to pay to improve the environmental quality of the lagoon (Hazen and Sawyer 2008). The economic value
of the IRL Basin's seagrass beds was estimated at $329 million per year for 72,400 acres of seagrass. Seagrass
habitats are an important component of the lagoon's ecology and are the foundation of the food web for many of
the animals that live in the IRL by providing nursery and feeding areas. This is particularly true for many of the
recreational and commercial fish species. Seagrass may provide additional economic value related to water
quality and aesthetics (Hazen and Sawyer 2008). Therefore, investing in projects and programs to improve the
lagoon's water quality and seagrass beds is not only important for environmental considerations but also to
improve the economy.
Land Use Conflicts
At this time there are few if any conflicts related to land use in the coastal area; however, this could change in
the future. The Riverfront Plan sets up guidelines for improving the riverfront, including preservation of strategic
areas. The goals, objectives, and policies of this Element will govern any conflicts that arise between land uses
proposed in the Riverfront Plan and the environmentally sensitive portions of the coastal area. It is the purpose
of this Element to protect estuarine resources from the adverse impacts of development and to prevent potential
conflict associated with development or redevelopment of marine related activity in the waterfront core area.
1_� 34
192
Floodplains
Flood zones allocated in the City of Sebastian are illustrated in Map 5-5. There are several areas within the City
of Sebastian which have been identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having the
potential for flooding in the 100-year storm event. Flood Zone A and AE represent the 100-year storm event flood
levels. Also included in the map is the 500-year storm event area (X500). These areas are subject to rising waters
due to their proximity to nearby rivers, tributaries, and lakes.
The City's Coastal Resiliency Plan includes additional flood data and maps regarding storm surge and future sea
level rise. The vulnerabilities that Sebastian faces due to sea level rise are outlined in this Plan and include
possible impact to outdoor facilities, City streets, and lift stations in future flooding events. Tropical storms and
hurricanes may further increase these risks. The Coastal Resiliency Plan also outlines mitigation strategies such
as defining existing street and structure flooding levels of service.
Coastal High Hazard Area
The Coastal High Hazard Area is an area particularly vulnerable to the effects of coastal flooding from tropical
storm events and is defined by section 163.3178(2)(h)9, Florida Statutes, as the area below the elevation of the
category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH)
computerized storm surge model (See Map 5-6). The only structures within the CHHA in Sebastian are mobile
homes. Additional infrastructure in the City that has been inventoried or identified as being at risk to seal level
rise or flooding is recorded in the City's Coastal Resiliency Plan. The threats of sea level rise and flood events
should be taken into consideration in regard to development and redevelopment strategies used in the CHHA as
defined in § 163.3178(2), F.S. The restriction of development activities and limiting of public infrastructure
expenditures within the CHHA and hazard prone areas should also be considered.
Hurricane Vulnerability Zone
The hurricane vulnerability zone for the City of Sebastian has been identified as those areas requiring evacuation
during the event of a 100-year storm, or Category 3 hurricane. The areas requiring evacuation during such
occurrences are the Indian River Lagoon shoreline, the 100-year floodplains, mobile and manufactured home
residences, and areas receiving impacts from Category 3 hurricane storm -surge heights. Generally, areas
experiencing Category 3 storm -surge impacts lie within the 100-year floodplain. Areas within the City receiving
storm -surge impacts during Category 3 storm events are within the 100-year floodplain for either the Indian River
or Sebastian River. Development and redevelopment strategies should be used to reduce flood risk in these
areas as defined in § 163.3178(2), F.S. Maps of the City's storm surge zones are documented in Map 5-7 and
the City's evacuation zones are illustrated in Map 5-8.
Shelter Capacity
During natural disasters, residents will seek refuge at public shelters managed by either the American Red Cross
or the Indian River County Emergency Management Service. The primary evacuation shelters within Sebastian
include Pelican Island Elementary School, Sebastian Elementary School, Sebastian River Middle School, and
Sebastian River High School. Although public shelters are dispersed throughout Indian River County, some
County residents from other evacuation zones or from neighboring coastal Counties may choose to take refuge
35
M
at Sebastian area shelters, yet, their numbers are expected to be minimal. Therefore, the City's local shelters
adequately meet the needs of those seeking shelter.
Evacuation Routes
The evacuation routes out of the City of Sebastian include US 1 and CR 512. These two roadways also serve
most of the northern half of the County. US 1 run north and south through the entire County and would be used
by a number of residents to evacuate into other counties. CR 510 via the Wabasso Causeway would provide an
evacuation route for the residents of the north barrier island. CR 510 connects with CR 512 west of Sebastian
and CR 512 connects with 1-95 a few miles west of the CR 510 intersection. Because the evacuation routes
serving the City also serve the County, hurricane evacuation planning must be done on a countywide basis.
Constraints are likely to prevail on certain segments of U.S. 1 and C.R. 512 since they both traverse through
areas subject to flooding from 100 to 500-year storm waters. The segment of U.S. 1 just south of C.R. 512 north
to Main Street lies within a 100 to 500-year floodplain, while a quarter -mile length of C.R. 512 crosses the 100-
year floodplain associated with Collier Creek. The potential for road -surface flooding during heavy rainfall is
greater along these road segments within Sebastian than along others.
Evacuation clearance times for Indian River County will vary based on storm levels and impacts associated with
a hurricane. In case of a hurricane threat, Sebastian residents will be notified by radio and television broadcast
systems and the mobile public-address system on appropriate time to evacuate their areas. Proper notification
will allow sufficient time for Sebastian residents to evacuate the area. The City's Coastal Resiliency Plan outlines
societal exposure hurricanes especially to the older population. The demographics of the city may impact the
warning time that the City needs to provide to its residents. The Indian River County Emergency Management
Department maintains a file of the physically handicapped and individuals with special needs. Special
transportation has been arranged which includes vans and hydraulic lifts, ambulances, taxis, and private vehicles.
Red Cross officials also have designated special shelters. Evacuation Routes are illustrated in Map 5-9.
Disaster Preparedness
In order to be prepared for natural disasters such as hurricanes, sea level rise, and flooding the City should take
preventive action. The Official Disaster Preparedness Guide for Indian River County is a source of information
for residents to be better prepared for natural disasters that occur. The City's Coastal Resiliency Plan outlines
adaptation strategies to increase the City's resilience to natural disasters and to decrease the detrimental impacts
to residents and the environment. The adaptation strategies were screened qualitatively using the following
criteria:
Ability to increase resilience
Cost and benefits
Community acceptance
Environmental impacts
Socio-economic impacts
A summary of the screening criteria is provided in Table 5-4. The table below summarizes potential adaptations
and their impacts within the community.
of 192
,ham_
HOME 4FPEUCAN MAND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WORKSHOP TRANSMITTAL
CRA WORKSHOP DATE: December 12, 2018
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Septic -to -Sewer Program Grant Program Workshop
BACKGROUND: The Cost -Share Agreement between the Indian River Lagoon Council
(IRL Council) and the City of Sebastian for the Septic to Sewer Grant Incentive Program within
the CRA district is coming to the end of its two year term December 31, 2018. The URL Council
agreed in December 2016 to provide funding in the amount of $100,000 to reduce the pollutant
loading from existing septic systems which may be leaching into the Indian River Lagoon. As
good environmental stewards, the City had implemented prior to 2016 a waste water sewer hook-
up incentive program offering property owners $5000 to remove an existing septic tank and
hook-up to the existing sewer line within the City's Community Redevelopment Area (CRA).
Due to the high cost for the connection into the existing sewer force main along Indian River
Drive, the numbers of applications were low. The City increased this incentive program in 2016
by leveraging the IRL Council grant funds.
Since its inception, the Sebastian CRA has allocated $375,000 and, leveraging $100,000 from
the IRLC Grant, funded a total of $475,000 for the Septic to Sewer Grant Program (SSP).
Applicants were eligible to receive up to $15,000 for costs incurred to remove seotic systems and
connect to the Indian River Countv wastewater treatment system. Grant funds were disbursed on
a reimbursement basis after providing receipts, documentation and inspection of improvements
by authorized government officials. Grants provided fandina for septic system closure,
connection fees to sewer system, nermittina costs. and design and construction costs. The SSP
provided up to $10,000 from City CRA funds and up to $5,000 from the Indian River Lagoon
Council Grant to qualified projects. Over a two year period, 21 septic systems were removed at
an average cost of $15,677 per tank.
Staff has requested a No Cost Extension of one year (December 2019) to the IRL Council for the
SSP Grant. This request will allow the distribution of the awarded, yet still pending, recipients
to receive their funding in accordance with the Grant. Attached please find the SSP Account
Summary to Date as well as the Septic to Sewer Grant program accounting to date. A sewer
connection map of properties within the Sebastian CRA Boundary, IRC utilities 2017, has been
provided for your information.
For your consideration:
The Indian River County Utility Department has confirmed that the North Sebastian
Sewer project has been completed within the City limits. Property owners within this
area are now eligible for hook up to the gravity sewer line. In July of 2017, the CRA
Board agreed that the SSP Grant would cover the costs of septic tank closure, design and
permitting, construction costs, and connection fees to the new waste water treatment
system. The CRA Board agreed that grant funding would not be provided to cover the
assessment costs to Indian River County. There are approximately 50 properties eligible
for hook up to this new gravitation system. In accordance with information received by
IRC, connection fees for the approximately 50 parcels are estimated to exceed $170,000.
In addition, the median cost for tank closure and construction costs is approximately
157 of 192
$5000 per system. Total costs to the City in accordance with current SSP Grant could
exceed $420,000.
2. There are over 100 parcels remaining within the CRA that are eligible to convert from
Septic to Sewer but must connect to a Force Main. Average costs for tank closure and
construction costs for a lift station have been $15,000, In accordance with the current
SSP Grant, the cost to the City could exceed $1,000,000 (City=$I0,000; IRLC = $5000).
3. There is currently $247,173 allocated to City-wide septic to sewer conversion projects in
the FY 2018/2019 budget.
4. Florida Statute 381.00655 Connection of existing onsite sewage treatment and disposal
systems to central sewerage system; (attached) states that that an owner of a property
must connect the system or the buildings plumbing to an available publicly owned or
investor -owned sewerage system within 365 days after written notification by the owner
of the publicly owned or invcstor-owned sewerage system that the system is available for
connection.
5. For FY 2018/2019, there is $99,631.58 remaining within the CRA funds allocated for the
Septic to Sewer program.
6. The IRL. Council will be announcing their next round of grant RFD's by the end of this
year. Grants require 50:50 match of funds. Grant funds would become eligible FY
2019/2020,
7. Additional funding options:
a) Clean Water State Revolving fund: The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF)
Program provides low -interest loans to local governments to plan, design, and build or upgrade
wastewater, stormwater, and nonpoint source pollution prevention projects. Interest rates on loans
are below market rates and vary based on the economic wherewithal of the community.
b) Septic to sewer projects ("319 Grant")' Section 319(h) of the Clean Water Act provides
federal funding to address nonpoint source pollution. Projects or programs must benefit Florida's
priority watersheds ("impaired waters"), and local sponsors must provide at least a 40 percent
match or in -kind contribution (with the exception that a State Revolving Fund loan, although
federal, can be used as nonfederal match). Eligible activities include demonstration and
evaluation of urban and agricultural stormwater best management practices, stormwater retrofits
and public education. Examples include laying the lateral for the residencelbusiness to the sewer
main, the connection to the sewer, installing a grinder pump/station on resident's property, and.
abandonment of the septic system if the septic tank would be a continued source of pollution.
Approximately $5 to $6 million is available each year depending on federal appropriations.
158 of 192
Regular City Councll
& CRA Workshop
December 12. 2018
Page Two
Brief Announcements
Sebastian River Ari Club Show in Riverview Park - Dec. 15 rrom 10 am to 4 pm
In addition to the Art Club Show, Vice Mayor Kinchen announced that the Sebastian Police
Department would be hosting Family Movie Night at Riverview Park on Friday, December
14 from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
Recess City Council Meeting and Convene Community Redevelopment Agency Workshop
A. Chairman Hill called the workshop to order at 6:08 p.m. Members present included
Chairman Hill, Vice Chairperson Kinchen, Mr. Dodd, Mr. lovino, and Mr. McPartfan.
B. Septic to Sewer Proaram (Transmittal, Accounting, Boundary Map, F.S.381.00655)
i. Discuss Future Funding Allocation of Matching Funds for Program
The City Manager introduced the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Manager and
requested how the Board would like to proceed to make the most use of the dollars to
remove septic systems.
The CRA Manager explained there are enough dollars remaining to fund what has been
allocated for the remainder of the year, and when the City pursues the Indian River Lagoon
National Estuary Program RFP, those funds would not be available until the fall of 2019.
Mr. Dodd asked if the $247,173 allocation, in consideration point #3, was actually set aside
to administer a study to determine if the sewer system could expand into the highlands. The
City Manager said staff was looking for direction if that should be set aside for citywide
consideration or allocated to the CRA district; as well as if grants should be administered as
on a percentage base, total cost or one system per property or building.
Mr. Dodd said there were two issues they were grappling with --the grant program and sewer
expansion to entire city; the $247,173 was aimed to the expansion throughout the City.
The CRA Manager stated staff has reached out to the County to let them know the City is
interested in partnering with them. Mr. Dodd noted there are about 3,520 homes on the
County's top list that will require about $44M which is something the City can't do on its own.
Mr. Dodd asked if there were gravity system properties outside the CRA district but inside
the City of Sebastian. The CRA Manager said there was not.
Mr. Dodd said he preferred a sharing program something like 75/25 and two different grant
amounts —for example, one for gravity ($7,500 cap) and one for a lift station ($5K from the
City and $1 OK from available grants).
As far as properties are concerned, Mr. Dodd said they might have to go back to active
operating systems with multi -buildings or multi -tenants or use the ERU assigned by the
County. He said he did not think it would be fair to say one grant per property because they
may have four systems; the number of grant awards would have to be specifically spelled
out.
Chairman Hill said they should look at ERUs since there can be three buildings on a
property but very little use; that way the grant dollars would be eliminating the most waste.
159 of 192
Regular City Council
& CRA Workshop
December 12, 2018
Page Three
The City Manager noted it would be difficult to look at applicant's ability to pay in that regard.
For example a hotel can pay more than a non-profit such as recent recipient, HALO Rescue.
Chairman Hill said the tax dollars should go toward eliminating septic tanks; the ERUs could
dictate the maximum amount given to a property.
The CRA Manager said ERUs rate water usage which is not equitable to the waste drain
and asked if a property with four ERUs should get four times the grant amount. Chairman
Hill said the maximum allocated, for example for HALO on an ERU basis, they would be
given the amount of ERUs.
The CRA Manager described that the County only gave HALO Rescue one ERU which may
not be an equitable standard to go by. She asked if the Board wanted to get away from the
permitting, design and construction costs to cover more system closures.
Chairman Hill said he would be comfortable with staff forwarding to the Board what they
determine is the most fair and equitable but didn't think per lank was the best way to go.
Vice Chairperson Kinchen said an award per tank is the way to go as staff has disputed the
number of ERUs the County has assigned to City properties in the past.
Mr. Dodd said some equitable cost sharing method with the property owners with different
award ceilings for gravity systems and lift systems should be considered.
Mr, Dodd suggested using the money allocated in consideration point #3 to hire grant
people to independently or in unison with the County, pursue federal and state grant money.
The CRA Manager noted the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is interested
in helping the City and described the 319 grant process which they may consider for the
gravity systems.
She also explained that along the riverfront there is only a force main that requires property
owners to purchase the more expensive lift station so they would remove more systems by
taking care of the gravity systems first.
Chairman Hill noted that property owners can pay the County low interest loans attached
to their utility bill payments to cover the assessment part of connecting to the sewer.
The CRA Manager suggested asking the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program
for a match to remove approximately 21 more tanks at the average cost of $15K each.
Damien Gilliams, 1623 US Highway 1, suggested using the occupational license fund to
remove the CRA septic tanks or the County's escrow fund. He also suggested using
businesses' tax id number and whether a force main or gravity system is needed as
variables to allocate grant awards.
The City Manager thanked the Board for their input and assured them that staff would come
up with ideas for final adoption.
C. Chairman Hill adjourned the CRA Workshop at 6:41 p.m.
160 of 192
NSWAQW�__�
CM 11
HOME OF PELICAN tKAND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TRANSMITTAL FORM
CRA MEETING DATE: January23, 2019
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Septic -to -Sewer Program Grant revisions
RECOMMENDATION: Approve recommended changes to Grant program
BACKGROUND: The Cost -Share Agreement between the Indian River Lagoon Council
(IRL Council) and the City of Sebastian for the Septic to Sewer Grant Incentive Program within
the CRA district has ended as of December 31, 2018. Staff received a No Cost Extension of one
year (December 2019) from the IRL Council for the SSP Grant. This request will allow the
distribution of the awarded, yet still pending, recipients to receive their funding in accordance
with the Grant.
In accordance with the CRA Board directive from December 12, 2018, staff has made changes to
the existing grant program that address the equitable distribution of remaining funds. The City
of Sebastian seeks to promote, preserve and protect Sebastian's waterfront heritage through
Indian River Lagoon preservation efforts. With the sunset of the Cost -Share Agreement between
the Indian River Lagoon Council (IRL Council) and the City of Sebastian for the Septic to Sewer
Grant Incentive ProtTram within the CRA district. the Citv Council has established criteria for
movins-, forward with the remainin , funds. The City may be able to increase this incentive
pro,_,rarn in 2019 b`- leveraL,,inL, future grant funds when they become available.
If Agenda Item Requires Expenditure of Funds:
Total Cost:
Amount Available: $99,631.58
If Cost Requires Appropriation:
Administrative Services Department/CFO Review:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. COS SSP Jan 2019
City Manager Authorization:
Date:
161 of 192
CITY OF SEBASTIAN 11 INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNCIL
cm, 04
HOME Of PELICAN ISLAND
The City of Sebastian seeks to promote, preserve and protect Sebastian's waterfront heritage through Indian
River Lagoon preservation efforts. With the sunset of the Cost -Share Agreement between the Indian River
Lacroon Council (IRL Council) and the Citv of Sebastian for the Septic to Sewer Grant Incentive Program within
the CRA district, the City Council has established criteria for moving forward with the remaining funds. The
City may be able to increase this incentive oro_cram in 2019 by leveraging future grant funds when they
become available.
The Sebastian Septic -to -Sewer Grant Program (hereinafter referred to as SSP) is designed to provide
individual grants to qualified property owners for costs incurred to remove an operational septic tank system
that serves an occupied facility or building and connects to the Indian River County sanitary sewer system.
The SSP is available to businesses or residences located within the CRA District currently utilizing septic
systems. In order to provide an equitable uroaram, the City will provide award amounts based on connection
types at a 25175% cost share. Hereinafter, nroperlies with septic systems with connection to available gravity
main sanitary sewer will receive award amounts not to exceed $5000. Properties with septic systems with
connection to available pressurized main sanitary, sewer will receive award amounts not to exceed $10,000.
Properties with more than one operational septic system may receive up to S5000 per tank in addition to the
connection amount. Grant funds will be disbursed as a reimbursement after receipts and documentation are
submitted and inspection of improvements occur. Grants from this program will not be awarded for sanitary
improvements made prior to filing a completed application. Grants shall be awarded at the sole discretion of
the CRA Board.
1. The application package includes:
A. Completed application (provided by the City of Sebastian, see attached);
B. Proof of ownership of the property;
C. Proof of paid taxes and certification that owner is current on any payment obligations to the City
of Sebastian;
D. Proof of Utility Permit submittal to Indian River County with copy of plan.
E. Current copy of vendor bid/quote.
2. Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant shall submit a "reimbursement package" to the City
which includes:
A. Completed Reimbursement Form (provided by the City of Sebastian, see attached);
B. Copies of applicable invoices, receipts, and/or cancelled checks.
C. Proof that the septic tank has been taken out of service, pursuant to State regulations.
D. Copies of records which indicate that the improvements have been appropriately inspected and
are in operation;
E. Copy of W-9 Form for grant fund reimbursement.
3. If the project is not commenced (with a filed Application for a Building Permit or Utility Permit) within six (6)
months of grant award or is not completed (with the final inspection) within one (1) year of the grant award,
the award shall expire. The applicant may request a six (6) month extension from the CRA Board.
162 of 192
Regular City Council. Stormwater Utility
Fee Credit Policy Workshop
8 CRA Meeting
Page
B. Ser)tic to Sewer Program Grant
i. Consider Changes to Grant Program (Transmittal, SSP Jan 2019)
The City Manager said these changes took into consideration the two different quotes:
$5,000 for a gravity system and $10,000 for a lift station; and a 75125 split along with a
clarification of active septic systems. He asked the Board if they would like to move forward
with the changes.
MOTION by Mr. Dodd and SECOND by Mr. McPartlan to approve the program changes.
ROLL CALL: Vice Chairperson Kinchen — aye Mr. Dodd — aye
Mr. lovino — aye Mr. McPartlan —aye
Chairman Hill — aye
Motion carried. 5-0
9, Adiourn Communitv Redevelopment Actencv and Convene City Council Meetinq
Mayor Hill recovened the City Council meeting at 7:15 p_m_
10. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes — January 9, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting
19.014 B . Authorize Mayor to Execute Sovereign Submerged Lands Lease Renewal for Yacht
Club Ramp and Piers (Transmittal, Lease)
19,015 C. Authorize the Purchase of One (1) 2019 Ford Explorer 4x2 SUV from Bartow Ford
Company in the Amount of $28,132.95 for the Leisure Services Director Under
Charlotte County's Bid No. 2018000509 (Transmittal, Quote, Bid)
19.016 D. Approve Alcoholic Beverages at Yacht Club for Blanchette Event on February 2,
2019 from 12.00 pm to 4:00 pm - DOB Verified (Transmittal, Application, Receipt)
MOTION by Council Member lovino and SECOND by Vice Mayor Kinchen to approve
consent agenda items A-D.
ROLL CALL: Council Member Dodd - aye Council Member lovino — aye
Council Member McPartlan — aye Mayor Hill — aye
Vice Mayor Kinchen — aye
Motion carried. 5-0
11 COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS
City committee reports and Council Member regional committee reports. No public input or action except for City
committee member nominations and appointments under this heading.
19,017 A. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (Transmittal, Application, Ad, List)
i_ Interview, Unless Waived, Submit Nominations for One Alternate Member
Position — Term to Expire May 31, 2021
163 of 192
1. Title of Project: Sebastian Septic to Sewer Conversion
2. Senate Sponsor: Debbie Mayfield
3. Date of Submission: 02/18/2019
4. Project/Program Description:
There are still many residents and businesses in the City of Sebastian Community Redevelopment Area and
surrounding Indian River County which have not converted from septic to sewer and who may have old and failing
septic systems. The City of Sebastian requests funding initiatives by the State to incentivire and assist residents and
businesses with converting to sewer or any conversion program that will expand the rate at which septic users
convert to sewer. Sebastian has dedicated funds every year to help fund the conversions. Over the last three years
the City has provided grants to resident and business to convert from septic to sewer, to date the City has paid
approximately $775,000.00 in these grants. Though these programs have been successful, areas designated as
critical by the County will cost approximately $2,000,000,00 to convert septic to sewer in the CRA District.
5. State Agency to receive requested funds : Department of Economic Opportunity
State Agency Contacted? No
6. Amount of the Nonrecurring Request for Fiscal Year 2019-2020
Type of Funding Amount
Operations
Fixed Capital Outlay 1,877,460
Total State Funds Requested 1,877,460
7. Total Project Cost for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 (Including matching funds available for this project)
Type of Funding Amount Percent
Total State Funds Requested (from question #6) 1,877,460 75.00%
Federal 0 0.00%
State (excluding the amount of this request) 0 0.00%
Local 0 0.00%
Other 625,820 25.00%
Total Project Costs for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 625,820 100.0%
8. Has this project previously received state funding? No
Fiscal Year Amount specific
(yyyy-W) Recurring NonRecurring Appropriation # Vetoed
9. Is future -year funding likely to be requested? No
Page 1 et 3
164 of 192
10. Details on how the requested state funds will be expended
Spending Category Description
Administrative Costs:
Executive Director/Project Head Salary and
Benefits
Other Salary and Benefits
Expense/Equipment/Travel/Supplies/Other
Consultants/Contracted Services/Study
Operational Costs:
Salary and Benefits
Expense/Equipment/Travel/Supplies/other
Amount
Consultants/Contracted Services/Study
Fixed Capital Construction/Major Renovation:
Construction/Renovation/Land/Planning connection fees, permitting, closing of the septic systems and 1,877,460
Engineering installation of sewer connections, either gravity or small lift
stations
Total State Funds Requested (must equal total from question #6)
11. Program Performance:
1,877,460
a. What Is the specific purpose or goal that will be achieved by the funds requested?
The goal is to convert the aging septic tanks along the Indian River Lagoon to Sanitary Sewer systems.
b. What are the activities and services that will be provided to meet the intended purpose of these funds?
Fund the connection fees, permitting, closing Of the septic systems and installation of sewer connections, either
gravity or small lift stations.
c. What are the direct services to be provided to citizens by the appropriations project?
Removal of the septic systems and conversion to a County Sanitary Sewer system.
d. Who Is the target population served by this project? How many individuals are expected to be served?
There are 150 residential units and business owners that have not connected to the Sanitary Sewer system.
Many of these tanks are failing and are bordered by the Indian River Lagoon.
e. What is the expected benefit or outcome of this project? What is the methodology by which this outcome
will be measured?
Removal of septic systems from the Indian River Lagoon Basin. The number of units converted.
f. What are the suggested penalties that the contracting agency may consider in addition to Its standard
penalties for failing to meet defiverables or performance measures provided for in the contract?
If the county fails to met the deliverables or performance measures, it should be ineligible for reimbursement
from the state.
Page Z of 3
165 of 192
12. The owner(s) of the facility to receive, directly or indirectly, any fixed capital outlay funding. include the
relationship between the owner(s) of the facility and the entity.
The owners of the businesses and residents are City of Sebastian residents and business owners and provide for
economy and sustainability of the CRA Area.
13. Requestor Contact information:
a. Name: Paul Carlisle
b. Organization: City of Sebastian
c, E-mail Address: pcariisle@!cityofsebastian.org
d. Phone Number: (772)388-8200 Ext. 8200
14. Recipient Contact Information:
a. Organization: City of Sebastian
b. County: Indian River
c. Organization Type:
0 For Profit
0 Non Profit 501(c) (3)
0 Non Profit 501(c) (4)
O Local Entity
0 University or College
0 Other (please specify)
d. Contact Name: Jim Hill
e. E-mail Address: jhill@cityofsebastian.org
f. Phone Number: (772)388-8203
15. Lobbyist Contact Information
a. Name: None
b. Firm Name: None
C. E-mail Address:
d. Phone Number:
Page 3 of 3
166 of 192
Question Can we please get an itemized budget for this project? Also need a detailed calculation of what
tees tivili be paid by property owners.
Statement: Septic to Sewer
There are still many residents and businesses in the City of Sebastian and surrounding Indian River County which
have not converted from septic to sewer and who may have old and failing septic systems. The City of Sebastian
requests funding initiatives by the State to incentivize and assist residents with converting to sewer or any
conversion program that will expand the rate at which septic users convert to sewer. Sebastian has dedicated
funds every year to help fund the conversions. Though these programs have been successful, areas designated
as critical by the County will cost approximately $800,000.00 to convert septic to sewer, In an effort to complete
the area along the Indian River Lagoon the City would like the State to consider the funds expended to date for
conversion as a match to the funds requested.
Budget Summary:
1. Approximately 100 parcels remaining within the CRA that are eligible to convert from Septic to Sewer by
connection to the Force Main.
■ Average costs to the City for tank closure, engineering and construction costs for a lift
station have been $15,000. ($15,677).
■ Existing Grant was $10,000 from City; $5000 from IRLC
■ Includes Average Costs to Property Owner:
• Design and Engineering: $4500
• Construction Costs (including tank closure): $13,000
• County impact fees: $2796 / ERU
2. There are approximately 50 properties eligible for gook up to new gravitation system.
Connection fees for the approximately 50 parcels are estimated to exceed $170,000.
Median cost for tank closure and construction costs is approximately $5000 per system.
167 of 192