Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-03-2022 PZ Agendaat%(X HOME OF PELICAN KMD 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 a FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2022 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CiTYWEBSITE 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular meetings of November, 4, 2021 & November 18, 2021 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL and PUBLIC HEARINGS • Chairman opens hearing, attorney reads ordinance or resolution or title • Commissioners disclose ex parte communication • Chairman or attorney swears in all who intend to provide testimony • Applicant or applicant's agent makes presentation • Staff presents findings and analysis • Commissioners asks questions of the applicant and staff • Chairman opens the floor for anyone in favor and anyone opposing the request (anyone presenting factual information shall be sworn but anyone merely advocating approval or denial need not be sworn in) • Applicant provided opportunity to respond to issues raised by staff or public • Staff provided opportunity to summarize request • Commission deliberation and questions • Chairman calls for a motion • Commission Action A. Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing — Site Plan Approval — H.A.L.O. Enrichment & Pet Adoption Center — 708 Jackson Street - Proposed Construction of a New 6,875 SF Building along with Parking, Utilities, Stormwater and Landscaping — CWR (Commercial Waterfront Residential) Zoning District. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC INPUT Public input on items other than on the printed agenda, is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of members present 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson 11. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. STAFF MATTERS 13. ADJOURN No stenographic record by a certified court reporter will be made of the foregoing meeting. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be heard. (F.S.286.0105) In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting should contact the City's ADA Coordinator at 772-388-8226 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. All government meetings in City Council Chambers will be broadcast live on COS -TV Comcast Channel 25 and ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed via the city website — www.citvofsebastian.ory unless otherwise noticed and rebroadcast at a later date — see COS -TV Channel 25 for broadcast schedule ZOOM INFORMATION Please click the link below to join the webinar: httr)s://us02web.zoom.us/i/81681266826 Or One Tap Mobile: US:+13017158592„81681266826# or+13126266799„81681266826# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 436 2866 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 9006833 Webinar ID: 816 8126 6826 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kfurU5AAc 2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION&OCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2021 I. Call to Order -- Chairman Roth called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 0 II. Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all. C.0 `� -, ,0 � arc III. Roll Call A � Fp £ Present: Mr. Roth Mr. Christino (a) CL E Mr. Simmons Mr. Qizilbash Ms. Kautenburg Mr. Hughan V Mr. Carter Mr. Alvarez N Ms. Jordan (a) ; Also Present: Ms. Lisa Frazier, AIPC Community Development Direjo 016 M Ck. Ms. Dorri Bosworth, Community Development Managed N Q < to Mr. Manny Anon, Jr., City Attorney -- Late Arrival Ms. Barbara Brooke -Reese, MIS Manager Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer (Zoom) Dr. Mara Schiff, Indian River County School Board liaison, was not present. IV. Announcements and/or Agenda Modifications Mr. Roth announced that there is full Commission present. All of the commissioners will have input. However, the alternates will not vote on any of the items that call for a vote. As far as agenda modifications, due to a conflicting schedule with the City Attorney, who is coming back from the Supervisor of Elections office in Vero Beach, having certified the recent election ballots, there will be modification of the agenda so that this meeting can move forward. Some of the other items on the agenda will be addressed before the Local Planning Agency (LPA) public hearings. The Chairman stated if the commissioners agree, immediately following the approval of the Minutes, Items VIII through XIII will be addressed. Mr. Roth then called for a motion moving the agenda items VIII through XIII be addressed before Item VI. A motion was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Hughan. Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. V. Ancroval of Minutes -- October 7, 2021 and October 14, 2021 Mr. Roth asked if all Commissioners have had a chance to review the Minutes from the October 7, 2021 meeting. All indicated they had There being no additions or corrections, Mr. Roth then called for a motion to approve the Minutes of October 7, 2021 as presented. A motion was made by Mr. Simmons, seconded by Mr. Carter, and approved unanimously via voice vote. Mr. Roth asked if all Commissioners have had a chance to review the Minutes from the October 14, 2021 meeting. All indicated they had. There being no additions or corrections, Mr. Roth then called for a motion to approve the Minutes of October 14, 2021 as presented. A motion was made by Ms. Kautenburg, seconded by Mr. Carter, and approved unanimously via voice vote. AT THIS POINT, THE CHAIRMAN MOVED TO ITEMS VIII THROUGH XIII OF THE AGENDA. VIII. Unfinished Business -- None IX. Public Inqut Mr. Roth called on anyone from the public who wished to speak on anything that is not on this evening's agenda. There being no one in chambers or on Zoom who wished to speak, Mr. Roth moved to the next item on the agenda. X. New Business -- None XI. Commissioners Matters Mr. Christino stated he understood that staff attended a Metropolitan Planning Association meeting and asked if staff had any comments on it. Ms. Frazier stated she had presented a Power Point presentation. Vero Beach and Sebastian were asked to do a presentation on some of the things that those cities have been working on. She covered the items that she talked about at that meeting. Mr. Christino said he is very interested in those programs and asked if the meeting was open to the public. Ms. Frazier thought that there was some citizen representation present. Mr. Christino asked if there is a way to notify the commissioners prior to meetings such as this in the future. Mr. Christino also inquired about the status of the Squid Lips project. Ms. Bosworth stated the staff is comfortable with their plans for their buildings, and they submitted at PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 3 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 their own risk the building permits. The project was approved at the July 15th meeting, and since then they have gone through the process of getting the structural parts of their building permits reviewed. As of this week the permit for the over -the -water restaurant has been issued, and there will probably be some activity down there soon. Mr. Roth asked regarding the meeting that Mr. Christino talked about, if that is something staff might want to make available to the citizens of Sebastian. Ms. Frazier said that she would suggest waiting until we see what the County does with this information. Mr. Roth added that the attendance tonight brings back up to the surface the work that everyone put together on the Comprehensive Plan. He had submitted a draft of something to go to the media on it, and he does not know what became of that. It gave credit to all those in the City who worked on it. He asked if it would be appropriate to bring that back up, because this is bringing new light to that situation. Ms. Frazier agreed and replied that she had passed it up the chain. She would be happy to ask again if we would like to do an article about it. Mr. Roth reviewed that in the past the City gave an award that was given to a business that had had a very nice architectural design on their new building. That award was given several times, recognizing those businesses for being aware of the concept that Sebastian has been following, i.e. the fishing village theme. That project just fell silent for some reason, and there have been a couple of very nice projects completed. He made a motion suggesting that we bring that back and have the Commissioners as well as members of the staff submit buildings that are in the City that meet those criteria so that they could receive some sort of recognition such as a plaque. He also suggested having the City Council weigh in on that as well. Ms. Frazier suggested that this matter be put on next month's agenda as a recommendation to City Council to bring this program back. Mr. Roth then withdrew his motion and agreed that it should be put on next month's agenda as a recommendation to City Council. It was the general consensus of the commissioners that this matter be brought up on next month's agenda. Mr. Hughan asked Ms. Frazier if the Power Point presentation will be available somewhere so that the public can look at it. She said she would post it. Mr. Roth stated he would like to see it also. Mr. Qizilbash asked regarding the last meeting where there were two large sub- divisions from Dr. Brooks that were addressed. He opined that that matter should be in the hands of Code Enforcement because the appearance of the property as it now exists presents a bad visual. Ms. Bosworth stated that matter has already been brought before the Special Magistrate in 2019. There was a formal order, and they are accruing PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 4 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 $100.00 a day until the sub -division is finished. It is an open Code Enforcement case until it is abated, which is going to be the recording of the final plat. (MR. ROTH THEN RECOGNIZED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY HAD APPEARED AT THE MEETING.) XII. Citv Attornev Matters -- None XIII. Staff Matters Ms. Bosworth stated about a week after the quasi-judicial hearing on the special use for the Caliber Car Wash, the applicant withdrew their application. So it is not proceeding to City Council, and they will look for another location. Mr. Roth announced that that finishes items VIII through XIII, and the meeting will resume with item VI. VI. Local Planning Aqencv (LPA) Public Hearinqs A. LPA Legislative Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan 2040 -- New Element: Private Property Rights -- Element 10 Mr. Anon read the item into the record, and Mr. Roth called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Frazier stated that the State Legislature passed in June 2021 that all local governments are required to add a new element called the "Private Property Rights Element." Staff has added Element 10, and staff could not proceed with adoption of any changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan such as the future land use map that is before the Commissioners this evening, until this element is also adopted. This element will be sent along with whatever future land use maps the commissioners and City Council want to transmit to DEO. She reviewed what is contained in Florida Statute 163.3177(6)(i). She then called for questions/comments from the commissioners. Mr. Olzilbash -- asked why in the statute is says "optional" in the heading. Ms. Frazier explained that this means we can use these words or use something else. Most of the municipalities are using this language. Mr. Roth -- asked if what the Commission will be forwarding on to City Council is Exhibit A that is attached to the Private Property Rights Element. Ms. Frazier said yes. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 5 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Mr. Roth then called for anyone from the public who wished to speak on this matter. Seeing no one in chambers and hearing no one on Zoom who wished to speak, Mr. Roth closed public input on this item and called for any deliberations from the Commissioners. There being none, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion recommending to City Council that they adopt the Private Property Rights Element, Exhibit A., into the City's Comprehensive Plan was made by Ms. Kautenburg and seconded by Mr. Qizilbash. Roll Call: Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carries. Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes B. LPA Legislative Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Soundview at Sebastian, West of US Hwy 1 -- Code RE Partners, Inc., Applicant -- Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject Parcels are 29.57 Acres, more or less -- Request is for a change from County C/1—Commercial/Industrial and City (CG) Commercial General Land Use to City (MU) -- Mixed Use Mr. Anon read the item into the record, and Mr. Roth called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Frazier placed a map onto the screen and pointed out where these parcels are located. She reviewed what is proposed for these parcels is a mixture of attainable and multi -family apartments as well as some commercial parcels on US 1. She also explained what mixed use is comprised of. Staff feels that this plan meets the consistency criteria of the Comprehensive Plan. She then called for questions/comments on this matter. Mr. Qizilbash -- asked if the parcel which is already in the City is the only one pertaining to mixed use. Ms. Frazier explained all the 29.5 acres are going to change to mixed use -- the parcels in the City and the parcel in the County are going to change to mixed use. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 6 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Mr. Christino -- asked if there is any intention for that property other than residential. Ms. Frazier stated the applicant has shared with staff that their intent is to have some attainable apartments in an apartment complex and then have outparcels of commercial. Staff then recommended that they request a mixed -use designation. The applicant will come in later to change their zoning to whatever is appropriate. Mr. Roth -- asked if each part of the parcel will require a site plan that is something similar to that in order to move forward. Ms. Frazier stated that is correct. Mr. Simmons -- inquired if the plan is to provide 12 units per acre for the apartments. Ms. Frazier stated that is the applicant's desire, and in the mixed use they are allowed, with incentives, go up to 12 units per acre. Whether they end up being able to get 12 units per acre all depends on their site plan. There being no further questions/comments from the commissioners, Mr. Roth called for public input. There being no one in chambers who wished to speak and no one on Zoom who wished to speak, Mr. Roth asked if there was any further deliberation by the commissioners on this matter. There being none, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion approving Item VI B, the LPA public hearing recommendation to City Council of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Soundview at Sebastian, West of US Hwy 1 -- Code RE Partners, Inc., applicant -- Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject parcels are 29.57 acres, more or less -- Request is for a change from County C/1—Commercial/Industrial and City (CG) Commercial General Land Use to City (MU) -- Mixed Use was made by Mr. Roth. Ms. Frazier requested that a statement to the effect that this plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan be added to the motions. Mr. Roth amended his motion to have the wording "consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as recommended by the LPA" contained in his motion, and Mr. Simmons seconded the motion with the addition of the language regarding the motion being consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Roll Call Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carries. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 7 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 C. LPA Legislative Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- MRC Conservation Parcels, West of St. Sebastian River -- Marine Resources Council (MRC), Applicant -- Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 38 East -- Subject Parcels are 7.88 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from City (LDR) Low Density Residential Land Use to City (CON) -- Conservation Land Use Mr. Roth stated that a request has been made to have this item tabled, along with Item VII-A, and called on staff to provide the background on this item. Ms. Frazier explained that these two items are being requested to be tabled until the December 2"d, 2021 meeting. Unfortunately, the newspaper did not publish this particular public hearing notification for the Marine Resources Council properties. Thus, this item cannot be addressed at this meeting, and it will have to be tabled until the December 2"d, 2021 meeting after the newspaper ad has been properly placed. That is the only reason for the request. Mr. Roth called for a motion on this item. A motion that Item VI-C be tabled until the December 2nd meeting due to the lack of appropriate publication was made by Ms. Kautenburg and seconded by Mr. Hughan. Roll Call Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in Favor. Motion Carries. Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes D. LPA -- Legislative Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Fischer 991h St. -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject Parcel is 1.47 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from County C/I Commercial/Industrial Land Use to City (GC) General Commercial Land Use Mr. Anon read the item into the record, and Mr. Roth called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Frazier pointed out the area on the map that is the subject of this application. She stated that Dr. Fischer has requested annexation of this 1.47-acre parcel into the City. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 8 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 As part of his request, he is requesting changing the future land use from County Commercial/Industrial to City Industrial land use. His plan is to basically maintain the use as it is today, which supports the mining activity and the industrial activity in that area. There are no plans at this time, but staff feels that it is compatible and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is consumed as part of a larger residential area, this particular use could still be for outside storage or parking or civic uses, etc. She called for questions/comments from the commissioners. Mr. Roth -- questioned if this property is bounded by any street or road. Ms. Frazier stated this property's access is through the Vickers Grove Mine property, and it has been verified that any type of use on it would have to show access to the Industrial Park Boulevard road or be a part of a larger development, which it is today. Mr. Qizilbash -- asked if presently this property is land -locked. Ms. Frazier stated it is, and the Vickers Grove is part of the City. It is a shared use for the Vickers Grove Mine, and it will continue to be so. Mr. Christino -- asked if there is an easement that has to be abandoned. Ms. Frazier said there is an easement around the property, and the applicant's attorney is here if you want to get more information regarding that. It is not a right-of-way easement. It is not a utility easement. It is just an easement around two sides of the property, and Attorney Warren Dill has submitted a letter explaining this, which is included in this evening's agenda packet. There being no further questions/comments from the Commissioners, Mr. Roth called for public input on this project. Mr. Warren Dill, Sebastian -- Mr. Dill identified himself as the attorney for Dr. Fischer. Regarding the easement issue, in preparing this application he did a title search and discovered that there was a question about two 12-foot strips of land, one on the north which is contiguous with Dr. Fischer's property where the sand mine is. The other one is on the western side. It says that they are two 12-foot strips of land reserved for future roads. He has filed an application with the County for the County to vacate any interest that they might have in those two strips. They have already assured him that they do not have any interest in them. They will be in the near future moving to vacate those strips to the extent they have any interest in them. All the utilities have indicated they have no objection. Mr. Dill feels confident that the County commissioners will move to vacate any interest they have. That should be done within the next 30 days. He added that the City staff has reviewed this, and their opinion is that it is compliant with the Comprehensive Plan, and they recommend that you recommend to City Council that PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 9 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 they approve this land use change. There being no one else from the chambers and no one on Zoom who wished to speak, Mr. Roth closed public input on this agenda item. There being no further deliberations by the commissioners, Mr. Roth called for a motion on this item. A motion that the commissioners recommend to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Fischer 99th St. -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject Parcel is 1.47 acres, more or less -- Request is for a change from County C/I -- Commercial/Industrial Land Use to City (IN) Industrial Land Use, this land use change being consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, was made by Ms. Kautenburg and seconded by Mr. Qizilbash. Roll Call Mr. Roth -- - Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carries. Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes E. LPA -- Legislative Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Fischer US 1, -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 17, Township 31 South, Range 39 East - - Subject Parcel is 6.17 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from County C/1 Commercial/Industrial Land Use to City (GC) General Commercial Land Use Mr. Anon read the item into the record, and Mr. Roth called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Frazier pointed out on the map the parcel that is the subject of this application. The applicant has requested that the property be changed from the County Commercial/Industrial to the City (GC) General Commercial Land Use. Staff believes that this is in compliance with the long-range plans of the City. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and recommends approval. Mr. Roth called for public input from anyone in chambers or on Zoom who would like to speak on this item. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 10 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Mr. Warren Dill -- Mr. Dill identified himself and stated he represents Dr. Fischer on this application. There is a very thorough and professional staff report that has been submitted. The property is on US 1. It is currently in the County with a Commercial/Industrial classification. Dr. Fischer is proposing to bring it into the City with a General Commercial (GC) classification, which would restrict a number of the uses that can be put on the property presently under the County zoning. There are no immediate plans to develop the property. He asked for questions from the Commissioners. Mr. Christino -- stated that Dr. Fischer already has a trade center north of Schumann Drive and asked if this would be something similar. Mr. Dill stated he does not know right now. There being no further public input, Mr. Roth closed public input on this item and asked if the Commissioners have any further deliberation/questions on this item. Hearing none, Mr. Roth called for a Motion. A motion on Item VI E, recommendation to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Fischer US 1, Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 17, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject Parcel is 6.17 acres, more or less — Request is for a change from County C/I — Commercial/Industrial Land Use to City (GC) General Commercial Land Use, which is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, was made by Mr. Qizilbash and seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Hughan -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes F. LPA Legislative Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment -- Cross Creek Addition -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 31, Township 39 South, Range 30 East -- Subject Parcel is 19.58 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from County R — Rural to City (VLD) Very Low Density Land use. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 11 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Mr. Anon read the item into the record, and Mr. Roth called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Frazier stated this is the Cross Creek Estates addition in the southern part of the City. It is surrounded on three sides by City property. There is a request by Dr. Fischer for an annexation of this property. The request includes changing the classification from County — R (Rural) designation to the very low -density residential designation, which is compatible with the adjacent Cross Creek Lake Estates development. The applicant does not have a proposed site plan for the subject property at this time. However, he has represented that this property, as well as the 20 acres adjacent to the east, are proposed to become part of the existing platted development. This will become an extension of the Cross Creek Lake Estates development. The land use element states that the VLD-R shall be comprised of primarily single-family, detached homes on individual lots. Staff believes that this is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and supports a recommendation of approval to City Council. Mr. Roth called for public input from anyone in chambers or on Zoom who would like to speak on this item. Mr. Warren Dill identified himself and stated that he represents Dr. Fischer with this land use plan change. He requested that after other members of the public speak, he be allowed to come back up and speak to any of the items brought up by other members of the public. He reminded everyone that the purpose of this item tonight is to address the land use plan. There are no development plans coming before the commissioners tonight. In the future there will be a public hearing when the sub -division plat comes before the commissioners, and the public will have another opportunity to have input. This property is currently in the County and currently has a classification of Rural, which is one unit per acre. The Countyjs presently planning to change this in the future to a designation of three units per acre. This property is surrounded on three sides by the City. This will be the final and last phase of the Cross Creek Estates development. There is already preliminary plat approval for the parcel next to this one which is approximately 25 acres. However, Dr. Fischer was able to acquire this property after he had preliminary plat approval on the other property. Dr. Fischer is wanting to put in a second main entrance. There are two emergency access points presently and one main entrance. There will be a second main entrance with gates on the west side of this property. Dr. Fischer is working with the City to get a site plan approved for additional boat parking, which will allow for many more spaces. The staff has reviewed this project carefully and concluded that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 12 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Mr. Christino stated that he looked at this, and it looks like there is a way out for the second exit now that is much easier than the one that was discussed going onto Shakespeare. Mr. Dill stated that will be completely closed once this property is developed. Dr. Jeff Carrier, Sebastian, stated that he has some concerns about this development. He lives on Lanfair, adjacent to the proposed development. He appreciates staff for looking at the low -density impact that this development will have with a maximum of three dwelling units per acre, and the proposed development coming in at three or perhaps two units. He referred to page 160 of tonight's attachment. There is some reference to annexing an additional 20 acres to this 19.58 acres that is proposed in this item. That will come at another time, perhaps, if the developers wish to do that. Taken together, this additional 40 acres provides an impact that might not be immediately apparent in the review of this tonight. Ingress and egress from this area is a concern because the adjacent property owners because, unless Dr. Fischer acquires land a little bit to the south where they can actually get ingress and egress to CR 510, this might be a potential issue. If that is the case, it has the potential to direct traffic into a very small, developed area where the streets are very short and curved. He has a concern that, as this particular development is undertaken, eventually construction vehicles will be used. This is not a neighborhood that was designed for that type of flow through. Furthermore, within the document there is an indication that there might be an extension of Shakespeare all the way to intersect with CR 510. Shakespeare is a one-way street that is a single lane, and the infrastructure is such and the easements are such that it is unlikely that that road could be expanded. If the development goes to its full 40 acres and if these roads are constructed, he has other concerns that biologists would have. He stated he is actually on the Natural Resources Board, and that Board is looking at the low -impact development and development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan that says we will take into consideration environmental concerns. There is a small amount of wetland in this area and some native vegetation in this area that is very sensitive. He suggested that his comments are more preemptive than anything else. He stated his group will be back here when this plat plan is finally developed and when these projects are brought forward to City Council. They at least wanted to raise these issues if in fact you are going to approve this. His group applauds the low density. They also have concerns about ingress and egress because, by approving this, traffic patterns and engineering studies will have to be done, and there are going to be considerable concerns in the future. He states that if the Commission's attention is drawn to those now and you are kept aware of these as development proceeds in this particular area, his group would like to have the Commissioners keep those in mind. His group will follow this as it progresses. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 13 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Michael Roth, Sebastian, lives on Memorial, and Memorial is adjacent to Shakespeare, which is adjacent to the old fish farm which is the property that is being discussed. He stated that several years ago when this development started, they wanted to cut roads to his neighborhood. At that time, the City turned Dr. Fischer down. He was told by Dr. Fischer's son that this wasn't the last of it. _he was going to get his roads through. He hopes that is not the case now. He lives in a very quiet neighborhood. Shakespeare is one way. That was not a problem because there were not that many people living back there. He stated his neighbors and he understand there is going to be development, and they know they are not going to stop that. The neighbors would like to see the development have a low -density classification and the ingress and egress stick to Powerline Road and stay off all the little side streets. He added that, if this is going to be a gated community, that is going to be an entrance to the community. Those people are going to be able to go through and then exit the community to Powerline Road, but the neighbors will not be able to go through there. Ms. Frazier explained that the right-of-way that would be given would be for public access. The right-of-way that is being proposed would be a public right-of-way, so the neighbors would have access. Mr. Roth stated that the residents of the community were promised many things when the original development was done. That did not happen to be the case. Chairman Roth said this project does need to come back here for a final site plan approval, and those things will be considered. The commissioners are well aware of Shakespeare and the problem on that. Amy Speak, Sebastian, resides at 441 Memorial. She and other neighbors want the low density, but they have significant additional concerns. She feels that if there is a gate installed to access the neighborhood, which is going to have a huge impact on the neighborhood. They need to figure out a way to purchase more property or get access to go another way. There are potentially 70 houses that may be built. That means much more traffic up and down two small roads potentially every day. Presently, they do not get that many in a month other than the people who live back there. She really wants the commissioners to think about the future impact that it would have on those who have lived back there for many years. She stated there are several species of wildlife, and she is concerned regarding the impact that this development will have on them. She is not saying don't do the neighborhood; she is just saying do the neighborhood right where it is not causing a disruption to the neighbors' peace. Mr. Warren Dill, attorney for the applicant, stated that he understands the concerns that the residents have. His applicant has in the past done his best to accommodate the neighbors. It is a physical impossibility for the applicant to access Powerline Road. He cannot go through Cross Creek and put another entrance in, as there are homes all along there. This is the only means of ingress and egress to this property. There will PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 14 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 be as low a density as possible. The comments of the residents are good comments, but they are not relevant to the land use application. Mr. Roth closed the public input and called on the commissioners for any further comments/questions. Mr. Christine -- stated that when the Commission originally approved the plats the exit off of Shakespeare basically was for an emergency. The City codes require that these be 400 feet apart. Ms. Frazier said that is correct. Mr. Christino stated he did not think that the emergency entrance was sufficient for an emergency vehicle to make the turn. He stated that there should be an alternative to that entrance in case of a hurricane, fire, etc. Ms. Frazier pointed out this 19.58 acres is coming in as an annexation as part of the already existing 25 acres to the east, and that is all that is under consideration this evening. Mr. Roth -- said that the other entrance/exit cannot be just for an emergency. It has got to be another regular entrance/exit. Somewhere it has to be provided for and, if it cannot be, it will have to be dealt with further. Mr. Roth called for a motion on this item. A motion recommending approval to City Council of the comprehensive plan future land use amendment, Cross Creek Addition by Henry A. Fischer, Applicant, Section 31, Township 39 South, range 30 east. Subject parcel is 19.58 acres, more or less. Request is for a change from County R — Rural to City (VLD) Very Low -Density land use, which is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Mr. Alvarez. Roll Call Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carries. Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Roth closed the LPA section of this evening's meeting and reopened the Planning and Zoning Commission section of the meeting. A. P&Z Quasi -Judicial Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Land Development Code Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- MRC Conservation Parcels, West of St. Sebastian River -- Marine Resources Council (MRC), Applicant -- Section 26, Township 31 South, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 15 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Range 38 East -- Subject Parcels are 7.88 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from City (RS-10) Residential Single Family to City (C) -- Conservation. Ms. Frazier stated that staff is requesting that this item be tabled for a time certain to the December 2"d, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting due to the inadvertent lack of public notice in the newspaper. It will be readvertised so that it can be on the agenda for December 2"d Mr. Roth called for a motion to table this item. A motion tabling Item 7A, MRC Conservation Parcels, Marine Resources Council, Applicant, subject parcels being 7.88 acres, more or less, requesting change from City (RS-10) Residential Single Family to City (C), conservation, till the December 2"d, 2021 Planning and Zoning meeting was made by Mr. Roth and seconded by Ms. Kautenburg. Roll Call Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carries. Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes B. P&Z Quasi -Judicial Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Land Development Code Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- Fischer 99th St, -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject Parcel is 1.47 Acres, More or Less - - Request is for a change from County (IL) Light Industrial to City (IN) Industrial Mr. Anon read the item into the record. Mr. Roth asked if any of the Commissioners have had any ex parte communications on this item. Mr. Alverez stated he will excuse himself from this item, as he has had some ex parte communication as well as having some financial connection to this project. Ms. Bosworth stated there is a special form that he will need to sign, on which he will need to disclose his connection with this project. (AT THIS TIME MR. ALVAREZ LEFT THE DIAS AND EXITED THE CHAMBERS.) Ms. Bosworth stated that Mr. Christino as the alternate will be voting in place of Mr. Alvarez on this matter. All those who would give PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 16 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 testimony on this matter were sworn in. Mr. Roth called on the applicant to speak on this matter. Mr. Warren Dill, attorney for the applicant, stated the commissioners have been presented a very thorough staff report. The use as was mentioned before is going from County IL to City IN, which is an industrial classification that is consistent with all the property surrounding it, including Dr. Fischer's property contiguous on the north side. He asked for questions or comments. There were none. Mr. Roth called on staff to make their presentation. Ms. Frazier reviewed that this is a straightforward request. Should it be annexed into the City, the applicant is requesting a change from County Light Industrial to City Industrial. This is consistent with the current uses of the property. According to the industrial district zoning requirements, the designation is to provide limited industrial development permitting uses such as utilities, commercial retail, storage facilities, restaurants, trades and skilled services, parking lots, clubs, and medical services. Standards are in place to reduce impacts on adjacent residential districts such as screening and buffering requirements should that come about. The sites surrounding this are currently operating as industrial. Staff is recommending this change and feels that it is consistent with the Land Development Code and supports a recommendation for approval to City Council from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Roth called for questions/comments from the Commission members. Mr. Christino -- asked if there will be any screening requirements for this parcel. Ms. Frazier stated that at this point there would not be because it is going to continue its current use, which is industrial. Mr. Christino commented that in the future this could potentially be an access to a residential area. There will need to be screening at that point. Ms. Frazier pointed out that the performance standards for industrial adjacent to a residential development would come into play. There being nothing further from the commissioners, Mr. Roth called for public input from anyone in chambers or on Zoom. There being none, Mr. Roth closed the public input. He stated that the applicant now has an opportunity to respond to any issues raised by the public or by staff. Mr. Dill stated he had no comments. There being no further deliberation from the commissioners, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion approving the recommendation to City Council of the rezoning amendment for a specific site -- Fischer 99th Street, Henry A. Fischer applicant, Section 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 east -- subject parcel being 1.47 acres, more or less -- request is PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 17 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 for a change from County (IL) to City (IN) Industrial, said designation being consistent with the Land Development Code of the City, was made by Mr. Christino and seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Hughan -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Christino (a) -- Yes C. P&Z Quasi -Judicial Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Land Development Code Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- Fischer US 1 -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 17, Township 31 South, Range 39 East -- Subject Parcel is 6.17 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from County (CL) Commercial Limited to City (CG) Commercial General Mr. Anon read the item into the record. Mr. Roth asked if any Commissioners have had an ex parte communications on Item 7-C. All stated they had none. Mr. Roth called on the applicant to make their presentation. Mr. Warren Dill, attorney for the applicant, stated he concurs with the professional staff report there is available on this item. Mr. Roth called on staff to present their findings. Ms. Frazier stated the 6.17 acres are located along US Highway 1. The current zoning is in the County for Commercial Limited, and they are requesting a change to Commercial General within the City should this property be annexed into the City. CG is to accommodate general retail sales and services, highway -oriented sales and services, and other general commercial activity. This designation is generally located in highly accessible areas adjacent to major arterials, and this designation is consistent with the long-range plans of the City. Staff recommends approval for this request and finds it consistent with the Land Development Code of the City. Mr. Roth called for questions/comments from the commissioners to the applicant and the staff. There being none, Mr. Roth called for anyone from the public who wished to PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 18 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 speak on this matter. Mr. Warren Dill, attorney for the applicant stated that he has nothing to add and said he would be happy to answer any further questions. There being no one else present in chambers or on Zoom who wished to speak, Mr. Roth closed the public input section on this item. (AT THIS POINT, MR. ALVAREZ REJOINED THE MEETING AND TOOK HIS PLACE AS A REGULAR VOTING MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION.) There being nothing further from the staff and there being no further deliberation of the commissioners, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion approving the recommendation to City Council -- Land Development Code Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- Fischer US 1 -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 17, Township 31 South, Range 39 East - subject parcel being 6.17 acres, more or less -- request is for a change from County (CL) Commercial Limited to City (CG) Commercial General -- said designation being consistent with the Land Development Code -- was made by Mr. Alvarez and seconded by Mr. Qizilbash. Roll Call Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. Mr. Simmons -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes D. Quasi -Judicial Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Land Development Code Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- Cross Creek Addition -- Henry A. Fischer, Applicant -- Section 31, Township 39 South, Range 30 East -- Subject Parcel is 19.58 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from County Agriculture-1 to City (RS-10) Residential Single Family Mr. Anon read the item into the record. Mr. any ex parte communications on Item 7-C. applicant to make their presentation. Roth asked if any commissioners have had There being none, Mr. Roth called on the Mr. Warren Dill, attorney for the applicant, stated he concurs with the professional staff report that is available on this item and that the project is consistent with the RS zoning PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 19 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 around the property, including within Cross Creek and including next door in the Highlands. The applicant will do his best to reduce the impacts of this project. He thanked everyone this evening for their time and patience. Mr. Roth called for staff to present their findings and analysis on this item. Ms. Frazier stated that the rezoning request before the commissioners this evening is from County A-1 to City RS-10, Residential Single Family which is compatible with the existing adjacent Cross Creek Lake Estates development. All of the zoning surrounding this property except to the south is RS-10. A potential right-of-way alignment to CR-510 is being proposed. This road right-of-way will be a public road right-of-way. It is essential to provide access to CR-510 and provide alternative safety routes to residents within the Highland neighborhood during evacuations and other emergency actions. Staff stated it is consistent with the City's Land Development Code and supports a recommendation of approval to City Council. Mr. Roth called for questions of the applicant or staff by the Commissioners. Ms. Kautenburg -- Regarding bringing this property into the City, it was being brought in as zoning classification VLD, Very Low Density, and now it is being called RS-10. She asked whether those two are the same classification. Ms. Frazier stated no, the VLD is only for the land use. The RS-10 is due to the rezoning. Mr. Roth -- Regarding the fact that there are wetlands on this property, there is a need to make sure that that this is addressed properly, with regard to a second entrance/exit. Hearing nothing further from the commissioners, Mr. Roth called on anyone from the public either in chambers or on Zoom who wished to speak. There being no one, Mr. Roth asked for additional input from the applicant. Mr. Dill had nothing further to add. There being nothing further from the commissioners or staff, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion approving the recommendation to City Council of Land Development Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- Cross Creek Addition -- Henry A. Fischer, applicant, Section 31, Township 39 South, Range 30 East -- subject parcel being 19.58 acres, more or less -- request is for a change from County Agriculture 1 to City (RS-10) Residential Single Family -- said designation being consistent with the Land Development Code -- was made by Ms. Kautenburg and seconded by Mr. Simmons. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2021 Roll Call Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg Mr. Carter -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion carries. XIV. Adiourn Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Hughan -- Yes Mr. Alvarez -- Yes There being no further, the meeting was adjourned by Mr. Roth at 8:35 p.m. By: A Date: PAGE 20 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 2021 I. Call to Order -- Chairman Roth called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Co II. Pledae of Alleaiance was recited by all. ,� •® m .. III. Roll Call .� E j3 - a:cu a Present: CL E F0 9 Mr. Roth Ms. Jordan (a) C: Mr. Simmons Mr. Christino (a) r-- co Ms. Kautenburg Mr. Qizilbash � m O Mr. Carter o 219 Also Present: T N < <05 Ms. Dorri Bosworth, Community Development Manager Ms. Michelle Faulkner, Planner Ms. Erin Taylor, Planner Mr. Manny Anon, Jr., City Attorney Mr. Joseph Perez, AV Technical Assistant Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer (Zoom) Dr. Mara Schiff, Indian River County School Board liaison, was not present. IV. Announcements and/or Agenda Modifications Mr. Roth stated Mr. Hughan and Mr. Alvarez have been excused from this evening's meeting. Ms. Jordan and Mr. Christino will be voting this evening in their places. V. Approval of Minutes -- None VI. Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearings -- None VII. Unfinished Business -- None Vill. Public Input Mr. Roth called for anyone in chambers or on Zoom who wish to speak on items that are not on this evening's agenda. Hearing and seeing no one, Mr. Roth moved to the next item on the agenda. X. New Business PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2021 A. Accessory Structure Review -- LDC Section 54-2-7.5 -- 714 Brookedge Terrace -- 980 SF Detached Garage -- Mr. Robert Sautner Mr. Anon read the item into the record. Mr. Roth called on the applicant to present information on the project. Robert Sautner, Sebastian, stated his plan is to build a garage in which to store vehicles. He has spoken with City staff on this project. Mr. Roth called on staff to present their findings. Ms. Faulkner stated that the staff report has been submitted to all Commission members. This accessory structure application is similar to others that have been brought before the Commission in the past and approved where there is a difference in the finished floor elevation of the accessory structure and the principal structure where they visually appear to be at the same height. Also stated in the staff report is that the facade of the principal structure has a front wall of brick. The applicant is proposing to do the same on the accessory structure. The overall appearance of the structure will match the house, and all the other code requirements have been met. Staff is recommending approval of this project. Mr. Roth asked how the height measurements that staff has provided were obtained. Ms. Faulkner stated they were obtained through the elevation plan that was submitted for the accessory structure and the existing elevation plan for the principal structure. Mr. Roth called for questions/comments from the commissioners. Mr. Qizilbash -- Asked if the applicant is planning to build a driveway going to the garage. Mr. Sautner stated he is. The driveway goes all the way back, but there is a section of it going to the garage that will have to be replaced. Mr. Qizilbash also asked if this structure will be finished on the interior. Mr. Sautner stated that it will just be an open ceiling, a small amount of electrical, and a garage door and rear entrance door. Mr. Christino -- Asked if the applicant is aware that there will be 36 shrubs needed to be installed around the accessory structure. Ms. Faulkner stated Mr. Sautner has a general contractor who has done the permitting for this, and he is aware of it and did provide the landscape plan showing the shrubs. Mr. Christino commented that the drawing of the landscape plan is quite small making it hard to read. Ms. Faulkner stated it is also set forth in the staff report that landscaping is required. Mr. Roth -- Asked where the access to the structure will be. Ms. Faulkner stated that the contractor had no recollection of the driveway. However, she stated that that can be a condition for approval, that they will apply for a building permit for that. There being nothing further, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion approving the accessory structure review -- LDC Section 54-2-7.5 -- 714 Brookedge Terrace -- 980 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 3 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2021 SF detached garage -- Mr. Robert Sautner -- was made by Mr. Christino and seconded by Qizilbash. Roll Call Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Ms. Jordan (a) -- Yes Mr. Christino (a) -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. B. Accessory Structure Review -- LDC Section 54-2-7.5 -- 933 Oswego Avenue -- 960 SF Detached Garage -- Mr. James Bucci Mr. Anon read the item into the record. Mr. Roth called on the applicant to present information on the project. Chris Pinson, 481 Avocado Avenue, Sebastian, stated he is representing Mr. Bucci. Mr. Pinson is the contractor who has been charged to build this accessory structure. He has worked with KSM Engineering to make sure this meets all the City codes and requirements. He is here to answer questions on this project. Mr. Roth called on staff to present their findings. Ms. Faulkner stated this is similar to the previous application which was just approved. There is a difference in the finished floor elevation of the primary structure and the elevations in the area of the lot where the proposed structure is going to be erected. That is going to visually make them appear to be the same height. There is an existing auxiliary driveway present that has already been permitted through the Building Department and approved. Staff has recommended approval. Mr. Roth called on the commissioners for questions/comments. Ms. Kautenburg -- Regarding the plan, she notes that there appears to be an additional area that may or may not be paved. Mr. Pinson stated that the applicant requested that we pour an additional section of the slab. Mr. Bucci has a recreational vehicle that he would like to park outside on that slab. Ms. Kautenburg stated that this property currently contains a tremendous number of things such as a very large trailer besides the recreational vehicle. Mr. Pinson stated the property owner has an RV, and he has a temporary trailer that is parked there that will not remain there. Ms. Faulkner stated that the Code allows two recreational vehicles parked outside a garage, but they have to be parked behind the front line of the house. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 4 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2021 Mr. Roth -- Stated that that could be a commercial vehicle on the slab. That was his concern, because it looks like it could be a commercial vehicle, and that being parked outside would be a Code violation. There being no further questions from the commissioners, Mr. Roth called for a motion. A motion approving the accessory structure to be built at 933 Oswego Avenue be approved as presented was made by Ms. Kautenburg and seconded by Mr. Simmons. Roll Call Mr. Qizilbash -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Mr. Roth -- Yes Mr. Simmons -- Yes Vote was 7-0 in favor. Motion passes. X. Commissioners Matters Mr. Christino (a) -- Yes Ms. Jordan (a) -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg thanked staff for forwarding the invitation to the MPO to the commissioners. She attended that meeting along with the City Planner and Mr. Christino as well as a lot of other people. She stated it was disappointing to discover that the MPO has almost no plans for any improvements for North County other than maintenance items and what is going to be done on CR 510 and a little bit along Riverside Drive. She finds this distressing as Sebastian has a greater population than Vero Beach does. She did learn about aggressive advocating. The entire meeting was overwhelmed with a bicycle club who literally took over the meeting, and there was very little that anyone else could say. Unfortunately, because those meetings tend to be scheduled during work hours, she will see if she can rearrange her schedule so that she can be there. Mr. Christino followed up with what Ms. Kautenburg said. They had taken a look at the County map of proposed improvements and were not surprised by what they saw. They looked at paving from Riverside Park to the County line north, and they were reassured that bicycle lanes on five-foot shoulders would be installed on CR 510. Very little else has been planned. He agreed with Ms. Kautenburg that there was a bicycle club that dominated that meeting. It was unfair to others who had concerns or questions. He and Ms. Kautenburg did note quite a bit of work going on south of Sebastian. He suggested that representatives of Sebastian go to those meetings and advocate for the City. This is an annual meeting, and he will plan to be there next year. He appreciates getting notice of these meetings from staff. They are informative and educational, and PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 5 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2021 he found it worthwhile to attend. Ms. Bosworth stated staff will definitely plan to forward any of those agendas/notices to the commissioners. That information can also be found on the ircgov.com website. She reviewed that during the last three years the County did an overlay on CR 512. She also noted that there are not many County roads in the City of Sebastian. Mr. Christino said he did have a chance to talk with the Public Works Director for the County to discuss issues that are present along Old Dixie Highway. He expressed the possibility of procuring a grant, as Mr. Christino explained to him that there are bicycle lanes in a development that could potentially be rerouted onto Old Dixie Highway to circumvent traffic on US 1. Apparently, there is a possibility of getting some money to get that accomplished. Mr. Roth thanked staff for providing reminders for those meetings, as they provide a lot of information. He also reviewed an item that had been discussed at the last meeting regarding giving a rebirth to the award for new construction and/or existing buildings that made renovations consistent with the fishing village theme throughout the City. He asked the commissioners to be thinking about a name for that award. He thinks this would reinstate a program that would promote Sebastian in a very positive way, recognizing a business that had made a very nice improvement to the City. Mr. Carter commented regarding the new sign that is in front of City Hall. He says it seems to stay on one subject too long, and when passing by drivers do not see anything else, as they have already driven past the sign. He suggested speeding the loop up so that there is opportunity to see other things that are coming up besides the one you can see at the time you drive by. Ms. Bosworth stated that there is a section in the City Code as to how fast those can be set. She will request the MIS department to take a look at that. Mr. Simmons asked regarding the status of the Mobil station that was to be demolished at US 1 and CR 512, and he also asked about the status of Spirit of Sebastian. Ms. Bosworth stated that the applicant for the Mobil station did bring in some building permits. There was a round of comments, and staff has not heard anything else from them. It has been six to seven months since staff has heard anything. Regarding the Spirit of Sebastian, they received their relocation permit for the tortoises. So they have relocated the tortoises for pods 1 and 2. Staff has not issued the formal land -clearing permit yet for them to be able to start doing the roads, but they have received a grubbing permit to remove all of the invasives. So they may be in there removing the pepper trees and some other unnecessary vegetation. They have received their St. John's permits. There are a couple other permits that staff is waiting for jurisdictional permits. They do have to go before City Council to get their license to encroach the developer's agreement regarding the bridge from Del Monte and the improvements that PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PAGE 6 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2021 they were putting on that. She would predict that by January or February they will have their full land -clearing permit, and they will be in there working on constructing the roads. Mr. Christino asked if someone will be in there a few weeks before they start clearing to check for gopher tortoises one more time. Ms. Bosworth stated that when they did the relocation FWC required them to put up some sort of fencing so that tortoises do not come back onto the property once they are located. She is positive that fence is up. Mr. Roth requested Ms. Bosworth to read into the record the memorandum regarding Commissioner Alvarez. She stated that the form for Mr. Alvarez stated that the Commission needed to be sent a copy and that this form must be read publicly at the next meeting. She read the disclosure regarding the local officer's interest into the record as follows: "I, Albert Alverez, hereby disclose that on November 4th, 2021 a measure came or will come before my agency which inured to my special private gain or loss. The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows. `I am involved in the sale, for which I will gain a commission.' " The document is dated November 9th, 2021 and signed by Al Alvarez. She stated that this form will be attached to the November 41h Minutes. XI. Citv Attornev Matters Mr. Anon said he had nothing except to wish the commissioners and staff a Happy Thanksgiving. XII. Staff Matters Ms. Bosworth stated that besides reading in the form regarding Commissioner Alvarez, she wanted to welcome the recording secretary back in chambers other than attending via Zoom. She also wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. XIII. There being no further business, Mr. Roth adjourned the meeting at 6:32 p.m. Date: J9 c"c' HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Site Plan Review Staff Report 1. Project Name: H.A.L.O. Enrichment & Adoption Center 2. Requested Action: Approval of a new site plan for an Enrichment & Pet Adoption Center for H.A.L.O. consisting of demolition of an existing residential structure and construction of a new 6,875 SF building with a water feature along with required parking, stormwater, landscaping, and site amenities. 3. Project Location 4. 6. a. Address: 708 Jackson Street b. Legal: Ocean Breeze Heights Subdivision, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 6, & Tract A; less that described portion conveyed in Deed Book 72, PG 351 C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 30-38-30-00001-0060-00000.1 Project Owners: Maria Hart and Jacquelyn Petrone 1546 U.S. Highway #1 Sebastian, Florida 32958 Project Applicant: H.A.L.O. No -Kill Rescue Ms. Jacquelyn Petrone 710 Jackson Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 (772) 589-7297 Project Engineer: MBV Enqineering, Inc. 1835 20' Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772) 569-0035 Project Surveyor: Mr. Steve Cartechine, LS Indian River Survey, Inc. 1835 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772) 569-78801 1 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: H.A.L.O. No -Kill Rescue has filed a site plan application for development of the property located at 708 Jackson Street, adjacent and east of their existing facility. The project consists of demolishing the existing residential structure, constructing a new 6,874 SF enrichment & pet adoption center including an outdoor water feature for the animals, adding parking & a stormwater drainage system, and bringing the site into compliance with current Riverfront landscaping & architectural requirements. Water and wastewater service to the site will be accomplished via connection to Indian River County Utilities and the existing septic system will be removed. The site consists of .63 acres, of which 14,854 SF will be impervious (53.76%) and 12,778 SF will be open space (46.24%). b. Current Zoning, Future Land Use and Overlay District: 1. Zoning: CWR (Commercial Waterfront Residential) 2. Future Land Use: RMU (Riverfront Mixed Use) 3. Performance Overlay District: Riverfront C. Adjacent Properties Zoning North: PS East: CW R South: CR West: CR d. Site Characteristics Current Use Future Land Use Cemetery INS Residence RMU Restaurant RMU HALO/Kennel RMU (1) Total Acreage: .63 acres (2) Current Land Use(s): Residential (3) Soil: St. Lucie Sand (4) Vegetation: Cabbage Palms, and exotics (5) Flood Hazard: Zone X (6) Water Service: Indian River County Utilities (7) Sanitary Sewer Service: Indian River County Utilities (8) Parks: Community Center — 100 feet Riverview Park — 2 miles (9) Police/Fire: Indian River County Fire — 1 mile Sebastian Police —1 mile 9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency a. Future Land Use: consistent b. Traffic Circulation: consistent C. Housing: n/a d. Public Facilities: consistent e. Coastal Management: n/a f. Conservation: consistent g. Recreation and Open Space: consistent 10. Contents of Site Plan: a. lot configuration: provided b. finished ground floor elevation: Proposed - 25.00 feet NAVD C. contours and designating number of dwelling units: N/A d. square footage of site: provided - 27,632 SF e. building coverage: 6,874 SF = 24.87% (Maximum 30%) f. square footage of impervious areas and open area: Impervious 14,854 SF = 53.76% (80% maximum) Open 12,778 SF = 46.24% (20% minimum) g. setbacks: provided - in compliance with zoning regulations. Front - Jackson Street Side (west) Side (east) Rear (north) Minimum Setback 0' 5' 10, 10, Provided 65.07' 10, 82.29' 28.18' h. scaled drawings of the sides, front and rear of the building or structure: provided i. generalized floor plan indicating uses and square footage of each proposed use within each building or structure: provided 3 j. Building exterior construction materials and color: provided k. building height: 23' (maximum 35') I. location and character of all outside facilities for waste disposal, storage areas, or display: provided — A waste bin storage area is located to the rear of the building and includes screening M. location and dimensions of all curb cuts and driveways: provided n. number of spaces with their location and dimensions: provided Parking Required: One space for every 200 SF of office area minus patio/storage area: 3,522 SF _ 200 = 17.61 spaces Parking Required: 18 spaces Parking Provided: 14 regular spaces 1 H/C spaces 3 Parking -in -Lieu spaces ------------------ 18 spaces o. details of off-street parking and loading areas (including requirements of Article XV): provided - Also, based on the gross office floor area of the building — less than 10,000 SF- a loading space was not required. No large truck deliveries are expected and smaller delivery trucks will park temporarily in site parking areas. p. all off-street vehicular surfaces available for maneuvering: provided q. surface materials: provided r. number of employees: not provided S. type of vehicles owned by the establishment: not provided t. If there is a combined off-street parking facility, required agreements: No parking agreement with another facility is proposed. However, the applicant is requesting to purchase 3 spaces through the Parking -in -lieu Purchase Program. Approval of the purchase will need to be approved by City Council, and should be done before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. U. Location of all pedestrian walks, malls, yards and open spaces: provided V. location, size, character, and height or orientation of all signs: provided - location only. All signs will require separate zoning reviews and building permits, and comply with the Overlay District design and color standards. 4 W. location and character of landscaped areas and recreation areas: provided X. location, design and character of all public, semi-public, or private utilities: provided y- location, height and general character of perimeter or ornamental walls, fences, landscaping: provided — Based on the difference in grade elevations west to east, a series of retaining walls, planter walls, and retaining walls with handrails are used in the design, as indicated on the plan. These walls should be painted to match the building color and not left as unfinished concrete. Z. surface water drainage facilities plan certified by an engineer or architect registered in the State of Florida: provided aa. location of existing easements and right-of-way: Provided on survey bb. Land survey with complete legal description prepared and certified by a registered surveyor: provided CC. Verified statement showing each and every individual person having a legal and/or equitable ownership interest in the subject property: provided 11. Site location and character of use: provided 12. Appearance site and structures: a. harmonious overall design: Yes b. location and screening of mechanical equipment, utility hardware and waste storage areas: provided — mechanical pad, waste bin storage area, and generator located in the rear have all been screened C. commercial and industrial activities conducted in enclosed buildings: Yes d. exterior lighting: provided — see included photometric plan/sheet. Lighting fixture details are shown on Sheet C9 13. Access, internal circulation, off-street parking and other traffic impacts: a. internal circulation system design and access/egress considerations: provided b. separation of vehicular and pedestrian areas: provided 14. Traffic impacts: Based on the trips generatedby the project, a traffic impact study was not required. (68 trips) 15. Open space and landscape (including the requirements of Article XIV): a. Name, address and phone number of the owner and designer: provided k b. North arrow, scale and date, minimum scale of one inch equals fifty (50) feet: provided C. Property lines, easements, and right-of-way with internal and property line dimensions: provided d. Location of existing or proposed utility service: provided e. Location and size of any existing or proposed structures: provided f. Location and size of any existing or proposed site features, such as earthen mounds, swales, walls and water areas: provided g. Location and size of any existing or proposed vehicular use area: provided h. Location and size of any existing or proposed sidewalks, curbs, and wheel stops: provided i. Location of sprinkler heads, hose bibs, or quick cupplers and other information on irrigation: Irrigation plan has been provided. A separate building permit necessary. j. Calculations of required type, dimensions and square footage of landscape materials and of required landscape areas, including: total site area, parking area, other vehicular use area, percentage of non -vehicular open space, perimeter and interior landscape strips, and required number of trees: provided k. Location of required landscape areas and dimensions: provided Location, name, height and size of all existing plant material to be retained: provided - Seven trees are proposed to be retained M. Location, size, height and description of all landscape material including name, quantity, quality, spacing, and specified size and specification of all plant materials: provided n. 0 12 q• Height, width, type, material and location of all barriers of nonliving material: provided Location, dimensions and area of landscaping for freestanding signs: provided Show all landscaping, buildings, or other improvements on adjacent property within five (5) feet of the common property line: provided Riverfront Overlay District special landscape requirements: All perimeter and foundation planting requirements have been met, including increased size, and 0 canopy, understory and hedge amounts. General Landscaping requirements from Article XIV have also been complied with. 16. Required screening of abutting residential and nonresidential uses: An opaque buffer — a 6' wood or vinyl fence — is being installed along the north and east property lines, as shown on the plan 17. Flood prone land and wetland preservation: There were no areas of wetlands found on the property, and the site is located in Flood Zone X. 18: Surface water management: provided 19: Available potable water: Indian River County Utilities 20: Wastewater service: Indian River County Utilities 21: Soil erosion, sedimentation control and estuary protection: provided 22. Performance Overlay District Requirements: in compliance 23. City Engineer's review: The City Engineer and Stormwater Department's staff has reviewed the plan, and all questions and comments have been responded to 24. Additional considerations: Staff supports the addition of Low Impact Designs (LTD's) being implemented into the stormwater design, if possible. LID's are encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan, and can be applied as credits toward the property's annual stormwater fee. 25. Staff Conclusion: The proposed site plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Code, and the Riverfront Overlay District. 26. Recommendation: Hold public hearing regarding the proposed site development plan. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the application request with the following conditions: 1. Approval by City Council of the request to purchase 3 parking spaces through the Parking -in -Lieu Purchase Program before issuance of the building permit occurs 2. All retaining and planter walls must be painted to match the color, or with a complimentary color, of the principal structure 7 3. An additional swale or drainage conveyance measure along the front property line, within the city's ROW, may be required by the City Engineer and Stormwater Department through their review of the ROW permit application 4. Copy of SJRWMD 10-2 Stormwater Exemption Certificate submitted before landclearing begins � ►u� If aoIa� PREPARED BY DATE arr� f ( I Permit Application No. City of Sebastian HOME OF PELICAN ISi.AND Development Order Application Applicant (If not owner, written authorization (notarized) from owner is required) Name: — H.A.L.O. No -Kill Rescue Address: 708 Jackson Street; Sebastian, FL 32958 f Phone Number: ( 772) 589 - 7297 FAX Number: ( ) - E-Mail: - - jpetrone@halorescuefl.org 1 Owner (if different from applicant) j Name: - Maria Hart (LE) Address: 708 Jackson Street; Sebastian, FL 32958 — Phone Number: ( 772 } 589 - 8931 FAX Number: E-Mail: amcacupuncture@yahoo.com Title of permit or action requested: Major Site Plan PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY 'THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-1/2" BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM, A. Project Name (if applicable): H.A.L.O Rescue S. Site Information Address: 710 Jackson Street Lot: 1 - 10 Block: 6 Unit: Subdivision: Ocean Breeze Heights Indian River County Parcel #. 30-38-30-00001-0060-00000.1 Zoning Classification: CWR Future Land Use: RMU Existing Use: CWR Proposed Use: RMU C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach extra sheets if necessarv): Construction of a4,036 +/ SF enrichment and training facility with offices for the H.A.L.O Rescce facility. DATE RECEIVED: / /a.a FEE PAID: $Am. cc RECEIVED BY: ��.. Ai:K �`4 �j fi Permit Application No. D. Protect Personnel: — Agent: Name: N/A Address Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: { ) 1 E-Mail: Attorney: Name: N/A Address j Phone Number: (- ) - FAX Number:- E-Mail: - - - Engineer: Name: Mr. Aaron Bowles, P.E. - MBV Engineering, Inc. ( Address 1835 20th Street; Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone Number: ( 772) 569 - 0035 FAX Number: ( ) - E-Mail; ryanm@mbveng.com — - Surveyor: _ Name: Mr. Steve Cartechine, LS - Indian River Survey, Inc. Address 1835 20th Street; Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone Number: ( 772) 569 - 7880 FAX Number: ( ) - E-Mail: stevec@indianriversurvey.com Maria Hart , BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: V I AM THE OWNER _ I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT ALL THE INFORMATION, MAPS, DATA AND/OR SKETCHES PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE ACCURATE AND TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SIGNATURE DATE f L SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BY yd"t`;/7 A� 0- WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO bd OR PRODU ED AS IDENTIFICATION, THIS _, DAY OF .- 20,ga. NOTARY'S SIGNATURE �[.i� � - -��: ; . ,EggICCAMAyypNS PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY w WCOMM$SIONSGGwu COMMISSION No./EXPIRATION - =.",� �71 EXPIKS:WOW A2022 SEAL: ••``'�• BotMediNuHd�ryPubHothideiwMMr� 111111 •y l - -- Permit Application No. The following Is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances, exceptions, and appeals. I/WE, ✓ THE OWNER($) I ® THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE Planning _& Zgjijno, BOARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SE13ASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICATION. I/WE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE I/WE MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD/COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING. THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT IS BEING SIGNED BY ME/US VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR PROMISES MADE, BY ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF S€BASTIAN. SIGNATURE -- DATE Sworn to and subscribed before me by h&_iQ__ __ f who is personally, known _tom e or produced as identification, this _c2_ day of .r�rr ixr- , 20,-ga. Notary's Signature Printed Name of Notary Commission NO./Expiration Seal: 1?1*1-11111"1'11W JESMHAWKINS MYC0MSS M M 252457 "= � XPiREES:OcbberA2= o„t:;�Bond¢dTIwuN06afYPuE6clbdeflMl� 3 APPLICATION FEES ARE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL. ADDITIONAL FEES FOR THE CITY'S CONSULTING ENGINEER REVIEW (WHEN REQUIRED) WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT. ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATE U N 72 HOURS BEFORE VWNO CALL TOLL FREE 0 KnowwhaPa below. Cell before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE LOCATION MAP 20M (IN FEET) 1 iicK= 1000R •Y"0 ( PFKMECT ZONING PS L LOCATION Fu wslmmoNAL �. i.'-�iy 3c . nG �' .• mac- FLU RMU •f, FLu RMu GRAPHIC SCALE VICINITY MAP I ' (IN 200 ,� N FEET) 1 irch � ZIX1 R H.A.L.O. NO -KILL RESCUE SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 30S, RANGE 38E CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OCTOBER 2020 REVISED: JANUARY 2022 INDEX OF DRAWINGS APPLICANT C1 COVER SHEET H.A.L.O. NO -KILL RESCUE C2 GENERAL NOTES 708JACKSON STREET SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 C3 EXISTING CONDITIONS, DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHONE (772) 589-7297 C4 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS OWNER C5 SITE PLAN C6 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN MARIA HART (LE) C% UTILITY PLAN 708JACKSON STREET SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 CS CROSS SECTIONS PHONE (772) 589-8931 C9 GENERAL DETAILS C10 STORMWATER DETAILS ENGINEER C11 STORMWATER DETAILS MB��� C12 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. C13 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS MOIA BOWLFFVILLAM:ZAR&A:SCZ,1: S C14 LANDSCAPE DETAILS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL* SURVEYING - ENVIRONMENTAL 1835 20TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL 32960 PH: (772) 569-0035 MELBOURNE, FL- PH: (321) 253-1510 FT. PIERCE, FL - PH: (772) 468-9055 SURVEYOR LEGAL DESCFZIPTION (PARCEL ID 30W3000001006000000.1) A PORTION OF TRACT'A'AND LOn l THROUGH 7. BLOCK G. AMENDED PLAT OF OCEAN BREEZE HEIGHTS. ACCORDING TO THE PLATTHEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK2, PAGE 7, MU G RECORDS OF INMAN RIVER INDIAN RIVER SURVEY, INC. COUNTY. FLOMDA. AND Professional Surveying and Mapping (PARDELID9IX18 GDeG1MD00000A A PORTION DF TRAOT'A' AND LOTS STHROUGH 10, BLOCK II.AMENDED PLATOF OCEAN BREEZE HEIGHTS, 1835 20TH STREET ACCORDING TO THE PIAT THEREOF. AS RECOR EDIN PUT BOOK 2. PAGE 7, PUBUC RECORDS OF INMAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIOA. LESS RIGHT OF WAY FOR US HIGHWAY 1. VERO BEACH, FL 32960 PH: (772) 569-7880 ARCHITECT C.M.CRAWFORD ARCHITECT, INC. P.O. BOX 6511 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32961 PH: (772) 567-1212 RECEIVED 1J'`pA w-....... ;''\0 NSF"•., y N 13 JAN 180 2022 - STA r ..F(OA10�,; �F-�!ONAL EdCT,1�T1P do n7 City Of Sebastian u F PS2II 3 CamMunity Development r? .E DATE: 1712/2022 PROJECT: 17-0486 SHEET C1 PRE -CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUAREDTOPERFORM HISWORK N ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMEWSMTHEVAMDM PERMITS WHICH WALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE (SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS) PRIOR TO THE PRELONSMUCTON MEETING. 3. CONTRACTOR WILL ATTEND A PRELONSMUCTION MEETING WITH THE DESIGN ENGINEER, MUNICIPALITY AND OR LMMER PRIOR M LAND DISTURBANCE. 4. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL FOR PLANNED PROJECT. CORRESPONDING SHALL BE BETWEEN WE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY AMID IS THE RESFOMIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THECONTRACTORIS ADVISED TO WOROLMaMLLY REVIEW THIS PLAN PACKAGE SO AS TO BE TOTALLY PREPARED TO PRESENT MS BID PRICES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. TIE PLAN PACKAGE SUFFICIENTLY DELINEATES THE SCOPE ANDINTENT OF THE ROADWAY WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED. TT WALL, THEREFORE. BE NCUMBENT ON THE CONTRACTOR TOADJWT HIS FEE DOLLARS TO REFLECTANT ANDALL ITEMS WHICH MAY - SE CLEARLY OUTLINED OR THOSE ITEMS WHICH MAY NOT BE INDICATED BUT WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR WE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OFTHIS PROJECT WIniOUTAODTIONWLCOSTS TO Tiff OWNER 2 ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SEBASTIAN AID FOGY' STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND OTHER UTILITIES IS BASED ON AVAILABIE RECORDS AND IS NOTGUARANTEEDTO BE ACCURATE OR ALL WCLUSNE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATIONAS TO THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND OTHER UTILITIES AS MAYBE NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE THERETO AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION O UTLJTY RELOCATION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD WITH UIIUTY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO 00N6TRUCTION. S. T IS WE RESPONSIBILITY OF ME CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ALL UTIUTY COMPANIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKNG DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, AS REQUIRED BY WE UNDERGROUND FACILITY DAMAGE PREVENTION AND SAFETY ACT. NOTIFY SUNSHINE AT eft. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN EXCAVATING NEARBY EXISTING UTILITIES. 7. CONTACTOR SHALL IMOW ENGINEER OF ANY CONFUCT BEFORE ANY FURTHER WORK IS COMPLETED. 0. UTILITIES ARE TO BE ACJUSTEDSY UTILITY OWNER OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER S. SURFACEINFDRMATON SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS WAS OBTAINED FOR USE IN ESTABLISHING DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TIE MOIECT. WE ACCURACY OF THUS INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PART OF THE PUNS GOVERNING CONSTRUCTION OF ME PROJECT. T IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF WE CONTRACTOR TO INQUIRE OF TIE ENGINEER IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE, TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO REVIEW SAME PRIOR TO SIDING, AND 15 TO MAKE HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO ALL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL NDTIFY WE ENGINEER IF SOIL OR SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS UNSUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE ENCOUNTERED. 11. AM EXCAVATED LS M S SDI DEEMED UTABLEASFflLMATERNLASIMSNAM E BYTIEENGNEERSHAM B E UTILIZED ON SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. THE EXACTLOCATION OF DELWERY ON SITE SMALL BE OEIERMNED BY THE ENGINEER ALL EXCAVATED SgLS DEEMED VNSMTABIE STALL BE d3PO5EDOF BY THE CONTRAGTO2 AT MS OYN EXPENSE. 12. ITEM IN CONFUCT IMTH DESIGN SUCH AS EXISTING CURBS AND GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, DRMNAGE STRUCTURES, PAVEMENT AND EXCESS EXCAVATIONSME TO BE REMOVEDBY THE CONTRA MRANDDISPOSEDOFINALEGALAMDPROPERMANNERAWAYFROM THE JOB SITE ATHIS OWN EXPENSE. 11 CONTACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR CON5TRUCTON 14. T SHOULD BE NOTED TFAT THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT PROHIBITS THE OPERATING OF EQUIPMENT OR MACHINES CLOSER THAN 1 TEN FEET TO ENERGQED ELECTRIC ONES RATES OFBELOW. (oJ AT KILOVOLTS I KIASO,NOEKCAVATONIS PERMITTED WITHINFNE (5)FEET OF POWER POLE FACILITIES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WTTHALL OSHA REOLIMMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION 16. AMIRO E AND MONUMENTS (PR.M.S) SHOWN ON PLANS. O R FOUND. SHALL BE PRESERVED. THOSE SHOWN IN PROPOSED PAVEMENT SWILL BE PROTECTEUWWTH A CAST IRON VALVE BOX. 17. ANY PUBLC LANID CORNERS WITHIN ME LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE PROTECTED. IF A CORNER MONUMENT IS IN DANGER OF BEING DESTROYED OR DISTURBED, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. 1S ALL MISTING TREES WITHIN TIRE RIGHT OF WAY ARE TO BE REMOVED AS CLEARING AND GRUBBING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. WHEN REFERENCED TO, FOOT REFERS TO RORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS,CURRENT EDITION. 20. TFE CONTRACTOR SH MSTOREALLAR MSTJRBEDWCONS M=ONTOAWNDITIONEOLIALTO.ORBETTERTHANTHATAM6 ISNOW EXISTING. 21. DACKFILL.GRADEAMD SODAS REQUIRED-MAM NEW CONSTRUCTIONAND ALL DEVELOPED LOTS TO PREVENTEROSION. SEED AND MULCH WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED TO RESTORE UNDEVELOPED LOTS AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 22. SODDING TO BE USED AT LOCATIONS AS DIRECTED BY ME ENGINEER SCO ALL DISTURBED AREAS UPON COMPLETION. 21 ALL EXCESS CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND WASTE M BE HAULED OFF4ITE AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. V. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SHWL BE ACCORDANCE WITH FOOT STANDARDS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL THROUGH WORKZONES AND MUTCD (PART VI). 25. PROPEWYOWNER6 AND BUSINESSESWITHINTHEMEAOFCON TRUCTTW SHAMBE GIVENACCESS TO THEIRPROPERTYATALLTIMES DURING THE PERO)OF CONSTRUCTION. 28. ALL MAIBOXES SNALL BE RELOCATEDBY THE CONTRACTOR AS DIRECTED BY THE U.S. POSTAL M ILCARMER V. THECONTRAGTORSMALLFEMO .W, RMOBUTERATEEXISTI%RMA YSIGNMDPAVEMEMMARKINGSTHATCONFUC MWR E coNSTRIDnon TRAFFIC coNTRa PUNS. 28. CONIRACTORTOPROTECTAMS RINILER HEADS NOTIN CONFUCT WITH DESIGN AND RELOCATE ALL THOSE MACH MEIN CONFUCTTOA LOCATION DETERMINED IN FIELD. 2L SCOT MFEETMIMMUMAOJGMDEPROPOSEDEOGEOFPAVEMEM. 30 THE CONTRACTOR SHA L PROVIDE ANY TEMPORARY DRAINAGE MEASURES AS REQUIRED ED TOADEQUATELY DRAINTHE PROJECTAND ANY TEMPORARILY TRAVELED ROADWAYS, TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBIUTY: HOWEVER, ALL SUCH MEASURES MUST BE APPROVED BY ME ENGINEER 31. THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED MUSS OTHERWISE NOTED. 32. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. M. 6AWCUT CONCRETE OR ASPHALT DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED FOR REPLACEMENT. N. ALL ABANDONED UTILITIES INCLUDING PEES, CABLES AND STRUCTURES) FOUND IN THE MOW OF WAY AND NOT SHOWN ON THE PUN.. ARE TO BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AT WE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR THIS INCLUDES ALL EXOTIC PIPES LIKE ASBESTOSCEMEW PIPE. COST TO BE INCLUDED N CLEARING AMID GRUBBING ITEM. 35. DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS AID WIDTHS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER %. BENCHMARK DATUM IN NNVD 1988. 37. SACKHMANDSOD AS REQUIRED BEYOND RIGNTOF WAY LINES ON INDNIDML LOTS TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE RGWINTO CURB AND GUTTER. WL GRATE AND SOD SWALES TEN(10) FEETFROM PROPOSED DITCH BOTTOM INLETS ANDMITERED END SECTIONS ON SIDE STREETS AS REQUIRED. 3B ITIS THE CONTRACTORS RESPON61BIUTY TO MANTAINQ (BASEUNE) AND C (CENTERUNE) CONSTRUCTION THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. 40. WECONIRACTOR SHAM REMOVE DRIVEWAY APRONS AID DRIVEWAY CULVERTS AND SHALL MAINTAIN ROUGH GRACE FOR UTILITY MODIFICATIONS. 41. ALL EXISTING SWALES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DAMAGE TO THE SWALE LINE SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. 42. PAYMENT FOR INCIDENTAL ITEMS NOT SPECIFICALLY COVERED IN THE INDIVIDIIAL BID ITEMS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICES FOR BID ITEMS. 43. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) MOT CLEIARANCE BETWEEN POWER POE AND EDGE OF SIDEWAIK. 44. WHEN ALL OTHER PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE FINAL SURFACE COURSE SHALL BE PLACED. 41 CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF THE FINAL SURFACE COURSE SHALL BE UNITED TO A DISTANCE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, THE CONTRACTOR CAN COMPLETE IN ONE (1) DAY. 40. THECONIRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENTTEMMRARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS UNTIL THE FINAL SURFACE COURSE WAS CURED MINIMUM THIRTY(30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SURFACE COURSE PLACEMENT). ANY TEMPORARY PANTED MARKINGS PLACED ON THE FINAL 47. PAVEMENT TRANSITION SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PAVEMENT TRANSITION DERNL 48. ALL APPROVED PERMIT CONDITIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOTUMITEDTO MOT,FDEP, AMID CITY OFSEBASTTM, SHALL BE MET BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION O COMPLETION BY ENGINEER ROADWAY SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL T IS INTENDED THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMEM OF TRANSPORTATION ETANMRD SMCIRCATIM FOR ROADANo BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION' MOSTCURRENT EDITION BE USED WHERE APFUCASUE FOR VARIOUS WORK ANDTHAT VNERE SUCHWORDINGTERFJNREFERSMTHESTATEWROPoMANDITSDEPARTMEMOFTRAN MUATION AND PERSONNEL, SUCH WORDING IS INTENLED TO BE kWPlArcn VA1H TFNTVWOPDING WHGi VrO1AD PROVIDE PROPER TERMINOLOGY. THEREBY MAKING SUCH'STAMDARD SMCIFKATIO6 FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION' AS THE 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS' FOR THIS PROJECT. IF WITHIN TINT PARTICULAR SECTION ANOTHER SECTION, ARTICLE OR PARAGRAPH 18 REMRRED M. ITSHAM. BE A PART OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ALSO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE THE ENGINEER 0 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO RECUMTWG INSPECTIONS AND SHALL SUPPLY ALL EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PROPERLY TEST AMID INSPECT RE COMPLETED WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS FROM ME DATE W PROJECT ACCEPTANCE, DURING WHICH ALL FAULTY CONSTRUCTION ANDOR MATERIALS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GRADING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL GRADING NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE PROPOSED PLAN GRADES INCLUDING TYPICALSECTIONS. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION IM OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. STAKING CONSTRUCTION STAKING WILL SE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. STABILIZING STABILIZED SUBGRADE SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED M THE ROPoM BEARING VALLF AS PER PLAN FORTFE DEPTH AND LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PUN, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 160 OF WE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. TTYPE C STABILIZATION. ALL STABILIZED AREAS SHAM BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 96% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-1B0. BASE COURSE THE BASE SHALL BE CONSTRUCIEDOF EITHER UMEROCK MATERIAIN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 911 OR CEMENTED COQUINA SHELL MATERIAL N ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION WS OFTHE STANDARD SMaRCARONS. UM ROCK BASE ANDCEMENTED COQUINA SHELL BASE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2W OF THE STANDAROSPEGFKATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ROD( PT CERTIFICATION FOR CEMENTED COQUINA SHELL MATERIAL BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED BY AT LEASTW%OF THE MAGMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-180. BASE SHAM SE APPROVED PRIOR TO PRIME COAT. PRIME AND TACK COAT PRIME AND TACK COAT FOR THE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION =OF WE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFAOF YMRMY,F .APh�L, TYPE SIII ACSC SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR THE pEPTHAND LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAR INACCORGAME VWM SECTIONS 320, AND 33DOF RE STANMRDSMC]RCATION% TESTING THE CONTRACTOR SMALL RETAIN TE SERVICES OF AN APPROVED INMPEMIDE W TESTING UBOMTORYTO CONDUCTALL REQUIRED TESTS ON SUBGRADE, BASE AND SURFACE COURSE MATERIALS. TESTRESULTSMUSTBE SUBMITTED PRIOR TOANY REOUESTFOR PAYMENT ON THE ABOVE ITEMS. THE SCHEM. FOR TESTING OF THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: A. SUBGRADE; 1. ROMMBEAF4MVALUETESTSSHALLBETAKENATINTERVALSOFNOTMORE TIAN200FEET,MCWSMAS MIGHT BE NECESSARY IN THE EVENTOF VARIATIONS N SUBSOIL CONDITIONS. 2. DENSITY TESTS SMU M TMEN ATINERVALS OF WT MORE nWJ 200 FEET OR MMERAS MGW M NECESSARY. B. BASE: 1. DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS OF NOT MORE THAN SOD FEET OR CLOSER AS MI GIBE NECESSARY, Aa WSnNG SMALL M TNLEN IN A STAGGERED SAMPUM PATTERN FROM A POINT 1 1I21MCHE5 INSIDE RE LEFT EDGE, TO THE CENTER, TO A POINT 12 INCHES INSIDE THE RIGHT EDGE O THE ITEM TESTED. IF AM TEST INDICATES THAT THE WORK DOES NOT NEUME SPECIFMXTIONIS, THE SUBSTANDARD AREA SHALL BE REWORKED OR CORRECTFDAND RETESTED, ATTHE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, UNTIL THE PROVISIONS OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE MET. ALL PASSING TESTS SHLLL BE PAID FOR BY TIE OWNER. ALL FAILING TESTS SHALL BE PAID FOR BY WE CONTRACTOR CLEAN-UP THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE CIEANLF OF EXCESS CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL UPON COMP:ETION OF THE PROJECT. THE SITE MUST BE LEFT IN A NEAT, CLEAN, GRADED CONDITION, CONSTRUCTION IN STREETS AM ROAD RIGF7AF Y9 1. OPEN ROAD CUTS REQUIRES PRIOR APPROVAOF THE CITY, COUNTY, STATE OR ANY OTHER AGENCY WHICH MAY HAVE JURISDICTION. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS ANDMRKMANSHPAM TO M IN ACCORDANCE AWTH RORIM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. 3, ALL AREAS IN EXISTING MI-l'WAYS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHAM RECEIVE SOLID SOD, 4. STREET RESTORATION TO BE DOME AS PER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY STANDARDS. 5, THE CONTACTOR SMALL COMPLY NA ALL RUES AD REGUATIONS OF THE STATE. COMTM MDCITY AUTHORITIES REGARDING CLOSING OR RESTRICTING THE USE OF PUBLIC STREETS OR HIGHWAYS. 6. TRAFFIC CONTROL ON ALL COUNTY AD STATE HIGHWAY MGHT-0F WAYS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (US. DOTFIN) AM ME REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AMID AM LOCAL AGENCY HAVING JU ISDICTIOR DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS STORM IMETS AND WWOLEG SHAMES CONSTRUCTED IN GENERALACCORDAME WITH SECTION 4EOF ME STMMRD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 284TAY STRENGTH OF S000 PSI. ALLREINFORCING STEEL TO BE ASTM A615-72 GRACE 40. FYP=0.- Mi.IND SHALL BE HANDLED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE AITH AG 31571 PRECASTCONCREM MANHOLES AND STORM INLETS MAYBE USED UPON THE ENGMERS APPROVAL OF TIE MANUFACTURERS SHOP DRAWINGS. STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 430 AND RELATED SECTIONS O THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS O ME FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRNNSPORTATOµ CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR INDICATED. ALL CONCRETE SWILL HAVE MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28DAYS OF3I= PSI. ALL WORK S W W. COMPLY VATH THE CURREMEDITION OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (AG) BUILDING CODE AND THE MPUCA&E BUILDING CODES HAVING JURISDICTION IN WE AREA. CULVERT PIPES REINFORCED CONCRETE PIM (R.C.P.) SCOW. BE IN ACCORDANCE PATH SECTION 4 Of THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. PRECAST CONCRETE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS ALL PRECAST CONCRETE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS ONCLUOING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ROUND CONIC. PIPE. ELLIPTICAL CON C, PIPE. LPDERDRAINS. MANPIOLES, INLETB, ENDWALLS. JUNCTION BOXES, THREE SIDED CONIC, CULVERTS, AND CONC, BOX CULVERTS) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WWTH SECTION 449 OF WE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. GROUNDWATER GROUNDWATER MAY BE ENCOUNTERED ON THIS SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO RAN ACCORDINGLY, RECORD DRAWINGS CONTACTOR SHALL KEEP ANDMAIWAIN RECORDDRAWIMS ON THE PROJECT SIZE ATAM TIMES WHICH SHALL SE ANNOTATED BY THE CONTRACTOR DEPICTING AM CHANGES MADE IN THE REM WHICH DIFFER FROM THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. INVERT AND TOP ELEVATIONS OF CULVERTSANDINLETSTRUCTURES, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COMPLETE AND FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION O PROJECT ANDPMOR TO FINAL INSPECTION AND FNAL PAYMENT. INSPECTION MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKPOINTS THE ENGINEER SNAIL BE NOTIFIED 1. PRIOR TO ANY MAJOR DEVIATION FROM TINE APPROVED PLANE. 2. PRIORTO BACIPIWNG ANT PIPE MENCH M. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF SUBGRADE GRADING AMID COMPACTION. 4. UPON BECINNNG OF SPREADING OF ROCK BASE MATERNAL S. UPON COMPLETON OF GRADING AND COMPACTION OF THE BASE MATEPoALAND PRIOR TO FUMING. 6. IMMEDIATELY PRIGR TO AND UPON APPLICATION O' LC.S.C. 7. LION COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. GENERALNOTES I. CONTRACTOR IS RASMNSIBLE FOR CHECKING ACTUALSIM CONDITIONS IJEFORESTARTNG CONSTRUCTION. 2. AMHOISCREPANCIESONTIIE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGNTTO THE ATTEMIONOFTIE ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. 1 ALL WORK SHALL BE IN WORKMANLIKE MANGIER AND SHALL CONFORM WATHAMAPPUCABLE CITY, COUNTY. STATE AMID FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND/OR CODES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO M RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND LICENSES REQUIRED TO BEGIN WORK. 0. ALLMAMMALSANDLABORUNOER MS PROJECT SHALL BEN STMCTACCMGAMENW REQUIREMENTS OF THE CRY OF SEBAS UN. WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, FDEP AND THESE PLANS AMID SPEC6ICATIONS. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. TINE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL CONCERNED UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. S. NO FIELD CHANGES OR OEVATDNS FROM DESIGN TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY DENSITY TESTS TO ENGINEER ON ALL SUB -GRAM AND BASE. TESTS SHALL BE PREPARED PER AASHTO T-1M MEMOD. 0. SLOPE GRADES FROM ELEVATI-G SHIOMN TO EXISTING GRADE AT PROPERTY LINE. MAXIMUM SLOPE JX, S. ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR AM INSPECTION. 1B ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SWLLL BE N ACCORDANCE WITH M.U.T.C.D STANDARDS. 11. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOWATIW 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. I THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTORS BID SHALL INCLUDECONSIDERATION FORADDRESSINGTHIBISSUE.WHENMR MATERISENCOUNTEREDTHE CONTACTOR SHALL PLAN ACCORDINGLY. 13. ALLINLETSSHALLINVEA6'MIN.SUMPBELOWLOVYESTINVERT. 14. EROSION CONTROL FENCING MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO GRADING. 15. PIPE LENGTHS AND SLOPES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. 1S IF AM EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED WRING CONSTRUCTION T SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSINLITYTO REPAIR ANDOR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN ITTO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 17. ALLSTORM PE ELATE % RING STRUCTUR S E SHALL BE GRgffED TO ASSURE CONIREC TKN ATSTHUCTUREIS WATERTIGHT. 10. CONTRACTORSHWLAMMTIN.ETISTRIJCTUREORCONMCnONLOOATIONASKQUREDTOE WFtE PROPOSED STRUCTURES AMID PIPES An IN PROPER ALIGNMENT AND HATCH SLOPE OF EXISTING PIPES OR CONNECTIONS. 19. THISPUNCONTEIP MSACCESSWMECTIONSTOADJACENTRDADSARSHIOWN. 20. FILLMATERIAL MAY NOT SE STOCKPILED HIGHER THAN SIX (b) VERTICAL FEET ONSITE PER INOAI RIVER COUNTY COOS. 21. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO EDGE O GUTTER OR PAVEMENT. RADII SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. M. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PER M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS. 21 ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS, EXCEPT PARKING STALL STRIPING. SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC PER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. Nk THE USES PROMSEDAS PARTOFTH65 PLAN DO NOT REQUM A SUBMITTAL OF A RISK MANAGEMENTPLAN PURSUANTTO US. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) REGULATIONS AND SHALL NOT EXCEED THE EPA'S RMP THRESHOLD QUANTITIES OF USTED SUBSTANCES. 4. WATER -FIREFIGHTING PURPOSES SHALL BE INDICATED VATHASLUEROADWAYREFLECTOR,PUCEOME FOOTOFFOTHECENTERUNEOFTHE ROAD FACING TIE FIRE HYDRANT. THIS INCLUDES NEWAND EXISTING SOURCES. M. REGARDLESS O PRIVATE OR PUBLC DEDCAnO . THERE SHLLL BE ND UTILITY COMIECTIONIS, METER BOXES OR VALVE BOXES IN EXISTING OR PROPOSED SIDEWALK OR DRIVEWAY AREAS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST INLET/STRUCTURE OR CONNECTION LOCATION AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND PIPES ARE IN PROPER ALIGNMENT AND MATCH SLOPE OF EXISTING PIPES OR CONNECTIONS. 2L AM STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED AS A RESULT O LAND CLEARING AND LANDSCAPING ACTIVITIES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, 29. CONTRACTORISRESMWBLETOPWO CTANDIORREPLACEALLSMR YMONUMEWATIONBYAUCENSED SURVEYOR IN TIE STATE OF FLCMDA. X. ALL PARKING SPACES WITH EXCEPTION OF THE HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES SHIALL BE STRIPEDIN WHITE. TRAFFIC PAINTANDBE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIN DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION (FOOT STANDARD SMCIFICJATIQNS FOR FOR ROAD S BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, SECTION 710. LATEST EDITION. PED ING SPACES SHAM 31. ALL HANDICAPPMKBE PROPERLY SIGNEDAND STRIPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MOT STMDARD INDEX 1735, LATEST EOTSJN. 3Z COMMRGAUMULRFAMLYBULDIMSSWUMSTAMNIMUMBNWNUAEPoCALAMD SS. 3S. ALL STRIPING WITH N CITY OF SEBASTIAN RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE REMO REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT (THERMOPLASTIC). U- ALLSM VISIONCONSTRUCION SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CRYOF SEBASTIAN ORDINANCES. 35. HOURSOFCONSTRUCTIONARE UMITEDTO M4', 7AM7PM, AM WEEKENDS, AM4MPM PER CITY OFSEBASTMN LAMIDDEVELOPMENTCODE SECTION% HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITATIONS: MUM OUTSIDETHOSE LIMITS SHALLREQUIRE DIRECT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BUILDING OFFICALS. ALL WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT-0E-WAY SHALL UTIUM MOT INDEX M DETAILS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF AM RO-W. ACTIVITY WITH ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS AND WORK MEAS PROPERLY MARKEp, SPECIFICALLY WITH CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE, SITE SGNAGE 37. ANY WORK IN THE MGMOAF-WAY WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY ENGINEER WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 7A HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PRIMARY BENCHMARK Ns. -A. BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM O ISO REFERENCING INDIAN RIVER COLAYTY BENCHARK BM0 IKQI ATM ELEVATION OF 14.S9 FEET (NAV088). A P... ••• 313 •• aa. A Ix : ATE OF HAL EgPI Lary �N ANION J. BOWLES Fl_ P.E.�313313 1/12/2022 SHEET C2 17-0466 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of 2/3/2022 Re: Commissioners Matters - Election of Chairperson & Vice Chairperson Attached: 1) Land Development Code section 2) Commissioner information from City Clerk's Office Sec. 54-1-2.4. - Planning and zoning commission. (f) Rules of procedure. (1) Officers. From among its members the planning and zoning commission annually shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson at the first regular meeting of the commission held at the beginning of each calendar year. Whenever possible, the persons selected as the chairperson and vice chairperson of the commission shall have served two years as a regular member of the commission and shall have attended at least 90% of the meetings of the planning and zoning commission which such member was not otherwise excused from attending by the chairperson at such meetings of the commission. The planning and growth management director shall appoint a city employee to serve as secretary to the planning and zoning commission and take minutes of the meetings of the commission. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 3-YEAR TERMS MEETS 1 ST AND 3RD THURSDAY OF EACH MONTH - 6:00 P.M. MEMBER NAME AND APPOINTMENT HISTORY ADDRESS [MOST RECENT HISTORY FIRST] Robert Hughan Reappointed reg member 12/9/2020 1244 Larkspur Street Sebastian, FL 32 Took McManus' regular member position rhuohana-bel uth.net 11/2017 (305) 498- 47 Reappointed alt member 2/22/17 Took Kautenburg's unexpired alternate member position 12/16/15 Rick Carter 237 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958. focussys(o)comcast.net 918-4600 Tahir (Bash) Qizilbash 103 Barbara Court Sebastian, FL 32958 Bash.aesftmail.com 581-0775 Bill Simmons 509 Drawdy Way Sebastian, FL 32958 Bsimmons41 acomcast.net (270) 314-3554 Reappointed 5/27/2020 Reappointed 3122/17 Took Cardinale's expired regular member position 4127/11 Took Durr's unexpired alt member position 2/9/11 Reappointed 3126/14 Reappointed 5/27/2020 Reappointed 5/10/17 Reappointed 3/26/14 Took Paul's expired regular member position 4/27/11 CURRENT STATUS Term to expire 11/1/2023 Term to expire 4/1/2023 Term to expire 5/1/2023 Appointed regular member 2/12/2020 Term to expire 2/1/2023 Reappointed alternate member 11/20/19 Took Alvarez's expired alternate member position 12/14/16 Louise Kautenburg Appointed regular member 6/9/2021 Term to expire 6/1/2024 973 Oswego Avenue Sebastian, FL 32958 Appointed alternate member 2/12/2020 Louisek1(@iuno.com 696-3716 Reappointed regular member 2/22/17 Took Durr's unexpired regular member position 10/14/15 Reappointed 1/8/14 Took Hennessey's unexpired alternate member position 3/14/12 Joel Roth — Vice Chair Reappointed 518/19 Term to expire 5/1/2022 1984 E. Lakeview Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 Reappointed 4/27/16 ioelroth(amsn.com 589-6894 Reappointed 4/24113 Reappointed 5112/10 Took Buchanan's unexpired regular member position 1/27110 Al Alvarez Reappointed 11/20/19 Term to expire 11/1/2022 492 Quarry Lane Sebastian, FL 32958 Took Dodd's expired regular member alaivarez(a)aol.com position 12/14/16 532-8767 Took McManus' unexpired alternate member position 11/19/14 John Christino - Alternate Took Mauti's expired alternate member Term to expire 1/1/2023 182 Spring Valley Avenue position 12111 /19 Sebastian, FL 32958 i.christinoOsbcolobal.net (772) 202-7812 Karen Jordan - Alternate Took Kautenburg's alternate member Term to expire 11/1/2022 487 Bywood Avenue position 7/28/2021 Sebastian, FL 32958 karenwoodiordan(aa mail.com (706) 994-9686 revised 7.29.2021 School Board Member: Mara Shiff, 1990 25t" Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 4 regular members are needed to make a quorum. In the event a regular member cannot make the meeting, an alternate steps in.