HomeMy WebLinkAbout03051997 City of Sebastian
I 1225 MAIN STREET g SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (561) 589-5330 n FAX (561) 589-5570
AGENDA
SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING(S)
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 1997 - 6:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK- 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
CALL TO ORDER
97.086
1-36
PLEDGE OF ALLLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
OUASI-J'UDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING(S), FINAL ADOPTIQ~
(Procedures on Back of Agenda)
Ao
Conduct Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Special Use Permit Application ~omRonald
Adamson for Car Wash. North U.S. 1 - Consider Adoption of Resolution No. R-97-11
(CommuniW Development Director Transmittal 2/21/97. R-97-11_ Staff Report. Map_ Application.
Knight Letter of OMecfion. 1982 EPA Guidance Document for Effluent Discharges)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A
CAR WASH IS NOT DETRIIVIENTAL TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE AND IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING
DISTRICT; GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MR. RONALD ADAMSON FOR A CAR WASH
LOCATED ON US I NORTH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF
RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS; CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
97.087
37-49
Conduct Ouasi-J'udicial Public Heating on Fischer Island Preliminary. Plat - Consider
Adomion of Resolution No. R-97-12 (Community_ Development Director Transmittal 2/21/97.
R-c)7- 12~ Staff Report. Map. Application. Plat Under Separate Cover)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING
THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS FISCHER'S LAKE ISLAND
SUBDIVISION; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
97.088
51-56
Conduct Ouasi4udicial Public Hearing on Park Place Preliminary_ Development - Consider
Adontion of Resolutlon No. R-97-13 (Communi~ Development Director Transmittal 2/21/97.
R-97-13. Map. Plat Unde~Set~arate Cover)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING
TIlE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PUD KNOWN AS LAKE DELORES A.K.A. PARK
PLACE; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
97.089
57-67
Conduct Ouasi-J'udicial PublicHearingon Park Place Final Plat - Consider Adoption of
Resolution No. R-97-14 (Communi _ty Development Director Transmittal 2/21/97.
R-97-14. Staff Report. Map. Application. Plat Under Separate Cover)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING
THE FINAL PUD AND FINAL PLAT FOR A PUD KNOWN AS PARK PLACE, PLAT 1, PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
5. ADJOURN
AN~ PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO ANT MATTER
CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING (OR HEARING) WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPO~V WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. (286.0105 ES.)
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL
ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LF_.4ST 48
HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING.
U_pcominv Meetings:
Special Meeting (Swearing In) - Monday, March 17, 1997 ~ 6 pm
Workshop - Wednesday, March 26, 1997 ~ 6pm or soon thereafter
Regular Meet~ng - Wednesday, March 26, 1997 ~, 7pm or soon thereafter
Procedures for Quasi. Judicial Hearings a.v Follows (In accordance with R-96-87):
· Mayor/Presiding Ofcer Opens Hearing and Outlines Rules
· CiO, Attorney read~ Ordinance or Rezolutlon (if Applicable)
· If Requested by ParO, or ParO, Intervenor - Clerk/Secretary Administers Oath to Other Parties and/or ParO, Intervenors Who Intend to Testify
· For Non.Land Use Matters - Disclosure ofF~-Parte Communicatton
· Staff Initial Presentation
° Inquiry of StaffbyAffected Parties through Mayor or Presiding Officer
· Applicant Presentation. Uninterrupted 15 Minutes
· Inquiry of Applicant or Applicant 'S Witnesses by Council (or Staff or Affected Parties through Mayor or Presiding Officer)
· Proponents' Testimony - 3 Minutes or I0 Minutes if Representing 5 or More
· Inquiry of Proponents by Council/Board
· Opponents' Presentation - Affected ParO, Opponents 15 Minutes - Non-Affected Opponents 3 Minutes or 10 Minutes if Representing a Group
of 5 or More
· Inquiry of Opponents or Opponent's IFitnes~s by Council/Board
· Opening of Informational Testimony- AnyMember of Public with Information or Need for Clarification - $ Minutes or 10 Minutes if
Representing Groups of 5 or More
· Inquiry of Informational IFitnesses by Council/Board
· Closing of Public Information Period - No AdditionalPublic Comments Allowed Except in Response to Council/Board Questions
Staff Response and Summary - 10 Minute~ (Response to Applican~ Opponents or Informational IFitnesses - Affected Parties May Request to
be Allowed to Point Out Errors of Fact or Ask Questions of Staff or Staff IFitne~res)
· Applicant's RebuttalPresentation - i0 Minute~ (Affected Parties or StaffMay Request to be Allowed to Point Out Errors of Fact or Ask
Questions of Applicant or Applicant Witne, ses)
· CiO, Council/Board Inquiry of Applicant& Opponents or Staff
· Close tlearing and FormalAction
Applicant, Staff and Affected l.~ndowners Entitled to Notice Under any Statute or City Code are considered Affected Parties.
Affected Parties May Request ~tension of Time
A person who appears before the decision maldng body who is not a parO, or parO, intervenor may be allowed to testify before the decim'on maldng
body, may be requested to respond to questions from the decision mat~'ng body but need not be sworn as a witness and is not be subject to cross-
examination and is not required to qualify as an e_xpert witness. The decision maldng body shah a~gn weight and credibility to such testimony as it
deem, appropriate.
\wp-min\quosi.pro
City of Sebastian
1225 MAIN STREET ~ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (407)589-5330 [] FAX (407)589-5570
SUBJECT: Approval of )
Resolution No. R-97-11 )
)
)
)
Approval for Submittal By: )
)
City Manager, ~j~ ~Z/~- ~~---
6/ )
)
)
)
)
)
)
Agenda Number:
Dept. Origin:
Date Submitted:
For agenda Of: ,,,
Exhibits:
Community Dev.
(RM)
02./21197
0315197
1. Resolution No. R-97-11
2. Staff report
3. Location map
4. application
EXPENDITURE
REQUIRED:
AMOUNT
BUDEGETED:
APPROPRIATION
REQUIRED:
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Mr. Konald D. Adamson has applied for a special use permit for a car wash located on US
1 north, on the east side of the road, just north of Wal-mart. Car washes are not addressed in the
land development code, therefore it should be addressed as a special use permit. A copy of the
staff`report, location map and application are attached.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve Resolution No. R-97-11.
RESOLUTION NO. R-97-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTiAN, INDiAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, FINDING A CAR WASH IS NOT
DETRIMENTL~L TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND
WELFARE AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE AND
INTENT OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING
DISTRICT; GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MR.
RONALD ADAMSON FOR A CAR WASH LOCATED ON US 1
NORTH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILiTY; PROVIDING FOR
REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS;
CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Mr. Ronald Adamson has applied for a special use permit for a car
wash; and
WItEREAS, the Piarming and Zoning Commission of the City of Sebastian has
considered this application and has found that the requested special use permit is not
detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare nor is it injurious to other' properties or
improvements within the immediate vicinity and that the proposed use is consistent with
the purpose and intent of the general commercial zoning district and the use is similar with
the uses allowed in such a district; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sebastian has
recommended approval of the requested special use permit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY Tl:IE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOIRDA, as follows:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACTS: The City Council of the City of
Sebastian, after considering the evidence presented at the heating, finds as follows:
The requested car wash located on US 1 north is not detrimental to the
public safety, health or welfare or injurious to other properties or
improvements within the immediate vicinity; and,
The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the general
commercial zoning district and is similar in nature and compatible with uses
allowed in such a district.
SECTION 2. APPROVAL: The City of Sebastian hereby approves a special use
permit for Mr. Ronald Adamson to operate a car wash at a lot described as follows:
Town of Wauregan PBS-178, northwesterly ½ of lot 23 lying east of
Highway 1 as described in Official Records Book 388, Page 761.
SECTION 3. CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to secure
the objectives and intent of the land development code:
That a eight foot high opaque buffer be constructed on the east property
line and the easterly 30 feet of the north and south property lines. This
buffer can be a fence, wall or vegetation; if vegetation is used, it shall not
minimize the landscape requirements of the site.
That the site lighting shall be directed away from the residential area to the
east of the subject parcel.
That the architectural style of the building be completed in the "Old Florida
Fishing Village" theme adopted for the riverfront area.
SECTION 4. SEVERAB][LITY: If any section or part of a section of this
Resolution is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any
other section or part of a section of this resolution shall not thereby be affected or
impaired unless it clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this
Resolution is wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so. held
to be invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. CONFLICTS: Ail Resolutions or pans thereof in conflict herewith
are, to the extent of such conflict, superseded and repealed.
SECTION 6, EFFECTIVE DATE:
immediately upon is adoption.
This ,Resolution shall take effect
The foregoing
Resolution was moved for adoption by Councilmember
The motion was seconded by Councilmember
and, upon being put into a vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Louise R. Cartwright
Vice-Mayor Walter Barnes
Councilmember Norma J. Damp
Councilmember Raymond Halloran
Councilmember Richard Taracka
day of
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this
,1996
City of Sebastian, Florida
By:
Louise R. Cartwright, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn M. O'Hallorart, CMC/AAE
(Seal)
Approved as to Form and Content:
Valerie Settles
City Attorney
5.
6.
7.
8.
Community Development Department
Special Use Permit Application - Staff Report
Requested Action:
Project Location
a,
b.
Project Name: Sebastian Car Wash North
Approval of a special use permit for a car wash.
Project Owner:
Project Agent:
Project Engineer:
Project Attorney:
Project Description
a.
Address:
Legal: Town of Wauregan PBS-178, northwesterly % of lot 23 lying east
of Highway 1 as described in Official Records Book 388 PP 761.
Indian River County Parcel Number:
Mr. Ronald D. Adamson
Narrative of proposed action: The applicant has requested a
special use permit for a car wash on the east side of US 1, across the
street from Wal-mart. Car washes are not addressed in the land
development code.
Mr. Adamson owns the Sebastian Car Wash located on the south end of
US 1. That use was apparently approved as a conditional use. The
conditional use was a ddve through facility.
One of the conditions for a ddve through facility is such a facility can not
be within 100 feet of a residential district. For the proposed facility, the
site is located adjacent to a residential district. Therefore, such a
conditional use is not allowed.
The applicant is requesting a special use permit for a car wash for this
site since a conditional use permit would not be allowed.
North:
East:
South:
West:
CG
Current Land Use
vacant
residential
vacant
Wal-mart, vacant
Future Land Use
CG
CG
CG
Total Acreage: .76 acre
Current Land Use(s): vacant
Current Zoning:
Adjacent Properties
Zoning
CG
(County)
CG
CG
Site Charactedstics
(1)
(2)
(3) Soil:
(4) Vegetation:
(5) Flood Hazard:
(6) Water Service:
(7) Sanitary Sewer Service:
(8) Parks:
(9) Police/Fire:
St. Lucie sand
sand pines
zone X
Indian River County Utilities
Indian River County Utilities
fire: 3,000 feet south on US 1
police: 7,800 feet south on Main Street.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
Future Land Use:
Traffic Circulation:
Housing:
Public Facilities:
consistent
consistent
consistent
consistent
Coastal Management: consistent
Conservation: consistent
Recreation and Open Space: consistent
10.
11.
12:
13.
14.
15.
16.
Is the granting of the special use permit detrimental to the public safety,
health or welfare or injurious to other properties or improvements within
the immediate vicinity in which the property is located? The applicant
operates the Sebastian Car Wash on the south end of US 1 in the city. There
are no records of harm to the public safety, health or welfare from the operation
of this facility. The proposed use is not detrimental to the public safety, health
or welfare nor injurious to other properties or improvements within the
immediate vicinity.
Is the use requested consistent with the purpose and intent of the
respective zoning district, and can it be demonstrated to be similar in
nature and compatible with the uses allowed in the zoning district? The
applicant operates the Sebastian Car Wash on the south end of US 1 in the
city. The zoning for that site is CG. A special use permit was issued for that
site. Therefor the use requested is consistent with the purpose and intent of the
CG zoning district, and it is similar in nature and compatible with the uses
allowed in the CG zoning district.
Additional considerations: none
Other Matters: none
Analysis: The requested special use is for a car wash on US 1. There is an
existing car wash on US 1 on the southern end of the city located in the CG
zoning district. That use has been compatible with the other uses allowed in the
area. These include ddve through restaurants.
To the east of the proposed site there is an existing mobile home park. The
impacts caused by a car wash are not expected to be any greater than other
uses that are alloWed in the CG zoning distdct such as a ddve through
restaurant. The impacts of the use can be minimized through the site plan
approval process.
Conclusion: The proposed use is not detrimental to the public safety, health or
welfare nor injurious to other properties or improvements within the immediate
vicinity and the use requested is consistent with the purpose and intent of the
CG zoning district, and it is similar in nature and compatible with the uses
allowed in the CG zoning district.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning and Zoning
Commission find that the requested special use permit for a car wash on US 1 is
not detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare nor injurious to other
properties or improvements within the immediate vicinity and the use requested
is consistent with the purpose and intent of the CG zoning district, and it is
similar in nature and compatible with the uses allowed in the CG zoning district.
It is further recommended that the planing and Zoning Commission recommend
to the City Council:
3
That the City Council find that the requested special use permit for a car
wash on US i is not detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare
nor injurious to other properties or improvements within the immediate
vicinity and the use requested is consistent with the purpose and intent
of the CG zoning district, and it is similar in nature and compatible with
the uses allowed in the CG zoning district.
That the City Council approve the request for a special use permit for a
car wash located at the northwesterly ~ of lot 23 lying east of Highway 1
as described in Official Records Book 388 PP 761, conditioned upon the
following:
a. That a six foot high opaque wall be constructed on the east property
line and the easterly 30 feet of the north and south property lines.
b. That the site lighting be directed away from the residential area to the
east.
c. That the architectural style of the building be completed in the "Old
Flodda Fishing Village" theme adopted for the Riverfront area.
PREP/~ED BY ....
DATE
4
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
City of Sebastian
1225 MAIN STREET [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (561) 589-5330 [] FAX (561) 589-5570
MEMORANDUM
March 4, 1997
Mayor and City Council Members, City Manager
Kathryn M. O'Hallora~, O' ¢
City Clerk
3/5/97 Special Meeting - Agenda Item No. 97.086 Adamson Car Wash
Attached please find a conceptual drawing of the proposed car wash which was submitted to
Community Development by Mr. Adamson and which we received today when asked by
Councilmember Taracka if there was any type of plan for the site.
sam
I
I
I
i
I
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
In accordance with Section 20A-2.6, Land Development Code, the
City Council may, in its sole discretion, grant a special use
permit in any district for a use which is not provided for in the
zoning regulations. Ail such uses shall not be otherwise
illegal, and shall not be specifically prohibited pursuant to the
comprehensive plan or other applicable law or regulations.
The City Council shall not grant any special use permit under
this section unless it shall make findings based upon the
evidence presented to. it in each case that:
1)
The granting of the permit will not be detrimental to the
public safety, health or welfare or be injurious to
other properties or improvements within the immediate
vicinity in which the property is located; and
2)
The use requested is consistent with the purpose and
intent of the respective district, and can be
demonstrated to be similar in nature and compatible with
the uses allowed in such district.
The fee for a special USe permit is $150 (established by
Resolution No. R-88-09). In addition the applicant must provide
the City Clerk's office with a list of the surrounding property
owners within a 200' radius of the subject property along with
the appropriate certified return receipt mailing fee (currently
$2.29 for U.S. mailing).
NAME OF APPLICANT-' Fonald D. Adamson
ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:_5.8.0_ Balboa ST. Se_b, Fl. 3..29.58
APPLICANT PHONE ~: Home: 388-14Qd~rkL388-2857
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Vacant-N. U.S. #1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:Town Of Waure~an PBS-178
ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Q3
REASON FOR REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT: To build a car wash. Car
wash is not included in present zoninq ord.
TIlE BUILBING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BACKUP INFORMATION
FOR CERTAIN REQUESTS
b:specuse.app
Date
WAIVER ~hND CONSENT
I/We, the owner(s) of the property located at NJ/9 ]m~ 9~ w~,~ 9~bE of US'
Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida, (the "Property,,~' hereby ~
authorize each and every member of the z~n~/o~ on,~n~{~
Board/Commission of the City of S~ba§tlan--- (the
"Board"/"Commission") to physically enter upon the property and ~
view the Property in connection with my/our pending Special Use Permit
(the "Proceeding").
I/We hereby waive any objection or defense I/we may have, due to
the quasi-judicial nature of the proceeding, resulting from any
Board/Commission member entering or viewing the property, including
any claim or assertion that my/our procedural or substantive due
process rights under the Florida Constitution or the United States
Constitution were violated by such entering or viewing.
This Waiver and Consent is being signed by me/us voluntarily and
not as a result of any coercion applied, or promises made, by any
employee, agent, contractor or official of the City of Sebastian.
day of
Dated this _~
o
and subscribed before me this /W ~ day
'
My Commission Expires:
of
Notary Public
To;
'/
. i
' I
4<..,
'~ I
IGU1DANC~
I FOR,
EFFLUE,NT 015CHAi'~G F~5
I FRON THF.
I AUTO A,"ID OTHER LAUNORIF.~
POINT 5OLFRCE CATI:GORY
I
I Administrator
~e£fre), Dcrdt, Acting Oirecxor
~flucnt Guidefln~ Division
G. Edw~d Sd§~Ll, Chic!
Inorganic Chemicals &nd ~rvice Industries Bra.r~h
~lwood F.. Mart~
David ?~ps~n
Feb~ 1982
INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT BY ICA LEGAL COUNSEL,
FEDERAL REGULATIONS UNDER CLEAN
WATER ACT DETERMINED NOT TO BE
NECESSARY FOR CAR WASH ESTABLISHMENTS
by
James Pickman, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
In order to implement the provisions of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, the United States
Environmental Protectio-n Agency ('EPA') was required to issue
effluent limitations guidelines, pretreatment standards and new
source performance standards. Because EPA failed to meet the
timetable set forth in the Act for issuing the required guidelines
it was sued in 1976 by several environmental groups. The court-'
approved settlement of that lawsuit in 1979 required EPA to
develcp a program and adhere to a schedule for p.romulgating
guidelines and pretreatment standards' for 21 major industries,
including the car wash industry. However, .with respect to the car
wash industry, the settlement decree did~provide that, "the
toxicity and the amount of incompatible pollutants {taken
together) introduced by such point sources into treatment works
that are publicly owned, is so insignificant as not to justify
developing a pretreatment regulation."
Thereafter, in order to perform its obligations under both
the 1972 Amendments and the settlement decreee, EPA did undertake
a study of "auto and other laundries,' which included sampling and
analysis of discharges from these industries. The results of the
study were presented in an EPA "Guidance Document,' published in
February 1982 by the Effluent Guidelines Division of EPA's Office
of Water and Waste Management. That study concludes with respect
to car wash establishments that 'no' further effort (would) be
given to developing (federal) re. gulations for this subcategory."
Although this document is dated 1982, it has not been
superceded by a subsequent dccument. Attached are relevant
excerpts from the Federal Cuidance Document.
CAR WASH ESTABLIS}{MENTS
Sampling and analysis cf discharges from this industry showed
that toxic pollutant3, both inorganic and organic, occur in waste-
water from all segmepts (except NEC). The amount and toxicity of
these pollutants, however, were considered insignificant in all sub-
categories except industrial laundries and linen supply laundries.
The number of facilities in this industry with treatment systems
is small. However, in cases where treatment systems have been instal-
led, dissolved air flotation (DAF) has been selected as providing
the best treatment. DAF effectively reduces both cenventional and
toxic pollutants. The use of various alternative technologies for
the removal of pollutants from th~-s industry was not feasible for
various technological reasons (see Sect ion 7).
TABLE 1-i. DISCHARGE GUIDA~CE
Estimated
Long-Term
Average
Daily
Variability.
Achievable
Performance
mg/1
Pollutant mg/1 Factor(a) 24-hr. max.
30 days Avg.
Chromium 0.18 4.0 0.74 0.22
Copper 0.74 2.7 1.5 0.93
Lead 0.93 3.7 3.7 1.7
Zinc 0.74 4.4 2.9 1.1
T$S 40 20
~OD 100 50
Oil and Greasa 20 10
(a) Daily variability factor is the ratio of the estimated
95th percentile to the estimated long term average.
2.2 OVERVIEW OF THE iNDUSTRY '
The Auto and Other Laundries industry category consists of nine
segments which have been divided by the Standard Industrial Classifica-
tion (SIC) system. The segments are:
Power laundries, family and commercial
Linen supply
i
I
I
Diaper service
Coin-ope_~ated laundries and dry-cleaning
Dry-cleaning plants, except rug cleaning
Carpet and upholstery cleaning
industrial laundries
Laundry and garment services not elsewhere classified
Car wash establishments
2.3 SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY
Background informaticn on the basic segments of the Auto and Other
Laundries industry was obtained from literature, contacts with the
industry and its trade associations, previous reports and a mail survey
of specific segments of the industry. ~
Data on wastewater characteristics including sources and disposi-
tion of wastewater, dis&barge quantities, and physical-chemical
characteristics for each of the eight industrial segments were obtained
from NPDE$ monitoring reports, municipal sewer district monitering
reports, a mail survey of approximately 250 laundries, trade associa-
tion studies, and the sampling and analysis programs conducted by the
Agency.
Sampling Pro_oram - Sampling and analysis of wastewaters generated
by the Auto and Other Laundries industry was initiated by the Agency
and its contractors in 1975. These early programs concentrated
primarily on conventional and nonconventional pollutants and trace
me t als.
In 1978 a sampling program was begun to determine the presence
and concentrations of the 129 tcxic pollutants as defined by the
Consent Decree, in wastewaters from this industry. A total of 40
facilities were sampled for toxic as well as conventional pollutants.
Sa~npling was conducted using automatic time-compositing equipment
during operating hours at each facility. In most cases sampling was
for cne day only. At facilities where wastewater treatment was in
place, samples of both treatment influent and effluent were taken.
One industrial laundry facility using a DAF treatment system was
sampled over a one-month period to obtain data on the variability of
is type of treatment system.
Processing of Data ~ Data on raw waste characteristics are sum-
marized and presented in Section 5 in terms of minimum, maximum, median
and mean concentration. Using average flow data, typical pollutant
loads in pounds or kilograms per day are also presented.
Data from plants with was~ewater treatment systems in place are
presented in Appendix A and summarized in Section 7. For the develop-
ment of achievable performances, a statistical evaluation of these data
was conducted and is presented in Section 9.
3.1.9 Car Washes (SIC 7542)
The auto laundry is comprised of facilities designed for the auto-
matic or self-service washing of vehicles including cars, vans, and
pick-up trucks. There are three types of car washes, tunnel, roi!over,
and wand, which will be described in 3.2.5.
The industry, as a whole, continues to grow at a rate of 3-4% a
year, although.the growth rates for each of the three types of facilities
will vary. The nu~nber of new tunnel facilities has been fairly constant
since their inception. The cost of land in many cities has become a
major part of the capital outlay for a new facility, and thus the ~ost
of these facilities may be prohibitive. Rollovers are primarily found
at service stations where oil ccmpanies have often used them as promo-
tional devices, sales, are therefore dependent on Such things as the
availability of c_as. A company will not want to promote a product that
is difficult to obtain, and so when a ~as crunch occurs, sales fall
off. However, if different marketing techniques are used, and the car-
wash is not viewed as a promotional device ,but rather as an additional
source of income, sales should not be greatly affected.
The largest sales increase has been for the self-service wand type
facilities. The resurgence in sales is partly due to a general
upgrading of both merchandise and facilities. Furthermore, wand washes
offer the highest return cn the least investment of the three types
of facilities. The number of bays installed at a location is generally
based on market studies. These studies normally show that an initial
four bay setup is the most economical.
Car wash manufacturers are generally optimistic concerning future
sales of auto washing equipment. As cars become more and more
expensive, owners will keep them for longer periods of time, and must
therefore take better care of them. This better care will include main-
raining the appearance of the auto. Also, in many areas (e.g., apart-
ment complex carports and driveways) people are no longer permitted
to wash .~heir cars, and must take them to a car wash for cleaning.
3.2.5. Auto Laundry.
There are three main types of car washes: tunnels, ro!lovers and
wands. Ail thee types use basically the same processes to wash the
auto, however the type of equipment used to accomplish this task varies.
Process--The first step in washing an auto is the application of
deter~ents and water and mechanically removing the dirt. This may be
accomplished by brushes or high-pressure streams of water. The auto
is %hen rinsed with clean water to remove the dirt and soap. Finally,
the auto is dried either by a blower as in a tunnel or by the owner
in a wand-type facility.
~ment--The tunnel wash is the larges~ of the three types and
is usually housed in a long building. The vehicle is pulled by a con-
veyor or driven through The length of the building, passing through
separate washing, waxing, rinsing, and drying areas. A trench, usually.
running the length of the building, collects the wastewaters. Because
of this design, it is possible to keep the wash and rinse wastewaters
separate by installing a dam in the trench. This facilitates the treat-
ment and Fartial reuse cf the wastewaters.
At a ro!!over wash, the vehicle remains stationary while the equip-
ment passes over the car. Similar in design are the exterior pressure
washes which utilize high pressure streams of water in lieu of brushes.
At both types, all the wastewater is collected in a single trench.
The car also remains stationary at a wand wash, but here the
customer washes his own car with a high-pressure stream of water from
a hand-held wand. As at a rollover, both the wash and rinse waters
are collected in a single trench or sump.
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
wastewater discharge rates are affected by essentially the san~e
factors that affect process water consumption rates. The major factor
affecting the total volume of wastewater discharged is the quantity of
garments and flatwork being wasP. ed. Discharge per unit production rates
are influenced by the types of materials handled, the soil loading on
~hese materials, individual washing machine design and capacity, overall
laundering capacity (larger laundries tend to be somewhat more efficient
in terms of water usage than smaller laundries) and the aforementioned
factors which influence process water consumption, wastewater discharge
ra~es are affected by the efficiency of the extractors used. In Table
5-i, a universal wastewater-discharge-to-water-c,~nsumption ratio of 0.9
was assumed because it is typical of the industry as a whole (according
to LSSA representatives). Ho~ever, this assumption does not necessarily
hold on a plant-bM-plant basis.
Wastewater discharge rates for auto washes to a large degree depend
upon the type of facility, whether tunnel, rollover, or wand, and the
number of autos washed. A brief discussion of wastewater volumes for
each type follows.
Tunnels: A tunnel wash has the capacity to handle 80-120 cars per
hour, although, the actual number of cars processed is usually much lower.
The number of cars washed per day at a tunnel facility ranges from about
100 to 600, with the average of about 250. When fresh water is used
for all cleaning procedures, an average of about 70 gallons per car is
used. A large percentage of tunnel facilities recycle their wash water,
cutting their usage to about 40 gallons per car. ~.arry-out and evapora-
tion account for a water loss of 2 gallons per car. Tunnel washes then
use between 40 and 70 gallons per car depending on whether the facility
recycles its wastes or not. For the average facility, this amounts to
between 10,000 and 17,500 gallons per day.
Rollovers: These facilities do a much smaller volume of business
than do tunnels, washing; an the average, 75 cars per day, with a range
of 10-150.
A typical rol!over uses between 30 and 45 gallons of water per car
depending on the length of the cycle and the number of passes the equip-
ment makes. Exterior pressure washers may use as much as 90 gallons
per car. The typical ro~llover will discharge between 2,200 and 3,400
gallons per day with carry-ouT and evaporation losses about the same
as tunnels.
>~WandS~ ~Th- number of bays at a self-service wand-wash may range
~om ~ ~/ove~ 10, with an average of about five Each bay can handle
b~twe~--5~and 12 cars an hour, depending on the length of the cycle and
the number of cycles used. A typical wand will provide 4 gallons of
water per minute for 5 minutes, or 20 gallons of water per cycle. The
customer is usually able to choose from among wash, rinse and wax modes
and therefore the amount of water used for washing as opposed to rinsing
may vary. However, most people tend to use about 2/3 of the cycle for
washing and 1/3 for rinsing. Water losses at a wand wash may be 9rearer
than those at tunnels or roi!overs as the customer is able to point the
wand in any direction, causing water to be deposited, in areas where it
may not be collected in the sump. Also, the high pressure (800-1000
psi) causes atomization of the water stream leadinG to increased
evaporation.
There exis~ regional variations in the amount of water used at
car washes. These variations are the greatest where winter conditions
in ncrthern climates often necessitate the use of salt and sand on
the roads. C~r washes in these areas must d~al with increased dirt
loads consisting of ice, salt and grit. HiGh vo!u~me initial rinses
are often used before the wash cycle and larger volume final rinses
may
be
necessary
to
remove
any
dissolved
salts left on the car so that
spotting is minimized.
5.2.1.8 Car Washes
Table 5-11 sum~r~arizes the co~Jventional and nonconventional raw
waste pollutant data obtained for 6 rollover and 6 wand and 17 tunnel
type car washes. For purposes of comparison, Table 5-12 presents
separate tunnel car wash data for both wash and rinse wastewater.
Based on median and mean pollutant concentrations shown in these
tables, wand type car wash wastewaters are more heavily polluted than
wastewaters from tunnel types and rollover type car wash wastewater
are the least polluted.
~.~ The median and mean concentrations of BOD, .TOC. . and phosphorus
were below" the typical concentration range of Dollutants...present in
domestic wastewater. COD, T$$ and oil and grease concentrations were
equivalent to or below the concentration in domestic sewage.
5.2.2.8 Car Washes
Three tables present and summarize toxic pollutant data from the
three types of car wash facilities. Table 5-22 summarizes wand
facilities, Table 5-23 summarizes rollover facilities, and Table 5-24
sun%marizes tunnel facilities. These tables present the maximum, median
and mean concentrations of each toxic pollutant found in the raw waste
samples and the number of wastewater samples in which these pollutants
were detected as well as the daily load of each pollutant in kg/day.
Lead and zinc were present in all samples from each of the three
typ~s of facilities. These toxic pollutant metals exhibited from the
highest concentrations although the average ranged only from .5 rog/1
to 1.0 mg/1 for lead and 0.4 mg/1 to 1.5 mg/1 for zinc. The only other
metals of significance were copper and nickel which were found in
almost every sample. Their mean concentrations averaged less than
0.2 mg/1.
Several toxic pollutant organics were found in the wastewaters
from car washes. No pollutant was present in concentrations greater
than 1.0 mg/1, and virtually all had mean concentrations below
0.05 mg/1. As with the conventional pollutants, the wand type facil-
ities had the highest number and concentrations of, pollutants.
o
Pol!utan~
CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT
CONCENTRATIONS IN ROLLOVER, WAND AND TUNNEL
TYPE CAR WASH WA£TEWATER$.
Numbera Minimum Maximum Median Mean
Rol lovers
pH 6
BCD5 6
COD 4
TOC 4
TSS 6
Oil and Crease 6
Phosphorus 4
Wand s
BOD5 6
COD 4
TOC 4
TSS 6
Oil' and 9tease 6
ph'osphoru$ 4
~ nnel$
p. 4
8OD5 17
COD 16
TOC 16
TS$ 17
Oil and grease 17
Phosphorus 16
a
Number of data points
Concentrations (mg/1)
6.2 7.7 7.7 7.3
8.0 132 20 37
102 254 135 156
24 173 31 65
30 576 158 199
6.0 188 9.4 45
0.25 1.9 0.41 0.74
6.4 8.3 ...,_ 7.4 ..... 7.~
29 ". 220 . -'69.,,... 90
167 ..... ::" 1120 ~'~;38 · .i442.'~
29 160 79 86
106 2970 659 ..:..~,, 929
20 404 .~ 90 126
0.8 3.2 2.8 2.4
7.5 9.0 8.7 8.5
<6.0 147 42 51
61 517 178 216
16 169 31 52
36 848 101 165
5.7 239 20 38
0.38 24 1.9 3.2
TA~SLE §-12.
.CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT
CONCENTRATIONS IN TUNNEL TYPE CAR WASH RAW
WASH AND RINSE WASTEWATER$
Pollutant
N ,~ber a
Minimum
Comcent rat ion~(mg/1 )
Maximtun Median Mean
Raw Wash
pH 15 7.! 10 8.0 8.3
BOD5 15 18 191 4 5 59
COD 14 96 652 204 261
TC~T 14 16 210 66 70
TSS 15 28 882 121 195
Oil and grease 15 4.8 655 17 68
Phosphorus 14 0.4 27 2.3 4.0
Raw Rinse
pH 13
BOD5 13
COD 12
TOC 12
TSS 13
Oil and grease 13
Phosphorus 12
Number of data points
7.3
8.0
64
11
19
5.8.
<0.2
9.4 8.,0 8.1
153 53 59
376 166 184
100 27 32
153 . 54 62
114 43 39
18.0 0.92 2.8
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
,~ I
00~000000
000 O000000000000 0 000 ~-'' I
I I
bbobb o oobboo bb
~]
0
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
/,5-
I
I~ 0 I'D ~ I..,.~ ~-~ ~1 ~I ~.~ I,.-,1.~.0 ~ ~
~ ~0
~'m 0 m' oo o ~ oo~o~o ~ oo oxI ~
· · I I I · · · · · · I · - 0 ·
I
~' Z~ .. ~
~ ~,
o ooooooo ~/ i
0 ~
~ H. ~ ~ I I I ~ 0 ~ ~ H 0 I 0 I 3 · N
~ · ~ o i I I o o o o o o I o i ~ ~
TABLE 5-25 NUMBER OF DIRECT DISCHARGERS IN THE LAUNDRY INDUSTRY
...... T~tal Di:~ct' "DiS~h~ge~$
Subcategory Number Number Percent
Industrial
laundries
Linen supply
Power laundries
Diaper services
Carpet and upholstery.
cleaners
Coin-operated
laundries
Dry cleaning
plants
.ca~ washes
1,000 0 0
1,300 1 0.1
3,100 16 0.5
300 0 0
2,700
32,000
2
140
28,400 6
22,000 100
0.1
0.1
6.6 CAR WASH ESTABLISHMENTS
fu~r Summary°f De t e r~i~ t ~°n~- _-=~-~ ~e~-~ ~ ~2~d f~a ~h~
s~ocat_g . Y._ ...... ~ecr~e, which states "the amount and to~c~y
iv o~ the ~on~c~u ~ ' '
(~) ....... ' ~- the discharge does not justify developing
~t~lP~~o~· and Paragraph (b)(ii) which states 'the
toxicity and the amount of incompatible pollutants (~ake9
together) introduced by such poin~ sources in~o ~rea~men~ wor~s
hat are ublicly owned is so insignificant as not to justify
~~~ a pret~eatment regulation."
~ - -~ ~ffluents The car wash subcategory
Production Frocess anu = -
is comprised of facilities' designed for the automatic or self-
service washing of vehicles including cars, vans, and pick-up
trucks. There are three types of car washes, tunnel, rollover,
and wand which were described in Section 3.2.5. Average
wastewater_flows for tunnels, rollovers, and wands are 75.7, 11.4,
and 19.9 mJ/day, respectively. Average toxic metals is less than
0.17 kg/day per facility for tunnels, less than 0.12 kg/day per
facility for wands, and less than 0.15 kg/day per facility for
rollover$. In all cases, zinc and lead were the major constituents
of the to~al toxic metals. Toxic organics were found in very
small quantities.
PLANTS - There are some 22,000 car wash establishments of
which an estimated 15,000 are tunnel, 3,500 'are wand, and 3,500
are rollover.
Status of Regulatioos -'There are no existing regulations for
this subcategory.
,'1
i
i
I
i
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
City of Sebastian
I 1225 MAIN STREET [] SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (407)589-5330 [] FAX (407) ,589-5570
SUBJECT: Approval of )
Resolution No. R-97~12 )
)
)
)
Approval for Submittal By: )
)
City Man a ge r~~.~ d~. f~~. )r~_
)
)
)
)
)
)
Agenda Number:
Dept. Origin:
Community, Dev.
(RM)
Date Submitted :,, 02/21/97
For agenda Of:
O3~5~97
Exhibits:
1. Resolution No. R-97-12
2. Staff report
3. Location map
4. application
EXPENDITURE
REQUIRED:
AMOUNT
BUDEGETED:
APPROPRiATION
REQUIRED:
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Henry A. Fischer has applied for approval of a preliminary plat for an residential
subdivision know as Fischer's Lake Island. This site has two previously approved preliminary plat
which was never constructed. Some of the property associated with the previously approved
preliminary plats have been sold to the State and Indian River County as a part of the
environmental lands acquisition program. This has necessitated the preparation of a new
preliminary plat. A copy of the staff.report, location map and application are attached.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve Resolution No. R-97-12.
RESOLUTION NO. R-97-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS FISCHER'S LAKE ISLAND
SUBDIVISION; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS
OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;
PROVIDI/qG FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WltEREAS, Henry A. Fischer has applied for approval of a preliminary plat for a
subdivision known as Fischer's island Lake Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sebastian has
reviewed and recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat,
NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI:IE
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Section 1. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. The preliminary plat of
Fischer's Lake Island Subdivision, as prepared by James A. Fowler dated February 14,
1997, is hereby approved with the following conditions:
a. That the applicant indicate the purpose of tracts & C, and D and to whom
they are dedication on the face of the final plat.
b. Prior to he commencement of construction, the applicant provide a statement
that al utilities, except for water and sewer have been coordinated.
Prior to he commencement of construction, the applicant provide shall provide
a copy of the surface water management plan as approved by the St. Johns
River Water Management District for staff review and approval.
d. That the preliminary plat be corrected to show that wells and septic tanks will
be used.
That the applicant show on the face of the plat the following easements:
I. Lake Betsey must be is a drainage easement.
The drainage pipe east of lots 8 and 9, block B shall be located in an
easement and an easement to flow across.
All side yard easement shall be 6 feet wide except Where wider
easements are shown.
4. A 20 foot wide maintenance easement around Lake Betsey.
f. That the construction of the north end of Eagle Circle shall be aligned closer to
the center of the right-of-way.
The applicant shall provide an area in tract A which would allow for the
passage of vehicles around the guard house in the event that an accident
occurred at the guard house.
Section 2.
hereby repealed.
CONFLICT. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict are
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction
shall hold or determine that any part of this resolution is invalid or unconstitutional, the
remainder of the Resolution shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City
Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional
provision. It shall be further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the
remainder of the Resolution without said invalid and unconstitutional provision, thereby
causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect,
Section 4.
upon final passage.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effect immediately
The foregoing Resolution
was moved for adoption by Councilmember
The motion was seconded by Councilmember
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Louise R, Cartwright
Vice-Mayor Walter W. Barnes
Councilmember Norma J, Damp
Councilmember Raymond Halloran
Councilmember Richard J. Taracka
day of
ATTEST:
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this
, 1997.
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORDA
By:
Louise R. Cartwright, Mayor
Kathryn M. O'Halloran, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
(Seal)
Approved as to Form and Content:
Valerie Settles
City Attorney
Community Development Department
Preliminary Plat Approval Application - Staff Report
Project Owner:
6.
7.
8,
Project Name:
Requested Action:
Project Location
a. Address:
b. Legal:
c. Indian River County Parcel Number:
Henry A. Fischer
10725 US #1
P. O. Box 68
Sebastian, FL 32978-0068
(561) 589-3159
Project Agent:
Project Engineer:
Project Attorney:
Project Description
Fischer~s Lake Island Subdivision
Preliminary Platt Approval
Narrative of proposed action:
a subdivision west of the Sebastian River.
Current Zoning:
Adjacent Properties
Zoninq
RS-20
Current Land Use
vacant
vacant
vacant
vacant
RS-20
North:
East:
South:
West:
The applicant proposes to construct
Future Land Use
preserve
preserve
10,
Site Characteristics
(1) Total Acreage:
(2) Current Land Use(s):
(3) Soil: Oldsmar fine sand
Wabasso fine sand
Electra sand
Vegetation: cleared
(4)
(S)
(6)
(7)
Flood Hazard:
Water Service:
Sanitary Sewer Service:
62 acres
sand mine
Parks:
(9) Police/Fire:
It appears that the site is in zone X.
private wells
septic tanks
The proposed subdivision is adjacent to
recently acquired as a preserve.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
a.
lands
Future Land Use:
Iow density residential future land use classification.
consistent with this classification.
The future land use map places this property in the
The proposal is
b, Traffic Circulation: The proposal is consistent with the traffic
circulation element.
Housing: The proposal is consistent with the housing element.
Public Facilities:
element.
Coastal Management:
management element.
The proposal is consistent with the public facilities
f. Conservation:
element.
The proposal is consistent with the coastal
The proposal is consistent with the conservation
Recreation and Open Space: The proposal is consistent with the
recreation and open space element.
Contents of Preliminary Plat:
2
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
name of subdivision: provided
vicinity sketch: provided
legal description including section, township and range: provided
north arrow graphic scale: provided
date of preparation: provided
name, address, and telephone of applicant: provided
name, address, and telephone of owner of record: provided
name, address, and telephone of mortgage holder: none shown
statement that they will join in the dedication: N/A
name, address, and registration number of engineer:
Mosby and Associates, Inc.
2455 14th Avenue
Veto Beach, FL 32960
(561) 569-0035
name, address, and registration number of surveyor: registration
number not provided
name of adjacent subdivisions, if any, including plat book and page
number reference: none
names of owners of record of adjacent acreage:
contour map including a perimeter strip up to
provided
provided
150 feet in width.
all existing watercourses, drainage ditches and bodies of water,
marshes, and other significant, natural or man-made features:
provided
name, aliment and width of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
rights-of-way or easements including name, right-of-way width,
street or pavement width and established center line elevations:
60 foot right-of-way, 24 foot pavement as required by code
names and elevations provided
all existing and proposed property lines, easements and right-of-
ways, their purpose, their effect on the property to be subdivided,
and the proposed layout of lots and blocks: provided. What is the
purpose of tracts A, C, and D?
access points to collector and arterial streets showing compliance
to the access requirements: provided
all existing drainage district facilities and the ultimate right-of-way
requirements: provided
utilities such as telephone, power, water, sewer, gas, etc., on or
adjacent to the tract: Not provided
a statement that all utilities are available and have been coordinated
with all required utilities: Not provided
sites proposed for parks, recreational areas and schools: No public
parks or schools provided. Private recreational sites shown.
location of all temporary structures or permanent structures having
a temporary use: none shown
x. if borders public water, delineate the mean high water line: provided
plan for stabilizing shoreline with natural vegetative cover or other
environmentally sensitive manner acceptable to DER and the city:
Not provided
permanent reference monuments shall be shown at all block
comers, at all points of reverse or compound curvature, and at all
points of tangency occurring with block limiting lines: provided
aa.
block perimeter returns at block comers or other block line
intersection:
4. Required Supplemental Information
a. existing land use policy and proposed policy changes:
b. on-site wastewater disposal data:
c. surface water management plan: provided
traffic impact analysis: not required (63 lots X 10 tdps per D.U. =
630 tdps, <1,000 tdps required for traffic impact analysis.
e. required park land and/or facility improvements:
4
required potable water improvements: Private wells will be used.
Preliminary Plat is in error.
required wastewater improvements: Septic tanks will be used.
Preliminary Plat is in error.
erosion and sedimentation control improvements: provided
reference to required improvements
iii.
iv.
V.
Vi,
access: provided
alleys: none needed
blocks: provided
bridges: none needed
comprehensive stormwater management system: provided
easements:
c. side yard
d. front yard
e. rear yard
f . maintenance
provided: 0
Lake mersey must be in an drainage easement
drainage pipe east of lot 50 needs to be in an
easement as well as an easement to flow across.
required: 6 provided: 5
required: 10 provided: lO
required: 7.5 provided: 0
easement around lake required: l0
preliminary plat shall show dedication of drainage
facilities to the homeowners association giving the
city right of access if the association fails to maintain
the system.
vii.
viii.
ix.
X.
xi.
xii.
Xllh
xiv.
XV.
xvi.
xvii.
XVIII.
xix,
XX.
lots: provided
seawalls, bulkheads, piers and docks: N/A
soils: muck soils not expected.
streets: The pavement should be aligned closer to the center
particularly at the north end of Eagle Circle. Erica's Way
does not meet code on construction drawings. The streets are
acceptable on the preliminary plat.
bicycle/pedestrian paths: none provided
off-street parking areas: N/A
utilities: Not provided
utility installation: Not provided
central water system: private wells
central wastewater system: septic tanks
individual sewage systems: N/A
water and sewage treatment and processing plants: N/A
median strips and entranceways:
traffic control devices: provided
6.
7.
8.
Se
10.
11.
xxJ.
xxJJ,
XXIII.
monuments: provided
commercial and industrial subdivisions:
mobile home subdivisions: N/A
N/A
j. schedule of multiple phases: none shown
Fee paid: yes
City Engineer's review: none
City Attorney's review: none
Other Matters: The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this
project on February 20, 1997 and has recommended approval with conditions.
Analysis: This project is a new preliminary plat for a parcel of land that
previously had included the Sebastian Springs West preliminary plat and the
Fischer's Lake preliminary plat. A portion of that land has been sold to the State
and Indian River County as part of an environmentally endangered lands
acquisition program. That has necessitated the submittal of a new preliminary
plat for the property. The acquisition program has removed all of the
environmentally sensitive lands from the previously approved projects.
The project has been evaluated for the potential impact on the adjacent
environmental lands. It is the staffs opinion that the design of this project
minimizes any adverse effect on those lands. The drainage is directed internally
to the large lake on the property. Most storm events will be treated in the lake.
The preserve will be better protected with a road adjacent to the property rather
than lots. If lots backed up to the preserve, encroachment is more likely.
The Planning and Zoning Commission talked at length about the need for two
access to the property. The project, as designed, can be connected in the
future to the adjacent property to the west. The Land Development Code does
allow the Council to waive the two entrance requirement if it posses an
unreasonable burden.
Conclusion: The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Code of
Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed preliminary plat is
consistent with the Land Development Code with conditions.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
preliminary plat and the construction drawings for the Fischer's Lake Island
Subdivision with the following conditions:
1. The purpose of tracts A, C, and D is provided and the proper dedication
listed on the face of the plat.
2. A statement conceming that all utilities except for water and sewer have
been coordinated.
Prior to construction, the applicant shall provide a surface water
management plan as approved by the St. Johns River Water Management
Distdct for review and approval by the staff.
The preliminary plat be corrected to show that wells and septic tanks will be
used.
5. That the following easement be shown:
Lake Betsey must be in an drainage easement
drainage pipe east of lot 50 needs to be in an easement as well
as an easement to flow across.
side yard required: 6 provided: 5
rear yard required: 7.5 provided: recommended
not to be required.
maintenance easement around lake required: 10 provided: O,
recommend a 20 foot easement.
That the construction drawing be modified to show the pavement
aligned closer to the center particularly at the north end of Eagle Circle;
modify Edca's Way to meet code on construction drawings; provide stop
signs and stop bars, to show blocks and remove the recreation
improvements on the drawings.
DATE
Pt. AT SITE
LOCATION'MAP
NO. TRUE SCALE
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE ~: (407) 589-5330
Application Number
Oate_J_~u~_2~_t~_9_7
Owner Henr~ A. Fis_c_h~_%_
Address
Subdivision Name__._'Fischers..~_ Island Lake~.~ Subd.
Township__33,~uO~ ....
Range__3ug_~e __
Project Surveyor_J~_m__~__%w~ar~ .......
Florida State ~__3~ ....
Project EngineerJi~%b_y_v~_-A-s-s-o-c~i~ Florida State
Zoning Classification_~_~3~___- Land Use Designa~ion.T~D-_l____
Development Site Size_~ ..... scres
Proposed Units Per Acre___~_ .......
Minimum Lot
No- of Lots 58
Will development be in phase~? No
The following attachments shall accompany thi~ application:
1. A copy of the owner'~ recorded deed.
2. If applicant is other than the owner, a mworn
statement of authorization is reguired.
3. Fifteen (15) copies of all-plans. (Pive for initial review)
4. Preliminary plat reguires complianc~ with Sec. 20A-
16.4 (B) of the Land Development Code, City of
Sebastian.
~. Existing legal description.
FEE SCHEDULE
Less than 10 acres
10 acres to 25 acre~
25 acre~ to ~0 acres
Over 50 acres
$350.00
~00.00
750
.00
~5.00/
y A.
Fischer
City of Sebastian
i 1225 MAIN STREET [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
I
TELEPHONE (407)$89-5330 r~ FAX (407/ 589-5570
SUBJECT: Approval of
Resolution No. R-97-13
)
)
Approval for Submittal By: )
)
City Manager~/~'~],(~~-~)
V
)
)
)
Agenda Number:
Dept. Origin: _
Date Submitted:
For agenda Of:
Exhibits:
1.
2.
Community Dev.
(RM)
02/.2.1197
O3~5~97
Resolution No. R-97-13
Location map
EXPENDITURE
REQUIRED:
AMOUNT
BUDEGETED:
APPROPRiATION
REQUIRED:
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The preliminary PUD for Villages of Lake Delores otherwise known as Park Place was
approved in 1988 and part of the project has been constructed. There has not been a final PUD
approved for the site. Part of the property has been sold to a third party.
The Land Development Code provides that the final PUD shall be submitted within
eighteen months. Upon failure to meet this requirement, the city council shall hold a public
hearing to consider terminating the approval of the preliminary development plan and the city
council may initiate the rezoning of the property to an appropriate zoning classification.
In the past, the staff apparently took the position that as long as the Lake Dolores (Park
Place) was not selling lots, the final PUD was not required. The present staff disagrees with that
position. The code clearly requires a final PUD plan.
In order to place this project in some sort of compliance with the code, the staff
recommends that the city council adopt a resolution approving the preliminary PUD as approved
in 1988. Then, the property owners will be required to submit a final PUD within eighteen
months or request an extension. This will allowed the city to better manage the development in
that area.
Resolution R-97-13 approves the preliminary PUD as adopted in 1988. The staff has not
done a detailed review of the project as if it were a new application. A significant portion of the
project has been constructed and such a review is not required under the circumstances.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve Resolution No. R-97-13.
RESOLUTION NO. R-97-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, iNDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PUD KNOWN AS LAKE
DELORES A.K.A. PARK PLACE; PROVIDiNG FOR REPEAL OF
RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WItEREAS, the Villages of Lake Delores received approval of a preliminary
development plan for a planned unit development (PUD) known as Villages of Lake
Delores a.k.a. Park Place in 1988; and
WHEREAS, the final PUD and final plat for the Villages of Lake Delores PUD
has not been submitted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian has terminated the
preliminary development plan for the Villages of Lake Delores PUD,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIl. OF THE
CiTY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Section 1. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL. The
preliminary development plan for Villages of Lake Delores PUD a.k.a. Park Place, as
shown on the sheets 1, 2, and 3 of 3 entitled Preliminary Geometry prepared by Gerald
Weatherington, dated 8/298/84 are hereby approved.
Section 2.
hereby repealed.
CONFLICT. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict are
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction
shall hold or determine that any part of this resolution is invalid or unconstitutional, the
remainder of the Resolution shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City
Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional
provision. It shall be further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the
remainder of the Resolution without said invalid and unconstitutional provision, thereby
causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect.
Section 4.
upon final passage.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effect immediately
The foregoing Resolution
was moved for adoption by Councilmember
The motion was seconded by Councilmember
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Louise R. Cartwright
Vice-Mayor Walter W. Barnes
Councilmember Norma j. Damp
Councilmember Raymond Halloran
Councilmember Richard J. Taracka
day of
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this
, 1997.
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
By:
Louise R. Cartwright, Mayor
Kathryn M. O'Halloran, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
(Seal)
Approved as to Form and Content:
Valerie Settles
City Attorney
m ~ SEBASTIAN HICHLAND$
i ~ CITY UMITS
I
I
m , OTY UMITS
m
i
m
Cl~ LIMITS
i LoC.~T ~o ~
City of Sebastian
1225 MAIN STREET [] SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (407)589-5330 [] FAX (407)589-5570
SUBJECT: Approval of )
Resolution No. R-97-14 )
)
)
)
Approval for Submittal By: )
)
!
)
)
)
)
)
)
Agenda Number:
Dept. Origin: Community Dev.
Date Submitted: 02/21/97
For agenda Of: . 0.315197
Exhibits:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. R-97-14
Staff report
Location map
application
(RM)
EXPENDITURE
REQUIRED:
AMOUNT
BUDEGETED:
APPROPRIATION
REQUIRED:
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The Villages of lake Delores has applied for approval of a final PUD and final plat for an
residential subdivision know as Park Place Plat 1. The preliminary PUD was approved in 1988
and part of the project has been constructed. The proposed final PUD and final Plat completes a
portion of the project. A copy of the staff'report, location map and application are attached.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve Resolution No. R-97-14 .
RESOLUTION NO. R-97-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE FINAL PUD AND FINAL
PLAT FOR A PUD KNOWN AS PARK PLACE, PLAT 1;
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF
RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Villages of lake Delores has applied for approval of a final PUD
and final plat for a subdivision known as Park Place, Plat 1; and
WItEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Sebastian has
reviewed and recommends approval of the proposed final PUD and final plat,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Section 1. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. The final PUD and final
plat of Park Place, Plat 1, as prepared by William E. Hayhurst dated December 17, 1996,
is hereby approved with the following conditions:
a. That the applicant provide the bonds for the incomplete work in the format
approve by the City Attorney.
Section 2.
hereby repealed.
CONFLICT. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict are
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction
shall hold or determine that any part of tiffs resolution is invalid or unconstitutional, the
remainder of the Resolution shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City
Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional
provision. It shall be further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the
remainder of the Resolution without said invalid and unconstitutional provision, thereby
causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect.
Section 4.
upon final passage.
EFFECTIVE DATE. TIffs Resolution shall take effect immediately
The foregoing Resolution
day of
ATTEST:
was moved for adoption by Councilmember
The motion was seconded by Councilmember
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Louise R. Cartwright
Vice-Mayor Walter W. Barnes
Councilmember Norma J. Damp
Councilmember Raymond Halloran
Councilmember Richard J. Taracka
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this
,1997.
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
By:
Louise R. Cartwright, Mayor
Kathryn M. O'Halloran, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
(Seal)
Approved as to Form and Content:
Valerie Settles
City Attorney
Community Development Department
Final Plat Approval Application - Staff Report
Project Name:
Requested Action:
Project Location
Park Place Plat 1
Approval of final PUD and Final Plat
Project Owner:
Project Agent:
Address:
Legal:
Indian River County Parcel Number:
Village of Lake Dolores
=
Project Engineer:
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc.
2901 Cardinal Ddve
Vero Beach, FL 32963
Project Attorney:
Project Description
Narrative of proposed action: The preliminary PUD for Park Place
was approved in 1985. This requested action is approval of a final PUD
and Final Plat for a section of the odginal project.
Current Zoning:
Adjacent Properties
Zonin~j
PUD-MH
Current Land Use
Future Land Use
North: PUD-MH vacant
East: PUD-MH vacant
South: PUD-MH vacant
West: RS-10 vacant and homes
PUD-MH
PUD-MH
PUD-MH
LDR
d=
Site Characteristics
(1) Total Acreage: 18.6 acres
(2) Current Land Use(s): mobile home park
10.
(4)
Soil: Archbold sand
Vegetation: urban, cleared
Flood Hazard: Zone X - outside the 500 year flood plain
Zone A - no base flood elevation
determined
Sanitary Sewer Service:
Parks:
Police/Fire:
Future Land Use: Consistent
Consistent
Consistent
Consistent
Indian River County Utilities
Indian River County Utilities
Coastal Management: Consistent
Conservation: Consistent
Recreation and Open Space: Consistent
(6) Water Service:
(7)
(S)
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
a.
b. Traffic Circulation:
c. Housing:
d. Public Facilities:
e.
f.
g.
Contents of Final Plat:
a. Name of Subdivision:
b. Title block: provided
c. Legal description: provided
d. Index sheet: provided
e. Require Survey Data:
Park Place Plat 1
provided
scale: provided
north arrow, bearing or azimuth:
2
bIIi,
iv.
V,
vi.
vii.
provided
point of beginning: provided
25" radius at intersections 30" provided
adjoining property: provided
permanent reference monuments: provided
space reserved for use by clerk of the circuit court: provided
fo
VIII.
iX,
mathematically close within 0.01 foot: provided
vicinity sketch: provided
Lot and Block identification:
Street Names: provided
Not-included parcels: provided
Right-of-ways and easements:
provided
11.
12.
13.
Restrictions, reservations and restrictive covenants: provided
k. Private street and related facilities: provided
I. Certification and approvals:
ii.
iii.
iv.
V.
vi.
vii.
viii.
dedications: provided
mortgagee's consent and approval: provided
certification of surveyor: provided
city engineer: provided
city attorney: provided
mayor and city clerk: provided
certification of title: provided
instrument prepared by:
m. Existing or recorded streets:
Timing of improvements and/or posting of surety: not provided
Schedule of development phases: N/^
Time restriction on development:
14.
15.
Submission of final plat:
I. contract:
ii. guarantees:
City Engineer's review:
City Attorney's review:
statement indicating when improvements will be made: not provided
fee paid: provided
check for recording plat with the clerk of the circuit court:
copy of homeowner's association or condominium documents:
provided
construction of improvements after approval:
not provided
not provided
none
not complete
17.
18.
19.
20.
Other Matters: none
Analysis:
Conclusion: The proposed final PUD is consistent with the Code of
Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan. The project is consistent with the
Land Development Code with conditions.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Final
PUD and the final Plat for a portion of Park Place with the following conditions:
That the applicant provide a statement as to when the improvements will
be completed and a surety bond for the future improvements.
DATE
TO WNSHIP 31' SO UTH, RANGE 3 9 . E~
LOCATION MAP
MOBI'LK HOM..I~ PARK
(~.~.~.)
mM,
FUTURE DE'V~LOPMLq',IT
(P.U.D.-U.H.)
29
~rdd
(p.u.D. - M,H.'I
JOHN'~ ISLAND CLUB WEST
GOLF COURSE
UNmCOP,~OP~TED
IN~L~ ~ ¢OUNT~
(,.U.D.-
p,&ln~ ]q~O~1al111'
(P,U,D. -
SECTIONS 20, 29,
31 SOUTH, 'RANGE
PROJ'
SITE
(P,U.D.-
(P.U.D.) INDICATES
ZONING DISTRICT.
TOWNSHIP
39 EAST
CT
;ENT
~"~ =:~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION "' -
~I~'NCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SEC.?ON 20. TO.SHIP 5~ SOUTH. RAN
PUD APPLICATION FORM
CIlfY OF SEBASTIAN
1225 [lain STREET
.'-~EBAST I AN ~ FLOR ! DA
TELEPIIO~E~
Thi9 91k~ plan app],lcaEtun mug~ b~ outplayed and r~urn~d
office, Thl~ oppllca~ton will ~l~en b~ re/-rr~
ADDRESS .............................. PIIONE
ZONING CLA~SIFICATION~3~i~, LAND U$~ DESIGNATION
STREET ADDR~S~ GU THE PROJECT
NEV SUBMITTAL ,..~ ................. CHANGE TO EX.I~T~NG PUD
SOUARE FOOTAGE OF H~V IMFERVIOUS SURFACE
GOUARE FOG'[AGE OF FROI'USED CIIANOE
AFPLICANI'
TIlE F[{LI.,OVlN'i; A'rl-ACIIHEN'rs SHALL ACCOMPANY TIlE APPLICATION
1. A copy of tl,~ owner'~ dv~d.
{~ ,othgr tim, own~i', u sworn m~a~emen% of authoriz~iun.
3. Rmvtmw (~ oi m ~_~.~0 il, camh ur chack ·drawn ua ~
· 2~.00 PBR ~E,A~ PLUS ~IO.C'U PE~ ACRE ~ F~ACTiON THEREOF.
ALL AFPLICAN'I'~ ARE F.,NCOURAGF. D 'rD SCHEDULE A pRE-APFLICATION
CONFER~,NC~ VlI'}t THE PLAIININO AND ZONING COMMISSION OR
ilOUgE STAFF PRIOR 'to TIiE SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. pRE-AFPLIGATION
CONFERENCE FEE; ~,100.00 A~D RE,FIRED AFFLICATIOH FORM PER
CII'Y REMtH.n~'I(.;N R-.nS-02.