Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2nd Qtr ending 6-30-2022
City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Quarterly Performance Report As of _June 30, 2022 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley Scott Owens, CFA®, CIMA® David Wheeler, CIMA®, CFP®, CRPS® Andy McIlvaine, CIMA® Managing Director - Wealth Management Managing Director - Wealth Management Associate Vice President Institutional Consulting Director Institutional Consulting Director Institutional Consultant Corporate Retirement Director Alternative Investment Director Financial Advisor - Wealth Management Impact Investing Director Corporate Retirement Director Andy.McIIvaine@msgraystone.com Alternative Investment Director David.A.Wheeler@msgraystone.com (813) 227-2160 Scott.Owens@msgraystone.com (813) 227-2178 (813)227-2027 WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stantey Quarter in Review 2Q 2022 As of June 30, 2022 It was a quarter of broken records and shocks across asset classes; not all of them were good and many were difficult to avoid as the Federal Reserve initiated monetary and quantitative tightening to fight accelerating inflation. Even as corporate earnings forecasts remained relatively consistent throughout the quarter, consumers and investors navigated higher inflation, soaring commodity prices, and rising interest rates alongside supply chain rebalancing, geopolitical turmoil, and the continuation of covid pressures. Each of these factors led to expectations for slower growth and eventually lower corporate earnings, as well as inflation -driven recession speculation. Markets, including stocks, bonds, and crypto were roiled, yet the US dollar was firm, as the US dollar index rose to levels last seen in 2002. In light of the persistently elevated inflation readings in the US, the Fed embarked on a path of interest rate hikes and Federal Reserve balance sheet reductions to try to lower inflation closer to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)'s 2% long-term target. After the Fed raised rates for the first time in March of the first quarter (1Q) by 25 basis points, markets anticipated another six 25-basis-point hikes by the end of 2022. Since then, the Fed raised rates another 5o basis points in May, 75 basis points in June, and guided to an additional 75-basis-point hike in July. MS & Co.'s Chief US Economist Ellen Zentner forecasts a 75-basis-point hike in July along with 50-basis-point hikes in September and November, followed by 25 basis points in December. Quantitative tightening began June 1 with reductions to the Federal Reserve balance sheet. Asa result, Treasury yields rose through mid -June and then fell by the end of the month. The US Treasury 10-year started the second quarter at 2.34% and rose to 3.5% by June 14, to decline to 3.o% on June 30. A similar movement was seen for the US Treasury 2-year. The continuation of higher oil prices was well -documented across markets, at the pump, and in Fourth of July holiday conversations with friends and family as summer travel picked up. WTI oil gained another 5.5% in 2Q and led to a rise of 40.6% since the end of last year. Heating Oil (+17.8%), soybeans (+6.7%) and coffee prices (+0.8%) rose in 2Q, but single -digit declines in a number of other commodities took the Bloomberg Commodity Index down 5.9% since the close of the first quarter in March 2022. Source: Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Office Market Research & Strategy Team Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or other financial instruGraystone in any trading strategy. Please refer to important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end of this material. Pa &rITH MANAGEMENT GLOBAL INVESTMENT OFFICE I CHARTBOOK I QUARTER IN REVIEW consulting, 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stantey Quarter in Review 2Q 2022 As of June 30, 2022 Inequities, poor second-quarter zozz (2Q) returns were abundant. By the end of 2Q, a number of major US indices experienced a dip of more than 16% sequentially while value stocks performed better than growth stocks. This included the S&P 500 (-16.1%), Nasdaq Composite (-22.3%), Russell l000-Large Cap (-16.7%), Russell Mid Cap (-16.9%), Russell 2000-Small Cap (-17.2%), and Russell 3000 (-16.7%). In each of these cases, declines trailed those experienced in the first quarter and led the indices to decline 20%+ below the price of each index on December 31, 2021. For the S&P Soo, while not one sector posted positive returns in 2Q, seven were down double digits versus the close on March 31, zozz. Consumer Discretionary deteriorated the most (-26.2%), while Communication Services (-20.7%), Information Technology (-20.2%), and Financials (-17.5%) fell markedly more than the S&P 500 (-16.1%) while Materials (-15.9%), Industrials (-14.8%), and Real Estate (-14.7%) also declined double digits. Health Care (-5.9%), Energy (-5.3%), Utilities (-5.1%) and Consumer Staples (-4.6%) declined but outperformed the S&P 500 Index on a relative basis. Low double-digit dips were most prevalent for equities in other regions across the globe by the end of the second quarter of zozz. Nonetheless, the China Shenzhen Composite (+0.2%) and the Hang Seng Hong Kong (+0.7%) posted gains by the end of the quarter, albeit light. The Fed's aggressive rate hikes resulted in significant fixed income losses in the second quarter, compounding the first quarter losses. These year-to-date returns were some of the worst in decades. The Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, a broad measure of the US bond market, fell 4.7% in 21022 after a 5.9% decline in the first quarter. Source: Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Office Market Research & Strategy Team Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or other financial instruGraystone in any trading strategy. Please refer to important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end of this material. Pa dNSILTH MANAGEMENT GLOBAL INVESTMENT OFFICE I CHARTBOOK I QUARTER IN REVIEW consulting, 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stantey Capital Markets Performance Capital Market Returns As of June 30, 2022; Private Real Estate as of March 31, 2022 ASSET CLASS INDEX IN USD 3-MONTH YTD s-YR 3-YR ANN 5-YR ANN Global Equity Global Equity MSCI All Country World -15.5% -20.0% -15.4% 6.3% 7.6% US Equity S&P 500 -16.1% -20.0% -10.6% 10.5% 11.8% International Equity MSCI All Country World ex US -13.5% -18.2% -19.0% 1.0% 2.6% Emerging Markets Equity MSCI Emerging Markets -11.3% -17.5% -25.0% 0.4% 2.4% Global Fixed Income Investment Grade Fixed Income Bloomberg US Aggregate -4.7% -10.3% -10.3% -o.6% 1.1% Inflation -Linked Securities Bloomberg Universal Govt Inflation -Link -9.8% -22.4% -7.8% 1.1% 3.0% High Yield Bloomberg Global High Yield (H) -10.6% -15.2% -15.4% -1.8% 0.9% Emerging Markets Fixed Income JP Morgan EM Bonds(UH in USD) -8.6% -14.5% -19.3% -2.5% -1.6% Alternative Investments Global REITs FTSE EPRA/NAREITGlobal REITs -16.8% -19.6% -13.5% -2.0% 2.7% Commodities Bloomberg Commodities -5.7% 18.4% 24.3% 12.5% 7.2% MLPs Alerian MLP -7.4% 10.0% 4.3% -1.6% -0.9% Hedged Strategies HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index -3.7% -5.0% -5.1% 2.8% 1.9% Managed Futures HFRX Macro/CTA Index 2.4% 3.3% o.8% 2.4% 2.3% Private Real Estate NCR EIF Private Real Estate - 5.3% 21.9% 9.6% 8.5% Global Cash Cash Citigroup3-month Treasury Bill 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 1.1% Other Fixed Income Municipal Fixed Income Bloomberg Municipal Bond -2.9% -9.0% -8.6% 0.1% 1.7% Source: FactSet, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management GIC. For more information about the risks to Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), please refer to the Risk Considerations section at the end of this material. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or other financial instruGraystone in any trading strategy. Please refer to important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end of this material. Pa �N�ALTH MANAGEMENT GLOBAL INVESTMENT OFFICE I CHARTBOOK I QUARTER IN REVIEW consulting, 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley Total Returns on Major US Stock Market Indices As of June 30, 2022 0% .5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -2g.2% Dow Jones Industrial S&P 500 NASDAQ Composite Russell l000 0202022 ■ YTD 12 months ending June 30, 2022 Russell 2000 Source: Bloomberg Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any ncesecGraystone financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Please referto important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end ofthis material. This slide sourced from Market Performa pa&SALTHMANAGEMENTGLOBALINVESTMENTOFFICEI CHARTBOOK I MARKET PERSPECTIVES - YTDTHROUGH Consulting`, 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stan ley Russell Style and Market Capitalization Indices As of June 30, 2022 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% -29.43" -z9.5 ro -31.0% Russell Russell Russell Russell l000 Value l000 Growth Midcap Value Midcap Growth ■ 2Q 2022 Is YTD 12 months ending June 30, 2022 Russell 2000 Value -33.5% Russell 200o Growth Source: Bloomberg Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any secGraystone financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Please referto important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end ofthis material. This slide sourced from Market Performance pa&BALTHMANAGEMENTGLOBALINVESTMENTOFFICEI CHARTBOOK I MARKET PERSPECTIVES - YTDTHROUGH Consulting`, 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley S&P 500 Sectors Second QuarterTotal Return As of June 30, 2022 Staples Utilities Energy Health Care Real Estate Industrials Materials Financials Technology Communication Services Discretionary -26.2% -30% -25% -20% -15% -so% -4.6% -5% 0% Source: Bloomberg Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any ncesecGraystone financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Please referto important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end ofthis material. This slide sourced from Market Performa pa �ALTHMANAGEMENTGLOBALINVESTMENTOFFICEI CHARTBOOK I MARKET PERSPECTIVES - YTDTHROUGH Consulting`, 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley Fixed Income Performance (Total Return %) Through June 30, 2022 rIi% -6.199. -10% -8.9% -15% -20% -25% US TIPS Global Inflation -Linked US Aggregate Global Aggregate ■ 2Q22 YTD ■ YOY 1 -9.8�12.8% � 11.9% "1 -14.2% -16.9% o -17.8 /o US Global HY Corp High Yield -21.8% -22.4% Global US Govt/ EM Broad Major (xUS) Corp (local currency) -2.3% GBI-EM Global Diversified Source: FactSet. (i) Represented by Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation Protected Notes (TIPS), Bloomberg Global Inflation -Linked, Bloomberg US Aggregate, Bloomberg Global Aggregate, Bloomberg US High Yield — Corporate, Bloomberg Global High Yield, Bloomberg Global Majors (x US), Bloomberg US Government/Corporate, Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Broad, JP Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Composite Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. This material is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any se�raystone financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Please referto important information, disclosures and qualifications at the end ofthis material. This slide sourced from Market Performance pa&gALTHMANAGEMENTGLOBALINVESTMENTOFFICEI CHARTBOOK I MARKET PERSPECTIVES - YTDTHROUGH Consulting, Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is the trade name of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, a registered broker -dealer in the United States. The sole purpose of this material is to inform, and it in no way is intended to be an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security, other investment or service, or to attract any funds or deposits. Investments mentioned may not be appropriate for all clients. Any product discussed herein may be purchased only after a client has carefully reviewed the offering memorandum and executed the subscription documents. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management has not considered the actual or desired investment objectives, goals, strategies, guidelines, or factual circumstances of any investor in any fund(s). Before making any investment, each investor should carefully considerthe risks associated with the investment, as discussed in the applicable offering memorandum, and make a determination based upon their own particular circumstances, that the investment is consistent with their investment objectives and risk tolerance. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC offers investment program services through a variety of investment programs, which are opened pursuant to written client agreements. Each program offers investment managers, funds and features that are not available in other programs; conversely, some investment managers, funds or investment strategies may be available in more than one program. Morgan Stanley's investment advisory programs may require a minimum asset level and, depending on your specific investment objectives and financial position, may not be appropriate for you. Please see the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC program disclosure brochure (the "Morgan Stanley ADV") for more information in the investment advisory programs available. The Morgan Stanley ADV is available at www.moraanstanlev.com/ADV. Sources of Data. Information in this material in this report has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness ortimeliness. Third -party data providers make no warranties or representations relating to the accuracy, completeness ortimeliness of the data they provide and are not liable for any damages relating to this data. All opinions included in this material constitute the Firm'sjudgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice . This material was not prepared by the research departments of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC or Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Some historical figures may be revised due to newly identified programs, firm restatements, etc. Global Investment Manager Analysis (GIMA) Focus List, Approved List and Tactical Opportunities List; Watch Policy. GIMA uses two methods to evaluate investment products in applicable advisory programs: Focus (and investment products meeting this standard are described as being on the Focus List) and Approved (and investment products meeting this standard are described as being on the Approved List). In general, Focus entails a more thorough evaluation of an investment product than Approved. Sometimes an investment product may be evaluated using the Focus List process but then placed on the Approved List instead of the Focus List. Investment products may move from the Focus List to the Approved List, or vice versa. GIMA may also determine that an investment product no longer meets the criteria under either process and will no longer be recommended in investment advisory programs (in which case the investment product is given a "Not Approved" status). GIMA has a `Watch" policy and may describe a Focus List orApproved List investment product as being on "Watch" if GIMA identifies specific areas that (a) merit further evaluation by GIMA and (b) may, but are not certain to, result in the investment product becoming "Not Approved."The Watch period depends on the length of time needed for GIMA to conduct its evaluation and for the investment manager orfund to address any concerns. Certain investment products on either the Focus List orApproved List may also be recommended forthe Tactical Opportunities List based in part on tactical opportunities existing at a given time. The investment products on the Tactical Opportunities List change overtime. For more information on the Focus List, Approved List, Tactical Opportunities List and Watch processes, please see the applicable Form ADV Disclosure Document for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Your Financial Advisor or Private Wealth Advisor can also provide upon request a copy of a publication entitled "Manager Selection Process." The Global Investment Committee is a group of seasoned investment professionals who meet regularly to discuss the global economy and markets. The committee determines the investment outlook that guides our advice to clients. They continually monitor developing economic and market conditions, reviewtactical outlooks and recommend model portfolio weightings, as well as produce a suite of strategy, analysis, commentary, portfolio positioning suggestions and other reports and broadcasts. The GIC Asset Allocation Models are not available to be directly implemented as part of an investment advisory service and should not be regarded as a recommendation of any Morgan Stanley investment advisory service. The GIC Asset Allocation Models do not represent actual trading or any type of account or any type of investment strategies and none of the fees or other expenses (e .g. commissions, mark-ups, mark-downs, advisory fees, fund expenses) associated with actual trading or accounts are reflected in the GIC Asset Allocation Models which , when compounded over a period of years, would decrease returns. Adverse Active AlphaSM 2.0 is a patented screening and scoring process designed to help identify high -quality equity and fixed income managers with characteristics that may lead to future outperformance relative to index and peers. While highly ranked managers performed well as a group in our Adverse Active Alpha model back tests, not all of the managers will outperform. Please note that this data may be derived from back -testing, which has the benefit of hindsight. In addition, highly ranked managers can have differing risk profiles that might not be appropriate for all investors. Our view is that Adverse Active Alpha is a good starting point and should be used in conjunction with other information. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management's qualitative and quantitative investment manager due diligence process are equally important factors for investors when considering managers for use through an investment advisory program. Factors including, but not limited to, manaqer Graystone DISCLOSURES Consulting, Page 9 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley turnover and changes to investment process can partially or fully negate a positive Adverse Active Alpha ranking. Additionally, highly ranked managers can have differing risk profiles that might not be appropriate for all investors. The proprietary Value Score methodology considers an active investment strategies'vaIue proposition relative to its costs. From a historical quantitative study of several quantitative markers, Value Score measures perceived forward -looking benefit and computes (i) "fair value" expense ratios for most traditional investment managers across 40 categories and (z) managers' perceived "excess value" by comparing the fair value expense ratios to actual expense ratios. Managers are then ranked within each category by their excess value to assign a Value Score. Our analysis suggests that greater levels of excess value have historically corresponded to attractive subsequent performance. For more information on the ranking models, please see Adverse Active AlphaSM 2.0: Scoring Active Managers According to Potential Alpha and Value Score: Scoring Fee Efficiency by Comparing Managers' "Fair Value" and Actual Expense Ratios. The whitepapers are available from your Financial Advisor or Private Wealth Advisor. ADVERSE ACTIVE ALPHA is a registered service mark of Morgan Stanley and/or its affiliates. U.S. Pat. No. 8,756,o98 applies to the Adverse Active Alpha system and/or methodology. Additionally, highly ranked managers can have differing risk profiles that might not be appropriate for all investors. For more information on AAA, please see the Adverse Active Alpha Ranking Model and Selecting Managers with Adverse Active Alpha whitepapers. The whitepaper are available from your Financial Advisor or Private Wealth Advisor. ADVERSE ACTIVE ALPHA is a registered service mark of Morgan Stanley and/or its affiliates. U.S. Pat. No. 8,756,o98 applies to the Adverse Active Alpha system and/or methodology. The Global Investment ManagerAnalysis (GIMA) Services OnlyApply to Certain Investment Advisory Programs GIMA evaluates certain investment products for the purposes of some — but not all — of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's investment advisory programs (as described in more detail in the applicable Form ADV Disclosure Document for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management). If you do not invest through one of these investment advisory programs, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is not obligated to provide you notice of any GIMA Status changes even though it may give notice to clients in other programs. Strategy May Be Available as a Separately Managed Account or Mutual Fund Strategies are sometimes available in Morgan Stanley Wealth Management investment advisory programs both in the form of a separately managed account ("SMA") and a mutual fund. These may have different expenses and investment minimums. Your Financial Advisor or Private Wealth Advisor can provide more information on whether any particular strategy is available in more than one form in a particular investment advisory program. Generally, investment advisory accounts are subject to an annual asset -based fee (the "Fee") which is payable monthly in advance (some account types may be billed differently). In general, the Fee covers Morgan Stanley investment advisory services, custody of securities with Morgan Stanley, trade execution with or through Morgan Stanley or its affiliates, as well as compensation to any Morgan Stanley Financial Advisor. In addition, each account that is invested in a program that is eligible to purchase certain investment products, such as mutual funds, will also pay a Platform Fee (which is subject to a Platform Fee offset) as described in the applicable ADV brochure. Accounts invested in the Select UMA program may also pay a separate Sub-Managerfee, if applicable. If your account is invested in mutual funds or exchange traded funds (collectively "funds"), you will pay the fees and expenses of any funds in which your account is invested. Fees and expenses are charged directly to the pool of assets the fund invests in and are reflected in each fund's share price. These fees and expenses are an additional cost to you and would not be included in the Fee amount in your account statements. The advisory program you choose is described in the applicable Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC ADV Brochure, available at www.morganstanley.com/ADV. Morgan Stanley or Executing Sub -Managers, as applicable, in some of Morgan Stanley's Separately Managed Account ("SMA") programs may effect transactions through broker -dealers other than Morgan Stanley or our affiliates. In such instance, you may be assessed additional costs by the other firm in addition to the Morgan Stanley and Sub -Manager fees. Those costs will be included in the net price of the security, not separately reported on trade confirmations or account statements. Certain Sub -Managers have historically directed most, if not all, of theirtrades to outside firms. Information provided by Sub -Managers concerning trade execution away from Morgan Stanley is summarized at: www.moraanstanlev.com/wealth/investmentsolutionS/Ddfs/adv/sotresr)onse.r)df. For more information on trading and costs, please referto the ADV Brochure for your program(s), available at www.moraanstanlev.com/ADV, or contact your Financial Advisor / Private Wealth Advisor. Conflicts of Interest: GIMA's goal is to provide professional, objective evaluations in support of the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management investment advisory programs. We have policies and procedures to help us meet this goal. However, our business is subject to various conflicts of interest. For example, ideas and suggestions for which investment products should be evaluated by GIMA come from a variety of sources, including our Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Financial Advisors and their direct or indirect managers, and other business persons within Morgan Stanley Wealth Management or its affiliates. Such persons may have an ongoing business relationship with certain investment managers or mutual fund companies whereby they, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management or its affiliates receive compensation from, or otherwise related to, those investment managers or mutual funds. For example, a Financial Advisor may suggest that GIMA evaluates an Graystone DISCLOSURES Consulting, Page 10 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley investment manager or fund in which a portion of his or her clients' assets areal ready invested. While such a recommendation is permissible, GIMA is responsible for the opinions expressed by GIMA. Seethe conflicts of interest section in the applicable Form ADV Disclosure Document for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management for a discussion of other types of conflicts that maybe relevant to GIMA's evaluation of managers and funds. In addition, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, MS & Co., managers and their affiliates provide a variety of services (including research, brokerage, asset management, trading, lending and investment banking services) for each other and for various clients, including issuers of securities that may be recommended for purchase or sale by clients or are otherwise held in client accounts, and managers in various advisory programs. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, managers, MS & Co., and their affiliates receive compensation and fees in connection with these services. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management believes that the nature and range of clients to which such services are rendered is such that it would be inadvisable to exclude categorically all of these companies from an account. Morgan Stanley charges each fund family we offer a mutual fund support fee, also called a "revenue -sharing payment," on client account holdings in fund families according to a tiered rate that increases along with the management fee of the fund so that lower management fee funds pay lower rates than those with higher management fees. ConsiderYour Own Investment Needs: The model portfolios and strategies discussed in the material are formulated based on general client characteristics including risk tolerance. This material is not intended to be an analysis of whether particular investments or strategies are appropriate for you or a recommendation, or an offerto participate in any investment. Therefore, clients should not use this material as the sole basis for investment decisions. They should consider all relevant information, including their existing portfolio, investment objectives, risk tolerance, liquidity needs and investment time horizon. Such a determination may lead to asset allocation results that are materially different from the asset allocation shown in this profile. Talk to your Financial Advisor about what would be an appropriate asset allocation for you, whether CGCM is an appropriate program for you. No obligation to notify— Morgan Stanley Wealth Management has no obligation to notify you when the model portfolios, strategies, or any other information, in this material changes. Please consider the investment objectives, risks, fees, and charges and expenses of mutual funds, ETFs, closed end funds, unit investment trusts, and variable insurance products carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about each fund. To obtain a prospectus, contact your Financial Advisor or Private Wealth Advisor or visit the Morgan Stanley website at www.moraanstaniev.com. Please read it carefully before investing. An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $i.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. The type of mutual funds and ETFs discussed in this presentation utilizes nontraditional or complex investment strategies and/or derivatives. Examples of these types of funds include those that utilize one or more of the below noted investment strategies or categories or which seek exposure to the following markets: (i) commodities (e.g., agricultural, energy and metals), currency, precious metals;(z) managed futures; (3) leveraged, inverse or inverse leveraged; (4) bear market, hedging, long -short equity, market neutral; (5) real estate; (6) volatility (seeking exposure to the CBOE VIX Index). Investors should keep in mind that while mutual funds and ETFs may, at times, utilize nontraditional investment options and strategies, they should not be equated with unregistered privately offered alternative investments. Because of regulatory limitations, mutual funds and ETFs that seek alternative -like investment exposure must utilize a more limited investment universe. As a result, investment returns and portfolio characteristics of alternative mutual funds and ETFs may vary from traditional hedge funds pursuing similar investment objectives. Moreover, traditional hedge funds have limited liquidity with long "lock -up" periods allowing them to pursue investment strategies without having to factor in the need to meet client redemptions and ETFs trade on an exchange . On the other hand, mutual funds typically must meet daily client redemptions. This differing liquidity profile can have a material impact on the investment returns generated by a mutual fund or ETF pursuing an alternative investing strategy compared with a traditional hedge fund pursuing the same strategy. Nontraditional investment options and strategies are often employed by a portfolio manager to further a fund's investment objective and to help offset market risks. However, these features may be complex, making it more difficult to understand the fund's essential characteristics and risks, and how it will perform in different market environments and over various periods of time. They may also expose the fund to increased volatility and unanticipated risks particularly when used in complex combinations and/or accompanied by the use of borrowing or "leverage." The Morgan Stanley Digital Vault ("Digital Vault") is accessible to clients with dedicated Financial Advisors. Documents shared via the Digital Vault should be limited to those relevant to your Morgan Stanley account relationship. Uploading a document to the Digital Vault does not obligate us to review or take any action on it, and we will not be liable for any failure to act upon the contents of such document. Please contact your Financial Advisor or Branch Management to discuss the appropriate process for providing the document to us for review. If you maintain a Trust or entity account with us, only our certification form will govern our obligations for such account. Please refer to the Morgan Stanley Digital Vault terms and conditions for more information. DISCLOSURES Page 11 Graystone Consulting, from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley Information related to your external accounts is provided for informational purposes only. It is provided by third parties, including the financial institutions where your external accounts are held. Morgan Stanley does not verify that the information is accurate and makes no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. Additional information about the features and services offered through Total Wealth View are available on the Total Wealth View site on Morgan Stanley Online and also in the Total Wealth View Terms and Conditions of Use. Mobile check deposits are subject to certain terms and conditions. Checks must be drawn on a U.S. Bank. Send Money with Zelle® is available on the Morgan Stanley Mobile App for iPhone and Android and on Morgan Stanley Online. Enrollment is required and dollar and frequency limits may apply. Domestic fund transfers must be made from an eligible account at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (Morgan Stanley) to a US -based account at another financial institution. Morgan Stanley maintains arrangements with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and UMB Bank, N.A. as NACHA-participating depository financial institutions for the processing of transfers on Zelle®. Data connection required, and message and data rates may apply, including those from your communications service provider. Must have an eligible account in the U.S. to use Zelle@. Transactions typically occur in minutes when the recipient's email address or U.S. mobile number is already enrolled with Zelle. See the Morgan Stanley Send Money with Zelle® terms for details. Zelle and the Zelle related marks are wholly owned by Early Warning Services, LLC and are used herein under license. Morgan Stanley is not affiliated with Zelleo. Electronic payments arrive to the payee within 1-2 business days, check payments arrive to the payee within S business days. Same -day and overnight payments are available for an additional fee within the available payment timeframes. KEY ASSET CLASS CONSIDERATIONS AND OTHER RISKS Investing in the markets entails the risk of market volatility. The value of all types of investments, including stocks, mutual funds, exchange -traded funds ("ETFs"), closed -end funds, and unit investment trusts, may increase or decrease over varying time periods. To the extent the investments depicted herein represent international securities, you should be aware that there may be additional risks associated with international investing, including foreign economic, political, monetary and/or legal factors, changing currency exchange rates, foreign taxes, and differences in financial and accounting standards. These risks may be magnified in emerging markets and frontier markets. Small- and mid -capitalization companies may lack the financial resources, product diversification and competitive strengths of larger companies. In addition, the securities of small- and mid -capitalization companies may not trade as readily as, and be subject to higher volatility than, those of larger, more established companies. The value of fixed income securities will fluctuate and, upon a sale, may be worth more or less than their original cost or maturity value. Bonds are subject to interest rate risk, call risk, reinvestment risk, liquidity risk, and credit risk of the issuer. High yield bonds are subject to additional risks such as increased risk of default and greater volatility because of the lower credit quality of the issues. In the case of municipal bonds, income is generally exempt from federal income taxes. Some income may be subject to state and local taxes and to the federal alternative minimum tax. Capital gains, if any, are subject to tax. Treasury Inflation Protection Securities' (TIPS) coupon payments and underlying principal are automatically increased to compensate for inflation by tracking the consumer price index (CPI). While the real rate of return is guaranteed, TIPS tend to offer a low return. Because the return of TIPS is linked to inflation, TIPS may significantly underperform versus conventional U.S. Treasuries in times of low inflation. There is no guarantee that investors will receive par ifTIPS are sold priorto maturity. The returns on a portfolio consisting primarily of environmental, social, and governance -aware investments ("ESG") may be lower or higherthan a portfolio that is more diversified or where decisions are based solely on investment considerations. Because ESG criteria exclude some investments, investors may not be able to take advantage of the same opportunities or market trends as investors that do not use such criteria. The companies identified and investment examples are for illustrative purposes only and should not be deemed a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities or investment products. They are intended to demonstrate the approaches taken by managers who focus on ESG criteria in their investment strategy. There can be no guarantee that a client's account will be managed as described herein. Options and margin trading involve substantial risk and are not appropriate for all investors. Besides the general investment risk of holding securities that may decline in value and the possible loss of principal invested, closed -end funds may have additional risks related to declining market prices relative to net asset values (NAVs), active manager underperformance and potential leverage. Closed -end funds, unlike open-end funds, are not continuously offered. There is a one-time public offering and once issued, shares of closed -end funds are sold in the open market through a stock exchange. Shares of closed -end funds frequently trade at a discount from their NAV which may increase investors' risk of loss. The risk of loss due to this discount may be greaterfor investors expecting to sell their shares in a relatively short period after completion of the public offering. This characteristic is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that a closed -end fund's net asset value may decrease as a result of investment activities. NAV is total assets less total liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding. At the time an investor purchases or sells shares of a closed -end fund, shares may have a market price that is above or below NAV. Portfolios that invest a large percentage of assets in only one industry sector (or in only a few sectors) are more vulnerable to price fluctuation than those that diversify among a broad range of sectors. Alternative investments often are speculative and include a high degree of risk. Investors could lose all or a substantial amount of their investment. Alternative investments are appropriate onlyfor eligible, long-term investors who are willing to forgo liquidity and put capital at risk for an indefinite period of time. They may be highly illiquid and can engage in leverage and other speculative Graystone DISCLOSURES Consulting, Page 12 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley practices that may increase the volatility and risk of loss. Alternative Investments typically have higher fees than traditional investments. Investors should carefully review and consider potential risks before investing. Certain of these risks may include but are not limited to: Loss of all or a substantial portion of the investment due to leveraging, short -selling, or other speculative practices; Lack of liquidity in that there may be no secondary market for a fund, Volatility of returns, Restrictions on transferring interests in a fund; Potential lack of diversification and resulting higher risk due to concentration of trading authority when a single advisor is utilized; Absence of information regarding valuations and pricing; Complex tax structures and delays in tax reporting; Less regulation and higher fees than mutual funds; Risks associated with the operations, personnel, and processes of the manager; and Risks associated with cybersecurity. As a diversified global financial services firm, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management engages in a broad spectrum of activities including financial advisory services, investment management activities, sponsoring and managing private investment funds, engaging in broker -dealer transactions and principal securities, commodities and foreign exchange transactions, research publication, and other activities. In the ordinary course of its business, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management therefore engages in activities where Morgan Stanley Wealth Management's interests may conflict with the interests of its clients, including the private investment funds it manages. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management can give no assurance that conflicts of interest will be resolved in favor of its clients or any such fund. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice and are not intended to be a forecast of future events or results. Further, opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management and/or other businesses/affiliates of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. This is not a "research report" as defined by FINRA Rule 2241 or a "debt research report" as defined by FINRA Rule 2242 and was not prepared by the Research Departments of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC or Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC or its affiliates. Certain information contained herein may constitute forward -looking statements. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or the performance of a fund may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward -looking statements. Clients should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund before investing. While the HFRI indices are frequently used, they have limitations (some of which are typical of other widely used indices). These limitations include survivorship bias (the returns of the indices may not be representative of all the hedge funds in the universe because of the tendency of lower performing funds to leave the index); heterogeneity (not all hedge funds are alike or comparable to one another, and the index may not accurately reflect the performance of a described style); and limited data (many hedge funds do not report to indices, and the index may omit funds, the inclusion of which might significantly affect the performance shown. The HFRI indices are based on information self -reported by hedge fund managers that decide on their own, at anytime, whether or not they want to provide, or continue to provide, information to HFR Asset Management, L.L.C. Results forfunds that go out of business are included in the index until the date that they cease operations. Therefore, these indices may not be complete or accurate representations of the hedge fund universe, and may be biased in several ways. Composite index results are shown for illustrative purposes and do not represent the performance of a specific investment. Individual funds have specific tax risks related to their investment programs that will vary from fund to fund. Clients should consult their own tax and legal advisors as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management does not provide tax or legal advice. Interests in alternative investment products are offered pursuant to the terms of the applicable offering memorandum , are distributed by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management and certain of its affiliates, and (i) are not FDIC -insured, (2) are not deposits or other obligations of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management or any of its affiliates, (3) are not guaranteed by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management and its affiliates, and (4) involve investment risks, including possible loss of principal. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is a registered broker -dealer, not a bank. This material is not to be reproduced or distributed to any other persons (otherthan professional advisors of the investors or prospective investors, as applicable, receiving this material) and is intended solely forthe use of the persons to whom it has been delivered. This material is not for distribution to the general public. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Actual results may vary. SIPC insurance does not apply to precious metals, other commodities, ortraditional alternative investments. In Consulting Group's advisory programs, alternative investments are limited to US -registered mutual funds, separate account strategies and exchange -traded funds (ETFs) that seek to pursue alternative investment strategies or returns utilizing publicly traded securities. Investment products in this category may employ various investment strategies and techniques for both hedging and more speculative purposes such as short -selling, leverage, derivatives and options, which can increase volatility and the risk of investment loss. Alternative investments are not appropriate for all investors. As a diversified global financial services firm, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management engages in a broad spectrum of activities including financial advisory services, investment management activities, sponsoring and managing private investment funds, engaging in broker -dealer transactions and principal securities, commodities and foreign exchange transactions, research publication, and other activities. In the ordinary course of its business, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management therefore engages in activities where Morgan Stanley Wealth Management's interests may conflict with the interests of its clients, including the private investment funds it manages. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management can give no assurance that conflicts of interest will be resolved in favor of its clients or any such fund. Alternative investments involve complex tax structures, tax inefficient investing, and delays in distributing important tax information. Individual funds have specific risks related to their investment programs that will vary from fund to fund. Clients should consult their own tax and legal advisors as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management does not provide tax or legal advice. A majority of Alternative Investment managers reviewed and selected by GIMA pay or cause to be paid an ongoing fee for distribution from their management fees to Morgan Stanley Wealth Management in connection with Morgan Stanley Wealth Management clients that purchase an interest in an Alternative Investment and in some instances pay these fees on the investments held by investments held by brokerage clients. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management has a conflict of interest in offering alternative investments because Morgan Stanley Wealth Management or our affiliates, in most instances, earn more money in your account from your investments in alternative investments than from other investment options. It should be noted that the majority of hedge fund indexes are comprised of hedge fund manager returns. This is in contrast to traditional indexes, which are comprised of individual securities in the various market segments they represent and offer complete transparency as to membership and construction methodology. As such, some believe that hedge fund DISCLOSURES Page 13 index returns have certain biases Graystone Consulting, from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley that are not present in traditional indexes. Some of these biases inflate index performance, while others may skew performance negatively. However, many studies indicate that overall hedge fund index performance has been biased to the upside. Some studies suggest performance has been inflated by up to 26o basis points or more annually depending on the types of biases included and the time period studied. Although there are numerous potential biases that could affect hedge fund returns, we identify some of the more common ones throughout this paper. Self-selection bias results when certain manager returns are not included in the index returns and may result in performance being skewed up or down . Because hedge funds are private placements, hedge fund managers are able to decide which fund returns they want to report and are able to opt out of reporting to the various databases. Certain hedge fund managers may choose only to report returns for funds with strong returns and opt out of reporting returns for weak performers. Other hedge funds that close may decide to stop reporting in order to retain secrecy, which may cause a downward bias in returns. Survivorship bias results when certain constituents are removed from an index. This often results from the closure of funds due to poor performance, "blow ups," or other such events. As such, this bias typically results in performance being skewed higher. As noted, hedge fund index performance biases can result in positive or negative skew. However, it would appear that the skew is more often positive. While it is difficult to quantify the effects precisely, investors should be aware that idiosyncratic factors may be giving hedge fund index returns an artificial "lift" or upwards bias. Hedge Funds of Funds and many funds of funds are private investment vehicles restricted to certain qualified private and institutional investors. They are often speculative and include a high degree of risk. Investors can lose all or a substantial amount of their investment. They may be highly illiquid, can engage in leverage and other speculative practices that may increase volatility and the risk of loss, and may be subject to large investment minimums and initial lockups. They involve complex tax structures, tax -inefficient investing and delays in distributing important tax information. Categorically, hedge funds and funds of funds have higher fees and expenses than traditional investments, and such fees and expenses can lower the returns achieved by investors. Funds of funds have an additional layer of fees over and above hedge fund fees that will offset returns. An investment in an exchange -traded fund involves risks similar to those of investing in a broadly based portfolio of equity securities traded on an exchange in the relevant securities market, such as market fluctuations caused by such factors as economic and political developments, changes in interest rates and perceived trends in stock and bond prices. An investment in a target date portfolio is subject to the risks attendant to the underlying funds in which it invests, in these portfolios the funds are the Consulting Group Capital Market funds. A target date portfolio is geared to investors who will retire and/or require income at an approximate year. The portfolio is managed to meet the investor's goals by the pre -established year or "target date." A target date portfolio will transition its invested assets from a more aggressive portfolio to a more conservative portfolio as the target date draws closer. An investment in the target date portfolio is not guaranteed at any time, including, before or after the target date is reached. Managed futures investments are speculative, involve a high degree of risk, use significant leverage, are generally illiquid, have substantial charges, subject investors to conflicts of interest, and are appropriate only for the risk capital portion of an investor's portfolio. Managed futures investments do not replace equities or bonds but rather may act as a complement in a well diversified portfolio. Managed Futures are complex and not appropriate for all investors. Rebalancing does not protect against a loss in declining financial markets. There may be a potential tax implication with a rebalancing strategy. Virtual Currencv Products (Crvptocurrencies) Buying, selling, and transacting in Bitcoin, Ethereum or other digital assets ("Digital Assets"), and related funds and products, is highly speculative and may result in a loss of the entire investment. Risks and considerations include but are not limited to: - Digital Assets have only been in existence for a short period of time and historical trading prices for Digital Assets have been highly volatile. The price of Digital Assets could decline rapidly, and investors could lose their entire investment. - Certain Digital Asset funds and products, allow investors to invest on a more frequent basis than investors may withdraw from the fund or product, and interests in such funds or products are generally not freely transferrable. This means that, particularly given the volatility of Digital Assets, an investor will have to bear any losses with respect to its investment for an extended period of time and will not be able to react to changes in the price of the Digital Asset once invested (for example, by seeking to withdraw) as quickly as when making the decision to invest. Such Digital Asset funds and products, are intended only for persons who are able to bear the economic risk of investment and who do not need liquidity with respect to their investments. - Given the volatility in the price of Digital Assets, the net asset value of a fund or product that invests in such assets at the time an investor's subscription for interests in the fund or product is accepted may be significantly below or above the net asset value of the product or fund at the time the investor submitted subscription materials. - Certain Digital Assets are not intended to function as currencies but are intended to have other use cases. These other Digital Assets may be subject to some or all of the risks and considerations set forth herein, as well as additional risks applicable to such Digital Assets. Buyers, sellers and users of such Digital Assets should thoroughly familiarize themselves with such risks and considerations Graystone DISCLOSURES Consulting, Page 14 from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley before transacting in such Digital Assets. - The value of Digital Assets may be negatively impacted by future legal and regulatory developments, including but not limited to increased regulation of such Digital Assets. Any such developments may make such Digital Assets less valuable, impose additional burdens and expenses on a fund or product investing in such assets or impact the ability of such a fund or product to continue to operate, which may materially decrease the value of an investment therein. - Due to the new and evolving nature of digital currencies and the absence of comprehensive guidance, many significant aspects of the tax treatment of Digital Assets are uncertain. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Digital Assets, directly or indirectly through a fund or product, under U.S. federal income tax law, as well as the tax law of any relevant state, local or other jurisdiction. - Over the past several years, certain Digital Asset exchanges have experienced failures or interruptions in service due to fraud, security breaches, operational problems or business failure. Such events in the future could impact any fund's or product's ability to transact in Digital Assets if the fund or product relies on an impacted exchange and may also materially decrease the price of Digital Assets, thereby impacting the value of your investment, regardless of whether the fund or product relies on such an impacted exchange. - Although any Digital Asset product and its service providers have in place significant safeguards against loss, theft, destruction and inaccessibility, there is nonetheless a risk that some or all of a product's Digital Asset could be permanently lost, stolen, destroyed or inaccessible by virtue of, among other things, the loss or theft of the "private keys" necessary to access a product's Digital Asset. - Investors in funds or products investing ortransacting in Digital Assets may not benefit to the same extent (or at all) from "airdrops" with respect to, or "forks" in, a Digital Asset's blockchain, compared to investors who hold Digital Assets directly instead of through a fund or product. Additionally, a "fork" in the Digital Asset blockchain could materially decrease the price of such Digital Asset. - Digital Assets are not legal tender, and are not backed by any government, corporation or other identified body, other than with respect to certain digital currencies that certain governments are or may be developing now or in the future. No law requires companies or individuals to accept digital currency as a form of payment (except, potentially, with respect to digital currencies developed by certain governments where such acceptance may be mandated). Instead, other than as described in the preceding sentences, Digital Asset products' use is limited to businesses and individuals that are willing to accept them. If no one were to accept digital currencies, virtual currency products would very likely become worthless. - Platforms that buy and sell Digital Assets can be hacked, and some have failed. In addition, like the platforms themselves, digital wallets can be hacked, and are subject to theft and fraud. As a result, like other investors have, you can lose some or all of your holdings of Digital Assets. - Unlike US banks and credit unions that provide certain guarantees of safety to depositors, there are no such safeguards provided to Digital Assets held in digital wallets by their providers or by regulators. - Due to the anonymity Digital Assets offer, they have known use in illegal activity, including drug dealing, money laundering, human trafficking, sanction evasion and otherforms of illegal commerce. Abuses could impact legitimate consumers and speculators; for instance, law enforcement agencies could shut down or restrict the use of platforms and exchanges, limiting or shutting off entirely the ability to use or trade Digital Asset products. - Digital Assets may not have an established track record of credibility and trust. Further, any performance data relating to Digital Asset products may not be verifiable as pricing models are not uniform. - Investors should be aware of the potentially increased risks of transacting in Digital Assets relating to the risks and considerations, including fraud, theft, and lack of legitimacy, and other aspects and qualities of Digital Assets, before transacting in such assets. - The exchange rate of virtual currency products versus the USD historically has been very volatile and the exchange rate could drastically decline. For example, the exchange rate of certain Digital Assets versus the USD has in the past dropped more than 5o% in a single day. Other Digital Assets may be affected by such volatility as well. DISCLOSURES Page 15 Graystone Consulting, from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley - Digital Asset exchanges have limited operating and performance histories and are not regulated with the same controls or customer protections available to more traditional exchanges transacting equity, debt, and other assets and securities. There is no assurance that a person/exchange who currently accepts a Digital Asset as payment will continue to do so in the future. - The regulatory framework of Digital Assets is evolving, and in some cases is uncertain, and Digital Assets themselves may not be governed and protected by applicable securities regulators and securities laws, including, but not limited to, Securities Investor Protection Corporation coverage, or other regulatory regimes. - Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC or its affiliates (collectively, "Morgan Stanley") may currently, or in the future, offer or invest in Digital Asset products, services or platforms. The proprietary interests of Morgan Stanley may conflict with your interests. - The foregoing list of considerations and risks are not and do not purport to be a complete enumeration or explanation of the risks involved in an investment in any product or fund investing or trading in Digital Assets. Asset allocation and diversification do not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining financial markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Actual results may vary. Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC ("Morgan Stanley"), its affiliates and Morgan Stanley Financial Advisors and Private Wealth Advisors do not provide tax or legal advice and are not "fiduciaries" (under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise) with respect to the services or activities described herein except as otherwise provided in writing by Morgan Stanley and/or as described at www.moraanstaniev.com/disclosures/dol. Individuals are encouraged to consult theirtax and legal advisors (a) before establishing a retirement plan or account, and (b) regarding any potential tax, ERISA and related consequences of any investments made under such plan or account. Annuities and insurance products are offered in conjunction with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's licensed insurance agency affiliates. Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot directly invest in them. They are not subject to expenses or fees and are often comprised of securities and other investment instruments the liquidity of which is not restricted. A particular investment product may consist of securities significantly different than those in any index referred to herein . Composite index results are shown for illustrative purposes only, generally do not represent the performance of a specific investment, may not, for a variety of reasons, be an appropriate comparison or benchmark for a particular investment and may not necessarily reflect the actual investment strategy or objective of a particular investment. Consequently, comparing an investment to a particular index may be of limited use. This material is not a financial plan and does not create an investment advisory relationship between you and your Morgan Stanley Financial Advisor. We are not yourfiduciary either underthe Employee Retirement Income Security Act of i974 (ERISA) or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and any information in this report is not intended to form the primary basis for any investment decision by you, or an investment advice or recommendation for either ERISA or Internal Revenue Code purposes. Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management will only prepare a financial plan at your specific request using Private Wealth Management approved financial planning signature. We may act in the capacity of a broker or that of an advisor. As your broker, we are not your fiduciary and our interests may not always be identical to yours. Please consult with your Private Wealth Advisor to discuss our obligations to disclose to you any conflicts we may from time to time have and our duty to act in your best interest. We may be paid both by you and by others who compensate us based on what you buy. Our compensation, including that of your Private Wealth Advisor, may vary by product and over time. Investment and services offered through Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management, a division of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Member SIPC. For index, indicator and survey definitions referenced in this report please visit the following: httas://www.moraanstaniev.com/wealth-investmentsolutions/wmir-definitions GLOBAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE (GIC) ASSET ALLOCATION MODELS: The Asset Allocation Models are created by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management's GIC. HYPOTHETICAL MODEL PERFORMANCE (GROSS): Hypothetical model performance results do not reflect the investment or performance of an actual portfolio following a GIC Strategy, but simply reflect actual historical performance of selected indices on a real-time basis over the specified period of time representing the GIC's strategic and tactical allocations as ofthe date ofthis report. The past performance shown here is simulated performance based on benchmark indices, not investment results from an actual portfolio or actual trading. There can be large differences between hypothetical and actual performance results achieved by a particular asset allocation or trading strategy. Hypothetical performance results do not represent actual trading and are generally desiqned Graystone DISCLOSURES Consulting, Page 16 from Morganstantey WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley with the benefit of hindsight. Actual performance results of accounts vary due to, for example, market factors (such as liquidity) and client -specific factors (such as investment vehicle selection, timing of contributions and withdrawals, restrictions and rebalancing schedules). Clients would not necessarily have obtained the performance results shown here if they had invested in accordance with any GIC Asset Allocation Model forthe periods indicated. Despite the limitations of hypothetical performance, these hypothetical performance results allow clients and Financial Advisors to obtain a sense of the risk/return trade-off of different asset allocation constructs. The hypothetical performance results in this report are calculated using the returns of benchmark indices forthe asset classes, and not the returns of securities, fund or other investment products. Models may contain allocations to Hedge Funds, Private Equity and Private Real Estate. The benchmark indices for these asset classes are not issued on a daily basis. When calculating model performance on a day for which no benchmark index data is issued, we have assumed straight line growth between the index levels issued before and after that date. FEES REDUCE THE PERFORMANCE OF ACTUAL ACCOUNTS: None of the fees or other expenses (e.g. commissions, mark-ups, mark-downs, fees) associated with actual trading or accounts are reflected in the GIC Asset Allocation Models. The GIC Asset Allocation Models and any model performance included in this presentation are intended as educational materials. Were a client to use these models in connection with investing, any investment decisions made would be subject to transaction and other costs which, when compounded over a period of years, would decrease returns. Information regarding Morgan Stanley's standard advisory fees is available in the Form ADV Part 2, which is available at www.morganstanley.com/adv. The following hypothetical illustrates the compound effect fees have on investment returns: For example, if a portfolio's annual rate of return is 15%for 5 years and the account pays 5o basis points in fees per annum, the gross cumulative five-year return would be ioi.i% and the five-year return net of fees would be 96.8%. Fees and/or expenses would apply to clients who invest in investments in an account based on these asset allocations, and would reduce clients' returns. The impact of fees and/or expenses can be material. Variable annuities are long-term investments designed for retirement purposes and may be subject to market fluctuations, investment risk, and possible loss of principal. All guarantees, including optional benefits, are based on the financial strength and claims -paying ability of the issuing insurance company and do not apply to the underlying investment options. Optional riders may not be able to be purchased in combination and are available at an additional cost. Some optional riders must be elected at time of purchase. Optional riders may be subject to specific limitations, restrictions, holding periods, costs, and expenses as specified by the insurance company in the annuity contract. If you are investing in a variable annuity through a tax -advantaged retirement plan such as an IRA, you will get no additional tax advantage from the variable annuity. Under these circumstances, you should only consider buying a variable annuity because of its other features, such as lifetime income payments and death benefits protection. Taxable distributions (and certain deemed distributions) are subject to ordinary income tax and, if taken prior to age 591h, may be subject to a io%federal income tax penalty. Early withdrawals will reduce the death benefit and cash surrender value. Equity securities may fluctuate in response to news on companies, industries, market conditions and general economic environment. Ultrashort-term fixed income asset class is comprised of fixed income securities with high quality, very short maturities. They are therefore subject to the risks associated with debt securities such as credit and interest rate risk. Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) are limited partnerships or limited liability companies that are taxed as partnerships and whose interests (limited partnership units or limited liability company units) are traded on securities exchanges like shares of common stock. Currently, most MLPs operate in the energy, natural resources or real estate sectors. Investments in MLP interests are subject to the risks generally applicable to companies in the energy and natural resources sectors, including commodity pricing risk, supply and demand risk, depletion risk and exploration risk. Individual MLPs are publicly traded partnerships that have unique risks related to their structure. These include, but are not limited to, their reliance on the capital markets to fund growth, adverse ruling on the current tax treatment of distributions (typically mostly tax deferred), and commodity volume risk. The potential tax benefits from investing in MLPs depend on their being treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes and, if the MLP is deemed to be a corporation, then its income would be subject to federal taxation at the entity level, reducing the amount of cash available for distribution to the fund which could result in a reduction of the fund's value. MLPs carry interest rate risk and may underperform in a rising interest rate environment. MLP funds accrue deferred income taxes for future tax liabilities associated with the portion of MLP distributions considered to be a tax -deferred return of capital and for any net operating gains as well as capital appreciation of its investments; this deferred tax liability is reflected in the daily NAV, and, as a result, the MLP fund's after-tax performance could differ significantly from the underlying assets even if the pre-tax performance is closely tracked. Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii) governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and government intervention. Physical precious metals are non -regulated products. Precious metals are speculative investments, which may experience short-term and long term price volatility. The value of precious metals investments may fluctuate and may appreciate or decline, depending on market conditions. Unlike bonds and stocks, precious metals do not make interest or dividend payments. Therefore, precious metals may not be appropriate for investors who require current income. Precious metals are commodities that should be safely stored, which may impose additional costs on the investor. DISCLOSURES Page 17 Graystone Consulting, from Morgan Stanley WEALTH MANAGEMENT Morgan Stanley REITs investing risks are similar to those associated with direct investments in real estate: property value fluctuations, lack of liquidity, limited diversification and sensitivity to economic factors such as interest rate changes and market recessions. Risks of private real estate include: illiquidity; a long-term investment horizon with a limited or nonexistent secondary market, lack of transparency; volatility (risk of loss); and leverage. Principal is returned on a monthly basis over the life of a mortgage -backed security. Principal prepayment can significantly affect the monthly income stream and the maturity of any type of MBS, including standard MBS, CMOs and Lottery Bonds. Asset -backed securities generally decrease in value as a result of interest rate increases, but may benefit less than other fixed -income securities from declining interest rates, principally because of prepayments. Yields are subject to change with economic conditions. Yield is only one factor that should be considered when making an investment decision. Credit ratings are subject to change. Duration, the most commonly used measure of bond risk, quantifies the effect of changes in interest rates on the price of a bond or bond portfolio. The longer the duration, the more sensitive the bond or portfolio would be to changes in interest rates. The majority of $25 and $i000 par preferred securities are "callable" meaning that the issuer may retire the securities at specific prices and dates prior to maturity. Interest/dividend payments on certain preferred issues may be deferred by the issuer for periods of up to 5 to io years, depending on the particular issue. The investor would still have income tax liability even though payments would not have been received. Price quoted is per $25 or si,000 share, unless otherwise specified. Current yield is calculated by multiplying the coupon by par value divided by the market price. The initial interest rate on a floating-rate security may be lower than that of a fixed-rate security of the same maturity because investors expect to receive additional income due to future increases in the floating security's underlying reference rate. The reference rate could be an index or an interest rate. However, there can be no assurance that the reference rate will increase. Some floating-rate securities may be subject to call risk. The market value of convertible bonds and the underlying common stock(s) will fluctuate and after purchase may be worth more or less than original cost. If sold prior to maturity, investors may receive more or less than their original purchase price or maturity value, depending on market conditions. Callable bonds may be redeemed by the issuer prior to maturity. Additional call features may exist that could affect yield. Some $25 or si000 par preferred securities are QDI (Qualified Dividend Income) eligible. Information on QDI eligibility is obtained from third party sources. The dividend income on QDI eligible preferreds qualifies for a reduced tax rate. Many traditional `dividend paying' perpetual preferred securities (traditional preferreds with no maturity date) are QDI eligible. In order to qualify for the preferential tax treatment all qualifying preferred securities must be held by investors for a minimum period — 91 days during a 18o day window period, beginning go days before the ex -dividend date. Companies paying dividends can reduce or cut payouts at any time. Nondiversification: For a portfolio that holds a concentrated or limited number of securities, a decline in the value of these investments would cause the portfolio's overall value to decline to a greater degree than a less concentrated portfolio. The indices selected by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management to measure performance are representative of broad asset classes. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management retains the right to change representative indices at any time. Because of their narrow focus, sector investments tend to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies. Growth investing does not guarantee a profit or eliminate risk. The stocks of these companies can have relatively high valuations. Because of these high valuations, an investment in a growth stock can be more risky than an investment in a company with more modest growth expectations. Value investing does not guarantee a profit or eliminate risk. Not all companies whose stocks are considered to be value stocks are able to turn their business around or successfully employ corrective strategies which would result in stock prices that do not rise as initially expected . Any type of continuous or periodic investment plan does not assure a profit and does not protect against loss in declining markets. Since such a plan involves continuous investment in securities regardless of fluctuating price levels of such securities, the investor should consider his financial ability to continue his purchases through periods of low price levels. This material is disseminated in the United States of America by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is not acting as a municipal advisor to any municipal entity or obligated person within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act (the "Municipal Advisor Rule") and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of the Municipal Advisor Rule. This material, or any portion thereof, may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. © 2022 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Member SIPC. DISCLOSURES Page 18 Graystone Consulting, from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Asset Allocation & Time Weighted Performance as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Performance(%) Market Quarter Fiscal 1 3 5 7 10 Since Inception n /o Value To YTD YTD Year Years Years Years Years Inception Date ($000) Date Total Fund Total Fund (net) 19,453 II II -11.58 (79) -15.09 (59) I -10.79 (54) I -11.18 (57) I 5.82 (37) 5.71 (68) 1 I 5.71 (72) 7.08 (66) 02/01/2011 6.24 (80) Policy Index 1 -12.03 (90) -15.94 (75) -11.85 (69) -12.27 (72) 5.23 (55) 6.36 (45) 6.54 (34) 7.71 (40) 7.42 (26) All Public Plans < $1B-Total Fund Median -10.41 -14.56 -10.39 -10.71 5.41 6.27 6.22 7.53 6.98 All Public Plans -Total Fund Median -10.11 -14.04 -9.89 -10.08 5.64 6.39 6.34 7.68 7.11 Domestic Equity Highland - Large Cap Value 3,869 19.89 -12.15 (57) -11.67 (48) -4.67 (50) -5.91 (55) 7.17 (86) N/A N/A N/A 7.45 (73) 08/01/2017 Highland - Large Cap Value (net) -12.26 (57) -11.90 (51) -5.03 (54) -6.38 (59) 6.65 (91) N/A N/A N/A 6.89 (82) Russell 1000 Value -12.21 (57) -12.86 (60) -6.09 (63) -6.82 (65) 6.87 (88) N/A N/A N/A 7.00 (80) IM U.S. Large Cap Value Equity (SA+CF) Median -11.76 -11.82 -4.75 -5.54 9.04 N/A N/A N/A 8.71 Polen - Large Cap Growth ' 1,315 6.76 -23.76 (84) -33.96 (87) -30.51 (88) -28.52 (81) N/A N/A N/A N/A -15.51 (78) 04/01/2021 Polen - Large Cap Growth (net) -23.90 (86) -34.20 (89) -30.88 (89) -29.01 (85) N/A N/A N/A N/A -15.99 (80) Russell 1000 Gr -20.92 (58) -28.07 (47) -19.70 (41) -18.77 (42) N/A N/A N/A N/A -7.34 (40) IM U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity (SA+CF) Median -20.20 -28.41 -21.78 -20.97 N/A N/A N/A N/A -9.88 iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF 1,454 7.47 -20.99 (44) -28.09 (35) -19.72 (25) -18.83 (25)= N/A N� N/A -5.33 (24) 01/01/2021 iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF (net) -20.99 (44) -28.09 (35) -19.72 (25) -18.83 (25) N/A N/A N/A N/A -5.33 (24) Russell 1000 Gr -20.92 (43) -28.07 (34) -19.70 (24) -18.77 (24) N/A N/A N/A N/A -5.57 (25) IM U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity (MF) Median -21.79 -29.48 -23.75 -23.36 N/A N/A N/A N/A -9.34 Boston Partners - SMID Value 2,447 12.58 -11.71 (35) -12.12 (19) -7.91 (40) -&4 (47) 9.99 (28) �& N/A N/A 6.70 (60) 08/O1/2017 Boston Partners - SMID Value (net) -11.92 (35) -12.52 (24) -8.53 (46) -10.68 (55) 8.96 (38) N/A N/A N/A 5.67 (81) Russell 2500 VL -15.39 (85) -16.66 (67) -11.36 (66) -13.19 (69) 6.19 (78) N/A N/A N/A 5.47 (83) IM U.S. SMID Cap Value Equity (SA+CF) Median -13.45 -15.30 -9.07 -10.47 7.92 N/A N/A N/A 7.12 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth 1,360 6.99 -21.14 (69) -26.21 (36) -21.18 (30) -22.47 (32) 10.50 (21) N/A N/A N/A 11.63 (30) 08/01/2017 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth (net) -21.30 (71) -26.52 (38) -21.65 (31) -23.09 (36) 9.65 (25) N/A N/A N/A 10.82 (43) Russell 2500 GR -19.55 (49) -29.45 (55) -29.31 (70) -31.81 (75) 3.68 (85) N/A N/A N/A 7.37 (84) IM U.S. SMID Cap Growth Equity (SA+CF) Median -19.66 -28.28 -25.93 -24.78 6.64 N/A N/A N/A 10.09 Highland - Intl Value IF 922 4.74 -15.29 (91) -20.43 (83) -17.68 (74) -18.86 (71) 0.46 (82) N/A N/A N/A 0.92 (74) 08/01/2017 Highland - Intl Value (net) -15.40 (92) -20.63 (83) -17.99 (75) -19.28 (74) 0.00 (84) N/A N/A N/A 0.44 (79) MSCI EAFE Net -14.51 (85) -19.57 (78) -17.40 (73) -17.77 (63) 1.07 (77) N/A N/A N/A 1.65 (62) MSCI EAFE VL Net -12.41 (58) -12.12 (22) -11.09 (23) -11.95 (18) 0.18 (83) N/A N/A N/A -0.15 (84) IM International Large Cap Value Equity (SA+CF) Median -12.02 -15.85 -14.45 -15.94 2.40 N/A N/A N/A 2.03 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 19 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Asset Allocation & Time Weighted Performance as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Performance(%) Market Quarter Fiscal 1 3 5 7 10 Since Inception Value % To YTD YTD Year Years Years Years Years Inception Date ($000) Date Renaissance - International Growth ad= 1,393 7.16 -13.98 (26) -20.11 (20) -17.62 (23) -19.85 (32) 0.12 (90) N/A N/A N/A -1.00 (100) 08/O1/2017 Renaissance - International Growth (net) -14.13 (27) -20.37 (23) -18.03 (24) -20.31 (36) -0.49 (94) N/A N/A N/A -1.59 (100) MSCI AC World ex US Net -13.73 (25) -18.42 (13) -16.94 (19) -19.42 (30) 1.35 (77) N/A N/A N/A 1.79 (90) IM International Large Cap Growth Equity (SA+CF) Median -15.53 -24.59 -21.89 -22.20 3.16 N/A N/A N/A 3.79 Highland -Fixed Income 41502 23.15 -3.04 (36) -7.34 (42) -7.39 (41) -7.12 (40) 0.87 (27) N/A N/A N/A 1.95 (31) 08/O1/2017 Highland - Fixed Income (net) -3.11 (37) -7.48 (42) -7.60 (44) -7.39 (42) 0.57 (38) N/A N/A N/A 1.60 (46) Barclays Aggregate -4.69 (52) -10.35 (62) -10.34 (64) -10.29 (65) -0.93 (89) N/A N/A N/A 0.80 (95) IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF) Median -4.63 -8.80 -8.85 -8.64 0.26 N/A N/A N/A 1.53 Intercontinental - Private Real Estate 947 4.87 7.26 13.43 24.65 =14.95 N/A N/A N/A 13.18 10/O1/2017 Intercontinental - Private Real Estate (net) 7.05 12.98 20.42 27.20 12.75 N/A N/A N/A 11.26 NCREIF Property Idx 3.22 8.72 15.41 21.44 10.22 N/A N/A N/A 8.96 Barclays Aggregate -4.69 -10.35 -10.34 -10.29 -0.93 N/A N/A N/A 0.74 Lazard -Global Infrastructure 1,162 5.97 -2.00 (2) -0.41 (5) _ 9.40 (2) 9.96 (5) N/A N/A N/A N/A 12.53 (2) 01/01/2021 Lazard - Global Infrastructure (net) -2.00 (2) -0.41 (5) 9.40 (2) 9.96 (5) N/A N/A N/A N/A 12.53 (2) DJ Brookfield Gbl Infra Comp TR -7.21 (38) -3.17 (16) 3.32 (28) 1.82 (55) N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.70 (5) IM Global Infrastructure (MF) Median -7.45 -4.78 2.30 2.77 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.75 Receipt & Disbursement 82 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.33 N/A N/A N/A 0.86 08/01/2017 90-Day T-Bills 0.14 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.61 N/A N/A N/A 1.09 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 20 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Asset Allocation & Net Dollar Weighted Performance (IRR) as of June 30, 2022 Current Fiscal 1 3 5 7 10 Since Inception Quarter YTD Year Years Years Years Years Inception Date 1 Total Fund 11 f. I :: I 01/31/2011 Domestic Equity Highland - Large Cap Value 19.89 -12.20 -4.77 -6.12 7.32 N/A N/A N/A 7.74 07/31/2017 Polen - Large Cap Growth 6.76 -23.90 -30.87 -28.97 N/A N/A N/A N/A -15.12 03/15/2021 iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF 7.47 -20.99 -19.73 -18.83 N/A N/A N/A N/A -5.32 12/31/2020 Boston Partners - SMID Value 12.58 -11.90 -8.42 -10.58 9.61 N/A N/A N/A 7.31 07/31/2017 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth 11-mingtinnal 6.99 -21.30 -21.79 -23.27 7.19 N/A N/A N/A 9.12 07/31/2017 Equity Highland - Intl Value 4.74 -15.40 -18.65 -20.10 -1.30 N/A N/A N/A -0.45 07/31/2017 Renaissance - International Growth 7.16 -14.13 -18.83 -21.25 -2.07 N/A N/A N/A -2.56 07/31/2017 IncomeFixed Highland -Fixed Income 23.15 -3.11 -7.75 -7.63 0.16 N/A N/A N/A 1.30 07/31/2017 w. Intercontinental - Private Real Estate 4.87 7.04 20.39 27.15 12.56 N/A N/A N/A 11.26 10/15/2017 Lazard - Global Infrastructure 5.97 -2.00 9.40 9.96 N/A N/A N/A N/A 12.57 12/31/2020 Receipt & Disbursement 0.42 -7.27 -5.83 -9.20 -6.68 N/A N/A N/A -5.84 07/31/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a Graystone guarantee of future results. Consulting Page 21 from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Total Fund - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 20.0 10.0 0.0 ■ . ■ _ p4 -10.0 -20.0 -30.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 5 7 10 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Years Years Years Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 3 5 7 10 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years Years Years Years 02/01/2011 Total Fund -11.43 -10.31 -10.56 6.48 6.37 6.40 7.73 6.86 Policy Index 1 -12.03 -11.85 -12.27 5.23 6.36 6.54 7.71 7.42 Differences 0.60 1.54 1.71 1.25 0.01 -0.14 0.02 -0.56 Historic Asset Growth Current Fiscal 1 3 5 7 10 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years Years Years Years 02/01/2011 Total Fund Beginning Market Value 22,215 21,543 21,600 15,565 13,571 11,924 8,344 7,730 Net Contributions -202 291 331 1,004 1,421 1,639 2,253 2,808 Fees/Expenses -33 -116 -152 -356 -542 -712 -865 -920 Income 114 359 470 1,153 1,869 2,470 3,152 3,454 Gain/Loss -2,640 -2,623 -2,795 2,088 3,134 4,133 6,569 6,381 Ending Market Value 19,453 19,453 19,453 19,453 19,453 19,453 19,453 19,453 Modern Portfolio Statistics Manager Risk & Return 10.11 8.0 6.0 4.0 P4 2.0 0.0 2.0 -4.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Total Fund Q Policy Index 1 . 90-Day T-Bills Standard Maximum Up Down Sharpe Inception Return Beta Deviation Drawdown Capture Alpha Capture Ratio R-Squared Date Total Fund 6.86 9.81 0.98 -17.43 99.04 104.19 -0.35 0.67 0.96 02/01/2011 Policy Index 1 7.42 9.83 1.00 -17.24 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.72 1.00 02/01/2011 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 22 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Total Fund - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $40.0 s~ 0 $30.0 s; $20.0 $10.0 $0.0 1/11 10/11 7/12 4/13 1/14 10/14 7/15 4/16 — Total Fund Policy Index 1 — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net As of Transfers Contributions Distributions 04/01/2022 Total Fund 22,214.58 - 2,927.66-3,130.01 Distribution of Returns 45 0 $20.5 $19.5 $9.6 1/17 10/17 7/18 4/19 1/20 10/20 7/21 6/22 Fees Expenses Income Return On Investment -33.14 - 114.08-2,525.81 30 Market Value As of 06/30/2022 19,453.28 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 23 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Large Cap Value - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 20.0 10.0 0.0 94 -10.0 -20.0 -30.0 Manager Risk & Return 10.11 8.0 6.0 0 40 Current Fiscal 1 3 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Inception p� Manager Annualized Performance 2.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Highland - Large Cap Value -12.15 -4.67 -5.91 7.17 7.45 0.0 Russell 1000 Value -12.21 -6.09 -6.82 6.87 7.00 Differences 0.06 1.42 0.91 0.30 0.45 Historic Asset Growth 20 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception o Risk (Standard Deviation /o) Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Highland - Large Cap Value Highland - Large Cap Value Q Russell 1000 Value Beginning Market Value 4,578 4,230 4,302 3,491 4,342 Net Contributions -160 -161 -172 -432 -1,826 . 90-Day T-Bills Fees/Expenses -6 -17 -22 -57 -96 Income 26 71 93 276 460 Gain/Loss -570 -255 -332 591 987 Ending Market Value 3,869 3,869 3,869 3,869 3,869 Modern Portfolio Statistics Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date Highland - Large Cap Value 7.45 17.69 1.01 -28.00 101.66 99.87 0.38 0.44 0.98 08/01/2017 Russell 1000 Value 7.00 17.35 1.00 -26.73 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.42 1.00 08/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 24 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland Large Cap Value - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $6.0 s~ 0 2 $4.0 v $2.0 $0.0 7/17 10/17 1/18 4/18 7/18 10/18 1/19 4/19 7/19 10/19 1/20 4/20 7/20 10/20 1/21 4/21 7/21 10/21 1/22 — Highland - Large Cap Value Russell 1000 Value — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets 6/22 Market Value Net Market Value As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investmenteturn O As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 Highland - Large Cap Value 4,578,055.25 - 890,298.32-1,050,625.82-5,718.75 --543,508.91 3,868,500.09 Distribution of Returns 16 12 U Q 4J II 8 v w 4 0 11 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 25 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Large Cap Value - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Communication Services Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples -� Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials - Information Technology mormMMIM - Materials -� Real Estate Utilities 0.0 6.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 Highland - Large Cap Value Russell 1000 Value Total Attribution Communication Services Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology - Materials Real Estate - Utilities Performance Communication Services - Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials - Information Technology - Materials Real Estate Utilities ■ 30.0 -36.0 -30.0 -24.0 -18.0 -12.0 -6.0 Highland - Large Cap Value Russell 1000 Value -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 26 L 0.0 0.4 0.6 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Large Cap Value - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation - 04/01/2022 Performance - Quarter Ending June 30, 2022 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Communication Services 6.73 7.15 -13.18 -11.67 Consumer Discretionary 6.63 5.01 -22.11 -15.28 Consumer Staples 7.13 7.40 -4.37 -5.36 Energy 7.71 7.10 -5.90 -5.19 Financials 20.50 20.76 -17.60 -16.99 Health Care 16.90 17.94 -5.01 -3.14 Industrials 11.56 10.97 -13.94 -14.47 Information Technology 9.02 9.29 -21.00 -18.25 Materials 3.92 4.05 -14.52 -18.45 Real Estate 5.10 4.92 -13.84 -16.73 Utilities 4.81 5.41 -3.67 -5.29 Total 100.00 100.00 -12.53 -11.59 Attribution Sector Stock Interaction Total 0.00 -0.11 0.01 -0.10 -0.06 -0.34 -0.11 -0.51 -0.02 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.04 -0.05 0.00 -0.02 0.01 -0.13 0.00 -0.11 -0.09 -0.34 0.02 -0.40 -0.02 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.02 -0.26 0.01 -0.23 0.01 0.16 -0.01 0.16 -0.01 0.14 0.01 0.14 -0.04 0.09 -0.01 0.04 -0.15 -0.70 -0.09 -0.94 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 27 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Large Cap Value - Portfolio Characteristics as of June 30, 2022 Portfolio Characteristics Top Ten Equity Holdings Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Wtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($000) 157,651,005.87 143,637,427.63 Weight Weight Weight Return Median Mkt. Cap ($000) 48,774,663.27 11,209,360.50 (%) (%) (%) (%) Price/Earnings ratio 11.99 14.10 Johnson & Johnson 2.63 2.64 -0.01 0.79 Price/Book ratio 2.39 2.35 Alphabet Inc 2.58 0.44 2.14 -21.68 5 Yr. EPS Growth Rate (%) 14.65 14.29 Chevron Corp 2.54 1.61 0.93 -10.33 Beta (5 Years, Monthly) 1.01 1.00 Unitedhealth Group Inc 2.53 0.24 2.29 1.08 Number of Stocks 91 859 Elevance Health Inc 2.40 0.46 1.94 -1.50 Debt to Equity (%) 97.06 10.03 JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.30 1.86 0.44 -16.77 Conocophillips 2.11 0.66 1.45 -9.11 Procter & Gamble Co (The) 2.04 1.12 0.92 -5.37 Exxon Mobil Corp 1.98 2.04 -0.06 4.75 Bank of America Corp 1.94 1.24 0.70 -24.05 % of Portfolio 23.05 12.31 10.74 Ten Best Performers Ten Worst Performers Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Weight Weight Weight Return Weight Weight Weight Return %) (%) N (%) (%) N (%) (%) AT&T Inc 0.95 0.85 0.10 16.66 Marvell Technology Inc 1.03 0.21 0.82 -39.24 Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.38 0.10 1.28 10.73 Ford Motor Co 0.95 0.25 0.70 -33.75 Cigna Corp 1.69 0.39 1.30 10.45 Target Corp 0.66 0.17 0.49 -33.17 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.46 0.93 0.53 6.16 MKS Instruments Inc 0.78 0.03 0.75 -31.45 Exxon Mobil Corp 1.98 2.04 -0.06 4.75 Walt Disney Co (The) 1.04 0.91 0.13 -31.18 Occidental Petroleum Corp 0.57 0.05 0.52 3.98 Boston Properties Inc 0.91 0.08 0.83 -30.16 Molson Coors Beverage Company 1.47 0.05 1.42 2.84 Skyworks Solutions Inc 0.56 0.08 0.48 -30.11 Constellation Energy Corp 0.00 0.11 -0.11 2.06 Hanesbrands Inc 0.59 0.02 0.57 -30.07 Ingredion Inc 0.66 0.03 0.63 1.89 Micron Technology Inc. 0.37 0.28 0.09 -28.93 Unitedhealth Group Inc 2.53 0.24 2.29 1.08 Boeing Co 0.90 0.29 0.61 -28.61 % of Portfolio 12.69 4.79 7.90 % of Portfolio 7.79 2.32 5.47 Graystone Page 28 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Polen - Large Cap Growth - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart nn -15.0 v -30.0 ■ -45.0 Current Fiscal 1 Since Quarter YTD Year Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 Since Quarter YTD Year Inception Polen - Large Cap Growth -23.76 -30.51 -28.52 -15.51 Russell 1000 Gr -20.92 -19.70 -18.77 -7.34 Differences -2.84 -10.81 -9.75 -8.17 Historic Asset Growth Current Fiscal 1 Since Quarter YTD Year Inception Polen - Large Cap Growth Beginning Market Value 1,729 1,905 1,875 1,677 Net Contributions -1 -1 -22 -47 Fees/Expenses -3 -9 -12 -13 Income 1 5 6 8 Gain/Loss -412 -583 -531 -310 Ending Market Value 1,315 1,315 1,315 1,315 Modern Portfolio Statistics Standard Return Beta Deviation Polen - Large Cap Growth -15.51 22.23 1.04 Russell 1000 Gr -7.33 20.82 1.00 Inception Date 04/01/2021 Inception Date 04/01/2021 Manager Risk & Return 8.0 4.0 0.0 -4.0 0 -8.0- -12.0 -16.0 ■ -20.0 -24.0 i -12.0 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Polen - Large Cap Growth O Russell 1000 Gr . 90-Day T-Bills Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date -34.62 84.43 113.05 -8.27 -0.64 0.95 04/01/2021 -28.07 100.00 100.00 0.00 -0.27 1.00 04/01/2021 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 29 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Polen - Large Cap Growth - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $2.4 0 $2.0 $1.6 c� $1.2 $0.8 \ $1.6 $1.5 `$1.3 3/21 4/21 5/21 6/21 7/21 8/21 9/21 10/21 11/21 12/21 1/22 2/22 3/22 4/22 5/22 6/22 — Polen - Large Cap Growth — Russell 1000 Gr — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value As of 04/01/2022 Polen - Large Cap Growth 1,729,341.87 Distribution of Returns 8 6 5 V Q v 4 v w 2 Net Return On Market Value Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investment As of 06/30/2022 128,788.94-129,396.44-2,771.59 --410,499.79 1,315,462.99 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 30 4 0 4To5 >5 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Polen - Large Cap Growth - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Communication Services -� Consumer Discretionary -� Consumer Staples -t• Energy - l Financials -` Health Care -r Industrials -� Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities 0.0 15.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 75.0 Polen - Large Cap Growth Russell 1000 Gr Total Attribution Communication Services Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology - Materials Real Estate - Utilities Performance Communication Services - Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials - Information Technology - Materials - Real Estate - Utilities - -60.0 -45.0 -30.0 Polen - Large Cap Growth Russell 1000 Gr -2.4 -2.0 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0.0 0.4 O18 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 31 1.2 1.6 -15.0 U.o 2.0 2.4 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Polen - Large Cap Growth - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation - 04/01/2022 Performance - Quarter Ending June 30, 2022 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Communication Services 18.97 10.46 -29.99 -25.53 Consumer Discretionary 16.76 18.50 -37.25 -28.53 Consumer Staples 0.00 4.24 0.00 -4.49 Energy 0.00 0.46 0.00 -4.15 Financials 1.06 2.47 -17.82 -20.15 Health Care 17.46 8.87 -16.58 -12.62 Industrials 0.00 6.14 0.00 -18.00 Information Technology 45.75 46.18 -18.95 -21.91 Materials 0.00 0.93 0.00 -16.23 Real Estate 0.00 1.73 0.00 -9.69 Utilities 0.00 0.03 0.00 -4.15 Total 100.00 100.00 -23.68 -21.32 Attribution Sector Stock Interaction Total -0.36 -0.47 -0.38 -1.20 0.13 -1.61 0.15 -1.34 -0.71 0.00 0.00 -0.71 -0.08 0.00 0.00 -0.08 -0.02 0.06 -0.03 0.01 0.75 -0.35 -0.34 0.06 -0.20 0.00 0.00 -0.20 0.00 1.37 -0.01 1.36 -0.05 0.00 0.00 -0.05 -0.20 0.00 0.00 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.75 -1.00 -0.61 -2.37 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 32 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Polen - Large Cap Growth - Portfolio Characteristics as of June 30, 2022 Portfolio Characteristics Top Ten Equity Holdings Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Wtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($000) 517,146,221.03 721,756,108.63 Weight Weight Weight Return Median Mkt. Cap ($000) 129,667,272.00 14,128,686.93 (%) (%) (%) (%) Price/Earnings ratio 30.34 25.36 Amazon.com Inc 11.80 5.35 6.45 -34.84 Price/Book ratio 7.52 8.93 Alphabet Inc 9.28 2.96 6.32 -21.68 5 Yr. EPS Growth Rate (%) 30.12 24.21 Mastercard Inc 6.72 1.54 5.18 -11.60 Beta N/A 1.00 Microsoft Corp 6.70 10.89 -4.19 -16.49 Number of Stocks 24 520 Adobe Inc 6.69 0.98 5.71 -19.66 Debt to Equity (%) 138.84 111.27 Visa Inc 6.55 1.84 4.71 -11.05 Meta Platforms Inc 5.86 0.45 5.41 -27.48 SALESFORCE INC 4.66 0.19 4.47 -22.27 Abbott Laboratories 4.23 0.14 4.09 -7.84 Unitedhealth Group Inc 4.20 2.48 1.72 1.08 % of Portfolio 66.69 26.82 39.87 Ten Best Performers Ten Worst Performers Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Weight Weight Weight Return Weight Weight Weight Return %) (%) (%) (%) (%) N (%) N Unitedhealth Group Inc 4.20 2.48 1.72 1.08 Netflix Inc 2.37 0.20 2.17 -53.32 Abbott Laboratories 4.23 0.14 4.09 -7.84 Airbnb Inc 3.26 0.19 3.07 -48.14 Zoeds Inc 2.93 0.46 2.47 -8.70 Illumina Inc 1.37 0.00 1.37 -47.24 Visa Inc 6.55 1.84 4.71 -11.05 DocuSign Inc. 1.53 0.06 1.47 -46.43 Mastercard Inc 6.72 1.54 5.18 -11.60 Align Technology Inc 1.02 0.08 0.94 -45.72 ServiceNow Inc 4.18 0.54 3.64 -14.61 PayPal Holdings Inc 2.59 0.14 2.45 -39.61 Microsoft Corp 6.70 10.89 -4.19 -16.49 Amazon.com Inc 11.80 5.35 6.45 -34.84 Accenture PLC 4.09 1.00 3.09 -17.42 Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.90 0.37 1.53 -33.47 Gartner Inc 2.16 0.11 2.05 -18.70 Meta Platforms Inc 5.86 0.45 5.41 -27.48 Adobe Inc 6.69 0.98 5.71 -19.66 Nike Inc 2.09 0.71 1.38 -23.86 % of Portfolio 48.45 19.98 28.47 % of Portfolio 33.79 7.55 26.24 Page 33 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 0.0 - -8.0 v -16.0 -24.0 -32.0 Current Fiscal 1 Since Quarter YTD Year Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 Since Inception Quarter YTD Year Inception Date iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF -20.99 -19.72 -18.83 -5.33 01/01/2021 Russell 1000 Gr -20.92 -19.70 -18.77 -5.57 Differences -0.07 -0.02 -0.06 0.24 Historic Asset Growth iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF Beginning Market Value Net Contributions Fees/Expenses Income Gain/Loss Ending Market Value Modern Portfolio Statistics Current Fiscal 1 Since Inception Quarter YTD Year Inception Date 01/01/2021 1,840 1,811 1,795 1,582 -4 -4 3 8 11 15 -389 -365 -348 -139 1,454 1,454 1,454 1,454 Manager Risk & Return 4.0 ?0 0.0 0 -2.0 4.0 6.0 -8.0 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF p Russell 1000 Gr 90-Day T-Bills 20.0 24.0 28.0 Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF -5.33 19.13 1.00 -28.09 99.90 99.04 0.26 -0.20 1.00 01/01/2021 Russell 1000 Gr -5.56 19.08 1.00 -28.07 100.00 100.00 0.00 -0.21 1.00 01/01/2021 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Consulting Page 34 g from Morgan Stanley 4 City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $2.4 0 $2.1 $1.8 $1.6 $1.5 $1.5 $1.4 $1.2 12/20 1/21 2/21 3/21 4/21 5/21 6/21 7/21 8/21 9/21 10/21 11/21 12/21 1/22 2/22 3/22 4/22 5/22 6/22 — iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF — Russell 1000 Gr — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net Return On Market Value As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investment As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF 1,839,846.38 - 2,584.67-2,584.67 - --386,176.54 1,453,669.84 Distribution of Returns 6 >1 4 3 0 o < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 35 3 0 4To5 >5 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Boston Partners - SMID Value - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 30.0 15.0 ■ 0.0 v -15.0 -30.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Boston Partners - SMID Value -11.71 -7.91 -9.74 9.99 6.70 Russell 2500 VL -15.39 -11.36 -13.19 6.19 5.47 Differences 3.68 3.45 3.45 3.80 1.23 Historic Asset Growth Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Boston Partners - SMID Value Beginning Market Value 2,826 2,726 2,808 695 672 Net Contributions -45 -50 -66 1,302 1,318 Fees/Expenses -6 -19 -29 -47 -61 Income 12 32 44 86 110 Gain/Loss -338 -242 -309 413 409 Ending Market Value 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 Modern Portfolio Statistics Manager Risk & Return 10.0 8.0 6.0 0 4.0 We 0.0 -2.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Boston Partners - SMID Value O Russell 2500 VL . 90-Day T-Bills 30.0 35.0 Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date Boston Partners - SMID Value 6.70 23.44 1.06 -38.80 107.49 103.09 1.12 0.35 0.97 08/01/2017 Russell 2500 VL 5.47 21.72 1.00 -34.64 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.31 1.00 08/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 36 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Boston SMID Value - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $4.5 z~ 0 $3.0 $2.4 C $2.3 $1.9 $0.0 7/17 10/17 1/18 4/18 7/18 10/18 1/19 4/19 7/19 10/19 1/20 4/20 7/20 10/20 1/21 4/21 7/21 10/21 1/2, — Boston Partners - SMID Value Russell 2500 VL — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net O As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investmenteturn 04/01/2022 Boston Partners - SMID Value 2,826,136.64 - 515,755.21 -561,142.71 -6,338.01 - -326,946.02 Distribution of Returns 16 12 U L.' v 8 D" 7 aUi w 4 0 6/22 Market Value As of 06/30/2022 2,447,465.11 11 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 37 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Boston Partners - SMID Value - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Communication Services -E—M Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples -- Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials - Information Technology - Materials -! Real Estate -ML� Utilities 0� 0.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0 40.0 Boston Partners - SMID Value Russell 2500 VL Total Attribution Communication Services Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology - Materials Real Estate - Utilities Performance Communication Services - Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials - Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities ■ i -40.0 -32.0 -24.0 -16.0 -8.0 0.0 Boston Partners - SMID Value Russell 2500 VL -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 O16 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 38 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Boston Partners - SMID Value - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation - 04/01/2022 Performance - Quarter Ending June 30, 2022 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Communication Services 3.35 3.00 -15.48 -22.88 Consumer Discretionary 11.91 8.68 -13.22 -18.03 Consumer Staples 3.22 3.32 -3.05 -7.60 Energy 9.90 7.32 -6.67 -9.41 Financials 24.14 20.19 -11.01 -11.94 Health Care 11.15 7.75 -13.67 -11.73 Industrials 15.98 17.18 -12.03 -15.08 Information Technology 10.67 8.23 -16.40 -16.38 Materials 6.36 7.87 -9.77 -20.34 Real Estate 1.78 12.36 -23.69 -17.55 Utilities 1.54 4.09 -10.17 -4.07 Total 100.00 100.00 -11.91 -14.39 Attribution Sector Stock Interaction Total -0.03 0.22 0.03 0.22 -0.12 0.42 0.16 0.46 -0.01 0.15 0.00 0.14 0.13 0.20 0.07 0.40 0.10 0.19 0.04 0.32 0.09 -0.15 -0.07 -0.13 0.01 0.52 -0.04 0.50 -0.05 0.00 0.00 -0.05 0.09 0.83 -0.16 0.76 0.33 -0.76 0.65 0.23 -0.26 -0.25 0.16 -0.36 0.28 1.37 0.83 2.48 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 39 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Boston Partners - SMID Value - Portfolio Characteristics as of June 30, 2022 Portfolio Characteristics Wtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($000) Median Mkt. Cap ($000) Price/Earnings ratio Price/Book ratio 5 Yr. EPS Growth Rate (%) Beta (5 Years, Monthly) Number of Stocks Debt to Equity (%) Ten Best Performers Block H&R Inc Delek US Holdings Inc Par Pacific Holdings Inc FTI Consulting Inc. Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. Stride Inc Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc White Mountains LCI Industries Americold Realty Trust Inc % of Portfolio Page 40 Top Ten Equity Holdings Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly 5,782,462.26 5,701,969.17 Weight Weight Weight Return 3,800,097.95 1,281,268.14 N N N N 11.63 10.57 Graphic Packaging Holding Co 1.91 0.05 1.86 2.67 2.04 1.86 SLM Corp 1.84 0.14 1.70 -12.69 17.20 16.22 WESCO International Inc 1.82 0.07 1.75 -17.70 1.06 1.00 Stride Inc 1.78 0.00 1.78 12.28 186 1,843 Callaway Golf Co 1.65 0.09 1.56 -12.89 117.92 -92 95 Change Healthcare inc 1.60 0.17 1.43 5.78 Diamondback Energy Inc 1.56 0.00 1.56 -9.47 Nexstar Media Group Inc. 1.44 0.18 1.26 -13.12 Science Applications International Corp 1.42 0.16 1.26 1.43 Syneos Health Inc 1.31 0.19 1.12 -11.45 % of Portfolio Ten Worst Performers 16.33 1.05 15.28 Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Weight Weight Weight Return Weight Weight Weight Return %) (%) N N (%) N N (%) 0.38 0.03 0.35 36.65 Victorias Secret and Co 0.35 0.02 0.33 -45.54 0.75 0.00 0.75 21.77 Unisys Corp 0.12 0.01 0.11 -44.33 0.38 0.00 0.38 19.74 Amedisys Inc 0.50 0.11 0.39 -38.99 0.39 0.11 0.28 15.03 PacWest Bancorp 0.57 0.10 0.47 -37.68 0.40 0.03 0.37 14.65 Anywhere Real Estate Inc 0.24 0.04 0.20 -37.31 1.78 0.00 1.78 12.28 SMART Global Holdings Inc 0.43 0.00 0.43 -36.62 0.56 0.21 0.35 9.83 Rackspace Technology Inc 0.10 0.01 0.09 -35.75 0.83 0.11 0.72 9.67 Scotts Miracle-Gro 0.33 0.07 0.26 -35.31 0.63 0.00 0.63 8.74 American Eagle Outfitters Inc. 0.14 0.05 0.09 -33.45 0.21 0.25 -0.04 8.54 Travel Plus Leisure Co 0.57 0.03 0.54 -32.38 6.31 0.74 5.57 % of Portfolio 3.35 0.44 2.91 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Fiera Capital SMID Growth - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 40.0 20.0 0.0 - 94 -20.0 ■ ■ -40.0 -60.0 Manager Risk & Return 18.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth -21.14 -21.18 -22.47 10.50 11.63 Russell 2500 GR -19.55 -29.31 -31.81 3.68 7.37 Differences -1.59 8.13 9.34 6.82 4.26 Historic Asset Growth Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth Beginning Market Value 1,729 1,708 1,740 837 669 Net Contributions -1 29 29 300 296 Fees/Expenses -3 -10 -14 -30 -40 Income 3 10 27 39 48 Gain/Loss -368 -376 -422 215 388 Ending Market Value 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 Modern Portfolio Statistics Standard Maximum Return Beta Deviation Drawdown Fiera Capital - SMID Growth 11.63 20.80 0.92 -26.32 Russell 2500 GR 7.37 21.83 1.00 -32.76 15.0 12.0 0 0 9.0 a 6.0 3.0 0.0 - -3.0 1 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Fiera Capital - SMID Growth Q Russell 2500 GR . 90-Day T-Bills Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Capture Capture Ratio Date 99.62 83.99 4.47 0.58 0.94 08/01/2017 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.39 1.00 08/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 41 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Fiera Capital SMID Growth - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $2.4 s~ 0 $1.8 00,--� $1.4 $1.2 $1.1 c� $0.9 $0.6 $0.0 7/17 10/17 1/18 4/18 7/18 10/18 1/19 4/19 7/19 10/19 1/20 4/20 7/20 10/20 1/21 4/21 7/21 10/21 1/22 6/22 — Fiera Capital - SMID Growth Russell 2500 GR — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net Return n Market Value As of Contributions Transfers Distributions Fees Expenses nt Investment e As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth 1,729,201.81 - 142,654.65 -143,302.15 -3,242.25 - -365,035.18 1,360,276.88 Distribution of Returns 20 15 U L.' v a 10 8 w 5 1[�2 0 0 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 42 13 4To5 >5 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Fiera Capital - SMID Growth - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Communication Services -LW Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples -� Energy -SIM Financials -� Health Care - Industrials -� l Information Technology - Materials Real Estate Utilities 0.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0 40.0 48.0 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth Russell 2500 GR Total Attribution Communication Services Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology - Materials Real Estate - Utilities Performance Communication Services - Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials - Information Technology - Materials - Real Estate - Utilities - -60.0 -45.0 -30.0 -15.0 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth Russell 2500 GR i -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 43 1.2 1.4 1.6 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Fiera Capital - SMID Growth - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation - 04/01/2022 Performance - Quarter Ending June 30, 2022 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Communication Services 3.04 2.26 -39.07 -23.39 Consumer Discretionary 15.68 14.46 -21.01 -20.65 Consumer Staples 0.00 2.83 0.00 -7.59 Energy 5.16 2.89 -10.15 -12.38 Financials 5.86 5.78 -25.57 -16.81 Health Care 26.81 21.01 -21.22 -19.47 Industrials 10.88 15.16 -10.01 -18.28 Information Technology 28.66 28.79 -25.28 -23.49 Materials 3.91 3.44 -25.52 -15.09 Real Estate 0.00 2.95 0.00 -20.57 Utilities 0.00 0.43 0.00 -6.67 Total 100.00 100.00 -21.52 -19.84 Attribution Sector Stock Interaction Total -0.03 -0.35 -0.12 -0.50 -0.01 -0.05 0.00 -0.07 -0.35 0.00 0.00 -0.35 0.17 0.06 0.05 0.28 0.00 -0.51 -0.01 -0.51 0.02 -0.37 -0.10 -0.45 -0.07 1.25 -0.35 0.83 0.00 -0.51 0.00 -0.51 0.02 -0.36 -0.05 -0.39 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 -0.06 0.00 0.00 -0.06 -0.27 -0.83 -0.59 -1.69 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 44 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Fiera Capital - SMID Growth - Portfolio Characteristics as of June 30, 2022 Portfolio Characteristics Wtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($000) Median Mkt. Cap ($000) Price/Earnings ratio Price/Book ratio 5 Yr. EPS Growth Rate (%) Beta (5 Years, Monthly) Number of Stocks Debt to Equity (%) Ten Best Performers arGEN-X SE Amicus Therapeutics Inc Ritchie Bros Auctioneers Inc Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc Neurocrine Biosciences Inc Insperity Inc. Mohawk Industries Inc. Devon Energy Corp Deckers Outdoor Corp Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. % of Portfolio Page 45 Top Ten Equity Holdings Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly 11,797,791.07 5,207,649.55 Weight Weight Weight Return 6,842,356.64 1,457,168.66 N N N N 18.66 18.71 Fortinet Inc 4.13 0.00 4.13 -17.22 4.23 4.20 Devon Energy Corp 3.84 0.00 3.84 -5.20 38.68 21.44 Arista Networks Inc 3.09 0.00 3.09 -32.55 0.92 1.00 Hyatt Hotels Corp 3.09 0.00 3.09 -22.57 64 1,371 iRhythm Technologies Inc 3.06 0.16 2.90 -31.40 -6.62 105.04 Molina Healthcare Inc. 2.60 0.00 2.60 -16.18 arGEN-X SE 2.59 0.00 2.59 20.16 Entegris Inc 2.59 0.62 1.97 -29.75 Citizens Financial Group Inc 2.50 0.00 2.50 -20.49 ShockWave Medical Inc 2.36 0.34 2.02 -7.81 % of Portfolio Ten Worst Performers 29.85 1.12 28.73 Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Weight Weight Weight Return Weight Weight Weight Return N N N N N N N N 2.59 0.00 2.59 20.16 Outset Medical Inc 0.34 0.04 0.30 -67.27 1.73 0.15 1.58 13.41 Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'l Inc 1.11 0.00 1.11 -63.41 0.80 0.00 0.80 10.68 Royal Caribbean Group 0.79 0.00 0.79 -58.33 1.51 0.00 1.51 7.48 SpringWorks Therapeutics Inc 0.63 0.01 0.62 -56.38 1.56 0.46 1.10 3.98 Cognex Corporation 0.92 0.34 0.58 -44.81 1.69 0.18 1.51 -0.05 MongoDB Inc 1.59 0.00 1.59 -41.50 1.70 0.00 1.70 -0.09 Etsy Inc 1.65 0.00 1.65 -41.09 3.84 0.00 3.84 -5.20 PubMatic Inc 0.88 0.03 0.85 -39.17 2.27 0.30 1.97 -6.73 Guardant Health Inc 0.42 0.20 0.22 -39.10 1.91 0.00 1.91 -7.60 Zentalis Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.40 0.05 0.35 -39.10 19.60 1.09 18.51 % of Portfolio 8.73 0.67 8.06 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - International Value - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 10.0 0.0 - v -10.0 -20.0 -30.0 Current Fiscal 1 Quarter YTD Year Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal Quarter YTD Highland - Intl Value -15.29 -17.68 MSCI EAFE Net -14.51 -17.40 Differences -0.78 -0.28 Historic Asset Growth Current Fiscal Quarter YTD Highland - Intl Value Beginning Market Value 1,090 1,042 Net Contributions - 85 Fees/Expenses -1 -4 Income 9 32 Gain/Loss -176 -233 Ending Market Value 922 922 Modern Portfolio Statistics 3 Since Years Inception 1 3 Inception Year Years 08/01/2017 -18.86 0.46 0.92 -17.77 1.07 1.65 -1.09 -0.61 -0.73 1 3 Inception Year Years 08/01/2017 1,058 741 701 84 213 238 -6 -13 -19 36 69 102 -251 -89 -100 922 922 922 Manager Risk & Return z.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 P 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1 1 1 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Highland - Intl Value Q MSCI EAFE Net . 90-Day T-Bills Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date Highland - Intl Value 0.92 18.55 1.11 -28.37 108.93 111.42 -0.55 0.09 0.90 08/01/2017 MSCI EAFE Net 1.65 15.85 1.00 -22.83 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.11 1.00 08/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 46 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - International Value - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $1.5 s~ 0 $1.2 $1.0 $0.9 $0.6 $0.3 7/17 10/17 1/18 4/18 7/18 10/18 1/19 4/19 7/19 10/19 1/20 4/20 7/20 10/20 1/21 4/21 7/21 10/21 1/22 6/22 — Highland - Intl Value — MSCI EAFE Net — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net Return On Market Value As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investment As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 Highland - Intl Value 1,089,803.62 - 19,537.44-19,599.35 -1,358.02 --166,482.54 921,901.15 Distribution of Returns 16 12 U Q 4J II 8 v w 4 0 9 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 47 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Intl Value - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Communication Services Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities Other 0.0 6.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 Highland - Intl Value 0 MSCI EAFE Net Total Attribution Communication Services Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities Other Performance Communication Services Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities Other 30.0 36.0 -40.0 -32.0 -24.0 -16.0 -8.0 U.o Highland - Intl Value N MSCI EAFE Net -2.4 -2.1 -1.8 -1.5 -1.2 -0.9 -0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 48 0.6 0.9 1.2 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Intl Value - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation - 04/01/2022 Performance - Quarter Ending June 30, 2022 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Communication Services 6.48 4.85 -6.90 -10.59 Consumer Discretionary 23.75 11.55 -20.21 -15.16 Consumer Staples 7.74 10.19 -9.25 -7.98 Energy 7.88 4.14 -9.44 -3.80 Financials 11.91 17.71 -16.75 -13.33 Health Care 8.09 13.05 -15.08 -9.37 Industrials 11.26 15.40 -18.92 -18.31 Information Technology 14.91 8.61 -18.06 -23.36 Materials 4.92 8.23 -18.37 -20.79 Real Estate 0.00 2.90 0.00 -14.71 Utilities 1.14 3.38 -13.36 -11.40 Other 1.91 0.00 -10.41 0.00 Total 100.00 100.00 -16.00 -14.17 Attribution Sector Stock Interaction Total 0.06 0.18 0.06 0.30 -0.12 -0.58 -0.62 -1.32 -0.15 -0.13 0.03 -0.25 0.39 -0.23 -0.21 -0.06 -0.05 -0.61 0.20 -0.46 -0.24 -0.75 0.28 -0.70 0.17 -0.09 0.03 0.10 -0.58 0.46 0.33 0.21 0.22 0.20 -0.08 0.34 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 -0.06 -0.07 0.04 -0.08 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 -0.28 -1.63 0.07 -1.83 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 49 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Intl Value - Portfolio Characteristics as of June 30, 2022 Portfolio Characteristics Top Ten Equity Holdings Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Wtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($000) 109,180,421.97 69,495,849.48 Weight Weight Weight Return Median Mkt. Cap ($000) 42,510,423.96 11,663,161.39 (%) (%) (%) (%) Price/Earnings ratio 12.22 12.54 Sony Group Corporation 7.04 0.76 6.28 -20.39 Price/Book ratio 2.00 2.42 Siemens AG 3.94 0.57 3.37 -27.40 5 Yr. FPS Growth Rate (%) 16.28 13.52 Kyocera Corp 3.90 0.13 3.77 -5.80 Beta (5 Years, Monthly) 1.11 1.00 STMicroelectronics NV 3.84 0.16 3.68 -27.06 Number of Stocks 59 799 Nippon T&T 3.34 0.25 3.09 -1.81 Debt to Equity (%) 96.34 105.32 Diageo PLC 3.28 0.73 2.55 -14.29 Hitachi Ltd 3.24 0.34 2.90 -6.70 Mercedes-Benz Group AG 3.12 0.34 2.78 -16.90 Honda Motor Co Ltd 2.98 0.29 2.69 -14.54 Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC 2.93 0.07 2.86 -21.46 % of Portfolio 37.61 3.64 33.97 Ten Best Performers Ten Worst Performers Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Weight Weight Weight Return Weight Weight Weight Return (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) JD.com Inc 1.83 0.00 1.83 13.62 Royal Caribbean Group 1.21 0.00 1.21 -58.33 Baidu Inc 1.36 0.00 1.36 12.42 Sea Limited 0.38 0.18 0.20 -44.19 Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.65 0.00 0.65 4.49 Jackson Financial Inc 0.04 0.00 0.04 -38.58 ING Groep NV 1.51 0.28 1.23 2.21 Atlas Copco AB 0.85 0.18 0.67 -32.63 Unilever PLC 2.04 0.85 1.19 1.63 Deutsche Bank AG 0.42 0.13 0.29 -30.91 GSK plc 1.49 0.80 0.69 0.73 Invesco Ltd 0.78 0.00 0.78 -29.31 Nippon T&T 3.34 0.25 3.09 -1.81 Arcelormittal SA 0.47 0.10 0.37 -28.56 BP PLC 2.70 0.67 2.03 -2.50 Siemens AG 3.94 0.57 3.37 -27.40 Vodafone Group Public Limited Company 0.65 0.30 0.35 -3.43 Barrick Gold Corp 1.40 0.00 1.40 -27.18 Novartis AG 0.96 1.36 -0.40 -3.67 STMicroelectronics NV 3.84 0.16 3.68 -27.06 % of Portfolio 16.53 4.51 12.02 % of Portfolio 13.33 1.32 12.01 Graystone Page 5o Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Renaissance - International Growth - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 10.0 0.0 -10.0 v -20.0 -30.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Renaissance - International Growth -13.98 -17.62 -19.85 0.12 -1.00 MSCI AC World ex US Net -13.73 -16.94 -19.42 1.35 1.79 Differences -0.25 -0.68 -0.43 -1.23 -2.79 Historic Asset Growth Manager Risk & Return 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.4 0 0.7 � a 0.0 -0.7 ■ -1.4 - -2.1 - -2.8 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception u Risk (Standard Deviation /o) Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Renaissance - International Growth Renaissance - International Growth Q MSCI AC World ex US Net Beginning Market Value 1,622 1,536 1,582 1,074 1,016 Net Contributions - 166 163 393 522 . 90-Day T-Bills Fees/Expenses -3 -8 -9 -24 -35 Income 18 41 45 91 134 Gain/Loss -245 -342 -389 -141 -244 Ending Market Value 1,393 1,393 1,393 1,393 1,393 Modern Portfolio Statistics Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date Renaissance - International Growth -1.00 18.27 1.14 -33.88 104.99 117.62 -2.67 -0.02 0.94 08/01/2017 MSCI AC World ex US Net 1.79 15.62 1.00 -24.30 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.12 1.00 08/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed guarantee of future results. to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a Graystone Consulting Page 51 g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Renaissance - International Growth - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $2.5 s~ .2 $2.0 $1.6 $1.5 —: v $1.0 v $0.5 $0.0 7/17 10/17 1/18 4/18 7/18 10/18 1/19 4/19 7/19 10/19 1/20 4/20 7/20 10/20 1/21 4/21 7/21 10/21 1/22 6/22 — Renaissance - International Growth MSCI AC World ex US Net — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Renaissance - International Growth Distribution of Returns 16 12 U L.' v a 8 v « w 4 0 Market Value Net Return On Market Value As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investment As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 1,622,161.40 - 199,427.65-199,840.15-2,637.00 --226,536.90 1,392,575.00 10 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 52 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Renaissance - International Growth - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation Performance Communication Services Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples -� Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities 0.0 6.0 12.0 18.0 Renaissance - International Growth MSCI AC World ex US Net Total Attribution Communication Services Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy Financials Health Care Industrials Information Technology - Materials Real Estate - Utilities Communication Services - Consumer Discretionary - Consumer Staples - Energy - Financials - Health Care - Industrials Information Technology Materials Real Estate Utilities 24.0 30.0 -36.0 -30.0 -24.0 -18.0 -12.0 -6.o U.o Renaissance - International Growth MSCI AC World ex US Net -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 53 0.4 0.6 0.8 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Renaissance - International Growth - Quarterly Performance Attributes as of June 30, 2022 Allocation - 04/01/2022 Performance - Quarter Ending June 30, 2022 Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Communication Services 6.94 6.17 -22.07 -10.64 Consumer Discretionary 15.78 11.07 -8.02 -8.28 Consumer Staples 6.01 8.43 -1.95 -7.27 Energy 4.16 5.39 -7.02 -4.54 Financials 18.90 20.56 -14.62 -13.80 Health Care 7.75 9.37 -6.45 -9.43 Industrials 10.73 12.23 -18.03 -16.81 Information Technology 15.46 12.21 -21.30 -22.47 Materials 10.45 8.92 -19.72 -21.10 Real Estate 0.00 2.47 0.00 -12.09 Utilities 3.83 3.18 -9.52 -9.16 Total 100.00 100.00 -14.12 -13.42 Attribution Sector Stock Interaction Total 0.02 -0.70 -0.09 -0.77 0.24 0.03 0.01 0.28 -0.15 0.45 -0.13 0.17 -0.11 -0.13 0.03 -0.21 0.01 -0.17 0.01 -0.15 -0.06 0.28 -0.05 0.17 0.05 -0.15 0.02 -0.08 -0.29 0.14 0.04 -0.11 -0.12 0.12 0.02 0.03 -0.03 0.00 0.00 -0.03 0.03 -0.01 0.00 0.01 -0.42 -0.15 -0.13 -0.70 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 54 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Renaissance - International Growth - Portfolio Characteristics as of June 30, 2022 Portfolio Characteristics Top Ten Equity Holdings Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Wtd. Avg. Mkt. Cap ($000) 62,822,828.99 76,884,684.65 Weight Weight Weight Return Median Mkt. Cap ($000) 31,523,627.02 8,471,272.23 (%) (%) (%) (%) Price/Earnings ratio 10.39 11.90 Vipshop Holdings Limited 2.96 0.02 2.94 9.89 Price/Book ratio 1.96 239 WH Group Ltd 2.77 0.03 2.74 24.96 5 Yr. EPS Growth Rate (%) 21.19 14.76 Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd 2.40 0.06 2.34 46.03 Beta (5 Years, Monthly) 1.13 1.00 Carrefour SA 2.27 0.05 2.22 -17.05 Number of Stocks 56 2,269 Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.26 0.99 1.27 4.49 Debt to Equity (%) 90.00 82.76 Astellas Pharma Inc 2.24 0.13 2.11 -1.12 PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia TBK 2.23 0.09 2.14 -14.14 HSBC Holdings PLC 2.21 0.60 1.61 -4.53 Nintendo Co Ltd 2.17 0.22 1.95 -14.99 Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc 2.06 0.00 2.06 0.22 % of Portfolio 23.57 2.19 21.38 Ten Best Performers Ten Worst Performers Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Portfolio Benchmark Active Quarterly Weight Weight Weight Return Weight Weight Weight Return (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd 2.40 0.06 2.34 46.03 Tremor International Ltd 1.25 0.00 1.25 -42.93 WH Group Ltd 2.77 0.03 2.74 24.96 Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.39 0.22 1.17 -37.43 ENN Energy Holdings Ltd 2.06 0.06 2.00 11.55 Infineon Technologies 1.63 0.14 1.49 -29.98 Vipshop Holdings Limited 2.96 0.02 2.94 9.89 Schneider Electric SA 1.57 0.29 1.28 -28.72 Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.26 0.99 1.27 4.49 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co Ltd 1.48 0.19 1.29 -27.25 Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc 2.06 0.00 2.06 0.22 Constellium SE 1.66 0.00 1.66 -26.61 CGI Inc 2.01 0.08 1.93 -0.21 Itau Unibanco Holding SA 1.59 0.10 1.49 -24.89 Astellas Pharma Inc 2.24 0.13 2.11 -1.12 Veolia Environnement, Paris 1.96 0.07 1.89 -24.78 Shell Plc 1.75 0.90 0.85 -3.99 Arkema 1.51 0.02 1.49 -24.68 Neste OYJ 2.03 0.09 1.94 -4.32 BRP Inc 1.64 0.01 1.63 -24.53 % of Portfolio 22.54 2.36 20.18 % of Portfolio 15.68 1.04 14.64 Graystone Page 55 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Fixed Income - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 12.0 6.0 0.0 94 -6.0 . . -12.0 -18.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 Highland - Fixed Income -3.04 -7.39 -7.12 0.87 1.95 Barclays Aggregate -4.69 -10.34 -10.29 -0.93 0.80 Differences 1.65 2.95 3.17 1.80 1.15 Historic Asset Growth Current Quarter Highland - Fixed Income Beginning Market Value 4,647 Net Contributions - Fees/Expenses -3 Income 30 Gain/Loss -172 Ending Market Value 4,502 Modern Portfolio Statistics Return Highland - Fixed Income 1.95 Barclays Aggregate 0.80 Fiscal 1 3 Inception YTD Year Years 08/01/2017 4,553 4,544 3,821 3,980 317 317 662 275 -10 -14 -39 -67 87 118 356 590 -444 -462 -298 -276 4,502 4,502 4,502 4,502 Manager Risk & Return 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.8 0 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 1 1 1 -1.4 -0.7 0.0 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.8 3.5 4.2 4.9 5.6 6.3 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Highland - Fixed Income O Barclays Aggregate . 90-Day T-Bills Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date 4.59 0.81 -7.97 95.49 70.83 1.32 0.21 0.51 08/01/2017 4.04 1.00 -11.91 100.00 100.00 0.00 -0.05 1.00 08/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 56 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Highland - Fixed Income - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $24.0 $8.0 $0.0 ($8.0) 1/11 10/11 7/12 4/13 1/14 10/14 7/15 4/16 1/17 10/17 7/18 4/19 — Highland - Fixed Income Barclays Aggregate — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees 04/01/2022 Highland - Fixed Income 4,647,448.86 - 744,474.24-744,807.42-3,487.06 Distribution of Returns 60 45 39 15 0 0 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 57 1/20 10/20 7/21 6/22 Expenses Return On Investment --141,152.58 Market Value As of 06/30/2022 4,502,476.04 2 2 4To5 >5 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Intercontinental - Private Real Estate - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart 45.0 30.0 v 15.0 0.0 Current Fiscal 1 3 Since Quarter YTD Year Years Inception Manager Annualized Performance Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 10/01/2017 Intercontinental - Private Real Estate 7.26 24.65 31.98 14.95 13.18 NCREIF Property Idx 3.22 15.41 21.44 10.22 8.96 Differences 4.04 9.24 10.54 4.73 4.22 Historic Asset Growth Current Fiscal 1 3 Inception Quarter YTD Year Years 10/01/2017 Intercontinental - Private Real Estate Beginning Market Value 890 800 763 708 112 Net Contributions -5 -15 -20 -52 458 Fees/Expenses -2 -29 -30 -46 -60 Income - - - - - Gain/Loss 64 190 235 337 437 Ending Market Value 947 947 947 947 947 Modern Portfolio Statistics Manager Risk & Return 21.0 18.0 15.0 12.0 - 0 9.0 - a 6.0 - 3.0 - 0.0 - -3.0 - -6.0 -4 .0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Risk (Standard Deviation %) Intercontinental - Private Real Estate Q NCREIF Property Idx . 90-Day T-Bills Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date Intercontinental - Private Real Estate 13.18 7.10 1.32 -0.02 141.93 2.02 1.13 1.62 0.86 10/01/2017 NCREIF Property 1dx 8.96 4.96 1.00 -0.99 100.00 100.00 0.00 1.53 1.00 10/01/2017 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have guarantee of future results. been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a Graystone Consulting Page 58 g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Intercontinental - Private Real Estate - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $1.5 z~ 0 $1.0 $0.9 $0.8 $0.5 $0.5 � J $0.0 ($0.5) 10/17 1/18 4/18 7/18 10/18 1/19 4/19 7/19 10/19 1/20 4/20 7/20 10/20 1/21 4/21 7/21 10/21 1/22 6/22 — Intercontinental - Private Real Estate NCREIF Property Idx — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Intercontinental - Private Real Estate Distribution of Returns 60 45 U L.' v a 30 v w 15 Market Value Net Return On Market Value As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investment As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 890,233.00 - --5,374.00-1,783.00 - 64,155.00 947,231.00 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 _ 1 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Page 59 Consulting g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Lazard - Global Infrastructure - Executive Summary as of June 30, 2022 Manager Performance Chart Manager Risk & Return 30.0 18.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 y low 12.0 9 0.0 -10.0 9.0 0 -20.0 6.0 - Current Fiscal 1 Since Quarter YTD Year Inception p4 Manager Annualized Performance 3.0 Current Fiscal 1 Since Inception 0.0- Quarter YTD Year Inception Date Lazard - Global Infrastructure -2.00 9.40 9.96 12.53 01/01/2021 -3.0 DJ Brookfield Gbl Infra Comp TR -7.21 3.32 1.82 10.70 Differences 5.21 6.08 8.14 1.83 Historic Asset Growth -G 0 -6.0 -3.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 Current Fiscal 1 Since Inception Risk (Standard Deviation %) Quarter YTD Year Inception Date Lazard - Global Infrastructure 01 /01 /2021 ■ Lazard - Global Infrastructure O DJ Brookfield Gbl Infra Comp TR Beginning Market Value 1,185 1,062 1,056 973 Net Contributions - - - - . 90-Day T-Bills Fees/Expenses - - - - Income 11 72 90 93 Gain/Loss -35 27 15 96 Ending Market Value 1,162 1,162 1,162 1,162 Modern Portfolio Statistics Return Standard Beta Maximum Up Down Alpha Sharpe R-Squared Inception Deviation Drawdown Capture Capture Ratio Date Lazard - Global Infrastructure 12.53 10.43 0.65 -3.41 80.27 54.85 5.25 1.17 0.74 01 /01 /2021 DJ Brookfield Gbl Infra Comp TR 10.67 13.74 1.00 -7.75 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.80 1.00 01 /01 /2021 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Graystone Consulting Page 6o g from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Lazard - Global Infrastructure - Change in Assets & Distribution of Returns as of June 30, 2022 Historic Change in Assets $1.6 0 $1.4 $1.2 _ $1.2 v ^� $1.0 $1.0 $0.8 12/20 1/21 2/21 3/21 4/21 5/21 6/21 7/21 8/21 9/21 10/21 11/21 12/21 1/22 2/22 3/22 4/22 5/22 6/22 — Lazard -Global Infrastructure — DJ Brookfield Gbl Infra Comp TR — Net Cash Flow Quarterly Change in Assets Market Value Net Return On Market Value As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Investment As of 04/01/2022 06/30/2022 Lazard - Global Infrastructure 1,185,218.83 - 22,217.44-22,217.44 - --23,650.08 1,161,568.75 Distribution of Returns 6 >1 4 U L.' v D" v « Wo 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 < -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 Returns (%) The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 61 4 3To4 4To5 >5 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley City of Sebastian Police Officers' Retirement Plan Policy Index History As of June 30, 2022 Policy Feb-2011 S&P 500 Total Return 48.00 Barclays Govt/Credit Bond 49.00 90-Day T-Bills 3.00 Jul-2011 S&P 500 Total Return 50.00 Barclays Aggregate 40.00 MSCI EAFE Net 10.00 Jan-2016 S&P 500 Total Return 50.00 Barclays Aggregate 40.00 MSCI EAFE Net 10.00 Jul-2017 Russell 1000 Value 21.25 Barclays Aggregate 25.00 MSCI EAFE Net 5.00 Russell 1000 Gr 21.25 Russell 2500 VL 5.00 Russell 2500 GR 5.00 MSCI AC World ex US Net 7.50 Alerian MLP Index 5.00 NCREIF Property Idx 5.00 Jan-2021 Russell 1000 Value 16.25 Barclays Aggregate 25.00 MSCI EAFE Net 5.00 Russell 1000 Gr 16.25 Russell 2500 VL 12.00 Russell 2500 GR 8.00 MSCI AC World ex US Net 7.50 DJ Brookfield Gbl Infra Comp TR 5.00 NCREIF Property Idx 5.00 The prices, quotes, or statistics contained herein have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Page 62 Graystone Consulting from Morgan Stanley Performance Appendix Performance Data below is net of fees. Please seethe Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Form ADV Part 2 Brochure for advisory accounts and/or any applicable brokerage account trade confirmation statements for a full disclosure of the applicable charges, fees and expenses. Your Financial Advisor will provide those documents to you upon request. or 3 5 10 Since Inception Account Name QTD YTDJ= Years Years Years Inception 1 Date Boston Partners - SMID Value -11.92 -12.52 -10.68 8.96 5.48 -- 5.48 07/14/2017 Fiera Capital - SMID Growth -21.30 -26.52 -23.09 9.65 10.44 -- 10.44 07/20/2017 Highland - Fixed Income -3.11 -7.48 -7.39 0.57 1.83 5.10 4.44 01/31/2011 Highland - Intl Value -15.40 -20.63 -19.28 0.00 0.89 -- 0.89 07/17/2017 Highland - Large Cap Value -12.26 -11.90 -6.38 6.65 6.82 -- 6.82 07/17/2017 Intercontinental - Private Real Estate 7.05 12.98 27.20 12.75 -- -- 11.26 10/01/2017 Lazard - Global Infrastructure -2.00 -0.41 9.96 -- -- -- 11.84 12/31/2020 Polen - Large Cap Growth -23.90 -34.20 -29.01 -- -- -- -15.99 04/01/2021 Receipt & Disbursement -7.45 -8.81 -13.70 -15.99 -- -- -11.56 08/01/2017 Renaissance - International Growth -14.13 -20.37 -20.31 -0.49 -1.50 -- -1.50 07/17/2017 iShares - Russell 1000 Growth ETF -20.99 -28.09 -18.83 -- -- -- -5.06 12/31/2020 All performance above are Time Weighted(TWR) performance Glossary of Terms Active Contribution Return: The gain or loss percentage of an investment relative to the performance of the investment benchmark. Active Exposure: The percentage difference in weight of the portfolio compared to its policy benchmark. Active Return: Arithmetic difference between the manager's return and the benchmark's return over a specified time period. Actual Correlation: A measure of the correlation (linear dependence) between two variables X and Y, with a value between +1 and -1 inclusive. This is also referred to as coefficient of correlation. Alpha: A measure of a portfolio's time weighted return in excess of the market's return, both adjusted for risk. A positive alpha indicates that the portfolio outperformed the market on a risk -adjusted basis, and a negative alpha indicates the portfolio did worse than the market. Best Quarter: The highest quarterly return for a certain time period. Beta: A measure of the sensitivity of a portfolio's time weighted return (net of fees) against that of the market. A beta greater than 1.00 indicates volatility greater than the market. Consistency: The percentage of quarters that a product achieved a rate of return higher than that of its benchmark. The higher the consistency figure, the more value a manager has contributed to the product's performance Core: Refers to an investment strategy mandate that is blend of growth and value styles without a pronounced tilt toward either style. Cumulative Selection Return (Cumulative Return): Cumulative investment performance over a specified period of time. Distribution Rate: The most recent distribution paid, annualized, and then divided by the current market price. Distribution rate may consist of investment income, short-term capital gains, long-term capital gains, and/or return of capital. Down Market Capture: The ratio of average portfolio returns over the benchmark during periods of negative benchmark return. Lower values indicate better product performance. Downside Risk: A measure similar to standard deviation, but focuses only on the negative movements of the return series. It is calculated by taking the standard deviation of the negative quarterly set of returns. The higher the value, the more risk the product has. Downside Semi Deviation: A statistical calculation that measures the volatility of returns below a minimum acceptable return. This return measure isolates the negative portion of volatility: the larger the number, the greater the volatility. Drawdown: A drawdown is the peak -to -trough decline during a specific period of an investment, fund or commodity. Excess over Benchmark: The percentage gain or loss of an investment relative to the investment's benchmark. Excess Return: Arithmetic difference between the manager's return and the risk -free return over a specified time period. Growth: A diversified investment strategy which includes investment selections that have capital appreciation as the primary goal, with little or no dividend payouts. These strategies can include reinvestment in expansion, acquisitions, and/or research and development opportunities. Growth of Dollar: The aggregate amount an investment has gained or lost over a certain time period, also referred to as Cumulative Return, stated in terms of the amount to which an initial dollar investment would have grown over the given time period. Investment Decision Process (IDP): A model for structuring the investment process and implementing the correct attribution methodologies. The IDP includes every decision made concerning the division of the assets under management over the various asset categories. To analyze each decisions contribution to the total return, a modeling approach must measure the marginal value of every individual decision. In this respect, the hierarchy of the decisions becomes very important. We therefore use the IDP model, which serves as a proper foundation for registering the decisions and relating them to each other. Information Ratio: Measured by dividing the active rate of return by the tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio, the more value-added contribution by the manager. Jensen's Alpha: The Jensen's alpha measure is a risk -adjusted performance measure that represents the average return on a portfolio or investment above or below that predicted by the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) given the portfolio's or investment's beta and the average market return. This metric is also commonly referred to as alpha.. Kurtosis: A statistical measure that is used to describe the distribution, or skewness, of observed data around the mean, sometimes referred to as the volatility of volatility. Maximum Drawdown: The drawdown is defined as the percent retrenchment from a fund's peak to the fund's trough value. It is in effect from the time the fund's retrenchment begins until a new fund high is reached. The maximum drawdown encompasses both the period from the fund's peak to the fund's valley (length), and the time from the fund's valley to a new fund high (recovery). It measures the largest percentage drawdown that has occurred in any fund's data record. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT): An investment analysis theory on how risk -averse investors can construct portfolios to optimize or maximize expected return based on a given level of market risk, emphasizing that risk is an inherent part of higher reward. Mutual Fund (MF): An investment program funded by shareholders that trade in diversified holdings and is professionally managed. Peer Group: A combination of funds that share the same investment style combined as a group for comparison purposes. Peer/ Plan Sponsor Universe: A combination of asset pools of total plan investments by specific sponsor and plan types for comparison purposes. Performance Ineligible Assets: Performance returns are not calculated for certain assets because accurate valuations and transaction data for these assets are not processed or maintained by us. Common examples of these include life insurance, some annuities and some assets held externally. Performance Statistics: A generic term for various measures of investment performance measurement terms. Portfolio Characteristics: A generic term for various measures of investment portfolio characteristics. Preferred Return: A term used in the private equity (PE) world, and also referred to as a "Hurdle Rate." It refers to the threshold return that the limited partners of a private equity fund must receive, prior to the PE firm receiving its carried interest or "carry." Ratio of Cumulative Wealth: A defined ratio of the Cumulative Return of the portfolio divided by the Cumulative Return of the benchmark for a certain time period. Regression Based Analysis: A statistical process for estimating the relationships among variables. It includes many techniques for modeling and analyzing several variables, when the focus is on the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables Residual Correlation: Within returns -based style analysis, residual correlation refers to the portion of a strategy's return pattern that cannot be explained by its correlation to the asset -class benchmarks to which it is being compared. Return: A rate of investment performance for the specified period. Rolling Percentile Ranking: A measure of an investment portfolio's ranking versus a peer group for a specific rolling time period (i.e. Last 3 Years, Last 5 years, etc.). R-Squared: The percentage of a portfolio's performance explained by the behavior of the appropriate benchmark. High R-Squared means a higher correlation of the portfolio's performance to the appropriate benchmark. SA/CF (Separate Account/Comingled Fund): Represents an acronym for Separate Account and Commingled Fund investment vehicles. Sector Benchmark: A market index that serves as a proxy for a sector within an asset class. Sharpe Ratio: Represents the excess rate of return over the risk free return divided by the standard deviation of the excess return. The result is the absolute rate of return per unit of risk. The higher the value, the better the product's historical risk -adjusted performance results in. Standard Deviation: A statistical measure of the range of a portfolio's performance; the variability of a return around its average return over a specified time period. Total Fund Benchmark: The policy benchmark for a complete asset pool that could consist of multiple investment mandates. Total Fund Composite: The aggregate of multiple portfolios within an asset pool or household. Tracking Error: A measure of standard deviation for a portfolio's investment performance, relative to the performance of an appropriate market benchmark. Treynor Ratio: A ratio that divides the excess return (above the risk free rate) by the portfolio's beta to arrive at a unified measure of risk adjusted return. It is generally used to rank portfolios, funds and benchmarks. A higher ratio is indicative of higher returns per unit of market risk. This measurement can help determine if the portfolio is reaching its goal of increasing returns while managing market risk. Up Market Capture: The ratio of average portfolio returns over the benchmark during periods of positive benchmark return. Higher values indicate better product performance. Upside Semi Deviation: A statistical calculation that measures the volatility of returns above an acceptable return. This return measure isolates the positive portion of volatility: the larger the number, the greater the volatility. Value: A diversified investment strategy that includes investment selections which tend to trade at a lower price relative to its dividends, earnings, and sales. Common attributes are stocks that include high dividend, low price -to -book ratio, and/or low price -to -earnings ratio. Worst Quarter: The lowest rolling quarterly return for a certain time period. Information Disclosures Performance results are annualized for time periods greater than one year and include all cash and cash equivalents, realized and unrealized capital gains and losses, and dividends, interest and income. The investment results depicted herein represent historical performance. As a result of recent market activity, current performance may vary from the figures shown. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Please see the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Form ADV Part 2 Brochure for advisory accounts and/or any applicable brokerage account trade confirmation statements for a full disclosure of the applicable charges, fees and expenses. Your Financial Advisor will provide those documents to you upon request. Benchmark indices and blends included in this material are for informational purposes only, are provided solely as a comparison tool and may not reflect the underlying composition andlor investment objective(s) associated with the account(s). Indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Index returns do not take into account fees or other charges. Such fees and charges would reduce performance. The performance data shown reflects past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal will fluctuate so that an investor's shares when redeemed may be worth more or less than original cost. Please note, current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data shown. For up to date month -end performance information, please contact your Financial Advisor or visit the funds' company website. Investors should carefully consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses before investing. The prospectus and, if available the summary prospectus, contains this and other information that should be read carefully before investing. Investors should review the information in the prospectus carefully. To obtain a prospectus, please contact your Financial Advisor or visit the funds' company website. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves market risk, including possible loss of principal. Growth investing does not guarantee a profit or eliminate risk. The stocks of these companies can have relatively high valuations. Because of these high valuations, an investment in a growth stock can be more risky than an investment in a company with more modest growth expectations. Value investing involves the risk that the market may not recognize that securities are undervalued and they may not appreciate as anticipated. Small and mid -capitalization companies may lack the financial resources, product diversification and competitive strengths of larger companies. The securities of small capitalization companies may not trade as readily as, and be subject to higher volatility than those of larger, more established companies. Bond funds and bond holdings have the same interest rate, inflation and credit risks that are associated with the underlying bonds owned by the funds. The return of principal in bond funds, and in funds with significant bond holdings, is not guaranteed. International securities' prices may carry additional risks, including foreign economic, political, monetary and/or legal factors, changing currency exchange rates, foreign taxes and differences in financial and accounting standards. International investing may not be for everyone. These risks may be magnified in emerging markets. Alternative investments, including private equity funds, real estate funds, hedge funds, managed futures funds, and funds of hedge funds, private equity, and managed futures funds, are speculative and entail significant risks that can include losses due to leveraging or\other speculative investment practices, lack of liquidity, volatility of returns, restrictions on transferring interests in a fund, potential lack of diversification, absence and/or delay of information regarding valuations and pricing, complex tax structures and delays in tax reporting, less regulation and higher fees than mutual funds and risks associated with the operations, personnel and processes of the advisor. Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) are limited partnerships or limited liability companies that are taxed as partnerships and whose interests (limited partnership units or limited liability company units) are traded on securities exchanges like shares of common stock. Currently, most MLPs operate in the energy, natural resources or real estate sectors. Investments in MLP interests are subject to the risks generally applicable to companies in the energy and natural resources sectors, including commodity pricing risk, supply and demand risk, depletion risk and exploration risk; and MLP interests in the real estate sector are subject to special risks, including interest rate and property value fluctuations, as well as risks related to general and economic conditions. Because of their narrow focus, MLPs maintain exposure to price volatility of commodities and/or underlying assets and tend to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies. MLPs are also subject to additional risks including: investors having limited control and rights to vote on matters affecting the MLP, limited access to capital, cash flow risk, lack of liquidity, dilution risk, conflict of interests, and limited call rights related to acquisitions. Mortgage backed securities also involve prepayment risk, in that faster or slower prepayments than expected on underlying mortgage loans can dramatically alter the yield -to -maturity of a mortgage -backed security and prepayment risk includes the possibility that a fund may invest the proceeds at generally lower interest rates. Tax managed funds may not meet their objective of being tax -efficient. Real estate investments are subject to special risks, including interest rate and property value fluctuations, as well as risks related to general and economic conditions. High yield fixed income securities, also known as "junk bonds", are considered speculative, involve greater risk of default and tend to be more volatile than investment grade fixed income securities. Credit quality is a measure of a bond issuer's creditworthiness, or ability to repay interest and principal to bondholders in a timely manner. The credit ratings shown are based on security rating as provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's and/or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are issued by the rating agencies for the underlying securities in the fund and not the fund itself, and the credit quality of the securities in the fund does not represent the stability or safety of the fund. Credit ratings shown range from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P and Fitch's classification (the equivalent of Aaa and C, respectively, by Moody(s). Ratings of BBB or higher by S&P and Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody's) are considered to be investment grade -quality securities. If two or more of the agencies have assigned different ratings to a security, the highest rating is applied. Securities that are not rated by all three agencies are listed as "NR". "Alpha tilt strategies comprise a core holding of stocks that mimic a benchmark type index such as the S&P 500 to which additional securities are added to help tilt the fund toward potentially outperforming the market in an effort to enhance overall investment returns. Tilt strategies are subject to significant timing risk and could potentially expose investors to extended periods of underperformance." Custom Account Index: The Custom Account Index is an investment benchmark based on your historical target allocations and/or manager selection that you may use to evaluate the performance of your account. The Custom Account index does take into consideration certain changes that may have occurred in your portfolio since the inception of your account, i.e., asset class and/or manager changes. However, in some circumstances, it may not be an appropriate benchmark for use with your specific account composition. For detailed report of the historical composition of this blend please contact your Financial Advisor. Peer Groups Peer Groups are a collection of similar investment strategies that essentially group investment products that share the same investment approach. Peer Groups are used for comparison purposes to compare and illustrate a clients investment portfolio versus its peer across various quantitative metrics like performance and risk. Peer Group comparison is conceptually another form of benchmark comparison whereby the actual investment can be ranked versus its peer across various quantitative metrics. All Peer Group data are provided by Investment Metrics, LLC. The URL below provides all the definitions and methodology about the various Peer Groups https://www.invmetrics.com/style-peer-groups Peer Group Ranking Methodology A percentile rank denotes the value of a product in which a certain percent of observations fall within a peer group. The range of percentile rankings is between 1 and 100, where 1 represents a high statistical value and 100 represents a low statistical value. The 30th percentile, for example, is the value in which 30% of the highest observations may be found, the 65th percentile is the value in which 65% of the highest observations may be found, and so on. Percentile rankings are calculated based on a normalized distribution ranging from 1 to 100 for all products in each peer group, where a ranking of 1 denotes a high statistical value and a ranking of 100 denotes a low statistical value. It is important to note that the same ranking methodology applies to all statistics, implying that a ranking of 1 will always mean highest value across all statistics. For example, consider a risk/return assessment using standard deviation as a measure of risk. A percentile ranking equal to 1 for return denotes highest return, whereas a percentile ranking of 1 for standard deviation denotes highest risk among peers. In addition, values may be used to demonstrate quartile rankings. For example, the third quartile is also known as the 75th percentile, and the median is the 50th percentile. Alternatives Graystone Consulting is a business of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. ("Morgan Stanley") This material is not to be reproduced or distributed to any other persons (other than professional advisors of the investors) and is intended solely for the use of the persons to whom it has been delivered. This material is not for distribution to the general public. The sole purpose of this material is to inform, and it in no way is intended to be an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security, other investment or service, or to attract any funds or deposits. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all clients. Any product discussed herein may be purchased only after a client has carefully reviewed the offering memorandum and executed the subscription documents. Morgan Stanley has not considered the actual or desired investment objectives, goals, strategies, guidelines, or factual circumstances of any investor in any fund(s). Before making any investment, each investor should carefully consider the risks associated with the investment, as discussed in the applicable offering memorandum, and make a determination based upon their own particular circumstances, that the investment is consistent with their investment objectives and risk tolerance. This information is being provided as a service of your Graystone Institutional Consultant and does not supersede or replace your Morgan Stanley customer statement. The information is as of the date(s) noted and subject to daily market fluctuation. Your interests in Alternative Investments, which may have been purchased through us, are generally not held here, and are generally not covered by SIPC. The information provided to you: 1) is included as a service to you, valuations for certain products may not be available; 2) is derived from you or another external source for which we are not responsible, and may have been modified to take into consideration capital calls or distributions to the extent applicable; 3) may not reflect actual shares, share prices or values; 4) may include invested or distributed amounts in addition to a fair value estimate; and 5) should not be relied upon for tax reporting purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, 1) to the extent this report displays Alternative Investment positions within a Morgan Stanley Individual Retirement Account ("IRA"), such positions are held by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC as the custodian of your Morgan Stanley IRA; and 2) if your Alternative Investment positon(s) is held by us and is registered pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, your Alternative Investment position(s) is covered by SIPC. Alternatives may be either traditional alternative investment vehicles or non-traditional alternative strategy vehicles. Traditional alternative investment vehicles may include, but are not limited to, Hedge Funds, Fund of Funds (both registered and unregistered), Exchange Funds, Private Equity Funds, Private Credit Funds, Real Estate Funds, and Managed Futures Funds. Non-traditional alternative strategy vehicles may include, but are not limited to, Open or Closed End Mutual Funds, Exchange -Traded and Closed -End Funds, Unit Investment Trusts, exchange listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). These non-traditional alternative strategy vehicles also seek altemative-like exposure but have significant differences from traditional alternative investment vehicles. Non-traditional alternative strategy vehicles may behave like, have characteristics of, or employ various investment strategies and techniques for both hedging and more speculative purposes such as short -selling, leverage, derivatives, and options, which can increase volatility and the risk of investment loss. Characteristics such as correlation to traditional markets, investment strategy, and market sector exposure can play a role in the classification of a traditional security being classified as alternative. Traditional alternative investment vehicles are illiquid and usually are not valued daily. The estimated valuation provided will be as of the most recent date available and will be included in summaries of your assets. Such valuation may not be the most recent provided by the fund in which you are invested. No representation is made that the valuation is a market value or that the interest could be liquidated at this value. We are not required to take any action with respect to your investment unless valid instructions are received from you in a timely manner. Some positions reflected herein may not represent interests in the fund, but rather redemption proceeds withheld by the issuer pending final valuations which are not subject to the investment performance of the fund and may or may not accrue interest for the length of the withholding. Morgan Stanley does not engage in an independent valuation of your alternative investment assets. Morgan Stanley provides periodic information to you including the market value of an alternative investment vehicle based on information received from the management entity of the alternative investment vehicle or another service provider. Traditional alternative investment vehicles often are speculative and include a high degree of risk. . Investors should carefully review and consider potential risks before investing. Certain of these risks may include but are not limited to:• Loss of all or a substantial portion of the investment due to leveraging, short - selling, or other speculative practices;- Lack of liquidity in that there may be no secondary market for a fund;- Volatility of returns;- Restrictions on transferring interests in a fund;- Potential lack of diversification and resulting higher risk due to concentration of trading authority when a single advisor is utilized; - Absence of information regarding valuations and pricing;- Complex tax structures and delays in tax reporting;- Less regulation and higher fees than mutual funds; and- Risks associated with the operations, personnel, and processes of the manager. As a diversified global financial services firm, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management engages in a broad spectrum of activities including financial advisory services, investment management activities, sponsoring and managing private investment funds, engaging in broker - dealer transactions and principal securities, commodities and foreign exchange transactions, research publication, and other activities. In the ordinary course of its business, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management therefore engages in activities where Morgan Stanley Wealth Management's interests may conflict with the interests of its clients, including the private investment funds it manages. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management can give no assurance that conflicts of interest will be resolved in favor of its clients or any such fund. Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot directly invest in them. Composite index results are shown for illustrative purposes and do not represent the performance of a specific investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Actual results may vary. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market. Any performance or related information presented has not been adjusted to reflect the impact of the additional fees paid to a placement agent by an investor (for Morgan Stanley placement clients, a one-time upfront Placement Fee of up to 3%, and for Morgan Stanley investment advisory clients, an annual advisory fee of up to 2.5%), which would result in a substantial reduction in the returns if such fees were incorporated. For most investment advisory clients, the program account will be charged an asset -based wrap fee every quarter ("the Fee"). In general, the Fee covers investment advisory services and reporting. In addition to the Fee, clients will pay the fees and expenses of any funds in which their account is invested. Fund fees and expenses are charged directly to the pool of assets the fund invests in and impact the valuations. Clients must understand that these fees and expenses are an additional cost and will not be included in the Fee amount in the account statements. As fees are deducted quarterly, the compounding effect will be to increase the impact of the fees by an amount directly related to the gross account performance. For example, for an account with an initial value of $100,000 and a 2.5% annual fee, if the gross performance is 5% per year over a three year period, the compounding effect of the fees will result in a net annual compound rate of return of approximately 2.40% per year over a three year period, and the total value of the client's portfolio at the end of the three year period would be approximately $115,762.50 without the fees and $107,372.63 with the fees. Please see the applicable Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Form ADV Part 2A for more information including a description of the fee schedule. It is available at www.moreanstanlev.com/ADV <httn://www.mor2anstanlev.com/ADV> <http://www.morganstanley.com/ADV> or from your Financial Advisor/Private Wealth Advisor. Alternative investments involve complex tax structures, tax inefficient investing, and delays in distributing important tax information. Individual funds have specific risks related to their investment programs that will vary from fund to fund. Clients should consult their own tax and legal advisors as Morgan Stanley does not provide tax or legal advice. Interests in alternative investment products are offered pursuant to the terms of the applicable offering memorandum, are distributed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and certain of its affiliates, and (1) are not FDIC -insured, (2) are not deposits or other obligations of Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates, (3) are not guaranteed by Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, and (4) involve investment risks, including possible loss of principal. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC is a registered broker -dealer, not a bank. SIPC insurance does not apply to precious metals, other commodities, or traditional alternative investments. © 2018 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Member SIPC. Money Market Funds You could lose money in Money Market Funds. Although MMFs classified as government funds (i.e., MMFs that invest 99.5% of total assets in cash and/or securities backed by the U.S government) and retail funds (i.e., MMFs open to natural person investors only) seek to preserve value at $1.00 per share, they cannot guarantee they will do so. The price of other MMFs will fluctuate and when you sell shares they may be worth more or less than originally paid. MMFs may impose a fee upon sale or temporarily suspend sales if liquidity falls below required minimums. During suspensions, shares would not be available for purchases, withdrawals, check writing or ATM debits. A MMF investment is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or other government agency.