Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-13-2022 BOA Agendapgs 74-91 E. Public Hearing — Consider Waste Management's Request to Increase to Residential Collection Rates (Transmittal, PPT, Article 12, Waste Management's Request) 8. RECESS THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND CONVENE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT pgs 92-95 A. Approval of Minutes — June 8, 2022 BOA Meeting pgs 96-126 B. RONALD AND JANET ZOLL, IN REGARDS TO LOTS 13 AND 14, BLOCK 335, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 13, LOCATED AT 1493 BEVAN DRIVE, IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE ROOF MATERIALS OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE THAT IS OVER 750 SF IN SIZE TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THE PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE WHEREAS THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SEC. 54-2-7.5(c) (7) REQUIRES THE MATERIALS TO BE THE SAME. — 9. ADJOURN THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND RECONVENE THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10. PIljLIC INPUT e eading on Regular Meeting agendas "Public Input"provides an opportunityfor individuals to bring NEW INFORMATION OR REQUESTS TO CITY COUNCIL NOT OTHERIWSE ON THE PREPARED AGENDA. Individuals are asked to resolve matters with staff prior to meetings, Individuals are asked to provide copies of materials for Council one week prior to the meeting if they intend to refer to specific material. City Council will not debate an issue during Public Input but may by consensus direct a Charter Officer in regard to the item if necessary or place a requested item on a future agenda. 11. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member of City Council so requests; in which event, the item will be removed and acted upon separately. If a member of the public wishes to provide input on a consent agenda item, he/she should request a Council Member to remove the item for discussion prior to start of the meeting or by raising his/her hand to be recognized. pgs 127-140 A. Approval of Minutes — August 24, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting pgs 141-145 B. Approval of Minutes — August 26, 2022 Special City Council Meeting pgs 146-162 C. Resolution No. R-22-24 — Vacation of Easement Over Lots 44 & 63 as Shown on Replat Recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 2 - , 2625 Kelly Drive (Transmittal, R-22- 24, Site Map, Staff Report, Approvals, Application, Survey, Plat) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, VACATING EASEMENTS OVER LOTS 44 AND 63 AS SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT FOR PARK PLACE PLAT 1 — REPLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 2; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4 of 383 MY OF SEBASTLAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 The attached June 8, 2022 Board of Adjustment minutes were approved at the September 13, 2022 Board of Adjustment meeting. Chairman Jim Hill ATTEST: Jeanette Williams, City Clerk Regular City Council & Board of Adjustment Meeting June 8, 2022 Page 2 Council Member McPartlan noted the GoLine is on pace to provide I AM rides and they might hit 2M for this year. Council Member Dodd said the GoLine bus system is the most efficient rider system in the state of Florida. 7. PUBLIC INPUT - None 8. Mayor Hill recessed the City Council meeting at 6:11 p.m. and convened the Board of �---- Adjustment meeting. A. A motion was made by Mr. Nunn and seconded by Mr. McPartlan to approve the February 23, 2022 BOA minutes. B. OUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING i. K&A FOREIGN CAR SERVICE, INC. HAS APPEALED AN ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION THAT THE NON -COMPLYING VEHICULAR SERVICES AND MAINTENANCE USE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 800 LOUISIANA AVENUE, FKA FIREHOUSE GARAGE, HAS BEEN ABANDONED BASED ON LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 54-2-8.8 AND CESSATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES FOR MORE THAN ONE (1) YEAR. THE APPELLANT WISHES TO PRESENT EVIDENCE THAT THE USE HAS NOT BEEN ABANDONED AND IS STILL ALLOWABLE. The City Attorney read the title of the appeal from K & A Foreign Car Service. There was no ex parte communication to disclose by the board members. The City Clerk swore in those who would be providing testimony. Arkadiusz Nowak, owner of K & A Foreign Car Service. She said they purchased building in January 2021 with the intent to fix up the shop and open a repair business however since the site has not been used in over a year, the repair shop cannot proceed. She asked the board to reconsider staff's determination that the repair shop has been abandoned. She said she has a mechanic ready to start; she also owns the lot next to the garage and when the capital comes in they plan to develop something next to it. The City Manager explained that in September 2020, the original proprietor filed for bankruptcy which started the one year time frame to re-establish use of the site. Since it was not re-established by September 2021, he sent the letter advising Ms. Nowak the vehicular services and maintenance use would no longer be allowed which brings them to the board tonight to see if they want to reverse his determination. Regular City Council & Board of Adjustment Meeting June 8, 2022 Page 3 The Community Development Manager said the original garage was built in 2004 and shortly after that Council determined those types of uses should not be located in the gateway so a triangle overlay district was created which didn't change the zoning but changed some of the uses. Since that time, the vehicular services and maintenance use has been non -conforming. The current owners bought the property in 2021 but the City didn't hear from them until they came in for their business tax receipt which is when the non -conforming abandonment of use came to light to Community Development. The Community Development Manager advised that for the appeal process, the code required staff to present the record for which they based their decision on; noting they did not receive some of the exhibits included in the backup because they were not provided by the property owner until they made their appeal. She briefly went over why staff felt the business was abandoned with regard to their business tax license. There was no one to speak for or against the appeal. The City Manager advised that a business tax license was one of the ways to determine if the business was abandoned but it was not proof that the garage was operating. He said it was now up to the board to determine if the garage was operating. Chairman Hill said they were trying to hire staff and had documents proving they were preparing the business. He said he felt they were operational. Mr. Nunn noted the building was designed to be an auto shop and the property owner was working hard to open. He was in favor of approving the appeal. Mr. Dodd said he hated the fact that there is a garage at that location because of the way the last owner ran his garage. Since it was an approved use, he couldn't see telling them no but he would love to see it turned into a restaurant. Chairman Hill said he wanted to make sure this wasn't going to be a perpetual approval but he could see the property owner has been trying to get the business going. Mr. Jones said he too, wouldn't like to see a garage as well but the property owners have been working hard. He said they have presented enough to him. MOTION by Mr. McPartlan and SECOND by Mr. Nunn to approve the appeal. Mr. Nunn said people ask him why he didn't know about businesses coming in and he noted that it is when exceptions are requested that Council hears about things. Staff followed all the rules and procedures but an exception was being requested. 6: 4S pm Mr. Jones asked if a sunset clause could be included in the motion. The City Attorney advised they were to vote for or against the appeal. Regular City Council & Board of Adjustment Meeting June 8, 2022 Page 4 Chairman Hill asked if there could be a condition that it be operational within 90 days. The City Attorney said that wouldn't be enforceable; testimony was provided that the garage is ready to go. Chairman Hill asked if a new time frame started today, at what point does it become non- conforming if they are unable to get up and naming and then an auto body shop would no longer be allowed. The City Attorney said that year has already expired. Chairman Hill said he found it hard to believe that based on board approval, it would allow this to always be an auto body shop even if the property owner doesn't do anything for five years. The City Attomey responded if they allow the property to be abandoned, at that time the use would have to be evaluated. The Community Development Manager said tonight the board was just appealing staffs decision if the garage has been abandoned; they weren't changing it from non- conforming to conforming; it will still be non -conforming and the same code sections will apply to them. If the new property owners didn't make a go of it and abandoned the business, the 180 days would start again. She said she thought Mr. Jones was asking if there could be a condition that it could only be a garage for five years. Roll call: Vice Chairman Jones - aye Mr. Dodd - aye Mr. McPartlan - aye Mr. Nunn - aye Chairman Hill - aye Motion carried. 5-0 Mr. Nunn wished the applicant luck and encouraged them to run a beautiful clean business. 9. Chairman Hill adjourned the Board of Adjustment hearing at 6:45 p.m. and reconvened �— the City Council meeting. 10. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes — May 25, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting B. Approve the Piggyback Purchase of Five (5) Ford Explorer SUV Vehicles from Bartow Ford Using Charlotte County Contract #2021000541 for the Police Department in the Amount of $277,506.35 (Transmittal, Letter, Acceptance, Quote, Bid Tab, Bid Doc, Source of Supply) C. Approve the Purchase of One (1) Defender Pro XT HD10 Utility Vehicle from Central Florida PowerSports for the Police Department in the Amount of $24,540.00 (Transmittal, Quotation Process Form, Vendor Quote) an If SEBASTLN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Council Meeting Date: September 13, 2022 Agenda Item Title: Variance Request - Zoll - Detached Garage Roofing Materials Recommendation: Conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing to consider a variance request for the property located at 1493 Bevan Drive Background: A variance application has been submitted from Ronald and Janet Zoll, the property owners, for relief from Section 54-2-7.5(c)(7) of the Sebastian Land Development Code to allow the roofing materials of a detached garage over 500 SF in size to be different than the principal structure, whereas the Land Development Code requires the materials to be same. The homeowners wish to submit a building permit to re -roof their house changing from asphalt shingles to metal panels but are not proposing to re -roof a 720 SF detached garage. In 2013 the garage was reviewed by the PZ Commission and approved to be built as it complied with the accessory structure code by matching the asphalt shingles material and color to the roofing materials on the house. In accordance with Section 54-1-2.5, staff has provided a report detailing the request, applicable exhibits, the criteria established for determining variances, along with additional information to assist with the Board's consideration. If Agenda Item Reauires Expenditure of Funds: Budgeted Amount: Total Cost: N/A Funds to Be Utilized for Appropriation: Attachments: 1. Staff Report with Board Criteria for Determining Variances 2. Exhibits A thru E, which includes application from homeowners Administrative Services Department City Attorney Review: Procurement Division City Manager Authorization: Date: r1 71 ;I - if applicable A11A m� SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN 15W D Community Development Variance Application - Staff Report 1. Project Name: Zoll — Detached Garage Roofing Materials 2. Requested Action: A variance from Section 54-2-7.5(c)(7) to allow the roofing materials of a detached garage over 500 SF in size to be different than the principal structure, whereas the Land Development Code (LDC) requires the materials to be the same. Project Location a. Address: b. Legal: 4. Project Owner: 5. Project Agent: 6. Project Engineer: Project Description: 1493 Bevan Drive Lots 13 & 14, Block 335, Sebastian Highlands Unit 13 IRC Tax Parcel ID No. 31-38-26-00001-3350-00013.0 Ronald & Janet Zoll, Sr. 1493 Bevan Drive Sebastian, Florida 32958 (772)589-6139 N/A N/A a. Narrative of proposed action: In 2013, the homeowners submitted a building permit to construct a custom built, 720 SF detached garage on their double -lot property. Because the size of the proposed accessory structure was over 500 SF, the garage was required to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine if the structure met the architectural requirements found in LDC Section 54-2-7.5(c)(7), i.e. matching the house color, matching building and roof materials, maximum height, etc. (Exhibit A, Code section). Because the proposed detached garage matched the house exactly with the same stucco material and color, same asphalt shingles, and was not higher than the residence, the PZ Commission approved the request. (Exhibit B, 317113 PZC Agenda Packet + Exhibit C, 317113 PZC Minutes). The building permit was issued, and the structure constructed. Two smaller, additional accessory structures already existed on the property, both under 500 SF in size, and cumulatively, all three under the 1000 SF maximum allowed for the double lot. The homeowners are currently requesting to submit a building permit to re -roof the residence. The house was built in 1989, and re -roofed in 2002, with the existing roof now over 20 years old. With consideration for longevity and added value, the residents would like to change the 8. 9. roofing material of the house from asphalt shingles to metal panels. Staff can approve the building permit as long as the detached garage remains in compliance with the architectural requirements for accessory structures of its size, that is, the detached garage would also need to be included in the re -roof permit to change its asphalt shingles to metal panels also. But because of the newer condition of the detached garage's roof, the homeowners do not wish to spend funds to re -roof this structure at this time. If the house was re -roofed with shingles, the detached garage would remain in compliance. The homeowners have applied for a variance requesting approval to allow the detached garage's roof not to match the principal structure's roof, as required by Section 54-2-7.5(c)(7) and previously approved by the PZ Commission. (Exhibit D, Variance Application, Materials, and Contractor Estimate) b. Current Zoning: RS-10 (Single -Family Residential) Current Land Use: LDR (Low Density Residential 5 units/acre) C. Adjacent Properties: Zoning Current Land Future Land Use Use North: RS-10 residence LDR East: RS-10 residence LDR South: RS-10 residence LDR West: RS-10 residence LDR d. Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: .66 acres, or 28,750 SF (2) Current Land Use(s): Single-family Residence (3) Water Service: County Water (4) Sanitary Sewer Service: Septic Tank & Drainfield Staff Comments: The two additional accessory structures located on the property — a shed and carport — did not have to be reviewed by the PZ Commission, nor match the house with colors or roofing materials. However, if needed for consideration of the variance, photos of the property and accessory structures are attached. (Exhibit E, Photos). The 10' X 16' shed's roofing material is asphalt shingles, while the 10 X 12 pre-fab carport is aluminum panels. Currently, the three largest structures on the property match with their roofing materials and colors (house, detached garage, and shed), which is a primary intent of the accessory structure codes. Board Criteria for Determining Variances: See attached analysis. This criteria was also considered in determining staffs recommendation, specifically Criterion #b, which states that the conditions cannot be created by the applicant, and Criterion #f, that requires the granting of a variance to be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the code. 2 10. Staff Recommendation: Based on existing Comprehensive Plan policies, Land Development Code regulations, and the criteria for determining variances not being met, staff recommends denial of the requested variance. 11. Board Action: Conduct quasi-judicial hearing to consider the requested variance. Dom Bosworth, Manger/Planner 3 g /a/.a:;z. Date ' BOARD CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING VARIANCES Section 54-1-2.5(c)(2) In order to authorize any variance from the terms of the land development regulations, the Board of Adjustment must use the following criteria for approving or denying a variance: a. Existence of special conditions or circumstances. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. Meets Standard Yes ❑ No X The shape or size of the property is not peculiar in any way with regards to norms, and the detached garage and house are currently in compliance with city codes. Throughout the residential areas, larger accessory structures over 500 SF are usually permitted and built after the residences have been completed, (excluding the attached garages built with the home), and therefore would have a newer roof than the house. An older roof on the residence would not be considered a special condition as other properties with accessory structures most likely have the same circumstance. b. Conditions not created by aanticant. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Meets Standard Yes ❑ No X The decision by the homeowner to change the roofing material of the house to metal panels is creating the nonconformance with regards to the accessory structure regulations. Other options are available such as re -roofing the residence with asphalt shingles, or re- roofing the detached garage with metal panels along with the house, as both will keep the property in compliance. C. Saecial orivileaes not conferred. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. Meets Standard Yes ❑ No X All residents who have applied for permits to have an accessory structure over 500 SF on their property since the regulations were adopted in 2002 have had to present their proposal before the PZ Commission and indicate that the structure would have similar and/or matching materials as the house. 4 d. Hardship conditions exist. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would create unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. Meets Standard Yes ❑ No X The opportunity to re -roof the residence would not be eliminated if the variance was not granted. e. Only the minimum variance granted. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. Meets Standard Yes X No ❑ Requesting the detached garage to be of a different material and color than the principal structure would be a minimum variance. f. Not injurious to public welfare or intent of ordinance. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan and this code, and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Meets Standard Yes ❑ No X The granting of the variance would not be considered injurious to the area involved or detrimental to the public welfare. However, the general intent of the code is to require larger accessory structures to be compatible in the residential areas by being architecturally and visually pleasing to surrounding neighbors. This is accomplished via the code by having certain types of structures prohibited (Quonset or quonset-type structures, structures higher than the house, etc.), and by requiring that larger accessory structures be similar or matching to the residence. Subsequently, property values in the area are also protected. And in this case, the detached garage was presented to and approved by the PZ Commission in 2013 that it would have matching roof materials with the house. If the variance is granted, with the property having multiple accessory structures with different roof materials, the intent of the code is not being met. E. Conditions and safeguards may be imposed. In granting any variance, the board of adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with chapter 163 F.S., the comprehensive plan, and any ordinance enacted under its authority. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the ordinance. Meets Standard Yes X No ❑ There are no recommended conditions of approval. h. Time limit may be imposed. The board of adjustment may prescribe a reasonable time limit during which the applicant shall commence and/or complete the subject actions and conditions approved by the board. Meets Standard Yes X No ❑ No time limit is being proposed by staff. i. No use variance permitted in specified instances. Under no circumstances shall the board of adjustment grant a variance to permit a use not generally permitted in the zoning district involved or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of the ordinance in the zoning district. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district and no permitted use of lands, structures, or buildings in other zoning districts shall be considered grounds for the authorization of a variance. Meets Standard Yes X No ❑ The variance as requested is not a use -related variance. 0 Sec. 54-2-7.5. - Accessory structures. EXHIBIT A (a) Presence of principal building required. No accessory structure shall be constructed or placed upon a lot until the construction of a principal structure has been started and no accessory structure shall be used unless the principal structure has received a certificate of occupancy. (b) Location: (1) General rule of location. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback), other than as outlined below. Furthermore, no detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. a. Special regulations governing rear yards. Detached structures, such as utility sheds and other structures accessory to a primary dwelling within a residential zoning district may encroach into a required rear yard, provided that any such structure maintain a minimum distance of ten feet from the rear property line and not be located within a dedicated easement. With the exception of structures that consist solely of screening and beams and supports for the screening material, no such structure shall exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage and shall not exceed 12 feet in height. Structures that consist solely of screening and beams and supports for the screening material, such as screen enclosures for swimming pool areas, shall not exceed 25 feet in height. (2) Corner lots. Accessory structures may not be located in the secondary front yard of an improved corner lot unless the corner lot is joined in unity of title within an interior lot that contains the principle structure. However, said accessory structures shall not be located closer than 25 feet from the secondary front property line in the RS-10 zoning district, and in all other zoning districts shall meet required front yard setbacks. (c) General regulations of accessory buildings. (1) No mobile home, travel trailer, tent or similar structure, truck trailer or any portion thereof, or motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. (2) No accessory structure shall be constructed or maintained without a building permit being issued by the city's building official expressly designating the type of the accessory structure (example: garage, shed, pump house). (3) The building official shall not issue a building permit if the accessory structure does not comply with all other provisions of the land development code, comprehensive plan or the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sebastian. (4) No accessory structure shall be constructed or maintained if the height thereof exceeds the height of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. (5) Attached or detached quonset-type or style accessory structures, usually defined as any self- EM supporting structure, typically in an "arch" or curved shape with no interior posts, trusses c support beams of any kind and with the exterior sheeting forming the building, are prohibited. (6) A residential lot will be allowed five square feet of accessory building area (cumulative), for every 100 square feet of lot area, not to exceed 1,000 square feet total. Attached garages, which are part of the original principal building design, will not be included in the cumulative total of accessory building area. Accessory structures, which consist solely of screening and beams and supports for the screening material (such as screen enclosures for swimming pool areas) will not be included in the cumulative total of accessory building area. (7) Any attached or detached accessory building over 500 square feet in area, any attached or detached carport and/or breezeway over 500 square feet in area, must be reviewed and approved by the planning and zoning commission utilizing the following criteria: a. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. b. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. C. Accessory structures 501 square feet to 750 square feet in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, roofing materials and pitch. d. Accessory structures 751 square feet to 1,000 square feet in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways. Said requirements are as follows: One shrub for every three lineal feet, 24 inches in height at planting. (Ord. No. 0-02-19, § 1, 12-11-2002) EXHIBIT B Sebastian Planning & Ora Zoning Commission SOS MN Approved S-a Dater T ! AppfO T° HOW OF .n,ow ta�rro Signatur Growth Management Department (Original Stamp Red) Accessory Structure Staff Report 1. Property Owner: Ron & Janet Zoll 2. Contractor: Ando Builders 3. Requested Action: Approval of a 24' X 30' (720 SF) detached garage 4. Project Location: 1493 Bevan Drive Lots 13 & 14, Block 335, Sebastian Highlands Unit 13 5. Current Zoning: RS-10 Current Land Use: Single-family Residence 6. Required Findings: Does Does Not Comply COmpIV A. No accessory structure shall be constructed until the construction of the principal structure has been started. 1. House completed _&49 ; or house under construction 2. Accessory structure to be located on same lot as principal structure ; or located on second lot that has been combined with principal lot by a unity of title t<uir! of -n-n i=- B. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback): 1. Front yard: No detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. Principal structure setback is 2S. (o Accessory structure setback is 77.1, 2. Front yard on corner lot: Accessory structures may not be located in the secondary front yard of an improved corner lot unless the corner lot is joined in unity of title with an interior lot that contains the principle structure. However, said accessory structures shall not be located closer than 25 feet / from the secondary front property line in the RS-10 zoning district, and in all other zoning districts shall meet required front yard setbacks. Secondary front yard setback is a5 , and proposed accessory structure front yard setback is 5-0' Does Does Not Comply Comply 3. Side yard: Required side setback is 10 t ✓ Accessory structure side setback is (OS' 4. Rear yard: The required rear yard is W A detached accessory structure may encroach into the required rear yard, provided it meets all the following: a. It is a minimum 10 feet from the rear property line. Proposed accessory structure has a -1I' setback. b. It is not in an easement. Rear easement is in and LZ proposed setback is al' c. It does not exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage. Proposed accessory structure is T ZO square feet. d. It does not exceed 12 feet in height. Proposed accessory l� structureis I `l. t5 feet in height. Accessory structures which are attached, or do not meet the above four requirements must meet the standard rear setback which is 10 Proposed accessory setback is al' C. No mobile home, travel trailer or any portion thereof, or ✓ motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. D. Applicant must expressly designate the type of the accessory structure (i.e. garage, shed, etc.) _j=MtfkG-C E. Must comply with all city codes. F. The height of accessory structure cannot exceed height of principal structure. House is approximately `�, and accessory structure will be I `f. S ' G. Attached or detached Quonset -type or style accessory structures are prohibited. H. A residential lot is allowed 5 square feet of accessory building area (cumulative) for every 100 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum 1000 square feet. / Property square footage < 0,OCD5F x .05 = / Allowable sq.ft. of accessory structures l000 SF Existing accessory structures Proposed accessory structure Total existing and proposed 12D t 1&0 SF =agDSF -7 RO SF 1000 sF 2 FEBUI LRLVJ 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Any attached or detached accessory building, carport or breezeway over 500 square feet in area must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission utilizing the following criteria: Does Does Not Comply Comply A. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained / from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. ✓ B. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. VIZ 5:1 � C. Accessory structures 501 sq.ft. to 750 sq.ft. in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and V/ trim, roofing materials and pitch. D. Accessory structures 751 sq.ft. to 1000 sq.ft. in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways, as follows: I shrub for every 3 lineal feet and 24 inches in height at planting. Lineal dimension totals _ 3 = Total Shrubs Required Review fee has been paid: V YES Additional Considerations: Prepared by NO MN —CO I Date ao 13