HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-12-2022 BAC MinutesCITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
Chairman Napier called the Citizens Budget Review Advisory Committee meeting
to order at 6:00 p.m.
It. Pledae of Alleaiance was recited by all.
III. Roll Call
Present
Mr. Napier Mr. Hall
Ms. Reed Mr. Shira
Mr. Newhart Mr. McGinn (Zoom
Mr. Hoffman
Not Present
Ms. Cerda — Excused
Mr. Sullivan — Unexcused
Present
Ken Killgore, Administrative Services Director/CFO
Paul Carlisle, City Manager
Barbara Brooke -Reese, MIS Manager
Janet Graham, Recording Secretary
ZMEFff 1MILTI l"
A. Meeting of July 18, 2022
Mr. Napier asked if all Committee members had reviewed the Minutes of July 18, 2022.
All Indicated they had. There being no corrections or additions, Mr. Napier called for a
motion. A motion approving the Minutes of July 18, 2022 as presented was made by Mr.
Newhart, seconded by Ms. Reed, and approved unanimously via voice vote.
V. Presentation of Power Point on Budaet
Mr. Killgore reviewed that the meeting scheduled in August was canceled since there was
nothing new to discuss. Since then, the recommended budget has been compiled. City
Council did approve the proposed millage at the recommended rate of 3.0043, but at this
point the City can go to 2.9050. He will explain in the Power Point how we got to that
point from where we were before. Mr. Killgore gave a Power Point presentation (SEE
ATTACHED) where he reviewed the proposed budget. There were changes in Personnel
Costs, which is now up to $697,360.00. The overall increase in the budget is 4.8. The
CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE PAGE 2
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
personnel who were below the minimum pay or the amount recommended in the
compensation study were brought up to the minimum without changing other categories.
On the slides it states on Page 4 that there had been eight full-time positions added. It
was corrected to seven full-time positions. The proposed Assistant City Manager position
has been deleted. It is being recommended that City Council adopt the millage at their
next meeting of 2.9050. Mr. Killgore reviewed the golf course budget, airport budget,
building fund budget, special revenue funds budget, trust fund, debt service, and capital
improvement program.
Mr. Napier asked what the rollback rate is for this proposed budget compared to the
2.9050. Mr. Killgore said the rollback rate is 2.6834.
Mr. McGinn referred to the proposed position of Assistant City Manager having been
removed. He asked for the reason. Mr. Carlisle stated that when the budget presentation
was given to City Council, they felt that it was not time for the City to move forward with
that position yet. Mr. McGinn stated his opinion is that the removal of that position is
short-sighted.
Mr. Killgore also reviewed the different millages and affecting factors, property values and
millage, and a chart showing a millage-setting, 17-year history and the comparisons
through several years. Mr. McGinn suggested that the chart should be made available
for the public to see. Mr. Killgore called for questions/comments from the Committee
members.
VI. Discussion on Budaet by Committee Members
McGinn agreed that it is a good budget. His only concern is that the Assistant City
Manager position was canceled. Mr. Napier said that this Committee does not get into
that question.
Ms. Reed thinks it is a good budget. Her concerns are the personnel costs and the
unknowns with the labor agreement. She is concerned that those two items are going to
be okay with the 2.9050, Mr. Killgore stated he feels comfortable that the range that he
would expect will be managed. Ms. Reed is also concerned that, with the loss of the
Assistant City Manager position, should Mr. Carlisle be incapable of performing his duties
or should he leave the City, what the costs are going to be as far as replacing him. She
wants to be sure that the City has that kind of money in its reserves so that we are not
going to run into an issue in that case. Mr. Napier stated that the General Fund has a $5
million reserve, and that should be adequate
Mr. Hall asked if the 2.9050 figure includes the General Fund reserves of $5 million plus.
Mr. Killgore stated that is correct. The General Fund reserves are available funding for
emergencies or for adapting to whatever circumstances come up during the year. Mr.
CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE PAGE 3
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
Hall also asked if the amount in the budget is for anticipated increased labor costs, or do
we have enough in the reserves to cover any unforeseen circumstances so that it will not
drop the $5 million reserves within reason. Mr. Killgore stated he expects that it will be
easily oversaw. Mr. Carlisle stated that we do not know yet where the union negotiations
are going to go. All those funds are not captured in the 2.9050. The reserves that are
available —we will have to do a budget amendment based on what is negotiated with the
union, and that will have to come out of reserves. Mr. Napier interjected that the revenues
are coming in very strong, and the expenditures are under budget. Mr. Carlisle stated
that it is his opinion that the City's proposed budget is adequate. Mr. Killgore added that
there is always a concern with the economy and where that is headed because of the
current soaring prices and high taxes, etc.
Mr. Newhart said he trusts the budget. He thinks the 2.9050 will cover it. If we do need
to go into the reserves, we have to run the City. When you look at how the millage rate
has come down according to the chart that was shown and how we are very efficient in
what we do —we have covered the City expansions —he thinks this is a great budget.
Mr. Hoffman agreed and stated this has been a very good presentation.
Mr. Napier said he would prefer to see rollback, but he understands why we are where
we are. He agrees that we should do the 2.9050 millage rate and that the Committee
should also approve the budget as presented.
There was additional general discussion among the Committee members and Mr. Killgore
and Mr. Carlisle regarding the figures in the Power Point presentation. It was the
consensus of the Committee members that this is a good budget.
Mr. Napier stated that the only two items the Committee needs to address tonight is to
approve a recommended millage rate for the City Council and approve a recommended
budget to City Council. He called for a motion regarding those two items.
A motion that the Committee adopt the budget for 22-23 as presented, including the
recommendation for the millage rate of 2.9050, was made by Mr. Hoffman, seconded by
Mr. Hall, and approved unanimously via voice vote.
VII. Adjournment
There being no further business, Chairman Napier adjourned the meeting at 6:31 p.m
By: �7cnn,..I ,') A c, Date: 3//34)
Chat�man Larry Napier jg