Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-15-2023 PZ Agendamn AN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ WWW.CITYOFSEBASTIAN.ORG AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THURSDAY, June 15, 2023 — 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAYBE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA OR ON THE CITY WEBSITE CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOU�CEM,NT$ AND/OR AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications an adddditions require unanimous vote of members. Deletions do not apply. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular meeting of May 4, 2023 6. QUASI-JUDICIAL and PUBLIC HEARINGS • Chairman opens hearing, attorney reads ordinance or resolution or title • Commissioners disclose ex-parte communication • Chairman or attorney swears in all who intend to provide testimony • Applicant or applicant's agent makes presentation • Staff presents findings and analysis • Commissioners asks questions of the applicant and staff • Chairman opens the floor for anyone in favor and anyone opposing the request (anyone presenting factual information shall be sworn but anyone merely advocating approval or denial need not be sworn in) • Applicant provided opportunity to respond to issues raised by staff or public • Staff provided opportunity to summarize request • Commission deliberation and questions • Chairman calls for a motion • Commission Action 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input on items other than on the printed agenda, is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of members present 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Accessory Structure Review — LDC Section 54-2-7.5 — 297 Joy Haven Drive - 700 SF Detached Carport - Mr. Tracy and Leah McCullough 10. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS 11. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. STAFF MATTERS 13. ADJOURN No stenographic record by a certified court reporter will be made of the foregoing meeting. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be heard. (F.S.286.0105) In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting should contact the City's ADA Coordinator at 772-388-8226 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. All government meetings in City Council Chambers will be broadcast live on COS -TV Comcast Channel 25 and ATT UVerse Channel 99 and streamed via the city website — www.citvofsebastian.orr unless otherwise noticed and rebroadcast at a later date — see COS -TV Channel 25 for broadcast schedule ZOOM INFORMATION Please click the link below to join the webinar: httos://us02web.zoom.usli/89042987691 Or One tap mobile: +13052241968„89042987691# US +19294362866„89042987691# US (New York) Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): +1 305 224 1968 US +l 929 436 2866 US (New York) +I 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +I 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +l 646 931 3860 US +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +I 564 217 2000 US +1 6694449171 US +l 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +I 689 278 1000 US +1 719 359 4580 US +l 253 205 0468 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) Webinar ID: 890 4298 7691 International numbers available: httos://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdkvtnSvFok 2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES MAY 4, 2023 Call to Order -- Chairperson Kautenburg called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Pledoe of Allegiance was recited by all. III. Roll Call Present: Ms. Matthews (a) Mr. Haddix Ms. Kautenburg Ms. Battles Mr. Carter Ms. Kinchen Ms. Lorusso Not Present Mr. Lucier -- Excused Ms. Geesey (a) — Excused Also Present Ms. Lisa Frazier, Community Development Director Ms. Dom Bosworth, Community Development Manager Mr. Andrew Mai, City Attorney via Zoom Mr. Joseph Perez, AV Technical Assistant Ms. Janet Graham, Technical Writer IV. Announcements and Aoenda Modifications 06 1 +CY) , I E u) 5 E F OF E. E a; Li N n Cf1 .0 $ m C r- Y.,..• L > 1 C ro O 0.ac 6 0 rqi Q CL.— Ms. Kautenburg announced that Mr. Lucier is excused from tonight's meeting, and he has tendered his resignation effective today. She thanked him for his service to the community and the many volunteer hours he served in the community, wishing him the best in the future. She stated that alternate member, Ms. Geesey, is also excused from tonight's meeting, and Ms. Matthews (a) will be voting in Mr. Lucier's place this evening. V. ADDroval of Minutes: Regular meeting of April 20, 2023 All having had an opportunity to review the Minutes of April 20, 2023, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion to approve the Minutes as presented from April 20, 2023 was made by Mr. Carter, seconded by Ms. Kinchen, and approved unanimously via voice vote. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 2 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 VI. Quasi -Judicial and Public Hearinqs A. Public Hearing -- Recommendation to City Council -- Rezoning Amendment for a specific site -- Sebastian Oaks, LLC, Louisiana Avenue — Sebastian Oaks, LLC, Applicant -- Section 6, Township 31 South, Range 39 East. Subject parcels are 15.75 Acres, More or Less -- Request is for a change from RM-8 Medium Density Multi -Family Residential to RM-10 Medium Density Multi - Family Residential. (Staff Report, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Letter of Opposition) Mr. Mai read the item into the record. Ms. Kautenburg explained to all the process for this agenda item and called on the Commissioners to reveal if they have had any ex parte communications regarding this item. All indicated they had not. Ms. Kautenburg called on Mr. Mai to swear in all who would be presenting factual information. All who would be presenting factual information were then sworn in. Ms. Kautenburg called on the applicant or his agent to make their presentation regarding this request. Jonathan Barkett, Attorney for the Applicant, introduced himself. He stated that Sean Greene, Engineer for the project, is also present this evening. He reviewed that this site is already zoned RM-8 and has been for years. The applicant is applying to change this to the new RM-10 designation. He stated that it is important to note that whether or not this amendment is granted, the area will be developed as multi -family residential. He understands from reviewing the staff report that traffic is going to be a topic of discussion. His client is happy to address these concerns at the site planning level at the proper time. He emphasized that tonight is just the rezoning from RM-8 to RMA 0. The engineers did provide a traffic study that shows that the road will meet the adoptive level of service and the standards of the City of Sebastian. The proposed amendment is otherwise in compliance with the policies of the City as well. He offered to answer any questions about the project. Ms. Kautenburg called on the Commissioners for questions/comments. Mr. Carter asked for a clarification. He asked that, by changing the zoning, 30 more units will be allowed. Mr. Barkett said it will be 18 more units. Ms. Kautenburg then called for staff presentation. Ms. Frazier stated this hearing this evening is for a Rezoning Amendment request for a specific site -- Sebastian Oaks LLC on Louisiana Avenue. She stated that the applicant is requesting a change from RM-8, which allows 8 units per acre, to RM-10, which allows 10 units per acre. Staff included the RM-10 zoning district ordinance PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 3 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 for the Commissioners' review. She reviewed that, as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan update it became apparent for the City to try and attempt to address some of the attainable housing needs throughout the country. The City established another zoning district with a little bit higher density and smaller units. It is very compatible with the City's existing RM-8 already existing townhome code. In that same ordinance some of the parking requirements were reduced that staff had found to really not be necessary in certain developments which created more impervious area and stormwater runoff that everyone is trying to reduce. That was the reasoning behind the RM-10 zoning district. The applicant, knowing that this was coming forward, requested that staff wait on their site plan review, which they submitted back in 2021, and stated that they would wait until this new zoning district comes into being in order to apply for it. They can get up to 157 units from the 126 units that they currently have. However, they are only proposing to add 18 units. Ms. Frazier stated that staff, during their review of the 2021 plan, were very concerned with access and traffic. That has been relayed to the applicant, and they are very much aware of it. That is why in this evening's packet staff did include their traffic analysis for Louisiana and the surrounding corridors that would be impacted or used. Ms. Frazier reviewed the history of the zoning for this area. She added that, regardless of the decision that is made this evening, this area will be developed with the medium density residential allocation as has been stated this evening by the applicant. She reviewed the items that shall be taken into consideration when the Commissioners consider a rezoning of a property. It must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Staff has outlined where they feel it is in line with the Comprehensive Plan or where it may not be. Staff feels that this zoning change is compatible with the land use and in conformance with the ordinances, and it is providing orderly development as is existing in this area. Thus, staffs conclusion is that the requested rezoning from RM-8 to RM-10 is consistent with the zoning map and zoning code and that this Commission is required to make a recommendation to the City Council as part of this request. The motion this evening should state that it is a recommendation to the City Council. Ms. Kautenburg called for questions/comments from the Commission members for the applicant and staff. Mr. Carter -- He asked the applicant in their planning for the project and the ultimate development, what is the price point that the applicant is looking to achieve for the units. Mr. Barkett stated that is not a question he can answer at this time. He emphasized that at this time the applicant is just looking for the zoning change. He added that to go into the pricing of the units at this time would be unrelated to whether or not the applicant meets the requirements of the City to change the zoning. Ms. Bosworth clarified that the site plan application that was submitted is for an apartment building for rental units. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 4 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 Ms. Battles -- Regarding the traffic study, questioned regarding the COVID factor of 1.1 used,,and how that was determined. Mr. Greene, the engineer for the project, stated that he did not prepare the traffic study, and he did not want to speculate as to why that was used. He can find out the answer. He is aware that traffic counts were projected out to 2024 using projections and numbers that are standard throughout Indian River County. Ms. Battles stated that she finds the number somewhat low, and that plays into the results of the report. Mr. Haddix -- He understands that tonight's agenda item is only for zoning. He asked if there is conditional zoning with this, or is it only zoning. Ms. Frazier said conditional zoning cannot be approved. However, in the Commission's approval or denial of a rezoning request, you can voice your concerns to Council regarding whether you approve or deny that particular rezoning request. He stated that he is concerned about the MOT of this area. He thinks that that should be addressed. Ms. Frazier said that can be a part of the motion this evening. Ms. Matthews -- She asked for a clarification regarding the number of units. The number discussed this evening has been 18; however, in the document it stated 16 units per building. Ms. Frazier stated that 18 is the proper number. Ms. Kautenburg -- She understands that we are only talking about changing the zoning rather than what it will look like in the future as to how many trees, are there sidewalks, what shape are the buildings, etc. None of that enters into a change of zoning. She wanted to emphasize that, should this Commission recommend the change and pass it on to the Council and the Council adopts the change, the change goes with the land. The change in zoning, rather than being specific to a site plan, is specific to the land in general. There being no more questions or comments of either staff or Commissioners, Ms. Kautenburg opened the meeting to individuals from the floor to address the Commissioners with their comments or concerns. She called on anyone from the public in favor of the request who wishes to address the Commissioners. There being no one other than the applicant, Ms. Kautenburg called on those who are opposed to the request Jane Sonia -- She is the manager of Grace's Landing, a senior community that has existed along Louisiana Avenue for 27 years. It is a 70-unit apartment community, and most of the residents are seniors, and they have experienced some really difficult traffic situations just based on the growth of Sebastian itself. She stated that to go east or get to US1 they have to cross the railroad tracks. So the trains come into play, and Brightline is going to be running 32 trains a day. There are also the freight trains, the traffic from their property, the growth of this whole area. She stated that Louisiana Avenue is a very narrow road, and it has a bend. In the site plan that she saw it looks like the access to PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 5 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 the property in question — and she acknowledges that there is a great need for housing in Sebastian — additional housing in that specific area she opines would cause a hardship to the people who already live there. There is a blind spot where it appears that they would be putting their access to Louisiana Avenue. She drives that road several times a day, and there have been many times when she is approaching that curve the mail truck is there, and she cannot see him until she is right there. She knows to go 15-20 miles an hour down that road. She stated her opposition to any additional zoning to allow the land to be able to carry more housing in the future if this does not go through. In the future, it could be 156 units. She stated it is the traffic situation. Even though housing is needed in Sebastian, she suggested the growth should not be more than what Sebastian can sustain, which this is going to be difficult enough. Diana McNamara, 1037 Foster Road, Sebastian -- She has come to City Hall to discuss this, and she has found out that there is a possibility that there might be allowed an emergency exit on Foster Road. She stated Foster Road is a private road. The City maintained it for potholes a few times, but they say the City does not own the road. She does not feel that an emergency exit from Sebastian Oaks should be allowed on a private road. The City does not help to maintain Foster Road. She does not feel that in the heart of the City a project like this should be allowed. It is too much for the traffic that Louisiana Avenue can handle presently, and it will cause a lot of problems. She would like the Commissioners to take the situation on Foster Road into consideration as a catchall for this property. Eight units would be great. She understands that the owner wants to develop that property, but her property will abut this property. Her concern is the aquifer because everyone on Foster Road has a well. She stated there is a lot of wildlife in that area, and she hates to see that affected. She opposes this zoning change, and she asked if the property owner is asking for 10 units to help with the cost of construction. She does not think this is the right setting for a project like this. Rob Gribbroek, 1041 Foster Road, Sebastian -- He agreed with the prior speakers. He questioned the traffic study being done during COVID. The traffic on Louisiana has tripled over the last few years. He stated that US and Main Street and Louisiana Avenue is a ticking timebomb. If there are a great number of cars turning left onto Louisiana, and there are 32 high-speed trains coming through there in addition to the other trains, this is not going to work. He spoke about Louisiana Avenue being a narrow road. He also is concerned about the aquifer. He suggested changes that would need to be done to make the traffic situation sustainable should this project go forward. Ira Downes, 1045 Foster Road, Sebastian -- He moved to Sebastian for privacy and safety. He is confused about the change from RM-8 to RM-10. He is concerned about PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 6 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 the devaluing of his property, safety with the traffic on Louisiana Avenue when adding 144 units, stormwater runoff, etc. Mark Lund, 1053 Louisiana Avenue, Sebastian -- He thinks the City should buy the property at a fair price and make the property a City park. Beth Taylor -- She is a resident at Grace's Landing. She does make multiple trips a day on Louisiana Avenue. She sees the backups every day when trains go through. Coming off of US1 onto Main Street is a nightmare. There are often two or three cars abreast right there as they come off of US1 onto Main Street. She opposed this Zoning change. Louisiana Avenue cannot hold all the traffic that is projected. Sheila Benfield -- She is a resident of Grace's Landing. She stated the traffic is horrible. When the railroad crossing was closed the traffic was backed up constantly trying to get to Main Street. Adding this much more traffic is going to make the traffic much worse. She hates to see this done to the property with all the wildlife that is present. Jon Hagerat -- He owns multiple houses on Foster Road. Regarding a turning lane, there is nowhere to put a turning lane anywhere on that road. The entrance to that road is right at the curve that has been talked about. He suggested that the study that was done during COVID is not realistic because, if you look at the population of Sebastian during COVID, and look at the population today, especially looking at the traffic on US1, there are many more people in Sebastian. He suggested that, at the very least, a study should be looked at during the winter months especially, when the northerners are here, and see what that would show. There was mention of the school buses. Whenever there is a school bus on Louisiana Avenue, traffic has to move over to be able to pass the school bus because the road is so narrow. Luther Fitch, 4 Palmer Drive, Sebastian -- He owns the property next to the applicant's property. There is a natural hammock that runs the length of the property. He would like to know what is going to be done with that. It is important to the habitat in that area. He agrees with what has already been said, and he is not in favor of this project at all. Linda Rindell, Foster Road, Sebastian (Zoom) -- She is in agreement with what has already been stated. There being no other members of the public to speak on this matter, Ms. Kautenburg called on the applicant to respond to the issues that have been raised. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 7 M I N UTES OF MAY 4, 2023 Mr. Barkett reiterated that the concerns of the citizens are valid. However, they are not appropriate at this stage. These concerns should be addressed at the site plan level, and this hearing is only about the zoning change. The City staff has not even had a chance to review the traffic study yet. In order to get approval for this project, the applicant has to hire expert engineers in traffic who prepare these reports to work with the professionals who work at the City. At that time, if the City staff has concerns, which they will, about the traffic and the turn lanes and blind corners, those issues will be addressed. These are very valid concerns, but that is the appropriate time to address those. Ms. Kautenburg called on City staff to summarize. Ms. Frazier thanked everyone who expressed their concerns. She reiterated that this property is zoned and land used appropriately for multi -family development, and the request is to increase the density from eight units per acre to ten units per acre. Traffic is an appropriate consideration when it is being looked at to increase density on the property. Staff has reviewed the traffic analysis. It shows that Louisiana Avenue can support the additional traffic. However, the road is very narrow, and there is very limited area to improve it. Those are considerations that will be addressed during the site planning process. However, the consideration of traffic at this point is appropriate when you are considering a rezoning to a higher density. Ms. Kautenburg asked for the Commissioners to deliberate and pose final questions. Ms. Battles -- She recalled that one of the residents had mentioned an emergency exit on Foster. She asked if that is in discussion because of them having more than 100 units and the requirement from the County Fire Marshal to have a second access for fire and emergency vehicles. Ms. Frazier stated that Ms. Battles is correct, that they need to have an emergency access, and the fire official has looked at Foster Road, and it would be adequate for emergency access. Ms. Battles asked if that is something that would need the approval of the private owner. Ms. Frazier said it is a private road, and the landowners around that road would have to be considered, yes. Ms. Battles stated that her concerns regarding the traffic study are consistent with what the residents have said. She suggested that a peak season factor of 1.11 is typical during a normal year. However, being that it was arrived at during COVID, she does not think that that was appropriate. She is concerned that some of those factors were low, and she opined that a new traffic study is required. Ms. Matthews -- She also has some concerns about the increase in the number of units and the possibilities of development and the effect on infrastructures and not being able to redevelop as time passes. She also suggested that a traffic study should be done before a decision is made on something like this. She does not see that area being able to handle this type of increase in structure and volume. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 8 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 Ms. Kautenburg -- Regarding the traffic study, she asked Ms. Battles and Ms. Matthews if they are indicating the new traffic study should be made prior to recommending a change from R-8 to R-10, or are they saying a traffic study should be made at the time the site plan is being developed for whatever would be built there. Ms. Battles suggested an updated count for appropriate factors used in the study that we see before we approve rezoning for additional units. That would be her preference. Ms. Matthews also would like to see a traffic study before the increase. She is concerned about the infrastructure, the increase in traffic, and she would like to see it done before the Commission votes for the increase. Ms. Kautenburg said she does not have any further questions at this time. Ms. Lorusso -- She is aware that Sebastian needs affordable housing. She has been stuck on the railroad tracks because of someone wanting to turn left onto Louisiana Avenue. She stated that is a frightening feeling. She does not think the zoning needs to be increased to RM-10 in the area of Louisiana Avenue. Ms. Kinchen -- In looking at the Staff Report, in Item 7 the Conclusion states that RM- 8 to RM-10 is consistent with the zoning map and the zoning code. She asked if the City staff is recommending that this change be approved. Ms. Frazier stated no. All that is meant by that sentence is that the request is in line with the zoning map and the zoning code, and the Commission must make certain that it is in compliance and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Kinchen also has a concern with the traffic on Main Street. However, there is an additional entrance to Louisiana Avenue from CR-512 that could be used instead of the entrance off of Main Street. She has been down Louisiana Avenue, and it is very narrow. She does not see the need to raise the density for this area at this point in time. She feels that Foster Road is too narrow even for an emergency exit. Ms. Kautenburg -- She added that she too has concerns regarding traffic. She agrees that an up-to-date traffic study should be done. She also mentioned the Brightline trains that will be coming through Sebastian as well as the freight trains that are presently coming through the City. Ms. Battles -- She asked if this matter can be tabled until an updated traffic study is done. Ms. Bosworth stated that one concern is that an updated traffic study may take three to four months, and how do we timely process the decision. Ms. Frazier called on the City Attorney for his input. Mr. Mai stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission's duty is to either recommend approval or denial of the application based on the evidence and the record that you have before you. You can continue this to a date certain, and it would have to be readvertised and would likely cause the applicant a hardship in the amount of time it would take. But the Commission could continue it to a date certain in the future to obtain more information. The applicant may agree or disagree. He added PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 9 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 that the Commission could in its motion indicate that you would prefer that the applicant brings forth an updated traffic study for the next hearing or the site plan. Ms. Lorusso -- She asked Ms. Frazier that whichever way this goes, whether the Commission recommends changing it to RM-10 or leave it at RM-8, the applicant does have to provide an updated traffic study at the site planning. Ms. Frazier, stated that whichever way it goes tonight, the City can make that request because staff would follow the Commission's concerns. Mr. Carter -- For clarification, he asked that whatever happens on the zoning, at site planning stage they would still need to have an updated traffic study. Ms. Frazier stated that is correct. There being no further discussion, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion denying recommending to City Council changing the zoning from RM-8 to RM-10 on the property in question was made by Mr. Carter. Mr. Haddix asked if the concern regarding the MOT be added to the motion. Mr. Carter agreed to add that to his motion. A second to the motion was made by Mr. Haddix. Roll Call Ms. Kinchen -- Yes Ms. Battles -- No Ms. Kautenburg -- Yes Ms. Matthews (a) -- Yes Vote was 6-1 in favor. Motion carries. Mr. Haddix -- Yes Ms. Lorusso -- Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Bosworth stated that the first reading of the ordinance for City Council will be on May 24. Adjacent property owners will receive a letter for that City Council hearing. VII. Unfinished Business -- None VIII. Public Input Ms. Kautenburg called for public input on items other than what are on the agenda for this meeting. Terry McGinn (Zoom) -- He stated that there is a piece of property on Indian River Drive that is scheduled to be reviewed for a 96-room hotel. He suggested that, if that goes forward, there will be a significant amount of traffic trying to exit at Kroegel's fruit PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PAGE 10 MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2023 stand on US1 or at Main Street, which will greatly exacerbate the traffic problem. He stated that his only reason for bringing this up is to call attention to the Zoning Commission and anyone who might be listening, and it is crucial that anyone from the Planning and Zoning Commission who is able to attend the technical review meeting on Wednesday, May 10t', concerning this piece of property which is 88 yards from the City limits. He has seen the traffic study, and he thinks that the traffic study that was done on that particular application, even though it is in the County, should be challenged and done over. This project if approved is going to have a drastic impact on the City and its traffic. Ms. Kautenburg added that, even though this proposal is for property in the County, so are we. She encouraged anyone who can attend that meeting and cares about this matter go to the meeting and make your feelings known. IX. Commissioners Matters -- None. X. City Attomev Matters -- None XI. Adioumment There being no further business, Ms. Kautenburg adjourned the meeting at 7:16 p.m. jg Ma - MW WHENWOMMEW— HOME OF PELICAN IRAND Community Development Department Accessory Structure Staff Report 1. Property Owners: Tracy and Leah McCullough 2. Contractor: Carolina Carports 3. Requested Action: Approval of a 700 SF Carport 4. Project Location: 297 Joy Haven Drive, Sebastian, FL 32958 Lots 16, 17, & 18, Block 363, Sebastian Highlands Unit 11 5. Current Zoning: RS-10 Current Land Use: Single -Family Residence 6. Required Findings: Does Does Not Comply comply A. No accessory structure shall be constructed until the construction of the principal structure has been started. 1. House completed 2000; or house under construction NW. J 2. Accessory structure to be located on same lot as principal structure NW; or located on second lot that has been combined with nrincinal lot by unity of title. J BK: 3124 PG: 318. B. No accessory structure shall be located in any required yard (setback): 1. Front yard: No detached accessory structure shall extend beyond the front building line of the principal structure that is located on the same real estate parcel or lot. Principal J structure setback is 25'. Accessory structure setback is 50'. 2. Front yard on corner lot: Accessory structures may not be located in the secondary front yard of an improved corner lot unless the corner lot is joined in unity of title with an interior lot that contains the principle structure. However, said accessory structures shall not be located closer than 25' feet NW from the secondary front property line in the RS-10 zoning district, and in all other zoning districts shall meet required front yard setbacks. Secondary front yard setback is 25', and proposed accessory structure secondary front yard setback is NW. Does Does Not 3. Side yard: Required side setback is 101. Accessory structure side setback is 179. 4. Rear yard: The required rear yard is 201. A detached accessory structure may encroach into the required rear yard, provided it meets all the following: a. It is a minimum 10 feet from the rear property line. Proposed accessory structure has a N\A setback. b. It is not in an easement. Rear easement is 10' and proposed setback is N\A. c. It does not exceed 400 square feet in lot coverage. Proposed accessory structure is 700 square feet. d. It does not exceed 12 feet in height. Proposed accessory structure is N\A feet in height. Accessory structures which are attached, or do not meet the above four requirements must meet the standard rear setback which is 20'. Proposed accessory setback is 50'. C. No mobile home, travel trailer or any portion thereof, or motor vehicle shall be permitted as an accessory structure. D. Applicant must expressly designate the type of the accessory structure (i.e. garage, shed, etc.) carport. E. Must comply with all city codes. F. The height of accessory structure cannot exceed height of principal structure. House is approximately 19.08' 1. and accessory structure will be 15.5'. G. Attached or detached Quonset -type or style accessory structures are prohibited. H. A residential lot is allowed 5 square feet of accessory building area (cumulative) for every 100 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum 1000 square feet. Property square footage 30,056 x .05 = Allowable sq.ft. of accessory structures 1,000 Existing accessory structures 288 SF Proposed accessory structure 700 SF Total existing and proposed 988 SF 7. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 2 Comply . Comply NW N\A NSA N\A N\A J J J J J J Any attached or detached accessory building, carport or breezeway over 500 square feet in area must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission utilizing the following criteria: Does Does Not Comply Comob• A. Accessory structures may not be constructed or maintained from corrugated metal or corrugated metal -looking products. B. The roof of the accessory building must have a minimum pitch of 3:12. ✓ C. Accessory structures 501 sq.ft. to 750 sq.ft. in size shall be compatible with the overall general architectural design of the ✓ primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, roofing materials and pitch. D. Accessory structures 751 sq.ft. to 1000 sq.ft. in size shall be of the same architectural design of the primary residence, including facade and materials, colors and trim, and roofing materials and pitch. Foundation plantings shall be required NU on all sides of the accessory structure excluding entranceways and doorways, as follows: 1 shrub for every 3 lineal feet and 24 inches in height at planting. Lineal dimension totals NW + 3 = Total Shrubs Required 0 Review fee has been paid: X YES _NO Additional Considerations: • The principal residence has a 5V Crimp Metal roof system. The proposed carport's roof is metal. The carport is also proposed to have a vertical side option added to the structure, which is also metal. The roof and siding color will match the house. There is an existing auxiliary driveway. 6/05/2023 Prepared by Date LOT 15 BLOCK 363 IE4Y Im".I S 42034'00' E 125.00' F. J.16, IL2N b'PMb DR. � �. I ;01 ' `J 1) 5� so' e q R LOT 16 BLOCK 363 �I �N \ W1� 4a K S O W A n K Is.a ' O Inr � F- 22 wwr % nmAruN \ s$ 25.W I N4294'=W N4E'7rB-- 4 >I W $i P 1 � �g ID y s Jy Om roc LOT 17 BLOCK 363 v H t 0 I NY ^� ' - C) mV CONCRETE RANfWAY L � �p65.3' � 15B'Lj N42-34'W' W 25.W N 42034'00' W 12 700' . S `18 LOT BLOCK1363 IM � BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF •26W W PER RECORD PLAT. 1. NO INSTRUMENT OF, 'ECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY ANDA7►OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TOTHIS SURVEYOR EXCIIT AS SHOWN. NO TITLE OPINION IS EXPRf5SE0 �lMPlIED. 3. THIS SURVEYIS NOT I ITENDED TO LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND FOUND IPONS, ENCROACHMENTS OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS EXTPTAS SHOWN. 4. THE LOT SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE 'X' PER FLOOD RESURA E RATE MAP 12061COM E. DATED MAY 4, 1989. ABBREVMTMS: PPLAT M-MEASURED, RAV4VGHTOFWAY AIC-MRCONDITION O.U.L.-OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 6-CENTERLINE COV.-COVERED CONC.-CONCRETE PUDDE-PUBLK UTILOY@ DRAINAGE EASEMENT PLS-PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR RLS-REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR LB -LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS BOUNDARY SURVEY CERTIFIED TO: HARBOR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK JONES PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF INDIAN RIVER. INC. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY LEGEND: 9, FOUND 5/B' IRON REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED -RLS 4029- 0. SET NAIL D 1.1/4' BRASS DISK STAMPED -PLS 4896' S. SET SB' IRON REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED'WT CORNER PLS 4896' ®-FOUND NAIL D 1.1/4- DISK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PREPARED BY: CECRLE LAND SURVEYING. INC., PHONE (772) 388 0520 FLORIDA LAND SURiCYING 6USINESS R6637 10749 HIGHWAY U.S.I. SUITE A. SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 CERTIFIED CORRECT TO THE REST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF IN CONFORNITTY WITH THE MINIM[IM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE P.URIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 OF THE FLORIDA STATUES AND 21NH-6 AND CHAPTER 61G17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THIS SURVEY IS PREPARED AND CERTIFIED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT OR CLIENTS NAMED HEREON. THIS SURVEY 15 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE EMBOSSED SURVEYOR'S SEAL OF THE UNDERSIGNED. NO I.LEff1lL-5. 4896 INDARY SURVEY 1-20.2003 SCALE 1'=30' I FIELD BOOK 48-71 I SHEET I OF 1 I PROJECT NUMBER 03-14 P.O.IIoa 1263 I87 ('ardinai l(idgcl'mil Dolman. N.C. 27017 Entail : C('I/dumlirw.arpunm.nsm Wchme: aml IN:ALER CUSTOMER NAME ADDRESS I PHONE: I Main ROOT STYLE UNIT SIZE COLOR SURFACE TYPE I 1 12 12 I T I 1 I 1 cz,IrfCT 1-}7n7'i$ t I IwId I Dcala Phon. No. Is,c\ NIL('.ltm,e6 I Lowry I loll Fr.: (8110)67(W262 Local: (336)367.&1011 Fax (336)367-6910 Fax (336)367-6a11 I-SIx4L;IN262 I Dal. 15 23 2113 h 56 41 Imhm Rncr TAX I (Where Dclivaed) I 700'. _-0 fa. Iliwn llns; I ('11Y I tich,,.uan 772-21-.967.1 I 011" Regular ❑ Mix Eace ❑ Valieal In W. I 20 I L. is I Ill. 11 POWERAVAILABLE TOP (i'icalmnc Sides L.md. mL Trim I V.1w, (imund I 0 l2mnll 1 ❑ 1 A plmll I❑ NOTE: ROOF IS I'LONGER THAN THE FRAME 20Fl Wide X 35Ft Long Vertical Roof 12 Gauge Upgrade 170 mph Engineered 13Ft Legs/4 flCenlers Eft Sides Closed Horizontal 1-Trim Under Side Panels Gable End Horizontal on Back End L-Trim under Gable End Site Spefic Plans SIAIIS I 11 I ZIP I 1`95x Other I GALIGE 14 ❑ I 12 Q Yes Q No ❑ UNCFRTIFIED ❑ Certified o Wood ❑ 0111a I I All Orders C.O.D. Price S6,783.00 I Tax $47481 S4,195.00 17.00% $720.00 Subtotal S7,257.81 Included $1,175.00 tI I $678.30 S700.00 10% I $95.00 10% Down Payment Before Tax S225.00 y order over$15,000 requires S30.00 l 50% payment of the balance due at I the time of scheduling CCI Di<_Ccu7i S357-00 I Total S6,579.51 0?% Surcharge Labor I S0.00 S339.15 1 Engineering Plans Balance Due at Install 1 $6,918.66 From \Inv (Width) Len Stdc(Length) R.ida Sid, (I rngthl 11"-V tr (R'alth) BINDING PURCHASE CONTRACT CHECK n'tTll YOUR COUNTY I CITY TO SEF. IF YOU NFEII A ZONING AND / OR 11CILDING PERMIT' Ihis pamha.e agi nmew (Iht• \grvemevl") 1• made b5 and betueeu ('atnlina ('arpan,. Inc. ("CCI" ), a North Carolina eorpoi alimt, and Tracy McCullough phi," Ruver''1. Buser agme• la hay, and C'CI agree• in ull, punmml a, Ih,- Ierms listed in Ihis:\grvv, aN, the heal devcribed above. Ruler hue read end undvnl:mds Ihiv mnro at Ibis Agreement, including the Iermv and .nJitinva a tined t7ti everve side of Ihiv document and agrcry v, br hound by the same. 11'u I mer ('('1: Bosd R. Final[: aloo•buiIder (igmaiLvam Ry: Boyd.Brcmvlirmearpormcon, Stte \\'ill ile L.sel / Im. & --- THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING CAROLINA CARPORTS INC. R.. 4v+21n 6' Height - VERTICAL BOXED SAVE REGULAR M -29 Gauge Panels 1B'x 20'x 6' 15'•16' HT REQUIRES A TELESCOPIC FORKLIFT ALL --.w- •29 Gauge Roofing BUILDINGS •4' Braces on Every Leg Bier Taller INCLUDE: 'Anchors Included •5' Centers Standard Heights 6'-16' 12x20 20x20 22x20 24x20 $1,695 $1,995 $2,395 $2,495 12x25 18x25 20x25 22x25 24x25 $2,095 $2,195 $2,495 $2,995 $3,095 12x30 18x30 20x30 22x30 24x30 $2,495 $2,695 $3.095 $3,595 $3.795 12x35 18x35 20x35 22x35 24x35 $2,895 $3,095 $3,595 $4,195 $4.395 12x40 18x40 20x40 22x40 24x40 $3,395 $3,595 $4,095 $4,795 $4,995 12x45 18x45 20x45 22x45 24x45 $3.790 $3,990 $4,490 $5,390 $5,590 12x50 18x50 20x50 22x50 24x50 $4,190 $4,390 $4,990 $5,990 $6.190 �clllpdi 3-'fF LI;.SX. tLLI:L 6'-12. single Leg. Single Base Red. 13'-14' Sirmle Leo. Sle.le Base Rail. Reiru.r .d 18' x 20' x 6' -- �n - 20' Frame-, - 18' x 20' x 6' j 18'Wide _14 Gauge 2 1l2" Frame Roof Length Is 1ft. Longer Than Frame Length 1 20 YEAR Limited Rust Through Warranty on: 11YEAIiWORKMANSHIPWARRANTY(Llmiled�I 'Panels for Vertical Roofs Up To Any Length :Regular and Boxed Eaves Up To 31' 1 10 Year Warranty on 14ga. 2 1), Framing I -Framing 12aa. 21)4" _ Standard Heights 6'-16' Standard Heights 6'-16' 12x20 20x20 22x20 24x20 12x20 20x20 22x20 24x20 $1,395 $1,795 $1,995 $2,295 $1,295 $1,695 $1,895 $1,995 12x25 18x25 20x25 22x25 24x25 12x25 18x25 20x25 22x25 24x25 $1,795 $1,895 $2,195 $2,495 $2,795 $1,595 $1,695 $1,995 $2,295 $2.495 12x30 18x30 20x30 22x30 24x30 12x30 18x30 20x30 22x30 24x30 $2,195 $2,295 $2,695 $3,095 $3,395 $1,795 $1,895 $2,395 $2,695 $2.995 12x35 18x35 20x35 22x35 24x35 12x35 18x35 20x35 22x35 24x35 $2,495 $2,695 $3,095 $3,595 $3.995 $1.995 $2,195 $2,795 $3.095 $3.395 Buildings over 35 feet long must be vertical roof style. MUST BE LEVEL PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLEASE NOTE THAT THE COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO THE PRINTING PROCESS. MEN[, ME ■ @ME& N Clay Ian Pewlor Santlstane Bem Beige aney Blue Red Burgundy Gray Red BNe Gray Grange Burgundy to Height of house 19.08' +\- 11 , FN7N OVATION W77 Of ELEVATION I/C•fP LIH EH .yam 5 " M t3f 5H n beiY' R it 1ff.5G0 WA ELEVATION V&--•a y CI�65h' nx 5� wa.�n—Vf+#Sn gQifELEVAiION " yr-ra ;4 5 I If11441 W � 11ILY .W I Vry k7!E, NL NA`(/R/YYUU5f09JiE1599f;kYfN1. _. h CITY OF S Tx� �V HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958 TELEPIIONE: (772) 589 5537 1`AX (772) 589 256e OWNER/BUILDER PERMIT APPLICATION AI.1. OF 7'IIE FOLI.OWING MUST' 131: FII.I.I:D IN RY APPLICANT, ACCORDING -1'O PS 713.135 PERM11 # DATE: 5a23 INDIANRIVER COUNTY PARCH.11)0 31382400001270000012.0 RECEIVELIBY: LOT:12 BLOCK:270 SUBDIVIMON:Sebastian Highlands FLOOD ZONE. No TYPE OF WORK: DJEW STRUCTURE [)ADDI'HON a1: n:RATION REPAIR ❑DIiM01.1"I'ION ✓) 0'111ER WORKINCLUDES:a-TRUCTURAL ❑f3.1;.CTRICAL D'LIIMBING wiECIIANICAI. DtOOFING-SLOPI:._ ❑ I IRE sVs'ITM ❑ N)OL Q ALUMINUM STRUCTURE ❑ SI II:1) Q FENCE SLAB OR DECK ❑✓ OTI II R WORK DESCRIPTION: Inslaln 2o■35 Carport 15_r S H C V) PVT ESTIMATED JOB VALUE: S 7.257.81 TOTALS/F UNDER AIR JOB NAME: Tracy and Leah McCullough Carport JOB ADDRESS: 297 Joy Haven Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 PROPERTYOWNER'SNAME: Tracy and Leah McCullough PHONE: 772.217.9674 ADDRESS: 297 Joy Haven Drive CITV/s"1'A"fli: Sebastian. FL ZIPCODI-. 32958 CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 41ovebu11ders®gman.com CONTRACTOR BUSINESS NAME: Caro9naQuirortslnc, I•ICFNSI:#• ADDRESS: PO Box 1263 - 187 Cardinal ngge Lane COACT PHONE: 1-800-670.4262 CITY/STA1T: Dobson.Ne —CONTACT 27107 CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS. cci@ml0I1na0arRvls.c0m ARCHITECTIENGINEER: Bechlol Engineering and Testing Inc PIIONE 386-734.8444 ADDRESS: 605 West New writ Avenue C 1'1'Y/S'1'A'IL•': Deland. H. %IP CODI: 32 CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS: eonlaClObechlol.com PRESENT USE: PROPOSED USE OCCUPANT LOAD: NUMBER OF: E::�'1'ORIES [HAYS EUNITS ❑IIEDROOMS QIIEI NIT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: GroPt d GROUP OCCUPANCY: AREA IS THE BUILDING PRESENTLY EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM? [:]Y[:,, ✓�JO BONING COMPANY: ADDRESS: MORTGAGE LENDER: ADDRESS: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK AND INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED. I CERTIFY THAT NO WORK OR INSTALLATION HAS COMMENCED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF ALL LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION IN THIS JURISDICTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FOR ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS AND AIR CONDITIONERS, ETC. J WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SIGNED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE FILED WITH THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY IF THE VALUE IS $2,500 OR MORE, EXCEPT HEATING OR AIR CONDITIONING CHANGE OUTS LESS THAT $7,500. NOTICE: IN"ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE AGENCIES, OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. ANY CHANGE IN BUILDING PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE RECORDED WITH THIS OFFICE. ANY WORK NOT COVERED ABOVE MUST HAVE A VALID PERMIT PRIOR TO STARTING. IN CONSIDERATION OF GRANTS, THIS PERMIT, THE OWNER, AND THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR AGREE TO ERECT THIS STRUCTURE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING CODES OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. NOTE: THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS VOID AFTER 180 DAYS UNLESS THE WORK, WHICH IT COVERS, HAS COMMENCED. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST HAVE A VALID STATE CERTIFICATION, STATE REGISTRATION, OR CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCY ISSUED BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN PRIOR TO OBTAINING PERMIT. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing Information Is accurate and that all work will be done In compliance Attlh all laws applicable regulating construction �n and zoning, 1 1LAC- / ' ic` C AN OWNER ACTING AS THEIR OWN' i• OWNER/AG* GNATURE CONTRACTOR MUST PERSONNALLY APPEAR AT THE BUILDING DEPARTIAENTTO SIGN THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PER FS 489.103 PRINTED 7ME OF OWNER/AGENT DATE: 50 0, Individuals who sign as the owner's agent must first obtain legal power of allomey to sign on their behalf. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF I hereb certify that on ll is 1/&Ga./ MCC. III Iti�tsvhois Type of i entifical' n produced: Offal i a ureeof NqWry Public day of/� ✓4 - , 20AL� personally appeared _ 'personally knowa((o me or has _ produced identification. Notary Seal Aft CITY OF SESTx�N HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589 5537 FAX (772) 569 @ 66 OWNER / BUILDER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, As an owner of your property you may act as your own contractor through a specific exemption to contracting law. The following disclosure statement is required to be filled out by any owner who wishes to act as their own contractor and to express any applicable restrictions and responsibilities as required by Florida Statute 489.103. OWNERS MUST PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO SIGN THE APPLICATION. BY SIGNING THIS STATEMENT, I ATTEST THAT: (Initial to the left of each statement) I understand that state law requires construction to be done by a licensed contractor and have pplied for an owner -builder permit under an exemption from the law. The exemption specifies that I, as the owner of the property listed, may act as my own contractor with certain restrictions even though I do not have a license. 1 nderstand that building permits are not required to be signed by a property owner unless he or she irresponsible for the construction and is not hiring a licensed contractor to assume responsibility. (.understand that, as an owner -builder, I am the responsible party of record on a permit. I understand that I may protect myself from potential financial risk by hiring a licensed contractor and having the permit filed in his or her name instead of my own name. I also understand that a contractor is required by law to be licensed in Florida and to list his or her license numbers on all permits and contracts. I Understand that I may build or improve a one -family or two-family residence or a farm outbuilding. I may also build or improve a commercial building if the costs do not exceed $75,000. The building or residence must be for my own use or occupancy. It may not be built or substantially improved for sale or lease, unless I am completing the requirements of a building ____-Permit where the contractor listed on the permit substantially completed the project. If a building j or residence that I have built or substantially improved myself is sold or leased within in 1 year II after the construction is complete, the law will presume that I built or substantially improved it for sale or lease, which violates this exemption. I understand that, as the owner -builder, I must provide direct, onsite supervision of the �/ construction. understand that I may not hire an unlicensed individual person to act as my contractor or to � supervise persons working on my building or residence. It is my responsibility to ensure that the persons whom I employ have the licenses required by law and by county or municipal ordinance. understand that it is a frequent practice of unlicensed persons to have the property owner obtain AA an owner -builder permit that erroneously implies that the property owner is providing his or her �/ own labor and materials. I, as an owner -builder, may be held liable and subjected to serious financial risk for any injuries sustained by an unlicensed person or his or her employees while working on my property. My homeowner's insurance may not provide coverage for those injuries. I am willfully acting as an owner -builder and am aware of the limits of my Insurance coverage for injuries to workers on my property._— I understand that I may not delegate the responsibility for supervising work to a licensed nlracI r who is not licensed to perform the work being done. Anv person working on my building who Is not licensed must work under my direct suJJ��ervision and must be emoloved by me. which means that I must comoly with laws reaulrina the wt'thholdina of federal income tax and social security grtributions under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) and must provide workers comrensation for tVira lovee. I understand that my failure to follow these laws may subject me to serious financial risk. I agree that, as the party legally and financially responsible for this proposed construction activity, /I will abide by all applicable laws and requirements that govern owner -builders as well as employers. I also understand that the construction must comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building codes, and zoning regulations. I am of aware of construction practices and I have access to the Florida Building Code. t I understand that I may obtain more information regarding my obligations as an employer from the eternal Revenue Service, the United States Small Business Administration, the Florida Department of Financial Services, and the Florida Department of Revenue. I also understand that I may contact (/ the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board at 1-850-487-1395 or at www.mvflorida.com/dbt)r/pro/cilb/ for more information about licensed contractors. I am aware of, and consent to, an owner -builder building permit applied for in my name and understand that I am the party legally and financially responsible for the proposed construction activity at the address listed below. I agree to notify the building department immediately of any additions, deletions, or changes to any of the information that I have provided on this disclosure or In the permit application package. / eLI ensed contractors are regulated by laws designed to protect the public. If you contract with a erson who does not have a license, the Construction Industry Licensing Board, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation and the building department may be unable to assist you (/ with any financial loss that you sustain as a result of a complaint. Your only remedy against an unlicensed contractor may be in civil court. It Is also important for you to understand that, if an unlicensed contractor or employee of an individual or firm Is injured while working on your property, you may be held liable for damages. If you obtain an owner -builder permit and wish to hire a licensed contractor, you will be responsible for verifying whether the contractor is property licensed and the status of the contractor's workers' compensation coverage. PropertyAddress/� Signatur/;F uildert Date / STATERIDA COUNTY O61NDIAN RIVER I Iy certify that o» this Y1� day 2(1� personally appeared —f who ispersonally • wn to me or has _ produced idendlication. 'type of idetRi (cation produced: official Sig alone of Nola u lic Notary Seal A siolation of this exemption is it misdemeanor of the first degree punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding I year and/or a $1,000.00 fine in addition to any chit penalties. In addition, the local per niuing jurisdiction shall ssithhold final approsal, revoke the permit, or pursue any action or remedy for unlicensed activity against the onner and any person performing Nsork ttnat requires licensure under the permit issued. "' •� COWVn C 'f.F".'�*xP;ery PatlkBt::e d.cega � �Y Cenn, GpbH SeC N. 2024 Barre! iN0.rx MaM,yl �: 2-. fat.