Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-2023 PZ MinutesCITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES AUGUST 3, 2023 I. Call to Order L r •`� II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call o o �. Present ry U:) f so Ms. Matthews Mr. Haddix Q O Mr. Carter Ms. Kautenburg Ms. Lorusso Ms. Kinchen Mr. Battles Ms. Geesey (a) •o • C tvN� N� Not Present `max 0 Mr. Roberts -- Excused Sip IV. Announcements and Agenda Modifications (j Ms. Kautenburg announced that the newest member, who is an alternate member, Mr. Christopher Roberts, is unable to attend this evening's meeting and has an official excused absence. Ms. Kautenburg also welcomed Sebastian's new City Attorney, Jennifer Cockcroft. V. Approval of Minutes: Regular meeting of 6-15-2023 All having indicated that they had reviewed the Minutes of June 15, 2023, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion to approve. A motion approving the Minutes of June 15, 2023 as presented was made by Mr. Carter, seconded by Ms. Matthews, and approved unanimously via voice vote. VI. Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) Public Hearing: A. Public Hearing - Recommendation to City Council -- Conceptual Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan -- River Oaks Preserve -- 85 Sebastian, LLC, Applicant — Subject Parcel is 146.5 Acres, More or Less -- 352 Single Family Units, 2.4 Units Per Acre -- Located South of Lanfair and Lighthouse Avenues, North of CR 510 & Citrus Hideaway Subdivision -- PUD-R (Planned Unit Development —Residential Zoning Designation -- VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) Future Land use Designation PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION PAGE 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 Ms. Kautenburg called on the applicant to make her presentation. Ms. Emily O'Mahoney introduced herself and presented slides on the screen that showed the proposed development which is proposed to have 352 detached single family units at a density of 2.4 units per acre (SEE ATTACHED). The project is called River Oaks Preserve. She explained the slides which also showed the lots, the amenities, streets, green space, wetlands, etc. She called everyone's attention to the cluster housing and explained what that is. The homes are planned to be rentals, but they could be purchased in the future. They are looking to develop an environmentally sensitive project with the goal to be sustainable over time. Ms. Bosworth reviewed that the original River Oaks development was approved in 2004 when the property was annexed in. The Code requires that to get that PUDR zoning designation you also have to present a conceptual plan, which they did. The original plan was in 2004. The economy fell apart, and the project died out. This is a different plan from that original 2004 plan. As such, the City's Development Code states that we have to process it the same way as the original. So, in essence, this is a revision from that original 2004 plan. Included in the staff report are some of the items that also had to be considered for the rezoning. They are currently not rezoning the property. There is not any new zoning designation on the property. Some of the items in the staff report are showing that this plan still meets the rezoning intentions too in order to get that PUDR consideration. She explained what PUD does. This conceptual plan is brought before this Commission and City Council so that everybody is on board with this design and what they are proposing before they go into the next step of subdivision construction with the preliminary plat. That is what is before the Commission tonight. You will look at it, make a recommendation to City Council, and they will also review it and decide if they want to continue and move forward with the conceptual plan and the subdivision. As this process goes forward, the Commissioners may have some additional conditions that you would like added that you will recommend to the City Council, and they may also have some conditions that they will add if they choose to approve this subdivision. After that, comes the preliminary plat. That is where much more of a design is portrayed, and the design will have more of a complete drainage plan, more detailed surveys on the trees and what can be preserved. Traffic —we are going to have a much more detailed analysis to know exactly how much traffic is going to be added to the road. After that, the preliminary plat comes before you, you will make a recommendation to the City, and City Council will make the final decision on the preliminary plat. The next step is the construction drawings. That gets reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer, and the final step would be the final platting. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 3 To put this in perspective, she compared it to another PUD. The last one that was done is Spirit of Sebastian. This project in 2018 got their PUDR designation and a conceptual plan was approved. Two months ago they did their final plan to begin, so that they can show the first houses to be built. So it was not something that within a year we are going to be houses being built on this property. There is still a lot of planning and detailing. It takes about four and a half years. Ms. Bosworth also reviewed the applicant's Justification Statement, which goes into a lot of detail about the project. There is also a traffic statement, along with the conceptual drainage plan, and the tree survey. At this point, Ms. Bosworth entered the staff report into the record. This report contains some staff recommendations as follows: a. In areas where a residential property line abuts a wetland buffer area or conservation tract/easement, a 3- to 4-foot high fence will be required, i.e. a conservation or split -rail type fence, to establish the specific boundary and prevent encroachment of accessory residential activities. b. Wetland buffer areas, notably in the NW corner, that encroach into proposed residential lots will be required to mitigate, one square foot for one square foot, to an applicable, alternative area within the PUD and must be shown on the Preliminary Plan. c. Alternative ground covers (vs. gravel) for the trails adjacent to the wetland buffer areas shall be constructed. d. Construction of the north 720 linear feet of the one-way Shakespeare Street extension shall occur in Phase 1, and with the final design approved by the City Engineer. e. If the final drainage plan, after working with SRID, modifies the conceptual design considerably, the Conceptual PUD Development Plan will need to be reconsidered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Staff required on the east side some dedication for the Shakespeare extension. Also, the piece of property, when they annex it in and also when they build, will be required to donate some dedicated property to the City for the Shakespeare extension. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 4 Ms. Bosworth put a drawing on the screen that shows the traffic flow. She also went on to describe the size of the houses, size of the lots, the easements, etc. Whereupon, staff recommends that this Commission forward a favorable recommendation to City Council with the above conditions. Ms. Kautenburg called for public input and explained how this works. Scott Carmine -- He lives on the one-way section of Shakespeare Street that cannot be divided into two lanes. His concern is, if you put Shakespeare Street through up to 510 the people in his neighborhood are concerned about the traffic flow. He would prefer not to have Shakespeare Street opened up all the way through. Leave that berm there. They can develop Shakespeare Street on the other side of Lighthouse. He stated that there is traffic going the opposite way on the one-way section of Shakespeare. He stated there will be more congestion on the area roads, and the roads cannot handle the added traffic. Tony Salazar -- He also lives on Shakespeare Street. He has lived two years in this neighborhood. He described Shakespeare Street as a narrow street. When the service vehicles (grass cutters, septic pumping trucks, delivery trucks, etc.) park there is hardly any room to get around them. You either have to wait for them to move or drive slowly down the one-way road. There are no sidewalks, and sometimes the water after a heavy rain comes right up on the streets. Heather Fisher -- She echoes the safety concerns of the first two speakers. She also lives on Shakespeare where it goes from two ways to one way. Shakespeare is like the courtyards that will be in the cluster housing area. The neighbors get together and talk to each other. We all know each other on that road. Missy Servis -- She lives on Joy Haven Street, having lived there for about seven years. She opposes the project for several reasons, some of which the other speakers have already addressed. She opined that some of the things that were described as benefits may be an injury to this community because of the density of the proposed project. She asked if it is now not low density. Ms. Bosworth said it will remain low density. The maximum is three units per acre. They are only coming in at 2.4, so they are not coming in at the maximum that they could have. She also shares concerns regarding Shakespeare. Another issue she has regard the emergency access road. She asked if that is an emergency access road, does that mean that only emergency vehicles can use PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 5 it, or can all residents and their friends, etc. use it. Ms. Bosworth said no. If there is a need for firetrucks or emergency vehicles to get in there, that is the purpose of that road. However, she added if the residents needed to use it to get out because of a fire, they could get out. It is not for everyday use. It is only if the other two entrances were blocked. John Glaser -- He lives at 1771 Shakespeare, and he echoes what the other people have said. There were 20-miles-per-hour signs, and hurricanes took down the signs. Now people are doing 30-40 miles an hour down that road. He personally has stopped approximately 50 cars coming down that road the wrong way. He suggested tire shredders being put on that road. He added that, if anyone said they have done a study on that street, that is not true. Francine Frank -- She lives on Joy Haven. She is concerned about the wildlife. She lives at the edge of the proposed property. She has had several species of wildlife on her property. Where are the animals going to go? It is something to think about. Jim Kwiackowski -- He has the same concerns as those voiced. He lives on Lanfair. He suggested that once people learn where the new streets are, they will be cutting down those streets to get to 510, and it is going to be a disaster. His other concern is construction traffic. Regarding the suggested trails, he did not see anything regarding parking for people who use those trails. Rita Richardson -- She has lived in Sebastian for 22 years. Her questions have to do with the cluster homes. She sees 26 clusters with an average of 7 to 9 units per cluster. Estimating one car per unit, that is over 200 cars just in that part of this development. Are the rentals going to be seasonal rentals, short-term rentals, etc.? Ms. Bosworth stated that after Public Input the applicant can come up and speak about that. She also asked where the public would park who want to use the trails. Ms. Bosworth stated that could be something that could be considered, but right now it's walking or bicycle access. She asked if that goes for the dog park as well. Ms. Bosworth said that would be for residents only. Norm Tessier -- He has lived on Seashore for 20+ years. He picked that area because of what it was then. If this project happens, it is not going to be what it was anymore. He knows that is part of life. The housing is going to happen. Why does it have to come into this quiet little section? People are going to cut all up and down these streets, where kids are out there playing. He does not know why they cannot make another entrance off of 510. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 6 Gudny Holm-Johannessen -- Her question is regarding construction traffic. She believes construction traffic will be coming off of 510 during the first phase. What about after that? She asked if construction traffic also will be coming down Shakespeare. Ms. Bosworth said construction traffic would not be coming from that area. They are required to give us plans on where construction traffic would come from. It would depend on which is the first entrance that gets built. Definitely we would not allow it to come through the Sebastian Highlands area. They have enough access off of 510 to get their construction traffic in. Kim Nielsen -- She stated she lives up against Lanfair, and she has lots of concerns, and she opposes this project. She has been here for 23 years and thinks Sebastian is a great place. All she sees happening is that we are just going to end up like West Palm Beach. She also does not think Sebastian can handle the infrastructure. The roads and businesses are not ready for all these additional residents. Regarding the trails, she asked if these would back up to the north end. If so, that can be a safety concern. She asked what kind of barriers are going to be installed. She also agrees with the concern about wildlife. She feels that, as soon as that construction phase 2 starts, it is going to push the wildlife into her yard. She thinks it's wrong how all the trees are going to be plowed down and the wildlife is going to be displaced. She also asked how the additional traffic is going to be handled. Ms. Bosworth emphasized that this is the conceptual PUD. There are a lot more details that have to be designed and studied -- drainage and the buffer areas. With the preliminary plan, there will be more of the final landscape plans and buffer plans. There will be a traffic analysis. If the intent is to look into the Shakespeare extension, City Council will decide. It may warrant a study of the road. She will tomorrow speak to the City's Traffic Engineering Department to let them know that there are some one-way signs and some traffic speed signs that need to be put back up on that road. Ms. Kautenburg called for any final comments from the applicant. Ms. O'Mahoney spoke regarding the questions about the cluster housing rentals. She said the intent at this time would be to do annual leases. The market studies have shown that this type of unit living is in demand. She added that all the entrances are coming off of 510, which means the construction would also come in from there. Ms. Kautenburg called for deliberation among the Commission members. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 7 Mr. Carter -- He asked if the applicant has given any thought to price points for the leasing of the cluster homes and also for the individual home sites. Also, he asked if there has been any thought to providing affordable housing in this project. Ms. O'Mahoney stated not at this time. It will be market driven at the time. She stated the applicant is not considering affordable housing. He then asked, if the applicant has not taken those things into account, how do you know the project is worthwhile doing. She stated they have done market studies on the area. She stated it is premature to be talking about that. Construction will not begin for three years or more assuming this is passed. Ms. Geesey -- She stated the commissioners have a lot of homework to do. She asked if this community will be governed by an HOA. Ms. O'Mahoney said yes. She said that she is also an animal lover. She understands there will be a study done on the gopher tortoises, and it has to be done when the land is being cleared. She asked when the streets are put in, the emergency vehicles have to okay what the turn radius is, etc. Ms. Bosworth said yes. Ms. Kinchen -- She stated that this project is not designed for you to drive to the project and park your car and walk the trails. It is designed for the neighborhood residents to walk onto the trails. Ms. Bosworth emphasized that there are public trails that are not just for the residents. Ms. Kinchen said it is not designed to put a parking area in for the public to walk the trails. Ms. Bosworth said that could be a consideration. Ms. Kinchen stated it is not on this plan. Ms. Bosworth said it could be on Shakespeare Street. There could be a parking area near the entrance that would allow bike racks, etc. Ms. Kinchen does agree with the concerns of a one-way street, because those streets are terrible. It can still be discussed with staff different ingresses and egresses for this project with regard to the one-way section, taking into consideration all of the public comments. We have to make a recommendation to City Council. City Council ultimately makes the final decision, so the public needs to go to that hearing and speak up at that one as well. Development is going to happen despite how people feel about it. It is going to take three or four years before you will even see the first house go up out there. By that time, 510 is going to be widened, and it is not going to affect additional traffic at that point because it will be widened into four lanes. She thinks it is a great development. We do not have a lot of developments with cluster housing. It is something new in Sebastian. She is in favor of it, but she wants to make sure that staff does take a look at the safety issues on the one- way street. Ms. Lorusso -- She agrees with a lot of what Ms. Kinchen has said. She emphasized that the key word now is "conceptual." She asked Ms. Bosworth how much import the Commission will have at the next stage. Ms. Bosworth said that the Land Development PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 8 Code requires that the preliminary plat pretty much meets what you are seeing here in terms of design, density, etc. Things like that cannot change from the conceptual -- if there is an addition of some trail parking, if the drainage design is tweaked a bit etc. That is why staff added as a condition of approval that if it changes substantially, staff will bring it back before the commissioners. She explained that, regarding what City Council says regarding Shakespeare Street, staff may have to look at the proposed conceptual plan. Ms. Lorusso wants to make sure that there is room to address the issues that the public is concerned about. Ms. Bosworth stated that is correct. Ms. Matthews -- She asked the applicant what the thought process was that went in regarding extending Shakespeare from Periwinkle down into the subdivision. Ms. O'Mahoney said that is probably a better question for staff. Ms. Bosworth said there are policies regarding interconnectivity. A future hearing will address Cross Creek Lake Extension. They are adding some lots in there. Staff feels that the interconnectivity and having those other streets down there is going to diminish some of the traffic on Power Line or on Barber Street and Schumann. Because of the one-way Shakespeare area that is going to remain one-way, staff understands that that is the concern that that may become a thoroughfare. The traffic that would use that two-way is going to be that area of Sebastian Highlands. Ms. Matthews said she likes the concept of this development. Her concern is the gate entry on Shakespeare -- if that is something that would be necessary because of the volume, or could it be strictly on 510, and that could be an emergency -type entry. Ms. Bosworth said if the concern is the extension of Shakespeare, she still thinks it is good planning to not have all the entrances on the same street. So, she thinks it will require the entrance off of Shakespeare. Ms. Matthews understands that people will get a little concerned, but she is not in agreement with taking that small Shakespeare/Lighthouse, that whole area, and making it a part of this. When you bring Shakespeare through, you are now connecting these two. She sees a lot of problems when the traffic comes in off of Periwinkle, because people are going to find the shortest route, the fastest way. Her concern is that connection. She thinks that we can have this community with access from 510. Ms. O'Mahoney clarified that any gating as part of the project is only going into the traditional single-family homes. The two entrances that we have are open, non - gated. Ms. O'Mahoney said that the applicant will do the will of the City. Ms. Matthews asked where the emergency exit would be. Ms. O'Mahoney said that is way up in the northwest corner. It is off of Lanfair. That would probably be gated with a lock box so that only emergency vehicles would have access. Ms. Matthews said she knows that growth is inevitable, but we need to pay attention to everyone involved in this. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 9 Mr. Haddix -- He asked if the developer will be responsible for the three- to four -foot fence. Ms. Bosworth said yes. He will agree with Ms. Matthews about it being questionable regarding extending Shakespeare, only with the thought that, is the City ready and prepared for the infrastructure that would be necessary to make the rest of the roads accommodate the potential traffic. He understands that is not part of this, but he thinks it has got to be considered. Ms. Bosworth stated these are improvements that the developer would do. He is concerned with Shakespeare potentially becoming a thoroughfare traveling south, and is the City prepared to widen Shakespeare from the 8 feet to make it 20 feet. He asked if there are going to be sidewalks. He opined that there will have to be additional infrastructure done at some point if all of that was to transpose. Ms. Bosworth said that the intent was that northern 720 feet that goes along their property, that there would be a design that would be reviewed by the City Engineer. It may have a sidewalk. When we get the other 25 feet from the property next to it, then there would be that final design. That developer will have to do that. She added that, in the long term when the last piece of the puzzle is that one vacant property which was annexed in last year, that is going to be a complete street. Mr. Haddix said what he was referencing is that additional infrastructure. He understands that the lot to the east would have to be that developer's responsibility for that 25 feet. But versus a thoroughfare, can this Commission make a recommendation versus a thoroughfare, maybe that it becomes a parking area and that the developer looks at their block 17 in that last lot and says that is a parking lot versus a home site. Ms. Bosworth stated she is kind of nervous with the word thoroughfare because it is not going to be a thoroughfare; it is going to be a local street, it's 50 feet. Mr. Haddix said it will become a thoroughfare to move south. People will use it as that. Ms. Bosworth said the intent is not to be a thoroughfare, so there could be some street design that is going to prevent that. That is what the study will be for when we get to that. Mr. Haddix asked that all of the oaks and the sabals that are on this property, we should make that as a condition that they are saved. Ms. Bosworth said there is a plan that definitely shows the trees that are going to be saved in that northern area. With the preliminary plat there will have to be a very detailed tree survey. Not all trees can be relocated, but they will save as many trees as they can. Ms. Battles -- Asked the applicant how is the cluster housing going to be serviced when it comes to trash. Ms. O'Mahoney said that would involve the conversation with Waste Management. It is very doable to go through the cul-de-sac and pick up garbage, but it has not been decided yet. It is also doable for emergency vehicles. Ms. Battles asked if the applicant is planning to have the minimum lot size be 54 x 60. Ms. O'Mahoney said on the cluster houses she thinks that is the smallest one. Ms. Battles asked if all the roads are going to be private. Ms. O'Mahoney said she thinks that was a condition. Ms. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 10 Bosworth said, if there are roads that are not gated through the clusters, they will be maintained by the HOA. Ms. Battles asked if all the roads on the property would be private, maintained by the HOA. Ms. Bosworth said yes. Ms. Battles asked who will be maintaining the public trails. Ms. O'Mahoney answered that is part of the public benefits. Ms. Battles asked if that is noted somewhere. Ms. Bosworth said that would be clarified in the HOA documents plus the final plat. The trails and the wetland buffers would be a tract dedicated to the HOA for maintenance but allowed for public use. Ms. Battles asked if public parking for the amenities is something that the applicant has considered. Ms. O'Mahoney said the applicant has not particularly thought about it. We thought about it as more of a whole connectivity system. Ms. Battles stated she likes the idea of public parking, so she would probably want to consider that as one of the conditions. She stated that it appears that all of the traffic generated, and in the report it shows 52% from westbound on 510 and 48% coming from the east direction. She asked if this was done before the request from the City to provide that link, is that why there was no traffic generated from that direction. Ms. O'Mahoney said they never counted on that traffic. Ms. Battles asked what percent of the traffic generated from your property would be coming from the north. Also, she asked how many background trips would there be from the Highlands that would be making that pass through. Mr. Jim Vitter, the applicant's civil engineer, answered those questions. Ms. Battles suggested that this plan was probably done before the request was made to link it, and that is why there was no traffic generated from the north. She would think there would be some trips. Ms. Bosworth said that part of the traffic analysis says it is required for them to address the traffic that is going to come from their project. Because there is no street extension yet, it is going to be hard to include that in part of that traffic study to see what is going to come from the Highlands. Ms. Battles suggested that there be an accurate traffic study that reflects how many trips would actually be coming from the north, as there would be some. Ms. O'Mahoney said she does have an answer to Mr. Carter's original question. Mr. Ben Brown said that it is important to note that the homes are designed to be very efficiently sized, so they are much smaller than the new development homes ranging from 1,200 square feet to 2,000 square feet including the garage. So as a price point on a monthly basis it is going to be lower than the typical large home. But on a price per square foot it will be higher. It's very hard to project in 4 years what the prices would be, but in Sebastian today homes are renting anywhere between $1,500.00 to $3,500.00 a month. He does not know where this project would fall in that range. Ms. Kautenburg -- She stated she has had experience with cluster housing before in other communities, and they are an excellent product for people in a lot of different stages of their lives. She displayed a photograph taken years ago touting Sebastian as a friendly PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION 3MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 PAGE 11 town of 1,600 friendly people and 6 old grouches. The reason she thought this was appropriate is because nobody likes change, and she is pretty sure that those 1,600 people did not want her here and probably did not want any of us here. She noted that change is always uncomfortable for some of us, but it is inevitable. She would very much like to see included in our recommendation a condition that would provide guest parking. There needs to be some kind of guest parking. Ms. O'Mahoney said there will be parking near the amenity center. All the roads are set up for the valley curb condition on the road edge. There is plenty of room to pull off in the grass in the cluster home area. She added there is the equivalent of about one parking space per unit additional parking in the court. Ms. Kautenburg stated that overall this planned -unit development meets all of the criteria that is required and fits within what our Comp Plan says we want for our city — a diversity of housing with connectivity to other neighborhoods. She asked Ms. Bosworth if Shakespeare was planned to be a two-way street. Is that what it shows on the plan? Ms. Bosworth said that when Cross Creek Lake Estates developer came in, they were going to give the 25 feet that was required to make a two-way street. There were residents who came to the City Council meeting, and it was decided at that point to keep Shakespeare one-way. Ms. Kautenburg said it seems that a number of people are very concerned with garbage trucks, moving trucks, Amazon trucks, etc. parking their vehicles every which way and people going the wrong way on a one-way street. She opined that a larger street would be a safer street. Ms. Bosworth said that it wouldn't be part of this project, but there is a 25-foot right-of-way. There being no further discussion or questions, Ms. Kautenburg called for a motion. A motion recommending approval to City Council at the meeting scheduled for September 1391, with the staff recommendations along with three additional: (1) Adding public parking for the public amenities; (2) Adding that the owner is required to maintain the public amenities in perpetuity; (3) Adding some sort of traffic calming devices along Shakespeare in the section where construction would take place in the section between the gate and Lanfair to limit the amount of traffic that would be using it as a cut - through was made by Ms. Battles. As a consideration, Mr. Haddix suggested adding wording regarding preservation of the trees, the current oaks and the sabals. The motion was seconded by Mr. Carter. Roll Call Ms. Kinchen -- Yes Mr. Haddix -- No Ms. Battles -- Yes Ms. Larusso -- Yes Ms. Kautenburg — Yes Mr. Carter -- Yes Ms. Matthews — No Vote was 5 yeas and two nays. Motion carries. PLANNING AND ZONNG COMMISSION PAGE 12 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 2023 VII. Unfinished Business -- None VIII. New Business Ms. Bosworth called attention to a one -page Comprehensive Plan addition at each chair. That was the policy that came out of the annexation agreement for the Graves Brothers. That is a sheet that needs to go into the Comprehensive Plan book that the commissioners have. IX. Adjournment There being no further business, Ms. Kautenburg adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. jg 0 4 t 4 Bobo: N W, 11 River Oaks Preserve a I 2 G H 0 Request ❖ PUD Conceptual Development Plan for ❖ 146.52 acres of land for a residential Planned Unit Development ❖ 352 detached single-family units for sale or rental �:• density at 2.40 du/ac. (Maximum density — 3.0 du/ac.) Planning & Zoning •:* Land Use Designation — Very Low Residential ❖ Zoning — Planned Unit Development — PUD=R ❖ Max. Density — 3 du/ac Public Benefit •'• Environmentally sensitive pro iect with goal to be sustainable now and over time •'• Public Trails ❖ Wider buffer ❖ Shakespeare Road Extension ❖ Additional Open space provided with the proposed cluster housing for the wetlands •'• Native vegetation provided throughout the PUD — exotics removed Aerial y984 N n 0 A-J ►l Lei 2) �T Y CD 3m L � 7 L r� .z J.. �i anaasaad SIBO JGAIN HDZa Legend Eotry Phasing Line Note: Infrastructure & Utility Phasing to be Determined at time of Engineering Permits N w n k. mW 2 G H �C, River Oaks Preserve �. Fkty - Legend —•— Public Trails — — — Private Trails �s � Tt t Lake Lake , in -'� \� .✓ ��� �I% Lake �� �, y Lake �• / .:..�'• \,:ram ��,__ � - — --- X - "-� - —1. )G . — 1' j 10 1 14 i� , i L 1F Lake' m p 2f 2� - -• - � Lake Allienil c o- - - i o T ake 9) s 9 rI 12 14, ri' —: 9\ 1 O 7 O Lake I ,Existing' — -I!- Wetland rm a�. .asement i I O • I O Y• ^- O I^ •. i Courtyard i 9 '--I 'I O z 6 � nl rgement A -- I Court B Enlargement I Unit Matrix Option 1 Cluster Housing I3Unit A - II— •- IT— •- —�1I • SF (excluding garage) 2 bed • 2 bed, 2 bath ® Unit B I - • 1,540 SF (excluding garage) • 3 bed, 2 bath O Unit • 1,275 SF (excluding garage) • 2 bed, 2 bath Courtyard I I® THE COURTS: DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING 10.21.22 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PRESENTATION Colberg. r f�. 2GH River Oaks Preserve Unit Matrix Option 2 °A Unit 8 _. • 1,540 SF (excluding garage) • 3 bed, 2 bath Q Unit C • 1,275 SF (excluding garage) • 2 bed, 2 bath I Courtyard 009 THE COURTS: DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING 10.21.22 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PRESENTATION Colberg. i hm lot I W L ILIAI, 2 G H 0 River Oaks Preserve 102IMM"If- Pod View: Push/Pull Flat Roof Portion: Stucco Gabled Roof Portion: wood Composite THE COURTS: DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING 10.21.22 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PRESENTATION INITIAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Garage extends towards courtyard. and main living area recesses to allow for more privacy V I t, Trees line the walls with no windows. which at - lows for a natural divide between properties and adds visual interest Colberg. House View: Front INITIAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN THE COURTS: DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING Colberg. 10.21.22 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PRESENTATION House View: Side/Back INITIAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN THE COURTS: DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING 10 2122 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PRESENTATION Colberg. �.. j� Lake Single Family Lot 1 rypica� Singkle IF=am ly Lot 2 10 30' `_ 1Vrl land ♦, IS \\ Ex. Lakr / Exietin - 0 Lake 11 9) e LTO+ r AA -Jq O C River Oaks Preserve City of Sebastian Planning and Zoning August 3, 2023 2 G H D River Oaks Preserve Owner I Applicant ❖ Charles Modica & Family has owned the land since 2005 (under two different names) ❖ Developer of the Love Street Development in Jupiter with several restaurants •'• Dedicated. ❖ Ben Brown is the appointed Development Manager 2 G H I1C. River Oaks Preserve