HomeMy WebLinkAboutRFP 24-01 - Brian Benton - Score SheetsInitial Evaluator Scoring Form
RFQ #24-01, Strategic Planning Services
Use a copy of this form to evaluate each individual respondent. If required, attach additional pages for comments.
Respondent (Firm Name): LOCAL GOVERNMENT VISIONS
Evaluation Criteria
Firm Background
Team Qualifications
Project Approach and
Philosophy
References
Cost Proposal
Initial Evaluator's
Weight Score
(0 — 4)
25
20
30
5
20
100
Reason / Rationale for Score
(provide reference(s) / page # of Respondent's Proposal)
Crr,&4-c l i n 20 itt. 3 Pr/ i Pr, .ft..+c .% 1'Jan t f "ej Gn 1n110 feeV(JC01 f4c pi4nf P/�cya�vcl�ice ccaC %u
D/1 S4.Ff 45 0-17�,1c L +-, 1e,.s f� I tt T.r-
�
ry ��.y
3 f�i�SFd�F lt.s 10c..i er�l sX cry S <�
)cadcil4P P.o,i...5 11 itn.� 4.rI�cA on
coAJu1+4 l )
TA.".) 41C4 dtst! IP�•�n Jr OcJ I }� �t.p f� 6
a ctv0-prak (. w A. S f hka
Weighted Score
(Initial Weight times
Evaluator's Score)
so
G0
90
J Z,14 A Is rJC.-C,%ccJ
15
Points for this criteria will be calculated and announced at the meeting by
N/A the Procurement Manager after using the following formula: d
Lowest Proposed Amount Divided by Proposed Amount Times 20.
Total (sum of weighted scores) —
RATING: All rating scores must be assigned only per the below table. You must provide a written explanation of why you chose each rating.
Scale
0 (0%) — Non -Responsive
1 (25%) — Missing/Lacking/Insufficient Evidence Provided
2 (50%) — Partial/Basic Evidence Provided
3 (75%) — Sufficient/Adequate/Appropriate Evidence Provided
4 (100%) — Exceeds/Outstanding/High Level Evidence Provided
This evaluation process shall be conducted in accordance with: Florida Statute: Title XIX PUBLIC BUSINESS, Chapter 287: PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND SERVI
of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping services; definitions; procedures; contingent fees prohibited; penalties. CE
Evaluator's Printed Name: ,br"t a, -I �G��6�
Signature: Date: � Y a�a-)
Initial Evaluator Scoring Form
RFQ #24-01, Strategic Planning Services
Use a copy of this form to evaluate each individual respondent. If required, attach additional pages for comments.
Respondent (Firm Name): SAVIAK CONSULTING, LLC
Initial
Evaluator's
Reason Rationale for Score
Weighted Score
Evaluation Criteria
Weight
Score
(provide reference(s) / page # of Respondent's Proposal)
(Initial Weight times
(0 — 4)
Evaluator's Score)
Firm Background
25
3
F:+ b►;��...t aoao, I„cl J�.j 2 Q 44'1 sub- co-s-it.,,+...,, 4LA's p..)<.4-, All 3
rr cxpf -. « .
7 s
Team
20
Qualifications
66
Project Approach and
30
J
L`
Vcr� d�{i 13 E fi'��,� 4 d� ��� 1 �svY t J,ode + fhyl O VTf DFI
S �
Philosophy
Prt'�'
References
5
Points for this criteria will be calculated and announced at the meeting by
Cost Proposal
20
N/A
the Procurement Manager after using the following formula: $1),s001-
Lowest Proposed Amount Divided by Proposed Amount Times 20.
100
Total (sum of weighted scores)
RATING: All rating scores must be assigned only per the below table. You must provide a written explanation of why you chose each rating.
Scale
0 (0%) — Non -Responsive
1 (25%) — Missing/Lacking/Insufficient Evidence Provided
2 (50%) — Partial/Basic Evidence Provided
3 (75%) — Sufficient/Adequate/Appropriate Evidence Provided
4 (100%) — Exceeds/Outstanding/High Level Evidence Provided
This evaluation process shall be conducted in accordance with: Florida Statute: Title XIX PUBLIC BUSINESS, Chapter 287: PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND SERVICES
of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping services; definitions; procedures; contingent fees prohibited; penalties.
Evaluator's Printed Name: �r,;--. Signature: Date:
Initial Evaluator Scoring Form
RFQ #24-01, Strategic Planning Services
Use a copy of this form to evaluate each individual respondent. If required, attach additional pages for comments.
Respondent (Firm Name): ANALYTICA
Evaluation Criteria
Initial
Evaluator's
Score
Reason Rationale for Score
Weighted Score
(Initial Weight times
Weight
(0 — 4)
(provide reference(s) / page # of Respondent's Proposal)
Evaluator's Score)
fOr^.ie% Ikgl. I rr,4Wt. Frar;dej Sf w4L)"- �la.,n rn, lor- •rcr• ci ti e
Firm Background
25
hki -11 -l.p—t 6vd 1,%� z ys4c_a +hP+ ,--rk ;+ �k, Jr. 2fi",5.. l,�r- .fs4yr4,
7 S
,S
1 J & ff Acn44r ,-:+k K ,..i,lc r4 ,)e crpc.tncc , DAtr I J4,t'f hc„ 1.�/, a
Team Qualifications
20
a.S
Ir-4+lc
Project Approach and
30
Ll
V«y do1.�i�� ��piso4� T9 t�i Procet3r .3'��f 411 �•�4S ��t.+
L�rc ,m��.+.n ;c t�,,. �. tJ� II +h�`�kk opt p "<,r.
Philosophy
P�.
Ii3�"' c �-rn... h.I.04 /"+�. �. a 4.�3icsr�ve st�'Icr lewol.�+s i'�c od �1•ti...l a��,->,
References
5
y
cars+Yr�3 few .Sp.
aU
Points for this criteria will be calculated and announced at the meeting by
Cost Proposal
20
N/A
the Procurement Manager after using the following formula:
Lowest Proposed Amount Divided by Proposed Amount Times 20.
100
Total (sum of weighted scores)
RATING: All rating scores must be assigned only per the below table. You must provide a written explanation of why you chose each rating.
Scale
0 (0%) — Non -Responsive
1 (25%) — Missing/Lacking/Insufficient Evidence Provided
2 (50%) — Partial/Basic Evidence Provided
3 (75%) — Sufficient/Adequate/Appropriate Evidence Provided
4 (100%) — Exceeds/Outstanding/High Level Evidence Provided
This evaluation process shall be conducted in accordance with: Florida Statute: Title XIX PUBLIC BUSINESS, Chapter 287: PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND SERVICES
of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping services; definitions; procedures; contingent fees prohibited; penalties.
Evaluator's Printed Name:r` ^ Signature: Date:
Initial Evaluator Scoring Form
RFQ #24-01, Strategic Planning Services
Use a copy of this form to evaluate each individual respondent. If required, attach additional pages for comments.
Respondent (Firm Name): CMA ENTERPRISE INCORPORATED
Initial
Evaluator's
Reason Rationale for Score
Weighted Score
Evaluation Criteria
Weight
Score
(provide reference(s) / page # of Respondent's Proposal)
(Initial Weight times
(0 — 4)
Evaluator's Score)
F,}.cl.;tisa 1"Coo. CI.�,t I.�+ %� p,.�r� s P., .+�. p�o,'a..a a b4.%c .,�.,.�.
Firm Background
25
I
✓ F C I/ f erV. C , o ff. J,
a S
.I l 11
P/OV,Pc4 ),;+ o Cd,t i't.an • 3v1+ a A+ GT L.p4�. i.'t. t) � Pc4� 1�-.A 1nfd
Team Qualifications
20
01
a� «�� co<c st.r���..i.� a -a #>,�:� y�.l;f.�.ted:s. A 1.4- .fJ.V'i _
Dbes '1 s�-.�.5•c
/'
yip
eXP��en�t c-a Go<.i✓1i%�. rctrlr Ij.. yn.� r'� tk�,er
Project Approach and
30
i,,t�r .a•1t _a- n.F k /� F 6 6 d GI -.I s c ,1r+r.;,. ,
4 r_ G� �,.
Philosophy
References
5
�
) S
Points for this criteria will be calculated and announced at the meeting by
Cost Proposal
20
N/A
the Procurement Manager after using the following formula:
1 �
Lowest Proposed Amount Divided by Proposed Amount Times 20.
Total (sum of weighted scores)
100
f
d1
RATING: All rating scores must be assigned only per the below table. You must provide a written explanation of why you chose each rating.
Scale
0 (0%) — Non -Responsive
1 (25%) — Missing/Lacking/Insufficient Evidence Provided
2 (50%) — Partial/Basic Evidence Provided
3 (75%) — Sufficient/Adequate/Appropriate Evidence Provided
4 (100%) — Exceeds/Outstanding/High Level Evidence Provided
This evaluation process shall be conducted in accordance with: Florida Statute: Title XIX PUBLIC BUSINESS, Chapter 287: PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND SERVICE
of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping services; definitions; procedures; contingent fees prohibited; penalties.
Evaluator's Printed Name: e&« T"1% Signature: t Date:_P)'1 -1J;tJ