HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 21 1989 City Seeks Delay of Lawsuit6A, Thursday, September 21, 1989, Vero Beach, Fla., Press -Journal
City Seeks Delay -Of Lawsuit
By PATRICIA DiLALLA
Sebastian Bureau Chief
Twelve days before the city is re-
quired to respond to a judge's
order relating to the airport law-
suit, Sebastian City Attorney
Charles Nash told the city he
cannot represent it in that action.
Nash withdrew Tuesday
afternoon because of a legal opin-
ion he rendered earlier this year
that the proposed charter amend-
ments might not be legal, City
Manager Robb McClary told coun-
cil at Wednesday's special budget
hearings.
Nash felt he could not adequately
defend the city in a matter on
which he issued a contrary legal
opinion, McClary said.
Councilman Lloyd Rondeau re-
acted angrily to Nash's action.
"I don't see what good Nash is
doing us," Rondeau said. "He can't
defend us against the FAA and
can't defend us in this action. I
don't know why we need him."
City voters approved the referen-
dum, which imposed a landing fee
and noise restrictions and cur-
tailed sources of income to operate
the airport, in the March election.
Nash did not attend Wednesday's
meeting and only informed McC-
lary of his decision the day before.
McClary individually briefed the
Sebastian OKs Budget
By a vote of 4-1, Sebas-
tian City Council approved the
proposed millage rate and
budget for fiscal 1990 without
change at Wednesday's special
meeting on the budget. Coun-
cilman Frank Oberbeck was
sole vote against adoption.
The millage rate has been es-
tablished for the second year
in a row at 6.644 mills, The
general fund budget was set at.
$3,869,46G.
Oberbeck said he is not satis-
fied that there was no increase
in the millage rate, since the
city had taken more revenues
councilmen on the problem before
the meeting.
McClary said he would have
ready at next week's council meet-
ing a recommendation on who the
city should hire as special counsel
in the lawsuit brought by resident
Burt Snell.
Nash now is trying to get Snell,
through his attorney, to agree to a
delay so the city can find someone
to represent it, McClary said. If
Snell does not agree, then Nash
from new construction aver
last year.
"1 don't think it was very dif-
ficult to hold the taxes as it
stood," Oberbeck said, "I
would have liked to see a roll
back.'
Oberbeck repeated his earlier
complaints against salary in-
creases for department heads.
Councilman Lloyd Rondeau,
on the other hand, said he
thought the budget should be
modified to give the depart-
ment heads the original raises
suggested by the city manager
during the budget workshop
will ask Circuit Court Judge Paul
Kanarek for an extension, he said.
McClary said he did not know
why Nash waited so long to with-
draw.
On Aug. 28, Kanarek signed an
alternative writ in mandamus that
ordered the city to either adopt an
ordinance implementing the air-
port charter amendments or show
cause why it should not.
The city was to have 20 days to
respond from the date the city
councilmen were served with a
copy of the writ.
The councilmen, however, were
not served until Sept. 11, and the
clock did not start running until
that date. The city must file a re-
sponse by Oct. 2.
In a flurry of legal motions, Snell
filed a complaint to force the city
to adopt the charter amendments,
which had been put on hold in
favor of a standstill . agreement
with the Federal Aviation Admin-
istration. The city asked the court
to dismiss the suit claiming Snell
had no legal standing to bring it,
and Snell filed a request to amend
his complaint.
When Kanarek allowed Snell to
amend his complaint, that changed
the city's defense, McClary said.
"The motion to amend put our
defense in a position where lack of
standing may not be appropriate
and the matter ultimately may be
tried on its merit," he said.
On Jan. 25, council asked Nash
to research the legality of the ref-
erendum language.
In a lengthy written opinion Feb.
20, Nash wrote that, in his opinion,
the proposed amendments were
subject to challenge on numerous
grounds and the city likely would
face numerous lawsuits from par-
ties adversely affected by the re-
strictions.