Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 Ashbury Preliminary Dev Plan PUD Approval Application Staff Rpt2. 4. an of SIEV � 4 HOME Of PWCAN IRAND Growth Management Department Preliminary Development Plan Planned Unit Development Approval Application Staff Report Project Name: Ashbury Subdivision Requested Action: Preliminary Development Plan Approval Project Location a. Address: North of Sebastian Elementary and south of Main Street. b. Legal: C. Indian River County Parcel Number: 31-39-06-00000-5000-00014.0 31-39-06-00000-5000-00015.0 Project Owner: Snook Properties, LLC 696 Shady Grove Road Coffee Springs, AL 36318-4644 5. Project Agent: The Coy A. Clark Company c/o Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC. 1140 7t' Court, Suite F Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772) 770-9622 fax: (772) 770-9466 6. Project Engineer: Same as Agent 7. Project Surveyor: Houston & Bryant Land Surveying 9436 U.S. Highway 1 Sebastian, Florida 32958 (772) 388-8603 fax: (772) 388-8604 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: The Coy A. Clark Company requested a large-scale land use map amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land situated along Powerline Road north of Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 1. The current land use designation for this parcel of land is L-2 (Residential 6units/acre (County)), while the current zoning is A-1 (Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The 9. -01 C. Coy A. Clark Company is requesting annexation of said parcel with a land use of LDR (Low Density 5 units/acre) and corresponding zoning of PUD- R (Planned Unit Development — Residential). The property is currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for development of 195 single- family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well below the 5 units/acre permitted under the LDR designation or the 6 units/acre currently permitted within the existing L-2 (County) designation. The proposed project also includes improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point north approximately 570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies immediately north, and said project will include improvements to Powerline from Main Street south to the Ashbury Subdivision. In addition, the primary subdivision access point will be via the proposed extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to the southeast corner of Ashbury. The developer agreed to a restrictive covenant limiting the subject development to 3.50 units/acre as suggested by City Council during the March 24th Council meeting. Current Zoning: PUD-R Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: (2) Current Land Use(s): (3) Soil: (4) Vegetation: (5) Flood Hazard: (6) Water Service: (7) Sanitary Sewer Service: (8) Parks: (9) Police/Fire: Preliminary Development Plan criteria 56.25 acres Vacant Immokalee, Myakka, Pomello Oaks, Palms, Palmettos, Pines Zone X Indian River County Utilities Indian River County Utilities North County Park -'/4 mile Sebastian Police — .5 miles Indian River Fire — 1.5 miles a. Compliance with subdivision regulations. Yes b. Compliance with zoning regulations. yes 2 (1) Modified building setbacks. (a) Privacy: provided (b) Light and air: provided (c) Use: provided (d) Building Configuration: provided (e) Fire exposure: provided (2) Required perimeter building setback: provided (3) Modification in minimum lot size in single-family district. (a) Design: provided — the developer proposes lots ranging in size from 55 x 110 to 65 x 130, which is a departure from the standard Sebastian Highlands lot of 80 x 125. (b) Use of open space: provided — public space surrounding retention lakes; and a community recreation tract proposed. (c) Compliance with other preliminary development plan requirements: provided 10. Contents of Preliminary Development Plan: a. Written material: (1) Development schedule: provided Phase Start Date Phase I June 2004 Phase II June 2005 (2) Quantitative data. (a) Total number of dwelling units by type: 195 — single-family homes. (1) Total parcel size: 56.25 acres 3 (c) Proposed lot or building site coverage by buildings and structures: provided — see attached preliminary development plan. (d) Proposed lot or building coverage by impervious surfaces, other than buildings and structures: provided — see attached preliminary development plan. (e) Residential Density 3.47 unitslacre (f) Proposed amount of open space: recreation tracts = 3.05 acres lake area = 5.63 acres preservation tracts = 6.16 acres wetland areas = 3.33 acres other areas = 12.7 acres total open space = 33.87 acres = 60.1 % Total green area exceeds the 50% minimum required per land development regulations. (g) Proposed amount of public lands including all dedicated rights -of -way, easements, and other lands dedicated for public facilities and services: 10.69 acres = 15.9% (3) Updated Environmental impact statement: The following excerpts are from an Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G. K. Environmental for Coy A. Clark dated May 2003. Three isolated wetlands exist on site. The wetlands have been flagged and verified by the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). The wetlands are isolated from waters of the state and should not require an Army coprs of Engineers permit to impact. However, the wetlands area II over .5 acres in size and a SJRWMD permit and mitigation will be required if these wetlands are impacted. Additinally, the SJRWMD will require an upland buffer (15-25 feet to be preserved surrounding the wetland area or mitigated for secondary impacts as a result of loss of buffer. 4 No Florida scrub jays were observed within the project boundaries during the five-day survey of the subject development. No other endangered and/or threatened species or significant and viable associated habitat(s) were observed or appear to exist within the project boundaries, except for the potential existence of the eastern indigo snake. One "Species of Special Concern" exists on the subject site, which is the gopher tortoise. Fifteen (15) gopher tortoise burrows were identified during the site inspections. No inactive burrows were observed. A state regulatory gopher tortoise "Incidental Take" permit will be required prior to permitted land clearing activities. (4) Public facilities impact statement: Ashbury Subdivision PUD will connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by Indian River County. (a) Quantity of wastewater generated; Wastewater generated will be at 250 G.P.D. per unit (195) 50,875 G.P.D. (b) Description of proposed recreational facilities; Recreation amenities include Children's playground, walking trails through preservation areas, and passive open space amenities. (c) Quantity of potable water required; Potable water will be 250 G.P.D. per unit (195) 50,875 G.P.D. (d) Estimated number of school age children expected within the development: Estimated 2 children per household = 390 children — this figure is based on historical averages. (e) Estimated property tax and/or sales tax revenue generated by the project by phase; and $2,500 per unit x 195 units = $487,500.00 (f) Any other positive or negative public facility impact. In addition, the statement shall also include all public facilities impact information that may be submitted as part of the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) review process, as applicable. Ashbury Subdivision PUD will connect to both public water and sanitary sewer facilities with service provided by Indian River County. 9 u (5) Additional information: none b. Graphic element of development plan. (1) Plat and site plan. (a) Proposed name of the PUD, title of map, name of city, and description of section, township and range. provided (b) Name and address of record owners, applicant, and person preparing preliminary development plan. provided (c) The locations and names of abutting subdivisions and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. provided (d) Date, north arrow and graphic scale acceptable to the city engineer. provided (e) Legal description and survey of the proposed PUD boundaries made and certified by a Florida registered land surveyor. provided (f) Proposed lot or building site lines with dimensions, setbacks, and landscaped yards. Location and floor area size of all existing and proposed buildings, structures and other improvements. Designation of all dwelling unit types and number of units. Net residential density calculations. Plans for nonresidential uses shall include the square footage allocated to each respective use. Provided on submitted survey. (g) Any desired changes from the underlying zoning regulations, and the boundaries of underlying zoning districts. N/A (h) Location, name and dimensions of all existing and proposed dedicated public lands and the conditions of such dedication. provided (1) The width and location of any street or other public way shown upon the comprehensive plan within the PUD and the proposed width, location and grade of all streets or other public ways proposed by the applicant. provided 0 (j) Location of closest available city water supply system and proposed preliminary design for water service improvements, including proposed level of service, general location of facility improvements, and schematic drawings as required by the city engineer. The final construction drawing shall not be required prior to preliminary plan approval, but shall be required prior to commencement of the installation of such improvements. provided (k) Area in square feet of each lot or building site, to be indicated in a rectangle within each lot or building site. provided on the preliminary development plan. (I) Typical cross -sections of proposed streets, sidewalks, canals and ditches and other proposed improvements. Provided — contained within preliminary development plan. (m) Location of proposed wastewater collection system and proposed preliminary design of wastewater collection improvements, including proposed location of improvements, level of service proposed, and schematic drawings as required by the city engineer. Final construction drawings shall not be required prior to preliminary development plan approval, but shall be required prior to commencing the installation of such facilities. provided (n) Location of proposed improvements for collecting and discharging surface drainage and the preliminary design of such facilities, including the proposed level of service, and schematic drawings as required by the city engineer. Final construction drawings shall not be required prior to preliminary development plan approval, but shall be submitted prior to commencing the installation of such facilities. provided (o) Location and preliminary design of proposed bridges or culverts which may be required, including the type of facility and general level of service as well as schematic drawings as required by the city engineer. Final construction drawings shall not be required prior to preliminary development plan approval, but shall be required prior to commencing the installation of such improvements. provided tl (p) Proposed locations and preliminary designs for sidewalks, curbs, storm drainage facilities, water mains, sanitary sewers, fire hydrants, and flow facilities. provided (q) Location and width of proposed permanent utility easements. The easements shall provide satisfactory access to existing rights -of -way or other open space shown upon the tentative PUD plat. Permanent drainage easements shall also be shown. provided (r) Where the tentative PUD plat covers only a part of contiguous rear property owned by the applicant, a master phasing plan shall also be required unless the application certifies that the remaining real property shall be developed independently of the proposed PUD plat. NIA (s) The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD plat, including material and techniques used, such as landscape, fences and walls for screening and buffering. provided (2) General appearance. (a) Floor plans and square footage of all multifamily and nonresidential buildings and structures: N/A (b) Elevations, sections and/or perspectives: N/A {3) Dedication or reservations of land for public use: provided (4) Vehicular, Pedestrian and bicycle circulation and parking: provided (5) Open space and landscape plan: not provided (6) Information concerning adjacent lands. (a) Existing land use: provided (b) Zoning classification: provided (c ) Circulation system: provided (c) Density: provided (e) Public facilities: provided 0 (d) Unique natural features: provided 11. Site plan review standards: N/A 12. Other Matters: 13. Analysis: The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting a large-scale land use map amendment for a 56+/- acre tract of land situated along Powerline Road north of Sebastian Elementary School and south of Main Street adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 1. The current land use designation for this parcel of land is L-3 (Residential 6units/acre (County)), while the current zoning is A-1 (Agricultural 1 unit/acre). The Coy A. Clark Company is requesting annexation of said parcel with a land use of LD (Low Density 5 units/acre) and corresponding zoning of PUD-R (Planned Unit Development — Residential). The property is currently undeveloped, undisturbed land proposed for development of 195 single-family residential homes, for a density of 3.47 units/acre, well below the 5 units/acre permitted under the LD designation or the 6 units/acre currently permitted within the existing L-3 (County) designation. The proposed project also includes improving Powerline Road from the subdivisions western access point north approximately 570'+/- to the north property boundary. Pelican Isles lies immediately north, and said project will include improvements to Powerline from Main Street south to the Ashbury Subdivision. In addition, the primary subdivision access point will be via the proposed extension of South Wimbrow from Sebastian Boulevard on a northwesterly direction to the southeast corner of Ashbury. Additionally, the developer agreed to a restrictive covenant limiting the subject development to 3.50 units/acre as suggested by City Council during the March 24t�' Council meeting. 14. Conclusion: The proposed PUD-R preliminary development plan is in compliance with the Code of Ordinances, Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. 15. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Ashbury PUD-R preliminary development plan. PR6KARED BY DATE 0 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE f3frl'}-5i ❑ FAX ff-p6t) 589-2566 772- -599- 5518 77 Z Growth Management Department FAX Transmission Cover Sheet FAX Number: Date/Time: Ce moo To: obi✓ sC r tL4-E-, P E From: CC: Re: S K T �; �4�►�lNi � SSld1r� NL� Crtf f�ae d�� �c� T1 Q1r-`. Sc?rv&-- You should receiv ages, including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all of a pages, please call (561) 589-5537