HomeMy WebLinkAbout04081985MINUTES OF SPECIALi MEETING
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
APRIL 8, 1985
MEETING WAS'CALLEDTO¥ORDER'BY MAYOR JIM GALLAGHER AT 2:30 P.M.
PRESENT:
VICE MAYOR HARRIS
COUNCILMAN SZELUGA
COUNCILMAN ROTH
COUNCILMAN VALLONE
MAYOR GALLAGHER
ATTORNEY PALMER
MAYOR GALLAGHER ANNOUNCED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING WAS TO GO THROUGH THE
37 APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR THE POSITION OF GOLF COURSE MANAGER AND SETTLE DOWN TO A
COMFORTABLE NUMBER TO BE INTERVIEWED.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SZELUGA, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ROTH, THAT WE LIMIT THE NUMBER OF
APPLICANTS THAT THE COUNCIL WILL INTERVIEW FOR THE POSITION OF GOLF COURSE MANAGER TO FIVE.
MOTION CARRIED.
Ti~E MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL WENT T~IRO EL-MIN~TION SS AND CAME UP WITH A LIST OF
NAMES FOR POSSIBLE INTERVIEW. ONE N~E[O~ -HI". LIST, LANKY GREGORY, WAS FELT TO BE MORE
QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION OF GOLF CQ~J~/SUP~I~RIN~_~E~DENTL
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SZELUGA, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ROTH, THAT MR. GREGORY NOT BE CONSIDERED
FOR AN INTERVIEW FOR GOLF COURSE MANAGER. ~ "]
MOTION CARRIED.
DOUGLAS FORD WAS ELIMINATED BECAUSE HE HAD NO EXPERIENCE IN THE RESTAURANT BUSINESS.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SZELUGA, SECONDED BY LIv~A~ ROTH, THAT MR. FORD ALSO NOT BE CONSIDERED
FOE AN INTERVIEW,
BE INTERVIEWED BE )TF N:SI;¥, L AUL YOCUM.
MOTION CARRIED
COUNCILMAN ROTH VOTED NAY
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 4;00 P.M.
CITY CLERK MAYOR
THESE MINUTES WERE APPROVED AT THE WORKSHOP MEETING ON MAY 1st, 1985.
Jim Gallagher
Mayor
Ci , Sebastian,
POST OFFICE BOX 127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 8, 1985 - 2:30 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
ANNOUNCEMENTS/PROCLAMATIONS
OLD BUSINES
MAYOR'S MATTERS
CITY COUNCIL MATTERS
CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS
NEW BUSINESS
SELECTION OF APPLICANTS FOR THE POSITION OF
GOLF COURSE MANAGER
ADJOURN
Deborah C. Krages
City Clerk
NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE
ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND
FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD
OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY
IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED.