Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11061985 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1985 MAYOR JIM GALLAGHER CALLED THE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: VICE MAYOR HARRIS COUNCILMAN SZELUGA COUNCILMAN ROTH COUNCILMAN VALLONE CITY ATTORNEY PALMER MAYOR GALLAGHER ABSENT: NONE VICE MAYOR HARRIS LEAD THE COUNCIL AND AUDIENCE IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. MAYOR GALLAGHER QUESTIONED THE CITY CLERK IF SHE HAD RECEIVED SEALED BIDS FOR THE CONCRETE TO BE 'USED FOR CART PATHS AT THE SEBASTIAN MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE. MRS. KRAGES, CITY CLERK, STATED THAT THE CITY HAD RECEIVED THREE BIDS FROM CONCRETE SUPPLIERS. ATTORNEY PALMER OPENED THE SEALED BIDS AND READ THEM ALOUD AS FOLLOWS: 1) RUSSELL CONCRETE OF VERO BEACh~O ~-~3I~--~S~-~.50 PER CUBIC YARD 2) R~NKER MATERIALS CORP OF VERO 1601D CU3IC Y~RDS ~9.50 PER CUBIC YARD PLUS !8.50 PER CU~I~YARD FOR FIBER MESH 3) TARMAX OF M1CCO v~2%~U3IC Y'~RDS ~i~lPAiD945.00 PER CUBIC YARD DI'sC__OUNT BY THE 10th OF THE MONTH MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VALLONE. SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ROTH TO REFER THE BIDS RECEIVED TO STAFF FOR EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDAT~D~'~'~ --~ MOTION CARRIED. MAYOR GALLAGHER ASKED MRS KRAGES CITY CLER~ ;FS~.HAD RECEIVED SEALED BIDS FOR THE TWO NEW RIDING TRIPLEX GREENS MOWE~S.~M,{S,~RAGES REPLIED ~HAT THE CITY HAD RECEIVED T~O. ATTORNEY,' PALME~NED ~ .SF. Ak~ 1) DEBRA ~"~ 59[~2.00[~A MOTION BY COUN~ V~NE~ TO STAFF FOR EVA[-[JATI'O-N'-i~ND ~(~ $19,564.00 I A ~ ~ ~L $17'490'00 /~/ \' ]~Id_MAN ~OTH ,._-0 R/_~F R~TFE ~S MOTION CARRIED. RECEIVED MAYOR GALLAGHER ASKED MRS KRAGES, CITY CLERK, IF SHE HAD RECEIVED SEALED BIDS FOR THE PICK-UP TRUCK FOR PUBLIC WORKS/BUILDING MAINTENANCE DIVISION. MRS. KRAGES REPLIED THAT SHE HAD NOT RECEIVED ANY BIDS. THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF PURCHASING THE PICK-UP TRUCK THROUGH STATE CONTRACT. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VALLONE SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN SZELUGA, TO PLACE THE PICK-UP TRUCK AS AN AGENDA ITEM FOR NOVEMBER 13, 1985. MOTION CARRIED. ATTORNEY PALMER READ IN ITS ENTIRETY A PROCLAMATION REGARDING BETTER WATER FOR PEOPLE WEEK. MAYOR GALLAGHER INTRODUCED MR ROGER CLOUTIER BUILDING OFFICIAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND AUDIENCE. MAY,OR GALLAGHER READ THE ANNOUNCEMENTS AS LISTED ON THE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA. MAYOR GALLAGHER THANKED THE PROPERTY' OWNERS BRINGING THEIR BUSINESS INTO COMPL~INCE ~}iTH THE NEWS1GN ORDINANCE. COUNCILMAN ROTH STATED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER ABOUT THE IMPACT FEES AND WOULD LIiKE TO DISCUSS IT. MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT THE IMPACT FEES WERE AN AGENDA ITEM. MINUTES WORKSHOP MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1985 INTRODUCTION OF BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC .~_)? MR D_6~.!Q..._..LOBATO INTRODUCED HIMSELF 50 THE COUNCI[MEMBER5 AND REMINDED THEM OF A RECENT ABANDONMENT OF' EA~EME~'¥~ND~IllE PROB'[~E"-HAD'ENCODNTERED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND HER STAFF REGARDING MISINFORMATION AND THE NECESSITY TO STAY IN A MOTEL PRIOR TO HIS RESOLUTION BEING ADOPTED BY' THE CO'UNCIL AND HIS DESIRE TO BE REIMBURSED FOR HIS EXPENSES. AFTER SOME DISCUSSION FROM THE COUNCILMEMBERS AND MR LOBATO IT WAS DECIDED PROVIDING MR LOBATO SUBMIT WRITTEN MATERIAL TO THE CITY CLERK, I.E. MOTEL BILLS AND EXPENSES THE COUNCIL WOULD DISCUSS THIS'MATTER AND CONSIDER IT AT THE NOVEMBER 20, 1985, CITY' COUNCIL 'MEETING. MAY'OR GALLAGHER STATED FOR THE RECORD AND TO MR LOBATO THAT HE MUST SUBMIT WRITTEN BACK UP MATERIAL TO THE CITY' CLERK. 2) MR JAY ANDRE, EASY STREET, QUESTIONED MAYOR GALLAGHER AS TO THE TRUTH CONTAINED IN A NEWSPAPER ARTICLE STATING THAT THE MAYOR WOULD NOT RUN FOR RE-ELECTION AND MR. ANDRE ADDED THAT IF THIS WERE FACTUAL HE WOULD BE TERRIBLY UPSET AS IT IS HIS OPINION THAT THE MAYOR HAS CHANGED THE CITY FROM A GRUSOME TOWN TO A HAPPY CITY, THE MAJORITY OF THE CITY RESIDENTS ARE HAPPY AND THE CITY EMPLOYEES ALL ACT AS THOUGH THEY ARE HAPPY. MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT HE DEEPLY APPRECIATED MR ANDRE ' S COMMENTS AND STATED THAT HE COULD NOT FINANCIALLY AFFORDTO BE THE MAYOR FOR AN ADDITIONAL TERM. OLD BUSINESS: F~ -- k-~, ~ 11) COUNCILMANYALLONE STATEDT~A- HE COLLD SA, E TH~(7OUNCIL A GREAT DEAL OFTIME IF HE WOULD BE PERMITTED TO READ A STA.~ENT. C(~U~CILM~N,VALLONE READ A PREPARED STATEMENT 0-78-6. MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT IF COUNC1L~~LI~OULD CALL POINT OF ORDER THE CHAIRMAN IS REQUIRED TO MAKE A DECISIOn'; 'H~ '~D¥I~q3 THAT HE WOULD CALL A FIVE MINUTE RECESS AND HAVE AN ANSWER FOR THE RECORD. ~] / COUNCILMAN VALLONE RAISED THE QUESTION~5,-,~,~ON~F OF ORDER. v~ MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD RECESS TO DETERMINE THE POINT OF [--] - /T1 MAYOR GALLAGHEN~ ~I~ON/EEE~D ~HtJC~UN~I~/~OR~FtO~-AT $::2 P M. A~DAS~ATED ~OF. THE RECORD THAT ALL COUNCIt'~E~BE~Sr~RESE~LI~'¥ IH~IC~LL 'O~,~HE ~EETING AR~ [~[_~EN- ~? 1HE RECONVENING 0 H EDT NC. L.] MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE RECONVENING OF THE MEETING WAS FOR THE CHAIR TO DETERMINE IF THE PACKAGE SUBMITTED WAS INADEQUATE, 'MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT HE ~ODLD SUBN!T THE POINT OF ORDER-TO THE CITY COUNCILMEMBERS AS THE CHAIR FINDS LEGITi~MATE QUESTIONS RAISED BY COUNCILMAN VALLONE. COUNCILMAN ROTH STATED THAT HE FELT THE COUNCIL SHOULD TURN THE POINT OF ORDER OVER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. ATTORNEY PALMER RESPONDED TO THE DOCUMENT SUBMITTED BY COUNCILMAN VALLONE HAD SOME VALID POINTS AND SOME OF THE ORDINANCE PERTAINS TO DIRECTORY REQUIREMENTS NOT DEMAND REQUIREMENTS, THE COUNCIL DID NOT RECOMMEND THEYEBE A PART OF THE PACKAGE. ATTORNEY PALMER STATED THAT THE UTILITY HAS ALREADY' BEEN BUILT AND THEY ARE REQUESTING PERMISSION TO INSTALL A LINE: HOWEVER, DETAILED ENGINEERING HAD NOT BEEN SUBMITTED, ATTORNEY PALMER STATED THAT THERE WOULD BE A GREAT EXPENSE TO THE DEVELOPER TO SUBMIT DETAILED ENGINEERING PLANS PRIOR TO THE COUNCILS CONSENT TO GRANT A FRANCHISE. AFTER A LENGTHY DISCUSSION THE COUNCIL ALLOWED MR DARRELL MCQUEEN, LLOYD AND ASSOCIATES TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL REGARDING THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED. MR MCQUEEN ADDRESSED THE SEVEN ITEM AND STATED THAT HE HAD SATISFIED THEM IN HIS OPINION. AFTER ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CONNECTION OF THE SCHOOL AND THE CR 512 COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR BOTH OR SEPARATELY THE FOLLOWING MOTION WAS MADE. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VALLONE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ROTH THAT THE COUNCIL DEFER ACTION UNTIL LLOYD AND ASSOCIATES FORWARD THE REQUIRED INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE. AFTER A LENGTHY DISCUSSION THE BASIC CONSENSUS OF THE COUNCIL WAS THAT THE PROPOSAL FOR THE SCHOOL WAS COMPLETE HOWEVER THE PACKAGE FOR THE SCHOOL AND THE CR 512 CORRIDOR WAS !NCOMPLETE. MAYOR GALLAGHER ADVISED THE COUNCIL IF THEY VOTED YES ON THE MOTION ~'T ~ODLD RESULT IN T~i END OF THE DISCUSSION. MINUTES: CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1985 ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMAN VALLONE NAYS: VICE MAYOR HARRIS COUNCILMAN SZELUGA COUNCILMAN ROTH MAYOR GALLAGHER MOTION FAILED. MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT IF THE COUNCIL DESIRED THEY WOULD RECESS FOR A SHORT BREAK. (9:10 P.M.) MAYOR GALLAGHER RECONVENED THE COUNCIL MEETING AT 9:24 P.M. AND STATED FOR THE RECORD THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL THAT WERE PRESENT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING WERE PRESENT AT THE RECONVENING OF THE MEETING. MAYOR GALLAGHE. R REQUESTED THAT THE COUNCIL CONSIDER THE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE AND AMENDMENTS ARE POSSIBLE PRIOR TO OR AT A PUBLIC HEARING. ATTORNEY PALMER READ FOR THE FIRST TIME BY TITLE ONLY AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 0-85-16, AND GRANTING AN AMENDED EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO SEBASTIAN LAKES UTILITY COMPANY A FLORIDA CORPORATION TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM WITHIN A PORTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA: SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS AND PRI¥ILEDGES ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF FRANCHISE; PROVIDING FOR RATES AND CHARGES, MOT!~ON BY' COUNCILMAN ROTH. SECON~'y C~-~N~~ READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE C[T¥'t:~)U~C]L O: THE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 0-85-16 AN) SRANTTNG AN A~ENDE LAKES UTILITY COMPANY, A FLORIDA Cg~[~-~RAT]ON -0 OPER, DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND SEWAGE C~_"Eg~'ION SY'S-Eq WITI SEBASTIAN FLORIDA: SETTING FORTH ~I'T:-"(~'T~s A~J~ PRI~ I~Xi' TO ACCEPT THE FIRST F SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA LUSIVE FRANCHISE TO SEBASTIAN ~T~ AND MAINTAIN A WATER Iii A PORTION OF THE CITY OF ~")GES ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF ~RANCHISE PROVIDING FOR RATES AND CHARGES AND. FOR SERVICE STANDARDS AND THAT THE ORDINANCE BE AMENDED TO REQUIRE SEBAST~K~ INSTALL A 6" FORCE MAIN FROM SE'BAST~AN LAKES TO THE NEW SCHOOL AND @E]ETE ~N~EFERENCE IN THE DRAFT OF THE CR 512 CORRIDOR OTHER THAN THAT NEEDED FOR RE~E~ENCE T~HE SCHOOL. // AFTER A VERY LENGTHY DISCUSSION REGARD~NG.,,T~E CqST AND ADDITIONAL L!FT STATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENT OF THE UTILITY' TO PAY' F"I~R-~T'BE ~,-NSTALLATION OF THE 6 LINE WITHOUT ANY' ASSURANCES FROM THE CITY THAT A FRANCHISE WOULD BE GRANTED IF THE PROPERTY OW'HERS ON CR 5jJ.2~I:QESIqC--B-1TO~OOKE~P. ~T.J~DI~N=L-EAD~M T-~T,B~EA OF A MR DARRELL MCQOT~I, xLLOY~D]AN) /~CI~I~.._E~,~ ENG'~I,~R FOR THE SCHgg~:.~A~D SEjAS-IAN LAKES SDBDI¥I~ ~D ~ILITYJ]A]E IA~E~E~IqN OF -HE _I~E~ ~ 'H~C~ 512 CORRIDOR. (MR~EN P~E~N~S~D~ TH~ LA~E ~I~R~WINGS AND THEY ARE iN THE CUSTODY OF THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE) COUNCILMAN ROTH WITHDREW HIS MOTION. MAYOR GALLAGHER ADVISED ~HAT THE COUNCIL WAS RUNNING OUT OF TIME AND IT WOULD BE NECESSARY' TO EXTEND THE MEETING OR JUST ADJOURN IT AT THE 10:30 P.M. DEADLINE MOTION BY' COUNCILMAN SZELUGA, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ROTH TO EXTEND THE COUNCIL MEETING NO LONGER THAN 15 MINUTES SO THE COUNCIL COULD MAKE A FINAL DECISION. COUNCILMAN VALLONE STOOD ALONE IN VOTING NAY. MOTION FAILED. UNANIMOUS CONSENT IS REQUIRED OF THE COUNCIL TO EXTEND THE MEETING BEYOND THE 10:30 P.M. DEADLINE. CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:30 P.M. CITY' CLERK MAYOR THESE MINUTES WERE APPROVED BY COUNCIL AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON MARCH 12, 1986 M!NUTE.~ CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING NOYEMBER 6, 1985 OLD BUSINF~SS~ ITEM NUMBER 11, ATTACHMENT PROPOSED SEWER MASTER PLAN FOR SEttASTIAN SCHOOL AND 5 1 2 CUR R t I)OR. I BELIEVEp{ THAT I AM ETHICALLY AND LEGALLY BOUND TO iNSURE FULL COMPI. IANCE WITH EXISTING CITY' ORDINANCES. ANY DEVIATION FROM THIS BELIEF WOULD BE A BETRAYAL Ok' THE TRUST PLACED IN' ~ BY ELECTORATE. COUNCil. MAN SZELUGA IS THE ONLY MEMBF. R OF THIS COUNCIL WHO WILL REMEMI~ER THE LONG HARD WORK EFFORT AND CAREFHL CONSIDERATION TIIAT WENT INT0~;~JJtEPARATION AND PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 0 78. ,-& KNOWN AS THE 'UTILITIES ORDINACE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN' THE 'UTILITY ORDINANC~ ' SETS FORTH THE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR THE GRANTING OF A UTILITY FRANCHISE. ORDINANCE NO. 0-78-6 IS STILL IN EFFECT AND WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL RECINDEDI STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF THE UTILITY ORDINANCE IS NECESSARI~ WHEN WE CONSIDER THF_ LONG TERM EXPENSE OF A SEWER SYSTEM WHICH WILL REQUIRE MANDATORY USE BY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS iN THE SERVICE AREA. THE REVISED WRITTEN REOUESTIAPPLICATION I;OR A UTILITY FRANCHISE FOR THE SEBASTIAN SCHOOL AND THE 512 COMMERICIAL AREA AS PRESENTED BY SEDA,~;TIAN_ LAKES UTILITIF3S DOtS NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 0-7S-GJ AN EXitAUSTIVE STUDY Of TIlE REOUEST/APPLICATION VS. THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE 'OTILITY ORDINANCE" REVEAL THE FOLLOW IN(; INADEOUACIES: LOCATION MAPS AS PART OF EXHIBIT 'B' ARE INCLUDED IN THE PACKA(;E. ALTHOUGH PREPARED BY AN ENGiNF~F. RING FIRM. THEY ARE REST DESCRIBED AS (;EMERALIZED BRiI~FIN(; CHARTS. THEY ARE TOTALLY INAI)EOUATE FOR ANY EN(;INEERIN(; OR COST EVALUATIONS. THE COMidERCiAI. LOTS ARE SHOWN BUT NOT IDENTIFIED BY LOT NUMBER. THE CRITICAL INFORMATION OF RE001RED RIGHTS OF WAYS IS NOT INDICATED TO TitE PROPERTY OWNERS. THERE IS NO SCAI~ INDICATED ON THE MAP NOR IS TilL:RE ANY SPACING INFORMATION. THERE IS NO COST DATA PRESENTED TO jUSTiFY THE COST OF THE THREE ALTERNATIVES DEPICTED. THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS HAVE YET TO BE DESCRIBED. I !~EFER YOU TO ORDINANCE NO. 0-TS-& PARAGRAPH (5). PAGE AS FOLLOWS: "ATTACH LOCATION MAP SHOWIN(; TIiF_ LAYOUT OF LOI3. LOCATION OF ALL REOUII{ED FOR IFflLFI~ PURPOS~ AMD .,${IOMl]' OWNERS QIr ALL NI~ESSAmY RI(;HTS QY WAYS. 0R [A$1~II~I~S OT]l[13t T]J[AM TIlE CiTy OF $];D&;STI&N. TI~ L0~ATJ_.ON_M&P MU;ST 3II0V ALL ADJ~CEtlT LANDOWBIj~IS WITHLM 30~) ~ O~ TI~C]IJ~]~ AJ~ ,~q~P T~i~I,R MAIL!N(; &DPR~ THE PACKAGE WHICH WE HAVE BEFORE US DOES MOT MEET' THE REQUIREId~ENTS OF THE Og~JNAN'C~t MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1985 OLD BUSINESS: ITEM NUMBER 11 ATTACHMENT MR. II]-:CTOR FRANCOo CITY ENGINEER. POINTED O0T TO THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL TIlE FACT THAT '~1]]~ pROI)F, gTy 0WNER~ MUST APPROyJ~ TtI~ ¢1T¥ ,ENGINE~o' PRIOR TO ANY PUBLIC HEARING ~' THAT ALL PLANNED CO#STRUCTION COMPLIES WiTH THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND ALi. OTH~ STAI~ AND F£DE~Ai-'I~GULATiONS. HOW CAN ANY PROFESSIONAL MAN OF INTEGRITY CERTIFY TO A SYSTEM OF UNKNOWN COMPONENTS?? I AM SURE THAT IdR. FRANCO WILL NOT lie PLACED IN SUCH A POSITION. IN EXHIBIT 'D' THE APPLICANT SUBMITS A VERY BULKY STACK OF PAPER WORK ONLY TWO SHEETS OF WHICH ARE MEANINGFUL! THERE iS ONLY ONE D.E.R. PERMIT/CERTIFICATION NUMBER I)C31-9qJ5303. THIS IS A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TI~ATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM. THIS PERMIT IS FOR THE ON-SITE PLANT AND HAS BEEN APPROVED TO SERVICE 30 ( $ PI.EX) BUILDINGS AND THE RECREATION BUILDING OF SEBASTIAN LA[ES. EXPANSION OF SERVICES TO THE SEBASTIAN SCHOOL AND THE 512 CORRIDOR WOULD REQUIRE THAT SEBASTIAN UTILITI£S SUBMIT TO D.E.B. COMPLETE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. THE APPLICANT HAS ATTACnFD NO PERMITS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIORMENTAL REGULATION. THE ST. .JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. OR iNDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO SERVICE THE SEBASTIAN SCHOOL AND/OR TIlE 512 CORRIDOR. EXHIBIT 'E' IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT SEBASTIAN LAKES ASSOCIATES AMD SEBASTIAN LAKES UTILITIES ~ TWO Si"-PERATE AND DISTINCi' ENTITLES. . APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED AS PROOF OF AVAILABLE FINANCING A COPY OF TIlE FINANCIAL AGREEIdENT ItETW~N MERRITT COMMERCIAL SAVINGS AND LOAN AND SEBASTIt~N LAi~E5 ~SSO~!A~['ES. THE LOAN AGREEMENT PROVIDES A CONSTRUCTION LOAN OF $4°750.000.00 TO CONSTRUCT (64) TOWN HOUSES. TH£ LOAN VAS GRANTED ON OCTOBER iZ, 1984. THE TEIRMS WERE THAT THE INTEREST WOULD RE AT AN ANNUAL RATE OF 2% ABOVE THE BANKS PRIME RATE. INTEREST ONLY WOULD RE PAiD MONTHLY FOR A' TIIERE iS N0 EVIDEMGE OF ANY TAEE-0UT COMMITTMEMT,( A WRITTEN * COMMITTMENT FROM A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION THAT PERMANENT FINANCING WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN THE PROJECT IS COMP. i~)HELD BY SEBASTIAN LAKES ASSOCIATES. ' ', ~ ," " THE LOAN AGREF, MENT STATES IN PARAGRAPH 17 - TIIIiIJ PAltT f BENEFICIARY 'NO OTHER PARTY OTilER THAN THE BORROWER SHALL DKRIV-~ ANY RIGHTS. BENIn'ITS OR PRIVILEGES FROM THIS COMMITMENT NOR IS IT INTENDED THAT ANY BE DEEMED A THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY OF THiS COMMI~rMENT. MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1985 OLD BUSINESS ITEM NUMBER 11 ATTACHMENT TIlE APPLICANT HAS SURMITTED NO CURRENT I'INANCIAL STATEMENT OF PRO01.' OF AVAILABLE FINANCING 01~ RESOURCES AS OUTLINED IN TIILE tlTII. ITY' ORDINANCE. TUE ONLY FINANCIAL DATA SUBMITTED iS OVER ONE YEAR OLD AND PERTAINS TO ANOTHER ENTITY ( SEBASTIAN LAKES ASSOCIATES). MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1985 OLD BUSINESS ITEM NUMBER 11 ATTACHMENT t)ATA REQUIREIvtENTS FOR 0-78 6 SUb, MARY' THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED: NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF APPLICANT AND NAMES Of TWO OFFICERS. (DID NO'J' iNDICATE WHO TIlE RESIDENT AGENT IS} {2} APPLICANT DID SUBMIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TIlE FRANCHISE AREA. IS IT ADEQUATE?? ' TIlE MAP SUBMITTED DOES NOT SHOW SPACING OR SiZE Of SEWER LINES. AREA REOUIRED FOR LIFT STATIONS. RIGHTS OF WAYS AND EASEl--S REOUIRED FOR UTILITY PII~I (4) THE APPLICANT. SEBASTIAN LAKES UTILITY. HAS SUBMITED NONE Of THE NECESSARY PERMITS FROM D.E.R., ST. JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OR APPROVALS Of PROPERTY OWNERS. (5) THE APPLICANT. SEBASTIAN LAKES UTILITY. HAS SUBMITTED MO CURRENT FINANCIAL DATA WHICH CAN BE APPLIED TO ITSELFI (&) THE APPLICANT HAS NOT SUBMITTED ANY SPECIFICATIONS OR DESCRiPTION OF THE SEWER SYSTEM TO THE CITY ENGIMEER!