HomeMy WebLinkAbout07061999BOA CITY OF SEBASTIAN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
JULY 6, 1999
Chairman Crockett called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
VC Devito
James Schmitz
EXCUSED ABSENCE: Gregory Gore
UNEXCUSED ABSENCE: Keith Miller
ALSO PRESENT:
Jan King, Growth Management Manager
Rich Stringer, City Attorney
Gerry Kubes, Recording Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
None
Chmn. Crockett
Clive Beckwith
MOTION by Schmitz/Beckwith
I make a motion to approve the minutes of the previous meeting.
There was no objection from any members.
OLD BUSINESS:
NEW BUSINESS:
None
A. PUBLIC HEARING:
Steve Schlitt, owner, in regards to Lots 1, 2 & 17, Vickers
Subdivision, located at 1209 U.S. 1, is requesting a variance to
reduce the parking requirements for this site from 32 to 21 spaces.
He also wishes to provide 38 percent (38%) compact spaces,
whereas the code would only permit 15 percent (15%) compact
spaces.
Mr. Steve Schlitt was present and was sworn in by Chmn. Crockett at 7:05 pm. Chmn.
Crockett opened the public hearing at 7:05 pm.
BOARD Of ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES Of REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 6, 1999
Mr. Schlitt gave a presentation and noted that they worked the plan to get the maximum
number of parking spaces on the site. He also noted that the Railroad owns the property
adjacent to the west, and he has approached them about purchasing a small piece of
that property. He also indicated that finalizing the purchase of the subject property
depends on approval of a variance.
There were fifteen (15) notices of hearing sent and there were no objection or non-
objection letters received.
Jan King gave staff presentation, noted that the applicant plans to reduce the size of the
building fifteen per cent (15 %) and use that space for parking. She commented that this
building is an extremely old building, possibly built before the 1940's, and this plan
seems to be the best one to utilize this property and still keep its character. She also
pointed out that the present parking area to the rear of this building is not part of this site,
but belongs to the Railroad, and has been used for years as a parking area. She then
indicated that staff recommends approval of this application because of the plans for a
drive-through parking area to allow traffic to move in and out of the spaces, and seems
like a reasonable request.
Randy Mosby, Mosby and Associates, Vero Beach, FL, was present and commented
about the public parking available off-site in this "downtown" area.
At this point, Mr. Mosby was sworn in by Atty. Stringer.
Atty. Stringer noted that if anything happened to the main structure, the variance would
not run with the land or any redevelopment.
Chmn. Crockett closed the public headng at 7:15 pm.
There was discussion on how many offices would be included in that building, and Mr.
Schlitt responded that in addition to his Real Estate business, there might be one other
user until he can take over the entire building, but he has not met with the architect yet.
Atty. Stringer reminded the Board that discussing the specific use within a category is
not something that this Board should consider.
There was further discussion on a vadance by Board of Adjustment and site plan
presentation to P & Z, and which one should be handled first. It was also noted that
businesses using that Railroad property have been doing so without any RR approval or
lease.
MOTION by Schmitz/Beckwith
I make a motion that we accept the proposal by Mr. Schlitt as to the parking
situation, however, if the parking changes (on the site plan) and need it be that you
come back to this Board to get further approval, then I would entertain that motion.
Discussion: It was discussed and clarified that the "changes" referred to in the above
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 6, 1999
motion would be a change in the total number of parking spaces from what is presented
here tonight.
Roll call: VC Devito - no Chron. Crockett - no
James Schmitz - yes Clive Beckwith - yes
The vote was 2 - 2. Motion denied.
Mr. Beckwith commented that he felt that this proposal would be puffing this site to its
best use, along with the applicant trying to keep the historical character of the site. He
also indicated that the applicant is making an effort to try to keep his utilization and
renovation of the building in context of what we would prefer to see in Sebastian.
Mr. Schmitz commented that there is plenty of off-site parking available in that area.
Mr. Mosby gave further information on bringing this site as close to compliance as
possible.
Atty. Stringer noted that staff recommended bringing this application to the Board of
Adjustment first.
Mr. Schlitt commented that he really wants to maintain the historical character of the site
and it would be a really attractive building. He also noted that fifteen (15) parking
spaces would be added, and the building area would be reduced by 1500 sq. ft., and he
is trying to come as close as possible to the present historical appearance and to
complying with the City of Sebastian requirements. He indicated that he will continue to
attempt to purchase additional property or get a long-term lease.
Jan King explained further that the applicant is planning to put heavy landscaping on this
site to conform to the Riverfront Ordinance, and is removing 1500 sq. ft. of building to
provide additional parking spaces. She restated that staff recommends approval for
reconsideration, and reminded to the Board that, since this site is already built and
established, there are some things that the applicant has no control over.
There was discussion on the "grandfathering' factor of this site.
Ms. King reminded the Board of a similar reduction of parking spaces at Washington
Plaza. She also noted that the only possible use of this site would be to continue in the
classification that is presently being utilized.
Chmn. Crockett voiced his opinion of this subject.
After much discussion, Mr. Mosby requested that since there is not a full Board present,
that this item be continued to the next Board meeting to bring it back. He didn't feel it
was fair to his client without a full Board present.
Atty. Stringer noted that, in order to change the voting outcome, and since there is a
quorum present, one of the negative voting members would have to move to reconsider
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 13, 1999
or move to continue.
Mr. Joe Generazio, 1058 Barber Street, commented that even though Mr. Schlitt is his
competitor, he would like to see him be able to improve and utilize this site as proposed
instead of the possibility of it standing vacant and becoming an eyesore, and he
reminded all present of the old Keen's grocery building. He was very complimentary
about Mr. Schlitt's plan for the Main St. property, and suggested that this would be good
for the City.
There was further discussion and it was noted that this denial could be appealed to City
Council.
Chmn. Crockett adjourned the meeting at 8:00 pm.
(7/13/99 AB)
4