HomeMy WebLinkAbout09111990BOA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
"SPECIAL MEETING"
SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 - 3:00 P.M.
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN MATTHEWS AT 3:00 P.M.
THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE WAS LED BY CHAIRMAN MATTHEWS.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
GALE MATTHEWS, CHAIRMAN
LOUIS PRIORE, VICE CHAIRMAN
JOSEPH STEPHENSON
MARY HEINICKE
JAMES HUSK, ALTERNATE
EXCUSED: WALTER SHIELDS
ALSO PRESENT: BRUCE COOPER, DIR. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OLD BUSINESS:
MOTION BY MR. STEPHENSON, SECONDED BY MRS. HEINICKE TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING HELD AUGUST 2,
1990 AT 3:00 P.M. AS WRITTEN.
MOTION CARRIED.
~_UB~7_C~_.~..~!~ - PRUDENTIAL BUILDING CO., INC., IN REGARDS TO
LOTS 9 AND 9A, ROSELAND ACRES SUBDIVISION, HAS REQUESTED A
VARIANCE FOR A BUILDING THAT ENCROACHES APPROXIMATELY 2.54
FEET INTO THE REQUIRED 20 FOOT SETBACK (CITY OF SEBASTIAN
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 20A-3.1(D)(6)(b).
WILLIAM BARBER, PRESIDENT OF PRUDENTIAL BUILDING CO. AND ALSO
THE ADJOINING NEIGHBOR TO THE HOME FOR WHICH THE VARIANCE IS
BEING REQUESTED, WAS PRESENT. THE SURVEY SUBMITTED TO THE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT INDICATED AN 18'
SETBACK. THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ADVISED THE BUILDER THAT
THIS NEEDED TO BE A 20' SETBACK. IT WAS A MISTAKE BY THE
SURVEYOR RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING. MR. BARBER KNEW THAT IT
HAD TO BE 20' AS HE LIVED IN THIS SUBDIVISION AND WAS ALREADY
FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIRED SETBACKS. A SMALL CANAL EXISTS
BETWEEN LOT 10 (OWNED BY MR. BARBER) AND LOT 9 (IN QUESTION).
THE PLACEMENT OF THE HOMES NEAR THIS CANAL HAS BEEN A PROBLEM
PAGE 2
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WHO WANTS THE HOMES PLACED WELL BACK
FROM THE WATER. MR. BARBER MET WITH H.R.S. ON THE SITE AND
AGREED TO PLACE THE HOUSE 23' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. AT
THIS POINT, MR. BARBER LEFT ON VACATION. MEANWHILE, H.R.S.
REQUESTED THAT THE HOUSE BE MOVED FURTHER AWAY FROM THE
CANAL. THE MASON WENT BACK AND LAID THE HOUSE OUT WITH MORE
DISTANCE FROM THE CANAL BUT SWUNG IT FURTHER TOWARD THE OTHER
PROPERTY LINE. THE FOUNDATION WAS THEN POURED. MR. BARBER
WAS NOT AWARE THAT THE HOUSE HAD A PROBLEM UNTIL AFTER THE
HOUSE WAS FRAMED UP AND HE ORDERED THE SLAB SURVEY. THE
TRUSSES WERE UP AND THE ROOF WAS ON BY THIS TIME. THE
BUILDER REQUESTS THIS VARIANCE SINCE THE NEXT HOUSE IS OVER
60' AWAY AND THE LOT SiZE IS OVER AN ACRE AND A QUARTER.
MR. BARBER ALSO NOTED THAT PRUDENTIAL BUILDING CO. OFFERED TO
BUY SEVERAL FEET FROM THE NEXT LOT (LOT 8) BUT THAT HOUSE iS
CURRENTLY FOR SALE AND THE OWNER WAS NOT INTERESTED IN
SELLING ANY PORTION OF THAT LOT. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED
THAT LOT 8 ALSO HAS AN EXISTING SHED LOCATED ALMOST ON THE
PROPERTY LINE AND COULD NOT SELL THIS PROPERTY FOR THAT
REASON. THIS SHED IS A CONCRETE BUILDING AND COULD NOT BE
MOVED.
MR. COOPER NOTED THAT THE OVERHANG OF THE SHED IS ENCROACHING
OVER ON TO LOT 9. THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS NO KNOWLEDGE
OF THE SHED BEING PERMITTED. THIS IS ALSO IN VIOLATION BUT
SHOULD BE APPROACHED AS A SEPARATE MATTER.
MR. COOPER ALSO NOTED THAT THE ENCROACHMENT iS ONLY 2 1/2
FEET OF THE CORNER OF THE BUILDING WHICH IS THE ONLY GOOD
THING IN FAVOR OF THIS VARIANCE. THE PERMIT WAS CONTINGENT
UPON HAVING A SLAB SURVEY AND THE PERMIT STATES THAT THE
BUILDER IS NOT TO CONTINUE FURTHER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE
SLAB SURVEY HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. WE DO NOT ASK FOR THE SLAB
SURVEY UNTIL THE INSPECTION FOR FRAMING, ELECTRICAL AND
PLUMBING ARE CAI, LED FOR AND WILL NOT DO THIS INSPECTION UNTIL
WE VERIFY THAT THE BUILDING HAS MET THE SETBACKS.
MRS. HEINiCKE NOTED THAT THIS WAS VERY UNFORTUNATE SINCE THE
LOT iS SO LARGE. MR. PRiORE SAID THAT IT WAS CLEARLY AN
ERROR BY THE BUILDER.
IT WAS NOTED BY THE BUILDER THAT THE PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE
THAT ENCROACHES IS THE GARAGE. THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE IS
ON THE 24' SIDE OF THE GARAGE. MRS. HEINICKE ASKED IF THE
CORNER COULD BE CUT OFF. MR. BARBER REPLIED THAT IT COULD,
BUT THEY HOPED THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY.
PAGE 3
MR. COOPER STATED THAT HE TALKED WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY WHO
MENTIONED THAT THE QUESTION TO ADDRESS SHOULD BE WHETHER THE
APPLICANT CAUSED THE HARDSHIP. IN THIS CASE, THE BUILDER
DEFINITELY CAUSED IT HIMSELF. IT WAS AN HONEST MISTAKE AND
CERTAINLY NOT INTENTIONAL, BUT NONETHELESS IT WAS RESULTING
FROM HIS OWN ACTIONS.
MR. PRIORE NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS SOMETIMES BEEN LENIENT IN
THESE CASES IF IT WAS ONLY FOR A MATTER OF INCHES. HOWEVER,
IN THIS CASE THE INFRACTION IS SEVERAL FEET.
MANUEL RAIMI, VICE PRESIDENT OF PRUDENTIAL HOMES WAS ALSO
PRESENT. HE NOTED THAT IN THIS ZONING THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS
PROVIDE FOR 40 FEET BETWEEN HOMES. ALTHOUGH THEY HAVE ONLY
17 1/2 FEET ON THEIR LOT, IF YOU CONSIDER THE SETBACK ON THE
ADJACENT LOT, iT WOULD FAR EXCEED THE REQUIRED 40 FEET
BETWEEN HOUSES. HE HOPED THAT THIS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED.
MR. COOPER NOTED THAT THE OWNER OF LOT 8 COULD BUILD TO THE
20 FOOT SETBACK. ALSO, WE STILL HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
ACCESSORY BUILDING ON LOT 8 WHICH IS ALREADY IN VIOLATION OF
THE SETBACK. IF THE STRUCTURE WAS BUILT PRIOR TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THEN IT COULD BE GRANDFATHERED IN. (THE OWNER OF
LOT 8 WAS NOT PRESENT AT THE MEETING.)
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CAME INTO EXISTENCE IN 1985. MR.
COOPER WAS NOT SURE IF THE RE-40 ZONING WAS EVEN ESTABLISHED
PRIOR TO ].985.
MR. RAIMI ALSO ASKED THE BOARD TO CONSIDER THAT THE OWNERS OF
BOTH LOT 8 AND LOT 9 HAVE NOT OBJECTION TO THE ENCROACHMENT.
AGAIN MR. COOPER NOTED THAT THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT THE
BOARD CAN GRANT BECAUSE OF NON-OBJECTION.
MR. MATTHEWS WAS ADVISED THAT ALL THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY
OWNERS WITHIN A 200 FOOT RADIUS WERE NOTIFIED OF THIS PUBLIC
HEARING. NO NEIGHBORS WERE PRESENT.
A LENGTHY DISCUSSION FOLLOWED CONCERNING WHETHER THE BOARD
SHOULD CONSIDER THE STORAGE BUILDING ON LOT 8 WHICH
ENCROACHES ON THE SETBACK AS A FACTOR IN CONSIDERING THIS
VARIANCE.
PAGE 4
MR. COOPER THEN REVIEWED THE CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
VARIANCES. MR. PRIORE NOTED THAT THE BOARD MUST FOLLOW AS
CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE TO THE REQUIRED RULES AND REGULATIONS AS
OUTLINED IN THE ORDINANCES.
MRS. HEINICKE NOTED THAT SOME BOARDS DO VOTE FROM THEIR
HEARTS MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. SHE FELT THAT PENALIZING THE
BUILDER FOR HIS MISTAKE WOULD CREATE A HARDSHIP FOR HIM. THE
HOUSES ARE NOT SO CLOSE TOGETHER THAT THEY WOULD BE AN
EYESORE.
MOTION BY MRS. HEINICKE, SECONDED BY MR. HUSK TO GRANT THE
VARIANCE iN REGARDS TO LOTS 9 AND 9A, ROSELAND ACRES, FOR A
BUILDING THAT ENCROACHES APPROXIMATELY 2.54 FEET INTO THE
REQUIRED 20 FOOT SETBACK (SECTION 20A-3.1(D)(6)(b) OF THE
SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE).
MR. PRIOR NOTED THAT IF THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED, THE BOARD
WOULD BE SETTING A PRECEDENT. MRS. HEINICKE FELT THAT THE
BOARD HAD ALREADY SET A PRECEDENT IN THESE CASES.
ROLL CALL:
YES: MRS. HEINICKE
MR. HUSK
NO:
CHAIRMAN MATTHEWS
VICE CHAIRMAN PRIORE
MR. STEPHENSON
MOTION DENIED.
MR. BARBER ASKED THAT THE VOTE ON THiS VARIANCE NOT REFLECT
NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF PRUDENTIAL BUILDERS WHICH WAS THE
RESULT OF AN HONEST MISTAKE MADE BY HIS MASON. MR. MATTHEWS
STATED THAT THIS WAS NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS NEGLIGENCE ON
THE PART OF THE BUILDER.
MOTION BY MR. PRIORE, SECONDED BY MR. STEPHENSON, TO DENY THE
VARIANCE IN REGARDS TO LOTS 9 AND 9A, ROSELAND ACRES, FOR A
BUILDING THAT ENCROACHES APPROXIMATELY 2.54 FEET INTO THE
REQUIRED 20 FOOT SETBACK (SECTION 20A-3.1(D)(6)(b) OF THE
SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE).
ROLL CALL: YES:
CHAIRMAN MATTHEWS
VICE CHAIRMAN PRIORE
MR. STEPHENSON
NO:
MRS. HEINICKE
MR. HUSK
MOTION CARRIED.
PAGE 5
PUBLIC HEARING - BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, IN
REGARDS TO LOT 12, BLOCK 29, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 1, HAS
REQUESTED A VARIANCE TO ALLOW WASTEWATER FACILITIES IN THE
REAR YARD, WHEREAS THE ORDINANCE (SECTION 20.A-5.6. OF
SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE) REQUIRES THE PLACEMENT OF
SUCH FACiLITiES IN THE FRONT OR SIDE YARD.
MR. MIKE DURRANT, DIVISION MANAGER OF BURGOON BERGER
CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, WAS PRESENT
REPRESENTING MR. & MRS. DISIENA, OWNERS OF LOT 12, BLOCK 29,
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 1.
WHEN MR. & MRS. DISIENA PURCHASED LOT 12, BLOCK 29, SEBASTIAN
HIGHLANDS UNIT 1 ON BANYAN STREET, THERE WAS NO HOUSE ON LOT
13 DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH OF THIS LOT. THE PROBLEM IS CAUSED
BY A HOME TO THE NORTH REAR OF THIS LOT WHICH HAS A SEPTIC
SYSTEM IN THE BACK YARD. THE HOUSE TO THE NORTH OF LOT 12
(LOT 11) HAS A WELL IN THE FRONT SOUTH CORNER. ALSO, THE LOT
TO THE SOUTH (LOT 13) HAS BOTH AN IRRIGATION WELL AND A
POTABLE WELL IN THE NORTH REAR YARD. THESE CONDITIONS WILL
NOT ALLOW BURGOON BERGER TO PUT A SEPTIC SYSTEM ANYWHERE ON
LOT 12. THE LOT iS CURRENTLY UNBUILDABLE.
BURGOON BERGER PROPOSES TO MOVE THE POTABLE WELL ON LOT 13
FROM THE REAR NORTH CORNER OF THE LOT TO THE REAR SOUTH
CORNER OF THEIR LOT. THiS WILL ALLOW PLACEMENT OF A SEPTIC
TANK AND DRAINFIELD IN THE REAR YARD OF LOT 12. THE REQUEST
IS FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW PLACEMENT OF THE SEPTIC AND
DRAiNFIELD IN THE REAR YARD OF LOT ].2 WITH THE CONDITION THAT
THE POTABLE WELL IS MOVED ON LOT 13 TO MAINTAIN A DISTANCE OF
75 FEET FROM THE DRAINFIELD. THE OWNERS OF LOT 13 HAVE
AGREED TO THIS AND A LETTER TO THIS EFFECT WAS SUBMITTED WITH
THE APPLICATION FOR THE VARIANCE.
MR. COOPER NOTED THAT THE WELL ON LOT 11 CANNOT BE MOVED
BECAUSE Of' THE EXISTING REAR SEPTIC SYSTEM ON THE LOT TO THE
REAR (LOT 8). MR. COOPER STATED THAT STAFF RECOMMENDATION
WOULD BE TO MOVE THE WELL TO A POINT OF LEAST IMPACT ON THE
VACANT LOTS ACROSS THE STREET. A CONDITION OF THE VARIANCE
MAY BE THAT THE WELL IS LOCATED AS FAR WEST AS POSSIBLE BUT
STILL MEET H.R.S. REQUIREMENTS.
MRS. HEINICKE ASKS IF THE VARIANCE WILL CAUSE LOT 7 ACROSS
THE STREET TO NEED A VARIANCE ALSO. MR. COOPER REPLIED THAT
LOT 7 ALREADY HAS A PROBLEM CAUSED BY THE WELL ALREADY PLACED
ON LOT 8 OF BLOCK 34. THE BOARD IS REQUIRED TO GRANT THE
MINIMUM VARIANCE POSSIBLE SO AS NOT TO CREATE A HARDSHIP ON
OTHER PEOPLE.
PAGE 6
MR. & MRS. GHANEY, OWNERS OF LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 34 WERE
PRESENT. THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE IMPACT ON LOT 8 BY
THE POSSIBLE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE. MR. COOPER NOTED
THAT THEY HAVE ALREADY IMPACTED THIS LOT WITH THEIR OWN WELL
LOCATED ON LOT 7.
MR COOPER RECOMMENDED A CONDITION OF THE VARIANCE BE THAT THE
WELL ON LOT 12 BE PLACED AS FAR WEST ON THE LOT SO AS TO HAVE
THE LEAST IMPACT ON THE VACANT LOTS ACROSS BANYAN STREET.
THERE FOLLOWED A LENGTHY DISCUSSION ABOUT THE DOMINO EFFECT
THESE VARIANCES CAUSE THE OTHER SURROUNDING LOTS.
TWO BROTHERS AND A SISTER-IN-LAW OF THE DISIENA PROPERTY
OWNERS WERE PRESENT. THE POINT THEY WANTED TO MAKE WAS THAT
THE LOT DID NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WHEN IT WAS PURCHASED. THE
PROBLEM CAME UP WHEN THE HOME WAS BUILT ON LOT 13. THE
HARDSHIP IS TO LOT 12 AND THEY ARE ASKING FOR THE VARIANCE TO
MAKE THEIR LOT BUILDABLE.
MOTION BY MRS. HEINICKE, SECONDED BY MR. STEPHENSON TO GRANT
A VARIANCE FOR LOT 12, BLOCK 29, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 1,
TO ALLOW WASTEWATER FACILITIES iN THE REAR YARD, WHEREAS
SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20A-5.6 REQUIRES THE
PLACEMENT OF SUCH FACILITIES IN THE FRONT OR SIDE YARD,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
WELL IS TO BE PLACED AS FAR NORTH AND
NORTHWEST AS POSSIBLE TO ALLEVIATE IMPACT
ON BLOCK 34, AND STILL MEET H.R.S.
REQUIREMENTS.
FOLLOWING A BRIEF DISCUSSION, A ROLL CALL WAS CALLED FOR.
ROLL CALL: YES:
CHAIRMAN MATTHEWS
MR. STEPHENSON
MRS. HEINICKE
MR. HUSK
NO: VICE CHAIRMAN PRIORE
MOTION CARRIED.
CHAIRMAN'S MATTERS:
COMMITTEE MATTERS:
NONE
NONE
PAGE 7
BUILDING OFFICIAL MATTERS:
THE LETTERS OF REAPPOiNTMENT FOR THE BOARD MEMBERS NEED TO BE
SUBMITTED BY ALI, MEMBERS WHO HAVE NOT YET TURNED THEM IN.
MR. PRIORE STATED THAT HIS LETTER WOULD BE TURNED IN WITHIN
THE WEEK.
NEW BUSINESS:
iT WAS REQUESTED BY SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD TO HAVE A
BLOWUP OF THE SURROUNDING LOTS PROVIDED TO ASSIST THEM WHEN
REVIEWING VARIANCES FOR REAR SEPTIC SYSTEMS. MR. COOPER
WAS IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS. HE ALSO ASKED THAT IF ANY
VARIANCE CASE PACKET WAS CONFUSING TO A BOARD MEMBER, TO
PLEASE CONTACT MR. COOPER OR JAN KING TO HELP ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
MR. STEPHENSON COMPLEMENTED THE CITY ON THE WONDERFUL PICNIC
AND ASKED THAT THEY KEEP IT UP!
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, MOTION TO ADJOURN WAS MADE
BY MRS. HEINICKE, SECONDED BY MR. STEPHENSON.
MOTION CARRIED.
THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:10 P.M.
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 n SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 [] FAX (407) 589-5570
PUBLIC MEETING
C.tTY OF SEBASTIAN
1225 MAIN STREET
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
[;'LOb[ I DA
THE SIi[;BAS'I"Ii:.'Fs/ L',O,.'hRE', C',L" AO2!_'>.','.F~VIENT '-'._",F TH.~:; ~.lfIi~.i"'~' ~'['~F'
.~NI,)[AX RiVLR (.K)UXTY, ['2;(.)Rli3A, NILL [-tOr,h~ A SPECIAL
TUESDAY, Sfi;PT]};51BL'.R i_1., 1.998, AT .3:00 'P.M. ]'N T'S[~; CITY COUNCIL
CNA}'IBER S.
SEBASTIAN ...... ARD OzA ..... _~.' ....X'.P
N(_')TE: IF ANY PERSOA' !i?i(:IDNS TO .APPEA'L ANY DECISION
THE ABOVE HATTERS, HE/SHE ~.[hL NEED A RECOND OF
PROC21[;DINGS, AND t:'{..}R SUC~'~ PURPOSES, l'[I:;;./S'}.-lI:,', HAY
rI'I~AT A VLiL{L',AI'I}I NSCORD Oll' THE PROCEEDINGS '.IS
RECORD i}%<i.'i_.t..;.}~0S "ll'[!.:.:l 'I'ESTINONY iIX ?;k'II.';i:.,;.N('},: f)h WI:.[ICff~ THE APPEAL
!S
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 [] FAX (407) 589-5570
A (i; E N D A
Tt]1"-':SDA',_', sr']PTEHBER !1, 1990
4 ("}!,D 3'dSINESS: APF'ROVE AUGt_,ST v '~ 990 ~TNUT]~S
f A R D.
(~6r'!~NIANS ~iA ERS:
C O}iH 1 T T f~', }'l] ?iA T T R R S:
7.
8.
9.
ANY PERSON WI,.{{.) DEK'!TDF, S TO i!,PPEAL AN~ DEC.IS]'ON HADE BY THE
t3(.:AI.{D OF ;kDJUSTHENT NI'Ffl ~RSPt::(;T q'('} AX¥' }I;%TTT_',N CONSIDERE;D .,¥f'
THIS HEE]TiN('3 (ON NEAL~IX(i) t~ILL NEI:]]I A RECORD
PR(}C3'3P;{.)INGS lIND HAl( P~E. Lii'} '1'O ENSURE: THAT A L'~:iRSAq'[H RECOP, O
'rt:ii{ PROCEEDINGS !'S HAD[S, WHICH RECORD .[NCLUDSS TIlE TESTIMONY
AND EViDENC3.) [;Ni)}{ NHiCH THE APPEAl, is TO ~:} [~P:ARD= (2U6.0J. 05
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 n SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 [] FAX (407) 589-5570
RIVER COUS,''!'v r, ~-, r L'I'
. ._, r LOt, IDA, WI ,_. COX'DUCT A 'mr"BT. ~,.= ~ IC HEARING
TUESDAY, SE~ImrlLgER :z, 1990 3:00 P.M. IN THE
CHAMB[ ...... RS LOCATED AT '~.~ ''>o5 MAiN STRBET, SEBAStiAN, ['LORIDA. TO
"~'R C'"'T" OF - ....
CO~IDER A VARIANCE
r~.'.<_.i~ THK _ ~ SEBAS~.IAN ,~AND
~)rx;P'roeMr:'{~' ('ODE SFiCTION 20A-3 !(D) (6) (b)
PRUDENTIAL BUILDING CO., iNC., !N R. EGARDS TO LOTS 9 AND 9A,
ROSELAND ACRES, HAS 'REQU[!iSTI:illl) A VARIANCE i?'OR A BLI'i.DING THAT
ENCROACHES APPROXiMATELI 2.54 FEET 7NTO THE REQUI'RED 20 FOOT
SETBACK.
" '""' ' "MC
KATHRYN M. ,_"}'riALL,_)hAX, ,~ /AAE
~LERt{
CITY OF SRBASTIAN
ANY PERSON WHO DECiDi£S TO APPEAL ANY D!!',CIS1ON MAD',-~ BY THE
BOARD OF ADJUSTHENT N'['li'f~ R'ESPECT 'Ii'O ANY HATTER [It.'IXSii1DI];;RE[) AT
"' ' ') ~xm(_i_,liD
THIS NE"TING { OR HEARliNG) WILL NmE[ A '~"' '" '" "' ON THE
PROCEEDIN(3S AND 5'[%Y' N/~)ED TO ENSURE TIJAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD iNCLUDES THE TESTIMONY
AND EVI.DEXC'.i: UP(DX NHICH THE APPEAL IS TO B[{} H[-".Ag:{D, (286.0].05
ff'.S. }
PUBL: SHE~.:
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 [] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 [] FAX (407) 589-5570
C T'TY OF SEI3AST'[AN
.] 225 }lAIN ST}-:?]W!'
il{DiAN RIVER COUNTY
FLORIDA
R i V E I-{ (70 [:: :T T !1, : i., ('~ R 1:3 A~ N ! L i.., C O N [1,~ ~_.: C T ,.I ~'~ ~,_.' ~.., ~."- -r C H E A R I N G
............... '¢ r-" x", :: ,"~
:'r ;~P'F:,::;'Rq ..... )...,-~.t ..... AT ~':, ~A~N S ~ SEBASTIAN, c~_~DA,
CONS J'lDi{;;f.t A VARi[ANC;' .....
D'PxrF'r (-~n,,,-c.-',T CODE ~
........ ~,', ............ r.,t..~.~.,...,: ~0 A-5,6.
i..~, ,7;,.,, ;{.-'N .~°9, UN`''~''~ , ~ , 1~.;'\!-; i[,~tl;;f~,'... [ii<'-"'! .... A V'ANIANOF:. . ~'-'~ ~, Al-Ii,OW
. [ .... -,- r ~-,~,.,- ,. ...... ~7. ~ ..... , .... X;r_!t:R'~,~ e .', - .
~.X~TF',~x,,~ z,;x ?ACI .... ~.~.E~ rN T[-~P. R~:,A,* .A 2 ...... ;':,~x THE
R~:;L.~. [ ~.,~::,e~, ,'?~.:*:~. ,, ~., :~'~ ..... ,.% "v'v[?'~:~,,..,,., ~ ,. :'.~ S. .... ~, "~-.~ r:...~ ..... ['I'I E;S .'~N '*'.~ F,~E FRONT .... OR
S I D E ' ~ "'
RATEIYN M. O '[..iALLORAX, 2P!C 'AA2
,CITY Cl.,fiR?,{
CITY OF
o~-~rx~'~'"~ r):;' .:%L),j~'S"~"~ T'F~... ~, t'¥1q'i~ ~ ..?,L.,~q~5:~'':' TO AXY }':L:I'f'TLf2~ CONS..~D~,Rr'-'''- ' ",.,[., AT
THIS MEET ' ~:('~.~ .~ ( ~Oz~" HL',AR.~N' '~'..:~ ) NIJ,,..' N ~ ', ,',,:. :_.._, ...~ l.'{ ~:' ',{:.,. .... .... ~.-~ ,-',,:',,.,: ,',,,'~ r',, r, :,
.x ...... L~ 'i"O .EN~'LR!: 'i!iA'.[' A VhP, SA'I.'x M NT:r'("ORD ,. ]
~HE PROC2;~D~XG.~ zS '~'x3!:, Cfi Rf;CORD NCLUDES THE 'r'ESTtHOXY
AND l::',k'.i I'I~:NCJ:;', ~ "' ~ ' ~' AP'P '~ ' '"'
I. b ~l.t '1.';'2': }i'L:~], ~ BF'. HFARD ( 0°6 (')~
i'~ i..' 13 !h I S i'l 1:: [ :
o,-:-, -~, .p~. t >'," " _1. 990
,r,;. F,.,. ,f.. E[,, e, ... _