HomeMy WebLinkAbout05081990City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 I:] SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330
FAX 407-589-5570
PUBLIC MEETING
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
1225 MAIN STREET
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FLORIDA
THE SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
iNDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, WILL HOLD THEIR REGULAR MEETING
ON TUESDAY, MAY 8,1990 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
K. NAPPI, SECRETARY
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD
NOTE~ IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON
THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL
IS BASED.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 8, 1990- 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
REGULAR MEETING, 4/10/90
SPECIAL MEETING, 4/24/90
OLD BUSINESS:
ATTORNEY MATTERS:
BUILDING OFFICIAL MATTERS:
NEW BUSINESS:
LETTER OF RECIPROCITY
CHRISTIAN, WILLIAM L./HARV "B"
CHANGE OF STATUS
LOSEKE, HUGO, R./BUILDING CONTRACTOR
BLOCK EXAM - GAINESVILLE
TOMLINSON, ROBERT J./TiLE & MARBLE
WHITMAN JR., WILLIAM N.,/RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR
REECE, THOMAS M./PAINTING SUB-CONTRACTOR
DISCUSSION: JOHN MASLOW, MASLOW CONSTRUCTION - SUB-
CONTRACTORS
DISCUSSION: NUMBER OF TIMES BLOCK EXAM CAN BE TAKEN WITHIN A
PERIOD OF A YEAR.
DISCUSSION: ROGER L. REESE/BRUCE FERGUSON
VOLUNTEERS FOR BLOCK EXAM - MAY 12, 1990
REGISTER SCORES IN SCOREBOOK
15 MINUTES TO PUBLIC
ADJOURN
NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON
T H E A B OV E __ MAT T-~:!~'~ ~__HE ~?~{E. '. W ILL.. ~._R E_CQ~_O~_ ._..~']~.,~ , ~
PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL
IS BASED.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOAR____~_D
REGULAR MEETINg
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY VICE CHAIRMAN LAMAN AT 7:30
P.M.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: MR. KELLEY
MR. NEUBERGER
MR. DERNBACH
VICE CHAIRMAN LAMAN
ABSENT:
CHAIRMAN CAREY - EXCUSED
MR. CAPP - EXCUSED
MR. HANEY - UNEXCUSED
ALSO PRESENT:
MR. COOPER, BUILDING OFFICIAL;
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
MR. BONACCI,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION BY MR. NEUBER~ER, SECONDED BY MR. KELLEY THAT THE
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF 4/10/90 AND THE SPECIAL
MEETING OF 4/24/90 BE ACCEPTED AS WRITTEN.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
LETTER OF RECIPROCITY
CHRISTIAN, WILLIAM L./HARV "B".
MOTION BY MR. NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY MR. DERNBACH TO ACCEPT
THE LETTER OF RECIPROCITY FROM WILLIAM CHRISTIAN TO BE A HARV
"B" CONTRACTOR- CARRIED.
CHANGE OF STATUS
LOSEKE, HUGO, R./BUILDING CONTRACTOR
MOTION BY MR. DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. KELLEY TO ACCEPT MR.
LOSEKE'S CHANGE OF STATUS.
CARRIED.
BLOCK EXAM - GAINESVILLE
TOMLINSON, ROBERT J./TILE & MARBLE
WHITMAN JR., WILLIAM N.,/RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR
PAGE 2
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - 5/8/90
BLOCK EXAM - GAINESVILLE cont
REECE, THOMAS M./PAINTING SUB-CONTRACTOR
MOTION BY MR. NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY MR. KELLEY THAT WE
ACCEPT THE APPLICATIONS OF MR. TOMLINSON, MR. WHITMAN AND MR.
REECE AND SPONSOR THEM FOR THE BLOCK EXAM IN GAINESVILLE.
CARRIED.
BUILDING OFFICIAL MATTERS
MR. COOPER TOLD THE BOARD THAT IN REGARDS TO THE PROPOSED
ORDINANCE 0-90-03 WHICH IS THE 1990 ELECTRICAL CODE DRAFTED
BY THE ATTORNEY, HE HAD CHECKED WITH THE STATE AND WAS TOLD
THE STATE HAD ADOPTED THE CODE IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE WILL BE ON THE AGENDA NEXT WEDNESDAY FOR A
FIRST READING BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SET FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
IT SHOULD BE ADOPTED WITHIN THE MONTH.
ALSO, 0-90-04, THE AMENDMENTS DISCUSSED BY THE BOARD
CONCERNING CHANGING THE SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS TO BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE COUNTY, AMENDMENTS IN THE LICENSING
EXAMINATION FEES, REQUIREMENT OF THE COUNTY OCCUPATIONAL
LICENSE, DELETION OF 7-95, WILL BE UP FOR A FIRST READING
NEXT WEDNESDAY ALSO.
LAST MEETING THERE WAS A QUESTION ON A FINE BEING IMPOSED IN
REFERENCE TO WHETHER OR NOT MR. VAETH COULD BE FINED
INDIVIDUALLY ON SEPARATE HOUSES AS TO WHAT AMOUNT. LOOKING
AT THE OLD CODE AND TALKING TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, WITHOUT
REALLY LOOKING INTO THE CASE, HE SAID EACH CASE COULD BE
BASED ON ITS OWN MERIT.
IT WAS NOTED THAT ALTHOUGH A MOTION WAS MADE AT THE 4/10/90
MEETING BY MR. HANEY AND SECONDED BY MR. CAPP TO FINE MR.
VAETH THE MAXIMUM $500.00 ON EACH VIOLATION, MR. COOPER SAID
HE WOULD CHECK WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THE AMOUNT AND
WHETHER OR NOT THE BOARD COULD CHARGE $500.00 ON EACH
VIOLATION. THEREFORE THE MOTION AND SECOND WERE WITHDRAWN.
SINCE MR. HANEY AND MR. CAPP MADE AND SECONDED THE ORIGINAL
MOTION, AND THEY ARE NOT PRESENT AT TONIGHTS MEETING, THE
BOARD FELT THIS MATTER SHOULD BE HELD OVER UNTIL THE JUNE
MEETING.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - 5/8/90
BUILDING OFFICIAL MATTERS cont
MOTION BY MR. NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY MR. DERNBACH TO TABLE
THIS UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING WHEN THE TWO MEMBERS INVOLVED ARE
PRESENT TO TAKE UP WHETHER OR NOT THEY WANT TO RE-INSTATE OR
RE-ADD THE FINE TO MR. VAETH IN THE THREE SEPARATE
VIOLATIONS.
CARRIED.
IN REGARDS TO THE AMOUNT OF INSURANCE REQUIRED FROM THE
CONTRACTORS, MR. COOPER SAID HE DID NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO GET
CONFIRMATION ON THE AMOUNTS.
ALTHOUGH THE BOARD FELT THE AMOUNTS SHOULD BE LEFT AS THEY
ARE, MR. COOPER SAID HE WOULD STILL CHECK INTO IT JUST FOR
THE INFORMATION.
DiSCUSSiON:
JOHN MASLOW, MASLOW CONSTRUCTION - SUB-
CONTRACTORS
VICE CHAIRMAN SWORE IN MR. MASLOW.
MR. MASLOW TOLD THE BOARD THAT IN REGARDS TO THE FOUR PERMIT
APPLICATIONS, GREAT LAKES DRYWALL DID THE WORK AT 372 EASY
STREET. MASLOW CONSTRUCTION DID THE WORK AT 285 JOYHAVEN
DR., 909 FULTON WAY AND 709 DOCTOR AVENUE. HE PROVIDED THE
BOARD WITH COPIES OF HiS PAYROLL RECORDS ON THE EMPLOYEES WHO
DID THE WORK ON THE LAST THREE LOCATIONS.
IN REGARDS TO GREAT LAKES DRYWALL, ROBERT VETA, THIS MATTER
HAD ALREADY BEEN DEALT WITH.
MOTION BY MR- NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY MR. DERNBACH THAT WE
FIND NO CAUSE FOR ACTION IN THE CASE OF MR- MASLOW
ERRONEOUSLY LISTING SUB-CONTRACTORS HE DID NOT USE.
CARRIED.
DiSCUSSiON:
NUMBER OF TIMES BLOCK EXAM CAN BE TAKEN WITHIN A
PERIOD OF A YEAR.
MR. HAROLD DUFFY EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT HE HAD TAKEN THE
WRITTEN PAINTING EXAM ONCE AND THE ORAL EXAM TWICE. HE HAD
REQUESTED TO RETAKE THE ORAL EXAM AGAIN BUT WAS TOLD THAT THE
EXAM COULD ONLY BE TAKEN THREE TIMES IN THE COURSE OF A YEAR.
PAGE 4
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD 5/8/90
DISCUSSION: BLOCK EXAM cont
MR. COOPER RECOMMENDED THAT AFTER THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MOVED INTO THEIR NEW OFFICES THAT WE TRY TO COMPILE
EVERYTHING THAT WE CAN AS TO WHAT HAS BEEN ADOPTED AS RULES
AND CORRELATE IT AND BRING IT BEFORE THE BOARD FOR A MOTION
TO ADOPT IT AS THE OFFICIAL HANDBOOK.
MOTION BY MR. NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY MR. KELLEY THAT THIS
BOARD EXPRESS THAT THERE IS NO SET LIMIT AS TO HOW MANY TIMES
A PERSON CAN TAKE THE TEST PROVIDING HE MEETS ALL THE
REQUIREMENTS.
CARRIED.
DISCUSSION: ROGER L. REESE/BRUCE FERGUSON
MR. COOPER EXPLAINED THE SITUATION TO THE BOARD. (COPIES
OF LETTERS ATTACHED TO THE MINUTES.) A BRIEF DISCUSSION
FOLLOWED.
MOTION BY MR. DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. KELLEY THAT THE BOARD
DOES NOT FIND ANY CAUSE FOR ACTION IN THE COMPLAINT OF REESE
VS FERGUSON.
CARRIED.
VOLUNTEERS FOR BLOCK EXAM MAY 12, 1990
VICE CHAIRMAN LAMAN AND MR. DERNBACH VOLUNTEERED TO MEET THE
BOARD SECRETARY AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER TO SIGN IN THE
APPLICANTS FOR THE BLOCK EXAM.
MR. NEUBERGER AND MR. KELLEY REGISTERED THE SCORES INTO THE
SCORE BOOK.
THERE WAS A BRIEF DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE QUALIFIER IN A
BUSINESS HAD TO TAKE AN ACTIVE PART IN SUPERVISING THE WORK.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:30
P.M.
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 o SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330
FAX 407-S89-5570
April 20, 1990
Roger L. Reese
1596 East Lake Lane
Sebastian, FL 32958
Dear Hr. Reese:
I have attached a copy of Mr. Ferguson's response to your
allegations concernin9 whether or not Mr. Ferguson did the
roofin~ on his model home located at the corner of Barber
Street and Conchs Drive.
The information you have submitted, I have determined the
Chevy Van, license 685FZT belongs to Richard Ostrowsky. which,
Mr. Fer~uson has indicated as an employee of his firm in his
letter dated 4/8/90.
At this time I can find no violation of the city code but', I
will be forwardin9 this matter to the Construction/Licensinq
Board meetin9 of May 14, 1990 (?:30 P.M.) for their review
and the Board will determine if there is sufficient
information to request a hearin9 on this matter. .,
I will try to answer your questions concernin9 "Can a first
time home builder do whatever he chooses after he pays
lip service to the City by fillin9 out a form that may or may
not have the truth printed on it? What rights does this
leave for a buyer of these types of properties?" First,
these types of properties are single family houses that must
meet minimum applicable codes. As in any form attestin9 to
be true and correct, it is presumed to be correct unless
otherwise verified.
The City requests the name of subcontractors to verify
whether or not the subcontractors are properly licensed and
insured. The City 9ocs one step further and requires a
Roger Reese
4/20/90
Page 2
,/
postcard to be made out to the subcontractor listed on the
application and the City will notify this contractor that his
or her name is utilized on the permit application. Also, if
a contractor is listed and is not properly licensed or
insured, the City requires a statement of fact that the
contractor is aware of this situation and will not use that
contractor until such person becomes licensed and insured.
Of course, this is more of an enforcement tool to be used in
case we find that he is not telling the truth. ! will also
be hiring a part-time enforcement officer to work during the
week and weekends to verify licensing of subcontractors.
If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at 589-5537.
Sincerely, ·
' Director of Community Development
BC/gk
reese.doc
April 10, 1990
Roger L. Reese
1596 East Lake Lane
Sebastian, FL 32958
Dear Mr. Cooper,
As per our conversation on Friday, April 6th, 1990, I am
putting into writing the situation we talked about on Monday,
April 2nd during a phone conversation.
As you are aware, a contractor by the name of Bruce Ferguseon
is building a model home on the corner of Barber St. and Concha Dr..
I protested the fact that he is building the house by letter to
the planning and zoning board, but my protest and that of my
neighbor were ignored and the model home was allowed. I can live
with that. But, if I have to, then the contractor will live up
to his end of the deal by constructing the house within the codes
and in the manner stated on his building permit application. After
all, the public will be entering the premises on the assumption
it was built correctly.
On that subject, Mr. Ferguseon listed himself as the roofing
contractor. However, He did not do the job nor was he there to
supervise the roofing nor was anyone other than the four men
physically doing the shingling ever on the roof. What does this
mean? Can a first time home builder do whatever he chooses after
he pays lip service to the city by filling out a form that may or
may not have the truth printed on it? What rights does this leave
for a buyer of these types properties? "Buyer Beware" was not
meant to be the the city motto. ~
I stated earlier that what I Want is for this builder to do
the things he stated he would on that building application, if
he doesn't, then I will be questioning his intentions with more
phone calls and letters and make you and the city do the right
thing.
There were four men doing the roofing on Saturday, March 31st.
They had two vehicles on the job site most of the day. One
vehicle was an older pick-up truck and the other was a blue chevy
Vandura, Fla. License No. %685-FZT. I watched them do. the work
and I will swear they had no supervision from Bruce Ferguseon.
I woUld like to know if these people were licensed to do this kind
of work. If they are emPloyees of Mr. Ferguseon in which case
they would be on his payroll and he could produce records to prove
that fact. If they are licensed contractors, why were they not
listed on the application.
I want you to know that I am watching over what goes on, not
as some person with nothing else to do but as a person with concerns
about how this city operates and it's ability to protect its citizens.
Sin ely~ _~
~er L. Reese
RECEIV'ED APR 1 0 1990
bt/he
~)