HomeMy WebLinkAbout07141992SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD
JULY 14g 1992 - 7=30, P.~...
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN LAMAN AT 7=30
ROLL CALL=
PRESENTs
MR. NEUBERGER
MR. HANgY
MR. CAPP
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH
CHAIRMAN LAMAN
ABSENTs
MR. KELLEY - EXCUSED
MR. MOSBY - EXCUSED
ALSO PRESENT: BRUCE COOPER, BUIbDING OFFICIAL; GEORGE
BONACCI, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR; BOB NICHOLSON, CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER~ RICK TORPY, ASSISTANT CITY ATTO~Y.
CHAIRMAN LAMAN REQUESTED THAT A SHORT RECESS BE TAKEN.T.O
ALLOW THE BOARD MEMBERS. TO COMPLETE THE REVIEW
APPLICATIONS.
7=37 P.M.
7s43 P.M. WITH ALL PRESENT.
APPROVAL OF MINUTESs
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY MR-. MEUBERaER TO ADOPT THE
MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEW'TING OF 6./9/92.
MOTION CARRIED.
BLOCK EXAM
ANDERSON-SMITH, MERVYN/RESIDRNTI. AL CONTRACTOR
MCCULLY, WILLIAM/ROOFING UNLIMITHD
NETTLES, WILLIS R./LANDCLEARING, GRADING
REINHARD, RAY/QLASS & GLAZING
RICHARDSON, DARReLL/STUCCO/PLAStERING
MOTION BY ViCE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. NEUBERGER
TO ACCEPT THE APPLICATION OF ~R. ANDE~ON-SNITH, MR. MCCULLY,
MR. REZNHARD AND MR. RICHARDSON. ~=
NOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. CAPP THAT
FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION THAT WE MOVE TO ACCEPT. MR.
METTLE'S APPLICATION FOR THE BLOCK EXAM.
PAGE2
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - RBGULAR MEETING -'7/14/92
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH NOTED THAT ON MR. NETTLE'S APPLICATION
THAT HE HAD A LOT OF EXPERIENCE AS A CITRUS PRODUCTION
MANAGER. HE ASKBD HR. NETTLES HOW. THIS TYPE OF EXPERIENCE
RELATED TO LANDCLEARING.
MR, NETTLES EXPLAINED THAT HE WAS INVOLVED IN THE DEVELO~ENT
O~ C.I.TRUS PRODUCTION .AND THAT HE MOULD TAKE A PIEC~ 0~. LAND
WITH NATIVE VEGETATION ON IT AND CLEAR, GRADE AND P.RE.PAI~ IT
FOR. CITRUS GROWTH.
MOTION CARRIED.
BLOCK EXAM - GAINESVILLE
8TUTLER, WILLSON/PAINTING
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBA~ THAT
WE ACCEPT MR. STUTLER'S APPLICATI, ON ~OR THE BLOCK EXAM ~
GAINESV.ILLE.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORAL EXAM - GAINESVlLLE
POLLY, DONNIE/ROO~ING UNLIMITED
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. HANBY, THAT
ME ACCEPT HR. POLLY'S APPLICATION TO TAKE AN ORAL BLOCK ~XAH
IN GAiNESVILLE.
MOTION CARRIED.
LETTER OF RECIPROCITY
WARREN, DANNY/HARV
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. HANEY THAT
#g kCCEPT THE LETTER'OF RECIPROCITY FOR MR. WARREN AS A HARV
#B# CONTRACTOR.
MOTION CARRIED.
CHANGE OF STATUS
BRACKETT, TOM/DRYWALL ~ CORPORATION TO INDIVIDUAL
HARSH, RODERICK/ALARM CONTRACTOR .II - QUALIFY NEW CORP.
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBA.CH THAT
WK ,ACCEPT THE CHANGE OF STATUS FOR TOM BRACKETT, DRY#ALL AND
RODERICK HARSH, ALARM 'CONTRACTOR IX.
MOTION CARRIED.
PAGE
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - 7/'22/92
VIOLATIO~ ~EARX~NGS
HARVEY E. KOEHNEN/PACE 2000
1673 BARBER ST./1620 STONECROP ST.
ATTORNEY STEPHEN NAVARETTA NAS PRESENT, REPRESENTING HR.
HAI~VEY KOEHNEN. :MR. DAVID MILLIGAN WAS ALSO PRESENT AT THE
'ME.ETIHG.
ATTORNEY NAVARETTA HAD LETTERS FROH ST. LUCIE AND MARTIN
COUNTY AND PORT ST. LUCIE ATTESTING TO THE EXCELLENT RECORD
OF HR. KOEHNEN. THESE LETTER8 WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CLSRK.
ATTORNEY NAVARETTA WANTED TO DISCUSS SEVERAL LEGAL AND
TECHNICAL PROBLEMS HE HAD WITH THIS PROCEEDING.
ATTORNEY NAVARETTA FORMALLY OBJECT'KD TO THIS PROCEEDING, TO.
YOUR KXERCISE OF JU,RiSDICTION OVER OUR CLIENT AND HE.',',BELI-EVKD
IT VIOLATED FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS.'
AT. THE'MAY 12TH MgETIN(~, PACE 2000.'WA8 FOUND TO BE IN
VIOLATION OF SEBASTIAN CODE OF ORDINANCES, SEC. 7~99(B) AND
7-100(2)., AT THAT MEg. TING SOMEONE SOGGESTED THAT THEY SHOOLD
ALSO BE CHARaED WI.TH 8gC. 7'100(1)'~ '~ILLFUL AND DELI~tR!ATg
DISREGARD 0F THE BUILDI,NG CODES..
PACE 2000 WAS BROUHHT BACK BE'FORE.THE BOARD AT THI'S MEETING
IN REGARDS TO VIOLATION OF SEC. ?-100(1). IT WAS THEIR"
O.~INION, (NAVARETTA) THAT THIS IS FUNDAMENTALLY UNFAIR.~
THEY ALSO FELT THE NOTICE WAS DEFICIENT BECAUSE iT DID NOT
S~F~CIFY THE BUILDING CODE THAT WAS BEINa VIOLATED, THEREFORE
ALSO VIOLATING FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS.
IT WAS NOTED THAT MR. KOEHNEN.I~ STATE CERTIFIED, TH~EFORE
ACCORDING.TO STATE STATUTES CHAPTER' 489, THE BOARD C~N NOT
EXERCIS!E DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST. A STATE CERTIFIED
CONTRACTOR.
ATTORNEY TORPY SAID THAT SINCE THIS,IS A DUE PROCESS HEARINg,
ANY REFERENCE TO THE MAY 12TM HgAR,~NG IS OF NO RELEV~ANCE, TO.
THE CHARGES THAT ARE BEIN~ BROUGHT THIS E~ENI'NH AND.HE
OBJECTED AS A MATTER OF RECORD TO. ltRY REFERENCE OF THE
12TH HEARIN~ BEi'I~.,B.ROUGHT UP.-THtSii'i~VgNIN~ TO THIS BOARD,..,,,':,
THOSE ARE MATTERS"THAT CAN BE RAISED ON APPEAL WITH R~GARD TO
THAT'CASE AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED BY THIS BOARD':~THIE
EVENING.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - 7/14/921
CHAIRMAN LAHAN TOLD ATTORNEY NAVARKTTA TO CONTINUE..
ATTORNEY NAVARETTA 'TOLD THE BOARD THAT THE ORDER
MAY~2THiHEARING R~SULTED FROM A' VOTE FROM T#O PEOS~K
'.HAVE"AN ~CTDAL coNFLICT OF INT~SST,IN THIS MATTER -
CHAIRMAN DERNBACH AND MR~ KELLEY'BYRSASON THAT THKY~BInON A
COQPLK OF THKSE JOBS THAT ARK THS~,.S'OBJECT MATTER,.OF THIS
PROCI~EDING.
ATTORNEY NAVARETTA BAID.~SINCE THE HEARINg ON NAY 12TH
VIOLATED FUNDAMBNTAL,DUE PROCESS AND VIOLATED CHAPTSR 409',
SUB, SEC. 127, SOB 4, SUB O, #HICH PRECLUDES THIS BO~D FROM
EXEB.CISINg DISCIPLINE OVER A ST'ATE CERTIFIED CONTRACTO~
BECAUSE OF THE CONFLICT OF INTKRES~ R.EASONS AND BECAU,~.E:
B~SI~ALLY BELIEVE THAT TYPE 0~ DISCIPLINE CAN NOT
OVER A STATE CERTIFZ.ED CONTRACTOR, WE HEREBY DKMANDA~
REQUEST THAT THE ORDERS OF MAY 12TH ON BOTH CASE'S BE..SET
ASIDE AND VACATED BY THIS BOARD....
DAVK MILL~GAN OF DAVE MILLIGAN NAS~NRY WAS PRESENT AT ..THEE
MEETING. HE WAS THE UNLICENSED SUB-CONTRACToR ON
CHA-~RNAN. LAMAN SWORE IN MR. MILLigrAM.
ATTORNEY' TO~PY ASKED MR. MILLIGAN IF PACK 2000 HAD
A COPY OF:HIS LICENSE AND HE SAID Y~S, BUT HE DID NO
THEM A COPY OF IT.
CHAIR'NAN LAMAN S#ORE IN MR. HARVEY KOEHN. KN.
MR.. KOEHNEN TOLD THE BOARD THAT ~N REGARDS TO THE FIRST CASE
THAT IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT IT WAS NOT #ILLFUL. MR. M~.~LIGAN
WAS LISTED ON THE FORM BKCAUSK #K THOUGHT HE WAS L~C~gED.
CHAIRMAN LAMAN NOTED THAT AN ACKNO#LKDGMKNT FORM HAD. BEEN
SIGNED BY GUI'DO, AN AGENT FOR THE COMPANY SHO#INg PACE #AS
AWARE THAT MR. MILLIGAN #AS NOT LICENSED.
ATTORNEY TORPY GAVE THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORMS TO MR. KOEHNEN,
ONE #AS FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 333 SIGNED BY'~A REPRESENTATIVE OF
PACE 2000 DATED 3/26/92, THE OTHER GMS'iS FOR LOT 4, BLOCK
401, UNIT~ -11, DATED 3/17/92 AGAIN SIGNED BY A REPRESENTATIVE
OF PACK 2000. THESE #ERE OFFERED ~-NTO THIS CASK AS SXH.IBITS.
PAGE 5
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - R~GULAR - 7/14/92
ATTORNEY TORPY ASKED MR. KOEHNEN IF HE WAS AWARE THAT
MILLIGAN WAS NOT LICENSED AT THE TINg WORK HAS BEING DONE ON
THE SITS. S.,
HR. KOgifNgN SAID NOT AT THE FIRST HOUSE, AT THE SECOND HOUSE
HE KN~W HE' ~A.S~ NOT LICENSED BECAUSE THEY HERE TRYING T-O GET
HIS HORKMAN'S COMP. MR. NXLLIGAN TOLD PACE 2000 ~THAT 'THERE
HAS NO PROBLEM AND THEY TOOK HIM AT~ HIS HOED. PACE 2000, AT
THAT TIME, THOUGHT"~R'. NILLIGAN D~D GET HIS LICENSE.
ATTORNEY TORPY ASKED GUIDO GREGORIS TO CONE TO THE
MICROPHONE.
CHAI'~MAN.~LAMAN SHORE IN GUIDO
MR. GREGORI8 TOLD THE BOARD THAT HE'HAD BEEN EMPLOYED BY! PACE
2000 ~OR THREE Y.EARS~=.
ATTORNEY TORPY ASKED NR.,.GREGORIS i!~='HE HAg NOTIFIED :BY AN
EMPLOYEg'OF THE CITY THAT MR~ MILlikAN DID' NOT HAVE '.CHg'
PROPER L~CENSE TO BE HORKiNG IN THE CITY= OF~ SEBASTIAN&. THE
ANSWER HAS YES. MR'.. GR'ECvORI.S SAiD. THAT H'E NOTiF.IEDM~.
· MiLLIGAN THAT HE HAD 'TO GET HIS:=LI<~EHSE IN ORDER.. H~ SA.ID
TH'AT .MR..NILLIGAN TOL~ HIM THAT i.T"'~A8 TAKEN CARg. O~. rAND.THAT
HE TOOK HtN-AT HIS.'.HORD.
ATTORNEY TORPY ASKED MR..MILLI~AN=.TO CONE UP TO 'THE
CHAIRNAN LANAN REMINDED HiN"THAT .H~ HAS STILL.
MR. MILLIGAN TOLD PACE 2.000 THAT HE WOULD HAVE HIS LiiCENSE
TAKEN CARE OF BEFORE THE NEXT
ATTORNEY TORPY REQUESTED THAT A FZV'~ M-INUTE RECESS BE TAKEN.
RECESSED AT 8~35 P.M. ~"
REOPeNED'AT 8.t40 P.M. WITH ALL PRE~[qT.
ATT~NKY TORPY SAID THAT ~ITH REGARD WITH THE NOTICE OE
VIOLATION FOR SEC. 7-'~00(1) WHICH IS THE SUBJECT FOR TH-IS
gVEN.INGS HEARiNg, THE .CITY A.T THIS 'TINg IS GOIN~'~Tt
TRE~,=R CHARGE A~ ~OOLD~RE0.OB8~ T'~.AT THE .BOARD TAK'~E
kW
PAGE 6
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - 7/14/92
MOTION BY MR. NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY MR. HANEY THAT TH~ BOARD
TAKE NO ACTION ON THE CASE OF HARVEY HOEHNEN, VIOLATION $'EC.
?-~00(~), WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE D~SREGARD"OF THE BU.~LD.I_NG
CODES.
DXSCUSSION~ MR. HANEY ASKED IF THIS WAS FOR BOTH CASE'S,,
ATTORNEY TORPY SAID THIS WAS JUST FOR THIS EVENINGS HEARING
BUT ON BOTH CASES.
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH ASKED ATTORNEY TORPY THAT HAVING BID
WORK FOR PACE 2000 AND HAVING NOT GOTTEN THE CONTRACT~ IF HE
SAW A CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
ATTORNEY TORPY 8AID THAT HE SHOULD DECLARE A POTENTIAL
~NFLICT BUT THAT DOES NOT PROHIBIT YOU FROM VOTING ON THIS
ROLL CALL= AYES~
MR.. NEUBERGER
MR. CAPP
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH
CHAIRMAN LAMAN
NAYs MR. HANEY
STEVE NAGLE/DRYWALL WORLD
1626 BARBER STREET
CHAIRMAN LAMAN SWORE IN STEVE NAGLE.
NOTION CARRIED.
MR. NICHOLSON GAVE A RUN DOWN OF THE CASE'
MR. NAGLE NOTED THAT HE DOES ON~q A SPRAY RIG BUT THAT~THEY
WERE. NOT USING IT AT THE TIME'OF THE VIOLATION:.
THIS CASE iNVOLVED THE USE OF A.C. DRYWALL AND SPRAY, INC.
WHICH AT THE TIME WAS NOT LICENSED IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN.
THE CASE OF A.C. DRYWALL WENT BEFORE THE BOARD AT THEIR MAY
12TH MEETING AND WAS FOOND IN VIOLATION OF NOT BEING LICENSED
IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. SI'NCE'~THAT TIME. THEY HAVE COME IN
AND'~'-EN~WED THE. IR LICENSE AND ARE CURRENTLY UP TO DAT~.
PAGE ?
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - REGULAR MEETING
FINDING OF FACT
MOTION BY MR. NEUBERGER, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DSRNBACH
TO FIND MR. STEVE NAGLE GUILTY OF VIOLATING SEC 7m~99(B), USE
OF UNLICENSED PEOPLE, GUILTY OF SEC. 7-100(2), AIDIN~ AND
ABETTING AND DROP THE CHARGES ON 7-100(1), WILLFUL AND
DELIB. ERATE DISREGARD OF THE BUILDIN~ CODES.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNB.ACH THAT.-
WE FINE DRYWALL WORLD, STEVE NAGLE, FOR VIOLATION OF 7-99(B),
THE~SUM OF $150.00 AND VIOLATION OF 7-~00(2), $~00.00.
MOTION CARRIED.
MR. NAGLE FELT THAT THE FINES WERE EXCESSIVE.
FELT THE BOARD NAS LENIENT,
CHA IR~#AN! L&MAN
PAT FINNIGAN (JOHN P. FINNIGAN)
590 BROWNING TERRACE
CHAIRMAN LAMAN SWORE IN MR. JOHN P. FINNIGAN.
MR.. FINNI.GAN TOLD THE BOARD THAT HE DID CLEAR THE LOT
THAT AT' THE TIME HE DID NOT KNO# A LAND CLEARING
NEEDED. ~S FAR AS LICENSING, THE CONTRACT WAS SIGNED
AETNA ENTERPRISES WAS QUALIFIED BY JOHN P. FINNIGAN
HE DECIDED NOT TO BUILD ANYMORE AND DECIDED TO GIVE'.IT TO HIS
SON.
THE OUES.?I.ON AROSE AS TO WHEN JOHN P. FINNIGAN III CLAWED
BE~.I.NG'.THE~QUALIF,IER FOR AE.~NA ENTERPRISES.
MR:. NICHOLSON GAVE A ROM DOWN OF THE CASE.
F.}NDING OF FACT
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY~.MR. CAPP THAT WE FSND'
JOHN P. FINNIGAN GUILTY OF VIOLATION 7-43, NO PERMIT AT S90
BRO#NING TERRACE.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY MR. HANES, SECONDED BY MR. CAPP TO FINE MR. J~HN
PATRICK FINN~iAN ~.S0.O0 FOR VIOLAT$.ON OF 7-4~, NO ~ERMIT.
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD FINE ~ WITH $100.00 SUSPENDED.
'.~Et'~HID!WITHDRAWN BY MR. CAPP.
MOTION WITHDRAWN BY MR. HANEY.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - REGULAR NEETING - 7./14/:92
NOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DgRNBACH, SECONDED BY NE..HANEY THAT
IN VIEW OF THE FINDINGS OP PACT, MR. FINNIGA~ .BE FINE ....
$15-0.O0, $1OO.00 SUSPENDED FOR VIOLATION OF SEC. 7-&3-
SEB'A!~IAN CODE OF ORDINANCES.
MOTION CARRIED.
THE. NEXT PART OF THE CASE HAD TO DO WITH AETNA
WITHOUT HAVING A LICENSED QUALIFIER,
MR. COOPER S'UGGESTED THAT THIS CASE BE CONTINUED AND',ALSO
BRING BACK NE. FINNIGAN III AND WILL ALSO VERIFY WITH, TH.E
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH POINTED OUT THAT REGARDLESS OF THE
S,TATi. US OF THE QUALIFIER FOR AETNA, ~T THE TIME THE CONTRACT
FOR ,THE CONSTRUCTION WAS SIGNED, IT WAS A CONTRACT EITHER
WRITTEN OR 'VERBAL., ENTERED INTO BETWEEN AETNA ENTERPRISES AND
RELIABLE SOMETIME PRIOR TO THE 13TH OF FEBR'O&RY, 1992'.,~.#HICH
ALSO.VIOLATES A SECTION OF' THIS CODE.
NE, COOPER ASKED MR, FINNIGAN THAT ~T THE TINE HE CALLED'
RELIABLE, IF HE' WAS REPRESENTING AETNA. MR, FINNIGAN SAID
YES. MR. FINNIGAN 'ALSO SAID THAT.THERE WAS NO AETNA
TIME. MR. COOPER NOTED THAT AT TIME HE WAS ACTING AS
UNLI.~ENSED CONTRACTOR.
MR, COOPER SAiD THAT IN VIEW OF WHAT WAS J0ST SAID HE' DID .NOT
FEEL NR. FINNIGAN NEEDED TO BE CALLED BACK SINCE HE
ADMITTING THAT AT THE TINE HE CALLED AND ACTED AS
CONTRACTOR FOR AETNA, THERE WAS NO AETNA.
CHAIRMAN LANAN SUGGESTED THAT JOHN FINNIGAN III BE
WHAT DATE DI'D HE STOP QUALIFYING AETNA. AND WHEN DID HE, START
INDIAN RIVER CARPENTRY, HE FE~T JiOHN SHOULD BE ASKED TO
BACK BEFORE THE BDARD JUST TO GIVE THE BOARD SONg D~TES.
NR. COOPER SAID HE ST'ILL #ANTED TO GET SOME VERIFICAT.I, ON
THE STATE SINCE THERE WAS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE
TESTIMONIES. (JOHN FINNIGAN III ~APPEARED BEFORE TH'g BOARDAT
THg.-NA¥ 1.2TH NESTING.)
NOTION 'BY NE. N~UBgRGgR, SECONDED BY NE. CAPP THAT,THIS CASE
BE.CONTiNUED U.N~ILii~E CAN CHECK INTO PROPER RECORDS!AND.~..DATES
AND GET ALL TH~ D~.CKS IN A ROW.
MOTION CARRIED.
NR..:~..~OO~ER ASKED NE. FINN'IGAN IS HE WAS WILLING TO .W&IVE HIS
.. RTS~S:,'TO BE NOTIFI,ED OF THE NEXT NEETING OR DO WE NKED TO
~'~.gRVE HIM. HE SAID'HE WOULD BK THERE.
PAGE 9
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - R~GULAR MKETING - 7/1.4./9'2
HOWARD J. TReMBLE/SCREEN BLDRS. II, INC.
1t0 FILBERT STREET
MR. COOPER TOLD THE BOARD THAT HE WITHDREW THIS CA.SZ~...PRON
AGENDA. IT WAS A NATTER OF A PERMI.T NOT BEING OBTA~D..'.AND
SINCE IT WAS A FIRST TINE OFFENSE, STANDARD PR~EDUR~.."g~S TO
PAY..A DOUBLE FEE.
LUKE PERINCEK/LUKE'S PAINTING CO.~
1101FELLSMERE RD., SEBASTIAN LAKES
MR. PERINCEK WAS NOT PRESENT AT THE MEETING.
MR. NICHOLSON DID A i%ECAP ON THE CASE.
FINDINGS OF PACT
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY MR. CAPP THAT WE FEND LUHE
PERINCEK OF LUKE'S PAINTING CO. GUILTY OF THE FOLLOg'ING
VIOLATIONS, 7-99(A), NO LICENSE, 7-100(1), WILLFUL AND
DELIBERATE DISREGARD OF THE BUILDING CODES AND 7-100(2).,
AIDING AND ABETTING, THIS HAVING'OCCURRED AT SEBASTIAN,s:LAKES
CONDO UNITS, 1'~01FELLSMERE ROAD, CiTY OF SEBASTIAN,'.
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH FELT THE CHARGES SHOULD BE DONE~ITH
SEPARATE MOTIONS. HE FELT THE BoARD COULDN T P~OVE #IiL~FUL
AND DELIBERATE AND HE ALSO Q~EST'IONED AIDING AND A~ETT'ING.
MR. CAPP WITHDREW HiS SECOND.
MR. HANEY gITHDREW HIS NOTION.
MOTION BY MR. HAN.~Y, SECONDED BY MR. NEUBERGER THAT ~ FIND
LUK..E PERINCEK OF LUKE'S PAINTING' GUILTY OF VIOLATION' OF 7-
99(A), NO LICENSE,
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH THAT WE FINE MR, L~K~
PERINCEK OF L~KE'S PAINTING CO. $-150.00 FOR ViOLATION~AT
SEBASTIAN LAKES LOCATED AT 1101 FELLSMERE ROAD, CITY OF
SEBASTIAN FOR VIOLATION OF 7-99(A) AND THAT MR. P~RI:NCEK IS
NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A 8EJ~STIAN LICENSE UNTIL ALL FINES ARE PAID
AND WE FURTHER ORDER~"".~ASE AND~DESiST ORDER FOR MR'.
PERINCEK OR HI~ CO%I~NY DOING ANY WORK IN SEBASTIAN,
MOTION CARRIED..
PAGE ~0
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - R~GULAR MEETING - 7/14/92
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. HANEY THAT
THIS BOARD FINDS NO FURTHER ACTION AGAINST LUKE PERINCEK FOR
VIOLATION 7-100(1) OR 7-100(2) OF THE SEBASTIAN CODE OF
ORDINANCES IN THIS MATTER.
MOTION~CARRIED
MR. NEUBERGER VOTED NAY.
RUSS THISTLE
il01FELL.SMERE ROAD, SEBA8TIAN LAKES
FINDINGS OF FACT
MOTION BY MR. HANEY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERRBACH THAT
NE FIND HR. THISTLE IN VIOLATION OF 7-99(A), UNLICEN.8'ED SOB-
CONTRACTOR AT l'101 FELLSMERE ROAD, CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
SEBASTIAN LAKES CONDOS.
.MR. HANEY STATED THAT MR, THISTLE WAS ON THE JOB, HE WAS
CHEMICALLY WASHING THE SHINGLES AS PER CONTRACT TO DO THE
PAINTING. MR. THISTLE SAID HE DID NOT WORK FOR LUKE'S
PAINTING, THAT'PUTS HIM AS A PR~P MAN FOR THE PAINTING, AS
PER THE CONTRACT.
MR. COOPER STATED THAT SINCE THE BOARD DID NOT TAKE ACTION
"~GAINST LUKE PERINCEK FOR AIDING AND ABETTING OR WILLFUL
DISREGARD OF THE BUILDING CODES' THAT IT WOULD BE HARD TO FIND
MR. THISTLE IN VIOLATION. ALSO, EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A
CONTRACT FOR PAINTING, HE WAS ONLY ON THE JOB DOX~N~
CLEANING. THE BOARD CAN NOT PROVE THAT HE WAS ~OING
PAINT.
VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH WlTHDRIW'H-IS' SECOND,
MR. HANEY WITHDREW HIS MOTION,
MOTION BY VICE CHAI.RNAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. HANIY THAT
Wg FIND NO.CAUB~ FOR ACT. ION AGAINST MR. RUSS THISTLE IN THIS
ROLL CALL~ AYES:
MR. HANEY
MR. CAPP
VICE.CHAIRMAN DERNBACH
CHAIRMAN LAMAN
NAY ~
MR. NEUBERGER
MOTION
. PAGE
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - 7/14/92
JULIUS WILLIAMS/J.W. CONTRACTORS
874.GRANDIN AVE.
MR. WILLI. AMS WAS NOT PRESENT AT. THE MEETING.
MR. NICHOLSON GAVE. A ROM DO#N ON THE CASE.
FINDINGS OF FACT
MOT~ON BY MR. ~HANEY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH.THAT
WE FIND .J.W. CONTRACTORS, JULIUS wILLIAMS, QUALIFIER, iiN~
VIOLATION OF SEC, ?-20(A), NO BUILDING PERMIT, SEC. ?'~99'(A),
NO LICENSE, AND SEC. 7-100(1), WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE
Di~,gREGARD FOR THE BUILDING CODES.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. NEUHERGER
TO FINE J.W'. CONTRACTORS, $180.00 FOR VIOLATING SEC'.
NO ~ILDING PERM. IT AT 874 GRANDIN AVE., $150.00 FOR SEC.
99(A), NOT HAVING A LICENSE AND ACTING AS A CONTRACTOR AT-THE
ABOVE REFERENCED ADDRESSED AND THAT WE FINE THEM .$..~0.00 FOR
VIOLATION OF SEC. ?-100(1), WI'LLF'uL AND DELIBERATBi:~.ISRK(~ARD,
OF THE'.BUILDING CODES, SPECIFICALLY FOR NOT HAvING. Ai~:BUiILDiNG
PE~!t~T AGAIN ~T TH~ ~BOW SE~CED ADDreSS.
MOTION CARRIED.
NOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. HAJ~JEY THAT
J.W. CONTRACTORS NOT BE ALLOWED TO 'APPLY FOR A LICENSE OR ANY
PERMITS IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN NOR SHALL THEY DO ANY WORK
IN.THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN UNTIL THESE FINES ARE PAID..,'
MR. NEUBERGER SUGGESTED THAT CO~I"ES OF ALL ORDERS BE GI,VEN TO
BREVARD, ST. LUC.IE AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTIES.
NOTION, CARRIED.
REOUEgT TO-ADDRESS THE BOARD - MICHAEL. W. HOLBRIDGE
MR. HOLBRIDGE REMOVED HIS REQUEST'TO SPEAK TO THE'IOARD.
DI.S~USSION~ FEES/~ERMITS
HAVING JUST COME BACK FROM VACATION, MR. COOPER. TOLD THE
BOARD THAT HE REALLY #AHN'T PRediCAtED TO GIVE MUCH
INFORMA~ION.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - H.EGOL.AR MEETING - ~/~/9.2
MR. COOPER SUGGESTED THAT MR. HANEY AND MR. NEUBERGER WRITE
DOWN SOME SU~ESTIONS AND GIVE ~HEM TO THE BOARD .SECRETARY TO
TYPE AND ALSO GET A COPY OF THE FEE STRUCTURE FROM INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY. THESE ALCH~G WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF ON
FEBS./:'PERMITS WILL BE BROUGHT BACK BEFORe' THE BOARD SG,,..,~HAT
THB.¥'WILL HAVE SOHZTHING TO LOOK AT.
DISCUSSlON~ FENCXN~ AROUND ABOVE GROUND POOLS
MR. COOPER NOTED THAT A SPBCIPIC SECTION OF THE CODE, R~QUIRES
A SWIMMIN~ POOL TO BE SCREENED OR FENCED IN.
THE: PREVIOUS BUILDING OFFICIAL I,NTERPRETED THAT I.F THERE WAS
A POLD UP LABDgR, THAT WAS OKAY..
M~, COOPER FEELS THAT THAT CAN NOT BE iNTERPRBTBDINTO.THE
CODES. WHAT HAPPENS IT THEY FORGET TO PULL THE LADDER
IN THE PAST, WE.-.HAVE ACCEPTED THAT TREY PENCE AROUND
LADDER PROVIDED THE ABOVE GROUND POOL IS AT LEAST
ABO~E THE GROUND.
POLLO#lNG A LENGTHY DISCUSSION, NO RECOMMENDATION ~AS' MADE BY
THE ,BOARD.
BLOCK EXAM SCORES FOR THE BLOCK EXAM WERE REGISTERED,.IN THE
SCORE BOOK BY VICE CHAIRMAN Dg'RNBACH AND MR. CAPP.
15 MINUTES TO THE PUBLIC
MR. KAVENAUGH REQUESTED .THAT HIS APPLICATION FOR WINDO#8,
DOORS AND GARAGE DOORS BE REVIE#ED BY THE BOARD. A LS~ER OF
RECIPROCITY WA'8 WiTH HIS APPLICAT~I. ON.
'MR. COOPER TOLD THE BOARD TH/~T MR. KAVENAUGH HAD TAKBN',THB
~N~AL ~AL~¥ ~AM AN~ THAT THE TRADES HE WAN~'"TO,~ BE
LZ~.Q~NSED,FOR ~LL CAME ~NDER THAT EXAH. BECAU'Sg OF THXS~HE
~EL.T~",THAT ONLY ONE APPLICATION FEE AND ONE LICENSE FBB SHOULD
BE CHARGED, AND THE/LICENSE WOULD-SHOW BOTH CATEGORIES°
MR. KAVENAOGH ALSO DOES WIRE SHBLVIN~ AND ASKED THE BOARD IF
A LICENSE WAS NEEDED FOR THIS ~YPE' OF WORK.
MOTION BY VICE CHA'~RMAN DERNBACH, SECONDED BY MR. HANEY TRAT
THE BOARD AT THI.8".T.IME FINDS THERE IS NO REASON TO ISSUE A
SPECIALTY L~CENSE TO INSTALL MB~AL SHELVING.
NOT I ON CARR I ED·
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION.BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - 7/14/92'
NOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERNBACHv SECONDED BY NRi HANEY THA~
THIS BOARD ESTABLISHES A GENERAL POLICY THAT IN CASE8 LIKE
THIS, WHERE T#O LICENSES ARE A~KED ~OR, BUT THEY REQDIRE THE
SAME:TEST, THAT AN APPLICATION PEE BE CHARGBD JUST FOR. THE
TEST, BUT THE LICENSE.~KE BE CHARGED FOR EACH CATE~:~TH.~E
LICENSEE SEEKS 'TO BE LICENSED'UNDER.
ROLL CALL~ AYES~ HR. HANBY
ViCE CHAIRMAN DERNBACH
CHAIRMAN LANAN
NAYs MR. NEUBKRGER
HR. CAPP
MOTION CARRIED.
LgTT'ER OF RECIPROCITY FOR HR. KAVENAOGHz
NOTION BY HR. H,N~Y, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN DERN~ACH THAT
WK ACCEPT MR. KAVKNAU~H'$ LETTER OF RECIPROCITY.
MOTION CARRIED.
THERE BEING NO F.URTHKR BUSINEgH, NEETIN~ ADJOURNED
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
JUL_._.~Y ldr 1992 - 7=30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES= REGULAR MEETING - 6/9/92
OLD BUSINESS=
NEW BUSINESS~
BLOCK EXAM
ANDERSON-SMITH, MERVYN./.RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR
MCCULLY, WILLIAM/ROOFING UNLIMITED
NETTLES, WILLIS R./LANDCLEARING, GRADING
REINHARD, RAY/GLASS & GLAZING
RICHARSON, DARRELL/STUCCO/PLASTERING
BLOCK EXAM - GAINESVILLE
STUTLER, WILLSON/PAINTING
ORAL EXAM - GAINESViLLE
POLLY, DONNIE/ROOFING UNLIMITED
LETTER OF RECIPROCITY
WARREN, DANNY/PLUMBING CONTRACTOR
CHANGE OF STATUS
BRACKETT, TOM/DRYWALL
HARSH, RODERICK/ALARM CONTRACTOR
VIOLATION HEARINGS
HARVEY E. KOEHNEN/PACE 2000
1673 BARBER ST.
HARVEY E. KOEHNEN/PACE 2000
1620 STONECROP ST.
PAGE 2
VIOLATION HEARINGS cont
LUKE PERINCEK/LUKE'S PAINTING CO.
1101 FELLSMERE RD., SEBASTIAN LAKES
RUSS THISTLE
1101PELLSMERE RD., SEBASTIAN LAKES
STEVE NAGLE/DRYWALL WORLD
1626 BARBER STREET
PAT FINNIGAN
~90 BROWNING TERRACE
JULIUS WILLIAMS/J.W. CONTRACTORS
874 GRANDIN AVE.
HOWARD J. TRIMBLE/SCREEN BLDRS. II, INC.
110 FILBERT STREET
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD - MICHAEL W. HOLBRIDGE
DISCUSSIONs FEES/PERMITS
DISCUSSIONs FENCING AROUND ABOVE GROUND POOLS
RECORD SCORES IN SCOREBOOK
ATTORNEY MATTERS~
1~ MINUTES TO PUBLIC
ADJOURN
NOTE~ IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON
THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD iNCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL
I8 BASED.
CONAGEN.DOC
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 780127 u SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 [] FAX (407) 589-5570
POBLIC MEETING
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
1225 MAIN STREET
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FLORIDA
THE SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, WILL HOLD THEIR REGULAR MEETING
ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 1992 AT 7t30 P.M. iN THE CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD
NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDE8 TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON
THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, ME/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, #HICH
RECORD iNCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL
IS BASED.