HomeMy WebLinkAbout09231985Jim Gallagher
Mayor
City of Sebastian
POST OFFICE BOX 127 ~ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958-0127
TELEPHONE (305) 589-5330
Deborah C. Krages
City Clerk
,~:,SEBAST]fANCCONS,TEUCTION~/BOARD.,
WORKSHOP MEETING
SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 - 7:00 P,M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
DISCUSSION - PROPOSED BUILDING PERMIT FEES
155MINUTES TO PUBLIC
ADJOURN
NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION~'/MADE ON THE
ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHEWiLL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS
AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE,SHE WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBA-
TIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH' RECORD INCLUDES.~
THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL~i.IS.~MADE.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - WORKSHOP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY. CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH AT 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
MR. DOMINIX, ALTERNATE
MR. HOFFMAN
MR. TRIPP
VICE CHAIRMAN CAREY
MR. RIZIO
MR. LAMAN, ALTERNATE
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH
MR. PALMER (ARRIVED AFTER THE START OF THE MEETING)
MR. MOLER, EXCUSED.
ALSO IN ATTENDANCE: .MAYOR"GALLAGHER, VICE MAYOR HARRIS, DEBORAH KRAGES,
CITY CLERK, HECTOR FRANCO, BUILDING OFFICIAL, COUNCILMAN VALLONE.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO FURTHER
DISCUSS THE PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE, AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR
THE UPCOMING YEAR.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED MR. FRANCO TO SUMMARIZE THE CURRENT SHORTCOMINGS
OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN TERMS OF THE BUDGET, THE NEEDS FOR THE FUTURE?
AS HE SEES IT AND THE UPCOMING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT.
HE ALSO ASKED MRS. KRAGES TO EXPLAIN HOW THE REVENUES ARE CURRENTLY BEING
COLLECTED AND HOW THEY ARE DISPERSED BACK TO THEIR RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENTS.
HE ALSO ASKED THE MAYOR TO SUMMARIZE THE PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY
AS A WHOLE AND HIGHLIGHT THE TIME CONSTRAINTS THAT WE HAVE WITH THE UPCOMING
BUDGET.
MR. FRANCO STATED THE BUDGET WAS BASED ON ONE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THKSEFULL
TIME INSPECTORS AND ONE SECRETARY. AT PRESENT TIME THE DEPARTMENT HAS ONE
FULL TIME INSPECTOR.AND THREE PART TIME INSPECTORS.
MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT BECAUSE OF THE COST INVOLVED PART TIME PEOPLE
WERE USED TO HELP SAVE ON THE BUDGET.
MAYOR GALLAGHER GAVE A BREAKDOWN OF THE PROPOSED BUDGET. TOTAL BUDGET -
$141,505.00.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH MENTIONED THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT APPROXIMATELY $220,000.00.
MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT UNDER THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THE ADDITIONAL MONEY WOULD BE USED FOR AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. THE
COUNCIL FELT THIS.iISNEEDED BY THE CiTY AND THAT AT THE TIME MR. FRANCO
WAS HIRED IT WAS THE INTENTION THAT HE WOULD EVENTUALLY MOVE INTO THAT
POSITION.
MAYOR GALLAGHER GAVE A BREAKDOWN OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH
TOTALED $67,228.45.
IN ADDITION, $4,000.00 WILL BE TAKEN OUT FOR LEGAL COUNCIL FOR P & Z AND
ALSO MONEY ALOTED TO THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE TO HIRE NEEDED HELP. NO .FIGURE
HAS BEEN SET FOR THIS.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - WORKSHOP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED WHY LEGAL COUNCIL FOR P & Z?
MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT WITH THE GROWTH.OF THE CITY AND THE NEW LAWS
ON THE BOOKS, LEGAL COUNCILWAS NEEDED.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED IF ANYONEHAD.CONSIDERED THE ENGINEERING'DEPARTMENT
SUSTAINING ITSELF AND NOT DEPEND ON THE BUILDING FEES?
MAYOR GALLAGHER SAID THAT SOME CITIES HAVE REVIEWS DONE AND THAT THE FEES
COULD COME FROM THERE.
CHAIRMANBALLOUGH ASKED MR. FRANCO IF THREE FULL TIME INSPECTORS W~RE
REALLY NEEDED?
MR. FRANCO ANSWERED YES~ THAT TO DO A DRIVEWAY ELEVATION YOU NEEDED TWO
MEN TO DO ITi AND THAT THERE WERE OTHER INSPECTIONS TO BE DONE ALSO.
MAYOR GALLAGHER SAID THE PAST 11 MONTH OPERATING STATEMENT ($75,522.68)
THE MAJORITY WAS DONE WITH THE USE OF PART TIME, TEMPORARY INSPECTORS AND
BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THAT BECAUSE OF THE UNION, WE CAN NOT CONTINUE USING
PART TIME, TEMPORARY PEOPLE.
IT IS THE CITY'S OBLIGATION TO ADOPT A BALANCED BUDGET ON OR BEFORE
,SEPTEMBER 30, 1985.
THE PRESENT BUILDING FEES HAVE BEEN ON THE BOOKS SINCE 1976.
MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT IF THE BUDGET WAS NOT ADOPTED, TAXES WOULD GO UP
AND THE CITY WOULD HAVE TO WORK WITH LAST YEARS BUDGET.
VICE CHAIRMAN CAREY STATED THAT WE HAD AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND ASKED
WHERE THE FUNDS CAME FROM FOR THIS DEPARTMENT. MAYOR GALLAGHER SAID HE
THOUGHT FROM THE GENERAL FUND.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED THE MAYOR TO WHAT'.OTHERi-'AREAS_.OF.iTHE'CITY"THE. FUNDS
~ENERATED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WOULD GO.
MAYOR GALLAGHER STATED THAT THE ELEVEN MONTHS ENDING ON AUGUST 31, 1985 OF
THE FISCAL YEAR WE ARE IN RIGHT NOW, MONEY HAS GONE INTO THE BUILDING
DEPARTMENT FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES RATHER THAN GOIN~GOUT OF THE DEPARTMENT.
THEY HAVE EXCEEDED THEIR REVENUES BY ABOUT $3,000.00. THAT MONEY IS MADE BY
GENERAL TAX MONEY FROM ANOTHER BUDGET.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED IF THIS BUDGET WAS ADOPTED AND THERE WAS AN EXCESS IN
FUNDS, WHERE WOULD THESE FUNDS GO?
MAYOR GALLAGHER SAID IT WOULD GO INTO THE GENERAL FUND AND WOULD BE ALLOCATED
INTO NEXT YEARS BUDGET.
VICE CHAIRMAN CAREY ASKED MR. FRANCO HOW MANY INSPECTIONS ARE MADE.ONAN
AVERAGE HOUSE.
MR. FRANCO ANSWERED 12.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH SUGGESTED THAT A LETTER BE WRITTEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO
ACCEPT THE PROPOSED BUDGET AND THAT THE BOARD MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
AMENDMENTS AT A LATER DATE.
SEBASTIAN CONTRUCTION BOARD - WORKSHOP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
MR. ROBERT FITZMAURICE ADDRESSED THE BOARD STATING THAT HE WAS AGAINST THE
INCREASE AND THAT HE HAD DONE SOME RESEARCH ON THE MATTER. HE READ TO THE
BOARD FLORIDA STATUTE 166.222, RE: BUILDING CODE INSPECTION FEES. HE
ALSO GAVE SOME STATISTICS ON THE NUMBER OF BUILDING PERMITS PULLED IN THE
PAST. HE WAS OPPOSED TO THE HIRING OF ADDITIONAL INSPECTORS, EXTRA OFFICE
SPACE, EXTRA FURNITURE, ETC.
HE FELT THERE WAS NO NEED TO TRIPLE FEES AND THAT HE WOULD BE AT THE NEXT
COUNCIL MEETING AND PROVIDE A BALANCED BUDGET THAT WOULD NOT INCLUDE ANY
INCREASE IN THE BUILDING FEES FOR THE NEXT YEAR.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED IF HIS BUDGET WOULD INCLUDE AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
MR. FITZMAURICE STATED THAT HE HAD TAKEN ENOUGH FAT OUT OF THE BUDGET TO
PROVIDE FOR AN "ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
VICE CHAIRMAN CAREY ASKED MR. FITZMAURICE IF HE FELT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
SHOULD BE SELF SUSTAINING TO WHICH THE ANSWER WAS YES..
MR. CHUCK NEUBERGER STATED THAT AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WAS NEEDED~AND
SINCE IT WOULD BE TAKING AWAY PROBABLY A THIRD OF THE WORK OF THE BUILDING
DEPARTMENT,.THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DID NOT NEED TO BE DOUBLED OR TRIPLED
IN SIZE.NOR DOES IT NEED FOUR BUILDING INSPECTORS. EVEN FEES ARE NEEDED,
NOT TRIPLING THE FEES.
MR. HARVEY HOLGREN, RETIRED BUILDER AND ALSO BUILDING INSPECTOR IN THE
STATE OF NEW YORK STATED THAT IT DOES NOT'TAKE TWO HOURS TO DO AN
INSPECTION AND THAT WHAT IS NEEDED IS MORE OFFICE HELP NOT MORE HELP IN THE
FIELD,.AND THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE SEPARATE FROM THE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD WORK ON THE BUDGET TO COME UP
WiTH SOMETHING FOR THE COUNCIL ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT OR RECOMMEND THE COUNCIL
PASS THE BUDGET AND THEN REDUCE IT AT A LATER DATE.
VICE CHAIRMAN CAREY FELT THE BOARD SHOULDN'T GIVE THE COUNCIL SOMETHING AND
THEN TRY TO REDUCE IT. THE FEES SHOULD BE REVISED BUT IT CAN'T BE DONE IN
A FEW DAYS.
MR. LAMAN ASKED CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH HOW FAR FROM THE PROPOSED BUDGET WAS THE
BOARD FROM GOING THROUGH IT AND COMING UP WITH A WORKING BUDGET.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH STATED THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NEEDED AND THAT IT
WAS AT LEAST A MONTH AWAY.
COUNCILMAN VALLONE SUGGESTED THAT BECAUSE OF THE LATE HOUR THEBOARD HAVE
NO RECOMMENDATION AT THIS TIME BUT HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS AT A LATER DATE OR
GIVE A GENERAL OUTLINE TO THE COUNCIL.
MR. FITZMAURICE STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN WORKING ON THE BUDGET FOR SOME TIME
AND THAT HE WOULD GIVE THE BOARD A WORKSHEET OF WHAT HE HAD DONE. HE THEN
GAVE A BREAKDOWN OF THE BUDGET HE DREW UP, THE TOTAL OF WHICH CAME TO
$88,888.00.
SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION BOARD - WORKSHOP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
MR. HOFFMAN STATED THAT HE FELT IT WAS NOT ~WE BOARDS JOB TO REWRITE A
BUDGET WHICH CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH AGREED WITH.
MR. LAMAN SUGGESTED THE BOARD TAKE 30 MINUTES WITH THE HELP OF MR. FITZMAURICE
AND HIS SUGGESTED FIGURES AND POSSIBLY COME UP WITH SOMETHING.
CHAIRMAN BALLOUGH ASKED FOR A 5 MINUTE RECESS.
BOARD RECESSED AT 9:34 P.M. REOPENED AT 9:40 P.M. WITH ALL PRESENT.
A DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARDS TO THE PROPOSED BUDGET AND THE BUDGET
MR. FITZMAURICE HAD DRAWN UP.
MOTION BY MR. TRIPP, SECONDED BY MR. DOMINIX THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE
CITY COUNCIL THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GENERATE THEIR OWN FEES AND NOT
BE PART OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
CARRIED.
MOTION BY MR. DOMINIX, SECONDED BY MR. TRIPP TO REMOVE THAT PORTION FROM THE
BUDGET (BUILDING DEPARTMENT) THAT REFERS TO P & Z.
DISCUSSION: MR. TRIPP ASKED IF THAT PORTION OF THE BUDGET REFERRED TO LEGAL
FEES TO WHICH THE ANSWER WAS YES.
MR. DOMINIX STATED THAT P & Z DOES GENERATE THEIR OWN FEES AND SHOULD BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OPERATIONS.
CARRIED.
MOTION BY VZCE"CHAIRMAN CAREY, SECONDED By'MR. HOFFMAN TO TAKE B~DGET WORKED
ON TO COUNCIL FOR ACCEPTANCE AND.THEN AT A LATER DATE THE BOARD WILL R~V!SE
THE BUILDING PERMIT F~S AND TAKE. TO COUNCIL. ~
CARRIED.
MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN CAREY, SECONDED BY MR. DOMINIX TO ADJOURN MEETING.
CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:00 P.M.