Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07091986CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - JULY 9~ 1986 - 2:00 P.M. MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN LEWIS AT 2:00 P.M. ROll CALL: PRESENT: MR. GRAY MR. BLOME VICE CHAIRMAN O' CONNOR MR. MCCLEARY ATI~0RNEY GORE CHAIRMAN LEWIS ABSENT: NONE ALSO PRESENT: TOM PALMER, CITY ATIORNEY, ROGER CLOUTIER, BUILDING OFFICIAL, VICE MAYOR, KEN ROTH. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. MCCLEARY, SECONDED BY MR. BLOME TO APPROVE MINUTES OF 5/14/86 AS READ. CARRIED. AYTORNEY' S MATINS: AYTORNEY GORE STATED THAT AT THE LAST MEETING IT WAS A SUGGESTION TO WRITE A LETIZ~ TO MR. BALIOUGH STATING THAT IN THE EVENT HE COMMITS A VIOLATION OF THE CODE, THE BOARD WILL IMPOSE A FINE ANDTHE BOARD WOULD REIMPOSE A FINE FOR EACH VIOLATION THAT OCCURS. A LEITER WAS NOT SENT DUE TO THE FACT THAT IF A VIOLATION IS FOUND, THERE MUST BE A HEARING TO INFORM MR. BALLOUGH THAT ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS WILL BE REGARDED AS A VIOLATION OF THE BOARD AND AN ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT RENDERED. ON THE ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT FOR MR. VORATH, THE BOARD REQUESTED THE ORDERS BE PRESENTED PRIOR TO THEM BEING SIGNED. UPON SIGNING THE ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT, ATIORNEYGORE SAID HE WOULD PREPARE A CERTIFICATION OF FINE FOR CHAIRMAN LEWIS TO SIGN. CERTIFICATION WILL BE ASSESSED FROM MARCH 12 TO MAY 14, 1986 FOR $950.00. ATTORNEY GORE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE STILL HAD CERTIFICATION OF FINES FOR MR. KEPLER AND MR. TAYLOR AND THAT HE NEEDED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR BOTH BEFORE THEY COULD BE RECORDED. A LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS ALSO NEEDED FOR MR. VORATH. OLD BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-5 - BALIOUGH MR. CLOUTIER PRESENTED PICIIRESHE HAD TAKEN PRIOR TO THE MEETING SHOWING THE THE LOT HAD BEEN CLEANED UP OF BUILDING EQUIPMENT. MOTION BY MR. MCCLEARY, SECONDED BY MR. BLOME TO CLOSE CASE NO. 86-5. CARRIED CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - JULY 9, 1986 CASE NO. 86-7 - VORATH CASE WAS DISCUSSED UNDER ATTORNEY'S MAYTERS. CASE NO. 86-47 - GEHRKE MR. CLOUTIER STATED THAT AS OF 5/21 THE TRUCK WAS GONE. MOTION BY MR. MCCLEARY, SECONDED BY MR. NEW BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-118 - LIN-MARC KENNELS GRAY TO CLOSE CASE NO. 86-47. CARRIED. MR. CLOUTIER TALKED WITH THE OWNERS WHO INFORMED HIM THAT THEY WOULD BE ON VACATION AND REQUESTED THEIR CASE BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE AUGUST MEETING. THE BOARD AGREED TO THIS. CASE NO. 86-74 - COCUZZA MR. CLOUTIER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE VIOLATION WAS CLEARED UP AND NO lONGER EXISTS. MR. CLOUTIER PRESENTED PICTURE TAKEN AT NOON TO THE BOARD FOR CASE NO. 86-73 AND 86-111. CASE NO. 86-73 - PATTON MR. CLOUTIER STATED THERE IS STILL A BOAT WITH A DISMANTLED TRAILER, WHEELS OFF, PILE OF CONCRETE BLOCKS, MISCELLANEOUS BloCKS AND WOOD. HE RECOMMENDED THE BOARD IMPOSE A FINE UNTIL EVERYTHING IS CLEANED UP AND GIVE THEM A TEN DAY GRACE PERIOD AFTER WHICH THEY BE FINED $25.00 A DAY UNTIL IT IS CLEANED UP. ATIORNEY GORE SWORE IN MR. PATRON. AITORNEY GORE ASKED MR. PATTON IF HE WAS AWARE HE HAD BEEN CITED FOR VIOLATION OF SEC. 16.1, 16.11, 16-2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. MR. PATRON REPLIED YES. ATIORNEY PALMER SDIT~D THAT MARY PAYTON SIGNED FOR A CERTIFIED LETTER ON MAY 21, 1986 FROM %HE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD. MR. PA%TON INFORMED THE BOARD II'AT SHE IS HIS DAUGHTER BUT DOES NOT LIVE WITH HIM AND THAT HE NEVER RECEIVED THE LEITER. MOTION BY MR. GRAY, SECONDED BY MR. BLOME THAT A GENERAL CLEANUP BE DONE IN 10 DAYS FROM THiS MEETING AND A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR WORK ON THE POOL AREA GIVEN TO MR. CLOUTIER. IF NOT DONE, IMPOSE A $25.00 A DAY FINE UNTIL THE VIOLATION IS TAKEN CARE OF. ROLL CALL: AYES: MR. GRAY MR. BLOME VICE CHAIRMAN O' CONNOR MR. MCCLEARY CHAIRMAN LEWIS NAYS: NONE CARRIED. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - JULY 9, 1986 ATTORNEY GORE - FINDING OF FACT - PRESENTLY ON PROPERTY, JUNK, DEBRIS AROUND BOAT, OTHER JUNK REMOVED FROM LAWN, COPY OF CONTRACT REGARDING WORK ON THE POOL ENCLOSURE IS TO BE PROVIDED. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IS %Iq_AT MR. PATTON IS IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 16, SEC. 16.11, 16-2, 16-0. ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT WILL STATE THAT MR. PATION WILL OBTAIN A CONTRACT REGARDING IMPROVEMENT ON POOL ENCLOSURE AREA, DEBRIS WILL BE MOVED FROM AROUND THE BOAT AND WEEDS AND OTHER GROWTH BE REMOVED FROM AROUND BOAT. IF NOT ACCOMPLISHED IN 10 DAYS FROM TOMORROWS DATE, THE BOARD WILL IMPOSE A FINE OF $25.00 PER DAY. CASE NO. 86-111 - ROBERTS MR. CIDUTIER TOLD THE BOARD THERE WAS A BOAT IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE, RED PICKUP TRUCK IN BACK OF THE HOUSE, PILE OF PALLETS, BODY OF VAN. FRONT PART OF HOUSE HAS BEEN CLEANED UP. ATTORNEY GORE- FINDING OF FACT - WILL HAVE 10 DAYS FROM TOMORROW TO REMOVE RED PICKUP TRUCK OR HAVE IT PROPERLY TAGGED, STACK OF WHAT APPEARS TO BE PALLETS, BODY OF VAN. THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 16. ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT - 10 DAYS TO REMOVE PALLETS AND VAN AND TO REMOVE RED PICKUP OR PROVIDE PROOF OF REGISTRATION AND SHOW IT iS OPERABLE, RE- MOVE BOAT TO COMPLY WiTH ZONING SET BACKS. MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, $~ED BY MR. GRAY TO GIVE 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A $25.00 A DAY FINE WILL COValENCE. ROLL CALL: AYES: MR. GRAY MR. BLOME VICE CHAIRMAN O' CONNOR MR. MCCLEARY CHAIRMAN LEWIS NAYS: NONE CARRIED. RECOmmENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL FOR BOARD MEMBERS MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, SECONDED BY MR. BLOME THAT COUNCILMAN ROTH TAKE TO THE CITY COUNCIL TONIGHT OUR RECOMMENDATION FOR MR. MCCOOL TO FILL TERM FOR SUB-CONTRACTOR, ENDING 3/89 AND MR. FISCHER TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM FOR REALTOR EXPIRING 3/88. CARRIED. DUE TO ATTORNEY GORE BEING OUT OF THE STATE THE SECONDED WEEK OF AUGUST, THE NEXT MEETING WILL BE HELD AUGUST 6, 1986. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 3:05 P.M. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD JULY 9 ~ 1986 2:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING HELD 5/14/86 ATTORNEY' S MATTERS: OLD BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-5 - BALLOUGH CASE NO. 86-7 - VORATH CASE NO. 86-47 - GEHRKE NEW BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-73 - PATTON CASE NO. 86-74 - COCUZZA CASE NO. 86-111 - ROBERTS CASE NO. 86-118 - LIN-MARC KENNELS RECOMMENDATION - BOARD MEMBER - SUB-CONTRACTOR BOARD ATIORNEY REQUESTS AND REPORTS: GENERAL BOARD DISCUSSION: ADJOURN NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MAT~ERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED.