Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11121986CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1986 - 2:00 P.M. MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN BLOME. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: MR. GRAY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR MR. MCCLEARY MR. MCCOOL ATTORNEY STEVE LULICH, ACTING BOARD ATTORNEY CHAIRMAN BLOME ABSENT: MR. FISCHER, EXCUSED ALSO PRESENT: MR. CLOUTIER, MR. THOMPSON, VICE MAYOR ROTH APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING HELD 10/8/87 MOTION BY MR. MCCLEARY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MEETING 10/8/87 AS RECORDED. CARRIED. CHAIRMAN BLOME WELCOMED ATTORNEY STEVE LULICH WHO WILL BE ACTING CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD ATTORNEY IN THE ABSENCE OF ATTORNEY GORE. ATTORNEY LULICH TOLD THE BOARD THAT ANYTHING HE DID BEFORE OR AFTER EXECUTION WOULD BE CARBON COPIED TO THE BOARD SECRETARY. ATTORNEY LULICH STATED THAT HE HAD NO INFORMATION ON THE CASES CONCERNING VORATH, KEPLER AND TAYLOR, AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THEIR FINES HAVE BEEN RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY. BOARD MEMBERS STATED THEY ALSO DID NOT KNOW. ATTORNEY LULICH SAID HE WOULD LOOK INTO IT AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD. OLD BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-089 - KIGHT, JR. MR. CLOUTIER ASKED THAT THIS CASE BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE DECEMBER MEETING DUE TO THE FACT THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION THAT MR. KIGHT RECEIVED A LETTER GIVING HIM 10 DAYS TO COMPLY. CASE NO. 86-130 - MORRISON MR. CLOUTIER STATED THAT HE IS SATISFIED WITH WHAT IS BEING DONE AND ADVISED THE CASE BE CLOSED. MOTION BY MR. NO. 86-130. GRAY, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR TO CLOSE CASE CARRIED. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - NOVEMBER 12, 1986 CASE NO. 86-156 - MCLAIN MR. CLOUTIER INFORMED THD BOARD THAT MR. MCLAIN HAD COMPLIED AND ADVISED THE CASE BE CLOSED. MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, SECONDED BY MR. GRAY TO CLOSE CASE NO. 86-156. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-171 - COBB MR. CLOUTIER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MR. COBB HAD COMPLIED AND ADVISED THE CASE BE CLOSED. MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, NO. 86-171. SECONDED BY MR. GRAY TO CLOSE CASE CARRIED. CASE NO. 86-187 - BENHAM MR. CLOUTIER STATED THAT SOME OF THE YARD HAS BEEN CLEANED UP. A PICTURE WAS SHOWN TO THE BOARD. THE GARAGE IS STILL BEING USED AS A WAREHOUSE AND THE SWALE HAS BEEN DESTROYED. A DRIVEWAY PERMIT WAS APPLIED FOR BUT TO DATE NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE. MR. CLOUTIER RECOMMENDED HE BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPY OR A $25.00 A DAY FINE BE INVOKED. MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, SECONDED BY MR. GRAY THAT CASE NO. 86-187 - BENHAM, BE GIVEN 10 DAYS FROM DATE OF MEETING TO COMPLY OR A $25.00 A DAY FINE SHALL BEGIN. DISCUSSION: VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR STATED THAT BOARD SHOULD BE SPECIFIC AS TO WHAT MUST BE DONE. FINDING OF FACT - SEC. 20A 3.4 - MISUSE OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. MR. CLOUTIER STATED IT WAS BEING USED AS A COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE. MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, SECONDED BY MR. MCCOOL TO AMEND MOTION TO INCLUDE VIOLATION OF SEC. 20A 3.4, MISUSE OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, ALSO THE DISTRUCTION OF THE SWALE, BOTH TO BE REMEDIED WITHIN 10 DAYS. ATTORNEY LULICH POINTED OUT THAT WITH REGARD TO THE SWALE, THE NOTICE SENT TO MR. BENHAM WAS FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THERE WAS NO MENTION OF THE SWALE, WHICH WOULD BE A SEPARATE VIOLATION. VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR WITHDRAWS MOTION AND AMENDMENT TO MOTION, MR. MCCOOL WITHDRAWS SECOND. MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR, SECONDED BY MR. MCCOOL THAT IN THE CASE OF 86-187 - BENHAM, ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF MR. CLOUTIER THAT MR. BENHAM BE GIVEN 10 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF NOTICE TO CLEAR UP VIOLATION, SEC. 20A 3.4, OPERATING A BUSINESS FROM A RESIDENCE OR A $25.00 A DAY FINE SHALL BEGIN. CARRIED. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - NOVEMBER 12, 1986 VICE CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR REQUESTED THAT A NEW VIOLATION, 23-30 OF THE CITY CODE BE SENT TO MR. BENHAM. THE BOARD WAS INFORMED THAT FOR FUTURE MEETINGS, THE PACKAGES WOULD BE HAND DELIVERED TO THE BOARD MEMBERS. THERE BEING NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, MEETING ADJOURNED AT 2:35 P.M. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD NOVEMBER 12, 1986 - 2:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING HELD 10/8/86 A TTORNE Y ' S MA TTERS: OLD BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-089 - KIGHT, JR. CASE NO. 86-130 - MORRISON CASE NO. 86-156 - MCLAIN NEW BUSINESS: CASE NO. 86-1 71 - COBB CASE NO. 86-187 - BENHAM BOARD ATTORNEY REQUESTS AND REPORTS: GENERAL BOARD DISCUSSION: ADJOURN NOTE: IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED.