Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-02-20 ORDINANCE NO. 0-02-20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177 the City of Sebastian is required to maintain a capital improvements element as a part of the mandated Comprehensive Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Florida Statutes, a capital improvements programs designating programmed capital improvements to public facilities projected for a minimum five-year period, together with estimated costs and projected revenue sources, is required as a part of this element; and WHEREAS, the City is further required to review and by ordinance update said capital improvements program on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the City of Sebastian needs to perform this review and update to comply with the requirements of law; and WHEREAS, said amendments have properly undergone duly noticed public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission sitting as the City's Land Planning Agency, and two duly noticed public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, based upon the findings from said hearings, it is hereby determined that the proposed amendments herein are consistent with the requirements of law and with the remaining provisions of the City Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sebastian, Chapter 9: Capita/Improvements Element is hereby amended to read as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A", which is hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City Council did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional provision, and that the City Council would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without said invalid provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon issuance of a Notice of Intent by the Florida Department of Community Affairs finding the amendment herein in compliance. PASSAGE UPON FIRST READING The foregoing Ordinance was moved for passage upon first reading for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs this 11th day of December, 2002, by Councilmember Coniglio . The motion was seconded by Councilmember Barczyk and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Walter Barnes aye Vice-Mayor James A. Hill aye Councilmember Joe Barczyk aye Councilmember Edward J. Majcher, Jr. aye Council member Ray Coniglio aye , ADOPTION The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember Barczyk The motion was seconded by Councilmember Con i g 1 i 0 and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Walter Barnes aye Vice-Mayor James A. Hill aye Councilmember Joe Barczyk aye Councilmember Edward J. Majcher, Jr. aye Council member Ray Coniglio a y e The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this 28th day of May .2003. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA By: tu~ &.~ Mayor Walter Barnes , Approved as to form and legality for relial~Lhe Citrebastian only: Rich Stringer, City Attorn Exhibit A Proposed Amendments to City of Sebastian Capital Improvements Element Note: Proposed amendments are presented in underline/strikethrough format. CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CHAPTER 9 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (reference ~9J-5.01(3), F.A.C.) ~9-1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT, GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Capital Improvements Element pursuant to gI63.3177(3)(a), F.S., and g9J-5.016(3), F.A.C. GOAL 9-1: MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. THE CITY SHALL UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ADEQUATELY PROVIDE NEEDED PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN A MANNER WHICH PROTECTS INVESTMENTS AND EXISTING FACILITIES, MAXIMIZES THE USE OF EXISTING FACILITIES, AND PROMOTES ORDERLY COMPACT GROWTH. OBJECTIVE 9-1.1: RATIONAL FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. Based on the scheduled timeframe in Table IX-2.1, the City shall commit necessary resources for capital improvements needed to implement goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The fiscal commitment is stipulated in Table IX-2.1 and Table IX-2.2 and is predicated on the analysis of capital improvement needs within the Traffic Circulation, Public Facilities, and Recreation and Open Space Elements together with level of service standards established and adopted pursuant to Policy 9-1.6.1 of the Capital Improvement Element. Capital improvements will be provided for purposes of correcting existing deficiencies, accommodating desired future growth, and replacing worn-out or obsolete facilities. T.\BLE IX 2.1: FIVE YK'ill. SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVE)),fENT TIMINC COST 1997 ~~ $IQ5,51Q 1997 ~9 $H1,25Q 1998 88 $7Q,QQQ 1997 2QQO $25,QQO 1997 ~9 r39,QQQ 1997 ~9 $21,QQQ 1~97 98 Sl ~,gQQ 1996 98 $12,813 Hlkoam Dam 1~96 98 $23 Q,991 19972001 $1,140,000 'A-':ater C:eatrel StruetlHe l~n 2001 $~50,00O 1999200! t750,000 19992001 $763,000 +99+ n 00,000 ~temw:at.r Ma5ter Plea 1996 ~7 t275,000 1997 ~~ $294,.100 Blossem Lal,. Basketean CeClrt ~ ~ Tennis Ce\lrts at ~shu"'aIlfl Pad, 1996 97 $140,.100 ~ $10,000 +99+ $4;000 So""oe: Cily eiSeaaGaar, 1996 Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21.'99 12/03/2002 9-1 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE IX-2.1: FIVE YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, FY 2003-2007 ImDrovement Year Funded Cost Fundin" Source Transcortation Pedestrian Bridaes 2003-04 $150000 Oiscretiona'" Saies Ta> Road Pavina 2003-04 $150,000 Local Ootion Gas Ta Pawerline Road North Enhancements 2004-05 $374,000 Oiscretiona'" Sales Ta> Road Pavina 2004-05 $150,000 Local Ontion Gas Ta> Main Street Enhancements 2005-06 $349,000 Oiscretlona'" Saies Ta> Road Pavino 2005-06 $150,000 Local Ootion Gas Ta Laconia Street Enhancements 2006-07 $500,000 Discretionarv Sales Ta Flemina Street Enhancements 2006-07 $1 ,305,000 Discretlonarv Sales Ta Road Pavina 2006-07 $150,000 Local Ontion Gas T a Laconia Street Enhancements 2007-08 $731 000 Oiscretiona'" Sales Ta> Flemina Street Enhancements 2007-08 $650,000 Discretionarv Saies Ta, Road Pavina 2007-08 $150,000 Local Ontion Gas T a Airoort - Install Security Fencina 2003-04 $500,000 Airnort Fund & Othe Airoort - Infrastructure Imorovements 2003-04 $625 000 Ai~ort Fund & Othe Alroort - Construct Taxiwav "C" 2003-04 $1 500,000 Aimort Fund & Othe Airoort - Rehab, Airoort Taxiwav 2004-05 $1 ,000,000 Airnort Fund & Othe Alroort - Runwav Sweeoer Acauisition 2004-05 $250 000 Airnort Fund & Othe Airport - Vertical Guidance Installation 2004-05 $100,000 Aimort Fund & Othe Airoort - Construct Muiti-Aircraft Hanaers 2005-06 $625,000 Aimort Fund & Othe Airoort - Acauire Land 2005-06 $250,000 Airnort Fund & Othe Airoort - Install Taxiwav Liahts 2005-06 $300,000 Aimort Fund & Othe Airoort - Conduct Master Plan Update 2006-07 $300 000 Aimort Fund & Othe Airoort - Construct Perimeter Road 2006-07 $800,000 Ai~ort Fund & Othe Airoort - Construct Apron 2006-07 $365,305 Airoort Fund & Othe Sidewalks and Bikewavs Annual Sidewaik Proaram 2003-04 $180000 Discretlona'" Sales Ta> Annual Sidewalk Proaram 2004-05 $180000 Oiscretiona"' Saies Ta Annual Sidewalk Proaram 2005-06 $180,000 Discretionarv Sales Ta' Annual Sidewalk Praaram 2006-07 $180,000 Discretionarv Sales Ta> Annual Sidewaik Proaram 2007-08 $180,000 Discretiona'" Sales Ta Recreation Facilities Cltv Hall Park (B1 2003-04 $400 000 Oiscretiona'" Sales Tax & Othe Bryant Court Park (Zone C) 2003-04 $40,000 Recreation Imnact Fee Rlverview Park Phase iV (Zone Bl 2003-04 $500 000 Discretiona'" Sales Tav Easv Street Park (Zone B) 2003-04 $30,000 Recreation Imoact Fee Southside Recreation Comolex (Zone Cl 2003-04 $400 000 Discretiona'" Sales Tay Riverview Park Phase V (Zone Bl 2004-05 $200 000 Dlscretiona"' Sales Tav Purchase Land In Park Zone A 2004-05 $48 000 Recreation Imoact Fee Schumann Lake Phase III (Zone C1 2004-05 $200,000 Dlscretionarv Sales Tav Keen TerriS, Wimbrow Park (Zone B) 2004-05 $41 000 Recreation Imnact Fee (continued on next oanel Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 99,(21!99 12/03/2002 9-2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE IX-2.1 (Continued from previous paQe) Imorovement Year Funded Cost Fundinn Source Blossom Park (Zone A) 2004-05 $30.000 Recreation I mnact Fee Southside Recreation Comolex (Zone C) 2004-05 $400.000 Discretionarv Sales Tax & Othe Periwinkle/Seashore Park (Zone 0) 2005-06 $21 000 Recreation Imoact Fee Stonecroo Street Park 2005-06 $60.000 Recreation Imnact Fee S. Wimbrow/Azine Terr Park 2005-06 $15000 Recreation Imnact Fee Southside Recreation Comolex (Zone C) 200S-06 $400.000 Discretion.." Sales Tax & Othe Sebastian Civic Center (Zone C) 2006-07 $1.000.000 Discretionarv Sales Ta Southside Recreation Comolex (Zone C) 2006-07 $400.000 Discretionarv Sales Tax & Othe Sebastian Civic Center (Zone C) 2007-08 $1 000.000 Discretionarv Sales Ta' Southside Recreation Comolex IZone C) 2007-08 $400.000 Discretionarv Sales Tax & Othe Golf Course - Club House Exoansion 2003-04 $20S.000 Golf Course Fund Golf Course - Build Four (4) Tennis Courts 2004-05 $200.000 Goif Course Fund Golf Course - Rebuiid Golf Course 2005-06 $470.000 Golf Course Fund Restrooms Public Facilities City Hall 2003-04 $3.500.000 Other Sources Police Deoartment 2003-04 $3.500.000 Other Sources Public Works Comoound Relocation 2003-04 $175.000 Discretionarv Saies Ta Land (Wetland Mitioation Bank) 2005-06 ~1 000 000 Discretionarv Sales Ta Source: City of Sebastian. 2002 TABLE IX-2.2: CURRENTLY FUNDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Const. Imorovement Year Funded Schedule Cost Fundlna Source Road Imnrovements Barber street imorovements Phase II FY 200012001 $314.920 Disc. Saies Tax Othe Barber street imorovements Phase III FY 200012001 $174000 Disc. Sales Tax Othe (Bndae Widenina) S12 Allev imorovements FY 200112002 $353.680 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Louisiana Ave Imcrovements FY 200112002 $1.000.000 Gen. Fund Disc. Sales Tax Local Ontion Gas Tax Othe Road Reconstruction FY 200212003 $210.000 Discretionarv Sales Tax Road Pavina FY 200212003 $240.000 Local Ootion Gas Tax Othe Jackson Street Extension FY 200212003 $312.000 Disc. Sales Tax Riverfron Redeveiooment Distric Drainaae Imorovements Thirteen (13) Side Yard Cui verts FY 2001/2002 $107.139 Discretionarv Sales Tax Three (3) Swale and Xina Pioe Uoarades FY 200112002 $19.0S9 Discretionarv Sales Tax (continued on next oaae) Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 9.3 09.'21/99 12/03/2002 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE IX-2.2 (continued from orevious oaqe\ Canst. Imcrovement Year Funded Schedule Cost Fundina Source Six (6) Crossina Culvert Replacements FY 2001/2002 $27 941 Discretiona'" Saies Ta' Emeraency Road Crossina Culverts FY 2001/2002 $65.000 Discretionarv Saies Ta Blossom Drainaae Ditch FY 2001/2002 $400.000 Discretiona'" Saies Ta' Sidewalks and bikewavs Tulle drive Sidewalk FY 2000/2001 $35.200 Discretiona'" Saies Ta, Extend Schumann drive sidewalk FY 200012001 $20 400 Discretiona'" Sales Ta' Barber Street Sidewalk FY 2001/2002 $71.500 Discretiona'" Sales Ta' (CR 512 to Hardee Park) Main StlWimbrow Dr Sidewalk FY 200112002 $93 .500 Discretiona'" Sales Ta' Hardee ParklWimbrow Dr Sidewalk FY 2001/2002 $71.500 Discretiona'" Sales Ta' (Bridoe Sidewalk) Annual Sidewalk Proaram FY 200212003 $189.368 Discretiona'" Sales Tax RECREATION FACILITIES Riverview Park Phase I FY 2000/2001 $425.000 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Shumann lake Park Phase I (Boat Rame) FY 2001/2002 $40.800 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Reroof Shelters at Parks FY 2000/2001 $6.000 Discretiona'" Sales Ta Fencina at Barber street seorts complex FY 200112002 $12.100 Discretiona'" Sales Tax Barber Street Soorts Comelex Improvements FY 2000/2001 $320.288 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Riverview Park Phase III FY 2001/2002 $400.000 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Hardee oarl<. trail imorovements FY 2001/2002 $35.000 Discretionarv Sales Ta Schumann lake Phase II FY 200212003 $150.000 Rec. Imeact Fee Georae Street Park (Zone D) FY 200212003 $40.000 Rec. Imnact Fee Filbert Street Park (Zone C) FY 200212003 $75.000 Discretionarv Sales Tax Pelican Isiand School Baseball Field FY 200212003 $75.000 Discretionarv Sales Ta Sebastian Elementarv Baseball Field FY 200212003 $75.000 Discretiona'" Sales Tax Public Facilities Parks Maintenance Buildino FY 2001/2002 $62.150 Discretiona'" Sales Ta Central Garaae Imerovements FY 200112002 $116.150 Discretionarv Sales Tax Police Impound Comeound FY 2001/2002 $65 000 Discretiona'" Sales Ta PO Communication Center Renovation FY 200112002 $22.850 Discretiona'" Sales Ta' Comoound storace shed FY 1999/2000 $14.803 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Fiber optic cable FY 2001/2002 $45 500 Discretiona'" Sales Tax City Hall Restoration FY 200212003 $500.000 Disc. Sales Tax Othe Yacht Club/Communitv Center Sians FY 200212003 $10.500 Other Sources Yacht Club Renovations FY 200212003 $60.000 Discretiona'" Sales Ta' Community Center Renovations FY 200212003 $50.000 Discretionarv Sales Tax IAirnort RJW Liahtina and Security Fence FY 1999/2000 $230.750 Airnort Fund Othe (continued an next oaoe\ Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies Q9/21!99 12/03/2002 9-4 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE IX-2.2 (continued from previous paael Const. Imorovement Year Funded Schedule Cost Fundlna Source T-Hanaar Construction FY 2000/2001 $531.250 Airoort Fund Othe Access Roads. Water/Sewer Gates FY 2000/2001 $500.000 Aimort Fund Othe Maintenance Faciiitv FY 2000/2001 $71.739 Aimort Fund Othe Rehab of Runwav 9-27 FY 2001/2002 $175000 Aimort Fund Othe Install Security Fencino FY 2001/2002 $333.334 Aimort Fund Othe ~onstruct T -Hanaers FY 2001/2002 $500.000 Airnort Fund Othe Clear RNV 9-27 Safety Areas FY 2001/2002 $877.500 Airoort Fund Othe Rehab. Runwav 9-27 Phase II FY 200212003 81.230.000 Airoort Fund Othe Construct Access Road FY 200212003 $625.000 Airnort Fund Othe Buiidino FY 200212003 81 000000 Aimort Fund Othe Source: City of Sebastian Policy 9-1.1.1: Intent of Capital Improvement Element. The City is committed to growth management which incorporates appropriate fiscal management practices and procedures. The City shall consider the use of all legal and suitable fiscal management techniques to achieve delivery of public services and facilities needed by existing and anticipated future populations. The capital improvement program presented herein identifies capital improvements needed by the existing population to satisfy levels of service standards incorporated within this Comprehensive Plan. The City shall consider performance standards as well as legal and equitable impact fees, where appropriate, to ensure that new developments provide in advance of development a sufficient level of public facilities and services (or fees in lieu thereof) in order to cover the costs of needed facilities and services, the demands for which are specifically attributable to such new development. This element shall provide a basis for estimating fiscal impacts required by capital improvements included in the Comprehensive Plan. The capital improvements program and budgeting process provide an ongoing process for continuing planning and review of the City's capital outlays, including their location, timing, estimated cost, relative priority, and potential funding sources. The capital improvement program and budget process is an advisory planning function. Capital outlays are fixed only by the City Council. Policy 9-1.1.2: Capital Improvement Program. A capital improvement project is defined as a project that is self-contained and that will usually be constructed or purchased as a unit. A capital improvement generally includes only those items constructed or purchased that have a useful life extending beyond a ten- year period following their acquisition, and usually involve a cost in excess of $10,000 or involve the acquisition or disposal of land regardless of cost. Minor recurring annual expense items, including routine maintenance and repairs, are excluded. All projects that are to be financed from bond funds are included. Similarly, preliminary engineering studies for public facilities such as the design of improvements to the transportation water, wastewater, and drainage systems are generally itemized as capital expenditure items due to their significant cost and their impact on the capital improvement program. The capital improvement program and budget is concerned with the assessment of need, assignment of priorities, and efficient allocation of the City's existing and potential fiscal resources for major community Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 9-5 09'21.'99 12103/2002 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT improvements or acquIsItIons over a five- to ten-year period. The fundamental purposes of the capital programming process are as follows: a. To consolidate and coordinate aU the various departmental requests by taxing district with the bope of reducing delays and coordinating individual improvement programs. b. To establish a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be evaluated in terms of public need, long- range development plans, and short- and long-term fiscal management impacts. c. To schedule future capital outlay projects pursuant to identified needs and priorities. d. To set forth a fmancing program that identifies potential funding sources, including but not limited to ad valorem taxes/general obligation bonds; user fees/revenue of excise tax bonds; grant programs; equitable contributions or exactments; as weU as performance standards and other components of growth management which may be used as a fiscal strategy for obtaining needed capital improvements in developing areas. e. To coordinate joint projects involving participation by one or more local governments, as weU as Regional, State, or Federal agencies. Policy 9-1.1.3: Capital Improvement Program and Budget as a Plan Implementation Device. The capital improvements program shall be used for achieving orderly urban growth and development. By providing a planned and reasonably reliable schedule of public projects, the capital improvement program and budget shall provide a guide for both public and private capital investment decisions affecting community development patterns. The capital improvement programming and budgeting process is a primary tool for closely coordinating land use planning and fiscal management required to successfully carry out the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 9-1.1.4: Fiscal Implications of Proposed Engineered Master Plans for Public Facilities. The City has no engineered master plan identifying preliminary costs for improvements to the transportation or drainage systems. Updated engineering estimates also are needed to determine cost impacts for potential improvements to the water, wastewater systems--either operated by the General Utilities Company or currently being planned by Indian River County. Needed engineering infrastructure improvement plans including cost and estimates are identified in the capital improvement program as needed preliminary engineering capital outlays. Policy 9-1.1.5: Availability and Scheduling of Capital Improvements. The City shall include within the five-year schedule of capital improvements contained within this Element all capital improvements which are identified in any of the respective elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Capital improvements with an estimated cost of less than $10,000.00 shall be included in the six-year capital improvements program and annual capital budget. Also, the capital improvement program and budgeting process shall be used to plan for needed infrastructure improvements to serve projects for which development orders were issued prior to plan adoption. The City shall also promote code enforcement as a means to assure availability of such services as deemed appropriate. Policy 9-1.1.6: Priorities in Allocating Capital Improvements. In allocating priorities for scheduling and funding capital improvement funds, the City shall assign highest priority to capital improvement projects in the the-year schedule of improvements which are designed to correct existing deficiencies. 9-1.1.7: Planning and Zoning Board to Draft and Rank Capital Improvement Priorities. The Planning and Zoning Board shall have the authority and responsibility to evaluate and recommend a rank order of priority for capital improvements which is proposed for inclusion in the five-year schedule of capital improvements. The City Council shall review and retain its authority to adopt the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies Q9.'21.'~9 12/03/2002 9-6 CITY OF SEBASTIA,'l CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Planning and Zoning Board with or without modifications In the proposed five-year schedule of improvements. Policy 9-1.1.8: Capital Improvement Project Evaluation Criteria. Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following priority level guidelines: a. "Levell": Whether the project is financially feasible and is needed to: . Protect public health and safety. . Fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services. . Preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. . Maintain compliance with plans of State agencies or the St. Johns River Water Management District that provide public facilities within the City of Sebastian. b. "Level 2": Whether the project accomplishes the following: . Increases efficiency of existing facilities. . Prevents or reduces future improvement costs. . Provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in-fill development or redevelopment. c. "Level 3": Whether the project: . Represents a logical extension of facilities and services for new development in a manner consistent with Future Land Use Element goals, objectives, and policies, including the Future Land Use Map. OBJECTIVE 9-1.2: LIMITATION ON PUBLIC INVESTMENTS IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA. The Public expenditures that subsidize development in the Coastal High Hazard Area shall be limited to improvements included in the Coastal Management Element and Public Facilities Element. Policy 9-1.2.1: Public Improvements In the Coastal Preservation Zone. The City of Sebastian shall not use public funds to subsidize development within the coastal high hazard area. However, this provision shall not preclude planned water wastewater infrastructure investments for purposes of improving water quality and sanitary conditions along major floodways and the Indian River Lagoon where current septic tank usage constitutes potential health and water quality hazards, including possibly effluent leaching into the Indian River Lagoon and floodway within residential areas. Similarly, drainage improvements may be recommended as part of a proposed citywide drainage improvement plan for purposes of managing stormwater runoff and improving water quality controls. No other infrastructure improvements shall be undertaken excepting facilities required to enhance shoreline access, resource restoration, or traffic improvements desigued to promote and further public safety within developed high hazard areas. OBJECTIVE 9-1.3: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS TO BEAR COSTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS. All development after January 1, 1998, shall be required to fund a pro rata share of all needed improvements which are directly attributed to the impact generated by the proposed development. A concurrency management system (CMS) shall be adopted before December 31, 1997, by the City of Sebastian (refer to Objective 9-1.5). The CMS shall mandate that applicants for development or redevelopment be required to provide a pro rate share of all capital improvements necessitated by the impact generated by the proposed development. The applicaht/developer shall meet their pro rata share of the capital improvements either by constructing the necessary component or by providing funds in lieu of construction. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 0~.'2l/99 12/03/2002 9-7 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 9-1.3.1: New Techniques for Funding Traffic and Stormwater Drainage Improvements Generated by New Development. As part of the proposed drainage and road improvement master plans, during FY 1992 tarough IT 1991 FY 2003 through FY 2007 the City shall investigate effective measures or funding projected future infrastructure needs for drainage and road improvements. The City's planning effort shall investigate municipal taxing districts and other approaches which are to be used in assessing new development a pro-rata share of costs necessary to fund drainage improvement needs. By the end of +9W 2003 the City shall adopt an ordinance which assesses new developments, a pro rata share for the necessary public facilities needed to maintain adopted level of service standards. OBJECTIVE 9-1.4: FISCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. The City shall manage fiscal resources to ensure provision of needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future development and redevelopment. Policy 9-1.4.1: Availability of Adequate Public Facilities. The City shall issue no development order or development permit for new development for which development orders were previously issued unless the concurrency management requirements cited in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-5.1 has been satisfied pursuant to requirements of g9J-5.0055 (2) F.A.C. The adequate facilities ordinance shall mandate that future applications or development shall include a written evaluation of the impact of the anticipated development on the levels of service or the water and wastewater systems, solid waste systern, drainage, recreation, and the traffic circulation system. Prior to issuing a development order or permit the City shall ensure that provisions of concurrency management established in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5 have been met. The developer's application shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall include all requisite improvements and that the improvements shall be in place concurrent with the irnpacts of development as defmed in and pursuant to Objective 9-1.5 and consistent with g9J-5.0055, F.A.C. The final point for determining concurrency must be prior to the issuance of a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of use. Policy 9-1.4.2: Limitation on Indebtedness. In funding capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than fifteen (15%) percent of the property tax base. The City shall restrict the maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue to a ratio of eighty-five (85%) percent. The City shall limit the use of revenue bonds to forty-five (45%) percent of total debt. Policy 9-1.4.3: Capital Improvements Program. The City shall prepare and adopt a six-year capital improvement program and annual capital budget as part of its budgeting process. Policy 9-1.4.4: Master Drainage Plan. As part of the drainage improvement plan the City shall investigate the desirability of enacting a special district(s) as a mechanism for rnanaging and funding needed drainage improvements through the year 2010. These improvement needs shall be identified in the ckainage improvement plan master drainage plan. Policy 9-1.4.5: Grantsmanship. The City shall pursue available grants or private funds in order to finance the provision of needed capital improvements. Policy 9-1.4.6: Replacement and Renewal of Capital Facilities. The City shall annually analyze public facility needs prior to adopting a capital improvement budget for the next fiscal year. The analysis shall Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121.'99 12/03/2002 9-8 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT include review of the public facilities and infrastructure improvement needs identified in the Comprehensive Plan together with any new engineered assessment of infrastructure components in order to identify needed replacement or renewal of capital facilities. The City shall annually prepare a local management strategy which is directed toward ensuring that needed replacement or renewal of capital facilities are identified, prioritized, and scheduled in a manner consistent with the existing and proposed fiscal resources of the City. OBJECTIVE 9-1.5: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT. Pursuant to Ch. 163, F.S., and g9J-5.0055, F .A.C., the City shall ensure that facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. Beginning in January 1,1998, no final development order shall be issued which would result in a reduction of adopted levels of service. In order to prevent a reduction in level of service, the City shall issue no final development order unless the applicant provides narrative and graphic information demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City that adopted level of service standards for public facilities including roads, water and wastewater services, drainage, solid waste, and recreation will be maintained and that improvement needs shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of development. This objective shall be implemented through the following policy: Policy 9-1.5.1: Resolving Concurrency Issues. In order to implement 99J-5.0055 and Objective 8-1.5, the above measure, the City shall require that all developments requiring a development order as part of the review process (as defined in g163.3164 F.S., including comprehensive plan amendments, rezoning amendments, subdivision approvals, site plan approvals, or building permit approvals) shall, at the time the subject application is filed, submit narrative and graphic information which demonstrates that all urban services needed by the proposed development can and will be provided concurrent with the new development. In order to establish an orderly review process, the City shall refme the Land Development Code by stipulating specific narrative and/or graphic data and information required at the time an application for comprehensive plan amendment or zoning code amendment, subdivision or replat approval, site plan approval, or building permit approval is field with the City. As a minimum, the information shall include the following: . The specific land use(s) and the proposed density and/or intensity ofthe use(s); . Estimated trips for the peak hour operated hy the proposed land use(s) together with anticipated on- and off-site improvements necessitated to accommodate the traffic impacts generated by the development including, additional R/W, roadway improvements, additional paved laneage, traffic signalization, proposed methods for controlling access and egress, and other similar improvements; . Planned improvements in potable water and/or wastewater systems required to establish and/or maintain adopted water and wastewater levels of service. System improvements and proposed funding resources required for implementing any improvements required to establish and/or maintain adopted potable water and wastewater system level of service standards; . Conceptual plan for accommodating stonnwater run-off and demonstrated evidence that the proposed drainage improvements shall accommodate stormwater run-off without adversely impacting natural systems or the City adopted level of service for stann drainage; . In cases where residential development is proposed, information shall be submitted describing plans for accommodating recreational demands generated by the development, including demonstrated evidence that the City's adopted level of service for recreation shall not be adversely impacted; . Projected demand generated by the development on the solid waste disposal system and assurances that the City adopted level of service for solid waste disposal shall not be adversely impacted; Comprehensive Plan Goals, Obj ectives and Policies 09/21/99 12/03/2002 9-9 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT . Other information which the City determines is necessary to assure that the concurrency requirement shall be satisfied without adversely impacting existing levels of service or the City's ability to adequately service anticipated developments which are consistent with adopted plans and policies of the City. All such information submitted pursuant to this subsection shall incorporate proposed funding sources, including any identification of improvements which the applicant anticipates shall be funded by the City or other public or private entity other than the applicant. Policy 9-1.5.2: Concurrency Management System. The City's Concurrency Management System is hereby included by reference and appears in the Appendix. OBJECTIVE 9-1.6: COORDINATION OF LAL~D USE DECISIONS, PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS, AND FISCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. The City shall ensure that land use decisions and fiscal decisions are coordinated with the adopted schedule of capital improvements to maintain adopted level of service standards and meet existing and future needs. This objective shall implemented through the following policies. Policy 9-1.6.1: Level of Service Standards. Prior to issuing a development order the City shall review all proposed development to ensure consistency with adopted LOS standards. No development shall be approved that is projected to decrease the existing LOS below the adopted standard, unless these are mitigated by the developer. The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facilities: Concurrency Facilitv Citv of Sebastian Adooted Level of Service Standard Sanitary Sewer: 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit Potable Water: 230 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit Solid Waste: 7.52 pounds per day per capita Drainage Facilities: Water Quanlity Standards: Off-Site Standard: Post development runoff shall not exceed the pre-development runoff rate for a 25-year, 24-hour design storm. On-Site Standard: Post-development runoff shall not exceed the pre-development runoff rate for a 10-year, 24-hour design storm. Water Quality Standards: Water quality standards of Chapter 17-25, F.A.C.. shall be applied as the quantitative standard. Chapter 17-25, F.A.C.. requires Outstanding Florida Waters (i.e., Indian River Lagoon) to reduce pollution loads by an additional fifty (50%) percent prior to discharge. Recreation: PARK CLASSIFICATION ACREAGE OF RECREATION AREAS/POPULATION Neighborhood Park 2.0 per 1.000 Community Park 2.0 per 1,000 Roads: ROADWAY FACILITIES MINIMUM LOS STANDARD PEAK HOUR' State Arterials U.S. Highway 1 C County Arterials CR 512 (Fellsmere Highway) D Cr 05 (Roseland Road) D City Collectors Indian River Drive D Schumann Drive D Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 9-10 Q0!2l!99 12103/2002 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Barber Street (Wimbrow Dr to Schumann Dr) D Fleming Street (Main St to CR 512) D East Street (Main St to Schumann Dr) D Vocelle Avenue (CR 505 to Aeming $t) D Main Street (US { to Wimbrow Dr) D Laconia Street (CR 512 to South Oty Limit) D Significant Local Street shown on the Major Thoroughfare Plan Barber Street Extension (Schumann Dr to US l}-City D Englar Avenue (Barber St to Schumann Dr}-City D Wimbrow Drive (Main 5t to East CR Si2)--City D Louisiana Avenue (Main 5t to CR S12Kity D Local All roads not classified as arterials, collectors, oc significant D local streets shown on the Maior Thorou1!hfare Plan. Note: '" The peak hours shall be the 3011I highest hour established by FOOT. Policy 9-1.6.2: Adequate Facilities Ordinance. The City shall issue no development order or development permit for new development for which development orders were previously issued unless the concurrency management requirements cited in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-5.1 has been satisfied pursuant to requirements of ~9J-5.0055(2) F.A.C. The adequate facilities ordinance shall mandate that future applications for development shall include a written evaluation of the impact of the anticipated development on the levels of services for the water and wastewater systems, solid waste system, drainage, recreation, and the traffic circulation system. Prior to issuing a development order or permit the City shall ensure that provisions of concurrency management established in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5.1 have been met. The developer's application shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall include all requisite improvements and that the improvements shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of development as defined in and pursuant to Objective 9-1.5 and consistent with 9J-5.0055, F.A.C. The final point for determining concurrency must be prior to the issuance of a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of use. Policy 9-1.6.3: Evaluation Criteria for Plan Amendments. Proposed Plan amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines: a. Does the proposed action contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the Public Facilities and/or Coastal Management Elements; b. Does the proposed action exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits, as described in the Transportation Circulation, Public Facilities, and/or Recreation and Open Space Elements; c. Does the proposed action generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases planned in the Five-Year Schedule ofImprovements; d. Does the proposed action conform with the future land uses designated on the Future Land Use Map within the Future Land Use Element; e. Does the proposed action comply with and accommodate public facility demands based on the adopted level of service standards contained herein; f. If the proposed action requires that any public facilities be provided by the City, there shall be a demonstration of financial feasibility; and g. Does the proposed action impact facility plans of any State agencies or facility plans of the St. Johns River Water Management District. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 9-11 09/21.'99 12/03/2002 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT ~9-2 IMPLEMENTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. This section stipulates a five-year schedule of Capital Improvements together with criteria for monitoring an devaluating the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 9-2.1: Five-Year Schedule of Improvements. Table IX-2.l "Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements: 1998 2001 .FY 2003-2007," contained herein, establishes the estimated projected cost, and potential revenue sources for each of the Capital Improvement needs identified within the respective comprehensive plan elements. These programs are scheduled in order to ensure that the goals, objectives, and policies established in the capital improvements elernent shall be met. ~9-3 MONITORING AND EVALUATING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENTS. The Capital Improvements element shall be reviewed on an annual basis in order to ensure that the required fiscal resources are available to provide adequate public facilities needed to support future land use consistent with adopted level of service standards. The annual review of the Capital Improvements Element shall be the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning Board. Findings and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board shall be considered by the City Council at a public meeting. At such time the City Council shall take action as it deems necessary in order to refine/update the Capital Improvements Element. The monitoring and evaluation procedure shall incorporate the following considerations: 1. Data Uodate and Refinements. Determine If any corrections, updates, andlor modificatIons should he undertaken, such considerations shall Include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: . Estimated costs . Recently constructed capital improvements . Scheduled dates of improvements projects . Revenue sources . Dedications 2. Consistencv Review. Determine whether changes to the Capital Improvements Element are necessary in order to maintain consistency with other elements ofthe Comprehensive Plan. 3. Imolications of Scheduled Master Plans. The five-year schedule of improvements shall be updated as necessary in order to rellect new projects identified in the projected improvement plans for drainage and traffic circulation improvements. 4. Priority of Scheduled Imorovements. The limited improvement plans for traffic circulation and drainage shall assess existing deficiencies and recommend a schedule of prioritIes for public improvements. 5. CaoItal Imorovement Evaluation Criteria. Annually, the Depllfl"'oBt af CSBl1BHBity D.',olspmeBt Growth Mana2ement Deoartment shall review the criteria used to evaluate capItal improvement projects in order to ensure that the projects are being ranked In their appropriate order of priority and incorporate any needed changes in order to upgrade and facilitate the evaluation process. 6. Level of Service Standards. Annually, the DepartmeBt of CeHlHiliBil"/ Develepment Growth Mana2ement Deoartment shall evaluate the City's effectiveness in maintaining the adopted level of service standards and recommend any needed action to address problem areas. 7. County. State. and Re2ional Imorovement Prol!1'ams. The Del'artment sf COllllflanity De'"elop",ent Growth Mana2ement Deoartment shall annually review the effectiveness of program coordination in resolvIng multi-jurisdictional issues surrounding the plans and programs of County, State, and Regional agencies as well as private entities, such as the General Development Utilities Company, that provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction. For instance, consider the effectiveness of intergovernmental coordination surrounding improvement to County Road 512 corridor, progress in improvements to water and wastewater systems, and other similar infrastructure improvements needed. 8. Private Sector Imorovements. Dedications or Fees in lieu Thereof. The Depllflment af CSffiffiaBil)' Doyelsl'meat Growth Mana2ement Denartment shall evaluate the effectiveness of provisions requiring mandatory dedications or fees in lieu ComprehensIve Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 99/21199 12/03/2002 9-12 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT thereof, as well as programs toward incorporating other programs for assuring new development a pro rata share of the improvement costs generated by the respective developments. 9. 1moact of Other Jurisdictions in Maintainino Level of Service Standards. The De~llfImeRt ef CeRUBlInil)' De'.'ele~meHl Growth Manaoement Deoartment shall coordinate with the City Engineer in evaluating the success and failure of intergovernmental coordination in achieving an areawide approach to achieving central water and wastewater systems, areawide transportation improvements, as well as drainage improvements, which may be required to maintain levels of service standards. 10. Outstandino Indebtedness. Annually, the Cily Manager's Omee Finance Deoartment shall evaluate the ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base. I!. Grantsmanshio. The De~""'.meHl ef CommliHity De','elo~meHl Growth Manaoement Deoartment shall evaluate efforts made to secure available grants or private funds in order to fmance the provision of capital improvements. 12. Fiscal Manaoement. The DepartmeHl efCeffilffilnit)' Develo~ffient Growth Manaoement Deoartment shall evaluate the City's progress in finding effective funding mechanisms for promoting road and drainage improvements as well as other capital improvement needs identified in the scheduled drainage, traffic circulation, water, and wastewater improvement plans. 13. Evaluation Criteria. The Department of Communit/ Develepment Growth Manaoement Deoartment shall evaluate the usefulness of criteria used to evaluate plan amendments as well as requests for new development/redevelopment. 14. Uodate Schedule of Imorovements. The De~artmeat ef Communi!)' DevelepmeHl Growth Manaoement Deoartment shall review the City's success in implementing the five-year capital improvement program and refine the schedule to include any new projects required to support any development during the latter part of the five-year schedule. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09.'2 J.l99 12/03/2002 9.13