The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10/11/20021225 Main Street [3 Sebastian, Florida 32958 Telephone 1772} 589-5330 ~ Fax {772) 589-5570 City Council Information Letter October 11,2002 Inter overnmental Coordination A reement with School Eadier this year, the State Senate passed a bill that changes requirements governed in the Florida Growth Management Act, notably a mandate that · which school expansion activities and requires counties and school districts to enter into inteflocal agreements a plicable local govern.m.u~t._,~;...~, ~fnr~_me ioned iurisdictions lo jo,~t,y i~tiative represents an e~ort tu u,,~- ......... nt . and cooperatively plan future school growth, as well as better forecast needs assessment activities accordingly. The State of Florida Department of community Affairs is requiring both indian River County and all of its incorporated cities to submit an adopted intedocal agreement by August 1, ian River County is currently initiating a process to 2003. As such, Ind. ----, document to be considered by all parties develop an interlocal agreeing-, involved· A coordination meeting between various representatives wil~ be hosted later this afternoon in the County Administration Building in Ve. ro As this matter directly incorporates long term comprehenswe Beach. implications, both Director of Growth Management Tracy Hass anodf planning possibly representatives from the Ilar Planning Group wil~ attend on behalf the City of Sebastian· Recommendations via consideration of said agreement, as wetl as via the anticipated revised comprehensive plan, will therefore be offered to City Council in the coming weeks and months. ~tian Police De a~rnent · t week, the Commission for Florida Law · now official! As .of tare I.as_ ~ R~.b stian police Department a fully 'Ft nt~orcement Accreditation orda,ned th~ ---a As such, accredited law enforcement and police administration agency· information relative to program objectives indicative of enhancing SPD's City Council Information Letter October 11, 2002 Page 2 ability to prevent and control crime will continuously be communicated publicly, via budgetary goal and objective presentations by SPD staff and quarterly budget progress reports as necessary. An awarded plaque from the Commission commemorating this accomplishment will therefore likely be presented during your October 23rd regular meeting. Establishment of Additional Sebastian School Zone in response to interest and concerns expressed by both parents and school officials, please be advised that arrangements are being made to establish a school zone on Wave Street, between George Street and Fleming Street to accommodate students and faculty of Sebastian Junior Charter High School. As school begins circa 8:15 a.m., a twenty (20) mile per hour speed limit will be in effect between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. An afternoon timeframe will also be establish, after staff from both the Sebastian Police Department and the Department of Engineering concludes facilitation of the applicable process with school officials. Necessary tasks to implement this initiative, namely installation of respective signage is anticipated to begin late this month. Sebastian Parks and Recreation Division Halloween Parade inclusive of the City of Sebastian initiating administration of eventual full service parks and recreational activities programming (as well in response to popular demand...), please be advised that the annual youth Halloween Parade and Costume Judging will be hosted at Riverview Park during the late afternoon and early evening hours of Wednesday October 30th. This particular day seems to work well because youth and parents interested in participating in respective activities will have plenty of time to prepare, as Wednesdays are typically half day sessions in schools throughout Indian River County. Appropriate timeframe and other information will be advertised on the Riverview Park marquee sign later next week, as well as on the Sebastian Government Channel. As such, arrangements are currently being made to secure "goodie bag" donations, judges and other volunteers for the event. Parks and Recreation Superintendent Chris McCarthY and Recreation Leader Kathy Falzone are the community's primary representatives for this activity. Either of them can be contacted to address related questions and/or concerns. City Council information Letter October 11, 2002 Page 3 ~ernment Da andO en House As the Florida League of Cities has officially designated October 20th through October 26t~ Florida City Government Week, please be advised that the City of Sebastian wilt host its third annual Student Government Day and Open House Wednesday October 23rd, 9:00 a.m. to noon. Approximately 55 to 60 pupils and students from area schools are anticipated to ioin city staff to learn more about municipa~ government operations and decision making. The program's ever-popular "mock City Council meeting" will begin at 11:15 a.m. to incorporate debate, deliberation and action relative to a true life policy scenario currently facing the community. Adult residents will also be welcome to participate, as this year marks the first time in which both Student Government Day and the City of Sebastian Open House wilt be hosted concurrently. Please feel free to join us if your schedules permit. Enclosure(s): County - intergovernmental Coordination Agreement with School Board packet from Indian River My Documents/infoLetter151 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Robert J. Bradshaw, Town of Indian River Shores Susan Zack-lursick, Town of Indian River Shores John Little, City of Fellsmere Cliff Campbell, City of Fellsmere Terrance Moore, City of Sebastian Tracy Hass, City of Sebastian Ernest Polverari, Town of Orchid Rex Taylor, City of V~ro Beach Dennis Ragsdale, City of Vero Beach Greg Smith, School Board John Fontana, School Board Robert M. Keating, AICP '~ ]~ Community Development Director September 24, 2002 MEETING REGARDING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEM]ENT WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD COORDINATION In the 2002 session, the legislature passed Senate Bill 1906. This bill changed some of Florida's Growth Management requirements. One change mandates that counties and municipalities enter into interlocal agreements with their respective district school boards. The purpose of the agreements . · · , 'sh the s ecific ways in which the plans and processes of the school district and ~s to jointly estabh . p,e ~. ---fl Fnr Indian River County and all of its municipalities, the the local government are ro De coorcana[c ....... deadline for submission of the interlocal agreement to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) is August 1, 2003 · (DCA) and Treasure Coast Regional At a workshop meeting with Department of Community Affmrs planrfing Council (TCRPC) staff on September 19, 2002, the county was designated as the lead jurisdiction to coordinate the preparation of the Indian River County school boardAocal governments interlocal agreement. To initiate the process of developing the interlocal agreement, county planning staff has scheduled an interlocal coordination meeting on October 11, 2002. BOARD OF coUNTY cOMMISSIO~° 1840 25th Street, Veto Beach, Florida 32960-3365 '[dephone: [7721567-B000 Comprehensive Plan Technical Advisory Committee intergovernmental Coordination Meeting October 11, 2002 2:00 P.M. 1st Floor Conference Room A County Administration Building AGENDA 2. 3. 4. Call to Order Introductory remarks and welcome Presentation of new school planning coordination laws and requirements Discussion of steps to prepare Intergovernmental Coordination Agreement with the school board Other planning coordination issues 6. Adjournment F:\Community Devetopment\U set sxvICKIE\SASANXINTCOORD2'd°c School Planning Coordination Chapter 2002-296, Laws of Florida ~ u__~_~e¢_t 163.3174-Sch°°1 District Representative on Local Planning Agency 186.504-School Board Member on Regional Planning Council 163.31777-Public Schools Inter local A~eement Notice of Schedule for Submissio~ of School Interlocal A~eement Model Interlocal Ageement For More Information see DCA's School Planning Web Site www. dca. state'fl'us/fdcp/DCP/Sch°°l Planning/school_planning'btm .Ch. 2002-296__ LAWS OF FLOI>,IDA _Ch. 2002-29t~ Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the'State of Florida: Section 1. Subsection (1) of section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 163.3174 Local phnning agency.__ (1)The · · . . . governing lx~dy of each local government, indiwdually or in combination as provided in s. 163.3171, shall designate and by ordinance emtblish " , . a local plarmmg agency, tm/ess the agency ss otherwise extablished ~e.or uivalent a~enc~ .......... ~-~,m~ ~au comvrenenslve ~ lan amendments in ~c;--~',-. - es that ~ ail aBoCoun shall ~oinled b the school board as a nonv m~e den~aI d~ u,~ nj= ~cc2a. -overnrnent ~-om grantin~ valSn o- ~t~ ~ ,~ ,,-, ,-h ~ ~,~. ....... '~'n.~r~ O~~v school bo=~ ..... c cal.~pl ..... ~, agc~wy pursuant rd mss auosection with the ~;~..'-~t. - mag.. estabhshrnent ofits loca~ ..~.-:-t .... ~' ~7,'? °g'~, *"~'.~-~ m= ara. re ~ana Pmnnmg agency ofthe TM ;--~ ..... t ~ ;T .'~.~'~' Y_*~umig i~gzncy. -~'.oa lOCal planmng agencies shall nrovide oy . . ~avu~v,lllcnt dy · · . . r oppor0mihes for m-r-- ._. , 3,. apphcable commumtycollegeboards,'wkichmaybe accomplished by formal representation, membersh/p on tectmical advise co ' means. The local plmming agency shall ,~,'~,are the c0m--t---'- ' ry . mrmttee.s, or other appropriate )~rh~da ~Senl~cv mr~a~,''v v' ="=~=~ve 'mn or p'an amenmxaent a.~er hearings to ~a p'an~n_.~_ti..o..n_s~t~ the g. ov. em?. g I:~, dy reg~ding the adoption or · · o g · y t.r~a~ io~mam~g corarn.leslOil~ tile larch, in gore ,turn,t, or other mstrumentahty, mcludino a co,,,,m-,~,~ao -~---:-- ~._P . _.t.g?ep.artment oft. he local counc~torlocal~,ovemm~,,,,.~:~.-~__ ~_, ~= ~2 ...... ~,~m= creatm pursuant to s. lO3 02 nrovided **. ........ · , r ,~ ~mpOsmon orthe council is fairly representative df all the governing bodies in the county or plann/mg area; however:. (a) Ifa joint p/arming ent/ty is in existence on the effective date of this act wkic governing bodies to ado . h authorizes the pt and enforce a land use plan effechve throughout the joint pla?ming area, that entity shall be the agency for those local governments until such time as the authority of the joint planning entity is modified by law. Co) In the case of chartered counties, the planning respons~ilitybetween the county and the several mun/cipalities therein shall be as stipulated in the charter. S Seedon 2. Subsecriofi (4) and paragraphs (a), (c), (d), and Ca) of subsection tatutes, are amended to read: (6) of section ! 6~3177, Florida 1632 177 Requked anti optional elemmm of comprehensive plan; stud/es and sUrveys.~ (4)(a) Cocrdirm~on of the local :omprehensive plan with the'Comprehensive pinna ofadjacem mun/cipalities, the county, adjacent cbunties, or the region; _with the al>proeriate water"~'nanagemettt district's reg/onal'water strgN¥ clans apemved pursuant FaLS. 373.0361. po y statemeniindicatihg the relationship of g g y shall include a specific COD/NG d~ ='=%fm-a d~ .und ' : Wor are deletions; xvor erlined are add.itiom. 2 Ch. 2002-296 LAWS O~_~_ Ch. 2002-296 date its co rehensive~_lklsn baseCl on the ~:-~,~ . ~e~o~ found 'to be s. 120.569. of ~e ~ z~ i~lum: ~ effegti~n~.ss o~~ ~slati~tio~s. ~ : ~zl sis and ~ovemment Acc~untabil: Section 12. p~s~aph (c) of subsett{on (2) ~d subsection (3] of 186.504, Flo~a Statutes, ~e amende~ to rea~: 186.504 Re~onal pla~[ng counCSS; creation; (2) ~emb~rship.. ..' on the .re~°nal. ,, plann~ngthe Oove~o~C°unc[l~omShallthebege°~aP (c) BepresentabveS aPP°m~ ~Jnca~~ct~8 ~sh°°l b°5~ covered by the ~~}tr:} ~mnnmz c°un~"~ ~m~l ~ard Assoc~o,,- t~e ~o~'n~ ~ ..... ~~ ~resentaUves ~e~nE a~ vo~n~ ~--~ on the Eove~mE ~ou,~ ' ~n~e ~V8~~e~ts chosenSy me ' ach county shall hzve at least one vote. ~ ..... ~}e. *~;~ nfthevO~g*~m · ~ 2 =rhnnl oar~ heremalnm~ one-, ....... include one ~}ect~5 .... ~_ b '.' ' ~r. + .... be appom~eu ? ~'~ By he Senate, ana.~,- - r -~2*nce in the s~e co '~'-~ to the gove~m~ ~' ~._ ~ove~or the opbou elected Section 13. Section 235.002, Florida Stern(es, is ~en&ed to read: 2~5.002 ~tent.-- (1) ~e intent of the Le~slat~e is Ch. 2002-~96 :LAWS Ch, 2002-296 ~ab]e water ~[on and cans b-- which to assure safe accessto schools ~ncludin sidewa]~ bic de sths tu~lanes and s~ si-' izat~on. ~~{b~e~ c~- ~itv to ~ic schools.. ~ t~esM~ti~ a~s and ~o com~ ~in - usin~ el~en~ ~hools as focal points f~g.~h~rhood% ~m ~n.:- sh~. ~a ac~ of ~ ub]~ sqhools ~ ~d ~z~s th~ are ~es, ~[h ~h~e~ew ~~ant ~ ~ 235185. ~~177 6::h & aud ~e edu¢&tional ~e e~on, or ~ ~nstku~e da~ and ~~~ r~sc~be Section 8. Section Z68.SZ777, ~ofida Statutes, is created to zea6: ~ ~l a eeme~.~ ~nt~ e~ ~area ~n in~erlocal a e~e~t ~h the dts~c~ 4 CODING: Words c~ ~x'e del¢ions; words ~ ~re addi~ions. Ch. 2002-296 L~SVS o~F YLOIqIDA Ch. 2002-296 -- . ~~n ~CCOTd~ ~i~u ~~j~he schoot district ~~[~e state izod ted contains ~- e dates ~or ;;~ . . ~e the ro!ec~ ~ '-- ' S declined over t~e ~.year~a~ced- c ~l_ . '~*~ ~.~ment and the school ~~e ofth~ ~~ -~se~ intermCai 5 cODING: {VordS ~ are d~letions; words uude~ned are aadJt/onS. Ch. 2002°296 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 200~-296 u~pcom~ff deadline .ann u~ ~m~.~,, - ~ssues_.' . ~ A piooess b%which each lo~ ~ve~men~ sad the dist~c~ school e their ~]~s on' consistent proiections of the board a~ee and bs. se u~ '-+.~n~ ~owth and student enrollment. ~ ~. a~ di~t~ n~u~sdiction-~ae ~o~h forecas~ ~s s =mot ob ' ~on. Local ~ove~=eats s~l ~y~ '"~ . · - ". o osed closure, reDgvat~on, or new rote ~th the local conmstencV.°f ~~a~e~nmu~,, circumstances and cnte~.' '- ~e~~e~ ~ tb~ ~~m~ ~ite improvements ~o ~+s mu ..... -~ress identification of the e~stin~ schools. The p~ocqS~ .... ts ~s~ble for school board to info~ the local ~ove~ment rezard- fo) A ~rocess for ~nz must b~ consistent ~thlaws ~,~' zehtin~ to measu~*?="~ JLi>--,,m~ ~ t the ~ublic school demsnu b~sed on ~he ismnu~s worz u~ ~~P ' ' '~,~o,,%he local ore, merits, in the prepzration, of~kthe an-~. A ro~ ss for dete~¢re ~nd how i0int use of e~ther s~hool ~fficiencg, boara ~lu .... i ' .~ and 186. ~cesses contEned ~n c~ . ~) ~ ove~ht rocess in~ an oD~o~unitY for public ~e~ementati9n 9fthe]~terlocE a~eement. . 6 CODING: Words ~ are deletions; words underlined are addltiorm. j_~tV S O~._.~_~OI~ID A Ch. 2002-296 Ch. 2002-296 -- -- de o~--I after a ublic hes~n on such eleCtio~ ~h~h m~V include th~ ~~erea into pursuant ~ house shall renew --- -=-~~~~nt, the st~t ~_. ~ ~~~he notice- inconsistent- =na] order that ~n~ts that ~~o~ Comm~s~on - ~tration Cem~ni~S~°n o.s COD~G: ~or~s ~ ~e dele~ons~ ~vor~s und~li~e8 are s~o~. LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2002-296 Ch. 2002-296 to Sho . c33fs yh; a~~~encv. The acencv shs.ll ~1 235.2 9 2~5.42. sectlon and remains in e~ect~ ~x~n cHt~a ~e Ia) The municipa]it~lic schools locate~ ~thin its bounda~es. ~a~ ~~.~h~t nonew school ~ anCO-' ear ti~ames. .~~s~ction. Section 6. S~bsectfon '(4) of section 16~.~80 ~o~da Statu~es, xs ~ended to read: 163.8180 ConcurrancY.~ ncurrency requirement as implemented in loczl comprehen- (4)(a) The c.o. .... = ~ther ~ub~ic faoilit~es and development to the sire pl~S apRne .... .-- ~ ~s~ other fac~ties an~ development, as pro- s~e e~ent tha~ ~ appnc~ ~ ~ . ~de~ by law. CODING: ~?Vords ~che~ ere deletions; ~vords underlined ere additions. 4 Volume 28, Number 29, July I,°, 2002 Florida z~ ~m[nistrative IYe~kly~yi--. ~- For more reformation regarding the interlocal agreement inclusion in the Department's budget request. Applications must be submitted to the Department by October 1, :2002. The applicant must be a unit of local government (as defined in s. lg.369) or ~ fair asso:i~tion (~s defined in S~ction. 616.001(9),.. ' · onsibl~ for th~pla~ing, destO, F.S., whmh ~s reap . _.~ o~:rauon of ~g~culmre education and promOtiOn facilit~ or hold! fitl~ to the prop~ on which such facilit~ is tc b* d~vcloped and located. ''r Mark Markl~y, To obtain an' p~ .. ,:, m~doacs state fi.us or 470 (850)921 199 , Y , - ~ -,~:.. Tallahasse:, Florida South Calh6un Street, Mayo 32399-0800. -- DEPA~T~ENI OF coMMUNI~ AFFAIRS ~OTICE OF SCHEDULE FOR sUBMISSION SCH~bL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS Notic* is hereby given to the public that the Depanmcnt of Community Affairs has finalized thc School Intcrloc~l A~rccment Schedule for submittal of ex,cured School Intcrlocal Agrcemen~ purmsm to Secfion~ 163.31~77 235.193, Florida Statutes (2002). Sections 163.31777(1) and 235.193[2)(a), F.S., require ~oua~, dist~ct ~chool hoard and municipalities located withih th~ geographic ~rea of a school district to enter into au interlocal agreement according this PPblished schedule. The Department hs~ set the same date for submittal for the count, thc district school board and all municipaliti~* located within ~ school district. Local governments and the district school board in each school district *re encouraged to adopt ~ tingle intcrlocal sgr,ement to which ~11 join as pa~ies. Pursuant to Section 163.31777(5), Flo6da Sta~tes, palm Beach Coun~ i~ not included in the published schedul*- Palm Beach County has implemented school conCu~nc~ ~nd is not r,quired to ~mend their interlocal agr, cment to confOm m th* n*w pre,siGns of this section. Sore* mumCipalities ~nclud~d in th* publi~h*d schedule may qualify for exemption from school .intcrlocal ~greement r~qu rem~n~s pursuant to S~ction.. Grids Statutes. Mun~c~liiies should obtai~ 16~.31~7(6),F1 .... ~*d verifying that [he letter from th* &smct scnoo~ ~- ~ubmit thc municipali~ me~ the criteria for exemption and ]e~er at least three mouths priOr to thc scheduled duc dat~ for submission of thc in/~rlocal agr,cm~nt. Sore* counties, di,tfict school boards and municipallti~s ~ qu~li~ Jar ~ waiwr of on~ or mare of ~e coht~nt requirements, of'th* inI~rlocal. lends pur~ . - -i~uld be Submitted to ~greemcnt uant to S~tion 163.3177~(1)(c), ~ Sta~tes. A petition for such a wmwr the Deps~m~ut of Communi~ Affairs al l,asr six months prior to th~ scheduled duc dst* for submission of tho intcrlocal requirements contact Mike McDaniel, Growth Management Administrator, Department of Community Affairs, Divifion of CommunitY. Planning, Bureau of State Planning, 2555: Shumard Oak Eonlevard, Tallahassee, Florida 52399-2!00. The schedule and additional information on school planning and coordination is available electronically on the DeparUment of Community Affairs web site nt http'flwww dca.state.fi.us/ fdcp/D CPlpr ogr ams/school_.pl annirig-htm' SCHEDULE FOR sUBMISS10N OF SCHOOL 1NTERLOCAL AGI~EM.~NTS 2003 -2004 c(~LrNTYflvlUNIC1PALITY ALACHUA CouNTY ALACHUA CITY ARCHER GAINBSVILLE HAWTHORNE HIGH SPRINGS LACROSSE MICANOPY NEWBERRY WALDO BAKER CouNTY GLEN SA1NT MARY MACCLENNY BAY coUNTY CALLAW-~Y CEDAR GROVE LYNN HAVEN ':'- MEXICO BEACH ~ pANAMA CITY PANAMA CITY BEACH pAK.KER SPRINGFIELD :..' BRADFORD COUNTY BROOKEK HAMPTON LAWTEY STARKE BREVARD COUNTY CAPE CANAVERAL ' Du~DATE 7/1/2004 7/1/2004 7/1/2004 7/1/2004 7tl/2004 W1/2004 W1/2004 '7/1/2004 7/1/2004 '7ll/2004 81112004 8/1/2004- 8tl/2004 1211~'2003 12/1/2003 - 12/1/2003 1211/2003 12/1/2003 12/1/2003 12all/200-~ 12/1/2002 12/11200~ '711/200z 7/1/200~ 711/200' 7II/200' ~I/200 3/1/200 3;1/20C Section Xll - MiscellaneOUS · Florida ,4dmlnistrative WeeNy Volume 2~ IVumber 29, July 19, 2002 COUNTY/MUNICIPALITY COCOA COCOA BEACH IND1ALANTIC INDIAN H~RBOR BEACH MALABAR MELBOURNE MELBOURNE BEACH MELBOURNE VILLAGE PALM BA~ PALM SHORES ROCKLEDGE SATELLITE BEACH T1TUSVILLE %VEST MELBOURNE BROWARD COUNTY COCONUT CREEK COOPER CITY CORAL SPRINGS DAN1A BEACH DAVIE DEERFIELD BEACH FORT LAUDERDALE HALLANDALE BCH HILLSBORO BEACH HOLLYWOOD LAUDERDALE LAKES LAUDERDALE-BY-T, HE-SEA LAUDERHILL LAZY LAKE. LIGHTHOUSE POINT MARGATE MIILAMAR NORTH LAUDERDALE OAKLAND PARK PARKLAND PEMBROKE PARK PEMBROKE PINES PLANTATION POMPANO BEACH PORT EVJSB. GLADES SBA I~.NCH LAKES SUNRISE TAMAKAC WESTON WILTON MANORS DUE DATE 3fl/2003 3/1/2003 311/2003 3/1/2003 311/2003 311/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 3/112003. 31112003 31112003 311/2003' 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 51112003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 5II/2003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 61112003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 511/2003 511/2003 51112003 5/1/2003 511/2003 511/2003 51112003 51112003 511/2003 511/2003 ~11/2003 5/1 ~2003 511/2003 5/1/2003 51112003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 511/2003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 51112003 COUNTY/MUNICIPALITY CALHOUN COUNTY ALTHA BLOUNTSTOWN CHARLOTTE.COUNTY PUNTAGORDA CITRUS COUNTY CRYSTAL RIVER . INVERNESS CLAY COUNTY - GREEN COVESPRINGS KEYSTONE HEIGHTS ORANGEPARK PENNEY FARMS COLLIER COUNTY EVERGLADES CITY MARCO ISLAND NAPLES COLUMBIA COUNTY FORT WHITE / LAKE CITY' DESOTO COUNTY ARCADIA DIXIE COUNTY CROSS CITY HORSESHOE BEACH iDUVA~ CODLNTY ATLANTIC BEACB BALDWIN 3ACKSONVILLE BEACH NEPTUNE BEACH ESCAMBIA COUNTY ' CENTURY PENSACOLA FLAGLER COUNTY BEVERLY BEACH BUNNELL FLAGLER BEACH MARINELAN D DUE DATE 911/2004 '91112004 9/112004 6/1/2003 61112003 9/112003 91112003 9/1/2003 12/1/2003 12/1/2003 12fl/2003 12/1/2003 12/1/2003 3/1/2bo3 3/I/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 3/I/2004 3/I/2004 .3/1/2004 6/1/2004 6/112004 2/1 t2004 211/2004 2/I/2004 7/1/2003 711/2003 7/1/20D3 7/1/2003 7It/2003 $/1/2004 8/1/200~, 811/2004 51112004 511/2004 5/1/2004 5/I/2004 5/1/20~ 3128. Section XII - Miscellaneous ' ~str~tlve }Yee~ly " · ' .... DUB DATE COUNTY . coUNTY/MUNICIPALITY FRANKLIN coUNTY APALACHICOLA CARRABELLE 4/112003 121112004 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY 411;2003 12/1/2004 pLANT CITY 4/1/2003 TAI,APA 4/1/2003 12/112004 TEMPLE TERRACE 12/1/2004 12/t12004 1211/2004 12/] 12004 12/1/2004 1211/2004 12/1/2004 GADSDEN CouNTY CHATTAHO O CHEE GREENSBORO GRETNA MIDWAY QUINCY : 4/1/2004 GILCHB.1ST COUNTY 4/I12004 BELL 4/I/2004 FANNING ~pR~NGS 4/1/2004 TRENTON" GLADES coUNTY MooRE HAVEN GULF CouNTY PoRT ST. WEWAHITC~'IKA HOLMES COUNTY BONIFAY NOMA poNCE DE LEON WBSTV1LLE EST(5 I"~IND1AN RIVER COUNTY FELLSMEKB ' INDIAN RIVER SHORES ~ oRCHID SEBASTIAN 311/2004 Vt vERO BEACH ~ 31112004~ ......... / JACKSON COUNTY 8/1/2004 g/1/2004 811/2004 6/1/2004 HkM1LTON CouNTY 6;1/2004 JASPER 6/112004 3EN]qlNGS 6/1/2004 wHITE SPRINGS HARDEE CoUNTY BOWLING GREEN WAUCHULA zOLFOSP~NGS HENDRY coUNTY CLEWISTON BELLE H~RNANDO coUNTY BROOKSVILLE WEEK! WACHEE HIGHLANDS COUNTY Avon PARK LAKE PLAC1D SEBRING 11/112004 11/1/2004 11/1/2004 11/1/2004 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 10/1/2003 10/1/2003 10/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 ALFORD BASCOM CAMPBELLTON COTTONDALE GRACEVILLE GRAND RIDGE GREENWOOD JACOB cITY MALON~- MAR1ANNA SNEADS JEFFERSON COUNTY MONTICELLO LAFAYETTE COUNTY MAYO LAKECOUNTY AS%ATULA cLERMONT EUSTIS pRUITLAND PARK GROVELAND HoWEyINTHE HILLS LADY LAKE LEESBURG MAscOTTE 11/1/2004 111U2004 ] 1/1/2004 1'1/1/2004 11/1/2004 111112004 $/1/2003 g/1/2003 8/112003 ~/1/2003 8/1/2003 g/I;2003 11/1/~004 11/112004 11/1;2004 11/1;2004 11/1/2004 11/1/2004 11/1/2004 11/1/2004 1111/200~I 1 I11/200~ 11/1/200' 9/1/200~ 9/1/200~ 4/1/200 4/1/20Q 3/1/20( 3/1/20{ 3/I/20 -~n12o 3/1/2{ 3/1/2~ 3/1/2( 3/1/2 S:ctionXll - Miscellaneous .Vlorlda A dministr ative Ff tekly cOUNTY/~UNICIPALITY MINNEOLA MONTVERDE MOUNT DORA 'TAVARES 'JMATILLA LEE COUNTY CAPE CORAL FORT MYERS FORT MYERS BEACH SANIBBI~ LEON CouNTY TALLAI-IASSEE LEVY COUNTY BRONSON CEDAR KEY CHIEFLAND INGLIS OTTER CR.EEK WILLISTON yANKEETOWN LIBERTY COUNT~ BRISTOL MAD1SON COUNTY GREENVILLE LEE MADISON CITY MANATEE COUNTY ANNA MAR1A ' BtLkDENTON BRADENTON BEACH HOLMES BEACH · PALMETTO M ARiON'COLrlqTY BELLEV1EW DUNNELLON MCINTOSH OCALA REDD1CK MARTIN COUNTY JUPITER ISLAND DUE DATE 3/] t2004 3II/2004 3/1/2004 311/2004 3/112004 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 4/1/'~00~ 411/2003 1211/2003 12/1/2003 1 I/1/2003 11/1/2003 11/1/2003 l 1/1/2003 11/1/2003 11/I/2003 1111/2003 11/1/2003 1011/2004 10II/2004 t2tl/2004 ]211/2004 12II/2004 12/112004 1 O/112003 10/1/2003 10/1/2003 101112003 1011/2003 ' 10/1/2003 5/1/2004 ~fl/2004 5/1/2004 51112004 5/1/2004 5/1/2004 a/1/2003 4/1.t2003 Volume 28, .Number 29, July I9, 2002 CoUNTY/MUNICIPALITY DUI: DATE OCEAN BREEZE PARK SEWALLS POINT STUAKT 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 '4/1/2003 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AVENTURA BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE BAY HARBOR ISLANDS BISCAYNE PARK COP. AL GABLES EL PORTAL . FLORIDA CITY GOLDEN BEACH HIALEAH HIALEAH GARDENS HOMESTEAD INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 3/112003 3/112003 31112003 3/1/2003 311/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 311/2003 ISLANDIA KEY BISCAYNE MEDLEY MIAMI MIAMI BEACH MIAMI SHORES MIAMI SPRINGS NORTH BAY NORTH MIAMI NORTH MIAMI BEACH OPA-LOCKA PINECREST SOUTH MIAMI SuN-NY ISLES BEACH SUP. FSIDB SWEETWATER V1RGINIA GARDENS WEST MIAMI MON~OBCOUNTY iSLAMARADA KEY COLONY BEACH KEY WEST LAYTON NASS;[U COUNTY CALLAHAN FERNANDINA BEACH HILLIARD 3/1/2003 31112003 3/1/2003 31112003 3/1/2003 3/] t2003 311/2003 311/2003 31112003 3/1/2003 31112003 311/2003 3/1/2003 3/1/2003 311/2003 3/1/2003 3/I/2003 3/1/2003 9/1/2003 9/1/2003 9/1/2003 9/I/2003 911/2003 -- g/1/2003 811/2003 81112003 8/1/2003 3130 Section XI1 - Miscellaneous Florlda AdrnlnistradVe Weekly ' __~,.,,r~n~l ~qlCIPAL1T~ DUBDATE ~ ...... DU~ DATE CouNTY fl'a u r~ ~-.~ "~-ITY coUNTYiMUN1CIPAL1TY oKALOOSA COUNTY cINCO BAYOU CiLESTVIBW DESTIN FORT wALTON BEACH LAUP35L PIILL lvlARY ESTHER NiCEVILLE. sHAL1MAR YALPAKAISO :~ OICEECHOBEB coUNTy oK~ECHOBEE cITY ORANGE couNTY ApoPKA BAY LAK-E BELLE ISLE EATONVILLB EDGBWoOD LAKE BUENA vISTA MAITLAND- oAKLAND OcoBE ORLANDO REEDY cREEK ~iNDEKMERE wINTER GARDEN wINTER pARK osCEOLA CouNTY KISSIMMBE SAINT CLOUD PALM BEACH coUNTY pAsco CouNTY DADB cITY NEW pORT R1CHE%~ poRT IRA cHEY ST. LEO SAN ANTONIO ~EPHYRHILLS 6/1120(}4 '611/2004 6/1/2004 6/1/2004 6;1f2004 611/2004 6/1~004 6/I~004 6/1~004 6/1/2004 8/1F2003 8/1/2oo3 1111/2003 11/1/200S 11/1/2003 11/1/2003 11/1~003 11/1/2003 111t/2003 11/I/2003 11/112003 ll/1~003 1'111/2003 ] 1/1/2003 11/1~003 11/1/2003 1 I/I~D03 611/2003 6/1/2003 6/1/2003 EXEMPT 611/20~)3 6/II2003 6/1~003 6/1~003 6/1~003 6/1/2903 PINELLAS CouNTY BELLBAIR BBLLEAIR BEACH BELLBAIR BLUFFS BELLEA1R SHORE CLEARWATER DUNBDIN GULPPORT INDIAN ROCKS BEACH INDIAN sHORES KENNETH cITY LARGO MADEIRA BEACH NORTH KED1NGTON PEACE OLDSMAR pINELLAS pARK REDINGTON BEACH REDINGTON SHORES SAFETY HARBOR SEMINOLE CITY soUTH PASADENA ST. pETERSBURG ST. PETERSBURG BEACH TARPON SPRINGS TREASURE ISLAND ? OLK CouNTY AUBURNDA_LE BAKTOW DAVENPORT DUNDEE EAG LB LAKE · FORT MEADE FROSTPROOF HAINES CITY HIGHLAND pARK HILLCREST HEIGHTS LAKE ALFRED LAKE HAMILTON LAKE WALES LAKELAND MULBERRY POLK cITY 6/1/200~ ' wINTER BAYBN pUTNAM coUNTY cRESCENT cITY iNTERLACHBN 5/lf2003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 $I1/2003 5/1/2.003 511/7.003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 5/1/2003 5/1~003 $/1A003 5/1/7-003 5/1/'2003 5/lf2003 511/2003 S/lfl003 51112003 5/1/2003 511/2003 511/20{33 511/2003 511/2003 511/2003 5/1/2003 2/I/2004 2/1/2004 2/1/2004 21112004 211/2004 21112004 211/2004 2/1/2004 211/2004 2/'11200~ 2/j.~O0z 2/1/200~ wiaoo 2311200 2/1;'20{ 2/1/20 2/1/20 101112 I0/112 osic Section Xll - Misc=llen¢oul .Florida Administrative Weekly COIJNTY/MUNICIPALITY DUE DATE PALATKA POMONA PARK WELAKA 10/I/2004 10/1/2004 10/1/2004 SANTA ROSA COUNTY GULF BILEEZE JAY MILTON 1/112004 1/112004 11112004 II1/2004 SARASOTA COUNTY LONGBOATKEY NORTH PORT 911/2003 9/'I/2003 9/1/2003 9/'1/2003 9/I/2003 $/I/2003 $/1/2003 5/1/2003 511/2003 5/1/2003 5;/1/2003 5;/I/2003 5/112003 SAP~SOTA CiTY VENICE SEMINOLE COUNTY ALTAMONTE SPRINGS CASSELBERRY LAKE MARY LONGWOOD OVIEDO SANFORD WINTER SPRINGS ST. JOHNS COUNTY HASTINGS ST. AUGUSTINE 1/112004 1/1/2004 I/1/2004 ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH 1/1/2004 ST. LUCIE COUNTY FORT PIERCE PORT ST. LUCIE ST. LUCIE VILLAGE 511/2004 511/2004 5/I/2004 511/2004 SUMTERCOUNTY BUSHNELL " CENTER HILL COLEMAN WEBSTER WILDWOOD 7/1/2004 7/1/2004 711/~004 7/1/2004 7/1/2004 7/1/2004 SUWANNEE COUNTY BRANFOP~D LIVE OAK 51112004 511/2004 5/1/2004 Volnme 28, Number 29, July Y9, 2002 COUNTYLMUNICIPALITY DUE DATE TAYLOR COUNTY 10/1/2004 PERRY 10/1/2004 UNION COUNTY LAKE BUTLER RAIFORD WORTHINGTON SPRINGS 9/1/2004 9/1/2004 9/1/2004 9/1/2004 VOLUSIA COUNTY DAYTONA BEACH DAYTONA I~EACH SHORES DEBARY DELAND DELTONA EDGEWATER HOLLY HILL LAKE HELEN NEW SMYRNA BEACH OAK HILL ORANGE CITY ORMOND BEACH 'PIERSON PONCE INLET PORT ORANGE SOUTH DAYTONA 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 4/I/2003 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 4/I/2003 4/1/2003 4/I/2003 4/1;2003 41]/2003 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 4/1/2003 441/2003 4/I/2003 411/2003 WAKULLA COUNTY SOPCHOPPy ST. MARKS 1/1/2004 1/I/2004 1/1/2004 WALTON COUNTY DEFUNIAKSPRINOS FREEPORT PAXTON 11/1/2003 l I/1/2003 1 I/1/2003 I 1/1/2003 WASHINGTON COUNTY 'CARYVILLE CHIPLEY EBRO VERNON WAUSAU 2/I/2004 2/1/2004 211/2004 2/1/2004 2/1/2004 2/1/2004 Pursuant to Section 163.31777(5), Florida Statutes, ~alm Beach County is not included in the schedule. Palm Beach County 'has implemented ~chool c6ncurrenc'y and is' not required to amend its interlocal agreement to conform to the new provisions of this section 3132 Section XII - Miscellaneous SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF SCHEDULE FOR SUBMISSION OF SCHOOL Ibr'fBRLOCAL AGREEMENTS DEPA.KTMElqT O~ COIv~Y AFFAIRS Division' of Community Planning A supplemental r3ofice is hereby given that the Depm[ment of Community A/fairs is supplementing t~ School Interlocal Agreement Schedule for s~brnittal of executed School Imerlocal Agreements pursuant to Sections 163.315/77 and 235.193, Florida Statutes (2002), Wkich was p~bllshed in the Florida Admirfistrative Weekly on July 19, 2002, [Volume 28, Number 29, page 31271, to include the following municipalities. cOUNTYfMUNICIPALITY DUE DATE BP. OWAKD COUNTY SOUTtt-WEST RANCHES 5/112003 FLAGLBK COUNTY PALM COAST 5/1/2004 LEE COUNTY BONITA SPP,_INGS 4/1/2003 mXm-D E cott'rr¥ tvllAldI LAKES PALMETTO BAY 311~2003 3/1/2003 MoIq'ROE COUNTY ldARATHON 911/2003 Sections 163.31777(1) and 235.193(2)(a) require the Counr3, district school board and municipalities located within the geographic area cfa school district to enter into an inzcrlocal agreement according tiffs supplemental published schedule. The Depzsb~,ent has set thc same date for s~hmittal for thc county, the district school board and all municip~IifiCs located wittnn a school district. Local govcrnmcn~ and the district school board in each school district arc encouraged to adopt a single interlocal a'~eement ~ which all join as parties. Some municip.ali~ies included in the published supplemental schedule may qualify for exemption from the scho(~l h~terlocal agrecmem requirements pursuant to section 163.31777(6), Florida Statutes. Municipalities should obtain a letter from the district school board verifying that the municip~li .tY meets the criteria for exemption and submit the letter at least tkree months prior To the schexiulcd due date for submission of the interlocal agreement. Some counties, discric[ school boards and municipalities may qualify for a xvaiver of one or more of the conten~ requirements of the interlocal agreement pursuaut to section 163..31777(1)(c), Florida Statutes. A petition for such a Waiver should be submitted to the Department of Community Affairs at l~asz six months prior to the scheduled due date for submission of the interiocal agrecmenu For more information reguding thc interlocal agreement requirements comact Mike McDani¢l, Growth Management Admin!strator, Department of Commu_rfity Affairs, Division of Community planning, Bureau of S~ate Plarmiug, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399; 2100. The schedule and additional information on school pla~ning and coordination is available - electronically on the Dcpartmen~ of Community A-flairs web site at http://vzww.dca.state-fl-us/fdcp"DCP/pr°~ams/sch°°l-plauning'htm' 5 MODEL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACIIJITY PLANNING This model agreement is intended to suggest items and issues for inclusion in actual interlocal .agreements and is designed to meet the requirements of Sections J 63.31777 and 235.193, Florida Statutes. It is not likely, that evfry ~uggested provisio~i .,vill be appropriate for every county, and each provision should be tailored for the situation in each counzy. This agreement is entered into between the County Commission ~hereinafter referred to as "County"), the City Commission or City Council of the Cities of (hereinafter r~ferred to as "Cities'd, and the School Board of County (hereinafter referred to as "School Board"). WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurture and general well-being of the children within their community; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board recognize the benefits that will' flow to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: namely (1) better coordination of new schools in time and place with land development, (2) greater efficiency for the school board and local goverrmuents by placing schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, (3) improved student access and safetyby coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, (4) better defined urban form by locating arid designing schools to serve as community focal points, (5) greater efficiency and convenience by co-locating schools with parks, ballfields, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities, and (6) reduction of pressures contributing to urban sprawl and support of exisCug nei.g,hborhoods by appropriately locating new schools and expanding and renovating.existing schobls; and WPIEREAS, Section 235.193, Florida Statutes, requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and . . WHEREAS, S~cfions 163.3177(6)(h)1' and 2, Florida Statutes, require each local government to adopt an interggvernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan v~th th~. plans of the school bom-ds, and describes the processes for collaborative planning and decision makin-~ on population projections and public school siting; and Vv-i-iEKEAS, Sections 163.31777 and 235.193, Florida Statutes, further require each county and the non-exempt municipalities xvithin that county to emer into an int~rlocal agreement with the districi school board to establish jointly the specific ways in wtSch the plans and processes of the district school board and the local governments are !o be coordinated; and Whereas, the School Board, the County, and the Cities enter into this agreement in fulfillment of that statutory requirement and in recognition of the benefits accruing to their citizens and stu~[nts described above; NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed between the School Board, the B oar6[ of County ComYaisgioners of County and the City Commissions of that the following procedures will be followed in coordinating land use and public school facilities planning: Section l. Joint Meetings 1.1 A staff working group of the County, School B o ard, and Cities will meet on a basis [quarterly, semi-annually or other basis] to discuss issues and formulate recommendations regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including such issues as population and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, and anbillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the school and ensure safe student accessY'Representatives from the Regional Plan.ning Council will also be invited to attend. [The agreement ~houM establish the par~y or parties, such as the Cozmry Planning Director or School t~oard Superintendent, responsible for ma~ng meeting arrangements and pro~iding notification.] 1.2 One. or more representatives of the County Commission, the governing body of each City, and the School Board will meet '~[semi-annually, annually or other] in joint workshop sessions. A representative of the Regional Planning Council will also be invited to attend. The joint workshop sessions will be opportunities for the County Commission, the City Commissions or Councils, and the School Board to hear reports, discuss policy, set direction, and reach understandings concerning issues of mutual · concern regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growlh, development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, and joint use opportunities. [The'agreement ~hould establish the party or parties, such as the County Manager or $choql.Board S¥flerintendent, responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing,notification.] Section 2.1 2.2 2.3 2. Student E~ollment and Population Projections In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities, and School Board agree to coordinate and base their plans upon consistent projections of the amount, type. and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. Countywide Eve-year pppulation and student enrollment projections shall be revised annuall7 and provided at the first staffworking group meeting described at subsection 1.1. The School Board shall utilize student population projections based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to Section 216.136, Florida Statutes, where available, as modified by the School Board based bn:development data and agreernem with the local governments and the Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse. The School Board may request adjustmdnt to the estimating conferences' projections to reflect actual enrollment and development trends. In formulating such a request the school board will coordinate with the Cities and County regarding development trends and future population projections. The School Board, Working w/th the County and Cities, will use the information described in Section 3.3 to allocate proj coted student enrollment into sub-county planning sector~ so that the district-wide projections are.not exceeded. The planning sectors will be established by mutual consent of the school board and local government staff. The allocation of projected student enrollment will be determined at the f~rst staffmeeting described in subsection 1.1. Section3. Co6rdinating'and Sharin~ ofhiformation 3.1 Tentative District Educational Facilities Plan: On. of each year, the School Board shall submit to the County and each City the tentative district educational facilities plan prior to adoption by the Board. The plan will be con~istant with the . requirements Of Section 235.185, Florida Statutes, and include prpjected student populations apportioned geographically, an inventory of existing school facilities, projections of facility space needs, information on relocatables, general locations of new schools for the 5-, 10-, and 20-year time periods, and options to reduce the need for additional permanent smdem stations. The plan will also include a financially feasible district facilities work program for a 5-year period. The Cities and County shall review the plan and comment to the School Board w/thin days. on the consistency of the plan with the local comprehensive plan, whether a comprehensive plan amendment MI1 be 3.2 3.3 necessary for any proposed educational facility, and whether the local l~overnment supports a necessary comprehensive plan amendment. If the local government does not support a comprehensive plan amendment, the matter shall be ~:esolved pursuant to Section 8 of this agreement. Educational Plant Survey:' At least one year prior to preparation of the Educational Plant Survey update, the staff working group established in subsection 1.1 will assist the School Board in an.advisory capacity in the preparation of the update. The Educational Plant Survey shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 235.15, Florida Statutes, and include at least an inventor)' of existing educational facilities, recornm.cndations for new and existing facilities, and the general location of each in coordination with the land use plan. The staffworkin~'gr0up will evaluate and make recommendations regarding the ]ocation and need for new, si_enificant renovation or expansion, and closures of educational facilities, and Ihelconsistency of such plans with the lqcal government comprehensive plan and relevant issueR-listed at subsections 4.3, 6.6, ~.'7, and 7.1 of this agreement. Growth and Development Trends: On. of each year, local governments will provide the school board with a report on growth and development trends within their jurisdiction. This report will be in tabular, graphic, and textual formats and will include the following: (a) the type, number, and location of residential units which have received zoning approval or site plan approval; Co) information regarding future land usc map amendments ~vhich may have an impact on school facilities; __. (c) building permits issued for the preceding year and their location; information regarding t~e conversion or redevelopment of housing or other (d) su'uctures into residential units which are likely ¢o generate new students; and (e) the identification of any developmem orders issued which contain a requirement for the provision of a school site as a'condition of development approval. Section 4. School Site Selection, Sienificant Renovations- and Potential School Closures 4.1 The School BOard v,411 establish a Public Schools Advisory Committee for the purpose of reviewing potential sites for new schools and proposals for significant renovation ~d potential closure of existing schools. Based on information gathered during the rewew, the Committee will submit recommendations to the Superintendent or designee. The Public Schools Advisory Committee will be a standing committee and will meet on an as 4.2 4.3 needed basis. In addition to appropriate members of the School Board, the Committee will include at least one staffmember of the County and a representative from each of the Cities [alternatively, within counties where the number of cities would make the size of such a committee unwieldy, the agreement could specify how one or more city representatives would be selected to represent city interes~ on the standing committee and membership could then be expanded on an [cs needed to include additional staff from any city in or near where a school is proposed.] When the need for a new school is identified in the district educational facihties plan, the Public Schools Advisory Committee will develop'a list of potential sites in the area of need. The list of potential sites for new schools and the list of schools identified in the district ~ducational facilities plan for significant renovation and potential closure will be submitted to the local government with jurisdiction for an informal assessment regarding consistency with the local government comprehensiv_e plan, including, as applicable: environmental suitability, transportation and pedestrian access, availability of infra'~tmcmre and services, safety concerns, land use compatibility, consistency with community vision, and other relevant issues. In addition, the issues identified in subsection 4.3 .of this agreement will he considered by both the local government and Public Schools Advisory Committee as each site or school is evaluated. Based on the information gathered during this review, for new schools the Committee will make a recommendation to the Superintendent or designee of one or more sites in order of preference. For significant renovations and potential closures, the Committee will make appropriate recommendations. The following issues will be considered by the Public Schools Advisory Committee, the School Board, and the Local Governments when evaluating new school sites and significant renovations and potential closure of existing schools:_~ a. The location of schools proximate to urban residential development and contiguous to existing school sites, and which provide logical focal pmnts, for community activities and serve as the cornerstone for irmovativ¢ urban design, .. including opportunities for shared use and collocation with othSr community facilities; b. The location of elementary schools proximate to and within walking distance of the residential neighborhoods served: - - c. The location of high schools on the periphery of residential neighborhoods, with _ access to major roads; e. Compatibility of the school site with present and projected uses of adjacent property; 4.4 Whether existing schools can be expanded or renovated to support community redevelopment and re-~italizati0n, efficient use of existing infrastructure, and the discouragement of urban sprawl; g. Site acquisition and development costs: h. Safe access to and from the school site by pedestrians and ve~cles; Existing or planned availability of adequate public facilities and services to suppor~ the school; E~iv~ronmental constraints that w0~Id either p/e~lude or render cost infeasible the development or s~ificant renovation of a public school on the site; ko Adverse impacts on archaeolo~cal or historic sites listed in the National P,e~stcr o~'Historic Places or designated by the affected local government as a locally significant historic or archaeological resource; The site is well drained and thc soils arc suitable for development or are adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with drainage improvements; The proposed location is not in conflict with.the local government comprehensive plan, stormwater ma~agcrnent plans, or watershed management plans; The proposed location is not within a velocity flood zone or floodway, as delineated in the applicable comprehensive plan; Co Thc proposed site can accommodate the requked parking, c~rculation and queuing of vehicles; The proposed location lies outside the area regulated by Section 333.03, F.S., regarding the construction of public educational facilities in the vicinity of an airport. At Ieast'60 days prior to acquki.'ng or lea~ing property that maybe used for a new public educational facility, the Sch061 BOard shall pr0vide'written notice't0 the local government with jurisdiction over the use of the land. The local government, upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the School Board within 45 days i£the proposed new school site is consistent with the land use categories and policies of the local government's comprehensive plan. This preliminary notice does not constitute the local goverrmnent's. determination of cormistency pursuant to section 235.193(12), Florida Statutes. Section 5. Supportin~ Inffastracture. 5.1 In conjunction with the preliminary consistency determination described at subsection 4.4 of this agreement, the school board and affected local governments will jointly determine the need for and timing of on-site and off-site improvements necessary to support each new school or the proposed significam renovation of an existing school, and will enter into a written agreement as to the timing, location, and the party or parties responsible for constructing, operating, and maintaining the required improvements. Section. 6. I~'~al Plarmin~ A~enc¥, Comerehensive Plan Amendments, Rezonin~s, and Development Apl~rovals 6.1 The County and Cities will include a nonvoting representative appointed by the School Board ~)n :the local planning agencies, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agencies consider comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. The Cities and County may at their discretion grant voting status to the school board member. 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 The School Board will appoint a representative to serve on the County's staff development review corrnnittee, or equivalent body. In addition, the School Board representative will be invited to participate in the Cities' staff development r~view committees, or equivalent body, when development and redevelopment proposals are proposed which could have a significant impact on student enrollment or school facilities. The County and the Cities agree to give the School Board notification of land use applications and development proposals pending before them that may affect student enrollment, enrolLment projections, or school facilities. Such notice will be provided at least days prior to approval o£the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the comprehensive plan future land use map, rezonings, developments ofre~onal impact, and other major residential or mixed-use development projects. Within days after notification by the local government, the School Board will advise the local government of the school enrollment impacts anticipated t9 result fi:om the proposed land use application or development proposal, and whether sufficient capacity exists or is planned to accommodate the impacts. School capacity will be reported consistent with State Requirements for Educational Facilities. If sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the School Board will specify how it proposes To meet the anticipated student enrollment demand; alternatively, the School Board, local govcmrnent, and developer 7 6.6 will collaborate to find means tc ensure sufficient capacity will exist to accommodate the development, such as, devel~t~er contributions, project phasing, or developer provided facility improvements. In reviewing and approving comprehensive plan amendments, rezon.ings, and development proposals, the county and cities will consider the following issues: a. School Board comments; b. Available school capacity or p]~,~u¢d improvements to increase school capacity; c. T~/e prowsion of school sites and facilities withiu planned neighborhoods; d. Compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites; e. ~.~.The co-location of parks, recreation and neighborhood facilitie~ with school sites; f.. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for safe access; g. Traffic circulation plans which serve schools and the sun-ounding neighborhood; h. The provision of off-site signalization, signage, access improvements, and sidewalks to serve schools; and i. The inclusion of school bus s~ops and mmarounds. 6.7 In formulating community development plans and programs, the County and Cities will consider the following issues: a. Giving priority to scheduling capital improvements that are coordinated with and meet the capital needs identified in the School Board district educational facilities plan; Providing incentives l0 the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to devcl6ping adequate school facilities in resideniial de¥clopments; c. Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools; and Wortdng to address and rasolve multi-jurisdictional public school issues. Section 7. Collocation and Shared Use 7.1 Co-location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School Board and local govemmems. The School Bo'ard will look for opportunities to co-locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the District Educational Facilities Plan. Likewise, co-location and shared use opporrurr[ties will l~e considered by the local governments when preparing the annual update to the comprehensive plan's schedule of capital improvements and when planr/mg and designing new, or renovating existing, cornmuniry facilities. For example, oppormrfitics for co-location and sharecl use with public schools will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, community centers, auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performing arts centers, and stadiums: In addition, co-location and shared use of school and governmental facilities for health care and social services will be considered. 7.2 A separate agreement will be developed for each instance of co-location and shared use which addresses legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from co-location and shared use. Section 8. Resolution of DJ utes 8.1 If thc parties to this agreement arc unable To resolve any issue in which they may be in disagreement covered in this agreemem, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapter 164 or 186, Florida Statutes. Section 9. Oversi ht Process 9.1 The School Board, the County and each City shall appoint a citizen member to serve on an oversight committee to monitor implementation 0fthe interlocal agreement. Committee members shall be invited to attend all meetings referenced in Sections 1 and 4 and shall receive copies of all reports and documents produced pursuant to this interlocal agreement. The committee shall appoint a chairperson, meet at least annually, and report To participating local governments, the School Board and the general public on the effectiveness with which the imerlocal.agreement is being implemented. Note: Local governments and schools board~ may wish to consider adding the fqllowing optional provisions to add~'ess the site.plan rewew process: Section __ S_ite Plan ]~eview .1 As early in the design phase of the site plan as feasible, but at least 90 days before commencing constraction, the School Board will reque.~t a formal consistency determination from the local government with jurisdiction over the ~tse of land The local government will determin~ in writing within 45 days after receiving a request and the ~2 necessary in formation from th~ School Board whether a proposed public educational facility is consistent with the Iocal comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Ifa school site is consistent with the fitture land use policies and land use categories that allows'public schools, the locat government may nqt deny the site plan application but may impose reasonable development standards and oonditidns in accordance with section 235.34(1); F. S. The local government may consider the adequacy of the site plan as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and ~ffects on adjacent properry. '(s. 235.193(13),F. S.) [This agreement~hould identify the issues the local government will consider for evaluating the adequacy of the site plan and the developme~ standards and conditions tha£ will be imposed by the local government, such as comprehensive plan policies related to land use, site location, compatibility, on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements pursuant to section 5 of this agreement, zoning regulations, environmental requirements, and roadway acces~ standards._] of.__ day of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Agreement has been executed by and on behalf County, the Cities of , and the' School Board of on this __ ,200. ATTEST: Chairman, School Board Chairman, Board of County Commissiqners Mayor, City of Mayor, City of 10 School Planning Coordination with Local Government School Planning - Before New Law Primary References: Sections 235.193, 235.194, 235.185 F.S. GOAL: To ensure that new schools or expansion projects at existing school sites are facilitated and coordinated with residential development and necessary services HOW THIS GOAL IS TO BE ACHIEVED: Through coOrdination and p annin,q by integration of the educational plant survey and other policies and procedures with the local comprehensive plan WHAT MUST THE PLANNING CONSIDER? The possibility of allowing students to attend nearby schools when a new development is constructed, even if the nearby school is in another county Utilization of central city services to discourage urban sprawl Sharing of facilities information Planned facilities, development, redevelopment, or additional development, and infrastructure required to support schools, concurrent with proposed development Use of statewide DOE enrollment projections by countyfor the district facilities work program HOW IS INTEGRATION ACHIEVED? Shadng of Facilities inforrfiation Annual submission of the qeneral educational facilities reoort to jurisdictions This report shall include consideration of applicable municipal and county growth and development projections The report must contain existing facilities, their locations and projected needs The report must contain the boards capital improvement plan, with facilities projects and funding for 3 years Submission of the educational plant survey to jurisdictions at least every 5 years HOW COORDINATION / INTEGRATION IS ASSURED: A school board is precluded from sitinq a new school within a jurisdiction where the school board failed to provide the annual educational facilities repor~ for the prior year unless the failure is corrected. The location of a new school must be consistent with the applicable co_g.~__prehensive plan The school board must give notice to the applicable local government before acauirina or leasinc~ property to be used for a school. Local government must give timely confirmation of consistency with the comprehensive plan and land use regulations when notice of intent to construct is provided by a school board. Local government may impose development standards relating to environmental, health, safety, welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Such standards (requirements for onsite or offsite improvements) must be consistent with expenditures authorized to be paid by a school board for onsite and offsite improvements. The school board and the local government may agree to an alternative process for review of a new facility, a site plan, and offsite impacts, Existing schools, expansion of existing schools, and collocation of schools shall be considered consistent with the comprehensive plan and land use regulations if the site is consistent with future land use policies. :The local government may impose reasonable standards for onsite and offsite improvements based on the expansion only. LoCal government approval is not required for placement of temporary or portable classrooms, renovation of facilities, or construction which results in up to 5 percent increase in student capacity. Construction~of a st~adium_ New Law -What's Changed? (Primary reference: Chapter 2002-296 L.O,F) GOAL: Expanded to require a systematic process of sharing information between school boards and local governments concerning growth and development trends in order to forecast future enrollment and schoot needs. This new process is to include a means to identify and meet infrastructure needs of public schools. HOW EXPANDED GOAL IS TO BE ACHIEVED: · board in ocal planning process: participation of schoO. .... *-live added to local planning agency as non- School boara voting member School board member added as member of regional planning council Land use element of comprehensive plan expanded to encourage elementary schools as focal point of neighborhoods Intedocal agreement is required to identifY the process for sharing of information Minimum requirements identified for interlocal agreements The general educational facilities report is repealed and replaced with a more comprehensive district educational facilities plan The district facilities work program is expanded to become the district educational facilities plan; a more comprehensive planning document. The plan must meet the needs of all growing communities in the district, from small rural communities to large urban cities. The educational plant survey is to become part of the district educational facilities plan Ten and twenty year work program becomes part of tentative educational facilities plan The general location of schools proposed for the 5 year, 10 year and 20 year period is to be included in the plan. Options deemed reasonable and approved by the board which reduce the need for additional permanent student stations are to be included Criteria for determining impact of proposed development to school capacity is to be applied · The plan must include a financially fe. asible distdct facilities work program which is balanced (proposed projects equal estimated revenue) The plan must be coordinated with local governments to ensure consistency with comprehensive plan. Local governments are to review plan and provide comments. HOW COORDINATION / INTEGRATioN IS ASSURED: OEF & DCA to review intedocal agreements to determine if requirements are met Financial penalty to school district if agreement is not submitted by due date ' (At least 5% of state school construction funds withheld) A new financial management and performance audit of the planning and construction activities of the district is required every five years. This audit may be performed by OPPAGA or the Auditor General pursuant to the Best Practices review requirement. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT 1. Process by which local government and board agree on projections of population and student enrollment 2. Process to coordinate and share information relating to existing and planned schools, renovations, closures, and local government plans for development and redevelopment 3. Process for participation of local governments in district decisions evaluating closures, renovations, and new sites before acquisition. 4. Process for determining need for onsite and offsite improvements to support district projects 5. Process for reporting capacity based on facilities work plan 6. Process for participation of local government in the annual update to the 5 year district facilities work plan and the educational plant survey 7. Process for determining when and how joint use of school or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency 8. Process for resolution of disputes 9. Identification of an oversight process including an opportunity for public participation for implementation of the interlocal agreement CONTENT OF TENTATIVE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN Projected student populations apportioned geographically at the local level with assistance from local governments 2. An inventory of existing school facilities with anticipated expansions and closures over the 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year periods. An assessment of needs for improvements to infrastructure in areas proximate to sites, and a listing of major repairs and renovation projects. 3. Projections of facilities space needs, which may not exceed the norm space and occupant design requirements per the State Requirements for Educational Facilities. 4. Information on leased, loaned, and donated space and relocatables used for instructional programs. 5. The general location of public schools proposed to be constructed over the 5, 10, and 20 year time periods with site acreage needs, anticipated capacity and maps showing general locations. 6. The options deemed reasonable by the school board which reduce the need for additional permanent student stations (such as acceptable capacity, redistricting, busing, year round schools, charter schools, magnet schools, and public-private partnerships). 7. The criteria and method for determining the impact of proposed development to public school capacity. 8. A financially feasible district facilities work program for a 5-year period which must include a. A schedule of major repair and renovation projects b. A schedule of capital outlay projects to provide satisfactory student stations needed for projected enrollment. The schedule must consider: 1. locations, capacities, and planned utilization rate of current facilities 2. proposed locations of planned facilities, whether those locations are consistent with the comprehensive plans of all local governments, and recommendations for infrastructure and improvements to support the facilities. 3. Plans for use and location of relocatable facilities, leased facilities, and charter schools 4. Plans for multitrack scheduling, grade level organization; block scheduling, or other alternatives that reduce the need for additional pe(manent student stations 5. Information concerning average class size and utiIization rate by grade level if the tentative district facilities work program is implemented 6. The number and percentage of students planned to be educated in relocatable facilities during each year of the plan 7. Plans for closure of any school, plans for disposition of facilities, and anticipated revenues. 8. Projects to be from CO&DS in priority order on project pdority list c. The projected cost for each project, as compared to state average costs d. A schedule of estimated capital outlay revenues from each source e. A schedule of projects which will be funded from currents revenues projected f. A schedule of options for generation of additional revenues for projects not funded in the work program. OEF Transition to New Law Development of Online System fo~ District Faciiities Work Program Work Program to be integrated with: FiSH Survey Development of Online System for Completing Educational Ptant Survey 2002-03 Work Program will be submitted using the existing Excel Spreadsheet. Data from 2002-03 will be used as baseline data and will be input by OEF staff. Training of DJ.strict Staff will be provided for use of online System. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR J-- ~ed INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR Page 1 of 10 PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING This agreement is entered into between the Lee County Commission (hereinafter referred to as "County"), the City or Town Council of the municipalities of Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach, and Saltibel (hereinafter referred to as "Cities"), and the School Board of Lee County (hereinafter referred to as "School Board"). WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board recognize their mntual obligaion and responsibility for the education, nurture and general well-being of the children of Lee County; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board recognize the benafits that will flow to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: namely (1) better coordination of new schools in time and place with land development, (2) greater efficiency for the school board and local governments by the placement of schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, parks, and drainage systems (3) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, (4) the location and design of schools so that they serve as community focal points, (5) the location and design of schools with parks, ballfields, libraries, and other community facihties to take advantage of joint use oppommifies, and (6) the location of new schools and expansion and rehabilitation of existing schools so as to reduce pressures contributing to urban sprawl and support existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, Section 235.193, Florida Statutes, requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, Florida Statutes, requires each local government to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the school boards, and describe the processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2, Florida Statutes, further requires each county, all the municipalities within that county, and the district school board to establish by interlocal or other formal a~eement executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described above consistent with their adopted intergovernmental coordination element; and Whereas, the School Board, the County, and the Cities enter into this agreement in fulfillment of that statutory requirement and in recognition of the beneftts accruing to their Citizens and students described above; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities and the School Board have mutually agreed that coordination of schooi facility planning and comprehensive land use planning is in the best interests of the citizens of Lee http://www.dca, state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/SchoolPlanning/School. LeeAgrmnt5.Final.htm 9/20/2002 Page 2 of 10 County and the Cities and Towns of Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach, and Sanibel; and WHEREAS, the County has jurisdiction for land use and growth management decisions within its unincorporated boundaries and the Cities have similar jurisdiction within their boundaries, and WHEREAS, the School Board has the responsibility to provide school facilities to insure a free and adequate public education to the residents of Lee County, and WHEREAS, the County, the Cities, and the School Board agree that they can better fulfill their respective responsibilities by working in close cooperation to insure that adequate public school facilities are available for the residents of Lee County, and WHEREAS, the parties are author/zed to enter into this interlocal agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2., and Section 235.193(7), F. S. NOW THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed between the School Board, the Board of County Commissioners of Lee County and the City or Town Councils of Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach, and Sanibel that the following procedures will be utilized to better coordinate public school facilities planning and land use planning: Section 1. Joint Meetings 1 .l Staffworking groups from the County, School Board, and Cities will meet on an as needed basis but no less frequently than twice per year to formulate recommendations, and discuss issues regarding coordination of land use and school facility planning, including such issues as population and student enrollment projections, development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use opportunities, and ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the school and ensure safe student access. The County Planning Director and School Board staff will be jointly responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing notification. 1.2 The County, the Cities, and the School Board will meet every other year in joint workshop sessions. The joint workshop sessions will be opportunities for the County, the Cities, and the School Board to set direction, discuss issues and reach understandings concerning issues of mutual concern regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growth, development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, and joint use opportunities. The County Manager and School Board Superintendent will be jointly responsible for mak2ng meeting arrangements and providing notification. Section 2. Student Enrollment and Population Projections 2.1 In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County, Cities and the http://www.dca.state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/SchoolPlanning/School.LeeA rnmt5 .Final.htm 9/20/2002 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR Page 3 of 10 School Board agree to coordinate their plans upon the same projections of the amount, type and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. Five-year population and student enrollment projections shall be revised annually to ensure that new residential development and redevelopment information prfivided by the Cities and County are reflected in the updated projections. 2.2 The School Board shall utilize the Department of Education (DOE) five- year county-wide student eurollment projections. The School Board may request that the DOE projections be adjusted to reflect actual enrollment and development trends not anticipated by the DOE projections. In formulating such a request the school board will coordinate with the Cities and County regarding future population projections and growth. 2.3 The County working with the Cities will use information on County growth and development trends for municipal and unincorporated areas, such as Census information or, population and housing characteristics, persons-per- household figures, historic and projected growth rates, and the information described in Section 3.2, to project residential units by type for five years (single family, multi-family and mobile home) and allocate these units into sub- county plarming sectors, such as student attendance zones, so that the county- wide projections are not exceeded. The planning sectors will be established by mutual consent of the school board and local government staff. The allocation of residential units by type and planning sector will be provided to the school board by April 1 of each year. 2.4 The School Board will evaluate the planning sector projections prepared by the County. The School Board working with the County will develop and apply student generation multipliers for residential units by type for schools of each type, considering past trends in student enrollment within specific planning sectors in order to project school enrollment. The school enrollment projections will be included in the educational facilities report provided to the County and Cities each year as specified h~ subsection 3.1 of this agreement. 2.5 Population Projections: Coordination regarding the update of the County populafion projections, their allocation into planing sectors, and conv~sion into projected student enrollment will occur on an annual basis at the staff working group meeting described in subsection 1.1 of this agreement. The revised projections and the variables utilized in making the projections will be reviewed prior to the staff working group meeting and discussed by all parties at the staff meeting. Section 3. Coordinating and Sharing of Information 3.1 Educational Facilities Report: By Octol~er 15 of each year, the School Board shall submit to the County and each City the educational facilities report. The report will contain information in tabular, graphic, and textual formats detailing existing and projected school enrollment, existing educational http://www.dca.state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/SchoolPlarming/School.LeeAgrmnt5.Final-htm 9/20/2002 INTEKLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR Page 4 of 10 facilities, their locations, the number of portables in use at each school, and projected needs. The report will also contain the board's capital improvement plan, including planned facilities with funding over the next 5 years, and the educational facilities representing the district's unmet need. The report will provide data for each individual school concerning school capacity based on Department of Education criteria and enrollmant of each individual school based on actual counts. The report will show the generalized locations in which new schools will be needed and plarmed renovations, expansions and closures of existing schools. The report will indicate properties the School Board has already acquired through developer donation, or properties on which there is a developer obligation to provide to the school board at the school board's discretion, or properties acquired through other means that are potential school sites. 3.2 Growth and Development Trends: On April 1 of each year, local governments will provide the school board with hfformation regarding the type, number, and location of residential units which have received zoning approval, site plan approval, a building permit, or a Certificate of Occupancy. Information regarding the conversion or redevelopment of housing or other structures into residential m~its which are likely to generate new students will also be provided. Local governments will also identify any development orders issued wl'fich contain a requirement for the provision of a school site as a condition of development approval. The actual students generated from new residential units will be used in the data and analysis for the annual update of the school board's Five-year Capital Facilities Plan. Section 4. School Site Selection 4.1 The School Board will establish an informal site selection committee for the purpose of reviewing potential sites for new schools and proposals for renovation, expansion and closure of existing schools, and making suggested recommendations to the District Site Selection Committee, the Superintendent and the School Board. The site selection committee will be a standing committee and will meet on an as needed basis. In addition to appropriate members of the school district staff, the informal site selection committee will include at least one staff member of the County appointed by the County Manager, and representatives selected by each of the Cities. The committee membership will be expanded as needed to include additional staff from any City in or near where a school is proposed. When the need for a new school is identified in the district facilities work program, the site selection committee will develop a list of potential sites in the area of need identified in the educational plant survey. The list of potential sites and list of schools proposed for renovation, expansion or closure will be submitted to the local government with jurisdiction for an hfformal assessment regarding consistency with the local government comprehensive plan including: environmental suitability, transportation and pedestrian access, availability of infrastructure and services, safety concerns, and land use compatibility. In addition, consistency with community vision and other issues such as student assignment that have a bearing on site suitability will be commented upon. The issues identified in subsection 4.2 of this agreement will also be considered by both the local government and site selection committee as each potential site and each school http://www.dca.state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/SchoolPlanning/School. LeeAgrnmtS.Final,htm 9/20/2002 Page 5 of 10 INTER.LOCAL AGREEMENT FOR proposed for renovation, expansion or closure is evaluated. Based on the information gathered during this review, the site selection committee will make a recommendation to the school district com~rfittee of one or more sites in order of preference. 4.2 The following issues will be considered by the informal site selection committee, the school board, and the local government when evaluating potential school sites or expansion or rebuilding of existing schools: a. The location of school sites that will provide logical focal points for community' activities such as the community facilities itemized in subsection 8.1 and serve as the cornerstone for mnovatwe urban design · · use and standards, including oppormmt~es for shared co-location of community facilities. b. The location of new elementary and middle schools proximate to residential neighborhoods. c. The location of new schools within reasonable walking distance of dwelling units served by the schools, as practicable under the student assignment program. d. The location of new high schools on the periphery of residential neighborhoods, with access to major roads. e. Compatibility of the school site with present and projected uses of adjacent property. f. Encouraging community redevelopment and revitalization and efficient use of existing infrastructure and discouraging urban sprawl. g. Site acquisition and development cost· h. Safe access to and from the school site by pedesffians and vehicles. i. Adequate public facilities and services to support the proposed school are available, or will be available, concurrent with the impacts of the school· j. Environmental constraints that would preclude development of a public school on the site or cannot be mitigated. k. Impact on archaeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated http:#www.dca, state.fl.us/fdcp/E 9/20/2002 FOR by the affected local government as a locally sigrfificant historic or archaeological resource. 1. The proposed site is well drained and soils are suitable for development or are adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes w/th drainage improvements. m. The proposed location is not in conflict with local government stormwater management plans or watershed management plans. n. Whether the proposed location is w/thin a velocity flood zone, a floodway, or the Coastal High Hazard Area, as delineated in the affected comprehensive plan. o. The proposed site can accommodate the required parking, circulation and queuing of vehicles onsite. p. Whether the proposed location l/es outside the area regulated by Section 333.03, F.S., regarding the construction of public educational faci[ities in the vicinity of an airport. 4.3 At least 60 days prior to acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility, or initiating the renovation, expansion or closure of an existing school, the School Board shall provide written notice to the local government with jurisdiction over the use of the land. The local government, upon receipt of this notice, shal/notify the School Board within 45 days if the proposed new school site or the proposed renovation, expansion or alosure of an existing school is consistent with the land use categories and policies of the local government's comprehensive plan. This prel/minary notice does not ' constitute the local government's determination of consistency pursuant to sections 235.193(5) and 235.194, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Supporting Infrastructure Page 6 o£I0 5.1 In conjanct~on w~th the prelnumary consistency determination described at S;bv;;Ction 4.3 of this agreement, the school board and affected local g rnments will jointly determine the need for and timing of on-site and off- s~te improvements necessary to support each new school or the proposed renovation, expansion or closure of an existing school, and w/Il enter into a written agreement as to the tinting, location, and the party or parties responsible for constructing, operating and maintaining the required improvements. Section 6. Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezonings, and Development Approvals http://www, dca.state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/SchoolPlanning/School,LeeAgnunt5.Fina .htm 9/20/2002 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR Page 7 of 10 6.1 The School Board will receive Local Planning Agency agendas and appropriate backup materials from all local governments and will review and comment as appropriate. 6.2 The County and the Cities agree to give the School Board notification of land use applications and development proposals pendh~g before them that may affect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities. Such notice will be provided at least 14 days prior to approval of the appldcation. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the comprehensive plan future land use map, rezonings, developments of regional impact, and other major residential or mixed-nsc development projects. 6.3 After notification by the local government, the School Board will advise the local government of the school enrollment impacts anticipated to result from the proposed land use application or development proposal, and whether sufficient capacity exists or is planned to accommodate the impacts. School capacity will be reported consistent with Department of Education criteria. 6.4 Based on the Department of Education definition of adequate capacity, if sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the School Board shall specify how it proposes to meet the anticipated student enrollment demand; alternatively, the School Board, local government, and developer may collaborate to fred means to ensure sufficient capacity will exist to accommodate the development, such as, developer contributions, project phasing, required facility improvements and school impact fees. 6.5 In reviewing and approving land use applications, rezoning requests and development proposals, the County and Cities will consider the following issues: a. Providing school sites and facilities within planned neighborhoods. b. Insuring the compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. c. The co-location of parks, recreation and community facilities with school sites. d. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks. e. Insuring the development of traffic circulation plans to serve schools and the surrounding neighborhood. f. Providing off-site signalization, signage, access improvements and sidewalks to serve all schools. g. The inclusion of school bus stops and turnarounds in new developments. htto://www.dca.state.fl.ns/fdcDfDCP/SchoolPlanning/School. LeeAgrnmt5.Final.htm 9/20/2002 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR Page 8 of 10 h. Encouraging the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. i. School Board comments on comprehensive plan amendments and other land-use decisions. j. Available school capacity or planned improvements to increase school capacity. 6.6 In formulating commurfity development plans and programs, the County and the Cities wiil consider the following issues: a. Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools. b. Giving priority to scheduling County and City programs and capital improvements that are consistent with and meet the capital needs identified in the School Board's school facilities plan. c. Giving priority to developments or property ownors who provide incentives including, but not lintited to, donation of site(s), reservation or sale of school sites at pre-development prices, construction of new facilities or renovation to existing facilities, and providing transportation alternatives. d. Working to address and resolve multi-jurisdictional public school issues. Section 7. Educational Plant Survey and Five-Year District Facilities Work Program 7.1 At least one year prior to preparation of the educational plant survey update, the staff working 'group established in subsection 1.1 of this agreement will assist the school board in an advisory capacity in the preparation of the update. The staff working group will evaluate and make recommendations regarding the locati/)n and need for new, or improvements to existing, educational facilities in terms of consistency with the local government comprehensive plan, and relevant issues listed at subparagraphs 4.2, 6.5 and 8.1 of tiffs agreement. 7.2 The School Board will provide the proposed annual update of the five-year district facilities work program to each local government for review and comment for consistency with the local government comprehensive plan prior to adoption. Local governments may provide written comments to the School Board following receipt of the proposed work program. Section 8. Co-location and Shared Use http ://www.dca. state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/S choolPlanning/S chool.LeeAgrmnt 5 .Final.htm 9/20/2002 INTE1LLOCAL AGKEBMENT FOR 8.1 Co-location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School Board and local governments. The School Board will look for opporturfitie, s to co-locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Educational Plant Survey. Likewise, co-location and shared use local governments when preparing the opportunities will be considered by. the 's annual update to their comprehensive plan' schedule of capital improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities. For example, opportunities for co-location and shared use will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, communkY centers, · centers, and stadiums. auditoriums, learning centers, museums, peffomung arts In addition, where applicable, co-location and shared use of school and governmental facilities for health care and social services will be considered. 8.2 A separate agreement will be developed for each instance of co-locat~on and shared use which addresses legal .Ii.ability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision. Section 9. Oversight Process The School Board, the County and each City shall appoint a citizen member to serve on an oversight · · ' of the interlocal agreement. Committee members shall be invited · · and shall receive copies of all reports and committee to momtor m~plementat~on all meetings referenced .m Sec~o~ 1,a~_ J_~4_~,~nt The committee shall appoint a chairperson,, to atten - ~ ----~,.ant to ti~s intenocar agt** ..... .h,~ ~chool Board and the genera documents proauceu pmo~,-. _. .... ,~;cinating local governmmtL~, ~ ~ meet at least annually, ano repor~ .iv v'-- r ~ public on the effectiveness with which the interlocal agreement is being implemented. Section 10. Resolution of Disputes If the parties to this agreement are unable to resolve any issue in which they may be in disagreement covered in this agreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapters 164 and 186, Florida Statutes. Section 11. Amendment and Termination of Agreement Any party may elect to withdraw from participation in this agreement up. on official action of its governing body and aiSer 30 days written notice to all other parties to this agreement. WHEREOF, this Interlocai Agreement has been executed by and on behalf of Lee Fort Myers Beach, and IN WITNESS . County, the Cities and Towns of Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, _, 2002. This agreement Smaa~'bbc2 ea~ :h o~cd~Yw:l~ an original, bnt all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument and be the agreement between the parties. ATTEST: httv://www.dca, state.fl.us/fdcv/D .Final.btm 9/20/2002 ....... .~r~,p_,lVl~lN 1 FOR Page 10 of 10 Chairman, School Board Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Mayor, City of Bonita Springs Mayor, City of Cape Coral Mayor, City of Fort Myers Mayor, Town of Fort Myers Beach Mayor, City of S anibel http://www.dca.state.fl.us/fdcp/DCP/SchoolPlanning/School. LeeAgrmmS.FinaI.htm 9/20/2002 Table of Contents for the Interlocal Agreement Introduction .................. : .................................................................................................... Page 1 Section 1 Joint Meetings ................................................................................................ Page 2 Section 2 Student EnrolIment Projections ...................................................................... Page 2 Section 3 Coordinating and Sharing o£Information ...................................................... Page 2 Section 4 School Site Selection ...................................................................................... Page 4 Section 5 Supporting Infrastructure ................................................................................ Page 6 Section 6 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Re-zonings, and DeVelopment Approvals ..................... ~....i .......... }.".'.; .............................. Page 6 Section 7 - Educational Facilities Report and Five-Year District Facilities Work Program ................................................... Page 7 Section 8 - Co-location and Shared Use ........................................................................... Page 7 Section 9 ~ Resolution of Disputes ................................................................................... Page 8 Section 10 - Oversight Process ......................................................................................... Page 8 Section 11 - Amendment Process and Term of the Agreement ....................................... Page 8 Section 12 - Execution in Counterparts ............................................................................ Page 8 Signature Pages ................................................................................................................. Page 9 Attachment "A" - School Siting Policy ............................................................................ Page A-1 Attachment "B" - Typical Development Review Process ................................................ Page B-1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING This agreement is entered into between the Polk County Commission (hereinafter referred to as "County"), the City Commission or City Council of the Cities of Auburndale, Barrow, Davenport, Dundee, Eagle Lake, Fort Meade, Frostproof, Haines City, Highland Park, Hillcrest Heights, Lake Alfred, Lake Hamilton, Lake Wales, Lakeland, Mulberry, Polk City, and Winter Haven (hereinafter referred to as "Cities"), and the School Board of Polk County, Florida (hereinat~er referred to as "School Board"). WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurture and general well-being of the children of Polk County; and VOtEREAS, the County, Ciries, and School Board recognize the benefits that will flow to the citizens and students of their communities by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs: namely (1) better coordination of new schools in time and place with land development, (2) greater efficiency for the school board and local govemmants by the reduction of student travel times and the placement of schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, O) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, (4) the location and design of schools so that they serve as community focaI points, (5) the location and design of schools with parks, ball fields, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities, and (6) the location of new schools and expansion and rehabilitation of existing schools so as to reduce pressures contributing to urban sprawl and support existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, Section 235.193, Florida Statutes, requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h) 1 and 2, Florida Statutes, requires each local government to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of their comprehensive plan that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the school boards, and describe the processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2, Florida Statutes, further requires each county, all the municipalities within that county, and the district school board to establish by interlocal or other formal agreement executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described above consistent with their adopted intergovernmental coordination element; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board enter into this agreement in fulfillment of that statutory requirement and in recognition of the benefits accruing to their citizens and students described above; and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board have mutually agreed that coordination of school facility planning and comprehensive land use planning is in the best interests of the citizens of Polk County; and WHEREAS, the County has jurisdiction for land use and growth management decisions within its unincorporated boundaries and the Cities have similar jurisdictiun within their boundaries, and WHEREAS, the School Board has the responsibility to provide school facilities to ensure a free and adequate public education to the residents of Polk County, and WHEREAS, the County, Cities, and School Board agree that they can better fulfill their respective responsibilities by working in close cooperation to ensure that adequate public school facilities are available for the residents of Polk County, and Interlocal Agreement For Public School Facility Planning Polk County, Florida WHEREAS, the parties are authorized to enter into this interlocal agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Suction 163.3177(6)(h)2, and Section 235.193(7), F. S. NOW TItEREFORE, be it mutually agreed between the Polk County School Board, the Board of County Commissioners of Polk County and the City Commissions of Aubumdale, Bartow, Davenport, Dundee, Eagle Lake, Fort Meade, Frostproof, Haines City, Highland Park, Hillcrest Heights, Lake Alfred, Lake Hamilton, Lake Wales, Lakeland, Mulberry, Polk City, and Winter Haven that the following procedures will be followed in coordinating land use and public school facilities planning: Section 1. Joint Meetings 1.1 A Steering Committee consisting of staff from the County, School Board, and Cities will meet semi- annually at a minimum to set direction, formulate recommendations, and discuss issues regarding coordination of land use and school facility planning, including such issues as population and student projections, development trends, school needs, emlocatiun and joint use opportunities, and ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the school and ensure safe student access. The County Planning Director will be responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing notification. 1.2 The County Commission, the City Commissions, the Regional Plaxming Couacil, and the School Board, or designated representatives of each, will meet annually in joint workshop sessions. The joint workshop sessions will be opportunities for the County Commission, the City Commissions, and the School Board to set direction, discuss issues, and reach understandings concerning issues of mutual concern regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including population and student growth, development trends, school needs, off-site improvements, and joint use opportunities. The County Manager and School Board Superintendent will be jointly responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing notification. 1.3 The meetings discussed in 1.1 and 1.2 of this agreement shall ensure that this Interlocal agreement is implemented in a timely and efficient manner. In addition, the meetings subject to 1.2 shall be noticed to the public and public comment shall be received. Section 2. Student Enrollment Projections 2.1 The School Board shall utilize the Department of Education (DOE) countywide student enrollment projections. The School Board may request that the DOE projections be adjusted to reflect actual enrollment and development trends not anticipated by the DOE projections. In formulating such a request the school board will coordinate with the municipalities and county regarding future population projections and growth. 2.2 2.3 The School Board, working with the County and Cities, will use the information described in Sections 3.6 and 3.8 to allocate projected student enrollment into sub-county planning sectors. The planning Sectors will be established by mutual consent of the school district staff and local government staff. The allocation of projected student enrollment wilt be accomplished at the first staffmeeting described in Section 1 A. The school enrollment projections and their allocation to sub-county planning sectors will be included in the educational facilities report provided to the county and cities each year as specified in subsection 3.2 of this agreement. Section 3. Coordinating and Sharing of Information 3.1 The School Board shall coordinate and share information with the County and Cities as follows. 3.2 Educational Facilities Report: By November 1 of each year, the School Board shall submit to the County and each City the educational facilities report (five-year work program). The report will contain information in tabular, graphic, and textual formats detailing existing and projected school enrollment, existing educational facilities and their capacity to be expanded, their locations, the number of portables in 08/14/2002, Page 2 Public School Facility Planning Polk County, Florida 3.3 3.4 3.5 use at each school, and projected needs. The report will also contain the board's capital improvement plan, including planned facilities with funding over the next 3 years, and the educational facilities representing the district's unmet need. The report will provide data for each individual school concerning permanent school capacity based on Department of Education criteria and enrollment of each individual school based on actual counts. The report will show the generalized locations in which new schools will be needed. The repor~ will indicate properties the School Board has already acquired through developer donation, or properties on which there is a developer obligation to provide to the school board at the school board's discretion, or properties acquired through other means that are potential school sites. When considering a significant renovation or a closure of a school facility not included in 3.2, the school board shall notify the appropriate city in which the school is located or the County Planning Division within 30 calendar days of such activity. Significant renovations encompass projects that increase or decrease a school's capacity, building square footage, design and/or visually impacts the surrounding neighborhood. The County and Cities shall coordinate and share information with the school board as follows: Project Review and Comments: Prior to development review, the County and Cities shall submit a copy of proposai applications end supporting documents to the School Board for their initial review and comments. Growth and Development: By June 1 of each year, local governments will provide the school board with information, accurate as of March 31, regarding the number of residential demolitions and the type, number, and location of residential units which have received zoning approval, site plan approval, or a building permit, plus any age restriction information. Information regarding the conversion or redevelopment of structures into residential units likely to generate new students will also be provided. Loeal governments will also identify any development orders issued which contain a requirement for the provision of a school site as a condition of development approval. The actual students generated from new residential units will be used in the data and analysis for the annual update of the school board's Five-year Capital Facilities Plan. In using the information provided by the local governments, the School Board and local governments will take into consideration the actual level of commitment the different types of approvals represent. When considering the development of, or redevelopment of an area (eg. neighborhood planning, enterprise zones, community redevelopment areas (CP,~)), the county and cities will notify the school board. These entities will provide the school board with a copy of draft plans and any plans completed prior to this agreement that are currently in the approval, funding and/or implementation stage of the plan. This should also include maps of I-Iistoric Districts, CRA's, or other special districts not readily identified on land use maps. Population Projections: Coordination regarding the update of the County population projections, their allocation into planning sectors, and conversion into projected student enrollment will occur on an annual basis at the joint staff meeting described in subsection 1.1 of this agreement. All parties at the staff meeting will review the revised projections and variables utilized in making the projections. All parties to this agreement, agree that any School Facilities Element adopted into Comprehensive Plans will be the same or consistent with the element adopted by the County and School Board. 08/14/2002, Page 3 Interlo¢~l Agreement For public School Facility Planning polk County, Florida Section 4. School Site Selection of reviewing potential sit~s for Board vdll establish a Site Selection Committee for the purpose 4.1 The School The Site SeleCtion Committee will be a an as needed basis and shall operate under Florida's Government in the new schools an.d makin, g recommendationS to the Superintendent. Selection Committee will standing committee, will meet on the County Manager. The commiiXee Sunshine law. in addition to appropriate members of the Sch°°l B°ard' the Site at least one staff member of the County appointed by affected city where a school is proposed include . . ~ to include additional staff from any membership wall be expan~ discretion of the School Board, additional members may be or the city providing utility service. At the the School the otentially affected city's manager, and the Steering added. When the need for a new schOOl is identified in the district facilities work program, u ~a shall notify the County M,a~.ager~ a school site in a particular location. The Site Selection ~nittee in writing that it is looking Ior co- identify and review the need for a new school site. AdditionallY, '(he committee Committee will meet to . · the Site Selection Committee a shall discuss the parameters to be considered. Furthermore, the committee shall determine whether location opportunities asa present. The School Board staff will prowde to list of all potential sites. from the following agencies of the 4.2 A Technical Advisory Commi~xee sha~l conSist of representatives and recreation, Cities' planning, engineering, traffic engmeermg, irnnsportauun, parks ff an adminis~'ative representative will be County and affected . ~ absence of all of the above sm,, ~ ~*ed utiiiw providers shall serve, on the~ and public safety, tn me -~*;ve of the school board ann anew, - 7~,t& .,rn,,osed school sites ann · addition, a represenm- . all meet to discuss each m ua~ ¥ r .... ,;ol 4re appointed. In _ , , .~-:o^.~ Commlttee sh_ ~ ~o~ re~ort for encn enmmittee. The Tecnnlcat ~u*,~,~,.~ -~- -~mmittee shall prepare ,3. ~,,,~_-- [ ... ~.~ shall submit sucn '7-- - hr~ieal review of each s~te. x~*.~. ..... ~- -itc as listed m 4.7 oelow, '~cluding the issues and unpacts ass Selection Committee meeting. reports to the Site Selection Committee w~thin 30 days of the lmttal Site 4.3 Local governments shall advise the district School Board as to the conSistency of the proposed closure, renovation, or new site with the local comprehensive plan, including the appropriate process under which a district school board may request an amendment to the comprehensive plan for school siting. Committee, the Site Selection Committee 4.4 Following the receipt of reports from the Technical Advisory down to three. shall within 60 days of the Technical Advisory Committee meeting, narrow the snas Advisory Committee, shall complete an Impact 4.5 The School Board staff, in cooperation with the Technical school Board Site Assessment Statement (IAS) and prepare a detailed Economic Analysis for each of the short-listed Florida Statute sites. Polk County has defined the lAS and Economic Analysis within the County-School 235.193, i.e., consistency with the local govemraent comprehenSive plan. The Economic Analysis shall, at Selection Agreement, Attachment "A". The lAS shall incorporate the review required by a minimum, iilentify required on-site and off-site improvementS, the costs ~ssociated with these improvements, and the entity responSible for the cost. The IAS shill be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners, the governing body of each affected City, and the School Board. 4.6 Each governing board shill meet separately W discuss and review the lAS and Economic Analysis · sites· In the event that the boards completed for each site~lika, a joint board meeting shall be scheduled to discuss the differences. At this Each governing board shall rank the short-hsted The do not rank the sites a common priority listing for the proposed schanl sites. meeting, the boards shall attempt to agree on School Board shall have the final determination ifthn boards fail to agree on a common priority list. The School Board shall officially approve the site determined to be the number one priority and authoriZe acquisition of the site. The School Board shall notifY the County and each affected City in writing when a site has been purchased. 08/14/2002, Page 4 4.7 The following issues will be considered by the Site Selection Committee, the school board, and the local government(s) when evaluating potential school sites: a. The location of school sites that will provide logical focal poinls for community activities and serve as the cornerstone · . use and co-location for innovative urban design standards, including opportunities for shared of eommanity facilities. b. Whether existing schools can be expanded or rebuilt to accommodate additional student pognlation. c. Court-ordered school desegregation. d. The location of new elementary and middle schools internal to residential neighborhoods. e. The location of new elementary schools within reasonable walking distance of dwelling units served by the schools. f. Th.e location of new high schools on the periphery of residential nelg'hborhoods, with access to major roads. g' Compatibility of the school ' ' . sac wtth present and projected uses of adjacent properly h. Encouraging COmmunity redevalopment and revitalization and efficient use of existing infrastructure and discouraging urban sprawl. i. Site acquisition and development cost. J- Safe access to and from the school site by pedestrians and vehicles. k. Adequate public facilities and services to support the proposed school are available, or will be available, concurrent with the impacts of the school. I. There are no significant environmental constraints that would preclude development of a public school on the site. m. There will be no adverse impact on archaeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated by the archaeological resource, affected local government as a locally significant historic or n. The proposed site is well drained and soils are suitable ~'or development or are adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with drainage irnprovementq. o. The proposed location is not in conflict with local government stormwater rnanagement plans Or watershed management plans. P. The proposed location is not within a floodway as delineated in the affected comprehensive plan. q- The proposed site can accommodate the required parking, circulation, and queuing ofvehicles onsite. r. The proposed location lies outside the area regulated by Section 333.03, F.S., regarding the construction of public educational facilities in the vicinity of an airport. 08/14/2002, Page $ Section 5. Supporting Infrastructure 5.1 In conjunction with the preliminary consistency determination described at subsection 4.4 of this agreement, the school board and affected local governments will jointly determine the need for and timing of on-site and off-site improvements necessary to support each new school or the proposed renovation or expansion of an existing school, and will enter into a written agreement as to the timing, location, and the party or parties rasponsible for conslructing, operating, and maintaining the required improvements. Section 6, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Re-zonings, and Development Approvals 6.1 The County and Cities will appoint a School Board representative, designated and approved by the School Board, to serve as a nonvoting member on the local planning agency of the County and Cities. The School Board representative will be noticed, provided an agenda, and invited to attend and/or provide comments to the County and City planning agencies. 6.2 The County and the Cities agree to give the School Board notification of henrings for Comprehensive Plan amendments, zone changes, and development proposals pending before them that may affect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school faci[itias. Such notice will be provided pursuant to local notice procedures (see typical in Attachment "B"). This notice requirement applies to amendments to the comprehensive plan, re-zonings, developments of regional impact, and other major residential or mixed-use development projects. 6.3 The School Board will appoint a representative to serve on or provide comments to the County's Development Review Committee. In addition, the School Board representative will be invited to participate in the Cities' development review committees when development and redevelopment proposals are submitted which could have a significant impact on student enrollment or school facilities. The School Board Representative will receive information packets in the same manner as other Development Review Committee members. 6.4 After notification by the local government, the School Board Development Review Committee representative, typically within ten (10) working days, will advise the local government of the school enrollment impacts anticipated to result from the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments, zone changes, and development proposals. There shall be a determination of whether sufficient permanent capacity exists or is plarmed to accommodate the impacts, based on the Five-year District Facilities Work Program. School capacity will be reported consistent with Department of Education criteria. 6.5 Based on the Department of Education definition of adequate permanent capacity, if sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the School Board shall specify how it proposes to meet the anticipated student enrollment demand; alternatively, the School Board, local government, and developer may collaborate to find means to ensure sufficient permanent capacity will exist to accommodate the development, such as, developer contributions, project phasing, and required facility improvements. School Concurrency is not the intent of this policy or of the document as a whole. 6.6 In reviewing and approving Comprehensive Plan amendments and development proposals, the county and cities will consider the following issues, as applicable: a. Providing school sites and facilities within planned neighborhoods. b. Ensuring the compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. c. The co-location of parks, recreation and community facilities in conjunction with school sites. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries, and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks. 08/14/2002, l~age 6 lnterioca] Agrecmem For Public School Facility Planvdng Polk County, Florida Targeting community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools. Ensuring *.he development of traffic circulation plans to serve schools and tine surrounding neighborhood, including any needed access improvements, sidewalks to schools, off-site signalization or safety-related signage. g. Consider the location of school bus stops and tumarounds in new developments. Encouraging the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. Encourage developers or property owners to provide incentives including, but not limited to, donation of site(s), reservation or sale of school sites at pre-development prices, construction of new faciIities or renovation to existing facilities, and providing transportation alternatives. j. School Board eommen~s on comprehensive plan amendments and other land-use decisions. k. Available permanent school capacity or planned improvements to increaSe school capacity. Section 7. Educational Facilities Report and Five-Year District Facilities Work Program 7.1 At least one year prior to preparation of the Educational Plant Survey update (as defined in Chapter 235, Florida Statutes), the staff working group ertablished in subsection 1.1 of this agreement will assist the school board in an advisory capacity in the preparation of the update. The staff working group at one of its two annual meetings will evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and need for new, or improvements to existing, educational faeilitias in terms of consistency with the local govemmant comprehensive plan, and relevant issues listed at subparagraphs 4.6, 6.6 and 8.1 of this agreement. 7.2 The School Board will provide the proposed annual update of the five-year district facilities work program to each local government for review and comment for consistency with the local govemmant comprehensive plan. The School Board will provide adequate notification to local governments after placing the work program on the agenda. All affected local governments will provide timely written comments 60 days following receipt of the proposed work program. 7.3 Capacity Reporting: The school board's five year work program will identify how each project meets capacity issues. This work program will provide for expansions and new facilities based upon projected population and student growth within areas of the county. The school board will identify alternative solutions within the work program (eg. year round or split session schools sites) when necessary to meet the public school demand when funding for capital expansion is not available. 7.4 As established in section 3, the cities and county will be notified of major renovations and closures. Local governments will determine if these projects are consistent with their comprehensive plans. Section 8. Co-location and Shared Use 8.1 Co-location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School Board and local governments. The School Board will look for opportunities to co-locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Educational Plant Survey. Likewise, co-location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the local governments when preparing the annual update to their comprehensive plan's schedule of capital improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities. For example, opportunities for co-location and shared use will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, community centers, auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performing arts centers, and stadiums. In addition, where applicable, co-location and shared use of school and governmental facilities for health care and social services will be considered. 08/14/2002, Page 7 Interloca] Agreement For Publi~ School Facility Planning Polk County, Florida 11.2 A separate agreement will be developed for each instance of co-location and shared use that addresses legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision or any other issues that may arise from co-location. Section Section 9. Resolution of Disputes If the parties to this agreement fail to resolve any conflicts related to issues covered in this document, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapters 164 and 186, Florida Statutes. 10. Oversight Process 10.1 The Steering Committee established in Section 1.1 shall be responsible for an annual assessment report on the effectiveness of this agreement. The report will be made available to the public and presented at the meeting establJ:shed jn Section 1.2. Section 11. Amendment Process and Term of the Agreement 11.1 This agreement may be amended by written consent of all parties of this agreement. The agreement will remain in effect in accordance with Florida Statutes. If the stautte is repealed, the agreement may be terminated by written consent of all parties of this agreement. Section 12. Execution in Counterparts 12.1 This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one in the same instrument. 08/14/2002, Page 8 Interloeal Agr eemm, d For Public School Facility Planning Polk County, Florida IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Agreement has been executed by and on behalf of County, the Cities of , and the School Board of on this day of ,2002. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA By James A. Nelson, Board Chairman Witness as to all Signatories Print Name ATTEST 1L J: Thomhill, Board Secretary (CORPORATE SEAL) Witness as to all Signatories Print Name State of Florida, Coumy of Polk WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of A.D. 2002. Prim Name My Commission Expims: (AFFIX NOTARY SEAL) Approved as to form and correctness: C. Wesley Bridges II, School Board Attomey 08/14/2002, Page 9 Intedocal Agreement For Public School Facility Planning Polk County, Florida DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COM/V[ISSIONERS OF POLK COUNTY ATTEST: Richard M. Weiss, Clerk By Jack R. Myers, Chairman By Deputy Clerk 08/14/2002, Page 10 CITY OF AUBURNDALE, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF BARTOW, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF DAVENPORT, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF DUNDEE, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY EAGLE LAKE, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF FT. MEADE, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF FROSTPROOF, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF HAINES CITY, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Se~) VILLAGE OF HIGHLAND PARK, FLORI2I)A Attest Mayor Village Clerk (Seal) 08/14/2002, Page 11 TOWN OF HILLCREST HEIGHTS, FLORIDA Attest Mayor Town Clerk (Se~) CITY OF LAKE ALFRED, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (SeaO TOWN OF LAKE ItAMILTON, FLOP, JI)A Mayor Attest Town Clerk (Seal) CITY OF LAKE WALES, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF LAKELAND, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) CITY OF MULBERRY, FLORIDA Mayor Attest City Clerk (Seal) TOWN OF POLK CITY Mayor Attest Town Clerk (Seal) CITY OF WINTER HAVEN, FLORIDA Mayor Attes( City Clerk (SeaO 08/14/2002, Page 12 Interloeal Agreement For Public School Facility Planning Polk County, Finrida Attachment A SCHOOL SITING POLICY All new public schools within Polk County shall be required to follow the procedures as set forth in this policy. 1) Purpose The construction and operation of a public school have significant impacts to the surrounding area based on land use compatibility and irrffastructure service requirements. It is the purpose' of this policy to ensure that during the early stages of siting a school, all agencies involved in providing and maintaining infrastructure for the impacted area, and those agencies responsible for ensuring land use compatibility, are an integral component of the decision-making process. Additionally, this policy will help to ensure that new school sites are consistent with Polk County's and, if applicable, the affected cities' Comprehensive Plans and land development regulations. 2) Initial Notification The Polk County School Board shall notify the County and, if applicable, the affected cities in writing that they have intentions and are looking for a school site in a particular location. 3) Site Selection Committee The Polk County School Board has established a Site Selection Committee'for the purpose of reviewing potential sites for new schools and making a recommendation to the Superintendent. The Site Selection Committee includes at least one staff member of the Board of County Commissioners appointed by the County Manager. When a school site will impact a municipality, a staff member from that city shall be invited to ~erve on the Site Selection Committee meetings for the duration of time that it takes to select a site in that city's area. The Site Selection Committee shall meet to identify and review the need for a new school site. Additionally, the Committee shall discuss the parameters to be considered. At this meeting, the School Board staff shall provide a list to the Site Selection Committee of all potential sites. 6/14/2002, Page A-1 Interloca[ A~reem~nt For Public School Facility Planuins Polk County, Flarid~ 4) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) A Technical Advisory Committee, is made up of representatives from the following agencies: a. Polk County Planning Division and, if applicable, any affected cities' City Planner; b. Polk County Engineering Division and, if applicable, any affected cities' City Engineer; c. Polk County Traffic Engineering Division and, if applicable, any affected cities' Public Works director; d. Polk County Transportation Planning Organization (TPO); e. School Board and; g. Affected utility providers. Representatives from each of these agencies and departments within the County, the corresponding cities, the School Board, and the utility providers shall meet to discuss each of the proposed school sites and give a technical review of each site. The TAC shall then prepare a brief report for each potential site, including the issues and impacts associated with each site. The reports will be sent to the Site Selection Committee within 30 days of the initial Site Selection Committee meeting referenced in number 3 above. 5) Short List Sites Following the receipt of the reports from the TAC, the Site Selection Committee shall within 60 days of the TAC meeting, narrow the sites down to three. 6) Impact Assessment Statement and Economic Analysis The School Board staff, in cooperation with the TAC, shall complete an Impact Assessment Statement and do a detailed Economic Analysis for each of the short-listed school sites. The Economic Analysis shall, at a minimum identify required on-site and off-site Improvements, the cost associated with these improvements, and the entity responsible for the cost. 7) Local Governments and School Board Meetings Representatives from each affected city, the BoCC, and the School Board shall meet separately to discuss and review the Impact Assessment Statement and Economic Analysis done for each site. Each board shall rank the short-listed sites. In the event that the boards do not rank the sites alike, a joint City Commission, County Commission, and School Board meeting shall be scheduled to discuss the differences. At this meeting, the representatives of the local governments and the School Board shall attempt to agree on a common priority listing for the proposed school sites. The School Board shall 6/14/2002, Page A-2 Interlocal Agreemem For Public School F~cility Planning Polk County, Flor/da have the final determination if the County or Municipal Boards fail to agree on a common priority list. 8) School Board Approves Site The School Board shall officially approve the site determined to be the number one priority and authorize negotiations for acquisition to begin. The School Board shall notify the affected local governments in writing within 30 days, when a site has been purchased. 9) Review Application Once a site has been purchased, the School Board shall complete the corresponding review process within the County (Level 2 Review) and, if applicable, the affected jurisdicti0n's annexation application, comprehensive plan amendment application, a zoning application, and/or a site plan review application, whichever applies. The applicable review process shall be initiated within 45 days of the School Board purchasing the property. 6/14/2002, Page A-3 Interlocal Agrecmeflt For Public School Facility Planning Polk County, Florid~ Attachment B TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW & NOTIFICATION TIME LINE Land Use Amendment, Zoning Change, or Development Application KeceivM by the City or County City or County Staff Contacts the School Board Staff for Dam and Comments within X Number of Days of Keceiving the Land Use Amendment, Zoning Change, or Development Approval Planning Commission or Zoning Board Hearing Scheduled & Notice Sent or Published X Number of Days Prior to Hearing (Notice refers to local notification procedures and Notifying the School Board in Writing) City Commission/Council end County Board Hearing Scheduled and Notice Sent or Published X Number of Days Prior to Hearing (Notice Refers to Local Notification Procedures and Notifying the School Board in Writing Land Use Amendment, Zoning Change, or Development Proposal Submitted to the Slate for Review City Commission/Council and County Board Hearing Scheduled & Notice Sent or Published X Number of Days Prior to Hearing (Notice Refers to Local Notification Procedures and Notifying the School Board in Writing City or County Receives Comments from the Slate I 6/14/2002, Page B-I ay t.is Neaorandua oE Underetandlns' dated thin 23rd of Deceebe~r ---------- _, 1986, by end betveen the Board of County Ce~mie·ton·ra of Zndien River County ("County") and th· Indian River Couoty School Board ("School BOard.)s the parties e&ree · · follows: · WHEREAS, pursuant to the Lots! Government Coaprehenslve Planning and Lend Developaent Reguletio~ Act, Indian River '* CountyI tiaa adopted · Comprehensive Land U·e Plan vhich 8o'~.erns development vithin Indian River County; and WHEREAS, Section 23~.26, Florida Statutes (1985) mendates · State Uniform Building Code /or Public Zdueetiona[ Facilities Construction ~hlch provides for a State Board of Education to adopt a uniEorms statevide buildln~ code for planning and tod·tr~ctib= of public educational fecllities; and WHEREAS, Section 163.319~, Florida Stetute· (1985), ptov:des thet a~ter a COnprehensive plan devel~pneut undertaken shall be eonn~etenha· been adopted a~: t vith said plan; and UHEREAs, the county end the School Board recognizes that It to unresolved under the le~ vhet~er the $c~eo! Board is eXenptl £:o= iht Site plan aPProval Process and furtheT tec:gni:e thc: -. :~ls a[teeaer.: nel:~er party ~alue$ its right co litigate t~at :sgue; and ~U£R£AS~ the County end School Board .recognize that the locetion of utllitie·~ co.herein1, industt!el, resident!a! and OC~er County approved developments directly impact $=hoo! BOard facilities; and ~REREA$, the County and the School BOerd recognize that the location and facilities-planning of ·chools directly lnPact County fecllities and Surround/al lend uae; and V~EBEAS~ tbs County and the SChool Board le· need to min~n~o, agree that thet~ -~.~r.. ut COUNT~,COHHI$$IOIiER$ OF I~DIA8 RIVER COUNTy. FLORIDA L,C.~ C, SCU~ CBatr~a: Bruce ~ ...... Assistant County Attorney APPR¢I'ED AS TO AD'~fI-~IISTRATIVE